1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:02,160 Speaker 1: The more capital you have in your balance sheet, the 2 00:00:02,240 --> 00:00:04,880 Speaker 1: larger the percentage of your valuation is based on that 3 00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:08,000 Speaker 1: actual bitcoin capital asset, the more correlated directly you'll be 4 00:00:08,080 --> 00:00:10,560 Speaker 1: with bitcoin. If you only yield bitcoin by having demand 5 00:00:10,600 --> 00:00:12,719 Speaker 1: for your equity, it's really tough. If you can yield 6 00:00:12,760 --> 00:00:16,320 Speaker 1: bitcoin using issuing fixed income products that are overcoloralized, you 7 00:00:16,320 --> 00:00:19,079 Speaker 1: can still have bitcoin yielding a bear. I think strategy 8 00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:23,320 Speaker 1: transition from a meaningful software business to a meaningless software 9 00:00:23,320 --> 00:00:26,280 Speaker 1: business in terms of its overall evaluation. Now they're wholly 10 00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:29,320 Speaker 1: dependent on Bitcoin's content and growth rate for the success. 11 00:00:29,480 --> 00:00:30,920 Speaker 2: If you want to scale the company, you want to 12 00:00:30,960 --> 00:00:33,199 Speaker 2: issue the preferreds. I want to make sure I have 13 00:00:33,320 --> 00:00:36,320 Speaker 2: enough Bitcoin on my books to be credit worthy, but 14 00:00:36,360 --> 00:00:38,919 Speaker 2: not necessarily back those because if I back those as 15 00:00:38,920 --> 00:00:42,599 Speaker 2: a collateral assets and that actually damages my credit worthiness. 16 00:00:42,680 --> 00:00:44,000 Speaker 1: It has to be unsecurity. 17 00:00:45,760 --> 00:00:48,000 Speaker 2: Dan, I want to start with the big picture here, 18 00:00:48,040 --> 00:00:51,800 Speaker 2: because we're seeing an explosion of bitcoin treasury companies and 19 00:00:52,400 --> 00:00:54,080 Speaker 2: there's a lot of different differences there, but a lot 20 00:00:54,120 --> 00:00:56,800 Speaker 2: of people trying to copy the micro strategy playbook. But 21 00:00:56,880 --> 00:01:01,080 Speaker 2: you've said that most people fundamentally miss understand how these 22 00:01:01,080 --> 00:01:04,480 Speaker 2: companies actually work. And what makes them valuable. So what 23 00:01:04,560 --> 00:01:07,560 Speaker 2: is it that you think everyone's getting wrong in this space? 24 00:01:08,280 --> 00:01:12,399 Speaker 1: I think the main thing that people are misunderstanding is 25 00:01:12,400 --> 00:01:14,720 Speaker 1: this idea of bitcoin is collateral. And if bitcoin is 26 00:01:14,720 --> 00:01:17,440 Speaker 1: a pristine capital asset, if it's something that you can 27 00:01:17,480 --> 00:01:20,399 Speaker 1: borrow against, that you can leverage, or that you can 28 00:01:20,400 --> 00:01:25,039 Speaker 1: issue fixed income against, then bitcoin yield is great. But 29 00:01:25,480 --> 00:01:28,399 Speaker 1: yielding bitcoin from ten bitcoin to twenty bitcoin on your 30 00:01:28,440 --> 00:01:31,200 Speaker 1: balance sheet does not give you that next level unlock 31 00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:34,280 Speaker 1: of using the bitcoin in productive ways as a collateral asset, 32 00:01:34,440 --> 00:01:37,840 Speaker 1: whether that be in ten years, acquiring different cash flowing businesses. 33 00:01:38,480 --> 00:01:40,680 Speaker 1: Whatever the landscape may look like for business, may be 34 00:01:40,760 --> 00:01:45,440 Speaker 1: their bitcoin yield via productive products or issuing these fixed 35 00:01:45,480 --> 00:01:48,840 Speaker 1: income giant capital market arbitrages. You need that collateral to 36 00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:50,040 Speaker 1: enable those activities. 37 00:01:50,640 --> 00:01:52,840 Speaker 2: So when you're saying bitcoin yield, you're meaning at the 38 00:01:52,920 --> 00:01:55,320 Speaker 2: rate at which they're acquiring new bitcoin under their balance 39 00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:57,240 Speaker 2: you or the rate of their bitcoin balance is growing, 40 00:01:57,520 --> 00:01:59,320 Speaker 2: not earning yield on the bitcoin, but at the rate 41 00:01:59,320 --> 00:02:01,640 Speaker 2: that they're growing there they're bitcoin. So you're saying that 42 00:02:01,840 --> 00:02:05,080 Speaker 2: it's really irrelevant how fast you're growing it. It's really 43 00:02:05,120 --> 00:02:07,520 Speaker 2: the total size of it. And so it's cool if 44 00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:10,320 Speaker 2: you're growing it at fifty percent, but if you're still 45 00:02:10,360 --> 00:02:12,760 Speaker 2: only fifty bitcoin, it doesn't really matter. I guess that's 46 00:02:12,760 --> 00:02:13,120 Speaker 2: what you're. 47 00:02:13,000 --> 00:02:16,120 Speaker 1: Saying, and I think it's not as black and white 48 00:02:16,160 --> 00:02:18,000 Speaker 1: as I make it made it out to sound. But 49 00:02:18,360 --> 00:02:20,240 Speaker 1: for an investor, if you're in at one bitcoin and 50 00:02:20,280 --> 00:02:23,560 Speaker 1: they're bitcoin yield or the number of bitcoin you own 51 00:02:23,680 --> 00:02:25,880 Speaker 1: per share, So bitcoin yield is a function of both 52 00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:27,359 Speaker 1: the amount of bitcoin and the balance sheet and the 53 00:02:27,440 --> 00:02:31,360 Speaker 1: number of fully diluted outstanding shares. So in that equation, 54 00:02:31,440 --> 00:02:33,079 Speaker 1: as a shareholder your site, you have a lot more 55 00:02:33,080 --> 00:02:37,040 Speaker 1: bitcoin per share. But from a company perspective and a strength, 56 00:02:37,240 --> 00:02:41,240 Speaker 1: durability and longevity perspective, the more bitcoin they own, the 57 00:02:41,280 --> 00:02:44,160 Speaker 1: more optionality they have moving into the future with these 58 00:02:44,160 --> 00:02:45,880 Speaker 1: different products. So I think those are the kind of 59 00:02:45,880 --> 00:02:48,600 Speaker 1: the two factors you have to weigh when looking at 60 00:02:48,600 --> 00:02:51,440 Speaker 1: one of these companies. And then when you think about 61 00:02:51,480 --> 00:02:54,960 Speaker 1: like reaching critical mass, issuing equity becomes less and less 62 00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:58,360 Speaker 1: attractive as the size of the company grows. So I 63 00:02:58,360 --> 00:03:01,519 Speaker 1: think all these bitcoin treasuries need a play to move 64 00:03:01,560 --> 00:03:05,400 Speaker 1: into beyond just issuing equity and yielding bitcoin because of 65 00:03:05,440 --> 00:03:07,239 Speaker 1: the nav the m nav arbitrage. 66 00:03:07,360 --> 00:03:10,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, I want to dig into all the mechanics of that, 67 00:03:10,440 --> 00:03:13,280 Speaker 2: but let's just zoom out a little bit before we 68 00:03:13,360 --> 00:03:18,639 Speaker 2: digged super deep into this. Are you a bitcoiner, were 69 00:03:18,680 --> 00:03:21,240 Speaker 2: you hold were you holding bitcoin in deep cold storage 70 00:03:21,280 --> 00:03:23,519 Speaker 2: before jumping into this, or are you sort of like 71 00:03:23,560 --> 00:03:25,240 Speaker 2: an equities guy that have moved into this. 72 00:03:27,320 --> 00:03:28,880 Speaker 1: Prior to being a So I was a bitcoiner in 73 00:03:28,919 --> 00:03:31,360 Speaker 1: twenty twenty one. I was a twenty twenty one bitcoiner, 74 00:03:31,760 --> 00:03:35,000 Speaker 1: and I found my conviction during the FTX collapse just 75 00:03:35,040 --> 00:03:37,520 Speaker 1: out of pure luck. I was reading all the material 76 00:03:37,520 --> 00:03:39,160 Speaker 1: and it happened to be very long price at the time. 77 00:03:39,200 --> 00:03:41,240 Speaker 1: So I feel very lucky because of that. But prior 78 00:03:41,280 --> 00:03:43,080 Speaker 1: to that, I was an index investor. So you know, 79 00:03:43,120 --> 00:03:45,360 Speaker 1: all through my younger years, I was dumping all my 80 00:03:45,400 --> 00:03:47,320 Speaker 1: money in the S and P and so I've always 81 00:03:47,560 --> 00:03:50,480 Speaker 1: I've always really thought the idea of just long term 82 00:03:50,520 --> 00:03:53,720 Speaker 1: compound growth on your money is very, very powerful, and 83 00:03:53,720 --> 00:03:56,440 Speaker 1: that's why I've kind of been attracted to bitcoin. But 84 00:03:56,640 --> 00:03:59,160 Speaker 1: I found bitcoin through kind of an option's lens. I 85 00:03:59,160 --> 00:04:01,520 Speaker 1: studied a lot of quanticy to finance through college and 86 00:04:01,560 --> 00:04:04,720 Speaker 1: graduate school, and I've always found it really interesting that 87 00:04:04,760 --> 00:04:06,800 Speaker 1: for an acid like bitcoin, if you believe it's growing 88 00:04:06,800 --> 00:04:08,960 Speaker 1: out a roughly a power log growth rate or just 89 00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:12,040 Speaker 1: a steady high compound growth, you can make a lot 90 00:04:12,080 --> 00:04:14,640 Speaker 1: of money with long term options on an asset like that. 91 00:04:14,840 --> 00:04:16,560 Speaker 1: So that's why I was really attracted to it. 92 00:04:16,839 --> 00:04:18,800 Speaker 2: So you kind of were attracted, I mean obviously by 93 00:04:18,839 --> 00:04:21,200 Speaker 2: the growth rate number one in gu as we call it, 94 00:04:21,279 --> 00:04:23,719 Speaker 2: right number go up. And then because of your background, 95 00:04:23,760 --> 00:04:25,920 Speaker 2: you saw the ability to do options against it, which 96 00:04:25,960 --> 00:04:29,520 Speaker 2: then increases that. And then you saw the treasuries, and 97 00:04:29,560 --> 00:04:32,679 Speaker 2: then they're even increasing the options if you will, almost 98 00:04:32,760 --> 00:04:34,960 Speaker 2: on that, Yeah, exactly. 99 00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:36,640 Speaker 1: And the treasure is so interesting because there were no 100 00:04:36,800 --> 00:04:39,360 Speaker 1: I that called you couldn't buy options on ib when 101 00:04:39,360 --> 00:04:41,280 Speaker 1: I was buying options on mstr you know, So like 102 00:04:41,839 --> 00:04:44,279 Speaker 1: I was forced into bitcoin treasuries because I was interested 103 00:04:44,279 --> 00:04:46,240 Speaker 1: in options, and then I had to learn about bitcoin 104 00:04:46,279 --> 00:04:47,000 Speaker 1: judges along the way. 105 00:04:47,080 --> 00:04:49,880 Speaker 2: Yeah. So twenty twenty one, Class of twenty twenty one, 106 00:04:51,960 --> 00:04:53,720 Speaker 2: I want to ask about our reference. But so far 107 00:04:53,800 --> 00:04:55,760 Speaker 2: we've seen you know, in the last year, Meta Planet 108 00:04:55,839 --> 00:04:57,880 Speaker 2: being the second company or really the first company I 109 00:04:57,920 --> 00:05:00,479 Speaker 2: should say, that's actually been able to duplicate what micro 110 00:05:00,520 --> 00:05:03,200 Speaker 2: strategy and now strategy has done their stocks up like 111 00:05:03,240 --> 00:05:06,200 Speaker 2: seven thousand percent in like a year. And now we're 112 00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:09,000 Speaker 2: seeing ones like Blockchain Group in France They're up like 113 00:05:09,040 --> 00:05:11,360 Speaker 2: three thousand percent in six months. And then we see 114 00:05:11,360 --> 00:05:13,840 Speaker 2: like the Smarter Web companies up like eight thousand percent 115 00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:16,600 Speaker 2: in like two months. Those are insane numbers. I mean, 116 00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:20,360 Speaker 2: you're an index investor, like, those are insane numbers. But 117 00:05:20,400 --> 00:05:23,120 Speaker 2: it it it's very similar to what we saw back 118 00:05:23,120 --> 00:05:27,039 Speaker 2: in like twenty seventeen in the cryptocurrency ico boom. So 119 00:05:27,080 --> 00:05:28,960 Speaker 2: they weren't IPOs like kind of what we're seeing now. 120 00:05:29,000 --> 00:05:31,599 Speaker 2: They were icos, And so you hear a lot about 121 00:05:31,960 --> 00:05:33,800 Speaker 2: some of the differences there. I mean, have you gone 122 00:05:33,800 --> 00:05:35,920 Speaker 2: back and sort of studied what happened there to see 123 00:05:35,920 --> 00:05:37,920 Speaker 2: if there's any kind of common parallels there. 