WEBVTT - Geoff Ogilvy - U.S. Open, Pebble, Winged Foot, and Life as a Pro

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another edition of the Friday Egg Podcast.

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is powered by tdam or Trade. Every stroke

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>counts on the scorecard and every penny counts in the market.

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>That's why tedam or Trade is committed to straightforward pricing

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>with no surprises, so you're free to swing with confidence.

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Visit tedomritrade dot com, slash Friday Egg member SIPC. It's

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>US Open weekend. We welcome on US Open champion two

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand and six US Open Champion Jeff Ogilvy. Jeff comes

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>on to talk about the US Open, what is like

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to play in it, a little bit about his win

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:41.599
<v Speaker 1>at Wingfoot and as well as other US Opens, and

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>then Pebble Beach. So, without further ado, here's Jeff Ogilvy

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and enjoy today's podcast. I miss the green, for example,

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm already upset. When I find my ball in the bunker,

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm really upset. And when I find my ball in.

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>A Friday Egg Frida egg thedded Frida egg Frida egg

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Frida egg Frida egg egg Lie.

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm about ready to run off of the course. If

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you were going to do a rota, say five courses

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>for the US Open, what would they be.

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Uh Oakmont finalst Number two, Shinnacock Pebble have many that

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 2>four it's for one more. I mean I like West

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Coast opens. I don't like Olympic though. I don't think

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 2>that belongs in that. I mean, Olympics amazing, but I

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 2>don't think it belongs in that. If it's just gonna

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 2>be fun, I don't know. Riv Maybe Riviera being incredibly

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 2>wis open. La North will be fun too. I think

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 2>v would be a great one.

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Actually, I'm excited for La North. I'm a little worried

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>about scores. People getting crazy about scores there.

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be wide, but the greens are pretty

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 2>crazy there. Yeah, I'm all worried about logistics. I mean,

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 2>how car is going to get in and out and

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 2>like where people are going to stay in, Like that's

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 2>like the busiest traffic area in the whole world. That's

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 2>going to be a logistically interesting you know, who's going

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 2>to rent the Playboy mention for the week?

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Monkeys are still, the animals are still. Do you know

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>those apartments like that overlook it they are like empty?

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh really, I guess that like oil money owns them

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:52.519
<v Speaker 1>and they're like perfectly content just hemorrhaging money. Oh yeah,

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:54.679
<v Speaker 1>it's like there's just all of them are empty.

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.839
<v Speaker 2>Because that's such a good place. Yeah, the West Coast

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>opens are good because of the weather's more predictable, right,

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 2>you just you can get foggy at Pebble, right, but

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 2>like l a weather in summer, like the Tory Open

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 2>was the best West weather we've had by far, and actually,

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 2>weirdly enough, the Chambers was the best one we've had too,

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 2>Like the East coast ones of storms and sometimes you

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 2>get unpredictable rain and it's really really hot. But yeah,

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 2>what I say, Oakmont, Pinehurst, Pebble, China, wing Foot. There

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 2>you go, We've got to put wingfo. It's a perfect venue. Actually,

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 2>it's a great place, not just because of me, but

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 2>it's a great club.

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>What what's the most underrated thing about winning a years helping?

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 2>The most underrated thing? They're all rated pretty high. I think,

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It's been good.

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess like, what's the thing that you didn't know

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that like when when you want it that now you

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>look back and you're like, whoa, that was cool.

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 2>The thing that blew me away the most is that,

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 2>even to this day, I get new people telling me

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 2>that they were there that's or they marshaled the fourth

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 2>hole the thirst day that week, or like, how many

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 2>people are like actually involved in watch interested in the

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 2>US Open is more than any other tournament that I've

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 2>ever seen or heard about. I mean, everybody's seen. This

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 2>is such a tradition in the US to watch the

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 2>US Open on Sunday others day. It's just what people do, right,

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 2>And they might not watch golf all year, but that's

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 2>their day to watch golf. And to this day I

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 2>meet people who talk about that Sunday for whatever reason.

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 2>It was kind of remember one because of what Phil

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 2>did and stuff too, so it kind of sticks out

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 2>in people's memories a little bit to I think, just

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 2>how many people watch it, it's just amazing for me.

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>You had Phil and you had Manti. Yeah, just the

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>scoring in general. The massacre at wing Foot.

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was nuts. It was. It actually didn't obviously

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 2>because I was playing well. It didn't seem everyone was

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 2>complaining about how hard it was, and I didn't think

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 2>it was that hard. I mean, obviously our scores were high.

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 2>We were I don't know if anyone was ever under par.

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Maybe after day one there was someone on a part,

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 2>but I want it five five over. I think five over.

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 2>But I never thought it was that hard, and people

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 2>complaining that the greens were a bit ropy in the

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 2>afternoons and stuff. But obviously I was playing well because

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I thought that it was playing perfectly. It was tough.

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, isn't that how it is? Though? If

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you're playing well, like you're probably not gonna be complaining.

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess. I mean every other US Open I

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 2>complained pretty much, not complained. But they're just so hard

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 2>and it feels unfair hard sometimes, you know, and it's

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 2>just you just get You can put in like nine

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 2>great holes and you're just grinding and you're trying so hard,

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 2>and every hole is the hardest hole you've ever played.

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 2>You're making pars and you're making pars, and you're making

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 2>pars and you get one kind of weird bounce into

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 2>a bad lay over the green. You make a double

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 2>and you're just all the air comes out of your

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 2>sales because you've just put so much effort in keeping

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 2>near parer. As soon as you make it, you know

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 2>you're never getting back to me a power again. Right.

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 2>It's just such a depressive, deflating kind of experience. You

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 2>can have a US Open that they could be hard

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 2>to play.

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And my buddy that played is a lot of am

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>USGA stuff. We were playing in the mid amf're and

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>he was like, just remember par. When you're making a

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of pars, you're doing really good. Like, especially with

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that being a match play thing, you know, like if

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you make if you just keep making lots of pars,

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll be fine. Like you can you know, you can avoid,

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, but if you make tons of pars, you're fine.

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like that's the way with the US

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Open too. I was, I was out watching today and

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I was, I think there's a lot of birdies at pebble,

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and Rory talked about it a little bit. There's a

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>ton of birdies at pebble because you get wedges if

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>you hit good shots. And but the flip side of

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it is that pebble might be like laden with the

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>most like you can make double or triple or quad anywhere.

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 2>It seems like you can make a double or triple

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 2>so fast and even with a wedge in your hand

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 2>if you just get a little too aggressive. The grains

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 2>are very kind of volcano. You know, they're all high

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 2>with the bunkers. Bunkers on the outside are really high

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 2>with steep slopes down onto the greens. And so if

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 2>you're landing it over any of these bunkers, you hit

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 2>these downslopes. And if you take on too much, you

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 2>hit a big downslope, you get one big bounce over

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 2>the back into some crazy rough they've got that. Just

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 2>ringing the bunkers is like nutty thick. You can and

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 2>you get over the green, and then you get over

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 2>the green on half the greens at Pebble you can't

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 2>get the web the pitch on the green. This is

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 2>no way. It's just going to go off the front.

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 2>So it's a it's relatively doable if you hit every shot. Well,

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, not every US Open can be like that. Man,

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 2>you can hit good shots at Oak Mautin get in

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 2>real trouble Pebble. Have you hit good shots, you're going

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 2>to be all right, But as soon as you miss,

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna have stress. When it's set up like this anyway, it's.

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>How much people talk about how different it is from

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>like the pro am, but like how what would you say,

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>like a shot value? Would us open versus AT and

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>T pro am set up.

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Be well, the pebble the pro am. We don't play

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 2>way off the back, I don't think. I mean there's

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 2>us open TC here that I don't think. I think

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 2>they only use every ten years here, So it's not

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 2>as long. I mean, the ball isn't rolling on the fairways,

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 2>so it maybe plays in some ways. It might play longer,

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 2>but it plays so wide because the fairways are really

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 2>wide here, normally like fifty sixty yards wide. I mean

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 2>it's a public course. They play sixty thousand rounds a year.

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 2>They want to get everyone around as fast as they can,

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 2>so the fairways are really wide, and the greens are

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 2>very soft, and the pins are right in the middle

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 2>of the prime because we've got ams out there and

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 2>they want to they don't have the tough pins, they

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 2>have the easy pins. So it's not it it's it's

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the same shots that you're being asked to hit because

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 2>the tough shot. The tough thing about people, I think

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 2>is that the balls I wasn't You're always on a

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 2>side slope the whole property like slopes towards the ocean,

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 2>and you play one the balls below your feet. You know,

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 2>you play two the balls below your feet, you play

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 2>like three, four, five, not so much. Six the balls

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>below your feet down slope. Eight the balls arguably on

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 2>a downslope sometimes nine the balls really below your feet.

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:57.839
<v Speaker 2>Ten the balls really below your feet, you know, And

0:08:57.880 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 2>then you turn back around to come the other way,

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 2>and the balls above your feet for the rest of

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 2>the way. And it's so that stuff is the same

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 2>when it's in the pro am. So the part of

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the trickiness of pebble is still there. But when the

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 2>ball lands, it stops in the pro am, and the

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 2>us over with the ball lands it doesn't stop, and

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 2>that's why it gets so much harder.

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The other thing I think that's neat I tucked

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>with Garrett, one of my who's our editor about it

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is that all the greens, it's kind of got that

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a gusta thing that you talked

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot about where the greens orient the opposite way

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of the slopes and all the holes, and you know,

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>it's different in the way Augusta is so varied, But

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 1>like pebble's kind of like you get through one stretch,

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>then you go to the other stretch where you're gonna

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>be like the opposite.

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the holes along the on the way out. I

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 2>suppose the holes like nine and ten. It's very obvious

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 2>that you need to hit a draw into those greens,

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 2>but the ball is so far below your feet and

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 2>the ocean's out to the right. It's a pretty scary

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 2>proposition to try to hit a draw, so it confuses

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 2>you slope a lot. It's pretty untalked about. I think

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 2>at Pebble and the US Open, it's just accentuated because

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 2>it's firmer, so the fairways get pink narrowed way down

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 2>to I mean, they're wider than some US Opens, I

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 2>would say here. I don't know if they've come out

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 2>with any numbers, but they're probably thirty yards wide at Pebble.

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Maybe because of this, they play fifteen yards wide though,

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 2>because the ball goes sideways when it lands a lot

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 2>of holes. So it's just a great place to play golf,

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's it asks. There's some scary shots you're

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 2>asked to hit, you know, like those Augusta style shots

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>over fifteen and like kind of hero shots here. They're

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 2>not quite as I guess famous, but I mean the

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 2>second jounter eight is a scary shot. The shot up

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 2>the hill at six is a really scary shot. You know,

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 2>it's a different style of thing of going over water,

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 2>but you're hitting it up just a cliff. You know.

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Eight's an incredibly tough shot. The second shot to nine,

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 2>and the second shot to ten, and the t shot

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 2>on ten. I mean, they're outrageously difficult shots and like

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 2>you really really just have to kind of sack up

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 2>and hit it, you know what I mean, You just

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 2>have to. Like, it's just there's no there's no way

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 2>of hitting a shot under the ninth or tenth graded

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 2>people if you're not just super confident put a proper

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 2>swing on it, because it's just not gonna happen.

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's more intimidation because it's like a

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>cliff than a normal water hazard.

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would think. I mean, it's so big the ocean, right,

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:25.319
<v Speaker 2>it's so beautiful and all you're looking at it all day,

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 2>so it's got your attention. And I think the psychologists

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 2>will tell us the ball goes where our attention is, right,

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 2>and it's your attention. How do you not look at

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 2>Carmel Bay when you're playing nine to ten? Right, it's

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 2>the prettiest thing in the world. It's clearly more difficult

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 2>being the ocean and the cliff than it would be

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 2>just a pond or a lake or something.

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>It's really amazing, Like when you when you get up

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>sex and then you see everything. It's like, no matter

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>how many times you see it, it's still just amazing.

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 2>It's ridiculous. It's the mean. It's the best revealing golf

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 2>is walking off the fourth tier pebble. Yeah, they play

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 2>the first three holes you like, and you can kind

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>of get a glimpse of what's going to go on

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 2>on the third, but then you've kind of play the

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 2>fourth T and it's you walk about one hundred yards

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 2>and all of a sudden you go past the beach

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 2>club and you just come out to this and for

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the next two hours you're just on the cliff looking

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 2>at the Pacific Ocean. It's outrageous, But that we walk

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 2>off that fourth T is one of the best moments

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 2>in golf.

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a coolhule too. I think that's that.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's sweet. I mean it feels over bunket these days,

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 2>but that's a great little hole, what a great little green.

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see him, go put it up one day,

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>make it too eighty.

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because going for it's not to play even if

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 2>you can get there, I don't think so if you

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 2>give it a too eighty, they're not going to be

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 2>able to help themselves, these guys. Yeah, and you can

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 2>see five sold all day because they'll all miss the

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:46.719
<v Speaker 2>green left and no one will hit it up. Pitch

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:51.719
<v Speaker 2>it on the green and yeah it'll be Yeah. That's

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 2>a that's a cool hole. That's a great hole. I mean,

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Pebble's got good holes, like people probably kind

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 2>of there's some Cypress points not around, you know who

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 2>don't think Pebble's worthy of the same breath. But it's

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 2>got a lot of really cool stuff about it.

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I think it's completely different style course

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>than Cypress, where where Pebbles like a a journey against

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>like the wilderness, you know, and like you know, like

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a big.

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Big course and.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>It's much more like a it's like browny and where

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:40.239
<v Speaker 1>like Cypress is like kind of like it's like a romantic.

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Cypress is like a romantic place to play off and

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>then you go to Pebble reminds me a lot of

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Yale which is like, you know the place where you're

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>going and it's like an adventure, you know, like in

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>nothing more to me than the sixth hole where you're

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>like climbing up and it's like you're you're hitting it

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>up a mountain. You can imagine doing that in nineteen

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine.

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty brave. I mean that routing like six, seven,

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 2>eight is incredibly It's an amazingly brave thing to do.

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 2>And that long ago, with the equipment that they had

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 2>to go up that hill, no one would go up

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 2>six anymore. You'd play down at the bottom of the

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 2>hill and you'd walk up and play another hole or something.

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, you wouldn't No one would do that now.

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 2>And seven's pretty audacious. Put a little hundred yard hole

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 2>right there on the thing, I mean, what a wile too, Yeah,

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's what a spot there like that that

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 2>section of course six through ten Green is that's a

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 2>pretty stretch, but it's a pretty good stretch of golf.

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then every bay sleeps on the uphill holes,

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>but they're pretty cool.

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 2>I like them too. It's different. It's there. I mean,

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 2>eleven is a pretty easy hole really in the US Open,

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Old thing. I mean, you can get it wrong because

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 2>the green's is really small. But twelve is one of

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 2>the hardest greens to hit in the world on a

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 2>path three for green, it really isn't very slopy. It's

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 2>actually one of the flatter ones of pebble. And it's

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 2>that's a nightmare hole next one you can get wrong.

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 2>It seems so simple, but that green is savage. And fourteen,

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 2>that green is you can make any number you want.

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 2>You could be one hundred and ten for two from

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 2>the green and you could you could make anything there.

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Fourteen it's better than it was when they fixed it,

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 2>but it's still great. It's so small. You try to

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 2>hit it onto a table top from one hundred and

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 2>ten and from one hundred and ten it plays one

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty up the hill. And if you miss

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 2>at a yard left, it's really bad. If you miss

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 2>a yard right, it can used to come all the

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 2>way back off the green behind the front bunker. Crazy.

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I saw a stat and twenty ten. If you miss

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the fairway on fourteen, only thirty four percent of players

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>hit the green in rag.

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 2>That'd be right, because it's I mean, I don't know

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 2>what it measures. Five point fifty or something. It's quite

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 2>a long hole, but it effectively plays about one hundred

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 2>yards longer than it is because third the second shot

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 2>is up. I mean, I don't have the centig grade

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 2>it's up, but it's up pretty steep for a really

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 2>long way way up in the air.

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>That left ruff is an awful place.

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I feel like, yeah, they're rough anywhere in the US Open,

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 2>and it feels people's obviously a fertile place, like grows

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 2>pretty good rough here.

