WEBVTT - The Defense 

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Before we begin, Please be aware this episode contains discussions

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>around infant deaths and other difficult topics. Please take care

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>while listening. The movement of the court can feel like theater.

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Everyone a member of a caste who knows their roles.

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Stand when the judge comes in, speak from the witness box,

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>swear to tell the truth. The prosecution is bound to

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>share their evidence with the defense, and the defense team

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>prepares ahead of time how best to defend their clients.

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Reporters who cover court for a living know this rhythm

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>in their bones.

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 2>I name every day a couple of other people there

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 2>every day.

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Kim Pilling, a reporter with the Press Association in the UK,

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>has been a news reporter for more than three decades,

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty years as a court reporter and ten months months

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of those covering the Lucy let Be case every single day, so.

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 2>We knew it was going to be a very lengthy trial,

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 2>full of complexities and lots of complex medical evidence surrounding that.

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 2>An effect was seventeen trials in one Really each day

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 2>we were full on, so to speak. There was a

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 2>lot of information being put out each day.

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 3>It was done at a very brisk pace.

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I remember sitting through days and days of medical testimony.

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>During my own trial, it was hard for me to follow,

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and I can't imagine what it was like for the jury.

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>But my life depended upon people understanding this evidence.

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 2>The prosecution case closes, defense case starts, and she's cool

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 2>to give evidence.

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>One spring day in twenty twenty three, after the Crown

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>ended its case, the doors of the court were opened

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>for the first time that morning.

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 3>When we came into court, she was already sat down.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>For months. All anyone saw of Lucy let Be was

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>from what the Brits call the doc It's essentially a

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.519
<v Speaker 1>glassed in box for prisoners to sit in during their trial.

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>From the public gallery, you see Lucy from the side,

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>facing the judge, who sits on his dais at the

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>front of the courtroom. But on this May morning, Lucy

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>was waiting for everyone to arrive from a different vantage

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>point at the front of the court, facing out from

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the witness box, before any.

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Of the lawyers came into the room, any of the

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 3>families came into the room.

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Since her arrest and through what was to be one

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:50.679
<v Speaker 1>of Britain's longest trials in history, Lucy let Bee had

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>lost the power to tell her own story. Now, sitting

0:02:55.919 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>there in the witness box, Lucy was about to try

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to get that power back. Everyone knew it would be

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a gamble. I'm Amanda Knox and from Vespucci and iHeart Podcasts.

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>This is doubt the Case of Lucy. Let be Episode five.

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 3>The Defense.

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>It is not a given that a defendant will testify

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>in their own trial. It's a tricky decision, and in England,

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>unlike in America, a failure to testify can actually be

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>held against a defendant. In my own trial, my lawyers

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and I both wanted me to testify because we understood

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that the prosecution's case relied so heavily on character assassination,

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and the best antidote to that was for the jury

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to see the real me. But there's a huge risk

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in testifying. It's perfectly normal to get details wrong or

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>confuse the order of events when recalling something that happened

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago. But every factual mistake in your

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>testimony is an opportunity for the prosecution to call you

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a liar. And if you say I don't remember, as

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>my lawyers recommended I do, that can look evasive because

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>people expect you to remember everything, and when it came

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to Lucy's cross examination, she often couldn't remember the details

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and said so on the record.

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 2>The defendants don't always give evidences. You don't have to

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 2>give evidence.

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>In an English courtroom, it's common for a witness that

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>is also a prisoner to be escorted from the dock

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to the witness stand.

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 2>They walk across the courtroom in front of the public

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 2>gallery where I'm shat, and then you go across the

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 2>witness box, sit down, face the jury, prison guard behind you.

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>But for the two weeks Lucy testified in her own defense,

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>each morning she would be there ready sitting in the

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>witness box before anyone else came into the courtroom.

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 2>I think she preferred to be sat in place before

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 2>the jury came in, so we didn't have this performance

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 2>of her being led across each each day from the

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 2>dock to the witness box.

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 4>This let be, would you give the court your full name?

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Please?

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 5>Yes, Lucy let Be?

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 4>And what's your date of birth? Miss let Be?

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 5>Fourth of January nineteen ninety.

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>There are no recordings in a UK court, so we've

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>had actors read from the trial transcripts.