124 00:05:38,520 --> 00:05:42,239 Speaker 1: Yeah, And I'm not extremely familiar with the ico boom 125 00:05:42,240 --> 00:05:44,599 Speaker 1: and bus cycle. I mean I studied alt coins for 126 00:05:44,640 --> 00:05:48,160 Speaker 1: a bit in twenty twenty two, just looking at different projects, 127 00:05:48,240 --> 00:05:51,279 Speaker 1: understanding the tokenomics and stuff, and I mean I wasn't 128 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:55,200 Speaker 1: all that attracted to it. And I think, what's I compare? 129 00:05:55,240 --> 00:05:59,159 Speaker 1: I think this bitcoin treasury craze more to the spack 130 00:05:59,200 --> 00:06:02,880 Speaker 1: craze of twenty one, so in twenty twenty. So that's 131 00:06:02,920 --> 00:06:07,560 Speaker 1: kind of my mental comparison. So there's people more knowledgeable 132 00:06:07,560 --> 00:06:09,200 Speaker 1: about the icos and they yeah, yeah. 133 00:06:09,080 --> 00:06:10,800 Speaker 2: I would, I would say that. I mean I think 134 00:06:10,839 --> 00:06:13,440 Speaker 2: both of very similar. I mean a SPAC was also 135 00:06:13,520 --> 00:06:15,080 Speaker 2: sort of like, hey, we're gonna raise a bunch of money. 136 00:06:15,080 --> 00:06:18,599 Speaker 2: We'll tell you what we're gonna do with it afterwards, right, 137 00:06:18,640 --> 00:06:19,960 Speaker 2: and then a lot of times they didn't have any 138 00:06:20,040 --> 00:06:22,000 Speaker 2: value there. ICO is sort of similar, like we raise 139 00:06:22,000 --> 00:06:23,679 Speaker 2: a bunch of money and then there's really just vapor 140 00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:26,640 Speaker 2: where there's nothing there, whereas these these treasury companies at 141 00:06:26,680 --> 00:06:31,120 Speaker 2: least they're buying bitcoin, so as there is that, yeah. 142 00:06:30,880 --> 00:06:34,800 Speaker 1: And there's fear greed, like I think icos and SPACs are. 143 00:06:35,120 --> 00:06:37,360 Speaker 1: You have to understand the fear greed aspect of any 144 00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:40,000 Speaker 1: of this, like trading behavior. So that's where they're helpful. 145 00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:42,200 Speaker 1: But ultimately, I think raising capital and putting into bitcoin 146 00:06:42,600 --> 00:06:45,800 Speaker 1: is actually a good faith, good hearted move. So we're 147 00:06:45,800 --> 00:06:47,920 Speaker 1: in a different sort of environment I think long term. 148 00:06:47,960 --> 00:06:50,400 Speaker 2: Okay, now, as we kind of dig into this, I 149 00:06:50,400 --> 00:06:51,840 Speaker 2: mean I want to get into the details, but we're 150 00:06:51,880 --> 00:06:54,640 Speaker 2: just kind of warming the audience here. But so you know. 151 00:06:54,720 --> 00:06:56,719 Speaker 2: I think you've said there's like two types of companies. 152 00:06:56,760 --> 00:06:58,839 Speaker 2: There's the tesla who holds a bitcoin on the balance sheet, 153 00:06:58,839 --> 00:07:01,320 Speaker 2: and then there's companies doing it as a strategy. But 154 00:07:01,400 --> 00:07:03,840 Speaker 2: would you also say that maybe within that, maybe there's 155 00:07:03,880 --> 00:07:06,880 Speaker 2: three companies. So there's the test let's put another balance sheet. 156 00:07:07,200 --> 00:07:09,840 Speaker 2: Then there's ones that are like a hybrid company that's 157 00:07:09,840 --> 00:07:12,720 Speaker 2: also running a strategy, and then there's peer play strategy companies. 158 00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:16,440 Speaker 1: I think absolutely yeah. I mean it can be. It's 159 00:07:16,520 --> 00:07:18,800 Speaker 1: it's kind of like a slider, right, you can adjust 160 00:07:19,040 --> 00:07:21,000 Speaker 1: how aggressive if you want to be with the bitcoin 161 00:07:21,560 --> 00:07:25,280 Speaker 1: capital market's arbitrage, or maybe you don't want to use 162 00:07:25,320 --> 00:07:27,040 Speaker 1: the capital markets at all to raise the bitcoin. You 163 00:07:27,080 --> 00:07:29,840 Speaker 1: just sweep your cash flows. And I think the most 164 00:07:29,880 --> 00:07:33,320 Speaker 1: important thing is in a falling bitcoin environment, which we 165 00:07:33,360 --> 00:07:36,680 Speaker 1: haven't really seen for three years, how do you navigate? 166 00:07:36,920 --> 00:07:39,360 Speaker 1: And that's going to be the real question. And I 167 00:07:39,400 --> 00:07:43,760 Speaker 1: actually think the strongest contenders in that environment are those 168 00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:45,360 Speaker 1: who sweep their cash flows into bitcoin. 169 00:07:46,360 --> 00:07:48,920 Speaker 2: So that means the strongest contenders would be ones that 170 00:07:49,040 --> 00:07:52,560 Speaker 2: actually have a business model that's making cash flow outside 171 00:07:52,600 --> 00:07:53,120 Speaker 2: of bitcoin. 172 00:07:54,160 --> 00:07:56,640 Speaker 1: I think it's a huge leg up. I think it's 173 00:07:56,640 --> 00:07:58,360 Speaker 1: a huge leg up for a bitcoin treasury, just even 174 00:07:58,400 --> 00:08:00,480 Speaker 1: if it's you know, five million dollars a year of 175 00:08:00,480 --> 00:08:03,360 Speaker 1: free cash flow, because you have so much optionality to 176 00:08:03,440 --> 00:08:07,120 Speaker 1: issue to to secure a debt and buy bitcoin in 177 00:08:07,960 --> 00:08:09,640 Speaker 1: market where the bitcoin price is suppressed. 178 00:08:09,720 --> 00:08:14,320 Speaker 2: Okay, but what do you think happens when a company 179 00:08:14,400 --> 00:08:16,920 Speaker 2: you have, like a similar scientific who's running like a 180 00:08:16,960 --> 00:08:20,360 Speaker 2: medical company, And like, as an investor, what do I 181 00:08:20,400 --> 00:08:22,400 Speaker 2: know about medical companies? And I don't know they're facing 182 00:08:22,440 --> 00:08:24,520 Speaker 2: a DOJ lawsuit and what could happen with that? And 183 00:08:24,560 --> 00:08:26,360 Speaker 2: oh what if they have a new patent and that's good, 184 00:08:26,360 --> 00:08:28,440 Speaker 2: but I don't know about that. But then they're also 185 00:08:28,520 --> 00:08:30,800 Speaker 2: running the strategy over here, so like how do I 186 00:08:30,920 --> 00:08:33,239 Speaker 2: value them? And so then maybe there's like this miscommunication 187 00:08:33,280 --> 00:08:37,400 Speaker 2: in the market. Whereas like Sailor he talks about I mean, 188 00:08:37,440 --> 00:08:39,080 Speaker 2: he made it very clear. I got to have dinner 189 00:08:39,120 --> 00:08:41,800 Speaker 2: with him in Prague and he said, if bitcoin goes up, 190 00:08:41,920 --> 00:08:44,240 Speaker 2: the market wants the strategy to go up twice as much, 191 00:08:44,240 --> 00:08:45,800 Speaker 2: and if bitcoin goes down, they want it to go 192 00:08:45,840 --> 00:08:49,120 Speaker 2: down twice as much because they the market needs to 193 00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:51,400 Speaker 2: know how to price around it. He's like, they don't 194 00:08:51,400 --> 00:08:53,960 Speaker 2: want me to lower the volatility, they'll just lower their position. 195 00:08:55,640 --> 00:08:58,559 Speaker 2: And so you know, he said, like he made the 196 00:08:58,600 --> 00:09:00,720 Speaker 2: funny case. He said, they've got game and spoke to 197 00:09:00,720 --> 00:09:02,400 Speaker 2: me tonight and told me the market was going to 198 00:09:02,440 --> 00:09:05,040 Speaker 2: crash tomorrow, and I hedged my position and the market crashed, 199 00:09:05,280 --> 00:09:09,400 Speaker 2: but we didn't. That's not what the market wants because 200 00:09:09,440 --> 00:09:12,080 Speaker 2: then they then they don't know what to expect, right, 201 00:09:12,120 --> 00:09:14,480 Speaker 2: And so then I start thinking about a similar scientific 202 00:09:15,000 --> 00:09:16,480 Speaker 2: and not to throw them under the bus or whatever, 203 00:09:16,480 --> 00:09:18,960 Speaker 2: but just as an example, like, how do I know 204 00:09:19,040 --> 00:09:22,560 Speaker 2: what to expect from that stock based off of bitcoin? 205 00:09:22,679 --> 00:09:23,440 Speaker 2: In that example? 206 00:09:25,800 --> 00:09:28,480 Speaker 1: And I think that's a really good question and something 207 00:09:28,520 --> 00:09:32,280 Speaker 1: I can't I can't answer directly because it's going to 208 00:09:32,320 --> 00:09:34,520 Speaker 1: be so diversified. There's going to be companies that exist 209 00:09:34,520 --> 00:09:37,320 Speaker 1: in so many different parts of the spectrum. But the 210 00:09:37,320 --> 00:09:39,800 Speaker 1: more capital you have in your balance sheet, the larger 211 00:09:39,840 --> 00:09:42,640 Speaker 1: the percentage of your valuation is based on that actual 212 00:09:42,679 --> 00:09:45,560 Speaker 1: bitcoin capital asset, the more correlated directly you will be 213 00:09:45,600 --> 00:09:47,000 Speaker 1: with bitcoin. That's all I can say. 214 00:09:47,080 --> 00:09:49,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, and then and then maybe that would only matter 215 00:09:49,720 --> 00:09:52,360 Speaker 2: for the common shares of the main company, But then 216 00:09:52,400 --> 00:09:55,640 Speaker 2: if you wanted to tap into Preford preferred shares or something. 217 00:09:55,720 --> 00:09:59,200 Speaker 2: Then that's a whole different piece, that's. 218 00:09:59,120 --> 00:10:01,560 Speaker 1: A whole different ball game. I find it extremely interesting, 219 00:10:01,559 --> 00:10:02,960 Speaker 1: and I think that's where all of this is going, 220 00:10:03,200 --> 00:10:04,840 Speaker 1: especially for the treasuries. 221 00:10:04,920 --> 00:10:07,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, for the peer play treasuries exactly. 