1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:03,400 Speaker 1: Welcome to today's edition of The Clay Travis and Buck 2 00:00:03,440 --> 00:00:04,720 Speaker 1: Sexton Show podcast. 3 00:00:05,360 --> 00:00:08,119 Speaker 2: Welcome to the Wednesday edition of The Clay Travis and 4 00:00:08,240 --> 00:00:14,920 Speaker 2: Buck Sexton Show. They did it, They dropped the indictment 5 00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:18,720 Speaker 2: relating to the twenty twenty election of January sixth. They 6 00:00:18,720 --> 00:00:22,040 Speaker 2: did it right a couple hours after we finished the 7 00:00:22,120 --> 00:00:25,960 Speaker 2: show yesterday. So I thought it was going to happen. 8 00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:28,440 Speaker 2: We all thought it was gonna happen sometime this week, 9 00:00:28,680 --> 00:00:33,960 Speaker 2: and sure enough it is here. Now there's a lot 10 00:00:34,040 --> 00:00:38,560 Speaker 2: going on. We're going to talk about this in detail today. Yes, 11 00:00:38,920 --> 00:00:41,600 Speaker 2: it is in a front to our judicial system. Yes, 12 00:00:41,840 --> 00:00:48,800 Speaker 2: it is Banana Republic, third world imprison your enemy's politically nonsense. Yes, 13 00:00:50,080 --> 00:00:55,520 Speaker 2: it's a preposterous standard that they are using for this indictment. 14 00:00:55,680 --> 00:00:57,400 Speaker 2: We're gonna look at it legally, though, we're gonna look 15 00:00:57,400 --> 00:01:01,520 Speaker 2: at it politically historically and trying to get a sense 16 00:01:01,560 --> 00:01:05,200 Speaker 2: as to where all this is going. To that end, 17 00:01:05,720 --> 00:01:08,320 Speaker 2: we'll have our friend Andy McCarthy with us in the 18 00:01:08,400 --> 00:01:12,199 Speaker 2: second hour, Julie Kelly with us in the third hour, 19 00:01:12,920 --> 00:01:17,959 Speaker 2: and coming off of vacation. Because that's right, Clay, the 20 00:01:18,000 --> 00:01:21,320 Speaker 2: Clay never stops. He's going to be joining us in 21 00:01:21,400 --> 00:01:23,560 Speaker 2: the bottom of this hour from his vacation because he 22 00:01:23,600 --> 00:01:28,200 Speaker 2: wants to weigh in on this moment understandably, So Clay 23 00:01:28,240 --> 00:01:29,480 Speaker 2: will be with us in just a little bit. In 24 00:01:29,560 --> 00:01:33,640 Speaker 2: the meantime, let's talk about what we know at this point. 25 00:01:34,360 --> 00:01:41,280 Speaker 2: The four count indictment includes conspiracy to defraud the United States, 26 00:01:41,480 --> 00:01:47,160 Speaker 2: conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of an attempt 27 00:01:47,280 --> 00:01:52,840 Speaker 2: to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights. 28 00:01:54,320 --> 00:01:55,440 Speaker 3: These are all. 29 00:01:56,240 --> 00:02:00,480 Speaker 2: Charges that you could drive the proverbial mac truck through 30 00:02:00,480 --> 00:02:03,440 Speaker 2: if you wanted to, right, I mean, this very vague stuff. 31 00:02:04,600 --> 00:02:07,760 Speaker 2: And once you read the indictment, which I tweeted about 32 00:02:07,760 --> 00:02:09,720 Speaker 2: this yesterday, I read read it as soon as it 33 00:02:09,760 --> 00:02:12,840 Speaker 2: came out, it just reads like a Rachel Maddow monologue 34 00:02:12,840 --> 00:02:16,320 Speaker 2: over at MSNBC. It's you know, and then he he 35 00:02:16,440 --> 00:02:19,280 Speaker 2: must have known this wasn't true. And Trump took this 36 00:02:19,760 --> 00:02:23,400 Speaker 2: legal theory and the legal advisors around him and it 37 00:02:23,440 --> 00:02:26,080 Speaker 2: was all lies about the election, and they were pushing lies. 38 00:02:26,160 --> 00:02:29,320 Speaker 2: And let's just take a step back for a moment. 39 00:02:30,080 --> 00:02:35,480 Speaker 2: The First Amendment clearly protects lies of politicians or else 40 00:02:35,560 --> 00:02:39,440 Speaker 2: all of our politicians, really, all of them would be 41 00:02:39,480 --> 00:02:43,799 Speaker 2: in prison. You are allowed to say things that end 42 00:02:43,919 --> 00:02:47,640 Speaker 2: up not being true except in very specific circumstances. Right, 43 00:02:47,639 --> 00:02:49,640 Speaker 2: if you are under oath, then it is a matter 44 00:02:49,720 --> 00:02:52,880 Speaker 2: of fact, not a matter of opinion. That is perjury 45 00:02:53,400 --> 00:02:56,480 Speaker 2: if you defame somebody on a matter of fact that 46 00:02:56,520 --> 00:03:00,120 Speaker 2: you know to be wrong. Yeah, there are some areas 47 00:03:00,200 --> 00:03:04,280 Speaker 2: very specific and narrow in the law, but I believe 48 00:03:04,320 --> 00:03:08,800 Speaker 2: this legal theory should be tested out. They are criminalizing 49 00:03:09,400 --> 00:03:14,040 Speaker 2: legal theory here. They are criminalizing trying to use the 50 00:03:14,120 --> 00:03:17,960 Speaker 2: legal process. And anybody out there who's a defense attorney 51 00:03:18,040 --> 00:03:21,920 Speaker 2: must be like, well, this is crazy, because, as we know, 52 00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:25,600 Speaker 2: we have a system that is set up an oppositional 53 00:03:25,639 --> 00:03:28,680 Speaker 2: system where you are entitled the most vigorous defense. You 54 00:03:28,680 --> 00:03:33,440 Speaker 2: are also entitled to try to use the law as 55 00:03:33,960 --> 00:03:38,640 Speaker 2: strenuously as possible in an effort to achieve a result 56 00:03:38,680 --> 00:03:42,920 Speaker 2: that you think is just that is the way the 57 00:03:42,920 --> 00:03:44,920 Speaker 2: system is. If it isn't that way, what do we 58 00:03:45,000 --> 00:03:48,520 Speaker 2: have And then think about what this would mean. Oh, 59 00:03:48,600 --> 00:03:52,760 Speaker 2: that that defense that you brought in court, it's so 60 00:03:53,080 --> 00:03:57,480 Speaker 2: flimsy that now we're going to prosecute you for your 61 00:03:57,600 --> 00:04:03,480 Speaker 2: bad defense. This is something that could rightly be described 62 00:04:03,520 --> 00:04:07,360 Speaker 2: as Kafka ask, this is something you would expect in 63 00:04:07,400 --> 00:04:13,200 Speaker 2: an authoritarian system, where any objection to what the system 64 00:04:13,240 --> 00:04:17,159 Speaker 2: is trying to produce creates this kind of reaction. Donald 65 00:04:17,200 --> 00:04:20,640 Speaker 2: Trump himself, as we know, is an affront in their 66 00:04:20,680 --> 00:04:24,200 Speaker 2: minds to their system. He is a challenge to the 67 00:04:24,240 --> 00:04:28,400 Speaker 2: way things are done, and that is why they're doing 68 00:04:28,440 --> 00:04:32,200 Speaker 2: everything they can destroy him. They are tearing down some 69 00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:36,160 Speaker 2: of our most important not just institutions, but principles along 70 00:04:36,200 --> 00:04:39,840 Speaker 2: with them. The notion that they will be able to 71 00:04:39,880 --> 00:04:42,640 Speaker 2: prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump did not 72 00:04:42,960 --> 00:04:48,880 Speaker 2: believe the election was stolen from him is absurd. The 73 00:04:48,920 --> 00:04:52,120 Speaker 2: notion that they're going to be able to prove that 74 00:04:52,200 --> 00:04:56,000 Speaker 2: there was no basis for conferring with lawyers about a 75 00:04:56,120 --> 00:05:01,960 Speaker 2: legal theory, given that they believe that there were improprieties 76 00:05:01,960 --> 00:05:06,159 Speaker 2: in the election. This is just criminalizing the difference of 77 00:05:06,200 --> 00:05:08,240 Speaker 2: opinion over the election. I mean, you know, it's a 78 00:05:08,240 --> 00:05:09,960 Speaker 2: good thing. I guess for al Gore, the statute of 79 00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:12,520 Speaker 2: limitations on two thousand has already run out right. It's 80 00:05:12,520 --> 00:05:15,760 Speaker 2: a good thing that this legal theory wasn't applied in 81 00:05:15,800 --> 00:05:19,800 Speaker 2: the past, or that the people in the FBI, for example, 82 00:05:19,839 --> 00:05:24,760 Speaker 2: who waged the Russia collusion hoax to try to undo 83 00:05:24,880 --> 00:05:30,000 Speaker 2: the twenty sixteen election. That was the entire purpose. Were 84 00:05:30,040 --> 00:05:33,679 Speaker 2: any of them punished. No, Remember the senior FBI, including 85 00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:35,880 Speaker 2: the head of the FBI, whether we're talking about Comy 86 00:05:35,960 --> 00:05:40,000 Speaker 2: or McCabe, his little stewge who took over, they were 87 00:05:40,040 --> 00:05:43,080 Speaker 2: able to get away with. We were so stupid that 88 00:05:43,200 --> 00:05:46,320 Speaker 2: we really believed we had to get a faiza set 89 00:05:46,360 --> 00:05:51,960 Speaker 2: up on people who are low level campaign associates or 90 00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:55,919 Speaker 2: employees of Trump because they were helping Russia and Russia 91 00:05:56,000 --> 00:05:59,040 Speaker 2: was helping Trump steal the election. It was insane. They 92 00:05:59,040 --> 00:06:01,839 Speaker 2: didn't believe that was a pretext. But they were able 93 00:06:01,839 --> 00:06:05,320 Speaker 2: to get away with. Well, we thought so. We abused 94 00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:11,040 Speaker 2: the law, misuse of official position, misuse of national security powers. 95 00:06:11,920 --> 00:06:13,560 Speaker 2: Never mind all the leaking that went on that was 96 00:06:13,560 --> 00:06:17,479 Speaker 2: never punished in twenty sixteen, including of the General Flynn 97 00:06:17,920 --> 00:06:22,039 Speaker 2: Ambassador kizil Yak phone call, remember that one. Remember their 98 00:06:22,080 --> 00:06:25,600 Speaker 2: abuse of the Logan Act. Oh, we had to sit 99 00:06:25,680 --> 00:06:27,919 Speaker 2: down with General Flynn because we thought he was abusing 100 00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:31,440 Speaker 2: the act. He was violating the Logan Act. They never 101 00:06:31,480 --> 00:06:34,440 Speaker 2: been charged in two hundred years. Look at the legal 102 00:06:34,520 --> 00:06:37,800 Speaker 2: progression when we talk about the weaponization. This is not 103 00:06:37,839 --> 00:06:41,440 Speaker 2: a one off. This is what they have been building to. 104 00:06:43,040 --> 00:06:46,520 Speaker 2: They created this legal theory of they the Democrats, they 105 00:06:46,600 --> 00:06:50,760 Speaker 2: the deep state. The abuse of the Logan Act was 106 00:06:50,800 --> 00:06:53,520 Speaker 2: how they went after General Flynn. They then tried to 107 00:06:53,560 --> 00:06:57,039 Speaker 2: bring out the emolument's clause because Trump had business interests, 108 00:06:57,120 --> 00:06:59,919 Speaker 2: you know, hotels that were still in operation, et cetera. 109 00:07:01,440 --> 00:07:05,560 Speaker 2: They then used the Russia collusion. Collusion wasn't even a 110 00:07:05,560 --> 00:07:07,320 Speaker 2: crime in the context they used it. They should have 111 00:07:07,360 --> 00:07:10,800 Speaker 2: said conspiracy, but they didn't like that word. They tried 112 00:07:10,800 --> 00:07:15,480 Speaker 2: to abuse that, and now here we are with criminalizing 113 00:07:15,560 --> 00:07:19,560 Speaker 2: differences of approach to a legal matter in election. Election 114 00:07:19,640 --> 00:07:23,480 Speaker 2: law is very complicated how elections are conducted, and each 115 00:07:23,480 --> 00:07:25,280 Speaker 2: and every state is different. As we all know, that 116 00:07:25,400 --> 00:07:29,240 Speaker 2: is the system that we have. There were challenges that 117 00:07:29,280 --> 00:07:32,800 Speaker 2: were brought in court. Those challenges were not successful. But 118 00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:36,520 Speaker 2: the elector's component of this and some of the other 119 00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:38,240 Speaker 2: aspects of Trump's strategy. 120 00:07:39,000 --> 00:07:41,040 Speaker 3: People they can dislike it. 121 00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:44,960 Speaker 2: They can think that it's you know, trying to ice 122 00:07:45,040 --> 00:07:47,240 Speaker 2: the kicker, so to speak. It'll call in the time out. 123 00:07:47,280 --> 00:07:48,640 Speaker 2: They can think, oh, you know, are you really going 124 00:07:48,720 --> 00:07:52,240 Speaker 2: to do that? They can say it's up on the edge, 125 00:07:52,320 --> 00:07:56,239 Speaker 2: but you're going to lock somebody up in prison for this. Remember, 126 00:07:56,240 --> 00:08:00,160 Speaker 2: they did not charge incitement to insurrection. They did not 127 00:08:00,320 --> 00:08:06,440 Speaker 2: charge the highest crimes possible here. And I think it's 128 00:08:06,480 --> 00:08:10,000 Speaker 2: because they recognize their fallback is this is going to 129 00:08:10,040 --> 00:08:12,120 Speaker 2: happen in Washington. 130 00:08:12,040 --> 00:08:12,800 Speaker 3: D C. 131 00:08:14,080 --> 00:08:17,800 Speaker 2: The judge who has been assigned to this, if you 132 00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:22,800 Speaker 2: were tasked with picking by record based on her treatment 133 00:08:23,040 --> 00:08:28,200 Speaker 2: of the January sixth detainees, the most anti Trump federal 134 00:08:28,280 --> 00:08:33,960 Speaker 2: judge possible, they got her. She is probably more so 135 00:08:34,040 --> 00:08:36,840 Speaker 2: than any other, has a clear record, And even the 136 00:08:36,920 --> 00:08:42,160 Speaker 2: Libs don't argue with this, the single most anti Trump 137 00:08:42,240 --> 00:08:44,040 Speaker 2: judge that he could have gotten. Do we think that 138 00:08:44,040 --> 00:08:46,440 Speaker 2: she's going to be fair with regard to motions? Do 139 00:08:46,480 --> 00:08:48,439 Speaker 2: we think that she's going to be fair with regard 140 00:08:48,480 --> 00:08:53,120 Speaker 2: to then you change? She should throw this out right away. 141 00:08:53,160 --> 00:08:55,679 Speaker 2: I don't think anyone's arguing that they think she will, 142 00:08:56,400 --> 00:08:58,720 Speaker 2: because they know what we're dealing with here. This is 143 00:08:58,800 --> 00:09:02,800 Speaker 2: the system, this is what they have been building toward 144 00:09:03,400 --> 00:09:07,000 Speaker 2: this whole time. Oh and I didn't even talk about 145 00:09:07,080 --> 00:09:12,080 Speaker 2: the usage of Farah as a criminal tool, a criminal weapon. 146 00:09:11,840 --> 00:09:12,880 Speaker 3: To go after Donald Trump. 147 00:09:12,920 --> 00:09:17,040 Speaker 2: Associates before the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which Hunter Biden 148 00:09:17,559 --> 00:09:22,640 Speaker 2: clearly egregiously violated over a number of years, but he 149 00:09:22,679 --> 00:09:24,040 Speaker 2: hasn't been charged with that yet. 150 00:09:24,360 --> 00:09:26,800 Speaker 3: I wonder why, Gee. 151 00:09:26,480 --> 00:09:29,920 Speaker 2: The timing of all of this isn't that interesting as well. 152 00:09:30,679 --> 00:09:34,439 Speaker 2: The timing comes down write when it is clear that 153 00:09:34,480 --> 00:09:38,760 Speaker 2: the Biden crime families global operations are now a matter 154 00:09:38,840 --> 00:09:43,240 Speaker 2: of public record and beyond dispute. The corruption the bribery 155 00:09:43,600 --> 00:09:47,680 Speaker 2: could not be more clear at this point. Oh, and 156 00:09:47,720 --> 00:09:51,360 Speaker 2: suddenly they have to come up with this additional federal prosecution, 157 00:09:53,160 --> 00:09:55,640 Speaker 2: yet another one. And we're still waiting on Atlanta, which 158 00:09:55,679 --> 00:09:59,360 Speaker 2: is probably gonna happen here and the next it could 159 00:09:59,360 --> 00:10:02,720 Speaker 2: be in the days ahead, maybe the weeks ahead. What 160 00:10:02,880 --> 00:10:06,400 Speaker 2: is more likely, friends that Donald Trump was able to 161 00:10:06,440 --> 00:10:10,040 Speaker 2: live his entire life, all the way up through running 162 00:10:10,080 --> 00:10:12,520 Speaker 2: for and then becoming president of the United States without 163 00:10:12,520 --> 00:10:18,560 Speaker 2: a single criminal prosecution, never once. But then he challenges 164 00:10:18,600 --> 00:10:20,720 Speaker 2: the system and they decide that they hate him, and 165 00:10:20,760 --> 00:10:23,120 Speaker 2: he insults them, which he does, and he's very good 166 00:10:23,200 --> 00:10:27,360 Speaker 2: at it, and then all of a sudden he faces 167 00:10:27,480 --> 00:10:32,920 Speaker 2: how many criminal trials at once. One of the first 168 00:10:32,920 --> 00:10:37,840 Speaker 2: things Trump pointed out, they waited until Now they've waited 169 00:10:37,920 --> 00:10:41,480 Speaker 2: until there is no way that you could even argue 170 00:10:41,520 --> 00:10:44,240 Speaker 2: this is not meant to influence the twenty twenty four election. 