1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:02,320 Speaker 1: But knowledge to work and grow your business with c 2 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:06,680 Speaker 1: i T from transportation to healthcare to manufacturing. C i 3 00:00:06,760 --> 00:00:10,520 Speaker 1: T offers commercial lending, leasing, and treasury management services for 4 00:00:10,600 --> 00:00:13,480 Speaker 1: small and middle market businesses. Learn more at c i 5 00:00:13,560 --> 00:00:23,680 Speaker 1: T dot com put Knowledge to Work. Welcome to add thoughts. 6 00:00:23,760 --> 00:00:27,400 Speaker 1: I'm Tracy Alloway, executive editor of Bloomberg Markets. My co 7 00:00:27,560 --> 00:00:31,600 Speaker 1: host Joe Wisenthal is away this week, but never fear 8 00:00:31,840 --> 00:00:34,680 Speaker 1: because his absence means we are about to geek out 9 00:00:34,880 --> 00:00:38,720 Speaker 1: on some of the most financing things of all things 10 00:00:38,840 --> 00:00:42,760 Speaker 1: in finance. So today joining me, we have a former 11 00:00:42,800 --> 00:00:46,960 Speaker 1: banker and corporate treasurer. He's also an all round derivatives expert. 12 00:00:47,320 --> 00:00:49,960 Speaker 1: He is the author of one of my all time 13 00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:53,440 Speaker 1: favorite finance books, Traders, Guns and Money. I am talking, 14 00:00:53,479 --> 00:00:58,400 Speaker 1: of course, about Showtujit das Uh. He actually has a 15 00:00:58,400 --> 00:01:01,040 Speaker 1: new book out, but you are going to be talking 16 00:01:01,080 --> 00:01:05,160 Speaker 1: about something much broader than that. The topic of today's 17 00:01:05,240 --> 00:01:09,399 Speaker 1: podcast was inspired by a recent column by my Bloomberg 18 00:01:09,440 --> 00:01:13,240 Speaker 1: colleague Noah Smith. His column was called How Finance took 19 00:01:13,319 --> 00:01:17,479 Speaker 1: Over the Economy. Dass has previously spoken about the financialization 20 00:01:17,520 --> 00:01:20,520 Speaker 1: of the world economy. Many of his books are full 21 00:01:20,600 --> 00:01:23,959 Speaker 1: of specific examples of this. But we are not just 22 00:01:24,080 --> 00:01:27,479 Speaker 1: going to talk about financialization of the economy. We are 23 00:01:27,600 --> 00:01:31,760 Speaker 1: also going to talk about the financialization in markets and 24 00:01:31,840 --> 00:01:35,399 Speaker 1: monetary policy, and that is of course one of the 25 00:01:35,480 --> 00:01:39,120 Speaker 1: big big questions for investors at the moment. So Das, 26 00:01:39,120 --> 00:01:41,880 Speaker 1: thank you so much for joining us today. It's my pleasure. 27 00:01:42,319 --> 00:01:45,480 Speaker 1: All right. Maybe just to begin, we should start by 28 00:01:45,520 --> 00:01:50,000 Speaker 1: defining our terms and talk about what we mean when 29 00:01:50,040 --> 00:01:54,120 Speaker 1: we say financialization. Well, that's a very very difficult question. 30 00:01:54,840 --> 00:01:57,600 Speaker 1: I think it's a bit like trying to define a smile, 31 00:01:58,120 --> 00:02:01,640 Speaker 1: because I think it was us who once said a 32 00:02:01,760 --> 00:02:04,160 Speaker 1: smile is the drawing back and slight lifting of the 33 00:02:04,200 --> 00:02:07,640 Speaker 1: corners of the mouth, which partially uncovered the teeth. So 34 00:02:07,680 --> 00:02:10,600 Speaker 1: I think financialization is a little bit like that, and 35 00:02:10,760 --> 00:02:13,760 Speaker 1: I have seen many people struggle with that. So I 36 00:02:13,840 --> 00:02:17,639 Speaker 1: actually tend to think about its manifestations, and I think 37 00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:20,919 Speaker 1: there's a few of them which are very important. One 38 00:02:20,960 --> 00:02:24,040 Speaker 1: which is obviously very topical, which is the use of 39 00:02:24,120 --> 00:02:29,400 Speaker 1: debt to drive financial and economic activity. The second is 40 00:02:29,680 --> 00:02:32,240 Speaker 1: which actually has become topical again is the size of 41 00:02:32,240 --> 00:02:35,600 Speaker 1: the financial sector and how large that is relative to 42 00:02:35,600 --> 00:02:39,400 Speaker 1: the real economy. And this is the whole idea, which 43 00:02:39,440 --> 00:02:43,800 Speaker 1: is a third point that instead of using traditional ways 44 00:02:43,840 --> 00:02:47,840 Speaker 1: to drive the economy, which is things like innovation, productivity, 45 00:02:48,040 --> 00:02:52,400 Speaker 1: new markets, we now start to use financial techniques or 46 00:02:52,440 --> 00:02:57,440 Speaker 1: financial engineering rather than real engineering to try to create growth, 47 00:02:57,600 --> 00:03:00,880 Speaker 1: wealth and prosperity. And the last one is an excessive 48 00:03:00,919 --> 00:03:07,480 Speaker 1: reliance