WEBVTT - Does Golf Need a Shot Clock?

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my.

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Ball in a brid egg Friday Egg, the dreadit Frida Egg,

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Frida Egg, Frida egg bride.

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Egg Lie, I'm about ready to run off the golf course.

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another edition of the Friday Egg Podcast.

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is with Barry's for Luga from the Washington Post.

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Barry writes about baseball a lot. He covers the Washington

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Nationals as well as, uh, you know, just general baseball

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>topics for the Washington Post. He also covers golf for

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Post, so he was at the Masters. He

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>goes to the major Championships. See Barry out on the

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>golf beat as well it you know, I've been wanting

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to do this pod for a few weeks now. With

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the new rules with Major League Baseball, Major League Baseball

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:18.919
<v Speaker 1>obviously has undergone a pretty substantial change in the rules

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of the game for this year. The intentions of them

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>really were to modernize the game, speed up the game,

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>make the game more appealing to a younger audience, and

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>they've instituted things such as a pitch clock, bigger bases,

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and really, you know, this is a seismic change for

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a sport that has held long standing traditions history. You know,

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it might sound familiar to another sport we talk about

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot on this podcast. Golf. Obviously, pace of play

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>has come to a head in recent weeks. You know,

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I think slightly unfairly, I think Patrick Cantley has become

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the boy for this. There are a lot of slow golfers.

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Cantley obviously is in contentional lot. He's one of

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the best players in the world. So it kind of

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>comes to light. But let's not act like there isn't

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a hundred slow players on the PGA Tour. Patrick Cantley

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is one of those. It does not excuse him, but

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it also you know, I think one of the one

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 1>of the big issues in golf is that the governing

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>bodies of the sport, the PGA Tour, the USGA, the RNA,

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>don't do anything to really penalize slow play. We've had

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>two instances really in the last ten years of slow

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>play being penalized. One of them was said Decky Matsiama

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Open Championship when he was eighteen years old

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>at Mierfield. So if it's not being monitored, what Patrick

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Cantley is doing is using the rules to the best

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of his advantage to play the best possible golf. Now,

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the bigger question it shouldn't be let's crucify Patrick Cantlay

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and Kim an example. It should be more discussing, Hey,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>what are the rules of the game. What's important to

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:12.279
<v Speaker 1>the game of golf is the ability to make decisions

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>under the gun and read putts quickly A big part

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of golf, Like, is that an important part of the sport?

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it is. Others might disagree, But if you

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>think about the product of golf, where it's going, what

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you want golf to be in the next hundred years,

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is pace of play important to the product of golf?

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you could make an argument that says

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it isn't you know these rounds where we were approaching

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>five hours with twusome's in golf on weekends. That's not

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>good for the sport. It makes it hard to televise

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that there's all these other trickle down effects. So the

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>point of this conversation with Barry and I you know,

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you know I don't like to say, I

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>think it turned out better than I anticipated. I was

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>hopeful that this would be a pod that really translated

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and that Barry would kind of understand where I was

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>going with it, and he really did and provided a

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of expertise on what baseball and is doing and

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>how it relates back to golf. You know, I think

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that this is the type of things that the sport

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 1>of golf needs to be looking at. It is a

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>bit unique with the way it's structured, but if you

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>look at every major league sport, whether it's baseball, hockey, football, basketball,

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>they are constantly testing and looking at ways that they

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>can improve their game, improve their product on television because

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 1>they understand in order to stay relevant, in order to

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>stay popular across generations, you need to make modifications evolutions

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to the game that appeal to the next generation. Baseball

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>has done this. One of the things that they looked

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>at was case of their games, and they have done

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it masterfully with this pitchclock. They're a month into it

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and really it's been phenomenal for the sport. So, without

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>further ado, we are going to get into this topic.

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think these are there are a

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of things in here. A lot of things in

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>other sports that they are doing that golf really should

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.559
<v Speaker 1>look at in terms of modernizing the game and making

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the professional game more appealing to a wider range of people.

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Barry, thanks for coming on. This is gonna

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit different podcast than than our normal topic.

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk. We're gonna talk a lot about baseball.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>But I promise everybody there's going to be a tie

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>back to golf here that there's a method to the madness. Barry,

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you cover both baseball and golf. I'm curious, just off

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the off the time up, you know, what, what's your

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 1>favorite aspect about covering each sport? Like is there something

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that you you know when you're at the Masters that

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you said sin that you're like, I love covering golf,

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and and when when baseball season kicks up, like, what

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>are you most excited about?