171 00:10:46,240 --> 00:10:50,959 Speaker 3: And what's at stake here, Well, the justice. 172 00:10:50,679 --> 00:10:53,360 Speaker 2: System is really the bedrocket is a foundation upon which 173 00:10:53,480 --> 00:10:59,800 Speaker 2: all the rest of our institutions function and are based on. 174 00:11:00,480 --> 00:11:03,600 Speaker 2: If you don't have a justice system, what do you have, 175 00:11:03,720 --> 00:11:07,720 Speaker 2: some kind of a winner take all mobocracy. If you 176 00:11:07,760 --> 00:11:10,679 Speaker 2: can't trust the justice system, if it becomes a tool, 177 00:11:11,040 --> 00:11:14,760 Speaker 2: a weapon, a cudgel of one side of the aisle, 178 00:11:16,360 --> 00:11:22,200 Speaker 2: what comes next, Ah, the death of the democracy that 179 00:11:22,240 --> 00:11:25,600 Speaker 2: they think they are defending in the first place. Now, 180 00:11:25,600 --> 00:11:27,679 Speaker 2: I know we are republic, not a democracy, but they 181 00:11:27,720 --> 00:11:30,760 Speaker 2: always love to call it a democracy. Nonetheless, you know 182 00:11:30,800 --> 00:11:33,120 Speaker 2: what this really comes down to. I thought this was 183 00:11:34,520 --> 00:11:41,240 Speaker 2: especially noteworthy. You know, the New York Times announced this 184 00:11:41,400 --> 00:11:45,640 Speaker 2: to their anti Trump, left wing lunatic readership. This was 185 00:11:45,679 --> 00:11:53,080 Speaker 2: their headline, Trump charged in bid to subvert democracy. This, 186 00:11:53,240 --> 00:11:56,439 Speaker 2: my friends, is the entire Biden twenty twenty four election campaign, 187 00:11:56,520 --> 00:12:00,800 Speaker 2: summarize for you in one headline, Trump charged and bid 188 00:12:00,840 --> 00:12:05,360 Speaker 2: tosubvert democracy. It doesn't matter that Joe Biden is decrepit 189 00:12:05,640 --> 00:12:11,120 Speaker 2: and wildly corrupt and dishonest and incompetent. It doesn't matter 190 00:12:11,160 --> 00:12:14,640 Speaker 2: that the economy is stumbling along. It doesn't matter the 191 00:12:14,640 --> 00:12:17,200 Speaker 2: border is wide open. It doesn't matter that the cities 192 00:12:17,440 --> 00:12:22,480 Speaker 2: are turning into hellscapes with crime and disorder and people 193 00:12:22,760 --> 00:12:25,200 Speaker 2: just doing drugs in open air, and all the things 194 00:12:25,200 --> 00:12:28,640 Speaker 2: that we see. They're going to argue none of it matters, 195 00:12:28,640 --> 00:12:32,439 Speaker 2: because if Trump wins, it all ends. And the tragic 196 00:12:32,520 --> 00:12:35,360 Speaker 2: irony of this is in their efforts to stop the 197 00:12:35,520 --> 00:12:40,200 Speaker 2: make believe Trump induced death of democracy, they themselves are 198 00:12:40,240 --> 00:12:42,760 Speaker 2: the ones that are pushing this to the very limit. 199 00:12:43,080 --> 00:12:46,360 Speaker 2: They themselves are the ones that are creating systemic risk 200 00:12:46,480 --> 00:12:50,280 Speaker 2: for our republic, because once you have the political opponent 201 00:12:50,720 --> 00:12:55,520 Speaker 2: getting locked up of this Biden regime, the primary political 202 00:12:55,520 --> 00:13:02,640 Speaker 2: opponent even possibly facing prison either of these outcomes, both 203 00:13:02,640 --> 00:13:05,280 Speaker 2: of those are possible. We already know he's facing prison time. 204 00:13:05,360 --> 00:13:07,480 Speaker 2: God knows what's going to happen in this DC. I 205 00:13:07,480 --> 00:13:09,480 Speaker 2: didn't even talk about the jury yet, which we will. 206 00:13:10,640 --> 00:13:13,720 Speaker 2: They're bringing this in the most anti Trump city with 207 00:13:13,760 --> 00:13:18,680 Speaker 2: the highest Democrat registration and the most swamp creatures, the 208 00:13:18,720 --> 00:13:23,480 Speaker 2: most swamped tentacles, the most swamp connection of any place 209 00:13:23,520 --> 00:13:29,280 Speaker 2: you could find in the entire country. And they're doing 210 00:13:29,320 --> 00:13:32,319 Speaker 2: this and telling us that it's about justice, and they 211 00:13:32,360 --> 00:13:39,080 Speaker 2: expect us to accept that. It's outrageous. It's outrageous, and 212 00:13:39,120 --> 00:13:40,679 Speaker 2: people are going to be asking what do we do? 213 00:13:41,480 --> 00:13:45,080 Speaker 2: Friends of mine, family members, they ask me, Buck, what 214 00:13:45,080 --> 00:13:49,679 Speaker 2: do we do about this? We stand strong, we stand tall, 215 00:13:50,120 --> 00:13:50,760 Speaker 2: and we find a. 216 00:13:50,760 --> 00:13:54,679 Speaker 3: Way to win. That's it. We win or they do. 217 00:13:55,360 --> 00:13:58,000 Speaker 2: And look what they're doing right now to achieve their goal. 218 00:13:58,240 --> 00:14:00,760 Speaker 2: Look the lengths. Look at the lengths at which they're 219 00:14:00,760 --> 00:14:04,320 Speaker 2: willing to go. So this is a wake up call, everybody, 220 00:14:04,520 --> 00:14:07,760 Speaker 2: wake up call for all of us. They are defeated 221 00:14:07,800 --> 00:14:09,920 Speaker 2: in this effort and they lose the twenty twenty four 222 00:14:09,960 --> 00:14:12,760 Speaker 2: election or else, it really is time to start thinking 223 00:14:12,800 --> 00:14:15,440 Speaker 2: about whether this is a free country, whether this is 224 00:14:15,480 --> 00:14:19,600 Speaker 2: the great republic that we were handed before the lunatic 225 00:14:19,760 --> 00:14:25,200 Speaker 2: commi Democrats decided that everything and anything was justified in 226 00:14:25,200 --> 00:14:27,480 Speaker 2: their quest to stop one politician, one man. 227 00:14:28,400 --> 00:14:31,800 Speaker 3: Oh God, heaven forbid, we have peace and auroring economy again. 228 00:14:31,800 --> 00:14:34,800 Speaker 2: Wouldn't that be? Wouldn't that be such a terrible thing. 229 00:14:34,840 --> 00:14:39,160 Speaker 2: It's it's the stunning and sad thing to watch. But 230 00:14:39,280 --> 00:14:42,880 Speaker 2: it's also, as I said, a. It's a wake up 231 00:14:42,880 --> 00:14:44,600 Speaker 2: call for all of us what we really face here. 232 00:14:44,880 --> 00:14:48,120 Speaker 2: And it's just beginning. So strap in, my friends, we'll 233 00:14:48,120 --> 00:14:50,160 Speaker 2: get into more of this. Like I said, legal analysis, 234 00:14:50,160 --> 00:14:53,240 Speaker 2: political analysis. Also want to take your calls eight hundred 235 00:14:53,280 --> 00:14:55,280 Speaker 2: two eighty two to two eight a two. Clay's going 236 00:14:55,320 --> 00:14:56,920 Speaker 2: to join us in a little bit. He's going to 237 00:14:57,000 --> 00:14:59,480 Speaker 2: pop pop out from his vacation with his family and 238 00:14:59,760 --> 00:15:01,520 Speaker 2: way in on this one. So I know it's important 239 00:15:01,560 --> 00:15:03,600 Speaker 2: name its imported to all of us. We'll get to 240 00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:03,920 Speaker 2: that here. 241 00:15:03,960 --> 00:15:04,400 Speaker 3: Coming up. 242 00:15:04,960 --> 00:15:08,880 Speaker 2: My Pillows twentieth anniversary celebration is giving the team working 243 00:15:08,880 --> 00:15:11,280 Speaker 2: with Mike Lindel the opportunity to offer you a gift. 244 00:15:11,640 --> 00:15:14,400 Speaker 2: It's valued at twenty dollars. You'll find it online at 245 00:15:14,440 --> 00:15:17,560 Speaker 2: their website MyPillow dot com. This company started twenty years 246 00:15:17,600 --> 00:15:21,160 Speaker 2: ago making a single product, a super comfortable, amazing pillow. 