WEBVTT - U.S. Hiring Downshifted Abruptly in August

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all furnishing the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. Searched Bloomberg clovel News today's jobs report showing

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that US hiring down shifted abruptly in August, with the

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>smallest jobs gained in seven months. As Charlie mentioned, it

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>complicates a potential decision by the Federal Reserve to begin

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>scaling back monetary policy support by year end. The number

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>we got today non farm payrolls increasing two d and

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty five thousand last month. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg they

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see something more in line with seven hundred

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and thirty five thousand, so a big miss there. Let's

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>get in to it with Becky franco Witz, president of

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Manpower Group in North America. She joins us as she

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>does many jobs days on the phone from Chicago. Becky,

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Really great to have you back on the show. Is

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>there any silver lining to this job's report today? Yeah, Tim,

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>so definitely not a report anyone wanted to see. Um.

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I would tell you that I'd characterize August is a

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>report of dashed hopes on both sides of the labor

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, environment. UM employers were hoping for the September

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>sunrise that we've spoken about before with increased labor supply

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and recovery of supply chains, you know in delta dash

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>fat and workers were hoping for the smooth transition, you know,

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>sending kids off to school, returning to work without fear

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of of you know, COVID. That's been dashed too, UM.

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>But I will tell you that we believe the situation

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is temporary, and I have real time data that tells

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.559
<v Speaker 1>us why. Well, let's hear about that real time data.

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>What does the future look like? Yeah, so hi, Katie. Um,

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we know we still know where in a

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>worker's market and here's why. There are ten point one

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>million open jobs, so jobs unfilled in our country today.

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Demand remains right now above pre pandemic levels, and unemployment

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>continues to decline, So that that is a silver lining,

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Tim's your question. And we also know, and this is

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>some new data, we know that the talent shortage is

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>especially acute in blue collar rolls. So let's just step

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>back and say, you know, in the past year, UM

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>demand for knowledge workers so think medical, you know, I

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>T space, that demand is increased four and you're you're

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking that's a pretty good number. Yet demand for blue

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>collar jobs is increased with a fifty percent rise in

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>operations logistics alone, as the shift online is here to stay.

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we anticipate hiring spikes and ops logistics

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>retail as we prepare for the holiday period. So that

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is the silver lining. Um. But this job's report in August,

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, ahead of the stimulus stoppages we go into September.

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, it was a disappointing one. There's no way

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.239
<v Speaker 1>around it. There is, though, still this mismatch between supply

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and demand demand. If there are ten point one million

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>open jobs and still millions of people who are on

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines working looking for work, right now, why aren't

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>they hopping off the sidelines. Yeah, so it's it's unfortunately complicated.

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>So you know, part of it definitely is stimulus, but

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that can't answer everything. There is fear, you know, rising

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>fear now around you, health safety in the workplace, and

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>there's complications that you know, some schools are opening, schools

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>are constantly threatening or we're gonna go hybrid or not

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>go hybrid um. So it's really an uncertain time personally

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and professionally for workers in our country, and and they

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>are still fitting on the sidelines. And again, what's so

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>disappointing is we all hoped and wanted to believe that

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we would be past this as we went back into

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the back to school season, but we're not quite out

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of the woods yet. Yeah. It's definitely not the start

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to September that I think many companies and just people expected.

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>But Becky, I want to pick up on your point

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>on stimulus, because we do have those enhanced unemployment benefits

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>starting to roll off next week, and like you said,

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>there's still ten point one million jobs unfilled. I'm curious

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>what you think that the end of those sorts of

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>pro ms could mean for the labor market and jobs

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>reports going forward. Yeah, so we've been tracking at state

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>by state Katie, as the as the stimulus has ended,

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and what we found is it's very uneven. So in

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>some states, you know, especially in states in the South,

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>where when stimulus came in it didn't have as big

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of a dampening effect, we didn't see as big of

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a recovery effect when the stimulus came off. Um. In

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>other states, we're just starting to see it roll off. Now.

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>We have seen some positive momentum come out of a

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of the states since the stimulus stops. But I

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>can tell you one thing, no matter what the state does, Um,

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>this is not stopping stimulus is not going to have

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the you know, solve effect that we all wanted it

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to have. We're going to have to make sure that

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>workers feel safe, they feel valued, they can trust their

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>employers to send people home they're sick um that are

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>around them, and that really is becoming. You know, This

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>trust and care economy is truly the way forward for

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the American worker. Becky Manpower Group is the world's third

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>largest staffing firm, so you do have a really good

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>understanding of what is happening in different areas of the

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>world when it comes to people going back to work

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>or what they want at a at a at a firm.

