WEBVTT - China Clampdown Could Reverse Global Real Estate Prices, Orlik Says

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Well

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>news crossing today that on Bang Insurance Group is getting

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>pressured to stop buying so many assets overseas and possibly

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>sell the iconic Waldorf Astoria hotel in New York, which

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it bought for almost two billion dollars. In with us

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this is Tom or Like, chief Asia

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>economist for Bloomberg Intelligence, normally based in Beijing, but he

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>is in New York today in our eleven three oh studios. Tom,

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. I want to

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>start with what's behind your request by China to a

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bang and others to reduce overseas investments and to sort of,

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, like what exactly triggered this. I think the

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>lens through we have through which we have to see

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a broader attempt by China's policymakers to crack

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>down on financial risk and to crack down on capitalite

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>flows and and bank ticks both of those boxes. On

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>financial risk, they're issuing short term, high interest rate investment

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>products to finance a liquid long term assets. That's a

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:38.759
<v Speaker 1>massive asset liability mismatch. On capital outflows, well, they're making

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of purchases overseas, so it's trying to crack

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>down on these two areas and banging other firms are

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>coming very clearly into the regulators crosshairs. Tom, Can you

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>put this into the context of government policy in China

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and their Silk Road initiative, And because they seem to

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>be putting a lot of money in overseas development, they

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>just wanted in a certain way and under a certain control.

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I think China's policymakers are firm believers in their own

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>ability to walk and chew gum at the same time um,

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and that means that they think they can pursue an

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>aggressive outbound investment strategy on the Belt and road building

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure in Southeast Asia into Central Asia at the same

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>time as cracking down on what they see as the

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>riskier aspects of capitalite flows, as it was the case

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>with Ambang. So to me, this is this is really compelling.

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>If Unbang does sell the Waldorf Storia, which have bought

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>just three years ago, what other assets could it sell

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 1>And could we see a mass sale among other assets

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>by other companies that are engaging in similar practices. So

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we're still a little bit in the realm

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of speculation here. We have a well sourced story on

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal. On this, we so far do not

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>have confirmation from China's policymakers, and A Bang are certainly

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>not affirming that they've been required to sell their overseas assets. Um.

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.959
<v Speaker 1>If it does come to that, um, then I think

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see some reversal in that excitement about

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>real estate prices. Well, I mean, that's sort of what

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting at, even if it's let's say, even if

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to confirm it, or even if they

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>don't sell the idea that Chinese companies may avoid some

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of the big purchases I'm thinking in particular property purchases

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in the in the New York area, for example, or

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in London. That changes the dynamic for those markets. Now, yeah,

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. I think one of the underlying

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>positives for global real estate markets in the last few

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>years has been this idea that the big Chinese buyer

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in the case of the prestige project like Waldorf, or

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the just the middle income Chinese buyer in the case

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of run of the mill residential property is going to

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>be there with a wad of cash willing to drive

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>up prices. If that story starts to change, clearly there

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>are some important implications. Tom. Before you came in, you

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that you know you've been in China for about

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a decade, perhaps even longer. What are some of the

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>biggest misconceptions that you try to dispel from people who

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.119
<v Speaker 1>just read the headlines or news but actually don't live

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>there and spend time there. I think what people underestimate

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is the capacity which China's policymakers have to pull policy

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>levers to change the dynamic in the short term. UM

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>So we underestimate the power of the Chinese government. I

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>think people are right that China's government and China's economy

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>faces some really serious problems in the long term, particularly

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>on the over extension of the banking sess system and

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the overborrowing by the corporate sector. UM what people underestimate

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is the capacity of China's policymakers to move things around

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>in a way which delays any kind of day of reckoning.

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Are we seeing any sales of assets overseas on the

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>part of bigger Chinese companies yet? I haven't seen any

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of that so far. So so far, there's been absolutely

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>no evidence that this is going on in any way.

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the beginning of the story, not

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the end, got it? And so what about wealthy individuals?