222 00:10:07,559 --> 00:10:08,160 Speaker 1: All right, So. 223 00:10:10,440 --> 00:10:12,760 Speaker 2: We have we have a spectrum, and I guess probably 224 00:10:12,800 --> 00:10:15,840 Speaker 2: at some point, at what point does the bitcoin strategy 225 00:10:16,000 --> 00:10:19,240 Speaker 2: start to overtake the existing bitcoin So like strategy, for example, 226 00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:22,720 Speaker 2: you barely hear about the software business anymore, whereas like 227 00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:25,360 Speaker 2: kind of going back to a Tesla or if Apple 228 00:10:25,360 --> 00:10:27,280 Speaker 2: were to buy bitcoin on their balance sheet, it wouldn't 229 00:10:27,280 --> 00:10:29,520 Speaker 2: even really move the needle. But kind of going back 230 00:10:29,520 --> 00:10:32,079 Speaker 2: to like I mean, index investing, traditional equity investing, and 231 00:10:32,120 --> 00:10:34,959 Speaker 2: typically you don't really value companies as a multiple off 232 00:10:34,960 --> 00:10:39,040 Speaker 2: their nave, right, so it's really all about those discounted cashlows. 233 00:10:40,440 --> 00:10:43,800 Speaker 2: So then so I guess you have to get to 234 00:10:43,800 --> 00:10:47,000 Speaker 2: a point where that bitcoin overtakes the traditional business. I 235 00:10:47,000 --> 00:10:48,319 Speaker 2: guess that that's the way that you see it. And 236 00:10:48,400 --> 00:10:50,400 Speaker 2: then that's just it on a spectrum. 237 00:10:50,800 --> 00:10:52,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, And I actually kind of have a metric I 238 00:10:52,920 --> 00:10:55,360 Speaker 1: use in my head for that, and so I think 239 00:10:55,520 --> 00:11:00,000 Speaker 1: strategy transition from a meaningful software business to a meaningless 240 00:11:00,040 --> 00:11:03,120 Speaker 1: offware business in terms of its overall evaluation, when the 241 00:11:03,160 --> 00:11:05,440 Speaker 1: free cash flow from the operating business has ceased to 242 00:11:05,440 --> 00:11:09,800 Speaker 1: be able to cover the annual liabilities of their debt. 243 00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:14,360 Speaker 1: So when the preferreds became started becoming issued, they no 244 00:11:14,440 --> 00:11:17,440 Speaker 1: longer can cover those preferreds by their free cash flow 245 00:11:17,520 --> 00:11:20,280 Speaker 1: from their operating business. Up until the end of twenty 246 00:11:20,320 --> 00:11:23,240 Speaker 1: twenty four, they were able to cover all the convertible 247 00:11:23,280 --> 00:11:25,960 Speaker 1: debt coupon payments through their operating cash flow. So that 248 00:11:26,040 --> 00:11:28,800 Speaker 1: was a fundamental shift in their strategy. And now they're 249 00:11:29,000 --> 00:11:32,319 Speaker 1: wholly dependent on bitcoin's compound annual growth rate for their success. 250 00:11:32,720 --> 00:11:36,439 Speaker 2: Okay, now we talk about the underlying business model and 251 00:11:36,520 --> 00:11:38,960 Speaker 2: the point of having some sort of cash flow. Five 252 00:11:39,000 --> 00:11:41,000 Speaker 2: million dollars is good enough to sort of cover that. 253 00:11:41,600 --> 00:11:44,280 Speaker 2: But you've also talked about quite a bit about sort 254 00:11:44,320 --> 00:11:47,920 Speaker 2: of like the convertible bond problem, and it almost seems 255 00:11:47,960 --> 00:11:51,400 Speaker 2: like maybe Sailors sort of headfaked the industry almost, if 256 00:11:51,400 --> 00:11:54,800 Speaker 2: you will, because micro strategy came out with the convertible bonds, 257 00:11:55,720 --> 00:11:58,120 Speaker 2: and now there's strategy which is maybe like the two 258 00:11:58,200 --> 00:12:01,000 Speaker 2: point zero, which is like no more vertibles and now 259 00:12:01,000 --> 00:12:04,959 Speaker 2: it's like atm and preferreds. So what's this convertible bond 260 00:12:05,000 --> 00:12:08,000 Speaker 2: problem that you see that seemingly sort of headfake the 261 00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:12,079 Speaker 2: industry to like, now everybody's copying that part, but it 262 00:12:12,120 --> 00:12:14,199 Speaker 2: seems to be a big problem. 263 00:12:14,360 --> 00:12:17,120 Speaker 1: Yeah. I can only speak to the risks associated with 264 00:12:17,120 --> 00:12:20,559 Speaker 1: a convert relative to it preferred, and that's when duration, 265 00:12:21,120 --> 00:12:25,480 Speaker 1: so converts come do and that term debt is very 266 00:12:25,480 --> 00:12:29,320 Speaker 1: problematic if Bitcoin has a sustained draw down. Two, it's 267 00:12:29,480 --> 00:12:32,760 Speaker 1: the pricing of his convertible notes and the delta hedging 268 00:12:32,880 --> 00:12:36,960 Speaker 1: where people will tend to short the exposure to MSTR 269 00:12:37,080 --> 00:12:39,439 Speaker 1: relative to the bond. So the bonds when they get 270 00:12:39,480 --> 00:12:43,520 Speaker 1: issued represent about fifty percent exposure to MSTR. And most 271 00:12:43,559 --> 00:12:46,600 Speaker 1: of the large players who buy these bonds these convertible notes, 272 00:12:46,720 --> 00:12:49,320 Speaker 1: they short the stock and they scalp the stock on 273 00:12:49,360 --> 00:12:52,280 Speaker 1: the way down. And that's very predatory for the common shareholders. 274 00:12:52,320 --> 00:12:56,160 Speaker 1: And so I don't think that's super advantageous for any 275 00:12:56,200 --> 00:12:58,640 Speaker 1: company who's looking to issue debt. And that's why I 276 00:12:58,640 --> 00:13:01,040 Speaker 1: think that prefers become more popular. 277 00:13:01,240 --> 00:13:03,600 Speaker 2: So it's sort of like at the beginning, it was like, 278 00:13:03,640 --> 00:13:05,480 Speaker 2: oh my gosh, he's raising billions of dollars at like 279 00:13:05,600 --> 00:13:08,240 Speaker 2: zero point eight interest, Like that's amazing, Like why wouldn't 280 00:13:08,280 --> 00:13:09,800 Speaker 2: you want to be at billions of dollars at very 281 00:13:09,840 --> 00:13:12,560 Speaker 2: low rates? Which is why again sort of the headfake. 282 00:13:12,640 --> 00:13:15,800 Speaker 2: Now you see, you know, Swamp sequons, you know, raised 283 00:13:15,800 --> 00:13:18,440 Speaker 2: two hundred million of converts, and I think Pump's company 284 00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:20,360 Speaker 2: rais two hundred fty million of converts. And you see 285 00:13:20,360 --> 00:13:22,960 Speaker 2: that over and over and over. But I guess what 286 00:13:23,000 --> 00:13:25,200 Speaker 2: you're saying is the sort of that predatory nature or 287 00:13:25,240 --> 00:13:27,520 Speaker 2: really it's the function of that convert market is going 288 00:13:27,559 --> 00:13:29,920 Speaker 2: to want to short the stock and so even though 289 00:13:29,920 --> 00:13:31,640 Speaker 2: they're getting the bitcoin, then they have to face the 290 00:13:31,640 --> 00:13:35,120 Speaker 2: headwinds of the of the downward pressure against the equity price. 291 00:13:36,360 --> 00:13:38,240 Speaker 1: Exactly. Yeah, I mean it's a good and a bad. 292 00:13:38,360 --> 00:13:40,200 Speaker 1: Like with everything, there's a negative. So it's a positive 293 00:13:40,200 --> 00:13:42,080 Speaker 1: they get all the bitcoin, it's a negative there's some 294 00:13:42,080 --> 00:13:44,880 Speaker 1: downre equity pressure. One point I think that's really important 295 00:13:44,880 --> 00:13:47,200 Speaker 1: to understand about those converts is you can have a 296 00:13:47,240 --> 00:13:50,000 Speaker 1: senior on secured convert or a senior secured convert. And 297 00:13:50,040 --> 00:13:52,240 Speaker 1: something to watch out for in these capital structures are 298 00:13:52,320 --> 00:13:54,920 Speaker 1: the secured nature of those converts because then there is 299 00:13:54,920 --> 00:13:58,160 Speaker 1: a margin call preference in the price of bitcoint whereas 300 00:13:58,200 --> 00:14:01,160 Speaker 1: with Strategy and most other bitcoin try it's unsecured, so 301 00:14:01,200 --> 00:14:03,920 Speaker 1: there's no margin call risk with those convertible notes. 302 00:14:04,640 --> 00:14:07,880 Speaker 2: So the duration of that debt instrument, as well as 303 00:14:07,920 --> 00:14:09,560 Speaker 2: whether it's secured or not secure, is going to make 304 00:14:09,559 --> 00:14:11,520 Speaker 2: a big difference exactly. 305 00:14:11,760 --> 00:14:13,439 Speaker 1: All those terms really really matter, and we're trying to 306 00:14:13,520 --> 00:14:15,800 Speaker 1: value the credit worthiness of any of these companies. 307 00:14:16,040 --> 00:14:21,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, do you think there's like a ratio where, like, 308 00:14:21,560 --> 00:14:25,520 Speaker 2: you know, we could probably take twenty percent in converts 309 00:14:26,080 --> 00:14:28,640 Speaker 2: and that extra bitcoin will help our stock grow, but 310 00:14:28,680 --> 00:14:30,960 Speaker 2: it doesn't really hold our stock down that much. Is 311 00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:32,760 Speaker 2: there like some sort of a ratio that you think 312 00:14:32,920 --> 00:14:35,520 Speaker 2: might work or does it really come down to those 313 00:14:35,600 --> 00:14:36,680 Speaker 2: terms that you said? 314 00:14:37,960 --> 00:14:40,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think it depends on whether or not you 315 00:14:40,160 --> 00:14:42,240 Speaker 1: can cover those converts with free cash flow. If you can, 316 00:14:42,560 --> 00:14:44,440 Speaker 1: I would go heavy on the converts because you have 317 00:14:44,520 --> 00:14:48,320 Speaker 1: maximum leverage with the lowest amount of risk as long 318 00:14:48,320 --> 00:14:52,320 Speaker 1: as it's not secured. But in terms of the short pressure, 319 00:14:52,360 --> 00:14:55,560 Speaker 1: I think bitcoin's price pushes. Bitcoin's price is really the 320 00:14:55,600 --> 00:14:58,520 Speaker 1: forcing function there, Like I wouldn't The shorts are predatory, 321 00:14:58,640 --> 00:15:01,400 Speaker 1: but they're not. They don't cripple stock price, so I 322 00:15:01,400 --> 00:15:02,760 Speaker 1: don't think they're a massive issue. 323 00:15:03,800 --> 00:15:06,680 Speaker 2: So if you could get it on good terms with 324 00:15:07,160 --> 00:15:11,520 Speaker 2: potentially being unsecured where you're not basically forced to sell, 325 00:15:12,960 --> 00:15:15,600 Speaker 2: and bitcoin runs, we're making you all the time as 326 00:15:15,600 --> 00:15:16,800 Speaker 2: the time of recording, and I think we had one 327 00:15:16,840 --> 00:15:19,760 Speaker 2: thirteen today. If it runs the two hundred thousand, that 328 00:15:20,160 --> 00:15:21,880 Speaker 2: headwinds of the pressure of the short selling is probably 329 00:15:21,920 --> 00:15:24,120 Speaker 2: not going to matter exactly. 