WEBVTT - He's Always Red Zone Guy

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice.

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Now along with the guys from fanball dot Com. Here's

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the host for Fantasy Football Weekly. It is time for

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>America's longest running fantasy show, Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm your host,

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Paul charge in fanball dot Com. I co hosts are

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Christian Peterson and Brian Johnson. Hello, gentlemen, PRX, how are

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you hello? Friends? I am doing well because it is

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>week nine. It is uh, this is this is for

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>many teams. This is sort of make or break. You're

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>like a three win operation right now. You need this game, trouble,

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you need this game. We're here for you. The playoffs

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>start for a lot of people in some ways. Yeah,

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're getting to that point point of the season.

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Over the course of today, we're gonna break down every

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>game fantasy style. We give letter grades for every meaningful player,

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>whole letter grades for every player, and the rationale for

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>each whole letter grade, so you can decide whether or

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>not you agree. Why are you looking at me when

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you say that no reason we give you nine players

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>upon whom you can take a chance. Later in the show,

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll answer three tough questions. Will jump into our time machine, cep.

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>If you heard our time machine yet, I have not, Baby,

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we have upgraded from the Blamo time Machine significantly better

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>than Yeah, that is and it kind of turns into

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of like a Chicago Bulls basketball game

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>right at the end, you know, like that part's a

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>little weird. But this is up until then, it was great,

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>way off topic. But if you ever look at the

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Bulls will go upside down? Yeah, what is it supposed

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to be? As I heard that? I don't know if

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I can say it on the radio. Still look at

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bulls will go upside Down't all right? Well maybe

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I should have done that a while. I go from

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the time machine. By the way, like if we can

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>run the time machine, and we're gonna go with the

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Bulls theme if it if it's a time machine, has

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to be related to the Bulls. Let's make Michael Jordan

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a tight end. Let's plant the seed inception style in

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>his mind that he loves football and he should be

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a tight end. Michael Jordan could have been if maybe

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>an awesome tight end in the NFL, it would have

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>been a lot more interesting than the whole baseball first

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>when he got when he got banned from the NBA,

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>when he got quote banned from the NBA. That was

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely not gambling related. Yeah that yeah, that band, I

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>remember that. Let's jump into the matchups, beginning with Tennessee

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>taking on Carolina. Christian this feels like a solid game

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>for Derrick Henry to me, what do you think? Yeah,

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>solid game for the running backs here and really not

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>much else on either side. Let's start with Derrick Henry.

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>This projects is a big game for him. The Panthers

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>allow four point nine yards per carry. They've given up

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a league leading ten running back rushing scores. Just last week,

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the forty niners destroyed Carolina for two hundred and six

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards five total tds. Derrick Henry gets an easy

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:08.119
<v Speaker 1>A grade here. Not so much for the passing game.

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Ryan tanny Hill has actually been pretty good touchdown passes

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in two starts, but Carolina knows how to stop the

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>pass They haven't led a QB throw for more than

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>two touchdown passes all year. They've held five of seven

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>passers two hundred eight yards or less. I think you

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>can find a better player and a better matchup than

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Tanny Hill, so I've got him on the bench. Same

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>for Corey Davis and A J. Brown. It's tough to

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 1>rely on either one of these guys. A couple of

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, it looked like Davis was going to emerge

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in tanny Hills first start, and then he laid an

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>egg the last start. So one catch last week. Yeah,

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>he's only topped forty four yards and two of his

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>last seven games he's he just has to be on

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Same with A J. Brown. His snap braid

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>is still hovering in the sixty to sixty five percent

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>range or fewer yards and five of his last seven games.

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>The Panthers secondary has given up some big games to

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>two guys. DJ Shark a hundred and sixty four yards

0:03:59.920 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and two touchdowns and Chris Godwin twice went for over

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and twenty yards and they've shut everybody else down.

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's just nothing here, uh to make me think

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that Corey Davis or a J. Brown are going to

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>break out. They've got a they've got a nice Panthers.

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>You've got a nice one two punch of cornerback they're

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>developing in Bradbury and uh Um Cockrell as a as

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to right. Uh John H. Smith at tight end hopefully

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>will not have to deal with either one of those guys.

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>He led Tennessee and Targets with seven catches six yards

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight last week and scored a touchdown, all with

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Delaney Walker sideline. Walker is still likely out. In fact,

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>officially it's officially out there we go and the Panthers

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>gave up eighty six yards to George Kittle last week,

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>eighty two yards and a touchdown to Tampa's Tampa's tight

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>ends the week before that, So I gave a B

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.559
<v Speaker 1>grade to John Smith. Let's go to the Panthers side.

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey an easy a starter here. The Titans are

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>good against the run. They allow you less than four

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry, but it doesn't matter. McCaffrey's an a

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>every week. The passing game, I've got Kyle Allen on

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Alan just can't be trusted. The matchup isn't horrible.

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston and Philip Rivers have each top three yards

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>with two touchdowns in the last two weeks against the Titans.

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>But I can't do it for Kyle Allen. Just a

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards per game with three touchdowns since that great

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>debut that he had in Week three. So he's on

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the bench just enough here for a starting grade on

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>d J Moore. He has at least eight targets in

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>three straight games. With that kind of usage, I think

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>he can start him against the secondary that just got

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>torched for a hundred yards and two touchdowns by Mike

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Evans last week. They could be missing one of their

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>starting cornerbacks, Adrey Jackson for the second straight week. So

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I've got a starting grade on DJ Moore. Not so

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.799
<v Speaker 1>much on Curtis Samuel, who may or may not play

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in this game. He's questionable. It sounds like they're saying

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>they think he's gonna play. He hasn't been good enough

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to justify the risk that he starts this game and

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't finish it because of that injury. Tight End Greg Olsen,

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I've got on the bench on He had a big

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>outburst in Week three, but has done literally nothing since then.

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Eight catches for seventy yards in the last four games.

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>He is on your bench. All right. Let's take a

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>look at Indianapolis taking on the Pittsburgh Steelers. No t

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Y Hilton this week and probably for a few weeks.

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you think at Jacobi Prissett, who quietly been

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the most reliable Fantasy producers at the quarterback position.

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.559
<v Speaker 1>But Brian, without t Y Hilton, you're taking the best

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>receiver off the field. Yeah, without a doubt, by a mile.

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>T Y Hilton the best receiver on the team. Let's

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about the guys behind him. Zach Pascal was the

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>number two receiver when Hilton was healthy. It looked like

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>played as number two. Played played over the snaps last week.

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Following is a hundred yard outing in Week seven. Then

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of course there's Paris Campbell, Dion Kane. It's a mess.

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Though I didn't like the matchup for Hilton, I was

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna bench Pascal of Hilton played, I will give a

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>pascalice c. But no opposing wide receiver has topped eighty

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>yards against Pittsburgh since Week one. Um only three wide

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>receivers have topped five catches against the Steelers all season.

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh Stephen nell Sin and the somewhat resurrected Iron Hayden

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of the years past dust Off the nickname have only

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>allowed touched Iron. Fitzpatrick went after him on the Monday

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>night game and had some success throwing at Hayden. He

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>did uh, Albert Wilson did score touchdown on Hayden. I believe,

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>but again I'm just I'm not. I'm worried about all

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the receivers for the Coals. I'll give Pascal to Sea,

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>but you gotta see who rises between Dion Kane, Paris Campbell,

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>those guys that are on the bench for me um

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Eric Ebron and give him a CEE. Pittsburgh has surrendered

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>some nice box scores to opposing tight end units. Seattle

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>tight ends had six catches for sixty three yards and

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns, basically George Kittle at six for fifty seven.

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore tight ends combined for nine catches seventy seven yards,

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Chargers tight ends combined for nine catches a

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifteen yards and two touchdowns. So see you

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>for Ebron. I was gonna bench Jack Doyle, but now

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that t Y Hilton's out, Hilton has the third most

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>targets inside the ten yard line this year. That brings

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Doyle into play, doesn't it bring Ebron even more to play?

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>He's always read zone guy. Yeah, but he's just so

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>bad though. Yeah, he season play, he's in play. But okay,

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll give them Ebron and Jack Doyle both whole hard sees.

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, I like it. That's a definitive answer, thank you.

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh Jacoby Rissette. Canna give him a C. Two. Since

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>acquiring Minca Fitzpatrick, Pittsburgh has not allowed more than two

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns in a game, and three of the five

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks um they faced and acquiring Minca were held under

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>two under passing yards. So uh se for Brissette, and

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna give him a SE even with t

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Y Hilton playing, so it's not a great match up

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>for him and Marlon Mack. Very quickly, I'll give him

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a B. Even though Pittsburgh has only allowed one rushing

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>touchdown to running back over the last four games and

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>no loan back has topped sixty two rushing yards during

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>that span. The Steelers are also holding running back to

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>under forty five receiving yards per game, and that's really

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>more of a concern for Nahem Hines, not Mac. So

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Mac not a great matchup for him, but the volume

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:55.719
<v Speaker 1>will be there. So we get to the b um

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>who's probably not gonna be there for Pittsburgh. Is James

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Conner now listed as doubt full with the shoulder injury.

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's just assume he does not play. That would put

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Samuels in the starting role. He took all the

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>first team reps at practice on Friday. Benny Snell is

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>not going either, so this could be. It could be

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 1>a game for Jalen Samuels And if you're not deeper

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>leagues and really hurting for running back, Trey Edmonds would

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>be the the ad. But that's that's very deep. But

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>not a great matchup for Samuel's uh No loan opposing

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>back as top ninety rushing yards against the Colts this

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>year and they've only surrendered one running back touchdown over

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>their last five games, and no loan back has top

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty receiving yards or scored through the air since Week

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>one against the Colts. So just to see for Samuel's

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>even though he should be the starter in this one,

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Hona give Juju would be Volume has been a bit

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of an issue with Mason Rudolph at quarterback, but if

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Juju can see seven to eight targets, he should be

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in line for a very good game. Only five opposing

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers have seen seven or more targets against Indie,

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and those rackenan Allen who had eight for one, three

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and one, Julio Jones eight one, Tyroll Williams three for

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty six and one, Byron Ringle six one oh three

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>for one, and DeAndre Hopkins for nine, one oh six

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and one. And they're also been four wide receivers you

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>see six targets. Three of those four hit at least

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.079
<v Speaker 1>seventy receiving yards, so that's probably your floor for Juju here,

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>but there is a ceiling um Deante Johnson. Nice call

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>last week by the chart take a chance my wide

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>receiver not playing the Dolphins this week though I got

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>him on the bench in in this matchup, but he

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>should be rostered in in most leagues and vans McDonald.

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>He's been pretty bad since scoring twice in uh Rudolph's debut,

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>just ten targets over his last four games, but it's

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a good matchup. Though. The Colts have allowed a seventy

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>completion rate to tight ends. That's the seventh highest mark

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in the league, and that's led to uh per game

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>average of six catches and six yards. The position, So

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I'll give McDonald to see if he doesn't get it

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>done here, he's probably droppable, and Mason Rudolph he's on

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the bench. The Colts have allowed one or zero passing

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns and more than half their games, and Rudolph has

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 1>failed to throw for more than two thirty yards in

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>any game this year. The least interesting game of the

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>weekend is Washing Been taking on Buffalo, and this won't

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>take long. There's only one Washington redskin you care about.

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>That's Adrian Peterson under Bill Callaghan. His usage has doubled, doubled,

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and he's actually rewarded Callahan with four point eight yards

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>per carry in the three Bill Callahan games. Those are

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>great numbers for Adrian. But it's Dwayne Hatskins making his

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>first ever start, so you know the game plan will

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 1>go through Adrian, for sure. But the defense knows that

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo has allowed a back to score in six of

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>their seven games. So I think Adrian finds his way

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>just through volume. I think he finds his way to

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a decent game here, and I've got a B grade

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>on him. Both Haskins at the helm. The entire passing

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>attack is on the bench, and the only guy you

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>would have atempted to start is Terry McLaurin. We'll talk

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>about him. His prospects are tremendously bleak. No opposing receivers

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>hit one hundred yards against Buffalo, only two have scored

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>all year, and he likely draws one of the toughest

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>matchups in the NFL against Tradevius White, who has limited

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>opposing passers to completion percentage and the lowest passer rating

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 1>of any cornerback in the league. Terry McLaren does he

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>does he need a nicknames White? Yeah, he probably does.

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I was on White House. I'm like,

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't make any sense. I like the I like

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the white out white Out. You could get white House.

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>That is pretty good. Get white House man. Well, let's

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.719
<v Speaker 1>work on that first. Let's work shop that work work

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>shopping it on air. Right now, let's go to the

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo side, where Josh Allen gets a be entering the

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>game with exactly two touchdowns in three straight easy games,

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and here comes another easy matchup, Washington, allowing the fifth

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>most passing touchdowns. Now, Washington's got one really good cornerback,

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Quentin Dunbar. Everybody else in the secondary cornerback safeties. They're

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>all awful. Josh Norman is completely cooked. Jimmy Moreland's last

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 1>name looks like the league's most literal example of what

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a player allows in his coverage. More Land, So, yes,

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. Yeah, that's right. Josh Allen gets

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a B, and so does John Brown. He's hauled in

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>at least five passes in six of seven games. He's

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>averaging seventy six yards per game. Those are very safe, solid, low,

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>high floor numbers. Brown will most often face Redskins cornerback

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Josh Norman and who has already given up five scores

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>in his coverage this year. Staying with the passing game,

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Cole Beasley gets a C grade. He rolls into this

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>matchup with touchdowns and back to back games, and again

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>favorable matchup. Here a lineup against slot cornerback Fabian Moreau,

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>who is allowing seven percent of his passes in his

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>coverage to be completed. He's only been credited with one

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>pass breakup on the season. Fabian Moreau, So we'll start

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Cole Beasley if you need to, then let's go to

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 1>the running game. Frank Gore gets a B because the

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Skins have been obliterated by opposing running backs. They allow

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the most rushing attempts, the fourth most rushing yards, and

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Gore still getting the lie and share of the rushing work.

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Very safe floor here. The last two teams to face

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins ran the ball thirty six and thirty three times.

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Gore is getting almost all the work he's set for

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>an easy twenty carries and probably more. Then let's talk

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>about Devin Singletary, also startable with a C grade. He's

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to this point mostly been used as a receiver, including

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>last week when he got targeted six times. Washington allows

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the second most receptions seventh most receiving yards to running backs.

