WEBVTT - Mexico Tariff War Is On

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>The tariff war with Mexico could in fact be on

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>my friends, This is in addition to what Trump is

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:09.079
<v Speaker 1>trying with China. We will talk about whether this is

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the right policy move, could it help finally secure the border.

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Plus Bernie Sanders says that the Soviet Union was bad,

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>but isn't that kind of new for him because didn't

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.119
<v Speaker 1>he go there. We've got that, plus Biden's plagiarism and

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot more coming up on The Buck Sexton Show.

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>And we've been working with decades from Mexico to be

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>equal partners to resolve this problem, and they've remained on

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines from day one. They only have about one

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty miles of chunk point of the border

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that they need to enforce, and we have two thousand.

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>We need Mexico to do to do three things. We

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>need them to do their interdiction along their border, We

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.279
<v Speaker 1>need them to attack and target the TCOs that are

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>profiting from this, and we need them to be partners

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>with respect of the side them process. I think that

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>this pressure is going to bring them to the table

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and get them closer to doing what they should be doing.

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. Everybody fight over the

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>border is heating up. How much is for sure at

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>this point? Do you have Republicans who are getting a

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit a little auntie, a little concerned about what

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the economic implications will be from this possible tariff and

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>tariff escalation that will come. It starts next week five

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>percent on all goods from Mexico into this country, driving

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of billions of dollars of goods overall, and that

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>will only go up from there, right, it will be

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>even more. This is a heck of a lot more.

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Three hundred and fifty billion dollars a year of Mexican

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.199
<v Speaker 1>imports is what we're dealing with here. So five percent

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and then ten percent and then fifteen percents a lot

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of money. And this is in addition to what Trump

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>has already taken on with tariffs against China to try

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to force China to the table on ending its unfair

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>predatory trading practices, intellectual property theft, all other things. And

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I do believe the President has largely on the substance,

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>won that argument as to whether we should confront China

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>before Trump came along. Oh no, we can't do that

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>trade war. Oh it's terrible now and says, well, hold

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>on a second, what have the Chinese really been doing?

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>And what does the future look like if we don't

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>take a different posture when it comes to China. But

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>now he's looking at Mexico and it's like, all right,

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe we're the tariffs there too. I do have a

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a concern that tariffs now are the

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>hammer and that Trump sees everything because he's got that

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>hammer as a nail. But maybe this does work, and

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>it certainly would work better if Republicans didn't at the

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>first sign of any friction, of any political and economic

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>cost suggest this is now the Senate Republicans who at

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of chrony capitalist, quasi open borders donor class

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Republicans in the Senate, that's where you find a lot

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of them, and they get very concerned about this and

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:07.239
<v Speaker 1>what it would mean, what it would mean for their

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>reelection prospects, I think, and also it would have a

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>negative impact on some businesses, and there will be some

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>economic pain that comes from this. I don't think there's

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>any question about that. But there's another aspect of this

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that we have to think about, and that is what

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is acceptable right now? What is an acceptable future for

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>us when it comes to the border. I mean you

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>had Mark Morgan there to start off the segment here

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about how Mexico can do more than it is

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>doing to help us out on this and should do more.

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>He says, there needs to be interdiction along the more

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>interdiction along the border, attack the criminal organizations, and be

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>partners in the asylum process. How many months now have

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I been saying to you and Mexico needs to become

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a safe third country and we need an agreement with

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>them to be a safe third country, meaning that anyone

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>who wants to get asylum in this country would show

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>up here, present themselves, but stay on the Mexican side

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>of the US Mexico border and have their process adjudicated

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>without them disappearing into the American interior, without the enormous

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>magnet that exists right now for fraud, for lawbreaking, and

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>for making a mockery of our immigration process by either

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>presenting oneself as a family unit when that's not the case,

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>or just knowing that as a family unit, if you

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>come to the border, you're going to be released into

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the American interior, and then there will be no real effort,

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>no real accountability to track you down afterwards. If this

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't change, then our situation at the border will not change.

0:04:55.320 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>It will only continue at one hundred thousand plus a

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>month coming into this country, and we will not have

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>a border that anybody could seriously consider secure. It's not

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>secure right now. It's the worst that it has been

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in a very long time. Completely overwhelmed, is what you're hearing.

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the description from the border patrol has

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 1>been for weeks. Arrests have surged to a seven year

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>high while these talks with Mexico are going on. I'm sorry,

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>but I have a tough time believing that we could

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>be at a point where we're setting records right now,

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>after all the attention to this issue has gotten and

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, more than one hundred and forty four thousand,

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>two hundred migrants according to the the New York Times. Here

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we're taken into custody by Customs and Border Protection along

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the southwestern border in May. That is a thirty two

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>percent increase, the highest monthly in seven years. Most crossed

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the border illegally. Ten percent arrived without the proper documents

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>at ports of entry, so they are crossing. These are

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>all illegal crossings, one hundred and forty four thousand illegal

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>crossings that resulted in people to being taken into custody.

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, almost all of them were illegal crossings. And

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>then you had about one in ten are in custody

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>because they don't have the right documents when they showed

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>up at a port of entry. So this problem is

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 1>even worse than worse than people who have been trying

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to get the alarm alarm bells wrong. Realize, one hundred

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and forty four thousand, we're gonna be We're gonna be

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 1>over well over a million for the year if this

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>keeps up, one hundred and forty four thousand people showing up,

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>not going through the normal And keep in mind, we

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>already have through the legal immigration process a million people

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a year who are going to be brought into the

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>American family. Personally, we have a million people a year

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>who will be staying in this country forever. And that's legal,

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's fine. But I'm just saying, you know, there's

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 1>a lot that our immigration system is already handling and

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>dealing with that you're going to add on to it. Now,

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>almost one hundred and fifty thousand people illegally crossing a

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>month is just indicative of how completely out of control

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the situation is. Who can afford who can better afford

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>in this trade dispute now that Trump is or this

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>this fight over a possible tariff implementation, Who can better

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>afford this price tag us for them? We have been

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>led to believe, I think, and this is from the

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>go along to get along swamp culture in DC. We

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>were led to believe that when it comes to foreign relations,

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>America should never it's bullying if we use leverage against

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a country that's not an oppositional country, or that's not

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>North Korea or Russia or something, but you know, any

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>other country we deal with, especially a neighbor like Mexico,

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it bullying if we say we're going to need you

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to do this or else to this. I say, this

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is negotiation. In any negotiation, there are good things you

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>can offer, and there are things you can offer that

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>aren't so good. You could say you do this, or

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll do that, or you do this, or I'll do

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>this other thing that you don't want me to do.

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>That's how this goes. We've been asking the Mexican government

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for a long time to help us more on this problem.

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>We've been trying to get them to be more constructive partners,

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>but they don't want to do that. Maybe they don't

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>want to spend the resources, maybe they don't want to

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>handle this. But the Mexican government can do a whole

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>lot more. And we know this. Lindsey Graham I think

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is a spot on here when he says that they

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>should become a third safe country. We should have that

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>agreement in place, and the other things that we see

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:45.839
<v Speaker 1>going on with the buses and everything else, that all

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>has to stop. Play clip nine. Ask Mexico to do

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>two or three things that they're not doing that wouldn't

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>matter help us. Make sure you apply for asylum in

0:08:56.200 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Mexico or Central America, not the United States. Stop giving

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>them buses to get to our border. A few things

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you could do would help the problem. And if they'll

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>do those few things, we won't do tariffs. But if

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>they refuse to help us, what options do we have?

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Refuse to help us? What options do we have? There

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>are things on the books I'll have you know if

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you if you really want to go deep in the

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>weeds and immigration, there are things like any country that

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>does not take back those that we are trying to deport.

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>We can suspend all visas. This is currently on the

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>books for immigration. We can suspend all visas from that country.

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure if the Trump administration did that with any

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of these Central American states, we'd be told that it's horrible.

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And look what they said when we cut off aid.

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>We're not allowed to invoke and this is the liberal

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>mentality on the immigration crisis. We are not allowed to

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>invoke consequences. We're not allowed to cause consequences for anyone

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in this process. We cannot punish people that cross illegally.

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>We cannot punish dates that will not stop those from

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>crossing illegally Mexico. We cannot punish Central American countries that

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>are allowing this outflow from their own territory into Mexico.

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>It's no one's fault. No one is allowed to suffer

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>anything as a result, suffer any consequences because of this.

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And if we as a sovereign nation, try to re

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>establish our sovereignty in some meaningful sense, if we're trying

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 1>to take any action that would deal with you, now

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>going on one hundred and fifty thousand a month illegally

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>crossing into the country. We're bad the we're the bad

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>guys here. They're saying it. Oh, Trump, this tiff, this

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>teriff issue is just showing how, you know, how he

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really understand the economics self. No, I think he

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>does understand the economics involved. What does it cost the

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>country right now to have this problem of illegal immigration.

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>What is the cost in healthcare and schools, in the

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>processing of all these people by the federal government, the

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.959
<v Speaker 1>court time, the lawyers that I'll be appointed in a

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post. Biggest story in the Washington Post front page

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is HHS canceling English classes and legal aid for unaccompanied

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>child migrants in shelters. Let's understand what's happening here. Every

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>unaccompanied migrant child that is currently in federal government custody

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>was sent by adults who know that they are exploiting

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 1>the system. So this is a direct response to what

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we have going right now, which is trying to do

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>everything we can to make them as comfortable as possible

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and to release them to a sponsor family somewhere in

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States. But this is not this is not

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>what's supposed to happen. You're not supposed to take your

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>kid from some other country, send them to the US

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>border and say okay, you take care of him now

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>until we can find somewhere else for that person to go.

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>There are budgetary constraints, and the budgetary constraints now are

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>affecting some soccer programs that they've set up for unaccompanied migrants,

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>for schooling programs. Look, I don't blame these kids. It's

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>not about punishing the kids. But Congress needs to do

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>more here to stop this from happen. The answer can't

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>be yeah, we are running a giant education and entertainment

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>facility for anyone who wants to send their child to America,

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>not through the legitimate process, and to put them in

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the hands of coyotes, to put them in positions where

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they are enriching the cartels, and then again no one

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>suffers any consequences. If you were a Central American who

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>wanted to come to America right now, why not do it?

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Nothing bad is gonna I mean nothing bad is going

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to happen to you from the American government. Bad things

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen because of the coyotes and the transfer across

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>cartel controlled territory. Are we allowed to do anything to

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Mexico to comply. I re allowed to do anything to

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>get some of these other countries that are taking money

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>from US. That's right, taxpayers sending them checks. I see here.

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Guatemala says it's working with the US to tighten its

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>borders and try to break up these caravans. Well, it's

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>it's about time. It's about time, and it maybe is

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>only happening because they see that if we're willing to

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>take steps against Mexico, that we'll have some economic consequences

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 1>in political pain in this country too. Tariffs are not

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be pain free. But if we're willing to

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>do that, then maybe we're going to do more about

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the Central American countries where a lot of these margarets

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>are coming from. But this is as a major issue.

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 1>We got more on this team and a whole lot

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>more show to talk about, so stay with me. The

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>news came that the President had this notion that he

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>was going to treat Mexico as an enemy. This is

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>dangerous territory. This is not a way to treat a friend.

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not a way to deal with immigration, it's not

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a way to deal the humanitarian needs at the border. Okay,

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi econ and trade expert Nancy Pelosi tonight at eleven,

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>what is the way to deal with Mexico on this?

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>What is the way to deal with the humanitarian crisis

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>at the border. It's also an illegal immigration crisis. Notice

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that the Democrats always trying to control the language, always

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to control the way that we talk about this.

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>What do they present? Oh, that's right, it's just humanitarian.

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Because then if you don't fund, you know, English as

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a second language classes for the migrant children, if you're

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>not putting them in school, giving them taxpayer funded healthcare,

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, recreational programs and movie showings and all

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>these things, you're a terrible person. Meanwhile, we are this

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is a scam. We are being scammed. It is happening

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>every day, and it's happening now to the tune of

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>almost one hundred and fifty thousand a month. I just

0:14:54.440 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>saw that number today. It's astonishing. And Pelos, she says

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that we're treating Mexico like an enemy. Why does Canada?

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Is Canada treating us like an enemy? Because there are

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>some tariffs on the import of US goods into Canada,

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>so they can protect some of their own industries. Is

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the EU treating us like an enemy because they have

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>tariffs in place to protect some of their industries that

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>they think are particularly necessary or sensitive for their own reasons.

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I would just I would like to know where the

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>lines are drawn here to call it treating Mexico like

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the enemy. Look, I understand there's a difference. Then there

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>should be a difference in how we approach dealing with

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>China and how we approach dealing with Mexico on trade.

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But this isn't really that hard, is it. Are we

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>asking for anything from the Mexican government that is impossible?

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Are we saying, well, if you don't stop all the

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>flow of drugs into this country, which are now killing

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of Americans a year. But look, that's hard,

0:15:55.440 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that's hard. You know, the cartels are not comply ying

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>with the Mexican government by their very definition. They're breaking

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the law. They're going around. Well there's I'm sure plenty

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of collusion with Mexican authorities, but that's another issue. But

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>we're saying, is hey, when you have a crowd of

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a thousand Hondurans or Guatemalans who are all marching together

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>across the country. Can you not provide them with food

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and shelter and buses and take them right to the

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:25.239
<v Speaker 1>border and then just say, well, this is your problem, America.

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Can you offer them safe haven in your country and

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>play ball this a little bit more so that they're

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>not walking into our country? Does that seem unreasonable? Is that?

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that an enemy state request? I can assure you

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that if we had one hundred and fifty thousand or

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>so illegal crossings at our northern border with Canada, we

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>would have some tough words for our Canadian brothers and sisters.

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, we would have to say, hey, can you

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>guys get a handle on things. If you can't, we're

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to you know, there's gonna have to be

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>some consequences year. But you know, but Pelosi, all the

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Democrats do on this issue is complain about Trump. They

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>never have anything to offer that is constructive. They just

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>want to sit back and use this as a means

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of bashing the administration, calling him racist, calling him xenophobic,

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and doing everything in their power in the meantime to

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>obstruct any meaningful change about the current situation of the border,

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 1>which is it is worse than it has been in

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years. Right now, President Trump, who beat

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the Republican field largely by talking tough on immigration and

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>making some big promises. The immigration situation at our border

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is worse than it has been in twenty years. What

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>is Trump supposed to ignore this? Tariffs? One reason he's

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 1>gone for tariffs is because it's an area where at

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>least the Democrats. You don't think some judge from the

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Ninth Circuit is going to come along and say, oh,

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the President can institute tariffs or maybe a judge, well,

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>just give it time, we'll be back. We have a

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>border situation in the inner station. You have one over here.

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But I hear it's going to work out very well.

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's both going to work out well. It's

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>going to work out very well here. And again, both

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>the military and the trade is such a big factor

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to be discussing that very much. So

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>it's an honor to be in Ireland with my friend

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>and he's doing a great job as your Prime minister.

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>They want to avoid a courses, it's going to avoid

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>our wall between No, I think you do. I think

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you do. The way it works now is good. You

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>want to try and keep it that way. And I

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>know that's a big point of contention with respect to

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Brexit as your border, and I'm sure it's going to

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>work out. Well. That was an interesting exchange. That was

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Trump there talking to Leo Varadkar, who is the Prime

0:18:52.440 --> 0:19:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Minister of Ireland. So oh sorry, President wait is the

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>president of Prime Minister of Ireland. I gotta make sure

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I get this to get this right. It doesn't really

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll figure it out in the meantime. Um, but talking

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>about the border wall, uh, you have sure enough the

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the Irish Premier. That's a good way to do one.

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>You have the Irish Premier who's not liking the idea

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:27.439
<v Speaker 1>of a h of a wall between Britain and or

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>between England and Ireland over over this whole Brexit issue.

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>So here here's I just thought that was kind of

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 1>a funny extent. Also strange that you wouldn't think that

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>he's the PM. Thank you, producer, Mike. That's what I thought.

