1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:03,120 Speaker 1: Brought to you by Bank of America. Meryll Lynch Seeing 2 00:00:03,120 --> 00:00:05,600 Speaker 1: what others have seen, but uncovering what others may not. 3 00:00:06,000 --> 00:00:09,680 Speaker 1: Global Research that helps you harness disruption voted top global 4 00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:13,000 Speaker 1: research from five years running. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, and 5 00:00:13,080 --> 00:00:18,720 Speaker 1: Smith incorporated Trump's campaign platform basically talking about the Chinese 6 00:00:18,840 --> 00:00:21,600 Speaker 1: raping the United States, and you know, and and this 7 00:00:21,640 --> 00:00:24,439 Speaker 1: whole idea that China simply you know, ripping American is 8 00:00:24,480 --> 00:00:28,200 Speaker 1: off by by making cheap goods. It ties into this 9 00:00:28,240 --> 00:00:31,560 Speaker 1: American idea that we've had about China since the nineteenth century, when, 10 00:00:31,600 --> 00:00:35,680 Speaker 1: for example, the Workingman's Party in California was hugely influential, 11 00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:39,239 Speaker 1: and their argument was that Chinese migrants in America were 12 00:00:39,320 --> 00:00:41,960 Speaker 1: ripping off the white working man because they weren't willing 13 00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:44,760 Speaker 1: to be union members, and they worked harder, and they 14 00:00:44,760 --> 00:00:56,640 Speaker 1: out competed the white man. Well. For the Bloombug Benchmark, 15 00:00:56,800 --> 00:01:01,400 Speaker 1: a podcast about the global economy, I'm Daniel Bloomberg's executive 16 00:01:01,520 --> 00:01:04,839 Speaker 1: editor for Global Economics in New York, and I'm Scott Landman, 17 00:01:05,040 --> 00:01:10,920 Speaker 1: Economics editor with Bloomberg in Washington. Taiwan Tariff's currency manipulation. 18 00:01:11,360 --> 00:01:14,600 Speaker 1: President elect Trump has had plenty to say about America's 19 00:01:14,680 --> 00:01:19,039 Speaker 1: largest trading pot, little of it flattering. A cursory glance 20 00:01:19,080 --> 00:01:22,880 Speaker 1: at recent headlines, Sorry Mike that tweets might lead a 21 00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:28,000 Speaker 1: reasonable person to think we are headed into perilously unshotted territories. 22 00:01:28,440 --> 00:01:31,360 Speaker 1: But as our guest today has written, it's all part 23 00:01:31,360 --> 00:01:34,679 Speaker 1: of the ebb and flow, the surge and retreat in 24 00:01:34,800 --> 00:01:37,480 Speaker 1: relations between China and the U S that go back 25 00:01:37,560 --> 00:01:41,479 Speaker 1: more than two hundred years. John Pomfret is the author 26 00:01:41,520 --> 00:01:44,240 Speaker 1: of a new book called The Beautiful Country and the 27 00:01:44,280 --> 00:01:48,520 Speaker 1: Middle Kingdom. Those are the names of America and China 28 00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:52,400 Speaker 1: has translated from Chinese, and the book charts American ties 29 00:01:52,440 --> 00:01:54,760 Speaker 1: with China going all the way back to the time 30 00:01:54,800 --> 00:01:58,320 Speaker 1: of the American Revolution. John, thank you for joining us. 31 00:01:58,960 --> 00:02:01,080 Speaker 1: Thanks so mux for having me and John, you're more 32 00:02:01,160 --> 00:02:04,120 Speaker 1: than just an author for our listeners. You were a 33 00:02:04,160 --> 00:02:08,000 Speaker 1: long time Washington Post correspondent in Beijing and one of 34 00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:12,600 Speaker 1: the first American students into China once relations were normalized. 35 00:02:12,639 --> 00:02:15,360 Speaker 1: Is that correct? Yes, I first went to China and 36 00:02:15,400 --> 00:02:17,560 Speaker 1: when I was twenty one in nineteen eighty That dates 37 00:02:17,600 --> 00:02:20,040 Speaker 1: me a little. I lived in a ten by fifteen 38 00:02:20,080 --> 00:02:24,239 Speaker 1: foot room with seven Chinese classmates in bunk beds. I'm 39 00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:26,799 Speaker 1: six three and my bed actually was five tens, so 40 00:02:26,840 --> 00:02:28,680 Speaker 1: I had to do a little yoga move each night 41 00:02:28,720 --> 00:02:31,160 Speaker 1: as I went to sleep. And I spent two years 42 00:02:31,240 --> 00:02:33,600 Speaker 1: then and then I am all together from the nineteen 43 00:02:33,639 --> 00:02:36,560 Speaker 1: eighties until now, I've lived in China for about twenty years. Well, 44 00:02:36,600 --> 00:02:41,000 Speaker 1: for many Americans and many Westerners, the relationship with China 45 00:02:41,639 --> 00:02:44,480 Speaker 1: is really perceived to have begun with Nixon's visit in 46 00:02:44,560 --> 00:02:48,760 Speaker 1: nineteen seventy two. Your book takes a much broader historical perspective. 