WEBVTT - Janet Jackson and Nikola Tesla

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio and

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:20.119
<v Speaker 1>How the tech are you Now. In a recent tech

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>News episode, I talked about how a Microsoft engineer named

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Raymond Chen revealed that the music video for Janet Jackson's

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>hit Rhythm Nation was at one time the crasher of laptops,

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>or at least of certain laptops. Some folks discovered that

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>if they played this video on their laptop computer, or

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>if their laptop computer was close to something else that

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>was playing this music video, the computer would spontaneously crash. Now,

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, these computers were not nasty, as miss

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Jackson might say. They were not music critics. It turns

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>out that a sound played in that music video matched

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>the resonant frequency of the hard disk drives in these laptops,

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.119
<v Speaker 1>though it took some time to suss that out. Chen

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>said that these were hard drives that we're spending at

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>five thousand four rpm. That's revolutions per minute, so going

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>around five thousand, four hundred times every minute. That's actually

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>on the lower end of what we typically see with

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>hard disk drives, they can top out at more than

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>twice as fast as that. But it's not bad. I mean,

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you can still go out and buy a hard disk

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>drive today that's at five thousand PM. People typically like

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>faster ones. It means that you can read and write

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>information to such a hard drive faster. Anyway, the sound

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>from the music video was causing the hard drives to vibrate.

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>The platters inside would vibrate, and ultimately this would prompt

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the computers to crash. So today I thought i'd talk

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about hard drives, a bit of out

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>resonant frequencies, how a sound could cause a hard drive

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to actually crash, and maybe talk about some myths surrounding resonance,

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>including one that I kind of perpetuated last week. So

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 1>I gotta hold myself up to a correction here anyway.

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>First up, if you were to take a hard drive apart,

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>don't do that, by the way, You're more than likely

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>going to destroy it. But you would see that inside

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the hard disk drive you have a spindle, and on

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the spindle would be at least one disc or platter.

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>More likely it would actually be more than one, perhaps

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a stack of them, and each platter would be separated

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:45.119
<v Speaker 1>from its neighbors by a small gap, and the platters

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>are kind of similar to a compact disk in some ways,

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>but compact discs store information that's read and written through

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>an optical drive. So with light laser specifically, hard disks

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>store information magneticle, not through optics. Now, this platter or

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>these platters are what spin inside a hard disk drive coding.

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 1>The platter is a thin layer of magnetic grains, so

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>using an electro magnetic head, the computer can write data

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to the platter by realigning these magnetic grains so that

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>they point in a specific direction, essentially pointing magnetic north

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>or pointing magnetic south, and thus they can represent zeros

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and ones. When the platter spins beneath the head or

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>above the head, depending on how this goes, and the

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>head is in passive mode, there's a little detector essentially

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>on the head that can pick up the magnetic fluctuations

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>from these aligned regions that are passing near it as

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the disc is spinning, so it's being read now. The

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>head in this case can look a bit like tweezers

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in a sense. There's typically a pair of arms, one

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that goes over the top of the platter one that's beneath.

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>They are not making contact with the platter. In fact,

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>if they were to touch the platter, that would damage

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the hard drive. You gotta keep in mind, these platters

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>are spinning super fast, so these electro magnets are separated

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>from the platters. They're not actually touching, they're they're hovering

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>above and below um. So really like every head is

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>usually a pair of red Wright heads. There's one on top,

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>one beneath each platter that allows the computer to store

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.559
<v Speaker 1>information on either side of platters. And as I said,

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 1>your typical hard drive often has several of these platters

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>arranged in a stack, separated from each of them by

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a small gap, and each platter has its own read

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>right head. But that is the super basic way that

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>hard drives work. I'm not even getting into things like

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>actually how you store a file on these platters, because

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not as simple as like the roove on a

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>on a vinyl album representing a song. It's not like that.

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>But the reason for this rapid rotational speed is that

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you do want to be able to read and write

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>information from this hard disk drive quickly. And you know,

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>if it didn't spin at these fast rates, it would

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>take forever, which is hyperbolie. It would take a really

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>long time for your computer to retrieve stored information from

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>the hard disk drive. And it blows my mind that

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 1>you can have platters spending times per minute or faster

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and read or write information to those platters, storing gigabytes

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of data in the process. Technology is really kind of

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>like magic, except you know it works. Now. If you

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>have a mechanical device like this, clearly everything needs to

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 1>be improper alignment or else you're going to have problems.