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 2>You know? I mean there's an old saying about sports

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 2>writing that the the smaller the ball, the better the writing,

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 2>And so the two smallest balls are baseball and golf.

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's literally true, but there's certainly

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 2>if you go through the litany of legendary sports writers

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 2>like there's the Herbert Warren Wins and the you know,

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Peter Gammons, and they're they're kind of are baseball and

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 2>golf writers. You don't think as much of the you know,

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 2>literary flair around football necessarily, So I mean from a

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 2>from a professional like aspiring to write well person, those

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 2>two sports, for whatever reason, lend themselves to good storylines

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 2>and good storytelling, and I do like them both, and

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 2>i'd like I think I like them both differently. I

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 2>love the flow of a golf tournament of a major

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 2>week and you know kind of what to expect on

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Tuesdays and all the anticipation and and getting into the

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 2>actual competition, and then you know, yesterday, for instance, I

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 2>went up to Camding Yards and it's a sunny Wednesday

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 2>afternoon for a one pm start between the Red Sox

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 2>and the Orioles, and it feels like the whole summer

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 2>is stretched out before you you see a nice, clean

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 2>baseball game. I love them both kind of, I would

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 2>say similarly and and differently. There's a different flow, but

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 2>they also involve a lot of super insightful characters and storytellers,

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 2>So I love them both.

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I imagine baseball like the dog days of you know

0:07:56.280 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the famous baseball the dog days like of August? Is

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that really like the dog days of being a sports

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>writer and being at like game one hundred and twenty

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it is on the calendar, and just you know,

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>if your team's not if you if you've got a

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>bad team you're covering, it's gotta be just just an

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>absolute drive to write every day.

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 2>For sure, for sure. And that's you know, back when

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I was the beat writer, I covered the Washington Nationals

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 2>for their first three and a half seasons, you know,

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 2>of their existence. Like, yeah, you'd get to you know,

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 2>you're on a one hundred lost pace and you get

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 2>to August and you know it's the eighth day of

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 2>an eleven day road trip, and it's not it's not easy.

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 2>I used to try to, you know, walking into the park,

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 2>say Okay, what's important and what's interesting about this team

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 2>on this day and try to gear myself up for

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, not making it game one twenty out of

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 2>one sixty two kind of a silo, but making it

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.839
<v Speaker 2>a chapter that tells that one hundred and sixty two

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 2>game game story. And when you find those those threads

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 2>that hold the season together. It makes it more interesting.

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 2>But you do I'm not going to say in those

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 2>days for the Beat writers that it's not a slog.

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 2>It can you can love the game and it can

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 2>be a slog in late August when you can't quite

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 2>see the finish line yet, you know there's there's still

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 2>quite a bit to go for a season that might

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 2>be going nowhere.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.839
<v Speaker 1>That that's good advice. That's that's great advice. I might

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>take it to heart this week with the Mexico Open

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>with one one player in the top ten, me wondering

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>what are we doing having this event right? You know,

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just a chapter. It's a chapter in the season

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>long book. You know we need we need William mcgert

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in the field for that for that chapter. It makes

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 1>it more interesting. So to get into what I wanted

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about here today, you know, baseball has gone

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>through some I think, I think pretty major rules changes

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 1>for the year. There are a few changes they aren't

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you know that obviously everybody's talking about the pitch clock.

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>So the pitch clock is is the big change. There's

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>now a timer that between pitches players, you know, the

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>X amount of times the pitcher can throw the ball.

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And anytime the batter's got to be ready in that

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>time frame. Obviously that that was untimed before it could

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>be however long you really wanted to throw a pitch.

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>You have bigger bases, and the shift has been eliminated.

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>So I got those are the three big ones, right.

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>What I'd love to hear about a little bit is like,

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>from your view, what were the prevalent trends in the

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>game before these changes, and you know kind of where

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>what was like if you could zoom out a little,

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>what was what was happening to baseball the last five

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to ten years.

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 2>So in addition to games getting longer, just in terms

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 2>of enduring what last year was a three hour and

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 2>four minute game, there's been a real imbalance in baseball

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 2>over the last decade. Teams have fetishized velocity from pitchers

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 2>and really sought to develop it over all other qualities.

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 2>And that's really led to a few things. What was

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, when we were growing up, what were the

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 2>big narratives about a baseball game? Who's pitching that night?

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 2>That was kind of defined what the matchup was going

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 2>to be. Was it going to be two aces against

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 2>each other? Was a lopsided matchup, and the job of

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 2>those pitchers in the seventies and the eighties was to

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 2>finish the game and shake the catcher's hand at the end.

