Speaker 1: All right, Thank you, Scott Shannon, Thanks to all of
Speaker 1: you for being with us. Right down our toll free
Speaker 1: telephone number if you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program as eight hundred and ninety four one Sean
Speaker 1: if you want to join us. I am so furious
Speaker 1: that people are not understanding what jerry mandering is, how
Speaker 1: Democrats have mastered the art of it, how they have
Speaker 1: plotted for it, they have designed it, they have mastered it.
Speaker 1: I keep going over these numbers. I keep explaining, Republicans
Speaker 1: have been shut out, shut down. It has been something
Speaker 1: that blue states have gotten away with forever, and for
Speaker 1: whatever reason, Democrats are still out there trying to act
Speaker 1: as though they are a victim and that they're going
Speaker 1: to fight back with fire, fighting fire with fire. The
Speaker 1: only problem is there's no more jerry mandering available in
Speaker 1: most of the states that we're talking about. They keep
Speaker 1: talking about fighting fire with fire. The funniest one of
Speaker 1: all was the governor of Massachusetts, We're going to fight
Speaker 1: fire with fire. We haven't had a single Republican congressional
Speaker 1: seat since the nineties. In Massachusetts. The Republicans get forty
Speaker 1: percent of the vote. In Connecticut, not a single seat
Speaker 1: that they got there either. And if you look at
Speaker 1: New York, if you look at New Jersey, if you
Speaker 1: look at Illinois, which is probably the most jerry manderate
Speaker 1: of them all, you look at California, Democrats have mastered
Speaker 1: the art of all of this, and the idea that
Speaker 1: somehow this is a threat to democracy is ridiculous. Now,
Speaker 1: there's one other part of this equation that nobody really
Speaker 1: wants to spend a lot of time talking about, and
Speaker 1: we will, and we'll get into it in great specificity.
Speaker 1: We have Texas Governor Greg Abbott who's come under fire
Speaker 1: for this. But all Greg Abbott is doing is exactly
Speaker 1: what has been done in every other blue state and
Speaker 1: has been up these standards that have been written by them,
Speaker 1: the rules written by them, applied only, you know, only
Speaker 1: to benefit them. And one little thing that most people
Speaker 1: I don't think.
Speaker 2: No, we have.
Speaker 1: Discussed it in the past, probably not enough, But the
Speaker 1: President now has directed the Department of Commerce to launch
Speaker 1: preparations for a quote highly accurate national census. According to
Speaker 1: his post on truth Social and the President said the
Speaker 1: count would reflect current information, incorporate data from the twenty
Speaker 1: twenty four presidential election, and explicitly exclude individuals that reside
Speaker 1: illegally in the US. I have instructed our Department of
Speaker 1: Commerce to immediately begin work on a new and highly
Speaker 1: accurate census based on modern day facts and figures, and importantly,
Speaker 1: using the results and information gain from the presidential election
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty four. People who are in our country
Speaker 1: illegally will not be counted in the sense. Thank you
Speaker 1: for your attention to this matter. Under the US Constitution
Speaker 1: and Census Acted, the Census Bureau is required to conduct
Speaker 1: account every ten years of every resident of the country,
Speaker 1: regardless of citizenship or legal status. Well, that's not an
Speaker 1: accurate reading, because most of these people that are here illegally,
Speaker 1: by the very nature of the fact that they broke
Speaker 1: the law, they don't respect our laws, border sovereignty. They
Speaker 1: don't belong here anyway. The next one is not doue
Speaker 1: until twenty thirty. Trump did not make clear if he
Speaker 1: is referring to the regularly scheduled population count or a
Speaker 1: special survey undertaken earlier. But the census is used to
Speaker 1: determine how many members of Congress are elected from each state.
Speaker 1: Pew Research Center estimates that, for example, ignoring unauthorized illegal
Speaker 1: immigrants in twenty twenty would have deprived California, Florida, and
Speaker 1: Texas of one House seat each. And I don't care
Speaker 1: that California is a blue state, but if it would
Speaker 1: have deprived them a seat, that is fundamentally unfair and
Speaker 1: it's not in keeping with the statutory language that is
Speaker 1: very clear and unambiguous. It's also used for apportioning votes
Speaker 1: in the state by state electoral college that decides presidential elections.