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>What are you seeing in terms of the return to

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the office, especially among large Wall Street banks and financial

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>services firms. Yeah, so it's quite interesting. We just did

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a big fourteen thousand people's survey in fourteen countries to

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>your to your question, Tim, and what we found is

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>really generationally demographically, we're seeing some differences. So if you say,

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>who's most excited to come back in the office, gen z,

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>they're fresh out of college, they're looking to make their friends.

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 1>It's where they find their dating pool. Like they're they're learning,

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>they're excited to be back in the office. Who's least excited,

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and this is global data. Millennials. You know, millennials are

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of childbearing, you know, child raising years. They're very they're

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>very concerned about their children getting the virus now, which

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know a year ago we were saying kids aren't

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>really susceptible. That's okay, So now we know that that

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>was inaccurate, and so there's concerned there. I'm also excited

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to come back in the workplace. Our our gen X

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and our boomers and think about who's running the world,

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, companies right now it is the gen X

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and boomers, and so we see really varied interest about

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>coming back into the workplace. Now from a vaccination perspective,

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you know that is giving some employees some confidence, particularly

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>as headquarters for rolling out vaccinations um. But still, you know,

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very uneven in terms of the excitement of

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>coming back in the office every day the week. Becky Frankowitz,

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>President at Manpower Group North America, joining us on the

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>phone from Chicago on this job's Friday. Becky, thank you

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>so much for taking the time. We really appreciate it.

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic from Bloomberg Radio. Well. Senate Democrats

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>are discussing a wider range of tax proposals than President

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden has proposed. This could include levies on stock buybacks,

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>carbon emissions, and even executive compensation. This as part of

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a package of measures to help fund a ramping up

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>in a social spending so writes Stephen at T Dennis.

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>He is Senate reporter for Bloomberg News, and he joins

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>us now on the phone from Washington at d C. Stephen,

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it's really great to have you on the show this afternoon.

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Who are the Senate Democrats who are who are doing this?

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Because we know that not all Democrats feel the same

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to taxation. Yeah, so basically the first

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>thing they need to do is to get the Senate

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Finance Committee Democrats on board. And this is what's circulating

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>among those Senate Finance Committee Democrats. They have yet to

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>settle on a particular plan amongst themselves, but we do

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>basically have the menu. You know, you're either you're either

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a lunch or you're on the menu or something or other.

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Even that's the old thing. Uh, this is this is

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the menu of who's gonna who's gonna make it to

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the lunch and who's gonna get eaten? And uh and

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>so you have all kinds of things that would potentially

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>affect a lot of stocks, a lot of markets. You know,

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>if you start saying, well, stock buybacks should be tax

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>just like dividends, or have an excise tax on stock buybacks,

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that would be a huge deal. Uh, supersized CEO pay

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you know they're they're they're talking about having an excise

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>tax on CEO pay that exceeds the average worker at

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that company by a margin they considered to be too high. Uh,

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and even things like mark to market rules for billionaires

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>with large unrealized cap gains, which would be a big

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>tax on a lot of entrepreneurs like Elon Musk or

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos who have very large amounts of unrealized capital gains.

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, the implications widespread. I mean, just this year,

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>we've already seen about three hundred and sixty billion worth

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of buy back. So Stephen, I'm curious does this have

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.839
<v Speaker 1>a shot of passing. I mean, like you said, you

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>have to get the Senate Finance Committee Democrats on board.

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>How likely is that to happen? I think basically any

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>one of these proposals is going to have a hard road.

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, right now, Joe Mansion wants to press the

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>pause button on the whole thing, and he wants a

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>much smaller package. Um. He's also, however, taken aim at

0:08:56.320 --> 0:09:00.719
<v Speaker 1>some of the more traditional tax increases that Joe Biden's proposed, Like,

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, he doesn't want to go to on the

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.719
<v Speaker 1>corporate tax rate. By He's talked about five percent of

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the corporate tax rate. Well, if you lose several hundred

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars there, you might be able to make it

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>up somewhere else. And the question is whether Joe By,

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:20.599
<v Speaker 1>whether Joe Manchin would stand in the way of some

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of these things. Now, certainly, I think you're gonna have

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a hard time getting fifty Senate votes for some kind

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of a carbon tax, even if it turns into rebates

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>for lower income folks. Uh, taxing plastic. You know, I

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>could see some Democrats supporting that. That might be a

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>harder sell even with the White House. Um and uh.