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I think his explosive play here gives him a chance

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to turn a short pass into a touchdown. And if

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo is gonna run the ball thirty plus times like

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the last two opponents, Frank Court is not running at

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty times, So I think Devin Singletary chips and some

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>carries as well. Everything charge, Hey, that's me. Everything charged

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>available at fanball dot com. But going to fanball dot

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>com slash charts you get instant access to my free

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>weekly rankings, my free one thousand dollar weekly contest, all

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of our podcast and it's your portal to fantasy auctions

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>fanball dot com slash a chart. Coming up next, it's

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a segment we called take a Chance on Me. Nine

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>players who wouldn't normally start but you can. This week,

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to Fantasy Football Weekly, Fantasy Equetball Weekly returns

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>on Paul Archi in. My co hosts are Brian Johnson

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and Christian Peterson. You're gonna hear from them momentarily. It

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is time for our very very royalty free version of

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>take a Chance on Me. When these three sleeper quarterbacks

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>running back to receivers hit paid dirt, you pay us nothing,

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>which is the exact same amount of what we paid

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>for this song, which is definitely positively in a very

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>legally binding way, not abbas classic take a Chance on

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Me song. We begin at the quarterback position. Brian Johnson,

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>who is your take a chance in the quarterback? All right,

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>this isn't the boldest of calls. I usually like to

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>try to go pretty deep, but I'm gonna go Matt

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Stafford at Oakland UM Oakland pretty good run defense. They're

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>essentially funneling all of the plays from the opposition to

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the past, and for that reason, they are allowing nearly

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>three passing yards per game and three passing touchdowns per game.

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Over their last two games, they've allowed eight passing touchdowns,

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>saying and uh nearly of Stafford's pass attempts or twenty

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>plus yards. That is the highest clip in the league.

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>And Oakland has surrendered the second most twenty plus yard

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>completions at thirty five, So that math adds up nicely

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>for me. Matt Stafford say that he's my number three

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>quarterback this week, by the way, I was gonna say,

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on him over every other quarterback. He's

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>my number one, is my number one. Matthew Stafford went

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>undrafted in most fantasy leagues, and I went back and

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>looked at my my preseason rankings. I had him at

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, and we all thought they were gonna We

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>believed him. We thought they were gonna run the ball.

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>But it turns out they can't run the ball, so

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>they have to pass. And Stafford has been good working

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>out j though news came out on Friday, very gross

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>not don't get involved. Don't get involved in that. That

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>is not even a three tough question. That's just don't

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>do it all right, Christian, you take a chance to

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>me quarterback. Yeah, I'm gonna go with Sam Donald this week.

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Not because I really like Sam Donald's game or his

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>seven interceptions over the last two games, but because of

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>his opponent. This is this is your weekly take a

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>chance on me cheet code at quarterback Dolphins. Every quarterback

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to face Miami has thrown at least two touchdown passes.

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins allow over two hunter and sixty passing yards per

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>game despite yielding the third fewest passing attempts. So if

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>case Keenum, Josh Allen, and Mason Rudolph can all toss

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdown passes against Miami, soaking Sam Donald, he probably can.

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>It takes a little gutch because of how badly he's

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>played lately, but it's Miami. Derek Carr is throwing multiple

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>touched down by the way, use Derek Carr last week

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>going back to the well again garbage Town. He's thrown

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdowns and four of the past five games and

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a juicy matchup against the Detroit Lions team seeing the

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>second most passes per game forty Do you get that

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of volume from Car? He remains very safe and

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>especially if Darius Slay can't go their stark cornerback. Without

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Darius Slay, that whole secondary is just garbage. Over the

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>past two weeks without Slay, Kirk Cousins and Daniel Jones

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>have combined for eight touchdowns and six hundred sixty yards.

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>A great opportunity for Derek Carr. Let's go to the

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>running back position, Brian, I've got Phillies Miles Sanders at

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>home against the Bears, who have yielded the fifth most

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>perceptions to running backs in the fourth most red zone

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>targets of the position. Sanders has proven to be a

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>very good pass catcher. Just look at the fact that

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:54.479
<v Speaker 1>he has more catches of yards than Julio Jones, Odell Beckham,

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fitzgerald, Adam Theeland, Michael Thomas, Juju Smith, Schuster, and

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins. Was our first round right there, baby Yeah.

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 1>And Chicago's run defense has gone south thought. They've allowed

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>six rushing touchdowns running backs over the last three. Of course,

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Howard in his revenge game, but Standers will still

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>get some work on the ground as well. So I

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>got him as my take onm rb Okay, Christian, I

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>am sticking with this Jets Dolphins game. I'm single handedly

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>making it so that people can pay attention to this game.

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>The O and eight Dolphins against the one and is

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a one and six or one in seven Jets. I'm

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Mark Walton running back for the Dolphins.

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>He played eight percent of the snaps last week, and

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that was before they traded Kenyan Drake away. It's his

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>backfield garbage. He's garbage. But the only issue is he's

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>still getting some carries at the stripe, which is super annoying.

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But Walton has been pretty good. He's averaging over four

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry, has been targeted thirteen times in the

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>passing game, and that was with Drake involved, so figures

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to be even more involved in the passing game here.

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>The Jets allow an average of one rushing touchdown per game.

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>They've let five different backs catch five passes or more

0:19:57.760 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>against them. We just talked about how Walton will be

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>involved in the passing games and blotched actively does not

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>want to catch if you have to throw passes at

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 1>him and he'll just like arms out right. Yeah, And

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>this is this is the rare game where the Dolphins

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>may not be in desperation catchup mode. They might be

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 1>able to try to establish the run a little bit.

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Walton will gets you know, fifteen sixteen touches here,

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>so let's roll with them. I'm a little bit worried

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>if if Mark Wallen's any good, they'll bench him. Could

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>be so I think a weird spot where if he's

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>doing too well, they'll just set him down. You can't

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:31.959
<v Speaker 1>they can't trade you anymore. Now if you're too good,

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll bench you. Would be devastating for them to win.

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>It would be devastating to their chances. Uh there, there there.

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Their primary goal in Miami this year's to get that

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>first pick. For Alexander Madison has at least forty nine

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>yards rushing in five games this year, including three of

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>his last four. Your backup to Dalvin Cook and he

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 1>goes up against the Chiefs their bottom five in rushing yards,

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards, fantasy points allowed to running backs and get

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>this opponent's backup run backs have scored four times in

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the last three Chiefs games. This is a great opportunity.

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>If you gotta go fere bye week, you got to

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>find a backup. Was on the waiver wire and by

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the way, Alexander Madison probably at this point as they're

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>starting to look more towards handcuffing season in fantasy football.

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>He's one of the two or three most valuable handcuffs

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>out there. Alexander Madison, you could pick him up and

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 1>start him this week. Let's go to the receivers. Brian,

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>who you got. I'm going back to the point orgy

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in Oakland. I'm taking Detroit's Danny Ammendla, who has become

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a big part of Detroit's offense since the running game

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>has disappeared. Over the last two weeks, he has nineteen

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>targets for sixteen catches and two hundred yards, and Oakland

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>has allowed a sixty seven pc completion rate on slot

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>targets for six five yards and five touchdowns. Okay, I

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like it. I'm gonna go with the tight end here

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>instead of a wide receiver. Cameron Braid going up against

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks this week. O. J. Howard is still nursing

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a hamstring injury, hasn't practiced this week, is unlikely to play.

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>That brings Bright into the crosshairs. He was targeted six

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 1>times with Howard out of the lineup last week. He

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't do much with that, but I like the match

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>up here. Seattle has been killed by tight ends this year.

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>They have allowed the fifth most receptions the third most

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 1>yards to the position. In the last four games, opposing

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>tight ends have averaged over a hundred yards per game

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>against them. And it's not like it's really good tight ends,

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it's bad Ones. Gerald ever at a hundred and thirty

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>six yards, c j used almost sixty six yards, Austin Hooper,

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>he's good sixty five and a touchdown, Ricky Seals Jones

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>scored a touchdown. Vince McDonald scored two touchdowns. Cameron Bright

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end this week just quickly related Hooper. Somebody was

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>asking me Um doing Chicago radio this week, who's the

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>biggest surprise of the year, And I started to think

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>things through. It's a super chalky year, like the you know,

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the good running backs are the good running backs. Normally

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>every year it's a bunch of just you know, out

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of the woodwork running backs. Not this year, maybe maybe,

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>but els trailed off so much in the last month

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that I can't count Deckler. I went Ston Hooper, he

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>is Hooper is wide receiver nine in PPR. Yeah, he's

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>tight end one. He's wide receiver nine. And he went

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>off the board on average as tight end twelve in

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the preseason. Well, you have two good games last year,

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>like two really good games here, like he was a

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>consistent performer, but he just like what the bed in

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>every other game. But yeah, not the case. I think

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>it's name feels like he's like the mailman or something.

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Well from Mr Hooper from Sesame wasn't a Sesame Street

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>probably was. He's still around. I don't know. Did this

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>is his son? You know Sesame Street has been on

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>so long, there's probably been like five Mr Hooper, five

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>guys who have played Mr Hooper. That's my guests. Uh,

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>final take a chance on me is a guy we've

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>used before and a guy that we are absolutely locked

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in on, Chris Conley. If we bother to mention his

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>name on this show, you started because we've nailed his

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>three good outings all year and we're calling another one here.

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Over the last two weeks, averaging ninety three yards and

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a score Texas, the Texans secondary is obliterated by injury.

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>They've surrendered a league high thirteen scores one two yards

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 1>per game to opposing receivers, and Conley's going to end

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>up missing two of the starting three cornerbacks. Bradley Roby

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>is out. Lonnie Johnson is out, which is actually too

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>bad because Lonnie Johnson might have been the worst cornerback

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in the in the NFL, we're starting cornerback. He's out

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>in this game as well. Chris Conley sitting in potentially

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>another in a series of good games. Let's work in

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>one final matchup into this segment. It is Houston Chake

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>taking on Jackson, billed the aforementioned Chris Conley's name Convenience. Yeah,

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>do you want to if you want to start there?

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>You can if you want, absolutely why not? And you didn't?

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>You didn't even mention that Houston now has lost J. J.

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Watt as well. Yeah, great point. Yeah, there's the pass

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for us impacted right there. Yeah, so Conley is in

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>for sure, as is DJ Shark. Targeted twelve times last week,

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>he scored for the sixth time in eight games. I

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>don't need to say anymore about this. DJ Shark is

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>an easy, a level starter that brings Gardner Minshew into play.

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I gave him a B again. Houston just lost J. J. Watt.

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>They weren't good before they lost him, surrendering averages of

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 1>three and three yards and three point to five touchdowns

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 1>per game to the last four quarterbacks they faced. Minshew

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>was off there for a little couple of weeks, didn't

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>play real well, and bounced back last week with that

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>three touchdown performance. Yep, he's back in the lineup here

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>with a B starting grade. That brings us to the

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>running game, Leonard four Net. I gave him an A.

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 1>It's based on volume here. He still has just one

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>touchdown these two teams met back in Week two. He

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>rushed for forty seven yards added another forty through the air.

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>Houston is actually much better against the run than they

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>are against the pass, yielding just seventy four rushing yards

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>per game and only two rushing scores. So I don't

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>love four net ceiling here. But because of volume, he's

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a guy that you're gonna put in there every week.

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So I gave him an A grade. If if if

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>there was something between an A and a B, it

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>would probably be that. But I'm gonna give him or

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a soft day. Yeah, that's a whole I just want

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to thank you for not speaking in Cockney, by the way,

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>shakingly said in Jacksonville. Jacksonville because it's it's the early

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>London game too, so be sure to note the early

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>start time in that. Yeah. On the other side of

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>this early start game London game is are they are

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the Texans with Deshaun Watson. Now this is a little

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>weird because again, these two teams played in Week two

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>and and Houston didn't do much of anything. But you

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>can't possibly even dream of benching Deshaun Watson. He's an

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a level start here, sixth in passing yards, second in

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns. They had been rushing yards first and rushing

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns among QB's in a level start everywhere Jalen Ramsey

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>at the time. So they did a sizeable loss for

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the Jacksonville second Yeah, big part of the reason why

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>they held DeAndre Hopkins to just five catches and forty

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>yards in that previous matchup. Now he's been Hopkins has

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>been targeted at least twelve times in three straight at

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>least nine catches in each of those games. He is

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>also an easy a level start. We are not going

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>to roll with Kenny Stills this week after he disappointed

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody last week just three catches on five targets against

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>this secondary that is still pretty good even without Ramsey.

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to go any deeper than DeAndre Hopkins

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>except at tight end, where Darren Fells is in the mix. Here,

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I gave him a B level starting grade. Point the

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Snaps last week fifty eight yards two touchdowns, and the

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars have allowed some big tight end games this year.

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey went for eighty eight yards to Laney Walker

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty four and from out of nowhere last week Ryan

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Griffin sixty six yards and two touchdowns. So Darren Fells

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I gave a B level starting grade. Finally, the running game,

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Hyde. Yeah, the Jaguars run Carlos hide it does

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's gonna get twenty plus touches, He's gonna

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>get seventy five or eighty yards and a coin flips

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>chance at a touchdown, So I gave him a B

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>level starting grade. The yuck that is yuck. Did we

0:27:57.400 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>get Duke Johnson in there? Duke Johnson I have on

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the hasn't top ten touches in a game. He has

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>scored twice in the last three games. He did nothing

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in the week two matchups, so he's just not getting

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.719
<v Speaker 1>enough volume from me. Did they have a third rounder

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the Texans, and then and then they're not using it.

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>It's when your head coaches of the GM. That's what happens.

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Now you got no kidding and you give away Jadavian

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Clowney and YadA, YadA YadA. Did you know fan Ball

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>has daily fantasy auctions, Yes, auctions. You love auctioning in

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the preseason. You will love auctioning for this weekend's games.

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Fanball auctions. They're fast paced, they're frantic, incredibly fun as

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you've been on four players simultaneously against your opponents. And yes,

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you you can win money with fan ball auctions, but

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>play fanball auctions just because they're so much fun. Coming

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>up next Sun Fantasy Football Weekly, we will break down

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>more matchups, including Detroit taking on the Oakland Raiders. Will

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you what to expect from Josh Jacobs in that

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>matchup when we return. You are listening to Fantasy Football

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Weekly High Am Paul Giarchie and my co hosts are

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Christian Peterson and Brian Johnson from famball dot Com. You

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>can hear us over the air and many stations around

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the country, and this show is also a podcast available

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>every Friday on all major podcasting platforms, including the number

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>one destination for podcasts, the I Heart Radio app. Guys,

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>let's dive into a few more, few more matchups, including

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Detroit taking on the Oakland Raiders. Brian we alluded to

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>this earlier Detroit not able to get a running game going.

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I've got to believe you don't like any of the

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>running backs, but you love the passing game here. Oh yeah,

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with Kenny Holiday, who gets a birth day.

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>His birthday is on Sunday, his real life birthday, baby

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>birthday bonus up against Oakland, allowing the fourth most yards

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>per game. Two wide receivers and opposing number ones have

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>blown up the block box score over the last three weeks. DeAndre,

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>they've blown out the candles are blown up the box.

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I wish I want that, all right, Well, just trying

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to help you did. Yeah, the Raiders are the gift

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that keeps on giving on your On Kenny Golladay's birthday, Yeah,

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>they gave gifts to DeAndre Hopkins eleven catches for a

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred nine yards, marqueesz Valdez Scandling who was the number

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>one receiver in that game, one thirty three and a touchdown,

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and then Allen Robinson had seven for nine seven and

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>two over the last three weeks, so easy A for

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the birthday boy, Kenny Golladay. Marvin Jones gets a B.