Speaker 1: I mean, here's the thing. Do you want free and
Speaker 1: fair elections? Do you want integrity in your election system?
Speaker 1: Now we haven't spoken a lot about it since before
Speaker 1: the twenty twenty four election, but it is something we
Speaker 1: need to pay attention to and we need to put
Speaker 1: in place while we have a chance. Election integrity measures
Speaker 1: basic fundamental measures, you know, for example of photo IDs,
Speaker 1: signature verification, if you have mailim ballots, chain of custody controls,
Speaker 1: meaning we should have on tape from the moment any
Speaker 1: ballots are delivered, they should be put in a room
Speaker 1: with a camera that can be monitored by the citizenry
Speaker 1: twenty four to seven so that nobody can you know,
Speaker 1: no monkey business can take place as they say, in
Speaker 1: other words, no Shenanigans can take place, and that adds
Speaker 1: integrity to the system. We need updated voter rolls. You
Speaker 1: don't need illegal immigrants voting in either local or state elections.
Speaker 1: Has been proposed by Democrats that we've talked about in
Speaker 1: the past. Also anyway, so the first redistricting lawsuits have
Speaker 1: been found by this Democratic group. But you know, all
Speaker 1: of this is on their watch. This is what the
Speaker 1: Democrats themselves have wanted. Now we're going to spend time
Speaker 1: on this today with Governor Abbott and with with Jim
Speaker 1: McLaughlin and John McLaughlin and hopefully we'll get to the
Speaker 1: bottom of it. And you know, it gets to the
Speaker 1: heart of you know, do we want free and fair elections?
Speaker 1: Do you want integrity in your election system? Now, where
Speaker 1: this goes off the rails is the reaction of Democrats.
Speaker 1: And what do we say before the election. We said
Speaker 1: before the election the Democrats, if they get their way,
Speaker 1: watch out what they are capable of doing, because these
Speaker 1: are opinions that they have expressed openly. Now, James Carvill
Speaker 1: again applying a double standard when it comes to the
Speaker 1: issue of districting and jerrymandering, is saying out loud that
Speaker 1: which Democrats many secretly have hoped for for a long time,
Speaker 1: and that is statehood for Puerto Rico and the District
Speaker 1: of Columbia. What would that do in the minds of Democrats?
Speaker 1: That would give them four Senate seats, power and perpetuity,
Speaker 1: which is the only reason why they'd ever want to
Speaker 1: do it. One of the reasons I didn't agree with
Speaker 1: President Trump on Canada be in the fifty first state
Speaker 1: because we'd probably add two Democratic Senate seats coming. That's
Speaker 1: just my guess. Anyway, he says, let's play carvill and
Speaker 1: what he would like Democrats to do, because Republicans are
Speaker 1: now doing that which Democrats taught them to do.
Speaker 3: Democrats win the presidency, the Senate, in the House in
Speaker 3: twenty twenty eight, which is not impossible. I don't know
Speaker 3: if you say likely or possible, I don't know what
Speaker 3: word you know, but it's certainly not impossible. They are
Speaker 3: just going to have to be litteredly at Puerto Rican
Speaker 3: industry of Columbia states. They're going to have to the
Speaker 3: Congress does give the Constitution gives Congress power over federal elections.
Speaker 3: I don't think they're going to read district. But they
Speaker 3: there things they go do. They're going to have to
Speaker 3: do it. They're just going to have to do it,
Speaker 3: and they may have to expand the court to thirteen members.
Speaker 3: Any of those things in isolation, I would be skeptical about.
Speaker 3: I would be cautious about. I would say, well, I
Speaker 3: don't know if that's the greatest idea in the world.
Speaker 3: If you're opening Pandora's box or all kinds of things.
Speaker 3: If you want to save democracy, I think you've got
Speaker 3: to do all of those things, because we're just moving
Speaker 3: further and further away from being anything closer to democracy.
Speaker 1: The funny thing is that ironic thing is a paradox
Speaker 1: here is that if you listen to Democrats, they ran
Speaker 1: on this idea that if Donald Trump won, well you're
Speaker 1: electing number one a racist, a Nazi, a fascist. You're
Speaker 1: electing Stalin and Hitler and Mussolini. And that was pretty
Speaker 1: much the closing arguments because they didn't really want to
Speaker 1: run on the fact that they like high gas prices.