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 2>And what the job of the starting pitcher has become

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 2>is to throw as hard as you can for as

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 2>long as you can, and we'll come get you in

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:06.199
<v Speaker 2>the fourth, fifth, maybe sixth inning, and we're going to

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:09.839
<v Speaker 2>hand the ball over to a series of dudes that

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 2>throw ninety eight and have ridiculous sliders, and they're going

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 2>to go all out. And the only way the offense

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 2>could counter was to swing. You know, there were no

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.839
<v Speaker 2>controlled swings. We're swinging up, we're swinging for launch angle,

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 2>we're swinging to hit the ball out of the park.

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 2>So what happened was you had strikeouts going up every

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 2>year since two thousand and five, new record every single year.

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 2>But also homer is starting to go up and no action.

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Like I always say, like, what's more interesting in baseball?

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 2>A solo home run where you watch the ball go

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 2>out and the guy jogs around or somebody you know,

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 2>a run around first and a ball into the right

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 2>field corner and now you have to look at the

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 2>right fielder and the cutoff man, and then the third

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 2>base coach, and is the runner is. You know, there's

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 2>five or six things that are going on over a

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 2>longer speriod period of time in that play where the

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>home run is is is boring. So that's a long

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 2>witted way of saying that all of those things had

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 2>the game out of whack, and then it was taking longer,

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 2>too long, and those you know, four hour postseason games

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 2>that no ten year old kid on the East Coast

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 2>could see the end of, you know, really threatening to

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 2>kill the game. So change was needed. Change was necessary.

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 2>They made some really fundamental changes and it's already having

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 2>a big impact.

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think people would push back obviously immediately on

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the homer being less interesting, But when when you think

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>about it, like, what makes a homer special is when

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they're scarce, when you know they aren't the prevalent way

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>people score runs, right, Like, it's I think it's really similar.

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want to get too into the comparisons

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to golf, but with a long drive, right, everybody says like, oh,

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>they're super long drives, but if everybody hits the long drive,

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>what is a long drive? Right? I remember growing up

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously I grew up in a Bridge era in the

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>ninety I mean, I remember early nineties baseball, and then

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I was a Cubs. I grew up a Cubs fan,

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>so I had the Sammy Sosid Mark McGuire steroid fest.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's okay to say on a golf podcast

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>where everybody's launching homers, but it was still like, you know,

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you saw like the metamorphos of you talked about the

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Orioles games of a Brady Anderson going from a nine

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>home run guy.

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 2>To fifty home run.

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, when all of a sudden everybody's hitting thirty to

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty homers. It's not of a crazy phenomenon. It's almost

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>like a diminishing return, right is the home run when

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple, you know, when there might be one

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a game. It's really an amazing spectacle that home run.

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>But the idea of manufacturing runs and the tension that

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>comes with having to really work for runs, I think

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>is I think that's what people fall in love with

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>every playoff. In the playoffs, where I feel like runs

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>become a little bit more scarce than in the regular season.

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's this is just somebody that

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>usually watches baseball, but runs get a little bit more scarce.

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of what the lure of baseball is

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is when you have to, you know, generate the runs

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>rather than just, you know, they just appear.

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I mean, I'll just use that game that

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I went to yesterday, the Oriols one sixty two of

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 2>the Red Sox. The Red Sox had one of the

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 2>runs on a solo homer, but the Orioles they had

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 2>two sacrifice bunts to move guys just from first and

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 2>second to second and third. They I'm not going to

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 2>argue that the sacrifice fly is a particularly interesting play,

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 2>but at least if there's gonna be a play at

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the plate, like, there's some tension there. The guy's setting up,

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 2>you've got places to turn your head and different. You know,

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 2>again the third base coach is he gonna send him?

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 2>What's the timing here? So the Oriols win a game

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 2>six to two in which you know, they had twelve hits,

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 2>that's action each one of those hits is you know,

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 2>I think there's more tension. And I don't want to

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 2>sound like some sort of home run fascist, but like

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 2>there's more tension in a single to write with a

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 2>guy on first and you're evaluating, Okay, is this guy

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna go for thirty? Is there going to be a

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 2>play at third? There's just there's more action, and then

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 2>you take what we're really here to talk about is

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 2>the pitch clock, meaning that the next play comes more quickly.

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 2>There's just more reason to be engaged all the time.

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 2>You don't lose track of how many outs are there,

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 2>how you know what's the count. You're you're more locked

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 2>in because you have to be here. You're gonna miss stuff.