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Are they still moving money overseas or is that slowing

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>down a bit? So if we look at the bigger

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>picture on China's capital outflows, the government has really been extraordinarily,

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily successful in stemming the outflow. If you go back

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to the end of two thousand and sixteen, capital light

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>flows were picking up again. The big fear was that

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we were going to see a flood of outflows at

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the start of two thousand and seventeen and we'd be

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>back to panic mode on China's economy. That hasn't happened.

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>At the end of last year, we saw the beginnings

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of a crackdown on corporate and household outflows. These latest

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>stories on and bang h Na Dally and Wander show

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>an extension of that policy. And if we look at

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the numbers, China's capital light flows have come right down

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>from fifty sixty billion dollars a month at the end

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of last year, too close to imbalance in the latest data.

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>One of thank you very much for coming in and

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.359
<v Speaker 1>spending time with us. Tom Orlick is our chief Asia

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>economist for Bloomberg Intelligence. We hear a lot about the

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>souring US Russia relations, and really underpinning it is the

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>ongoing investigation into President Trump. And here to give us

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more color from the Russian perspective and

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>from a deeply knowledgeable and informed place, is Richard Khan,

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>managing partner at Eurasia Advisors, based in New York City,

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>also has offices in Moscow. And Richard, you have a

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>deep background with Russia, with financial dealings of all sorts

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>between Russia and the US, and I just want to

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>start with you know, how serious do you think that

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>this is being overblown, the Russia investigation into President Trump?

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And do you think that it's not fair to say

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that this is really at the heart of the ongoing

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>conflict between the US and Russia. I do not think

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it's being overblown, Lisa. From the first time I spoke

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>with you, roughly a year ago, I highlighted some red flags,

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioning people's names such as, you know, Paul Maniford and

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Carter Page, folks who I felt or indicative of efforts

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>by the FSB to place people around Trump. And since,

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and I've of course been cautious about stating what I

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>really think may happen in that context, but I think

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we now have a pretty good picture of what's going on,

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and those of us who spend time in Russia and

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>are familiar with the FSB tactics really have I think

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>very little doubt that there's a tremendous amount of fire here.

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And there are a variety of criminal UH statutes that

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>may well have been violated that I'm sure Mueller is

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at right what UH. I would give several examples.

0:07:55.280 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>One would be cyber intrusion, another, campaign finance laws, false

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>statements to federal agents, foreign ancient registration, f c p A, RICO,

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>money laundering, espionage, possible obstruction of justice. Of course, all

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of these things I can give examples of in terms

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of how I think they may play out, But one

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>simple one would be well, first, let me just say

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>during the time period when when we do not know

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>all of the facts, if there is a fire, let's

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>say regarding money laundering, the Russians are aware of that,

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>just as they were aware of the meeting in Trump Tower,

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but did not disclose that during those time periods when

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>they know it but we do not. That's what's called compremat.

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>That puts the Russians in a position of having information

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 1>that's embarrassing to the President and his team and allows

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>them great leverage. But in the money laundering context, as

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>an example, I'm sure that Mueller is looking at a

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>very classic technique used in the high levels of Russian government,

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>which is the movement of capital to real estate markets

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to clean money by basically by paying high prices for

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>real estate and eventually having the ability to sell those

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 1>assets and have the money at that point be utilized.

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>In Schedule three countries meeting countries which are on the screen, Well,

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>this all ties to two very recent developments. Because it's

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>clear that Congress doesn't fully trust President Trump in his

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 1>dealings with Russia. That could be an interpretation of popular

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>one from the sanctions that were by passing a bipartisan

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 1>fashion through Congress UH that resulted in Russia's retaliation by

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>ejecting the more than seven hundred diplomats that are in Russia.

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And then of course there's this escalating concern about Russia's

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>interactions with North Korea, with Venezuela. I mean, this is

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>getting very complicated with Trump. I mean, how much leverage

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>does he have within the US even to deal with Russia,

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>even if Russia does have compromont on him. Well, the

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>way I think of it, and I look going first

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>say we eurased advisors. We want to see good relations

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>with Russia. That's what we're really about is trying to

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>build bridges, trying to see business move ahead, resolve problems.