247 00:15:21,840 --> 00:15:24,160 Speaker 2: I'm not alone in thinking that they've sold some eighty 248 00:15:24,200 --> 00:15:27,200 Speaker 2: million of them over the last two decades, while also 249 00:15:27,280 --> 00:15:30,800 Speaker 2: introducing a lot of other very comfortable products mattress toppers, 250 00:15:30,840 --> 00:15:34,040 Speaker 2: my slippers, Geeze, dream sheets, bath towels, pet beds and blankets, 251 00:15:34,080 --> 00:15:37,680 Speaker 2: and so much more. For a limited time visit their 252 00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:40,960 Speaker 2: website and find your free gift valued at twenty dollars. 253 00:15:41,000 --> 00:15:43,760 Speaker 2: No purchase is necessary, and while you're there, check out 254 00:15:43,800 --> 00:15:45,920 Speaker 2: some of the deep discounts they currently have on some 255 00:15:45,960 --> 00:15:49,200 Speaker 2: of their most loved products. To access these discounts, just 256 00:15:49,240 --> 00:15:51,800 Speaker 2: go to my pillow dot com, click on the radio 257 00:15:51,840 --> 00:15:54,720 Speaker 2: listener square and use our names Clayan Buck as your 258 00:15:54,760 --> 00:15:57,080 Speaker 2: promo code. You can call as well and ask about 259 00:15:57,080 --> 00:15:59,920 Speaker 2: this free gift. No purchase necessary. Just go to my 260 00:16:00,040 --> 00:16:02,440 Speaker 2: ipillow dot com or call eight hundred and seventy nine 261 00:16:02,440 --> 00:16:05,320 Speaker 2: to two three two sixty nine and use promo code 262 00:16:05,400 --> 00:16:06,600 Speaker 2: Clay and Buck. 263 00:16:07,440 --> 00:16:11,360 Speaker 1: The Truth Compass pointing do right every day. 264 00:16:11,840 --> 00:16:14,200 Speaker 3: The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton show. 265 00:16:14,440 --> 00:16:19,600 Speaker 2: The indictment on Election twenty twenty in January sixth, related 266 00:16:19,640 --> 00:16:23,440 Speaker 2: issues from these Democrats. That's want to note that there 267 00:16:23,440 --> 00:16:26,880 Speaker 2: are co conspirators named as well. One of the people 268 00:16:27,000 --> 00:16:30,960 Speaker 2: named as a co conspirator is the man who was 269 00:16:31,040 --> 00:16:36,080 Speaker 2: for years the greatest mayor in the country, Rudy Giuliani. 270 00:16:36,200 --> 00:16:39,240 Speaker 2: Here he is pointing out what's really going on here, 271 00:16:39,280 --> 00:16:43,240 Speaker 2: which is criminalizing free speech, First Amendment rights and really 272 00:16:43,520 --> 00:16:44,800 Speaker 2: access to the legal system. 273 00:16:44,800 --> 00:16:45,480 Speaker 3: Play clip four. 274 00:16:45,640 --> 00:16:48,720 Speaker 4: Here's what I say to Jack Smith after the Supreme 275 00:16:48,760 --> 00:16:53,000 Speaker 4: Court throughout your case, which should should have been a disgrace, 276 00:16:53,000 --> 00:16:55,600 Speaker 4: and you should have gone and found another profession because 277 00:16:55,640 --> 00:16:58,600 Speaker 4: you don't belong in this one. This one will be 278 00:16:58,680 --> 00:17:02,920 Speaker 4: your legacy, violating the rite of free speech of an 279 00:17:02,960 --> 00:17:03,920 Speaker 4: American citizen. 280 00:17:04,240 --> 00:17:06,119 Speaker 1: Never mind whether he was president or not. 281 00:17:06,960 --> 00:17:08,600 Speaker 3: It could be anybody, it. 282 00:17:08,600 --> 00:17:11,960 Speaker 4: Could be a homeless person. You don't get to violate 283 00:17:12,040 --> 00:17:14,720 Speaker 4: people's first amendments, right Smith, No. 284 00:17:14,640 --> 00:17:17,280 Speaker 1: Matter who the hell you are, but no matter how sick. 285 00:17:17,240 --> 00:17:20,800 Speaker 4: You are with Trump's derangement syndrome. And this isn't the 286 00:17:20,840 --> 00:17:24,080 Speaker 4: first time you've acted like an unethical lawyer. It should 287 00:17:24,119 --> 00:17:25,120 Speaker 4: be the last. 288 00:17:27,000 --> 00:17:27,879 Speaker 3: So there we have it. 289 00:17:28,200 --> 00:17:33,320 Speaker 2: He's seeing exactly what's coming at them now. These so 290 00:17:33,480 --> 00:17:38,000 Speaker 2: called alleged co conspirators in this are Trump's lawyers, everybody. 291 00:17:38,680 --> 00:17:40,840 Speaker 2: They're trying to throw the lawyers into the mix too. 292 00:17:41,280 --> 00:17:45,440 Speaker 2: Nothing in the law is sacred to the Democrats other 293 00:17:45,600 --> 00:17:47,600 Speaker 2: than get Trump. 294 00:17:48,320 --> 00:17:48,800 Speaker 3: That's it. 295 00:17:49,119 --> 00:17:52,080 Speaker 2: There's no other principle at work here other than destroy 296 00:17:52,680 --> 00:17:58,160 Speaker 2: the political opponent who has emotionally broken them. My friends, 297 00:17:58,200 --> 00:18:01,719 Speaker 2: the artificial intelligence gold rush could soon mint new millionaires. 298 00:18:01,760 --> 00:18:04,439 Speaker 2: But while everyone is focusing on chat GPT and AI 299 00:18:04,480 --> 00:18:07,520 Speaker 2: stocks like Nvidia. Something really unique is happening less than 300 00:18:07,520 --> 00:18:11,120 Speaker 2: two miles from chat GPT's headquarters. For the past few months, 301 00:18:11,160 --> 00:18:13,760 Speaker 2: engineers from Google and Microsoft have been working on a 302 00:18:13,800 --> 00:18:17,680 Speaker 2: little known crypto project that could revolutionize the AI industry. 303 00:18:18,000 --> 00:18:19,560 Speaker 2: And you now have a chance to get in on 304 00:18:19,600 --> 00:18:22,000 Speaker 2: the ground floor of this project for pennies, giving you 305 00:18:22,040 --> 00:18:24,199 Speaker 2: a rare chance to turn one thousand dollars into a 306 00:18:24,240 --> 00:18:27,200 Speaker 2: six figure nest egg. All this information is coming directly 307 00:18:27,240 --> 00:18:30,040 Speaker 2: from Tika Tawari, the man who picked a number one 308 00:18:30,080 --> 00:18:32,520 Speaker 2: crypto six years in a row. Tika has followed this 309 00:18:32,560 --> 00:18:35,439 Speaker 2: industry and written about it extensively. A week from today, 310 00:18:35,480 --> 00:18:39,280 Speaker 2: that's next Wednesday, he's hosting a free online strategy session 311 00:18:39,320 --> 00:18:42,000 Speaker 2: to give you all the details on his number one coin. 312 00:18:42,080 --> 00:18:45,320 Speaker 2: For this AI boom, simply go to ai coin twenty 313 00:18:45,400 --> 00:18:47,879 Speaker 2: twenty three dot com to sign up for this free event. 314 00:18:48,200 --> 00:18:51,520 Speaker 2: That's ai Cooin twenty twenty three dot com paid for 315 00:18:51,720 --> 00:18:54,480 Speaker 2: by Palm Beach Research Group. Hi, everybody, welcome back to Klay, 316 00:18:54,480 --> 00:18:57,920 Speaker 2: Travis and bucks exon show. A big day in the news, 317 00:18:57,920 --> 00:19:01,040 Speaker 2: as you all know, a troubling day for this country 318 00:19:01,280 --> 00:19:03,240 Speaker 2: and one that will go down to the history books. 319 00:19:03,280 --> 00:19:07,960 Speaker 2: I think ignominiously. Our friend, our co host, our main man, 320 00:19:08,160 --> 00:19:12,880 Speaker 2: Clay Travis steps away from his vacation with his family 321 00:19:13,400 --> 00:19:14,879 Speaker 2: to bring you his thoughts on this. 322 00:19:15,000 --> 00:19:17,800 Speaker 3: Now, mister Clay, I knew you'd come back. What's going on? 323 00:19:18,200 --> 00:19:19,400 Speaker 1: Well, this is what happens. 