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 4>When was it that you first knew you wanted to

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 4>be a nurse.

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>The first five days Lucy spent answering questions from her

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>defense lawyer.

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 5>I've always wanted to work with children, but it was

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 5>towards the end of secondary school that I thought I

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 5>wanted to do nursing, and then picked a level subjects

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 5>that would best support that career.

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>After months of evidence being presented against her, it was

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>finally Lucy's turn to answer for herself.

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 4>Over the period of twenty fifteen to twenty sixteen, we

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 4>know you were looking at a number of babies in

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 4>this indictment, and you understand that, don't you. Yes, there's

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 4>seventeen of them. Yes, But could you put a figure

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 4>on the number of babies you cared for over that

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 4>twelve month period?

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.119
<v Speaker 5>Probably hundreds hundreds? Yes?

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 4>And did you care for them?

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 5>Yes?

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 4>Did you ever do anything that was meant to hurt

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 4>any of them?

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 5>I only ever did my best to care for them.

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 4>Did you ever want to hurt any baby you looked after?

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 5>No, that's completely against everything that being a nurse is.

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 5>I'm there to help and to care, not to harm.

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Everything about Lucy let Be was scrutinized during her time

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>on the stand. From what she wore, she was.

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 3>So dark blue black, you know, she quite no bright colors.

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>To how she spoke, she was.

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Very directave clear answers, didn't deviate from the question, but

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 2>again not particularly expressive.

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>And of course how she looked.

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you didn't know she was a nurse,

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 2>you might think she was a librarian, something like that.

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, quite mousey. Maybe that's been a kid.

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>This intense gaze on your every move and utterance is exhausting.

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>When it came to the coverage of my trial, I

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>was in an unwinnable situation. If I smiled at my

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>family in the courtroom, a small gesture to let them

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>know I was surviving, I was a media whore hungry

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>for the spotlight. If I cried, they were crocodile tears

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and I was being manipulative. It was soul destroying. In

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>September of twenty twenty four, Lucy let Be got a

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.439
<v Speaker 1>new lawyer. His name is Mark McDonald.

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 6>So, I mean, it all initially started when the family

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 6>contacted me and asked me to go and see Lucy.

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>It's almost as though Mark McDonald's career was leading him

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 1>to this case.

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 6>I think this is a mischaracter justice. Before I became

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 6>a barrister, actually in the operating theater, of the operating

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 6>room as they called it in the US, for fourteen years,

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 6>I was an assistant to the anetheist and the surgeon.

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 6>I've worked in the INTERP two K unit, I've worked

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 6>in A and E. I've spent many years working and

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:17.599
<v Speaker 6>embedded in the hospital in former situations as a doctor's assistant,

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 6>I carried the crash bleep when I went to cardiac arrest.

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 6>On the ward, I could take part an anesthetic machine

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 6>and ventilators and put them back together again. I knew

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 6>all the drugs and assistants. I intubated, I put IV

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 6>lines in, I put arterial lines in, netlines in. I

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 6>had a wealth of knowledge. And then I came to

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 6>the bar and I qualified through night.

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>School at the age of thirty four. Mark became a lawyer.

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.079
<v Speaker 1>Today he has taken on Lucy's case and is working

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>pro bono.

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 6>You know, from the moment she was arrested, it became

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 6>a story in the mainstream media, on the front page

0:09:55.840 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 6>of all the newspapers and documentaries and news items. She

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 6>was described as evil as you described as the worst

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 6>person in the country. It became about dismantling her as

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 6>an individual, and I don't want to be part of

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 6>that narrative. I want to focus on what convicted her

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 6>and ow do ee and do that conviction.

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Mark says to do that, he has employed a multi

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 1>pronged approach.

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 6>The first element is the most important element. You don't

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 6>undo a conviction unless you have the legal arguments and

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 6>the expertise to be able to do so.

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Going through Lucy's testimony, it's clear that was something Lucy's

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>trial lawyer Ben Myers had attempted to do. For example,

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the jury had heard that Lucy was on duty for

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>every suspicious death and collapse. Myers tried to show that

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>she was not alone.

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 4>What was the atmosphere like concerning Baby N as that

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 4>afternoon went on, We see there were these multiple attempts

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 4>at indubation.