Speaker 1: They want to tell you how to live your life.
Speaker 1: They want to tell you what cars you can drive,
Speaker 1: They want to tell you what air conditioners you can use,
Speaker 1: or if you can't use them, And the same with
Speaker 1: the refrigerators and freezers, etc. And what straws you can
Speaker 1: drink out of. They wanted to raise taxes. Democrats just
Speaker 1: voted for the largest tax increase in history by voting
Speaker 1: against the largest tax cut in history, and they don't care.
Speaker 1: Democrats claim to be the party of working men and women,
Speaker 1: but they just voted against cutting taxes on tips and
Speaker 1: overtime and social security for old people. That's where their
Speaker 1: vote is. But this is very insightful in terms of,
Speaker 1: you know, a real threat to democracy and when you
Speaker 1: couple what Carvil is saying here, and I'm sure this
Speaker 1: opinion is shared by many Democrats, maybe not expressed as
Speaker 1: openly as he is, that this is something that they
Speaker 1: have They have periodically discussed and brought up, and I
Speaker 1: brought up many times during the election that this was
Speaker 1: a possibility. You better pay attention to it because I
Speaker 1: know that that's where the Democrats would want to go.
Speaker 1: And now that you see the real Democratic party emerging.
Speaker 1: In other words, things that Democrats would always believe but
Speaker 1: they kind of hide they they they would masquerade around
Speaker 1: and kind of you know, talk around the fringes of it.
Speaker 1: But now it's just white out. You know, it's right
Speaker 1: out in the open. Now you've got Marxist mum donni,
Speaker 1: you know, guy can and condemn global Antifada. The guy
Speaker 1: that wants to put higher taxes in rich whder neighborhoods,
Speaker 1: tax people according to their race. This is the guy
Speaker 1: that wants to defund dismantle the police. This is a
Speaker 1: guy that wants to send in social workers even for
Speaker 1: domestic disputes or people that are potentially violent in the
Speaker 1: subways or in Times Square. You know, then you've got
Speaker 1: other people. You got this guy Fata in Minneapolis, I mean,
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party in Minneapolis now willing to go against
Speaker 1: an incumbent mayor to elect this radical like mom Donnie,
Speaker 1: who've gone through his track record before. Then you've got AOC,
Speaker 1: You've got the squad, you got Jasmine Crockett, You've got
Speaker 1: Grandpa Bernie, You've got Pocahontas. They are the modern extreme
Speaker 1: Democratic Party. Do you doubt that these people have given
Speaker 1: power in Washington? Do you doubt that they would not
Speaker 1: try to pack the courts, the Supreme Court with liberal justices.
Speaker 1: Do you doubt that they would not act unilaterally? To
Speaker 1: add Puerto Rico and DC and declare statehood for both
Speaker 1: of them so they could gain four Senate seats so
Speaker 1: that they can keep power and perpetuity. Do you doubt
Speaker 1: that this party would not institutionalize wokeism. I mean, Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris openly believed in taxpayer funded sex change operations. Her
Speaker 1: running mate believed in free college tuition for illegals. Kamala
Speaker 1: wanted a taxpayer funded sex change operations for illegals and
Speaker 1: for convicts. Tim Walls wanted to put feminine hygiene products
Speaker 1: in grade school boys bathrooms. He wanted gender affirming care
Speaker 1: for minors without parental consent, and the same thing is
Speaker 1: being expressed by other prominent Democrats around the country. You know,
Speaker 1: this is Kamala Harris that said that the high cost
Speaker 1: of energy, which went so much higher under Biden Harris
Speaker 1: and their administration, was the cost of democracy, all because
Speaker 1: they were pursuing this radical green new deal, which is
Speaker 1: very reflective and very similar to Mamdanni, which is the
Speaker 1: womb to the tomb, cradle to grave society where you're
Speaker 1: going to have government provided let's see daycare and childcare
Speaker 1: and government provided preschool in kindergarten and government provided healthcare,
Speaker 1: And how's that working out for you? Obamacare? None of
Speaker 1: those promises were kept. Then they want to tax the rich.
