WEBVTT - Intel Skyrockets, Darden Restaurants Slides, Cracker Barrel Falls

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 2>The Stock Movers Report, your roundup of companies making moves

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:16.919
<v Speaker 2>in the stock market, harnessing the power of Bloomberg Data.

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tim Steeveeck along with Carol Masser. Let's take a

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>look at some stocks on the move today with US

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Now is Bloomberg News Senior reporter and deputy team leader

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>for US Equities Jess Menton. Jess, I hope you're looking

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>at Intel, of.

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 3>Course the best I'm just making sure in the S

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 3>and P five hundred and the Nasdaq one hundred, I

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 3>INTC is the ticker symbol, so up twenty three percent

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 3>at this point, so one pace for its best one

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 3>day percentage gain since October nineteen eighty seven, so almost

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 3>four decades ago. Here And of course, if for people

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 3>who remember until actually got kicked out of the Dow

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 3>last November, and usually when it happens, it can be

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a contrier and indicator for some

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:56.959
<v Speaker 3>traders if you think of when Exon or ge got

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 3>kicked out of the Dow. But what's interesting about this

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 3>is in video actually replaced it in the doubt. But

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 3>what happened here and why it's up so high today.

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 3>It's actually in Vidia has a five billion dollar investment

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 3>with Intel, and so when you think about the AI

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 3>story and the theme here in Vida and Intel said

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 3>they would collaborate in developing chips for personal computers as

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 3>well as data centers. So Intel, for context, specializes in

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 3>ships known as those central processing units that serve as

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 3>the brain of the computer. So in VideA actually makes

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 3>those graphics processing units. So that's more of kind of

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 3>the powerful tasks like crunching a lot of data and that.

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 3>So this is why it's important. So basically in Vidia

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 3>throwing a lifeline to a one time rival. Here in

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 3>the New York Times actually reporting earlier today that the

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration actually approached in Vida nine months ago and

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 3>asked it to invest in Intel, according to two people

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 3>familiar with the knowledge. So interesting context here when you

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 3>look at a stock like this, but have to point

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 3>out in Vidia stock vda's the ticker up about four

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 3>percent right now.

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, interesting, And I was just looking at Intel. It

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 4>was a seventy four almost seventy five dollars stock back

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 4>in two thousand. It did go up as much to

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 4>the level of like about sixty eight and change back

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 4>in April of twenty twenty one, so it's still like

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 4>half of that.

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 3>It's true, and you have the Dow tradding around records

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 3>right now. But then also Intel since November eighth of

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 3>last year, whatever it got kicked out officially and in

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 3>video got added. It actually is outperforming in video as

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 3>well as the Dow in that time span over twenty percent.

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 4>So some context there, all right, Darden Restaurants take our dri.

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Now looking at this dock down almost seven percent so

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 3>on pea Sports worst day since May of twenty twenty two.

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 3>So this is a company that owns the parent company

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 3>so basically Olive Garden when it comes to those breadsticks,

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 3>as well as Longhorn here and formally used to own

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Red Lobster, which I used to work at, but unfortunately

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Red Lobster has their own stuff that was back in college, so.

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Long harm because you're a Texan.

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, surprise, surprise actually, but they don't own anymore. Red

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Lobster has its own sort of bankruptcy issues that it

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 3>was going through in recent years. But nonetheless maybe a

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 3>turnaround maybe, right, that's true, but they're seeing some bright

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 3>spots there with some of those endless shrimp specials that

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 3>they tend to have in the fall, just for contexts

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 3>in case people wanted to know. But besides all of that,

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 3>so darted. Actually, so I mentioned it's stuck down around

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 3>seven percent on paceports worst day since made of twenty

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty two, but its first quarter comparable sales unfortunately at

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 3>this core restaurant brand, So the two mentioned all of

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Garden as well as Longhorn, those disappointed. So those profit

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 3>expectations trailing Wall Street expectations for the quarter. So really unfortunately,

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 3>food inflation still feeling a lot of that at those companies.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 3>If you look at the A and R function in

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 3>the terminal, twenty buys twelve holds and two cells for Darden.

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 4>All right, good to know, good to know, all right.

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Cracker Barrel, Yes, so this of course, I think you're

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 3>out a couple of weeks ago, Carol, when Tim and

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 3>I were actually chatting about this, but this was back.

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 4>And are you going to say that you went to

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 4>Cracker Barrel bite.

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 2>To eat out?

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, in late August they actually wiped out nearly one

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 3>hundred million dollars in value. After that rebrand that was

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 3>very controversial was announced looking at its stock now, the

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 3>ticker CBRL down seven percent on paceports worst days since

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 3>September second from earlier this year. The stock actually had

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 3>been down around six percent this year through Wednesday's close.

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Obviously after that gyrations there, but unfortunately it has a

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 3>weak forecast that's been pressuring that stock. So Cracker Barrel

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 3>unfortunately cracking under the pressure when it came to that controversy,

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 3>what did they do?

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 4>Did they get yes?

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Guy it was the uncle. Yes, isn't he called the

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>old timer uncle Herschel?

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Yes, they brought it to remove him and he

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 3>had the olveralls. I thought they were just going to

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 3>have it without it, and it really caused an uproar,

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 3>unfortunately with all that's going on in the work, right,

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 3>and so critics were accusing the company of sort of

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 3>erasing traditional elements that were tied to the brand. But unfortunately,

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 3>all right, you know, and so they really kind of

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 3>backed down for the pressure there after what it did

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 3>to its stock. But so it's revenue for fiscal twenty

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty six, which will run through extra lights, projected to

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 3>be in the range of three point three five a

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 3>billion to three point four to five billion, and unfortunately

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 3>analysts were expecting sales of three point five two billion

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 3>in that period. So unfortunately at Stock feeling some pressure

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 3>once again.

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 4>If I said it last night, about twenty five percent

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 4>of the float is short, so you can see the

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 4>negative sentiment on this one in a big way.

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 2>The Stock Movers report from Bloomberg Radio. Check back with

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 2>us throughout the day for the latest roundup of companies

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 2>making news on Wall Street and for the latest market

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 2>moving headlines. Listen to Bloomberg Radio Live, catch us on YouTube,

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg dot com, and on Applecarplay and Android Auto with

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Business app.