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Jostling a hard disk drive can potentially knock a disc

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>off kilter, which would mean that once the spin doll

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 1>that the disks start on starts to spin, you're gonna

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>have some damage, possibly catastrophic damage. The platters need to

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>maintain both horizontal and vertical alignment, and honestly, knowing how

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>delicate a hard disk drive can be, I'm actually amazed

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>that my first ever MP three players survived for so

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>many years. I had a creative Zen device which had

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a spinning hard disk drive inside of it, which is

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a very tiny little hard drive, and I say I'm

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>amazed that survived because I know that thing took a

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>tumble more than once, and the impact could have been

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>enough to damage the hard drive, but I guess I

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>had more luck than brains anyway. According to a data

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>recovery firm called drive Savers, of hard disk drive failures

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>are the result of damage recording surfaces, typically created as

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>the result of a physical shock. Other potential causes for

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>failure include things like circuit board problems uh stiction, which

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is the combination of friction and sticking, where if you

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>haven't used a hard des drive for a long time,

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes there can be this kind of friction sticking issue

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that impedes the disks from spinning. And also drive motor failure,

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>which makes up like less than a percent of all

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the hard disk drive failures. So usually the motor doesn't

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>isn't the problem. By the time the motor has given out,

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>something else has already failed in that hard disk. Now,

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>if something were to cause the hard drive to stop

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>spinning while it's in operation, you get a hard disk

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>drive failure in that prompts a full crash of the computer.

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And this brings us to Janet or miss Jackson. If

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm nasty, and it turns out that the song Rhythm

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Nation has within it a frequency that resonates with a

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>certain popular model of hard disk drives from many years ago.

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>So this isn't really about current tech. We're actually talking

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>about machines that were sold around the year two thousand five.

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>So really kind of amazing that this even became a problem,

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>right because Rhythm Nation came out in nine, this particular

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>uh laptop that was prone to this kind of stuff,

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>or these laptops, I should say, because they all had

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>this hard drive in common. It wasn't the laptops fault.

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Those were sold around two thousand five, and specifically, the

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the sound frequency from the music video would resonate with

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the natural resonant frequency produced by the hard drive when

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the platter is spinning. So let's talk about frequency and

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>sound and resonance for a bit. With waves. Frequency refers

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to the number of waves that pass a fixed point

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>within a given amount of time, and we use the

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>metric hurts to measure frequencies. So one hurts is equal

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>to one wave passing a fixed point in one second.

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Two hurts would mean two waves would pass that point

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in one second. Now, notice I didn't say sound waves

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>here because Hurts can refer to any kind of wave

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>or oscillation, so we can use frequency to talk about

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff like light or sound or all sorts of other things.

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>But in this episode we're mostly concerned with sound. So

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>if you were to play the middle C on a piano,

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and assuming that piano had been tuned according to VERD tuning,

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>which is not standard uh, the note would produce a

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>frequency of two hundred fifty six hurts. So that means

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the sound wave travels at two hundred fifty six waves

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>past a given fixed point per second. Now, sound waves

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>are really vibrations, right. Physical vibrations is a physical phenomenon.

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>It is why there's no sound in space, because you

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have stuff close enough to transmit vibration from one

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>thing to another, and you have to have stuff close

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>enough to vibrate and affect other things in order for

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that to propagate for it to travel. Most of the

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff we hear is traveling through the air, So in

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>this case, the vibrations we're talking about are typically these

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>little fluctuations in air pressure. You can kind of imagine

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that these changes in air pressure are effectively pushing against

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and pulling on your ear drum. Just slightly, which then

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>transmits those vibrations to our inner ear. Our brains ultimately

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>interpret this signal as sound, and the frequency at which

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the air fluctuations affect our ear drums determines what pitch

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>we hear. So slower frequencies produce lower pitches. Faster frequencies

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>produce faster pitches. Two fifty six fluctuations like full fluctuations

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>per second produces middle C. Now, let's talk about resonant frequencies.

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Systems have a frequency that they tend to oscillate at.