Speaker 1: Billionaires shouldn't exist, Mamdani says, not only tax the rich,
Speaker 1: but then they're going to have you government guaranteed job,
Speaker 1: government guaranteed healthy foodment guaranteed retirement, government guaranteed at pretty
Speaker 1: much everything. Well, are they going to get the money
Speaker 1: to pay for this? And what has government done up
Speaker 1: to this point? Who somehow enhance your confidence in their
Speaker 1: ability to accomplish anything short of the military. They've screwed
Speaker 1: everything up, Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, they're all on the
Speaker 1: verge of insolvency and bankruptcy. Now it's going to be
Speaker 1: saved because of changes that are being made and reducing
Speaker 1: the rate of growth. Is not going to be any
Speaker 1: cuts in spite of the lies Democrats are telling. How
Speaker 1: is your local school system doing, especially if you're in
Speaker 1: a liberal city or a liberal town. You know, we
Speaker 1: pay more per capita for education for kids, we have
Speaker 1: the worst results. What does government do so well? Now
Speaker 1: that you want to give them more power, you want
Speaker 1: to give them more control, because I don't care what
Speaker 1: the hell you call it. If you want to call
Speaker 1: it socialist, redistributionism, statism, marxism, communism, doesn't matter what name
Speaker 1: you apply to it. It always ends the same, broken promises,
Speaker 1: more poverty and a loss of your personal freedoms, which
Speaker 1: you can calculate, you know, at some point down the
Speaker 1: road when you realize you suckered into nothing but a
Speaker 1: big lie and that this was a power grab for
Speaker 1: them because they want control of every aspect of your life.
Speaker 1: You know, if it's that's the choice between false security
Speaker 1: or freedom in life, Linda, I know this will impact
Speaker 1: you if you grew up and you grew up in Philly,
Speaker 1: and Howard Stern was on in Philly, But if you
Speaker 1: grew up in New York, as I did, it was
Speaker 1: like everybody would listen to Howard Stern and don Imus.
Speaker 1: Also don Imus was big and they both hated each other,
Speaker 1: which kind of made it even more interesting at the time.
Speaker 1: And story out today and I think they're denying it.
Speaker 1: But as of now that he his future is uncertain
Speaker 1: as Serious exem according to multiple reports and anyway, and
Speaker 1: he could exit Serious ExM after a twenty year run
Speaker 1: when his contract expires. According to the US Sun later
Speaker 1: this year, and according to sources now, Stern's contract is
Speaker 1: up in the fall, and Sirius apparently he's planning to
Speaker 1: make him an offer, but they don't intend for him
Speaker 1: to take it because he's making he had been making
Speaker 1: an astronomical amount of money. And anyway, it's so disappointing.
Speaker 1: Do you remember when I interviewed Stern on radio? I
Speaker 1: think he was here for like an hour, two hours,
Speaker 1: was in studio. I mean, that was the old Howard Stern.
Speaker 1: He was fun, he was lively, he was entertaining, you know,
Speaker 1: and then he also has this other side of him,
Speaker 1: which is neurotic as hell but funny as hell. And
Speaker 1: you know, I remember questioning him and asking him, you
Speaker 1: have more money than you ever dreamed of in your life,
Speaker 1: more money than you can spend in a lifetime. And
Speaker 1: I read that every day. And this was at the time.
Speaker 1: I don't think he does this now. Every day you
Speaker 1: go home from work and you go to your basement,
Speaker 1: you smoke weed and you watch TV. And then you
Speaker 1: spend like four days a week going to a shrink
Speaker 1: And I'm like, what the hell is going on here?
Speaker 1: You should be happy out and enjoying your life, and
Speaker 1: he goes, I know, I know, I know, So I
Speaker 1: don't really know. Maybe whatever trauma that he might have
Speaker 1: experienced as a kid made him a great radio host,
Speaker 1: but there's no disputing that he was a great radio host,
Speaker 1: and he was often brutal to people. Then Howard changed,
Speaker 1: and when he changed, he changed big time. And what's
Speaker 1: happened is there's every single person that I know and
Speaker 1: I grew up with that listen to him growing up.
Speaker 1: None of them listen to him anymore. None of them
Speaker 1: really care about him anymore. None of them can understand
Speaker 1: what the hell happened to him. I mean, let's listen
Speaker 1: to what he says about Donald Trump, but more importantly,
Speaker 1: what he says about Donald Trump voters.