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>A great way to synthesize this would be if, as

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about that, I was thinking about going

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>back to my youth when I try what I keep score,

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, manually keep score, and how simple solo home

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>runs are versus when you have a guy on first,

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.959
<v Speaker 1>you have sacrifice, like all the little intricacies of of

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>keeping that perfect scorecard. You know, you know when that happens,

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know that it's it's funny because like you

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>think about like a guy going to third, like you

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>signifying all that while you're keeping score, would be like

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a perfect way to visualize what you're talking about, like

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the interest in the game so.

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna grab from my trash, uh the score my

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 2>scorecard from yesterday.

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, wait, this might be the video video cutout right.

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so but anyway, you're you're totally right, Like you

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 2>probably can't see this, but that's this is the orial

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 2>side of the board and all this stuff where the

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 2>runs are scored and there's a sack here and I

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 2>keep track of which which hit place in the lineup

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 2>moves the guys over, and how did you know? That?

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 2>To me tells a more interesting story then then if

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 2>we go to the Red Sox, like here's the solo homers, Like, okay, yeah,

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 2>let us let off the inning with the solo homer,

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 2>it's just like a block. Like we may be getting

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 2>too deep in the in the weeds. But I'm sure

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>there are nerds who listen to this podcast and and

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing nerdier than than doing that and believing that

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 2>it it tells a story about the game.

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think that you could say the same thing

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>with with golf, right it's you know, when you have

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to hit more shots, that's just like what we're talking

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>about here. And I didn't mean to get into the

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>comparisons directly, but like you know, when when players are

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.439
<v Speaker 1>forced to hit more shots, just like there, when there

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:55.479
<v Speaker 1>are more possible outcomes in in baseball, you could bunt,

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you could try and hit and run, you could try

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know you want to hit to the left

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>side of the enfield, you know, or the right side

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of the enfield to move the right side of the enfield,

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>move a guy from second to third, Like you know,

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>when you have these these more varied outcomes in golf,

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it's okay should I lay up on a par five,

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>like what we saw with the changes that Augusta National

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>has made, for example, where it's not a foregone conclusion

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>if I hit the fairway that I am going for

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the green in two, like the idea that there was

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>even a thought in players heads, even though they all

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>ended up going for it again, but like even though

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>there was a thought, there was discourse before the week.

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 1>It made it more interesting because all of a sudden,

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>when they're they hit the fairway, there's the tension of

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:46.479
<v Speaker 1>the walk to the ball. Are they going to go

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>for it? Yeah?

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 2>And I think I was absolutely thinking about the team

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 2>move back at thirteen and Augusta when you were talking

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 2>about that, because like it wasn't even just that there

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 2>wasn't a thought that they were going to go for

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 2>it before. It was like they were going to go

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 2>for it with an aid iron, right, Like it's just

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 2>it's pitch and putt to some Now is there an

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 2>excitement and somebody rolling in an eagle putt at number

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 2>thirteen on August on a Sunday. Yeah, absolutely, I'm not

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 2>going to deny that. But like it matters that they're

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 2>standing over you know, in some cases a fore iron

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 2>over that creek and into you know, a green that

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 2>suddenly is not as receptive because the launch, you know,

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 2>the angle it's coming in is different. Like you want variety,

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 2>and if you put the home run with the long

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 2>drive and the long drive leading to just you know,

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 2>having a wedge in and spinning it back, that's not

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 2>as interesting as I think for nerds around the sport.

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.959
<v Speaker 2>And I would equate this with baseball too, like all

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 2>the stuff that I was talking about earlier, the stuff

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 2>that's actually action that's not involved in a home run.

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 2>It's very very similar to Okay, I just hit a

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and thirty four yard drive and now I

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 2>have a wedge in and that's an easy birdy.

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.479
<v Speaker 1>And I think the thing about it is just like

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>homer's right, Homers, like what we're talking about, homers are

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 1>are more interesting when they're a little bit more of

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a feat. Right. An eagle on a par five is

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>way way more compelling, way more exciting when it is

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>more of a feat. When there's less eagles of like

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>scored on a hole, that eagle is more exciting and interesting,

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>just the same same way a birdie on a on

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a tough part part four, par three is is more

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting than a you know, a birdie on a par

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>three that's giving them away like you know, free candy. Right,

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>those birdies, those become more significant, more relevant. So back

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to the baseball stuff, you know, before these changes were made,

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>what were the complaints that kind of were bubbling within

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>within the game before anything was done.