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>But that has to start in a situation where the

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>United States is being represented by people who are trustworthy

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and both in terms of not having complet model them,

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>not having been paid as some of the people around

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump have been, and in addition being in a position

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to have the confidence of the population behind you in

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>order to make deals. I actually view Trump right now

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>as the major impediment to better relations with Russia. And

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I say it that way because I don't think it's

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>possible having Trump in power given all that we already

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>know about him, and I believe there will be a

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>great deal more that comes out. I don't think he's

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>going to ever going to be in a position where

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>people in the United States, whether they're in Congress or

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>just a population generally, are going to have a confidence

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 1>that he's actually acting exclusively in the best interests of

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States, without any concern for information that people

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>may have on him or for his own business dealings.

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And as you were just saying, Lisa, the tentacles of

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 1>this go far beyond Russia. This this comes into play

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>when you're dealing with relations with China, with Turkey, with Greece.

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>It comes into play when it comes to the undermining

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of our civil society in the United States, whether in

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>other words, attacking anyone who is going to be part

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of the accusations against him, anyone who is essentially playing

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a prosecutorial role, whether that's the court system, whether it's

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the media, whether it's an individuals such as Mueller. I

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>think he has made the decision from a fairly early

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>stage because he knew what was out there, that he

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>had to undermine these sources of attack on him, and

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he's done that in a very broad manner

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's extremely harmful. So it's a matter that I

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>think that affects all of us as he tries to

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>deal with these allegations, although a lot of people would

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>say that they have been overblown, that there has been

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>no proof that you know, he is generally moving forward

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>with the consensus of a pretty big corps of people

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>who think that he's still doing a good job despite

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the less popular polls, and they

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>have come out, and you know, he's basically put some

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty respected people in right below him, and they certainly

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>like McMaster, who is absolutely respected broadly, so you could

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>say that, you know, they could act and negotiate to

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a decent level. Well, Look, I have respect for many

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>people whom he's hired. I know Rex to Learsten somewhat

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>from having served on a board with him years ago.

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think many people and I would assume he's

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in this category trying to be helpful in the situation,

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>recognize that there are serious problems with Trump and many

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and his team and want to be responsible and our

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>patriots trying to do the right thing. I'm not sure

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be successful for them. And I also

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think that at the end of the day that

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be enough to over in any

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>way overcome the uh the undercurrents that we are now

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing coming out in terms of actual links between Russia

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Trump team. And as I said, I think

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a great deal more of that. What

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 1>we look forward to your commentary and your thoughts. Richard

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Kahn is the managing partner at Eurasia Advisors, speaking about

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>US Russia relations. All right, here to tell us what

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to do with your money is Phil Orlando. He is

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the chief Equity market Strategist, group head of Macro Balanced

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and Growth and Income Teams at Federated Investors, and he

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>joins us here in our eleven trio studio. Phil, thanks

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>very much for being o. Hey, Pim, thanks for very

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>much for hearing me. So let's let's try to just

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>understand exactly where we are in the market right now.

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we've heard these calls that equities are overvalued,

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>bonds don't return a lot. What are you suggesting to

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>your customers right now, Well, we don't think that stocks

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>are revalued per se. We're sitting here at about nineteen

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 1>times this year's estimated earnings of a hundred and thirty dollars.

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>But I gotta tell you that the earnings are just

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>coming in beautifully. You know. The first quarter is a

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent year every year, best quarter in five years.

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Second quarter we're about sixty done. We're up about ten

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>eleven percent, another solid quarter. Journal this morning made a

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>comment that this is the best six month period we've

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>seen in corporate earnings since um and but how much

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>does that due to the weaker dollar? Well, currency is

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>absolutely headwind. But but you know, why do we Why

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>are we gonna penalize companies because the dollars weeken? They're

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the large cap companies are selling more stuff overseas. That's

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the environment in which they're dealing with. And if the

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>earnings were terrible now because of the strong dollar, uh

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and and I would say, well, we've got to compensate

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>for the strength of the US dollar being a headwin

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to tailwin, you'd say, and just just treat

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the earnings as they are. That's true. We wouldn't say that.

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, when you came in here and

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>we were gonna we were talking ahead of the segment

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about, you're expecting a three to five

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>percent pullback. How do you think about that and how

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>do you sort of see that being triggered given the

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>fact that earnings are coming in fantastically and that there

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't really anything that seems to shake confidence of investors.