Speaker 4: The oddity in all of this is the people Trump
Speaker 4: despises most love him the most. Go look at mar Lagos.
Speaker 4: See if there's any people that look like you. I'm
Speaker 4: talking to you in the audience that the Trump voter
Speaker 4: who idolizes the guy he despises you. I don't hate
Speaker 4: Donald Donald's doing his thing. I hate you for voting
Speaker 4: for him, for not having an intelligence, not aman to
Speaker 4: see what's going on with the coronavirus, not able to
Speaker 4: see what the Justice Department is doing. I hate you.
Speaker 4: I don't want you.
Speaker 1: Here, don't I don't agree with Trump politically. I don't
Speaker 1: think you should go anywhere near the White House. I
Speaker 1: don't hate the guy. I hate the people who vote
Speaker 1: for him. I hate that they're stupid. I'll be honest
Speaker 1: with you, I have no respect for you. He said
Speaker 1: all of this on his own show. Now, if you
Speaker 1: go back and you look at the people that really
Speaker 1: liked Howard back in the day, they were the blue
Speaker 1: collar construction workers. They were the taxi drivers back in
Speaker 1: the day.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: They were the people that would, you know, make the
Speaker 1: trek to work, and and those are the people that
Speaker 1: are benefiting the most under Trump policies. The old Howard
Speaker 1: Stern would have loved Donald Trump as president. The old
Speaker 1: I don't know what happened. It's like it's like invasion
Speaker 1: of the body snatchers. It's inexplicable to me. And this
Speaker 1: has now been building for a long period of time.
Speaker 1: When Hillary Clinton was running, he sucked up to Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 1: didn't give her a real interview, did the same thing
Speaker 1: with Kamala Harris in the more recent election and was
Speaker 1: kissing up to him. I remember one day tuning in
Speaker 1: and hearing him, you know, loving Leonard Dunham or Dunno,
Speaker 1: whatever her name is, you know, the person that I'm
Speaker 1: talking about, And I'm like, oh my gosh, what happened
Speaker 1: to him? I mean, that's the question. Why would you
Speaker 1: insult the very people that helped create all of this
Speaker 1: success and insult their intelligence intelligence. Look, if Howard wants
Speaker 1: to be a liberal, he can be a liberal. If
Speaker 1: he wants to support Hillary, he can support Hillary. If
Speaker 1: he wants to hide in his basement because he's scared
Speaker 1: to death of the coronavirus and lecture people how dumb
Speaker 1: they are not to take that stupid shot. I mean,
Speaker 1: is Howard ever addressed the fact that the government lied in,
Speaker 1: the government misled people, and the government had made promises
Speaker 1: about the COVID vaccine that if you get the shot,
Speaker 1: you're not going to get COVID. If you get the shot,
Speaker 1: you're not going to infect other people. Apparently went into hibernation.
Speaker 1: I know somebody that lives near him was in hibernation
Speaker 1: for three long years because he was so scared to
Speaker 1: death of getting COVID, and that eventually got it anyway,
Speaker 1: talked about it and didn't regret taking the shot. A
Speaker 1: lot of good that shot did him, and the promises
Speaker 1: that were made to him that you know, why isn't
Speaker 1: he mad at the government? And then he actually is
Speaker 1: comparing Trump to Hitler, his rhetoric to Hitler. And I'm
Speaker 1: just bewildered by the whole thing. I don't know what happened.
Speaker 1: You know when things started, when signs began to show,
Speaker 1: is you'd read on like page six, or you'd read
Speaker 1: in one of the New York papers that he was
Speaker 1: hanging out in the Hamptons. That was a bad sign.
Speaker 1: I've been to the Hampton. I don't like the Hamptons.
Speaker 1: I don't like the people in the Hamptons. I don't
Speaker 1: want anything to do with them. And that he was
Speaker 1: going to polo matches, and then he started kissing up
Speaker 1: to liberal politicians. And then he started like becoming the
Speaker 1: crazy cat lady down the street and has this large
Speaker 1: collection of cats, which you might sympathize with because you
Speaker 1: love cats, even though you overfeed them and they become
Speaker 1: so heavy they have to go to the cat fat
Speaker 1: farm to get skinny, which you did because your cat
Speaker 1: became four times the size of what a real cat
Speaker 1: should be.
