WEBVTT - Sunday night oddsmakers, Week 6 Recap, Breakdown, and Analysis...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app, and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you can listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. You're

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy best Friends Forever.

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>M Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:53.720 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Don too Yeah Jay the Fantasy

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>best Friends Forever Here on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>alongside Frankie Stample. I am Greg. What's going on? Budday Reggae?

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>What an expletive game last night? Man? Which explod? Want

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to use? What game? Is? Sure? It was fun and Brady,

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it was fun man, man, it did a game game

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>one game fun weekend. Um. I've learned that, you know,

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I should probably leave the playing football to the athletes

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>because I played two hand touch that's all I played

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.479
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday. And my body is like broken today. It's

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.639
<v Speaker 1>like two days later. My hamstrings feel like string cheese.

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>My back is broken, my ribs are like I learned, basically,

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>just just don't play anymore. It's the thing I used

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to do like every Saturday week up earlier. I told

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you to do that because you know, we had our

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>fantasy basketball draft together. Want to hear that we were

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>face timing four right before that. I was playing a

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>little football. I'm banged up. Maybe we want to hear

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>about it. Probably not all right? It sucks. Yeah, I

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>had to play quarterback for my team. I mean, I

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>prefer to play wide receiver. I'll do it all, do

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>it all. Hey, I was looking at your God, I

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.679
<v Speaker 1>was looking at the picks last night. What did you

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>pick the Chiefs out on Friday? I got them at

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>plus three and a half. That's something I did want

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to bring up today. These oddsmakers are amazing, amazing, dude.

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>The Patriots were up by four points with like whatever

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>five minutes left in the game. They kick a field goal,

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.519
<v Speaker 1>they go up seven. Obviously, the Chiefs respawned right away

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the Tyreek kills seventy five yard touchdown. So like, it

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>was just a roller coaster of emotions for me. Getting

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:52.679
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs at plus three and a half, I'm like,

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, yeah, they're up four, Like you know,

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>this is is probably gonna be the end, right, Like

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>Patriots are gonna win by four, and I'm gonna miss out,

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you know on the half point right, boom field goal

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>up seven, Bam. I'm like, all right, you know, give

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the Cheeks a chance. Boom, Tyreek Hills teventy five yard touchdown,

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>tie game, boom. Patriots just sit on the ball and

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 1>kick a field going to win. And I was like,

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm happy. I'm a happy camper. Was not

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to be happy about. Yes, I went to for two

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.959
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday night. So I actually so, I show the

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Eagles in the over for our official Ye, I went

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to in one in our picks. You didn't because I did,

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. Yes, I had the Steelers, I

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>had the Yes, I did. What would I have? You

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>had Buffalo? Yes? I did both in Buffalo. You in

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City. Okay, I got one wrong. You didn't. I

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>went through and now hold on, I tried to do

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it last night to be prepared. You should have took

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>my Miami Colpins like I told you. You went to.

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>You did go to? You went. It was the Panthers.

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>One that I got, I should have taken the Steelers.

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>So what I've been doing every week now is like

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll place like four bets. I'd tell everyone I go

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to Jersey, I put my bets in. UM, I placed

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>like four bets and I put like a small parlay

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>on all fours. It's like, you know, if I get

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>everything right, then you know I have a really really

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>great weekend. The one that screwed me this weekend was

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina Panthers. Yeah, against Washington or else, I would

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>have hit on everything else I had. I had the

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>two right on the on Thursday night game, I had

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles in the over, I had had the Steelers yesterday,

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I had the Bills obviously, and then I had the

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs last night. So the only one that screwed me

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>was the Carolina Panthers. But regardless, it was still a

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>fun weekend for fantasy for for two hand touch football,

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for a fantasy basketball draft for the New York Jets,

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.239
<v Speaker 1>and then that awesome, awesome game last night which totally

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>three points ridiculous, way over ridiculous. It was crazy. It

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even Sammy Watkins nowhere to be found, Nowhere we

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>found it wasn't even ow Michael's. They brought it up,

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>by the way, how did you do in your picks?

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>And went to in one alight? They said, up Cincinnati,

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'm com coming. I'm coming for you. Yeah, you're

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>eating six or I'm sorry your seven and set an

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>now they're eating so so I actually I keep tracking

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>my my iPhone notepad of all the things that I

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>placed bets on throughout the football season so far. Although

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I have not done great with you, which seven most

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>your seven and seven? Is that right? That doesn't sound right.

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't sound right. Um, I'm actually eleven and five

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>on the bets that had places. Okay, what am I

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>feeling is it's not right? How you're seven and eight?

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>There we go, I'm made seven and you're seven and eight.

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense. I went to and what we both

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>went to it one this week? I missed that Cincinnati.

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>It was only missed. Wasn't I a game behind you?

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Last week? Right? We went doing one? All right? Even

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>though I told you, like, we're not allowed to have

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the same picks. We are, dude, No, we're not. We

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>both liked your picks. I make my picks a lot

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of games to choose. You're allowed to have the same picks. Okay,

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>what do you want to start? All right? What do

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>we want to start? I want to start before we

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>before we dive into yesterday's games, has been basketball team?

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Can we start? Can we just talk about Levan Bells. Well,

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>he's supposed to report throughout the the bye week. There's

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it could be any time throughout this week,

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously next week. There's been no sign of him, and

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend it was revealed that there's been no

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>contact between the Steelers. But we had this report a

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago, oh that living on Bell according to

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>some guy on ESPN, some Steelers be writer that he's

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>going to be there. And you remember, if you remember

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>at the time, I said, just because we have a report,

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>does it definitely mean that it's going to happen? You

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>did say that. I'm just saying. I'm just saying, So

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what you wanted to start. I think because a

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are, you know, waiting on Levian Bell.

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's I think it's a big story. Um, okay, great,

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with Chicago, but I'm also want

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to talking about Miami because I was a crazy game.

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I texted you, I really screwed this whole thing up. Man,

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>I in one league. I just can get nothing right.

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>You should have used the Seahawks defense, because I remember

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you telling me that. I woke up somewhere I was like,

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what, Greg, should use the Seahawks def. So

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the things that I wait up and just think about it, right.

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>So I had a lot of thoughts in my mind

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>last night, none about this, but um correct. So I

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:08.559
<v Speaker 1>texted you around noon. I was like, dude, I cannot

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>start with Miami defense with broadcast wild quarterback a lot

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of for a lot of that game, they looked pretty good.

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>They did, they absolutely did, and then they didn't. Do

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>they drop Miami? I was like, all right, do I

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>pick up the Seahawks again and go, oh my gut?

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Or do they go with Carolina against Washington? Caroline's been

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. Carolina versus Washington that was a mistake. I

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>would have won obviously if I started the Seattle defense.

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I cannot get this right, so annoying. That's why you

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>should have just drafted the Jaguars defense. You could start

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>them every week, Greg, I guess, yeah, except against dek

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Prescott and the potent offense that is the Dallas Cowboys.

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>That's when you think you haven't figured it out, Greg

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Week six comes and slaps you in the face. I

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>guess so frustrated the Dolphins though, Seriously, the Dolphins, Like

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I texted both of you as sister, you and Michael Florida.

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, how does anybody figure out this Miami Dolphins teams? Weird?

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>They are like the biggest anomaly, like the biggest enigma

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of all time. How the hell do you figure out

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>this Dolphins team? Because on paper, it's like, who do

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they have? Kenyan Drake is their best player and he's

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>in a timeshare with Frank Gore, who's like forty eight

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>years old. You have Albert Wilson out here looking like

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>he's Antonio Brown, scoring monster touches brock oswhile leading a

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>miraculous comeback against arguably the best defense in the NFL.