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But there are these things that seem to be relatively

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>low hanging fruit, like these supersized i ra s. There

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>are some people with tens of millions of dollars they've

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>accumulated in their iras, and you could just say, well,

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna cap those at five million, and anything over

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that you have to have a distribution and pay taxes

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on it. So some of these things I think could

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>very well end up in the package and are a

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit more likely to happen than others. We should

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>note that even today, when the President was speaking after

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that dismal jobs report came out, he did once again

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>repeat the line that he will not raise taxes on

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>people who make less than four hundred thousand dollars a year.

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.839
<v Speaker 1>It's something that he continues to uh to talk about,

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>what what do the Democrats who are proposing these um

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>want this money to pay for? Yeah, so there's you know,

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>there's three hundred three point five trillion dollar package of

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>social spending um everything from childcare benefits to free community college,

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>to expanding Medicare benefits for dental and vision and hearing um.

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>There's there's just an enormous array of things that have

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>been building up, frankly for decades that Democrats have wanted,

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 1>as well as things like paid sick leave and paid

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>family leave and maternity leave and all these things. Well,

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that bill cobbles out to about three point five trillion

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>over ten years, which is about a five percent increase

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in federal spending. And you're gonna have to find money

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to pay for it. And it gets if your universe

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of who has to pay for it is people making

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>more than four dollars a year. That's not a lot

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of people, but that is a lot of money. And

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it's going to be very challenging

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to get it through because those people with the biggest

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>pockets on earth can afford a lot of good lobbyists.

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>And guess what, a lot of those people are voting

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress. Steven Dennis, Senate reporter at Bloomberg News,

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>running us on the phone from Washington, d C. Steven,

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for it taking the time. We

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate it. Check out his story on the Bloomberg

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Terminal Senate Democrats, I taxes on stock buybacks and excess

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>CEO pay. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes tim's Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well. In the

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>current issue of Bloomberg business Week, it's the New City's issue.

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 1>It's Bloomberg business Week magazine. It's available on newsstands and

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash business Week. It's an issue

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that is focused on cities in one city that it

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>does take a very close look at in an area

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of the city is Seattle, and a Seattle commercial district

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that has undergone trial by virus. The pandemic change the

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>heartbeat of urban areas across the US, few more so

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>than the Pike Pine Corridor of Seattle's Capitol Hill neighborhood.

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>So writes Noah bou Hire, finance reporter for Bloomberg News,

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and he joins us now on the phone from Seattle, Noah,

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>for people who haven't been to Seattle or visited this

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>particular area of Seattle, the Pike Pine Corridor of Capitol Hill,

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>what's it like? Well, it's um, I think what a

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of people would imagine as a Biberne at all hours,

0:12:55.440 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 1>retail arts, commercial district. There's music venues on a restaurant. UM.

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not uh, giant buildings, but you've got a lot

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of you know, for six seven eight story UM apartment

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 1>blocks that have retail at the ground floor. So it

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>was really the part of Seattle that that that felt

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>most city like outside of UM downtown. And what happened

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>over the last year is the pandemic took hold and

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>commuters started staying home and not going to those restaurants.

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.599
<v Speaker 1>And and then just a few months later, in the

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>aftermath of the murder of George Floyd, UM activists took

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to the streets there to demand racial justice. Yeah. So look,

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it was an interesting UM neighborhood to follow for all

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>those reasons you just mentioned. UM. You know, a lot

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of the businesses in in this corridor UH were the

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>kinds of places that you know, relied on a vibrant

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>street life and and and people being able to get together.

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And obviously the pandemic UM made that difficult. And UM,

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the other thing that was interesting about this neighborhood is

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:05.119
<v Speaker 1>that there are just a ton of UM, smaller businesses.