Speaker 5: I think any cats forced to live with Howard Stern,
Speaker 5: I feel very sorry for ouch.
Speaker 2: That's mean.
Speaker 5: Yeah, he deserves it. He's scum.
Speaker 1: Wow, there real anger here.
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, I don't like him. The way he talked
Speaker 5: about people. You know what, I was not about it.
Speaker 5: I never supported all that covid crap. I'm not going
Speaker 5: to go into it right now because it would take
Speaker 5: me five hours to talk about how I feel. But
Speaker 5: you know this whole thing about you know, my body,
Speaker 5: my choice and all this BS. You know, he forgot
Speaker 5: where he came from. He really did. And he, let
Speaker 5: me tell you something, God put his hand on him
Speaker 5: and gave him a lot of opportunity that he sure
Speaker 5: as hell did not deserve. And then he's going to
Speaker 5: turn around and when he gets on America's got talent,
Speaker 5: he gets all woke as a joke and now, oh,
Speaker 5: I can't do this, and I can't. You know what,
Speaker 5: Just stay in your house and hide in your mask
Speaker 5: and live in your sye off. Like I'm done. I'm
Speaker 5: done with your BS, I'm done with your comments. Nobody
Speaker 5: cares the reason that your show is not being renewed
Speaker 5: is because you suck, and it's you've sucked for quite
Speaker 5: a while actually, and we've.
Speaker 1: Had just gone on a long time. It's just I mean,
Speaker 1: it's been it's been over a decade. It's like, as
Speaker 1: I said, Invasion of the Body Snappers. Let me play
Speaker 1: the cut of him, he says to me, the opposite
Speaker 1: of woke as being asleep. And if woke means I
Speaker 1: can't get behind Trump, which is what I think it means,
Speaker 1: or that I support people who want to be transgender,
Speaker 1: or I'm for the vaccine, dude, call me, uh woke
Speaker 1: as as much as you effing want, he said. The
Speaker 1: problem is nobody really cares if adults make decisions about
Speaker 1: being transgender. I knew, I know, Caitlyn Jenner, I have
Speaker 1: to interrupt you.
Speaker 5: We care if our taxpayer dollars or used to fund it.
Speaker 5: I don't give a riple do with your own mind.
Speaker 1: Oh we care about that too, But we also care
Speaker 1: about whether or not, like in the case of Tim Walls,
Speaker 1: who I guess he voted for, is willing to give
Speaker 1: gender affirming care unlike other states too, young adult young
Speaker 1: people without parental consent. That part I have a big
Speaker 1: problem with the not your children. We don't hand our
Speaker 1: children over to the government. You know, if he wants
Speaker 1: to take the COVID vaccine, take the COVID vaccine. You
Speaker 1: want to believe the big lie. You know, believe the
Speaker 1: big lie. You still got COVID even though you were
Speaker 1: hiding out for three years. But if but is not defined,
Speaker 1: then he went on about the whole bud bud Light controversy,
Speaker 1: and he said, you know that if woke means not
Speaker 1: being mad at bud Light for partnering with Dylan mulvainy
Speaker 1: or getting the COVID vaccine, or supporting gay rights along
Speaker 1: with programs like Social Security, medicare what bothers me. In
Speaker 1: part of that statement, he doesn't understand what conservatism really is,
Speaker 1: You know, conservatism. I never told people what to do
Speaker 1: in terms of getting the shot or not getting the shot.
Speaker 1: I said, take it seriously, talk to your doctor. I
Speaker 1: don't know a damn thing about your medical condition, whether
Speaker 1: you have comorbidities, pre existing conditions, I said, but make it.
Speaker 1: Make an informed choice and understand that there are people
Speaker 1: out there that are very worried about an experimental vaccine
Speaker 1: that they'd never used. Before using mRNA technology.
Speaker 5: How does a guy who used to watch models vibrate
Speaker 5: on base speakers get off telling anybody about elections, politics
Speaker 5: or vaccines. Why don't you take the Michael Jordan route
Speaker 5: and be a DJ, a radio talk show host that
Speaker 5: talks about culture, pop culture and things of that nature,
Speaker 5: and do that and stay in your wheelhouse. Because Michael
Speaker 5: Jordan was very smart. He said, I don't talk about politics.