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>The reason middle C sounds like middle C is that

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>there is a string in that piano that's at the

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>right length and it's at the right tension to produce

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>that frequency. When that string is struck by a hammer,

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>when you push down on the key, a hammer strikes

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the string and it vibrates at this frequency, and thus

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>we hear that middle C. Similarly, if you take a

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>wine glass and you tap the wine glass, you will

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>hear it ring out a tone. That tone is the

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>resonant frequency, the natural frequency for that glass. It's the

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>frequency at which it tends to oscillate naturally when struck. Now,

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>if you were to produce that same tone near the glass,

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you would cause the glass to vibrate. You would induce

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>vibration in the glass. If you produce the tone with

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>enough volume or amplitude, if we're talking about waves, that

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>vibration can start to deform the glass enough to cause

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the wine glass to shatter. And you've probably seen examples

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of this, you know. The classic one is you have

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>an opera singer singing a clear note and holding a

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>wine glass and the glass inevitably breaks apart. That is

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>possible if you have someone with the lung power and

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the singing ability to produce a strong enough sound at

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the right frequency, but it ain't easy. In demonstrations and

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>physics classes, folks typically use a tone producer and an

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>amplifier and a speaker, which simplifies things, and it's also

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>safer than holding a glass close to your face while

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to make it explode. You can also really dial

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>into the proper frequency, and you can kind of think

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of this as being similar to pushing someone who is

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>swinging on a swing set. If you push at just

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the right moment in their arc, you can really get

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 1>them to go higher without putting in too much effort

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in your push but it does have to be at

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>just the right moment within the arc of the swing

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to give a boost rather than interfere with the arc

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of the swing. The sound waves are kind of giving

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>the glass of it just the right frequency for it

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to oscillate and to keep oscillating. When we come back,

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about what this has to do with hard drives,

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk a bit more about some misconceptions about resonants,

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>including one that that I kind of talked about. Okay,

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So Rhythm Nations music video had within the music video

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a sound that was at a frequency that matched the

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>hard disk drives resonant frequency when it was spinning. So

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>if you were to play the Rhythm Nation music video

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>on one of these laptops, that sound would start to

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>push the platters on the hard disk drive at the

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>frequency that they were naturally going to vibrate at, so

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>they would start vibrating more and more, and that would

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>cause the hard disk drive to ash and the subsequent

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>computer crash. So how do you solve this problem? If

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>if hard disk drives are delicate, you know, that's why

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>they're in these very sturdy cases typically because they need

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to be protected from everything else. Well, if they're so delicate,

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>how do you protect against this issue? Well, the hard

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>disk drive is a mechanical device, and everything has already

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>been engineered to work a specific way, so it's not

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>super easy to change the hard disk drive. You've already

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>sold all these laptops that have it in there. So

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the solution was really to create a sound filter that

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>would mask the frequency, the resonant frequency. So essentially, this

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>filter would block laptops from playing that specific frequency. All

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the other frequencies could play because they weren't going to

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>resonate with the hard disk, but this one wouldn't, and

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>chances are it was tough for human listeners to even

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>tell the difference, because being able to pick out a

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>specific frequency from a whole bunch of them in a

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>song is and something your average person can do. So

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the thought was, yeah, this is technically going to have

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>an impact on certain media that contains this frequency, but

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>chances are no one's going to be able to tell

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the difference anyway, and it won't matter if it's crashing computer,

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's just block that from being able to play

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>on these kinds of laptops. So that filter saved the day.

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>But you could theoretically be working on your computer, and

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the video for him Nation might play on some other device,

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>like say your home entertainment system. Presumably your home entertainment

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>system would not have this sound filter on it, so

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>your laptop might still crash because that frequency would be

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>present in that version of the music video. So one

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>reason I think Chen brought this up was that if

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>we forget about these things, if we forget about these

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>kinds of odd cases that require these patched solutions, then

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we end up with stuff that's no longer really necessary. So,

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>like I said earlier, this regular problem was affecting machines

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>sold around two thousand five. The hard drives today are different,

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of laptops don't even use hard disk

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>drives anymore. They use solid state drives, which don't have

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>any moving parts in them, And that means that filter

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>may not actually be necessary anymore. It might not be needed,

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>but it might still be in place on machines because

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it was in earlier machines, and it ends up being