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>So we talked, we talked about it was kind of fitting.

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>We talked about Brooks the last last time we talked

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>before the PGA and how like historically great like he

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>is on the back nines and closing out stuff and

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>then sure enough, like he goes out and wins. You

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of called it. You're like, it's going to be

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a high ball hitter.

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know with Brooks, like what do you what

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think about in terms of how do you

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>measure winning major championships versus PGA Tour event, Like you

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>know the balance of winning a lot or winning the

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>really big ones a lot?

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, Brooks, you obviously want to win the

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 2>majors of the pinnacle of the sport, and only the

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 2>great players seem to win them more than once or twice,

0:16:57.920 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean, it's only the truly greats to

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 2>win multiples. I still think there's something impressive about the

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 2>guys who play well every week, they play and win

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 2>piles of tournaments forever, like they five six seven wins

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 2>a year for fifteen twenty years. I think it would

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 2>be fun to see him win some more regular events.

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Not that would make him any better or worse and whatever.

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I just think it's those truly truly like forever greats,

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, the samson Needs and the Hogans and the

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Nelson's and the Nicholas's and the Tigers, and they've won

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 2>every size of event and they win everywhere they go.

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think that's really impressive. Nothing against Brooks

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 2>at all. And it's ridiculous what he's doing. I mean,

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 2>he could maybe he wins them all late, you know,

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe he just starts winning. It's baffling to me how

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 2>he can look that good in like in the Majors,

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, or he was only one shot away at

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 2>the Masters too in the end, you know, like you

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 2>can look that good in the big tournaments and in

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the regular tournament it's almost like it's not a big

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 2>enough occasion for him or something, you know, or he's

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 2>working on his game, or he's tuning up for the majors.

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but it's different. It's different how he

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:03.719
<v Speaker 2>plays in majors to norms.

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>It's I don't know, there we had, Like you know,

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>there are some basketball players like Robert Ory who'd always

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>hit big shots, like you know, but like he wasn't

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>like an all time great, you know, he just would

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>hit big shots. But like you know, Robber Ory, you

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>can't compare like a guy going out and winning four

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 1>majors and you know, nine nine attempts to Robber Ory.

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>But like with Brooks, it's it's fat. It's so they

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the super Book, it was like, I think it's the

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>longest bet they've ever like time wise, they've ever put out.

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And they put out Brooks seven and a half wins

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>or seven and a half majors.

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 2>Seven and a half. What's the one that five.

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Four four and it expires when he turns fifty.

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Wow, you probably take the over at this point. You know,

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 2>he's won four in two years, But I mean, who

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 2>knows I mean you just don't know, right, how often

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 2>do you see a guy have a run like this?

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 2>And I mean two years ago you would have said

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Jordan's going to win fifteen, right, and the two years later,

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:06.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying he's not going to win fifteen, but

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 2>no one's saying that anymore. Right. It's hard to Rory too. Yeah,

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 2>time changes things, It's weird. I mean you would have

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 2>thought it only might have won a few more than

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 2>he did, you know, And then Tiger came along. You

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 2>would have thought Phil would have won them earlier, or

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Westwood would have won something. It's a or sergeriy I

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have taken so long, you know, or Adam Scott

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 2>or Justin Rose. You know, so the hard ones to

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 2>win and you can. And who knows if there is

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 2>a kid who's twenty one right now who's already better

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 2>than Brooks, you know, or he just needs a couple

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 2>of years under his belt like Brooks had, and then

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 2>he goes and wins more and it gets harder and

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 2>harder for every generation.

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>That's the interesting thing with Brooks too, is like he's

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine, Like it wasn't I guess, like Rory, we

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>had this flurry when he was really young, and it's

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>almost like he struggled. I wonder if like having it

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>come a little bit later while still being young was

0:19:58.200 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>almost like it is almost a blessing for.

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I think Brooks is the roadmap he's taken to get

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 2>here is interesting, and I think more like junior golfer

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 2>zoo have aspirations or who are going to potentially be

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 2>that good should look at it. Going to Europe first

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 2>and playing like the challenge to like the smallest her

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 2>in Europe just to get on the European terny. He

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 2>played in Europe for three or four years just because

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean to learn how to play everywhere around the world.

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 2>So he just came back a more complete golfer. And

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 2>the guys who went majors are complete players. You know.

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 2>You have to have every shot, and you have to

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 2>be good at every aspect, and you have to be

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 2>good at the travel and learning a new course fast

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 2>and dealing with adversity. And that's what happened when you

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 2>play your first four or five years somewhere else, especially Europe,

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>because you get to a different country every week and

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 2>there's different currencies and languages and foods. And maybe not

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 2>the same conditioning you used to in America maybe, And

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 2>he just I think he just became such a more

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 2>well rounded player. So I just think the roadmap he

0:20:56.000 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 2>took to get here prepared him better than anyone else's path.

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, is that do you think you because you

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.479
<v Speaker 1>went and played Europe right after you turn pro for

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a while, Like, is that the hardest part about like

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.239
<v Speaker 1>early in your career, is like being a professional on

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the road?

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Like it's yeah, I mean I was so enthusiastic at

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 2>that point. I didn't find it hard. I just found

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 2>it exciting. Right, I'm just traveling around the world. Who

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 2>doesn't travel want and travel around the world when they're

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.479
<v Speaker 2>twenty one twenty two. Everybody kind of wants to write.

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 2>And I was getting paid to do it, so it

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 2>was I thought it was exciting. And I didn't do

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 2>it as long as Brooks. Brooks was there for a

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 2>long time, four or five years, I think. And you're

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 2>really total And Peter Euline did the same thing. They

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 2>were kind of doing it at the same sort of time.

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 2>And Peter's become a pretty well rounded good player too.

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, It's not that it's not great here but

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 2>playing the PGA, trying to get on the PGI to

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 2>a straight away would be like trying to like get

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 2>a hit from a major league pitcher from little league.

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, like it's not that big a jump, but

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 2>it's a pretty big jump and you can get beaten

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 2>over the head pretty quick. Saying it's not tough in Europe,

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 2>but it's probably a little bit easier. There's a lot

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 2>more toilets to choose from, and again, you get a

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 2>different environment and you've maybe got fields you gradually can

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 2>beat up on just a little bit quicker than you

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 2>could beat up on the ones over here, and you

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 2>just build confidence and skill, and yeah, it's pretty It's

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 2>it's an interesting way he took because it's tight. It

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:22.479
<v Speaker 2>would be tough for an American kid to do that.

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:24.479
<v Speaker 2>It's easy for an austrain kid to go to Europe first, right,

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 2>because you have to go somewhere first, you do the

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 2>stepping stone thing. It makes sense. But to leave your

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 2>home country when you're a kid and go do that,

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 2>it's pretty brave.

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it is. Well, wasn't like he was a schmuck either.

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>He was you know, like American, yeah, golfer.

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 2>He could have tried the route that most people tried,

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 2>but was he either got really good advice or was

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 2>just had a kind of it's a bit of wisdom

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 2>at the time and thought, you know, this is the

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 2>path for me, and it wow, I mean, look at it.

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 2>He's he's the most rounded complete golfer we've almost ever seen,

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 2>really the way he's playing at the moment.

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>The Q School also now still you can still go

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a Q school and be on the European Tour.

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're still going to real Quy school.

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which is I think there's something cool about it,

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>but I think.

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 2>We can still I think we should still have one too.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 2>But even if it wasn't twenty five cards, I just

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 2>there was something really cool about, you know, zero to

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 2>PGA Tour in one week, you know something about it.

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>It led to some guys that flamed out quick.

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, yeah, but I mean really through history of

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 2>at least through my era, of who I grew up

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 2>with and who made it and who didn't, I can't

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 2>think of many who should have made it who didn't

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 2>know And then there's no shoot ups and you can't

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 2>make predictions like that. But by the time everyone was thirty,

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:44.239
<v Speaker 2>the ones who you thought were going to make it.

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 2>They all kind of found their way out there. Maybe

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 2>took them a couple more years than they wanted. But

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 2>usually the ones who are supposed to get out there

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 2>get out there. I mean some of like Jordan, for example,

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 2>he missed it second stage and then six months later

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>it was like number one in the world or something like.

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 2>It was just it was inevitable that he was going

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 2>to get on to it right. Second stage didn't matter.

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 2>He just found a different way to get on. But

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 2>you school was a good.

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Thing usually, you know, you know, like certain guys like

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>what are what are the things that like, you know,

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a guy is going to make it versus a guy

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that like me, they have comparable amateur but like you know,

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>one guy is sure fire and one gay is maybe do.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 2>You think this? I mean, these are intangibles, right, but

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 2>you just I don't know the guy who makes that

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 2>great up and down to stay one in front of

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 2>the seventeenth hole somewhere, or like just they do that

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:34.959
<v Speaker 2>key stuff. I mean, there's plenty of goes to hit

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 2>it well and part well and that it's part of

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 2>that too. Like some guys just make golf look easy, right,

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 2>just easier than ever it looks for everyone else. You know,

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Adam Scott at fourteen looked like he was gonna be

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 2>number on in the world. It just looked like it.

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, he just it was easier for him. But

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 2>there's other guys you just see it in their eyes

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 2>at the right moment. So you know, they finish off

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 2>tournaments really well, or they compete really on the harder courses,

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe better than the other courses. They handle situation like

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 2>situations that not everyone handles well, intangible sort of stuff,

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 2>but you can tell when you see someone who there's

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 2>no again, there's no guarantees, but you can usually tell

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 2>the ones who have got a little bit more something

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 2>than the others. It was the game that he was

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 2>at least I can in golf.

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 1>Most surprised that didn't get to where he say, you

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>may we might have an injury to In.

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 2>My era, Joel Kraibell was an incredible player. He was

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of second ranked amateur around after Tiger. Right attack

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 2>right Stanford went at the same time as Tiger lost

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 2>to him in the semi finals. I think of his

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 2>last us M, he looked the real deal. He was

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 2>really special and me he won the Western End that

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 2>I went to, like no one even got close to him,

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 2>like it was. This guy's pretty amazing. I can't think

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 2>of many others though. He got injured when he when

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 2>he was turning and got back injury and never really

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 2>kind of made it back, so it didn't kind of

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 2>work out for him. But I'm sure there's been a few.

0:25:57.680 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's always a few that slipped through the cracks, right.

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 2>They get hurt at the wrong time. I mean Patrick Cantley,

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 2>he's kicking goals now, but he kind of got set

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 2>back a little bit with a bad back at the

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 2>wrong time. You know, you don't have a bad week.

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean Jordan, as I said, speak missed second stage.

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Accu's cool. He nearly had to have a year up

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 2>right when he was turning pro. So it's a tough

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 2>deal to get onto her.

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they And now with this new schedule, it makes

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it like even more interesting how you would go about

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it as a college kid.

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 2>Like, you know, like there'd be two there's two real roots.

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 2>You can do the Latin America Canada to a thing

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.360
<v Speaker 2>to try to get top five on them, to get

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 2>on the web, and then the web you can try

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 2>to get up or do you go to Europe and

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 2>really back yourself and say I'm going to go to

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Europe or Asia and try to get top fifty in

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 2>the world and start getting invites and go that way.

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 2>It's almost there's no easier way. I mean, each model

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 2>would work for different people, but you might become a

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 2>more rounded player if you went the Europe route, you

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean. You mean you might never get

0:26:57.840 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 2>to top fifty in the world. I mean, that's quite

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 2>hard to get to the top the world, and you

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 2>might even not get on the European Tour. But that's

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 2>really the only two methods is come up off the

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.719
<v Speaker 2>WAB or come through top fifty in the world. You know.

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>So yeah that like Kitty Yama guy, uh, Kurt Kittyama

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>had no status and he got he went through European Tour.

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Q School American guy. He's won three times this.

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Year in Europe. Well there you go. So he's on

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 2>his wife, right, his ranking must be getting up there exactly.

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's unbelievable, you know, he went through, but

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>like think about how much his life changed. He probably was,

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, pondering what am I doing? What am I

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna do right two now he's won three times. Yeah,

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:41.199
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy on the second BIX Tour in the in

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the world.

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and in Europe. I mean you can see. I

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 2>mean the Righter Cup proves it. I mean those guys

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 2>can go like they can really play.

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there what's the difference in the style

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of play between the two tours, Like, is there a

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>noticeable difference between setup or golf courses or is it

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>just the diversity of where you are?

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well the golf courses, I mean, America's had a

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 2>pretty big influence at least on competitive golf around the world.

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 2>The places that you play a similar style than you

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 2>play on the PHA to it mostly but you do again,

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 2>you're going to some pretty crazy places. So grass is

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 2>different everywhere, mostly newer courses because they're the ones who

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 2>have the money, the promoter, the owners and the promoters

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 2>to kind of show off their golf course. That's kind

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 2>of half the reason golf tournaments are on. Sometimes you're

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 2>just go to so many different places, probably and the

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 2>conditioning is probably a little bit more inconsistent. You can

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 2>you still have some you don't get bad green weeks

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 2>on the PHA two very often, or bad fairways or

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 2>weird way they might create some but it's generally pretty perfect.

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Every week you're less so right because you're going to

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 2>some non golf countries and you're going to Germany. I mean,

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 2>they've had some good golfers, but they don't really have

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 2>many golfers there, so they don't really have to spend

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 2>the money on their golf courses. And you get a

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Russia or they don't know, are got any golf courses,

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 2>and so in Turkey they're playing in Turkey now, Saudi

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Arabia now like Dubai Kenya, they play everywhere. Right, So

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 2>you're and travel always makes I don't know, adds a

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 2>bit of wisdom to people or like roundedness or common

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 2>sense or something right, because you just see every different

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of condition and every sort of different level of

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 2>frustration that you just get better at dealing with stuff.

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 2>And I think that aspect is the most important thing

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 2>about that tour. I mean, you probably get it to

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 2>their Latin America tour as well, and you're going to

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 2>play Canada and driving around in a car like some

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 2>of those guys do or something, and that would be

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 2>like really great too, I think. But zero college to

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 2>the PGA tours. I mean, I know they're trying to

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of create a faster route from college to PGA Tour,

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 2>but that's that's a road that's not many guys are

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 2>ready for. That's a fast that's a fast track. I

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have been close to ready. Yeah.

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So getting back to the US Open, so we

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>saw backpage like you can't he predicted a little bit

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it was gonna be a high ball hitter if we saw.

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 2>DJ DJ and Brooks one of the two picks. Yeah.

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And then and then Rory, who had a dismal first

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven holes, managed you know, last forty five years

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>better than everybody, you know, worked his way up to

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>t T eighth. So you know, with that, that golf

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>course like clearly set up for that type of player. Like,

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to create, you know, set up a

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>golf course for where any style player in the field

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>could win, how would you set it up?

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, you do, Pebble would be pretty close this week,

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 2>everyone's got a chance. I think it's it's not long.

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.479
<v Speaker 2>It's long for a normal golf course sakes, but it's

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 2>not long for you. It's open, and it doesn't see

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Beth Page is long, but it plays way longer because

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 2>you go up to all the greens and it's all carried.

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 2>You can't run it on any of the greens pebble.

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 2>You could probably play it along the ground almost some

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 2>of it, so it'll certainly suit. I mean, a longer

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 2>hitter always has an advantage, but it's nullified here a

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 2>little bit. They have the advantage of being able to

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 2>hit less club onto the fairways. That's always going to

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 2>be an advantage of three wood instead of driver and

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that. But it's such an experience strategic kind

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 2>of test. It's more about that kind of that kind

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 2>of canny golf skill, you know, missing it around the

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 2>greens in the right place and having all the little

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:26.719
<v Speaker 2>kind of shots around the greens and being absolutely impeccable

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 2>from inside ten feet because you just can't have short

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 2>power parts of pebble. It's really difficult. They're so slopey,

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 2>and this West Coast grass this power when it gets firm,

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 2>like when the usg get it firm, which Thursday is

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 2>not going to be like that by Sunday. Well, they

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 2>get very difficult to get your speed right on such slopes.

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 2>So you're going to have three four five footers for

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 2>power all day. So the real magic skill is a

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 2>great part of a great short putter, I would think,

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 2>and I think in two thousand tigers, one hundred percent

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 2>from inside ten feet or something.