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders traded starting cornerback Garyon Connley to Houston recently,

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>which has pushed Trayvon Connley into a starting role. Conley

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>has seen just nine targets so far, but it's allowed

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>six catches in a touchdown, so he's not very good.

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>And uh, he figures would be covering Martin Jones quite

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit. So Jones gets a very safe BE and

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Danny Amndla also startable. It might take a chance on

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>me wide receiver and even though he's been pretty frustrating,

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty brutal, t J. Hockinson gonna give him a See

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a great matchup for t J. Oakland has

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>ranked twenty nine and d v o A against tight ends,

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and the last four tight ends to face the Raiders

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>were Darren Fells who had six for fifty eight and two,

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Graham four for sixty five and one. Trey Burton

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>wet the bed, but that's understandable, and then Eric Ebron

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 1>had one for one for forty eight and touchdown and

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Jack Doyle had eight I'm sorry, four catches for twenty

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:28.959
<v Speaker 1>two yards in a touch and then that same game,

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>so a great matchup for t J. And that makes

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Matt Stafford a very easy take a chance on me quarterback.

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry I went so easy there, but I would

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>sorry him over anyone. Just put it that way. And

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>for your daily players out there all day, Stafford um

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and the running backs all on the bench. Here's the

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>snap counts, uh last week without carry on Johnson Ty

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Johnson twenty five, Trey Carson nineteen, j D McKissick sixteen,

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Paul Perkins got six carries. Just avoid that whole situation entirely.

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And j J I uh, we won't even mentioned that.

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>We talked about huh. We will talk about John Jacobs

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, he gets an A. Since Week five,

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>only four players have accounted for a higher percentage of

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>team touches. And Josh Jacobs, who is garnering overt of

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Oakland's touches right now and he's been doing it plan

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>half hurt too. Yeah, and his his passing work has

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>ramped up. Catching the ball at the backfield. The posing

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>running backs are averaging more than twenty nine touches per

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>game against Detroit, who have allowed eight total touchdowns to

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>running backs over their last four So smashed spot for

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs here. Uh. Probably another smash spot for Darren Waller

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:30.719
<v Speaker 1>as well. He gets an A. Detroit is allowing more

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>than six yards per game to tight ends and they've

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>allowed tight end touchdowns and back to back games to

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Evan Ingram and Kyle Rudolph Tyler. I'm sorry Tyrrell Williams

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:42.719
<v Speaker 1>gets a B because all he does is score touchdowns

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>if he's healthy. He's healthy this week. Uh. We mentioned

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Darius Slay in an earlier segment pretty questionable with a

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>hamstring injury to play in this one, so Williams would

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>get an A if Slays out, but still would be

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>even if Slay goes. Detroit has to render five scores

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers over the last three games and um

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and if Slay is to sit, that would lead another

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>start for Rashaan Melvin, who only allowed a hat trick

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in his coverage last week. Three touchdowns allowed by Rashaan Melvin.

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>So great spot for Tyrod Williams and a pretty good

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>spot for Hunter. Renfro. I'm gonna give him a see

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Hunter runs primarily out of the slot in Detroit, has

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>been vulnerable covering the seams. Larry Fitzgerald at eight for

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>one and a touchdown, Keenan Allen eight, Golden Tate eight

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>for eighty five, Nelson Aglare eight for fifty and two,

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and even B. C. Johnson for for forty and one

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Lions. And that's why Derek Carr was your

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.959
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me quarterbacks, Yes he was. Vikings

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Kansas City Chiefs. Dalvin Cooks sitting out

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>potentially huge game if trends continue here, Kansas City has

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>allowed the opponent's starting running back to amass at least

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thirty combo yards, and all four of their

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>home games they've given up the third most rushing yards,

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the second most receiving yards to running backs, and the

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>fourth most fantasy points to backs. And here comes the

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Vikings with arguably the most potent rushing attack in the NFL.

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>So Dalvin Cook a lock a and as I mentioned,

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and take a chance, I mean Alexander Madison as a

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>deep reach is a plausible sleeper as well. We go

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to the passing game. Kirk Cousin Cousins comes in with

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a b here. He enters the game as the NFL's

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>hottest quarterback. Aaron Rodgers just through for three hundred yards

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.399
<v Speaker 1>and three scores against the Chiefs, but it did take

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>some Hall of Fame level passing from for Uh for

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Rogers to get there. And prior to that, the chief

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 1>secondary was dramatically improved, averaging just two hundred fifty yards

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and one point one passing touchdowns. That's it now. Part

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of it was because seems just run on the Chiefs

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and run successfully. Um, if there is more balance, there

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>is some upside here. Also, it looks like Frank Clark,

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>their star defensive alignment will not go in this one.

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>And when Kirk Cousins has time, he was usually pretty good.

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Um adam feeling expected to play. He injured his hamstring

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>two games ago. Um, he is technically questionable. Everybody assumed

0:34:56.360 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>he'd be like but after limited practice all week, not

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>one percent sure he's gonna go. And you want to

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>watch him up to game time. He had found the

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>paint in three consecutive weeks prior to that seventy five

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>yards and or he touchdown in six of seven games

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this year and Chief slot. Cornerback Kendall Fuller missed last

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>week and is questionable for this one as well. And

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>if Fuller can't go, that would set him up against

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:23.280
<v Speaker 1>sixth round rookie Rashad Fenton, who got forced into action

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>last week and allowed to touchdown, and theland would get

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>an upgrade if that were the case. Stefan Diggs has

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred yards in four of his last five

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>games and a franchise record four hundred fifty two yards

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>over the last three games. Over the last four weeks,

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs are allowing just one hundred twelve yards per

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>game to opposing receivers. They haven't allowed to receiver to

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 1>find the end zone. But Shot Bryland is questionable for

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>this game. Is a lot of Chiefs injuries. He's questionable,

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and he would be with a cornerback who would get

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of play on Diggs and if he can't go,

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 1>upgrade Digs to an a here as well. Let's go

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Kansas City side. Travis Kelsey is an obvious

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>A using tight ends, averaging a healthy nine and a

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>half targets per game against the Vikings. Although the Vikings

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>have not allowed to touch down to a tight end yet,

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 1>but big games in terms of receptions and yards to

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hooper, Darren Waller, Evan Ingram all fared well against Minnesota.

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey is obviously an elite play no matter who

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback is. And let's go to the quarterback position,

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>where if it's Patrick Mahomes, you'd see it's an a

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>start because it's Patrick Mahomes in the Vikings secondary has

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 1>had a variety of problems over the course of this year. Um, Now,

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 1>if Mahomes doesn't have his mobility, he's playing with a

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>brace on his knee, He's not gonna do these things

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:37.280
<v Speaker 1>where he's running at a full speed on one direction

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and then throws a laser forty yards downfield the other

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 1>side of the field. I don't think that stuffs in

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>play here, but I still think he would be an

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 1>A grade player Mahomes would be if he goes that said,

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he goes. Let's talk about Matt mooreher

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>gets a B as the probable starter. The only quarterbacks

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>who have failed to throw multiple touchdowns against Minnesota Daniel

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Jones and like his second NFL start or third NFL

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>are Chase Daniel in a backup role, and then the

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.359
<v Speaker 1>combo platter of case Keenum and Dwayne Haskins. Everybody else

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>has thrown multiple touchdowns. All other quarterbacks are averaging two

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>eighty five yards and two point four touchdowns. We take

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>two eight five and two point four to Matt More

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that would be a solid day and that's why he

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 1>gets a B here. Um he does not have the

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 1>downfield sling and ability that Patrick Mahomes has, but Tyreek

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Hill still remains an A grade regardless of the quarterback.

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>He plays from all over the field, has strong matchups

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>at every spot. From the slot, Hill has a huge

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>speed and speed advantage over Mike Hughes and or Mackenzie Alexander.

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Trey Waynes has got straight line speed to hang with Tyreek,

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>but not the moves. And the Vikings are allowing the

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 1>third most receptions to wide receivers the third most touchdowns

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers. Continue to start Tyreek Hill. Sammy Watkins

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>gets a C grade, even though he's been completely and

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>totally unreliable this year. But the Viking secondary is just

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>unusually yielding and I think he's startable here and Watkins

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>had been playing the slow Tyreek Hill out. We think

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 1>he gets goes outside and that puts him up against

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 1>slumping cornerback Xavier Rhodes who's allowing of the passes in

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>his coverage to be completed and a passer rating of

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 1>one five in Xavier roads coverage. I've been to have

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a new nickname for Xavier Xavior Rogue. Rogue. He's gone

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>rogue because he's just running around the field, not covering anybody.

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>What about roads open, roads are open, It's open for

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:26.879
<v Speaker 1>business on his side of the field. Um, I'm gonna

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 1>put I'm gonna put McCole, Hardman and Damian Williams on

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the bench. For Hardman just eight snaps on offense last

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>week with Tyree kill back, So if that's all the

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:38.720
<v Speaker 1>usage he's gonna get, I can't count on him. Damian Williams,

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:40.919
<v Speaker 1>by the way, So we shift over to the running game,

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>who scored last week, but the usage incredibly low. He

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.439
<v Speaker 1>has the top nine rushes since the opener, just one

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 1>catch per game over the last three weeks. Lea Shawn

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>McCoy though, gets a C grade, vikings near the top,

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and almost every running back defensive metric they've only allowed

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:00.080
<v Speaker 1>a single rushing touchdown this year, and one back is

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:02.879
<v Speaker 1>topped one hundred rushing yards, Aaron Jones. Both of those

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>both to touch. I on the hundred yard game. They're

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>giving up just seventy nine rushing yards per game. I

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>think McCoy probably needs a goal line carry here for

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:13.240
<v Speaker 1>fantasy relevance, but I am giving him a c start

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 1>anyway due to the overall potency of the Kansas City offense.

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Christian Chicago takes on Philip Delphia. The Chicago offense has

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>been a wreck here and they finally got back to

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>David Montgomery, who we're going to talk a lot more

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:29.919
<v Speaker 1>about in a few minutes. But tough matchup for David

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery against the good Eagles run defense, Yeah it is.

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Although Philadelphia's run defense their top five Rundy, they allowed

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>just sixty nine rushing yards per game. It's partly because

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.959
<v Speaker 1>teams can just pass all over them. The one team

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that committed to it was the Cowboys, and Ezekiel Elliott

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>turned twenty eight touches into hundred and forty seven yards

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown. So will they commit to David Montgomery

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 1>again this week? Let's they sure did last week one

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 1>touches play of the snaps. If they do that, I

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>think Montgomery can get get some work done here, but

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure they will. So just a B level

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>starter here the passing game, I've got a bunch of

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 1>bench grades. You cannot start Mitchell Trobinsky shout out of

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the end zone and four of his six starts, he's

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 1>on pace for thirteen touchdowns this whole season. Obviously, he

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 1>sad trombone Ski is out of your lineup despite the

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:21.800
<v Speaker 1>nice matchup here. He's doing just enough to keep Allen

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Robinson relevant here. Robinson has reached sixty yards in all

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:27.240
<v Speaker 1>but one game. He has three touchdowns in his last

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:30.319
<v Speaker 1>three games. The Philadelphia secondary has allowed the fourth most

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver yards, the second most wide receiver touchdowns, including

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>six yard games. Allen Robinson getting half of the wide

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.839
<v Speaker 1>receiver targets just going to him, That's right. So I've

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 1>got I've got to be grade on him just because

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't trust Trabisky, but he certainly is in your lineup,

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's not enough here for Taylor Gabriel or Anthony Miller,

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 1>although I will note that Miller is becoming more involved.

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Nineteen targets in a hundred and eighty three yards in

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>his last three games, so keep an eye on that

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:58.400
<v Speaker 1>if Rabisky can manage to turn things around here in

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the unlikely event that he can on the eagle side,

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of much of the same here. I've got the most.

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I've got the passing game mostly on the bench. The

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Bears defense remains elite against the past. They've allowed just

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 1>seven passing touchdowns in seven games. Three of the last

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>four quarterbacks they've faced were scoreless. Carson Wentz has just

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 1>not done enough to deserve being in your lineup, held

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 1>under two hundred yards with one touchdown and three of

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>his last four, so don't force him into your lineup.

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 1>He's on the bench all Sean Jeffrey just to see here,

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't topped seventy six yards all year, just eleven

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 1>targets in the last two weeks. Chicago has given up

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 1>some big games over a hundred yards by Stefan Diggs

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Thomas in the last couple of weeks, but

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we just haven't seen that type of upside from Jeffreys

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 1>just a level. But it's a revenge game. I know

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you're probably gonna get too that soon. Also, one Tray

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Burton by the way who you yeah, Riddle, Riddle. Trey

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Burton hasn't topped twenty yards this season. I'll take my

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:58.360
<v Speaker 1>chances with him on the bench. Nelson Aghilor and Sean

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Jackson are both on your bench. Jackson may actually return

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>this week for the first time since Week two, but

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:07.919
<v Speaker 1>given his questionable injury status, I'm not going to throw

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 1>him in there in his first game back. I have

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>both Zach Ertz and Alice Goddard on the bench here.

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Urt's just one touchdown, hasn't topped seventy two yards all year,

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>season lows and targets. Over the last two weeks he

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>went six targets and then four touchdowns, while Goddard has

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 1>scored in both of those games. So I don't I

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know if the torches being passed here or what's happening,

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 1>but Chicago is too good against tight ends. They haven't

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:35.240
<v Speaker 1>allowed a tight end touchdown since Week one. No opposing

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:37.799
<v Speaker 1>tight end has topped even forty seven yards. So with

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Arts and Goddard splitting the looks here, I've got them

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>both on the bench. And now we get to the

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>running game, where we have a revenge game of sorts

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 1>for Jordan Howard straight up revenge game, and Chicago has

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:52.359
<v Speaker 1>been just crushed by running backs recently. They have allowed

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and twenty three yards and two touchdowns to

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jacobs, then one nineteen and two to Latavious Murray,

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:02.720
<v Speaker 1>then two touchdowns to Melvin Gordon and Austin Ekeler. Howard

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:05.240
<v Speaker 1>had a coming off a season high twenty three carries

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 1>last week. He figures to be a focal point. I've

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>got a B level starting grade on him and Miles Sanders.

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:13.759
<v Speaker 1>We talked about how the Bears are vulnerable against past

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>receiving running backs. Brian's take a chance on me running back.

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I've got a C grade on Miles Sanders. I have

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to This is so close to the double bonus for

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Howard. Tomorrow is his birthday. We almost want the

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:31.279
<v Speaker 1>birthday Saturday, one day from the birthday revenge game. Yeah,

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 1>but don't go out drinking. Jordan's apparently not. Um Cam

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Newton is going to see a foot specialist, which you

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:40.720
<v Speaker 1>think is something he would have done a long time ago.

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But now he's going to see a foot specialist, and

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it's really cast some doubt on the remainder of his season. Christian,

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you are the official Cam Newton apologist desk around here.