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So you're in great shape right now with the earnings

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>valuation at nineteen times is not that excessive. But earning

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>season to end in a couple of weeks and then

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, seasonally, we've got this August September period, which,

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the duldrums of the summer tend to lead

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to corrections. You've had a twenty move in the market since, uh,

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>since the election. Uh, Washington can't seem to get out

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of its own way, for reasons that I still don't understand.

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>They keep they keep trying to pound this you know,

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>round peg of of healthcare into a square hole here,

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to pivoting over to something that actually matters,

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>which is to focus on corporate tax reform and infrastructure

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and repatriation, the things that will move the needle. So

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point, maybe the market just says, you know what,

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we're just frustrated as hell with the fact that this

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>administration can't can't shoot straight and and maybe that is

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>what you know, triggers a little bit of an air pocket. Well,

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>they might be frustrated, but if you're invested in the

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundreds, you're up more than ten percent so

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>far this year correct on the basis of earnings that

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no Trump. You know. But let's say, as an investor,

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't do you really care why it goes up.

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>If you're long you just are happy that you're you know,

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>your trade played out or your investments. Well, all right,

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>so at Federated investors were long term investors. And the

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>way we see this cycle playing out is we think

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the SMP, you know, at two thousand or so last election,

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we thought we had a nice clean run to three

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>thous and looking out into the spring of so as

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>as as we see that fifty percent move, we have

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>no problems with what's playing out. But we're not the

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>average investor. The average investor is looking at day to day,

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>week to week stuff. The hedgees are not looking out

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to it for a year. Let me just challenging them,

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>because when you say average investor, let's just I understand

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. You know, it's like at the margin,

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 1>they may set the price on any given day. But

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>as you just described, if you're a long term investor,

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking to make an investment now for three

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to five years down the road, couldn't you be considered

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to be like an actual investor as opposed to a speculator.

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 1>And if we were to get a three, five or

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>seven percent declined, what would you be buying? Oh, we

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 1>would absolutely be buyers. And the areas that we have

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>shifted our focus to post election were those areas that

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.959
<v Speaker 1>are economically sensitive that we think will will benefit from

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>the improved economy. So technology, financial services, energy, materials, industrials,

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the areas that you know will do better than the

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>big stable dividend pairs. So I want to go back

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>fil to what you were saying about the three to

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>five percent correction, that we're entering the dull drums period

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of the year, and that typically that's a good time

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>for a sell off. Of course, um, that is not

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>enough of a catalyst that people are bored to to

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>trigger a sell off, because otherwise they would have sold

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>off a long time ago. But you know, I think

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a Rist cost Rich of Black Rock was on Bloomberg

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Television earlier today and he was talking about the build

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>up of leverage at hedge funds and other investors in

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>particular to buy stocks. And I have to wonder what

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that means for short term interest rates. If they rise,

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>that leverage becomes much more expensive. Perhaps you get margin

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>calls or having to post a more collateral and all

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden that could trigger a sell off. Do

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you see that as a potential catalyst. If not, what

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>are some of the other potential catalysts. So Russ is

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a smart guy and and looking at the leverage of

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>head funds, hedge funds is certainly an issue as we

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the potential for rising interest rates. Uh. We

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>we know on the calendar that that we've got the

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>FED Dr Yellen giving a key speech at at Jackson

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Hole in UH. I guess in about a month or less,

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>little less than a month's time, where we think she's

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna lay out, you know, UH, a firmer plan in

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of the Feds unwind of uh, you know, the

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.400
<v Speaker 1>early stage of shrinking that four and a half trillion

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar balance sheet. We think the Fed kicks off with that, uh,

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>definitively at their fo MC meeting in mid September. So

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:24.719
<v Speaker 1>so perhaps somewhere in there the market has the reality

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of the shrinking of the balance sheet, which is another

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>way of saying that the Fed will continue to to

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 1>withdraw accommodation from the market. Maybe maybe that is a

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>trigger that that that gets investors starting to take some

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>chips off the table. So it's really hard to sit

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>here and say definitively that this is the issue that's

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>going to trigger it. Uh, there may be three or

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>four things that the markets nervous about. And given the

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that that you're you're entering sort of a typically

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>perilous time with the stock market having done phenomenally well.