Speaker 5: I make sneakers, I play sports. And you know what,
Speaker 5: people from both sides of the island, all walks of life,
Speaker 5: they wear sneakers, they buy sneakers, they watch sports, they
Speaker 5: buy tickets to watch sports. Thank you very much and
Speaker 5: good night.
Speaker 1: That was has false impressions because conservatives like me support
Speaker 1: choice on issues involving personal health. Conservatives like me, you know,
Speaker 1: I don't care what adults how they choose to live
Speaker 1: their life. The bud Light controversy is bud Light not
Speaker 1: knowing who their audience is and the fact that people,
Speaker 1: you know, Dylan Mulvainy never rank bud Light. That was
Speaker 1: the most ironic part of that whole story. And Republicans
Speaker 1: and conservatives are not against maybe some are, but they're
Speaker 1: not against gay rights. They're just they don't want their
Speaker 1: kids indoctrinated in school and a value system, especially when
Speaker 1: kids can't read, write through math, science and don't know
Speaker 1: any history. And if you listen to Donald Trump, he said, no,
Speaker 1: we're going to We're going to save social Security and
Speaker 1: Medicare and Medicaid. Rather, I don't know, but.
Speaker 5: Stephen Colbert in twenty fifteen, Howard Stern was singing Trump's praises.
Speaker 5: It just became, you know, not so cool to do
Speaker 5: it because some other people said, Hey, that's not cool.
Speaker 5: Don't do that. Listen to this.
Speaker 2: You couldn't actually be the president.
Speaker 6: Yeah, the country is doing very poorly, and we will
Speaker 6: make the country do well.
Speaker 2: Do you really want to be president?
Speaker 4: Because I look at your life, especially what's going on
Speaker 4: down in Bralago and stuff.
Speaker 2: Now to step down like the White House is a
Speaker 2: horrible place to live compared to your mar A Lago. Seriously,
Speaker 2: won't get Robin Howard's been saying this to me for
Speaker 2: two years. I know you already lived the life. Yeah,
Speaker 2: you're not gonna be impressed with it. And so the
Speaker 2: fact that you want to be president it means you
Speaker 2: actually might want to do something. Yeah, that's very true.
Speaker 6: It's not gonna happen to me.
Speaker 1: Could you if you see a little inkling of it?
Speaker 2: Robin, the two of you immediately called me. You around, Yeah,
Speaker 2: listen back. But no, I've seen it so often.
Speaker 6: And I see people I support people, and they're these
Speaker 6: great people, men, women, and then they get to Washington
Speaker 6: and they I guess they look up at these beautiful
Speaker 6: buildings and they get medatar I am, and yeah, they're
Speaker 6: afraid to do anything.
Speaker 2: What are you going to do day one? Let's say
Speaker 2: you pull this off and you become president day what
Speaker 2: you know what I'm gonna do about President?
Speaker 6: I'm gonna do a great job. That's what I'm gonna
Speaker 6: There's so many things we're gonna do, but we're gonna
Speaker 6: do it.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna stop this. We're coming up on the constraints
Speaker 1: and time here. But look what he's done for working
Speaker 1: men and women. No tax on tips over time, so security,
Speaker 1: largest tax increase in history. He's he's controlled our borders
Speaker 1: so unvetted illegals, including terrorists, murderers, rapist, gang members, and
Speaker 1: cartel members and drug dealers can't get in the country.
Speaker 1: He's moving US towards energy dominance, which means that's going
Speaker 1: to create a lot of high paying career jobs thirteen
Speaker 1: trillion dollars or I'm sorry, fifteen trillion dollars in committed
Speaker 1: moneys for manufacturing, which is going to help working men
Speaker 1: and women. How did this guy get so far away
Speaker 1: from who he once was? Or maybe he always was
Speaker 1: this person and he just hit it and played a game,
Speaker 1: but now it's like serious for him. Here's the problem.
Speaker 1: I don't think any of his old audience is going
Speaker 1: to give a flying rip that he's leaving radio if
Speaker 1: he leaves radio eight hundred ninety four to one shown,
Speaker 1: especially when you're insulting people the way, kind of like
Speaker 1: Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Kimmel. Jimmy Kimmel's another jackass.