WEBVTT - You Asked, We Answered

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody.

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to The Philly Show with Ruben Tomorrow, Junior, Jim Salidberry.

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I am Todd so lucky. It's Friday, May seventeenth, twenty

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. The Phillies won three of four in a

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 2>rare home and home series against the Mets. They lost

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Thursday night in eleven innings. They still have the best

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 2>record in baseball. Before we get going, guys, I wanted

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 2>to announce that The Phillies Nation TV Show debuts on Saturday,

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>May twenty fifth on NBC Sports Philadelphia, and we will

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 2>be making weekly appearances on it. They'll be using some

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 2>of the podcast. We'll be making appearances with Greg Murphy

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 2>and Sam Stafford. They're gonna have special guests throughout the year,

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 2>and it's gonna date. It's gonna show one hour before

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 2>every Saturday home game, our Saturday game on NBC Sports Philadelphia.

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:01.959
<v Speaker 2>So you like the podcast, If you want more Phillies,

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 2>check out The Phillies Nation TV Show. Let's jump into

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 2>a couple of injuries before we get into listener questions.

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>We asked people last night to submit some listener questions.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 2>We got a bunch we didn't get. We're not going

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 2>to get to them all, but we got some good ones.

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.839
<v Speaker 2>So Taiwan Walker takes a line drive or he takes

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>a ball off his left big toe X rays our negative.

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>It's his landing foot.

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Explain how concerning this might be, you know, you know,

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:31.919
<v Speaker 2>if he can't if he can't go.

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, he had to come out of the game, so

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 3>that's concern right there. But afterwards both he and Rob

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Thompson kind of downplayed it a little bit. I'm sure,

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 3>excuse me, I'm sure Taiwan Walker will be champing at

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 3>the bit to get back out there because there's a

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 3>guy kind of nipping at his heels in Spencer Turnbull,

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 3>who you know. I think they've succeeded in keeping him

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 3>mostly stretched innings the other night on what Wednesday night,

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 3>So if Taiwan Walker can't go, his next turn Turnbook

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 3>will slide in there. But with an off day on Monday,

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 3>they could also skip that spot, giving Walker a little

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 3>bit more time, so they have options on how to

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 3>handle this depending on the severity. I don't think it's severe.

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 3>But as we've talked about Rubin and Todd, I mean something,

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 3>you know that we were talking about six pictures for

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 3>five spots and how it was a good problem and

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 3>something will manifest itself, something will present itself where that

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 3>extra guy will indeed find himself getting plenty of work.

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 3>And you know, this could be that situation coming about

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 3>right before our eyes.

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 4>And we had the most durable five man rotation through

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 4>like seven through through twenty eleven. I mean, these guys

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 4>posted all the time, and we still had depth problems.

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you can absolutely never have enough starting pitching.

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 4>You're gonna have to have eight or ten guys at

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 4>some point who are going to take the baseball to

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 4>start a baseball game. So, you know, I think time

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 4>wa Walker is a pretty tough guy. When he first

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 4>got hit, I thought maybe it was just a glancing,

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 4>glancing blow. But but you know, it's one of those

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 4>things where when you first get hit, it sort of

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.399
<v Speaker 4>gets numb real fast. And then he started walking off

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 4>and then then the shortness came in and it was

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 4>pretty obvious that that he got poked pretty pretty uh

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 4>pretty badly. Otherwise he would not have come out of

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 4>this game. This guy's a competitor, man. I like. I

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 4>like the way he goes about his business. I mean,

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 4>you could say what you want about Taiwan Walker that

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, he's he's you know, he's the IRA's high

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 4>and this, that and the other. Well, uh, he wants

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 4>to compete, he wants to be out there first teammates,

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 4>great teammate and uh and you're right, Jim, this guy

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 4>is not gonna want to miss any starts. He's gonna

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 4>want to pitch, and for for a variety of reasons.

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 4>One pride, too, because he's a good teammate, and three

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 4>because he wants he wants to win. I mean, it's

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 4>the guy who wants to I love guys who want

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 4>the baseball. And you know there's an issue about him,

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, him getting upset about not pitching in the

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 4>playoffs last year. Well guess what I like that. I

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 4>like the fact that he felt like he was dis

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 4>because he wants to pitch. And that's and that's and

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 4>that's exactly what you want in uh, in your starters

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 4>and anybody on the field. You want people to compete.

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 4>One of the most important parts of being a champion

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 4>is how well you compete.

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 3>So you guys, show me. I'm just gonna say, show

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 3>me a guy who's happy to be sidelines, and I

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 3>will show you a loser.

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>That's right, that's right, great point.

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Are you guys surprised that Trey Turner is already out

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 2>jogging taking ground balls. I've never blown out a hammy, Jimmy,

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 2>You've blown out of hammy?

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 3>I did, I did. I thought I was dead. Were

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 3>you there that you were there that day? Right? No?

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:04.679
<v Speaker 1>No, this is before I started covering the games.

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 3>God. So I'll tell you this quick story. It was

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 3>the last year of Veterans Stadium and they put in

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 3>remember the ruben, you guys put in a new turf

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 3>and it had some depth to it.

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I had a lot to do with that putting

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 4>in that turf. I was like on the committee.

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 3>So the old stuff was this matted down concrete astro

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 3>turf right correct, And then they put in so the

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Eagles were moving on call.

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 4>It was called next Turf, I believe, Next turf.