324 00:19:19,480 --> 00:19:23,920 Speaker 5: Right Like I go on vacation, Trump gets indicted and 325 00:19:24,440 --> 00:19:27,159 Speaker 5: I'll be back on Monday. But just like what happened 326 00:19:27,160 --> 00:19:29,760 Speaker 5: the last time I was on vacation, Trump got indicted 327 00:19:29,800 --> 00:19:33,480 Speaker 5: down in Miami, and now this happens obviously on Tuesday evening. 328 00:19:34,080 --> 00:19:38,080 Speaker 5: And look to me, Buck, I expected so much more 329 00:19:39,000 --> 00:19:42,199 Speaker 5: after all of the all of the lead up to 330 00:19:42,359 --> 00:19:45,600 Speaker 5: what Jack Smith was going to be able to get 331 00:19:45,640 --> 00:19:50,600 Speaker 5: Donald Trump for. I actually think the Miami case, which 332 00:19:50,760 --> 00:19:52,760 Speaker 5: I don't believe we'll get any conviction on because I 333 00:19:52,760 --> 00:19:55,639 Speaker 5: don't think a South Florida jury is going to convict Trump, 334 00:19:56,359 --> 00:20:00,760 Speaker 5: is way more legitimate than what he has charged Trump 335 00:20:00,840 --> 00:20:04,560 Speaker 5: with associated with January sixth, And in particular, Buck, what 336 00:20:04,960 --> 00:20:07,320 Speaker 5: jumps out to me as I read the indictment yesterday 337 00:20:07,680 --> 00:20:10,000 Speaker 5: and as I still continue to think about it on Wednesday, 338 00:20:10,640 --> 00:20:16,120 Speaker 5: is essentially Jack Smith has tried to criminalize legal advice 339 00:20:16,800 --> 00:20:19,800 Speaker 5: and for people out there who don't understand this, I 340 00:20:19,880 --> 00:20:24,119 Speaker 5: think it's really important. Lawyers debate whether cases make sense 341 00:20:24,240 --> 00:20:27,040 Speaker 5: all the time. Buck, This is not uncommon. If you 342 00:20:27,160 --> 00:20:31,040 Speaker 5: have a room full of lawyers, you can get seven 343 00:20:31,160 --> 00:20:34,919 Speaker 5: eight different opinions from seven or eight different lawyers about 344 00:20:34,960 --> 00:20:38,840 Speaker 5: whether a case makes sense or not. And to me, 345 00:20:39,040 --> 00:20:44,639 Speaker 5: the essence of this, again at its pure distillation, is 346 00:20:45,119 --> 00:20:50,160 Speaker 5: they changed the law to try to eliminate any uncertainty 347 00:20:50,320 --> 00:20:54,640 Speaker 5: surrounding what the vice president's role was when it came 348 00:20:54,720 --> 00:20:59,600 Speaker 5: to receiving the electoral votes. Buck, if you knew beyond 349 00:20:59,640 --> 00:21:02,920 Speaker 5: a chef of a doubt that this legal claim had 350 00:21:02,960 --> 00:21:06,840 Speaker 5: no merit at all, why in December of twenty twenty 351 00:21:06,880 --> 00:21:11,800 Speaker 5: two did Congress change the rules relating to an act 352 00:21:11,880 --> 00:21:15,600 Speaker 5: that went back to eighteen eighty seven to specify that 353 00:21:15,680 --> 00:21:19,800 Speaker 5: the vice president was primarily engaging in a ceremonial role 354 00:21:20,160 --> 00:21:23,160 Speaker 5: and didn't have the authority to engage in any sort 355 00:21:23,160 --> 00:21:26,600 Speaker 5: of analysis of whether the electoral votes were legitimate or not. 356 00:21:27,080 --> 00:21:29,399 Speaker 5: To me, this is an open and shutcase, and I 357 00:21:29,480 --> 00:21:32,520 Speaker 5: actually think it's going to go to the extent that 358 00:21:32,600 --> 00:21:35,560 Speaker 5: it survives, and it probably will because the forum is 359 00:21:35,560 --> 00:21:38,760 Speaker 5: so favorable the Supreme Court I think will vote maybe 360 00:21:38,960 --> 00:21:41,560 Speaker 5: seven too maybe even nine to zero, that this is 361 00:21:41,600 --> 00:21:45,200 Speaker 5: not a legitimate use of power, and that these charges 362 00:21:45,280 --> 00:21:49,960 Speaker 5: in DC are entirely illegitimate, not founded in the law, 363 00:21:50,440 --> 00:21:53,639 Speaker 5: and that Trump had every right to engage in the 364 00:21:53,680 --> 00:21:56,280 Speaker 5: behavior that he did, acting on the advice of some 365 00:21:56,359 --> 00:21:57,320 Speaker 5: of his legal counsel. 366 00:21:58,040 --> 00:22:01,080 Speaker 2: Do you think that that's going to happen though in 367 00:22:01,160 --> 00:22:03,800 Speaker 2: advance of trial? Like, what's what do you think the 368 00:22:03,840 --> 00:22:07,680 Speaker 2: process is going to be here? For the We got 369 00:22:07,760 --> 00:22:10,840 Speaker 2: multiple criminal trials going on. So let's assume that d 370 00:22:11,000 --> 00:22:15,800 Speaker 2: C goes before the election, they'll have to go to 371 00:22:15,840 --> 00:22:19,040 Speaker 2: the Court of Appeals. Right, that's the first to try 372 00:22:19,119 --> 00:22:21,760 Speaker 2: to There's a whole bunch of things that venues should 373 00:22:21,800 --> 00:22:25,560 Speaker 2: be adjudicated here. The judge, as as a lot of 374 00:22:25,560 --> 00:22:29,520 Speaker 2: folks are noticing, is basically the worst judge for Trump 375 00:22:29,880 --> 00:22:34,240 Speaker 2: based on record. That how that happens, Huh, Yeah, it's funny. 376 00:22:33,960 --> 00:22:38,000 Speaker 3: How that went down that way. And see what's going 377 00:22:38,000 --> 00:22:38,480 Speaker 3: on right now? 378 00:22:38,520 --> 00:22:41,760 Speaker 2: You say to yourself, Okay, they're probably not going to 379 00:22:41,840 --> 00:22:43,560 Speaker 2: let them change venue, because they didn't let any other 380 00:22:43,640 --> 00:22:46,080 Speaker 2: jan six cases change venue. They're not going to let 381 00:22:46,119 --> 00:22:47,800 Speaker 2: them change the judge, which means the trial is going 382 00:22:47,880 --> 00:22:50,280 Speaker 2: to go forward. So then the appeals court for the 383 00:22:50,320 --> 00:22:53,000 Speaker 2: appeals Court in D C. District, I mean the DC 384 00:22:53,080 --> 00:22:55,640 Speaker 2: Court of Appeals. You can't I can't think that that's 385 00:22:55,680 --> 00:22:56,480 Speaker 2: going to go his way. 386 00:22:56,680 --> 00:22:59,880 Speaker 5: Well, I think Buck, you could probably get an expedited. 387 00:23:00,600 --> 00:23:02,760 Speaker 5: First of all, I don't think, and I've been on 388 00:23:02,800 --> 00:23:04,520 Speaker 5: the record, I could end up being wrong. But I 389 00:23:04,560 --> 00:23:06,040 Speaker 5: don't think they're going to be able to get these 390 00:23:06,080 --> 00:23:09,960 Speaker 5: trials done before the election. So I think the twenty 391 00:23:10,040 --> 00:23:13,040 Speaker 5: twenty four election is going to have already occurred before 392 00:23:13,080 --> 00:23:16,560 Speaker 5: we get a full result in Miami South Florida area 393 00:23:16,800 --> 00:23:18,879 Speaker 5: or in DC. We're going to have it in New 394 00:23:18,960 --> 00:23:20,960 Speaker 5: York for sure, may get a result in New York, 395 00:23:21,000 --> 00:23:25,080 Speaker 5: but I think that's such a trivial, trivial crime. They'll 396 00:23:25,080 --> 00:23:27,200 Speaker 5: be an appeal and everything else. I don't think it'll 397 00:23:27,200 --> 00:23:31,120 Speaker 5: have any real impact. I actually so, I would suspect 398 00:23:31,119 --> 00:23:33,879 Speaker 5: that they will expedite in the event that there was 399 00:23:33,960 --> 00:23:38,680 Speaker 5: a trial, They would, I believe, expedite this review very quickly, 400 00:23:39,119 --> 00:23:41,440 Speaker 5: and I think it would run through the DC Circuit, 401 00:23:42,480 --> 00:23:45,360 Speaker 5: through the and through the Supreme Court, and I think 402 00:23:45,359 --> 00:23:49,040 Speaker 5: they would toss this out so I expected and I 403 00:23:49,080 --> 00:23:50,480 Speaker 5: haven't even read I don't know if you've had a 404 00:23:50,560 --> 00:23:53,600 Speaker 5: chance to spend very much time even reading the left 405 00:23:53,640 --> 00:23:56,119 Speaker 5: wing opinions on this. And I don't mean like the 406 00:23:56,200 --> 00:24:00,520 Speaker 5: slanted news coverage. I mean lawyers looking at this and saying, 407 00:24:01,280 --> 00:24:04,639 Speaker 5: I mean, I expected this. This is so much closer 408 00:24:04,680 --> 00:24:07,840 Speaker 5: to New York City the charge is there than it 409 00:24:07,960 --> 00:24:11,679 Speaker 5: is to Miami, because there are arguments that Trump based 410 00:24:11,680 --> 00:24:15,680 Speaker 5: on obstruction refusing to turn over the documents. I don't 411 00:24:15,680 --> 00:24:17,920 Speaker 5: think we'll get a conviction in South Florida. But when 412 00:24:17,920 --> 00:24:20,000 Speaker 5: I read that indictment, we came on Buck and I 413 00:24:20,040 --> 00:24:22,359 Speaker 5: was like, Okay, this is a different level. Trump could 414 00:24:22,400 --> 00:24:25,879 Speaker 5: behaved recklessly here. There's nothing. I mean, it almost feels 415 00:24:25,920 --> 00:24:29,359 Speaker 5: like this story is almost vanished because the left wing, 416 00:24:29,480 --> 00:24:31,560 Speaker 5: I think, was hoping, Oh, he's going to get charged 417 00:24:31,560 --> 00:24:34,080 Speaker 5: with sedition, He's going to get charged with treason, all 418 00:24:34,119 --> 00:24:37,400 Speaker 5: these different things, and you've got a conspiracy that's basically 419 00:24:37,480 --> 00:24:39,240 Speaker 5: rooted in legal discussion. 