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Ridiculous stuff might have been that whole year.

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Mcdowe's an incredible short putter. He's he talked about last

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 2>time the green's kind of got a bit ropy in

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 2>the afternoons last time in twenty ten, and he couldn't

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 2>understand whatever I was talking about. He thought the greens

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 2>were rolling perfect. So you know, when you're putting well,

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 2>you're putting well. So I mean it could be a

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 2>speech week, you know, it plays into him. If he

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 2>was playing at his best, this would be like right

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 2>down Jordan's street. I would have.

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Thought, Yeah, I always play as well at Pabo too,

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and the at and t. It's got a lot of

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>similarities with Augusta in the way of like the skills,

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot.

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Of fast greens, really tricky around the greens and fast

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 2>and side slopes. You're hitting off side slopes, which is yeah,

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 2>so shape becomes really important, right because the shape is

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 2>getting dictated to you by the slope. But you kind

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 2>of sometimes want to have the other shape. So it's

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 2>real skill that can do that, real form, I should say.

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean everyone could do it out here, it's just

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 2>it's guy's in form that'll do that.

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about? So with Open you win,

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you go to sixty Masters lifetime, PGA pretty much lifetime,

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and then US Open ten years.

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 2>It's perfect because there's no other tournament like the US Open.

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 2>The Masters has proven that you can compete with wisdom

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 2>and experience to your sixties, right, I mean plenty of

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 2>guys have shown it over the years. I mean Jack

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 2>nearly wanted at fifty eight, Freddy's been in contention for

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 2>the last twenty years. Watson had a bit of a

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 2>run at some point. Like you can play Augusta. For

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 2>what you lose in distance, you continue to gain an experience.

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 2>So it's just you're not making up the numbers when

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 2>you're fifty five at the Masters, of you're Fred couples,

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 2>you're actually a real threat for the tournament. The Open

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 2>is probably similar. I mean they're getting longer the Opens.

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 2>But again we saw Tom when he was sixty right

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 2>nearly when it when he was sixties, So like it's

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 2>that's doable too. The PGA probably not so much, but

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 2>that's just the way they do it. But the US Open,

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, ten years out of winning, you could really

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 2>be in different form. You know, it's a long time

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 2>and the US Open is the ultimate test, and if

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 2>you are not playing really, really well, you're going to

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 2>go for a lot and it would kind of well,

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 2>it would be embarrassing, and it's just it's just not

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 2>fair on the guy. It's almost fairer to say, look,

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you still exempt, that's great because you're

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 2>still playing well. But if you've not done well for

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 2>the last ten years, we're going to look after you

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:36.280
<v Speaker 2>and not make you do it.

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I get in. It would make it less open.

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it would make it less open too, So that

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 2>makes more sense to because it is nice that it's

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 2>effectively one hundred percent of qualifying field. Really. I mean,

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 2>the PGA, the top fifty in the world guys they've

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 2>kind of qualified because they've qualified through their last two

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 2>years of play, right, and the rest of the field

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 2>is qualified. And it's truly what seventy or eighty or

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 2>ninety qualifying spots I think in this field, and that's

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 2>really good.

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Is Sectional qualifying like the least covered event and professional golf.

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I don't know, maybe it's a pretty they're interesting days.

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, nobody likes them. Not two guys don't like them.

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm sure, like if the US Open is

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 2>your thing, and you're you're an AM and you're a

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 2>club golfer and you have a normal job, and you

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 2>play really well enough for getting the sectional, it's the

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 2>biggest day of the year, right, it's a really good thing.

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 2>But for two guys who have just come off like

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:32.839
<v Speaker 2>four tournaments in a row, to go out and play

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 2>thirty six holes around one course on a Monday is

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 2>not everyone's favorite. And there's a lot of attrition, Like

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 2>on the second round. There's nobody there in the second

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 2>round because anyone who shoots over parms for sure, it

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 2>just goes home. But there's some cool stuff there they

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 2>could get. They could make some good TV there because

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 2>there's a little drama, Like especially you've always got that

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 2>young AM kid who's like right on the line and

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 2>he's waiting at the eight eighth green, and you get

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:01.319
<v Speaker 2>the grizzled old who's the only one who can knock

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 2>him off his spot. Shoots sixty six in his second round,

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 2>and then the lookle kid gets sad or the little

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 2>kid makes it, and there's a playoff with seven guys

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 2>for two spots, and everyone watches and there's some fun

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 2>stuff that happens, and it's kind of a throwback. It

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 2>feels like I'm going to golf a little bit. A

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of guys are carrying their bags, or the local club,

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 2>the members all come out to watch, and there's like

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 2>the leaderboard with the someone's just filling in all the

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 2>boxes with the sharpies and stuff, or like the chisel

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 2>point doing all the nice graphics and stuff. It's like

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 2>it's just it's a bit of a throwback. Playing thirty

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 2>six in a day. I love flaying thirty six in

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:36.360
<v Speaker 2>a day. I wish we did that more. I just

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 2>think the day you can find yourself. You can get

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:40.839
<v Speaker 2>such you can get into such sweet patches of form

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 2>when you have that long to kind of find your

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 2>swing for the day. And playing a course twice in

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 2>a day. I always liked the second lap because you

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 2>learn all this stuff on the first lap. I don't

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 2>know they're good things. It'd be a good you could

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 2>what you can make some pretty good TV out of

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 2>it if they condensed it. I mean it's a long day,

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 2>but you'd condense and make some little package out of

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 2>it to be fun.

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, thirty six is such a it's like a I

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 1>always think after the thirty six holidays, like you get

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in your car and you're driving somewhere and it's like

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>you've been like in a completely different world. It's like

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you like escape reality. But then I always think that

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the back nine and the first nine or of the

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:23.280
<v Speaker 1>second round, the back nine of the first round, first

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>time in the second round, it's like that if you're

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>playing good, like those eighteen holes that are like gonna

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 1>be about best eighteen also goth, you could passibly play.

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I just like I always loved it. I just

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I missed thirty six in a day. I mean I

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 2>would have trouble walking around it at the moment. But

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 2>and Amatons, we used to play thirty six, thirty six,

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:44.760
<v Speaker 2>we do Saturday Sunday thirty six thirty six. We wouldn't

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:46.320
<v Speaker 2>think of it and then do it the next weekend.

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 2>But those qualifiers are they're fun. They're fun because like

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 2>it is all manner of different like levels of intensity

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 2>and attitude on gus, you have to go really low,

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 2>you have to play really well. The first one I

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 2>first started playing them, I was really surprised at Like

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 2>you see the scores and you're like, well, that course

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 2>must have been easy. But then you go there and

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 2>you shoot two sixty eighth and you're right under and

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 2>you missed by two. It's like, wow, this is like

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 2>it's the next level. The level is really high.

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there's something too, like the with the qualifiers,

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>where there's this like I guess and if you covered

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it would lose this A litt all is like where

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>there's like this added shread of like doubt and you

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going on, like where like you don't

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:32.919
<v Speaker 1>and that's like one of the toughest things to deal

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 1>with when you're playing is like you're thinking about the number, yeah,

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>but you have no clue. Nobody knows even you know

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 1>you're out there and you're like, nobody knows, but you

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>know you think it's good enough. Eventually you just I

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know.

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 2>You kind of get an idea, I guess, but you

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 2>really don't because it's always lower than you think. You know,

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 2>you think a six under will make it this course,

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 2>like when you're nine holes in or something and then

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 2>it ends up being eleven, right, It's like, well, sometimes

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:57.359
<v Speaker 2>it's the other way obviously if you're playing really well.

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 2>But that's that's the best. That's the thing you miss

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 2>in pro golf when you, like you were amateur golf

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 2>that walked from eighteen, that really fast walked from putting

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 2>your card in to go see the board to see

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 2>if you did any good or not because you didn't

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 2>know what anyone had. So to walk over and see

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 2>the guy filling in all the boxes with the sharpig,

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's just a good moment in golf.

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 2>It's like the the leaderboards getting flipped up at the Masters.

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:19.759
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's a bit of suspense.

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, and then you're sitting waiting for everybody to

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>come in that's the worst.

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 2>And you're going through the things. He had sixty eight

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 2>in the first round so he could do it, and

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 2>you pick out the three or four guys who were

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:31.479
<v Speaker 2>coming that could actually knock you out. It's like, it's

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 2>just it's just a fun I just really like that scene.

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 2>It's just a good scene. And the whole qualify that's

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 2>what it is is fifty guys standing around the border

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 2>at the end wondering what's going to happen and talking

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:42.359
<v Speaker 2>about all their stories from the golf day and how

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 2>unlucky they got. Yeah, it's fun.

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:48.520
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, I could talk about that. I mean, that's

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:51.359
<v Speaker 1>this is a whole rabbit hole yourself and week we're

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about qualifier. So with your US Open experience, let's

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 1>take the wing foot out of it, Like, what was

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the what was the next best US Opening was it?

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Was it all pain and suffering in the US Opening?

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Or it was all suffering?

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Was your next favorite? You know kind of experience with her?

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 2>Tory was my next favorite. I played second last group

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:16.360
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday with Rocco.

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god.

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I was in a pretty good spot. Tiger

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 2>and Westwood were in the last group. We were in

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 2>the second last group, and I played pretty well. I

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 2>think I was like, I don't know if I was

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 2>ever in the lead, but I might have been title

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 2>one back going up nine and I plugged one in

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 2>part five nine at toris like seven thousand hours long,

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:36.839
<v Speaker 2>and I plugged in the fairway bunker and then later

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 2>it and like got it out and then went for

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the green and plugged it with my third shot in

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 2>the bunk. I had two plugs in one hole or

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 2>something made buggy and never really Friday Glass again Friday

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:51.839
<v Speaker 2>egsperts and then ended up eighth or seventh or eighth

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 2>or something like that. But I just I had the

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 2>Rocco show. So Roco played great all day, Tiger and

0:40:56.760 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Westwood behind us, so that San Diego and that he

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 2>was at the peak of his powers. Tiger with the

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 2>knee thing, and like they were just and it was

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:05.879
<v Speaker 2>his town and they're going nuts and Roco. Everybody loves

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Rocco and it was really really fun. And Rocco finishes

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 2>eighteen and Tiger's won back now right, Yeah, He's laid

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 2>it out in the rough, and we were standing around.

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I had the little gaggle of people and Rocco had

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the big gaggle of reporters around him while Tiger makes

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 2>that big part and the noise was just outrageous. I mean,

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 2>it was pretty special. But I really enjoyed that open

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 2>again West Coast. We stayed in like delmar I looked

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:33.720
<v Speaker 2>at the ocean every day and like seventy degrees and Tory.

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 2>It was the one time I really enjoyed playing Tory

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 2>like it was firm and the greens were decent. It's

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 2>so tough in the tournament in January that it's just

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:44.319
<v Speaker 2>it beats you around the head because it plays so long,

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 2>because it's cold and soft, and it was I had

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 2>a great time. That was my second favorite, easily my

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:49.880
<v Speaker 2>second favorite.

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I was reading about oh Sex and I saw like

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the quotes that stuck out was like how

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>good Porter was to play with, like in the final round,

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Like what do you do? You think there's something about

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like when you're coming down the stretch, like you're playing

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>partner and situations like that.

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I mean I knew Paulton really well by

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:18.279
<v Speaker 2>that point. I mean socially, we hung out and we

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 2>played in Europe together a fair bit, so I knew

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:22.839
<v Speaker 2>him really well, and we're kind of similar age, and

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:26.279
<v Speaker 2>so it was just I think being with one of

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 2>your boys helps, you know, or maybe it can hurt

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 2>in some situations, But for me it was great because

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:36.879
<v Speaker 2>he was his energy was well, if he wasn't gonna

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:38.479
<v Speaker 2>win it, then he wanted me to win it, right,

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 2>so you can then that's kind there's something about that,

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, if a guy can be obstreperous out there

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 2>and act a bit like a right whatever. He's not

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 2>that into you winning that It's different. I don't know.

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:52.319
<v Speaker 2>It just did good energy and he was It was

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:54.759
<v Speaker 2>just fun to be with one of your mates when

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:56.359
<v Speaker 2>you win the tournament and the scorers. Thatt with him

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 2>was the best because we kind of watched the film

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 2>show unfold a little bit on the TV and the

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:05.360
<v Speaker 2>scorer's hut, and he was just you could look in

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:07.879
<v Speaker 2>his eye when Phil ends up hitting his second shot,

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 2>hits the tree, it drops and starts looking for me,

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:11.799
<v Speaker 2>looking pold. His eye was like he had this little

0:43:11.800 --> 0:43:13.759
<v Speaker 2>glimmer in his eye, like this is going to work

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:15.799
<v Speaker 2>out pretty well. He was just genuinely happy for me,

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:17.799
<v Speaker 2>and it was nice to be with someone like, you

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 2>know who's just because I would have been happy for

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:20.839
<v Speaker 2>him to win. It would have been great. I don't

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 2>know I would have been as genuinely happy as he seemed.

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:26.319
<v Speaker 2>He was just really pumped that his playing partner and

0:43:26.360 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 2>his friend is about to win this tournament. It was

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:31.799
<v Speaker 2>just a nice group. You know. He wire all pink too,

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:36.040
<v Speaker 2>pink shoes, pink socks, pink pants, belt, everything on father's

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 2>day in New York. So it was pretty brave. So

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:39.840
<v Speaker 2>he took all the attention away, which was great.

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 1>That was during Palter's apparel era, Like you know, he

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:48.240
<v Speaker 1>were he wore that all gold that one time. Remember

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that that goal. Whenever I think Ian Porter, I think

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>about that outfit, I can't get it out.

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Pretty brave man, like not short on confidence with his apparel.

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>His story. I mean when he turned pro with have

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a four handicap legend, that just a legend.

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Like he if there's any like a like a case

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 2>that you can talk yourself into something if you want

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 2>it bad enough, he talked himself into it. You know.

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean there's clearly people with more physical skills, but

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 2>he has turned himself into them. Like just an outrageously

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 2>good player and under pressure he is just I mean

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 2>he has the respect of the whole locker room because

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:27.799
<v Speaker 2>the stuff he does in the right A cup, it's

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 2>just on another level, Like it's outrageous. How good he is.

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:31.400
<v Speaker 2>His story is incredible.

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's I think he obviously gets it. He gets

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:40.160
<v Speaker 1>under people's skin. So like you know, I think from

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:42.360
<v Speaker 1>like a fan perspective, you know, there's a lot and

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:45.160
<v Speaker 1>in New York. He just I'll think he just had

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to be.

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 2>And it's kind of rubbing it in their face, right,

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 2>because it's exactly what they don't want their golfers to

0:44:49.920 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 2>be wearing in New York. I see, I feel like

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 2>and it's just but he he banters back fun with

0:44:55.600 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 2>them and like they end up loving him, right because

0:44:57.400 --> 0:44:58.720
<v Speaker 2>he's great to them.

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:01.360
<v Speaker 1>What was that with Phil? Like, you know, he's like

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the New York guy and like being in the mix

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>with Phil and the mix out of us upend, Like

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>did it feel like more of an atmosphere of like

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a I don't know President's Cup ever it has had

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>like an atmosphere like a Ryder Cup, but like that

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Raider Cup where you were playing like almost against the

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 1>hometown crowd, like you were at an away game, like

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 1>if it was like an NBA Finals.

0:45:23.520 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 2>It's certainly in the last nine holes when it became

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 2>apparent that he might win, it was very profil. But

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't anti anybody else. It was just pro Phil.

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 2>They love him, I mean they they just love him

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 2>so much. And the way he was playing that week,

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:41.359
<v Speaker 2>he was driving at the Raff, making a crazy part

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 2>driving the raff, making Birdie out of the raff, like

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 2>he was doing crazy stuff from crazy places and it

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:49.319
<v Speaker 2>was just probably really great fun to watch the way

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 2>he was doing it. But yeah, the last he made

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:54.640
<v Speaker 2>he made Bertie on fourteen when we were on the

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:56.800
<v Speaker 2>fifteenth tee and it was like really out of the

0:45:56.880 --> 0:45:59.239
<v Speaker 2>rough and he hit it to four feet or five

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 2>feet and they just went absolutely ballistic when he made

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 2>the part. I was like, wow, this is these people

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:05.839
<v Speaker 2>want this guy to win really bad. But we're kind

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:07.400
<v Speaker 2>of sad for the middle in the end, because like

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 2>they were like it was their man's weak right.