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Are arguably? I mean they're up there. They're definitely top three?

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Your top three? Are they not? Three Bears? Defense? Is it? Okay?

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Who's better than them? The Jaguars are not playing well

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:48.079
<v Speaker 1>right now? Jaguars are better defense? Are they right now?

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about that. They haven't. They haven't been

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>great the past couple of weeks. Have they They look

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>they look great against Sam Donald and the Jets. Okay, whatever,

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bears are top three defense, rock Oz the Osweler

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>goes out there, just slings it all over the place,

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>nearly four hundred yards, three touchdowns. Again, it's when you

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>think you have everything figured out, and the Dolphins are

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>just a team that you will not be able to

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>figure out weekend and week out. And obviously I'm ruining

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>for them to lose every week because I have their

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>season under at six and a half, so that doesn't

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>look like it's gonna happen. But they're still a frustrating

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>team for fantasy. Like even if you go out and

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>pick up Albert Wilson, are you gonna start him? Like

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>there's just nothing to trust with the Miami Dolphins story.

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Sure cool. So yesterday, my my buddy always participates in

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the Million Million Maker, and every week he participates, aways

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>thing is gonna win. Obviously last week, but yesterday he goes,

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I had this is it? I got girly in my

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>line up. I'm Antonio Brown in my lineup, and I

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>got my my sneaky play in there. Who's just sneaky

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>played dude a you know, a group chat. He has

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>got a big feel about Albert Wilson today, and we're

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>all we all just start losing our minds obviously, like

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Albert Wilson with brock Oswiler starting at quarterback against the Bears. Now,

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I gotta feeling like, all right, so he starts Albert Wilson,

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sitting with my friend in a holy crap

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.599
<v Speaker 1>like this is how you win a million dollars, Like

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you start a guy like Albert Wilson. The problem is

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>he did start Albert Wilson, which is good. He also

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>started play off his lad up right now. Uh, he

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>started Antonio Brown and Todd Gurley, as I said, But

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 1>then oh, he took another shot. He went heavy on

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a team you really like Cleveland yesterday. Oh no, David

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and Joku Carlos Hide not hit and the Browns defense

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:49.439
<v Speaker 1>not hit. No, no mhm. So that was kind of

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>an isshie. Yeah, anything else with that lineup? Uh you

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>want to reveal or is that just the end of

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the story. That's very anti climate lost. I think you're

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>like the Browns. Yeah, the end of the that was

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 1>the end of the story. Who is his quarterback? I

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 1>don't know. He didn't like screenshot that part. Yeah, but

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that is how you win, right to take the shot

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>on Albert Wilson. I believe it was the Draft Kings

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>millionmaker at both Rock Goshwiler and Albert Wilson, which is

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you used it once. Like there are a few millionmakers

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>where you look at the line up and you're like,

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I could figure that out, right, And then there are

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>ones also where you're like, you know what, nobody would

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>have figured that out. This guy, I'm sure he had

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred fifty lineups, so you just kind of thrown

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:34.839
<v Speaker 1>one anyway and see what happens. And he did it

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and it worked, and it worked out very well for Miami.

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 1>He was saying, nobody can figure it out. I'm just wondering,

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>like maybe the Bears aren't that good, right, Like maybe

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe that one wasn't that hard. You were all over

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Miami defense for their defense is still really good. I

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>told you had been on Miami yesterday, like you were

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>all over Miami all week, and I thought you were

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 1>mocking you right now, all yeah, and you know what,

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the line went crazy the other way did you see,

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>like by the kind the game started was like they

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>were they were getting seven points at home when Brock

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Osweiler at the quarterback, and it made sense he made

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a mistake and it made sense you should put Look,

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't regret it, man, It's like you still still

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>would have covered I mean they still would have covered

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it if it was still plus three and a half um.

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>But just looking at like the running back situation. Obviously,

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you know Frank Gore fifteen carries in this game had

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>one reception, so sixteen touches. Saying you want about Kenyan Drake,

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it's very it's it's frustrating, you know, I thought after

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>even want to go line he was never ever again,

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah and ever maybe he won't, probably not, but and

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you know that was just I mean, the invisible man

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>came and stripped it out of his hand, like what

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.839
<v Speaker 1>happened on that plate, So I think easily could have

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:41.839
<v Speaker 1>walked in. So I think it's a bad handoff. I

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think it was my Osweiler and he just never

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>had it. It seemed like he had it and then

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like whatever, Kenyan Drake still had seventeen

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>touches in this game, So say that you want about

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he fumbled on the goal line. It's probably

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>still just going to be a fifty split next week.

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>But they faced the lines next week and they're really

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>bad against the run, and Kenyan Drake's had seventeen touches.

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think Frank Gore is kind of playing himself

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>into flex discussion. What do you think about that? I agree, man,

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Everyone laughed at me when I picked Frank Gore at

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 1>the end of the draft, every draft yourself included. We

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>haven't on our GSD team, and I went. I tried

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:13.719
<v Speaker 1>to pick him up in my other leagues as well,

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 1>just because he's getting he's getting used age. Man, I

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>dropped on a few teams first hundred yard rushier against

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bears this season. Like he's playing well, annoyingly to us,

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake owners, he's playing well. And especially we're also

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly where we were at like Week four last year

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>with Jordan Howard and Tree. Exactly where we are. I

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>have people tweeting at me asking should I trade Jordan

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Howard for Tree? So now getting the same exact questions

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 1>as we were last year. Nothing has changed. Great, It's amazing,

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>But what scares me is that his other usage percentage

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>or snap percentage has gone down each of the last

0:13:53.200 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>four weeks seven three offense has gotten better. Sigmund loom

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I retweeted it, Oh, maybe that's where maybe that's where

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I saw it from you. So Graham Barfield tweeted Jordan's

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Howard snappery over the last month. Sigmund bloom quote tweeted

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:16.559
<v Speaker 1>and said, and the effectiveness in the office is going

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>in the in the opposite direction, correct, which is true.

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Is something you obviously have to worry about the way

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that this offense is built right now right and the

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>things that Matt Maggie wants to do. The rico and

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>is better built for that. You know. The thing is,

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a simple eye test. So you can look at analysis,

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and you can look at data, and and that's great.

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You can let stuff like snap percentage look at the

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>eye test. The offense is electric with Trico and on

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the field. And I understand he's not necessarily a guy

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you won't running inside every play, but this office was

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>moving with him on the field, and it looked like

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>he was getting chunks of yardage every time he touched

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the ball. It seemed like ten yards every single time

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>he touched the ball. Well, Jordan Howard like ran pretty

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>well out of the day when he when he had opportunities,

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>he didn't look bad. He just look a lot slower

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>when he is than to Rico And and obviously he

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>also builded all the goal line this or and you

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>look what they want to do in that offense. There

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>are a lot more quick, hitting up tempo when they

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>have Treco and in the game that I mean that

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously makes a lot of sense. Do you want this

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>offense to be bogged down when you have Jordan Howard

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>who it's it's pretty much doing his job right. Like

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>he's rushing for you know, four yards to carry like

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>fourteen carries about seventy yards like he's doing fine. But

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Treco and five carries thirty one yards and a touchdown.

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>That's six yards per carry. He's targeted nine times, seven

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>receptions ninety yards. It's just that element that he brings.

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>It's different than Jordan Howard, and I think that is

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>more so what the Bears want to do right now.