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 3>And it had a little give to it, and it

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 3>had a little length so you could actually bunt. But anyway,

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to do a story on it. So they

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 3>also put it in at the half field in clear

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 3>Water behind Jack Russell Stadium. So I wanted to do

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 3>a story on how it played. So John Bukovich offered

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 3>to hit me some ground balls and hit me a

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 3>few at third base and you know, flip them over.

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 4>He was pretty And let me just say this, I

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 4>watched him witnesses. Jimmie's a pretty good damn good athlete.

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 4>He is well, I mean, Neil, we could talk about

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 4>him catching Billy Wagner and all that stuff, but the

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 4>fact that the fact that he I mean, his his

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 4>movements and all of his actions and that kind of

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 4>stuff pretty damn good. I mean, I was like, whoa,

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 4>look at this little dude.

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Well that was before I put on fifty pounds and

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm kidding. But anyway, so anyway, it takes him at

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 3>third base. Bukevich says, go over to the shortstop, and

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 3>now he starts moving me around, and he hits one

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 3>sort of up the middle, and I range over and

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 3>I plant my left leg hard on the turf and

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 3>I reached to grab the ground ball and I just

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 3>went down. It was like when they shoot the elephant

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 3>with the tranquilizer guns and boom, I go down. My

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:50.239
<v Speaker 3>nose is flat in the turf, and the only thought

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 3>I had in my head was you stupid son of

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 3>a bitch. You just blew out your knee or something,

0:06:55.920 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, And honestly, my whole leg went numb and

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 3>I barely could get up. And it turned out I

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 3>had my hamstring had blown apart or something, and just really,

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, it stayed for a long time. And I

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 3>remember later that spring, I was kind of walking around

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 3>on a pair of shorts and I had a big

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 3>mass of blood behind my knee. And Jeff Cooper says,

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 3>what the hell happened to you? The old trainer? And

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 3>I said, I think I pulled my hamstring. He goes,

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 3>you did more than pull it. You tore that thing,

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 3>so they hurt. But anyway, this is about Trey Turner.

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 3>He seems to be he seems to be coming along quick.

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 4>No, no question. And listen, I pulled hamstrings not often,

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 4>but I recently pulled a hamstring as I've gotten older. Now, obviously,

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 4>when you're younger yourselves, you know, replicate quicker, you get

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 4>back quicker. Your your body recovers much better. And clearly

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 4>he's recovering much better than than than we would. But

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 4>it just I just pulled my hamstring playing pick a

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 4>ball with Paul Holmgren. Like last year, it took me

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 4>almost eight or nine months to feel like I could

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 4>actually do something. I mean, it was really weird. I

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 4>felt like I actually felt it, like I pulled it

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 4>off the bone. And it was like a almost a

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 4>year before I actually could get on the pickle ball

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 4>court again. Kind of sad, but we saw one.

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 3>We saw one get pulled off the bone. Todd in Milwaukee,

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 3>remember with Charlie Morton. Oh yeah, oh my gosh, I

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 3>mean you talk about going down. Yeah, and he he

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 3>pulled the ham. He missed the whole season. He had

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.959
<v Speaker 3>to have it surgically and reattached. Yeah, and he's come

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 3>back to pitches pretty well, but tough injury, Thank goodness,

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:48.599
<v Speaker 3>Trey Turner's because he's so important. Thank goodness, wasn't uh,

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, serious, because he's out, like you said, taking

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 3>ground balls, he's running, he's throwing, and you know, he

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 3>kind of is wearing the body language to me of

0:08:57.760 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 3>a guy who thinks he's going to be back sooner

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 3>then later. Now, I know they've built up a cushion,

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of padding with the victories and the quick start,

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 3>so they can afford to be conservative with an important player,

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 3>but I still get the feeling he might be ahead

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 3>of time schedule.

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 4>You got an MVP player sitting on the bench. Man.

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 4>I picked this guy to be the MVP, and he

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 4>has MVP type talent, and so when you're missing a

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 4>guy like that, that's huge and you don't want to

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 4>miss him for so long. And the fact that it's

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 4>my concern is that speed is so much of a

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 4>part of his game and his ability to range and

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 4>do other things that hopefully doesn't take away from all

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 4>those abilities of the adds.

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>So let's hear. So we got some reader questions.

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 2>This one, this first one isn't a reader question, but

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I stumbled upon it last night. I was going through

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 2>my Facebook and I found this on a Facebook message

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 2>I sent some time over the last week.

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Give people an.

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Idea of some of the messages I get. This is This

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 2>is the.

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Parsing some of it down here.

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Dude, you're writing is getting awful again. Why don't you

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 2>really analyze, really analyze castianos in Schwarber's numbers. This is

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 2>from a guy named Lee, And the only thing I

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 2>can say to this guy Lee is you know the

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Phillies are thirty one and fourteen, Bro, they're six eighty nine. Oh,

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 2>winning percentage is on pace for one hundred and twelve games.

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Schwarber's hitting the ball, okay, the last seventeen games.

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Nick Castianis has picked it up a little bit.

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 3>I think now.

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 2>I started actually, in all seriousness, I tried to think

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.719
<v Speaker 2>what this guy was referring to. And the only thing

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 2>I can think I can think of is Wednesday's Phillies

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 2>Beat newsletter. I wrote a little bit about Kyle Schwarber's

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 2>bat speed, and now he's got the third fastest bat

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 2>speed in baseball, which I thought doesn't mean anybody is

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 2>a great hitter or a bad hitter. I just thought

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 2>it was interesting because I always said to myself, man,

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 2>I bet you this guy. I can't think of too

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 2>many players in baseball that actually swing the bat faster

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 2>than him as consistently as him.