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and maybe we're just gonna, you know, nitpick

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>our way to a small correction. Fel gonna be nit

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>pick our way to that small correction. We're gonna be

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>doing it with a lot fewer stocks. Do you have

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>any thoughts on this idea that inn we had about

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy five hundred publicly traded companies that wasn't like the

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Wilshire five thousand. Right now we have about thirty five

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred that's at the kind of fifty percent. That's just

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>fewer stocks to invest this maybe even growing amount of money. Uh.

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>That's an issue. I would think that with a stronger economy, uh,

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>with more business friendly fiscal policies, uh, we would start

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to see a wave of I p O s that

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>would bring more, you know, fresh companies into the market.

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Another concern to your point, Pim, and we were discussing

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>this at our morning meeting this morning, is that in

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the past, you know, you'll remember this, you're an old

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>guy like me. Uh, companies when the stock price gets

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to a certain level, would split the stock two four

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>three four. Don't they don't do that right now? Not are?

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Are are? One of our Dan Paris, the head of

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>our strategic Vale You franchise, was bemoaning the fact that that, uh,

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>you know that that McDonald's is trading it. I don't know,

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>it's north of a hundred bucks. Was a hundred fifty

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>bucks right now? In the old days, you know, Uh,

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>companies would say, okay, we want to keep that stock

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between thirty and fifty dollars a share, and you

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>would periodically get these two for one three for one splits.

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Now everybody's working up towards a thousand dollars, you know,

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett saying, we don't need to split the stock.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.479
<v Speaker 1>Let's just keep you know, keep Berkshire Hathaway up at

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, these stratospheric levels. So that that also creates

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>an issue because the retail investor, per se, doesn't really

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to buy a Hunter and hundred fifty

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar stock. They like to buy stocks that are of share,

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>so they go to index funds where they can buy

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>them all. Phil Orlando, thank you so much for joining us.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>It's always a pleasure to speaking. Thank you so much.

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the rest of your summer. Thank you too, Phill Orlando.

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Chieffectuty Equity Market Strategistic Federated in Investors, joining us here

0:21:54.080 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg eleven three oh studios. Well he's real,

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>he's here with us today. Paul Sweeney US director of

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Research and senior Media Internet Analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. He

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>can be followed on Twitter at pt Sweeney r I

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 1>P T. Sweeney tell us about this combination Scripts, Networks

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>and Discovery. Why are they getting together? You know, I

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>think they're getting together simply to get scale in a

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>consolidating media business that is being disrupted by the likes

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Netflix and Hulus and you know, all the

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>other types of Internet enabled commerce and entertainment. So we

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>saw in the last you know, a couple of years,

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of consolidation on the distribution side of the business.

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>We saw a T and T by Direct Tv, UH,

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Charter Communications, by Time Warner Cable, and now I think

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing kind of the flip side, some consolidation on

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the content side of the media equation. UH. And this

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>is a deal Discovery and Scripts that investors have been

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>speculating on for a long time. It really makes the

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>most UH strategic sense. You've got two companies that are

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>very good, high quality cable network companies, but you know,

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>in this relative to the UH Foxes of the world

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Disneys of the world, are probably a little

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>bit subscale. And by merging they can get a little

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>bit of scale to compete against some of these big distributors.

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>And they're hoping that people will continue to want to

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>watch people renovate their bedrooms for perpetuity. I want to

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>get a sense from you, Paul. Discovery shares down more

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>than six percent right after the open on this news.

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Are they overpaying. UM. You know, I don't think they're overpaying,

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's um. What happened this morning also is um

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>uh Scripts reported earnings that came in blow expectations, that

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they pre announced their earnings in controjunction with the deal,

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and they also took down their their guidance for the

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>remainder of the year. So it just highlighted once again

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that the cable network business, UM, you know, isn't quite

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>as good a business as it used to be, and

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in fact, the cord cutting issues are are impacting all

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>cable networks, including the ones that Scripts and Discovery UH.