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a carryover. So, in other words, something that was originally

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>put in place in order to fix a problem stays

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in place because people haven't bothered to remove it. And

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>if we don't remember why we put something there to

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>begin with, we could just be living with stuff that

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really do anything anymore, or that can can, at

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>least at some level impact our experience when we want

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to jam out to Rhythm Nation. But let's talk about

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>some other residant frequency stories and myths, and let's start

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>with one I kind of whiffed on last week. So

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned when first covering the story that subjecting something

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to its resonant frequency can be quite destructive, as illustrated

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>by the wineglass demonstration that clearly shows that a resident

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>frequency can break something well. I also mentioned suspension bridges

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in that particular news item, which I really should have

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>stopped to think about, because I already knew this was

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>not really relevant or correct, but for some reason to

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 1>just skip my mind. But I was referencing a real

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>world disaster that frequently is mentioned uh in concert with resonans,

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>but the actual cause of the destruction wasn't resonants. The

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>disaster in question was the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Bridge in the state of Washington in the United States.

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So construction on this suspension bridge began in the nineteen thirties.

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>The finished project opened for traffic on July first night,

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>ten forty, and on November seven of that year we

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>got the collapse. So first, let's talk about what a

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>suspension bridge is. So it has advantages over your traditional

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>solid bridges that had, you know, multiple arcs of solid

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>material spanning whatever it is you're building the bridge across,

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a chasm or river or a bay or

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.199
<v Speaker 1>whatever it might be. One of the big advantages of

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a suspension bridges that you need way less material to

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>make a suspension bridge than one of these traditional bridges were.

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Really the only thing you have to worry about is

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that the bridge is able to, you know, withstand the

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>gravitational force of it being pulled down, right. That's it.

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Like otherwise they're pretty sturdy. Suspension bridges have other concerns.

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Suspension bridges can be lighter, that can be less expensive

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 1>to build because you're using less material, and since the

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>public typically foots the bill for a construction of bridges,

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>making construction less spensive is a pretty high priority in

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>most projects. So a suspension bridge consists of two towers,

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of like Tolkien, and these two towers are connected

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to each other by cables. Those cables also extend further

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to attached to either end of the bridged area. You

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>have rods that connect these cables to the bridges surface,

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>which is also known as the deck uh And so

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the deck is suspended above whatever it is. The bridge

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>is crossing the chasm, the bay, the river, whatever it

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>might be. Thus we get suspension bridge. Now, the Tacoma

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Narrows Bridge was the third longest suspension bridge at the

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>time of its construction, and in an effort to maximize

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>cost efficiency, the bridge was using plate girders along the

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>sides of the bridge to provide rigidity to the deck. Now,

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>typically instead of girders, you would use trusses, but trusses

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>would require more material and thus would have been more expensive,

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 1>So this was one of the considerations. One of the

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the compromises made to have the bridge be less expensive

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>was to go with this model where you kind of

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>had this this ribbon like effect across the bridge as

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>opposed to trusses to make it more rigid. So this

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>compromise meant the bridge was more flexible than other suspension bridges.

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Too flexible, you would say. Construction workers who were working

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>on building the darn thing referred to it as the

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>galloping Gurdie because of the girders and because well even

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>before the bridge opened, it was clear that the bridge

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.919
<v Speaker 1>moved more than it necessarily should, at least under certain conditions.

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So on November seven in Washington, the winds were in

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>high force, and as these high sustained winds were hitting

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the suspension bridge, vorteses were forming. So when a fluid

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 1>hits a blunt object, vortices form as the fluid moves

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>around and then beyond the object. So if you could

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>see the wind, you would see it was creating this

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of wiggly vortices behind the components that was hitting

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 1>on the bridge. And we were talking about some issues

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>with residents here. If those vibrations were at the right frequency,

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>then it starts to impart vibrations into the bridge itself

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 1>and the bridge begins to move up and down. And that,

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in fact did happen, So there was at least some

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>movement of the bridge on November seven that related to residents. However,

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that was not what caused the bridge to ultimately break

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:46.479
<v Speaker 1>apart and collapse. So the bridge began to twist, not

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>just move up and down, but starting to twist along

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 1>its length, and that was really the problem, and that

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>twisting didn't come from residents. Instead, the wind was hitting

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>these girders along the side, and the vote disease that

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we're forming, we're causing the bridge to move in a

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>specific way, like one side would move down, the other

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>side would move up. But then the bridge would try

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to return back to its neutral position, you know, being level,

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>instead of being tilted to the left or to the right.