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>How much were you like paying attention to the leaderboard

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>when you were in the hunt and tournaments coming down

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the stretch.

0:46:18.239 --> 0:46:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Normally quite a lot. I never really found it weird

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 2>to see my name on it, so I didn't. I

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 2>never noticed myself react negatively weird, like play poorly after

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:29.920
<v Speaker 2>looking at it, So I never really came up with

0:46:29.960 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 2>a reason to not look at it. But that week,

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:37.880
<v Speaker 2>for whatever reason, whether there weren't many or whatever, I

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:40.400
<v Speaker 2>didn't really look much on the back nine. Maybe I

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:44.239
<v Speaker 2>knew that it was better for me to not, and

0:46:44.280 --> 0:46:45.719
<v Speaker 2>I had I knew I was I think I was

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:50.800
<v Speaker 2>two back with four to play, maybe, and I was

0:46:50.880 --> 0:46:54.839
<v Speaker 2>kind of losing my head a little bit frustrated because

0:46:54.840 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I think I burgied fourteen and feel birdied fourteen, so

0:46:57.000 --> 0:46:58.279
<v Speaker 2>maybe I was even three back at that point. I

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 2>don't know, probably two bad. And Squirrel Makeddie just said, look,

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:05.239
<v Speaker 2>let's no one's going to part of the last four holes.

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's just part of the last four holes, and who knows,

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 2>no one's going to do that, so let's just do that.

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:12.520
<v Speaker 2>You'll be really close if you do that. So I

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:14.719
<v Speaker 2>kind of, like, for whatever reason, had this moment of

0:47:15.640 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 2>being sensible for once on the golf course, and I

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:19.719
<v Speaker 2>actually really did just try to part fifteen, and then

0:47:19.760 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 2>when I got to sixteen, I'm like, oh, I just

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 2>make part because it seemed like such a ridiculous proposition.

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 2>It kind of forced me to just think about the

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:27.279
<v Speaker 2>next shot in front of me, like to part of

0:47:27.280 --> 0:47:29.239
<v Speaker 2>the last four holes. That's how hard it seemed like

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:31.720
<v Speaker 2>a proposition. So I didn't even like running a marathon

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 2>it so let's just run the first mile. So here

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 2>we go. And I was one of the only times

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 2>in my life that I was actually like that, like

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:38.960
<v Speaker 2>properly one shot at a time, or one hole at

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 2>a time, Part fifteen, Part sixteen, made a good up

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 2>and down from shore of the green on sixteen, drove

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 2>it the trees on seventeen and ended up chipping in

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 2>for par. I mean, my ball never really was on

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 2>the green except when it was rolled into the hole,

0:47:53.880 --> 0:47:55.680
<v Speaker 2>and then eighteen made a great par. In the end,

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I got in a great drive, got unlucky. It went

0:47:58.160 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 2>into a divot that was kind of like an old

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:02.359
<v Speaker 2>sound divot and hit a decent second shot, I thought,

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:04.440
<v Speaker 2>and I was actually posing. I thought i'd actually stiffed

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 2>it. It was right at it, and I thought it had

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 2>landed like a foot short of where it needed to.

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 2>But you watched on TV, he'd probably landed five yards

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:14.640
<v Speaker 2>short where it needed And it was probably the sand

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:16.160
<v Speaker 2>and the divot that made it go shorter than I

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 2>thought it was going to go. I felt like I

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:20.279
<v Speaker 2>got all ball. But you know, Sandy Divotts, this is

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:23.160
<v Speaker 2>not quite the same as grass got up there and

0:48:23.200 --> 0:48:26.239
<v Speaker 2>had a filthy little pitch. But the thing that I

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:28.920
<v Speaker 2>the first time I really noticed that I knew the

0:48:28.960 --> 0:48:30.759
<v Speaker 2>true state of affairs is when I got to that

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 2>green after I'd missed it short. We got up there,

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:34.759
<v Speaker 2>the leaderboard was to the left of the green, which

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:37.120
<v Speaker 2>and it's kind of a dog leg left wing foot,

0:48:37.200 --> 0:48:38.880
<v Speaker 2>so you can't see the leaderboard till you get to

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 2>the green that Monty had made six not five. We

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 2>knew Monty had made bogey. We saw him miss a

0:48:45.920 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 2>part on the green and there was a groan, and

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:50.879
<v Speaker 2>we knew we'd missed the green. But I guess he'd

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:54.760
<v Speaker 2>three padded, so he'd made double. So it wasn't until

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 2>then I had that pitch suret the third shot on

0:48:56.719 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 2>eighteen that I knew that it was. Phil was the

0:48:58.440 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 2>only one in front of me, and if I got

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:04.319
<v Speaker 2>up and down, I was second on my own. We

0:49:04.440 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 2>figured I was on the same score as Monty because

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 2>we thought he'd make bugg. You made double that so

0:49:09.120 --> 0:49:11.319
<v Speaker 2>that made me a little bit. I still thought I

0:49:11.320 --> 0:49:12.719
<v Speaker 2>was gonna get up and down and finished second at

0:49:12.760 --> 0:49:15.960
<v Speaker 2>this point with a real chance to to playoff. You

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 2>know that kind of went through my head. It's say, back,

0:49:19.280 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 2>that was eighteen whole playoff days too, so like new

0:49:22.000 --> 0:49:24.759
<v Speaker 2>hotel room, Like what am I going to do? Like

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 2>all this stuff, So you were thinking about that kind

0:49:28.000 --> 0:49:30.520
<v Speaker 2>of a minute, like it flashed into my head like,

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:33.439
<v Speaker 2>oh wow, I could because for the previous three holes,

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 2>I kind of thought I wasn't. I didn't think about

0:49:35.160 --> 0:49:36.920
<v Speaker 2>winning or anything because I thought I wasn't going to win.

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:39.560
<v Speaker 2>I just figured Phil was going to because as I said,

0:49:39.600 --> 0:49:41.839
<v Speaker 2>I was at least two back, I think, and there

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:45.239
<v Speaker 2>were no birdies to be had. So I had a

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:47.400
<v Speaker 2>really good pitch. It was an easy pitch probably to

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:49.360
<v Speaker 2>hit the fifteen feet because it kind of goes up

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 2>again past the hole, so, but a hard one to

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 2>hit the four or five or whatever it hit. I

0:49:54.680 --> 0:49:56.400
<v Speaker 2>hit a really good one and it came out nicely

0:49:56.440 --> 0:49:58.880
<v Speaker 2>and spun and did everything it needed to do. So

0:49:58.960 --> 0:50:01.840
<v Speaker 2>that was nice that I didn't that I gave myself

0:50:01.880 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 2>an relatively simple put out. It was downhill, but it

0:50:04.480 --> 0:50:07.359
<v Speaker 2>was downhill inside right. You could just get it moving

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:08.880
<v Speaker 2>and it was going to go in if you started

0:50:08.880 --> 0:50:11.560
<v Speaker 2>in the right spot. So and then yeah, Phil did

0:50:11.640 --> 0:50:14.640
<v Speaker 2>what he did. So when I when I made it,

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:18.799
<v Speaker 2>when I was putting it, like, I thought it was

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:21.120
<v Speaker 2>a really good chance for a playoff because eighteen is

0:50:21.160 --> 0:50:24.680
<v Speaker 2>really hard, right, yeah, And I think there was no

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:29.560
<v Speaker 2>balls that we could see on the fairway. But I didn't.

0:50:30.360 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I never thought that would be to win the tournament

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 2>out right. Ever, No, it never entered my head. Who

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:36.239
<v Speaker 2>thought who was going to think that he would make double?

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:42.520
<v Speaker 1>That Johnny Carl was pretty epic. A buddy of mine

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:45.319
<v Speaker 1>sent me that, like because he had a fried egg

0:50:45.640 --> 0:50:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and then yeah, the way Johnny said the like and

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:51.319
<v Speaker 1>it's just funny how but like I was listening as

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:54.960
<v Speaker 1>like an advocate, you know, Carl. But with that that

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:59.400
<v Speaker 1>pit shot, I mean, I've always thought, like a really

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:04.040
<v Speaker 1>pitch that you hit the pitch just rate is one

0:51:04.080 --> 0:51:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of the greatest feelings in golf. Like right when you

0:51:06.600 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 1>hit it, you know, it was just perfect.

0:51:08.239 --> 0:51:10.799
<v Speaker 2>It was ridiculous. Like I'd been working on it for

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:13.719
<v Speaker 2>my pitching more than anything else for a long time,

0:51:13.880 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 2>just for a few different reasons. But there's that one shot,

0:51:18.560 --> 0:51:22.200
<v Speaker 2>and I think only really really great short games actually

0:51:22.239 --> 0:51:26.720
<v Speaker 2>have ever felt that perfect, Like elite golfers have felt

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:29.279
<v Speaker 2>that one that just comes out so perfect, you know,

0:51:29.440 --> 0:51:31.840
<v Speaker 2>just grabs on the face properly, and it flights a

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 2>little bit lower whatever, and it's spinning and it's like

0:51:33.840 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 2>it's a one in five even when you're pitching it.

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Well right, Yeah, But balladas. It was a little bit easier,

0:51:37.760 --> 0:51:39.400
<v Speaker 2>but like these days, it's just and you're gonna have

0:51:39.480 --> 0:51:41.600
<v Speaker 2>really good grus and clean and a good line. Everything's

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 2>got to work right and when you do it, even

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:46.040
<v Speaker 2>when you're practicing, you like look around. So did anyone

0:51:46.040 --> 0:51:47.400
<v Speaker 2>say that he good? Was that? I mean, it's just

0:51:47.440 --> 0:51:49.719
<v Speaker 2>a special feeling and it came out like.

0:51:49.680 --> 0:51:53.920
<v Speaker 1>That you want, yeah, it grabs just right. Yeah, just

0:51:54.480 --> 0:51:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it remained me that pitch and Justin Roses and Marion

0:51:58.560 --> 0:52:02.920
<v Speaker 1>they like those they're very similar, like like they but

0:52:03.280 --> 0:52:05.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's like the thing is like with the Masters,

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Like everybody like, oh, you know the US Open, like

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 1>but like that that shot in golf is is unbelievably

0:52:14.520 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 1>fun to watch, is like the recovery shot. And yeah,

0:52:18.320 --> 0:52:20.839
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's something like Masters. You we think

0:52:20.880 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 1>about the approaches and everything, and the Open is that

0:52:24.200 --> 0:52:26.479
<v Speaker 1>you have the elements and everything. And the US Open

0:52:26.600 --> 0:52:28.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes people are like, well, they're just getting beat over

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the head, but like those are the shots that kind

0:52:31.600 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of win.

0:52:32.360 --> 0:52:34.120
<v Speaker 2>And they're the shots that like move the needle in

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 2>the locker room, if you like, the people got the

0:52:35.680 --> 0:52:37.480
<v Speaker 2>guys in the locker room get really excited about the

0:52:37.480 --> 0:52:40.520
<v Speaker 2>great short game shots just the freakish ones you know

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:43.560
<v Speaker 2>there are and you have to have a freakish green

0:52:43.719 --> 0:52:45.640
<v Speaker 2>a week around the greens, especially at pebble, because I

0:52:45.680 --> 0:52:48.800
<v Speaker 2>mean they are so small. I mean, twelve grains a

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:50.440
<v Speaker 2>day would be really impressive for you, you know. So

0:52:50.480 --> 0:52:53.279
<v Speaker 2>that's six up and downs the day. That's twenty four

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:55.600
<v Speaker 2>for the week. Like, that's a lot of times. You

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 2>gotta get up and down and a long stuff to

0:52:57.120 --> 0:52:58.040
<v Speaker 2>really slope greens.

0:52:58.200 --> 0:53:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So the other thing with the with the pitches is

0:53:00.960 --> 0:53:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that's where I feel like the nerves can get you.

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:08.520
<v Speaker 2>The mass short grass, Yeah, pictures with a wedge, Yeah,

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:11.120
<v Speaker 2>with a lob wedge or something. They you can get

0:53:11.160 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 2>them wrong for sure. They're the one. Well, they're the

0:53:12.719 --> 0:53:14.760
<v Speaker 2>ones when you say guys have issues where they're pitching,

0:53:14.840 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 2>like targeted a few years ago, that's the one that

0:53:17.160 --> 0:53:19.319
<v Speaker 2>you don't want. You know, you're not rough under the ball.

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:20.920
<v Speaker 2>No one gets the flubs out of the rough. I

0:53:20.920 --> 0:53:24.239
<v Speaker 2>mean you might not good shots, but you don't fat

0:53:24.280 --> 0:53:25.920
<v Speaker 2>them or thin them out of the rough. But off

0:53:25.920 --> 0:53:28.160
<v Speaker 2>the short grass, that's that's that's when you know you

0:53:28.280 --> 0:53:30.279
<v Speaker 2>be pitching it well. When you could you could pitch

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:32.160
<v Speaker 2>yourself a pudding green and it would go well, you.

0:53:32.120 --> 0:53:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Know, yeah, it's it's still true. It's I mean the

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:39.680
<v Speaker 1>short game and stuff. I think, I don't know, what

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:41.800
<v Speaker 1>did you think about Aaron Hills a few years ago?

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Like from the idea, you know, people are always about

0:53:45.160 --> 0:53:47.720
<v Speaker 1>thick rough, but like the short grass around the greens.

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:51.440
<v Speaker 2>I think if the course suits short grass, then I

0:53:51.560 --> 0:53:54.200
<v Speaker 2>like short grass around the greens. I think it's a

0:53:55.000 --> 0:53:58.000
<v Speaker 2>it's sometimes it's a it's an easier test for a

0:53:58.000 --> 0:54:01.400
<v Speaker 2>good picture, and it's a harder test for a bad picture,

0:54:01.560 --> 0:54:03.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, a bad short game. And I think it's

0:54:03.920 --> 0:54:06.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of what you want, right you want the guys

0:54:06.560 --> 0:54:08.279
<v Speaker 2>who are playing well, who have the complete game, to

0:54:08.320 --> 0:54:11.800
<v Speaker 2>be able to separate themselves. I think sometimes some courses

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:14.799
<v Speaker 2>just don't lend themselves to that yeah set up. And

0:54:14.840 --> 0:54:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I think sometimes rough around the greens. It's not my

0:54:17.000 --> 0:54:18.440
<v Speaker 2>if I was going to build a course from scratch,

0:54:18.440 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 2>you would always try to build it where balls were

0:54:20.040 --> 0:54:22.040
<v Speaker 2>going to roll off round greens, like they do with

0:54:22.080 --> 0:54:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the Masters or something. But sometimes I think rough around

0:54:26.000 --> 0:54:29.280
<v Speaker 2>the greens is a good test, especially if it's varying rough.

0:54:29.360 --> 0:54:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if I love the uniform stuff. It's

0:54:31.719 --> 0:54:33.440
<v Speaker 2>relatively the same shot you have to play out. It

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:36.319
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter where you go. When it's that perfect four

0:54:36.360 --> 0:54:39.200
<v Speaker 2>inch high rye grass, it's all in a dead straight vertical.

0:54:39.200 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I think sometimes that's a little bit kind of boring.

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:44.839
<v Speaker 2>I like that kind of gnally kind of variable rough

0:54:44.880 --> 0:54:49.320
<v Speaker 2>that you get into the fescue at Chittacock or in Britain.

0:54:49.400 --> 0:54:51.279
<v Speaker 2>You get some pretty narly stuff. And I think that again,

0:54:51.320 --> 0:54:54.560
<v Speaker 2>the really gifted short games, which is what you're trying

0:54:54.560 --> 0:54:56.120
<v Speaker 2>to find in a golf tournament, is the gifted the

0:54:56.120 --> 0:54:58.279
<v Speaker 2>good guys, right, the guys who are playing their best,

0:54:58.719 --> 0:55:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the more variety you give them a on the greens,

0:55:00.520 --> 0:55:04.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that's maximum chance for the best golf, the

0:55:04.560 --> 0:55:06.280
<v Speaker 2>cream to rise at the top in the end.