0:43:52.640 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Tell me in thirty seconds or so, the dynasty value

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 1>that Cam Newton has as we start to look forward

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to and maybe by the way the Bears starting quarterbacks. Well, yeah,

0:44:04.600 --> 0:44:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess it could could depend on if he winds

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 1>up somewhere else. But over the last two years ago,

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 1>he was the number two fantasy quarterback. Last year, despite

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>battling through injury, on a points per game basis, he

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:17.399
<v Speaker 1>was the number seven guy. So I'm not dumping him

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 1>out right in Dynasty. I'm holding You're holding him. You're

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna You're gonna burn that roster spots. The biggest struggle

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 1>running the spot absolutely coming up nuts. Let's answer three

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 1>tough questions. You can play along, try to go a

0:44:28.960 --> 0:44:47.360
<v Speaker 1>perfect three and oh on Fantasy Football Weekly. It's Fantasy

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly on Paul arch and famball dot com. My

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>panel of experts today, Christian Peterson, Brian Johnson, Boys, I've

0:44:56.680 --> 0:45:04.440
<v Speaker 1>gotten especially difficult set of tough questions. They're extra tough listeners.

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 1>You can play along see if you can go three

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and oh. We like to begin with tough question Number

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 1>one was last week's game The turnaround game for David

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery's season. We begin with Brian Johnson. I'm gonna say

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it was, and you know, it wasn't like someone else

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 1>was getting the work over David Montgomery all year long.

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery total carries, Mike Davis and three co and have

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.240
<v Speaker 1>combined for forty all season. So it's always been Montgomery

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 1>has always been the guy. But Chicago's has never been

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:34.719
<v Speaker 1>running the ball their top eight and passing play percentage

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:37.800
<v Speaker 1>top five over the last three weeks. But that's clearly

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>not working for them. Uh. They just they have to

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 1>rely on their defense and the run game. Don't have

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>any chance of making the playoffs this year. Their quarterbacks suck.

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Their schedule does not suck moving forward though for running backs.

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:52.280
<v Speaker 1>According to Fantasy Pros, the Bears at the third easiest

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 1>remaining schedule for running backs. You know, Mike Davis and

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 1>threat and aren't a threat to steal his carries. So

0:45:58.000 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a turnaround from Montgomery, and the

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>bye little window is probably closed. But I'm saying he's

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:05.879
<v Speaker 1>turning it around. Yeah, I mean, as you probably heard

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:07.839
<v Speaker 1>in the matchup that I did with the Bears, I'm

0:46:07.880 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>not totally convinced that that the Bears are gonna suddenly

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:13.719
<v Speaker 1>start committing to him the way that they should. I mean,

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it looked like they were going to do that in

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Week four when they gave him twenty four touches, and

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 1>then in the next two games he got fifty and

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 1>touches combined. So I'm not totally convinced that they're sold

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that this is the way that they're gonna win games.

0:46:25.160 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I agree that I think it is with the running

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>game in the defense. I just don't know if Matt

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Naggi agrees with that. But Brian, you mentioned that the

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:35.080
<v Speaker 1>schedule is really favorable here. This week is pretty tough

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:38.399
<v Speaker 1>against Philadelphia, but he gets Detroit twice by thanksgiving their

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 1>bottom five against the run, really no stoppers on the schedule,

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and then in the fantasy playoffs, Green Bay sixth worst

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 1>against running backs and Kansas City fourth worst against the

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:51.239
<v Speaker 1>running backs, so he has a very favorable schedule here.

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>So I say, from a fantasy perspective, yes, this is

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the turnaround for David Montgomery. If Eddie Pinneo just made

0:46:57.080 --> 0:46:59.439
<v Speaker 1>his damn kick, I'd feel a lot better about Matt

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Nagy learning a valuable lesson here. And you can win. Yeah,

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:04.799
<v Speaker 1>that's right. You can go win games with a run

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:09.439
<v Speaker 1>with an especially at David Montgomery spearheading your running game.

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, unfortunately, you know, we don't really know

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that for sure. But I still want to believe that

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>they go back and look at the tape and agree

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that the best, maybe the best thing that's happened to

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:22.719
<v Speaker 1>them offensively all year was this game by David Montgomery.

0:47:23.200 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You don't, you know, for Mattenegge, God, you don't have

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to be the smartest guy in the room all the time.

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to like overthink every single thing and

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 1>always be contrarian offensive guy. Sometimes everything is as obvious

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 1>as it looks. Sad trombon Ski is not the path

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to victory. It's all about and Brian has said, well,

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 1>elite defense and running game. San Francisco forty Niners are undefeated,

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings are six and two. That it's not complicated,

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that's all you need. I want to believe Matt Aggie

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:55.839
<v Speaker 1>is not so bullheaded and or dumb that he can't

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 1>figure that out. We will go with Yes. Last week's

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:02.760
<v Speaker 1>game Wilma Park to turn around for David Montgomery. Tough

0:48:02.880 --> 0:48:07.240
<v Speaker 1>question Number two. Should fantasy owners add new Seahawks wide

0:48:07.239 --> 0:48:13.319
<v Speaker 1>receiver Josh Gordon or stay away Christian So if this

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:17.160
<v Speaker 1>question was worded slightly differently, I would say to stay away.

0:48:17.200 --> 0:48:19.719
<v Speaker 1>If if you said, is he going to be a

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 1>fantasy starter the rest of the year, I think the

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 1>answer is no, then why roster him? Well, because there

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:28.319
<v Speaker 1>is there is upside. We've seen his upside over the years.

0:48:28.400 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Right over the last couple of years playing with the Patriots,

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:32.399
<v Speaker 1>He's had a couple of big games here and there,

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:34.799
<v Speaker 1>and we know that he's talented. He gets added to

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a Seahawks roster where he's almost certainly number two in

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:40.319
<v Speaker 1>the pecking order behind Tyler Lockett. But at the same

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>time Tyler Lockett plays in the slot, they do have

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:46.719
<v Speaker 1>DK Metcalf who's basically just an end zone presence, and

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't really have a tight end after Will Disley

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:51.759
<v Speaker 1>went down, they don't have anybody to throw too there,

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:54.480
<v Speaker 1>so they do kind of need a pass catcher, and

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I just think the upside is certainly enough for me

0:48:57.200 --> 0:48:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to add him to the end of my roster just

0:48:59.120 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to see what happens. Okay, yes, I'm probably gonna stay away.

0:49:04.160 --> 0:49:07.200
<v Speaker 1>The only you know wide receiver traded mid season that's

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:09.440
<v Speaker 1>done well that I can remember, has been a Mari Cooper,

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:12.399
<v Speaker 1>and that's because he had a massive upgrade going from

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Derek Card to Dak Prescott. Going from Tom Brady to

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson's pretty much alateral move. It's certainly not a

0:49:19.760 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>upgrade or down, you know what I'm saying here, But uh,

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in the schedule pretty tough. You want him against the

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Bucks this week, but there's no way he's gonna know

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the plays. He's playing forty Niners next week. That's a

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 1>bench Eagles is a good matchup. That might be the

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 1>one game you want to start them, But then Vikings

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and other sort of a neutral matchup. But then the Rams,

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:39.200
<v Speaker 1>who just required Jalen Ramsey. The Panthers have emerging duo

0:49:39.200 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of cornerbacks. I just don't see him wearing the plays

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:44.480
<v Speaker 1>well enough for the remainder of the season. So I'm

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:47.920
<v Speaker 1>just staying away, saying entirely away. What's legal in Washington

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:50.319
<v Speaker 1>State that you can think of, that's a good point.

0:49:51.080 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Throw that in there. It's Leland Boston too. Maybe that's

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:59.480
<v Speaker 1>why he got good. The average game for Josh Gordon

0:49:59.760 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Well of the last two years, the average game two

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 1>years of Tom Brady passing three catches fifty seven yards

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and zero point to five touchdowns. That's it with Tom Brady.

0:50:15.640 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 1>You are, so let me give you a comparable from

0:50:17.640 --> 0:50:21.040
<v Speaker 1>this season. Who else is three catches fifty seven yards

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and zero point to five touchdowns? This year it's Curtis Samuel,

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 1>who's dropped in half of leagues and not a regular starter.

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Um Curtis Samuel's wide receiver forty three. So to tell

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:36.279
<v Speaker 1>you what three catches fifty seven yards and zero point

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 1>two five touchdowns gets you. It gets you to wide

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver forty three by fantasy points per game. There are

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 1>still people reliving Josh Gordon's twenty thirteen season. Allow me

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to give you a very distinct way of understanding how

0:50:51.920 --> 0:50:55.799
<v Speaker 1>long ago that was. This is twenty nineteen, seventeen. Six

0:50:58.000 --> 0:51:02.360
<v Speaker 1>seven years ago was the last time Josh Gordon was

0:51:02.400 --> 0:51:06.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly good. I don't know that he's better than John Brown.

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you that. No, you're going to stay

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 1>away from Josh Gordon. I don't. By the way, He's

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:14.840
<v Speaker 1>got to go like learn a whole new playbook and

0:51:14.920 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 1>learn all that. A scholar of the game Josh Gordon.

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. Tough question number three. To this point,

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon has been so ineffective it would have been

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:29.000
<v Speaker 1>better if his fantasy for his fantasy units, if he

0:51:29.000 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 1>had just continued to hold out honestly for the season though,

0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 1>going forward, will he be an RB one and r

0:51:37.000 --> 0:51:40.960
<v Speaker 1>B two, a flex or a bench level player? Melvin Gordon?

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:44.720
<v Speaker 1>We begin with Brian Johnson, all right, the schedule moving forward,

0:51:44.760 --> 0:51:49.719
<v Speaker 1>starting on Sunday, Green Bay, Oakland, Kansas City, Denver, Jacksonville, Minnesota,

0:51:49.760 --> 0:51:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Oakland again, and there's a by mixed in there, so

0:51:52.200 --> 0:51:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that's clearly a zero point week for Gordon and really

0:51:54.719 --> 0:51:58.760
<v Speaker 1>just two good matchups, one being Green Bay on Sunday,

0:51:58.800 --> 0:52:01.640
<v Speaker 1>but I'm a full confident Gordon's up to bell Cow

0:52:01.719 --> 0:52:04.720
<v Speaker 1>status yet and then Kansas City is another favorable matchup.

0:52:04.719 --> 0:52:07.439
<v Speaker 1>But outside of those, he's a flex player at best.

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 1>And the Chargers have just gotten very bad, and so

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:13.719
<v Speaker 1>bad they've been forced to pass nearly seventy of the

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:16.440
<v Speaker 1>time over their last three games, their third and pass

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:19.800
<v Speaker 1>play percentage overall in the season. Austin Ekeler clearly a

0:52:19.840 --> 0:52:22.440
<v Speaker 1>threat to the passing with Crew Gordon, so I'm just

0:52:22.480 --> 0:52:26.000
<v Speaker 1>saying flex flex, and that's barely uh great. I want

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:28.439
<v Speaker 1>to give him close to bench, but flex. Ok. Yeah,

0:52:28.480 --> 0:52:30.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say he's gonna be on the bench. I

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see how he ever, bites off enough

0:52:32.760 --> 0:52:35.839
<v Speaker 1>of those looks to become fantasy relevant. I mean, he's

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:38.399
<v Speaker 1>been horrible two point five five yards per carry since

0:52:38.440 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 1>ending us holdout. The Chargers have lost three of his

0:52:41.160 --> 0:52:43.840
<v Speaker 1>four games. At some point, I think they're going to

0:52:43.880 --> 0:52:45.680
<v Speaker 1>figure out that they need to stop feeding him the

0:52:45.680 --> 0:52:47.759
<v Speaker 1>ball and give it back to Eckler a little bit more,

0:52:47.800 --> 0:52:51.200
<v Speaker 1>who has been the the much more superior runner. So

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:54.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's a matchup or two here, But I think

0:52:54.840 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 1>as the season goes on, the time split is gonna

0:52:57.640 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 1>skew more and more towards Ekler. So I've got Gordon

0:52:59.880 --> 0:53:01.279
<v Speaker 1>on the bench the rest of the way. That's a

0:53:01.280 --> 0:53:03.319
<v Speaker 1>great point. It was once something in my notes as well,

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:05.359
<v Speaker 1>that it's sooner or later you'd think that they get

0:53:05.400 --> 0:53:07.879
<v Speaker 1>desperate enough that they just stopped this whole Melvin Gordon

0:53:07.960 --> 0:53:10.359
<v Speaker 1>experiment and just go to Eckler. They're not bringing them

0:53:10.400 --> 0:53:12.560
<v Speaker 1>back next year. They're not bringing them back next year.

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:13.839
<v Speaker 1>And that was why I think they were running him

0:53:13.840 --> 0:53:15.200
<v Speaker 1>into the ground. You know, what do they care if

0:53:15.239 --> 0:53:16.600
<v Speaker 1>they run him into the ground and he's gonna go

0:53:16.640 --> 0:53:18.319
<v Speaker 1>be a free agent, But sooner or later, they gotta

0:53:18.320 --> 0:53:20.920
<v Speaker 1>win games. Now, offensive line should get a little better

0:53:20.920 --> 0:53:23.800
<v Speaker 1>with Russell o'com returning, but every time he tried to

0:53:23.880 --> 0:53:25.719
<v Speaker 1>returning gets hurt again. So you know, we need him

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:27.239
<v Speaker 1>to get back and get healthy. That would help a

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:30.760
<v Speaker 1>ton um. The loss of Ken Wizzen Hunt can only help.

0:53:31.120 --> 0:53:34.320
<v Speaker 1>That's addition, by subtraction, his offense ranked twenty eight and

0:53:34.400 --> 0:53:38.120
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards and twenty eight and rushing touchdowns, that's probably

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:40.640
<v Speaker 1>helps this offense, and I think that works in his favor.

0:53:40.680 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 1>You guys, I think hit the schedule just about right.

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:44.680
<v Speaker 1>A couple of good spots in there, a couple of

0:53:44.680 --> 0:53:47.000
<v Speaker 1>bad spots in there. It doesn't do a lot for me.

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 1>From Melvin Gordon, I've got a flex level grade on him.

0:53:50.239 --> 0:53:52.440
<v Speaker 1>They were going to be in these easy matchups. I

0:53:52.480 --> 0:53:54.160
<v Speaker 1>still think he's going to be the goal line guy

0:53:54.160 --> 0:53:56.239
<v Speaker 1>and will be playable in those easy matchups. And in

0:53:56.320 --> 0:53:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the rest of him, you're probably gonna bench him, but

0:53:57.960 --> 0:54:00.399
<v Speaker 1>there's enough there where he's going to get lex. He's

0:54:00.400 --> 0:54:02.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna get He's gonna be a B grade and a

0:54:02.200 --> 0:54:04.200
<v Speaker 1>C grade a few times, and a bench grade a

0:54:04.200 --> 0:54:06.560
<v Speaker 1>few times, and it will net out to a flex

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:10.399
<v Speaker 1>level play for Melvin Gordon. Let's work getting one more

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:14.520
<v Speaker 1>matchup into the segment, Cleveland taking on the Denver Broncos Brian.