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Just making sure. It's tough to keep it all straight

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>with all these European places. UH got you know, you

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>get the President of France, Matron Missieur mac roll, and

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>then you got the PM in the UK, the PM

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in Ireland, but now they don't want walls there. Ireland.

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've never been, which is interesting because it's

0:19:58.240 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of the mother country for me in a sense.

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm about half Irish and I've never been

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to it, so I gotta get I gotta work on that.

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>I've been to China, I mean to Afghanistan. I've never

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 1>been to Ireland, so I don't know how that's happened.

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 1>But my friends who have spent a lot of time

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 1>they're tell me that it is shockingly left wing and

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>its politics, that it is even even for a European country.

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>People have told me. I remember hearing a friend of

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>mine who did a who studied in Ireland for years.

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>He said that Ireland is the Cuba of Europe. That's

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a whoa. That is rough stuff. I don't know if

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that's true or not, but I wouldn't think of Leo

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Varadkar as a particularly Irish name. But obviously they've had

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of immigration and folks and different backgrounds going

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>to Ireland. All right, let's move on the board of

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>situation with the tariffs. Let's see if it gets moving

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>from Mexico. If you're asking me for a prediction right now,

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I would think I would think that the likeliest situation

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>is that Mexico's gonna try to They don't want this

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 1>to go to effect. We don't want this to go

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>into effect. So good chance, in my mind that what

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>happens here is the Mexican government says, okay, okay, we'll

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>do some stuff, and it gives the Trump administration the

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>cover to say, all right, since you're gonna work with us,

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gon we're gonna put this on hold. And wouldn't

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that be let's just establish this now so that when

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the media is trying to tell you that Trump is

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>terrible and he's so bad and doesn't know anything and

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>he's orange and his hair is weird, let's remember that

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>if that happens, if Mexico promises and takes some additional

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>steps as a result of this, it's a threat. I mean,

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it's an economic threat. But this threat of an implementation

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of a five percent tariff, wouldn't that be Trump making

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a deal? Wouldn't that be successful negotiation from the negotiator

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in chief here? I think the answer has to be yes, right.

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to see this as a win

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>for Trump. So I say this now, maybe it doesn't happen,

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe the five percent tariff goes into effect. I say

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>this now because Trump, you know, will get no credit

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 1>from the media whatsoever. Even if Mexico blinks, Mexico backs

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.719
<v Speaker 1>down and says, you know what, we'll play ball on this.

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll stop some of this inflow into your country of

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:17.120
<v Speaker 1>illegals keep in money. You know, Mexico has sovereignty too.

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Mexican government, Mexican authorities can do things about people entering

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>their country from another country. You know, if you just

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 1>walked into Mexico without permission, guess what they would have

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>a problem with that. But no surprise, they haven't taken

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of action so far to help us

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in this process. But if Trump gets action out of them,

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 1>just remember it's a win. And very few media outlets

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>will tell you that because they're also invested in the

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>destruction of this president. Speaking of the destruction of this president,

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you see what I did there, That's what we call smooth,

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>smooth turn by a smooth operator. It's a smooth transition

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:04.239
<v Speaker 1>you have of the constant talk now of impeachment from

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the media. Thanks Muller, We all know what Mueller's press

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>conference was really about. It was to light the fuse

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>or re light the fuse on impeachment proceedings against the president.

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 1>You still haven't had anybody really define whether Mueller decide

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>whether Muller is going to be giving open testimony, which

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>he absolutely must do. I do not understand how anyone

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't see this as a necessary You can't let him

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>walk out, just have his say and then just bounce.

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Here's the truth. If the Democrats thought that Mueller would

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>provide them, and you know this, Muller would provide them

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>with a massive bash Trump extravaganza opportunity, and there wasn't

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a risk to them of it majorly backfiring. We would

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>have already had Mueller down on Capitol Hill. Oh, they

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>would have pushed for it right away at the House,

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the committees, the media would have been a whole circus.

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>But there are questions that Muller needs to be asked.

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>There are questions that Christopher Steele is apparently going to

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 1>be asked. But we'll see if not, how that happens

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and when that happens. But for Muller, I would like

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to know, at what point did you find out that

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the operations against the Trump campaign was that one that

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the Trump campaig didn't clue with Russia. You start with that,

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>When did you know that? And why did you continue

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>with this massive, grinding investigation even after it was clear

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>there was no collusion. We know the answer to it,

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>but I want to get him on the record as

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to why he continued with this. I also want him

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to explain how it is that the official record of

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the origins of the Russia collusion investigation indicate that this

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>was all because of Papadopolis and what he said in

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a bar and that's just laughable, and in fact, in

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the Mulla report, I believe it gets wrong that Mifsu

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>reached out to They think that Papadopolus reach out to Mitsu,

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>but Mifsud reach to Papadopolis first, which makes this much

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>more likely to be a dangle, which would change the

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 1>way that it should have been treated by law enforcement.

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>If they put somebody near the campaign and planted the

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>idea of Hillary's emails getting hacked by the Russians in

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the first place, then that's entrapment. They're trying to avoid this,

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>But what we're going to find out is that there

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 1>was entrapment, but we can't. Unfortunately, until we have the

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>IG report, we're limited in how much we can fight

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>back on some of this. And in the meantime, the

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are running around with this impeachment narrative, and first

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of all, the media that they're in a frenzy And

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>why are they in a frenzy over this? Well, they're

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 1>in a frenzy because their credibility, such as it is,

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>has taken a hit. I don't mean their credibility about

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>their reporting so much, because that was already You and

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>I both know that a lot of these networks are

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>anti Trump. They're full of people who are perpetrators of

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a fake news narrative against Trump. Don't ever forget that

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it was the media that first used the term fake

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>news to describe how gullible Republicans and Trump supporters were

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>with the stuff that was on Facebook, and Trump managed

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>to turn that around to say, Yeah, you think that

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 1>we're gullible. You think that our side traffics in falsehood.

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Your side traffics in falsehood all the time and pass

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>themselves in the back for it. Your side traffics in

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>propaganda and misdirection, and thinks that they are doing a

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 1>great service for the country. They're not even good faith errors,

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>they're bad faith errors. And you embrace this part of

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, the journals embraced this part of themselves. But

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the problem that the media has to deal with now,

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the anti Trump media, which is just an we always

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>go back and forth on this is the media and

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>appendage of the Democratic Party. Is the Democratic Party and

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>appendage of the media. I think you make the case

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:04.239
<v Speaker 1>their way, But they promised. I mean, you look at

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>someone like Rachel Maddow, her show on MSNBC Night after night.

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 1>The promise of that was and so many people built

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>their careers in the last two years on the left

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>around there's going to be a moment of Aha, this

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump presidency is over. They're gonna get him. If they

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>had to lie to get there, that was always okay.

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>The people that watch CNN, MSNBC, they're not upset if

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>there are fake news stories used to hurt the president.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>That's all part of the effort. In fact, I think

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>they'd be upset if they found out that CNN and

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 1>MSNBC and the Washington Post and other places were unwilling

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to bend or even break their standards entirely in order

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to take down this president. After all, they think he's

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a threat to our democracy, they think he's a threat

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to our institutions, clear and present danger to America. Shouldn't

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>they be willing to color outside the lines a little

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>bit to get this guy. I don't think that the

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>CNN audience is, in particular, having spent a lot of

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 1>time over there and having some contact with members of

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that audience through the digital world, they're crazy. I don't

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>think that they have a problem at all with the

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that CNN has had to fire people for fake

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>stories that they've run. They've run with things that were

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 1>big time fake news. They've gotten things wrong, like the

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 1>date of the communications around the around Donald Trump Junior

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Trump Tower meeting. There's all kinds of things

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that they just get wrong and wrong and wrong and wrong, wrong.

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>As long as it hurts Trump is fine, but wrong.

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>And then not giving the goods to the audience, meaning

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the end of the Trump presidency. That's what's so unacceptable

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to them. They've been promising, promising their audience that this

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>was all this get Trump effort was going to be

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Watergate two point zero and would result in the destruction

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of this presidency in one way or another, and nothing

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>short of that is going to be acceptable to them,

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>which is why the media is alloard. They're all on

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>board for impeachment, totally believe in it. Playclip three. I'm

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>starting a playclip four. Rather, this is the media telling

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you how much there needs to be impeach on playclip four,

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>bounting pressure growing calls to start impeachment after Robert Muller

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>breaks his two years silence. If the House leadership doesn't

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>start hearings now, I believe it's hard to see them

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>every doing it in the months ahead. Again, now or never,

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>we seem to be moving toward a place where impeachment

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>may be inevitable. The damn really seems to be breaking

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>wide open. When he was really saying, is Congress has

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a job to do? It was almost a jeopardy question

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the way Robert Muller put it yesterday. There is a

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>process other than the criminal justice system to charge a

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>sitting president. What's the answer. The answer is impeachment. The

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>answer is peachment. I do believe that that in a sense,

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the Democrat aligned media might be giving the Democrat Party

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>some bad advice here because they're thinking short term and

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the short term. They just want to have coverage of

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>impeachment proceedings. And they feel like if this moves to impeachment,

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>no matter what the outcome, the media will have been

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>justified in what they've done in the eyes of their

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>audience and their supporters and subscribers. And since Trump came

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>into office, then then they don't look like they were

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>just a bunch of clowns who overpromised, underdelivered, and completely

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>debased themselves and their profession, in the profession of journalism

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in the process. They'll say, oh, well, Trump was impeached,

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>so we were even if Russia collusion was a farce,

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>we were right all along. See, because he got impeached,

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it covers their It covers their backs, so to speak.

0:30:56.200 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It gives them some professional credibility and some degree of

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>relevancy once again, which right now a lot of them

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like they're scrambling what have they been doing? What

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>was this all about? If not to lead to impeachment. Now,

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi and the Democrats they gotta think, Okay, but what

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>does this really mean? How would this really shake out?

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll address that part of it right after the break.

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I travel all the time in the country. Do you

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>know most people think that impeachment means you're out of office.

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever get that feeling or are you just

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in the bubble here? They think that you get impeach,

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you're going and that is completely not true. And I

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>may have thought that myself fifty years ago. But you

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>get impeach, and it's an indictment. It's an indictment. So

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>when you're impeaching somebody, you want to make sure you

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>have the strongest possible indictment, because it's not the means

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to the end that people think all you do vote

0:31:56.000 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to impeach, Bye bye, Bertie. It isn't that She's right,

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>It isn't that. First of all, I am a little surprised.

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, wildly ignorant anti Trump lunatics are Pelosi's base,

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So now all of a sudden there ignorance is a

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>problem for her. That's just a surprise to me. But

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.239
<v Speaker 1>she seems a little bit, a little bit upset by that.

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>But notice how she says, it's all about having the

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>best case possible. Okay, the best case possible. Why Speaker Pelosi,

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>if it's not me, it's not a means to an end.

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:36.719
<v Speaker 1>She seems to suggest, unless you have a really strong case, okay,

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and if she has that really strong case, which some

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrats say they already do, and Pelosi, I'm sure tomorrow

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>will say, well, our case is really strong, but we

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>still have to wait to see if we can make

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it stronger. It's the strongest case ever. But let's let's

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>drag this process out and drag her feet on a

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>little more to see if it could be the even stronger,

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>strongest case Ever's this is babel, it's babel babbling from Pelosi.

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not a surprise. But also, there's not going to

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:10.479
<v Speaker 1>be removal of the president from office. That's not going

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to happen. That's not a part of this. Right. We

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>all know that the Republicans in the Senate are not

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna go along. I'm gonna have a two thirds majority.

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna have a I don't believe you have. Well,

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I hope you wouldn't have a single Republican senator vote

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>for removal from office. It'll be a straight party line

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>vote from the Democrats. So there is no means to

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>an end here, no matter what the whole purpose of

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>impeachment and the reason Democrats are talking about it so

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>much is because of the optics. It's because of the

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>narrative going into the reelection. So who doesn't really understand

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>what's happening here, Pelosi are the people that she seems

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to think are too dumb to understand what's happening. They

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>want the president of peach so that they can say

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the president was impeached. Impeached is bad. Impeached is a

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>mark of disapproval, but it's a political process. It's a

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>political check on the president, but a purely partisan impeachment

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that does not result in removal from office. The Democrats

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 1>could get that anytime they want. They could just do it.

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Any majority could impeach any president if they really chose

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to do it. It doesn't it doesn't have meaning beyond that,

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>So there will never be a means to an end

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the president is. I don't think anybody believes realistically going

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to be moved or removed from office by the Senate

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a two thirds majority, never mind the fact that the

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Republicans thankfully have a narrow Senate majority right now. So

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>what is all this about. It's just power politics playing

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 1>out in front of us. All It's the insanity of

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party inflicting itself on the nation once again,

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to flail about for some way of evening the odds,

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>because they have to do the more savvy ones, and

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi has air savvy or moments. The more savvy Democrat

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>operators here have to know that none of these candidates

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>right now that they're putting up have a have a

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>prayer of defeating Donald Trump unless they can try to

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.359
<v Speaker 1>stack the deck for their side. And maybe they think

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>impeachment is just that Buck Sextons decoding the news and

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 1>disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, American, You're

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show.

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>CIA analysts another battle in the free speech wars unfolding today,

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 1>this one involving mister Stephen Crowder, who I've done his

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>show a couple times in the past. Stephen is a conservative,

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>is built a very large following on YouTube. He's one

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of the kind of early I think. I can't think

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>of many conservatives who became YouTubers earlier than Stephen. He

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>got into that game early on and has rightly benefited

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 1>from that foresight. I know Steven's content have been I've

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>been a guest on his show. I can't say that

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I know all of his content, all the things that

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 1>he said. I mean, that would be crazy, right. He's

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>done probably thousands of shows over the years, but YouTube

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>is a major platform for him. And guess what social

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 1>justice warriors want him gone. They want him off deep

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>platformed speech equals violence. Oh my gosh, Stephen Crowder is

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>so scary. We have to get him kicked off the platform.

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>That's where we are right now. And there had been

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a rumblings for the last I'd say the last couple

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of days of how they There was a review going

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>on of Crowder, a review going on of whether YouTube

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>would kick him off entirely. Yeah, and initially, and this

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>was started also because of a I'm trying to remember

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>this guy's name. He's from Vox, which is really the

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 1>most left wing, smarmy, whiny, beta male organization in media

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:23.839
<v Speaker 1>that I'm aware of. I mean, just very a lot

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of sort of pajama boys style, you know, just whiny

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:34.720
<v Speaker 1>nonsense from Vox, and they're among Vox is almost like parody.

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>You read it and you think that really can't be

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the article, is it? I mean, I can't do a

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:39.879
<v Speaker 1>good job right now at the top of my head

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:42.439
<v Speaker 1>of coming up with some of the things that Vox

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 1>will write. But you know, do do Disney cartoons all

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 1>perpetuate the white patriarchy in society? You know, they'll they'll

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 1>write things like that all the time. I mean, they

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's really helpful for society. You know, they're also

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:58.439
<v Speaker 1>a big, big proponents at Vox if there's no such

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 1>thing as a non political or non politicized space, and

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>so they take it upon themselves to pollute everything with

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>their far left politics. You know, Ezra Kleine was I

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 1>think it was a senior person over at Vox, for example,

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's he's someone who if you really want to

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.240
<v Speaker 1>take the measure of him, just listen to the debate

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that he had with Sam Harris sometime go on Sam

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Harris's podcast, where you just picked up that Klein was

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a a very smarmy, self righteous and intellectually dishonest individual.

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:33.240
<v Speaker 1>That was what I took from listening to Sam Harris

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 1>and as Recline go back and forth on the This

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 1>was maybe at least a year ago now, I think.

