WEBVTT - The Cycle: Pitching Streamers and Two-Start Pitcher Competition (Ep. 1071)

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Hello everybody, Welcome into the cycle part three for the week,

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I am Ryan Warmley, joined as always by Mike may Or.

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 2>We are talking pitching.

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Streamers and of course doing our two start pitcher competition. Mayor,

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>why don't you kick us off and run through your

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>streamers for the upcoming week.

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Sure, let's kick it off, go day by day and

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 3>I will mention this week. I wrote the names down

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 3>in the sheet. You know I don't want any Last

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 3>week we kind of did it live. I got some

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 3>some hateful comments about that. You know, you and I

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 3>have talked about it in the past where I kind

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 3>of like to do it live and do a gut

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 3>check with the Fantasy Pro streaming tool. You prefer to

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 3>have names in the sheet and the YouTube comments agreed

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 3>with you because I made a mistake and I got

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 3>a lot of hate for it.

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I always do.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 3>I got a lot of hate for it in the comments.

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Gosh forbid you mess up? You know you could you

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 3>mistake Tosh Bradley for Shane Bass? Who could ever forgive you?

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 3>But all right, let's get into it. So Monday, looking

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 3>at our streaming's tool, I went with Eric Fetti, who

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 3>is at the Pirates who was one of you know,

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 3>they are one of the top five teams to stream

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 3>a pitcher against right now. Some of the other that

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 3>was to me the clear options. Some of the other

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 3>options were Max Scherzer. But he's coming off the IL

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 3>and potentially facing the Yankees. I want an interest in that.

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Michael Waka against the Mariners is the name that can

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 3>I thought about, But he's likely rostered in your league.

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, he's only like fifty percent consensus rostered, but

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 3>there's a chance if you're in an active competitive league,

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 3>he's probably already roster. He's been pitching pretty well. And

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Ryan Nelson is a name we just talked about in

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 3>our previous segments as a deep league target, but he's

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 3>got the Giants. I don't really love streaming him. Eric

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Fetty's where I landed, however, I know we normally do

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 3>day by day here, but a pitcher, I'm going to

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 3>mention in a little bit, what about Chase Burns if

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.559
<v Speaker 3>he's still available in your league, which is possible based

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 3>on you know, when he had to be picked up,

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 3>and you know, like I mentioned in our previous video

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 3>when we talked about waivers and pickups in NFBC leagues,

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 3>and you know, there are certain leagues where depending on

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, like Chase Burns is still available in a

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of leagues because of when he was called up

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 3>and because he needs to kind of like make an

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:22.839
<v Speaker 3>appearance to be available. Would you stream Chase Burns at

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 3>the Red Sox. Yes. Would you pick him over Eric

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Fetti against the Pirates?

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>It would depend on the matchup, because I think, you know,

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 1>just making your second career start, like inherently there's more

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>risk there. And obviously the Pirates are such a great

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>matchup for Fetti. But if I'm in a situation where

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm like I kind of need to swing for a

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>really good start here, I would rather start Burns. And honestly,

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>as I'm talking through it, I might just say him

0:02:57.400 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in any league, I might just say it rather Burns.

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm yeah, go ahead.

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 3>I think I would do Burns in pretty much every

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 3>league over Fetty.

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, yeah, I like kind of

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>talked out of myself, talk myself out of that logic

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>as I was going, like, I would just say Burns.

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I went with Fetty just because it's more likely

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 3>that Burns is rostered in your league. Yes. The other

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 3>thing with Burns against the Red Sox as well, like

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 3>they do have kind of this inconsistent offense that can

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 3>explode and then go quiet. They are pretty quietly, like

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 3>the third worst team in terms of strikeouts, and so

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 3>he could rack up a bunch of strikeouts against the

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Red Sox On Tuesday, I went with Edward Cabrera, another name.

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 3>We talked about it in our previous video. Go back

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 3>and watch it. But I have Edward. Edward Cabrera against

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 3>the Twins is where I landed. I looked at some

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 3>other names that are available, Gavin Williams against the Cubs,

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 3>not touching that. Jeffrey Springs against the Rays is an

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 3>am I considered.

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>But you know that's he was bad today.

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 3>He was bad today. Yeah, don't comments. I didn't. I

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 3>didn't see his stats today. I was doing it.

0:03:59.040 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>No, No, that's fine.

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 2>He he was pitching while we were taping this.

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>But I only noticed this because I have him facing

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you and that dynasty head to head league, and he.

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Got me negative one point four points.

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 3>That forma excellent excellent for.

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's because he got the loss. I mean, it

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a good start from him. Regardless, he was three

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>earned runs in five innings, so like, not great, but

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the loss really hurt.

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 2>In points format.

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 3>He's been wildly inconsistent this year.

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Two.

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 3>He started off and he's stunk, and then he got hot,

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 3>and then he's been kind of inconsistent. So that's another

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 3>reason I wanted to stay away from him. Also, like

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 3>against the Rays, who have been hot in Tampa, that

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 3>teen tiny ballpark, I stayed away from it. Hayden Birdsong

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 3>against the Diamondbacks is another one I considered, but you know,

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Diamondbox is the hot offense, So yeah, I landed on

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Edward Cabrera against the Twins. Some other names if you

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 3>want to, if they're available, Culton, Gordon against the Rockies.