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:56.959
<v Speaker 1>And I just thought it was.

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Kind of cool that this new metrics showed that the

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 2>eye test matched the actual data.

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 4>So well, imagine that. Imagine that, imagine the eye test

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 4>actually matching the data. I mean, listen, I think it's

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 4>great that they have all this information and all this

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, now they can track bat speed and and

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 4>that kind of stuff. But let me just tell you something.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 4>As a scout, I know whether guy's quick with his bat,

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 4>and that's bat speed because I can see it with

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 4>my eyes. Okay, I don't need to see it. I

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 4>don't need and I can see the way the ball

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 4>comes off the bat. That's how you measure bat speed.

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 4>And and and it's great for the lay person now

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 4>to be able to see what it is because you

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 4>have you know, stat cast stuff on it or whatever

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 4>or whatever it is. But that said, you know, that's

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 4>that's the job of the scout, and it's been the

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 4>job of the scout for a thousand years. And I'm

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 4>not surprised that Kyles war is one of the fastest

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 4>one so it gets through the zone.

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Two quick things. One Todd Selek is my first read

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 3>every morning, probably three hundred days a year, and enjoyable

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 3>and informative. And two dovetailing off what you said, Reuben. Yesterday,

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 3>in the dugout before the game at Citizens Bank Park,

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Rob Thompson was asked about Johann Rojas and he dropped

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 3>two balls on Wednesday night in center field and somebody

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.719
<v Speaker 3>offered that, you know his defensive metrics, some of his

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 3>advanced defensive defensive metrics are down, and Thompson extinguished that

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 3>talk in a hurry, saying he does not believe in

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 3>defensive metrics. I was actually surprised to hear it, because

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 3>he does embrace a lot of that modern you know,

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 3>a lot of modern analytics. He's what I would call

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 3>analytically literate. And I do think this stuff he believes in,

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 3>and I do think there are stuff, there is stuff

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 3>that should be believed in this. It just has to

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 3>be kind of a balance. But he said he does

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 3>not believe in defensive metrics. When it comes to defense,

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 3>his number one metric is his eyes. And you know

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 3>he looks at Johann Rojas's getting to more balls than others,

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 3>and yes he dropped a couple over ran him, maybe whatever,

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 3>but he will get better. But it was quite interesting

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 3>to hear Rob Thompson say he doesn't believe in defensive metrics.

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 3>He trusts his eyes. And that kind of picks up

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 3>on what Rubin was saying. And I'm sure what you

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 3>were kind of writing that day, Todd.

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 4>Hey, let me tell you something about the defensive metrics.

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 4>I had Jackie Bradley and Mookie Betts in the outfield

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 4>in Boston and they had terrible and not Mookie and

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 4>right because he had a lot of space out there.

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:41.959
<v Speaker 4>But the metrics on Jackie Bradley Junior were like awful

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 4>that he was one of the worst center fielders in baseball,

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 4>and you want to know why because he had a

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 4>short fence and he couldn't get to the balls that

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 4>hit off off that freaking green monster and so balls

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 4>that everybody else would catch in every other stadium, and

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 4>they didn't have factor those things in And I'm like, guys,

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 4>this is the best center fielder in baseball. I mean

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 4>no disrespect to to other guys in it, but but

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 4>instinctively one of the best I've ever seen. I mean

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 4>the guy in Toronto now who used to be in

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Tampa Bay and brain locking on his name, Uh no, no, no, Kevin,

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 4>Kevin Kiermyer, yep. I mean obviously one of the better

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 4>ones as well, and they always sort of battle each other.

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 4>But defensive metrics, as far as I'm can start, eyeballs, man.

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 3>I think I think, I think that might be the

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 3>first on the Phillies show.

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 4>That's it.

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the first one, and then the second one.

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Is a is a right handed This is somebody a

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 2>decap twenty on Instagram. Is a right handed, high leverage

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 2>reliever the Phillies' biggest potential need at the trade deadline.

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean to me, probably yes. Probably as I sit

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 3>here right now, I would say maybe yes, because you

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 3>know they do come at you with some left handed

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 3>thunder down there would be nice to balance it off. Now,

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 3>I do think if Sir Anthony gets it together, it

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 3>couldmit get that. Yeah.

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Sir Anthony's that's that.

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 2>That's the key right now is you know, Hoffman's pitched

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 2>mostly great, Kirkering's showed very well. Sir Anthony's struggled a

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 2>little bit. You know, Slider hasn't been as great this year.

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 2>He's I think he's given up three home runs off

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 2>his slider.

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>He don't think.

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 2>I think he gave up like four in his entire

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 2>career office slider going into this season. So he's got

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 2>to clean that up a little bit. But yeah, I mean,

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 2>I think when you look at this team, you don't

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 2>really see a lot of huge needs other than you

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 2>can always add a bullpen piece, right Ruby. I mean,

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 2>that seems to be the thing to go to if

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 2>you don't have something major on your you know, your

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 2>everyday lineup that you're trying to fill. You don't have

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 2>a gaping hole, and I don't think this team does.

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 2>The rotation is obviously solid. You're not gonna go out

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 2>and get a start unless there's a major injury. So

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I think you go, let's throw in another high quality arm.