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 5>It was becoming increasingly chaotic. More and more staff were

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 5>coming to try and assist. There was a sense of

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 5>panic around the unit. I think that we weren't sure

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.839
<v Speaker 5>how we were going to manage Baby n.

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 4>Do you remember how many people were present as the

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 4>afternoon went on, how many people gathered.

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 5>There were loads of people I would say ten to fifteen.

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Were you his designated nurse during this Yes? Were you

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 4>the only person caring for him at any point?

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 5>No baby n needed such care that he always had

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 5>at least two members of staff with him. I remember

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 5>nurse being helping a lot, and the doctors were near

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 5>enough in the room the whole time.

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 1>Mark won't cred size Lucy's original lawyer, but he has

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 1>no trouble pointing out what he says is a lack

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.359
<v Speaker 1>of evidence against his client.

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 6>No direct evidence of Lucy's doing anything wrong. In fact

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 6>the opposite. So no witnesses, no forensic evidence. Don't see

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 6>see TV you know, no lesson abted drunks that have

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 6>gone missing, In fact the opposite. She was highly regarded

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 6>and seen by many on the unit as an excellent nurse.

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>But what about those damning post it notes, the self

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>incriminating notes found under Lucy's bed during the police investigation.

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 7>I am an awful person, you write down at the

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 7>top right hand corner, don't you?

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 8>Yes?

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 7>And that's true, isn't it.

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 5>No, That's how I felt at the time. I was

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 5>not good enough and I must be an awful person.

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 1>The Crown used those notes and her social media posts

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to try and paint a picture of a woman who

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 1>would hurt babies.

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 7>We don't need to go back through the social media

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 7>stuff to show you out on the rasp with your friends,

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 7>do we No, you are having a good time, weren't you.

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 5>Yes? There were times in those years that I did

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 5>have good times.

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 7>Yes, drinking fizz, going to the races.

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 4>Yes, you felt like.

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 7>This because you knew that you had killed and grievously

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 7>injured these children. No, and that's the truth, isn't it.

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 5>No, it's not the truth.

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 7>You are a murderer.

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 5>No, I am not.

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 7>You have murdered many children.

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 5>I've never murdered a child or harmed any of them.

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 7>I have nothing further. Thank you.

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Lucy's notes made for sensational headlines, but those who have

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>come to Lucy's defense say the police and the media

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately the jury have read them all wrong. Mark

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>says Lucy had written these notes before she had been arrested,

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>but had realized she was being blamed for the deaths

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on the unit.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Why had you written not good enough and underlined it?

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 5>I think that's the overwhelming thought and feeling that I

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:15.479
<v Speaker 5>had about myself at that point that I wasn't.

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Good enough and why did you think you weren't.

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 5>Good enough because of the way people have made me feel?

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 4>Had you actually done anything wrong to hurt any baby?

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 6>No, and emotionally, she's writing this stuff down, as I say,

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 6>with other stuff, saying that she hadn't done anything wrong,

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 6>But the prosecution presented this to the Jewy as a confession,

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.119
<v Speaker 6>and it was left to the Jewy as a confession.

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Lucy wasn't the only nurse who leaned on this practice

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to help them cope with how hard their job really was.

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 9>I do that too.

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>This is a nurse named Jenny Harris. She's been a

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>new Needdle nurse for eighteen years.

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 9>So like things like saying that she did the confession

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 9>on the post it note. I've been to therapy, I've

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 9>been in CBT, I've had counselors and they've told me

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 9>to write things down on what I'm thinking and what

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 9>I'm feeling, but it doesn't mean it's right. So like,

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 9>for example, I had a core belief that I was

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 9>worthless and I was a bad person. There was no

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 9>evidence that I was a bad person. That's what I've

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 9>learned through my therapy. But I was to write that down,

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 9>and I would write down I'm worthless, I'm a bad person,

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 9>but I'm not a bad person.

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 3>But just because I.

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 9>Wrote it down doesn't mean it's true. But as soon

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 9>as I heard that she'd written these post it notes,

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 9>I was like, well, I've done that.

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Well the prosecution considered these notes a confession. Mark McDonald says,

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>one of UK's leading experts on false confessions, does not

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>see it that way.

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 6>Thank you for everything, and he writes a very detailed

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 6>report says this is not a confession. It should never

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 6>have been treated as a confession. In fact, should never

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 6>be put before the jewelry. And we've got to remember

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 6>again that was left to the Jewey as a confession,

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 6>and no expert evidence before the jewelry to counter that.