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 3>It's at Colorado, but that's not as scary as it

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 3>used to be. Although their offense is kind of picking

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 3>up a little bit, it's still bottom five according to

0:04:55.400 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 3>the tool. And ooh, your boy, Charlie Morton at the Rangers.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 3>Are you streaming Charlie Mooreton? Uh?

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>He didn't look great against the Rangers a couple of

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>days ago, So.

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Facing the second time, I.

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Think I think I would I think I would stream

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Morton over Cabrera.

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Actually, okay, the Carbrera is ranked higher, but Morton is

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 3>technically going up against their worst offense. According to this

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Onto Wednesday, I went with Brian Bao against the Reds. Right.

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 3>Bo has been pitching really well lately, just you know,

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 3>it seems like when he faced the Yankees a few

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 3>starts ago it really unlocked something. And he's got a

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 3>few quality starts in a row and running hot. The

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 3>he's facing the Reds at home, So I mean not

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 3>that it's not the Fenway Park is a much better

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 3>pitcher park than a great American small park in Cincinnati,

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 3>but it is not as bad, you know, as long

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 3>as you can live with some of the damage there.

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 3>But down to a three point three one ERA and

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 3>fifty one strikeouts and sixty five and a third innings,

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 3>he like a little bit higher there, but he has

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 3>been pitching really well, and so someone who's still available

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 3>in eighty percent of leagues, I like him some of

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 3>the other options. Will Warren was at the top of

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 3>the tool, but I didn't. He's facing he's been pitching,

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 3>he's been kind of on a heater himself, and he's

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 3>got ninety six strikeouts and seventy five and third innings.

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 3>But he's got the blue Jays. I have almost no

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 3>interest against streaming anyone against the Blue Jays. Land the

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 3>group against the Diamondbacks I didn't want to do. And

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 3>then the other one I considered is Noah Cameron against

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 3>the Mariners. That was kind of been triaguing to me

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 3>any interest in any of those.

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Cameron, I like what we've seen from him.

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 3>What day was this?

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 2>He said, Wednesday?

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 3>This is Wednesday, This is Wednesday.

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I kind of yeah, maybe him. I

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's a lot of like okay options, not like

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>rushing out to definitely do him, but not bad either,

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like that seems like a few different

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>okay options.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. For Bayo, four quality starts in a row, including

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 3>six strikeouts in his last outing and two outings a go,

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.679
<v Speaker 3>seven shoutout innings, eight strikeouts against the Yankees. So he's

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 3>heating up, as they would say in NBA JAM. Yeah, Thursday,

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 3>small slate day. I went with Dustin May against the

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 3>White Sox. Dustin May has had a really weird up

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 3>and down year, which is you know, I expected his

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 3>roster percentage to be higher, but it's not because he's

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 3>just been inconsistent, but a picture that I believe in,

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, similar to how I believe in Max Meyers.

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 3>So hopefully it works out better with Dustin May has

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 3>been streaky, but really good matchup against the White Sox,

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 3>and so I am willing to stream him against the

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 3>White Sox. The other name I considered Uri Perez against

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 3>the Twins, but I don't know that I'm necessarily ready

0:07:58.080 --> 0:07:59.679
<v Speaker 3>to take that risk just yet.

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I prefer me for sure.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 3>All Right, Friday, the day we can almost never find

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 3>a picture for, I went with former Red Sox great

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Quinn Priester against the Marlins in Miami. So bad offense,

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 3>bad ballpark for hitters. He's been pitching very well lately himself,

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, that's.

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>What I like.

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Some of the other names, those two are not going

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 3>to be available in your leagues. The name see every

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 3>week is Justin Erlander not going to do it against

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:39.239
<v Speaker 3>the Athletics in Sacramento. Yeah, Zac Lttel against the Twins,

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Mike Sroko against the Red Sox. I think for me,

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 3>the top option is clearly Quinn Priester against the Marlins

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 3>in Miami on a day we normally struggle to find

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 3>pictures for no comments of that one. I'll keep moving.

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Then no, all right, I guess I'll keep moving. So

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Saturday is a fun one. I wrote as Saturday, I

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 3>wrote as a potential stay away, as you like to

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 3>say that sometimes the best litererdter streams to not stream

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 3>at all. And uh, oddly enough, one of the best

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 3>options for the day is your boy Tosh Bradley coming

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 3>off sixty.

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 2>He's not my boy sixty, your boy.

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Two shutout innings?

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you sure it's Dosh Bradley and not shamed boss

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this time?

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 3>I am sure I recommended him by accident you corrected me.