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 4>Now, I think that's absolutely right. Right now, Dave Dombrowski

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 4>has the the cushion he had. He's in a situation

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 4>that's almost ideal as a GM because now you can

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 4>sit back and wait and see what happens up until

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 4>the deadline, and then now it's a very firm deadline,

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 4>so you have to pick and choose your spots well.

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 4>But right now they're not in a situation where they

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 4>have any pressing needs. I would always, you know, err

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 4>on the side of pitching every single time, whether it's

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 4>a starter or reliever, whatever kind of depth you can

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 4>you can add. The one thing I will say about

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 4>this is is this, at some point they're going to

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 4>have a need and hopefully, you know, another hamstring or

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 4>a knee or whatever the case may be, doesn't happen.

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 4>That said, I love the fact that Kirker Ing struck

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 4>out three guys yesterday with his fastball. Yes, because he's

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 4>a slider, slider, slider guy, and I think he's starting

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 4>to understand that he's got to utilize it. Those a

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 4>ninety eight mile hour fastball with some hop to it,

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 4>and so he's starting to command that pitch better. And

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 4>the fact that he struck out three guys with with

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 4>those with that fastball's great for his confidence. And I

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 4>think it's going to take him to another level because

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 4>now he's got real, two real weapons that he can

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 4>rely on and uh, and I think he's gonna take

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 4>that step forward. I do think that Sir Anthony needs

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 4>to find his confidence. I saw some better sliders out

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 4>of him. He's starting to get a little bit more

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 4>depth out of him. Uh. In his last outing, it

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 4>was a it was a solid one and that's a

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 4>that's a good sign. It wasn't a high leverage situation.

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 4>But that said, I mean he got the he got

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 4>the baseball and and pitched pretty well. So if they

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 4>can get those three guys going, because Hoffmin has done

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 4>a nice job, not notwithstanding what would happened last night,

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 4>because I think he was wasn't very sharp handed, pitched

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 4>for like three or four days. I think they're I

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 4>think they're gonna be just fine as far as your

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 4>bullpen is concerned. I think it's it's actually been really

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 4>good since May first, real good.

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they've been pitching.

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 2>They have been pitching a lot better than their overall

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Like a would indicate, oh yeah, uh, a quarter of

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 2>the way through the sea. What individual or team stat

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 2>jumps out at you so far? This is from our

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.719
<v Speaker 2>buddy Pat Kritz, who designed the logo you see on

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 2>the screen there. So and you guys don't have the

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 2>benefit of looking up at some stats right in front

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 2>of you, So what performance?

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>What overall?

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 2>And you kind of know the gist of who's having

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 2>a good season who's not. What would you guys say,

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 2>what jumps out at you the most? And let's say this,

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 2>don't mention starting rotation. Let's take the starting rotation out

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 2>of the equation. The rotation has been amazing. We all

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 2>know it. They're fantastic. Other than the rotation, what individual

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 2>stat or team stat really kind of sticks out to you, guys?

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, I might again, I don't have access to

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot of stuff on my computer right now, but

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 3>one thing that's jumped out to me really since he

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 3>arrived in Philadelphia is the way Alec Baum hits with

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 3>men on base, and another hit with men on base

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 3>last night as they kind of monted a comeback. It's

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of uncanny. It's really a great skill to have.

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 3>They were two for fifteen with run as scoring position

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 3>last night. They could have used a lot more from

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 3>other people. But you know, I just every time I

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 3>lift my head up, he's getting another big hit with

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 3>men on base. And I'm sorry, I don't have the

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 3>numbers in front of me to quantify it, but it

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 3>just seems like he's really good at that. There was

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 3>one number I looked at this morning. Do you know currently,

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 3>as we sit here at four am on a Friday morning,

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 3>we like to we like to tape really early. They

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 3>have just been this narrative. They haven't beaten anybody, and

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, I understand it. It's a weak National League.

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 3>As we sit here right now, they have only played

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 3>three games against teams who have a better than five

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 3>hundred record. Right currently, only three of the teams they've

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 3>played have a better than five hundred record. That's that's

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 3>something as well.

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 4>No that is something. It is something that said, and

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 4>there's some bad baseball out there. There's some really mediocre

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 4>baseball out there. Just in general. You just watch the

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 4>teams that are playing. I mean, Washington Nationals, we saw

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 4>him earlier, We're going to see him this weekend. You know,

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 4>they're what one or two or three games under five hundred. Yeah,

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 4>I mean that's a team that I don't know in

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 4>a typical season. I know that they're rebuilding and they're

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 4>they're young players are getting better. That's a team that

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 4>typically would be like eight or ten games under five hundred.

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 4>I think at this stage, just looking at their talent,

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm not trying to miss them. I just don't feel

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 4>like they're they're a five hundred team and they're close

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 4>to five hundred and we're already, you know, a month

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 4>and a half into the season. I just don't think.

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 4>I think that there's a lot of parody and a

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 4>lot of mediocrity in the in the league. There's only

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 4>a few really good teams. I think it's the Phillies.

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 4>I think it's Atlanta. I think it's the Dodgers. I

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 4>think there's other teams that are pretty good. San Diego's

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 4>pretty good talent wise, and but I just don't think

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 4>there's a ton of great teams, so it doesn't really matter.

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean another teams are all that great. They're not

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 4>that many teams over five hundred or that much over

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 4>five hundreds. But but that but that said, you know,

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 4>you gotta win the games against every you just yeah,

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's the major.