47 00:02:49,720 --> 00:02:52,240 Speaker 1: If we just focus on nineteen seventy two, what are 48 00:02:52,280 --> 00:02:56,640 Speaker 1: we missing, Well, we're missing about almost two hundred years 49 00:02:56,639 --> 00:02:59,440 Speaker 1: of American engagement with China. Americans first went to China 50 00:03:00,160 --> 00:03:02,919 Speaker 1: in seventeen eighty four. That's when the first American ship 51 00:03:03,000 --> 00:03:05,080 Speaker 1: landed in China to trade with the Chinese. And the 52 00:03:05,120 --> 00:03:08,640 Speaker 1: basis of the relationship from the beginning, basically, there were 53 00:03:08,639 --> 00:03:11,800 Speaker 1: two pillars. One was the missionary experience of trying to 54 00:03:11,880 --> 00:03:14,880 Speaker 1: Christianize the Chinese, but the more important one by far 55 00:03:15,120 --> 00:03:20,040 Speaker 1: was the commercial relationship. Because the United States in seventeen three, 56 00:03:20,040 --> 00:03:23,040 Speaker 1: after they beat the British, found itself isolated Basically, the 57 00:03:23,080 --> 00:03:27,000 Speaker 1: British had closed their ports to American ships, and going 58 00:03:27,040 --> 00:03:29,760 Speaker 1: to China was kind of a hail Mary passed by 59 00:03:29,800 --> 00:03:33,480 Speaker 1: American merchants in the Northeast to find new markets for 60 00:03:33,520 --> 00:03:37,200 Speaker 1: American products and and to buy Chinese tea. So the 61 00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:40,520 Speaker 1: search for new exports was on even then, on even 62 00:03:40,560 --> 00:03:43,240 Speaker 1: then exactly. And and because at the time the United 63 00:03:43,280 --> 00:03:46,440 Speaker 1: States was not yet a continental power, we were very 64 00:03:46,520 --> 00:03:49,840 Speaker 1: much sort of hard up against the the Atlantic seaboard 65 00:03:49,920 --> 00:03:54,080 Speaker 1: thirteen colonies, and trading was very important to them. And 66 00:03:54,160 --> 00:03:56,400 Speaker 1: so going to China was a way to break out 67 00:03:56,400 --> 00:04:00,840 Speaker 1: of the British uh sort of embark ago, if you will, 68 00:04:01,240 --> 00:04:03,480 Speaker 1: and and to find new markets. And the first for 69 00:04:03,520 --> 00:04:05,400 Speaker 1: the first product they sent to China, of course was 70 00:04:05,400 --> 00:04:08,280 Speaker 1: American jen sing because because the type of Jensen grows 71 00:04:08,400 --> 00:04:11,840 Speaker 1: United States. Ultimately the Americans sent a lot of Mexican 72 00:04:11,880 --> 00:04:14,720 Speaker 1: silver to China, which the Chinese loved. And of course 73 00:04:14,760 --> 00:04:17,120 Speaker 1: we also engaged in the opium trade, just like the 74 00:04:17,120 --> 00:04:21,040 Speaker 1: British did. Now that's a good way of condensing several 75 00:04:21,080 --> 00:04:24,320 Speaker 1: hundred years just into a few sentences. Dan was talking 76 00:04:24,360 --> 00:04:27,599 Speaker 1: about how for many people the frame of references Nixon 77 00:04:27,640 --> 00:04:31,200 Speaker 1: and Mao in ninety two. But for many Americans today, 78 00:04:31,400 --> 00:04:35,040 Speaker 1: their frame of reference really starts and ends with Donald Trump. Uh, 79 00:04:35,160 --> 00:04:38,880 Speaker 1: He's and it's not even about exports. It's about imports. 80 00:04:39,240 --> 00:04:42,320 Speaker 1: It's about how factories are moving to China. You hear 81 00:04:42,360 --> 00:04:46,359 Speaker 1: Trump saying things during the campaign like China is raping 82 00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:49,400 Speaker 1: our citizens, He's threatening to impose tariffs, talk of a 83 00:04:49,480 --> 00:04:53,760 Speaker 1: trade war. How does this fit into the two hundred 84 00:04:53,800 --> 00:04:59,599 Speaker 1: year historical context of relations with China. Well, there's always 85 00:04:59,640 --> 00:05:02,520 Speaker 1: been ebb and flow in American views on China, and 86 00:05:02,600 --> 00:05:04,720 Speaker 1: from the Chinese side at ebb and flowing their views 87 00:05:04,720 --> 00:05:08,360 Speaker 1: of the United States. There's this rapturous enchantment that we've 88 00:05:08,440 --> 00:05:12,039 Speaker 1: had with China, and there's also crushing disappointment that we've 89 00:05:12,040 --> 00:05:14,680 Speaker 1: had in China. And I think Trump clearly comes from 90 00:05:14,760 --> 00:05:18,160 Speaker 1: the crushing disappointment side of the ledger, in which he 91 00:05:18,279 --> 00:05:21,839 Speaker 1: has argued that the Chinese have been playing the United States, 92 00:05:22,200 --> 00:05:24,719 Speaker 1: They've been getting a better deal for Americans have gone 93 00:05:24,720 --> 00:05:28,359 Speaker 1: out of the way to welcome China into the international community. 94 00:05:28,839 --> 00:05:30,960 Speaker 1: We brought it into w t O, we got it 95 00:05:31,040 --> 00:05:33,320 Speaker 1: onto UH, we got it to sign a lot of 96 00:05:33,360 --> 00:05:36,800 Speaker 1: international treaties. We helped it as it got to get 97 00:05:36,800 --> 00:05:40,080 Speaker 1: back it's un Security Council seat. But then the question is, 98 00:05:40,080 --> 00:05:41,960 Speaker 1: all right, well, what have we gotten from China? That's 99 00:05:42,000 --> 00:05:45,159 Speaker 1: Trump's question, and his argument was, we haven't gotten much, 100 00:05:45,760 --> 00:05:48,240 Speaker 1: and so it's time from his perspective, to get tough 101 00:05:48,320 --> 00:05:51,320 Speaker 1: on China, to punish China, if you will, for not 102 00:05:51,560 --> 00:05:54,800 Speaker 1: living up to our our beliefs about where where it 103 00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:57,440 Speaker 1: was going to go. Now you have him coming in 104 00:05:57,480 --> 00:05:59,840 Speaker 1: and saying these things. But isn't it true that a 105 00:06:00,080 --> 00:06:02,880 Speaker 1: lot of presidents have been coming into office and in 106 00:06:03,560 --> 00:06:06,360 Speaker 1: the last few decades all hot and bothered about China, 107 00:06:07,000 --> 00:06:09,600 Speaker 1: and they say these things, and then economic and political 108 00:06:09,680 --> 00:06:14,080 Speaker 1: ties actually get stronger during their term insteative weakening. That's 109 00:06:14,120 --> 00:06:16,719 Speaker 1: a good point. Bill Clinton talked about the butchers of Beijing. 