0:55:07.120 --> 0:55:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Variable testing people talk about the identity of the US helping, Well,

0:55:15.280 --> 0:55:18.320
<v Speaker 1>what would you say, is you're the identity of the

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 1>US helping.

0:55:19.360 --> 0:55:23.000
<v Speaker 2>It's the hardest test relative to power in golf.

0:55:23.600 --> 0:55:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So par is a central piece of air.

0:55:26.520 --> 0:55:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Well they think it is. I don't think it is,

0:55:31.040 --> 0:55:34.160
<v Speaker 2>but there are I mean I would argue that there

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:36.960
<v Speaker 2>are just as difficult as shots. On weeks where we

0:55:36.960 --> 0:55:41.000
<v Speaker 2>shoot fifteen under, you know what I mean, But maybe

0:55:41.040 --> 0:55:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the power is a little different stuff. Sometimes it's like

0:55:45.120 --> 0:55:47.080
<v Speaker 2>it's a battle. They have a tournament at Whisper Rock

0:55:47.960 --> 0:55:49.520
<v Speaker 2>once a year where they put the pins on sides

0:55:49.560 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 2>of hills. It's crazy staff and the tees. Your right

0:55:52.080 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 2>foots off the back of the tee on every hole.

0:55:53.760 --> 0:55:56.439
<v Speaker 2>It's called the Battle of attrition. I think the US

0:55:56.520 --> 0:56:02.839
<v Speaker 2>Open is the battle of attrition. That's his identity. They

0:56:02.920 --> 0:56:05.560
<v Speaker 2>just have this obsession. It seems like they're hopefully they're

0:56:05.600 --> 0:56:08.560
<v Speaker 2>losing it now, but or they're drifting away from it

0:56:08.600 --> 0:56:12.439
<v Speaker 2>to get us to shoot around pass somewhere. And that's

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:15.319
<v Speaker 2>I think probably where they go wrong, because sometimes that's

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:18.359
<v Speaker 2>just not possible unless there's weather involvement, you know, or

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:22.560
<v Speaker 2>if it's too soft or something so and then they'll

0:56:22.600 --> 0:56:24.160
<v Speaker 2>just go nuts with the greens just to keep us

0:56:24.160 --> 0:56:25.040
<v Speaker 2>somewhere near PA, you know.

0:56:25.080 --> 0:56:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean.

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:33.680
<v Speaker 2>I just think, just find a set up that allows

0:56:33.760 --> 0:56:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the guys who are playing their best that week separate themselves.

0:56:36.760 --> 0:56:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the score is I don't think it matters.

0:56:39.239 --> 0:56:41.319
<v Speaker 2>I think the US Open generally does that. I mean,

0:56:42.480 --> 0:56:44.960
<v Speaker 2>you can't fake it at the US Open. You have

0:56:45.040 --> 0:56:48.520
<v Speaker 2>to be playing well. You know, you really don't. You

0:56:48.560 --> 0:56:50.279
<v Speaker 2>can't get away with a bad driver that week, or

0:56:50.320 --> 0:56:52.399
<v Speaker 2>a bad putter or a bad anything, right. I mean

0:56:52.440 --> 0:56:54.319
<v Speaker 2>in a normal week, maybe you can kind of get

0:56:54.480 --> 0:56:56.200
<v Speaker 2>the talented guys can get away with something being a

0:56:56.239 --> 0:56:58.800
<v Speaker 2>little bit off, but not at the US Open. Battle

0:56:58.800 --> 0:57:03.520
<v Speaker 2>of attrition just every shot is that every hole is

0:57:04.000 --> 0:57:06.440
<v Speaker 2>the hardest hole at your home club, set up as

0:57:06.480 --> 0:57:08.400
<v Speaker 2>hard as it can and you do that seventy two

0:57:08.440 --> 0:57:11.719
<v Speaker 2>holes holes in a row. Like it's just there's never

0:57:11.760 --> 0:57:12.279
<v Speaker 2>a let up.

0:57:13.120 --> 0:57:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I imagine like US Open rounds, when you get off

0:57:15.600 --> 0:57:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the course, did you feel different than say a normal

0:57:21.680 --> 0:57:22.680
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour event.

0:57:23.200 --> 0:57:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, fatigued? You know that. I mean anyone who's ever

0:57:25.400 --> 0:57:28.160
<v Speaker 2>played competitive golf who like knows they have to part

0:57:28.200 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 2>of the last nine holes or do a stretch of

0:57:31.120 --> 0:57:33.560
<v Speaker 2>holes and it's in a really good score to like

0:57:33.680 --> 0:57:36.400
<v Speaker 2>get to make a card or to make the match

0:57:36.400 --> 0:57:38.840
<v Speaker 2>play at your club, James, or whatever it is. And

0:57:38.920 --> 0:57:41.600
<v Speaker 2>you you hold that kind of whatever it is, that

0:57:41.720 --> 0:57:44.040
<v Speaker 2>focus at tension or whatever in your head, that really

0:57:44.200 --> 0:57:47.800
<v Speaker 2>intensity I guess it is that has to be high

0:57:47.800 --> 0:57:51.000
<v Speaker 2>when you play US Open. So you feel I think

0:57:51.080 --> 0:57:53.200
<v Speaker 2>after a Thursday, especially if you're doing well. If you're

0:57:53.200 --> 0:57:55.440
<v Speaker 2>doing poorly, I think you kind of male it in

0:57:55.440 --> 0:57:57.840
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, just because you focus on all how

0:57:57.880 --> 0:58:00.360
<v Speaker 2>bads must score hards. It's just when you kind of

0:58:00.360 --> 0:58:02.360
<v Speaker 2>playing well, you just hang on to that tension and

0:58:02.360 --> 0:58:06.080
<v Speaker 2>that anxiety and the intensity. It's a bit of a

0:58:06.680 --> 0:58:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Not many people grind on the range of the US

0:58:09.480 --> 0:58:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Open after they play. I mean the guys still do,

0:58:11.880 --> 0:58:15.000
<v Speaker 2>but way less than an normal tournament. Yeah, it's tiring.

0:58:15.000 --> 0:58:18.120
<v Speaker 2>It's super tiring mentally tiring, because every shot is the

0:58:18.160 --> 0:58:21.320
<v Speaker 2>hardest shot you've ever had. Almost It feels like sometimes

0:58:21.320 --> 0:58:22.960
<v Speaker 2>you play Oakmond and every hole is the hardest home

0:58:22.960 --> 0:58:24.320
<v Speaker 2>you've ever played, and you got it an eighteen times

0:58:24.360 --> 0:58:26.080
<v Speaker 2>in a row, and every time you miss the shot,

0:58:26.080 --> 0:58:29.320
<v Speaker 2>you make a bogie like that. That's a level of

0:58:29.360 --> 0:58:32.040
<v Speaker 2>intensity or pressure or something on every shot that's not normal.

0:58:33.680 --> 0:58:36.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you think would happen if they changed the power?

0:58:38.280 --> 0:58:41.600
<v Speaker 1>They say they made pebble par sixty nine. You know,

0:58:41.680 --> 0:58:44.400
<v Speaker 1>guys are hitting mid irons at eighteen. Guys are hitting

0:58:45.280 --> 0:58:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're hitting the only real par five where

0:58:48.920 --> 0:58:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you know the definition of parr in nineteen eleven was

0:58:52.040 --> 0:58:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that ideal shots from tee to green, allowing for two parts.

0:58:58.320 --> 0:59:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it would be interesting. I think some

0:59:00.800 --> 0:59:05.800
<v Speaker 2>guys would have different scores, don't you think, Like if

0:59:05.800 --> 0:59:11.320
<v Speaker 2>you made eighteen to part four for one tournament, and

0:59:11.360 --> 0:59:13.080
<v Speaker 2>you might eight in the part five for the tournament

0:59:13.160 --> 0:59:15.280
<v Speaker 2>the next week, and everything else was exactly the same,

0:59:15.400 --> 0:59:16.840
<v Speaker 2>the scoring average would be different.

0:59:17.200 --> 0:59:22.600
<v Speaker 1>They'd they'd score better at past sixty nine, I think so.

0:59:22.880 --> 0:59:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's what they say they see with this

0:59:25.640 --> 0:59:28.120
<v Speaker 1>loss of version stuff. But like, but then all of

0:59:28.120 --> 0:59:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, like if Pebble's par sixty nine, like you

0:59:32.120 --> 0:59:35.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have to do anything crazy to have score be

0:59:35.440 --> 0:59:35.960
<v Speaker 1>around park.

0:59:36.080 --> 0:59:37.200
<v Speaker 2>No, that would be interesting.

0:59:37.280 --> 0:59:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's like what I And if you want the

0:59:39.960 --> 0:59:43.280
<v Speaker 1>definition of par like because it's all based off of

0:59:43.280 --> 0:59:45.720
<v Speaker 1>this history, right, but par's arbitrary.

0:59:45.760 --> 0:59:47.440
<v Speaker 2>You could draw the line in the sand whatever you want.

0:59:47.440 --> 0:59:50.280
<v Speaker 2>It's us. It's our perception of whether over power under

0:59:50.280 --> 0:59:52.120
<v Speaker 2>power is a good score or not. It doesn't really

0:59:52.400 --> 0:59:53.360
<v Speaker 2>mean anything.

0:59:53.200 --> 0:59:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Right exactly, Like you know, like this is the thing

0:59:56.080 --> 0:59:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is like for some why did PARR become a determinive

0:59:59.720 --> 1:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>different dificulty when it's just made up and it's like

1:00:02.560 --> 1:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>nobody would say, like if you played pebble in the

1:00:05.520 --> 1:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>US Open, then you play it on a Sunday morning

1:00:09.440 --> 1:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in April with you know, after it rained, you know,

1:00:12.600 --> 1:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>an inch and there's no wind, like, be completely different

1:00:15.800 --> 1:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>golf course.

1:00:16.680 --> 1:00:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and oak Water to past seventy eight isn't necessarily

1:00:19.080 --> 1:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>an easy course. Still just the same shots, right, it's

1:00:21.400 --> 1:00:24.320
<v Speaker 2>still really really hard. Yeah, just because you're six under

1:00:24.360 --> 1:00:27.360
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't mean it's easy. Every shot'spin just as hard

1:00:27.400 --> 1:00:29.160
<v Speaker 2>to shoot seventy two as it was being two over

1:00:29.200 --> 1:00:32.200
<v Speaker 2>it's seventy two. Yeah, it's the same because it's a

1:00:32.240 --> 1:00:32.960
<v Speaker 2>mental difference. Though.

1:00:33.200 --> 1:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>It made me think about Trinity Forrest too. When I

1:00:35.320 --> 1:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>started thinking about this, it's like, oh, traenty fourth is

1:00:37.280 --> 1:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>easy because they're shooting twenty three underd It's like, well

1:00:39.320 --> 1:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you got mid iron into one. Everybody's going for seven,

1:00:43.280 --> 1:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, five is everybody can get home?

1:00:46.600 --> 1:00:49.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, Yeah, it played short last year, so then

1:00:49.240 --> 1:00:49.440
<v Speaker 2>all of.

1:00:49.400 --> 1:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>A sudden you got It's like if it was part

1:00:51.800 --> 1:00:55.959
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight and eleven underwins, it's said twenty three under,

1:00:56.680 --> 1:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>would people say it's easy.

1:01:00.840 --> 1:01:01.800
<v Speaker 2>No, of course it wouldn't.

1:01:02.480 --> 1:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>No. So it's like the problem with the USGA. This

1:01:05.720 --> 1:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>par thing is a real thing.

1:01:07.520 --> 1:01:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, Well it is, but it shouldn't be.

1:01:09.840 --> 1:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because it's not. That isn't a difficulty, right, because

1:01:13.720 --> 1:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>something can be difficult and you could shoot sixty five. Yeah,

1:01:18.480 --> 1:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>but if everybody shoots, you know, seventy, you still played

1:01:22.720 --> 1:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>really good.

1:01:25.600 --> 1:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>It would be I would rather than see them defend

1:01:28.520 --> 1:01:31.560
<v Speaker 2>power by changing par than changing the course, which is

1:01:31.720 --> 1:01:34.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of what you're saying, Yeah, that's right, or manipulating

1:01:34.360 --> 1:01:36.760
<v Speaker 2>the course. I mean it should be at its most difficult, right.

1:01:36.760 --> 1:01:38.439
<v Speaker 2>It should be like the club championship in any club.

1:01:38.480 --> 1:01:40.560
<v Speaker 2>It should be back teas. It should be the greens

1:01:40.600 --> 1:01:42.360
<v Speaker 2>as good and fast and firm as you can make

1:01:42.400 --> 1:01:45.920
<v Speaker 2>them sensibly, and your four toughest pins. It should be yeah,

1:01:46.200 --> 1:01:49.360
<v Speaker 2>you know. And if that has us shooting adding under

1:01:49.360 --> 1:01:51.720
<v Speaker 2>power and that makes the USGA not happy, then yeah,

1:01:51.840 --> 1:01:54.560
<v Speaker 2>change the par don't manipulate the course and put the

1:01:54.560 --> 1:01:56.120
<v Speaker 2>pins on sides of the hills and grow the rough

1:01:56.160 --> 1:01:58.960
<v Speaker 2>crazy long and do crazy stuff. Just have it. I

1:01:58.960 --> 1:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>don't know it'd be an interesting to do it. I

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:03.640
<v Speaker 2>think you just want to see the guy who plays

1:02:03.680 --> 1:02:08.120
<v Speaker 2>the best be able to showcase his skills and win,

1:02:08.320 --> 1:02:10.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, like people here in two thousand. I mean,

1:02:11.120 --> 1:02:13.919
<v Speaker 2>the best player in the world clearly found the course

1:02:14.000 --> 1:02:17.360
<v Speaker 2>pretty playable and no one else did. So it gave

1:02:17.440 --> 1:02:19.840
<v Speaker 2>the best player in the world the best canvas possible

1:02:19.880 --> 1:02:21.480
<v Speaker 2>to win. And so does Scenanders because he won by

1:02:21.560 --> 1:02:25.400
<v Speaker 2>nine like ten minutes later. Right, So two completely different

1:02:25.440 --> 1:02:28.439
<v Speaker 2>courses that found the best golfer in the world and

1:02:28.480 --> 1:02:31.680
<v Speaker 2>no one could catch him. A bad setup in that

1:02:31.720 --> 1:02:34.040
<v Speaker 2>era would have been one that Tiger didn't win by

1:02:34.040 --> 1:02:37.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot, you know, because those those setups allowed him

1:02:37.200 --> 1:02:41.000
<v Speaker 2>to show he was the best as long as it

1:02:41.040 --> 1:02:43.160
<v Speaker 2>allows that. I don't think it matters what the score is.

1:02:43.160 --> 1:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Is there one that sticks out like that was where

1:02:46.160 --> 1:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you felt like the most where it wasn't you know,

1:02:49.840 --> 1:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the best player what you know, didn't they made it one,

1:02:52.720 --> 1:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>but that you know they it was hard to separate.

1:02:58.600 --> 1:03:00.600
<v Speaker 2>I thought Chambers was hard to set up. I think

1:03:00.600 --> 1:03:02.560
<v Speaker 2>the best player ended up winning and it was a

1:03:02.560 --> 1:03:05.360
<v Speaker 2>great leader board in the end. So, but that would

1:03:05.360 --> 1:03:06.880
<v Speaker 2>have been a hard one to separate because you just

1:03:06.880 --> 1:03:08.960
<v Speaker 2>couldn't make any puts. You just couldn't, Like, it just

1:03:09.040 --> 1:03:09.720
<v Speaker 2>wasn't possible.

1:03:09.880 --> 1:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Would that be a good venue if they fix if

1:03:11.840 --> 1:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the greens, the grass or.

1:03:13.560 --> 1:03:18.320
<v Speaker 2>It's an interesting venue, Like it's the weird property that

1:03:18.320 --> 1:03:19.960
<v Speaker 2>there's about five or six holes that go up and

1:03:20.000 --> 1:03:22.240
<v Speaker 2>down this just massive cliff at the edge of this quarry.

1:03:22.280 --> 1:03:23.640
<v Speaker 2>And I don't like those holes at all, but all

1:03:23.640 --> 1:03:25.240
<v Speaker 2>the ones on the bottom I thought were really cool.