330 00:15:24,320 --> 00:15:26,280 Speaker 1: And when those converts are really deep in the money, 331 00:15:26,400 --> 00:15:28,200 Speaker 1: so there's a strike on the convert where they can 332 00:15:28,240 --> 00:15:31,720 Speaker 1: convert the short delta arbing, the delta hedging that goes 333 00:15:31,760 --> 00:15:36,120 Speaker 1: on is pretty much negated at stock prices well above 334 00:15:36,120 --> 00:15:38,200 Speaker 1: the conversion price, So as you get higher and higher 335 00:15:38,200 --> 00:15:40,000 Speaker 1: as bitcoin runs, it matters less than us. 336 00:15:41,320 --> 00:15:44,720 Speaker 2: You've said that. I think you've said that their predatory 337 00:15:44,760 --> 00:15:47,600 Speaker 2: towards the stock and that strategy is frustrated with them. 338 00:15:48,440 --> 00:15:50,000 Speaker 2: I mean, wouldn't there be an opportunity when the price 339 00:15:50,040 --> 00:15:52,080 Speaker 2: a bitcoin runs up to maybe buy those out or 340 00:15:52,120 --> 00:15:52,920 Speaker 2: close those out. 341 00:15:55,000 --> 00:15:58,600 Speaker 1: Yeah, strategy has the ability to convert call those for 342 00:15:58,640 --> 00:16:01,760 Speaker 1: conversion early as long as there's certain terms that are met, 343 00:16:01,800 --> 00:16:04,760 Speaker 1: and all of the duration terms have been met, but 344 00:16:04,800 --> 00:16:08,360 Speaker 1: it's not advantageous for Strategy or any Bitcoin treasury to 345 00:16:08,360 --> 00:16:10,360 Speaker 1: call them early because of the good faith with the 346 00:16:10,400 --> 00:16:15,480 Speaker 1: convertible note hedgers and purchasers, and because there's provisions that 347 00:16:15,960 --> 00:16:19,280 Speaker 1: make Strategy or any of these companies issue more shares 348 00:16:19,480 --> 00:16:22,320 Speaker 1: in the case the company itself calls the debt early, 349 00:16:22,440 --> 00:16:25,080 Speaker 1: so they're kind of just waiting until the delta hedges 350 00:16:25,080 --> 00:16:27,360 Speaker 1: are done hedging and they convert. 351 00:16:27,560 --> 00:16:29,320 Speaker 2: Yeah, just kind of like write it out. 352 00:16:29,920 --> 00:16:31,720 Speaker 1: I think it's their best best option. 353 00:16:32,040 --> 00:16:37,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, at this point. What about something more another type 354 00:16:37,360 --> 00:16:39,400 Speaker 2: of instrument, like the Blockchain Group has done where they've 355 00:16:39,440 --> 00:16:43,360 Speaker 2: taken bitcoin that can convert into equity. What do you 356 00:16:43,400 --> 00:16:44,960 Speaker 2: think about those types of converts? 357 00:16:46,040 --> 00:16:50,360 Speaker 1: So interesting, right, And the risk for the corporation is 358 00:16:51,160 --> 00:16:55,800 Speaker 1: exponentially lower when they take bitcoin downside, right because in 359 00:16:55,840 --> 00:16:59,400 Speaker 1: the case of Strategy convertible notes, they have a principal 360 00:16:59,400 --> 00:17:01,920 Speaker 1: payment due on a certain date in the future denominated 361 00:17:01,920 --> 00:17:04,560 Speaker 1: in USD. In the case of Blockchain Group, I mean, 362 00:17:04,560 --> 00:17:08,359 Speaker 1: it's denominated in bitcoin, So you're not going to face 363 00:17:08,640 --> 00:17:13,760 Speaker 1: a situation where you owe more bitcoin to creditors at 364 00:17:13,800 --> 00:17:15,800 Speaker 1: some point in the future, whereas if the price of 365 00:17:15,840 --> 00:17:19,439 Speaker 1: bitcoin plummets over the next four years, strategy will ultimately 366 00:17:19,520 --> 00:17:23,520 Speaker 1: owe those creditors more bitcoin as represented by the flat 367 00:17:23,600 --> 00:17:26,879 Speaker 1: US D value, so very very much so less risky 368 00:17:27,280 --> 00:17:28,680 Speaker 1: from a perspective. 369 00:17:28,720 --> 00:17:30,080 Speaker 2: But you might also say that then they would have 370 00:17:30,119 --> 00:17:32,119 Speaker 2: to give the bitcoin back. So to your point, you 371 00:17:32,119 --> 00:17:33,920 Speaker 2: to give it back and the US dollar value would 372 00:17:33,920 --> 00:17:36,760 Speaker 2: be lower. But like, if the entire kind of strategy 373 00:17:36,800 --> 00:17:39,520 Speaker 2: is to kind of keep that yield growing, if they 374 00:17:39,520 --> 00:17:41,000 Speaker 2: had to give back a bunch of the bitcoin that 375 00:17:41,000 --> 00:17:42,879 Speaker 2: would work in reverse. Wouldn't it be catastrophic. 376 00:17:43,920 --> 00:17:47,960 Speaker 1: It would be catastrophic, and I think for it would 377 00:17:47,960 --> 00:17:53,280 Speaker 1: be catastrophic. But the problem I think there is that 378 00:17:54,600 --> 00:17:57,600 Speaker 1: if those shares don't convert over a period of time, 379 00:17:57,640 --> 00:18:00,960 Speaker 1: it means the stock underperformed Bitcoin over that duration. And 380 00:18:01,000 --> 00:18:03,920 Speaker 1: so if the stock underperforms Bitcoin, that kind of it's 381 00:18:03,960 --> 00:18:06,320 Speaker 1: all it's all a mess. It's all bad, right. 382 00:18:06,400 --> 00:18:08,680 Speaker 2: If the stock can't overperform Bitcoin. 383 00:18:09,200 --> 00:18:13,080 Speaker 1: Exactly, then bitcoin yield wasn't effective and you lost money 384 00:18:13,080 --> 00:18:14,000 Speaker 1: as a convert holder. 385 00:18:14,560 --> 00:18:16,760 Speaker 2: So let's talk about that for a minute. So you know, 386 00:18:16,880 --> 00:18:19,119 Speaker 2: that's what we see. I see a lot in the 387 00:18:19,160 --> 00:18:20,879 Speaker 2: bitcoin space. I'm sure you do as well as like 388 00:18:21,840 --> 00:18:24,359 Speaker 2: will these outperform Bitcoin, otherwise why don't I just hold Bitcoin? 389 00:18:24,560 --> 00:18:26,840 Speaker 2: And so you know, in the bitcoin community, we believe 390 00:18:26,840 --> 00:18:29,439 Speaker 2: one bitcoin's one bitcoin, that's the hurdle rate, you know, 391 00:18:29,520 --> 00:18:32,400 Speaker 2: et cetera, et cetera, And so I see that a lot. 392 00:18:32,440 --> 00:18:35,320 Speaker 2: But then, like you're an index investor, you used to be, 393 00:18:35,560 --> 00:18:40,040 Speaker 2: So it's like modern portfolio theory or just normal portfolio 394 00:18:40,080 --> 00:18:43,440 Speaker 2: theory would be sort of a diversified portfolio, right, I mean, 395 00:18:43,480 --> 00:18:46,919 Speaker 2: maybe some people might put five percent towards bitcoin or 396 00:18:46,920 --> 00:18:49,960 Speaker 2: ten percent towards bitcoin, and it doesn't seem that the 397 00:18:50,000 --> 00:18:52,240 Speaker 2: majority of people are on a bitcoin standard. So they're 398 00:18:52,280 --> 00:18:54,800 Speaker 2: trying to beat the S and P five hundred, they're 399 00:18:54,840 --> 00:18:58,480 Speaker 2: trying to beat the inflation rate, but not necessarily bitcoin's rate. 400 00:18:58,880 --> 00:19:00,879 Speaker 2: So what do you think think about that? Because, like 401 00:19:00,920 --> 00:19:02,480 Speaker 2: I said, in the bitcoin community to be thinking, well, 402 00:19:02,520 --> 00:19:04,399 Speaker 2: why would I buy that if it can't outperform bitcoin? 403 00:19:04,440 --> 00:19:08,240 Speaker 2: But I don't feel like the normal, the normy investor 404 00:19:08,240 --> 00:19:09,840 Speaker 2: thinks that way. 405 00:19:10,960 --> 00:19:12,879 Speaker 1: Yeah, there's a lot of benefit and there was early 406 00:19:12,920 --> 00:19:15,600 Speaker 1: on for a bitcoin treasury company trading as a public equity, 407 00:19:15,800 --> 00:19:19,320 Speaker 1: the ability to margin and borrow at good rates against 408 00:19:19,320 --> 00:19:22,000 Speaker 1: that equity, the ability to sell calls the ability to 409 00:19:22,119 --> 00:19:24,480 Speaker 1: leverage that position and store it a broken's account. So 410 00:19:24,560 --> 00:19:26,720 Speaker 1: there are a lot of advantages to those public bitcoin 411 00:19:26,760 --> 00:19:29,240 Speaker 1: exposure equities. But the way I look at it is 412 00:19:29,240 --> 00:19:31,520 Speaker 1: like when I'm trying to value a bitcoin equity relative 413 00:19:31,520 --> 00:19:35,560 Speaker 1: to the bitcoin hurdle rate, is you can leverage bitcoin directly, right, 414 00:19:35,600 --> 00:19:37,640 Speaker 1: You can just take leverage on your bitcoin and tech 415 00:19:38,040 --> 00:19:41,760 Speaker 1: theory outperform it. So these companies have to have some 416 00:19:41,800 --> 00:19:44,080 Speaker 1: sort of debt instrument that you can't buy. They have 417 00:19:44,160 --> 00:19:46,920 Speaker 1: to have bitcoin yield in future expectations that you believe 418 00:19:46,920 --> 00:19:49,720 Speaker 1: will outpace bitcoin, And I think you have to look 419 00:19:50,320 --> 00:19:53,120 Speaker 1: long term and think about the durability of their own 420 00:19:53,240 --> 00:19:55,679 Speaker 1: bitcoin per share yield over a ten year period and 421 00:19:55,680 --> 00:19:57,920 Speaker 1: then decide for yourself whether or not they're going to outperform. 422 00:19:58,119 --> 00:20:00,800 Speaker 2: Right. But what I'm saying is I don't know if 423 00:20:00,800 --> 00:20:03,560 Speaker 2: the majority of investors in the world are trying to 424 00:20:03,600 --> 00:20:04,520 Speaker 2: outperform bitcoin. 425 00:20:05,800 --> 00:20:07,040 Speaker 1: Oh, I mean, great point. 426 00:20:07,119 --> 00:20:08,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's what I'm saying. So like you and I 427 00:20:09,080 --> 00:20:10,960 Speaker 2: in the bitcoin space were like, hey, if it's not 428 00:20:10,960 --> 00:20:12,920 Speaker 2: going to beat bitcoin's return, why would I buy it? 429 00:20:13,359 --> 00:20:16,320 Speaker 2: But the majority of investors out there, they're just trying 430 00:20:16,320 --> 00:20:19,000 Speaker 2: to beat the S and P five hundred, Yeah, or 431 00:20:19,040 --> 00:20:22,320 Speaker 2: they're just trying to beat inflation. So if you know, 432 00:20:22,400 --> 00:20:26,600 Speaker 2: if micro Strategy stock or XYZ stock went up thirty 433 00:20:26,640 --> 00:20:29,040 Speaker 2: percent this year, they might be pretty excited about that, 434 00:20:29,080 --> 00:20:30,919 Speaker 2: even though it underperformed Bitcoin. 435 00:20:31,800 --> 00:20:36,040 Speaker 1: Totally, totally. I think everyone has their own benchmark, right, 436 00:20:36,040 --> 00:20:38,600 Speaker 1: and if the SMP's the benchmark, a lot of anything 437 00:20:38,640 --> 00:20:40,360 Speaker 1: that has to do with bitcoin has performed quite well 438 00:20:40,400 --> 00:20:41,520 Speaker 1: relative to that benchmark. 439 00:20:41,840 --> 00:20:45,200 Speaker 2: Do you think there's some sort of like launch launch 440 00:20:45,280 --> 00:20:48,480 Speaker 2: plan and then like maybe escape velocity where like most 441 00:20:48,480 --> 00:20:51,040 Speaker 2: of these companies maybe are sort of bootstrapping off the 442 00:20:51,080 --> 00:20:53,960 Speaker 2: backs of bitcoiners djen bitcoiners that are looking for a 443 00:20:54,000 --> 00:20:56,720 Speaker 2: more yield than what bitcoin can provide. But then eventually 444 00:20:56,720 --> 00:20:59,680 Speaker 2: they get big enough to where they get into mainstream finance, 445 00:20:59,800 --> 00:21:02,280 Speaker 2: and then they're being purchased by regular equity holders that 446 00:21:02,320 --> 00:21:03,920 Speaker 2: are not trying to beat bitcoin as a hurdle rate. 447 00:21:05,280 --> 00:21:07,119 Speaker 1: Absolutely, and a lot of them do get included in 448 00:21:07,119 --> 00:21:11,480 Speaker 1: those passive equities passive indices in their you know, listing 449 00:21:11,520 --> 00:21:15,760 Speaker 1: exchange in their listing country, and that's a huge kind 450 00:21:15,760 --> 00:21:19,320 Speaker 1: of bitcoin trojan horse into the traditional capital markets. And 451 00:21:19,359 --> 00:21:21,000 Speaker 1: I think it's really really good for bitcoin. A lot 452 00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:23,080 Speaker 1: of people, a lot of hardcore bitcoiners, get upset with 453 00:21:23,119 --> 00:21:25,320 Speaker 1: the Bitcoin Treasury is saying it's paper bitcoin and this 454 00:21:25,359 --> 00:21:26,760 Speaker 1: is and the next thing. But I think what they 455 00:21:26,840 --> 00:21:30,640 Speaker 1: miss is that it's really an introduction of bitcoin into 456 00:21:30,640 --> 00:21:33,040 Speaker 1: capital markets in ways that you know, a lot of 457 00:21:33,040 --> 00:21:36,159 Speaker 1: investors holding these diversified portfolios don't even know they're holding 458 00:21:36,280 --> 00:21:39,440 Speaker 1: their beginning to hold these sorts of companies. I mean, 459 00:21:39,560 --> 00:21:42,440 Speaker 1: strategy was in the Russell to just got added to 460 00:21:42,440 --> 00:21:43,920 Speaker 1: the Russell two thousand a few months ago. 461 00:21:44,000 --> 00:21:46,560 Speaker 2: Yeah. I put a post on X a week or 462 00:21:46,560 --> 00:21:48,639 Speaker 2: two ago that went kind of viral and I basically 463 00:21:48,640 --> 00:21:50,639 Speaker 2: said that you know, these these are not for bitcoiners. 