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, uh, Amazon has one of their Grocery

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Stories stores there. There's a Starbucks reserve roster in the neighborhood,

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>so there's some corporate presence, but there were also a

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of small, uh scrappy businesses that just had to

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. UM. And UH you know, with this piece,

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I I followed UM a number of them uh through

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the last year and a half to figure out how

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>they did it. Because while you know a number of

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>businesses did UM go under during the pandemic, UM, a

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>lot managed to get to this point uh through UM

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the generosity of customers, through UM government assistance programs, and

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of scrappiness that I don't think um

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>uh people have fully appreciated. And so No, it's a

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>great piece. And one of the reasons why it's such

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a good read is because you did track a group

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of four businesses over the past year and a half.

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'm curious. You know, you mentioned the scrappiness of

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the businesses and the business owners, but I'm curious if

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>there was a uniting common denominator and how they were

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>all able to get through the pandemic. Yeah, that's a

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>great question. UM I I really think it is the

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>constellation of factors. It was. It was you know, these

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>these were established businesses with with loyal customers and UM

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, to the extent UH some of them were

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>able to do go fund means government assistance, which is

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely key UH programs like the Paycheck Protection Program. Pretty

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>much everyone took that money. UM. It was either a

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>form of bridge financing or um uh to get them

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to other federal grants or UM or or it was

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing itself that that helped get them through UM.

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, I think another uh under appreciated

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>part of this is that, UM we're talking about a

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>city where a lot of people have been willing to

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>get vaccinated. And even though we've had pretty strong, UM

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:16.119
<v Speaker 1>strong public health restrictions here in Washington State throughout the pandemic,

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>UM people were willing to go back to this neighborhood

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>when when those things lifted, because we're talking about a

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>city where, you know, seventy five more than seventy of

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>UH people twelve and up have have gotten their jobs. Well,

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because one of the one of the elements

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of this that really sticks out to me, that really

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>caught my attention is the graphical representation of the change

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in weekly visits from nine that are in here charts

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that just show how foot traffic has not returned to

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>retail establishments there too, restaurants there even after the vaccine rollout,

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to music venues for example, in some cases restaurant visits

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>they're still down even after vaccinations from How are these

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>business owners dealing with that? Yeah, that's a that's a

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>great question. I do. I do want to highlight that

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the data here is really interesting. We were able to

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>get UM foot traffic data on about fifty locations around

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>this neighborhood. Most of them were you know, commercial establishments

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and UM I think that data really does show you,

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>like you said, that things are a far are far,

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>far far from being back to normal. Um. And the

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>reason these businesses are still you know, any of these

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>owners will tell you things are not back to normal.

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean they are. They are still very much in

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the thick of this and we're you know, going into

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>the fall when things like outdoor dining are going to

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>be harder to do and frankly in Seattle just not

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>comfortable because it rains so much here. So I think

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a big part of this part of this story

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 1>is that these businesses have been resilient, but they are

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>by no means, you know, out of the woods yet

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and so no. One of the stats that caught my

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>eyes in the story is that the medium income in

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the city is over one hundred thousand dollars, which, as

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you note, is more than fifty percent higher than the

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>national average. I'm curious how important was that factor in

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 1>explaining the resiliency of some of these businesses. I don't

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>think it can be understated. Um. Look, there are academics

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>who you know, started studying the pandemics effect on small

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>business and um, you know, while the lens of of

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>this story is one particular neighborhood. What I can say

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>is anecdotally, UM, having customers and people who like your

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>businesses and supported them, and who were willing to come

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in and spend more money, and who you know, maybe

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>kept their jobs throughout the pandemic has just been crucial. Um.

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, two of these businesses had had fundraisers and

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>they raised tens of thousands of dollars and that was

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>just um, completely instrumental to them, you know, being able

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to survive to this point. Yeah, not something that would

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily be possible in other parts of the country where

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the clientele who frequent these places don't have these same

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.479
<v Speaker 1>household incomes and wouldn't necessarily be able to afford, at

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>least during a pandemic and during a time of uncertainty,

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to throw money and support throw money at these businesses

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and support them even in difficult times. Noah bou Hire

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is finance reporter for Bloomberg News. Noah, thank you so

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. The story is a Seattle Commercial

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Districts trial by virus. Bloomberg tract a group of businesses

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Capitol Hill neighborhood for a year and a

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>half and were amazed by their resilience. Check it out.

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>It's featured in the New City's issue of Bloomberg Business

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Week magazine. It's available on newsstands and at Bloomberg dot

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>com slash business Week. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. We cannot, Katie Graidfeld, talk enough about crypto.