1:03:25.720 --> 1:03:29.960
<v Speaker 2>And I think the fine fescue Open was good for

1:03:30.040 --> 1:03:33.120
<v Speaker 2>the Open. I like that kind of Lynxy is not lynxy,

1:03:33.200 --> 1:03:35.560
<v Speaker 2>but the ball running like a Lynx course, running fifty

1:03:35.640 --> 1:03:38.520
<v Speaker 2>sixty seventy meters and like going over with these hills

1:03:38.560 --> 1:03:41.240
<v Speaker 2>and running down slopes, and I think it's a different

1:03:41.280 --> 1:03:43.880
<v Speaker 2>style of test. Great players generally play well when it

1:03:43.920 --> 1:03:45.960
<v Speaker 2>gets like that. Yeah, so that's kind of why I

1:03:46.000 --> 1:03:48.160
<v Speaker 2>like that. I mean, the partner's number two is completely

1:03:48.240 --> 1:03:50.760
<v Speaker 2>unique for US Open, but it's perfect. You're going to

1:03:50.800 --> 1:03:51.760
<v Speaker 2>find a good player.

1:03:51.480 --> 1:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>There because and camer separated.

1:03:53.880 --> 1:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Separated, like truly separated. See that's a piners is maybe

1:03:58.160 --> 1:04:00.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit too far around the greens because KMA

1:04:00.920 --> 1:04:03.040
<v Speaker 2>chipping would be his achilles here if he has one,

1:04:03.680 --> 1:04:08.320
<v Speaker 2>because chipping is so hard there, then he actually he

1:04:08.400 --> 1:04:11.680
<v Speaker 2>didn't have. His weakness wasn't necessary. He didn't have to

1:04:11.680 --> 1:04:14.080
<v Speaker 2>expose his weakness because you can put from everywhere Pinehurst,

1:04:14.280 --> 1:04:17.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, so he didn't have to chip. There's interesting

1:04:17.760 --> 1:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>that what's seen as a short game test might actually

1:04:21.240 --> 1:04:22.960
<v Speaker 2>be more of a long game test, you know.

1:04:23.960 --> 1:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Like yeah, I guess yeah, because he could put everywhere.

1:04:28.160 --> 1:04:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Apart from everywhere, he didn't have to use his laugh

1:04:29.960 --> 1:04:33.680
<v Speaker 2>so that's countship. But if he has a weakness, it

1:04:33.720 --> 1:04:36.200
<v Speaker 2>would be in that area. So he puts from everywhere,

1:04:36.240 --> 1:04:40.000
<v Speaker 2>and he's an incredible ball striker. But yeah, that great

1:04:40.040 --> 1:04:43.480
<v Speaker 2>players and he's a great player. Clearly thrive when it

1:04:43.520 --> 1:04:46.720
<v Speaker 2>gets fiery, you know, like so I kind of and

1:04:46.840 --> 1:04:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Chambers get super fiery. That was as fiery as I've

1:04:48.920 --> 1:04:50.880
<v Speaker 2>seen it open. So I think in some respects it's

1:04:50.880 --> 1:04:53.160
<v Speaker 2>a good venue. But I think he'd have trouble getting

1:04:53.160 --> 1:04:54.800
<v Speaker 2>the players to go back to go back there with

1:04:54.840 --> 1:04:57.760
<v Speaker 2>that complaining because that was pretty poor. The Greens. Yeah,

1:04:57.880 --> 1:05:00.360
<v Speaker 2>not that no one's fault. They lost him, but and

1:05:00.400 --> 1:05:02.360
<v Speaker 2>it was they lost them too late and you couldn't

1:05:03.000 --> 1:05:06.320
<v Speaker 2>save them. But we had best of it. I mean

1:05:06.320 --> 1:05:08.200
<v Speaker 2>it was incredible weather. We had eighty five degrees and

1:05:08.320 --> 1:05:12.000
<v Speaker 2>some for seven days straight. Huge crowds, too, huge crowds,

1:05:12.160 --> 1:05:15.600
<v Speaker 2>they love it up. There would be great I mean it's.

1:05:14.680 --> 1:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>A there's in more places up in the Pacific Northwest

1:05:18.000 --> 1:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>because like this is the best West Coast open by far,

1:05:21.360 --> 1:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the best because like you know, everybody gets to watch

1:05:24.200 --> 1:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the most golf yeah, of any open.

1:05:26.440 --> 1:05:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Like, and it's predictable weather. Yeah, it never rains in

1:05:29.240 --> 1:05:31.560
<v Speaker 2>the West Coast in summer ever, you know, and it's

1:05:31.880 --> 1:05:33.880
<v Speaker 2>nice all day and it's a good temperature, and like

1:05:33.880 --> 1:05:35.800
<v Speaker 2>you said, the East Coast TV, it's perfect. Everyone gets

1:05:35.800 --> 1:05:37.880
<v Speaker 2>home from work and watches yeah, perfect.

1:05:38.280 --> 1:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And they just seed more good golf course down

1:05:40.360 --> 1:05:40.959
<v Speaker 1>the West coast.

1:05:40.960 --> 1:05:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's plenty. You know. California's got two coming up, right,

1:05:44.000 --> 1:05:47.920
<v Speaker 2>It's got this and in LA in two years. Yeah yeah, No,

1:05:48.080 --> 1:05:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Tory in two years and then LA in a couple

1:05:49.840 --> 1:05:51.480
<v Speaker 2>of years after that. So they're coming here a lot.

1:05:52.760 --> 1:05:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Toris in a couple of years.

1:05:54.040 --> 1:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, yeah, they got two years.

1:05:56.720 --> 1:05:59.680
<v Speaker 2>That's a good open. Toy is a good open. It's

1:06:00.320 --> 1:06:03.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, it'll surprise you. I promise you. It's a

1:06:03.160 --> 1:06:05.600
<v Speaker 2>great open. It is. If it's like it was last time,

1:06:05.600 --> 1:06:06.240
<v Speaker 2>it's brilliant.

1:06:06.400 --> 1:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It's what means help. The Tiger made wing Foot so

1:06:10.480 --> 1:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>tough and of sex.

1:06:13.440 --> 1:06:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, it was the first year they did the graduated rough,

1:06:15.640 --> 1:06:19.439
<v Speaker 2>so the rough was playable. It was the first year

1:06:19.440 --> 1:06:21.600
<v Speaker 2>we could miss the fairway by three or four yards

1:06:21.600 --> 1:06:23.440
<v Speaker 2>and move it somewhat near the green. I mean it

1:06:23.480 --> 1:06:25.440
<v Speaker 2>wasn't like you could get a five on on it,

1:06:25.480 --> 1:06:27.400
<v Speaker 2>but you could backfoot a nine one or and eight

1:06:27.440 --> 1:06:28.960
<v Speaker 2>on and hack it up somewhere around the green and

1:06:29.000 --> 1:06:30.440
<v Speaker 2>hope you could get it up and down, whereas before

1:06:30.440 --> 1:06:32.680
<v Speaker 2>it was just get this, get the sandwich out, and

1:06:32.760 --> 1:06:35.240
<v Speaker 2>you was open up to that point. So that was different.

1:06:35.280 --> 1:06:36.960
<v Speaker 2>So that was kind of easier. But the greens at

1:06:36.960 --> 1:06:40.680
<v Speaker 2>wing Foot are brutally hard, really back to front pitched

1:06:40.680 --> 1:06:44.040
<v Speaker 2>greens with like kind of waves and stuff, and they're

1:06:44.080 --> 1:06:51.640
<v Speaker 2>really tricky and their power they get ropie when you

1:06:51.720 --> 1:06:53.600
<v Speaker 2>push them, really really firm, and they were kind of

1:06:53.800 --> 1:06:57.280
<v Speaker 2>difficult to put on beaten up. I would have called

1:06:57.320 --> 1:07:02.040
<v Speaker 2>them on Thursday and Friday afternoon. And when they're really fast,

1:07:02.080 --> 1:07:04.400
<v Speaker 2>really slopey with a little bit of ropiness about them,

1:07:04.480 --> 1:07:07.040
<v Speaker 2>it gets really tough. And it's just naturally it's a

1:07:07.080 --> 1:07:09.080
<v Speaker 2>tough course. It's like Okamon. It's one of those just

1:07:09.880 --> 1:07:12.720
<v Speaker 2>naturally difficult courses that there's really no good places to

1:07:12.720 --> 1:07:15.040
<v Speaker 2>miss it on some holes, and the greens play really

1:07:15.080 --> 1:07:19.400
<v Speaker 2>effectively small, and my shelt game was just outrageous at

1:07:19.400 --> 1:07:21.840
<v Speaker 2>that point. So I didn't really I did it because

1:07:21.840 --> 1:07:24.240
<v Speaker 2>I got up and down a lot kind of had

1:07:24.240 --> 1:07:24.800
<v Speaker 2>to do.

1:07:24.880 --> 1:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>You expect a similar like scoring next year.

1:07:31.000 --> 1:07:33.160
<v Speaker 2>I think golf is gold The standard of golf is

1:07:33.160 --> 1:07:37.160
<v Speaker 2>generally higher than it was then. There's more good players.

1:07:37.560 --> 1:07:39.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we were playing great golf. We thought we

1:07:39.000 --> 1:07:40.760
<v Speaker 2>were playing great golf, and clearly Tiger was playing as

1:07:40.760 --> 1:07:42.280
<v Speaker 2>good as anybody kind of around that era.

1:07:42.360 --> 1:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>But how's the first time he missed a cutting? Like forever?

1:07:45.280 --> 1:07:49.000
<v Speaker 2>His father just died a year Yeah, so fill and

1:07:49.080 --> 1:07:51.560
<v Speaker 2>the Masters and he won hole Lake straight after that.

1:07:51.920 --> 1:07:55.800
<v Speaker 2>So but that era was obviously good. But I feel

1:07:55.840 --> 1:07:59.240
<v Speaker 2>like it's deeper now. Those the pool that you would

1:07:59.560 --> 1:08:01.280
<v Speaker 2>you were picked, thing that could win a major now

1:08:01.360 --> 1:08:02.480
<v Speaker 2>is bigger than it was then.

1:08:03.080 --> 1:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Did they have the Grand Slam Ofcgarf that year?

1:08:05.400 --> 1:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1:08:06.440 --> 1:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Did you play? That had to be one of the

1:08:09.640 --> 1:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>last years for.

1:08:10.280 --> 1:08:13.400
<v Speaker 2>That it We were one of the last ones in Kawaii.

1:08:13.440 --> 1:08:15.840
<v Speaker 2>We went to Kawaii and they went to Bermuda for

1:08:15.840 --> 1:08:18.679
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years after that. It was a crazy event.

1:08:18.760 --> 1:08:20.960
<v Speaker 2>I think Furich was at mine because he had the

1:08:21.000 --> 1:08:26.960
<v Speaker 2>next best scoring average because Tiger won two. So it

1:08:27.000 --> 1:08:30.080
<v Speaker 2>was Phil the Tiger and Weir and Furick, I think

1:08:31.560 --> 1:08:33.599
<v Speaker 2>because they always used to let the if someone won

1:08:33.680 --> 1:08:36.720
<v Speaker 2>too for that year. But the best, the best thing

1:08:36.760 --> 1:08:38.400
<v Speaker 2>out of the best thing that came out of wing

1:08:38.400 --> 1:08:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Foot was I played with Tiger and Film in the

1:08:40.200 --> 1:08:42.840
<v Speaker 2>first year rounds of Madonna in two thousand and six,

1:08:42.920 --> 1:08:47.080
<v Speaker 2>which was the biggest crowd I've ever seen. It was

1:08:47.120 --> 1:08:49.840
<v Speaker 2>just unbelievable for six holes. It was a really fun

1:08:50.160 --> 1:08:53.400
<v Speaker 2>six holes because it was the height. Field won the Masters,

1:08:54.280 --> 1:08:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Tiger won the Open, and I'm in sandwich in the middle,

1:08:57.080 --> 1:08:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Like no one really even cares that I'm there, so

1:08:58.640 --> 1:09:01.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm just a spectator. Really, it was crazy. It was

1:09:01.160 --> 1:09:03.960
<v Speaker 2>really fun. And Chicago people are allowed, as you know,

1:09:04.720 --> 1:09:08.040
<v Speaker 2>and Madonna's a loud place like the amphitheaters.

1:09:07.360 --> 1:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And a loud place except when the Euros make a Sunday.

1:09:11.200 --> 1:09:13.839
<v Speaker 2>Rosie makes the seventy, it's really quiet.

1:09:14.200 --> 1:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, is that the playing with Tiger shot thing? Real?

1:09:20.080 --> 1:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Like the people say, like I think Rory and GT

1:09:24.120 --> 1:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>said something like last year after riv like you know,

1:09:27.439 --> 1:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>it had to be a shot a shot in half.

1:09:29.880 --> 1:09:32.240
<v Speaker 2>What they dealt with that day because I played two

1:09:32.240 --> 1:09:33.760
<v Speaker 2>groups in front of them that day. What they were

1:09:33.760 --> 1:09:36.000
<v Speaker 2>dealing with because that was Tiger just back out. Everyone's

1:09:36.080 --> 1:09:38.680
<v Speaker 2>hyped this has come back number four or whatever, but

1:09:38.720 --> 1:09:40.280
<v Speaker 2>like this one's going to stick, right.

1:09:40.840 --> 1:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>People were just crazy for the craziest morning, outrageous.

1:09:45.479 --> 1:09:47.880
<v Speaker 2>And River is a really small property and holes are

1:09:47.920 --> 1:09:51.720
<v Speaker 2>really close together, and uh, target group. Tiger fans are

1:09:51.720 --> 1:09:55.160
<v Speaker 2>different from normal golf fans, or an element of his

1:09:55.520 --> 1:09:58.439
<v Speaker 2>crowd is different. They're Tiger fans. They're not golf fans.

1:09:58.479 --> 1:10:00.400
<v Speaker 2>So they're just there to see their man. They don't

1:10:02.000 --> 1:10:05.280
<v Speaker 2>like understand that there's other groups on the course, and

1:10:05.320 --> 1:10:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's not what they're about. They're about seeing Tiger, right.

1:10:07.720 --> 1:10:11.960
<v Speaker 2>So I think whenever I played, I play with him

1:10:11.960 --> 1:10:13.759
<v Speaker 2>a lot, and I was pretty fortunate in some pretty

1:10:13.760 --> 1:10:16.880
<v Speaker 2>good situations like that. People were great. But I think

1:10:16.920 --> 1:10:19.320
<v Speaker 2>on these comebacks, especially when he hasn't been around for

1:10:19.320 --> 1:10:20.880
<v Speaker 2>a long time and then he came in. When he

1:10:20.920 --> 1:10:26.240
<v Speaker 2>came back, people were extra crazy. It was look, it

1:10:26.360 --> 1:10:28.320
<v Speaker 2>was tough. He was good to play with him, that

1:10:28.360 --> 1:10:30.840
<v Speaker 2>he wouldn't put in part out if he didn't have

1:10:30.960 --> 1:10:34.679
<v Speaker 2>to and like get the crowd to walk off and stuff.

1:10:34.680 --> 1:10:37.160
<v Speaker 2>He was generally pretty good to you like that, Like

1:10:37.200 --> 1:10:40.040
<v Speaker 2>he had he had an understanding or an awareness of

1:10:40.360 --> 1:10:42.200
<v Speaker 2>the effect that he had on the crowd, so he

1:10:42.200 --> 1:10:46.439
<v Speaker 2>was pretty good with it. But yeah, it's difficult. The

1:10:46.479 --> 1:10:48.320
<v Speaker 2>hardest group to play in was in front of Tiger

1:10:48.400 --> 1:10:51.840
<v Speaker 2>in those days or any day really probably because every

1:10:51.840 --> 1:10:54.240
<v Speaker 2>time whenever you're putting, his crowd's coming up the fairway.

1:10:54.240 --> 1:10:56.240
<v Speaker 2>They're all walking to try to get positioned around the green.

1:10:56.240 --> 1:10:57.640
<v Speaker 2>They're all trying to get on the tee, they're all

1:10:57.680 --> 1:10:59.840
<v Speaker 2>trying to get positioned for the next group to get

1:10:59.880 --> 1:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>a good view. So they don't care that you're putting.