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So for those asking that question, if you play in

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>PPR leagues and you have that offer on the table,

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I would rather have treco And right now than Jordan

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Howard and I know said last year, and there were

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>weeks where like it didn't work out, like Jordan Howard

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimately ended up being more effective than Tarrecohen, but that's

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>because John Fox and the Bears coaching staff from the

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>last year didn't know how to continue getting trek And

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>involved once teams had tape on him. They didn't know

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>how to do it. I think Matt Naggie and the

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>offensive minds that they have now know that, Okay, even

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>if teams look at what we've done with Tariko and

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll figure out more unique ways to get him involved,

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>so he's not just going to be bogged down like

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he was last year, or his usage is just gonna

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>start to you know, dissipate. I do think that in

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this offense and with what they're trying to do, Tariko

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>And probably makes more sense. And it was for Jordan Howard.

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Tariko and snap split. So again things are training down

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>for Jordan Howard and training up for Tree Cone the PPR.

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have Cohen listen. I completely coletly get it,

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and you can, like in standard you could probably make

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the same argument because how many touchdowns. Is Jordan Howard scoring.

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>He was very close. He scored one touchdown this year.

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>He was very close yesterday and that was in Week

0:16:56.240 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>three against the Cardinals. He was very close. Yestay having

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>averaging three and a half yards for carry this year.

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not working for Jordan Howard Man, it's not so good. Nope,

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>day break when we come back Cooper Cup. Thank God.

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Well that Daily Rodo dot Com learned from the game's

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>best DFS players. We don't just give you premier advice.

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections,

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily Rodo dot Com optimize that in minutes,

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>building optimized line up for cash games and turneys. Learned

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players joined Daily Rodo dot com.

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>H back with you. You're in the beast and that's

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the best friends forever. Where is that some pirating along?

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Are you the advocate for Barrock Osweiler? Like it? That's

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>good job of bet ds. I celebrate twenty years is

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the industry's biggest and safest betting site. They have great

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>customer service, fast he's payment winnings. You can play virtually

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>every sport. I bet d s I with hundreds of

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>waging options, including liven game wagering on all major sporting events,

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>so you can make your play and anytime during the

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>game betdas eyes. Now we're offering up to a thousand

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>dollar bonus on your first deposit if you use the

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>promo code f mds Y that's bet d SI dot com.

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 1>The promo code is f n t s Y. Hand

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>on over about d s I and start winning today.

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Listener Osweiler. So in l A yesterday or in Denver yesterday,

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I was very nervous, Frank because in my home league,

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>where I was three and two coming into the week,

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I lost Calvin Ridley earlier in the day. No, it

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>seems that he will be okay, nothing is serious, and

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>they have a Monday night or this week and then

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>they're off, so you'll have some time. I lost Calvin Ridley,

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and then I thought I lost Cooper Cup forever. Like

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>red zone flows back and I just see this dude

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>on the ground like that kind of looks like Cooper Cup.

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 1>I literally just saw like a little piece of the

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>eight and like his leg and I'm like, I I

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 1>think I think that looks like a man, Cooper, And

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>then they said it and then I saw it. I

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>was like, this is he just tore his achilles. I'll

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>never see him again. And I'm thinking, how much you

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>have to spend on Josh Reynolds. What am I gonna do?

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>And then we started the second half and they cut

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the red zone again and there's Cooper cup just running

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in motion and I'm like, all right, so they're showing

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you replay with him getting hurt. And then I see

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the bottom it's like third quarter, Like what is happening?

0:19:58.280 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>It's I. I did a little dance. I started selling

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>raining and then I read that he barely played in

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a second half. But I was just happy to see

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>him running around and and being Okay, he's alive, and well,

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.479
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't believe it. Frank, somebody upstairs is looking at

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>for Cooper Cup man and his his his NFL career

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and all of his fantasy owners for the rest of

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the season. Obviously, this was a this was a tough

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>game for him and and you know, in weeks six

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>for his fantasy owners. But just be happy that he's

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you know that he's looks like he's gonna be healthy

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna be good to go. Obviously, we'll we'll

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>learn more about that, but it just be just be

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>excited that he's not done for the year. Obviously, Robert

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Wood stepped up in his absence, or you know, Robert

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Woods ten ten targets, seven receptions, a hundred and nine yards.

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks not as good as he's been, but I'm

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>sure you can blame some of it on the weather

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it being super cold in Denver. Um. Todd Gurley was

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley, though, I'm sure you're just happy that Cooper cups. Okay, Yeah, listen,

0:20:57.480 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Robert Wood is awesome. I stand by that. I knew

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that coming into the year that he was in a

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver too, Frank, I pushed that as hard as

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I possibly could. I love Molly Woods this year. Um,

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>he's awesome, and he did step up yesterday, but no

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>more nobody stepped up more than Tod Gurley, who had

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a career high in rushing. And this is not only

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna target Denver's rushed the events. It just got awful. Yes,

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's David Johnson on Thursday night this week in

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a short week, terrible, terrible, game to watch, honest, but

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson could be very very effective. Maybe we get

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a game where you know, he averages more than like

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>three yards per carry or whatever. I don't think we will.

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I saw a stat yesterday about how the Cardinals are

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 1>on pace to run the fewest amount of offensive plays.

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:41.239
<v Speaker 1>I saw that in a season, no team has run

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>fewer than nine plays in a like in the NFL season,

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>and they're on pace to like run eight hundred. And

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it's bad. Man. This Mass Joseph thing is is bad.

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the Cardinals. Greg Well, I'm not just talking about Denver.

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, well yeah, I mean, look, they're running games

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>bad too. Yeah. The Broncos run game is terrible. I

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 1>mean a lot of people are asking, now can they

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>drop Royce Freeman. I think we're getting pretty close. Yeah,

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. I was doing. I was watching the games

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>my buddy yesterday and he's like a Royce Freeman owner.

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm just gonna drop this guy. I was like,

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll take him. Yeah, But like nobody, it's not like

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>anyone else on the team did anything. I mean, Phillip

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay four for eighteen, Devontae Booker two for fifteen. Um,

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the receivers were good, and you know, I thought that

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to Marius Thomas would have another good game and that happened.

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think now is the time to try and

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>sell him coming off two games in a row where

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>he scores a touchdown, could still kind of sell him

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>based on his name value too, So I would just

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 1>shot to Marius Thomas around, like if you could pull

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you could do this, maybe add

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>someone to to Marius Thomas and try and trade for

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Landry because he's obviously a by low Right now,

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Landry is getting double jugit targets week in a

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>week out, but just hasn't been converting them for Fantasy points.

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>And his schedule is about to get really really good.

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you can turn to Marius Thomas plus like

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>another said player for Jervis Landry, that's something I would

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>look into doing. Um, But Emmanuel Sanders was good. The

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>same way that we're targeting the Broncos secondary now, I

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>mean the Broncos defense for like rushing attacks. I think

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>we're targeting the Rams defense every single week for wide

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.959
<v Speaker 1>receivers because obviously the Rams offensive superpotent. They play from

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>ahead in a lot of games. So those other teams

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that are facing them are trailing and are going to

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>be throwing the ball to try and get back in it,

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and without a key to lead, their secondary is just

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>not the same, Greg, No, it's it's not. They are

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>burnable as well. And you saw it yesterday. You saw

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it yesterday with Shasta Imanuel Sanders. As you said, Frankie, Um,

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not the same. It's not the same, which to

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>me is great for us because that means people score

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 1>points against them and well the Rams not the score more.

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And when you go to den when you go to

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Denver talking about their secondary, they're even just is atrocious

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>advanced Joseph and that system that they have that they

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>have put together that doesn't work. That Joseph is a goner.

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Denver playing Arizona on Thursday night, that system is a disaster.

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Although I picked at the Arizona defense by the way,

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>for there the night, who wants to lose more? The

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals are the Broncos. I put the ore. I pick

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>up the Arizona events yesterday morning in preparation. But there's

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 1>inivable where's that game? Is an Arizona Denver? I'll look

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it up for you, pulling up the Broncos schedule right now.

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>That is in Arizona. Job, Greg can be low scoring.

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 1>I love it. I wonder what the I'm sure they

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 1>already have odds out for that game. I bet the

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>totals like that was weird. Yeah, we were like, we're

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>into vodka, best friends forever. M hm um. So we

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>were close with the with the Cardinals two and a

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>half point home dogs already, So that's interesting. Yep, probably

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>on the Cardinals. Yeah, I don't know. It's just like

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a gross game. But I'm sure you need something invested

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in that game in order to watch it. So I

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know. It was the NBA schedule looking like Thursday.

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh whoa little NBA acction, Greggy, I'm back man. Yeah,

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question. We sure we usually have like

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the T n T primetime games. We have three. We

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 1>got three games. Let's just on the slate, all right,

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>So T and T. We'll get the Bulls and late

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>one is the Lakers in Portland, which is fun. We

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>do we have anybody on these teams? Uh? I don't

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>think so. And then the Miami Heat and Wizards, which

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>is not tell So this is terrible here. So let's like,

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>if we watch David Johnson go up against the Broncos,

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it looks like I will be saving this week's Halloween

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Baking Championship until Thursday day night. Come on, Greg, I'll

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>do that, Dude, this is I don't have to watch

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>sports Man. We got baseball playoffs. How about Jamis Winston?

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>How about Jameis Winston? Him ranks of the top five quarterback.

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Obviously I didn't have him ranked number one. Finishes number

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 1>one right now, the number one quarterback, number one quarterback.

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know I did a few bad things yesterday,

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 1>bad tweets. You haven't called me off for bad tweets lately, Well,

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.239
<v Speaker 1>I had a bad one yesterday. Um. I tweeted out

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the picture of Ryan Fitzgregor, it's Patrick and in the

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>in the get up, I was like, can we just

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>get this guy back because we like need fantasy value.

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But it was like the first drive James marched down

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the field or a touchdown to Cameron Brake, which we

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>knew it would happen, obviously, um, and then nothing for

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.479
<v Speaker 1>like the next two and a half quarters, and then

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>we get a bunch of Jameis Winston like the fourth quarter,

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>which obviously ended up saving his fantasy day and a

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of other people's fantasy days. Uh not Mike Evans,

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>which kind of sucks, but yeah, Jamis Winston, Uh, just

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>typical James Winston. Throw for a ton of yards, through

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>for a ton of touchdowns, still throw to costly interceptions

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and James Winson. And also like Jameis Winston first first

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>touchdown of the game, Cameron Bright like, oh great, Cameron

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>break game didn't have another cat for like the rest

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of the game, and not getting the ball Mike Evans. Yeah,

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just like the one thing we need you to

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>do is give the ball to Mike Evans. Obviously, the

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 1>run game here was was still a lot of Peyton

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Harbor saw the majority of touches, even had a receiving

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in this game, something we haven't seen a lot

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of from either running back. To be honest, between Ronald

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Jones or Peyton Barbara, they haven't had a lot of

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>pass game work between those two, but yeah, Peyton Barbara

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>dominated this game. We were wondering, is it gonna be

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones coming out of the bye with him and

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston kind of starting off together. Did not happen, Greg,

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>No one did not. By the way, unrelated going back

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to Robert Woods conversation, the only wider series have more

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy points than Robert Woods. That comes from a tweet

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>from Mike Clay Adam Feelan, Tyreek Hill, Tony Brown, and

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones and then Robert Woods not five wide receiver

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>advantage football Adam Celan, Tyreek Hill, Tony Brown, Julio Jones,

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Hula Jones doing it with how many touchdowns break zero?

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy. Zero Top five Fantasy wide receiver with zero

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in the first six weeks of the season. The

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>guy might go for two thousand yards this year no touchdown? Unbelievable, man,

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>how fun would that be? Not fun? Peyton Barber thirteen

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 1>rushes for eighty two yards, So the efficiency was there.

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>This is just this is the hapless Falcons defense. That's

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>basically what this was here. Start all running backs. Like again,

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>coming into this game, the Bucks could not run the

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>football for anything, and what the Falcon struggle with is

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>allowing running backs to catch the ball. And that's exactly

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>what Peyton Barber even did in this game. So it

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>was continued to stream running backs against the Falcons. Even

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>after this week, I don't have a lot of faith

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>in Peyton Barber. I don't have a lot of faith

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>in Ronald Jones Chris Godwin go though a player was

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>only his owned in less than sixty percent of leaks. Still,

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and I asked you guys yesterday, I mean, I was

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>going back and forth, and then should I start Isaiah

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>er Well? Should I start Chris Godwin? It honestly might

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>be the difference between a win and a loss. Because

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm up thirty one, I'm going against Aaron Rodgers and

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Morris to night. It is four point passing touchdowns,

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>so I have a chance. But I believe Karwell put

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>up seven or eight points and Chris Godwin ended up

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>with That might be the difference. See the highlight on

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>ESPN behind us Tyree Hill stupidly game fast like I've

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>never seen that before. He should have been tackled easily.

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>The thing from the Patriots perspective there, how do you

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>let Tyreek Hill get that wide open in the middle

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.719
<v Speaker 1>of the field. There wasn't no but on the last touchdown,

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>like suld have seventy five yard touchdown, right, there wasn't

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>anyone within ten yards of him. It's Tyreek Hill. It's

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the one guy you can't let beat you. It was

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the same exact thing we said last year when he

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>scored that touchdown, that miraculous touchdown before the end of

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:28.959
<v Speaker 1>this uh the first half against the Dallas Cowboys were

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>they just pretty much like through a short pass Tyree

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Hill and they're like, all right, whatever, just like run

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>out the clock and he scored a touchdown. The same

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>thing happened yesterday when you're up by seven points. It's

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>just I don't know, I don't know what this. I

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the Patriots were thinking. But yeah, kudos

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to Patrick Mahomes, Tyreek Hill, the entire Chief's offense. Uh.

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I wish, I wish Kareem Hunt could just play the

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Patriots every single week an one last year six that

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>was something. Also, you know, I think about Grace Usman

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot when I when I when I wake up

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in the morning, I'm like, there are a few things

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that Greg was right about this week. The Seahawks defense

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>over the Dolphins. Yeah, you're right about that. Kareem Hunt.

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>A couple of weeks ago, I brought him up to

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of worried because at that point. I remember three

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>targets through three games. Over the next three games, Greg

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt has eleven targets, so they're you know, they

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>just they got right, they figured it out, they're being

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>smart with it. I was just worried that exactly for now.

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I was just worried that with the with all the

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>receiving options in the downfield style of Patrick Mahomes, that

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>they weren't going to throw the ball all that much

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of Kareem Hunt totally got it, but they're getting him

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:37.959
<v Speaker 1>more involved in the past game. I don't completely regret

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>trading basically Kareem Hunt for David Johnson and Julian Edelman,

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>because those are two helpful, helpful pieces. At some point,

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I might regret that when I so, I was watching

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>watching a lot of football obviously over the last over yesterday,

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and Kareem Hunt in Melvin Gordon, who went like seven

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>eight ish in the first round. Those two guys are

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>still two guys you can finish number one overall. And

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I said that, we said that during the pre drack process,

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>like both of those guys have that ability. Maybe Melvin

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Gordon's were in the offense for him, and maybe he's

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a guy. Like, why aren't we taking Melvin Gordon in

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the top five? Like, why aren't we doing that? The

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>thing is next year will be the year that we

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>finally figure it out, and then that will probably be

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the year that he lets us down. Did we pick

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>up Nils Paul last week? Wasn't that a thing? Yeah?

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean we just needed insurance in case Grank didn't

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>play our insurance, uh, spraining his MCL. He's gonna be

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>out for a while. Alright, Well, you know, it's an

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>extremely deep league where the tight ends are very bad,

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>so I don't really regret it, but I'm sure we'll

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>just be dropping Nile with Paul. Thanks for the Nile

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Paul update here. I was using it to get into

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars. It was called the transition Frank, and to

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>make fun of ourselves first. But that's fine. We still

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>own Dez Bryant that lead because Frank will let me

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>drop him. But anyway, tell tell me who we're going

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to drop him for. I think we dropped Albert Wilson

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>last week, though I think we did too. We said start,

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>we started telling Gabriel, who's awesome? This did Gabriel, He's

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a thing. He's a real thing over yards again, what's

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>going on with the Jaguars here, Frankie, Blake Bortles got

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>destroyed yesterday. The Jaguars in Dallas lost forties and seven,

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>terrible on the road. On the road. Dallas is really

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>good at home, and I think we need to understand

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that now. And something's all with Jacksonville. Maybe they need

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to start Eric Flower. Maybe that's what it is, Yeah,

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>so that we can get Blake Bortles out of the

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>pocket more because you get more rushing production out of

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Blake Bortles. Because in that same league where I told

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you I'm up by thirty one, I'm facing Rogers. I

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>had Blake Bortles in that game, and every single time

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>we got the ball, I'm like, dude, just give me

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>some garbage time Blake Bortles production. And it just didn't happen.

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Greg the guy finished with a hundred and forty nine yards,

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown and interception. They couldn't get anything going. It's

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a credit to the Dallas Cowboys defense. And I liked

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys defense as a stream. I brought that

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>up last week. But it's also just the Jaguars, like

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Blake Bortles. This guy's whole career is just a roller

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>coaster ride on a week league basis. You never know

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>which Blake Wordles you're gonna get. You never you never

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>know which play calling you're gonna get. Why can't we

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>just get the Blake Bortles and the play calling that

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we got in like Week two or Week three, whatever

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>it was against the Patriots, because they got it that week.

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>They understood, like Nathaniel Hackett got it. They put their

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>foots down, they were passing, they were being aggressive, they were,

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, using their wide receivers in creative ways. Um,

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, t J Yelden I think I'm not gonna

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>say t J Yelden is technically a better fit for

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>this team than Leonard Fournett. He's not. But Leonard Fournett

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is like a very like North South runner. He's a

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>break tackles kind of guy. Teldon is very elusive. He

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>can catch the ball. He adds a diverse element to

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>this team. I just don't know what happens in these games.

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Were like Blake Bortles forgets how to play football, and

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody around him just forgets how to like call a game.

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Credits to the Cowboys defense, but there's just an incredible

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>amount of inconsistency weekend and week out with Jacksonville Jaguars.

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>The Jaguars wide receivers continue to remain a mystery. Dallas

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>does not. Cole Beasley stepped up yesterday, had his best

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>game in years for Dak Prescott, and this Cowboys team

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is cold. Beasley worth picking up Frankie probably just because

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>there's four teams on by heading into next week, and

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>four very crucial teams to the Steelers, Packers, the Raiders

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and the Packers. So we're gonna be without a lot

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of wide receivers. Do do Antonio Brown, Davontae Adams, m

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>vs Geronimo Allison, Tyler, Lockett, Doug Ballin. Lots of wide

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>receivers gone next week. So with that being said, I

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>think Cole Beasley is gonna be an ad by the way.

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>So on Judy's team, her three starting wide receivers or

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown, Juju and Damante Adams and rr R B

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>two is marshawn eight team league play with Daniels ten team.

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>It's intensive league. Her team, her team is good, but

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>she started a tough lost yesterday. Gainst the number one team,

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:51.399
<v Speaker 1>so she's she gets really angry. She she gets really

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>really had a vision. I don't I don't think this

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>happens in that accusing Judy of like domestic violets. But

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I could just see Judy getting mad over like fantasy football.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like beating you. She yells at verbally like it's

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:06.399
<v Speaker 1>like throws. She keeps telling me she's like a block

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of cheese at you, and you have a lot of

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>cheese in your house. We just post me yesterday. She's

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>engaged with a fantasy expert, Like why does she lose?

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I go fantasy experts. I show her my team. You

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 1>don't want another team, but I want to talk about

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>when we come back, trade Beckham for like John Brown

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and like a bunch of players don funches. One of

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>them these scored. The other one is actually what I

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>want to get into NAPS and that's in Cleveland Baker

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield with Jarvis Landry and the Browns. Another wide receiver

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>that I gotta ask Frankie if we need to know

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 1>who he is to stick around more NFL Week six

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 1>reaction code Up next, Fantasy Best Friends Forever, Fantasy Sports

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network. If you're someone that needs fantasy sports advice

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>every day. The Fantasy Sports Radio Network has you covered.

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:53.919
<v Speaker 1>When you download the n T S Y Sports Radio

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Network GAP, you get the top fantasy advice every single

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>day right through the weekend. Be sure to listen to

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>our weekend moreriors like College Call Today. Welcome to College

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Football Today Weekend Fantasy Update. They called me the fantasy

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Jesus in this league is never short of exciting at

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I T L and it's so much more. Download the

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network GAP in the iTunes and Google

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 1>play Store now and keep the best fantasy experts right

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:16.439
<v Speaker 1>in your pocket all day long and all week long.

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Shot wasn't sure you're on camera. They're just dancing the

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodo NBA line about my fisers now Avala well,

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and that means you can use the same tools and

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>projections that Daily Rodo dot Com NFL Premium subscribers use

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and are using each and every week for your NBA contest.

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Freak and I were just talking NBA tomorrow night Draft tonight.

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>You've heard a lot about Daily Wonder dot coms NFL

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>do you have as optimizer here on the f n

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>T S Wire Radio Network. And now it's time for

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you those who play NBA to get in the game,

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>start winning those tournaments on FanDuel and draft Kings. With

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Daily order dot Com is produced seven million dollar winners,

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and now it's time start winning money in NBA t

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>f S. So you're playing daily fantasy sports and you

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>aren't using Daily rodo dot com, You're doing it wrong.

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I looked at Delily Rhodo before I started planning some

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 1>stuff in my video today. It helped me because Kevin

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Durant is gonna go off tomorrow night and it's gonna

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>be awesome. Gonna Daily rodo dot com. Click and go

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>premium and edge of the promo code F N T

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>s Y for a special discount and start winning today.

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 1>That's Daily rodo dot com. Click on go premium, edge

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of the promo code F and T s Y for

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a special discount and start winning today Daily rodo dot com.

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not a site where millionaires are made, Greggy, speaking

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of da dot com, Daily Rodo dot Com. I'm in

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>first place in our fan duel. Did you realize that

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you weren't last time I looked. I am number one

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, and what I did was I ran the optimizer.

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 1>I legitimately like checked off all the games that were

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 1>like over fifty game total. I was like, I want

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 1>players on these teams obviously, okay, and I basically took

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 1>their line up that they had and I made a

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:06.320
<v Speaker 1>few changes weeks which were Sammy Watkins and Miami Dolphins.

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:09.279
<v Speaker 1>So basically the things that I added contributed to the

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:12.359
<v Speaker 1>optimizer were terrible, but the optimizer got everything else right.

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I had James Winston, Nice, Evin Coleman, Okay, whatever, you

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>scored a touchdown, tie Mixing, great, Leo Jones, great, Tyler

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Boyd great, can't remember it scored a touchdown, whatever, Todd Gurley,

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:27.919
<v Speaker 1>that's Tyler. I'm in last, which is great. I'm gonna

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go out and say that you didn't have

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley. No, you know what's annoying. A lot of

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the players you mentioned I had, like I had. I

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 1>had Austin Hooper, I had temp, I had Tevin Coleman,

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I had Jamis Winston, had the Chicago Bears defense in

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the same game. Here's where I went wrong. I took

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 1>more Shawn Lynch in Revenge game. I thought that would

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 1>go well. I had um Sammy Watkins as I mentioned

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 1>really like Will Fuller yesterday that that was poor um

0:38:57.680 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Ajan Green. I was in the big game yesterday, Tyler

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 1>boy didn't stead poorly. Frank No, we don't do this often.

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>We we often, you know, call ourselves out for making mistakes,

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Greg because I think that's probably like a good way

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to live, right, Like we should hold ourselves accountable. What

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I did say last week, I did not like to

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Shawn Watson, and I had him ranked lower than the consensus.

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna go ahead and give us a little

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>pat on the back for that one. Bells your John, Frankie,

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 1>good job. The Cleveland Browns and my buddy had and

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>his million millionaire maker. It didn't work and they got

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>stopped by Francs. Lost Angeles Chargers. They're on a roll, Greggy.

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Now Los Angeles super Bowl put in the books. No,

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be it's gonna be like the Super Well,

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I've rejected the Rams and the Chiefs. How much fun

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 1>with that? That? Would? You know what? Totally fine for

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>that to happen, like if that's the case, but you know,

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>seeing a Chargers Chiefs game again, like a rematch in

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs would also be fun. I believe Chargers Chiefs

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>not really interested. Chargers Chiefs hatch Chiefs in the quarterfinals,

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and then we get Patch Chiefs and said me finals

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 1>like the NFC Championship, and then the A and then

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and then the Chiefs Rams. Super Bowl? Interesting where the

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Rams win? Because I obviously have money on them. Sure

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you have money on them? Do I get any of

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that money? Right now? My buddy is like a pool yesterday.

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Who did you have as your preseason Super Bowl prediction? Rams, Chiefs?

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>What did you actually? Yeah, I'll pull I just closed them,

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>pull it right back up. Did you have the Chiefs? Dude?

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>You know I love the Chiefs. Like the Chiefs. I

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>know you had their over on the season. I have

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Rams over Chiefs in the super Bowl for real? All right,

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 1>it's right there, you go get Rams Chiefs. What else

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:36.960
<v Speaker 1>do we have over here? I'll look at that. Did

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you have Rams over the Chiefs? Your NFL m d

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 1>P was Philip Rivers, min was Aaron Rodgers, not of

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>which Rivers has been very good. I'll get you talk girl.

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 1>At this point, we both took Sequon Barkley as the

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>NFL Rookie of the Year. I thought the Giants were

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the NFC East. That seems gonnastake NFC least like I

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>had the Cardinals making the water. Yeah, they're gonna win

0:40:57.600 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the the vision. It seems wrong. I have the Texans

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and Ravens cards. What seems possible. Texans, No, they're a

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>bad teams. Good, definitely Division I. The Steelers, I don't know.

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>The Bengal of Bengals are good. You're the Titans and

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars and wild Card you also you have three sound

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>um your Falcons are wild Cards again, No, that's not

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. Everything else is pretty good. Were you doing

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 1>all right, Frank? It's pretty cool. The Browns, all right,

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 1>it's kinda the Browns. So what what's going wrong here?

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 1>What's going wrong with the Cleveland Browns? With Baker Mayfield?

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:31.439
<v Speaker 1>I realized I lost some weapons. You're certainly Josh Gordy

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and Rochard Higgins and we thought they had had a

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Jokey would step up score Touchton yesterday? So he did.

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 1>That was good. All targets, back to back games, double

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 1>digit targets, very strong. Jarvis Landry disappeared, Antonio Callaway kind

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of disappeared, the leading receiver, the doubt for the Cleveland

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Browns yesterday. He was like signed a week ago. His

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:57.880
<v Speaker 1>name Damian Ratley six eight two eight targets yesterday. I

0:41:57.960 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 1>really like do Johnson picked up everywhere. I told you

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 1>that this week bad four or seventy three wasn't a

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:05.880
<v Speaker 1>little that muchly five times, but okay, that's a big key.

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:09.240
<v Speaker 1>They have to get it more involved. What's going on Cleveland?

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Frankie Well, I think obviously it all starts at the

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterback position with Baker Mayfield. And you look over the

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>last three games. This was a guy who the most

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>accurate passer in college football history the past three games

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>greg forty seven point eight percent completion percentage. That was

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 1>yesterday twenty two forty six not great against the Ravens

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:30.520
<v Speaker 1>also a tough matchup, but twenty five or forty three

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a fifty eight percent completion percentage. And then against

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders in an overtime loss, he threw the ball

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>forty times only completed twenty one fifty one two percent

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>completion percentage. Over the past three games, Baker Mayfield has

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 1>not been very accurate. Now, that could be a combination

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of the offensive line not playing well, uh teams throwing

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:52.240
<v Speaker 1>exotic blitz is away. He is a rookie, so obviously

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna find ways to make his life uncomfortable. But honestly,

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield has not looked great over the past few weeks.

0:42:57.920 --> 0:42:59.839
<v Speaker 1>And we look at the targets for in Joe Couli

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 1>get the targets for Jarvis Landry. We continue to talk

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>about that every single week. But to be honest, besides

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:08.400
<v Speaker 1>in Joeku scoring, you know, having seven receptions and scoring

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown in this game, everyone else was not efficient.

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And Jarvis Landry the past couple of weeks, Yes, he's

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>been getting targets, he's not been efficient. He had nine

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>targets in this game. He had two receptions for eleven yards.

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Callaway, mind you, I mean he had some drops

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in this game too. Ten targets, two receptions, nine yards.

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:28.360
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of inefficiency right now with the Cleveland

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Browns and Damien Ratley. Honestly, I didn't know the guy's

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 1>name before yesterday when I was watching I was flipping

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>through a few like pregame shows yesterday and I was

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 1>watching the Fantasy whatever on ESPN, and Mortenson Chris Mortenson

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>brought up Damien Ratley. He was like, this is my

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:47.719
<v Speaker 1>fantasy is super long, crazy, and he's like, he's gonna

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>be targeted like seven or eight times to because the

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns have been talking him up throughout the week.

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>You were targeted eight times. He had six receptions for

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:57.160
<v Speaker 1>eighty two yards. So I think he's a name that's

0:43:57.200 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on our radar. I think in deeper leagues we might

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:01.319
<v Speaker 1>be looking at him just as like a sleeper ad

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>because there hasn't been a number two wide receiver to

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 1>step up for the Cleveland Browns. But there's inefficient quarterback

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:09.919
<v Speaker 1>play right now. Um, the play calling has not been great.

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 1>I know some people have been criticizing Todd Haley. Um,

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>they haven't been able to run the football effectively. So

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 1>all those things kind of coupled together are going to

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>lead to an offense not playing very well right now?

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Am I gonna regret taking a Baker Mayfield and not

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 1>picking up James Winston? Yes? I don't know about that.

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Why not about that? I think James Winsons will be

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 1>overrated this week because he faced Atlanta Like that's a

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a perfect match. A man, Here's I think it's

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you just look at it from a game flow perspective.

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 1>The Cleveland Browns defense, although they did get she lacked

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in this game, they allowed thirty eight points. Pretty good.

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Their defense is good top three going No, they're not

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:48.440
<v Speaker 1>top three. Didn't say top three. They were top five

0:44:48.480 --> 0:44:52.399
<v Speaker 1>fantasy scoring defense last week heading into Week six. There's

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 1>still a good defense. I still trust their defense. They're

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be in lower scoring games than the Bucks are

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>just because of game flow. James winston Ant offense is terrible.

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be a lot of you know, garbage time,

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>him playing from behind, having opportunities to throw the ball.

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I think it's Jamis Winston in a landslide,

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's not going to be very close. The way

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're using Jarvis Landry right now playing on the outside,

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>they're using him in that Antonio Brown roll from the

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Steelers offense. That's what that was, Todd Haley's offense that

0:45:21.560 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 1>he ran. They're using Jarvis Landry in that role. Is

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it fair to say that, you know, maybe he was

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 1>just better in his in his Miami Dolphins role. What

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 1>he was good at being a slot receiver, you know,

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>catching a lot of passes at the line of scrimmage

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and making things happen after the catch. We're not seeing

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that this year. I know, you know. Air yards is

0:45:39.440 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>something that's being criticized here on the network right now,

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 1>but Jarvis Landry has more air yards this year than

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 1>like he's ever happened. They're targeting him down the field.

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they should use him in the ways that he

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>was successful and that's a lot of shore passes and

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>letting him, do you know, do things after the catch. Yeah,

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it's been a bit of a disaster for Jarvis Landry

0:45:56.960 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of weeks, just one touchdown on

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the year, and I'm nervous and I like Baker Mayfield,

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 1>this Ratley character. Is he worth picking up? I think

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in deeper leagues he's on your radar um just because

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:12.440
<v Speaker 1>no number two wide receiver for this team is stepped up.

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And I know you mentioned that you like Caloi because

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be usage there because Richard Higgins is out.

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Makes sense and the opportunity was still there, but only

0:46:22.160 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 1>converted two of those. And that's a lot of what

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:25.759
<v Speaker 1>we've seen out of Caloi this year. It still looks

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:28.919
<v Speaker 1>very raw, has a lot of things to to learn

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to excel at the NFL level. I think this Ratley

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 1>guy is at least on our radar. He could be

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>like an end of the bench kind of pick up

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in deeper leagues for sure, and your standard like twelve

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:42.839
<v Speaker 1>team five bench spots probably not okay? Would you rather

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>own Damian Ratley? It was like saying that. Or Tyrelle

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Williams same game yesterday. He had amazing He had one

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:51.800
<v Speaker 1>amazing drive. He had like a forty five yard reception

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and then like a thirty yard touchdown. It worked out well.

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Those are two of his three catches, three for one eighteen.

0:46:58.320 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 1>That's it. Mhm, who'd uther knowing rightly? Or with Tyra Williams.

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:05.239
<v Speaker 1>I think I'd rather own Tyro Williams, But honestly, I'm

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:08.320
<v Speaker 1>not rushing to get either. This Tyroll Williams reminds me

0:47:08.400 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Robby Anderson from a week ago. Like

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:12.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't do it on a lot of targets, had a

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:14.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of long catches for the He had the two

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:17.879
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns over a hundred yards, but its usage has still

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:20.799
<v Speaker 1>been very inconsistent a weekend a week out. Keenan Allen

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:22.880
<v Speaker 1>is still gonna be the top target getter. They target

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon a ton this year out of the out

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:30.239
<v Speaker 1>of the backfield as a receiver. Um, so I don't

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 1>love either. I'd probably take a shot on Tyro Williams

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:34.239
<v Speaker 1>just because I think it's a more efficient offense. Neither

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of the more up to Sampa offense, so neither of

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>them will highlight your waiver or wire guys for tomorrow.

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I have to look at two matchups because again with

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 1>those four teams on a buy like one of these

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:47.399
<v Speaker 1>players might end up being a streamable player. The Chiefs

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:50.239
<v Speaker 1>are going up against the Titans at nine thirties, so

0:47:50.360 --> 0:47:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that's probably a London game, I'm assuming, And the Cleveland

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Browns are going up against the Tampa Bay Bucks. So

0:47:58.360 --> 0:47:59.800
<v Speaker 1>if I'm gonna take you shot on one of probably

0:47:59.840 --> 0:48:03.759
<v Speaker 1>rabble and that's assuming Chard Higgins is out. Hen keep

0:48:03.760 --> 0:48:07.000
<v Speaker 1>wanting to call him THEO Ratt Left. That's a blast

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:09.279
<v Speaker 1>from the past. He's usually a pretty good fanasy player.

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Tyroll Williams, Greig Mike Williams. Is he droppable? I think

0:48:14.400 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 1>he is sucks man. It looked like it was happening

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and then in any of the season. But to be honest,

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the way that the charges are playing, they just don't

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 1>have to throw the ball all that much like the

0:48:26.120 --> 0:48:29.239
<v Speaker 1>way Melvin Gordon. And when they do for the ball,

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it's either to Keenan Allen or it's to Melvin Gordon.

0:48:31.640 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Right Lovin Gordon's his targets share on the season. I mean,

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 1>it's up there among the elite at the running back position.

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:39.279
<v Speaker 1>He's being used more in the past game than we,

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, even we could have expected. So I just

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know that there's enough opportunity in the past game

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:47.600
<v Speaker 1>both Mike Williams and Keane now And and Melvin Gordon

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and Tyro Williams to all get there's It's sad to say,

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:52.840
<v Speaker 1>but I think Mike Williams the borderline droppable player. I

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:54.400
<v Speaker 1>think he is. We'll talk more about that when we

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:57.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about our drop players on tomorrow's show. With that,

0:48:57.400 --> 0:48:59.879
<v Speaker 1>will say goodbye to our YouTube audience The Fantasy Both

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 1>as He Comes Your Way next with Corey Parson Jim

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Day and The Closer Chris Venture. If you enjoined the show,

0:49:05.040 --> 0:49:07.799
<v Speaker 1>please subscribe on iTunes, rate us five stories, give us

0:49:07.840 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a comment. We sincerely, sincerely appreciate it. Frankie, we got

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a game tonight, Green Bay and San Francisco. The spread

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>sits at what sir? It's currently green Bay Lane nine

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 1>at home against c J beat Hard in the potent

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:23.080
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners offense. Can I can I be honest with

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:26.800
<v Speaker 1>both you for a second? You say it, Dane says it,

0:49:27.280 --> 0:49:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Corey says it. I believe Corey was the first one

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:31.319
<v Speaker 1>to say it. To be fair, Corey was the first

0:49:31.360 --> 0:49:34.719
<v Speaker 1>one to say beat hard really was the first pon,

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>first person to look at c J. Beathard to be

0:49:37.280 --> 0:49:41.759
<v Speaker 1>like wheatod it's pretty funny, but like Mr Sussman is

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:44.799
<v Speaker 1>here again, everyone does it down the fun find something

0:49:44.840 --> 0:49:49.360
<v Speaker 1>more creative. All right, where's your creativity? What do you

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:51.880
<v Speaker 1>want to say about the packers of the forty Niners offense?