464 00:21:50,920 --> 00:21:53,199 Speaker 2: These are not a replacement for cold storage, right. This 465 00:21:53,280 --> 00:21:55,239 Speaker 2: is really for trapped equity that doesn't have a way 466 00:21:55,280 --> 00:21:58,520 Speaker 2: to get exposure to get into it, and so it's 467 00:21:58,560 --> 00:22:00,639 Speaker 2: not a replacement for that. That's why kind of the 468 00:22:00,640 --> 00:22:02,000 Speaker 2: first question I asked you is if you were a 469 00:22:02,000 --> 00:22:06,560 Speaker 2: bitcoin or first, But I guess back to that escape velocity. 470 00:22:06,600 --> 00:22:08,679 Speaker 2: So then if the company can get big enough and 471 00:22:08,720 --> 00:22:11,120 Speaker 2: it can be looked at like additional equity, then as 472 00:22:11,160 --> 00:22:15,479 Speaker 2: a previous a reformed equity investor, I'm just kind of curious, right, 473 00:22:15,440 --> 00:22:19,800 Speaker 2: we would typically value those based off of potential future earnings, 474 00:22:19,800 --> 00:22:22,680 Speaker 2: just kind of cash flows, et cetera. Right, so they'd 475 00:22:22,720 --> 00:22:24,639 Speaker 2: sort of have like, well, you know, if Apple can 476 00:22:24,640 --> 00:22:27,240 Speaker 2: continue to expand its iPhone sales and its profit margins 477 00:22:27,240 --> 00:22:28,840 Speaker 2: stay about the same, how much will be worth in 478 00:22:28,880 --> 00:22:31,240 Speaker 2: three years or five years from now? Even maybe a 479 00:22:31,240 --> 00:22:34,040 Speaker 2: Warren Buffett who would never invest into bitcoin because it 480 00:22:34,040 --> 00:22:37,400 Speaker 2: doesn't produce anything, but he liked capital efficient businesses, right, 481 00:22:37,440 --> 00:22:40,280 Speaker 2: so they had him out. They needed very little capital 482 00:22:40,359 --> 00:22:43,679 Speaker 2: kind of keep going. So then I'm curious how you 483 00:22:43,760 --> 00:22:46,240 Speaker 2: might look at these from like more maybe more in 484 00:22:46,280 --> 00:22:49,320 Speaker 2: that lens, right, So, like take strategy for example, it 485 00:22:49,400 --> 00:22:51,760 Speaker 2: sells a product, it has three or four products, right, 486 00:22:51,800 --> 00:22:54,080 Speaker 2: it's got to strike stripe drive, right, it's got it preferreds. 487 00:22:54,440 --> 00:22:58,000 Speaker 2: It has a massive profit margin on those fifty percent. 488 00:22:59,160 --> 00:23:02,560 Speaker 2: It's very capital efficient. It doesn't take any really very 489 00:23:02,640 --> 00:23:06,240 Speaker 2: much capital to do that. And then if it just 490 00:23:06,400 --> 00:23:09,440 Speaker 2: holds the bitcoin, I mean, Sailor said, what's the worst 491 00:23:09,440 --> 00:23:11,080 Speaker 2: that can happen? We can't raise any more money, and 492 00:23:11,119 --> 00:23:13,480 Speaker 2: we're a sixty billion dollar company growing by sixty percent 493 00:23:13,480 --> 00:23:15,920 Speaker 2: a year. So if bitcoin gets to two hundred thousand 494 00:23:16,000 --> 00:23:18,119 Speaker 2: or gets to five hundred thousand, then how much is 495 00:23:18,200 --> 00:23:21,600 Speaker 2: strategy worth? So I'm curious do you look at it 496 00:23:21,640 --> 00:23:24,080 Speaker 2: like that trying to sort of take that traditional equity 497 00:23:24,160 --> 00:23:26,440 Speaker 2: lens and try to sort of project out that diskind 498 00:23:26,440 --> 00:23:28,560 Speaker 2: of cash flow model. 499 00:23:30,040 --> 00:23:32,280 Speaker 1: I think you have to do those valuations on a 500 00:23:32,280 --> 00:23:37,360 Speaker 1: bitcoin standard because a traditional corporation's assets you can't personally 501 00:23:37,400 --> 00:23:40,720 Speaker 1: own and have them producing whatever they produce at a 502 00:23:40,800 --> 00:23:43,919 Speaker 1: rate of thirty percent annually. So I think it's difficult 503 00:23:44,040 --> 00:23:48,640 Speaker 1: to consider the bitcoin price appreciation as part of earnings. 504 00:23:48,880 --> 00:23:51,119 Speaker 1: I really like the metric bitcoin gain, which is the 505 00:23:51,240 --> 00:23:54,800 Speaker 1: new the US dollar value of the new bitcoin that's 506 00:23:54,880 --> 00:23:58,200 Speaker 1: added on a per share basis for any of these corporations, 507 00:23:58,680 --> 00:24:02,520 Speaker 1: because that's real new dollars in the door per share, 508 00:24:02,720 --> 00:24:04,720 Speaker 1: And so I really look at that metric try to 509 00:24:04,720 --> 00:24:07,160 Speaker 1: figure out how valuable that is moving forward, and that's 510 00:24:07,160 --> 00:24:09,400 Speaker 1: ever increasing because the price of bitcoin is also increasable. 511 00:24:09,480 --> 00:24:11,080 Speaker 2: What happens if Bigwin goes down, then. 512 00:24:12,760 --> 00:24:15,919 Speaker 1: Then you'd be looking at a scenario in which the 513 00:24:15,920 --> 00:24:19,399 Speaker 1: bitcoin gains still positive USD value, but it's not a 514 00:24:19,440 --> 00:24:22,320 Speaker 1: compounding positive USD value in the short term. 515 00:24:22,119 --> 00:24:22,840 Speaker 2: Right, got it? 516 00:24:23,240 --> 00:24:23,320 Speaker 1: So? 517 00:24:23,560 --> 00:24:25,119 Speaker 2: I mean a lot of people seem to use the 518 00:24:25,280 --> 00:24:28,879 Speaker 2: m NAV metric as sort of like that multiple to 519 00:24:28,880 --> 00:24:30,760 Speaker 2: the nave, right, and then the multiple to the bitcoin 520 00:24:30,800 --> 00:24:34,040 Speaker 2: that they have. Do you think that's more of like 521 00:24:34,080 --> 00:24:37,280 Speaker 2: a leading indicator of where the potential price could be? 522 00:24:37,400 --> 00:24:39,240 Speaker 2: Or is that like a lagging indicator sort of telling 523 00:24:39,240 --> 00:24:39,960 Speaker 2: you where they're at. 524 00:24:41,480 --> 00:24:44,159 Speaker 1: I think it's so hard and so complicated, and I 525 00:24:44,200 --> 00:24:45,800 Speaker 1: know we spend a lot of time thinking about this. 526 00:24:47,000 --> 00:24:49,800 Speaker 1: M NAV I originally believe was a function of the 527 00:24:49,880 --> 00:24:52,479 Speaker 1: leverage in the capital structure. Right, If you have one 528 00:24:52,520 --> 00:24:55,199 Speaker 1: hundred dollars a bitcoin and thirty percent of that is 529 00:24:55,200 --> 00:24:57,879 Speaker 1: on leverage, is borrowed ad zero percent debt, which was 530 00:24:58,119 --> 00:25:01,080 Speaker 1: originally how you know strategy the of the bitcoin leverage 531 00:25:01,080 --> 00:25:04,919 Speaker 1: equity capital stack existed. Then if you believe bitcoin's going 532 00:25:05,000 --> 00:25:07,840 Speaker 1: up over a long term time horizon, then the debt 533 00:25:07,880 --> 00:25:10,320 Speaker 1: will melt away in the value of the bitcoin will increase. 534 00:25:10,680 --> 00:25:14,159 Speaker 1: So there should be a theoretical premium on that leverage 535 00:25:14,160 --> 00:25:16,560 Speaker 1: if you believe bitcoin's going up. If you believe bitcoin's 536 00:25:16,560 --> 00:25:18,440 Speaker 1: going down over a long period of time, there should 537 00:25:18,440 --> 00:25:20,840 Speaker 1: be a discount on that leverage capital structure. So I 538 00:25:20,840 --> 00:25:25,000 Speaker 1: think one MNAV is function of the leverage. Now all 539 00:25:25,040 --> 00:25:27,879 Speaker 1: these companies are yielding bitcoin or increasing the bitcoin per share, 540 00:25:28,280 --> 00:25:30,600 Speaker 1: so a lot of times m NAV has become kind 541 00:25:30,600 --> 00:25:33,119 Speaker 1: of a function of the future expectations of on a 542 00:25:33,119 --> 00:25:36,000 Speaker 1: bitcoin each shareholder will have. And I think those work 543 00:25:36,200 --> 00:25:38,919 Speaker 1: in tangent and they ebb and flow, and there's just 544 00:25:39,000 --> 00:25:41,919 Speaker 1: market dynamics, you know. Index inclusion pushes up the MNAV, 545 00:25:42,480 --> 00:25:45,719 Speaker 1: fear push it down the m NAV. So it's not 546 00:25:45,880 --> 00:25:47,480 Speaker 1: just one kind of metric. 547 00:25:47,400 --> 00:25:50,240 Speaker 2: Would you say it could almost be similar in a 548 00:25:50,280 --> 00:25:52,880 Speaker 2: way to like a pe ratio where it's like sort 549 00:25:52,920 --> 00:25:55,119 Speaker 2: of like hey, Metaplanet's at a five or a six 550 00:25:55,520 --> 00:25:58,679 Speaker 2: because the rate at their bitcoin yield, the rate at 551 00:25:58,680 --> 00:26:01,119 Speaker 2: which they're growing the bitcoin stack, they can cover that 552 00:26:01,359 --> 00:26:03,760 Speaker 2: in a short period of time, whereas Strategies is much 553 00:26:03,840 --> 00:26:07,720 Speaker 2: lower because as a percentage, they're growing their bitcoin yield slower. 554 00:26:08,680 --> 00:26:10,240 Speaker 2: So it's sort of like that is that it's like 555 00:26:10,240 --> 00:26:12,840 Speaker 2: a forward looking metric based off of how fast they're 556 00:26:12,840 --> 00:26:15,040 Speaker 2: growing into that I think. 557 00:26:15,119 --> 00:26:16,840 Speaker 1: So I think that's a really good way to put it, 558 00:26:17,040 --> 00:26:19,560 Speaker 1: and that's definitely how the market's starting to price these things. Right. 559 00:26:19,600 --> 00:26:22,479 Speaker 1: We've seen really really high end navs for these smaller 560 00:26:22,480 --> 00:26:26,080 Speaker 1: companies that are yielding bitcoin quickly and lower end navs 561 00:26:26,080 --> 00:26:28,840 Speaker 1: for larger corporations that the base effect math kind of 562 00:26:28,880 --> 00:26:30,560 Speaker 1: inhibits their BDC yield for share. 563 00:26:30,720 --> 00:26:35,280 Speaker 2: Yeah, Now, because you think that size matters, would you 564 00:26:35,359 --> 00:26:37,480 Speaker 2: say that right for the collateral base that you could have? 565 00:26:37,760 --> 00:26:38,000 Speaker 1: Right? 