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Share a bitcoin, I almost said, shares a bitcoin bitcoin

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>price higher by eight hundred and thirty four dollars right now.

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>That's trading at fifty dollars three hundred and eighty three

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>right now. David Knitski is chief executive officer at Kracking Bank.

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Cracking Bank is one of the largest crypto exchanges, with

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>over eight million users world ride. They've had approximately one

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>point five million new sign ups over the course of

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter of one. That is why I'm saying

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we cannot talk enough about crypto. David, thanks so much

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. You were joining us live from Cheyenne, Wyoming,

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>where you are based. Katie and I were both talking

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>during the breaking We said, Wyoming, Why Wyoming? Tell us why? Yeah? Well,

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Wyoming A pass the first of its kind new regulatory

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>license here for a special special purpose depository institution. It's

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>a state chartered bank. Uh. And up until now, crypto

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>companies have really been round peg square hold into existing

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>licenses and regimes that didn't make a ton of sense.

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.479
<v Speaker 1>And we're kind of locked out of the existing banking world. UH.

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>So for that reason, we'll bring in the US business

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>under a more certain, more formal, and better regulatory regime,

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>as well as expanding into new opportunities, new products and markets.

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>As you see, everything's converging between crypto, neo bank, spintech,

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>traditional and so were we want to be at the

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>heart of that market. But you do call yourself a bank, Yeah,

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we are. We are state chartered bank. And so Wyoming

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>is interesting obviously has positioned itself to be a crypto hotbed.

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Where does that stand with the rest of the United States?

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Are other states uh moving towards Wyoming? Or is Wyoming

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>really an outlier at this point? Wyoming definitely got the

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>ball started, but the ball rolling. But a number of

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>states have let's say, borrowed liberally from the Wyoming playbook

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>and enacted their own version of a similar charter. UH

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>And it's provoking federal regulators to take action as well.

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of the beauty of our republic and our

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>system here where states can be uh the laboratories of

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>innovation and push things forward faster than the federal government have.

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's really been a spark that's moved the whole

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>industry forward. David, you say that Cracking will be the

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>first United States crypto bank, it's I'm wondering the problem

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>that you're you're setting out to solve here, what is

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>not being met by traditional finance. Yeah, so in the

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>traditional regimes right now, you can either apply for fifty

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>state money transmission licenses or you can try and none

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>of them have like crypto specific language. They're built for

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>like Western unions and fin techs of the world. Uh.

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>And then or you could try to pursue a banking license.

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But the federal regulators, the s i C, have been

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent about that UM and they don't have written moved

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>about how they're going to treat crypto UM that has

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a dedicated supervisory and over site manual. We just want

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>to know, Hey, this is how we're going to be

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>regulated and what our expectations are. And we can meet them.

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So for those reasons, the lack of clarity around some

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff in other states is really suboptimal. Um

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and banking has been a traditional problem for crypto cracking.

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Is lucky to have a swath of good third party

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>banking partners, but there's nothing like vertically integrating, controlling your

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>own destiny direct to the FED. And so, David, I've

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>always been curious, you know, how do you scale? Obviously

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>there are regulatory hurdles, but in terms of the average

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>American who maybe only has a passing understanding of what

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and what cryptocurrencies are, how do you convince them

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that this is the next uh you know wave of banking,

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>This is the next evolution of how you handle money.

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 1>How do you bring that message beyond just the cryptocurrency community. Now, well, one,

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the crypto currency community is growing rapidly, and more and

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.479
<v Speaker 1>more kind of mainstream adopt is taking place. We think

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that's going to continue. So on the one hand, the

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>market is coming to us. But on the other hand, yeah,

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>this banking license lets us offer online mobile uh checking

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 1>accounts and savings accounts and traditional equities brokerage things like

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that that you know, mainstream America are used to. And

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>so if you put that side by side for crypto,

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a kind of a great conversion mechanism. You do

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>know on Cracking Bank's website that you are not f

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>d I c ensured. The money that you put in,

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the crypto you put in is not f d I

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 1>c ensured. Um, explain why that is a little bit

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.719
<v Speaker 1>and and why you think that consumers from who might

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>be a little concerned about that should or should not

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>be yeah anything, Uh, their advantages to our structure. So

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the way that the the SPDI charter works is we

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 1>are required to be a fully reserved, fully back bank,

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>so we maintained we take customer deposits and we keep

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a hundred percent of it in cash, so we don't

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.959
<v Speaker 1>have the types of market or credit risk or insolvency

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 1>risk that the FBI c was meant to protect against.