I suppose on financial techniques and instruments, And maybe 49 00:03:07,560 --> 00:03:12,480 Speaker 1: underlying all of that is the increased emphasis on not 50 00:03:12,600 --> 00:03:16,960 Speaker 1: the real economy but just creating and trading financial claims 51 00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:19,280 Speaker 1: of different types on them. And the best way to 52 00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:21,480 Speaker 1: describe it as you and I are creatures of that 53 00:03:22,120 --> 00:03:24,440 Speaker 1: because at an earlier age we might have been useful 54 00:03:24,520 --> 00:03:27,320 Speaker 1: and worked in real industry instead of which we keep 55 00:03:27,400 --> 00:03:32,079 Speaker 1: talking about financialization. Oh wow, um, you went there. Okay, Well, 56 00:03:32,160 --> 00:03:34,120 Speaker 1: I'm going to turn this back on you. You have 57 00:03:34,240 --> 00:03:37,240 Speaker 1: a long career as a banker and a trader. Was 58 00:03:37,280 --> 00:03:41,000 Speaker 1: there a particular moment in time that you can remember 59 00:03:41,080 --> 00:03:45,280 Speaker 1: thinking that financialization was a thing, or that the finance 60 00:03:45,320 --> 00:03:49,800 Speaker 1: industry had grown too big, or that financial engineering was 61 00:03:49,840 --> 00:03:52,400 Speaker 1: starting to get a little bit weird? Well, I think 62 00:03:52,720 --> 00:03:55,320 Speaker 1: I think there was never one magic moment in all 63 00:03:55,360 --> 00:03:57,760 Speaker 1: of this, but I realized there was something very odd 64 00:03:57,880 --> 00:04:00,720 Speaker 1: when I used to be a corporate treasurer, and in 65 00:04:00,760 --> 00:04:04,160 Speaker 1: those days it was fashionable to run corporate treasuries as 66 00:04:04,600 --> 00:04:10,240 Speaker 1: profit centers. That's something that's fallen into disrepute recently. But 67 00:04:10,880 --> 00:04:14,840 Speaker 1: in a particular year, we made more money than the 68 00:04:14,880 --> 00:04:20,279 Speaker 1: real business, which was to me a sign of considerable 69 00:04:20,760 --> 00:04:25,760 Speaker 1: alarm in the sense that we were a transport company, 70 00:04:26,200 --> 00:04:30,440 Speaker 1: but the financial jiggery, pokery and pettifoggery that we were 71 00:04:30,480 --> 00:04:34,520 Speaker 1: doing was actually creating more wealth then the business of 72 00:04:34,560 --> 00:04:39,159 Speaker 1: shifting parcels around the world, which I didn't think was healthy. 73 00:04:39,320 --> 00:04:41,560 Speaker 1: And the other thing I supposed was earlier in my 74 00:04:41,680 --> 00:04:44,919 Speaker 1: life when I used to work in banking, and I remember, 75 00:04:46,240 --> 00:04:50,240 Speaker 1: with some degree of shame, actually thinking that my bonus 76 00:04:50,320 --> 00:04:55,040 Speaker 1: in one year was more than the earnings that my father, 77 00:04:55,120 --> 00:05:00,200 Speaker 1: who was a mechanical engineer, had earned over probably really 78 00:05:01,160 --> 00:05:04,120 Speaker 1: a decade, or probably more than that. And I thought 79 00:05:04,160 --> 00:05:08,040 Speaker 1: there was something I suppose wrong with the world, which 80 00:05:08,080 --> 00:05:13,800 Speaker 1: actually looks at that type of evaluation relatives. Wow, this 81 00:05:13,920 --> 00:05:17,680 Speaker 1: podcast is turning into a big guilt trip for finance workers. 82 00:05:17,839 --> 00:05:19,960 Speaker 1: But tell me, how do you think we got to 83 00:05:20,040 --> 00:05:23,480 Speaker 1: this point in time where a trader, someone like yourself 84 00:05:23,560 --> 00:05:26,520 Speaker 1: can earn more than a mechanical engineer in a single year. 85 00:05:28,040 --> 00:05:30,039 Speaker 1: I think there's several aspects to it. I don't think 86 00:05:30,040 --> 00:05:32,479 Speaker 1: it's actually any one thing. I think you have to 87 00:05:32,480 --> 00:05:35,560 Speaker 1: go back to the seventies, and in the seventies, you 88 00:05:35,600 --> 00:05:38,520 Speaker 1: remember we had a period of stagflation, which is a 89 00:05:38,640 --> 00:05:42,720 Speaker 1: period of high inflation and high unemployment and low growth. 