566 00:26:39,280 --> 00:26:42,720 Speaker 2: Do you think the bitcoin yield is maybe used too 567 00:26:42,840 --> 00:26:45,000 Speaker 2: much and it's not really as important as people make 568 00:26:45,040 --> 00:26:47,480 Speaker 2: it out to seem because back to Smarter Web company 569 00:26:47,520 --> 00:26:51,120 Speaker 2: or even Metaplanet, they have a pretty incredible yield, but 570 00:26:51,320 --> 00:26:54,679 Speaker 2: micro strategy or strategy or you know, adds more bitcoin 571 00:26:54,720 --> 00:26:58,520 Speaker 2: in one purchase than Metaplant even has for example. So 572 00:26:59,040 --> 00:27:01,199 Speaker 2: I mean, how is that? Is that a metric that 573 00:27:01,240 --> 00:27:02,440 Speaker 2: you that you use a lot? 574 00:27:04,160 --> 00:27:06,439 Speaker 1: I think about it in a couple different ways, And 575 00:27:06,840 --> 00:27:09,640 Speaker 1: the main way I think about is durability of bitcoin 576 00:27:09,720 --> 00:27:12,920 Speaker 1: yield because the real question is how for looking are 577 00:27:13,800 --> 00:27:16,600 Speaker 1: the is in equity? Right? All equities are forward looking, 578 00:27:16,600 --> 00:27:20,639 Speaker 1: whether that be the price, the PD ratio, et cetera. 579 00:27:20,840 --> 00:27:24,040 Speaker 1: But with a bitcoin treasury company, then the question you're 580 00:27:24,040 --> 00:27:26,440 Speaker 1: asking is how far looking is the future expectation of 581 00:27:26,440 --> 00:27:29,199 Speaker 1: bitcoin per share? And so if the company has a 582 00:27:29,200 --> 00:27:31,720 Speaker 1: really fast bitcoin yield, but it can won't be able 583 00:27:31,720 --> 00:27:35,120 Speaker 1: to sustain bitcoin yield in five years or during a drawdown. 584 00:27:35,720 --> 00:27:37,199 Speaker 1: You can't look out that far. If you have a 585 00:27:37,200 --> 00:27:40,880 Speaker 1: company that can issue you know, eight percent fixed debt 586 00:27:40,960 --> 00:27:43,720 Speaker 1: against their massive capital stack and continue to yield bitcoin 587 00:27:43,720 --> 00:27:47,040 Speaker 1: into perpetuity, maybe that is a more durable, you know, 588 00:27:47,080 --> 00:27:49,639 Speaker 1: business structure. But where yet to see that, you know, 589 00:27:49,840 --> 00:27:50,800 Speaker 1: practice in the market. 590 00:27:50,920 --> 00:27:54,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, well at Prague there was video Sailor did with 591 00:27:54,720 --> 00:27:56,960 Speaker 2: Adam Back and Alexander from the Blockchain Group, and I 592 00:27:56,960 --> 00:27:59,720 Speaker 2: think he actually called it a durable business model, which 593 00:27:59,800 --> 00:28:02,359 Speaker 2: was issuing the preferred to add the bitcoin, and that 594 00:28:02,520 --> 00:28:06,440 Speaker 2: was the durable model. So going back to the size matters, 595 00:28:06,520 --> 00:28:08,719 Speaker 2: and you talked about like the credit worthiness and so 596 00:28:09,040 --> 00:28:11,960 Speaker 2: I'm guessing what do you mean by credit worthiness and 597 00:28:11,960 --> 00:28:12,800 Speaker 2: why is that important? 598 00:28:15,000 --> 00:28:19,680 Speaker 1: Credit worthiness? And for a bitcoin treasury company is really 599 00:28:19,840 --> 00:28:22,919 Speaker 1: comes down to the different tranches of debt in the 600 00:28:22,920 --> 00:28:25,720 Speaker 1: capital stack and how over collateralized they are by the 601 00:28:25,720 --> 00:28:28,919 Speaker 1: bitcoin and the track record of the company in bitcoin 602 00:28:28,960 --> 00:28:32,840 Speaker 1: acquisition and not messing up the strategy quite frankly, so 603 00:28:33,040 --> 00:28:35,000 Speaker 1: do they take do they borrow against their bitcoin for 604 00:28:35,040 --> 00:28:39,680 Speaker 1: other purposes that harm the bitcoin itself, that jeopardize the bitcoin, 605 00:28:39,720 --> 00:28:41,680 Speaker 1: Do they do things with the bitcoin, do they lend 606 00:28:41,680 --> 00:28:44,600 Speaker 1: it out that could jeopardize the bitcoin on the balance sheet. 607 00:28:44,640 --> 00:28:46,640 Speaker 1: All those things will hurt the credit rating of a corporation. 608 00:28:47,200 --> 00:28:50,160 Speaker 2: Then and issuing issuing converts that were recourse or had 609 00:28:50,240 --> 00:28:51,240 Speaker 2: term on them, right. 610 00:28:51,560 --> 00:28:54,600 Speaker 1: Exactly secure debt, I mean, that would really hurt the 611 00:28:54,640 --> 00:28:57,320 Speaker 1: credit worthiness of any security issued below it in the 612 00:28:57,320 --> 00:28:59,160 Speaker 1: capital stack, got it. And so these are the things 613 00:28:59,160 --> 00:29:01,720 Speaker 1: you're looking at, and people say the credit worthiness of 614 00:29:01,760 --> 00:29:04,440 Speaker 1: the company, I think the real question here is the 615 00:29:04,440 --> 00:29:07,400 Speaker 1: credit worthiness of the instrument, and the company kind of 616 00:29:07,400 --> 00:29:10,040 Speaker 1: defines that credit worthiness because in Strategies capital stack, or 617 00:29:10,040 --> 00:29:13,440 Speaker 1: in Semilar's capital stack, I mean, the similar converts are 618 00:29:13,480 --> 00:29:16,960 Speaker 1: credit worthy because of what Semilar has done in the past, 619 00:29:17,040 --> 00:29:19,520 Speaker 1: and their bitcoin stack is overclateralized by you know, x 620 00:29:19,520 --> 00:29:22,360 Speaker 1: amount percent. With Strategy, they have four different products, so 621 00:29:22,440 --> 00:29:25,240 Speaker 1: each of those it's a different credit rating rating relative 622 00:29:25,240 --> 00:29:26,920 Speaker 1: to each other. And there'll be more and more of that, 623 00:29:26,960 --> 00:29:27,479 Speaker 1: in my opinion. 624 00:29:27,680 --> 00:29:30,800 Speaker 2: But those preferreds, the four that you mentioned for Strategy, 625 00:29:30,880 --> 00:29:33,680 Speaker 2: they're not actually collateralized though, right, so they're sort of 626 00:29:33,760 --> 00:29:36,960 Speaker 2: backed by the credit rating of Strategy, but not actually 627 00:29:37,080 --> 00:29:40,120 Speaker 2: collateralize themselves. 628 00:29:39,920 --> 00:29:43,320 Speaker 1: They're not secured, but they do have a liquidation preference. 629 00:29:43,600 --> 00:29:47,280 Speaker 1: So in the case of strategies dissolution or if they're 630 00:29:47,320 --> 00:29:51,040 Speaker 1: also cumulative dividends other than stride, So the dividends if 631 00:29:51,040 --> 00:29:54,520 Speaker 1: they're ever missed for Striper Strife, they compound against Strategy, 632 00:29:54,840 --> 00:29:57,840 Speaker 1: and the shareholders have different provisions where they can put 633 00:29:57,840 --> 00:30:00,000 Speaker 1: a board member onto Strategy and make sure those difidence 634 00:30:00,080 --> 00:30:02,880 Speaker 1: get paid. In the case of the dividends aren't paid 635 00:30:02,920 --> 00:30:05,160 Speaker 1: over a long enough period of time, they're owe the 636 00:30:05,160 --> 00:30:09,200 Speaker 1: liquidation preference, which moves to meet the value of both 637 00:30:09,400 --> 00:30:12,760 Speaker 1: crecord strife. So there's protections in place that that protect 638 00:30:12,760 --> 00:30:13,440 Speaker 1: those shareholders. 639 00:30:13,440 --> 00:30:16,960 Speaker 2: So the same so they're backed by the credit worthiness 640 00:30:17,000 --> 00:30:19,280 Speaker 2: of micro Strategy, but not necessarily the bitcoin is the. 641 00:30:19,280 --> 00:30:25,360 Speaker 1: Collateral exactly, Yeah, exactly, And so then argue that worthiness 642 00:30:25,560 --> 00:30:27,680 Speaker 1: is a function of the bitcoin is collateral. But you're 643 00:30:27,720 --> 00:30:31,920 Speaker 1: totally right, it's not secured. It's not directly bitcoin collateralized. 644 00:30:32,000 --> 00:30:34,080 Speaker 2: Right, So then if you want to issue, if you 645 00:30:34,120 --> 00:30:36,280 Speaker 2: want to scale the company, you want to issue the preferreds. 646 00:30:37,440 --> 00:30:39,240 Speaker 2: I want to make sure I have enough bitcoin on 647 00:30:39,280 --> 00:30:42,360 Speaker 2: my books to be credit worthy, but not necessarily back 648 00:30:42,400 --> 00:30:45,000 Speaker 2: those because if I back those as a collateral asset, 649 00:30:45,040 --> 00:30:47,240 Speaker 2: then that actually damages my credit worthiness. 650 00:30:49,000 --> 00:30:52,160 Speaker 1: It has to be unsecured debt. That's yeah, that's the 651 00:30:52,160 --> 00:30:53,960 Speaker 1: only way I would put it. Yea. If it's if 652 00:30:54,000 --> 00:30:56,080 Speaker 1: you have secure debt anywhere in your sheet on your 653 00:30:56,080 --> 00:30:58,800 Speaker 1: balance sheet that's secured by the bitcoin, it really jeopardizes 654 00:30:58,800 --> 00:31:00,440 Speaker 1: the credit worthiness of the institution. 655 00:31:00,560 --> 00:31:04,920 Speaker 2: Got it. Okay, So you've got a new fund going. 656 00:31:05,080 --> 00:31:07,360 Speaker 2: Congratulations on that. Just for everybody that wants to know, 657 00:31:07,840 --> 00:31:10,560 Speaker 2: smart guy running a fund to obviously see the opportunity 658 00:31:10,560 --> 00:31:13,800 Speaker 2: in space, what is Can you give us your framework 659 00:31:14,000 --> 00:31:16,680 Speaker 2: that you're looking for to try to identify which are 660 00:31:16,720 --> 00:31:20,040 Speaker 2: going to be the outliers and where a good valuation 661 00:31:20,240 --> 00:31:21,840 Speaker 2: is today in the future, et cetera. 662 00:31:23,120 --> 00:31:27,040 Speaker 1: Absolutely, We only invest a small portion of the fund 663 00:31:27,160 --> 00:31:32,280 Speaker 1: in bitcoin treasuries. Specifically, our main focus is on preferred 664 00:31:32,360 --> 00:31:34,240 Speaker 1: coming to the market, So I guess that's a form 665 00:31:34,240 --> 00:31:37,920 Speaker 1: of bitcoin treasuries and the options chain. So I got 666 00:31:37,920 --> 00:31:42,080 Speaker 1: my start trading options on both IBIT, MSTR MSTR during 667 00:31:42,080 --> 00:31:44,400 Speaker 1: the bear and that's where I see a lot of 668 00:31:44,480 --> 00:31:49,000 Speaker 1: value is pricing bitcoin in decaying fiat options. I think 669 00:31:49,000 --> 00:31:52,160 Speaker 1: you can't price you can't price a bitcoin option in 670 00:31:52,240 --> 00:31:54,560 Speaker 1: decaying FIAT is what I've always believed, and I think 671 00:31:54,560 --> 00:31:56,719 Speaker 1: that will continue to be the case, especially as more 672 00:31:56,720 --> 00:31:58,600 Speaker 1: of these treasury companies have an options market, you can 673 00:31:58,640 --> 00:32:02,120 Speaker 1: express different bath in ways you can't with just a 674 00:32:02,160 --> 00:32:06,320 Speaker 1: traditional equity. So we're a leverage bitcoin alpha fund, and 675 00:32:06,360 --> 00:32:11,720 Speaker 1: we combine options on large stable bitcoin jrudgery companies and 676 00:32:11,800 --> 00:32:15,080 Speaker 1: small allocations to investments like you may. 677 00:32:15,040 --> 00:32:19,200 Speaker 2: Work, okay, so you're not like long any of these companies. Necessarily, 678 00:32:19,280 --> 00:32:21,800 Speaker 2: you're taking sort of your experience, your background with the 679 00:32:21,840 --> 00:32:24,760 Speaker 2: options market, and sort of leveraging up maybe more like 680 00:32:24,840 --> 00:32:27,480 Speaker 2: trading positions around these yep. 681 00:32:27,560 --> 00:32:32,560 Speaker 1: We take multi month, multi year directional positions on mostly 682 00:32:32,640 --> 00:32:35,920 Speaker 1: strategy and IBIT, but then we also go long for 683 00:32:36,000 --> 00:32:38,560 Speaker 1: long periods of time in these bitcoin truatury companies as well. 684 00:32:38,600 --> 00:32:40,360 Speaker 1: So it's kind of a hodgepodge of all. 685 00:32:40,240 --> 00:32:43,000 Speaker 2: Of that, got it. So then you're not really trying 686 00:32:43,000 --> 00:32:45,840 Speaker 2: to determine if it's cheap or expensive, or what the 687 00:32:45,960 --> 00:32:48,880 Speaker 2: valuation is today or potential future valuation. You're just more 688 00:32:48,920 --> 00:32:50,840 Speaker 2: looking for a dislocation in the market that you could 689 00:32:50,840 --> 00:32:54,560 Speaker 2: take advantage of exactly. Yeah, Yeah, which I guess would 690 00:32:54,600 --> 00:32:58,040 Speaker 2: still require you to somewhat understand where that fair market 691 00:32:58,120 --> 00:32:58,560 Speaker 2: value is. 692 00:33:00,200 --> 00:33:03,800 Speaker 1: So yep, it does, and so we are really focused 693 00:33:03,800 --> 00:33:06,360 Speaker 1: on trying to value the bitcoin treasury companies, and I 694 00:33:06,400 --> 00:33:09,760 Speaker 1: think valuing a bitcoin treasury company changes during every phase 695 00:33:09,760 --> 00:33:10,600 Speaker 1: of a market cycle. 