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 6>It was part of and a strong part of the

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 6>public narrative.

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Over the course of those twenty five weeks the Crown

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>put on their case, the jury heard from expert after expert,

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of hours of testimony from people who all believed

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Lucy had killed these babies. But when it came time

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to refute all that expert testimony, the jury heard first

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>from Lucy and then from one other person.

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 2>In the end, she didn't call any experts on ABF

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 2>and we heard a plumber.

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 3>So the optics may look a bit curious there.

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>That's right. You just heard reporter Kim Pilling say that

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the only witness to be called on behalf of Lucy

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>let be was a plumber.

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 2>He was just called to make a point which had

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 2>come up during the trial that there'd been issues in

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 2>the past with a sewage system on the unit, which

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 2>the defense sort of portrayed the picture of well or

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 2>was not well at the hospital.

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 1>In fact, for about a year the unit was designated

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a risk, sometimes a high risk for a bacteria called

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Pseudomonas eruginosa, absolutely deadly for newborn babies. This decision to

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>only call one person other than Lucy to the stand

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it's been widely criticized, but Lucy's current lawyer, Mark McDonald

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>says that painting a pure of a sick hospital was important,

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 1>something he believes is partly key to the question of

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>what happened to those seven babies who died.

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 6>It's no surprising now that we have so many problems

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 6>in our NHS, not soly down to poor doctoring, but

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 6>you know a whole complex issues in our hospital environment

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 6>that we have a crisis. Our health system in this

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 6>country is broken, and I should say that Lucy's a

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 6>consequence of that broken system.

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>But Mark's message is more than that. He believes there

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is another broken system at play here.

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 6>One of the failings in our criminal justice system is

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 6>that our threshold well what is an expert is actually

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 6>quite low, as almost any medic can pitch up and

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 6>say that they're an expert at something. And I know

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 6>that it was argued during the trial that the lead

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 6>expert in this case didn't have the expertise to say

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 6>what he said. The Court of Appeal disagreed that defense

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 6>arment was said to the trial judge. But that's one

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 6>of the arguments that I'm now taken forward.

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Much has been made of doctor Dowie Evans since this trial.

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>The police leaned heavily on his word and the Crown

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>put him on the stand as their star witness.

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 10>Juwey Evans was set up as some kind of messiah

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 10>of the truth.

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>John Ashton, who investigates serious failures of practice and hospitals,

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>found doctor Evans' testimony lacking.

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 10>When actually, in my view, there is a case for

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 10>him to answer with the General Medical Council, which has

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 10>consistently refused to even look at his behavior and his testimonies.

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>In essence, John is saying that the way doctor Evans

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>acted and what he said should have been investigated by

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the regulator for doctors in the UK, the General Medical Council,

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>and John isn't alone in this thinking. Member of the

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>people we interviewed had very specific issues with the way

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>doctor Evans presented evidence during the trial and his behavior

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>after not the.

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Experience I've got sitting down with experts. You know, they spake.

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 11>A lot of time on these things and very rarely

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 11>do they come out with it. Yes, this is being

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 11>a deliberate killing.

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Steve Watts is a veteran police officer and former

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Assistant Chief Constable. He authored the National Guidelines for Investigating

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Potential Crimes in healthcare settings used by police departments across England.

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>He thinks the Cheshire Police made every grave mistake possible

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 1>during their investigation into Lucy, starting with their involvement with

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>doctor Dowie Evans.

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 11>You know, it's very much more nuanced than that. I mean,

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 11>speaking personally, if I'd had an expert who responded in

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 11>that way, it would raise questions in my mind as

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 11>to whether I needed that evidence look to again, and

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 11>that sort of view validated by others.

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Phil Hammond, a columnist from Private Eye magazine and

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a critic of Lucy's conviction, also weighed in.

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 12>I think the thing that was a big red flag

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 12>for me as a doctor about Dewry Evans, who's the

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 12>lead prosecution expert, is his certainty. If he had said

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 12>I've looked at all of these cases and in my

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 12>professional opinion, the most likely cause of these deaths is

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 12>deliberate harm, then that's absolutely fine to me. But what

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 12>he said, he's absolutely certain that it's deliberate harm, and

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 12>has since gone on podcasts saying that Lucy let Me

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 12>is evil. He couldn't possibly be wrong. People are only

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 12>defending her because they're obsessed with a pretty blonde nurse.