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:43.759
<v Speaker 1>But YouTube was looking at Stephen Crowder because of a

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 1>car I believe Carlos Maza, who works at Vox, who

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>has tweeted out things like since I started work in Vox,

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Crowder has been making video after a video debunking

0:38:56.600 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>strike Through. Every single video has included repeated over at

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>tax on my sexual orientation and ethnicity, and so he

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>had he's complaining, essentially saying that that Crowder, this Vox

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 1>writer says a Crowder is is being anti Hispanic and

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>anti gay in making fun of Carlos Maza, whom I

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 1>had never heard about until this controversy. But I feel

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>like I probably could guess a lot of his political

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>leanings and all that he works for Vox. I mean

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it's basically a COMI I mean, if you work for Vox,

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you're you're to the left of Bernie Sanders, if that's

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>even possible, if there's any room on the spectrum to the

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the left of Bernie Sanders, if you work in Vox,

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 1>you're pretty much there. So they went after Crowder, and

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Crowder is, look, he's a you know, I gave Steven's

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>always been a very very nice to me when I've

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>done a show. I gave him credit for being a

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>conservative pioneer on YouTube, somebody who was early among on

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>the right to use YouTube as a platform, and they

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 1>want to make it he's a great person for the

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>left or trying to make an example of because if

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 1>enough conservatives grow large followings on YouTube, well then it

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>becomes a place where we have real clout and where

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>we can go and it's an alternative to the current

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>valkanization that's happening in the digital space on you know,

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>with some of these other channels that are out there

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:17.919
<v Speaker 1>that well is this you know, is this going to work?

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Is this going to be a real going concern for

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 1>conservatives stretching for a while, or is it going to

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:28.239
<v Speaker 1>fold anyway? They put this out there for Crowder that

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:31.359
<v Speaker 1>they were looking at his stuff, and YouTube came back

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 1>and said, I'm trying to find the actual statement here.

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>After Maza's complaint, here we go, Here we go, YouTube

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>yesterday said quote, our team spent the last few days

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>conducting an in depth review of the videos flagged to us,

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and while we found foul language that was clearly hurtful.

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, the videos as posted don't violate our policies

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>as an open platform. It's crucial for us to allow

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone from creators, a journalist to late night TV host

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to express their opinions within the scope of our policies.

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Opinions can be deeply offensive, but if they don't violate

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>our policies, they'll remain on our site. And quote, Now,

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I this is really I think, if they're being honest

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>about this, this would be if applied in good faith,

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that there are rules, and if you don't violate the rules,

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you stay on the platform, even if it makes people

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:31.919
<v Speaker 1>sad on the inside, even if it gives them hurt

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 1>feelings lots of tears. If you don't break clearly defined,

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 1>universally applicable rules on the platform, you don't get kicked

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>off the platform. That's from the perspective of what we

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>could hope for with Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, any of these

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>things Google which owns YouTube, or Alphabet is the parent

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:56.839
<v Speaker 1>company which owns Google, which owns YouTube. That's the best

0:41:56.840 --> 0:42:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that we can hope for. But continued pressure from Vox

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and other sites, and the left has a much bigger

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>megaphone to the heads of Silicon Value than we do

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 1>on the right. They did not let up the pressure

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 1>after this, and they took action against Crowder. Anyway, Oh, Okay,

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>so what do they do. They didn't kick him off

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the platform entirely, but they de monetized him. They demonetize him.

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:31.319
<v Speaker 1>So now, okay, you can still be on YouTube, but

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:35.759
<v Speaker 1>you just can't use YouTube in a professional capacity to

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>make money. You can't use this as something that you

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>can partner with YouTube as a content creator for monetization.

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 1>And here's what YouTube said about this update on our

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>continued review. We have suspended this channel's monetization. Speaking a

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Crowder's channel, we came to this decision because a pattern

0:42:56.840 --> 0:43:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of egregious actions has harmed the broader community and is

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>against our YouTube partner program policies. What the heck does

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:11.799
<v Speaker 1>that mean? Harmed the broader community? Is that code for

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 1>things libs don't like, things the vox commies get upset,

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:21.279
<v Speaker 1>get a little sad about. I couldn't even tell you

0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 1>harmed the broader community. How is it a violation or

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the rules or not? You see what happened here was

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 1>you had a high profile test of whether or not

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:39.840
<v Speaker 1>YouTube engages in anti conservative viewpoint discrimination. And I'm not,

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I'm not agreeing or disagreeing, or I'm

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:44.799
<v Speaker 1>passing no judgment on the specifics of what. First of all,

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen or heard what Crawder said. I've seen

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of pull quotes on it, but you know,

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if some of the stuff he said

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not passing judgement on one way or the other.

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 1>But YouTube decided when they looked at this that it

0:43:57.080 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 1>did not violate any of their rules, and that was

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 1>their judgment. Now a day passes, there's media attention on this.

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Clearly the social justice left he is up in arms

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:16.240
<v Speaker 1>about this decision, and so they come up with the well,

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll go with the kind of halfway. We'll split the baby,

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:24.359
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. Here we will tell Crowder that he

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 1>can stay on the platform, but he has been demonetized,

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>so that is taking sanction against him, That is punishing

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 1>him for speech that the left does not like. Now,

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 1>conservatives are all fired up about this, as we should be,

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:45.920
<v Speaker 1>just as when friends of mine like Raheem Kassam and

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Kelley and others have been summarily suspended from Twitter

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 1>for things that to me or it's a judgment call

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, but an incredibly poor judgment call based

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 1>on the kind of things they've been suspended from the past,

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:04.800
<v Speaker 1>we conservatives rally together, but this is going to continue

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>on and I can't say that I really, I really

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:09.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like we have an answer here. This does remind

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit of the debate that has been

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:18.520
<v Speaker 1>roiling conservatism and the right for the last week or

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>so about Frenchism, and I guess sarab amari Ism. I

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 1>don't know what we really you know, Frenchism pro or

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:31.319
<v Speaker 1>khnum or four or against and that, and by the way,

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:34.919
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not I don't want to try to dig

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:36.680
<v Speaker 1>too deep into that one right now, because I'm not

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 1>going to represent to David's satisfaction his point of view

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:42.280
<v Speaker 1>from David French from Nash Review accurately, and I certainly

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be able to represent sarab Amari's point of view

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:50.319
<v Speaker 1>on this. But in very basic summary, it's you know,

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 1>do you do you have to do what you have

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to do to win if you really believe in and

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>if you really believe that there are things that are

0:45:56.560 --> 0:45:59.359
<v Speaker 1>important in conservatism that must be implemented and not just

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>weight around that hope that one day the other side

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to their senses, or do you try to be

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 1>nice and stay within the already agreed power frameworks and

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:13.719
<v Speaker 1>see if you can just sort of make incremental progress

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:18.360
<v Speaker 1>toward conservative ents. What do we do with these social

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 1>media platforms? Do we just keep pushing back and saying,

0:46:22.160 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, we know that what you're doing. And this

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is the future of communication, my friends. This is the

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 1>battle that conservatives have been waging a battle against the

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:36.200
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media since well at least the eighties with Reagan.

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But really, you know, thanks to Rush and some of

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the other big voices out there who gave a voice

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:44.279
<v Speaker 1>to half of the country, and then the rise of

0:46:44.280 --> 0:46:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Fox News starting in nineteen ninety six, the Drudge Report,

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:50.839
<v Speaker 1>which has been a mainstay of my Internet reading since

0:46:50.840 --> 0:46:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I was in college. You know, thanks to these alternatives,

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:57.560
<v Speaker 1>we finally had some balance in the voices in the media.

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:00.720
<v Speaker 1>But now that you know, the digital world that seemed

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 1>open this up and now it's being closed off again

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 1>because of the dominance of these platforms. These are the

0:47:07.280 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>ways that people get their information online. Now, you know,

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 1>people are not going no one's typing in you know, Patriot, Newscoolstuff,

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:20.440
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, slash net and persand backslash Patriot. I mean,

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:23.080
<v Speaker 1>no one's doing that, right, you go. You see what's

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in your Facebook feed, you see what's in your Twitter feed.

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:27.360
<v Speaker 1>You google a word or two about the news of

0:47:27.360 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the day, and whatever pops up is what you're going

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to read. So this gives them a massive advantage. And

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 1>who knows how you can even calculate how valuable this

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 1>was for Democrat candidates in the last few elections. You know,

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 1>we're just waking up to this now, We're waking up

0:47:43.480 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to how pervasive the bias of Silicon Valley is, how

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:53.000
<v Speaker 1>strongly the left has dominated behind the scenes via algorithms,

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of service and these enforcement procedures. I mean,

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:58.720
<v Speaker 1>here's one idea. If I got suspended, let's say from Twitter,

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 1>who would I even call? What do you even do?

0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Is there is there a phone number? Can I get

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 1>someone on the phone at Twitter that will explain to

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>me what's going on? Not that I'm aware of, there's

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:09.719
<v Speaker 1>no you know, one eight hundred Twitter. So I get

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to send into some anonymous turn someone anonymous service email

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 1>account and hope that someone is going to give me

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a fair shake. There. You know, I don't even know

0:48:19.200 --> 0:48:22.319
<v Speaker 1>what the answers are to these things. But I also

0:48:22.360 --> 0:48:25.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know how we're supposed to continue to engage with

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:29.400
<v Speaker 1>these platforms in good faith unless they or believing that

0:48:29.480 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 1>they're engaging with us in good faith, unless that they

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:33.280
<v Speaker 1>established very clear rules of the road. And in cases

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:36.960
<v Speaker 1>like this, where it's where it's a close call, or

0:48:37.080 --> 0:48:39.160
<v Speaker 1>rather where it's an important call not a close call,

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't go against the conservative somehow. This was a

0:48:44.719 --> 0:48:48.200
<v Speaker 1>real test for YouTube. And you know, there's a major

0:48:48.280 --> 0:48:51.960
<v Speaker 1>effort underway right now to get rid of all kinds

0:48:52.000 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of content from YouTube, and this was the New York

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Times piece. YouTube is removing thousands of videos that push

0:48:58.000 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 1>quote extreme views now, as is so often the case

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 1>with the debates over censorship and the First Amendment, which

0:49:06.000 --> 0:49:08.719
<v Speaker 1>are some of the most interesting constitutional fights that we've

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:11.799
<v Speaker 1>had in this country. Where does the First Amendment stop

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and start? What's protected, what's not? And it is it

0:49:15.160 --> 0:49:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is an essential freedom, And yes, we need the First Amendment.

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we need the Second Amendment to protect the first,

0:49:20.560 --> 0:49:22.439
<v Speaker 1>but we also need the First Amendment to protect the second.

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:24.920
<v Speaker 1>We need the First Amendment for everything else that's going on.

0:49:26.320 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Freedom of speech, the liberty to share ideas without prior

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:33.680
<v Speaker 1>restraint from the government, without punishment from government, entities and

0:49:33.719 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>bodies except in the most clearly defined circumstances, and it's

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>easier said than done to clearly define them. This is

0:49:40.960 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 1>central to our society and it's really one of the

0:49:43.160 --> 0:49:48.239
<v Speaker 1>things that separates us from many other developed countries, not

0:49:48.280 --> 0:49:51.080
<v Speaker 1>just in the West, but around the world, industrialized, wealthy countries.

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:54.200
<v Speaker 1>We have true freedom of speech. It doesn't really exist

0:49:54.239 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else. But when you start to see the the

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:04.759
<v Speaker 1>capacity for digital censorship grow in this way, meaning that

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:08.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, an algorithm can shift the public conversation about

0:50:08.280 --> 0:50:11.400
<v Speaker 1>an issue, whether it's immigration or healthcare, or which presidential

0:50:11.440 --> 0:50:13.839
<v Speaker 1>candidate they can shift behind the scenes, you don't even

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:17.320
<v Speaker 1>know what's going on. You don't know how they're doing

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:19.399
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. It's not just like a newspaper that's

0:50:19.440 --> 0:50:22.319
<v Speaker 1>presenting you information. Are you seeing this because it's the

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:24.719
<v Speaker 1>most relevant search result? Are you seeing it because your

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 1>friends that you agree with want you to see this?

0:50:27.239 --> 0:50:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Why are you being shown these things? Unless we have

0:50:30.400 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 1>full transparency into that, we're never really going to know

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:39.719
<v Speaker 1>why we're seeing the information that we are, how it's impacting,

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:43.800
<v Speaker 1>how it's influencing our view on a whole host of issues.

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:47.319
<v Speaker 1>And I want to return to this censorship point, because

0:50:47.360 --> 0:50:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that's where this YouTube removing extreme videos. This is something

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:54.360
<v Speaker 1>we need to watch very very closely because this is

0:50:54.360 --> 0:50:55.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be true across the Internet on all these

0:50:55.920 --> 0:50:59.880
<v Speaker 1>different platforms, and given what we've seen with Crowder, where

0:51:00.320 --> 0:51:02.399
<v Speaker 1>they'll find a way to punish you if your conservative ian,

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>if you don't break their rules. Think about where that

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 1>could go next and who could be next in this process.

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll have more for you on this in just a moment. YouTube. Facebook.

0:51:12.920 --> 0:51:17.839
<v Speaker 1>They dwarf CNN, the New York Times in not just

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 1>the money that they command in the advertising dollars, in

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:24.279
<v Speaker 1>their ability to elevate and suppress voices. I mean, it's

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:27.360
<v Speaker 1>not even close. There's been a massive shift in power

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:31.160
<v Speaker 1>from these old legacy platforms like the New York Times,

0:51:31.200 --> 0:51:34.640
<v Speaker 1>CNN apparatus and the apparat chicks who work for them,

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to these social media platforms. That's that has happened. It

0:51:38.520 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 1>is reality now and they're much bigger players in this space.

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:47.680
<v Speaker 1>These digital platforms are the future of communication. I mean

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:51.359
<v Speaker 1>they're the present and future of communication. And that's why

0:51:51.400 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 1>when you see things like this from The New York

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Times about them, we should all be on guard and

0:51:57.040 --> 0:51:59.720
<v Speaker 1>not just and then you see what happens with Stephen

0:51:59.760 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Crow and other conservatives, fellow conservatives in terms of the

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:07.440
<v Speaker 1>punishments that are meeted out, the suspensions that all of that.

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:10.480
<v Speaker 1>We got to be ready. This is this is the

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>biggest First Amendment fight in terms of free speech, not

0:52:14.360 --> 0:52:16.880
<v Speaker 1>religious liberty. That's other parts of this that we're going

0:52:16.920 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to have going forward. New York Times Rights here that

0:52:19.600 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the companies like YouTube have come under intense criticism for

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:28.240
<v Speaker 1>their delayed reaction to this spread of hateful and false content.

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, President Trump and others argue the

0:52:31.120 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 1>giant tech platforms censor right wing opinions, and the new

0:52:34.239 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 1>policies put in place by the companies have inflamed those debates. Yeah, yeah,

0:52:40.080 --> 0:52:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they have. Is what is really hateful and false content?

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:49.839
<v Speaker 1>How could we even engage that? Things like if someone

0:52:49.920 --> 0:52:52.879
<v Speaker 1>says abortion as murder? Is that a hateful comment? Because

0:52:52.920 --> 0:52:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of you listening would say, well,

0:52:54.880 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it's hateful to kill babies. So what is hateful content?

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Illegue immigration is bad and I legal immigrants should be

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:06.200
<v Speaker 1>punished for breaking the law. Is that hateful content? You

0:53:06.200 --> 0:53:08.960
<v Speaker 1>may say, buck, of course not, But if you ask,

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:12.080
<v Speaker 1>if you asked a room full of people that work

0:53:12.120 --> 0:53:14.960
<v Speaker 1>for Google or people that work for Facebook, is that hateful?

0:53:15.000 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I think they would say absolutely. You had none other

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:24.320
<v Speaker 1>than Anderson Cooper himself be rating someone on air because

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Facebook would not take down a video that was essentially

0:53:27.719 --> 0:53:30.239
<v Speaker 1>a parody video of Nancy Pelosi looking like it looking

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:34.319
<v Speaker 1>like a clown. That's right, take it down. Deep platform it.

0:53:35.680 --> 0:53:38.080
<v Speaker 1>The mentality that you see from the left on college

0:53:38.120 --> 0:53:42.160
<v Speaker 1>campuses has now found its way, not just in a

0:53:42.239 --> 0:53:47.640
<v Speaker 1>peripheral sense, into the most powerful media platforms and in

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:49.799
<v Speaker 1>the minds of the most powerful media figures on the left.