90 00:05:42,880 --> 00:05:46,039 Speaker 1: And at that point in time, I think the economic 91 00:05:46,080 --> 00:05:50,080 Speaker 1: policymakers and political leaders were experimenting with the different ways 92 00:05:50,880 --> 00:05:56,960 Speaker 1: of breaking out of the traditional Keensian dominated mixed economy, 93 00:05:57,120 --> 00:06:01,760 Speaker 1: and people like Milton Friedman and basically Frederick Hike became 94 00:06:01,920 --> 00:06:05,360 Speaker 1: very popular, mainly because politicians kept quoting them, despite the 95 00:06:05,400 --> 00:06:07,159 Speaker 1: fact that none of them had the slightest idea of 96 00:06:07,200 --> 00:06:11,359 Speaker 1: what their principles or policies or theories were. And what 97 00:06:11,560 --> 00:06:14,279 Speaker 1: that did was deregulate a number of key industries. And 98 00:06:14,320 --> 00:06:17,719 Speaker 1: one of those key industries that had actually deregulated was finance, 99 00:06:18,720 --> 00:06:22,560 Speaker 1: and that set off the whole series of things, including 100 00:06:23,040 --> 00:06:25,880 Speaker 1: the rise of the financial sector, the growth of debt, 101 00:06:26,440 --> 00:06:30,480 Speaker 1: and obviously the entire process of financial engineering that went on. 102 00:06:31,320 --> 00:06:34,200 Speaker 1: And I think that was very successful, and that grew 103 00:06:34,240 --> 00:06:39,560 Speaker 1: the economy. So that created that self reinforcing sort of dialectic, 104 00:06:40,080 --> 00:06:43,200 Speaker 1: which is that this must be good. And I think 105 00:06:43,240 --> 00:06:48,240 Speaker 1: that effectively started a process which has different sort of strands, 106 00:06:48,320 --> 00:06:52,680 Speaker 1: one of which is what Emmanuel Derman called the POWs, 107 00:06:52,760 --> 00:06:56,799 Speaker 1: the physicists on Wall Street. I actually called them actually 108 00:06:56,960 --> 00:06:58,919 Speaker 1: prisoners of Wall Street, because once you get there and 109 00:06:58,960 --> 00:07:01,800 Speaker 1: get paid that you can never lead. But essentially what 110 00:07:01,920 --> 00:07:05,839 Speaker 1: happened was industry was dying, the bell labs were shutting down, 111 00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:10,720 Speaker 1: some major science based projects were shutting down, to talent 112 00:07:11,360 --> 00:07:15,400 Speaker 1: basically moved away from real industry into the financial industry, 113 00:07:15,400 --> 00:07:19,080 Speaker 1: which was getting started. And the other thing which I 114 00:07:19,120 --> 00:07:25,480 Speaker 1: think people underestimate in terms of the importance of one 115 00:07:25,520 --> 00:07:30,080 Speaker 1: element of finance, which is actually drives financialization, is I 116 00:07:30,120 --> 00:07:34,040 Speaker 1: don't know if any industry in which you can actually 117 00:07:34,080 --> 00:07:38,280 Speaker 1: attribute earnings or at least choose to attribute earnings as 118 00:07:38,360 --> 00:07:44,080 Speaker 1: accurately to individual activities and therefore link directly rewards to 119 00:07:44,200 --> 00:07:47,000 Speaker 1: those achievements. And that's a huge element. If you work 120 00:07:47,080 --> 00:07:49,120 Speaker 1: for a large company building a motor car, there are 121 00:07:49,160 --> 00:07:52,360 Speaker 1: so many little bits to it, who actually takes credit 122 00:07:52,440 --> 00:07:54,640 Speaker 1: for it. But if you make a trade which makes 123 00:07:54,640 --> 00:07:56,680 Speaker 1: a lot of money, it's much more easily to attribute 124 00:07:56,960 --> 00:08:01,240 Speaker 1: the success to an individual. So it felt like we 125 00:08:01,320 --> 00:08:04,000 Speaker 1: did get close to a moment in two thousand and 126 00:08:04,040 --> 00:08:07,679 Speaker 1: eight where the world could have woken up and said, 127 00:08:07,800 --> 00:08:11,280 Speaker 1: wait a second, all this financialization, whether it be in 128 00:08:11,360 --> 00:08:14,960 Speaker 1: terms of products like derivatives or in terms of growth 129 00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:18,680 Speaker 1: generated through the accumulation of debt, this is not a 130 00:08:18,720 --> 00:08:21,520 Speaker 1: good thing, and it's bound to end in tears. But 131 00:08:21,640 --> 00:08:25,040 Speaker 1: it feels like we actually kind of moved away from that. 132 00:08:25,120 --> 00:08:28,760 Speaker 1: It feels like, if anything, we've sort of continued with 133 00:08:28,760 --> 00:08:33,400 Speaker 1: our financial engineering. Well, I think fundamentally our problem is 134 00:08:33,559 --> 00:08:35,959 Speaker 1: a different one, which is we are addicted to growth 135 00:08:36,600 --> 00:08:39,760 Speaker 1: and we can't conceive of a world without growth. And 136 00:08:39,840 --> 00:08:43,680 Speaker 1: particularly after two thousand and eight, we had an additional problem. 