110 00:06:17,200 --> 00:06:20,120 Speaker 1: Tim Dightner said China was manipulating its currency. I mean, 111 00:06:20,200 --> 00:06:24,760 Speaker 1: what gives here? Right? So basically every president since Nixon 112 00:06:24,880 --> 00:06:28,080 Speaker 1: has come into the office when when China was discussed 113 00:06:28,120 --> 00:06:31,960 Speaker 1: in the electoral campaigns, he's they've they've come into office 114 00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:35,760 Speaker 1: basically criticizing the policies of their predecessors, except for one. 115 00:06:36,240 --> 00:06:40,160 Speaker 1: Barack Obama did not really criticize George W. Bush's China policies, 116 00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:43,280 Speaker 1: but he was He's an outlier from that perspective. So 117 00:06:43,400 --> 00:06:46,320 Speaker 1: Clinton came into office basically saying he was going to 118 00:06:46,400 --> 00:06:48,920 Speaker 1: make human rights a major platform of our engagement with 119 00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:52,320 Speaker 1: the Chinese, and he ultimately shelved that. George W. Bush 120 00:06:52,360 --> 00:06:57,000 Speaker 1: came into office declaring China strategic competitor uh and with 121 00:06:57,120 --> 00:06:59,440 Speaker 1: all for all tents and purposes, the idea of improving 122 00:06:59,480 --> 00:07:03,159 Speaker 1: relations of Taiwan, but that was shelved as nine eleven 123 00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:06,440 Speaker 1: erupted and the Americans focused their attention on the Middle East. 124 00:07:06,839 --> 00:07:10,440 Speaker 1: Would you say the biggest blunder in history or maybe 125 00:07:10,480 --> 00:07:13,960 Speaker 1: the president who did the most to make China relations 126 00:07:14,040 --> 00:07:20,160 Speaker 1: toteriory was Woodrow Wilson In part, yeah, Wilson was Wilson's 127 00:07:20,400 --> 00:07:24,320 Speaker 1: you know, the First World War, there was the Versailles Conference, 128 00:07:24,360 --> 00:07:26,920 Speaker 1: the peace conference after the war, and which Wilson basically 129 00:07:27,000 --> 00:07:30,880 Speaker 1: promised the Chinese that the Americans would help China during 130 00:07:30,920 --> 00:07:35,040 Speaker 1: that peace conference regain one of its provinces called Shandong, 131 00:07:35,120 --> 00:07:37,400 Speaker 1: which is sort of the cradle of Chinese civilization, that's 132 00:07:37,400 --> 00:07:40,400 Speaker 1: where Confucius was born, and regained it from the Japanese, 133 00:07:40,440 --> 00:07:43,480 Speaker 1: and the Japanese had taken Shandong from the Germans over 134 00:07:43,520 --> 00:07:45,840 Speaker 1: the course of World War One. The Japanese at the time, 135 00:07:45,880 --> 00:07:47,800 Speaker 1: we're fighting on the Allied side, on the side of 136 00:07:47,840 --> 00:07:51,080 Speaker 1: the Americans and the British. But during the conference, the 137 00:07:51,160 --> 00:07:54,640 Speaker 1: British and the French revealed that they had made secret 138 00:07:54,720 --> 00:07:57,560 Speaker 1: deals with the Japanese allowing them to keep Shandong, and 139 00:07:57,960 --> 00:08:01,480 Speaker 1: in effect Wilson was forced to raaks promised to the Chinese, 140 00:08:01,960 --> 00:08:05,040 Speaker 1: and that touched off a huge wave of demonstrations in 141 00:08:05,200 --> 00:08:09,000 Speaker 1: China against the United States, and it really triggered. It 142 00:08:09,080 --> 00:08:11,360 Speaker 1: was sort of the tipping point in which young Chinese 143 00:08:11,440 --> 00:08:13,600 Speaker 1: began to look not to America as a model for 144 00:08:13,680 --> 00:08:16,480 Speaker 1: their system, but to the young Soviet Union as a 145 00:08:16,560 --> 00:08:19,200 Speaker 1: model to their system. So that was a critical tip 146 00:08:19,240 --> 00:08:21,880 Speaker 1: and the Chinese really felt completely sold out by the 147 00:08:22,000 --> 00:08:25,760 Speaker 1: United States during that period. So did government canteens offer 148 00:08:26,000 --> 00:08:30,680 Speaker 1: Freedom fries instead of French fries. We'll get back to 149 00:08:30,760 --> 00:08:33,640 Speaker 1: the currency manipulation question in a minute, but you know, 150 00:08:33,760 --> 00:08:36,559 Speaker 1: through these ebbs and flows, John, the term you used, 151 00:08:37,000 --> 00:08:40,720 Speaker 1: one thing seems to have remained constant over the past 152 00:08:40,800 --> 00:08:44,640 Speaker 1: four decades, and that is the economic relationship has deepened 153 00:08:45,000 --> 00:08:48,400 Speaker 1: as China's economy has become bigger. It's now the world's 154 00:08:48,440 --> 00:08:53,000 Speaker 1: second largest. Now, how easy is it to hit reverse 155 00:08:53,920 --> 00:08:57,040 Speaker 1: on a two way economic relationship that's that important. Can 156 00:08:57,280 --> 00:09:00,520 Speaker 1: any one man, even if it's a hit of state 157 00:09:00,880 --> 00:09:04,560 Speaker 1: undo that has it come too far? I think it's 158 00:09:04,600 --> 00:09:07,720 Speaker 1: come too far. I think the relationship on the economic 159 00:09:07,800 --> 00:09:10,880 Speaker 1: side is clearly too big to fail. The Chinese are 160 00:09:11,000 --> 00:09:15,400 Speaker 1: deeply the Chinese factories are deeply incorporated into production chains 161 00:09:15,400 --> 00:09:18,880 Speaker 1: in the United States. If you're gonna basically force Apple 162 00:09:19,000 --> 00:09:22,600 Speaker 1: to leave China, it's gonna crash apples business. If you're 163 00:09:22,640 --> 00:09:25,400 Speaker 1: going to slap tariffs on Chinese goods, the Chinese will 164 00:09:25,400 --> 00:09:29,880 Speaker 1: stop buying Boeing jets. So the reality is that there 165 00:09:29,960 --> 00:09:32,760 Speaker 1: is so much interplay between the two sides, and so 166 00:09:32,960 --> 00:09:36,559 Speaker 1: much mutual reliance between the two sides, that if you 167 00:09:36,679 --> 00:09:40,480 Speaker 1: begin to punish the Chinese with tariffs on their goods, 168 00:09:40,559 --> 00:09:44,040 Speaker 1: you're going to cause significant problems in your own economy. 