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Leagues, right.

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 2>It was funny Jim, because that was one of the

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 2>questions that another listener asked, was you know, what do

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 2>you make of all that? He said negative hoopola around

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 2>the Philly schedule on social media and about you know,

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 2>they're only beating week teams.

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 1>They're only beating week teams. And I wrote about this.

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 2>I think we talked about this in another episode several

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 2>several episodes back. Last season, only eight teams had a

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 2>five hundred better or better record against teams with winning records.

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 2>The Phillies were one of them. Only seven teams did

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 2>it in twenty twenty two. Only eight teams did it

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty one. So you know, the Phillies are

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 2>doing exactly what they're supposed to do. They're pounding the

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 2>bad teams. They're five hundred and you know, assuming they're

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 2>going to be five hundred or better against the good teams.

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 1>And I test, you know, I tests, I test, Yeah.

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:47.479
<v Speaker 3>I test tells me they're a good team. I'm not

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 3>certainly not diminishing what they no, no, no, I've done. I

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 3>am a believer. But it just wow to all know

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 3>that it's only Atlanta. They've only Atlanta currently has a

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 3>winning record of the teams they've played, so only three

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 3>games so far, as we saiding against teams with a

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 3>winning record.

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 4>So you talked to so Todd, you you actually talked

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 4>a little bit about about what stat to me, the

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 4>one individual stat that kind of surprises me a little

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 4>bit compared to where we were last year. And there's

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 4>a lot of talk about our swings and misses that

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 4>are on base percentage is actually really good? Are on

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 4>base percentage is like two or three in all of baseball.

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 4>I think it's like three thirty seven or three forty

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 4>or something like that. That on base percentage compared to

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the league. I think it's number two

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:38.199
<v Speaker 4>or three. And I think it's a product of the

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 4>guys trusting more, trusting the guy behind him and not

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 4>feeling like, hey, I got to get this job done.

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.919
<v Speaker 4>And I think we've talked about this before, and it

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 4>happened a lot late in twenty twenty two where guys

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 4>just sort of passed the baton, and I think that's

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 4>sort of what's happening now. Guys are trusting these young

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 4>guys in the depth of the lineup, the stocks and

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 4>the bones and the guys deeper in the lineup, you know,

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 4>even the Marshes of the world. Who's who's sort of

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 4>tailed off here a little bit lately. But I think

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 4>that that's part of it, and the fact that they're

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 4>getting on base and kind of creating opportunities every single inning.

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Almost Jim Alec Bohm this season runners in scoring position

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 2>batting four hundred one point one three five ops in

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 2>his career wow, three twenty four eight to eleven ops.

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. That's the guy that just loves

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>those situations.

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 3>Are you You gotta stat that jumps out Todds.

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 2>I do well. I had the benefit of kind of

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 2>looking this up ahead of time, but it kind of

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 2>dovetails into what Rubin was just talking about. Everybody again

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 2>talking about the rotation, the rotation of the rotation entering

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 2>last Night's game runs per game, because you know runs

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 2>teams play have played different amount of number of games

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 2>and whatnot, so the overall runs are a little bit deceptive.

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Phillies and Dodgers tied in Major League Baseball with the

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 2>most runs per game five point twenty seven runs per game.

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 2>So this is an offense that I feel like hasn't

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 2>totally gotten going in a sense. You know, they're playing

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 2>without Turner. You haven't gotten a good Nick Castianos. Schwarber

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 2>has even hit the June Schwarberfest. Yet Harper's been Harper's

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 2>been good, He's hit a ton of home runs, but

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 2>he hasn't been MVP Bryce Harper, and you know, you

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 2>assume that eventually that's.

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Going to show up.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 2>So they not only have great starting pitching, but they

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 2>have based off of runs per game, that matters right

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 2>with the Dodgers for the best offense in baseball.

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 4>So they're showing to me, they're showing me they're the

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 4>most complete game team in the game. They to me

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 4>they're the most complete team when you start looking about,

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, and you start ranking all the things that

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 4>they can do.

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 2>So Rubin, you mentioned marsh kind of cooling off and

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 2>I thought this is an interesting question because I've heard

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 2>this a lot and we have not talked about it

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 2>on the show. This is from I can't even pronounce

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 2>this handle on Instagram T d Mark twenty four. Do

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 2>you think benching Marsh and Stott regularly against lefties is

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 2>bad for their development?

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think it's one of the reasons why it's

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 4>I think it's one of the reasons why they will

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 4>not stop. In his situation, I mean, he's been swinging

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 4>the bat. He has been phenomenal really using his hands.

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 4>He's not working underneath the baseball anymore, using his top

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 4>hand much better. His hands have just been fantastic. I

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 4>think in Brandon Marsh's case, yes, I would like to

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 4>see him play more. I know what, I know what

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Rob Thompson's doing. He's got to get with Maryfield in there.

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 4>I think he wants to flip you know, Pache in

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 4>there a few times. But I think that there's going

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 4>to come a point where, and I think Rob Thompson

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 4>has some cushion. I think it's going to come to

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 4>a point where in June, late June, whatever you got

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 4>you gotta put run out like the same nine guys

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 4>for a while and just let go. And I think

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 4>at that point, and I think that's one of the

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 4>reasons maybe why the way marsh Is is kind of

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 4>slowed up a little bit because he he hasn't played

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 4>six or seven games in a row for a while,

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 4>and and I think that's affecting him a little bit

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 4>because he's a pretty good hitter. Man, He's a really

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 4>good hitter. He's gotten much better. Is he a finished product,

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 4>maybe not, but he's he's better than what he has

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 4>been over the last several, you know, two or three weeks.