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 3>But lo and behold, you should have streamed Tosh Bradley

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 3>for his six and two thirds shutout innings, and this

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 3>time he gets the Twins. So I really hope the

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Twins don't have a good offensive week. Yeah, it seems

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 3>like I'm targeting the Twins a lot, but I really

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 3>have it as more of a stay away. So I

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of put Tosh Bradley in there as you know,

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 3>breaking case of emergency, if you really need to stream someone,

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 3>that would be my pick, because one of the other

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 3>options I would have said is Jamison ty Own, but

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 3>he coming off a clunker and he's got the the

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Cardinals again, so I don't want any part of that.

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Michael Walker against the Diamondbacks, everything in in that, and

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 3>so yeah, it's probably a stay away day. You could.

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 3>I thought for a little bit about Chad Patrick against

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the Marlins, but I don't know that I really trust

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 3>that for a streaming option. So it's probably more of

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 3>a stay away from me on a Saturday this week

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 3>and then last but not least, Sunday. Reees Slsen is

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 3>potentially returning. He's scheduled to return. He gets the Guardians,

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 3>who are somewhat surprisingly a bottom five offense right now

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 3>for Fantasy, And if he's available, he's around fifty percent

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 3>consensus rostered, so he may or may not be available

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 3>in your leagues. Check your league settings. But he's coming

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.199
<v Speaker 3>back from injury, so if someone couldn't stash him on

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 3>the IR, he's probably available and you can pick him

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 3>up before he comes back. So he's probably the top

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 3>option is you know, I don't love starting someone right

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 3>off the IL, but he's probably you know, even if

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 3>you just grab him to dash, he's not a bad option.

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 3>The other option I wrote, here is Edward Cabrera who

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 3>gets the Brewers. With the kind of added bonus here

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 3>is if you're in a weekly league and you wanted

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 3>to stream Cabrera against the Twins on Tuesday, you could

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 3>get the two step from him and get him on

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Tuesday versus the Twins, and then on Sunday against the Brewers,

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 3>which was, you know, two not terrible matchups, and so

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Edward Cabrera might be the streamer of the week.

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Any honorable mentions for you.

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 3>No honorable mentions. It's kind of a gross scale unless

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 3>you wanted to do. I mean, I won't spoil my

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 3>two week picture, but you know, unless you wanted to

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 3>stream my two star pitcher.

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's get into our two star picture competition. You

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>use that segue here as a reminder. We did not

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>have a week ten contest because both of our pictures

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>ended up only pitching one start. So we have not

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>yet gotten to the results of week eleven. We'll see

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>how that goes. So even though we are on week

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>twelve now, the current standings are only nine completed contests

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in it's.

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Still five to four.

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Mayor. Because I am still down, I had to break

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>out the big guns and roll with Garrett Crochet facing

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the Reds and then the Nationals, two teams that have

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>not been very good against lefties too, you know, not

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:22.959
<v Speaker 1>crazy scary lineups in general, particularly the Nationals. So yeah,

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't used him yet, and I figured it was

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>about time because he's really good and has good matchups

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>this week. So I finally finally broke out Crochet and

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you are going with somebody? Are they facing each other?

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 2>I didn't.

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't look ahead at the schedule to see if

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they're If they're both two star pitchers, they must be

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 1>close to facing each.

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Other, because you're you're a pitcher. They are wout ruin

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 2>who yours is?

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 3>They face each other on Monday. So I am going

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 3>with Chase Burns. Who a fun one. Chase Burns Garrett Crochet,

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 3>That's a fun matchup. May Yeah, I'm taking the risk

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 3>here because I'm going with a very young pitcher. But

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 3>he's got you know, he just looks so good. I

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 3>wanted to use him. I didn't really love a lot

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 3>of the other options, at least in terms of pitchers

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:06.839
<v Speaker 3>I hadn't used yet, and so.

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was going to say there were some good

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>options this week, but it was a lot of guys

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 1>I had already used also.

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and so I decided to go with Chase Burns,

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 3>even though the matchups aren't the best. It's at Boston

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 3>at Philly, so against two pretty good offenses, and on

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 3>the road against those two offenses. Although as I as

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 3>I just said, the Red Sox are somewhat quietly like

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 3>one of the best teams to for pitchers in terms

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 3>of strikeouts, their top three in terms of strikeout rate,

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 3>So we could see him strike out double digit guys

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 3>against the Red Sox on Monday. That'll be a fun

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 3>matchup and we'll be able to see the go ahead

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 3>to head.

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is going to be fun. That'll be a

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 2>must watch.

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>If we were doing weekday excitement, that would be our

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Monday excitement for sure.

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. But yeah, we'll go ahead and wrap up there.

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Unless you have anything else you wanted to toss in

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>here before we get out of here, No, that's it

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>for me, all right.

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 2>We will go ahead and wrap up.

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>If you missed our earlier segments, please check out Rounding

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bases. We talked about a whole bunch stuff, including

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>more of a deep dive on Chase Birns some rookie

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff by self. For the second half of the season,

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>we talked about about Cal Roley, just because he's so awesome,

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and then we talked about in our part too as usual,

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>our buys and cells and our waiver Central.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 2>So we got it all for you this weekend.

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Hope you check out all the segments of the show

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>for Mayor, I'm Ryan Warmy.

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for tuning in. We'll see you next time.

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>or Spotify. Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB