WEBVTT - 5 White Sox Not Coming Back

0:00:00.310 --> 0:00:03.550
<v Speaker 1>Howard, my dad was T-boned by a utility vehicle and

0:00:03.690 --> 0:00:06.900
<v Speaker 1>is in surgery now. What should I do?

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:08.580
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry to hear about that.

0:00:08.940 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 3>It's really great that you're getting him the medical care

0:00:11.060 --> 0:00:13.420
<v Speaker 3>and treatment that he needs right now. These are three

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:15.940
<v Speaker 3>important things that I think you need to know. Injuries

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.630
<v Speaker 3>are unexpected and turn lives upside down. I'm Howard Ankin,

0:00:19.790 --> 0:00:20.489
<v Speaker 3>and I'm here to help.

0:00:20.970 --> 0:00:22.409
<v Speaker 4>If you or a loved one have been hurt at

0:00:22.450 --> 0:00:24.630
<v Speaker 4>work or in a car, truck, or ride share accident,

0:00:24.890 --> 0:00:29.390
<v Speaker 4>call 312-6-MILLION. Injury law made personal. That's Ankin Law.

0:00:43.490 --> 0:00:48.970
<v Speaker 2>From your favorite source for Chicago White Sox talk, delivering news, interviews, analysis,

0:00:49.130 --> 0:00:49.610
<v Speaker 2>and more.

0:00:49.950 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 5>This is the Sox Machine Podcast with your hosts, Jim

0:00:53.420 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 5>Margulis and Josh Nelson.

0:00:55.140 --> 0:00:57.140
<v Speaker 1>Hello, folks. Welcome to a new episode of the Sox

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.430
<v Speaker 1>Machine Podcast, part of the Foul Territory Network. I'm your host,

0:01:00.570 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Josh Nelson. And we are bringing a new episode to

0:01:04.140 --> 0:01:08.780
<v Speaker 1>you during this offseason, continuing our offseason plan projects. We

0:01:08.830 --> 0:01:12.690
<v Speaker 1>know that many of you have already submitted plans on SoxMachine.com.

0:01:12.709 --> 0:01:15.730
<v Speaker 1>Continue to do so. In this episode, I'm going to

0:01:15.770 --> 0:01:18.649
<v Speaker 1>be sharing a little sneak peek of my upcoming offseason

0:01:18.670 --> 0:01:22.940
<v Speaker 1>plan project. for the Chicago White Sox this offseason, starting

0:01:22.980 --> 0:01:25.820
<v Speaker 1>with the five players that I am not going to

0:01:25.860 --> 0:01:28.740
<v Speaker 1>be having the White Sox return. Now, that is with

0:01:28.780 --> 0:01:31.530
<v Speaker 1>an asterisk because it is more than just five players,

0:01:31.580 --> 0:01:34.890
<v Speaker 1>but I'm grouping some players that are in the same boat,

0:01:35.810 --> 0:01:42.339
<v Speaker 1>same position, same inefficiency when it comes to their performance,

0:01:42.780 --> 0:01:45.179
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to be taking a look at how

0:01:45.380 --> 0:01:48.180
<v Speaker 1>easy or difficult it's going to be for the White

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:52.690
<v Speaker 1>Sox replacing that production with what they have internally. And

0:01:52.730 --> 0:01:55.150
<v Speaker 1>if it is going to be difficult... how they're going

0:01:55.170 --> 0:01:57.050
<v Speaker 1>to have to find it in free agency or via

0:01:57.110 --> 0:02:00.420
<v Speaker 1>trade this offseason to replace that production. But we all

0:02:00.500 --> 0:02:04.780
<v Speaker 1>know the Chicago White Sox love themselves a reunion. You

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>can never say never with some of these players. So

0:02:08.260 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll also debate whether or not, how likely... a reunion

0:02:12.820 --> 0:02:15.570
<v Speaker 1>is between the white socks and these players. And joining

0:02:15.590 --> 0:02:18.830
<v Speaker 1>me is socks machines, mansion editor, Jim Margulis.

0:02:18.910 --> 0:02:19.930
<v Speaker 2>And hello, Jim.

0:02:20.530 --> 0:02:23.390
<v Speaker 1>Uh, so far, let's get a quick, uh, heat check

0:02:23.450 --> 0:02:25.750
<v Speaker 1>on the off season plan project. Uh, how are the

0:02:25.770 --> 0:02:26.550
<v Speaker 1>plans coming in?

0:02:28.530 --> 0:02:32.150
<v Speaker 2>A lot of variety, a lot of, uh, people stuck

0:02:32.210 --> 0:02:37.470
<v Speaker 2>between adhering to the $ 130 million soft cap that I

0:02:37.530 --> 0:02:41.570
<v Speaker 2>issued and people getting angered by it and blasting by it. Uh,

0:02:42.380 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Copying and pasting the previous plan into the next plan

0:02:45.180 --> 0:02:50.260
<v Speaker 2>to create a template. A lot of disagreement over the

0:02:50.540 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 2>middle of the arbitration eligible players. I'm really interested to

0:02:55.020 --> 0:02:57.340
<v Speaker 2>see what the percentages are like because aside from Miguel

0:02:57.380 --> 0:03:00.700
<v Speaker 2>Vargas and to a lesser extent, Brenton Doyle, not a

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:05.610
<v Speaker 2>whole lot of agreement on the top four players on

0:03:05.630 --> 0:03:10.430
<v Speaker 2>that ARB eligible list. So that's something that's kind of unusual.

0:03:10.530 --> 0:03:13.650
<v Speaker 2>Usually it's a little bit more You know, 90 percent,

0:03:13.650 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 2>40 percent, 10 percent in terms of the calls. So

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 2>that'll be interesting. A lot of disagreement over the impending

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:26.020
<v Speaker 2>free agents about whether to retain all the players that

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 2>had better than expected seasons with the White Sox and some.

0:03:31.100 --> 0:03:35.530
<v Speaker 2>Internal arguments or arguments inside the heads of the GMs

0:03:35.730 --> 0:03:40.130
<v Speaker 2>wondering like are we doubling down on a bet that

0:03:40.150 --> 0:03:41.790
<v Speaker 2>worked out the first time but might not work out

0:03:41.810 --> 0:03:44.570
<v Speaker 2>well the second time? Or is it a case of

0:03:44.610 --> 0:03:48.500
<v Speaker 2>just like a guy like Eric Fetty? He seems to

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.380
<v Speaker 2>like pitching in Chicago. The White Sox have ideas for him.

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 2>He fares fairly well. Why not keep that arrangement going?

0:03:54.980 --> 0:03:58.100
<v Speaker 2>So I thought it was going to be a varied–

0:03:58.570 --> 0:04:00.850
<v Speaker 2>off-season plan project just because of all the ways you

0:04:00.870 --> 0:04:03.690
<v Speaker 2>can go with it and the ways you can read

0:04:03.690 --> 0:04:07.050
<v Speaker 2>84 and 78 and look at it both ways in

0:04:07.070 --> 0:04:08.970
<v Speaker 2>terms of a team on the rise or a team

0:04:08.990 --> 0:04:11.890
<v Speaker 2>that's hit its head on its own ceiling based on

0:04:11.910 --> 0:04:14.470
<v Speaker 2>what they currently have and and a lot of revision

0:04:14.530 --> 0:04:16.850
<v Speaker 2>is needed and it should be pretty fun when it

0:04:16.890 --> 0:04:19.570
<v Speaker 2>comes to tabulating the end results by the end of

0:04:19.589 --> 0:04:22.070
<v Speaker 2>you know like i don't know a few scores of

0:04:22.270 --> 0:04:26.450
<v Speaker 2>uh plans here uh just seeing exactly what the consensus.

0:04:26.050 --> 0:04:29.330
<v Speaker 1>Is Yeah, so again, with this podcast, I'm going to

0:04:29.390 --> 0:04:33.589
<v Speaker 1>be sharing in bits and pieces my off-season plan project,

0:04:33.650 --> 0:04:36.510
<v Speaker 1>focusing on the players that I'm not having return. So

0:04:36.550 --> 0:04:39.630
<v Speaker 1>for those that have already submitted plans, you and I

0:04:39.650 --> 0:04:42.350
<v Speaker 1>get to compare and contrast of what you have submitted

0:04:42.750 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the tender or non-tender the arbitration

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.690
<v Speaker 1>eligible players and the impending free agents. So these are

0:04:50.750 --> 0:04:53.570
<v Speaker 1>the five. Now, it's a little bit more than just

0:04:53.610 --> 0:04:56.750
<v Speaker 1>five players. It's a total of seven players that I

0:04:56.810 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>know are not returning, but I grouped some of them

0:04:59.500 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in the same position group or the same inefficiency gym.

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But we're going to start with number one, and I

0:05:05.660 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>hope he does not find me because I do not

0:05:09.060 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>want to ever fight this van, but Tommy Pham. And

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>The reason why Tommy Pham's not returning, Jim, is that

0:05:17.220 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>he was a short gap fix. When the White Sox

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>brought him on, I wasn't necessarily sure if that move

0:05:22.500 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>was necessary. He had a big home run against Parker Messick,

0:05:26.100 --> 0:05:28.980
<v Speaker 1>which ultimately didn't mean anything because the White Sox still

0:05:29.020 --> 0:05:34.409
<v Speaker 1>lost that game. And he had that almost an extra

0:05:34.430 --> 0:05:38.830
<v Speaker 1>base hit. Fantastic defensive play by Angel Martinez at the

0:05:38.890 --> 0:05:42.589
<v Speaker 1>wall to rob Tommy Pham. But when you look at

0:05:42.650 --> 0:05:46.070
<v Speaker 1>his numbers, just the one home run, with a 176

0:05:46.070 --> 0:05:50.050
<v Speaker 1>batting average. For me, this is one of the easiest

0:05:50.089 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>decisions of the off-season plan project. But, you know, looking

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.220
<v Speaker 1>at its production, I also think it's pretty easy to

0:05:57.260 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>replace internally. on what Tommy Pham provided to the White Sox. However, Jim,

0:06:02.660 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned in the intro, this team, this franchise

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:10.670
<v Speaker 1>loves reunions. They've already brought Tommy Pham back. This was

0:06:10.730 --> 0:06:13.770
<v Speaker 1>his second stint with the White Sox. Could we see

0:06:13.870 --> 0:06:16.029
<v Speaker 1>a third stint with the White Sox?

0:06:17.370 --> 0:06:19.550
<v Speaker 2>And this one was off the boards, too, in terms

0:06:19.710 --> 0:06:22.950
<v Speaker 2>of a reunion. Hadn't been in the majors basically all season,

0:06:22.990 --> 0:06:27.220
<v Speaker 2>aside from early April, I think, with the Mets. And

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:31.220
<v Speaker 2>just been hanging out in the Phillies AAA roster all year.

0:06:31.380 --> 0:06:34.980
<v Speaker 2>And then come at the end of August, White Sox

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 2>feel they need to have a right-handed bat on the roster.

0:06:37.540 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 2>And they come knocking for Tommy Pham and add him

0:06:39.900 --> 0:06:42.020
<v Speaker 2>to the roster. So he's eligible for the postseason roster.

0:06:42.700 --> 0:06:44.900
<v Speaker 2>And he's getting postseason at bat. So a lot of

0:06:44.980 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 2>things already clicked into place to make a reunion possible.

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 2>To say, well, the odds aren't as low as they

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:59.530
<v Speaker 2>probably seem. But it does seem like, yeah, I would

0:06:59.589 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 2>say internally they don't have replacements for him yet. But

0:07:04.420 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 2>that's the kind of roster spot, the kind of area

0:07:06.700 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 2>on the depth chart that you rotate quadruple A players,

0:07:12.580 --> 0:07:16.750
<v Speaker 2>post-type prospects, free agents. Is anybody with a hint of potential?

0:07:16.810 --> 0:07:19.590
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at Dustin Harris. He had some moments with

0:07:19.610 --> 0:07:22.270
<v Speaker 2>the White Sox early on before he was on the

0:07:22.330 --> 0:07:23.750
<v Speaker 2>wrong end of the roster crunch. And then he went

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 2>to Houston and it was unremarkable there. But then San Diego,

0:07:27.860 --> 0:07:29.580
<v Speaker 2>I didn't realize how good he was in San Diego.

0:07:29.620 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 2>I know he's getting at bats, but I looked at

0:07:30.940 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 2>his numbers. 322 batting average, 364 OBP, 422 slugging. Like

0:07:36.420 --> 0:07:39.430
<v Speaker 2>just the bat to ball is working. Probably some Babbitt

0:07:39.490 --> 0:07:42.190
<v Speaker 2>luck because the strikeouts were always pretty reasonable at every level.

0:07:42.250 --> 0:07:44.470
<v Speaker 2>Just a matter of like whether he hits the ball

0:07:44.490 --> 0:07:47.630
<v Speaker 2>hard enough to succeed. But, you know, he's somebody you

0:07:47.650 --> 0:07:49.860
<v Speaker 2>can look at and say, well, you know, he's one

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 2>of those, you know, he's lefty, but just in terms

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:57.460
<v Speaker 2>of the kind of Previously interesting prospects who's bounced around

0:07:57.500 --> 0:07:59.950
<v Speaker 2>and has kind of stalled out at AAA or Cups

0:08:00.010 --> 0:08:02.870
<v Speaker 2>of Coffee, Tristan Peters is another one. Those are the

0:08:02.910 --> 0:08:06.190
<v Speaker 2>kind of players you give those plate appearances to early on.

0:08:06.210 --> 0:08:08.270
<v Speaker 2>You give those roster spots to and you hope one clicked.

0:08:08.850 --> 0:08:11.810
<v Speaker 2>And if not, like Tommy Pham probably will be around,

0:08:11.830 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, if he's still producing. If they do need

0:08:14.450 --> 0:08:16.780
<v Speaker 2>to reunite with him at some point or definitely need

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.180
<v Speaker 2>that bat. So that's why I would say probably pretty

0:08:20.260 --> 0:08:22.119
<v Speaker 2>low to hit those odds twice.

0:08:22.930 --> 0:08:26.130
<v Speaker 1>All right, so not expecting a third reunion with Tommy

0:08:26.170 --> 0:08:30.190
<v Speaker 1>Pham for the White Sox. Let's move over to number

0:08:30.270 --> 0:08:33.150
<v Speaker 1>two in the five, not returning, and this is the

0:08:33.190 --> 0:08:37.930
<v Speaker 1>first grouping, the backup catchers, Jake Rogers and Joey Bart. Now,

0:08:37.990 --> 0:08:40.110
<v Speaker 1>we barely got to see Joey Bart. He only appeared

0:08:40.130 --> 0:08:42.790
<v Speaker 1>in three games and then broke a knuckle after getting

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:44.580
<v Speaker 1>hit by a pitch as he was one of the

0:08:44.620 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 1>midseason trade acquisitions. With MLB trade rumors and the arbitration

0:08:49.700 --> 0:08:52.729
<v Speaker 1>value of $ 2. 9 million, I would not spend that on

0:08:52.770 --> 0:08:55.550
<v Speaker 1>a backup catcher if I were the Chicago White Sox.

0:08:56.110 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>And Jake Rogers, Jim, he had good defensive numbers for

0:08:59.380 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox in his short stint. He was worth

0:09:02.700 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>plus three fielding runs above average. But the bat is

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.660
<v Speaker 1>just not there. Yeah, he had that walk-off home run.

0:09:10.380 --> 0:09:15.300
<v Speaker 1>But Jake Rogers just batted 103. And defensively, like when

0:09:15.340 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at Drew Romo, most of Drew Romo's positive

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>fielding runs above average was because of how well he

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:30.090
<v Speaker 1>did with the ABS, with the automatic ball strikes. He

0:09:30.130 --> 0:09:34.030
<v Speaker 1>was worth plus two and better than Kyle Thiel. I

0:09:34.070 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>thought Thiel was getting better. Offensively, Drew Romo doesn't provide

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.620
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot either, but I just don't feel like

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.860
<v Speaker 1>in a tight offseason budget with a soft cap of

0:09:43.860 --> 0:09:48.540
<v Speaker 1>$ 130 million, Jim, I would be spending millions of dollars

0:09:48.620 --> 0:09:51.730
<v Speaker 1>on either Joey Bart or Jake Rogers to back up

0:09:52.510 --> 0:09:57.250
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Teal. Now, the first question is, comparing Jake Rogers

0:09:57.550 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and Joey Bart to, let's say, even Drew Romer or

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:05.780
<v Speaker 1>Edgar Caro, is the production from Jake Rogers easily replaceable

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.579
<v Speaker 1>by what the White Sox already have to back up

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:09.730
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Teel at catcher?

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.089
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think so. I think Drew Romo is there.

0:10:14.470 --> 0:10:17.729
<v Speaker 2>Even Edgar Caro, to an extent. Like, Caro is, you know,

0:10:17.850 --> 0:10:20.189
<v Speaker 2>it's amazing how much his stock has collapsed. I'm thinking

0:10:20.250 --> 0:10:22.990
<v Speaker 2>back to last winter when he was the subject of

0:10:23.550 --> 0:10:26.850
<v Speaker 2>a big ESPN piece about his work at Driveline, you know,

0:10:27.010 --> 0:10:29.569
<v Speaker 2>talking about how they spent two days following him. Like,

0:10:29.630 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 2>perfect candidate for Driveline or that kind of intensive hitting

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:36.620
<v Speaker 2>program because he'd been doing everything well enough aside from

0:10:36.700 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 2>hitting the ball hard. And so that just seemed like

0:10:38.580 --> 0:10:41.130
<v Speaker 2>the last thing to unlock. before he embarks on a

0:10:41.130 --> 0:10:44.220
<v Speaker 2>10-year career and then it just kind of all collapses

0:10:44.300 --> 0:10:46.540
<v Speaker 2>and just you know now there's a point where it's

0:10:46.620 --> 0:10:48.540
<v Speaker 2>like you know two's a coincidence three's a trend and

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 2>i just think of like driveline and white socks and

0:10:50.700 --> 0:10:53.569
<v Speaker 2>i think of carson fulmer and tim anderson and now

0:10:53.830 --> 0:10:55.590
<v Speaker 2>uh edgar carroll in terms of guys some of these

0:10:55.610 --> 0:10:55.949
<v Speaker 2>guys are.

0:10:55.890 --> 0:10:58.209
<v Speaker 1>Getting hired by front offices now jim.

0:10:58.550 --> 0:11:00.150
<v Speaker 2>Yeah i mean like it's not you know it's not

0:11:00.170 --> 0:11:03.470
<v Speaker 2>slagging driveline just a case of like uh it it's

0:11:03.510 --> 0:11:05.609
<v Speaker 2>not a silver bullet. It doesn't work for everybody. And

0:11:06.150 --> 0:11:08.130
<v Speaker 2>perhaps it's more a sign of like, I'm going to

0:11:08.170 --> 0:11:11.510
<v Speaker 2>driveline because something's fundamentally wrong with my game versus I'm

0:11:11.550 --> 0:11:14.110
<v Speaker 2>going to driveline and they're going to add 15 points

0:11:14.130 --> 0:11:16.690
<v Speaker 2>to my WRC plus, you know, it might be kind

0:11:16.710 --> 0:11:18.580
<v Speaker 2>of like a pounds of muscle thing of like when

0:11:18.620 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 2>a player comes into spring training, talking about pounds of muscle,

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.380
<v Speaker 2>it's usually a poor season follows afterwards. And that's just

0:11:24.420 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 2>because they have to talk about what they're doing better

0:11:26.620 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 2>in the first place. And I wonder if driveline is

0:11:29.059 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 2>kind of the same thing of just, you know, those

0:11:30.860 --> 0:11:34.650
<v Speaker 2>stories about, hitting labs and pitching labs, et cetera. You know,

0:11:34.670 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of like the new pitch, best shape of

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 2>my life type thing. But yeah, Caro is still there.

0:11:40.140 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Like I think Romo is probably your backup catcher who

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.950
<v Speaker 2>prevents you from over-investing in the position. Like I think,

0:11:48.070 --> 0:11:50.510
<v Speaker 2>you know, the White Sox could trade, they could sign.

0:11:51.070 --> 0:11:53.150
<v Speaker 2>Like Joey Bart, I think they could maybe non-tender and

0:11:53.190 --> 0:11:55.450
<v Speaker 2>bring back. I think there are a lot of catchers

0:11:55.650 --> 0:11:59.010
<v Speaker 2>on that tier of just maybe call them second division

0:11:59.050 --> 0:12:02.660
<v Speaker 2>starters or second division backups. I think Romo is kind

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.449
<v Speaker 2>of a quintessential third catcher at this point. They seem

0:12:06.470 --> 0:12:08.970
<v Speaker 2>to like having him around. Seems to work well with

0:12:08.990 --> 0:12:11.510
<v Speaker 2>the pitchers. Occasionally comes up with a hit, but doesn't

0:12:11.550 --> 0:12:13.390
<v Speaker 2>strike out all that often to where he doesn't look

0:12:13.690 --> 0:12:16.250
<v Speaker 2>completely overmatched in a game. So if you want to

0:12:16.290 --> 0:12:18.330
<v Speaker 2>start him once or twice a week while somebody's down,

0:12:18.350 --> 0:12:24.069
<v Speaker 2>like Romo's, that's a fine use of a third catcher spot.

0:12:24.090 --> 0:12:25.609
<v Speaker 2>And he's got one option left, so he may as

0:12:25.630 --> 0:12:28.830
<v Speaker 2>well take advantage of that. But I think Caro is

0:12:28.850 --> 0:12:32.939
<v Speaker 2>the more interesting one in terms of Does he hang around?

0:12:33.020 --> 0:12:36.780
<v Speaker 2>Does he produce kind of back to where he was

0:12:36.860 --> 0:12:39.220
<v Speaker 2>two years ago? Does another team look at him and say, like,

0:12:39.260 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 2>we can fix that? But I think as long as

0:12:42.460 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 2>those two guys are on the roster, I don't see

0:12:44.020 --> 0:12:47.340
<v Speaker 2>the White Sox adding more catchers to the roster until

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 2>they have to. So when it comes to those decisions

0:12:49.780 --> 0:12:52.650
<v Speaker 2>with firm dates like they have with Jake Rogers and

0:12:52.670 --> 0:12:55.870
<v Speaker 2>Joey Bart, it seems like they wouldn't necessarily let that

0:12:55.970 --> 0:12:58.780
<v Speaker 2>force their hand. It really seemed like with Bart– They

0:12:58.820 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 2>talked about him like a rental, as opposed to like

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:04.180
<v Speaker 2>Brenton Doyle and Huascar Brazoban at the deadline, who they

0:13:04.220 --> 0:13:06.460
<v Speaker 2>talked about, we're signing, we're trading these guys with years

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:08.370
<v Speaker 2>of control. They're not only here for this year, they're

0:13:08.380 --> 0:13:12.490
<v Speaker 2>here for 2026 too, or 2027 too. Versus, you know,

0:13:12.690 --> 0:13:14.670
<v Speaker 2>Bart was like, oh, you know, Teal's coming back. We'll

0:13:14.690 --> 0:13:16.849
<v Speaker 2>see what we have. Yeah, right.

0:13:17.150 --> 0:13:20.730
<v Speaker 1>So likelihood of reunion between the White Sox with Jake

0:13:20.770 --> 0:13:21.830
<v Speaker 1>Rogers or Joey Bart?

0:13:23.770 --> 0:13:27.140
<v Speaker 2>I'd say... more than fam. So medium, I guess, in

0:13:27.179 --> 0:13:30.329
<v Speaker 2>terms of wouldn't shock me if, you know, they, they

0:13:30.370 --> 0:13:32.050
<v Speaker 2>looked at the entire market and we're looking for a

0:13:32.070 --> 0:13:35.309
<v Speaker 2>right-handed compliment to, uh, Kyle Teal and thought like, yeah,

0:13:35.350 --> 0:13:38.010
<v Speaker 2>these guys can do the job for the right price. Uh,

0:13:38.150 --> 0:13:42.190
<v Speaker 2>just doesn't strike me as like, maybe, uh, you know,

0:13:42.230 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of like when the Tigers non-tender James McCann and

0:13:45.890 --> 0:13:47.500
<v Speaker 2>then the White Sox brought him in, like, I think

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.219
<v Speaker 2>the tender price isn't quite right for his market value, uh,

0:13:50.830 --> 0:13:54.870
<v Speaker 2>But perhaps they could come back at a slightly reduced

0:13:54.929 --> 0:13:58.410
<v Speaker 2>rate or guarantee in terms of a minor league contract

0:13:58.429 --> 0:14:01.020
<v Speaker 2>versus a major league contract. And then at the end

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:02.860
<v Speaker 2>of the winter, end of the spring, I should say,

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.650
<v Speaker 2>when they look at who is the best player, possible

0:14:05.730 --> 0:14:10.069
<v Speaker 2>bat and glove to back up, hopefully help the Kyle Teal.

0:14:10.530 --> 0:14:12.250
<v Speaker 2>That'll be when they ultimately make the call.

0:14:12.790 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>See, I have it as low, low chance that either

0:14:15.820 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of these guys return to the White Sox. I still

0:14:17.980 --> 0:14:20.479
<v Speaker 1>feel like they're going to get gigs in the major leagues. Well,

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.140
<v Speaker 1>Jake Rogers and Joey Bart, we'll see them on other

0:14:23.300 --> 0:14:27.370
<v Speaker 1>MLB teams, just not the White Sox. And then our

0:14:27.510 --> 0:14:31.790
<v Speaker 1>other group that I've created here, the injured pitch pitchers

0:14:31.850 --> 0:14:36.270
<v Speaker 1>slash inefficient pitchers and the, Jordan Leisure, he's hurt with

0:14:36.290 --> 0:14:38.790
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John. I don't know if we're going to see

0:14:38.830 --> 0:14:42.470
<v Speaker 1>him at all in the 2027 season. So I don't

0:14:42.510 --> 0:14:44.670
<v Speaker 1>think it really makes a whole lot of sense tendering

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>him a contract. Chris Murphy, is Murphy better than what

0:14:49.260 --> 0:14:52.060
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox currently have from the left-handed side of

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the bullpen? I don't necessarily think so. And when it

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to production, I mean, Jordan Leisure had an ERA

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:03.530
<v Speaker 1>over six in 18 innings. And Chris Murphy in 33

0:15:03.530 --> 0:15:06.370
<v Speaker 1>innings with the White Sox had a 4.81 earned run

0:15:06.450 --> 0:15:09.790
<v Speaker 1>average before he spent most of the time in Charlotte.

0:15:10.110 --> 0:15:12.890
<v Speaker 1>So I guess when it comes to Leisure and Murphy,

0:15:12.970 --> 0:15:16.130
<v Speaker 1>seeing as how I'm not having either of these guys returning, Jim,

0:15:16.580 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>with the production, little production that they provided to the

0:15:19.060 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>White Sox in 2026, is this going to be easy

0:15:22.380 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>or difficult for the White Sox to replace these innings

0:15:25.980 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>with what they have internally?

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, leisure is easy because it's just greater

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:31.940
<v Speaker 2>than zero.

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.980
<v Speaker 1>Can you throw a baseball? Yes. Without pain?

0:15:35.020 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately, Tommy John surgery. Yeah, that seems like it'll be

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.710
<v Speaker 2>like a Tim Elko or Juan Carella case of just

0:15:41.770 --> 0:15:43.850
<v Speaker 2>getting injured at the wrong time, getting Tommy John surgery

0:15:43.870 --> 0:15:47.810
<v Speaker 2>at the wrong time. And you just can't take up

0:15:47.850 --> 0:15:51.050
<v Speaker 2>a spot in a full 40-man roster when you have

0:15:51.070 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 2>so many months of off-season remaining. So I could see

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.090
<v Speaker 2>him being brought back in a Meyer League contract. Uh,

0:15:57.110 --> 0:15:59.110
<v Speaker 2>it kind of like they've done with other guys, you know,

0:15:59.130 --> 0:16:01.570
<v Speaker 2>to see the rehab stints through and bring them all

0:16:01.590 --> 0:16:03.370
<v Speaker 2>the way back and then see how they look after

0:16:03.410 --> 0:16:06.010
<v Speaker 2>they return. But yeah, I would say he's on the

0:16:06.050 --> 0:16:10.830
<v Speaker 2>outside looking in Chris Murphy and he doesn't have options remaining.

0:16:10.870 --> 0:16:13.870
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's makes a little bit harder to

0:16:13.930 --> 0:16:16.270
<v Speaker 2>retain him knowing that like, if he looks like he

0:16:16.310 --> 0:16:19.350
<v Speaker 2>did last year where he's just kind of, yeah, he's

0:16:19.370 --> 0:16:20.750
<v Speaker 2>an up and down guy. I think it's fair to

0:16:20.790 --> 0:16:24.170
<v Speaker 2>say like probably too good for AAA, not necessarily good

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.860
<v Speaker 2>enough to hold down like medium leverage, uh, in the

0:16:26.910 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>majors as he's shown so far. And, you know, like

0:16:31.140 --> 0:16:33.580
<v Speaker 2>they have Jaden Woods, who's currently not on the 40

0:16:33.580 --> 0:16:35.900
<v Speaker 2>man might have to be protected from the rule five draft.

0:16:36.020 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 2>If there is a rule five draft with the lockout,

0:16:37.860 --> 0:16:40.540
<v Speaker 2>there may not be a rule five draft. But like

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:42.620
<v Speaker 2>Jaden Woods might be able to come in and kind

0:16:42.660 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 2>of do a similar job. So I think they can

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.770
<v Speaker 2>replace him on the depth charts. I just wonder if

0:16:47.830 --> 0:16:51.930
<v Speaker 2>it's a case where the price is low enough, you know,

0:16:51.970 --> 0:16:54.030
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about like, you know, a million or less

0:16:54.630 --> 0:16:58.110
<v Speaker 2>based on the projection that, Do they bring him back

0:16:58.170 --> 0:16:59.970
<v Speaker 2>and say, well, even if he's on the wrong side

0:16:59.990 --> 0:17:02.270
<v Speaker 2>of the squeeze, can we try sneaking him through waivers

0:17:02.310 --> 0:17:04.650
<v Speaker 2>and keep him around because he's nice to have? And

0:17:04.869 --> 0:17:08.100
<v Speaker 2>if another team claims him, so what? Or is it

0:17:08.130 --> 0:17:10.500
<v Speaker 2>a case where you can swing a trade between two

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.540
<v Speaker 2>roster crunches where I can use that player and they

0:17:14.580 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 2>can use my player and we can swing a trade

0:17:17.500 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 2>to ease a little bit of roster pressure that makes

0:17:21.100 --> 0:17:23.500
<v Speaker 2>it mutually agreeable since he does have some arm talent.

0:17:23.580 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 2>I think the one thing that kind of... Maybe gives

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:31.660
<v Speaker 2>me some pause is just watching Cam Boozer just really

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 2>deliver for the Rays. And it's kind of a similar

0:17:34.700 --> 0:17:37.100
<v Speaker 2>case of like the White Sox acquired Boozer from Boston.

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Had a bad year. They released him. The Rays picked

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 2>him up. And you just kind of made a couple

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:46.419
<v Speaker 2>more tweaks. And Boozer is throwing strikes, not giving up

0:17:46.460 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 2>homers and being the best lefty and lefty reliever in

0:17:48.460 --> 0:17:50.580
<v Speaker 2>the American League. And I think with Murphy, it's kind

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.260
<v Speaker 2>of similar of just there's some arm talent there. They

0:17:53.300 --> 0:17:56.740
<v Speaker 2>traded him, traded for him for a reason. And if

0:17:56.770 --> 0:18:00.149
<v Speaker 2>they give up on him after one up and down year,

0:18:01.170 --> 0:18:03.110
<v Speaker 2>do they risk the same thing of just like another

0:18:03.130 --> 0:18:05.850
<v Speaker 2>team figuring it out? Should they have two bites of

0:18:05.869 --> 0:18:08.270
<v Speaker 2>the apple, so to speak? So I could see it

0:18:08.310 --> 0:18:13.889
<v Speaker 2>going either way. Leisure would be low probability, Murphy medium,

0:18:13.950 --> 0:18:16.810
<v Speaker 2>just because they can replace him, but also they can

0:18:16.869 --> 0:18:19.990
<v Speaker 2>probably just hang on to him because of the cost

0:18:20.170 --> 0:18:22.350
<v Speaker 2>and see like if he looks great in the spring,

0:18:22.670 --> 0:18:24.450
<v Speaker 2>they can carry him and then like let the lack

0:18:24.490 --> 0:18:28.909
<v Speaker 2>of options Complicate matters like once you're into April or

0:18:28.930 --> 0:18:30.190
<v Speaker 2>May or whenever the season starts.

0:18:30.950 --> 0:18:32.850
<v Speaker 1>Well, we have two more players on my list that

0:18:32.869 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>will not be returning to the White Sox in 2027.

0:18:34.869 --> 0:18:38.270
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be reviewing those two players and those

0:18:38.310 --> 0:18:41.790
<v Speaker 1>decisions that I am making my offseason plan project after

0:18:41.830 --> 0:18:43.590
<v Speaker 1>a quick word from our sponsors.

0:18:44.869 --> 0:18:46.950
<v Speaker 6>It's that time of year where all the sports are

0:18:46.970 --> 0:18:49.940
<v Speaker 6>pretty much going right now from the baseball playoffs, which

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.860
<v Speaker 6>obviously on foul territory, we love NCAA football. There's huge

0:18:53.900 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 6>games this weekend, conference games. There's NBA starting, NHL is going,

0:18:58.660 --> 0:19:01.300
<v Speaker 6>and the NFL is in full swing right now. So

0:19:01.340 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 6>if I need to get tickets because I go everywhere

0:19:03.260 --> 0:19:05.100
<v Speaker 6>and I go to a lot of games, I use SeatGeek.

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:07.940
<v Speaker 5>I don't need to go everywhere. I just need to

0:19:07.980 --> 0:19:10.469
<v Speaker 5>go to the World Series. Maybe I got to go

0:19:10.510 --> 0:19:14.090
<v Speaker 5>see LeBron play too. So I just scroll across. I

0:19:14.150 --> 0:19:16.550
<v Speaker 5>figure out where the best place to watch the game is.

0:19:17.070 --> 0:19:17.889
<v Speaker 5>SeatGeek's got me.

0:19:18.710 --> 0:19:22.109
<v Speaker 6>That's right. Red dot, bad deal, they think. Green dot,

0:19:22.170 --> 0:19:22.570
<v Speaker 6>great deal.

0:19:22.590 --> 0:19:23.389
<v Speaker 4>But you get to choose.

0:19:23.850 --> 0:19:26.010
<v Speaker 6>That's the one great thing about SeatGeek. And of course,

0:19:27.070 --> 0:19:28.690
<v Speaker 6>we have a code. Kratz and I have a code

0:19:28.730 --> 0:19:31.930
<v Speaker 6>for you. You can use code TERRITORY10 for 10% off

0:19:32.340 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 6>your next set of tickets at SeatGeek. That's 10% off

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.660
<v Speaker 6>all tickets with promo code TERRITORY10. Make sure you click

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.219
<v Speaker 6>the link in the description to download the app and

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.619
<v Speaker 6>have the code automatically added to your account so you

0:19:43.660 --> 0:19:44.310
<v Speaker 6>can use it later.

0:19:44.869 --> 0:19:48.750
<v Speaker 1>Howard, my dad was T-boned by a utility vehicle and

0:19:48.869 --> 0:19:49.790
<v Speaker 1>is in surgery now.

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:50.700
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>What should I do?

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:53.380
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry to hear about that.

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.820
<v Speaker 3>It's really great that you're getting him the medical care

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.220
<v Speaker 3>and treatment that he needs right now. These are three

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.740
<v Speaker 3>important things that I think you need to know. Injuries

0:20:00.810 --> 0:20:04.430
<v Speaker 3>are unexpected and turn lives upside down. I'm Howard Ankin,

0:20:04.590 --> 0:20:06.390
<v Speaker 3>and I'm here to help. If you or a loved

0:20:06.470 --> 0:20:07.929
<v Speaker 3>one have been hurt at work, or in a.

0:20:07.910 --> 0:20:12.310
<v Speaker 4>Car, truck, or ride share accident, call 312-6-MILLION. Injury law

0:20:12.330 --> 0:20:14.190
<v Speaker 4>made personal. That's Ankin Law.

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Visit the new Sox Machine store at SoxMachineShop.com to pick

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>up your new white socks and Sox Machine gear. Sam Antonacci,

0:20:22.619 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Munitaka Murakami, Tristan Peters, Chase Myadroth, and the celibate for

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Sean Burke shirts are available in the store, plus new

0:20:30.580 --> 0:20:36.350
<v Speaker 1>Sox Machine three-quarter zip-ups, sweaters, coffee mugs, and Sox Machine shirts,

0:20:36.850 --> 0:20:42.450
<v Speaker 1>officially licensed gear from the MLB Players Association. Visit SoxMachineShop.com.

0:20:43.290 --> 0:20:45.129
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Sox machine podcast.

0:20:45.170 --> 0:20:45.450
<v Speaker 6>All right.

0:20:45.470 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>So we already reviewed the three areas of players that

0:20:49.060 --> 0:20:52.890
<v Speaker 1>are not returning for my off season plan project. Tommy Pham,

0:20:53.210 --> 0:20:56.510
<v Speaker 1>Jake Rogers, and Joey Bart, the backup catchers, and the hurt,

0:20:56.670 --> 0:20:59.869
<v Speaker 1>inefficient pitchers, Jordan Leisure and Chris Murphy. So technically, I've

0:20:59.890 --> 0:21:01.850
<v Speaker 1>already given you five. But as I mentioned, there's seven

0:21:01.890 --> 0:21:04.170
<v Speaker 1>on my list that I was pretty certain that will

0:21:04.210 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>not be returning. But that doesn't mean that replacing their

0:21:07.140 --> 0:21:09.220
<v Speaker 1>production is going to be easy for the White Sox,

0:21:09.260 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>which brings me to number four. And that is reliever

0:21:13.300 --> 0:21:14.140
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Richards.

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 2>And.

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 1>One, I think the reasoning is the White Sox kind

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:20.609
<v Speaker 1>of made it for me. They didn't seem to trust

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.030
<v Speaker 1>him enough to add him to the postseason roster, Jim.

0:21:24.090 --> 0:21:26.410
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what spots in any of these playoff

0:21:26.430 --> 0:21:28.909
<v Speaker 1>games that Richards would have pitched for the White Sox.

0:21:29.010 --> 0:21:32.690
<v Speaker 1>Maybe game three of the American League Division Series when

0:21:32.730 --> 0:21:37.459
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland had it in hand. Instead of using Davis Martin

0:21:37.500 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>or David Sandlin, maybe do go to Trevor Richards in

0:21:40.260 --> 0:21:45.550
<v Speaker 1>those situations. But again, In this era of max velocity,

0:21:46.430 --> 0:21:49.709
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to relievers and bullpen arms, Trevor Richards

0:21:49.730 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't have the juice. That doesn't mean that he's

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>not effective or he can get outs. He can, but

0:21:55.960 --> 0:22:00.590
<v Speaker 1>his foreseeing fastball is just getting hurt by right-handed batters.

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.990
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that he's a right-handed reliever and he's

0:22:04.010 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>got to go to off-speed stuff, a change-up slider combination

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.780
<v Speaker 1>to get righties out, that makes it difficult to see

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:13.490
<v Speaker 1>his staying power in the major leagues coming out of

0:22:13.510 --> 0:22:17.730
<v Speaker 1>the bullpen. However, his misproduction because he was a rubber

0:22:17.990 --> 0:22:20.929
<v Speaker 1>arm during the regular season for the White Sox, he

0:22:20.970 --> 0:22:24.230
<v Speaker 1>appeared in 52 games, Jim, and he covered more than

0:22:24.230 --> 0:22:28.210
<v Speaker 1>78 innings for the White Sox out of the bullpen.

0:22:28.730 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think this is easy production to replace internally.

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:35.139
<v Speaker 1>Do you disagree with that notion, Jim? Is this going

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>to be easy or difficult for the White Sox to

0:22:37.220 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>replace his production?

0:22:40.490 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Should be able to replace his effectiveness maybe the way

0:22:43.380 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 2>he was used and the way Will Venable would run

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 2>him out for two-plus innings or sometimes one-plus innings on

0:22:51.900 --> 0:22:57.310
<v Speaker 2>back-to-back days. That was kind of unique. So... It struck

0:22:57.350 --> 0:23:00.189
<v Speaker 2>me when they acquired him and they purchased him from

0:23:00.210 --> 0:23:03.449
<v Speaker 2>the Phillies. So it's a case where he might be

0:23:03.490 --> 0:23:05.820
<v Speaker 2>available again based on how they acquired him the first

0:23:05.859 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 2>time to where they don't have to commit to him

0:23:08.220 --> 0:23:10.419
<v Speaker 2>now to have him on the roster later, whether it's

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.500
<v Speaker 2>a minor league contract or mid-season trade. But it did

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 2>seem like they were just kind of using him to

0:23:16.780 --> 0:23:20.550
<v Speaker 2>use him. Not necessarily exploiting him, but it did seem like, well,

0:23:21.450 --> 0:23:23.870
<v Speaker 2>he can respond. He's helping us protect our other arms.

0:23:23.910 --> 0:23:28.430
<v Speaker 2>We're really just Indulging that luxury we have of having

0:23:28.470 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 2>this guy who will just take the ball whenever in

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.820
<v Speaker 2>order to prevent Grant Taylor from being used too often

0:23:34.100 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 2>or Sean Newcomb in some situations with Richard Changeup being

0:23:38.060 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 2>effective against lefties. He did try to fill both sides

0:23:41.700 --> 0:23:45.129
<v Speaker 2>or the responsibilities of both arms sometimes in a higher

0:23:45.190 --> 0:23:49.070
<v Speaker 2>leverage situation. He was also a well-traveled veteran to where

0:23:49.230 --> 0:23:51.230
<v Speaker 2>if he blows a game, we're not worried about his

0:23:51.250 --> 0:23:53.710
<v Speaker 2>psyche or anything like that. He can take it. He's

0:23:53.730 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 2>been around the block. So he did serve a purpose

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.050
<v Speaker 2>and kind of fit a really unique niche with the

0:23:59.070 --> 0:24:03.690
<v Speaker 2>White Sox to where I could see him coming back. Maybe,

0:24:03.710 --> 0:24:06.290
<v Speaker 2>you know, if they just loved what he brought and,

0:24:06.310 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, he was game for anything and just Will

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:12.980
<v Speaker 2>Venable like managing him. Zach Bove liked having him around.

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 2>But I think the way he was used struck me

0:24:14.859 --> 0:24:16.540
<v Speaker 2>as like. we're just going to use the hell of

0:24:16.580 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 2>this guy. Cause he, you know, just, you know, he,

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:23.100
<v Speaker 2>he allows us to protect our more valued arms. And

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 2>so like the mileage, it kind of like a rental car,

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.030
<v Speaker 2>like just the, the mileage they put on him was rough.

0:24:29.890 --> 0:24:31.770
<v Speaker 2>And he was like, I wouldn't buy that car. I

0:24:31.830 --> 0:24:33.810
<v Speaker 2>know how I drove it. So I don't know if

0:24:33.830 --> 0:24:35.909
<v Speaker 2>they would do it the same way, but that's kind

0:24:35.930 --> 0:24:37.409
<v Speaker 2>of how it struck me in terms of how they

0:24:37.430 --> 0:24:41.890
<v Speaker 2>were using him. And one thing that surprised me while

0:24:41.910 --> 0:24:45.350
<v Speaker 2>looking up Richard's stats, he led the league in wild pitches, right?

0:24:45.950 --> 0:24:49.430
<v Speaker 2>which I did not know. Like he, you know, he

0:24:49.450 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 2>threw 78 innings and his 12 wild pitches led the

0:24:53.300 --> 0:24:55.500
<v Speaker 2>American League, which is one kind of a lower total

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 2>than I thought would lead the AL. But also like

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.180
<v Speaker 2>Sean Burke was second and he threw nearly a hundred

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 2>more innings. Gavin Williams is third. So it's like seeing Richards,

0:25:03.940 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 2>like he didn't start spiking change-ups at the end to

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:11.950
<v Speaker 2>where when, you know, he's on fumes, you can definitely

0:25:12.050 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 2>see it and the misses get pretty, And so that's

0:25:15.060 --> 0:25:19.260
<v Speaker 2>why I think that, yeah, just it's a case where

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I first looked up a service time. Like if he's

0:25:21.300 --> 0:25:22.959
<v Speaker 2>getting close to 10 years of service time, yeah, bring

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.180
<v Speaker 2>him back, get him over the hump, get him that ceremony.

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:30.090
<v Speaker 2>Cause that's always cool to see, but he's at 6.1

0:25:30.090 --> 0:25:32.350
<v Speaker 2>years or either six or seven, depending on whether roster

0:25:32.390 --> 0:25:36.970
<v Speaker 2>resource updates their service time after the season or at

0:25:36.990 --> 0:25:39.750
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of like a new year. But either way,

0:25:39.990 --> 0:25:42.770
<v Speaker 2>not close enough to the service time threshold to make

0:25:42.790 --> 0:25:43.830
<v Speaker 2>that part of the calculation.

0:25:44.690 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>It is something that I have to consider, though, because

0:25:46.980 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it is a big chunk of innings. And I'm not sure, Jim,

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>if Mike Vassell is going to be healthy enough to

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.400
<v Speaker 1>count on him for another 100 innings like he pitched

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>for the White Sox in 2025. So this is something

0:25:59.940 --> 0:26:02.660
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to be mindful of with my offseason plan project.

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>If I'm not bringing back Richards, somebody needs to help

0:26:05.859 --> 0:26:08.850
<v Speaker 1>out and take on these innings or this mop-up role

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 1>for the White Sox in 2027. And my last one,

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.719
<v Speaker 1>And it's a bit difficult, but I think most of us,

0:26:17.790 --> 0:26:20.490
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to assume, Jim, with the offseason brand projects,

0:26:20.910 --> 0:26:24.990
<v Speaker 1>are not bringing back Randall Gritchick. Now, I don't, I

0:26:25.030 --> 0:26:27.210
<v Speaker 1>have to admit, I don't have a good feeling about

0:26:27.390 --> 0:26:30.210
<v Speaker 1>what direction the White Sox are actually going to take.

0:26:30.830 --> 0:26:34.950
<v Speaker 1>But my reasoning is that if this was a decision

0:26:35.369 --> 0:26:38.860
<v Speaker 1>based on Randall Gritchick and Andrew Benetendi, and you only

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>had to bring one back, I'm taking Randall Gritchick. However,

0:26:42.619 --> 0:26:45.180
<v Speaker 1>it's Gritchick that's a free agent and Ben Attendee still

0:26:45.220 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>has a year left on his deal and he's not cheap.

0:26:48.940 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's why Ben Attendee is going to continue staying

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 1>on this roster is just because the soft cap that

0:26:56.940 --> 0:26:59.700
<v Speaker 1>you provided to us at $ 130 million, and let's say

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.330
<v Speaker 1>you're spot on with that, the White Sox are just

0:27:02.369 --> 0:27:04.870
<v Speaker 1>not in a position right now to really eat that

0:27:04.970 --> 0:27:08.580
<v Speaker 1>money unless they're going to increase their payroll to $ 150

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>or $ 170 million, then maybe things change. Misproduction, this is

0:27:15.260 --> 0:27:18.030
<v Speaker 1>significant production that the White Sox would be losing having

0:27:18.070 --> 0:27:22.190
<v Speaker 1>Randall Gritchick leave, Jim. I mean, he was worth $ 1. 7 war,

0:27:22.230 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>according to baseball reference. He batted $ 2.

0:27:24.990 --> 0:27:25.060
<v Speaker 3>99.

0:27:25.050 --> 0:27:25.810
<v Speaker 1>He slugged $ 5.

0:27:25.570 --> 0:27:25.689
<v Speaker 2>98.

0:27:25.690 --> 0:27:31.609
<v Speaker 1>He had 15 home runs and 44 RBIs, playing sparingly

0:27:31.650 --> 0:27:34.550
<v Speaker 1>in left field, but part of this DH platoon with

0:27:34.730 --> 0:27:38.990
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Benatendi. So, looking at the internal options right now

0:27:39.050 --> 0:27:42.430
<v Speaker 1>for the White Sox, these 15 home runs and some

0:27:42.450 --> 0:27:44.890
<v Speaker 1>of the slugging power that they were able to get

0:27:44.930 --> 0:27:48.790
<v Speaker 1>from Randall Gritchick against left-handed pitching and even some right-handed

0:27:48.810 --> 0:27:51.109
<v Speaker 1>pitching later in the season, is this going to be

0:27:51.290 --> 0:27:53.710
<v Speaker 1>easy or difficult for the White Sox to replace with

0:27:53.750 --> 0:27:55.170
<v Speaker 1>the options they have internally?

0:27:55.930 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 2>It's difficult. It's also difficult to count on Gritchick doing

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.859
<v Speaker 2>it again, which is why this conversation is complicated here.

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.990
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at Gritchick's Baseball reference page looking at the

0:28:08.070 --> 0:28:12.100
<v Speaker 2>OPS plus and like he's had good seasons like this or,

0:28:12.170 --> 0:28:14.780
<v Speaker 2>you know, this was like his best season in terms

0:28:14.820 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 2>of like a platoon bat. But just there's a lot

0:28:17.820 --> 0:28:20.780
<v Speaker 2>of variation looking at since 2023 of those partial teams.

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:34.230
<v Speaker 2>OPS plus numbers 122, 81, 139, 101, 58, 47, 154.

0:28:34.230 --> 0:28:38.130
<v Speaker 2>So it's a case of just the variance going between

0:28:38.710 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 2>hot and cold is notable. And when you look at

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.900
<v Speaker 2>his numbers, the White Sox, obviously the power was there,

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.580
<v Speaker 2>just a lot of impact, but didn't draw walks. And

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 2>while you wouldn't want Gritchick drawing walks with what he

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:56.900
<v Speaker 2>was doing with his contact, it does hint at maybe

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:00.140
<v Speaker 2>like a one-trick pony or somebody who's played approach, like

0:29:00.180 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 2>if it's not going well, is a lot of quick

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:04.940
<v Speaker 2>outs and unremarkable defense in left field. And now you've

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.740
<v Speaker 2>like fixed a roster spot for that guy or fixed

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 2>like an aging platoon, uh, with that guy. And so

0:29:11.220 --> 0:29:13.070
<v Speaker 2>that's why I think it's a, it's a tricky, uh,

0:29:14.830 --> 0:29:18.630
<v Speaker 2>it's a tricky player, uh, just characteristics to bring back

0:29:18.690 --> 0:29:20.430
<v Speaker 2>and fit on a roster that already has, like you

0:29:20.450 --> 0:29:23.810
<v Speaker 2>mentioned with Andrew Van Tendi, a similar player in terms

0:29:23.850 --> 0:29:27.730
<v Speaker 2>of just age and, um, Yeah, I think the signs

0:29:27.750 --> 0:29:30.390
<v Speaker 2>of decline in Benintendi are obvious, but just, yeah, you're

0:29:30.430 --> 0:29:36.220
<v Speaker 2>locking in on an otherwise youthful roster, two 35-year-old players, basically,

0:29:36.290 --> 0:29:39.970
<v Speaker 2>who are, yeah, platoon bats at best, and with Benintendi,

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.820
<v Speaker 2>barely hanging on to the platoon bat, Gritchick has lost

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 2>it and regained it, lost it and regained it. So

0:29:46.660 --> 0:29:49.380
<v Speaker 2>that's why it feels like, you know, it was awesome

0:29:49.860 --> 0:29:52.820
<v Speaker 2>watching him produce the level that he did after, like

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.580
<v Speaker 2>the Yankees usually get that kind of production from platoon

0:29:55.620 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 2>bats and the White Sox did instead. And that's a

0:29:58.300 --> 0:30:01.490
<v Speaker 2>hell of a thing. But I just think that making

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 2>that bet two times in a row and if that

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 2>bet doesn't come through, then you may have lost some

0:30:07.820 --> 0:30:09.780
<v Speaker 2>flexibility in terms of the players you could bring up

0:30:09.820 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 2>and down in audition and missed out on younger players

0:30:13.770 --> 0:30:16.450
<v Speaker 2>who might have their best years in front of them. So, yeah,

0:30:16.470 --> 0:30:20.170
<v Speaker 2>you know, we talked about with like players that can

0:30:20.210 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 2>be reacquired, like I think you know, Gritchick based on

0:30:23.260 --> 0:30:26.340
<v Speaker 2>his history as somebody who signs with a team that

0:30:26.380 --> 0:30:28.380
<v Speaker 2>needs an outfielder and then gets traded at the deadline

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 2>or gets DFA. So like you can always let another

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:33.300
<v Speaker 2>team sign them and then see what he has left.

0:30:33.380 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 2>And if that team is, you know, isn't contending and

0:30:36.990 --> 0:30:40.950
<v Speaker 2>just needs the needs the player, or if he's disappointed again,

0:30:40.990 --> 0:30:43.970
<v Speaker 2>you can always, you know, history says you can always

0:30:44.830 --> 0:30:46.470
<v Speaker 2>take a look at mid season at what you need

0:30:46.510 --> 0:30:48.050
<v Speaker 2>and what he looks like and see if there's a

0:30:48.050 --> 0:30:48.390
<v Speaker 2>fit again.

0:30:49.930 --> 0:30:52.209
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's why I like the likelihood of reunion. I'm

0:30:52.230 --> 0:30:54.850
<v Speaker 1>going to put it at medium for Randall Gritchick. I

0:30:54.870 --> 0:30:57.950
<v Speaker 1>could totally see him returning to the White Sox in

0:30:57.970 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that type of situation. Because again, they brought Tommy Pham back.

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So they brought Tommy Pham back. Maybe they could bring

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>back Randall Gritchick if they are contending again in 2027,

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>come to the trade deadline. They would just like a

0:31:11.610 --> 0:31:14.970
<v Speaker 1>veteran right-handed bat to help out coming off the bench

0:31:15.030 --> 0:31:18.660
<v Speaker 1>in pitching situations. They counted on Randall Gritchick, and he

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:22.090
<v Speaker 1>delivered in 2026, so it wouldn't be a bad bet.

0:31:22.130 --> 0:31:24.810
<v Speaker 1>But when you're looking at creating a roster from the

0:31:24.870 --> 0:31:27.530
<v Speaker 1>get-go to try to get as many wins as possible

0:31:27.650 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>early on, I just don't see the logic in bringing

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>back Randall Gritchick and running it back again with the

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 1>platoon at DH Gym between Gritchick and Andrew Benatendi. But

0:31:39.500 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the more I think.

0:31:40.060 --> 0:31:41.220
<v Speaker 2>About it, I also don't know.

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:44.460
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's a lot of logic right now

0:31:44.500 --> 0:31:48.050
<v Speaker 1>in bringing back Andrew Benatendi only because of his contract.

0:31:48.550 --> 0:31:52.450
<v Speaker 1>His contract is saving his spot. There is a part

0:31:52.470 --> 0:31:55.390
<v Speaker 1>of me, Jim, that wanted to add Andrew Benatendi to

0:31:55.430 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>my list of players not returning to the White Sox.

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>You can't play him in the field. He just looked

0:32:02.140 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>really overwhelmed against Gavin Williams in the postseason. So I

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>am concerned about a velocity difference. is going to be

0:32:09.940 --> 0:32:13.810
<v Speaker 1>an issue for Andrew Benatendi. He's in between two approaches

0:32:14.670 --> 0:32:17.070
<v Speaker 1>at the plate. And I don't know if his bat

0:32:17.130 --> 0:32:20.030
<v Speaker 1>still has enough juice to even be a 25 homer

0:32:20.510 --> 0:32:23.570
<v Speaker 1>or a better type of hitter. So he's not that

0:32:23.630 --> 0:32:27.390
<v Speaker 1>effective as a designated hitter for the White Sox. He's

0:32:27.550 --> 0:32:31.890
<v Speaker 1>on this team because of that contract. That's not really

0:32:31.930 --> 0:32:33.570
<v Speaker 1>a great reason to have someone on your team.

0:32:34.420 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 2>No, it's, you get to the point where if Benintendi

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:43.500
<v Speaker 2>is costing you better opportunities to use that roster spots

0:32:43.860 --> 0:32:48.150
<v Speaker 2>or the, you know, create your platoons or more versatility

0:32:48.170 --> 0:32:50.770
<v Speaker 2>in the outfield, you have to look at that and

0:32:50.810 --> 0:32:53.110
<v Speaker 2>say like, how much is that worth? How much is that,

0:32:53.150 --> 0:32:57.380
<v Speaker 2>you know, that remaining financial obligation for Benintendi? As much

0:32:57.430 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 2>as it, Probably sucks to, you know, eat that amount

0:33:01.710 --> 0:33:03.260
<v Speaker 2>and just say, you know, probably not going to be

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 2>able to trade them. If you do trade them, it's

0:33:04.620 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 2>probably kicking in like most of the freight to where

0:33:08.220 --> 0:33:10.780
<v Speaker 2>you're paying like, you know, 13 million or whatever, you know,

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:14.860
<v Speaker 2>at the very least for some, you know, arm of,

0:33:15.020 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, I would say like minor league arm of

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:20.150
<v Speaker 2>note basically. you can look at that and just say like, well,

0:33:20.210 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 2>you can create maybe $ 13 million of opportunity or 15, 17,

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.959
<v Speaker 2>what have you, just by having some younger players that

0:33:27.980 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 2>we like be able to get those opportunities. And if

0:33:29.700 --> 0:33:32.530
<v Speaker 2>they're being paid the league minimum, kind of like we

0:33:32.570 --> 0:33:34.990
<v Speaker 2>did with Austin Hayes and Randall Gritchick last year, like

0:33:35.170 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 2>with Hayes being on the shelf, but Gritchick being so productive,

0:33:37.380 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 2>you looked at those contracts and say, oh, $ 7 million

0:33:39.780 --> 0:33:43.020
<v Speaker 2>for that production, that's fine. And so I think you

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.180
<v Speaker 2>can maybe look at the same thing with Benintendi and say, well,

0:33:45.180 --> 0:33:49.510
<v Speaker 2>$ 17 million, whatever he's owed, and then the $ 1 million

0:33:49.530 --> 0:33:52.670
<v Speaker 2>for the league minimum guy, it's like $ 18 million. Try

0:33:52.690 --> 0:33:55.390
<v Speaker 2>to take a shot at using that roster spot for

0:33:55.430 --> 0:33:57.290
<v Speaker 2>cheaper players that might be as productive and then just

0:33:57.350 --> 0:33:59.290
<v Speaker 2>lump it on the cost of Benintendi. That might be

0:33:59.330 --> 0:34:03.110
<v Speaker 2>worth it if you phrase it that way. So if

0:34:03.250 --> 0:34:05.470
<v Speaker 2>they cut Benintendi over the course of the winter, I

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't be surprised. I should say I'd only be surprised

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 2>based on the cost. But we've seen the White Sox

0:34:12.180 --> 0:34:16.540
<v Speaker 2>shed money before or just kind of acknowledge a sunk

0:34:16.580 --> 0:34:19.980
<v Speaker 2>cost and eat the money before. And so if they

0:34:20.020 --> 0:34:23.060
<v Speaker 2>did with Benintendi, knowing that they have a young roster,

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:27.169
<v Speaker 2>they have so many pre-R players everywhere else. That creates

0:34:27.230 --> 0:34:31.270
<v Speaker 2>a luxury to move on from a one-year obligation for Benintendi.

0:34:32.130 --> 0:34:35.130
<v Speaker 2>Maybe makes more sense than ever to do it. We

0:34:35.150 --> 0:34:36.850
<v Speaker 2>talk about more bats than spots. I think they just

0:34:36.870 --> 0:34:42.360
<v Speaker 2>have to probably add enough to where Benintendi becomes a

0:34:42.380 --> 0:34:45.020
<v Speaker 2>casualty based on like, look at the numbers here. We

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:46.379
<v Speaker 2>just have too many guys we want to look at instead,

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.580
<v Speaker 2>and they're not quite there yet. But Gritchick, I think

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.969
<v Speaker 2>you raise an interesting point in terms of Or it

0:34:53.010 --> 0:34:54.779
<v Speaker 2>struck me as, you know, he's out of options. And

0:34:54.820 --> 0:34:56.450
<v Speaker 2>one of the problems is that, you know, when you

0:34:56.469 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 2>have guys out of options, and we saw this last

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 2>year with Austin Hayes and Everson Pereira and Derek Hill,

0:35:01.980 --> 0:35:03.700
<v Speaker 2>just like they're, you know, when you have so many

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:07.940
<v Speaker 2>of those guys, you really either have to shed somebody

0:35:07.980 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 2>too early because they don't have options, or you have

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:12.140
<v Speaker 2>to reserve a spot for somebody who might not ever

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 2>be able to just answer the call. And I think

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 2>if you had Gritchick and not Ben Attendee, you could

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.170
<v Speaker 2>live longer with Gritchick being you know, one of us

0:35:23.230 --> 0:35:25.270
<v Speaker 2>colder spells to start a season, but with two of

0:35:25.290 --> 0:35:28.430
<v Speaker 2>them going, if you create a crunch that way of

0:35:28.450 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 2>just out of options guys, that just might be a

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of wasted money at the end and also wasted

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 2>months because you just reserve the roster spots for these

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 2>guys through the off season and into the first month

0:35:38.980 --> 0:35:42.540
<v Speaker 2>of the year when so many other opportunities that players

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:45.060
<v Speaker 2>you might've scouted or, you know, your evaluators might've liked

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 2>your acquisitions department might've liked you know, they, they, They

0:35:49.500 --> 0:35:52.140
<v Speaker 2>tried to get your attention, didn't do it, and now

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 2>you're missing out on players who might have more to offer.

0:35:54.940 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>The elephant in the room when it comes to this

0:35:57.780 --> 0:36:02.390
<v Speaker 1>left field spot for me is Caleb Bonhamer, Jim, and

0:36:02.450 --> 0:36:07.089
<v Speaker 1>how well Bonhamer hit at the Arizona Fall League. I

0:36:07.170 --> 0:36:10.590
<v Speaker 1>get it. The average isn't all that great, but he

0:36:10.630 --> 0:36:14.230
<v Speaker 1>does a good job of drawing walks, and guys, this

0:36:14.290 --> 0:36:18.290
<v Speaker 1>power seems legit. Like, He's only going to be 21

0:36:18.290 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>years old next year. And he's really exciting. He continues

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to excel. The White Sox in recent years have used

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:31.270
<v Speaker 1>these great production at the Arizona Fall League Gym as

0:36:31.650 --> 0:36:34.569
<v Speaker 1>a trampoline into the next year on guys that we

0:36:34.630 --> 0:36:38.970
<v Speaker 1>are serious about having them join our roster sooner than later.

0:36:39.130 --> 0:36:42.710
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what Charlotte is going to provide on

0:36:42.730 --> 0:36:45.610
<v Speaker 1>the severity on a test or difficulty of a test

0:36:45.630 --> 0:36:48.870
<v Speaker 1>to Caleb Bonham or Jim. I could see him absolutely

0:36:48.930 --> 0:36:52.070
<v Speaker 1>crushing the first month and then month two comes along

0:36:52.450 --> 0:36:57.100
<v Speaker 1>and that's enough for Chris Gatz. If they're not able

0:36:57.140 --> 0:37:01.180
<v Speaker 1>to replace that production so easily internally with Randall Gritchick

0:37:01.219 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>leaving gym, maybe that is replacing Gritchick's production internally is

0:37:07.100 --> 0:37:10.569
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Bonhamer. It does raise the question, what do you

0:37:10.590 --> 0:37:13.250
<v Speaker 1>do with Sam Antonacci? But I think that's a conversation

0:37:13.310 --> 0:37:17.270
<v Speaker 1>for a different show. But I think it's Bonhamer and

0:37:17.330 --> 0:37:21.930
<v Speaker 1>how he progresses and how he fares this off season,

0:37:22.410 --> 0:37:26.950
<v Speaker 1>continuing to work on his craft. Whenever spring training starts,

0:37:27.210 --> 0:37:28.070
<v Speaker 1>what shape.

0:37:27.850 --> 0:37:28.430
<v Speaker 2>Is he in?

0:37:29.130 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>How much better is he in the outfield? It doesn't

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>seem like he's going back in the dirt anytime soon

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 1>for the White Sox. Maybe it's Caleb Bonhamer, who is

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the future left fielder, Jim, that could help out being

0:37:42.420 --> 0:37:46.830
<v Speaker 1>a middle-of-the-order bat, hopefully, that this power continues to evolve

0:37:47.270 --> 0:37:50.330
<v Speaker 1>and develop and translates into the major leagues. I think

0:37:50.690 --> 0:37:54.130
<v Speaker 1>Bonhamer here is playing a factor in my off-season plan project.

0:37:55.430 --> 0:37:58.100
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think as long as you don't make him–

0:37:58.510 --> 0:38:00.790
<v Speaker 2>we've seen this before. Starter on day one. Hey, it

0:38:00.810 --> 0:38:03.190
<v Speaker 2>worked with Oscar Colas. What are you talking about? Yeah,

0:38:03.210 --> 0:38:05.250
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say Andrew Vaughn and Oscar Colas. Yeah,

0:38:05.270 --> 0:38:10.049
<v Speaker 2>those are the cautionary tales of penciling in somebody who

0:38:10.790 --> 0:38:12.989
<v Speaker 2>may not ever be ready or somebody who feels like

0:38:13.010 --> 0:38:16.169
<v Speaker 2>a major leaguer but not yet. That would be the

0:38:17.310 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 2>two counterpoints. But I think he's worth– having the conversation

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:23.720
<v Speaker 2>of just like you don't have to go nuts addressing

0:38:23.739 --> 0:38:26.779
<v Speaker 2>this position. You don't have to overinvest in a left

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.390
<v Speaker 2>fielder you don't love because Bonhamer might be there within

0:38:29.430 --> 0:38:33.089
<v Speaker 2>the year to really just, if not set the league

0:38:33.110 --> 0:38:38.130
<v Speaker 2>on fire, at least provide league average production, above average power,

0:38:38.370 --> 0:38:41.410
<v Speaker 2>and seems like the athleticism in the outfield should be

0:38:41.450 --> 0:38:44.870
<v Speaker 2>enough to play left. I think center, it's funny watching

0:38:44.910 --> 0:38:48.009
<v Speaker 2>him play center just because he– Well.

0:38:48.030 --> 0:38:50.810
<v Speaker 1>They restricted him, right? They're playing with those restricted rules.

0:38:50.830 --> 0:38:53.469
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah. I mean like watching him in Birmingham. It's

0:38:53.489 --> 0:38:56.089
<v Speaker 2>just funny because like Birmingham's outfield is so big alley

0:38:56.110 --> 0:39:00.250
<v Speaker 2>to alley and not used to watching him run defensively

0:39:00.290 --> 0:39:01.969
<v Speaker 2>just because he plays third base. It's like a step

0:39:02.010 --> 0:39:04.090
<v Speaker 2>and a dive basically. So you're not really used to

0:39:04.110 --> 0:39:06.930
<v Speaker 2>seeing him cover just like so much running for him,

0:39:07.090 --> 0:39:09.649
<v Speaker 2>just gap to gap in some games, especially with some

0:39:09.710 --> 0:39:14.700
<v Speaker 2>of the pitchers that Birmingham had. It's a case where–

0:39:15.580 --> 0:39:17.100
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they're running him through the ringer right now in

0:39:17.140 --> 0:39:19.540
<v Speaker 2>Birmingham center field and the switch to left field will

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:23.390
<v Speaker 2>look pretty easy by comparison because either have Tristan Peters

0:39:23.410 --> 0:39:25.669
<v Speaker 2>next to you in center or Brenton Doyle to cover

0:39:25.690 --> 0:39:27.410
<v Speaker 2>that ground in the alley. And now you're just working

0:39:27.430 --> 0:39:29.509
<v Speaker 2>on one side and perhaps all this.

0:39:31.150 --> 0:39:34.130
<v Speaker 2>Time in center field is just over-preparing him for a corner,

0:39:34.170 --> 0:39:37.270
<v Speaker 2>which would be a nice change of pace from giving

0:39:37.310 --> 0:39:39.569
<v Speaker 2>Sam Antonacci a week basically in Charlotte and saying, yeah,

0:39:39.590 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 2>you're good. We'll figure it out. Don't kill yourself or

0:39:42.300 --> 0:39:47.100
<v Speaker 2>anybody else. Sorry, William Bergoglia. That's, I think, where, you know,

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:49.380
<v Speaker 2>that's where I'd have him is just in that corner

0:39:50.550 --> 0:39:52.630
<v Speaker 2>Two months in, but have a good plan for April,

0:39:52.870 --> 0:39:56.110
<v Speaker 2>not just Caleb Bonhamer. And, you know, whether it's injury

0:39:56.170 --> 0:39:58.069
<v Speaker 2>or whether Bonhamer being too good, there's a way for

0:39:58.090 --> 0:40:00.850
<v Speaker 2>him to hit his way in, regardless of how well

0:40:00.890 --> 0:40:02.029
<v Speaker 2>left field is working out for you.

0:40:03.030 --> 0:40:07.050
<v Speaker 1>And again, how you guys are attacking the outfield situation,

0:40:07.090 --> 0:40:09.700
<v Speaker 1>that's the beauty of the Sox machine offseason plan project.

0:40:09.739 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 3>You can.

0:40:10.940 --> 0:40:14.359
<v Speaker 1>write up your reasoning and your perspective and how you're

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:18.500
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the situation. But the outfield is ever evolving

0:40:18.540 --> 0:40:20.620
<v Speaker 1>for the White Sox, but I do not have Randall

0:40:20.660 --> 0:40:25.220
<v Speaker 1>Gritchick coming back. So out of these five, technically seven players,

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:28.810
<v Speaker 1>let me know who you disagree or you agree with

0:40:28.850 --> 0:40:34.070
<v Speaker 1>the reasoning not returning to the White Sox in 2027.

0:40:34.070 --> 0:40:36.989
<v Speaker 1>And before we conclude this episode of the Sox Machine Podcast,

0:40:37.460 --> 0:40:39.380
<v Speaker 1>Let's go ahead and check in on the World Series

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:42.100
<v Speaker 1>real quick, Jim. It's Game 3 of the World Series

0:40:42.180 --> 0:40:45.779
<v Speaker 1>as it goes to St. Petersburg, Florida. Will be on

0:40:45.830 --> 0:40:49.450
<v Speaker 1>Monday night, but the Milwaukee Brewers, Jim, are up 2-0.

0:40:50.070 --> 0:40:55.630
<v Speaker 1>A fantastic Game 2 comeback for the Brewers. I thought that...

0:40:55.950 --> 0:40:58.489
<v Speaker 1>They were in real trouble with the Rays going up

0:40:58.670 --> 0:41:01.410
<v Speaker 1>four to nothing in the first inning, Jim. But the

0:41:01.450 --> 0:41:04.300
<v Speaker 1>Brewers continue to do this. They did this in game

0:41:04.340 --> 0:41:06.740
<v Speaker 1>four of the National League Championship Series against the Dodgers.

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Shohei hit that home run, and I just thought, well,

0:41:10.180 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Dodger Stadium is alive. Dodgers are going to at least

0:41:12.820 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>win one game. Brewers came back and won that. Rays

0:41:16.300 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>up four to nothing early. It's the Rays. It's really

0:41:19.180 --> 0:41:22.540
<v Speaker 1>tough to score runs against the Rays. Brewers still found

0:41:22.580 --> 0:41:26.590
<v Speaker 1>a way to win five to four. I'm incredibly impressed

0:41:26.610 --> 0:41:30.390
<v Speaker 1>with how well Milwaukee played at home against the Rays.

0:41:30.730 --> 0:41:34.989
<v Speaker 1>And I am curious on how things translate now in St.

0:41:35.050 --> 0:41:35.770
<v Speaker 2>Petersburg.

0:41:35.830 --> 0:41:38.500
<v Speaker 1>Does a pendulum swing into the Rays favor because they've

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 1>been so good at home?

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:42.020
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:46.219
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's, uh, two games to nothing. You know,

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:48.700
<v Speaker 2>the Brewers winning, but there were two one run games,

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:51.570
<v Speaker 2>two games that came down to the ninth inning runners

0:41:51.620 --> 0:41:56.310
<v Speaker 2>in scoring position. Um, The Brewers' bullpen is showing that, yeah,

0:41:57.930 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 2>you can understand why they blasted past the Dodgers, why

0:42:00.700 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 2>they're able to come back in games, because even if

0:42:02.780 --> 0:42:06.320
<v Speaker 2>they dig an early hole, even the Brewers' middle of

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:08.700
<v Speaker 2>the bullpen is throwing scoreless innings to keep them in

0:42:08.739 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 2>the game and allow them to come back, buy them

0:42:10.700 --> 0:42:13.779
<v Speaker 2>a lot of time. So you can see that that

0:42:13.910 --> 0:42:16.450
<v Speaker 2>has translated from one series to the other, but it's

0:42:16.710 --> 0:42:19.609
<v Speaker 2>still 200 in losses. The Rays had to come back

0:42:19.710 --> 0:42:23.470
<v Speaker 2>against the Guardians, and they did. And pretty convincingly as well,

0:42:23.489 --> 0:42:26.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, after an early wobble. So, you know, the

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 2>saying is that, you know, it's not really a series

0:42:28.219 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 2>until a home team loses a game. And I could

0:42:31.620 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 2>see the same thing being the case here to where like, yeah,

0:42:34.300 --> 0:42:36.259
<v Speaker 2>the Brewers won a couple of games, but by one run,

0:42:36.540 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the Rays are still, they're close, like close. you can understand,

0:42:40.540 --> 0:42:43.219
<v Speaker 2>you kind of see why the Brewers, because of the

0:42:43.260 --> 0:42:45.840
<v Speaker 2>two strike hits that it got, the fewer strikeouts, better bullpen,

0:42:45.860 --> 0:42:49.430
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, why they're winning games. But the Rays have

0:42:49.450 --> 0:42:51.870
<v Speaker 2>won games in similar fashion too, with a lot of depth.

0:42:51.969 --> 0:42:55.810
<v Speaker 2>So game three, I think is pivotal game three. It's

0:42:55.830 --> 0:42:59.089
<v Speaker 2>not quite pivotal in the classic sense because of just,

0:42:59.130 --> 0:43:01.130
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's not going to give a team a lead.

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 2>It's going to just have the deficit that the Rays

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:07.270
<v Speaker 2>are currently facing. But in terms of, I could see

0:43:07.310 --> 0:43:09.370
<v Speaker 2>this being a case where both teams hold serve at

0:43:09.410 --> 0:43:13.350
<v Speaker 2>home and either whether it's home field advantage becomes a

0:43:14.570 --> 0:43:17.370
<v Speaker 2>factor or just because both teams are good and they

0:43:17.410 --> 0:43:21.070
<v Speaker 2>play slightly better in friendly environments, but otherwise they're evenly matched.

0:43:21.230 --> 0:43:24.810
<v Speaker 2>I'm not throwing in the towel or raising the white

0:43:24.830 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 2>flag for the Rays just yet.

0:43:26.660 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 1>No, nobody should because they got Freddy Peralta starting game three.

0:43:31.660 --> 0:43:34.020
<v Speaker 1>And Freddy Peralta has been awesome for the Rays ever

0:43:34.060 --> 0:43:37.270
<v Speaker 1>since he's joined the team via trade. From the New

0:43:37.290 --> 0:43:41.500
<v Speaker 1>York Mets. It is something that's on my mind, though,

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:43.340
<v Speaker 1>is that if the Brewers do find a way to

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 1>win games three and four, Jim, and sweep the Rays,

0:43:47.060 --> 0:43:51.500
<v Speaker 1>that's an 11-1 postseason. That matches what obviously the 2005

0:43:51.500 --> 0:43:55.530
<v Speaker 1>Chicago White Sox did. when they won the World Series.

0:43:55.550 --> 0:43:58.989
<v Speaker 1>So it is possible the Brewers could finish 11-1. That's

0:43:59.030 --> 0:44:03.219
<v Speaker 1>still alive for the Milwaukee Brewers. But a great scene

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:08.020
<v Speaker 1>in Milwaukee. The crowd was awesome, an American fam. Just

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the reaction to Sal Freelick hitting that home run, just

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 1>really cool moments in Milwaukee. We knew this World Series

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 1>was going to be entertaining. Can't wait to see how

0:44:19.380 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 1>it unfolds in Game 3 in St. Pete between the

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Rays and the Brewers. But that will do it for

0:44:25.500 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 1>this episode of the Sox Machine Podcast. Thank you guys

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:33.470
<v Speaker 1>so much for watching and listening. This is a video podcast,

0:44:33.489 --> 0:44:35.290
<v Speaker 1>so you can watch the show at our YouTube channel

0:44:35.310 --> 0:44:38.710
<v Speaker 1>at youtube.com slash Sox Machine. We continue to gain subscribers.

0:44:39.110 --> 0:44:42.410
<v Speaker 1>Thank you guys so much for subscribing to the Sox

0:44:42.430 --> 0:44:45.230
<v Speaker 1>Machine YouTube channel. If you haven't subscribed yet, please hit

0:44:45.250 --> 0:44:47.969
<v Speaker 1>the subscription button. We greatly appreciate it. If you need

0:44:48.010 --> 0:44:49.890
<v Speaker 1>something to listen to, you can listen to the audio

0:44:49.930 --> 0:44:53.110
<v Speaker 1>version of this show wherever you listen to podcasts such

0:44:53.130 --> 0:44:55.930
<v Speaker 1>as Spotify and Apple Music. Follow us on social media.

0:44:55.950 --> 0:44:58.410
<v Speaker 1>We're on all the social media platforms at Sox Machine.

0:44:58.820 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And the Sox Machine podcast is a production of SoxMachine.com.

0:45:01.980 --> 0:45:04.839
<v Speaker 1>We offer all things Chicago White Sox baseball and part

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:08.700
<v Speaker 1>of the Foul Territory Network. Alongside Jim Margulis, I'm Josh Nelson.

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:10.820
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for watching and listening.