696 00:33:10,760 --> 00:33:12,280 Speaker 2: So can you walk us through that? And can you 697 00:33:12,320 --> 00:33:12,920 Speaker 2: walk us through that? 698 00:33:13,840 --> 00:33:17,600 Speaker 1: Absolutely, as we enter kind of a euphoric phase, one 699 00:33:17,760 --> 00:33:21,760 Speaker 1: saying one old trading saying is two times crazy is 700 00:33:21,800 --> 00:33:26,000 Speaker 1: still just crazy. So as the cycle heats up, there 701 00:33:26,000 --> 00:33:28,120 Speaker 1: will be a lot of crazy things happening in the 702 00:33:28,120 --> 00:33:31,200 Speaker 1: market in dislocations. But I think the real money's made 703 00:33:31,200 --> 00:33:34,000 Speaker 1: on the backside, and who doesn't lose their shirt when 704 00:33:34,040 --> 00:33:37,280 Speaker 1: this is all over. So we're just very conscious of 705 00:33:37,960 --> 00:33:42,000 Speaker 1: not forward. We don't like to project out past historical 706 00:33:42,000 --> 00:33:45,120 Speaker 1: bitcoin yield for bitcoin treasuries, and that's something I'm really 707 00:33:45,200 --> 00:33:47,920 Speaker 1: really feel very strongly about. A lot of people see 708 00:33:47,920 --> 00:33:52,440 Speaker 1: the exponential growth in bitcoin treasuries and then assume that 709 00:33:52,520 --> 00:33:55,360 Speaker 1: will continue forward, that they'll own all the bitcoin in 710 00:33:55,400 --> 00:33:57,680 Speaker 1: like three months, And I think that's no way to 711 00:33:57,760 --> 00:33:59,200 Speaker 1: value one of these companies because a lot of it 712 00:33:59,200 --> 00:34:00,840 Speaker 1: has to do with liquidity, and so we try to 713 00:34:00,840 --> 00:34:01,800 Speaker 1: be pretty honest about that. 714 00:34:02,320 --> 00:34:04,840 Speaker 2: So Metaplan has been able to maintain this one percent 715 00:34:05,400 --> 00:34:07,520 Speaker 2: for quite a while. They've been pretty consistent about that. 716 00:34:07,600 --> 00:34:09,880 Speaker 2: But then you have a small company, like a smarter 717 00:34:09,920 --> 00:34:11,920 Speaker 2: web company who has like some crazy yeld that I 718 00:34:11,960 --> 00:34:13,120 Speaker 2: don't know if I saw it right the other day 719 00:34:13,120 --> 00:34:15,319 Speaker 2: it was like twenty four thousand percent or something like that. 720 00:34:15,360 --> 00:34:19,000 Speaker 2: I don't know. Gosh, obviously that's not sustainable, right, they'd 721 00:34:19,000 --> 00:34:20,760 Speaker 2: have the whole bitcoin supply in a year or whatever. 722 00:34:22,480 --> 00:34:24,680 Speaker 2: So what do you think happens to a company that 723 00:34:24,760 --> 00:34:26,640 Speaker 2: comes out of the gate hot with a really high 724 00:34:26,680 --> 00:34:30,080 Speaker 2: bitcoin yield that's obviously non sustainable, is going to have 725 00:34:30,120 --> 00:34:31,600 Speaker 2: to slow that down at some point. 726 00:34:33,239 --> 00:34:34,600 Speaker 1: It's going to be a function of the demand for 727 00:34:34,600 --> 00:34:37,720 Speaker 1: the equity. Right, if you're yielding bitcoin by issuing equity, 728 00:34:37,760 --> 00:34:40,520 Speaker 1: which a lot of these are doing via different mechanisms, 729 00:34:40,520 --> 00:34:43,960 Speaker 1: whether moving strike warrants or atm then there has to 730 00:34:44,040 --> 00:34:45,560 Speaker 1: be a sustained demand for the equity, which in a 731 00:34:45,600 --> 00:34:47,800 Speaker 1: lot of markets there are. Obviously Japan has been extremely 732 00:34:47,800 --> 00:34:50,680 Speaker 1: receptive and that's why it's performed so well. In other 733 00:34:50,719 --> 00:34:53,360 Speaker 1: markets that liquidity may drive up. Look at Strategy for example, 734 00:34:53,440 --> 00:34:56,280 Speaker 1: they had they had like three hundred percent annualized bitcoin 735 00:34:56,360 --> 00:34:59,839 Speaker 1: yield yield for three weeks last November. So it's all 736 00:35:00,280 --> 00:35:03,160 Speaker 1: liquidity in the market and kind of euphoria demand for 737 00:35:03,160 --> 00:35:04,680 Speaker 1: the equity, and I think that comes and goes. 738 00:35:04,920 --> 00:35:08,319 Speaker 2: Yeah, But I mean if that if that yield dramatically 739 00:35:08,400 --> 00:35:11,479 Speaker 2: slows down, I mean that could dramatically break the price, 740 00:35:11,600 --> 00:35:13,759 Speaker 2: the price of the equity down with it, right, because 741 00:35:13,800 --> 00:35:15,479 Speaker 2: if they're looking at sort of that growth and trying 742 00:35:15,480 --> 00:35:17,920 Speaker 2: to project out like the days to cover that whatever 743 00:35:17,960 --> 00:35:22,920 Speaker 2: potential projected high MNAB is, it seems like that could 744 00:35:22,920 --> 00:35:24,160 Speaker 2: be a catastrophic event as well. 745 00:35:25,360 --> 00:35:27,479 Speaker 1: Yeah, And that's one metric I don't use, is day's 746 00:35:27,520 --> 00:35:29,400 Speaker 1: color MNAB. I know a lot. It's been popular for 747 00:35:29,440 --> 00:35:32,160 Speaker 1: a lot of folks, but I think you have to 748 00:35:32,160 --> 00:35:34,120 Speaker 1: look at it from a risk reward framework. And if 749 00:35:34,120 --> 00:35:36,879 Speaker 1: you're treading at a twenty m NAV, your downsides your 750 00:35:36,880 --> 00:35:39,439 Speaker 1: downsides ninety five percent, and so that's something to really 751 00:35:39,480 --> 00:35:41,200 Speaker 1: really consider when you take these bets. 752 00:35:41,480 --> 00:35:43,840 Speaker 2: So what would be your key metrics that you're looking at. 753 00:35:43,920 --> 00:35:51,120 Speaker 1: Then it's the risk reward profile of potential bitcoin acquisition 754 00:35:52,080 --> 00:35:55,000 Speaker 1: realistically based on kind of liquidity and that specific market. 755 00:35:55,560 --> 00:35:58,800 Speaker 1: The downside of the enav compressing to the fair value 756 00:35:58,920 --> 00:36:01,719 Speaker 1: value of the leverage rate show, So that's not necessarily one. 757 00:36:01,760 --> 00:36:03,440 Speaker 1: That maybe be one point three, one point four, depending 758 00:36:03,480 --> 00:36:06,359 Speaker 1: how much leverage there is in the capital stack, and 759 00:36:06,400 --> 00:36:10,880 Speaker 1: then also kind of the market conditions for that specific equity. 760 00:36:11,040 --> 00:36:13,480 Speaker 1: So in the case amount of planet, obviously there's a 761 00:36:13,480 --> 00:36:16,759 Speaker 1: premium for the nuances of the Japanese market. 762 00:36:17,160 --> 00:36:19,080 Speaker 2: Because of the fixed income markets that they're sort of 763 00:36:19,080 --> 00:36:23,160 Speaker 2: trapped in that market, got it? So I like how 764 00:36:23,160 --> 00:36:24,920 Speaker 2: you said this. So the m NAB based off of 765 00:36:24,960 --> 00:36:28,440 Speaker 2: the leverage they have in the stack, because for a 766 00:36:28,480 --> 00:36:33,440 Speaker 2: well run bitcoin treasury strategy company, they're using leverage and 767 00:36:33,480 --> 00:36:36,120 Speaker 2: they're tapping into cheap, cheap debt cheap leverage in the 768 00:36:36,160 --> 00:36:38,759 Speaker 2: debt equity markets, So they should always be higher than 769 00:36:38,800 --> 00:36:40,440 Speaker 2: one if it's a good company, if it's a well 770 00:36:40,480 --> 00:36:43,719 Speaker 2: run company. And so you're looking at bitcoin' what's that 771 00:36:44,400 --> 00:36:47,960 Speaker 2: and Bitcoin's going up over a long period of time, right, Yeah, 772 00:36:48,000 --> 00:36:49,960 Speaker 2: but yeah, I mean if they can apply some leverage 773 00:36:50,000 --> 00:36:52,879 Speaker 2: and yeah, assuming right if bitcoin drop that leverage works 774 00:36:52,880 --> 00:36:54,520 Speaker 2: against them obviously to your point. 775 00:36:54,440 --> 00:36:56,760 Speaker 1: Exactly, I believe bitgoin's going yourself. 776 00:36:56,960 --> 00:36:58,719 Speaker 2: Yeah, well, over a long period of time, I mean, 777 00:36:59,040 --> 00:37:02,120 Speaker 2: you know, I still think the four year cycles in play. 778 00:37:02,200 --> 00:37:07,120 Speaker 2: Until proven otherwise, maybe that happens next year. We don't 779 00:37:07,160 --> 00:37:09,319 Speaker 2: know how high it'll go and how far to pull back. 780 00:37:09,640 --> 00:37:11,640 Speaker 2: I don't advise people waiting for a dip could go 781 00:37:11,640 --> 00:37:13,560 Speaker 2: to two fifty and pull back to one fifty if 782 00:37:13,560 --> 00:37:17,359 Speaker 2: we don't know. But until proven otherwise, there's there's there's 783 00:37:17,360 --> 00:37:18,960 Speaker 2: probably a bear market. Maybe it's only a thirty percent 784 00:37:19,000 --> 00:37:20,560 Speaker 2: drove down, we don't know, but it is going to 785 00:37:20,600 --> 00:37:24,040 Speaker 2: put these companies into that position. So you think, really 786 00:37:24,239 --> 00:37:26,520 Speaker 2: the ones that are going to sink or swim are 787 00:37:26,520 --> 00:37:29,200 Speaker 2: really the ones that use this leverage properly. I think 788 00:37:29,200 --> 00:37:33,160 Speaker 2: that's what you're saying right now. 789 00:37:33,360 --> 00:37:35,560 Speaker 1: And to have a way to use bitcoin in a 790 00:37:35,600 --> 00:37:38,640 Speaker 1: bear market, right, like we talked about earlier, if you 791 00:37:38,719 --> 00:37:41,640 Speaker 1: only yield bitcoin by having demand for your equity, it's 792 00:37:41,680 --> 00:37:45,040 Speaker 1: really tough. If you can yield bitcoin using issuing fixed 793 00:37:45,040 --> 00:37:47,760 Speaker 1: income products that are overcollateralized, you could still have bitcoin 794 00:37:47,800 --> 00:37:49,680 Speaker 1: yielding a bear and I think that's really that's a 795 00:37:49,680 --> 00:37:50,560 Speaker 1: big differentiator. 796 00:37:50,719 --> 00:37:53,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, because you're able to add when when it's when 797 00:37:53,040 --> 00:37:55,960 Speaker 2: it's cheap, which is good you're buying, you're buying the dip. 798 00:37:57,160 --> 00:38:00,440 Speaker 2: Theoretically you could just sort of hunker down and down 799 00:38:00,480 --> 00:38:03,080 Speaker 2: the hatches, you don't lose any bitcoin, and you wait 800 00:38:03,120 --> 00:38:04,839 Speaker 2: six or nine months and it comes back up again 801 00:38:04,840 --> 00:38:06,120 Speaker 2: and you're back off to the races again. 