169 00:09:45,040 --> 00:09:48,599 Speaker 1: That said, the Chinese are more reliant on exports to 170 00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:54,360 Speaker 1: America than America is reliant on exports the China. So uh, 171 00:09:54,480 --> 00:09:57,200 Speaker 1: if you're going to punish them, they're probably gonna suffer 172 00:09:57,320 --> 00:10:01,040 Speaker 1: more than you. But the total effect on global economy 173 00:10:01,120 --> 00:10:04,520 Speaker 1: of that type of trade war is going to be basically, 174 00:10:04,600 --> 00:10:06,319 Speaker 1: the Chinese are gonna you know, you're gonna get a 175 00:10:06,400 --> 00:10:08,640 Speaker 1: serious wound. The Chinese are going to be are They're 176 00:10:08,640 --> 00:10:10,400 Speaker 1: gonna get a deeper wound. But at the end of 177 00:10:10,440 --> 00:10:12,280 Speaker 1: the day, both of you are going to be so wounded, 178 00:10:12,320 --> 00:10:14,160 Speaker 1: and the effect on the global economy is going to 179 00:10:14,200 --> 00:10:17,920 Speaker 1: be so major that that it's almost incomprehensible to think 180 00:10:17,960 --> 00:10:20,320 Speaker 1: that such a trade war could happen. In the twenties 181 00:10:20,360 --> 00:10:22,320 Speaker 1: and the thirties, there were there was a similar trade 182 00:10:22,360 --> 00:10:25,160 Speaker 1: war and net led in many ways to the depression. 183 00:10:25,640 --> 00:10:28,240 Speaker 1: And that's what one warries about. Basically, if you go 184 00:10:28,400 --> 00:10:31,200 Speaker 1: down this road of tit for tat economic sanctions, you're 185 00:10:31,200 --> 00:10:33,760 Speaker 1: going to have it specifically in two economies like the 186 00:10:33,840 --> 00:10:36,760 Speaker 1: United States in China, which are so tied into the 187 00:10:36,800 --> 00:10:42,079 Speaker 1: whole global economy, you risk basically making forcing the whole 188 00:10:42,120 --> 00:10:44,240 Speaker 1: thing to ground grind to a halt. So we're still 189 00:10:44,280 --> 00:10:48,079 Speaker 1: a ways away from Starbucks having to shelvet's expansion plans 190 00:10:48,120 --> 00:10:51,679 Speaker 1: into every corner of China, yes, I think for and 191 00:10:51,880 --> 00:10:54,040 Speaker 1: in fact, Starbucks looks like they're going to be opening 192 00:10:54,120 --> 00:10:57,440 Speaker 1: up one of their high end rostaries in Shanghai. They're 193 00:10:57,440 --> 00:10:59,200 Speaker 1: just looking for a place to do it. So their 194 00:10:59,280 --> 00:11:03,280 Speaker 1: plans for expansion are very, very bullish on China. Starbucks 195 00:11:03,320 --> 00:11:06,079 Speaker 1: has a fascinating, fascinating case study in China because what 196 00:11:06,200 --> 00:11:08,719 Speaker 1: it really in addition to the coffee culture, which is 197 00:11:08,760 --> 00:11:12,959 Speaker 1: Western culture, it also supplies public space to the Chinese 198 00:11:13,000 --> 00:11:15,880 Speaker 1: because there's this so little public space and the fact 199 00:11:15,920 --> 00:11:18,079 Speaker 1: that you can go to a Starbucks place and hang 200 00:11:18,160 --> 00:11:22,080 Speaker 1: out is something that's considered extremely valuable to the Chinese, 201 00:11:22,120 --> 00:11:24,160 Speaker 1: and they're willing to pay, you know, five bucks for 202 00:11:24,200 --> 00:11:26,840 Speaker 1: an espresso to do it. And it's a very visible 203 00:11:27,080 --> 00:11:31,400 Speaker 1: part of the surge in services and consumption, which is 204 00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:34,240 Speaker 1: the other thing that seems to be missed in the 205 00:11:34,360 --> 00:11:36,960 Speaker 1: course of the dialogue through this year in the United States, 206 00:11:37,320 --> 00:11:40,599 Speaker 1: it's as much a services economy now as it is 207 00:11:40,679 --> 00:11:45,400 Speaker 1: this caricature of a sweatshop churning out T shirts. Right 208 00:11:45,559 --> 00:11:48,600 Speaker 1: that that transition is happening. It's not happening as fast 209 00:11:48,679 --> 00:11:51,079 Speaker 1: as some economists would like it. But the transition of 210 00:11:51,200 --> 00:11:54,080 Speaker 1: China from an economy basically relying on investment, and as 211 00:11:54,120 --> 00:11:56,360 Speaker 1: you said, these you know, the being the factory of 212 00:11:56,400 --> 00:11:59,400 Speaker 1: the world to an economy that's focus to consumers is 213 00:11:59,480 --> 00:12:03,800 Speaker 1: happening in Shanghai right now. It's what the economy, and 214 00:12:03,920 --> 00:12:05,800 Speaker 1: most of the big cities on the East Coast, it's 215 00:12:05,840 --> 00:12:08,679 Speaker 1: it's more than of the economy, the service economy, and 216 00:12:08,800 --> 00:12:11,360 Speaker 1: that trend is just going to continue as long as 217 00:12:11,520 --> 00:12:14,520 Speaker 1: Chinese salaries keeps on keep on going up. And they 218 00:12:14,559 --> 00:12:16,719 Speaker 1: seem to be still growing even though the economy is 219 00:12:16,760 --> 00:12:19,640 Speaker 1: not growing quite very well. But salaries are growing well, 220 00:12:19,679 --> 00:12:22,040 Speaker 1: and that that allows to consumer to have more power. 221 00:12:22,559 --> 00:12:25,199 Speaker 1: Why isn't that message getting through? We do seem to 222 00:12:25,280 --> 00:12:29,400 Speaker 1: be stuck in this debate that's framed around some low 223 00:12:29,840 --> 00:12:36,280 Speaker 1: cost you know, manufacturer, right, and many of those manufacturers 224 00:12:36,320 --> 00:12:39,720 Speaker 1: are now moving on from China. Why is the debate frozen? 