137 00:08:43,920 --> 00:08:46,120 Speaker 1: We recognized that we had too much debt in the world, 138 00:08:46,480 --> 00:08:49,160 Speaker 1: and the only way you actually reduced debt in a 139 00:08:49,240 --> 00:08:52,680 Speaker 1: meaningful sense is through growth and inflation. So we needed 140 00:08:52,720 --> 00:08:58,360 Speaker 1: things which created that growth and inflation and the elements 141 00:08:58,360 --> 00:09:01,160 Speaker 1: of the real economy, because what lives growth really is 142 00:09:01,200 --> 00:09:05,360 Speaker 1: things like population, new markets, productivity, and innovation. Those things 143 00:09:05,360 --> 00:09:09,320 Speaker 1: are very difficult to engineer on demand, certainly within the 144 00:09:09,520 --> 00:09:13,680 Speaker 1: life of a political leader. And remember political processes have 145 00:09:13,760 --> 00:09:17,920 Speaker 1: quite short lifespans because you have to run for office regularly, 146 00:09:18,440 --> 00:09:22,160 Speaker 1: So everybody was looking around for something to do. And 147 00:09:22,520 --> 00:09:27,280 Speaker 1: essentially the financial leavers, which is budget deficits, let's get 148 00:09:27,400 --> 00:09:30,760 Speaker 1: interest rate, let's do que or move on to something 149 00:09:30,800 --> 00:09:36,080 Speaker 1: more adventurous like helicopter money, was far more I suppose 150 00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:40,640 Speaker 1: attractive to people with those shorter term horizons. And I 151 00:09:40,679 --> 00:09:44,839 Speaker 1: think that's what actually happened, and nobody really sat down 152 00:09:44,960 --> 00:09:48,000 Speaker 1: and looked very, very clearly at what the causes of 153 00:09:48,040 --> 00:09:50,160 Speaker 1: the problems of two thousand and eight are. I'll give 154 00:09:50,200 --> 00:09:52,680 Speaker 1: you one example. You know we talked about de leveraging 155 00:09:52,720 --> 00:09:55,800 Speaker 1: in terms of debt. Debt is increased by over fifty 156 00:09:55,840 --> 00:09:58,840 Speaker 1: seven trillion dollars between two thousand and seven and two 157 00:09:58,880 --> 00:10:03,199 Speaker 1: thousand fourteen. Now we know the world has actually grown 158 00:10:03,240 --> 00:10:05,280 Speaker 1: in terms of GDP as well, but if you take 159 00:10:05,320 --> 00:10:08,520 Speaker 1: it as a percentage of GDP, world debt has grown 160 00:10:08,520 --> 00:10:12,720 Speaker 1: by seventeen percentage points, and most alarmingly, places like China 161 00:10:12,880 --> 00:10:16,040 Speaker 1: have gone from seven trillion dollars in debt in two 162 00:10:16,040 --> 00:10:19,600 Speaker 1: thousand and seven to well over twenty eight trillion dollars 163 00:10:19,600 --> 00:10:22,480 Speaker 1: of debt today, and even despite the fact that their 164 00:10:22,480 --> 00:10:25,200 Speaker 1: economy has grown quite a lot during that period. It's 165 00:10:25,240 --> 00:10:28,240 Speaker 1: almost doubled as a percentage of GDP. So we went 166 00:10:28,320 --> 00:10:32,080 Speaker 1: for the easy solution, and and to some extent, I 167 00:10:32,120 --> 00:10:34,800 Speaker 1: can understand why people chose that, because they didn't want 168 00:10:34,800 --> 00:10:39,480 Speaker 1: a sudden curtailment of activity. But there's a problem with 169 00:10:39,640 --> 00:10:42,319 Speaker 1: debt driven growth, which is what they're trying to do, 170 00:10:43,040 --> 00:10:45,280 Speaker 1: which is that the moment you turn off the debt tabs, 171 00:10:45,320 --> 00:10:49,319 Speaker 1: growth stops as well. So this is the classic heroin addiction, 172 00:10:50,000 --> 00:10:52,920 Speaker 1: where you need to take larger and larger doses to 173 00:10:52,960 --> 00:10:56,440 Speaker 1: get the same effect, and that obviously traps you in 174 00:10:56,520 --> 00:10:59,760 Speaker 1: a number of things. For instance, now were now trapped 175 00:10:59,760 --> 00:11:03,120 Speaker 1: in a position where we can't actually increase interest rates 176 00:11:03,160 --> 00:11:06,720 Speaker 1: or normalize interest rates because that would bring the house 177 00:11:06,760 --> 00:11:09,680 Speaker 1: of cards down. So what we've seen is, I suppose 178 00:11:10,120 --> 00:11:16,800 Speaker 1: the financialization of economic policy with some I suppose problematic outcomes. 179 00:11:18,080 --> 00:11:20,520 Speaker 1: All right, we're going to take a quick break for 180 00:11:20,600 --> 00:11:28,400 Speaker 1: a word from our sponsor. But knowledge to work and 181 00:11:28,440 --> 00:11:31,760 Speaker 1: grow your business with c i T from transportation to 182 00:11:31,840 --> 00:11:35,840 Speaker 1: healthcare to manufacturing. C i T offers commercial lending, leasing, 183 00:11:35,880 --> 00:11:39,520 Speaker 1: and treasury management services for small and middle market businesses 184 00:11:39,760 --> 00:11:42,400 Speaker 1: learn more at c I T dot com put knowledge 185 00:11:42,440 --> 00:11:47,319 Speaker 1: to work. We are back with shot Das. We are 186 00:11:47,320 --> 00:11:51,800 Speaker 1: talking about the financialization of the economy, of markets, of 187 00:11:51,880 --> 00:11:58,160 Speaker 1: monetary policy. So Das, I'm wondering, you know, policymakers were 188 00:11:58,160 --> 00:12:01,440 Speaker 1: in a tough spot after two an eight. I know 189 00:12:01,559 --> 00:12:04,200 Speaker 1: they used quie and we can argue that that increase 190 00:12:04,280 --> 00:12:07,240 Speaker 