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree. You know, if you're not seeing lefties,

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 3>you're not going to get better against him. So, you know,

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 3>I do think sitting marsh against when lefty pitches is

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 3>probably hurting his development just because he's not getting those

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 3>valuable reps and getting that opportunity to improve against them.

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 3>But they're kind of rocking a hard place. They're here

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 3>to win ball games, they're here to win a World Series,

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 3>they're here to win a division so they can get

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 3>that better seating. And you've got to play the guys

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 3>who are producing in those situations. And Thompson has you know,

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 3>is responsible for looking at all twenty six men, keeping

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 3>all twenty six men sharp and trying to get that

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 3>team ready to play in the meat grinder of September

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 3>and October. And this is the way he feels best

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 3>about it. So it's a catch twenty two. You want

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 3>to see the guy develop against lefties. To me, Stop

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 3>should be playing every day right or left. But you

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 3>want to see Marsh develop against lefties. But you also

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 3>need to win these ball games. You need to keep

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 3>guys fresh and sharp. And it's easy being a big

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 3>league manager. But if you know, Marsh could solve the

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:28.439
<v Speaker 3>problem by hitting lefties better. But right now, it's just

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 3>the way that Thompson is juggling.

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:34.360
<v Speaker 2>These balls well, Like, is Marsh showing enough I guess

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 2>against lefties?

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Like again, I looked this up last night.

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Batting one to eighteen this season, seventeen strikeouts and thirty

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 2>four at bats against against lefties this year. Now, I think,

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 2>isn't the problem kind of compounded by the factor the

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 2>issue kind of stands out more because Mirifield really hasn't

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 2>gotten going. He was supposed to be the guy that

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 2>would slide in there and produce. He had a little

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.360
<v Speaker 2>decent little stretch. I think he's got like, he's got

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 2>like two hits in his last twenty eight at bats.

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 2>He's not really producing offensively, so you're not getting much

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 2>from him. So I think the cries for more Brandon

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 2>marsh are, it's understandable, but Mark, but Scott, for sure,

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I think he's going to start getting in there a

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 2>lot more against lefties. He's actually played pretty well against

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 2>lefties this season, and I just think that he needs

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 2>to be an everyday player. And I think once Turner

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 2>comes back, you're going to see him out there a

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 2>heck of a lot, a heck of a lot more.

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 4>That's a difficulty of what Rob Thompson has to deal with.

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean as to try to you know, does he

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 4>does he give that guy more at bats? You know

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 4>witt Maryfield more at bats? Does he? Because he's got

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 4>to get him going too. At some point they may

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 4>very well need him, just like they need him right

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 4>now because they got Turner out. I mean, so these guys,

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 4>it's a tough juggling act, as you said.

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 3>As you said, James Rubin, if you were the GM,

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 3>would you go downstairs and say you know or do

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 3>gms typically do that? I'm sure in your career. You

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 3>probably have like, how we balance balancing this guy's development.

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we gave up a good prospect for him,

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 3>a premium position. We need develop him. He's still young.

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 3>But how do you balance that with you know, we

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 3>got a humongo payroll and a ticking oh dometer on

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 3>our nucleus and we need to win soon. How do

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 3>you balance all that?

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so typically I would go down and talk with

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 4>Charlie about it. I always believe this that my job

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 4>is to give him the players, and the manager's job

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 4>is to put those players in the best position to

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 4>win the baseball game. His job is down there. My

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 4>job is upstairs. And but but I would have those discussions. Yeah,

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 4>there's a big picture element, no doubt there is a

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 4>big picture element to it. But I also believed I

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 4>was sort of in lockstep with Charlie. Man, we're trying

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 4>to win baseball games. We got to win, and we

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 4>were we were in that in that cycle of winning

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 4>when I when I took over, and so uh so

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 4>I believed in in his you know, there were some

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 4>times I had it. You know, we were talking about

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 4>Chase Utley. There were times when I pointed his name

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 4>and go dude, let's get him. Let's get him out

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 4>of the I mean, the guys can't I mean, let's

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 4>get him out of the lineup. Can we get at

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 4>any point to Eric Bruntlett's name and go, I'm gonna

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 4>place that guy with that guy?

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 3>And I like Derek Bruntlet.

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 4>He's a good play. But I can understand.

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Charlie, Charlie, go which guy would.

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 4>You want to play?

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so here that's great, right, So one hundred percent

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I totally get that. So here's another This kind of

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 2>plays off what we've just been talking about. This is

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 2>a question from John uh It was on Facebook. How

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 2>much longer can they keep trying whit Mierfield out there

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 2>with his lack of production. If he doesn't start producing

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 2>it the plate by the All Star Game or trade deadline,

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 2>will they look to replace him?

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Stuff?

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 1>He paid the guy eight million dollars.

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 2>He's a veteran with a track record or the track

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 2>record has not been as good the past couple of years.

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 2>But talking about Brandon Marsh getting more time in left

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 2>field to develop, but they're playing this guy because he's

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 2>supposed to have a platoon advantage in left field and

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 2>he's not producing.

0:30:58.280 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 4>So here's here.

0:30:59.280 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>It's tough.