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>But when it would return, it would go beyond its

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>normal rest spot due to momentum, kind of like how

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>if you pluck a string, it actually moves beyond its

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>rest position when it when it uh when you let

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>it go. So the wind would then push on the

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>girders again as they had reached their other side, kind

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>of like you know, pushing someone on a swing. And

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>this introduced what engineers referred to as aero elastic flutter.

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>If you hold up a sheet of paper to the

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>wind and you see it like fluttering back and forth,

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>vibrating kind of in your hand, you can see an

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>example of aero elastic flutter. This is not resonance, it's

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a separate phenomenon. So it ends up shaking up the bridge.

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's not because it's at a resonant frequency. It's

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>because the wind is creating these war disease that are

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>putting additional pressures on the bridge and making it twist

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. And you know, when you physically move

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, like if you're wiggling something over and

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.719
<v Speaker 1>over and over again, you weaken it. And at around

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>eleven am, some concrete from the bridge structure broke loose

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>from the deck and fell down. Then a cable broke

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.679
<v Speaker 1>and that drastically impacted stabilization, and it began to twist

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>even more violently, and eventually the bridge buckled and collapsed.

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Reports say that at the peak of the twisting motion,

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the sidewalk on one side, like the left side of

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the bridge, would be nearly thirty feet higher than the

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>sidewalk on the opposite side of the bridge, like on

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>the right side. Um, as you were going down the bridge,

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and that is terrifying to think of. Also, there's film

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of the is happening. You can watch videos on YouTube

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>showing the twisting of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge and it

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is dramatic to say the least. But as I said,

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>resonance ultimately did not play the major part of destruction

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>on that bridge. It did have an impact, but the

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>actual destruction came from these vortices and the arrow elastic flutter. Now,

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>when we come back, we'll talk about another mythical story

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>about residents and our good friend Nicola Tesla. But first

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break Ah Tesla. Depending on what

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>circles you run in on the Internet, Tesla can either

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>be looked at as a very eccentric, tortured person who

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>had to struggle with mental health both issues for much

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of his life and who got the raw end of

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the deal on more than one occasion, but also was

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a heck of a self promoter. Or you might see

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>him as an unimpeachable source of genius and innovation who

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>had come up with almost magical technologies that never manifested

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>but he totally had them in his head, like death

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:28.679
<v Speaker 1>rays and stuff. Um. I tend to go on the

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>more modest side, uh and and I would never say

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 1>that Tesla was not a genius. He clearly was a genius,

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 1>but again he was a born self promoter. In fact,

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>I would say he was pretty darn similar to Thomas Edison,

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in that regard, and a lot of folks kind of

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>referred to Thomas Edison as being lex luthor to Nick

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Nicola Tesla's superman. Uh that there were two sides of

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the same coin. Uh. I think that's being more than

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a little melodramatic personally. But one thing Nikola Tesla experimented

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>with was an oscillating or reciprocating electric generator, and in

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>fact he got it to work. The principle was very

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>much sound. It's just that he found a better way

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of accomplishing what his goal was, which was to create

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a a sustained, consistent alternating current. So let's break this down. Now.

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Imagine that you've got kind of like it looks kind

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>of like a metal post that's several inches long, maybe

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe up to a foot or maybe even bigger, uh,

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and cylindrical in nature. Inside of that, you had a

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>chamber where there was a piston that could go up

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and down the chamber cylinder. This piston would drive a

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 1>post like an iron core that had copper wire wrapped

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 1>around it, and this wire would connect to a circuit

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of some sort and that would freely move up and

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>down the length of this one chamber based upon the

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>movements of this piston inside a cylinder. Now surrounding this

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:15.120
<v Speaker 1>rod with copper coil on it was an electro magnet

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>connected to a battery. So a battery generates direct current.