0:49:51.920 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think they're gonna get stopped, But like

0:49:54.000 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 1>so you would take the package. I know Gay likes Niners,

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 1>but that's just a suckers play. You just know better

0:49:57.640 --> 0:50:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of bad teams, and Matters are bad team. In Lambeau

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Monday night, you'd have been on the c J beat Hard.

0:50:02.080 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Look about that. Oh, now you're allowed to say CJ

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:09.919
<v Speaker 1>beat I was proving a point. I was proving a point.

0:50:11.000 --> 0:50:12.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's a It's a tough tough game

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to call. If I had to choose one, I would

0:50:14.480 --> 0:50:16.000
<v Speaker 1>probably take the forty nine Ers two, just because I

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:18.239
<v Speaker 1>don't trust the Packers defense. They have a lot of

0:50:18.239 --> 0:50:20.920
<v Speaker 1>injuries in that secondary. Right now, Greg, Oh, I get it, man,

0:50:21.800 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Probably this is a backdoor covered is what you're looking for?

0:50:24.560 --> 0:50:29.520
<v Speaker 1>The VS back there m V s plat him in

0:50:29.560 --> 0:50:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the secondary. Just do it. I mean, he's a big,

0:50:31.960 --> 0:50:35.319
<v Speaker 1>duty's fast right the hands team. We have the game

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:37.399
<v Speaker 1>total at forty six and a half. An now, I'd

0:50:37.400 --> 0:50:39.840
<v Speaker 1>probably take the over. They'll bang that over, no problem,

0:50:40.000 --> 0:50:43.560
<v Speaker 1>bang that over over, beat hard that over. We got

0:50:43.640 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a gosh, no creative. There you go, and you're still

0:50:47.600 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 1>using beat hard though. Else you want to measure from yesterday? Quickly?

0:50:50.840 --> 0:50:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Um Nick Peterman got in the game, Josh Allen got

0:50:52.960 --> 0:50:55.600
<v Speaker 1>hurt yesterday and believe it's an elbow injury for him

0:50:55.920 --> 0:50:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in classic Nate Peterman fashion, through a game tying touchdown

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and then I backbreaking pick six. Hilarious. Ye, I don't

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:06.799
<v Speaker 1>really have much from that game. Year be back next week, right,

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the rumor he is eligible to start practicing this week.

0:51:10.120 --> 0:51:12.279
<v Speaker 1>He can come off the publist. I don't know how

0:51:12.360 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 1>much he's gonna be used right away. They'll probably slowly

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 1>work him in, but I wouldn't be uh shocked if

0:51:18.400 --> 0:51:21.160
<v Speaker 1>again he is the starter over the next couple of

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:23.479
<v Speaker 1>weeks soon. And that's something we highlighted in last week's

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Waiver Wire show. I thought, you know, this was a

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:28.040
<v Speaker 1>game that could have been for Dalvin Cook and his

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 1>fantasy owners, but obviously he missed it. I think it

0:51:30.600 --> 0:51:32.319
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense in a game where they

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 1>were favored by ten and a half points at home.

0:51:34.719 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 1>But Let'savius Murray looked awesome. So again, continue to stream

0:51:38.680 --> 0:51:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you running backs against the Cardinals. Yeah. I think that's

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the real thing that Denver. I'm happy that they

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:44.279
<v Speaker 1>sat out to Avin Cooked though, like, let's get this

0:51:44.360 --> 0:51:48.240
<v Speaker 1>guy healthy, man. Yeah, it was a smart decision by them. Also,

0:51:48.560 --> 0:51:53.919
<v Speaker 1>yesterday sand really good for the Jets. Oh Diddy, Greg, Yeah,

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:56.400
<v Speaker 1>he did, is why I said it. Sure you'd rather

0:51:56.440 --> 0:51:59.440
<v Speaker 1>have him on your team that sick one Barkley. No,

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I just agree. He's very good. Barkley best running back

0:52:03.640 --> 0:52:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. If Justin Herbert is good, can you

0:52:05.960 --> 0:52:10.040
<v Speaker 1>play quarterback Justin Herbert is good. Then yeah, yeah, that's

0:52:10.040 --> 0:52:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a new thing. Yeah, I don't it's any thing. I

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:15.640
<v Speaker 1>don't reely like Oregan quarterbacks, this combination. Admittedly I don't

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:18.000
<v Speaker 1>watch an ounce of college football, but everything that I've

0:52:18.080 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 1>read and seen is that scouts are quote unimpressed by

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:23.200
<v Speaker 1>this year's draft class. There's still a lot of college

0:52:23.200 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 1>football play. Obviously, here's the here's the problem. So I

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>just pulled up a picture of this guy. This guy,

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:30.120
<v Speaker 1>this guy can't be the starting quarterback in here Giants.

0:52:31.120 --> 0:52:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, this this guy, No, no, no, no, this

0:52:33.560 --> 0:52:36.479
<v Speaker 1>this this, this, this is not gonna work. We can't

0:52:36.520 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 1>make this happen. It's like a ninth grader from Long Island.

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that was an old picture. Oh he has long hair.

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's more recently. That'd be cool. Oh no, this

0:52:45.480 --> 0:52:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is pretty boy, pretty boy quarterback in the Giants. Greg,

0:52:48.160 --> 0:52:50.919
<v Speaker 1>this is not good. This, this is this is bad.

0:52:51.280 --> 0:52:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Aren't you the one who told me that, like quarterbacks

0:52:53.000 --> 0:52:56.719
<v Speaker 1>in Oregon, offenses don't really trans Joe Harrington has been

0:52:56.719 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a disaster. Joe Harrington, the Ducks, the way, the culture

0:53:00.719 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 1>so bad. Andrew Luck awesome. Every week for a fantasy perspective,

0:53:04.920 --> 0:53:06.560
<v Speaker 1>just going back to the Sam Donald stuff, though he

0:53:06.960 --> 0:53:10.359
<v Speaker 1>honestly did look impressive. Had the Jets defense look great too.

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Marlon Mack basically handed him a pick six,

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you know that early like they tried a little dump

0:53:15.200 --> 0:53:17.279
<v Speaker 1>off past him. He bobbled it right into the hands

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:19.399
<v Speaker 1>of Mo claiborne. They bring that back for a pick six.

0:53:19.719 --> 0:53:21.799
<v Speaker 1>So the Jets training in the right direction. I don't

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:24.200
<v Speaker 1>know if you've seen Dan Orlovsky, who's like trying to

0:53:24.280 --> 0:53:29.120
<v Speaker 1>break into uh like he's doing like his breakdown. He's

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:31.120
<v Speaker 1>doing his breakdowns and he had an awesome one today

0:53:31.160 --> 0:53:34.000
<v Speaker 1>for Sam Donald. So it's a fun time. Look, he

0:53:34.120 --> 0:53:36.560
<v Speaker 1>still makes some ricky mistakes that that interception that he

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty much just floated up like you're gonna get one

0:53:39.120 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of those per game out of Sam Donald, but he

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:43.520
<v Speaker 1>also makes plays like he did on that's real prior

0:53:43.560 --> 0:53:46.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdown where he just youngest starting quarterback in the NFL,

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:49.239
<v Speaker 1>and he looks good. I'm excited about him for the

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:51.200
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years. Fantasy Well friends, he comes your

0:53:51.200 --> 0:53:53.879
<v Speaker 1>way next Corey Jim and of course the closer Chris

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Vedra For Franky Stamble, my name is Greg. Thank you

0:53:56.760 --> 0:53:58.920
<v Speaker 1>so much. For watching The Fantasy best Friends Forever. We'll

0:53:58.920 --> 0:54:01.040
<v Speaker 1>do it all again tomorrow, we hope.