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 4>A couple VI is a tough so, so a couple

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 4>of things. I will say. When they signed him, I

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 4>thought it was a great signing. I think he's a

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 4>perfect fit for this team. That said, when you take

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:13.959
<v Speaker 4>an everyday player and then make him a platoon type player,

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 4>that is a huge adjustment for a guy and he

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 4>has to mentally buy in number one and number two.

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 4>There's a totally different way to prepare to be that

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 4>like non everyday guy, that two time a week guy,

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 4>that one time a week guy. And so I think

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 4>he's still adjusting to that. I think that there is

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 4>there are much better ways with a lot of the things,

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 4>and you know a lot of the drills and things

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 4>that you have. You have one of those pitching machines

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 4>that simulates, you know, real pitching. There's all types of

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 4>things that that teams have, especially the Phillies. It pretty

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 4>much has of everything. Was John Middleton made sure that

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 4>you know they are well equipped. But there's a lot

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 4>of different ways to prepare and I think that's part

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 4>of his developed as a part time player, and so

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 4>I think it may take some time, but this guy's

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 4>going to get some big bass hits. I'm telling you

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 4>right now, he's going to win a couple of baseball

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 4>games with some big bass hits and some really good

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 4>quality at bats. It's just a matter of him getting

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 4>an opportunity to make the adjustment to being this type

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 4>of role player.

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't think they would replace him because I

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 3>think in the back of their minds they know just

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 3>what Rubin said that you know, I don't care if

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 3>he's sitting in you know, a buck fifty. At some

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 3>point he's going to have a good run for us

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 3>because there's some track record there, and you know, you

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 3>don't need him to light it up every day. He's

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 3>not going to be an everyday guy, but he could

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 3>end up being a very valuable role player down the

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 3>stretch if you continue to hang with him, just because

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 3>the track record has been such. So I'm not ready

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 3>to give up on him as a contributor in a

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 3>part time role or in a you know, off the

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 3>bench roll at some point. And I think at some

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 3>point he's gonna you know, that death signing is going

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 3>to pay off. So I'm only going to be patient there.

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 2>This is a I got a bunch of these and

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 2>this actually surprised me, but it kind of tells you

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 2>what's on listeners minds. And it's interesting which eight Philly

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 2>has the best chance at Cooperstown? Which eight Philly should

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 2>have their number retired? To god, they got like three

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 2>or four people asking this question. So it's something that

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 2>people are thinking a lot about. Of the eight Phillies,

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 2>who has the best chance to make the Hall of Fame?

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Whose numbers should be retired?

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:32.959
<v Speaker 4>If any?

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 2>The Phillies have a policy where if you're not in

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 2>the Hall of Fame, Well they had a policy, Yeah,

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 2>then they.

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Change it for Dick Allen, who should be in the hall? Yeah, John, John,

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you know he should be in the Hall of Fame.

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 2>I think we can all agree Dick Allen has been

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 2>snubbed for decades and decades and decades.

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 4>We could have a whole show on that.

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:55.239
<v Speaker 2>Hun totally, totally so. Of the eight Phillies, who has

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 2>the best chance?

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I really ate.

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 3>The best chance. Look at the way the voting has gone,

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 3>and you look at the things that voters value. Uh,

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 3>they've sort of you know, awakened to a lot of

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 3>the things he he did so well, and value that more.

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 3>In their voting, so I'd say he's he has the

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 3>best shot. Ryan Howard fell off the ballot. Jimmy has

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 3>kind of treaded water, but utleast seems to have, you know,

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 3>a lot of suction, as they say, down the road.

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 3>And as far as retiring numbers, to me, Jimmy's the

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 3>all time franchise hits leader. That number has got to

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 3>be retired in my mind, if you're gonna do just

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 3>one of them. But you know, you always talk about

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 3>best first baseman, second basement short stop franchise history. Howard,

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Utley and Rollins. They were such integral players and leaders,

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 3>foundation pieces on those great teams that Reuben was upstairs

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 3>with that, you know, I certainly could see them doing

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 3>all three. And the fact that they haven't issued any

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 3>of those numbers, but they have issued Goal Animal's number

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 3>tells me that probably at some point they're planning on

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 3>retiring those those three numbers. Howard, Utley and Rollins. I

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 3>would have no problem with it.

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 4>I completely agree, And I don't know that you can

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 4>distinguish but the contributions that all three of those guys

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 4>made in one way, shape or another, I don't think

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 4>I ultimately don't know that any of them will get

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 4>into the Hall of Fame. I think that Jimmy Rollins

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 4>has should have had a chance to just because of

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, I start thinking about how he stacks up

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 4>against Barry Larkin, and I think he's a guy that

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 4>probably should get in because of you know, where Barry

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.879
<v Speaker 4>Larkin's in there. Some other people can have a different

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 4>argument about that, but I think it really becomes a

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 4>discussion between Chase and Jimmy. That is it, you know,

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 4>is the quality of like the bulk, quality of the

0:35:56.360 --> 0:36:00.479
<v Speaker 4>bulk that Jimmy had, or the quality of that one

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 4>span of five years that Utley had, And how do

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 4>you how do you measure that? How do you vote

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.799
<v Speaker 4>on that? The voting part, you know, you can throw

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 4>it in the trash for me, and I know it's

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 4>an important part of it, but I think it's the

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 4>contribution to the team during that time. I think both

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 4>those guys should be Hall of Famers myself now, yeah,

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 4>but I'm I'm a more expanded Hall of Fame guy.