420 00:24:39,480 --> 00:24:43,040 Speaker 2: Isn't there the possibility though, of a superseding indictment still? 421 00:24:43,520 --> 00:24:46,440 Speaker 2: I mean, if you look at the timing of all 422 00:24:46,440 --> 00:24:49,520 Speaker 2: of this, it comes down right about when the whole 423 00:24:49,520 --> 00:24:53,200 Speaker 2: Biden House of Cards is, of course right, very hard 424 00:24:53,240 --> 00:24:56,600 Speaker 2: not to notice that this is going on, just as 425 00:24:56,640 --> 00:24:59,160 Speaker 2: we see everything they said about how Joe never talked 426 00:24:59,200 --> 00:25:01,200 Speaker 2: a hunter about us. Oh, actually he was on speaker 427 00:25:01,200 --> 00:25:03,320 Speaker 2: for all with him like twenty times. Joe wasn't a 428 00:25:03,359 --> 00:25:05,560 Speaker 2: part of this. Actually Joe Biden was the brand. All 429 00:25:05,640 --> 00:25:10,200 Speaker 2: that comes down and they try to put the final 430 00:25:10,359 --> 00:25:14,440 Speaker 2: nail in the legal coffin of the Trump campaign, and 431 00:25:15,119 --> 00:25:18,240 Speaker 2: it does feel like, wow, that's quite a coincidence. There's 432 00:25:18,240 --> 00:25:20,200 Speaker 2: still the possibility of though, just as we saw in Florida, 433 00:25:20,280 --> 00:25:22,639 Speaker 2: of a superseding indictment that would include more. 434 00:25:23,040 --> 00:25:27,040 Speaker 1: Possibly. I think it looks messy personally. 435 00:25:27,560 --> 00:25:31,120 Speaker 5: If you don't have all your ducks in a proverbial road, 436 00:25:31,119 --> 00:25:34,359 Speaker 5: doesn't mean they can't do it. But I think this 437 00:25:34,520 --> 00:25:36,880 Speaker 5: is their shot. I think this is their shot at 438 00:25:36,920 --> 00:25:39,720 Speaker 5: Trump on January sixth. There's always the possibility that new 439 00:25:39,760 --> 00:25:40,760 Speaker 5: evidence emerges. 440 00:25:41,840 --> 00:25:45,320 Speaker 2: He's name these co conspirators Clayton right in the indictment 441 00:25:45,359 --> 00:25:49,440 Speaker 2: that's come down, basically his lawyers. You also notice everybody, 442 00:25:50,359 --> 00:25:53,439 Speaker 2: if you would just beam down to earth, in the 443 00:25:53,440 --> 00:25:55,720 Speaker 2: pre Trump era, we had this whole thing in this 444 00:25:55,800 --> 00:26:00,280 Speaker 2: country of lawyers and attorney client privilege, and that was 445 00:26:00,280 --> 00:26:03,720 Speaker 2: something that we considered somewhat sacred in the legal profession. 446 00:26:04,160 --> 00:26:06,280 Speaker 2: And now we know Trump's lawyers have been turned against 447 00:26:06,320 --> 00:26:09,280 Speaker 2: them numerous times. I think that's the play of the 448 00:26:09,320 --> 00:26:13,040 Speaker 2: play here, or the unindicted co conspirators, They're all going 449 00:26:13,119 --> 00:26:15,600 Speaker 2: to be offered you totally walk, no problem, you flip 450 00:26:15,640 --> 00:26:17,600 Speaker 2: on Trump. And so that's the only way that I 451 00:26:17,600 --> 00:26:21,040 Speaker 2: could see them going for some kind of additional charges, 452 00:26:21,200 --> 00:26:22,920 Speaker 2: because what they would say is, well, now with the 453 00:26:23,040 --> 00:26:27,360 Speaker 2: lawyer's testimony, the co conspirators, now we can nail him down. 454 00:26:27,400 --> 00:26:28,080 Speaker 3: You see what I mean. 455 00:26:28,520 --> 00:26:32,120 Speaker 5: Yeah, I just again, the theory of this case is 456 00:26:32,560 --> 00:26:39,160 Speaker 5: Trump's legal claims were so patently absurd that he actually 457 00:26:39,200 --> 00:26:42,760 Speaker 5: engaged in a conspiracy because he knew that those legal 458 00:26:42,800 --> 00:26:45,360 Speaker 5: claims were patently absurd, and he knew that he had 459 00:26:45,359 --> 00:26:47,760 Speaker 5: lost the election, and so therefore we got him on 460 00:26:47,760 --> 00:26:48,320 Speaker 5: a conspiracy. 461 00:26:48,359 --> 00:26:48,960 Speaker 1: And I'll just say this. 462 00:26:49,000 --> 00:26:51,080 Speaker 5: I've said it on the show before when I was 463 00:26:51,080 --> 00:26:54,399 Speaker 5: in krimlawbuck my Krim Law professor, he was a legend 464 00:26:54,480 --> 00:26:59,320 Speaker 5: at Vanderbilt Law School, Don Hall. He said, the number 465 00:26:59,320 --> 00:27:02,480 Speaker 5: one thing that prosecutors always say is, man, we really 466 00:27:02,520 --> 00:27:04,480 Speaker 5: don't have a case here, we'll get them on a 467 00:27:04,480 --> 00:27:08,399 Speaker 5: conspiracy that's always the weakest of all charges. And so 468 00:27:09,440 --> 00:27:11,320 Speaker 5: I just want to take you inside. I've been in 469 00:27:11,440 --> 00:27:15,359 Speaker 5: so many discussions with lawyers where everybody's sitting around the 470 00:27:15,359 --> 00:27:18,520 Speaker 5: table and you're saying, Okay, what arguments do we have 471 00:27:18,680 --> 00:27:23,520 Speaker 5: to make on our side, and lawyers just start spitballing ideas. Okay, 472 00:27:23,560 --> 00:27:26,520 Speaker 5: well we'll claim this, we'll claim that, and then in 473 00:27:26,600 --> 00:27:30,679 Speaker 5: real time lawyers work through and say, I don't know that. 474 00:27:30,760 --> 00:27:33,359 Speaker 5: I buy into that argument very strong. I like this 475 00:27:33,560 --> 00:27:37,520 Speaker 5: argument better. And ultimately, if you read pleadings lawyers all 476 00:27:37,720 --> 00:27:41,439 Speaker 5: oftentimes buck will say we believe X, but if X 477 00:27:41,520 --> 00:27:44,679 Speaker 5: doesn't apply, we believe why, and if why doesn't apply, 478 00:27:44,760 --> 00:27:47,160 Speaker 5: we believe Z applies. In other words, you're throwing out 479 00:27:47,200 --> 00:27:50,200 Speaker 5: all sorts of legal arguments because you're not sure how 480 00:27:50,200 --> 00:27:52,439 Speaker 5: the Court's going to respond to them. And I just 481 00:27:52,560 --> 00:27:56,760 Speaker 5: come back to when they change the law, you can 482 00:27:56,880 --> 00:28:01,680 Speaker 5: argue that this is an expansive, aggressive definition of what 483 00:28:01,720 --> 00:28:04,239 Speaker 5: the vice president's role was. I'm focusing on this in 484 00:28:04,240 --> 00:28:08,080 Speaker 5: particular on jan six, But when they changed the law 485 00:28:08,680 --> 00:28:13,240 Speaker 5: to eliminate any uncertainty, to me, that ends the argument 486 00:28:13,520 --> 00:28:16,520 Speaker 5: that it was an illegitimate argument in the first place, 487 00:28:16,640 --> 00:28:19,280 Speaker 5: because the fact that they had to change the law 488 00:28:19,320 --> 00:28:24,040 Speaker 5: to remove that ambiguity proves that the ambiguity was there 489 00:28:24,119 --> 00:28:27,400 Speaker 5: and that you could make that argument as a legally 490 00:28:27,520 --> 00:28:28,480 Speaker 5: colorable claim. 