802 00:38:07,360 --> 00:38:07,800 Speaker 1: Exactly. 803 00:38:07,960 --> 00:38:09,160 Speaker 2: Yep, that's not the worst case. 804 00:38:10,440 --> 00:38:11,279 Speaker 1: That's a pretty good case. 805 00:38:11,320 --> 00:38:13,840 Speaker 2: The worst case is becoming a force seller. 806 00:38:15,200 --> 00:38:20,520 Speaker 1: Exactly. Ye do you see poor compression? Right, Like, if 807 00:38:20,560 --> 00:38:23,760 Speaker 1: there's a future expectation of bitcoin yield that doesn't manifest 808 00:38:23,800 --> 00:38:26,879 Speaker 1: and it's trading out of twenty m NAV, you may 809 00:38:26,920 --> 00:38:27,719 Speaker 1: never recover that. 810 00:38:28,120 --> 00:38:31,319 Speaker 2: You may never recover the twenty m NAV exactly right, 811 00:38:31,680 --> 00:38:33,680 Speaker 2: So you might get back down to a two or three. 812 00:38:33,920 --> 00:38:38,319 Speaker 2: But yeah, and obviously there's there's plenty of parallels in 813 00:38:38,480 --> 00:38:40,880 Speaker 2: history that shows that with certain tech stocks and stuff 814 00:38:40,880 --> 00:38:42,760 Speaker 2: that are still trading today is still really good companies 815 00:38:42,800 --> 00:38:44,920 Speaker 2: like Oracle for example, but never reclaimed it's like twenty 816 00:38:45,200 --> 00:38:48,719 Speaker 2: two thousand high. So we've seen that happen before. So 817 00:38:48,760 --> 00:38:51,840 Speaker 2: when you talk about defending the m NAV regardless of 818 00:38:51,840 --> 00:38:54,160 Speaker 2: market condition, what would that look like? 819 00:38:54,960 --> 00:38:58,520 Speaker 1: Defending the m NAV is really really important, especially with 820 00:38:58,760 --> 00:39:02,080 Speaker 1: senior claim over the bitcoin, so something like that. It's 821 00:39:02,120 --> 00:39:05,239 Speaker 1: been brought to my attention about the predatory shorting is 822 00:39:06,360 --> 00:39:10,760 Speaker 1: in a bear market, all these convertible note arbitragers press 823 00:39:10,840 --> 00:39:13,720 Speaker 1: the stock, They lay on the stock and push it lower, 824 00:39:13,719 --> 00:39:16,480 Speaker 1: push it lower, And when an en NAV goes lower 825 00:39:16,480 --> 00:39:20,200 Speaker 1: and lower and lower, the company can't issue equity and 826 00:39:20,239 --> 00:39:23,720 Speaker 1: yield bitcoin, so their m NAV drops, the bitcoin yield drops. 827 00:39:24,000 --> 00:39:27,040 Speaker 1: It gives the short sellers more reason to short the 828 00:39:27,080 --> 00:39:28,960 Speaker 1: stock because there's no bitcoin yield. So it's kind of 829 00:39:28,960 --> 00:39:32,799 Speaker 1: a self perpetuating downward cycle. Right. There needs to be 830 00:39:32,880 --> 00:39:35,239 Speaker 1: some sort of instrument that they can issue in such 831 00:39:35,280 --> 00:39:38,400 Speaker 1: a market condition such that they can get bitcoin yield 832 00:39:38,400 --> 00:39:40,640 Speaker 1: back up and running, they can add leverage to the 833 00:39:40,640 --> 00:39:44,040 Speaker 1: capital stack and force the shorts to lay off the 834 00:39:44,080 --> 00:39:48,200 Speaker 1: stock and take it potentially below one MNAV. That instrument 835 00:39:48,239 --> 00:39:49,680 Speaker 1: for strategy is strived. 836 00:39:49,840 --> 00:39:51,040 Speaker 2: So that's why you're so bullish on it. 837 00:39:51,120 --> 00:39:54,440 Speaker 1: Our ferds, Yeah, I think they're a really necessary component 838 00:39:54,760 --> 00:39:55,440 Speaker 1: of an LBE. 839 00:39:55,719 --> 00:40:00,040 Speaker 2: Yeah. So it's a necessary component. It's a race to 840 00:40:00,080 --> 00:40:02,879 Speaker 2: get there, but the company has to be credit worthy 841 00:40:02,960 --> 00:40:05,960 Speaker 2: enough to get there, So then you need size, and 842 00:40:06,000 --> 00:40:08,520 Speaker 2: you need some sort of longevity or some sort of 843 00:40:08,600 --> 00:40:10,279 Speaker 2: reputation to prove that you can do what you said, 844 00:40:10,320 --> 00:40:12,319 Speaker 2: you did, I. 845 00:40:12,360 --> 00:40:13,960 Speaker 1: Think all those things are extremely necessary. 846 00:40:14,040 --> 00:40:16,799 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, okay, Well, I mean that's kind of what 847 00:40:16,840 --> 00:40:19,000 Speaker 2: I see as well. That's kind of how I'm thinking 848 00:40:19,000 --> 00:40:20,839 Speaker 2: about it. What about I mean, how do you think 849 00:40:20,840 --> 00:40:22,239 Speaker 2: about it? I mean, I guess you're more of a 850 00:40:22,560 --> 00:40:24,520 Speaker 2: sort of I hate to use the word trader, but 851 00:40:25,000 --> 00:40:27,439 Speaker 2: you know you're doing a different strategy with your option 852 00:40:27,520 --> 00:40:30,719 Speaker 2: strategy and the fund. But how do you think the 853 00:40:30,840 --> 00:40:34,280 Speaker 2: average investor would think about allocating across these. 854 00:40:36,520 --> 00:40:39,680 Speaker 1: Well, I think you start with Bitcoin first. You understand 855 00:40:39,680 --> 00:40:41,520 Speaker 1: that you believe in that, and you look at it 856 00:40:41,960 --> 00:40:44,560 Speaker 1: what you expect to be it's terminal or long term 857 00:40:44,560 --> 00:40:46,919 Speaker 1: growth rate, and that's very high, and you can't really 858 00:40:46,920 --> 00:40:51,000 Speaker 1: expect to beat that unless you're a professional or are 859 00:40:51,080 --> 00:40:54,240 Speaker 1: very good working off that. You have to find something 860 00:40:54,600 --> 00:40:57,280 Speaker 1: that has a good risk adjusted return relative to bitcoin, 861 00:40:57,360 --> 00:41:00,520 Speaker 1: and most of these ledees they may have massive turns, 862 00:41:00,560 --> 00:41:03,759 Speaker 1: but risk adjusted it's difficult because it's so unknown and 863 00:41:03,920 --> 00:41:06,200 Speaker 1: so new. So I think you have to think really, 864 00:41:06,239 --> 00:41:09,759 Speaker 1: really hard, really really in depth about what happens in 865 00:41:09,840 --> 00:41:13,480 Speaker 1: a worst case scenario. In a bad scenario, how much 866 00:41:13,480 --> 00:41:15,560 Speaker 1: do you lose without allocation? How much do you make 867 00:41:15,560 --> 00:41:18,279 Speaker 1: in a really positive scenario and then decide how you 868 00:41:18,400 --> 00:41:21,680 Speaker 1: allocate two different whether it be an options contract, an 869 00:41:21,800 --> 00:41:26,480 Speaker 1: lbe a you know something else. So that's the way 870 00:41:26,560 --> 00:41:27,960 Speaker 1: the kind of mental framework I use. 871 00:41:28,440 --> 00:41:31,319 Speaker 2: Yeah, good, good, Okay. So basically what you're saying is 872 00:41:31,360 --> 00:41:32,560 Speaker 2: allocate based on risk. 873 00:41:33,960 --> 00:41:36,319 Speaker 1: Alocate based on risk. Yeah, and don't listen to any 874 00:41:36,320 --> 00:41:40,640 Speaker 1: mode about risk. Whoever is running the company, whoever, don't 875 00:41:40,640 --> 00:41:44,000 Speaker 1: listen to them. Everyone's talking their book. Think hard about yourself. 876 00:41:44,080 --> 00:41:46,279 Speaker 1: You have to protect yourself first and foremost. What is 877 00:41:46,280 --> 00:41:48,560 Speaker 1: the risk I am taking on based on my knowledge 878 00:41:48,800 --> 00:41:51,480 Speaker 1: of the prospectus, the capital structure, and everything I know 879 00:41:51,560 --> 00:41:53,160 Speaker 1: to be true about the company. You have to rely 880 00:41:53,200 --> 00:41:56,319 Speaker 1: on yourself because if anything goes south on any sort 881 00:41:56,360 --> 00:41:58,560 Speaker 1: of investment, no one will hold your hand. It's just 882 00:41:58,680 --> 00:42:00,000 Speaker 1: you in an empty brokerage account. 883 00:42:00,360 --> 00:42:03,920 Speaker 2: Nice. Give me a final thought. So we've obviously we're 884 00:42:03,920 --> 00:42:06,239 Speaker 2: talking about the treasury thing. It's the hottest subject going 885 00:42:06,320 --> 00:42:08,400 Speaker 2: right now, as we've seen it all the big conferences. 886 00:42:09,000 --> 00:42:11,680 Speaker 2: If someone walked away from this conversation with one key 887 00:42:11,960 --> 00:42:16,640 Speaker 2: insight about the future of these bitcoin treasury companies, what 888 00:42:16,760 --> 00:42:18,719 Speaker 2: is that? What does the future hold? 889 00:42:18,880 --> 00:42:21,360 Speaker 1: It's very easy to compare the bitcoin treasury companies to 890 00:42:21,520 --> 00:42:24,879 Speaker 1: a spack craze or ico craze. But if you believe 891 00:42:24,920 --> 00:42:27,279 Speaker 1: in bitcoin long term, there will be relevance for a 892 00:42:27,280 --> 00:42:31,280 Speaker 1: bitcoin treasury strategy. The part of the bitcoin treasure strategy 893 00:42:31,400 --> 00:42:35,600 Speaker 1: I don't know will exist in five years is issuing equity. 894 00:42:35,680 --> 00:42:39,160 Speaker 1: The demand for equity in the market to yield bitcoin. 895 00:42:39,239 --> 00:42:42,480 Speaker 1: That's been a massive capital market's arbitrage that has existed. 896 00:42:42,719 --> 00:42:45,720 Speaker 1: I don't think it will exist into perpetuity. So people 897 00:42:45,800 --> 00:42:49,200 Speaker 1: have to understand that all these bitcoin treasuries will have 898 00:42:49,239 --> 00:42:51,960 Speaker 1: to evolve over time, and I don't know what that 899 00:42:52,000 --> 00:42:54,560 Speaker 1: looks like right now. It seems to be preferred and 900 00:42:54,600 --> 00:42:57,120 Speaker 1: fixed income debt issuance, So that's kind of where I 901 00:42:57,160 --> 00:42:58,160 Speaker 1: think people should be looking. 902 00:42:58,239 --> 00:43:00,600 Speaker 2: So the opportunities now don't it's going to look like 903 00:43:00,640 --> 00:43:02,080 Speaker 2: in a couple of years is they don't let it 904 00:43:02,120 --> 00:43:06,239 Speaker 2: pass you by exactly? All right, Dan, you guys do 905 00:43:06,239 --> 00:43:08,680 Speaker 2: a great job on the True North podcast. I want 906 00:43:08,680 --> 00:43:10,480 Speaker 2: to shout that out. We'll link to that down below. Dan, 907 00:43:10,520 --> 00:43:13,279 Speaker 2: you do amazing contribution there. Anything else people should be 908 00:43:13,280 --> 00:43:15,080 Speaker 2: paying attention to for you? 909 00:43:15,080 --> 00:43:18,000 Speaker 1: No, all my works on my Twitter, my Twitter feed 910 00:43:18,040 --> 00:43:20,880 Speaker 1: at Hillary Underscore, Dan h I L l e r Y. 911 00:43:21,320 --> 00:43:24,200 Speaker 1: I'm running a small private place and fund that will 912 00:43:24,239 --> 00:43:28,920 Speaker 1: be a combination of auctions and bitcoin treasury strategies. It 913 00:43:28,920 --> 00:43:32,319 Speaker 1: won't be a complete swing, you know, home run, it 914 00:43:32,320 --> 00:43:35,759 Speaker 1: will be steady outperformance of bitcoin ideally. Other than that, 915 00:43:35,840 --> 00:43:37,640 Speaker 1: thanks for everything to do Mark, This has been awesome. 916 00:43:37,719 --> 00:43:38,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, thanks all, ich Stan