1: the debt burden and it hasn't been successful at least 191 00:12:07,320 --> 00:12:10,199 Speaker 1: yet in terms of generating inflation. Have there been any 192 00:12:10,280 --> 00:12:14,760 Speaker 1: benefits to those sorts of medicines. Sure it bought time, 193 00:12:15,240 --> 00:12:18,520 Speaker 1: and I think the crucial thing was that politically nobody 194 00:12:18,559 --> 00:12:22,839 Speaker 1: could accept the actual sort of collapse of demand and 195 00:12:22,920 --> 00:12:26,840 Speaker 1: activity that may take place as a result of just 196 00:12:26,920 --> 00:12:30,560 Speaker 1: called turking the cure, I suppose. But the problem with 197 00:12:30,640 --> 00:12:34,760 Speaker 1: buying time is you have to use it properly. And 198 00:12:34,840 --> 00:12:37,040 Speaker 1: there's a very famous line in Shakespeare and Richard the 199 00:12:37,080 --> 00:12:39,920 Speaker 1: third I think it is I wasted time, and now 200 00:12:40,040 --> 00:12:43,280 Speaker 1: time wastes me. And so we wasted that time because 201 00:12:43,320 --> 00:12:46,400 Speaker 1: we did not look at the real issues of re 202 00:12:47,040 --> 00:12:52,000 Speaker 1: engineering our economies away from financialization, away from debt, focusing 203 00:12:52,080 --> 00:12:56,000 Speaker 1: on the things we actually needed to do. And so 204 00:12:56,040 --> 00:13:00,640 Speaker 1: that opportunity has now been wasted, and during problem we've 205 00:13:00,720 --> 00:13:04,760 Speaker 1: multiplied the debt and all sorts of other issues, which 206 00:13:04,840 --> 00:13:08,599 Speaker 1: leads us now down a path which is very difficult 207 00:13:08,679 --> 00:13:11,760 Speaker 1: to reverse. And that's the real issue. So yeah, there 208 00:13:11,760 --> 00:13:15,960 Speaker 1: were benefits, but ultimately I don't think that was the 209 00:13:16,040 --> 00:13:19,080 Speaker 1: right decision. I'll give you an idea of how ridiculous 210 00:13:19,160 --> 00:13:21,640 Speaker 1: the argument gets. We're not talking about negative interest rates, 211 00:13:21,640 --> 00:13:25,760 Speaker 1: which is kind of a strange, surreal world. And let's 212 00:13:25,760 --> 00:13:27,600 Speaker 1: have a look at if you want to have negative 213 00:13:27,640 --> 00:13:31,080 Speaker 1: interest rates, the kind of arguments you put up in 214 00:13:31,160 --> 00:13:34,560 Speaker 1: support of it. Now, first thing, low interest rates haven't works. 215 00:13:34,600 --> 00:13:37,560 Speaker 1: I'm not quite sure why negative interest rates will necessarily 216 00:13:37,720 --> 00:13:41,920 Speaker 1: work much better. But then what happens is if you 217 00:13:41,960 --> 00:13:45,000 Speaker 1: have negative interest rates, look at the sort of side 218 00:13:45,000 --> 00:13:47,520 Speaker 1: effects of that. What is you undermine the profitability of 219 00:13:47,520 --> 00:13:50,240 Speaker 1: the banking system. And what happens is people just take 220 00:13:50,280 --> 00:13:52,520 Speaker 1: their money out, because why would you leave money in 221 00:13:52,800 --> 00:13:55,120 Speaker 1: and lose some of it? You take it out and 222 00:13:55,240 --> 00:13:59,439 Speaker 1: keep it at home. Incidentally, home safes, particularly places like Japan, 223 00:13:59,480 --> 00:14:01,600 Speaker 1: and so it's all and have gone through the roof 224 00:14:01,640 --> 00:14:03,960 Speaker 1: in terms of sales. So you take the money out. 225 00:14:04,040 --> 00:14:06,560 Speaker 1: But that destroys the funding base off the bank. And 226 00:14:06,600 --> 00:14:09,800 Speaker 1: one of the reasons for basically having negative interest rates 227 00:14:09,840 --> 00:14:11,760 Speaker 1: is to encourage lending. But if you don't have a 228 00:14:11,760 --> 00:14:13,880 Speaker 1: funding base, how the hell is that can occur? And 229 00:14:13,920 --> 00:14:17,360 Speaker 1: then you get into an absurd situation. And I've noticed 230 00:14:17,840 --> 00:14:21,720 Speaker 1: that several luminaries have now been enlightening us on the 231 00:14:21,720 --> 00:14:27,280 Speaker 1: pages of different publications saying how bad cash is for crime. Now, 232 00:14:27,560 --> 00:14:29,360 Speaker 1: you know, money has been around for a long period 233 00:14:29,400 --> 00:14:31,280 Speaker 1: of time, and crime has been around for a long 234 00:14:31,320 --> 00:14:34,920 Speaker 1: period of time. But I'm now discovered that these large 235 00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:37,040 Speaker 1: notes are the cause of crime, which has something I've 236 00:14:37,080 --> 00:14:40,200 Speaker 1: never really understood before. But the problem here is the 237 00:14:40,200 --> 00:14:43,440 Speaker 1: truth lies somewhere else. And Andrew Haldane from the Bank 238 00:14:43,440 --> 00:14:46,560 Speaker 1: of England actually outlined there is very very clearly. He said, 239 00:14:46,680 --> 00:14:49,440 Speaker 1: when the next crisis comes, and it will come, we're 240 00:14:49,440 --> 00:14:51,680 Speaker 1: going to have to cut interest rates and they're very low, 241 00:14:51,720 --> 00:14:54,240 Speaker 1: so we're going to have to go into massive negative territory. 