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 12>He said some quite extraordinary things that have completely gone

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 12>outside the lane of being an independent expert, and that

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 12>for me is a big red flag.

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Warden, a neonatal practitioner at Countess of Chester, is

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>also wary of doctor Evans's motivation.

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 8>He's also on record of saying I've never lost a case. Now,

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 8>how can an expert. He's not a barrister, he's not

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 8>a lawyer. He shouldn't be about winning and losing. He's

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 8>about giving his expert opinion. But he's never lost a case.

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 8>So he's a hired gun really for the prosecution. It

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 8>earned a lot of money. Is on record of saying, well, yes,

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 8>I earned a lot of money, but I have to

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 8>pay for my daughter's horse and my son's car. I mean,

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 8>he's on record. He said that in a I think

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 8>it was BBC radio program. He said that.

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Ben Myers, Lucy's original defense lawyer, did conduct a very

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>aggressive cross examination of doctor Evans.

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 4>No, what you have done in your evidence today is

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 4>introduced something new with the purpose of supporting the allegation

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 4>rather than explaining the facts. Isn't it.

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 13>No, No, that is incorrect. I'm here to support the

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 13>jury and everyone in this court trying to explain what

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 13>was it that led to a baby who was very

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 13>small and premature suddenly collapsing and where resuscitation was unsuccessful.

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 13>In doing that, I am totally upfront in seeing that.

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 2>It was very adversarial between mister Myers and Dowie Evans.

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.959
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they clashed quite regularly.

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 2>And to the point where you know, in the end,

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 2>we got very quickly to the point where mister Myers

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 2>just accused Dowie Evans of being bused.

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 13>I am not relying on my opinion alone. I'm relying

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 13>on other people's opinion, sorry, other medical people's opinion as well.

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 3>That is what doctors do. We do it all the time.

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 3>That is what we do.

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 13>Okay, So I'm here to assist the members of the

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 13>jury in sorting out what is a pretty complicated case.

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm suggesting to you, Dr Evans that you were reaching

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 4>for things that support the allegation rather than reflecting the facts. Well,

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 4>I disagree with you.

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.919
<v Speaker 14>I have just explained the facts.

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Mister Meyeres was accusing him of being an unreliable witness,

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 2>and Dutch Evans I think he took that.

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 3>Personally as well.

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 2>So that played all out and at times it was

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:25.360
<v Speaker 2>quite uncomfortable.

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 3>To listen to.

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>It's up to every defense team to decide which witnesses

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to call and how to present their case. But it's

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>important to remember that Lucy was considered innocent before the

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>jury found her guilty, and it wasn't her lawyer's job

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to prove her innocent. His job was to poke holes

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in the evidence presented against her. And at some point

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Lucy's team decided they would not call their own witnesses.

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know that's the defense meant that decision,

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 3>and they're not at liberty to disclose why they met

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 3>the decision like that.

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 2>But I'd say that my experience is, if you're going

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 2>to call a witness, are they going to help your case,

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 2>are they're going to assist it?

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Or could they potentially damage your case?

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 2>And as a general rule, if the downside is greater

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 2>than the upside, then it's maybe best not to call

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 2>this wordness for whatever reason. Mister Meyers is extremely experienced.

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Council.

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 2>If they've decided not to call the medical experts, that

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 2>it wouldn't have been done on a whim, and it

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 2>would have been a tactical decision.

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 1>It's a tactical decision that doctor Mike Hall did not

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 1>agree with.

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 14>I was indignant, I think it was the best word

0:25:56.000 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 14>I can find, and extremely concerned that I had heard

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 14>things said purporting to be medical facts, which in my

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 14>view were not medical facts.

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Mike Hall, an expert in neonatal medicine was there

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for the whole trial on behalf of the defense team.

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 14>The request was that they asked if I would attend

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 14>court now, initially for the first probably three or four months,

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 14>that was in person in Manchester, and subsequently for the

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 14>last I can remember two or three months of the trial.

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 14>I did that from home.

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Hall was expecting to be called as an expert

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>witness for the defense. That never happened.