0:54:14.560 --> 0:54:17.080
<v Speaker 1>The Cleveland passing attack has just been an utter wreck

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:19.600
<v Speaker 1>so far, and now they get a tough matchup against

0:54:19.640 --> 0:54:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a good secondary in Denver. Yeah, let's start with Odell Beckham,

0:54:23.000 --> 0:54:26.280
<v Speaker 1>who's on pace for seventy eight catches eleven hundred yards,

0:54:26.400 --> 0:54:29.080
<v Speaker 1>which is decent but not the numbers you're expecting. But

0:54:29.320 --> 0:54:32.480
<v Speaker 1>two point three touchdowns is the pace he's on. Emmanuel

0:54:32.480 --> 0:54:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Sanders had two touchdowns on Thursday night, and he didim

0:54:34.640 --> 0:54:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Garoppolo didn't even know each other's name before the game started.

0:54:37.560 --> 0:54:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I think his name was Babe. But Beckham just been

0:54:40.200 --> 0:54:42.160
<v Speaker 1>brutal and this is not a spot for him to

0:54:42.239 --> 0:54:45.319
<v Speaker 1>bounce back. Opposing wide receiver units are averaging just nine

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:47.759
<v Speaker 1>catches for a hundred eleven yards. That's all the wide

0:54:47.760 --> 0:54:50.239
<v Speaker 1>receivers on the team per game, and number ones have

0:54:50.360 --> 0:54:53.720
<v Speaker 1>been blanked from a touchdown perspective. A Rob Davante Adams,

0:54:53.760 --> 0:54:56.000
<v Speaker 1>d J Chark, Keenan Allen, t Y Hilton failed to

0:54:56.000 --> 0:54:58.799
<v Speaker 1>score against Denver and Beckham probably will too, so just

0:54:58.840 --> 0:55:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to see for him, he'll be shadow by Chris Harris

0:55:00.920 --> 0:55:05.720
<v Speaker 1>all game. Harris just you know, eliminates you from um

0:55:05.800 --> 0:55:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Landry. I'll give him a sea as well. Should

0:55:08.440 --> 0:55:11.520
<v Speaker 1>see plenty of Duke Dawson, who man's the slot if

0:55:11.520 --> 0:55:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Harris does not. Dawson was a second round pick of

0:55:13.960 --> 0:55:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots last year, but went on I R and

0:55:15.719 --> 0:55:17.799
<v Speaker 1>then was traded in the off season. He's only seen

0:55:17.840 --> 0:55:19.560
<v Speaker 1>six targets in coverage, so we don't really know what

0:55:19.600 --> 0:55:23.759
<v Speaker 1>we have there. But I'll give yeah, definitely so l

0:55:23.800 --> 0:55:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Angel will get to see. That's because Beckham is gonna

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:28.840
<v Speaker 1>be blanked by Harris. The tight ends. I actually wanted

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to suggest one um. Over the last three weeks, opposing

0:55:31.760 --> 0:55:34.759
<v Speaker 1>tight ends are averaging six catches for sixty nine yards. UM.

0:55:35.080 --> 0:55:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Demitrius Harris scored last week for Cleveland, but he played

0:55:37.880 --> 0:55:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the fewest amount of snaps. Ricky Seals Jones played twenty

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:43.359
<v Speaker 1>nine snaps and Farrell Brown played twenty six, so it's

0:55:43.360 --> 0:55:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a three headed monster. So the tight ends are on

0:55:45.840 --> 0:55:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the bench. And to the running backs. Nick Chubb gets

0:55:48.400 --> 0:55:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a B, worth noting this is his last game before

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:53.279
<v Speaker 1>the return of Kareem Hunt, the last solo game before

0:55:53.320 --> 0:55:56.680
<v Speaker 1>cream Hunt is eligible to play. UM. Not a great

0:55:56.680 --> 0:55:58.960
<v Speaker 1>matchup for Chubb at all, even though the Broncos have

0:55:59.000 --> 0:56:02.960
<v Speaker 1>yielded the most rushing attempts to opposing backs. UM. Everyone

0:56:03.000 --> 0:56:05.239
<v Speaker 1>outside of Leonard four Net has, who had a monster

0:56:05.280 --> 0:56:07.399
<v Speaker 1>game against Denver is struggled mightily. Take out the four

0:56:07.440 --> 0:56:10.640
<v Speaker 1>net game. The Broncos are allowing amasily three yards per

0:56:10.680 --> 0:56:14.000
<v Speaker 1>carry and no back has topped thirty five yards or

0:56:14.000 --> 0:56:16.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, eighty five yards. Read that wrong? And then

0:56:16.880 --> 0:56:20.359
<v Speaker 1>who were over to the Denver side get my notes

0:56:20.400 --> 0:56:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in order here. Let's start with the running backs, Philip

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay and Royce Freeman. Give them both a B. I

0:56:25.480 --> 0:56:27.480
<v Speaker 1>want this to be a huge game for Lindsay. Yeah,

0:56:27.520 --> 0:56:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I know it could be Freeman is out snapping him,

0:56:30.560 --> 0:56:35.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's a pretty good spot for both. Denver

0:56:35.360 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to want to run the ball with Brandon

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Allen at quarterback. We'll talk about him in a second. Actually,

0:56:39.040 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna say bench when I mentioned him again.

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:42.480
<v Speaker 1>But they're gonna want to run the run the rock.

0:56:42.719 --> 0:56:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland probably gonna struggle to keep their offense on the field.

0:56:46.239 --> 0:56:48.839
<v Speaker 1>The Browns are yielding a healthy twenty five carries per

0:56:48.880 --> 0:56:51.120
<v Speaker 1>game to running backs four point seven yards per carry,

0:56:51.120 --> 0:56:53.600
<v Speaker 1>so Philip Lindsay and Royce Freeman both very startable with

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a B. Courton Sutton just gonna give him a C

0:56:56.320 --> 0:56:59.520
<v Speaker 1>sadly because of the Brandon Allen factor. Um. He has

0:56:59.520 --> 0:57:01.960
<v Speaker 1>provided a safe floor all season with at least sixty

0:57:02.040 --> 0:57:04.879
<v Speaker 1>yards and seven of eight games. But again, Brandon Allen

0:57:05.080 --> 0:57:07.759
<v Speaker 1>first ever start for bench and Allen I don't, I

0:57:07.760 --> 0:57:10.960
<v Speaker 1>don't love it. I don't, I don't. But something's like

0:57:11.160 --> 0:57:13.400
<v Speaker 1>he's a wide receiver. He's the top twelve wide receivers.

0:57:13.400 --> 0:57:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I was. It's not like Joe Flacco is good either.

0:57:16.200 --> 0:57:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Liked Williams. Greedy Williams comes back, which puts Cleveland secondary

0:57:23.200 --> 0:57:26.040
<v Speaker 1>at full strength for the first time all year. I'm

0:57:26.040 --> 0:57:27.800
<v Speaker 1>still gonna give him a CE, though charge. I can't

0:57:27.840 --> 0:57:29.480
<v Speaker 1>fault anyone for bet looking else or if you have

0:57:29.520 --> 0:57:31.560
<v Speaker 1>better options, But if you don't, you can start Sutton.

0:57:31.920 --> 0:57:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh Dave Shawn Hamilton's do not start him. He's on

0:57:34.360 --> 0:57:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the bench in his first game without Manny Sanders. Everyone thought,

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Hamilton's gonna do something. Forty five seventy three snaps,

0:57:41.320 --> 0:57:45.000
<v Speaker 1>zero catches on one target. He's dead to us. We'll

0:57:45.000 --> 0:57:46.320
<v Speaker 1>never mention him on this show for the rest of

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the season, I'm sure. And Noah Fant in his first

0:57:49.160 --> 0:57:52.920
<v Speaker 1>game without Manny Sanders, he said season high and snaps

0:57:53.120 --> 0:57:56.600
<v Speaker 1>slot snaps fourteen, targets a team high eight and catches

0:57:56.640 --> 0:57:59.320
<v Speaker 1>with five. But the only tight ends to produce against

0:57:59.360 --> 0:58:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland were a healthy Delaney Walker in week one and

0:58:01.840 --> 0:58:04.200
<v Speaker 1>then George Kittle and Mark Andrews. No a fan is

0:58:04.240 --> 0:58:06.640
<v Speaker 1>even even the same universe as those guys. Yeah, probably

0:58:06.720 --> 0:58:08.440
<v Speaker 1>never will be so, but I am going to give

0:58:08.480 --> 0:58:11.080
<v Speaker 1>him a sea in the waste land if you're super desperate. Desperate,

0:58:11.120 --> 0:58:13.800
<v Speaker 1>but uh, I don't know. More down bench, he's on

0:58:13.840 --> 0:58:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the bench, and so Brandon Allen, he and Brandon Allen

0:58:15.640 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 1>can hang out on the bench. I kind of like

0:58:17.120 --> 0:58:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Ben Allen, does that work? Yeah, Brandon brand don't Brandon

0:58:23.640 --> 0:58:25.560
<v Speaker 1>don't Allen? All right? That? I kind of like that better,

0:58:25.600 --> 0:58:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Brandon d Allen. Yeah, it doesn't roll off. The tongue

0:58:27.680 --> 0:58:30.160
<v Speaker 1>is easily, but it punctuates the point. I think we

0:58:30.240 --> 0:58:32.120
<v Speaker 1>need to hear a little bit better. You know, every

0:58:32.120 --> 0:58:34.560
<v Speaker 1>week you can play the Crush Charts Championship for free

0:58:34.600 --> 0:58:37.080
<v Speaker 1>at fan ball dot com. When you assemble a better

0:58:37.160 --> 0:58:39.120
<v Speaker 1>salary cap team than mine, you get a shot at

0:58:39.120 --> 0:58:42.720
<v Speaker 1>this week's prize pool of one thousand dollars. But more importantly,

0:58:42.760 --> 0:58:45.160
<v Speaker 1>when you do beat me, that's how you get an

0:58:45.280 --> 0:58:48.920
<v Speaker 1>entry into our week seventeen Championship game where you battle

0:58:49.120 --> 0:58:52.560
<v Speaker 1>for the ten thousand dollar prize pool. Go to fanball

0:58:52.600 --> 0:58:55.640
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash chart again, it's all free. We're back

0:58:55.680 --> 0:58:58.680
<v Speaker 1>in moments with more matchups. The things you need to

0:58:58.720 --> 0:59:02.040
<v Speaker 1>know to set your line up in Looting Green Bay

0:59:02.160 --> 0:59:07.360
<v Speaker 1>taking on the l A Chargers. We know to start

0:59:07.360 --> 0:59:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones, What about Jamal Williams? What happens if Davante

0:59:10.320 --> 0:59:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Adams comes back? We'll tell you when we return Fantasy

0:59:33.040 --> 0:59:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly returns or diving back into the matchups. But first,

0:59:37.360 --> 0:59:39.480
<v Speaker 1>did you know you can play super Flex salary Cap

0:59:39.520 --> 0:59:41.920
<v Speaker 1>at Famile dot com. If you love starting two quarterbacks,

0:59:41.960 --> 0:59:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Go to Famile dot com play our super Flex Salary

0:59:44.760 --> 0:59:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Cap d f S Green Bay takes on the Chargers.

0:59:50.000 --> 0:59:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones at this point has become an obvious a um,

0:59:53.440 --> 0:59:55.280
<v Speaker 1>although the only thing I'm gonna mention him is that

0:59:55.280 --> 0:59:58.080
<v Speaker 1>his reception pace is just unsustainable the way they've used

0:59:58.120 --> 1:00:00.640
<v Speaker 1>him here, and with Davante Adams likely return earning, I

1:00:00.640 --> 1:00:02.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to drop off a bit here, but

1:00:02.120 --> 1:00:04.800
<v Speaker 1>he's still an obviously. And then we go to Aaron Jones,

1:00:04.800 --> 1:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>whos vaulted into the NFL m v P conversation. Any

1:00:09.400 --> 1:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>doubts about his greatness have been eliminated over the last

1:00:12.240 --> 1:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, during which he scored nine touchdowns and throwing

1:00:15.520 --> 1:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>zero picks charges past events. Looks good on paper, but man,

1:00:19.200 --> 1:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>they face some crappy quarterbacking. The only two quarterbacks they

1:00:23.880 --> 1:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>faced who are remotely close to Rogers, Matthew Stafford Deshaun

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Watson averaged two yards and two and a half touchdowns.

1:00:33.280 --> 1:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that feels very comfortable for Aaron Rodgers here,

1:00:35.720 --> 1:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>especially if Davante Adams comes back. By the way, a

1:00:38.680 --> 1:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>grade for Aaron Rodgers if I didn't say that explicitly,

1:00:41.240 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams gets to be assuming he plays, even though,

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and though we will note there's some small chance of

1:00:47.520 --> 1:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a setback here, but generally Turftoe doesn't have the setback

1:00:50.560 --> 1:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times. It's a pain management thing. So

1:00:53.560 --> 1:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>on Friday there was video of him at practice leapfrogging.

1:00:58.200 --> 1:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think he's good. It's a lot of

1:01:00.200 --> 1:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the turf toe is really about cutting and uh and planting,

1:01:03.520 --> 1:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and those are big things of receivers, and you can

1:01:05.160 --> 1:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>leap your coach without cutting or planting, So you know,

1:01:08.600 --> 1:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he goes here he will draw Casey Hayward,

1:01:11.400 --> 1:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>very good corner who shadows opposing top receivers. But the

1:01:14.760 --> 1:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>weird thing is, even though Casey Hayward's good and he

1:01:17.080 --> 1:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>goes after the top receivers, the top receivers usually end

1:01:19.640 --> 1:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>up with good games. T Y Hilton two touchdowns, Kenny

1:01:22.920 --> 1:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Golladay hundred yards, touchdown, DeAndre Hopkins six sketches, sixty seven yards,

1:01:28.040 --> 1:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Courtland Sutton ninety two yards and a touchdown. They're all

1:01:31.240 --> 1:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>able to get it done against Seattle's uh sorry, the

1:01:33.720 --> 1:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>charger secondary. So I think Davante Adams finds his way

1:01:36.640 --> 1:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to a good game here. The other receivers, though, Marquez Veldez,

1:01:41.200 --> 1:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>scant Laning, Geronimo Allison, Jake Kumero, Alan Lazard, I think

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>they neutralize each other. Sure one of those guys probably

1:01:48.640 --> 1:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>does something, but they're all sharing playing time and none

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of them are getting consistent targets. They're not getting consistent snaps,

1:01:55.120 --> 1:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>so they're all on the bench. The only other receiver

1:01:57.320 --> 1:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to mention here is tight end Jimmy Graham, who's having

1:01:59.520 --> 1:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a better season than expected. And the Chargers appeared tough

1:02:02.560 --> 1:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>on paper against tight ends, but the opposition has been

1:02:05.520 --> 1:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>completely uninspiring, especially at the tight end position, so this

1:02:10.000 --> 1:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>is maybe one of the better tight ends they've seen.