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:52.880
<v Speaker 1>It's at the very top of the power structure. You know,

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:56.239
<v Speaker 1>you have you know Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg and

0:53:56.320 --> 0:53:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the people that run these platforms. They feel the social

0:53:59.480 --> 0:54:02.799
<v Speaker 1>pressure and they have bought in at some level to

0:54:03.000 --> 0:54:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the construct that the left creates here of a need,

0:54:07.719 --> 0:54:12.480
<v Speaker 1>an immediate need to suppress, suppress, and sensor speech. This

0:54:12.600 --> 0:54:16.759
<v Speaker 1>is going to have very negative consequences for us. Do

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you able to fight back going forward? If they're able

0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to just determine what's hateful, what's fake, they get to

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:26.319
<v Speaker 1>pull down what's fake. Now, is it that going to

0:54:26.360 --> 0:54:29.200
<v Speaker 1>be interesting, considering that they believe every word out of

0:54:29.200 --> 0:54:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's mouth. Donald Trump can say that he had

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a bagel for breakfast and they'll say that it's fake news.

0:54:35.280 --> 0:54:37.520
<v Speaker 1>We're going to let them now determine on these platforms,

0:54:38.440 --> 0:54:41.080
<v Speaker 1>what is the answer. It's gonna have to be government regulation, folks.

0:54:41.120 --> 0:54:44.560
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna have to be wartime conservatives uniting and take

0:54:44.600 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 1>an action that a whole lot more show teams stay

0:54:47.760 --> 0:54:51.520
<v Speaker 1>with me this day. Have set upon a mighty endeavor,

0:54:52.560 --> 0:54:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a struggle to preserve our republic, our religion, and our civilization,

0:55:00.600 --> 0:55:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and you set free a suffering humanity. When I attended

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:10.759
<v Speaker 1>the commemoration of the sixtieth anniversary of the D Day landings,

0:55:12.120 --> 0:55:16.840
<v Speaker 1>some thought it might be the last such event. But

0:55:16.960 --> 0:55:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the wartime generation, my generation, is resilient, and I'm delighted

0:55:24.760 --> 0:55:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to be with you in Portsmouth today. A lot of

0:55:29.719 --> 0:55:32.759
<v Speaker 1>pomp and circumstance around the President's visit and time with

0:55:32.880 --> 0:55:36.919
<v Speaker 1>the royal family, which one would expect. And now with

0:55:37.360 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 1>June sixth, the D Day commemoration, right, I know, today's

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:48.600
<v Speaker 1>June fits or tomorrow's technically the D Day, the day

0:55:48.600 --> 0:55:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of D Day. But while we look at this and

0:55:51.440 --> 0:55:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we find ourselves one. I think first hearkening back to

0:55:56.239 --> 0:55:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the courage of those who were storming those beaches in

0:55:58.920 --> 0:56:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Normandy and what they did, what they put on the line.

0:56:01.520 --> 0:56:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Many gave their lives for this country. Many Brits, many

0:56:04.239 --> 0:56:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Canadians and some others from some other countries as well,

0:56:08.719 --> 0:56:12.960
<v Speaker 1>gave their lives in that effort, and we have a

0:56:13.040 --> 0:56:15.360
<v Speaker 1>very special relationship with the with the Brits as a

0:56:15.440 --> 0:56:18.279
<v Speaker 1>result that endures to this day. I mean, it's yes,

0:56:18.320 --> 0:56:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it's true. We have all this cultural similarity and this

0:56:21.680 --> 0:56:24.800
<v Speaker 1>connectivity between us and the Brits that stretches back for centuries,

0:56:24.800 --> 0:56:27.640
<v Speaker 1>although not all, not all of the history with Great

0:56:27.640 --> 0:56:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Britain's great we had they did. They did burned down

0:56:29.600 --> 0:56:31.319
<v Speaker 1>our White House at one point, right, I mean, there's

0:56:31.360 --> 0:56:33.480
<v Speaker 1>been some bad stuff. They were impressing our sailors for

0:56:33.520 --> 0:56:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a while and we had to we had to beat

0:56:35.000 --> 0:56:36.799
<v Speaker 1>them in a revolution. But it's cool. We're friends now.

0:56:36.840 --> 0:56:38.680
<v Speaker 1>We love the Brits. In fact, I saw a poll

0:56:38.760 --> 0:56:43.200
<v Speaker 1>today that said that Americans ninety percent of Americans have

0:56:43.239 --> 0:56:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a favorable view of Great Britain, which is about what

0:56:46.160 --> 0:56:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I would have guessed. And then the ten percent I

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:50.560
<v Speaker 1>think are just curmudgingly. I don't like anybody, you know,

0:56:51.000 --> 0:56:57.480
<v Speaker 1>probably probably hate you know, Barbados, the Bahamas, Vanuatu and

0:56:57.560 --> 0:57:00.440
<v Speaker 1>other like little island paradises that how could you be

0:57:00.480 --> 0:57:02.640
<v Speaker 1>mad at them? But I'm sure there's there's you can

0:57:02.680 --> 0:57:05.120
<v Speaker 1>find ten percent of people that don't like any issue,

0:57:05.160 --> 0:57:07.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter what it is. But this should be a

0:57:07.960 --> 0:57:12.279
<v Speaker 1>day when it's maybe just a little bit out of

0:57:12.320 --> 0:57:15.279
<v Speaker 1>favor to trash Trump. You know, we got the D

0:57:15.360 --> 0:57:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Day commemoration. He is the commander in chief. As I

0:57:18.440 --> 0:57:21.000
<v Speaker 1>was telling you yesterday, I think he gets not nearly enough.

0:57:21.920 --> 0:57:26.240
<v Speaker 1>He gets not nearly enough praise or support or recognition

0:57:26.880 --> 0:57:29.520
<v Speaker 1>for being a commander chief who has stayed his hand

0:57:29.640 --> 0:57:32.680
<v Speaker 1>when the two previous commanders in chief really did not

0:57:32.760 --> 0:57:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, and I think made some enormous strategic

0:57:36.280 --> 0:57:40.120
<v Speaker 1>errors both Obama and Bush. Trump has not made enormous

0:57:40.120 --> 0:57:44.280
<v Speaker 1>strategic errors on national security, has not put large numbers

0:57:44.320 --> 0:57:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of our troops in harms way unnecessarily. But the the patriotism,

0:57:50.560 --> 0:57:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, and the water's edge, that whole, that doesn't

0:57:54.320 --> 0:57:58.280
<v Speaker 1>really you know, that that partisanship stops the water's that

0:57:58.400 --> 0:58:01.360
<v Speaker 1>just that's not really true anymore, is it. We've got

0:58:01.400 --> 0:58:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a president on foreign soil, He's still getting people coming

0:58:04.600 --> 0:58:06.480
<v Speaker 1>after him and every way they can at CNN have

0:58:06.560 --> 0:58:09.160
<v Speaker 1>one of their correspondents. I don't know if this is

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:13.160
<v Speaker 1>just stretching for stretching for time, or if this is

0:58:13.200 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to just pander to the CNN audience, which is

0:58:15.880 --> 0:58:22.240
<v Speaker 1>psychotically anti Trump, psychotically anti Trump. But here's CNN CNN

0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:24.919
<v Speaker 1>correspondent talking about how maybe Trump wants to be king

0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:30.520
<v Speaker 1>himself play seven. Essentially, there are so few people who

0:58:30.600 --> 0:58:34.080
<v Speaker 1>can seemingly inspire that level of respect, that level of

0:58:34.200 --> 0:58:38.480
<v Speaker 1>deference in President Trump. We don't often see that, but

0:58:38.520 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 1>as you said, the queen, he's always taking a very

0:58:41.440 --> 0:58:44.200
<v Speaker 1>deferential tone. He seems to have a huge amount of

0:58:44.200 --> 0:58:48.440
<v Speaker 1>respect for the institution of the monarchy. Perhaps he likes

0:58:48.480 --> 0:58:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the idea of being a king. I would say that's

0:58:53.280 --> 0:58:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a Freudian slip. But you know, it's just they can't

0:58:57.640 --> 0:59:01.240
<v Speaker 1>help themselves. She's a correspondence, not a pundit. She's supposed

0:59:01.240 --> 0:59:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to just be reporting on the president's visit and that

0:59:04.520 --> 0:59:08.400
<v Speaker 1>he has. You know, these are the are the loops

0:59:08.440 --> 0:59:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that exist in the minds that there's a kind of

0:59:10.480 --> 0:59:13.520
<v Speaker 1>playback loop that exists in the minds of many liberals

0:59:13.600 --> 0:59:18.240
<v Speaker 1>on these issues. And one of the loops is that

0:59:18.320 --> 0:59:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump Trump likes authoritarians, supports authoritarians, wants to work with authoritarians.

0:59:23.920 --> 0:59:29.040
<v Speaker 1>You know. That's yeah, that's one of the loops. And

0:59:29.080 --> 0:59:33.479
<v Speaker 1>so when when he's meeting with you know, maybe maybe

0:59:33.520 --> 0:59:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Canada is a closer rally, I don't know. I don't

0:59:34.960 --> 0:59:38.080
<v Speaker 1>want to get in between our Canadian and British brothers

0:59:38.120 --> 0:59:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and sisters on this one. I don't know who's technically

0:59:39.760 --> 0:59:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a close rally the United States. You could make the

0:59:41.280 --> 0:59:43.320
<v Speaker 1>case out of the way, it's probably Canada. But we

0:59:43.400 --> 0:59:45.640
<v Speaker 1>love the Brits too, you know, we can't. We can't

0:59:45.640 --> 0:59:48.840
<v Speaker 1>pick among our children. We love them all equally. But

0:59:49.200 --> 0:59:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you'd think that here he is showing. You know, they

0:59:51.920 --> 0:59:54.600
<v Speaker 1>always say he's not presidential. They always say he doesn't

0:59:54.640 --> 0:59:56.880
<v Speaker 1>give all the due respect, and he says things that

0:59:56.880 --> 1:00:01.000
<v Speaker 1>he shouldn't say. And now he's being respe backfull, not

1:00:01.120 --> 1:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of Putin or Kim Jung un. We know they want

1:00:04.680 --> 1:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to jump on that and say all kinds of things

1:00:06.640 --> 1:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>about how, oh, look at what this tells us, and

1:00:08.560 --> 1:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>he loves dictators, and all this other stuff. We know that, right,

1:00:12.240 --> 1:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>But he's being respectful of the royal family in one

1:00:16.600 --> 1:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of our closest allied countries, and it's indicative in some way,

1:00:21.680 --> 1:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>according to the CNN report, everyone and maybe he wants

1:00:24.120 --> 1:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to be king of Trump's monarchical tendencies, of Trump's desire

1:00:29.480 --> 1:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to be an autocrat himself, even though the king in

1:00:33.400 --> 1:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the if there was a king in Great Britain, it

1:00:36.760 --> 1:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>would not be a person of any power authority, So

1:00:39.000 --> 1:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>why would you want to do that? And I'd be

1:00:41.480 --> 1:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>only the bet that Trump has. I don't know what

1:00:43.480 --> 1:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the real funding is for the Royal family in Britain

1:00:48.080 --> 1:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, but my sense is that Trump has a

1:00:53.440 --> 1:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>whole lot more money and certainly a lot more freedom

1:00:55.480 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and what he can do than I think Great Britain does.

1:00:58.160 --> 1:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>You know. Also, they did a little bit of a

1:00:59.760 --> 1:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>clear up on the Megan Markel issue. I mean, Trump

1:01:02.760 --> 1:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>addressed that again, it was fake news what they did

1:01:05.600 --> 1:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that was being spread around in a way that was

1:01:08.320 --> 1:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>meant to just poison the well of media coverage before

1:01:13.480 --> 1:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the president's arrival. He didn't, he didn't go after Megan

1:01:17.240 --> 1:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Markel unnecessarily. He just said he didn't realize she had

1:01:19.840 --> 1:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>said something mean and then he said something nice about her.

1:01:22.600 --> 1:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>So that was fake news. You know that they want

1:01:24.280 --> 1:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to skip past that, but that was indeed fake news. Uh.

1:01:30.000 --> 1:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of fake news, well, I guess it's plagiarism. Isn't

1:01:34.400 --> 1:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>really fake news. It's fake thinking. It's falsifying your own

1:01:39.160 --> 1:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>ability and thinking so that people believe you know more

1:01:42.120 --> 1:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>than you do. Biden's got himself in some trouble. Has

1:01:45.200 --> 1:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to do with a Green New Deal. In the environment.

1:01:47.480 --> 1:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>We always hear that Trump administration is it's so terrible

1:01:51.240 --> 1:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>from liberals say this, it's so terrible in the environment.

1:01:53.360 --> 1:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump disagrees with that. Play fifteen. You know, we have

1:01:57.520 --> 1:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the cleanest air in the world in the United States

1:01:59.720 --> 1:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and gotten better since some president. We have to clete

1:02:02.920 --> 1:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>this water. It's crystal clean, and I always say I

1:02:05.160 --> 1:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>want crystal clean to water in air. And so I

1:02:07.600 --> 1:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard his comments, but we do have we're setting

1:02:09.920 --> 1:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>records environmentally. I think that in part he just says

1:02:14.040 --> 1:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>this because he knows that it drives liberals insane. One

1:02:17.960 --> 1:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of the areas there's a the liberal mind really does

1:02:21.520 --> 1:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>believe that Republicans, they've been so brainwashed on this issue.

1:02:26.280 --> 1:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>They think that Republicans don't care about leading the water

1:02:31.320 --> 1:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>real pollutants, not CO two, which is what you and

1:02:33.680 --> 1:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I breathe out. I'm filling the room around me right

1:02:36.160 --> 1:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>now with CO two, so are you. It's not a pollutant.

1:02:40.080 --> 1:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But they have come to believe that they are the

1:02:43.560 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>planet's only hope. That the left, the Green New Deal

1:02:47.640 --> 1:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>advocates they're the only hope for saving the world. And

1:02:52.040 --> 1:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not an exaggeration. That is how they view this,

1:02:55.000 --> 1:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to save the world by continuing to

1:02:59.400 --> 1:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>push with policies that they can't they will never implement themselves,

1:03:04.520 --> 1:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>will never get through Congress, would be astronomically expensive. But

1:03:10.680 --> 1:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it's really more about the psychological posture of Liberals with

1:03:13.960 --> 1:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>this issue than anything else. They believe much more strongly

1:03:17.840 --> 1:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in their own greatness, as indicated by their belief in

1:03:22.960 --> 1:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the Green New Deal, than anything that has to do

1:03:25.520 --> 1:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>with really saving the world. But Trump pointing out that

1:03:29.800 --> 1:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of good stuff going on with the environment,

1:03:32.000 --> 1:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that we're constantly the EPA has not been destroyed. All

1:03:36.000 --> 1:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>regulation of the environment is not you know, has not

1:03:38.880 --> 1:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>gone by the wayside. This drives them insane. This is

1:03:43.080 --> 1:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a great way of trolling them, because they true believers

1:03:46.960 --> 1:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>on the left insist, and I've come across them. They

1:03:51.320 --> 1:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>really do think that you and I, those of us

1:03:53.720 --> 1:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>who are conservative have no interest or care whatsoever for

1:04:00.400 --> 1:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the environment, for conservation and for the world around us.

1:04:04.680 --> 1:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>What do they base this on, It's not clear climate

1:04:09.200 --> 1:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>change skepticism, or rather skepticism of the catastrophic implications of

1:04:14.240 --> 1:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>climate change. Even though we can point to the same

1:04:17.800 --> 1:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>projections about climate change stretching back for decades being wrong,

1:04:21.120 --> 1:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>We're still supposed to believe that the people who were

1:04:22.920 --> 1:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>wrong are going to be right the next time. But

1:04:24.280 --> 1:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Biden is trying to make some headway with the left

1:04:27.360 --> 1:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>on the Green New Deal long climate change, and he

1:04:31.600 --> 1:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>ran into a little trouble because he borrowed from some

1:04:33.720 --> 1:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>other some other places in his announcement for his own plan.