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>That means the electricity always flows in the same direction

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>from uh, I mean, if you're talking about you're talking

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>about the way Benjamin Franklin thought of it. It goes

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.479
<v Speaker 1>from positive to negative. The actual electrons go from negative

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to positive. But you know, you you get what I'm saying,

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So it always flows in that direction that cannot reverse

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 1>with direct current. So the electro magnet inside this piston

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>generator thing was acting just like a stationary permanent magnet was.

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Tesla could have just put a very powerful

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>permanent magnet in this thing. It would have worked the

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>same way when you move a conductor through a stationary

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>magnetic field. So like you have a conductive material and

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you pass it through a magnetic field that induces electricity

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to flow within the conductor. You induce electric current by

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>moving the conductor up and down past this electric magnetic field.

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Rather then you know, having this oscillating or reciprocating action

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>as the the coil moves up and down through this

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this magnetic field. You actually have a similar effect as

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>if the magnetic field was fluctuating, was reversing its current

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:35.719
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. So it's it's almost the same as

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>if the the coil were stationary, but the electro magnet

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>around it was powered by alternating current. Now, the reason

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>why this is important is that that would actually reverse

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the flow of electricity through that coil. You generate alternating

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>current by moving this this coil up and down through

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>this magnetic field. So you take a direct current source

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>from the battery into this reciprocating electric generator, and by

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>moving this piston up and down, you can output alternating current. UH.

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>To provide the up and down power to move the coil,

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we have to go to the piston. Now, in this

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>early invention, the piston was driven by steam power. Now,

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could adequately describe Tesla's design here because

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it really was genius. I mean, it was a beautiful

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.959
<v Speaker 1>approach to creating a piston that can move up and

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>down be driven by steam, and it was beautifully simple

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>uh in design. However, to describe it is really hard

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to do without visual aids. There are videos that You

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>can watch that show how this worked, and I recommend

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you check it out if you want. But what you

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>need to know is that Tesla's piston served also as

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a valve, and that valve controlled where steam could enter

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>an exit the cylinder that the piston was moving in.

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>So Tesla was using steam for both directions of the

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>stroke of the piston. So the upward and the downward

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>movements of the piston were driven by steam. Steam would

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>push the piston down, steam would push the piston back up,

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and this would drive that coil to move up and

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>down the magnetic field further up inside the electric generator,

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and thus the piston was providing the reciprocating motion. Now

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>let's get to resonance. So the story Tesla told is

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that he was working in the lab late one night

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>when his eyes beheld an eerie sight because his reciprocating

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>electric generator or some oscillator that was similar to it

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>because it changes from story to story, was moving at

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the same frequency as his buildings natural frequency. Some versions

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of the story say that he had attached the piston

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to a girder to provide stability, because obviously, if you

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>have something that's moving up and down rapidly. It's going

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to be clattering all over the place unless you has

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>strap it down somewhere. So he was saying that he

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>was tuning in the resonance or the frequency rather of

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>this oscillator, so it resonated with the girder that it

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>was connected to within his building, and thus he began

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to introduce increasingly violent vibrations into the building, and those

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>vibrations continue to build an intensity, and it led to

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a small man made earthquake, leading a lot of people

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to call this Tesla's earthquake machine. Then the story goes

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that police and ambulances responded to the scene and they

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>got there justice Tesla was either taking a sledgehammer to

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>his generator to stop it from tearing the joint apart,

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>or that he had already stopped it and that he

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>was just playing coy and saying, oh, I didn't even

0:31:56.320 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>notice an earthquake. Now, could such a thing be possible?

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you could theoretically create a reciprocating device and tune

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it to a frequency that induces vibrations in a structure,

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>And theoretically you could maybe do one powerful enough that

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimately it would start to cause damage. But We need

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to keep several things in mind here. One is that

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Tesla mostly told this story in his declining years. Uh.

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:31.239
<v Speaker 1>The account I see most frequently cited comes from an

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>article that was published in nineteen on Tesla's seventy ninth birthday,

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and that the actual shaking of the building was said

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to have happened either in eighty seven or eight eight eight,

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>according to that article. So even that article doesn't get

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>specific on when this supposedly happened, and a different source

0:32:55.120 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>targets the the event to eight, so we don't even

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>have agreement of when this supposed earthquake happened. Tesla also

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>told other stories at that same party that are referenced

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in the article I was mentioning, like the fact that

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>he had discovered cosmic radiation before anyone else did, he

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>just didn't think to tell anyone about it, and that

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>he found there are particles that traveled perhaps as much

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>as five times faster than the speed of light, which

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>just isn't true. So my point is that Tesla is

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>at best and unreliable source when it comes to stories

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>about his own work. In many ways, his life depended

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>upon his fame at this stage in his life he

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>was drifting from hotel to hotel in an effort to

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>avoid homelessness, and hotels would be happy to receive the

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>famous Tesla at least initially, but eventually his welcome would

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>wear out and he'd take the show on the road again.