225 00:12:40,440 --> 00:12:42,720 Speaker 1: That's a great question, But I think in part it's 226 00:12:42,800 --> 00:12:48,080 Speaker 1: because we have, as Americans, were stuck in the categories 227 00:12:48,280 --> 00:12:52,439 Speaker 1: that we have to to think about China. So Trump's 228 00:12:53,000 --> 00:12:57,280 Speaker 1: campaign platform basically talking about the Chinese raping the United States, 229 00:12:57,360 --> 00:12:59,920 Speaker 1: and you know, and and this whole idea that China 230 00:13:00,080 --> 00:13:03,160 Speaker 1: simply you know, ripping American is off by by making 231 00:13:03,240 --> 00:13:07,360 Speaker 1: cheap goods subsidized by the government. It ties into this 232 00:13:07,480 --> 00:13:10,720 Speaker 1: American idea that we've had about China since the nineteenth century, when, 233 00:13:10,800 --> 00:13:14,160 Speaker 1: for example, the Working Land's Party in California was hugely 234 00:13:14,240 --> 00:13:17,600 Speaker 1: influential on the West Coast in terms of a political power, 235 00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:21,240 Speaker 1: and their argument was that Chinese migrants in America were 236 00:13:21,320 --> 00:13:23,960 Speaker 1: ripping off the white working man because they weren't willing 237 00:13:24,000 --> 00:13:26,760 Speaker 1: to be union members, and they worked harder, and they 238 00:13:26,800 --> 00:13:29,559 Speaker 1: out competed the white man, and they were build a 239 00:13:29,640 --> 00:13:33,600 Speaker 1: wall between the US and Mexico to keep up people, 240 00:13:33,800 --> 00:13:37,520 Speaker 1: believe it or not. So in eighty three, the US 241 00:13:37,600 --> 00:13:40,840 Speaker 1: passed the Anti Chinese Exclusion Act, with basically what's banned 242 00:13:41,160 --> 00:13:45,040 Speaker 1: Chinese laborers from coming to America because the white whites 243 00:13:45,080 --> 00:13:48,840 Speaker 1: were unhappy with that Chinese competition. And then Chinese began 244 00:13:48,880 --> 00:13:51,920 Speaker 1: to sneak in in great numbers across the Mexican border, 245 00:13:52,000 --> 00:13:54,040 Speaker 1: and there was this call at the time so to 246 00:13:54,160 --> 00:13:57,439 Speaker 1: build a wall, which you know again echoes today for 247 00:13:57,640 --> 00:14:00,439 Speaker 1: different reasons, but it just shows you lot of this 248 00:14:00,559 --> 00:14:03,480 Speaker 1: ebb and flow. And so back to the issue. So 249 00:14:03,679 --> 00:14:06,000 Speaker 1: we have a difficult time looking at China as a 250 00:14:06,080 --> 00:14:09,160 Speaker 1: country that could one could innovate, two could be much 251 00:14:09,200 --> 00:14:11,640 Speaker 1: more reliant on its consumer sector, because we think of 252 00:14:11,720 --> 00:14:15,240 Speaker 1: the Chinese as laborers and we always have and so 253 00:14:15,600 --> 00:14:18,920 Speaker 1: part of the positive part of our relationship was we 254 00:14:19,000 --> 00:14:22,560 Speaker 1: have lots of very warm feelings for the Chinese traditionally, 255 00:14:22,600 --> 00:14:25,840 Speaker 1: but also we also have these categories that we stick 256 00:14:25,920 --> 00:14:29,280 Speaker 1: the Chinese as just worker bees, where we cannot think 257 00:14:29,320 --> 00:14:32,880 Speaker 1: of them as as something else, and and that those 258 00:14:32,960 --> 00:14:35,560 Speaker 1: categories tend to be in terms of looking at what 259 00:14:35,760 --> 00:14:37,760 Speaker 1: a future China is going to develop into, can can 260 00:14:37,920 --> 00:14:41,600 Speaker 1: be very constricting. I also think in some ways the 261 00:14:41,720 --> 00:14:45,120 Speaker 1: media has had a difficulty telling that new Chinese story 262 00:14:45,800 --> 00:14:48,480 Speaker 1: because the media itself has a tendency to kind of 263 00:14:48,560 --> 00:14:51,840 Speaker 1: get extra hard on China. One because you look at 264 00:14:51,880 --> 00:14:54,600 Speaker 1: the coverage of China versus the coverage of India in 265 00:14:54,680 --> 00:14:59,000 Speaker 1: the Western press, and we expect more from China, so 266 00:14:59,320 --> 00:15:02,560 Speaker 1: we cover it much more, much more harshly in many 267 00:15:02,600 --> 00:15:05,120 Speaker 1: ways than we expect from India. India often gets a 268 00:15:05,280 --> 00:15:07,280 Speaker 1: kind of a free ride, and it's coverage in the 269 00:15:07,360 --> 00:15:11,200 Speaker 1: Western press, whereas the China or it's ignored, whereas the Chinese. 270 00:15:11,400 --> 00:15:16,120 Speaker 1: We focus on generally relatively negative things on China because 271 00:15:16,160 --> 00:15:18,320 Speaker 1: we expect to do better. We're going to take a 272 00:15:18,400 --> 00:15:21,640 Speaker 1: quick break and we'll be right back hauled that thought, John, 273 00:15:31,720 --> 00:15:34,600 Speaker 1: brought to you by Bank of America, Meryll Lynch. Seeing 274 00:15:34,640 --> 00:15:36,960 Speaker 1: what others have seen, but I'm covering what others may not. 275 00:15:37,480 --> 00:15:41,120 Speaker 1: Global Research that helps you harness disruption voted top global 276 00:15:41,200 --> 00:15:44,520 Speaker 1: research from five years running. Mary Lynch, Pierce, Venner and 277 00:15:44,560 --> 00:15:56,520 Speaker 1: Smith Incorporated. And we're back John. We're talking about media 278 00:15:56,640 --> 00:16:00,840 Speaker 1: stereotypes of China and what drives that right so now, 279 00:16:00,920 --> 00:16:03,800 Speaker 1: and it's not just media stereotypes, it's also like US 280 00:16:03,880 --> 00:16:09,240 Speaker 1: government stereotypes. An example would be um an extraordinarily influential 281 00:16:09,400 --> 00:16:11,800 Speaker 1: thing that the United States