242 00:14:54,920 --> 00:14:58,760 Speaker 1: So to make that policy work, we have to ban cash. 243 00:14:59,080 --> 00:15:01,800 Speaker 1: Now it's not only banned cash, he didn't go to 244 00:15:01,840 --> 00:15:04,760 Speaker 1: this extent, but you have to also ban capital flows 245 00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:07,640 Speaker 1: between countries because otherwise people would take money out of 246 00:15:07,640 --> 00:15:09,640 Speaker 1: a country with negative interest rates and get to somewhere 247 00:15:09,640 --> 00:15:13,720 Speaker 1: with positive interest rates, which is a completely dysfunctional reversal 248 00:15:14,160 --> 00:15:18,480 Speaker 1: of the precise objectives that we actually are trying to 249 00:15:18,520 --> 00:15:21,080 Speaker 1: achieve and some of the things we believe in, which 250 00:15:21,080 --> 00:15:23,600 Speaker 1: is free capital flows. And one of the things that 251 00:15:23,680 --> 00:15:27,480 Speaker 1: really troubles me about this spirit of history is that, 252 00:15:28,160 --> 00:15:30,520 Speaker 1: you know, Winston Churchill once book is very elegantly when 253 00:15:30,520 --> 00:15:32,520 Speaker 1: he said, you know, no no matter how beautiful the strategy, 254 00:15:32,920 --> 00:15:35,600 Speaker 1: one should occasionally look at the results. And I don't 255 00:15:35,600 --> 00:15:38,640 Speaker 1: think anybody's looking at the results. Well, what is the solution? 256 00:15:38,680 --> 00:15:40,960 Speaker 1: Then it seems like we're sort of at our wits end. 257 00:15:41,000 --> 00:15:44,680 Speaker 1: In terms of monetary stimulus. It doesn't seem like fiscal 258 00:15:44,760 --> 00:15:48,600 Speaker 1: stimulus is on the way anytime soon, and it's unclear 259 00:15:48,640 --> 00:15:51,800 Speaker 1: whether or not that would even really solve the problem 260 00:15:51,800 --> 00:15:54,720 Speaker 1: that we're talking about. You're right, and I think there's 261 00:15:54,720 --> 00:15:58,000 Speaker 1: basically three scenarios which now stretch out in front of us. 262 00:15:58,720 --> 00:16:02,240 Speaker 1: One of which is is what I call the Lazarus economy, 263 00:16:02,280 --> 00:16:05,640 Speaker 1: which is that things miraculously suddenly get better for all 264 00:16:05,680 --> 00:16:09,320 Speaker 1: sorts of reasons. I'm personally personally looking for the Martians 265 00:16:09,360 --> 00:16:12,800 Speaker 1: or some extraterrestrial intelligent life to visitors and solve our problems. 266 00:16:13,280 --> 00:16:16,760 Speaker 1: And that's some major technological advance, right, Yeah, and it 267 00:16:16,760 --> 00:16:19,200 Speaker 1: could be a technological advance. You never can say never. 268 00:16:19,320 --> 00:16:23,040 Speaker 1: I mean, if somebody was to basically find infinite energy 269 00:16:23,240 --> 00:16:26,120 Speaker 1: solve the problems of cold fusion, you would get certain 270 00:16:26,160 --> 00:16:29,880 Speaker 1: things that would happen. But that's not something you can 271 00:16:29,920 --> 00:16:33,320 Speaker 1: bank on. But the more likely case is a period 272 00:16:33,400 --> 00:16:36,880 Speaker 1: of prolonged stagnation. And this is very much the Japanese 273 00:16:36,920 --> 00:16:40,040 Speaker 1: and what's becoming the European model, which as we can 274 00:16:40,120 --> 00:16:43,720 Speaker 1: solve the problems, so we will use monetary morphine to 275 00:16:43,800 --> 00:16:47,040 Speaker 1: keep the process going for as long as we can do, 276 00:16:47,560 --> 00:16:52,920 Speaker 1: and hope over that period we can gradually deliver the economy. 277 00:16:53,320 --> 00:16:58,320 Speaker 1: And that basically means transferring wealth from the savers to 278 00:16:58,360 --> 00:17:00,560 Speaker 1: the borrowers. And that's what's going to happen to be done, 279 00:17:00,840 --> 00:17:02,920 Speaker 1: and you're trying to stretch out that adjustment over a 280 00:17:02,920 --> 00:17:04,959 Speaker 1: long period of time, and Japan shows that you can 281 00:17:05,040 --> 00:17:07,640 Speaker 1: do it under certain conditions, at least for a long 282 00:17:07,680 --> 00:17:10,080 Speaker 1: period of time. But the problem with all of that 283 00:17:10,320 --> 00:17:13,960 Speaker 1: is that once people realize that the outcome, the last 284 00:17:13,960 --> 00:17:19,199 Speaker 1: option comes into play. Which is everybody panics and starts 285 00:17:19,240 --> 00:17:21,880 Speaker 1: to try to get out of this game, as it were. 286 00:17:22,480 --> 00:17:25,199 Speaker 1: And the crucial thing he remember is this game is 287 00:17:25,280 --> 00:17:31,560 Speaker 1: underpinned by essentially an act of heroic faith in central bankers. 