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm not as a smell like you know, people have

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 4>different thoughts about it. I think all three of those

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 4>guys's numbers are going to be retired because of what

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 4>they brought to the table in that era. There's not

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, as Jim said, I mean the impact that

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 4>they had on that club for those many years and

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 4>that was a nice run, was pretty significant. And I

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 4>have a feeling that John Middleton and others will choose

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 4>to do that.

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think always got the best chance for sure,

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 2>because he kind of I think he's gonna trend kind

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 2>of like Scott Rowland. A lot of voters today, I

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 2>don't want to get into this too much, but a

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 2>lot of voters say they start with they look at

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 2>the war. They go, all right, Chase at least got

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 2>a war of like sixty eight or sixty five issues

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 2>in the sixties. Jimmy Rownds is in the forties. Chase

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Utley is going to be my guy. He's going to

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 2>trend upward and upward. But Jimmy Rownds, you know, look

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 2>at some of the other shortsteps that they're in the

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Fame. I mean, no, you know, all apologies

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 2>to Phil Rizzuto, but come on, if he's in the

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Fame, then.

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:22.959
<v Speaker 4>Jimmy, Jimmy Rewnds should be in the Hall of Fame.

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:26.359
<v Speaker 1>So gonna be I think it's gonna be Chase Utley.

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>You'll probably get in.

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 2>I think probably Jimmy Rounds will not, although I think

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:34.800
<v Speaker 2>both should. So. Last question, this comes from Gary H.

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:38.919
<v Speaker 2>What is the story behind the closing remarks each show

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 2>between Jim and Ruben Smell you later.

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 4>That's for Jim.

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't shower often. Once we went to the

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Virtual Zoom World a few years ago, you know, I

0:37:55.840 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 3>just gave up showers. So no, I'm kidding you, just

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 3>sort of like see you later, sort of sort of

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 3>our George Burns saga Night Gracy. Is that what it was?

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Good Night Gracie.

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yeah, we're.

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:11.879
<v Speaker 3>Taking to getting it on a T shirt.

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 4>I think there was a guy. I think there's a

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 4>guy I played with in like the minor leagues. At

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 4>some point he used to say, Hey, see you later,

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 4>and then you would say see you later, but no, no,

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 4>smell you later, And so I sort of started saying

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 4>saying that. I think I started saying it to you

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 4>guys every once in a while when we were when

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 4>you were covering our club right right and getting fired

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:37.240
<v Speaker 4>and getting me fired. So I decided, you know, okay, guys,

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 4>smell you lator.

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:40.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a little bit of like one half

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 2>immaturity one part absurdity.

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:44.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that has something to do with.

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:49.399
<v Speaker 3>It as well. With Ruby and I have always had

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 3>like sort of like we we poke each other impatially

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 3>and we we enjoy it sometimes occasionally sometimes it's occasionally

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 3>even clean enough that people can, can you know, publicly

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 3>consume it.

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 4>I'll say it's out of great it's out of great respect.

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 4>And I have to say this. I will say this

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:15.320
<v Speaker 4>about both of you guys. I had the great opportunity

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 4>to be able to to talk with them for many,

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 4>many many years as an executive and two of the

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 4>most knowledgeable, professional, quality people I've ever been around. And

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 4>that's the truth.

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Thanks many, Yeah, that's nice.

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but it's serious.

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that. Thanks man.

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Nothing that we got. No questions from six.

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Though, No questions from six though. He must have been

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>asleep at the wheel last night. So we'll do this again.

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>We will do this again. Well, that was fun. We

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>got some good chance.

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Is there a chance that he's not a regular listener?

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh, then I'll get on his ass about that. If

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 4>that's the case, I mean, I.

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Mean, that would make him a huge frau.

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 4>Will I will I will Twitter troll him all right,

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 4>next troll him.

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 3>He'd better be listening and passing the words to his

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:07.879
<v Speaker 3>family friend. Well, we'll find out.

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>If he tweets at us later today, then we'll know

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 1>he's listening.

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 2>If he's not, and he tweets about the podcasts after,

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 2>then we'll know he's not the regular listener.

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Guys, thanks a lot. That was fun. Thanks to all

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the listeners that sent in questions.

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Sorry we couldn't get through the mall and we will

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 2>be back early next week.

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Take care, everybody, Smell you later.

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:39.840
<v Speaker 5>Jim, This is the Philly Show. If you haven't already,

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 5>please subscribe to The Philly Show wherever you get your podcasts.

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 5>You can also watch us on our YouTube channel. If

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 5>you like what we do, give us a review, Tell

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 5>a friend. Catch Reuben, Jim and Me on Phillies Nation TV,

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 5>presented by Valley Forge Tourism. New episodes air an hour

0:40:55.800 --> 0:41:00.320
<v Speaker 5>before every Saturday Phillies game on NBC Sports Philadelphia. Plays

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:03.919
<v Speaker 5>air throughout the week and on Philliesmation dot com. Get

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 5>more of Reuben's analysis during before and after Phillies games

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 5>on NBC Sports Philadelphia on the Sports Radio ninety four, WIP.

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Morning Show, and MLB Network reajim at the Allcity Network

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 2>at allphl y dot com.

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 5>Find more of me at MLB dot com, the PHILLIESB Newsletter,

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:23.880
<v Speaker 5>and occasionally on MLB Network