government, in fact, probably one 282 00:16:11,800 --> 00:16:14,320 Speaker 1: of the most influential things the United States government has 283 00:16:14,360 --> 00:16:16,920 Speaker 1: done in China in the last twenty years, which was 284 00:16:17,040 --> 00:16:21,440 Speaker 1: to install an e p A air monitor system on 285 00:16:21,520 --> 00:16:24,120 Speaker 1: the roof of the U. S. Embassy in Beijing and 286 00:16:24,240 --> 00:16:30,160 Speaker 1: then to begin to tweet out the air quality index 287 00:16:30,600 --> 00:16:35,320 Speaker 1: data on an hourly basis to folks that wanted to 288 00:16:35,360 --> 00:16:40,040 Speaker 1: follow the Twitter feed, and that went viral, so millions 289 00:16:40,080 --> 00:16:42,640 Speaker 1: of Chinese people signed up for this Twitter feed, even 290 00:16:42,640 --> 00:16:44,520 Speaker 1: though Twitter is blocked in China, but there's ways to 291 00:16:44,560 --> 00:16:48,880 Speaker 1: get around it. That was repurposed by other Chinese websites 292 00:16:48,960 --> 00:16:51,280 Speaker 1: that used it as a way to sell sell products 293 00:16:52,240 --> 00:16:56,680 Speaker 1: like air filters, And this small act, which was not 294 00:16:56,880 --> 00:16:59,960 Speaker 1: done by any sort of National security council or state department, 295 00:17:00,080 --> 00:17:02,760 Speaker 1: actually done just by a small bureau in the embassy, 296 00:17:04,080 --> 00:17:10,000 Speaker 1: basically was singularly critical in raising people's consciousness about the 297 00:17:10,040 --> 00:17:13,560 Speaker 1: air pollution problem in China, which really has led to 298 00:17:14,680 --> 00:17:17,280 Speaker 1: forcing the government to embrace this issue as as an 299 00:17:17,320 --> 00:17:20,240 Speaker 1: important issue, not just because it's nice and groovy, but 300 00:17:20,320 --> 00:17:24,080 Speaker 1: because it's an issue of social stability. But the question 301 00:17:24,160 --> 00:17:27,280 Speaker 1: to ask is, well, why did the Americans put h 302 00:17:27,600 --> 00:17:31,000 Speaker 1: e P A sensor on the embassy in Beijing? Why 303 00:17:31,080 --> 00:17:35,920 Speaker 1: not in New Delhi where the air is equally as horrid. Again, 304 00:17:36,000 --> 00:17:37,520 Speaker 1: I think it gets back to this idea that the 305 00:17:37,600 --> 00:17:41,000 Speaker 1: Americans expect the Chinese to do better. We've always had 306 00:17:41,040 --> 00:17:44,880 Speaker 1: incredibly high standards for what they have to achieve, which 307 00:17:45,200 --> 00:17:49,080 Speaker 1: which I guess feeds back into Trump's sort of bashing 308 00:17:49,160 --> 00:17:51,280 Speaker 1: of the Chinese, because he really thinks they should be 309 00:17:51,359 --> 00:17:52,920 Speaker 1: able to do better. They should be able to do 310 00:17:53,040 --> 00:17:55,800 Speaker 1: more to deal with our North Korea problem. They should 311 00:17:55,840 --> 00:17:58,040 Speaker 1: be able to do more to help us with counter terrorism. 312 00:17:58,080 --> 00:18:00,359 Speaker 1: They should be able to do to do more UH 313 00:18:00,480 --> 00:18:03,560 Speaker 1: in dealing with their currency. But you don't see similar 314 00:18:03,640 --> 00:18:06,719 Speaker 1: pressure being put on other nations like this who are 315 00:18:06,760 --> 00:18:09,840 Speaker 1: also like China and instill in the developing nation mode. 316 00:18:10,240 --> 00:18:12,480 Speaker 1: Let's talk a little bit more about Trump. You had 317 00:18:12,520 --> 00:18:16,040 Speaker 1: a recent piece in the Washington Post talking about five 318 00:18:16,200 --> 00:18:21,359 Speaker 1: myths about the US policy towards Taiwan. If I can 319 00:18:21,400 --> 00:18:26,240 Speaker 1: sum it up that way, Trump has been obviously showing 320 00:18:26,600 --> 00:18:29,560 Speaker 1: some friendliness towards Taiwan. He took a phone call from 321 00:18:29,600 --> 00:18:33,960 Speaker 1: the President of Taiwan and uh, you know, he's kind 322 00:18:33,960 --> 00:18:37,959 Speaker 1: of openly talking about uh changing a policy that's been 323 00:18:38,000 --> 00:18:41,720 Speaker 1: in place for some forty years or so. What's going 324 00:18:41,800 --> 00:18:46,600 Speaker 1: through the minds of Chinese leadership as they as they 325 00:18:46,720 --> 00:18:51,080 Speaker 1: as Trump keeps making pronouncements on this issue, and could 326 00:18:51,160 --> 00:18:54,440 Speaker 1: it really become a serious cudgel in the U S 327 00:18:54,560 --> 00:19:01,320 Speaker 1: China economic relationship. So Trump seems to be calling into 328 00:19:01,480 --> 00:19:05,520 Speaker 1: question the basis of something that is that that, for 329 00:19:05,680 --> 00:19:10,880 Speaker 1: better or worse, has kept the peace between China mainland China, 330 00:19:10,920 --> 00:19:14,879 Speaker 1: and Taiwan for the last forty smit years. By saying 331 00:19:14,960 --> 00:19:18,240 Speaker 1: that the US One China policy, which is a policy 332 00:19:18,359 --> 00:19:23,240 Speaker 1: that basically says that there's one China, but it doesn't 333 00:19:23,320 --> 00:19:26,879 Speaker 1: say that actually Taiwan is part of that China. It 334 00:19:27,000 --> 00:19:32,679 Speaker 1: basically lets the status of Taiwan be undetermined. And because 335 00:19:32,760 --> 00:19:36,800 Speaker 1: of this policy, which is extremely ambiguous, it allows the 336 00:19:36,880 --> 00:19:41,280 Speaker 1: United States to conduct effective state to state relations with Chinwan, Taiwan, 337 00:19:42,160 --> 00:19:46,879 Speaker 1: sell Taiwan weapons, support Taiwan in the international system without 338 00:19:47,040 --> 00:19:51,800 Speaker 1: having formal relations with the government of Taiwan. And this 339 00:19:52,400 --> 00:19:55,920 Speaker 1: kind of ambiguous