1:11:02.040 --> 1:11:03.639
<v Speaker 2>They're just walking right because they want to be next

1:11:03.640 --> 1:11:09.080
<v Speaker 2>to the green. So the least favorite draw historically would

1:11:09.120 --> 1:11:11.240
<v Speaker 2>have been a group in front of him, not with him.

1:11:11.280 --> 1:11:13.280
<v Speaker 2>With him, it's kind of your bit insulated because it's

1:11:13.520 --> 1:11:15.719
<v Speaker 2>you're just in amongst it, and it's like that white noise.

1:11:15.720 --> 1:11:17.759
<v Speaker 2>It's just so much noise, you know, it's like noise

1:11:17.760 --> 1:11:20.040
<v Speaker 2>canceling headphones. You don't notice after a while because it's

1:11:20.080 --> 1:11:24.200
<v Speaker 2>just constant. But the group in front or around him,

1:11:24.520 --> 1:11:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that gets tough because you don't quite have the white

1:11:27.360 --> 1:11:30.000
<v Speaker 2>noise effect, but you have the stampeding masses up coming

1:11:30.080 --> 1:11:31.559
<v Speaker 2>up behind you when you're hitting all the time.

1:11:32.560 --> 1:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. So what we got five under through day one,

1:11:37.280 --> 1:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>what's the winning score going to be at Pebble.

1:11:39.680 --> 1:11:42.439
<v Speaker 2>I think it'd be less than ten. I think there's

1:11:42.479 --> 1:11:45.320
<v Speaker 2>no course that I know that could get difficult quick

1:11:46.000 --> 1:11:52.360
<v Speaker 2>faster than Pebble. I think just by amount of water

1:11:52.400 --> 1:11:53.720
<v Speaker 2>they put on the greens. It's not going to rain,

1:11:53.920 --> 1:11:57.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean it, if it stays foggy, it won't get

1:11:57.640 --> 1:11:59.880
<v Speaker 2>as firm. But they could get the greens crazy firm

1:11:59.920 --> 1:12:03.680
<v Speaker 2>and crazy fast really quick here, I think, And I

1:12:03.680 --> 1:12:06.080
<v Speaker 2>think by the end they'll be tough, although they probably

1:12:06.080 --> 1:12:08.719
<v Speaker 2>a little gun shy right because of their last few years.

1:12:08.720 --> 1:12:10.599
<v Speaker 2>They need a really smooth, good one, right, I need

1:12:10.600 --> 1:12:11.720
<v Speaker 2>no one to talk about set up.

1:12:13.960 --> 1:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's too easy.

1:12:15.840 --> 1:12:18.759
<v Speaker 2>But again, if if it goes too deep, they're obviously

1:12:18.840 --> 1:12:21.360
<v Speaker 2>not afraid because Aaron Hill's yeah, they went into the teens, right,

1:12:21.400 --> 1:12:23.320
<v Speaker 2>so they've broken that kind of Well that.

1:12:23.439 --> 1:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Was rain no whend yeah two, I don't know.

1:12:28.840 --> 1:12:30.519
<v Speaker 2>I don't The forecast doesn't look like there's anything too

1:12:30.560 --> 1:12:33.000
<v Speaker 2>crazy coming, but I think it'll be like high single digits,

1:12:33.040 --> 1:12:34.800
<v Speaker 2>I would think. I don't think there'll be a whole

1:12:34.800 --> 1:12:36.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of people under part at the end. I mean

1:12:36.200 --> 1:12:39.880
<v Speaker 2>seventy two holes here. Eventually you're going to have some

1:12:40.160 --> 1:12:41.880
<v Speaker 2>you're going to have some bumps in the road, you know,

1:12:41.920 --> 1:12:44.160
<v Speaker 2>and it's going to get progressively harder every day. I

1:12:44.200 --> 1:12:46.960
<v Speaker 2>didn't really study the pins today, but most pins that

1:12:47.320 --> 1:12:51.360
<v Speaker 2>are tough because they're also slopey. So single digits under

1:12:51.360 --> 1:12:54.400
<v Speaker 2>path we'll see.

1:12:53.640 --> 1:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, if it's eight be even part of parax.

1:12:56.680 --> 1:12:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Well there you go. Yeah, so it's past seventy one,

1:12:58.760 --> 1:13:01.599
<v Speaker 2>it is past every one. Yeah, that's not a bad

1:13:01.640 --> 1:13:03.880
<v Speaker 2>way to think about it. Actually, if they're really obsessed

1:13:03.880 --> 1:13:06.639
<v Speaker 2>with score near Pa, just change the power. But then

1:13:06.880 --> 1:13:08.799
<v Speaker 2>we're going to be growing because there's night pop offs.

1:13:10.000 --> 1:13:14.519
<v Speaker 1>Well but is it a part five anymore? If to so,

1:13:14.680 --> 1:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>think about the definition two ideal shots from an expert player,

1:13:19.479 --> 1:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>or how many ideal shots from an expert player plus

1:13:23.680 --> 1:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>two putts?

1:13:27.560 --> 1:13:29.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well that that's a difficult definition.

1:13:29.840 --> 1:13:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Eighteen at Pebble, if you hit a great drive, gat

1:13:33.320 --> 1:13:35.519
<v Speaker 1>not a four. But if you hit a great drive

1:13:35.520 --> 1:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and great second shot, you're on the green, right, yes.

1:13:38.600 --> 1:13:42.599
<v Speaker 1>So if on six at Pebble you hear a great drive,

1:13:42.720 --> 1:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>great second shot, good say even good good drive, good

1:13:46.200 --> 1:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>second chat, you're on the green, right, yeah, so it's

1:13:49.240 --> 1:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>part four. That's what it was in nineteen eleven.

1:13:53.080 --> 1:13:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Six four definition of yeah, yeah, well it's interesting, but

1:13:59.520 --> 1:14:01.640
<v Speaker 2>you're arguing it kind of kills itself because par it

1:14:01.680 --> 1:14:03.280
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really matter anyway, right.

1:14:03.080 --> 1:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Well it does. Then I'm just saying, if you're going

1:14:05.400 --> 1:14:07.839
<v Speaker 1>to care about score it apart, then you got to adapt.

1:14:08.240 --> 1:14:10.720
<v Speaker 2>And I've always traditionally done traditionally that's what they did,

1:14:10.840 --> 1:14:12.839
<v Speaker 2>right They'd go to a normal course, pinching the fairways

1:14:12.840 --> 1:14:14.800
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, turn a past eventy two and a

1:14:14.800 --> 1:14:17.080
<v Speaker 2>past seventy and that was it. That's that was kind

1:14:17.120 --> 1:14:18.920
<v Speaker 2>of their thing. And they just got so excited about

1:14:18.960 --> 1:14:21.400
<v Speaker 2>how hard they made it that they just took it

1:14:21.439 --> 1:14:25.160
<v Speaker 2>too far. Maybe sometimes what if you but but you

1:14:25.240 --> 1:14:27.200
<v Speaker 2>say that if you look at the list of champions

1:14:27.200 --> 1:14:29.599
<v Speaker 2>we've had, even through these controversy setups like Jordan speak

1:14:29.600 --> 1:14:31.760
<v Speaker 2>winning at Chambers. Everyone thought that was a disaster. You

1:14:31.840 --> 1:14:33.120
<v Speaker 2>give me the the best goal from the world at

1:14:33.120 --> 1:14:35.160
<v Speaker 2>the time won and he beat Dustin Johnson, who was

1:14:35.840 --> 1:14:37.479
<v Speaker 2>probably the other best golfer in the world at the time.

1:14:37.479 --> 1:14:40.519
<v Speaker 2>Adam Scott was up there and Jason David they were

1:14:40.560 --> 1:14:43.320
<v Speaker 2>all right there, right, Brooks has won twice in a row.

1:14:43.360 --> 1:14:45.439
<v Speaker 2>He's clearly the best player in majors. So they're finding

1:14:45.479 --> 1:14:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the right champions. So say what we want that they're

1:14:49.240 --> 1:14:51.080
<v Speaker 2>ticking my box and that they're letting the best player

1:14:51.120 --> 1:14:53.320
<v Speaker 2>in the field show his skills, you know.

1:14:53.720 --> 1:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then yeah, like it already their early outreach

1:14:56.200 --> 1:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>today is like I was too soft and you look

1:14:58.040 --> 1:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>at the leader ports like then you get the best

1:15:00.200 --> 1:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in the world at the top, Like you don't, Like

1:15:03.160 --> 1:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I went to watch you know today and it's like

1:15:06.280 --> 1:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you watch it, you hit a bad shot, Like it's

1:15:08.240 --> 1:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be really really really hard to make par you know,

1:15:11.120 --> 1:15:11.559
<v Speaker 1>like you guts.

1:15:11.640 --> 1:15:14.679
<v Speaker 2>Funny that people look at the score rather than the Nimes. Yeah,

1:15:14.840 --> 1:15:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it is the Moors look at the names

1:15:17.120 --> 1:15:19.080
<v Speaker 2>and Lightbow, not the Scooes all shooting. To me.

1:15:19.439 --> 1:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but and that's like the thing that drove me

1:15:22.080 --> 1:15:24.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of crazy about Aaron Hills when everybody was going nuts,

1:15:24.760 --> 1:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>was like that Saturday was absolutely electric. You had j

1:15:29.000 --> 1:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>T make an like he made eagle on eighteen for

1:15:33.520 --> 1:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he shot sixty three, Patrick Reid shot sixty five,

1:15:36.400 --> 1:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>He hit nine greens. You know, he's just chipping in

1:15:39.439 --> 1:15:42.479
<v Speaker 1>from everywhere making everything. Like you know, it's just an

1:15:42.600 --> 1:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable round where you saw these guys just playing un

1:15:46.320 --> 1:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Fleetwood had a crazy good round. Like it

1:15:49.120 --> 1:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>was like all the greatest players in the world are

1:15:51.360 --> 1:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>having Like you're watching them do spectacular stuff and everybody's

1:15:55.160 --> 1:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>complaining because they're shooting low score.

1:15:57.040 --> 1:15:58.960
<v Speaker 2>And I was just nonsense wrong. Yeah, Like, but that's

1:15:59.000 --> 1:16:00.840
<v Speaker 2>part of it's almost on because if you go to

1:16:00.880 --> 1:16:04.120
<v Speaker 2>a different venue every year, you can't get us to

1:16:04.120 --> 1:16:06.200
<v Speaker 2>shoot the same score because we're just on different courses

1:16:06.240 --> 1:16:09.240
<v Speaker 2>in different conditions. It should you should have low scoring

1:16:09.320 --> 1:16:11.000
<v Speaker 2>years at high scoring years. I mean, it should go

1:16:11.240 --> 1:16:12.800
<v Speaker 2>like that depending on where you go and what the

1:16:12.840 --> 1:16:14.560
<v Speaker 2>conditions and the weather have been. So we need to

1:16:15.360 --> 1:16:18.240
<v Speaker 2>golf fans collectively need to give the USGA a break

1:16:18.320 --> 1:16:20.559
<v Speaker 2>on the score at least. Yeah. Well, I think it's

1:16:20.600 --> 1:16:22.120
<v Speaker 2>like I need to get rid of it out of

1:16:22.160 --> 1:16:23.519
<v Speaker 2>their head too. I think they still have it in

1:16:23.560 --> 1:16:24.920
<v Speaker 2>their head. I think a little bit of the score.

1:16:25.600 --> 1:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I think like the every venue should have their unique

1:16:29.080 --> 1:16:33.479
<v Speaker 1>thing right, yeah, because like that's what the Open has.

1:16:34.360 --> 1:16:37.360
<v Speaker 2>The Open is unique and nobody ever cares or remembers

1:16:37.439 --> 1:16:40.240
<v Speaker 2>the score that's been shot at the Open, and each

1:16:40.479 --> 1:16:42.920
<v Speaker 2>venue is like necessary freakish score.

1:16:43.080 --> 1:16:45.599
<v Speaker 1>They're kind of like unique little thing like well, at

1:16:45.760 --> 1:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Troon you got to avoid all of the bunker like

1:16:48.040 --> 1:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Truan on the Moon, you know, and then you've got Burkedale,

1:16:50.880 --> 1:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>which everybody's oh it's the bad, but it's it's much

1:16:53.479 --> 1:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>more of a standard task, like you know, everybody's got

1:16:57.360 --> 1:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and like nobody cares that at the Old Court. So

1:17:00.120 --> 1:17:02.559
<v Speaker 1>if somebody, if they win at eighteen hundred, you.

1:17:02.600 --> 1:17:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Know, cares, well. I don't think many people care. No

1:17:05.760 --> 1:17:07.640
<v Speaker 2>one goes away going oh they Open wasn't a real

1:17:07.680 --> 1:17:09.560
<v Speaker 2>tournam this year because I didn't under won the tournament, right, Like,

1:17:09.640 --> 1:17:12.360
<v Speaker 2>no even think spect saying something on it. Yeah, it's funny.

1:17:13.200 --> 1:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. My thought is just like par hasn't

1:17:15.840 --> 1:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>been adjusted for the modern game, and that's why they're

1:17:20.280 --> 1:17:23.360
<v Speaker 1>having such problems with setup to protect par.

1:17:25.040 --> 1:17:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, you can't do it with length. They've been trying

1:17:28.240 --> 1:17:29.400
<v Speaker 2>to do it with length, and you can't do it

1:17:29.479 --> 1:17:31.680
<v Speaker 2>with length, and you shouldn't do it by making the

1:17:31.720 --> 1:17:33.920
<v Speaker 2>greens too fast, so the ball doesn't ever stop on

1:17:34.000 --> 1:17:37.840
<v Speaker 2>a slope, right, So whatever else you can do, I guess,

1:17:38.160 --> 1:17:40.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, and par is the easiest way to at

1:17:40.520 --> 1:17:42.080
<v Speaker 2>least affect the number on the right hand side of

1:17:42.080 --> 1:17:42.920
<v Speaker 2>the scoreboard.

1:17:43.120 --> 1:17:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you're not going to regulate, if you you know,

1:17:47.960 --> 1:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>they didn't regulate the technology that allowed for mass distance,

1:17:52.400 --> 1:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>but they've regulated par where they don't allow power to move. Yeah,

1:17:57.520 --> 1:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>which is it doesn't make any sense.

1:18:00.320 --> 1:18:02.240
<v Speaker 2>That's it's quite interesting, but it would be a shame

1:18:02.280 --> 1:18:06.599
<v Speaker 2>if we lost great like Part five strategies and stuff,

1:18:06.640 --> 1:18:09.720
<v Speaker 2>because everything just became a Part four. And see, I

1:18:09.800 --> 1:18:12.920
<v Speaker 2>don't know if it's completely it's completely the same because

1:18:14.000 --> 1:18:18.000
<v Speaker 2>two ideal shots. It's not the whole field that can

1:18:18.080 --> 1:18:20.280
<v Speaker 2>hit two ideal shots on the eighteenth, you.

1:18:20.320 --> 1:18:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Don't think so, No, everybody's hitting it past the tree.

1:18:26.439 --> 1:18:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Well in this particular week. But if it goes two

1:18:29.479 --> 1:18:31.920
<v Speaker 2>miles an hour into the wind and gets misty and foggy,

1:18:32.360 --> 1:18:34.880
<v Speaker 2>no one in the field gets it there into so.

1:18:35.280 --> 1:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't see. Because that that's a funny thing with Chambers.

1:18:39.120 --> 1:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Remember when you can't say.

1:18:40.200 --> 1:18:42.840
<v Speaker 2>It's an ideal driver. Three wood from two to sixty, right,

1:18:42.920 --> 1:18:45.080
<v Speaker 2>it's got to be like a I think it has

1:18:45.120 --> 1:18:48.800
<v Speaker 2>to be a driver and an iron for pretty much

1:18:48.840 --> 1:18:50.200
<v Speaker 2>everyone in the field for it to be a part

1:18:50.240 --> 1:18:53.639
<v Speaker 2>four an iron, the longest iron three on drivers, three iron,

1:18:53.680 --> 1:18:56.599
<v Speaker 2>that can be a part four for I'll pick on Zack. Yeah,

1:18:57.160 --> 1:19:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Zach's in the bottom twenty percent of driving distanceably in

1:19:00.360 --> 1:19:03.040
<v Speaker 2>the field. Okay, but I mean he may disagree.