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 14>I'm not ilegal legally trained in any way, so as

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 14>a man in the street, as it were, I couldn't

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 14>understand why on earth you would not call expert witnesses,

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 14>particularly given what I'd heard by other expert witnesses. A

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 14>significant proportion of what some of the other expert witnesses

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 14>said I disagreed with, and while the jury would have

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:07.719
<v Speaker 14>had to decide which of us they believe, I think

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 14>it was important in my view for Lucy let Be

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 14>to have experts who gave a different opinion.

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Hall says that he disagreed with a fundamental aspect

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Crown's case.

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 14>This concept that really was portrayed at the trial, that

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 14>babies don't suddenly collapse for no no good reason, that's

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 14>not the case in the enatal Claire. Babies do suddenly change,

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 14>and they can change quite quickly when you're not expecting

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 14>them to.

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Evans argued that Lucy must have caused an air

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>embolism by pumping air into their bodies, but since the conviction,

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>controversy around that theory has grown, Doctor Hall says that

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>if he had been able to testify, he would have

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 1>pointed out the flaws.

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 14>I thought all of the conclusion relating to our embolism

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 14>were not based on credible evidence.

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Mark McDonald says that the first part of his job

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is to get the courts to acknowledge key issues with

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the evidence used to convict Lucy. That includes issues with

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the way police framed the timeline of the so called murders.

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>He says that parents who lost babies after Lucy was

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>off the ward have been ignored by the police.

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 6>I've disgusted with families who have lost their children as

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 6>a result of problems, medical problems, diagnoses and failures to

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 6>treat a child who has died. And so I've got

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 6>these people. These have all come to me since so

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 6>I get many emails every day.

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>But there is more to Mark's approach than just dealing

0:28:55.560 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>with problematic evidence. Remember, his approach has more than one prong.

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 6>The second is to change the narrative around her.

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Mark says that this negative narrative around Lucy is hurting

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>her chances for an appeal.

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 6>So it's important to get an alternative narrative out. They're

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 6>not a false al tentative plan, not a pretend narrative,

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 6>but simply tell the truth as to what's going on

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 6>in exposing the issues. She was one of the most

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 6>qualified nurses on the unit, which is why she got

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 6>all the seriously ill patients. And she was someone also

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 6>that worked, had a passion for a job, so did

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 6>a lot of extra shift. She was saving up to

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 6>buy a flat, and so she would do extra hours

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 6>so she would get more money so she could get

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 6>herself a mortgage for her apartment. And so she was

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 6>someone who was committed and loved her job. And she

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 6>told me one weeks ago that you know, she would

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 6>go out in the evening, she'ld go out with friends

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 6>and she'd get a text from the unit because they

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 6>couldn't set up this particular type of equipment and didn't

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 6>know how to do it, and say she had come out,

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 6>and she'd go back and she'd showed them how to

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 6>do it, but says she was always sort of almost

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 6>constantly on call and constantly there.

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>This hits me hard. I know what it feels like

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>when other people take your life story and write their

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>own narrative. I've had my own diaries used against me.

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I've had my childhood nickname twisted to mean something ugly.

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I too, tried to be the author of my own story.

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>After my trials, and once I was back home in

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the US, I wrote my first book, hoping that if

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I told things from my point of view, people would

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>hear it. Some did, lots did not. It took me

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>years to find a way through this maze. A big

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>part of this journey is accepting that I will never

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>be able to correct all the false perceptions about me.

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I have to find my sense of freedom outside of

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the question of whether people believe I'm innocent. I'm not alone.

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So many women who face the criminal justice system face this.

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>One thing I've noticed is that it's more common for

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>women to face character assassination than men. They have to

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>deal with unequal scrutiny when they are faced with answering

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>for a crime, innocent or not, the justice system is

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>not genderblind.

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 6>Years after this conviction is over to people will be

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 6>talking about issues of misolgyny and feminism that I think

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 6>polluted the whole. In this case, I have the narrative

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 6>behind it.

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>When I was researching for this podcast, I came across

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>this video online for expeditions the Living Library of Knowledge.

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 15>When I talk about the gender nature of law is

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 15>about basing attitudes towards women in the stereotypes and the

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 15>myths that exist about womanhood and about women's sexuality, about

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 15>the need to constrain women.