1:02:12.960 --> 1:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>The tennesse See tight ends total ninety yards against Los

1:02:16.600 --> 1:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Angeles recently in the Houston tight ends combined for hundred

1:02:19.080 --> 1:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>yards and three touchdowns against them in Week three, So

1:02:21.160 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Jimmy Graham's a C level start. Jamal Williams

1:02:25.800 --> 1:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>is the only other Packer player that I probably ought

1:02:28.720 --> 1:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to touch on and haven't yet. He scored a short

1:02:30.880 --> 1:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>receiving touchdown UM. In three straight games he has scored

1:02:35.240 --> 1:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a receiving touchdown, and four the last five he hasn't

1:02:38.480 --> 1:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>scored UM. He hadn't scored receiving touchdown in the twenty

1:02:41.840 --> 1:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>previous games, however, so it feels a little bit unsustainable.

1:02:45.200 --> 1:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Williams has been seeing the field on roughly fifty of

1:02:49.120 --> 1:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the offensive snaps. I think you can give him a

1:02:51.240 --> 1:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>start here against a wobbly run defense. I've got a

1:02:53.840 --> 1:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>C grade on Jamal Williams. Let's flip over to the

1:02:57.480 --> 1:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Chargers side. I know Melvin Gordon has been a disaster,

1:03:01.880 --> 1:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and we just talked about him a lot not that

1:03:03.440 --> 1:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>long ago, but this is a really good opportunity for him.

1:03:06.640 --> 1:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the handful of games where we

1:03:08.440 --> 1:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about him getting B grades. This is one of them.

1:03:11.000 --> 1:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Two Packers defense that's giving the up the eleventh most

1:03:14.080 --> 1:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts, sixth most yards per game, and at four

1:03:17.640 --> 1:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>point nine yards per carry, it all trends to a

1:03:20.640 --> 1:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>bigger Melvin Gordon game here, unless they've just had it

1:03:23.720 --> 1:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>with him, which is a possibility. The Packers have also

1:03:26.400 --> 1:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>given up one hundred or more rushing yards and or

1:03:28.440 --> 1:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>he touchdown to the lead back in every game since

1:03:30.760 --> 1:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the opener. So I'm Melvin Gordon gets it done here.

1:03:34.080 --> 1:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's not a homecoming, but Melvin Gordon hailing

1:03:37.240 --> 1:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>from Kenosha, that's a good point. Played as a college

1:03:40.120 --> 1:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>ball at Wisconsin. Um As for the backup, Austin Ekeler

1:03:43.640 --> 1:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>averaging just four rushes since Gordon's return, which is completely deflating.

1:03:48.320 --> 1:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>He's basically James White now Ekeler is so you only

1:03:52.760 --> 1:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>get what he gives you through the air. And since

1:03:56.040 --> 1:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the opener, the Packers are allowing opposing running backs to

1:03:59.600 --> 1:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>manage just four catches for thirty three yards combined, all

1:04:03.480 --> 1:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of them through the air. That's nothing. Only one has

1:04:07.000 --> 1:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>scored a receiving touchdown against the Packers. So I've got

1:04:10.080 --> 1:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>equally with just a C grade here, and I just

1:04:12.920 --> 1:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I should give him a bench grade. I really should.

1:04:16.240 --> 1:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>But I love Austin that Clara did the video of

1:04:19.680 --> 1:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>him doing one man. Austin Ekeler is so good, So

1:04:25.880 --> 1:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't on talent alone, I don't have

1:04:27.720 --> 1:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the heart to put him on the bench. Let's go

1:04:29.160 --> 1:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to the let's go to the passing. Is that more

1:04:30.840 --> 1:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>difficult to do while reading a book? But I bet,

1:04:35.160 --> 1:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I mean enough items totally relevant? What else

1:04:40.200 --> 1:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>could he be doing with that one hand while doing

1:04:42.640 --> 1:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the set ups? Are the pull ups that would make

1:04:45.360 --> 1:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it harder? I don't know. I don't juggling, juggling I'd

1:04:49.360 --> 1:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>be harder video games? If he turned the page with

1:04:54.000 --> 1:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the Army was using to do the pull ups really

1:04:56.240 --> 1:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>quickly and then grab it again. Then Philip Rivers goes

1:04:59.600 --> 1:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>up against the Packers defense that's allowed multiple passing touchdowns

1:05:02.960 --> 1:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and four of the past five games. And here's Rivers

1:05:05.520 --> 1:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>who's somehow managed to cobble together solid fantasy numbers in

1:05:08.400 --> 1:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>five different games despite all the injuries, the offensive line

1:05:11.280 --> 1:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>in tatters. You know, I worry about rivers protection breaking

1:05:15.080 --> 1:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>down against Preston Williams and sorry, Preston and Zadarius Smith,

1:05:19.360 --> 1:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>who have combined for fifteen sacks and seventy two pressures

1:05:22.800 --> 1:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>between them per Pro Football Focus. Dang, that's a lot

1:05:26.320 --> 1:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>so B grade on Philip Rivers. Here a sorry, A

1:05:29.280 --> 1:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>C grade on Rivers, a C grade on Keenan Allen,

1:05:31.680 --> 1:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>who is not eclipse sixty one yards in any of

1:05:33.960 --> 1:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>his last five games. That is a serious drop off

1:05:37.080 --> 1:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>from a guy who is averaging a hundred thirty six

1:05:39.240 --> 1:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>yards in his first three games of the season. He

1:05:42.000 --> 1:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>goes up against Packers slot cornerback Traymont Williams, who surrendered

1:05:46.440 --> 1:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>eleven scoreless yards per game over the last three weeks.

1:05:50.040 --> 1:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>That's it. No slot receiver has scored against the Packers

1:05:53.800 --> 1:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>this year, So just to see grade on Keenan Allen

1:05:56.600 --> 1:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. Mike Williams is on the bench. He has

1:05:58.800 --> 1:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>yet to score, which is tru bling for a touchdown

1:06:00.880 --> 1:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>dependent receiver like him, and the Packers secondary has yielded

1:06:03.960 --> 1:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>just five scores to receivers. That's the fifth fewest in

1:06:07.040 --> 1:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the league. So Mike Williams also on the bench. The

1:06:11.880 --> 1:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Jets take on the Miami Dolphins. You've already identified Christian.

1:06:15.840 --> 1:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Many take a chance on meat level sleepers in this game, several. Yeah.

1:06:20.320 --> 1:06:24.439
<v Speaker 1>One guy that fantasy owners desperately need to get right

1:06:24.760 --> 1:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is leaby On Bell, and this is the best opportunity

1:06:27.600 --> 1:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of his season. You're right, I mean, if he can't

1:06:30.680 --> 1:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>get it done here, we might be talking about Levan

1:06:33.000 --> 1:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Bell as a sabotage drop candidate. Well, we're not for

1:06:35.720 --> 1:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he plays Miami again later, so there's

1:06:38.280 --> 1:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that you might want to hold him for that, but

1:06:39.680 --> 1:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that might be it. He's been so bad. Just eight

1:06:41.960 --> 1:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>carries twenty three yards last week. That may have been

1:06:44.320 --> 1:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the low point of a stunningly disappointing season. But faces

1:06:48.120 --> 1:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a Dolphins run defense that's allowed the most rushing attempts

1:06:50.960 --> 1:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. The most rushing yards in the NFL.

1:06:53.800 --> 1:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>They've given up five runners ten running back touchdowns. This

1:06:58.960 --> 1:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>is it for for leve Onbell owners. This is your

1:07:01.560 --> 1:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a level start again. If he can't get it done here,

1:07:04.440 --> 1:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>there's there's not much hope for the rest of the season.

1:07:06.800 --> 1:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>The passing game, I talked about Sam Donald, he was

1:07:08.840 --> 1:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance on me quarterback against the secondary

1:07:11.640 --> 1:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>giving up over two and fifty yards and two touchdowns

1:07:14.080 --> 1:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>per game. That brings both Jamison Crowder and Robbie Anderson

1:07:18.640 --> 1:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>into play. The Dolphins lead the NFL and wide receiver

1:07:21.560 --> 1:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns allowed with thirteen, including seven to the slot receiver position.

1:07:28.520 --> 1:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>So Jamison Crowder had that huge Week one, that's seventeen

1:07:31.760 --> 1:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>target Week one. He's been virtually invisible since then, just

1:07:35.080 --> 1:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>five targets in each of the last two games. So

1:07:38.360 --> 1:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a big roll of the dice here, but the

1:07:40.040 --> 1:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>matchup sure favorite Crowder. I gave him a sea level start.

1:07:43.560 --> 1:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Same with Robbie Anderson. He's been targeted twenty two times

1:07:46.520 --> 1:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>in the three starts since Donald returned to the field,

1:07:49.680 --> 1:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's the primary beneficiary of the Dolphins shutting down

1:07:52.560 --> 1:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>star corner Zavian Howard due to injury in air quotes.

1:07:59.520 --> 1:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Now he to face backup Ken Webster, who's ranked a

1:08:02.240 --> 1:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sevent among cornerbacks by Pro Football Focus. I

1:08:05.920 --> 1:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>gotta believe they don't even rank many more than I

1:08:08.080 --> 1:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think they do. You know, Anderson is, He's He's

1:08:10.520 --> 1:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a boomer Bus guy, right, He's the deep threat. So

1:08:12.520 --> 1:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you're depending on a touchdown here. So again, just a

1:08:14.680 --> 1:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>sea level grade here. Even to Marius Thomas, He's been

1:08:17.680 --> 1:08:20.639
<v Speaker 1>targeted eighteen times in the last three games, had five

1:08:20.640 --> 1:08:24.439
<v Speaker 1>catches for sixty three yards last week. So not all

1:08:24.479 --> 1:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of these guys are going to do anything. I know that,

1:08:27.200 --> 1:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>but one of them is, and two of them might.

1:08:30.280 --> 1:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So Thomas could even be a dart throw. We're not

1:08:33.160 --> 1:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>quite there yet. On Chris Herndon, it looks like he's

1:08:35.920 --> 1:08:38.639
<v Speaker 1>unlikely to play this week still with that hamstring injury.

1:08:38.960 --> 1:08:40.439
<v Speaker 1>He's on the bench. So that brings us to the

1:08:40.520 --> 1:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>other side of the matchup. We talked about the running game.

1:08:43.000 --> 1:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got Mark Walton and as gonna take a chance

1:08:44.920 --> 1:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>on me running back. The passing game Church Stu Beard.

1:08:49.080 --> 1:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>We haven't seen vintage Stu Beard average less than two

1:08:51.840 --> 1:08:54.479
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards per game toss just five touchdown passes in

1:08:54.520 --> 1:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the four games in which he's seen extensive time. Now,

1:08:57.439 --> 1:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that that is vintage Sard. That's exactly

1:09:01.040 --> 1:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>what we should expect. I know you would have a differentendion.

1:09:04.520 --> 1:09:07.759
<v Speaker 1>What I love about what I love about Stu Beard

1:09:08.000 --> 1:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick is he just throws deep ball after deep fall,

1:09:12.680 --> 1:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>regardless of interceptions, whatever. It just all. It takes one

1:09:16.120 --> 1:09:18.519
<v Speaker 1>hook up and the Jets are capable of giving it up.

1:09:18.600 --> 1:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I'm not advocating going on starting Ryan Fitzpatrick,

1:09:23.680 --> 1:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't be surprised if he cobbles together a

1:09:26.200 --> 1:09:28.839
<v Speaker 1>couple of touchdown passes. And may I mean Gardner Minshew

1:09:28.920 --> 1:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>did have three touchdowns against the Jets last week, but

1:09:31.360 --> 1:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>before that they had only allowed one opposing quarterback to

1:09:34.080 --> 1:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>throw more than one touchdown pass, So they haven't been

1:09:36.280 --> 1:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>horrible against the past. And honestly, Fitzpatrick is always at

1:09:40.120 --> 1:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>risk of an in game bench. You know, he might

1:09:42.560 --> 1:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>be out by the end of the first quarter. At

1:09:44.880 --> 1:09:48.479
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver Davante Parker and Preston Williams, these guys are

1:09:48.520 --> 1:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>tough to analyze because they're both pretty similar. They're okay,

1:09:52.080 --> 1:09:54.599
<v Speaker 1>but not great. Neither his top six catches for eighty

1:09:54.640 --> 1:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>two yards all season, Parker has scored in three of

1:09:57.760 --> 1:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>his last four. He ranks fourteenth in the NFL and

1:10:00.000 --> 1:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>are yards. So if I was going to start one

1:10:01.760 --> 1:10:04.519
<v Speaker 1>of them, he would be the guy, except that he

1:10:04.600 --> 1:10:08.639
<v Speaker 1>has a tougher cornerback matchup against Truemayin Johnson. Preston Williams

1:10:08.720 --> 1:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>draws Darryl Roberts on the other side, So the cornerback

1:10:11.880 --> 1:10:15.519
<v Speaker 1>matchup favors Williams at sea level starting grade on both

1:10:15.560 --> 1:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of them, I don't rudg. I don't love it, and

1:10:18.000 --> 1:10:20.799
<v Speaker 1>Mike just sicky at tight end. He's not doing anything.

1:10:21.040 --> 1:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Jets have allowed the fourth fewest yards to it. He's

1:10:23.320 --> 1:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>not even owned by anybody in my dynasty league. I've

1:10:26.840 --> 1:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>been I've had stashed all year Preston Williams, and he's

1:10:30.960 --> 1:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>eating up a roster spot and this isn't easy. But

1:10:34.200 --> 1:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking towards next year when the Dolphins, like it,

1:10:37.840 --> 1:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>will have the first or the second overall pick, and

1:10:39.680 --> 1:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna draft a quarterback, and whoever that young kid

1:10:41.800 --> 1:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is is probably gonna be pretty good, and that guy

1:10:43.960 --> 1:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>will be looking at Preston Williams I think his you know,

1:10:47.240 --> 1:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>his long term combo. He's been good enough in in

1:10:51.400 --> 1:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>his rookie year that you want to hold him looking

1:10:53.240 --> 1:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>forward to next year. I think you're you're in rebuild

1:10:56.040 --> 1:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>mode and you don't need the roster spot to compete.

1:10:58.040 --> 1:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Now now I see, I do. Okay, that's it's different.

1:11:01.000 --> 1:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>It's been a pain. It's been a little bit painful

1:11:03.040 --> 1:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to Wold Preston Williams, but I think it's important to

1:11:05.240 --> 1:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>do it. Our final topics are had. No, wait, we

1:11:07.760 --> 1:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>got one more matchup. We've got one more matchup to

1:11:09.800 --> 1:11:12.759
<v Speaker 1>work in Dallas taking on the New York Giants. Brian,

1:11:12.880 --> 1:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the Giants have got arguably the worst starting three cornerbacks

1:11:16.040 --> 1:11:18.439
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. You've got to love every part of

1:11:18.439 --> 1:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas passing game here. Yeah, these teams met in

1:11:20.640 --> 1:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>week one. Um, let's talk about the receivers for Dallas

1:11:23.360 --> 1:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>real quickly. Mary Cooper easy a six for one oh

1:11:25.479 --> 1:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>six in one in Week one. Since then, the Giants

1:11:27.920 --> 1:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>have probably faced two true comparable receivers to Cooper, and

1:11:31.120 --> 1:11:33.439
<v Speaker 1>those were Mike Evans and Kenny Golladay, who only combined

1:11:33.479 --> 1:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>for fourteen catches, three yards and five touchdowns. Those two guys.