1:04:38.200 --> 1:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So we will get into that. We all saw about

1:04:39.800 --> 1:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders and socialism. It's gonna be fun stick around.

1:04:42.640 --> 1:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>It's shameful the way we treat it Puerto Rico in

1:04:46.840 --> 1:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the Islands. I'm not even sure people in the Presence

1:04:49.920 --> 1:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>administration knew Puerto Ricans are all citizens. No, I'm not,

1:04:55.720 --> 1:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not joking. And so there was this notion that somehow,

1:05:00.200 --> 1:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>why should we have to make and invest that kind

1:05:03.520 --> 1:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of money in dealing with what is a genuine existential crisis.

1:05:09.680 --> 1:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>An existential crisis, he says, after taking a shot at

1:05:13.560 --> 1:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>at Puerto Rico. Let me tell you that that's Joe

1:05:17.200 --> 1:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Biden who's got his own He's got his own problems.

1:05:19.120 --> 1:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>This week that the Trump administration has sent billions and

1:05:24.880 --> 1:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars in disaster relief to to Puerto Rico.

1:05:31.000 --> 1:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>And while Biden is going to sit there and tell

1:05:33.360 --> 1:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>us all that this is that, you know, he's making

1:05:36.720 --> 1:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>fun of them, that making fun of Trump, that his

1:05:39.080 --> 1:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>people on administration don't know that Puerto Ricans are citizens.

1:05:42.400 --> 1:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I would just note that I spoke to the governor

1:05:45.400 --> 1:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of Puerto Rico about this issue, and I said, are

1:05:47.840 --> 1:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you getting sufficient this? I interviewed him and I said,

1:05:51.040 --> 1:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>are you getting sufficient funds? Are is the government response?

1:05:55.080 --> 1:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>The federal government response strong? And he said yes. Now

1:05:59.120 --> 1:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>there are some issues that should be addressed. One is

1:06:03.480 --> 1:06:06.439
<v Speaker 1>the Jones Act, which is an outdated and really kind

1:06:06.440 --> 1:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of really somewhat bizarre statute that says that you know,

1:06:11.160 --> 1:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>if a ship leaves. I mean, I can't remember the

1:06:13.920 --> 1:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>specificsm it now, but it has to You can't just

1:06:16.280 --> 1:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>send a ship from the US to Puerto Rico. It

1:06:19.320 --> 1:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>has to come from some or a foreign ship has

1:06:21.520 --> 1:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to go to a US port first before it goes

1:06:23.560 --> 1:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to Puerto Rico. I forget that, but it just means

1:06:25.520 --> 1:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that the price of goods is much higher. It also

1:06:28.320 --> 1:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>was an issue for the relief efforts initially. But you

1:06:31.840 --> 1:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>can tell that that Biden is not going to be

1:06:34.200 --> 1:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a stickler for accuracy, because why should he be. They're

1:06:38.000 --> 1:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna they're gonna prop him up and say he's great

1:06:40.280 --> 1:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>no matter what. They're gonna do what they always do,

1:06:43.520 --> 1:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>which is skip over any inconsistency, any inaccuracy that Biden

1:06:48.840 --> 1:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>puts forward, and as long as it's negative for Trump,

1:06:52.280 --> 1:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>they will find a way. They'll find a way to

1:06:55.560 --> 1:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>make it sound like Biden's more or less on more

1:06:57.760 --> 1:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>or less on track. But he does have a little

1:06:59.640 --> 1:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>problem that came up, and this is actually from CNN

1:07:05.320 --> 1:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>where Biden once again has a plagiarism issue. This is

1:07:10.640 --> 1:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the democrats number one candidate. This guy a month ago

1:07:13.600 --> 1:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>had a sniffing, kissing tops of heads being super inappropriate

1:07:18.840 --> 1:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and weird issue, which you'll note Democrats even to meet

1:07:22.120 --> 1:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you era not a problem for them. They think he's

1:07:24.040 --> 1:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the most electable, so they'll they'll just skip past all that.

1:07:27.640 --> 1:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>But CNN's John King he was displeased with Biden for

1:07:33.840 --> 1:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>h this problem that should not have been place sixteen.

1:07:37.000 --> 1:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a pretty amateur mistake for the front runners

1:07:39.320 --> 1:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>campaign to make on a substantial policy rollout when they

1:07:42.520 --> 1:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>had to know when Team Biden got together planning to

1:07:45.040 --> 1:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>announce his campaign. The one thing they cannot do is

1:07:47.600 --> 1:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>plagiaris it's lazy, or it's arrogant. And let me flip

1:07:50.320 --> 1:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing. You would think he would be happy to

1:07:52.120 --> 1:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>quote progressive groups on his website as they are. They're

1:07:54.520 --> 1:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>attacking great embrace. This is i'll call this a style issue.

1:07:58.080 --> 1:07:59.919
<v Speaker 1>All this is a leadership issue. This is a comp

1:08:00.080 --> 1:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>this issue he wants to be present in that states.

1:08:01.760 --> 1:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>This is a leadership and competence issue. You can't do

1:08:03.920 --> 1:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. You just can't. You do it in our business,

1:08:05.960 --> 1:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you get fire. Donald Trump tweeted out plagiarism charge against

1:08:10.360 --> 1:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>sleepy Joe Biden on his ridiculous climate change plan is

1:08:14.160 --> 1:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a big problem. But the corrupt media will save him.

1:08:18.160 --> 1:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>That's true. His other problem is that he is drawing flies,

1:08:21.200 --> 1:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>not people to his rallies. Nobody is showing up, I

1:08:23.680 --> 1:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>mean nobody. You can't win without people. Is this comes

1:08:30.960 --> 1:08:35.839
<v Speaker 1>from Republican National The RNC has been going after Biden

1:08:35.880 --> 1:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>on this too. The RNC Steve Guests tweeted during his

1:08:40.000 --> 1:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty eight campaign, Biden plagiarized campaign speeches from British

1:08:44.000 --> 1:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>Labor Party leader Neil Kinnock as well as Robert Kennedy.

1:08:48.080 --> 1:08:54.599
<v Speaker 1>During law school, Biden plagiarized too. Likes to plagiarize. This

1:08:54.680 --> 1:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>is an issue. I would just point out that there

1:08:57.560 --> 1:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>was there was a a member of the incoming administration

1:09:03.040 --> 1:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Trump campaign who the left wing media was

1:09:05.640 --> 1:09:08.559
<v Speaker 1>actually CNN went after her for a twenty year old

1:09:08.560 --> 1:09:13.639
<v Speaker 1>plagiarism issue and cause huge problems for her unfairly, and

1:09:14.000 --> 1:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>this was used to sink an incoming administration official. This

1:09:18.920 --> 1:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is not going to sing Biden though, because they're gonna

1:09:21.840 --> 1:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>just skip past it. They're gonna say, they're gonna say

1:09:25.120 --> 1:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that this was It's fine. You know, they'll they'll allow it.

1:09:28.040 --> 1:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>The groups that he plagiarized from will say no, no,

1:09:30.600 --> 1:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>even without without giving us official permission, we will give

1:09:36.479 --> 1:09:43.759
<v Speaker 1>retroactive permission to Joe Biden to steal our stuff. Biden

1:09:44.000 --> 1:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>has said some other really interesting stuff, by the way.

1:09:46.200 --> 1:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's going really hard here on climate because

1:09:49.880 --> 1:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to find a way to look relevant and

1:09:53.720 --> 1:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>authentic to the left wing base, because he needs he's

1:09:57.160 --> 1:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>going to need the base to support him if he's

1:09:58.640 --> 1:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna beat all these other candidates, be enough just for

1:10:00.800 --> 1:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the the establishment of DC, the swamp, the media to

1:10:04.960 --> 1:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>be with him. He's going to need grassroots activists on

1:10:07.760 --> 1:10:10.599
<v Speaker 1>the left to give him at least some support in

1:10:10.600 --> 1:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>this process. But you know, the Daily Caller News Foundation

1:10:15.720 --> 1:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>has looked at a few parts of this report that

1:10:18.680 --> 1:10:22.519
<v Speaker 1>are problematic. Then remember this is Biden's climate change call

1:10:22.600 --> 1:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to arms. Not quite as crazy as Elizabeth Warren, who

1:10:26.280 --> 1:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>says that it might be a greater challenge than World

1:10:28.320 --> 1:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>War two, but you know, is saying that this is

1:10:32.160 --> 1:10:35.519
<v Speaker 1>something that we have to deal with. Aviation, according to

1:10:35.560 --> 1:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the Biden platform that was released on this accounts for

1:10:38.280 --> 1:10:42.519
<v Speaker 1>nearly two percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, and that

1:10:42.600 --> 1:10:45.479
<v Speaker 1>portion is expected to increase. Unfortunately, today, a few low

1:10:45.520 --> 1:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>carbon technologies or fuels have been developed to tackle this challenge.

1:10:51.560 --> 1:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>The liberal website Vox in January used language that is

1:10:55.680 --> 1:10:57.559
<v Speaker 1>similar to this, right. I mean, these are the different

1:10:58.080 --> 1:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the different areas where he just sort of took this.

1:11:01.200 --> 1:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it's a staffer. I'm sure it's a staffer

1:11:04.280 --> 1:11:07.519
<v Speaker 1>who pulled this stuff together. What's more, it's gonna be

1:11:07.600 --> 1:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>than anything else, is just the way that Biden is

1:11:09.400 --> 1:11:12.599
<v Speaker 1>going to skate. He's gonna skate on this because he's

1:11:12.600 --> 1:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna skate on everything. It's gonna be Hillary all over again.

1:11:15.000 --> 1:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>They think that he is the electable one, and so

1:11:17.439 --> 1:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>he's the one that they will do everything they can

1:11:20.479 --> 1:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>to knock all barriers down in favor of. They're gonna

1:11:24.680 --> 1:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>do whatever they have to to try to help this guy,

1:11:26.439 --> 1:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna need to do a lot. He's he's

1:11:29.200 --> 1:11:32.479
<v Speaker 1>not a formidable candidate against Donald Trump. He's not. I

1:11:32.680 --> 1:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>still believe that Bernie Sanders as as crazy as it says.

1:11:35.280 --> 1:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk about crazy Bernie and the Soviet Union

1:11:37.840 --> 1:11:40.519
<v Speaker 1>in a minute. I still think that Bernie Sanders is

1:11:41.120 --> 1:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a bigger problem than Joe Biden if he gets the nomination. Obviously,

1:11:46.840 --> 1:11:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Soviet Union was in authoritarian society with no democratic rights.

1:11:52.880 --> 1:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think if you know history, you'll know that

1:11:54.800 --> 1:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>democratic socialists stood up and fought against that. You can

1:11:58.000 --> 1:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>look about what existed in the Soviet Union in Venezuela.

1:12:01.360 --> 1:12:06.719
<v Speaker 1>That's not what I'm talking about. Wait a second, why

1:12:06.840 --> 1:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is Bernie Sanders and Bernie Sanders there is talking about

1:12:09.080 --> 1:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>how the Soviet Union is not a good example of sellers.

1:12:11.680 --> 1:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>He can't look at that. Let's not forget that Bernie

1:12:15.360 --> 1:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't some big critic of Soviet socialism. He went there

1:12:18.760 --> 1:12:23.759
<v Speaker 1>on his honeymoon. Bernie went to the Soviet Union on

1:12:23.840 --> 1:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>his honeymoon. A bizarre choice. If nothing else, just think

1:12:28.000 --> 1:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>about the food. I mean, how much borsht can one

1:12:31.840 --> 1:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>man have on his honeymoon before he wants something else.

1:12:34.840 --> 1:12:36.799
<v Speaker 1>And he was there back in what was the eighties,

1:12:37.960 --> 1:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>so I can't imagine what that was really like. But

1:12:41.080 --> 1:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>he and he came back and with his wife. I've

1:12:43.280 --> 1:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>played the audio for you before on the show. He

1:12:47.640 --> 1:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>was defending what he saw there. In fact, he was

1:12:49.960 --> 1:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>glorifying some of what he saw there. It's kind of

1:12:52.000 --> 1:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a modern day you know, Walter Duranti, remember the guy

1:12:55.360 --> 1:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>from it was that the new York Times of Chicago Tribune.

1:12:57.320 --> 1:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the New York Times who went

1:12:59.120 --> 1:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>over there and didn't want to talk about or didn't

1:13:03.840 --> 1:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>want to report on the famine in Ukraine, which was

1:13:06.880 --> 1:13:10.479
<v Speaker 1>a forced famine. It was an intentional government policy. These

1:13:10.479 --> 1:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>people would have no food, they would starve. So I

1:13:13.240 --> 1:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>believe it's called the Holadamar by the Ukrainians, but I

1:13:16.360 --> 1:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>might have that wrong. There's a Ukrainian holocaust through the

1:13:20.640 --> 1:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>famine that the Soviet Union pushed on them, pushed on Ukraine.

1:13:26.479 --> 1:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>But Bernie is somebody who came back saying nice things

1:13:28.720 --> 1:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>about the Soviet Union as an adult, and as an

1:13:31.120 --> 1:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>adult who chose to travel there, So that may bring

1:13:34.880 --> 1:13:37.479
<v Speaker 1>us to all one. He's not honest about his past

1:13:37.600 --> 1:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>with socialism, which is not surprising at all. But then

1:13:41.000 --> 1:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>there's also how is it that socialism is still gaining

1:13:44.280 --> 1:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in popularity in this country at a time when you

1:13:47.240 --> 1:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>would think, given the internet access, we have what's happening

1:13:50.360 --> 1:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in Venezuela. Oh, and they all pretend like Venezuela is

1:13:54.000 --> 1:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>not a place that any of them would have ever

1:13:55.840 --> 1:14:00.080
<v Speaker 1>said anything nice about. That's not true. Venezuela is a

1:14:00.160 --> 1:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>country that, as recently as twenty twelve, you could find

1:14:04.280 --> 1:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>supportive editorials in the New York Times the Washington Post

1:14:07.800 --> 1:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>about what Chavez was trying to accomplish in that country.

1:14:11.920 --> 1:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have results really to point to, but they're saying,

1:14:14.280 --> 1:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's he's on the right track, trying the

1:14:17.880 --> 1:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>right things, doing what he can here. He's doing his

1:14:20.880 --> 1:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>best to make sure that there's going to be, you know,

1:14:26.240 --> 1:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a more equitable society in Venezuela.

1:14:31.080 --> 1:14:33.439
<v Speaker 1>But one of the reasons that I think it's becoming

1:14:33.960 --> 1:14:37.439
<v Speaker 1>more popular is that you're one that the media is

1:14:37.520 --> 1:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>largely supportive of this. Just as during the Soviet Union's era,

1:14:43.520 --> 1:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of people in academia and the

1:14:46.080 --> 1:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>media in this country who liked the idea of the

1:14:49.720 --> 1:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Soviet I'm not talking about fellow travelers and actual communist penetrations,

1:14:53.040 --> 1:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>which we did have here and is still a part

1:14:55.960 --> 1:14:59.479
<v Speaker 1>of our history that is completely whitewashed by the left.

1:15:00.000 --> 1:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>If you have not read Whittaker Chambers Witness, please please

1:15:04.040 --> 1:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>read that book. There are many others that I would

1:15:07.520 --> 1:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>blacklisted by history is great. There's there's a lot of

1:15:10.120 --> 1:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that's about McCarthy. There's the Venona Project. There's books about

1:15:15.760 --> 1:15:17.519
<v Speaker 1>the Nona that you should read. It's all about the

1:15:17.520 --> 1:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>penetrations the Soviet Union had of this country. The KGB

1:15:23.280 --> 1:15:27.439
<v Speaker 1>archives that were released as the metrok and archives, you know,

1:15:27.479 --> 1:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the Sword of the Shield about the KGB. Highly recommend

1:15:30.360 --> 1:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that book. It'll tell you one the extent of the

1:15:32.360 --> 1:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>operations against us at the hands of the Soviet Union,

1:15:35.240 --> 1:15:39.479
<v Speaker 1>but it'll also tell you about how the KGB and

1:15:39.560 --> 1:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the Communist Party were much closer to at some point

1:15:44.920 --> 1:15:46.519
<v Speaker 1>going to maybe open war with us than a lot

1:15:46.560 --> 1:15:49.439
<v Speaker 1>of people realize. They were really thinking about it. They

1:15:49.439 --> 1:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>were they thought we were going to have a first

1:15:51.040 --> 1:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>strike on them, so they were really considering a first

1:15:53.000 --> 1:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>strike on us. There's some scary stuff in those archives.