288 00:17:32,080 --> 00:17:36,120 Speaker 1: And remember, in the old times, priests intermediated between rulers 289 00:17:36,119 --> 00:17:39,560 Speaker 1: and their gods. These days we have economic gods, and 290 00:17:39,680 --> 00:17:43,480 Speaker 1: the alchemists or the priests are the central bankers and 291 00:17:43,520 --> 00:17:47,440 Speaker 1: the economic policy mandarins, and they intermediate between the body 292 00:17:47,520 --> 00:17:51,239 Speaker 1: politic and these economic forces. And there's a lot of 293 00:17:51,280 --> 00:17:55,480 Speaker 1: faith in them. And everybody has suspended disbelief and wants 294 00:17:55,520 --> 00:17:57,920 Speaker 1: to believe that this will work. But at some point 295 00:17:57,960 --> 00:17:59,719 Speaker 1: in time, and I'm starting to see signs of that 296 00:17:59,840 --> 00:18:03,360 Speaker 1: or ready that there will be a moment when they say, well, actually, 297 00:18:03,680 --> 00:18:07,000 Speaker 1: you know, they don't know what they're doing, or what 298 00:18:07,040 --> 00:18:10,199 Speaker 1: they're doing can't work, or they don't have the tools 299 00:18:10,200 --> 00:18:14,280 Speaker 1: to do this, and that sets off a horrible process. Now, 300 00:18:14,960 --> 00:18:16,840 Speaker 1: you know, I've worked in financial markets for a very 301 00:18:16,920 --> 00:18:19,439 Speaker 1: very long time, and the one thing I do know 302 00:18:20,119 --> 00:18:23,960 Speaker 1: is when people panic in financial markets, it's never a 303 00:18:24,080 --> 00:18:27,840 Speaker 1: very pretty side, and everybody wants to be first to 304 00:18:27,920 --> 00:18:31,400 Speaker 1: get out. And the reason is very simple. If you're 305 00:18:31,400 --> 00:18:33,880 Speaker 1: the first. It's you don't call it panic, it's very 306 00:18:33,880 --> 00:18:37,280 Speaker 1: sensible trading. And everybody is looking at each other saying, 307 00:18:37,280 --> 00:18:40,800 Speaker 1: how long can we continue this game where we suspend disbelief. 308 00:18:41,520 --> 00:18:44,880 Speaker 1: And that's a very dangerous situation to find yourself in 309 00:18:45,359 --> 00:18:48,919 Speaker 1: because the consequences are not only economic. This is not 310 00:18:48,960 --> 00:18:52,960 Speaker 1: an economic problem ultimately, this is actually a social problem 311 00:18:53,000 --> 00:18:56,639 Speaker 1: and a political problem. All economic problems ultimately more as 312 00:18:56,680 --> 00:19:00,720 Speaker 1: we saw in the nineties and nineteen thirties, into political problems. 313 00:19:00,960 --> 00:19:03,560 Speaker 1: And we're seeing signs of that in terms of extreme 314 00:19:04,480 --> 00:19:07,160 Speaker 1: um movements of the right and left in different parts 315 00:19:07,200 --> 00:19:10,720 Speaker 1: of the world, the rise of some interesting populist politicians, 316 00:19:11,160 --> 00:19:14,640 Speaker 1: and those pressures are going to start to actually play out. 317 00:19:14,720 --> 00:19:17,840 Speaker 1: I mean, the most interesting thing about the Republican potential 318 00:19:17,880 --> 00:19:21,640 Speaker 1: candidate is he's repudiating things like free trade and all 319 00:19:21,680 --> 00:19:24,240 Speaker 1: sorts of things that we believed in. And he's openly 320 00:19:24,280 --> 00:19:27,520 Speaker 1: flagged the idea that perhaps not repaying your debt is 321 00:19:27,560 --> 00:19:30,000 Speaker 1: not such a bad idea, which are things that are very, 322 00:19:30,119 --> 00:19:34,840 Speaker 1: very dangerous in the way we've structured our financial system. Uh, 323 00:19:35,440 --> 00:19:39,679 Speaker 1: let's leave our listeners with some actionable advice in terms 324 00:19:39,680 --> 00:19:42,119 Speaker 1: of the rush for the exits that everyone seems to 325 00:19:42,119 --> 00:19:44,760 Speaker 1: be worrying about and has been worrying about for so long. 326 00:19:45,119 --> 00:19:46,600 Speaker 1: What do you think is going to be the key 327 00:19:46,680 --> 00:19:49,439 Speaker 1: thing to look out for. I think in terms of 328 00:19:49,440 --> 00:19:52,000 Speaker 1: asset classes, the key asset classes which will take the 329 00:19:52,000 --> 00:19:55,080 Speaker 1: pressure of currencies. I know there's no currency war going 330 00:19:55,080 --> 00:19:57,360 Speaker 1: because I listened to central bankers, but I can assure 331 00:19:58,080 --> 00:20:00,720 Speaker 1: you that there is a currency war going on because 332 00:20:00,760 --> 00:20:03,600 Speaker 1: everybody is trying to devalue their way to prosperity. That's 333 00:20:03,640 --> 00:20:06,120 Speaker 1: the first thing. That's one of the asset classes which 334 00:20:06,160 --> 00:20:09,240 Speaker 1: will take enormous train. The other thing is I think 335 00:20:09,280 --> 00:20:13,800 Speaker 1: political and policy developments are going to be crucial in that, 336 00:20:13,880 --> 00:20:16,639 Speaker 1: so you have to monitor what these people do. But 337 00:20:16,720 --> 00:20:19,240 Speaker 1: the other thing is in terms of investment, I think 338 00:20:19,280 --> 00:20:23,880 Speaker 1: you need to understand some very very simple rules, and 339 00:20:24,119 --> 00:20:27,000 Speaker 1: I always look at investments in terms of three criteria. 