1:11:38.520 --> 1:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Easy A for Cooper, easy for Gallup, who had seven

1:11:41.439 --> 1:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for one fifty eight in Week one. The Giants have

1:11:43.920 --> 1:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed the most completions of twenty plus yards at thirty six.

1:11:47.240 --> 1:11:49.559
<v Speaker 1>If you bench Gallop you should probably quit playing fantasy football.

1:11:49.600 --> 1:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>He gets in a Randall Cobby even gets a starting grade.

1:11:52.120 --> 1:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>He's healthy. Uh. He gets to see slot receivers against

1:11:54.840 --> 1:11:58.439
<v Speaker 1>New York to kill them. Danny Amndola eight, Edelman nine

1:11:58.439 --> 1:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>for one thirteen, Adam Feeling seven for one thirty and two.

1:12:01.800 --> 1:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Cole Beasley had four for eighty three, and oh yeah,

1:12:04.280 --> 1:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Randall copp at four for sixty nine and one in

1:12:06.080 --> 1:12:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Week one as well. So startin Randall Copp with the Sea.

1:12:08.520 --> 1:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm benching Jason Witten, though witness scored in three straight

1:12:11.439 --> 1:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>games against the Giants dating back to seventeen. He did

1:12:13.920 --> 1:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>score touchdown in Week one, but that's the last game

1:12:16.439 --> 1:12:18.519
<v Speaker 1>the Giants surrendered a tight end touchdown, and no wan

1:12:18.600 --> 1:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>tight end has top three catches against them all season.

1:12:21.160 --> 1:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So I'm benching Witten this week and Dak Prescott obvious A,

1:12:24.760 --> 1:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and so is zeke Um. The Cowboys will get left

1:12:27.120 --> 1:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>tackle Tyron Smith and right tackle Lyle Collins back, which

1:12:30.240 --> 1:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>is huge. Zeke only at thirteen carries for fifty three

1:12:33.280 --> 1:12:35.479
<v Speaker 1>yards in the opener, but he did score, which means

1:12:35.520 --> 1:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>he's topped a hundred rushing yards or hit paydirt and

1:12:38.120 --> 1:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>every game he's played against the Giants, but shockingly, he

1:12:40.439 --> 1:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't done both in the same game. A touchdown against

1:12:43.240 --> 1:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, but it's probably gonna happen this week. Even

1:12:45.160 --> 1:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>though the Giants traded for defensive tackle Leonard Williams, no

1:12:48.080 --> 1:12:50.639
<v Speaker 1>one really cares about that though they're they're just getting

1:12:50.640 --> 1:12:52.679
<v Speaker 1>shredded by any running back who doesn't play for Detroit

1:12:52.760 --> 1:12:55.519
<v Speaker 1>or Washington. Remember when they gave up snack snacks Harrison

1:12:55.680 --> 1:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>four free. Basically, I think he had a fifth round

1:12:58.400 --> 1:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>pick for one of the best runs stuffing d tackles

1:13:01.160 --> 1:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in the league. One of the many reasons I've abandoned

1:13:03.800 --> 1:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>ship as a Giants fan um kan the Bengals, But whatever. Still,

1:13:09.000 --> 1:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm still happier being a Bengals fans. At A lateral

1:13:12.240 --> 1:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>moves at an upgrade is that A I had to

1:13:14.360 --> 1:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>go to a barren landscape. I can't, you know, just

1:13:16.360 --> 1:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>jump on a successful bandwagon. I gotta go along this

1:13:19.160 --> 1:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>on fire and sinking at the same time. Anyway over

1:13:22.200 --> 1:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the giant side, se Kwon Barkley, I'm gonna give him

1:13:24.120 --> 1:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>an A in PPR, but a B in standard leagues.

1:13:27.040 --> 1:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Dallas is allowing the fourth most receptions per game to

1:13:29.360 --> 1:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>running backs at six point seven, and Barkley is averaging

1:13:31.920 --> 1:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>seven targets and five catches in his four full games

1:13:34.080 --> 1:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>this year. UH. The Cowboys are very tough on the ground,

1:13:36.320 --> 1:13:38.719
<v Speaker 1>though only two loan backs have received more than fourteen

1:13:38.800 --> 1:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>carries this year, and se Kwon Barkley wasn't one of

1:13:41.160 --> 1:13:43.559
<v Speaker 1>those running backs in Week one, UM, but he did

1:13:43.600 --> 1:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>top a hundred yards on eleven carry, So you're starting

1:13:45.880 --> 1:13:49.519
<v Speaker 1>sae Kwon Barkley regardless of sterling. Shepherd will play. He

1:13:49.600 --> 1:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>has cleared concussion protocol. Uh. He logged just six for

1:13:52.960 --> 1:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>forty two in the opener, ran primarily out of the slot,

1:13:56.479 --> 1:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>which just convolutes things because Golden Tate wasn't playing. Then

1:14:00.720 --> 1:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>he was suspended. Now he's a slot receiver. It is.

1:14:03.680 --> 1:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>It's messy. I'll give them both a seed. Dallas has

1:14:07.040 --> 1:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>surrender just three wide receiver touchdowns, and the receivers that

1:14:10.720 --> 1:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>have done well have been Burner boundary receivers. That is

1:14:13.280 --> 1:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>not Sterling Shepherd or Golden Tape, but they probably be

1:14:16.240 --> 1:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>playing from behind, and I'll give them both a soft sea.

1:14:19.479 --> 1:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Darius Layton, who had two touchdowns last week, is on

1:14:21.800 --> 1:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the bench now now that Sterling Shepherd has returned. Evan Ingram,

1:14:25.280 --> 1:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>though easier opposing tight ends, are averaging more than six

1:14:28.320 --> 1:14:30.679
<v Speaker 1>yards per game against the Cowboys. Anger went off against

1:14:30.760 --> 1:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Dallas in Week one, catching eleven balls for a hundred

1:14:33.160 --> 1:14:35.639
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen yards. He's scored in every career game against

1:14:35.680 --> 1:14:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, But I'm benching Danny Dimes in this one.

1:14:38.920 --> 1:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Even though Eli Manning managed the top three yards and

1:14:41.320 --> 1:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>throw a touchdown against Dallas in Week one, Dallas was

1:14:43.800 --> 1:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>missing some key members on their defense due to injury

1:14:46.080 --> 1:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>or suspension. That's not the case of this week. Uh.

1:14:49.280 --> 1:14:52.599
<v Speaker 1>Dallas has allowed one or zero touchdown passes in five

1:14:52.640 --> 1:14:56.639
<v Speaker 1>of six games, and outside of cake matchups against Tampa

1:14:56.640 --> 1:15:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Bay Detroit, Danny Dimes is averaging a yards one touchdown

1:15:00.560 --> 1:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in one point seven five interceptions per game five or

1:15:04.280 --> 1:15:06.639
<v Speaker 1>six games outside of the Giants game. I should have said, yeah,

1:15:06.840 --> 1:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>got it, got it. That was a comprehensive breakdown of

1:15:09.439 --> 1:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the Giants right there and otherwise somewhat mundane offense. Our

1:15:13.120 --> 1:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>final topics are had. We provide you with three guys

1:15:15.439 --> 1:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>we believe will be hot waiver wire pickups next week,

1:15:20.920 --> 1:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>but you're gonna grab them this week because that's in

1:15:23.880 --> 1:15:28.719
<v Speaker 1>the private Chaine. Yes, it is premature speculation happening next,

1:15:28.760 --> 1:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>whether you're ready for it or not. Fantasy Football Weekly

1:15:31.880 --> 1:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>coming up next. It is the final segment of Fantasy

1:15:54.080 --> 1:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Remember, all my player rankings are available for

1:15:57.439 --> 1:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>free at famball dot com slash chart, and you can

1:16:01.000 --> 1:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>play against me for free for your share of the

1:16:03.120 --> 1:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollar prize pool in the crush Charts Championship. Guys,

1:16:06.920 --> 1:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>it's time for premature speculation, maybe the most popular segment

1:16:10.000 --> 1:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>on Fantasy Football Weekly. Each of our hosts are gonna

1:16:13.000 --> 1:16:14.479
<v Speaker 1>give you a player we believe will be a hot

1:16:14.479 --> 1:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire pick up next week. But Blamo already on

1:16:18.960 --> 1:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>your team together of that machine sound effect right there,

1:16:23.800 --> 1:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you will already have him. Brian, who is your premature

1:16:28.520 --> 1:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>speculation player this week? Well, the hotness might be dumbed

1:16:31.960 --> 1:16:34.599
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit since the acquisition of Josh Gordon

1:16:34.640 --> 1:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>by the Seahawks, but I have there now starting tight end.

1:16:36.840 --> 1:16:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Hollister is my premature speculation, um starting you actually

1:16:40.880 --> 1:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>stream him this week against Tampa Bay, but including uh

1:16:43.360 --> 1:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this week's game against Tampa Bay, four of Seattle's next

1:16:46.040 --> 1:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>seven opponents are top six and yards allowed to tight ends,

1:16:48.920 --> 1:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and they've combined to surrender sixteen touchdowns to the position.

1:16:52.360 --> 1:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So you have Tampa Bay this week, Minnesota and week twelve,

1:16:55.520 --> 1:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the Rams in Week fourteen, and the Peace that Resistance

1:17:00.040 --> 1:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals in weeks Baby, everybody wants that Cardinals tight end.

1:17:03.960 --> 1:17:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Josh Gordon Muddies of Water is a

1:17:06.360 --> 1:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit probably, but more than half of your league

1:17:08.920 --> 1:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>is desperate for tight ends on a weekly basis, and

1:17:11.040 --> 1:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Hollister has got some pretty prime matchups about half of

1:17:13.320 --> 1:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>his matchups. So Jacobs, that's deep. I like it. That's

1:17:17.840 --> 1:17:20.479
<v Speaker 1>a deep call. I'm gonna go with running back Darius

1:17:20.560 --> 1:17:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Guys here. Of course, we haven't seen him since Week one,

1:17:22.960 --> 1:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>when I think it was a meniscus injury in the knee.

1:17:25.280 --> 1:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>That's not put him on I R. But he is

1:17:27.600 --> 1:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>eligible to come off of I R. And it looks like,

1:17:30.320 --> 1:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>or it sounds like he's going to suit up in

1:17:32.080 --> 1:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>week eleven after the Redskins week ten, by four of

1:17:35.560 --> 1:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>his final six opponents rank in the bottom twelve against

1:17:38.479 --> 1:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>opposing running backs. And more importantly, the Redskins have absolutely

1:17:42.080 --> 1:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing to gain by continuing to hand the ball to

1:17:44.120 --> 1:17:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson. We've got to see what they have in guys.

1:17:47.800 --> 1:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>We're almost two years into this experiment here. They need

1:17:50.280 --> 1:17:54.559
<v Speaker 1>to know the right and so you're gonna hear a

1:17:54.560 --> 1:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>lot about this next week when they're actually on there. By,

1:17:58.360 --> 1:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>go grab him now before everybody else realizes it. Uh

1:18:01.080 --> 1:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>speaking of a guy who's returning. Kareem Hunt's ownership at

1:18:04.760 --> 1:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the draft. At coming out of drafts was you know

1:18:08.000 --> 1:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>where it is now nine weeks later, it's down to

1:18:11.479 --> 1:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>almost because you know you're the rutrition, right, you need

1:18:15.080 --> 1:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that roster spot. By weeks are coming. You're tired of

1:18:17.280 --> 1:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>getting a zero out of that roster spot. Half of

1:18:19.720 --> 1:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the people out there have dropped Kareem Hunt outright. He's

1:18:23.160 --> 1:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>coming back and he's already practicing with the team. You're

1:18:26.320 --> 1:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>going to hear this story next week about him coming

1:18:29.200 --> 1:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>back for eligibility next week, but you're already going to

1:18:32.000 --> 1:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>have Kareem Hunt now. He will make his debut against Buffalo.

1:18:36.280 --> 1:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>That's coming up next week, Buffalo. You can't pass on him.

1:18:38.960 --> 1:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>You gotta run. Now. Some people will tell you that

1:18:42.160 --> 1:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt is nothing more than a product of a

1:18:44.720 --> 1:18:48.479
<v Speaker 1>great Andy Reid offense, and he's not He's really not good. Yeah,

1:18:48.640 --> 1:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>that's a bunch of ps. Tell that to Damien Williams

1:18:50.920 --> 1:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>in his two yards per carrying an Andy Reid offense.

1:18:53.920 --> 1:18:56.559
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt is a very good player. Now, Nick Chubb

1:18:56.760 --> 1:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>has been a workhorse and he's been great, and I'm

1:18:58.960 --> 1:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>not taking anything way from him it but Hunts too

1:19:01.960 --> 1:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>good to ride pine. They're gonna work him into this offense,

1:19:06.160 --> 1:19:09.599
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Chubb can't keep going at this pace.

1:19:09.720 --> 1:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Probably they're going to want to have more of an

1:19:12.320 --> 1:19:15.559
<v Speaker 1>even split. And Kareem Hunt is an awfully good player.

1:19:16.200 --> 1:19:20.559
<v Speaker 1>So would you rather have Hunts or guys hunt? Because Hunts,

1:19:20.560 --> 1:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I know, Hunts really good and he's not coming off injury.

1:19:22.840 --> 1:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>He's hitting the too. I know he's in a time.

1:19:27.320 --> 1:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing. Sure, he's splitting time with Nick Chubb.

1:19:30.479 --> 1:19:33.599
<v Speaker 1>I would contend that Geiss is splitting time with Dwayne

1:19:33.600 --> 1:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Haskins in that Haskins is so bad that I think

1:19:38.360 --> 1:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Haskins is going to be a total grade a bust

1:19:41.560 --> 1:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>based on what we've seen so far, which is very small.

1:19:44.240 --> 1:19:46.599
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the case. Let's jump out back into

1:19:46.960 --> 1:19:49.559
<v Speaker 1>some matchups. We've got just got two left. New England

1:19:49.560 --> 1:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>takes on Baltimore on Sunday night. Let's start with Tom Brady,

1:19:52.320 --> 1:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and despite the Patriots undefeated record, Brady's passing has been

1:19:55.960 --> 1:20:00.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty pedestrian. His completion percentage is that it's low US

1:20:00.200 --> 1:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>point in five years, he's averaging one point six touchdown

1:20:04.320 --> 1:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>passes per game. And here comes a raven secondary that's

1:20:08.240 --> 1:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>been pretty good. Only Patrick Mahomes has thrown multiple touchdowns

1:20:11.280 --> 1:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>against them. They get cornerback Jimmy Smith back. Brady's only

1:20:15.439 --> 1:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>truly reliable receiver is Julian Edelman, and he's got a

1:20:20.040 --> 1:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>very tough matchup. In fact, let's go to him. Brady

1:20:22.080 --> 1:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>gets a B, so does Edelman with just a B.