1:15:56.360 --> 1:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>But why why would anybody not understand the lessons that

1:16:00.160 --> 1:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>have been learned here? Man? How is it really possible

1:16:02.560 --> 1:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that in this at this stage of the game, there

1:16:06.800 --> 1:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>would be such a lack of understanding of the truth

1:16:11.280 --> 1:16:13.679
<v Speaker 1>of socialism? Well, you know the Daily the Daily Show,

1:16:13.760 --> 1:16:18.439
<v Speaker 1>which is a straight up propaganda show with jokes, so

1:16:18.600 --> 1:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>sometimes there's funny stuff, but it's it's political propaganda in

1:16:21.360 --> 1:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>joke form. I did this man on the street kid

1:16:24.240 --> 1:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>asking people about socialism, and I mean, here's what they said,

1:16:29.000 --> 1:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>play club eleven. I think socialism is great. I think

1:16:33.000 --> 1:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you should definitely help whoever you could at any situation

1:16:37.320 --> 1:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>for socialism just design to anything that's helping black people out. Okay,

1:16:41.360 --> 1:16:47.759
<v Speaker 1>so your socialism curious? In college? Do you hate billionaires? Bokey? Yeah.

1:16:47.960 --> 1:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>You look at Jeff Basis, he doesn't look human. I mean,

1:16:51.000 --> 1:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the socialism is one point. I mean I

1:16:55.360 --> 1:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>don't really know what socialism now. I know you said Buck,

1:17:00.120 --> 1:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>this isn't a scientific poll. There's a there's a bunch

1:17:02.920 --> 1:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>of college kids. What do they really know. Well, all

1:17:05.479 --> 1:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the polling that we see right now, I mean, if

1:17:07.400 --> 1:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about scientific polls, shows that there

1:17:09.560 --> 1:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty dramatic increase in support for socialism overall,

1:17:14.920 --> 1:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>that that people do believe in socialism, they do believe

1:17:18.720 --> 1:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's something that we should consider more as a country,

1:17:21.160 --> 1:17:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and it's getting close to I think fifty percent support

1:17:24.720 --> 1:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>among millennials that have to check the most recent polling.

1:17:27.840 --> 1:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>But part of it is that they don't know what

1:17:29.200 --> 1:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>it is. They don't really understand that what you have,

1:17:33.040 --> 1:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, in and I used to joke around that

1:17:35.120 --> 1:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders is running for the mayor of Stockholm. That's

1:17:37.320 --> 1:17:41.559
<v Speaker 1>not really fair to Stockholm. Stockholm is Sweden. Obviously Stockholm

1:17:41.720 --> 1:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>is a major city. There is a country that has

1:17:45.320 --> 1:17:49.559
<v Speaker 1>a pretty free market economy. It just has very high

1:17:49.600 --> 1:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>tax rates in a very large social welfare state. But

1:17:53.200 --> 1:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>it's not a socialist country. It's not meaningfully socialist in

1:17:57.680 --> 1:18:00.559
<v Speaker 1>many ways. It does not have government called the means

1:18:00.560 --> 1:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of production. It's not all state industries. It used to

1:18:03.760 --> 1:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>be along it used to be back in the seventies.

1:18:06.479 --> 1:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But the designation of these as socialist countries is not accurate.

1:18:14.800 --> 1:18:17.519
<v Speaker 1>Venezuela is much closer to a socialist country. And we're

1:18:17.520 --> 1:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>really looking at this Venezuela where the government was controlling prices.

1:18:22.880 --> 1:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And as I've said to you, the price control mechanism

1:18:25.320 --> 1:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>was one of the reasons that Venezuela failed so rapidly

1:18:28.040 --> 1:18:31.519
<v Speaker 1>and so miserably, because sure, as night follows day, you

1:18:31.560 --> 1:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>control prices on based on a social justice platform of oh,

1:18:35.520 --> 1:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>these guys are the greedy capitalists are taking too much

1:18:37.960 --> 1:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>money from you with their price. Now the price is lower, well,

1:18:40.760 --> 1:18:43.599
<v Speaker 1>then guess what the price is the price because that's

1:18:43.640 --> 1:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>what the market price was, So then you create a

1:18:45.720 --> 1:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>black market for things, and then people stop making things

1:18:48.040 --> 1:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>for the open market, and then the open market starts

1:18:50.439 --> 1:18:53.479
<v Speaker 1>to collapse because people can't buy the things that they're

1:18:53.479 --> 1:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to that they want to buy, and the producers

1:18:56.120 --> 1:18:59.479
<v Speaker 1>can't make them because the prices are wrong. And then

1:18:59.479 --> 1:19:01.559
<v Speaker 1>the government would step in Venezuela and say, well, now

1:19:01.600 --> 1:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>we control the factory because you're not making, you know,

1:19:05.320 --> 1:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>widgets cheaply enough for the Venezuelan people. We're gonna take

1:19:08.120 --> 1:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>over your widget factory and we're gonna be the ones

1:19:10.760 --> 1:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>running it and telling people, oh, do you think that

1:19:12.800 --> 1:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>works out well? And so on and so forth. And

1:19:16.000 --> 1:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that's how you have the country with the largest proven

1:19:18.360 --> 1:19:22.880
<v Speaker 1>oil reserves in the world in his state of complete

1:19:22.880 --> 1:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>economic and financial despair. Though I'll note that Maduro is

1:19:26.680 --> 1:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>still hanging on. I've been worried all along that this

1:19:29.640 --> 1:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>guy was going to find some way to cling to power,

1:19:32.200 --> 1:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>and that's exactly where we are. He is, in fact,

1:19:35.120 --> 1:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>clinging to power. But kids should at least know that

1:19:40.800 --> 1:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the programs that we're talking about in this country, that

1:19:43.120 --> 1:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the things that are under discussion, what is socialism and

1:19:47.680 --> 1:19:50.360
<v Speaker 1>what's not. They should be able to distinguish that. And

1:19:50.479 --> 1:19:53.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, medicare for all is not in and of

1:19:53.520 --> 1:19:57.839
<v Speaker 1>itself socialism. It is closer and closer though to socialized medicine.

1:19:57.840 --> 1:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>It'll put us on a path through socialized medicine. I mean,

1:20:00.240 --> 1:20:01.880
<v Speaker 1>they need to know that. But if all it is

1:20:02.000 --> 1:20:04.759
<v Speaker 1>is helping people, doing nice things for poor people, spreading

1:20:04.760 --> 1:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>money around from rich people, which is what the common

1:20:07.320 --> 1:20:12.519
<v Speaker 1>conception among millennials and gen z currently is, then social

1:20:12.680 --> 1:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>is gonna keeping popular. Basically, they don't know what it is.

1:20:16.000 --> 1:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>The relevance of this dossier is that it was used

1:20:18.760 --> 1:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in one FISA application for carter Page. Carter Page is

1:20:22.840 --> 1:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>one individual in this entire Russia investigation. So I just

1:20:26.360 --> 1:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>want to point out that this is like one thread.

1:20:29.400 --> 1:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>The question is which piece of the dossier did they

1:20:32.840 --> 1:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>rely on. I can tell you that they didn't staple

1:20:35.040 --> 1:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the dossier to a cover letter and hand it to

1:20:37.720 --> 1:20:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the court, and was it corroborated? And I think we

1:20:40.720 --> 1:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know the answers to that questions to those questions

1:20:43.520 --> 1:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>yet because most of it has been redacted, and the

1:20:46.439 --> 1:20:51.160
<v Speaker 1>IG report should shed more light on those. So that's

1:20:51.160 --> 1:20:56.599
<v Speaker 1>one of the premier defenders of the upper echelon management

1:20:56.600 --> 1:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of the FBI that engaged in the deep state coup

1:20:59.360 --> 1:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>against empty deep state coup against the president. You know,

1:21:02.760 --> 1:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the uh the the foremost bad experts

1:21:08.320 --> 1:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and analysts over at seeing an Asher rang Gappa, who

1:21:12.479 --> 1:21:14.559
<v Speaker 1>was at FBI for you know a long time, and

1:21:14.640 --> 1:21:17.439
<v Speaker 1>she's been a mainstay. It's been her. This guy Mud

1:21:17.479 --> 1:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>who's just completely lost his mind. I actually have met

1:21:20.120 --> 1:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>him a couple of times and he seemed normal. But

1:21:22.439 --> 1:21:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Trump has broken him like he's broken many other people.

1:21:25.160 --> 1:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>There's Rangappa, there's Pajama, the FBI Pajama Boy. I don't

1:21:28.439 --> 1:21:30.759
<v Speaker 1>remember his name, but you know who I'm talking about,

1:21:31.040 --> 1:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the one that looks like pajama boy and he comes on.

1:21:33.360 --> 1:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>He's like James Coomey's number one, number one fan. And

1:21:37.680 --> 1:21:40.360
<v Speaker 1>what they do now is they keep on either just

1:21:40.439 --> 1:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>getting things entirely wrong, which rung Gappa did here. The

1:21:45.360 --> 1:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>dossier was not used in one FIES application. It was

1:21:48.200 --> 1:21:50.360
<v Speaker 1>used in from what we've already seen for once been released,

1:21:50.400 --> 1:21:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it has been using all of the fives applications. It

1:21:52.800 --> 1:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>was cited again and again for the extensions. So if

1:21:56.240 --> 1:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they had more information, if there was more stuff. You

1:21:58.560 --> 1:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>would think that they wouldn't have to rely on what

1:22:01.520 --> 1:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>we now know. And this is not some spin, This

1:22:04.720 --> 1:22:07.759
<v Speaker 1>is not some effort to describe it in a way

1:22:07.800 --> 1:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that is inaccurate. It was opposition research paid for by

1:22:14.320 --> 1:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the DNC relying on foreign on a foreign intelligence former

1:22:19.040 --> 1:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>foreign intelligence operative, Christopher Steele, who relied on foreign sources

1:22:22.320 --> 1:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of information. I've still never gotten an answer to the question,

1:22:27.280 --> 1:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>why is it that the meeting that Vezelnisky at Trump

1:22:31.240 --> 1:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Tower had with Donald Trump Junior and Mana Ford and

1:22:34.840 --> 1:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cohen. Why was that meeting evidence of some kind

1:22:38.840 --> 1:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of treason. It's horrible, It's terrible. He's never start taken

1:22:41.840 --> 1:22:45.479
<v Speaker 1>that meeting. And because it would have been information from

1:22:45.560 --> 1:22:48.479
<v Speaker 1>a foreigner, that's all. It is information from a foreigner

1:22:48.479 --> 1:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>about Hillary Clinton and the Clinton DNC paid a foreigner

1:22:55.800 --> 1:22:59.479
<v Speaker 1>to get information from other foreigners. And that's okay. No

1:22:59.560 --> 1:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>one has ever explained that to me. You know, they say, oh, well,

1:23:02.760 --> 1:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Steele, he's highly respected. Really, we're I know, now

1:23:05.800 --> 1:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get Steel testifying. That's the ladies. He

1:23:08.920 --> 1:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>can testify. I gotta see if it's behind what the

1:23:11.520 --> 1:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>what the specifics of the parameters of the testament, you're

1:23:15.240 --> 1:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be But Christopher Steele is going to be testifying,

1:23:17.200 --> 1:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>and we have to find out, okay, well who told

1:23:20.720 --> 1:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>him on and when we have to get him under oath.

1:23:23.760 --> 1:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if if he is found to lie about

1:23:26.160 --> 1:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>any of this stuff, do you think that they will

1:23:28.640 --> 1:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they will prosecute him. Do you think that there's really

1:23:31.400 --> 1:23:36.519
<v Speaker 1>any realistic possibility that they will hold him accountable if

1:23:36.800 --> 1:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>he engages in any kind of falsehood up there? No,

1:23:38.920 --> 1:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of course not. Just like how Tony Podesta, John Podesta's brother,

1:23:44.240 --> 1:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>for his foreign engagements and working for foreign governments, is

1:23:48.280 --> 1:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>going to find himself in no trouble whatsoever. You know,

1:23:52.920 --> 1:23:54.439
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to get in trouble for what he

1:23:54.560 --> 1:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>did because we have a two tiered justice system. But

1:23:56.920 --> 1:24:00.519
<v Speaker 1>but back to this miss Rangappa, who has once or

1:24:00.560 --> 1:24:03.120
<v Speaker 1>twice crossords with me on Twitter in the past, so

1:24:03.400 --> 1:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we've I've never met her, but she is she's in

1:24:07.360 --> 1:24:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a sense remarkable because in a crowded field of clownery,

1:24:13.280 --> 1:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Miss Rangapa at CNN as their national security analyst is

1:24:17.439 --> 1:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>among the most consistently and spectacularly wrong analysts that have

1:24:25.200 --> 1:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>been on this issue. Period. She has managed to be

1:24:28.880 --> 1:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>completely off based time and again. But CNN never holds

1:24:31.840 --> 1:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>anyone to account for this because the purpose of their analysts,

1:24:35.520 --> 1:24:37.879
<v Speaker 1>and this is very important, The purpose of the CNN

1:24:38.320 --> 1:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>National security analyst are going on TV is not to

1:24:40.880 --> 1:24:44.880
<v Speaker 1>tell you things that are true, is not to tell

1:24:44.920 --> 1:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you things that are accurate. It is to promote a

1:24:47.320 --> 1:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>narrative that is pleasing to CNN's audience. Despite the fact

1:24:51.880 --> 1:24:54.679
<v Speaker 1>that now they've had a think an eighteen percent drop

1:24:55.479 --> 1:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in their ratings, they have a narrative they're trying to push.

1:25:01.280 --> 1:25:05.719
<v Speaker 1>This is I believe very personal for CNN top management.

1:25:05.760 --> 1:25:08.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that Zucker views his role now is engaging

1:25:08.960 --> 1:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in a kind of massive feud with Trump, and it's

1:25:13.200 --> 1:25:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump versus Zucker at some level. And this has been

1:25:15.760 --> 1:25:18.360
<v Speaker 1>personalized in a way that if I were still an

1:25:18.360 --> 1:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>employee of CNN, which I am certainly not, I would

1:25:21.240 --> 1:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>find wholly inappropriate and bothersome But being wrong is never

1:25:27.960 --> 1:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>an issue at cnit See That's what I'm really getting

1:25:29.960 --> 1:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>at here. I mean, what NAPA said is just factually incorrect.

1:25:33.040 --> 1:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Did you think they're going to issue a correction? Maybe

1:25:35.920 --> 1:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll put it in like the website and no one's

1:25:37.800 --> 1:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna see it, and no one's gonna care. It doesn't

1:25:39.960 --> 1:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>matter though, And the other part of this that I

1:25:42.320 --> 1:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>find so interesting is that you have these former national

1:25:46.520 --> 1:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>security people, people from my old community in one way

1:25:50.280 --> 1:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>or another, like Rongappa, CNN, Pajama Boy and Phil mud

1:25:55.920 --> 1:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>who I know people that like Phil and say he's

1:25:57.920 --> 1:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a good guy. So I don't know what's and I'm

1:26:00.320 --> 1:26:02.360
<v Speaker 1>probably being much more charitable about him than he would

1:26:02.360 --> 1:26:04.360
<v Speaker 1>be about me, which is fine, But I don't know

1:26:04.439 --> 1:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>what's happened to him. But in the Trump era, you know,

1:26:06.720 --> 1:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>he's the one that was yelling about the blank whole countries,

1:26:09.479 --> 1:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, he's from a blank whole country. I

1:26:11.439 --> 1:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>think he's Irish, so you know, it's not a very

1:26:14.320 --> 1:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>nice thing to say about Ireland. But you know, you

1:26:17.439 --> 1:26:20.479
<v Speaker 1>look at this and you see that there's there's a

1:26:20.840 --> 1:26:24.479
<v Speaker 1>a fallback position for a lot of these individuals that well,

1:26:24.520 --> 1:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the FISA Court had a process with judges signing off

1:26:28.320 --> 1:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>on stuff, so it's okay. This is never the position

1:26:30.960 --> 1:26:33.559
<v Speaker 1>of the left on any other matter of national security interest.