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So as a result, we're kind of exempt from having

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to apply for that. There is no you know risk

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>because we're not lending money out in the mortgage portfolios,

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not putting it into we're not even putting the treasury,

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>let alone longer duration or riskier instruments, and so quickly David,

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious. You know, Cracking was the first crypto exchange

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to receive a banking charter, and Cracking, along with Crypto

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Auntie, have tried to tap into the Federal

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Reserves payment system. Little luck so far, and I'm curious

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>whenn't using the FEDS payment system sort of go against

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the spirit of crypto. And David, we just have about

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds, but then we're gonna come back with you

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>have to readA some news. Yeah. Well, one our our

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>mission is to kind of promote the adoption of cryptocurrency

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to enable more financial freedom. One way to do that

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is to get a bridge from the legacy or traditional

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>system to crypto, and then once they're in crypto, they

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>can take all advantage of the crypto centric kind of

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>eat up. Let's get back to David Knitski, CEO at

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Kracking Bank, joining us once again on the phone from Cheyenne, Wyoming. David,

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Kracking Bank, and I should say Crackton was the first

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>crypto exchange ever to receive a banking charter. I'm wondering,

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>given the increased interest in crypto, the way we do

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>see traditional financial institutions starting to embrace it, if you

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>expect to get significant competition from the big names in

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>banking and even community banks. Yeah, I mean I expect

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>more and more to realize the opportunity and coming to

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the market. Um, we welcome them, not particularly concerned about it.

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>As you see any news like technology medium, normally it's

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the folks who are kind of that native to that

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>medium are the ones that do best. I think it'll

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>be pretty challenging for institutions and incumbents to really adopt

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the crypto fully, but I think it does help the

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>market more broadly, and I do think the question is

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:54.239
<v Speaker 1>to find the existing financial industry coming to crypto rather

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>than crypto coming to the financial industry. And so I

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>want to switch gears and talk about stable coins because

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of sessed with them. Uh. For those listening

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 1>who don't know, stable coins are cryptocurrencies that try to

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>maintain a fixed exchange rate with another fiat With a

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>fiat currency, usually it's the dollar. They try to maintain

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a one to one peg. They've come under a lot

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of scrutiny lately. Uh. Some people might have heard of Tether.

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>It's the largest stable coin. It was supposed to be

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>back to one for one by US dollars. We learned

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in May that it wasn't that actually holds a ton

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of commercial paper, maybe thirty one billion if you look

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 1>at Tether's market cap. I'm curious what that could look

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>like going forward. We know that UM Treasury Secretary Jennet

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Yellen is concerned about stable coins. Some FED policymakers have

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>made worried noises as well. I'm curious, David, whether you

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>think that we could see regulation in that space. Yeah.

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I always expect regulation in new financial markets, no doubt. UM.

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>I think the stable coins are a net U in

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>a boon. In fact, the US should love stable coins.

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>It is the best way to uh maintain our dollar

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>reserve and hegemony uh and for our kind of global

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 1>reach and global economic clouds, and so the U s

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>should love stable coins. But we know that the US

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't love stable coins, and you do have banks like

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Barkley's warning that this could raise some really thorny issues

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>for the FED. If there is a run on Tether

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>people trying to redeem their holdings, that could cause Tether

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to dump commercial paper on mass. And the commercial paper

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>market is crucially important to just the functioning of companies.

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious what would get the US on board

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>if they should love stable coins. Yeah, I mean, look,

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that looks it's not surprising that a bank

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>would be wary of something that definitely is competitive to it.

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Um And there are certain areas of stable coins that

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, could potentially use a little bit more transparency,

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>no doubt. And in fact, even teather, which is certainly

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the more questionable ones in the market, like, it's getting

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>better and it is definitely changing. It's kind of like

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet, uh to to these concerns. Um So, I

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>do think that's going to change over time, and there's

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be more transparency, whether by force or just

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>by market dynamics. Um So, I expect that to happen,

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>um sooner rather than later. Hey, David, and really have

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a minute left, give us an idea of the type

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of regulation you'd like to see on a federal level

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>so we can see these types of charters become more widespread. Yeah.