491 00:28:28,960 --> 00:28:29,400 Speaker 1: Lawyers. 492 00:28:29,400 --> 00:28:34,360 Speaker 5: Here's the other thing, buck, If lawyers make indefensible legal arguments, 493 00:28:34,760 --> 00:28:38,880 Speaker 5: the court can sanction those lawyers. And so far as 494 00:28:38,960 --> 00:28:42,200 Speaker 5: I have seen, I have not seen any of the 495 00:28:42,240 --> 00:28:44,760 Speaker 5: filings that Trump has made, and I'm not an expert 496 00:28:44,800 --> 00:28:48,080 Speaker 5: in all of this, I have not seen all of 497 00:28:48,120 --> 00:28:52,480 Speaker 5: the lawyers being severely reprimanded for the claims that they 498 00:28:52,600 --> 00:28:56,800 Speaker 5: have tried to make. Now, individual Bar associations have gone 499 00:28:56,840 --> 00:29:00,280 Speaker 5: after some of Trump's lawyers, but that's mostly political. They 500 00:29:00,280 --> 00:29:02,760 Speaker 5: tried to go after Rudy Giuliani, They've gone after I mean, 501 00:29:02,840 --> 00:29:07,920 Speaker 5: that's just weaponizing blue states against red attorneys. 502 00:29:08,080 --> 00:29:10,240 Speaker 1: And unfortunately that's become a real thing too. 503 00:29:10,560 --> 00:29:10,720 Speaker 3: Well. 504 00:29:10,760 --> 00:29:13,560 Speaker 2: You'd have to wonder, you know, the take it back 505 00:29:13,600 --> 00:29:17,200 Speaker 2: to a trial that everybody who's certain age remembers and 506 00:29:17,440 --> 00:29:21,880 Speaker 2: pretty clearly OJ's lawyers knew what they were doing wasn't true. 507 00:29:22,520 --> 00:29:24,520 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I mean that's often the job of 508 00:29:24,520 --> 00:29:25,720 Speaker 1: a defense attorney, right. 509 00:29:25,680 --> 00:29:26,760 Speaker 3: They were not idiots. 510 00:29:26,960 --> 00:29:29,880 Speaker 2: They knew what had really happened there, but they gave 511 00:29:30,000 --> 00:29:34,040 Speaker 2: the most vigorous defense they could and they tried anything 512 00:29:34,080 --> 00:29:37,400 Speaker 2: they could within the bounds of the law to get 513 00:29:37,400 --> 00:29:39,720 Speaker 2: their client off. And we all know how that happened. 514 00:29:40,600 --> 00:29:43,000 Speaker 2: You know, I do think you can argue it's unethical. 515 00:29:43,000 --> 00:29:46,960 Speaker 2: I think you can argue it's unseemly, but it's not criminal. 516 00:29:47,200 --> 00:29:49,520 Speaker 2: And that's the thing here is you can say you 517 00:29:49,560 --> 00:29:54,400 Speaker 2: don't like the actions and people. The real test for this, 518 00:29:54,600 --> 00:29:56,719 Speaker 2: or the real punishment should be what did the American 519 00:29:56,760 --> 00:29:59,800 Speaker 2: people think, you know, like in an election. That's how 520 00:29:59,840 --> 00:30:03,160 Speaker 2: they should be adjudicated, not trying to throw people in prison. 521 00:30:03,400 --> 00:30:03,800 Speaker 1: No doubt. 522 00:30:03,800 --> 00:30:07,800 Speaker 5: Buckin And I'll also mention Joe Biden himself has gotten 523 00:30:07,840 --> 00:30:10,880 Speaker 5: slapped down by the Supreme Court a lot for legal 524 00:30:10,920 --> 00:30:14,640 Speaker 5: theories that he has advanced, including legal theories that he 525 00:30:14,760 --> 00:30:19,400 Speaker 5: himself said he knew was unconstitutional. Remember the eviction moratorium. 526 00:30:19,800 --> 00:30:22,400 Speaker 5: Biden said, oh, well, the Supreme Court's not going to 527 00:30:22,400 --> 00:30:24,800 Speaker 5: allow us to do this. We don't have the authority. 528 00:30:25,160 --> 00:30:29,640 Speaker 5: What about student loan forgiveness? Nancy Pelosi said Joe Biden 529 00:30:29,720 --> 00:30:32,240 Speaker 5: didn't have the authority to do it. The president can't 530 00:30:32,280 --> 00:30:37,440 Speaker 5: just act. In other words, the Supreme Court regularly says 531 00:30:37,480 --> 00:30:40,800 Speaker 5: to the President of the United States, you have done 532 00:30:40,880 --> 00:30:46,280 Speaker 5: something that is unconstitutional. Under Jack Smith's definition, if you 533 00:30:46,440 --> 00:30:50,280 Speaker 5: engaged in illegal argument that you think is unlikely to win, 534 00:30:50,520 --> 00:30:53,760 Speaker 5: maybe even that you have publicly said you expect to lose. 535 00:30:54,360 --> 00:30:58,560 Speaker 5: That's a conspiracy to defraud the American people. It's just 536 00:30:58,920 --> 00:31:02,480 Speaker 5: it is a broken case on its inception. 537 00:31:03,280 --> 00:31:06,840 Speaker 2: Problem though with all of this is let's just assume, 538 00:31:07,480 --> 00:31:09,320 Speaker 2: because it's almost always the case that you and I 539 00:31:09,400 --> 00:31:11,600 Speaker 2: are right in our overall view of this. Right, let's 540 00:31:11,640 --> 00:31:14,360 Speaker 2: assume that the legality of this and so many other 541 00:31:14,440 --> 00:31:17,400 Speaker 2: We're gonna have any McCarthy on later. You know, I 542 00:31:17,440 --> 00:31:20,239 Speaker 2: know Dershowitz was on Glenn Show this morning, and you 543 00:31:20,280 --> 00:31:23,120 Speaker 2: have all the Jonathan Turley I saw his quotes last night. 544 00:31:23,160 --> 00:31:24,920 Speaker 3: When this broke, people are saying. 545 00:31:24,680 --> 00:31:28,320 Speaker 2: This, this is just it's flimsy, especially for going after 546 00:31:28,760 --> 00:31:30,720 Speaker 2: somebody who's running for president right now. 547 00:31:31,480 --> 00:31:33,240 Speaker 3: The process is still the punishment. Clay. 548 00:31:33,320 --> 00:31:36,320 Speaker 2: Yeah, let's take a look at the politics of this 549 00:31:36,400 --> 00:31:37,960 Speaker 2: and a second here we come back. What does it 550 00:31:38,040 --> 00:31:41,680 Speaker 2: mean for the Trump campaign, What does it mean for 551 00:31:41,760 --> 00:31:44,560 Speaker 2: Biden's hopes of reelection, looking at this more from the 552 00:31:44,560 --> 00:31:47,200 Speaker 2: political than the legal lens. And then we will let 553 00:31:47,200 --> 00:31:51,440 Speaker 2: Clay go back to his vacation and his family. I said, Clay, 554 00:31:51,440 --> 00:31:53,640 Speaker 2: it's okay, You're allowed to take vacation. He's like, the 555 00:31:53,680 --> 00:31:57,000 Speaker 2: people need me, I said, sir, I agree, we got you. 556 00:31:57,120 --> 00:31:57,600 Speaker 3: So he's here. 557 00:31:57,680 --> 00:31:59,480 Speaker 2: We'll come back to him in just a second born 558 00:31:59,520 --> 00:32:02,080 Speaker 2: on America's darkest day of nine to eleven. The Talta 559 00:32:02,120 --> 00:32:05,680 Speaker 2: Towers Foundation has been supporting heroes who risk life and 560 00:32:05,720 --> 00:32:08,600 Speaker 2: limb in the line of duty ever since. Detective Joseph 561 00:32:08,680 --> 00:32:11,600 Speaker 2: Seal served in the Jersey City, New Jersey Police Department 562 00:32:11,640 --> 00:32:14,680 Speaker 2: for thirteen years. He worked with a city ceasefire unit, 563 00:32:14,720 --> 00:32:17,640 Speaker 2: where he helped get dozens of illegal guns off the streets. 