1:26:34.080 --> 1:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>This is never the position of the left that because

1:26:37.520 --> 1:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a there are some internal checks and balances, no

1:26:41.760 --> 1:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>external watchdogs, A secret government process to spy on people

1:26:46.560 --> 1:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is just fine and just fine and dandy. Oh, but

1:26:49.400 --> 1:26:52.120
<v Speaker 1>there was somebody signing off on it. Really, so was

1:26:52.160 --> 1:26:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the left okay with there's somebody signing off on drone strikes,

1:26:55.160 --> 1:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>so then the drone strikes must just be fine. Well,

1:26:58.040 --> 1:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>they were fine when Obama was doing them, but before

1:27:00.120 --> 1:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>or that, that was of course, that was not fine.

1:27:04.000 --> 1:27:06.559
<v Speaker 1>They changed their mind on these things based very much

1:27:06.680 --> 1:27:11.360
<v Speaker 1>on who the individual, Who the individual is, who's making

1:27:11.400 --> 1:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the calls, and that's what you have with all these

1:27:14.880 --> 1:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>institutionalists on the payroll at CNA. They're defending the process

1:27:19.400 --> 1:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>because the process was used at the FBI and the

1:27:21.960 --> 1:27:25.559
<v Speaker 1>DOJ to get at Trump, the Inspector General port As

1:27:25.600 --> 1:27:27.479
<v Speaker 1>I keep saying, it is going to come out. There

1:27:27.560 --> 1:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to be people who look very very bad

1:27:30.400 --> 1:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and look stupid. I don't know if there's going to

1:27:32.880 --> 1:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>be any accountability in government. I'm not sure there will be.

1:27:35.680 --> 1:27:37.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to overpromise to you and tell you

1:27:37.560 --> 1:27:40.559
<v Speaker 1>that I really believe at this point that those at

1:27:40.600 --> 1:27:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the FBI who stepped out of line, who abused their authority,

1:27:43.439 --> 1:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>who abused their power, will be held to account because

1:27:47.240 --> 1:27:50.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that that is true. In fact, I

1:27:50.800 --> 1:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>doubt very much that that is true. And I can

1:27:53.320 --> 1:27:55.559
<v Speaker 1>also tell you that the people that have been getting

1:27:55.600 --> 1:27:59.519
<v Speaker 1>paid to run around and be mouthpieces for the Russia

1:27:59.560 --> 1:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>collusion delusion for a long time here, those people will

1:28:04.080 --> 1:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>also not be punished by the media apparatus because they

1:28:08.200 --> 1:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>weren't being paid to go on TV and be smart

1:28:11.360 --> 1:28:14.719
<v Speaker 1>and be right. They were paid to give a kind

1:28:14.840 --> 1:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of believability, to create of a near of respectability of

1:28:20.160 --> 1:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>what was a conspiracy theory. And as you know, the

1:28:22.920 --> 1:28:25.640
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theory was that President Donald Trump worked with the

1:28:25.720 --> 1:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Russians to undermine our election, steal the election from Hillary Clinton.

1:28:31.479 --> 1:28:33.519
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy and it needs to keep being set out

1:28:33.560 --> 1:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>loud because it's so crazy. Rangappa and others over there,

1:28:37.720 --> 1:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they're part of the Well, it didn't matter that we

1:28:40.320 --> 1:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>were wrong, because now let's move to oh that, now,

1:28:42.400 --> 1:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>let's move to obstruction. The process was weaponized against Trump

1:28:47.240 --> 1:28:51.479
<v Speaker 1>to create the conspiracy theory of Russia collusion, and now

1:28:51.600 --> 1:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the process of the process, meaning the investigation of the

1:28:56.920 --> 1:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theory that's being weaponized against Trump. It's it's never enough,

1:29:02.000 --> 1:29:04.519
<v Speaker 1>that never will be enough because it also was never

1:29:04.600 --> 1:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>really about the truth. And once that's established, and once

1:29:07.800 --> 1:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we understand that, then everything else really makes sense and

1:29:11.080 --> 1:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>falls into place. I saw some story here about Los Angeles.

1:29:14.840 --> 1:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, I spend some time reason I like I

1:29:17.000 --> 1:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>like LA to visit. I don't know, I don't know

1:29:19.360 --> 1:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>if I could live there or not, just because the traffic.

1:29:21.200 --> 1:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm a I'm not a car guy. I like, I

1:29:24.479 --> 1:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>like to be driven. I'm a very much. The ride

1:29:27.240 --> 1:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>share thing has made LA much better for me. I

1:29:29.240 --> 1:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>like ubering, and that's right. I believe that you should

1:29:32.360 --> 1:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to get Uber riders to get ratings too, not just drivers.

1:29:35.120 --> 1:29:36.479
<v Speaker 1>And I know many of you who disagree with me

1:29:36.560 --> 1:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>on that. But LA has gotten some more some more

1:29:39.840 --> 1:29:42.599
<v Speaker 1>bad news about city mismanagement, the homelessness problem. I want

1:29:42.600 --> 1:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to I want to just touch on that a little

1:29:44.360 --> 1:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>bit and then we'll get into your favorite time in mind,

1:29:47.040 --> 1:29:49.439
<v Speaker 1>roll call. That's coming up. I was just out in China,

1:29:49.479 --> 1:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>as many of you know, for a week, and when

1:29:52.439 --> 1:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I when I came back, I spent the week in

1:29:54.640 --> 1:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles and I have to say that the new

1:30:00.000 --> 1:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>inline here for the day about how the number of

1:30:01.960 --> 1:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>homeless people's jumped twelve percent across La County and that

1:30:05.760 --> 1:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you have nearly sixty thousand homeless living on the streets.

1:30:12.640 --> 1:30:18.479
<v Speaker 1>This is tragic, but it's unsurprising. And California, you know,

1:30:19.080 --> 1:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it takes a long time for a place to degrade.

1:30:23.160 --> 1:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, Rome wasn't built overnight, but it also didn't

1:30:25.400 --> 1:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>collapse overnight. It took a long series of events, over

1:30:29.760 --> 1:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a considerable period of time for everything to finally just

1:30:33.000 --> 1:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>fall apart. And you know, you start to think, how

1:30:35.880 --> 1:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>quickly would some of these blue states really just collapse

1:30:41.479 --> 1:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>if they if they didn't have the federal government backing

1:30:44.120 --> 1:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of their programs and giving them all this stuff.

1:30:46.360 --> 1:30:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how quickly would the actual governing decisions of

1:30:49.640 --> 1:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>some of these blue states turn into a Detroit like

1:30:52.640 --> 1:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>situation or blue cities? I should say, although states too

1:30:56.439 --> 1:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>at some level. But you know, California is a place that,

1:31:00.240 --> 1:31:04.479
<v Speaker 1>given its natural resources, it's tremendous beauty. I mean, you know,

1:31:04.520 --> 1:31:07.719
<v Speaker 1>you drive along Pacific Coast Highway, you go check out Malibu,

1:31:08.320 --> 1:31:10.479
<v Speaker 1>big sir, These are some of the most beautiful places

1:31:10.520 --> 1:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Some people would argue some of

1:31:12.439 --> 1:31:15.479
<v Speaker 1>the more beautiful places in the world. And the fact

1:31:15.520 --> 1:31:19.479
<v Speaker 1>that California has the problems that it does here really

1:31:19.560 --> 1:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>just go to the political monoculture that exists. Now. There

1:31:25.840 --> 1:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>are I think someone told me there are a million

1:31:28.760 --> 1:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a million Republicans, a million registered Republicans in the Los

1:31:32.840 --> 1:31:36.519
<v Speaker 1>Angeles County, either in the county or in Los Angeles

1:31:36.560 --> 1:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>County and the surrounding areas. But there are Republicans. Ever,

1:31:40.760 --> 1:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>they're just completely outvoted. I think it's three to one.

1:31:44.200 --> 1:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And you have all these policies that are being pushed

1:31:47.080 --> 1:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that are just they don't make sense. These are not

1:31:49.840 --> 1:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>intelligent things to do. And this keeps happening in these

1:31:55.160 --> 1:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>cities that are very, very blue. There's tremendous mismanagement. This

1:32:00.160 --> 1:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is happening in Los Angeles where the homelessness population is exploding,

1:32:06.920 --> 1:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And this is happening in San Francisco, where you now

1:32:10.200 --> 1:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>have the poop patrol for people trying to find human

1:32:12.920 --> 1:32:15.679
<v Speaker 1>feces via apps on the streets so they can avoid

1:32:15.760 --> 1:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>those areas. I'm here in Baltimore, which has certainly had

1:32:19.640 --> 1:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>its fair share of problems from mismanagement, continues to be

1:32:23.120 --> 1:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>plagued by crime. Really one of the only one of

1:32:26.720 --> 1:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the only exceptions to this, which is a very large

1:32:29.920 --> 1:32:33.599
<v Speaker 1>blue city. I mean, Chicago had its most violent weekend

1:32:33.800 --> 1:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of the year this past weekend. I think fifty people

1:32:37.840 --> 1:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>were shot something along those lines. But really, the only

1:32:40.960 --> 1:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>exception to this is New York City, where I'm originally from.

1:32:45.600 --> 1:32:50.680
<v Speaker 1>And I just believe that New York, under you know, Giuliani,

1:32:50.800 --> 1:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>cleaned it up so that crime wasn't going to be

1:32:52.720 --> 1:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a problem. And then you did have a very lucky

1:32:57.040 --> 1:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>period of tremendous not just investment in the in the

1:33:01.760 --> 1:33:04.759
<v Speaker 1>financial sector and all the employment there, but but global

1:33:04.880 --> 1:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>investment in New York City. Because New York is a

1:33:06.840 --> 1:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>truly global city. You've had people from Russia, China, Brazil, India,

1:33:13.840 --> 1:33:18.679
<v Speaker 1>very very wealthy foreign nationals buying incredibly expensive properties, which

1:33:18.720 --> 1:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>has helped prop up the real estate market more than

1:33:20.720 --> 1:33:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it would have otherwise been. So New York is a

1:33:22.640 --> 1:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>bit of an anomaly. But all these other places San Francisco,

1:33:25.880 --> 1:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles, Baltimore, Chicago, New Orleans and just poorly run, man,

1:33:32.960 --> 1:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean just not run well at all. And you

1:33:36.000 --> 1:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>see the decisions that are being made, and you can

1:33:39.760 --> 1:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>tell on the left coast the west coast, people think

1:33:42.320 --> 1:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's mean to stop homelessness. They think it's it's

1:33:46.080 --> 1:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you're being unkind if you try to prevent people from

1:33:48.840 --> 1:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>living on the streets and being in squalor, even if

1:33:51.360 --> 1:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to prevent the outbreak of diseases like typhus.

1:33:54.439 --> 1:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, the things that have been eradicated in the

1:33:56.720 --> 1:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>general population for a long time. But if you are

1:34:00.400 --> 1:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>living in unsanitary conditions, you can get so. I feel

1:34:04.000 --> 1:34:05.960
<v Speaker 1>badly for a place like la because there's a lot

1:34:06.000 --> 1:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of great people live there, a lot of great Los

1:34:07.880 --> 1:34:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Angelenos listen to this show. But I also feel like

1:34:12.360 --> 1:34:15.519
<v Speaker 1>the country does get to learn something from far left

1:34:15.600 --> 1:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>management of these cities is incredibly damaging. Roll Calls up next. Hey,

1:34:29.520 --> 1:34:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Team Buck, it's time for roll call. Let's get to

1:34:49.400 --> 1:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it Facebook dot Com, slash Buck Sexton, and let's get

1:34:54.240 --> 1:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to Kyle who rides Buck heard you want Kennedy talking

1:34:57.120 --> 1:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>about China. It bothers me that people in this country

1:35:00.120 --> 1:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>loosely throw around the term fascist at whomever they disagree

1:35:03.240 --> 1:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>with politically. But if you look at the definition of

1:35:05.680 --> 1:35:08.280
<v Speaker 1>what fascism actually is, I think the twenty first century

1:35:08.400 --> 1:35:12.800
<v Speaker 1>reincarnation is China. I know they call themselves communists, but

1:35:12.840 --> 1:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I think their mix of nationalism, state run quasi capitalist enterprises,

1:35:17.280 --> 1:35:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Orwellian police state is more fascist than communist

1:35:20.400 --> 1:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in its features. I'm not sure there can be a

1:35:22.800 --> 1:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>deal with a devil like that unless we sacrifice our

1:35:25.479 --> 1:35:29.599
<v Speaker 1>principles and security. But I hope I'm wrong. Churchill warned

1:35:29.600 --> 1:35:31.519
<v Speaker 1>about Hitler in the early thirties, but no one took

1:35:31.560 --> 1:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>them seriously until the threat was too large to diffuse

1:35:34.000 --> 1:35:37.280
<v Speaker 1>without all out war. We need leaders who understand the

1:35:37.320 --> 1:35:39.280
<v Speaker 1>threat and take it seriously because the target is on

1:35:39.360 --> 1:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>our backs and the Chinese are practicing their aim. Well.

1:35:43.120 --> 1:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've been reading them more and more of

1:35:45.720 --> 1:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>these geostrategists of people that have been long time China watchers,

1:35:51.680 --> 1:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and they seem pretty united in the idea that China

1:35:56.920 --> 1:35:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is really looking to defeat us or get ahead of

1:35:59.760 --> 1:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>us economically before we're going to see anything militarily from them.

1:36:05.280 --> 1:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And I see your point about how they're not They're

1:36:08.000 --> 1:36:13.880
<v Speaker 1>definitely not really truly communist because the central tenet of

1:36:13.960 --> 1:36:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a of a communist system is economics, right. I mean,

1:36:17.479 --> 1:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that's Marxism, is it's a political and economic system intertwined together,

1:36:22.360 --> 1:36:25.240
<v Speaker 1>or it's really politics directing the entirety of the economy

1:36:25.840 --> 1:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>for the purposes of redistribution. But whether it's a you know,

1:36:31.200 --> 1:36:36.639
<v Speaker 1>fascist or quasi capitalist, or some new thing we've never seen,

1:36:36.760 --> 1:36:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you could probably argue that China is in

1:36:38.840 --> 1:36:41.800
<v Speaker 1>many ways, it's its own, its own political entity, and

1:36:41.880 --> 1:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it is unlike anything else that we have ever seen

1:36:44.880 --> 1:36:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in the past. There is a Central Committee, there is

1:36:46.840 --> 1:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese Communist Party, and the Central Committee does control things. Shijinping, though,

1:36:52.320 --> 1:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>from what I understand, controls the Central Committee, So it's

1:36:56.760 --> 1:37:00.519
<v Speaker 1>a communist dictatorship, it's an individual dictator ship. It's a

1:37:00.640 --> 1:37:06.360
<v Speaker 1>one one party capitalist status enterprise. There's a lot of

1:37:06.400 --> 1:37:08.360
<v Speaker 1>ways you could describe China, but all of them are

1:37:08.439 --> 1:37:12.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be problematic for us going forward. Adam writes book,

1:37:12.880 --> 1:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>you should do an ad campaign that coincides with the election,

1:37:15.920 --> 1:37:18.679
<v Speaker 1>have a parody of Comrade Commy Bear run for president,

1:37:19.080 --> 1:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>do all the tropes from the USSR, and help Trump win.