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>So again, like I as I said before, I think

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of the framing has been backwards a bit. It's

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>not the main question is not how to fit crypto

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in the existing frameworks in financial world today, is how

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to update our financial industry for the economy of the

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>future and stay innovative. H and so, what I'd like

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to see is clarity, right so, and lack like less discretion,

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>more clarity, defined treatment of crypto assets and expectations in

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of compliance, and require and dedicated supervisory and oversight

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>programs that understand how crypto works. All right, We're gonna

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>have to leave it there. David Knitsky, CEO of Cracking Bank,

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from Cheyenne, Wyoming. David, thank

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you so much for taking the time. A fascinating conversation, Katie. Um,

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I know we got to get him on our other show,

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:24.479
<v Speaker 1>Quick Take Stocks, each and every day at noon Eastern

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>time at Bloomberg dot com slash quick Take. Yeah, and

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean stable coins. They're in almost every cryptocurrency transaction.

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>It's the perfect interscction of fixed income with cryptocurrencies. You

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>can't ask for anything better. If you're Katie Griffield, you

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>can't ask for anything better. I'm brother journal Yeah, but

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you let me drive. Oh no, no, no, all right, please,

0:30:52.000 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll do right. I want to try it the Drive

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to the close down on Bloomberg Radio. It is the

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>drive to the close. We're just over ten minutes away

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>from the close of trading on this job's Friday, September one.

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Brian Jacobson is joining US now senior investment strategist at

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Wells Fargo Asset Management, six hundred and four billion dollars

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of assets under management. Brian joins us on the phone

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>from Milwaukee. We heard an update from Charlie Pellett just

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>moments ago about what exactly is happening in the markets

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>right now? Stock struggling to find a direction. Uh, the

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred is just down, not even a full point,

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>so pretty much flat right now. Well, the NASDAC is

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in the green and the Dow is lower by one

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>tenth of one per cent. Brian talked to us a

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the equity market reaction to today's jobs numbers.

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>The US hiring slow sharply amaled a delta variant non

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>from perils increasing only two thousand last month, a huge miss.

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Why not a bigger equity market reaction? Well, you know

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question. When I saw the headline, my

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 1>eye brows went up. Yeah, I said a little bit

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of shock, But you know, when and I think it's

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.719
<v Speaker 1>just because the equity market in resists in general. Are

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at the details here, right, that leisure and hospitality

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>was very weak, Retail is very weak, and so I

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>think people can attribute it mainly to the rise of

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the delta variant, just affecting consumer behavior, maybe potential employee

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>behavior that they're not as willing to go in those

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of high contact jobs. So there was strengthen the

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing sector. And so I think that's really the explanation

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is it's still a good number. It's not great, right,

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>going from great to good doesn't have to be bad

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>when we can attribute. But it was such a big miss.

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, seven thirty three thousand is the survey of

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>economists that from Bloomberg. That's what that's what we're looking for. Well,

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that's truly, Yeah, it is an awfully big miss. But

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it is I think, to use the term that the

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>FED has really enjoyed using. It looks transitory to the

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>extent that the delta variant looks like it might be peaky.

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that we could see a nice surge in

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>September or October for job creation. Well, it's let's wrap

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that into what we're expecting out of the FED if

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>September is a really strong month for the labor market,

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. In conversations today, it feels like a

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>FED September tapering announcement is off the table. I'm curious

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>how you think, UH, Federal Reserve policymakers and Jero and

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Pal are looking at today's number knowing that we have,

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>for example, enhanced unemployment benefits rolling off just next week. Yeah,

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that is one of the factors that could lead to

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a September urge in hiring, if it's the rolling over

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of delta, the expiration of those enhanced benefits. UH, and

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 1>our position is that we think that the said wasn't

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>going to announce spring per se in September, that they

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>would actually likely like to tee up capering in September,

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and so ever since the Jackson Hole speech, that's been

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>our position is that they would like to see that

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>further progress on the labor front, and that likely in September.

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>They'll still say that if we continue to see decent

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>gains and high inflation, that would be appropriate in the

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>next few meetings, which for us then that would mean

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>likely in December to actually start caperingber I'm sorry, would

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>this be considered a decent gain. Well, I think so.