1:19:05.320 --> 1:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>He's been working on as uh.

1:19:07.080 --> 1:19:12.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, speak space. But it's a dissensible to ninety something, right,

1:19:13.439 --> 1:19:15.080
<v Speaker 2>But the guy it's a two ninety something. He's not

1:19:15.160 --> 1:19:16.880
<v Speaker 2>hitting an iron in the eighteenth of Pebble Beach. He's

1:19:16.920 --> 1:19:21.559
<v Speaker 2>a three wood probably, yeah, maybe not maybe five wood.

1:19:22.000 --> 1:19:24.200
<v Speaker 2>That's well, look at the shot. It is, though, there's

1:19:24.200 --> 1:19:28.240
<v Speaker 2>got to be some respect for the difficulty of the shot.

1:19:28.800 --> 1:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>See, it would be easier if you went half pars,

1:19:32.000 --> 1:19:35.479
<v Speaker 1>because then if you made if you made eighteen eighteen

1:19:35.520 --> 1:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and six half pars and you were you're par seventy,

1:19:40.840 --> 1:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>how do you have a half par? I mean there's

1:19:44.280 --> 1:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>there's I mean, like I said, Pinehurst four and five

1:19:47.840 --> 1:19:49.759
<v Speaker 1>when Core flipped the pars.

1:19:50.040 --> 1:19:52.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and they did Chambers in the tournament. Yeah, one

1:19:52.520 --> 1:19:53.120
<v Speaker 2>in eighteen is.

1:19:53.120 --> 1:19:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Four five four five, and people went nuts, couldn't You

1:19:56.200 --> 1:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>just didn't think it.

1:19:56.840 --> 1:19:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Was that weird that that was one of the least

1:19:58.320 --> 1:20:00.960
<v Speaker 2>weird things about Chambers. I think it was kind of

1:20:00.960 --> 1:20:01.799
<v Speaker 2>a little bit weird.

1:20:03.439 --> 1:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Because you think about par you think about, oh, I

1:20:05.880 --> 1:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>mean birdie or boguey.

1:20:08.280 --> 1:20:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, how do you make a power if

1:20:10.000 --> 1:20:10.599
<v Speaker 2>it's a half ba.

1:20:11.560 --> 1:20:13.519
<v Speaker 1>But when you say you make a birdie on like

1:20:13.560 --> 1:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a two forty par three, you walk off the green.

1:20:17.560 --> 1:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>In your head, you're kind of like, I got I

1:20:19.320 --> 1:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>got a little more on a shot there, right, Yeah,

1:20:23.120 --> 1:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>when you make a bogie on like a really hard

1:20:25.080 --> 1:20:29.519
<v Speaker 1>part four, you think that way too, right, Yeah? Yeah,

1:20:29.640 --> 1:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what about this idea, whatever the leader is,

1:20:35.120 --> 1:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is that zero everyone else's PA, everyone else is not

1:20:39.920 --> 1:20:44.719
<v Speaker 1>over par but just one four six.

1:20:47.280 --> 1:20:50.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, certainly, like it's hard to mess with PA because

1:20:50.720 --> 1:20:53.639
<v Speaker 2>it's the way of measuring someone's skull relative to everyone

1:20:53.680 --> 1:20:55.479
<v Speaker 2>else at different points in the round, because that's not

1:20:55.600 --> 1:20:57.080
<v Speaker 2>just wait till the end and you've had childred and

1:20:57.120 --> 1:20:59.080
<v Speaker 2>seventy four shots sort of it like it's you need

1:20:59.120 --> 1:21:00.960
<v Speaker 2>to be able to measure in the middle of a round.

1:21:03.520 --> 1:21:07.479
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that would be a massive shift in golf scoring thinking.

1:21:08.640 --> 1:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>It would be I think, to a certain extent better

1:21:10.840 --> 1:21:11.799
<v Speaker 1>because it would show.

1:21:12.280 --> 1:21:13.880
<v Speaker 2>It would be better if we didn't worry about past

1:21:13.920 --> 1:21:16.120
<v Speaker 2>so much. But power is so important for handicapping, right,

1:21:16.400 --> 1:21:17.040
<v Speaker 2>so it.

1:21:17.040 --> 1:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Would be standard though with everything across, like you'd see, oh,

1:21:21.360 --> 1:21:24.439
<v Speaker 1>like he won by you know, like people would stop saying, oh,

1:21:24.600 --> 1:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it was like what you said at the beginning. Like

1:21:27.600 --> 1:21:30.719
<v Speaker 1>sometimes when it's you know, somebody shoots twenty two hunderd,

1:21:30.720 --> 1:21:31.839
<v Speaker 1>it's still really challenging.

1:21:31.920 --> 1:21:32.320
<v Speaker 2>It can be.

1:21:32.520 --> 1:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so if they wanted.

1:21:33.920 --> 1:21:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Zero always, yeah, that guys it was at zero maybe,

1:21:39.360 --> 1:21:39.880
<v Speaker 2>and it will.

1:21:39.760 --> 1:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Show relative people, Yeah, start to judge relative performance more

1:21:44.240 --> 1:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>because like you know, I don't know, I'm trying to

1:21:46.360 --> 1:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>sell you on some Craig crack pot.

1:21:48.720 --> 1:21:50.599
<v Speaker 2>I think golf's doing it. I think they just need

1:21:50.720 --> 1:21:54.320
<v Speaker 2>to just understand. Like last year, I think, I mean

1:21:54.360 --> 1:21:57.920
<v Speaker 2>they're going to say that I don't know, they didn't

1:21:57.920 --> 1:21:59.599
<v Speaker 2>do anything wrong and it just got either go unlucky.

1:21:59.640 --> 1:22:01.880
<v Speaker 2>But they just have to say, well, sometimes we're going

1:22:01.920 --> 1:22:04.240
<v Speaker 2>to shoot low these boys. You know, if we don't

1:22:04.240 --> 1:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>have the weather this week, or we didn't have the

1:22:06.120 --> 1:22:08.040
<v Speaker 2>lead up weather, or we didn't get the course to

1:22:08.160 --> 1:22:10.200
<v Speaker 2>how we thought it could be as tough as well.

1:22:11.040 --> 1:22:12.960
<v Speaker 2>That's what we go this week. Let's just make the

1:22:13.040 --> 1:22:15.280
<v Speaker 2>best of it, and they shoot fifteen they shoot fifteen

1:22:15.360 --> 1:22:17.599
<v Speaker 2>under and let that happen every now and then. When

1:22:17.640 --> 1:22:20.880
<v Speaker 2>they can't make it really difficult. Sometimes it's easy, right,

1:22:20.880 --> 1:22:22.320
<v Speaker 2>You got to openmond, you have to do anything. You

1:22:22.439 --> 1:22:25.200
<v Speaker 2>just open the gates, and it's tough pineers and number

1:22:25.200 --> 1:22:27.360
<v Speaker 2>two it's going to be the same. But sometimes you

1:22:27.439 --> 1:22:29.120
<v Speaker 2>come to pebbles sometimes and maybe it's been a little

1:22:29.120 --> 1:22:30.639
<v Speaker 2>bit damp in spring. It's just going to be soft.

1:22:30.720 --> 1:22:32.080
<v Speaker 2>It just is what it is, and guys are going

1:22:32.160 --> 1:22:34.360
<v Speaker 2>to go low. That's all right though, right, Yeah, good

1:22:34.400 --> 1:22:36.439
<v Speaker 2>players when the at and t great players when the

1:22:36.520 --> 1:22:38.960
<v Speaker 2>eighteen t usually yeah, you know, so you're going to

1:22:39.000 --> 1:22:40.040
<v Speaker 2>find a good champion anyway.

1:22:40.280 --> 1:22:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I think what you said about like look at the leaderboard,

1:22:42.720 --> 1:22:44.559
<v Speaker 1>not the score, look at the names.

1:22:44.720 --> 1:22:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like that's the if you get the names. I mean,

1:22:48.800 --> 1:22:51.200
<v Speaker 2>you can tell the guys people in golf who follow golf,

1:22:52.320 --> 1:22:56.840
<v Speaker 2>they regardless of the world rankings, know the cream. You

1:22:56.920 --> 1:22:58.880
<v Speaker 2>know who's playing well at the time, and the cream

1:22:58.960 --> 1:23:01.880
<v Speaker 2>in that field. If the cream that field if the

1:23:02.439 --> 1:23:04.720
<v Speaker 2>platform they're on or the course they're on allows the

1:23:04.800 --> 1:23:07.200
<v Speaker 2>guys who are playing their best to be there at

1:23:07.200 --> 1:23:09.040
<v Speaker 2>the end on Sunday, then it's a good setup. And

1:23:09.160 --> 1:23:13.680
<v Speaker 2>that's that's what the Masters does. They almost always get

1:23:13.760 --> 1:23:16.920
<v Speaker 2>everyone they should have in contention in contention deep on

1:23:17.000 --> 1:23:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Sunday afternoon because the test that's presented is it's such

1:23:21.439 --> 1:23:24.400
<v Speaker 2>a complete test that only the players playing really, really

1:23:24.439 --> 1:23:27.280
<v Speaker 2>well can pass that test.

1:23:27.400 --> 1:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Well. Yeah, and then like this year is a perfect example.

1:23:29.479 --> 1:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>It was a wet, warm week, you know, like not

1:23:33.120 --> 1:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>ideal for them, like conditioning wise, and then on Sunday

1:23:37.000 --> 1:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you got Mulinarry would all that.

1:23:40.280 --> 1:23:42.519
<v Speaker 2>Every pre tournament favorites opt for Rory is like they're

1:23:42.800 --> 1:23:45.000
<v Speaker 2>really in contention, you know. And it seems to happen

1:23:45.080 --> 1:23:47.519
<v Speaker 2>every year. So it doesn't really matter the score that is.

1:23:47.640 --> 1:23:50.400
<v Speaker 2>It just matters that the players playing their best are

1:23:50.479 --> 1:23:53.280
<v Speaker 2>given the kind of platform that allows them to show

1:23:53.320 --> 1:23:56.000
<v Speaker 2>their skills, you know, and that doesn't always have sometimes,

1:23:56.040 --> 1:23:58.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying in US Opens, but sometimes we have

1:23:58.160 --> 1:24:01.360
<v Speaker 2>tournaments that really lay on like it's all about to

1:24:01.400 --> 1:24:03.640
<v Speaker 2>go who parts well? See Beth Page. I think is

1:24:03.680 --> 1:24:05.639
<v Speaker 2>a little bit one dimensional in that you just can't

1:24:05.680 --> 1:24:07.040
<v Speaker 2>do it unless you fly it a really long way

1:24:07.080 --> 1:24:09.840
<v Speaker 2>in the air, which is a massive part of being

1:24:09.880 --> 1:24:11.280
<v Speaker 2>one of the best players in the world, right, But

1:24:11.400 --> 1:24:13.960
<v Speaker 2>it's not probably the complete test that you could get

1:24:14.000 --> 1:24:16.680
<v Speaker 2>at the Masters, which is massive on distance, but it's

1:24:16.680 --> 1:24:18.439
<v Speaker 2>also massive on strategy and short game.

1:24:18.520 --> 1:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, think about if Spith had gained ten

1:24:21.200 --> 1:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>shots or eleven charts like he did at beth Page

1:24:24.560 --> 1:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and at the Masters, like on the greens he has

1:24:27.960 --> 1:24:31.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the historically unbelievable putting me. Yeah, and he

1:24:31.280 --> 1:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>was what six shots behind Brooks, Yeah, no chance.

1:24:35.000 --> 1:24:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no chance. It was well, certainly much more difficult,

1:24:38.120 --> 1:24:40.160
<v Speaker 2>and like there's a there's probably a time for that test,

1:24:40.200 --> 1:24:43.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, just like there's the time for the tiny, little, small,

1:24:43.920 --> 1:24:47.200
<v Speaker 2>bouncy narrow test. You know, there's a time horrible yeah,

1:24:47.240 --> 1:24:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Harbortown style test, well, the Marian kind of deal, you know.

1:24:53.000 --> 1:24:54.800
<v Speaker 2>But as long as the best, the guys who are

1:24:54.800 --> 1:24:59.880
<v Speaker 2>playing their best are kind of given that opportunity to shine,

1:25:00.160 --> 1:25:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I think you know you've got it right. I don't

1:25:02.400 --> 1:25:04.960
<v Speaker 2>think the score matters then, And the best tournaments always

1:25:05.000 --> 1:25:09.519
<v Speaker 2>had the the best leaderboards, the best setup, So the

1:25:09.560 --> 1:25:11.599
<v Speaker 2>best golf course setups always have the best leader boards,

1:25:12.439 --> 1:25:13.720
<v Speaker 2>and they're the final ones to watch. The other ones

1:25:13.760 --> 1:25:15.160
<v Speaker 2>we want to watch. We want to watch number one

1:25:15.200 --> 1:25:19.360
<v Speaker 2>versus number three, number versus number seven versus whoever else.

1:25:19.360 --> 1:25:21.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, we always want to watch our heroes.

1:25:21.640 --> 1:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's the most memorable ones. Yeah, no, very remember that.

1:25:27.640 --> 1:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know some people remember the other ones, but

1:25:30.520 --> 1:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you know you remember Jack versus Watson Dull in the.

1:25:33.920 --> 1:25:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Sun, Yeah, and like and that Obviously that was rock

1:25:36.280 --> 1:25:38.360
<v Speaker 2>hard that week, and it allowed the two best players

1:25:38.360 --> 1:25:40.439
<v Speaker 2>in the world at that time showcased that there was

1:25:40.560 --> 1:25:42.680
<v Speaker 2>so much better than third at that moment. You know.

1:25:42.920 --> 1:25:45.439
<v Speaker 2>It was a bit like Hendrick can Fiel. It true,

1:25:45.439 --> 1:25:48.439
<v Speaker 2>and it was obviously very playable that week if you

1:25:48.560 --> 1:25:52.160
<v Speaker 2>were playing like them. If you weren't, it was completely impossible, right,

1:25:52.240 --> 1:25:55.160
<v Speaker 2>So it allowed perfect It's a perfect setup. That was

1:25:55.200 --> 1:25:57.080
<v Speaker 2>absolutely magic, and who doesn't that was one of the

1:25:57.120 --> 1:25:58.599
<v Speaker 2>best weekends of golf to ever watch.

1:25:59.160 --> 1:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I always will remember that one.

1:26:02.560 --> 1:26:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that course it's naturally tough. You don't have to

1:26:05.160 --> 1:26:06.960
<v Speaker 2>do anything, true, all.

1:26:06.920 --> 1:26:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Right, we're gonna wrap it. I don't know, I don't

1:26:10.600 --> 1:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>need to give you any more of my theories it's

1:26:13.280 --> 1:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>enough for a day. But thanks for coming on. Who

1:26:16.720 --> 1:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>you are, who you taking. We're midway through round one.

1:26:20.800 --> 1:26:23.240
<v Speaker 2>So well. I was picking Jordan before the week, but.

1:26:25.000 --> 1:26:26.519
<v Speaker 1>We got to get a leaderboard up to eight.

1:26:26.600 --> 1:26:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Here, we're gonna get an update. Xander is interesting, Xander's

1:26:33.360 --> 1:26:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Xander look good. I think Louis. I always liked Louis.

1:26:35.760 --> 1:26:38.040
<v Speaker 2>If Louis gets down deep in the tournament, he's more

1:26:38.080 --> 1:26:42.559
<v Speaker 2>competitive than people know, and he is. He's got every.

1:26:42.400 --> 1:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Show, the Grand Slam runner up.

1:26:44.280 --> 1:26:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's got the Grand Slam runner up. He's a

1:26:46.000 --> 1:26:49.000
<v Speaker 2>big he's a big time performance. Let's go for Louis.

1:26:49.840 --> 1:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, I got I took Dustin, but he's even.

1:26:54.240 --> 1:26:55.439
<v Speaker 1>He's already five shots back.

1:26:57.160 --> 1:26:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Dustin at Pebbles always gonna be there and nothing.

1:27:03.280 --> 1:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Pros prosident. The Boston story instant, the Baston consist papers,