1:37:22.320 --> 1:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Shields High well, Adam, I think especially there's a part

1:37:25.120 --> 1:37:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of me that's hoping that Bernie Sanders is going to

1:37:28.400 --> 1:37:31.559
<v Speaker 1>get the nomination, just so then we can bring back

1:37:31.600 --> 1:37:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Commy Bear, which would be a whole lot of fun

1:37:34.479 --> 1:37:36.559
<v Speaker 1>and it would be a really good way for us

1:37:36.640 --> 1:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do some fun commentary and do

1:37:40.040 --> 1:37:42.760
<v Speaker 1>some good things. So we'll see, we'll see what we got.

1:37:43.000 --> 1:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Stan writes In Paraguay, a teacher broke a piece of

1:37:46.000 --> 1:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>chalk while writing on the chalkboard. Trump was blamed because

1:37:52.080 --> 1:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of the white chalk. He was also cited for racism. Stan,

1:37:56.640 --> 1:37:58.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're a comedian, do not quit your day job,

1:37:58.920 --> 1:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>my friend, But I do you. Writing in Nonetheless, Brandon

1:38:02.840 --> 1:38:05.559
<v Speaker 1>writes book Great Show Yesterday. The opening scene in Saving

1:38:05.600 --> 1:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Private Ryan's the main reason I joined the Army. I

1:38:08.800 --> 1:38:10.839
<v Speaker 1>was in tears watching it at the age of twenty.

1:38:11.400 --> 1:38:13.439
<v Speaker 1>I always loved my country, but didn't see the need

1:38:13.520 --> 1:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to serve her. I thought to myself, what makes me

1:38:16.120 --> 1:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>so special that I get to enjoy this freedom in

1:38:18.200 --> 1:38:21.559
<v Speaker 1>liberty without any sacrifice of my own. Shortly after watching

1:38:21.640 --> 1:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the movie, I went to an Army recruiter in my

1:38:23.680 --> 1:38:27.320
<v Speaker 1>small community college in Saginaw, Michigan. I told the recruiter

1:38:27.360 --> 1:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do what Ryan did in the movie.

1:38:29.640 --> 1:38:31.320
<v Speaker 1>By the grace of God, it all worked out, and

1:38:31.400 --> 1:38:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I became an airborne infantryman with all with the ACO

1:38:35.920 --> 1:38:39.320
<v Speaker 1>one five O five in the eighty second Airborne Division.

1:38:40.120 --> 1:38:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Today's a very special day for my old unit. One

1:38:42.760 --> 1:38:45.599
<v Speaker 1>day before D Day h minus. It's written on our

1:38:45.640 --> 1:38:47.840
<v Speaker 1>crests our unicrest to remember the men that jumped into

1:38:47.880 --> 1:38:51.760
<v Speaker 1>France one hour before June sixth, nineteen forty four. So

1:38:51.920 --> 1:38:55.479
<v Speaker 1>on June fifth, around twenty three hundred, that's when it happened.

1:38:55.720 --> 1:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for what you do, brother Airborne all the way.

1:38:59.360 --> 1:39:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I think I might say yesterday the anniversary D Day,

1:39:01.360 --> 1:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I might have. I know it's June six I just

1:39:03.840 --> 1:39:07.320
<v Speaker 1>got confused as to what day we're what date we

1:39:07.439 --> 1:39:10.400
<v Speaker 1>were on, so apologies for that, but obviously D Day

1:39:10.479 --> 1:39:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is June sixth, which is coming up in a day

1:39:14.160 --> 1:39:17.360
<v Speaker 1>day before today would be the day that you're getting

1:39:17.439 --> 1:39:20.960
<v Speaker 1>loaded onto boats and getting ready to get on the

1:39:21.040 --> 1:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>planes for the air drop and all the rest of it.

1:39:23.240 --> 1:39:29.240
<v Speaker 1>And we talked about it in some detail yesterday, Michael rites.

1:39:29.280 --> 1:39:31.800
<v Speaker 1>But a couple of things. Glad you're leaving Rising the

1:39:31.880 --> 1:39:34.599
<v Speaker 1>show will leave lose half its audience when you leave.

1:39:35.160 --> 1:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Their website. Video playback was horrendous in terms of Uber ratings.

1:39:39.120 --> 1:39:41.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. It's a free market solution to a problem.

1:39:41.840 --> 1:39:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Like all unregulated services in the free market. They only

1:39:44.880 --> 1:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>get better with time. On baby Trump, I think it's

1:39:49.080 --> 1:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of cute. Would be the ultimate troll of his

1:39:51.280 --> 1:39:54.240
<v Speaker 1>supporters added a maga hat to it and started bringing

1:39:54.280 --> 1:39:57.439
<v Speaker 1>little Trump baby balloons to the campaign rallies. Someone in

1:39:57.479 --> 1:39:59.599
<v Speaker 1>the audience needs to get on that. Look, if they're

1:39:59.640 --> 1:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>not all ready selling fat baby Trump merchandise, then they're

1:40:05.120 --> 1:40:07.600
<v Speaker 1>missing out on a big merchandising opportunity. You know, if

1:40:07.640 --> 1:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not already doing that, I would how many of

1:40:10.280 --> 1:40:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you would buy a little baby Trump blow up for

1:40:12.760 --> 1:40:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the pool? You know? You know how people do those

1:40:14.760 --> 1:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>things where you know, like a big swan or I

1:40:18.040 --> 1:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know, whatever it is, you blow up, you throw

1:40:19.720 --> 1:40:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it in the water and then you can you can.

1:40:22.040 --> 1:40:24.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not what is it called a float? I guess

1:40:24.800 --> 1:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that would make sense because it's you're floating on it.

1:40:27.360 --> 1:40:30.960
<v Speaker 1>But baby Trump merchandise, fat baby Trump merchandise is definitely

1:40:31.040 --> 1:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>something that there's an opportunity. And so if they have

1:40:34.120 --> 1:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>not already trademarked it and just putting it out there,

1:40:36.720 --> 1:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you can send me, send me a ten percent cut.

1:40:39.280 --> 1:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>For the person that actually gets it and starts making it,

1:40:41.640 --> 1:40:43.360
<v Speaker 1>send me my ten percent cut and will consider it

1:40:43.439 --> 1:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>even Let's see here, John Rights, where are you located

1:40:50.000 --> 1:40:51.680
<v Speaker 1>so far back in the woods? I get TV a

1:40:51.800 --> 1:40:54.919
<v Speaker 1>day late. Well, John, I do the show out of Washington,

1:40:55.000 --> 1:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>d C. But as I said, I'm in Baltimore tonight

1:40:57.800 --> 1:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>because sometimes I gotta make moves. I got meetings how

1:41:00.200 --> 1:41:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to do, and that's yeah. I do the show in

1:41:02.840 --> 1:41:06.599
<v Speaker 1>the Swamp, live from the swamp. Jeff Rights, Hey, Buck

1:41:06.680 --> 1:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>love your show. Listen nightly. By the way, what artist

1:41:09.200 --> 1:41:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and song is your bumper music between segments? Sounds great.

1:41:12.520 --> 1:41:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to know so I can download it. Thanks

1:41:14.439 --> 1:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and have a great day. Well, Jeff, appreciate you writing

1:41:17.240 --> 1:41:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in the bumper music between segments. It comes from a

1:41:20.479 --> 1:41:23.519
<v Speaker 1>music library which we have a commercial license for, so

1:41:23.760 --> 1:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know that there's a band associated with it.

1:41:27.240 --> 1:41:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just the overall library that we have

1:41:29.479 --> 1:41:32.280
<v Speaker 1>rights too. I couldn't tell you, but I did pick

1:41:32.320 --> 1:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>out some of the music. So the more upbeat stuff

1:41:35.160 --> 1:41:37.920
<v Speaker 1>tends to come from tends to come from me. We

1:41:38.040 --> 1:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about doing a kind of revamp of the

1:41:41.840 --> 1:41:44.599
<v Speaker 1>music on the show. In general. We're thinking about doing

1:41:44.720 --> 1:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>some changes to the They call it imaging, which I

1:41:47.640 --> 1:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>always think is interesting because it's audio, it's not image,

1:41:51.040 --> 1:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>but the radio imaging may be changing pretty soon. Marissa

1:41:55.840 --> 1:41:58.599
<v Speaker 1>Rights heard roll call. Thank you, Yes, send the Freedom

1:41:58.640 --> 1:42:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Hunt address and I'll get them sent to you. In

1:42:02.280 --> 1:42:05.599
<v Speaker 1>the male. The beard oils, all right, Marissa, I haven't forgotten.

1:42:05.640 --> 1:42:07.599
<v Speaker 1>We'll get that to you. Although my beard is, as

1:42:07.640 --> 1:42:10.760
<v Speaker 1>some of you noticed, very trimmed down from what it

1:42:10.880 --> 1:42:14.080
<v Speaker 1>used to be. It's much less of a much less

1:42:14.120 --> 1:42:17.559
<v Speaker 1>of an Eric Eric the red Viking beard, and now

1:42:17.680 --> 1:42:19.439
<v Speaker 1>more of a like, Hey, I'm a hipster who makes

1:42:19.479 --> 1:42:22.799
<v Speaker 1>coffee kind of a beard. I don't know if hipster's

1:42:22.800 --> 1:42:26.360
<v Speaker 1>talked that way. I don't know what really happened there, Sarah, Hey,

1:42:26.439 --> 1:42:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Buck really galls mean that Virginia Governor Northam cannot wait

1:42:30.360 --> 1:42:33.559
<v Speaker 1>to kill babies but wants to keep others safe from

1:42:33.640 --> 1:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>harm by guns. Same old communist socialist agenda shields high. Oh, Sarah,

1:42:40.439 --> 1:42:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I have much to add to that.

1:42:44.360 --> 1:42:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's see here, dude, this is from Matt. Dude, what

1:42:49.240 --> 1:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>is the deal? I haven't had to care about the

1:42:52.720 --> 1:42:56.799
<v Speaker 1>British Royal Navy, British Royal family, not Navy, sorry, British

1:42:56.840 --> 1:43:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Royal family since July four, seventeen seventy six. I never

1:43:00.439 --> 1:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>understand seeing their pictures, all of the tabloids and the

1:43:03.160 --> 1:43:06.240
<v Speaker 1>checkout line I liked, I like Trump would have been

1:43:06.240 --> 1:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>completely lost if I were asked about the Duchess of Sussex.

1:43:09.760 --> 1:43:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Who who? What? What? Who? Matt. I also, I share

1:43:15.360 --> 1:43:20.719
<v Speaker 1>your confusion here because why anyone cares at all about

1:43:21.840 --> 1:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the British royal family is something that I have no

1:43:26.280 --> 1:43:29.960
<v Speaker 1>real Well, I'll say this, people like fairy tales and

1:43:30.760 --> 1:43:34.040
<v Speaker 1>royal families figure heavily in that, and I think for

1:43:35.200 --> 1:43:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I noticed that they're more popular among young women. They

1:43:38.200 --> 1:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>like Meghan Markle and the Prince Harry and all these guys.

1:43:41.920 --> 1:43:45.400
<v Speaker 1>They're viewed as a kind of ultimate like a classy

1:43:46.840 --> 1:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>what do you call it, classy reality star. That's what

1:43:49.120 --> 1:43:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the British Royal family is for a lot of people.

1:43:51.320 --> 1:43:55.720
<v Speaker 1>They're like classy reality stars. So maybe that's part of it, um,

1:43:55.960 --> 1:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>But I couldn't I couldn't speak to it really beyond that.

1:44:00.120 --> 1:44:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Pablo hey Buck, you asked for good shows to watch,

1:44:03.560 --> 1:44:05.519
<v Speaker 1>and just saw this week in a mini series about

1:44:05.560 --> 1:44:08.559
<v Speaker 1>the Central Park five. I thought it was done really

1:44:08.600 --> 1:44:10.800
<v Speaker 1>well and telling the story of this tragedy. Then they

1:44:10.840 --> 1:44:13.160
<v Speaker 1>couldn't help themselves and actually took a jab in the

1:44:13.280 --> 1:44:18.240
<v Speaker 1>summary part of the show. Huh, shields high. I don't

1:44:18.240 --> 1:44:19.560
<v Speaker 1>know what you mean by took a jab in the

1:44:19.600 --> 1:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>summary part of the show. I would just say this.

1:44:23.280 --> 1:44:27.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, Ann Coulter has done a lot of really

1:44:27.439 --> 1:44:32.559
<v Speaker 1>interesting work on the Central Park five and has pointed

1:44:32.600 --> 1:44:37.680
<v Speaker 1>out that the people that were initially convicted, they confessed,

1:44:38.479 --> 1:44:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and the way that they were all exonerated was essentially

1:44:41.280 --> 1:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that their DNA was not the DNA found on the

1:44:44.520 --> 1:44:47.719
<v Speaker 1>woman who was brutally raped and attacked and almost beaten

1:44:47.760 --> 1:44:50.479
<v Speaker 1>to death in the park. But that was always, as

1:44:50.520 --> 1:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I understand it, that was always known. It was always

1:44:52.720 --> 1:44:56.639
<v Speaker 1>believed that there was a primary attacker who got away,

1:44:56.760 --> 1:44:58.880
<v Speaker 1>but that did not mean that no one else took

1:44:58.960 --> 1:45:01.040
<v Speaker 1>part in the attack. And for that kind of a

1:45:01.080 --> 1:45:03.799
<v Speaker 1>sexual assault, if anyone takes any part in the attack,

1:45:03.880 --> 1:45:07.479
<v Speaker 1>they are equally guilty as the perpetrator who would have

1:45:07.600 --> 1:45:12.439
<v Speaker 1>left behind his genetic material. So I'm willing to bet

1:45:12.520 --> 1:45:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that if I watch this and then read back over

1:45:14.439 --> 1:45:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the court transcripts of it, and maybe I'll have to

1:45:16.360 --> 1:45:18.920
<v Speaker 1>do that, I will find that this is likely a

1:45:19.120 --> 1:45:24.800
<v Speaker 1>work of some propaganda. But we shall see, we shall see.

1:45:26.000 --> 1:45:32.720
<v Speaker 1>What else do we have here? We have Chris all right,

1:45:32.880 --> 1:45:34.800
<v Speaker 1>buck heard you talking about Stephen King. I grew up

1:45:34.800 --> 1:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in the eighties and he was one of the defining

1:45:36.280 --> 1:45:38.840
<v Speaker 1>cultural authors. I read every book up until he got

1:45:38.920 --> 1:45:40.479
<v Speaker 1>hit by a van of the nineties. I think he's

1:45:40.479 --> 1:45:43.240
<v Speaker 1>writing veered off into something after that. I still read

1:45:43.280 --> 1:45:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a number of his books, but he never really recovered

1:45:45.280 --> 1:45:48.679
<v Speaker 1>from the accident. I married my midlife crisis. He wallowed

1:45:48.680 --> 1:45:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in that life threatening accident. Who am I to judge?

1:45:52.320 --> 1:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>What has always jared me is that all of his

1:45:53.760 --> 1:45:57.040
<v Speaker 1>main characters are unmistakably conservative insane. In other words, the

1:45:57.200 --> 1:46:00.479
<v Speaker 1>heroes of his stories are recognizable as normal. He doesn't

1:46:00.520 --> 1:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>understand the good guys. He writes about our conservative talk

1:46:03.120 --> 1:46:05.840
<v Speaker 1>about cognitive dissidence. Well, Chris, thanks so much for our

1:46:05.880 --> 1:46:08.760
<v Speaker 1>writing it about Stephen King. I have never read a

1:46:08.960 --> 1:46:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Stephen King book, so I can't really speak to it,

1:46:11.320 --> 1:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>but thank you very much for giving me your thoughts

1:46:14.080 --> 1:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>on the matter. All Right, team, that's gonna be it

1:46:16.840 --> 1:46:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for today in the Hut from Baltimore. Get a shout

1:46:20.040 --> 1:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>out to all the folks listening on WCBM. I hope

1:46:23.160 --> 1:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you are enjoying it and we will be back tomorrow

1:46:27.160 --> 1:46:32.559
<v Speaker 1>from the swamp from DC, same time, same place, well,

1:46:32.600 --> 1:46:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess different place for me, but same place for you,

1:46:35.360 --> 1:46:36.880
<v Speaker 1>hopefully Shieldsaye