1:20:24.040 --> 1:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Here he faces exceptional slack corner Brandon car. Not only

1:20:29.160 --> 1:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>has Car surrendered fewer than forty four yards in four

1:20:33.080 --> 1:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>straight games, Brandon Carr has given up one touchdown in

1:20:37.320 --> 1:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>his coverage in two years. Julian Edelman is tied for

1:20:41.840 --> 1:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the lead with thirteen red zone targets. We like that part.

1:20:44.479 --> 1:20:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Brady is connected with him one of those red zone targets.

1:20:47.720 --> 1:20:50.479
<v Speaker 1>We like that, and he's converted four of those targets

1:20:50.520 --> 1:20:52.719
<v Speaker 1>into touchdowns. Let's hope for a touchdown here for Edelman,

1:20:52.760 --> 1:20:55.479
<v Speaker 1>who gets a B grade. Sticking with the receiver's Mohammed

1:20:55.479 --> 1:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>sanu is on the bench. He played two thirds of

1:20:58.479 --> 1:21:00.880
<v Speaker 1>his snaps from the slot last week, his first game

1:21:00.920 --> 1:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>as a Patriot, and that puts him behind Julian Edelman

1:21:03.160 --> 1:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>for slot work. I don't think he's on the field

1:21:04.800 --> 1:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>enough to matter here, unfortunately, and Philip ur said also

1:21:08.320 --> 1:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>on the bench, he runs almost entirely from the outside,

1:21:11.439 --> 1:21:14.559
<v Speaker 1>where he faces a tough matchup with either Marlon Humphrey

1:21:14.600 --> 1:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>on one side or much improved Marcus Peters on the

1:21:17.040 --> 1:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>other side. I don't love door set here. I've got

1:21:19.479 --> 1:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a bench grade on him as well. Let's go to

1:21:22.840 --> 1:21:27.559
<v Speaker 1>the running backs, Sony Walkman, just to see the Baltimore

1:21:27.640 --> 1:21:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Ravens allow the third fewest rushing attempts the fifth fewest

1:21:30.840 --> 1:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game to opposing backs. Since being obliterated

1:21:34.479 --> 1:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>by Nick Chubbins in Week four, the Ravens have limited

1:21:37.720 --> 1:21:41.719
<v Speaker 1>far more talented backs than Sony Walkman, James Conner, Joe

1:21:41.800 --> 1:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Mix and Chris car Carson averaging forty three rushing yards

1:21:46.200 --> 1:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>per game. That is it. That's at the absolute max

1:21:50.160 --> 1:21:53.799
<v Speaker 1>for Sony Michelle. I think his ceiling Michelle totally touchdown dependent.

1:21:53.880 --> 1:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>He only he only gives what his offensive line gives him.

1:21:56.320 --> 1:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is a tough matchup. Speaking of tough matchups,

1:21:59.280 --> 1:22:01.360
<v Speaker 1>James White almost gave him a bench grade here. The

1:22:01.439 --> 1:22:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Ravens allow the fifth fewest receptions and the seventh fewest

1:22:04.479 --> 1:22:07.799
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards to opposing backs. They've only allowed a single

1:22:07.840 --> 1:22:10.599
<v Speaker 1>back to have more than three receptions. It's only out

1:22:10.600 --> 1:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of just respect for James White and how much they

1:22:12.720 --> 1:22:15.719
<v Speaker 1>use him that he maintains a C grade in this game.

1:22:16.439 --> 1:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's flip it over and go to the Baltimore side

1:22:18.160 --> 1:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>where we start with Lamar Jackson. Now, we all remember

1:22:21.360 --> 1:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson's epic Week one against Miami Kindness. Since then,

1:22:26.880 --> 1:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's been a slow degrade in his passing performances over

1:22:31.120 --> 1:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>the course of the year. His completion percentage has dropped

1:22:34.680 --> 1:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in four consecutive games. He's thrown one touchdown in his

1:22:39.560 --> 1:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>last three games. Meanwhile, the Patriots have somehow allowed two

1:22:43.800 --> 1:22:47.559
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns on the entire season, a staggering level of

1:22:47.600 --> 1:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>success no matter the competition. And you might say to yourself, well,

1:22:51.840 --> 1:22:54.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't need Lamar Jackson to pass, he will run

1:22:54.560 --> 1:22:58.360
<v Speaker 1>me to fantasy victory. Well, New England's giving up ten

1:22:58.520 --> 1:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>quarterback rushing yards per game ten. I've got a B

1:23:03.600 --> 1:23:06.640
<v Speaker 1>grade on Lamar Jackson because anything can happen, But I

1:23:07.160 --> 1:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>can't say I like him in this matchup at all.

1:23:11.360 --> 1:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>His primary receiver wide receivers Marquis Brown. He gave us

1:23:15.920 --> 1:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Fool's Gold in Week one and has been limited by

1:23:18.320 --> 1:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>an injury ever since. He is back to for this game, however,

1:23:20.920 --> 1:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and will play. He's averaged just three catches per game

1:23:24.040 --> 1:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>since Week two, and his targets have dropped in every

1:23:26.920 --> 1:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>week since Week two. You know, hopefully he's healthy and

1:23:30.000 --> 1:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>ready for a second half of the season resurgence for

1:23:32.160 --> 1:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Marquis Brown. But I don't think it happens this week

1:23:34.240 --> 1:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>against a ridiculously good Patriots secondary that's yielded a league

1:23:38.360 --> 1:23:42.400
<v Speaker 1>low one score to wide receivers on the season. That

1:23:42.479 --> 1:23:44.360
<v Speaker 1>brings us to Mark Andrews. The only other part of

1:23:44.360 --> 1:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the receiving game that you might play. He's been held

1:23:47.160 --> 1:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>under forty five yards and four of the past five games.

1:23:49.800 --> 1:23:51.759
<v Speaker 1>He's slumping his well, I told you Jackson is slumping,

1:23:51.760 --> 1:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>so is his best receiver, Mark Andrews. There's no positive

1:23:55.200 --> 1:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>angles I've got here from Mark Andrews. Although the one

1:23:59.000 --> 1:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>other touchdown the Patriots have yielded is to a tight end.

1:24:02.640 --> 1:24:06.120
<v Speaker 1>So fifty percent of Patriots touchdowns going to tight ends.

1:24:06.320 --> 1:24:09.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not a silver lining, not a bronze lining. I

1:24:09.120 --> 1:24:11.559
<v Speaker 1>don't even gotta keep going down the same periodic table

1:24:11.600 --> 1:24:16.559
<v Speaker 1>of zinc um lining. Maybe I don't know. For Mark

1:24:16.600 --> 1:24:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Andrew's a C grade on Andrew's lastly mark Ingram with

1:24:20.200 --> 1:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. He's been great. But the Patriots the

1:24:22.400 --> 1:24:25.439
<v Speaker 1>only team to allow a touchdown, only team not to

1:24:25.600 --> 1:24:28.479
<v Speaker 1>allow a touchdown to a running back, and they're also

1:24:28.520 --> 1:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>allowing the second fewest rushing attempts and the third fewest

1:24:31.520 --> 1:24:35.439
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game. Here, here's your end, here's your

1:24:35.439 --> 1:24:38.360
<v Speaker 1>silver lining. Levyan Bell and Nick Chubb over the past

1:24:38.360 --> 1:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>two weeks five and a half yards per carry against

1:24:41.080 --> 1:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. So I think you are going to see

1:24:42.760 --> 1:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of mark Ingram here. I wouldn't be surprised

1:24:44.920 --> 1:24:46.479
<v Speaker 1>for a decent game, and he gets a B grade.

1:24:47.120 --> 1:24:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to our final matchup of today's show, and

1:24:49.400 --> 1:24:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that's Tampa Bay taking on Seattle Christian. For Jamis Winson,

1:24:54.320 --> 1:24:57.679
<v Speaker 1>it's been all over the board with highs and lows.

1:24:57.760 --> 1:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about Jamis Winston and the passing

1:25:00.000 --> 1:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>game against Seattle. I've got a pretty high grade on

1:25:02.400 --> 1:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>him here this First of all, this game has the

1:25:04.080 --> 1:25:06.360
<v Speaker 1>highest over under total of the week at fifty two

1:25:06.360 --> 1:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half. There's gonna be some points scored here. Secondly,

1:25:09.240 --> 1:25:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Seattle just allowed four hundred and sixty yards to Matt

1:25:12.439 --> 1:25:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Shab last week. They also allowed three yards to Jared

1:25:16.479 --> 1:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Goff earlier in the year and four hundred and eighteen

1:25:19.080 --> 1:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to Andy Dalton. None of those guys are any good either,

1:25:22.600 --> 1:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>So I've got Winston as a B level grade. He

1:25:25.320 --> 1:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>has top three yards four times in his last five games.

1:25:29.280 --> 1:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a danger that he throws two interceptions

1:25:31.320 --> 1:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter and he ends up on the bench.

1:25:33.120 --> 1:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So but the matchup is great here. That of course

1:25:36.080 --> 1:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>brings Mike Evans and Chris god Went into play, both

1:25:38.880 --> 1:25:41.759
<v Speaker 1>as A level starters. The Seahawks are bottom five against

1:25:41.760 --> 1:25:44.559
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. They have allowed the sixth most receptions, the

1:25:44.640 --> 1:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>third most yards and touchdowns to opposing wide outs. So

1:25:47.920 --> 1:25:49.519
<v Speaker 1>you don't need me to tell you that Mike Evans

1:25:49.520 --> 1:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Godwin are in your lineup as A level starters.

1:25:52.160 --> 1:25:55.599
<v Speaker 1>I will mention this about Evans. They've Seattle's got these

1:25:55.680 --> 1:26:00.080
<v Speaker 1>super physical, big cornerbacks and that's so much of like

1:26:00.160 --> 1:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>evans games, just out muscling the slappy cornerbacks around. That

1:26:03.840 --> 1:26:06.599
<v Speaker 1>might not happen here, and I like Godwin over Evans

1:26:06.640 --> 1:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>because of that angle. Okay, all right, we can dig it.

1:26:09.320 --> 1:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Tight end. Camon Bright was my take a chance on

1:26:11.800 --> 1:26:13.559
<v Speaker 1>me tight end, so he's in your lineup as well.

1:26:13.560 --> 1:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I gave him a B level start. Both running backs

1:26:16.080 --> 1:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>are on the bench. Neither one is doing anything. Neither

1:26:18.439 --> 1:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones nor Peyton Barber has top thirty five rushing

1:26:21.240 --> 1:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>yards in three weeks. They are both on the bench.

1:26:24.200 --> 1:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>So let's go to the Seahawks side, where we've got

1:26:26.040 --> 1:26:30.439
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of starters here. Russell Wilson is an easy a. Now,

1:26:30.560 --> 1:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks past defense is really bad. They have allowed

1:26:32.840 --> 1:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>three yards and an average of three hundred yards and

1:26:34.880 --> 1:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>two touchdown passes. Per game, which is even worse when

1:26:37.760 --> 1:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you consider who they've faced Jimmy Garoppolo, Cam Newton, Daniel Jones,

1:26:41.240 --> 1:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff, Teddy Bridgewater, Kyle Allen, Ran, Ryan Tanny Hill.

1:26:44.800 --> 1:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>These guys aren't any good. Imagine what a good passer

1:26:47.320 --> 1:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>will do. Wilson's an A. Tyler Lockett, his top receiver

1:26:50.600 --> 1:26:52.519
<v Speaker 1>is an A. The Bucks have allowed six wide receiver

1:26:52.600 --> 1:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in their last three games. DK Metcalf, you could

1:26:56.000 --> 1:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>start him in desperation. I don't even think it's desperation, well,

1:26:58.920 --> 1:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>only because he has got more than four passes in

1:27:01.280 --> 1:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>a game all year, hasn't top sixty nine yards since

1:27:03.680 --> 1:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Week one, but he leads the NFL and end zone targets.

1:27:06.000 --> 1:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Just had two touchdowns last week, so he's an all

1:27:08.320 --> 1:27:11.719
<v Speaker 1>or nothing touchdown guy. Uh. Let's go to the running

1:27:11.760 --> 1:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>game here, which is a little tricky. With Chris Carson,

1:27:14.160 --> 1:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay has easily the league's best run defense. They

1:27:16.880 --> 1:27:20.120
<v Speaker 1>allowed just fifty six yards per game, held Christian McCaffrey

1:27:20.160 --> 1:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to thirty seven yards and thirty one yards Todd Gurley

1:27:24.120 --> 1:27:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to sixteen, Alvin Kamar at a sixty two. Seattle just

1:27:27.479 --> 1:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>lost their starting center to I r So that doesn't

1:27:30.479 --> 1:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>bode well for Chris Carson. But they're probably gonna be

1:27:33.520 --> 1:27:35.599
<v Speaker 1>up big on the clock. They'll be in clock killing mode.

1:27:35.640 --> 1:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Carson's gonna get his twenty plus touches and we've seen

1:27:38.000 --> 1:27:39.759
<v Speaker 1>what he can do with that. So B level starting

1:27:39.800 --> 1:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>great on Carson. Yeah, I was tempted to make him

1:27:42.080 --> 1:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>more like a Sea guy. I know it is back

1:27:44.040 --> 1:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Tampa. It's a really bad match it is.

1:27:46.920 --> 1:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a really bad matchup, and I just worry that

1:27:49.880 --> 1:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>offense is gonna flow through Russell Wilson in his arm

1:27:52.320 --> 1:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>yep UM. Thank you for listening to the show. If

1:27:54.240 --> 1:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you love the show, please go to fanball dot com

1:27:56.360 --> 1:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>slash charge from a free player rankings where you can

1:27:59.000 --> 1:28:01.400
<v Speaker 1>get more detail on all of these players, and also

1:28:01.479 --> 1:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>my free one thousand dollar weekly contest are Frantic Auctions

1:28:05.000 --> 1:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>are there at fan ball as well. And many thanks

1:28:07.080 --> 1:28:09.479
<v Speaker 1>to everybody who takes the time to rank and review

1:28:09.520 --> 1:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>the show on your podcasting platform of choice. Always grateful

1:28:12.680 --> 1:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>for your feedback. Everybody, have a great week nine. We'll

1:28:16.200 --> 1:28:25.599
<v Speaker 1>talk to you next week on Fantasy Football Weekly. Fantasy

1:28:25.600 --> 1:28:28.519
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly is a production of I Heart Radio. For

1:28:28.560 --> 1:28:30.920
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i heart

1:28:31.040 --> 1:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

1:28:34.040 --> 1:28:34.759
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.