340 00:20:27,119 --> 00:20:31,040 Speaker 1: One is basically the capital the return of the capital. 341 00:20:31,080 --> 00:20:34,520 Speaker 1: The American comedian Will Rodgers once said very elegantly, it's 342 00:20:34,560 --> 00:20:36,919 Speaker 1: the return of my capital rather than the return on 343 00:20:37,040 --> 00:20:40,199 Speaker 1: my capital that I worry about. The second thing is 344 00:20:40,240 --> 00:20:43,760 Speaker 1: the income, and the last thing is the capital gains. Now, 345 00:20:43,760 --> 00:20:46,080 Speaker 1: historically in the last thirty years, we've reversed the order 346 00:20:46,119 --> 00:20:50,359 Speaker 1: of importance. I think maintaining capital and getting a bit 347 00:20:50,400 --> 00:20:54,359 Speaker 1: of income will actually be crucial. And I think this 348 00:20:54,480 --> 00:20:56,720 Speaker 1: is a world in which you can't actually look at 349 00:20:56,720 --> 00:20:59,399 Speaker 1: the past in any meaningful way. And I'll tell you 350 00:20:59,480 --> 00:21:01,119 Speaker 1: an example all of that, which is one of my 351 00:21:01,200 --> 00:21:05,320 Speaker 1: great mistakes. A friend of mine who used to trade 352 00:21:05,440 --> 00:21:08,080 Speaker 1: JGBS or who's actually a fund manager Japanese government and 353 00:21:08,200 --> 00:21:11,080 Speaker 1: g GBS were around three. He asked me a question. 354 00:21:11,200 --> 00:21:14,919 Speaker 1: He said, to me, is it actually good value? And 355 00:21:14,960 --> 00:21:18,160 Speaker 1: I said, you know, you're looking at twenty years. Three 356 00:21:18,200 --> 00:21:20,840 Speaker 1: percent does not seem to me the right record for 357 00:21:20,880 --> 00:21:24,439 Speaker 1: that period. He ignored my advice entirely, and he loaded 358 00:21:24,520 --> 00:21:27,040 Speaker 1: up on every long day to j g B that 359 00:21:27,119 --> 00:21:31,000 Speaker 1: he could actually find. And history shows that g GBS 360 00:21:31,000 --> 00:21:33,920 Speaker 1: had never flirated with those sorts of levels. Again, so 361 00:21:34,359 --> 00:21:37,680 Speaker 1: what we thought was in the past reasonable and what 362 00:21:37,760 --> 00:21:39,560 Speaker 1: we may need to live with are going to be 363 00:21:39,640 --> 00:21:44,119 Speaker 1: fundamentally different. So being agile and actually going back to 364 00:21:44,200 --> 00:21:48,120 Speaker 1: some very very simple principles will serve people much much 365 00:21:48,240 --> 00:21:51,600 Speaker 1: better than trying to be clever in this sort of environment. 366 00:21:52,480 --> 00:21:54,840 Speaker 1: All right, I think that is some excellent advice for 367 00:21:54,880 --> 00:21:58,119 Speaker 1: all the investors out there. Show us. One of my 368 00:21:58,240 --> 00:22:01,400 Speaker 1: all time favorite finance authors. He has a new book 369 00:22:01,400 --> 00:22:04,199 Speaker 1: out called The Age of Stagnation, Why perpetual growth is 370 00:22:04,240 --> 00:22:07,440 Speaker 1: unattainable and the global economy is in peril. If you're 371 00:22:07,680 --> 00:22:11,720 Speaker 1: looking for some uplifting reading over the weekend. Thank you 372 00:22:11,800 --> 00:22:18,600 Speaker 1: so much for joining us. It's my pleasure. Tracy. All right, 373 00:22:18,680 --> 00:22:22,480 Speaker 1: that was shortage at das UM talking about the financialization 374 00:22:22,600 --> 00:22:26,680 Speaker 1: of everything, pretty much the economy, markets, monetary policy, and 375 00:22:26,880 --> 00:22:30,639 Speaker 1: leaving us with some quite depressing thoughts. To be honest, 376 00:22:31,400 --> 00:22:34,240 Speaker 1: thank you so much for joining this episode of Odd Blots. 377 00:22:34,960 --> 00:22:42,480 Speaker 1: Joe Wisenthal will be back next week. Put Knowledge to 378 00:22:42,560 --> 00:22:45,160 Speaker 1: work and grow your business with c i T from 379 00:22:45,160 --> 00:22:50,280 Speaker 1: transportation to healthcare to manufacturing. C i T offers commercial lending, leasing, 380 00:22:50,359 --> 00:22:54,000 Speaker 1: and treasury management services for small and middle market businesses. 381 00:22:54,200 --> 00:22:56,880 Speaker 1: Learn more at c I T dot com. Put Knowledge 382 00:22:56,920 --> 00:23:00,520 Speaker 1: to Work t