fiction that the Americans and the Chinese 340 00:19:56,000 --> 00:19:59,440 Speaker 1: have kind of agreed to disagree on has kept the 341 00:19:59,480 --> 00:20:02,879 Speaker 1: peace gener Really Now there's lots of people in the 342 00:20:02,960 --> 00:20:05,920 Speaker 1: United States who support Taiwan, who want to see more 343 00:20:06,119 --> 00:20:11,040 Speaker 1: direct support and direct recognition of Taiwan, because Taiwan indeed 344 00:20:11,200 --> 00:20:15,760 Speaker 1: has changed significantly since the since the time that Nixon 345 00:20:15,800 --> 00:20:18,879 Speaker 1: went to China. It's become a democracy, it's has the 346 00:20:18,960 --> 00:20:23,480 Speaker 1: freest press in Asia. It's an LGBT friendly society, it's 347 00:20:23,480 --> 00:20:26,760 Speaker 1: a it has a very vibrant religious and civil society 348 00:20:27,240 --> 00:20:29,680 Speaker 1: in in in and in comparison to China, it is 349 00:20:29,720 --> 00:20:32,560 Speaker 1: a free it is a free entity or a free country. 350 00:20:33,400 --> 00:20:36,240 Speaker 1: And so there's this push from people who like Taiwan 351 00:20:36,440 --> 00:20:39,560 Speaker 1: and who who are unhappy with the direction that China 352 00:20:39,680 --> 00:20:43,880 Speaker 1: is going to to basically recalibrate our relations with Taiwan. 353 00:20:44,520 --> 00:20:49,160 Speaker 1: The problem is, if you do that, you potentially incur 354 00:20:49,320 --> 00:20:51,480 Speaker 1: the wrath of the People's Republic of China. And they 355 00:20:51,560 --> 00:20:54,720 Speaker 1: have hundreds of missiles facing Taiwan and they can do 356 00:20:54,920 --> 00:20:58,480 Speaker 1: and and of Taiwan's economy is reliant on that of 357 00:20:58,520 --> 00:21:01,760 Speaker 1: the PRC through investment in a lot of trade. And 358 00:21:01,920 --> 00:21:05,760 Speaker 1: so if you begin to unravel this fiction, if you will, 359 00:21:06,320 --> 00:21:11,920 Speaker 1: that's kept the peace in in in Asia, you embolden 360 00:21:12,200 --> 00:21:15,880 Speaker 1: those in China who want to punish Taiwan, potentially even 361 00:21:15,920 --> 00:21:18,320 Speaker 1: embolden those in China who want to come into conflict 362 00:21:18,400 --> 00:21:21,760 Speaker 1: with the United States. But the first potential casualty of 363 00:21:21,840 --> 00:21:23,600 Speaker 1: all this will beat Taiwan on the island of the 364 00:21:24,000 --> 00:21:28,399 Speaker 1: three million people. And Trump, in doing this, seems to 365 00:21:28,520 --> 00:21:32,119 Speaker 1: be interested in using Taiwan as a bargaining chip to 366 00:21:32,280 --> 00:21:35,480 Speaker 1: get Chinese cooperation on other issues that the Americans are 367 00:21:35,520 --> 00:21:39,479 Speaker 1: interested in, for example trade or North Korea. And if 368 00:21:39,560 --> 00:21:42,120 Speaker 1: you do that, what happens If the Chinese say, okay, 369 00:21:42,160 --> 00:21:44,840 Speaker 1: we'll play ball, we'll be we'll squeeze the North Koreans more. 370 00:21:45,000 --> 00:21:47,720 Speaker 1: But then you've got a force Taiwan to negotiate its 371 00:21:47,840 --> 00:21:53,280 Speaker 1: political its effective political defeat and and unification with China. 372 00:21:53,520 --> 00:21:57,719 Speaker 1: Or you know, so if Taiwan becomes a chip, if 373 00:21:57,760 --> 00:22:00,920 Speaker 1: the Chinese then say, yeah, let's talk, will do X 374 00:22:01,040 --> 00:22:03,639 Speaker 1: you have to do? Why? Will Will Trump actually be 375 00:22:03,680 --> 00:22:07,280 Speaker 1: willing to further sell Taiwan down the river? So he 376 00:22:07,400 --> 00:22:11,040 Speaker 1: puts his let's make a deal philosophy on. This is 377 00:22:11,119 --> 00:22:13,520 Speaker 1: dangerous if the Chinese want to play ball. And it's 378 00:22:13,600 --> 00:22:15,880 Speaker 1: also dangerous is the Chinese say, Okay, we're just gonna 379 00:22:15,920 --> 00:22:19,480 Speaker 1: get really aggressive with Taiwan. Then what happens? So I 380 00:22:19,640 --> 00:22:22,120 Speaker 1: worry that that this is an initial gambit, it's sort 381 00:22:22,160 --> 00:22:25,480 Speaker 1: of a feel good gambit to try to show the 382 00:22:25,920 --> 00:22:29,200 Speaker 1: pro Taiwan people in the United States and people in 383 00:22:29,320 --> 00:22:32,600 Speaker 1: Taiwan and hey, we've got your back. But my next 384 00:22:32,680 --> 00:22:36,240 Speaker 1: question is what happens next? And that that that that 385 00:22:36,440 --> 00:22:39,080 Speaker 1: that's what what what worry? What worries me? At the 386 00:22:39,160 --> 00:22:41,879 Speaker 1: Asia Society last month, I heard you talk about some 387 00:22:42,000 --> 00:22:46,320 Speaker 1: of the economic dislocation in the Chinese heartland. Two things 388 00:22:46,400 --> 00:22:49,920 Speaker 1: struck me. One, you talked about unemployed men who can't 389 00:22:50,040 --> 00:22:55,880 Speaker 1: find wives and the growth of evangelical Christianity that would shock. 