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>So I think, you know, in the context of the

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>price tag paid in in light of the reduced estimates

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>for Scripts, I think some investors are taking it out

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>on the Discovery. But again, it just kind of highlights

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>one once once again the challenges that these companies, no

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>matter how big they're going to get, UH, will continue

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to face in terms of cord cutting and the ability

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that and the impact that has us on its advertising

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 1>revenue and on on on its affiliate feed revenue. Well,

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>does that mean that they really haven't taken the opportunity

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to change the business model at all? From just relying

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>on advertising, specifically a lot of advertising from automobile companies. Yeah,

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the the cable network business historically has been the best

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>part of the television advertising UH story over the last

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>ten to twenty years, as people spend more time with

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>the cable networks versus the broadcast networks. But that is

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>essentially played out now. The story is can these cable

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>networks and the broadcast networks, but particularly the cable networks,

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>how do they get their content to the consumers If

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the consumers are cutting the cord or maybe never even

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 1>signing up for paid TV at all? How did they

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>get their content in front of consumers and get paid

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>for it through advertising or affiliate fees. So we you know,

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 1>they need to go direct to consumer, much like HBO

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>has gone direct to the consumer with HBO now um

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think they need to be a part of

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the skinny bundles that some of these consumers

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>are signing up for. They need to have a direct

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to consumer solutions. So I think one of the expectations

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>is that Discovery and Scripts will pull their content and

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 1>create a direct to consumer kind of brand to go

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>right to the consumer, much like Netflix goes right to

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the consumer with its content. Well, the market might not

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>be that enthusiastic about the price and especially the earnings

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of Discovery, but stock traders are very happy with the

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>news that UH soft Bank might purchase Charter shares at

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the highest level ever, up more than four percent so

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>far in trading. UH, can you just give us a

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>sense of why soft Bank would want to buy Charter?

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>The recent soft Bank would want to buy Charter is

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>because soft Bank also owns Sprint in the United States,

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and Sprint is a company that is not performing well,

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that is really challenged from a strategic perspective. It is

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the fourth of the four wireless carriers in the United States,

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's in a weak strategic positions, and it's in

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a relatively weak financial position, and it Massa. Siro Son

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>believes that by combining with Charter, a much stronger company,

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a company with a diversified business of video and high

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>speed data and landline phone, that this would be a

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>good way to shore up Sprint. But you know it's strange, Okay,

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>So SoftBank tried to get Charter to buy Sprint outright,

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>they said no. So now soft Bank is trying to

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 1>just buy Charter. Sprint shares not up, they are down. Well,

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 1>it's surprising to me, it is a little bit, and

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm I'm actually surprised a little bit that

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that Charter is up as much as it is, because

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the there's a high level of skepticism in

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace that Massa son Um can in fact pull

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 1>off by transaction and acquisition of Charter Um. You know,

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>if you factor in some type of premium for Charter

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>an ACQUA system, Charter would approach two hundred billion dollars

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>when you include the sixty billion dollars in debt that

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Charter has. So this is a huge transaction, UH, and

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it would be very difficult from also to pull off

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>from a financial UH perspective, even if Charter wanted to sell.

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And let's remember when we talk about Charter once again,

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about John Malone. He has a significant shareholder

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of Charter Communications, and he would have to agree to

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>any deal. And I do not believe that he is

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>looking for an outright sale of Charter. Is he willing

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 1>to do some type of UH strategic transaction with Sprint

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>or with Massa son Very possible. John Malone is the

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, a prolific deal maker. So maybe there's some

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 1>stret strategic outcome here, but I don't think an outright

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>acquisition of Charter is in the cards right now. Well,

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's a that that's something I guess they

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>haven't figured out yet because they're trying to make this

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>deal happen. I mean, I wonder if the technology is

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>up to date. I know, yeah, Sprint, you know, it's

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just talked to John Butler are telecom

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>antals here, and he made the comment to me that Sprint,

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>because of its uh you know, a week financial position,

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>has not been investing in its network. Paul Sweeney, As always,

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>we love hearing from you. Paul Sweeney, thank you for

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>joining us. He is US director of Research and senior

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Media and Internet Analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Thanks for listening

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm on Twitter

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>one before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.