564 00:32:17,920 --> 00:32:20,480 Speaker 2: He was shot and killed during a confrontation with armed 565 00:32:20,480 --> 00:32:24,240 Speaker 2: gunmen in twenty nineteen, just days before Christmas. He left 566 00:32:24,240 --> 00:32:27,960 Speaker 2: behind his wife, Laura, and five children. Tunala Towers immediately 567 00:32:28,000 --> 00:32:30,800 Speaker 2: paid off the family's mortgage. To date, the foundation has 568 00:32:30,840 --> 00:32:33,720 Speaker 2: delivered over one thousand mortgage free homes to our country, 569 00:32:33,760 --> 00:32:38,160 Speaker 2: severely injured veterans and first responders, homeless veterans, gold Star families, 570 00:32:38,160 --> 00:32:41,640 Speaker 2: and fallen first responder families. Talenta Towers gives hope to 571 00:32:41,720 --> 00:32:45,440 Speaker 2: families thanks to your generosity, joined Tanta Towers on its 572 00:32:45,440 --> 00:32:48,880 Speaker 2: mission to do good and never forget the sacrifices of 573 00:32:48,920 --> 00:32:52,720 Speaker 2: America's greatest heroes. Join me in donating eleven dollars a 574 00:32:52,720 --> 00:32:55,160 Speaker 2: month the Talata Towers at T two t dot org. 575 00:32:55,560 --> 00:32:58,240 Speaker 3: That's t the number two t dot org. 576 00:32:59,160 --> 00:33:03,200 Speaker 5: The Clay and Buck podcast team dives with cool content 577 00:33:03,400 --> 00:33:06,600 Speaker 5: surprise guests. Get it all on the iHeart app or 578 00:33:06,640 --> 00:33:09,760 Speaker 5: wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome back in I'm off 579 00:33:09,800 --> 00:33:12,360 Speaker 5: my vacation. You hear me break down everything with Buck. 580 00:33:12,400 --> 00:33:15,040 Speaker 5: I couldn't resist. Every time I go on vacation we 581 00:33:15,160 --> 00:33:19,040 Speaker 5: end up with these indictments. It feels like, all right, Buck, Politically, 582 00:33:19,080 --> 00:33:22,520 Speaker 5: you just teased it as we went to break for me. 583 00:33:22,840 --> 00:33:25,880 Speaker 5: On a political level, I actually don't think this changes 584 00:33:26,000 --> 00:33:28,760 Speaker 5: very much, and I think the story will vanish because 585 00:33:28,800 --> 00:33:32,640 Speaker 5: there isn't any major new revelation, and so I think 586 00:33:32,680 --> 00:33:35,800 Speaker 5: what it does is it strengthens Trump in the Republican primary, 587 00:33:35,840 --> 00:33:38,600 Speaker 5: makes it even more likely that he's the nominee, and 588 00:33:39,080 --> 00:33:42,640 Speaker 5: simultaneously the Democrats believe weaken him in the general. 589 00:33:43,000 --> 00:33:44,880 Speaker 1: We'll see whether that ends up being true. 590 00:33:44,880 --> 00:33:47,680 Speaker 5: As we talked about earlier this week, CNN even acknowledged 591 00:33:47,960 --> 00:33:50,360 Speaker 5: that Trump is in a stronger position right now than 592 00:33:50,360 --> 00:33:53,680 Speaker 5: he was during the twenty sixteen or twenty twenty campaign 593 00:33:54,000 --> 00:33:55,840 Speaker 5: at the same time as in the cycle. What's your 594 00:33:55,840 --> 00:33:57,920 Speaker 5: big takeaway politically, I. 595 00:33:57,840 --> 00:34:00,520 Speaker 2: Think that this is going to be the the big 596 00:34:00,600 --> 00:34:03,920 Speaker 2: test of the theory that's out there that Democrats want 597 00:34:04,000 --> 00:34:05,840 Speaker 2: Trump to win the primary and they think they can 598 00:34:05,880 --> 00:34:08,120 Speaker 2: defeat him in the general. I think that based on 599 00:34:08,239 --> 00:34:11,400 Speaker 2: the flimsy nature of this, And remember when we say 600 00:34:11,440 --> 00:34:15,360 Speaker 2: that that is their calculation, you can think their calculation 601 00:34:15,560 --> 00:34:17,960 Speaker 2: is wrong, and I think a lot of us do, 602 00:34:18,560 --> 00:34:20,040 Speaker 2: But that I think is what. 603 00:34:19,960 --> 00:34:22,000 Speaker 3: The Democrats are gearing up for. 604 00:34:22,719 --> 00:34:25,480 Speaker 2: And I just say that they don't think that they 605 00:34:25,520 --> 00:34:29,640 Speaker 2: have to win in court to beat him in the election, 606 00:34:29,840 --> 00:34:32,520 Speaker 2: which is the single most important thing to them. These 607 00:34:32,600 --> 00:34:35,840 Speaker 2: criminal trials they believe will help them in the general. 608 00:34:36,200 --> 00:34:38,960 Speaker 2: I think that's very I think it's very hard to 609 00:34:39,040 --> 00:34:42,120 Speaker 2: argue against that right now from the Democrat mindset. 610 00:34:42,440 --> 00:34:44,919 Speaker 5: I also think politically, and we talked about this when 611 00:34:44,960 --> 00:34:47,239 Speaker 5: the indictment came down in New York City, and when 612 00:34:47,239 --> 00:34:50,839 Speaker 5: the indictment certainly came down in South Florida. This is 613 00:34:51,360 --> 00:34:56,880 Speaker 5: the full culmination of I believe, the destruction of a reasoned, 614 00:34:57,120 --> 00:35:01,600 Speaker 5: logical and fair judicial system in this country, in particular 615 00:35:01,640 --> 00:35:04,480 Speaker 5: the Department of Justice itself. We've never seen anything like this. 616 00:35:04,840 --> 00:35:07,759 Speaker 5: When I see the weakness of these charges that are 617 00:35:07,760 --> 00:35:11,279 Speaker 5: being brought against Trump, I can't help but think this 618 00:35:11,480 --> 00:35:14,640 Speaker 5: is now the new normal in America. Maybe Republicans are 619 00:35:14,680 --> 00:35:17,000 Speaker 5: not going to do it, but if you charge Trump 620 00:35:17,080 --> 00:35:20,920 Speaker 5: under these conspiracy charges, you could charge any politician in 621 00:35:21,000 --> 00:35:24,920 Speaker 5: America just about with any kind of conspiracy charge. Because 622 00:35:25,120 --> 00:35:29,319 Speaker 5: there's always legal advisors who disagree, and always presidents who 623 00:35:29,320 --> 00:35:32,200 Speaker 5: are going to push their executive power to the limit. 624 00:35:32,520 --> 00:35:35,759 Speaker 2: It's always Democrats who end up pushing this stuff. I 625 00:35:35,800 --> 00:35:39,520 Speaker 2: think of the honest services fraud prosecutions that they've tried 626 00:35:39,520 --> 00:35:42,400 Speaker 2: in the past, which are so expensive, Supreme Court had 627 00:35:42,400 --> 00:35:45,440 Speaker 2: to totally strike them down, so expansive as to be 628 00:35:45,480 --> 00:35:49,719 Speaker 2: effectively meaningless, Like anything could be considered an intrusion. I 629 00:35:49,719 --> 00:35:52,160 Speaker 2: think Scalia actually said in one of his decisions, So 630 00:35:52,200 --> 00:35:54,240 Speaker 2: if someone gives you a good table at a restaurant 631 00:35:54,280 --> 00:35:56,759 Speaker 2: because you're the CEO of a company, is that can 632 00:35:56,760 --> 00:35:59,240 Speaker 2: not be considered honest services fraud to the APT customer. 633 00:35:59,400 --> 00:36:02,080 Speaker 2: The whole thing is but really here, Clay. It also 634 00:36:02,120 --> 00:36:05,279 Speaker 2: sends a message, which is the lengths that the Democrats 635 00:36:05,360 --> 00:36:08,440 Speaker 2: are willing to go to to get somebody who challenges 636 00:36:08,480 --> 00:36:10,320 Speaker 2: them the way that Trump has. They will do anything. 637 00:36:10,320 --> 00:36:12,239 Speaker 2: They will cut down all the laws of the nation. 638 00:36:12,360 --> 00:36:13,000 Speaker 2: They don't care. 639 00:36:13,200 --> 00:36:16,160 Speaker 5: I think that's one hundred percent right. And to your 640 00:36:16,200 --> 00:36:18,640 Speaker 5: point on is there more, I mean, I'm in Atlanta 641 00:36:18,719 --> 00:36:21,520 Speaker 5: right now. I think there probably will be charges in Atlanta. 642 00:36:21,760 --> 00:36:23,800 Speaker 5: The goal will be to keep Trump in the courtroom 643 00:36:23,840 --> 00:36:25,960 Speaker 5: throughout twenty twenty four and try to brand him as a. 644 00:36:25,960 --> 00:36:28,600 Speaker 2: Felon the question to our people are going to rally, 645 00:36:29,000 --> 00:36:31,399 Speaker 2: it's our people, it's you know, we hop we all 646 00:36:31,400 --> 00:36:33,440 Speaker 2: hop in the bunker with them, right. You know what 647 00:36:33,480 --> 00:36:36,520 Speaker 2: Democrats are thinking, Independence and swing states are going to 648 00:36:36,560 --> 00:36:39,200 Speaker 2: see a lot of Trump walking around courtrooms. That's what 649 00:36:39,239 --> 00:36:39,800 Speaker 2: they're thinking. 650 00:36:40,080 --> 00:36:42,759 Speaker 5: That's the calculus, and we'll see whether or not it 651 00:36:42,840 --> 00:36:46,439 Speaker 5: ends up being true. I hope everybody has a fantastic week. 652 00:36:46,440 --> 00:36:49,920 Speaker 5: I'm back with the family now, Buck keep the ship afloat. 653 00:36:50,160 --> 00:36:52,040 Speaker 2: I will do my best. No keg parties that go 654 00:36:52,120 --> 00:36:54,040 Speaker 2: past two am. See you guys an hour two In 655 00:36:54,080 --> 00:36:54,480 Speaker 2: a second,