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that they would likely look through this, look

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>at the details the s that, you know, it's still

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 1>a decent number on a three month moving average. We're

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to get another employment situation report by the

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 1>September one, so they'll look at some of the other data.

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think they want to uh pooh pooh

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>this job's report too much. So I'd like to talk

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about tapering regardless of when we

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:22.399
<v Speaker 1>get the announcement, when tapering actually starts, When the FED

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>does start to reduce the pace of its monthly bond buying,

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:27.720
<v Speaker 1>how do you expect that to play out in markets,

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and particularly the bond market, because theoretically there will be

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>less demand for bonds. I would think, just buy the

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.320
<v Speaker 1>laws of supply and demand. That should make yields go higher.

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 1>But you haven't really seen that happen in the wake

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of Pal's Jackson Hole appearance. Well, no, you know, and

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the Fed is a quite price insensitive buyer of bonds

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>eight billion a month for treasuries and forty billion a

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 1>month for mortgage backed securities. We also know that we

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 1>have the debt ceiling so maybe issuance isn't quite what

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it will be uh come October, assuming that Congress passes

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a new budget and perhaps with the death ceiling, and

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.919
<v Speaker 1>so we could have those technical factors at play where

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>simple supply and demand would suggest that we should likely

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>see yields rise, and that's been our position. We are

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>expecting to see that, especially on the long end of

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve, because we know that the said has

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be somewhat neutral along the curve as far

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>as what they're buying, and so we think that we

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>could see the ten year treasury move up. We're actually

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>more position for the longer and say the thirty year

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to move back above two percent. We're kind of down

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>around one point nine five is percent. We think we

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 1>could get back up to uh you know too and

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a quarter maybe two point one five to two and

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a quarter by the end of the year. So a

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:55.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent move from here. Hey, how are you thinking

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>about inflation? Because we did see in this report. I

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>guess you could say the silver lining was wage growth,

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering how what that signal that sends you

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:09.280
<v Speaker 1>about potential price increases. In other words, inflation not necessarily

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 1>being transitory, because wages aren't necessarily something that go down. Yeah,

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:16.399
<v Speaker 1>that is one of the factors I think that could

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>play into the Fed's thinking on this, that maybe they

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 1>don't want to uh kind of remove or push out

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the timeline for tapering is that you do see the

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:30.280
<v Speaker 1>wage growth. Uh. Some economists fear a wage price spiral.

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I personally don't think that that's necessarily always in the data.

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 1>We haven't really seen real wage games, especially for lower

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>income workers, for this recovery or over the last few months.

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at the inflation numbers, those have

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>increased faster than what we have seen the wages, especially

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>on the lower end of the spectrum. So you know,

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in a way, I think that the FED would be

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of welcomes to see that wage game, but you

0:37:57.719 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 1>don't want it to want to see it jump too

0:37:59.880 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 1>much to instill fear and investors that you are going

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to see some sort of wage wage price spiral. And so, Brian,

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to bring up a kind of taboo topic because,

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:14.720
<v Speaker 1>like you say, inflation is high, we know there's wage pressure.

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the labor markets, still millions of

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:20.320
<v Speaker 1>jobs short uh, and the rate of economic growth is slowing,

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>So when can we talk about stagflation. Well, I don't

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 1>think we can really get to stag inflation until we

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>see negative growth. Um. And it's mainly because the stag

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.360
<v Speaker 1>inflation of the nine seventies, right, you had a double

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 1>digit inflation growth and uh, you know right now we're

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>running uh anywhere from three to five percent. So until

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>we get above say seven percent with inflation, and if

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 1>we see economic growth rancheting down to something closer to

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe one percent real, I don't think that stag inflation

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 1>is appropriate. It's more about reflation. So you have the

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>higher inflation, but you still have a reco free pace

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>of economic growth. And that's why I think that the

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 1>equity markets can still remain fairly attractive. You have low yields, Yes,

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 1>you have high inflation. Hopefully it's transitory, but there is

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>still decent growth. Going from great growth to good growth

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be bad. Brian Jacobsen, we're gonna have

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to leave it there. Thank you so much for taking

0:39:19.760 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the time and joining us on Bloomberg Business Week. Brian

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>senior investment strategist at Wells Fargo Asset Management. More than

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>six hundred billion dollars in assets under management. He joins

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Milwaukee. Thanks for listening to

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to our

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:40.320
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News.