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Baroness Helena Kennedy, a distinguished politician, human rights advocate,

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and lawyer who practiced law for over fifty years, often

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>focusing on women and the law, the.

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 15>Ways in which it is assumed that women will manipulate

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 15>and lie, the ways in which itselften assumed that women

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 15>will not be honest about their own sexual longings and behavior,

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 15>and indeed the very idea that women have sexual longings

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 15>has often been denied in law.

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>This question of why women may be treated differently by

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the judicial system is one I've spent a lot of

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>time thinking about. Here's me speaking to my producer about this.

0:32:55.800 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are ways that men are stereotyped, Like

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>things that people tend to project onto men are things

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>like anger and violence. And so if someone is able

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to present themselves calmly and with confidence in a courtroom,

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>people are when they're a man that plays well for

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>them right, they seem relatable, agreeable, especially if they're put together.

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Luigimnngoni is a great example here in the US right now,

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>where he is this charismatic, very seemingly like optimistic figure,

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that there's copious evidence that shows that

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>he just murdered this CEO of a healthcare company in

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>cold blood. It's amazing to me that like men who

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>are accused of murder can still imbue this sense of charm,

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this sense of this calm, confident, amicable nature. Whereas when

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to women, if you smile and have this

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of calm or warmth to you, well you're clearly

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a psychopath. If you are cold and withdrawn, well you're

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>clearly a psychopath. Like it just seems that when it

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to women, if your drab and ugly, well that's

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>more motive for you have to have committed some crime.

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>If you're beautiful and charismatic, Ah, well, that's more ability

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>for you to have used your feminine wiles in order

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>to commit this crime. There's just no winning when you're

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a woman. Everything about you, anything that you do, or

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>say or appear to be, can be used to find

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:43.399
<v Speaker 1>fault in you. And when it comes to Lucy, let

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>be I mean this is true of all women who

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>are accused of violent crimes, violent crimes that statistically are

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>committed by men, and so we do not expect them

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to be committed by women. And so we think that

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>a woman has to be a true, the egregious example

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of a monster in order to rise to the level

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of violence that men are capable of. And then, above all,

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.280
<v Speaker 1>for that to be someone who is in the position

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:16.479
<v Speaker 1>of being a caretaker for a vulnerable population like that

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 1>is the greatest betrayal of our sex that you could

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>possibly be. And so it doesn't come to a surprise

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to me that Lucy, having been found guilty of these crimes,

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>having been found guilty of this betrayal of our gender,

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 1>was handed such a harsh sentence to be made an

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 1>example of. And in the one hand, I sort of

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>understand it because society does rely upon women being safe

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and stable, and so we are especially driven to punish

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and condemn examples of when that doesn't pan out. That's

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>exact exactly what Lucy let Be was about to face.

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>She's now sitting in prison, about to be sentenced to

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the harshest sentences in British history, coming up

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>on doubt the case of Lucy let Be.

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 15>As soon as she was found guilty, it was I mean,

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 15>there was just no voice scene of any skepticism or

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:29.240
<v Speaker 15>doubt about the verdict. It was just the first time

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 15>that things were questioned really openly. It just didn't It

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 15>just didn't sit right to me.

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't believable.

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:38.320
<v Speaker 2>There's huge holes in the story that they were telling

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 2>and what they had to.

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:39.959
<v Speaker 3>Back it up with.

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Doubt. The Case of Lucy let Bee is brought to

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:50.839
<v Speaker 1>you by Vespucci, iHeart Podcasts and Knox Robinson Productions. I've

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>been your host Amanda Knox. This episode was written by

0:36:55.040 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Kathleen Goldharm. Senior producer is Natalia Rodriguez. The producer was

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Lucy Ditchmont. The assistant producer was Amy Gill. The sound

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:09.399
<v Speaker 1>designer is Tom Biddle. The theme music was written by

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Tom Biddle, story editing by Kathleen Goldhar. Legal advice was

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>provided by Jack Browning. Voice acting by Kenny Blythe, Serena

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Montigui and Paul Leaming. The producers at iHeart Podcasts are

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Chandler Mays and Katrina Norville. The executive producers were Joe Meek,

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Amanda Knox, Christopher Robinson, Daniel Turkin, and Johnny Galvin. Thank

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you for listening.