390 00:22:55,960 --> 00:23:00,719 Speaker 1: Many people, particularly the Evangelical Christianity, took a bit more 391 00:23:00,760 --> 00:23:04,840 Speaker 1: about that. So the missionary experience, I mean Americans of 392 00:23:04,920 --> 00:23:07,800 Speaker 1: course have been have been going to China's missionaries since 393 00:23:07,840 --> 00:23:10,520 Speaker 1: the eighteen thirties, and in ninety nine, when the Communist 394 00:23:10,520 --> 00:23:13,960 Speaker 1: Revolution happened in a country of more than four million people, 395 00:23:14,160 --> 00:23:18,800 Speaker 1: there were probably two million or some odd Christians Protestants, 396 00:23:18,880 --> 00:23:23,240 Speaker 1: and maybe two millions some odd Catholics. These days, the 397 00:23:23,920 --> 00:23:27,840 Speaker 1: Evangelical Protestant population in China is anywhere between sixty eight million, 398 00:23:28,520 --> 00:23:31,560 Speaker 1: and in the last fifteen to twenty years it has boomed, uh, 399 00:23:31,880 --> 00:23:34,480 Speaker 1: starting in some of the richer areas, but also in 400 00:23:34,560 --> 00:23:37,480 Speaker 1: the countryside. Jijiang Province, which is just south of Shanghai 401 00:23:37,680 --> 00:23:40,959 Speaker 1: is a boom area for that, so it's Fujian Uh. 402 00:23:41,040 --> 00:23:43,879 Speaker 1: There are hundreds and hundreds of American missionaries in China 403 00:23:44,520 --> 00:23:47,919 Speaker 1: masquerading as English teachers, but actually they really are bringing 404 00:23:47,960 --> 00:23:50,720 Speaker 1: the good word to the Chinese and it's been enormously, 405 00:23:51,000 --> 00:23:54,440 Speaker 1: enormously successful. And one of the reasons is that, like 406 00:23:54,520 --> 00:23:58,000 Speaker 1: a lot of post communist societies, the Chinese have confronted 407 00:23:58,080 --> 00:24:01,520 Speaker 1: with the collapse of their ideal ideology and their belief system. 408 00:24:01,920 --> 00:24:06,800 Speaker 1: They've confronted this moral vacuum, and lots of religions, Christianity 409 00:24:06,880 --> 00:24:11,520 Speaker 1: being one, following Going being another, Buddhism, Taoism being others, 410 00:24:11,840 --> 00:24:14,960 Speaker 1: have have moved in to fill this void in in 411 00:24:15,240 --> 00:24:20,199 Speaker 1: in the souls of many Chinese and it's been extraordinarily successful. 412 00:24:20,240 --> 00:24:23,560 Speaker 1: And and and the evangelical message of a direct relationship 413 00:24:23,640 --> 00:24:28,800 Speaker 1: with God has also been very attractive to Chinese entrepreneurs 414 00:24:29,440 --> 00:24:31,920 Speaker 1: who you know, if you think of your you know, 415 00:24:32,320 --> 00:24:36,280 Speaker 1: Protestant theology. Uh, you know, the Protestantism grew up as 416 00:24:36,440 --> 00:24:39,760 Speaker 1: the bourgeoisie grew up in Europe. It's a very similar idea. 417 00:24:40,320 --> 00:24:43,480 Speaker 1: And a lot of business owners in China, specifically out 418 00:24:43,520 --> 00:24:46,040 Speaker 1: of the Wenjoe region, which is a very successful sort 419 00:24:46,080 --> 00:24:51,119 Speaker 1: of beehive of entrepreneurial activity, have embraced Christianity specifically because 420 00:24:51,280 --> 00:24:54,560 Speaker 1: it talks about agency in your life, you know, your 421 00:24:54,640 --> 00:24:57,320 Speaker 1: direct relationship with God. You don't need a church. And 422 00:24:57,640 --> 00:25:01,960 Speaker 1: this disappeals a lot to entrepreneurs and to capitalists. Unlike here, 423 00:25:02,040 --> 00:25:05,600 Speaker 1: it has not taken on a political vine yet right, 424 00:25:05,840 --> 00:25:08,320 Speaker 1: not yet um, and it might not. I mean, the 425 00:25:08,400 --> 00:25:12,240 Speaker 1: Communist Party is extremely worried about any organization outside of 426 00:25:12,280 --> 00:25:15,680 Speaker 1: its control, and so the party continues to suppress religious 427 00:25:15,800 --> 00:25:20,199 Speaker 1: specifically Christian religious growth, and the Party learned a very 428 00:25:20,320 --> 00:25:24,480 Speaker 1: hard lesson in the in the nineties when they attempted 429 00:25:24,560 --> 00:25:30,320 Speaker 1: to encourage the growth of nativist local Chinese religions as 430 00:25:30,359 --> 00:25:34,119 Speaker 1: a way as a counter to pro Western ideas in China, 431 00:25:34,680 --> 00:25:37,760 Speaker 1: and they effectively created the following gold religious movement, which 432 00:25:37,800 --> 00:25:39,920 Speaker 1: they then turned around and cracked down on and in 433 00:25:40,520 --> 00:25:43,679 Speaker 1: the early two thousand's John, thank you for joining us. 434 00:25:43,720 --> 00:25:48,000 Speaker 1: It's been a fascinating discussion, and as the new administration 435 00:25:48,160 --> 00:25:51,320 Speaker 1: finds its fate, we'd love to have you back. Daniel Scott, 436 00:25:51,400 --> 00:25:53,760 Speaker 1: thanks a lot for having me. Benchmark will be back 437 00:25:53,840 --> 00:25:55,760 Speaker 1: next week and until then, you can find us on 438 00:25:55,800 --> 00:25:58,560 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg terminal and Bloomberg dot com, as well as 439 00:25:58,640 --> 00:26:01,960 Speaker 1: the newly redesigned Bloomberg app, where you can also find 440 00:26:02,000 --> 00:26:06,200 Speaker 1: Bloomberg's other excellent podcasts. Can also find us on iTunes, 441 00:26:06,320 --> 00:26:09,480 Speaker 1: pocket Casts, and Stitcher. While you're there, take a minute 442 00:26:09,520 --> 00:26:11,800 Speaker 1: to rate and review the show so more listeners can 443 00:26:11,840 --> 00:26:14,359 Speaker 1: find us. Do let us know what you thought, and 444 00:26:14,480 --> 00:26:18,679 Speaker 1: you can reach us on Twitter at moss dash Echo. 445 00:26:19,200 --> 00:26:23,119 Speaker 1: Our guest is it at J. E. Pomfort and Scott U. 446 00:26:23,680 --> 00:26:27,760 Speaker 1: Scott Landman Benchmark is produced by Sarah Patterson. Bloomberg's head. 447 00:26:27,800 --> 00:26:46,400 Speaker 1: A podcast is Alec McCabe See You Next Week, brought 448 00:26:46,440 --> 00:26:49,119 Speaker 1: to you by Bank of America. Merrill Lynch Seeing what 449 00:26:49,240 --> 00:26:52,320 Speaker 1: others have seen, but uncovering what others may not. Global 450 00:26:52,359 --> 00:26:56,000 Speaker 1: Research that helps you Harness disruption voted top global research 451 00:26:56,119 --> 00:26:59,959 Speaker 1: from five years running. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Incorporated. 452 00:27:00,000 --> 00:27:00,040 Speaker 1: It