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>So I have my doubts about Tesla's stories. At least

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I doubt he was producing enough vibration to simulate an earthquake.

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:05.719
<v Speaker 1>And I definitely doubt the versions that suggests that not

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 1>only was this building shaking, but that glass was bursting

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>from nearby buildings and that the road outside was quaking.

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that for a second. And one reason

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I doubt this is that you've got a lot of

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>material and buildings that can have a dampening effect on vibrations. Right.

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Not everything is contributing to this resonant frequency, this resonant oscillation.

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Some stuff ends up resisting that and inhibiting that. And typically,

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>or usually, like the larger the thing you're trying to

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to to vibrate, the larger the thing you're trying to

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:47.919
<v Speaker 1>shake apart, the more force you need to really get

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 1>things going. In other words, if you walk up to

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a building and you happen to know exactly how frequently

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you need to tap on a girder to match the

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:02.439
<v Speaker 1>frequency of that girder, and you do it. Uh yeah,

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you're tapping at it, and you could probably feel those

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>vibrations along the length of the girder, but you're not

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna force it to break apart. You'd have to use

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 1>more force than that. Pushing a kid at just the

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>right moment in the swings arc gives the kid a

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 1>significant boost, but you do have to push. You can't

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 1>just you know, like tap, it's not gonna do anything.

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So the source of the vibrations have to produce waves

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:28.399
<v Speaker 1>of significant amplitude to affect something like a building. Same

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>thing with the wine glass. Right, If you can produce

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the right note, but you're not producing it at a

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>high enough volume, the glass won't break. It will vibrate.

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>If you put something like a piece of paper inside

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the glass, you'll see the paper jump around because the

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>glass will be vibrating, but it won't be enough to

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 1>cause the glass to deform to the point where it breaks.

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 1>So I just doubt that Tesla's oscillator would be able

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to do it, particularly the way he was describing it.

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>In his later descriptions of the technology, he said that

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>he had as an air powered one that could fit

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in your pocket. So it was like a smaller version

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of the oscillating electric generator. So technically, yes, I think

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you could do this if you had something that was

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>significantly powerful enough to introduce vibrations that would ultimately cause destruction.

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think Tesla's did it. I don't think so,

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>but I could be wrong. It's it's the hard thing

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is that there just aren't any reliable sources outside of Tesla,

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and Tesla was not a reliable source. He made a

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of claims that have been unsubstantiated, and many of

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>them I believe were really meant to help keep him

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in the public eye so that he could, you know,

0:36:55.680 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>live out his life with as little hardship as he could. Again,

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:06.280
<v Speaker 1>he lived rather tortured existence, So no hard feelings against

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the guy. He was just trying to get through life

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 1>under frustrating, to say the least circumstances. I mean, I

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>could go into the whole story about Tesla and Marconi.

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:19.919
<v Speaker 1>If you think Tesla and Edison is one of those

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>big tales of two people, you know, posed against each other,

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>which really I would say Edison Westinghouse really is that story.

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 1>That's nothing compared to Marconi and and Tesla in my mind.

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's the story for another time. Anyway, hope you

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:39.240
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed this discussion about resonant frequencies and how a Janet

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Jackson music video was shutting down computers left and right

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.479
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand five. I found it interesting. I hope

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you did too. If you would like me to cover

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>something specific on tech stuff, please reach out to me.

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 1>One way to do that is to download the I

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app. It's free to download. You can navigate

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 1>over to tech Stuff, push little microphone icon, leave a

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>voice message up to thirty seconds in length and let

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:04.280
<v Speaker 1>me know there. Or you can drop me a line

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter to handle for the show is tech Stuff

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 1>H s W and I'll talk to you again really soon. Y.

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from I Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.