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 2>So I think, you know, if you go to the

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 2>velocity and the imbalance between the pitcher and the hitter,

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 2>that that people couldn't really identify that necessarily. But the

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 2>root of all evil here was velocity. But that built

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 2>a longer game, and worse than the length of the

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 2>game was the amount of inaction in the middle of

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 2>the game when a pitcher could take as much time

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 2>as he wanted to take deep breaths to walk off

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 2>the back of the mound to get the rosen ban

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 2>bag and dry his hand. He's gathering strength again to

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 2>throw another ninety nine mile an hour fastball to a

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 2>hitter who might say, you know what, Actually, I'm not

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:39.719
<v Speaker 2>feeling it right now. I'm going to step out. So

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 2>what they've done with this pitch clock, which is fifteen

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 2>seconds between pitches on a normal scenario, is the brilliant

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 2>part about it is they have eliminated nothing that you

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 2>wanted to see in the first place. They have only

0:22:56.600 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 2>cut fat from the game. And it's visceral. You can

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 2>feel it when you're watching a game on TV or

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 2>you're at a game. The ball is going back to

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 2>the pitcher and he is reporting to the rubber and

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 2>he's getting himself set and the hitter has to be

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 2>in there at seven seconds on the clock or it's

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 2>a violation against him. And they're doing it again and

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 2>the result I mean. I asked Major League Baseball to

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 2>send me this morning the updated numbers through yesterday, through

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight days of the season. Last year, games were

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 2>three hours and five minutes long. On average, they settled

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 2>at three hours and four minutes over the course of

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 2>the entire season. Through twenty eight days of this season,

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 2>they're two hours and thirty six minutes long. That is

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:52.239
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight minutes a game shorter, essentially a half an

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 2>hour on average shorter. Take that over the course of

0:23:56.000 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 2>the season, and that's eighty hours of only fat that

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 2>you have cut out of baseball. And you may have

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 2>East Coast kids who can turn on their team at

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 2>seven and watch them until nine thirty and still get

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 2>to bed at an hour when they're not bleary eyed

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 2>in the morning. It's just it's a fundamental, fundamental change

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 2>to not just the length of the game, but the

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 2>pace of the game.

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that it's it's it's so important, right obviously,

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Like it is, like you said things that nobody wanted

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to watch, right, Like you can maybe make an argument

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that the time builds tension. That could be one thing

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you could make an argument, but like, is it noticeably

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>different between fifteen seconds and a minute or two minutes?

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, you talk about building the tension. Like I remember,

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 2>and this was years ago. I would say it was

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and six or two thousand and seven, I

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 2>was primarily a baseball I was a baseball report and

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 2>in the postseason, you know, these games were the Red

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Sox were taught to like take as many pitches as

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 2>you can follow them back, like have these incredibly long

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 2>at bats. And I remember doing a story on that

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 2>at that time and talking to a television producer, you

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 2>know who produced the games for Fox or ESPN or

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 2>whoever it was at the time, saying, we have to

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 2>have this whole dance where okay, here's the picture, here's

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 2>the hitter, now it's the manager, here's a nervous fan.

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Now we're back to the picture. And you're what do

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 2>you do? You know, yes, there's drama in doing that,

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 2>but there's no action. And if you repeat that kind

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 2>of scenario, you know, a hundred times a night, that's

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 2>just that's rough, and that is it's not it's not action.

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 2>And I think if you you know, with golf, the

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 2>good thing about a golf telecast is you can move

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 2>away from it. Either's one hundred and forty four players

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 2>or a hundred fifty six players or whatever, obviously not

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 2>all out there at the same time, but half that

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 2>out there at roughly the same time, you've got choices

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 2>and you don't have to cut out or you don't

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 2>have to just sit there and watch the waiting. But

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 2>there's no question that it impacts the play the experience

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 2>of anybody on site watching it when you're when you're

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 2>walking around for a five hour round where you're watching

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Cantley, you know, or yeah, right, no, it matters.

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:33.719
<v Speaker 2>It totally matters.

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think, like the thing with golf telecast that

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I noticed is that the problem you know, and this

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 1>is where the pitch clock's brilliant, right, and like the

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>problem with the with the golf telecast is that they

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>have they go to pre shot routine and they have

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>no clue when that pre shot routine is going to

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>be over right, so you might be with the player

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>for you see it. Sometimes where they're on a player,

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 1>they cut away from the player and come back to

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the player. Sometimes they stay on the player and it's

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>like we're watching this for ninety seconds. If all of

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a sudden they had a finite amount of time, you know,

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and I know that we can talk about implementation. I

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about this a little bit later, but

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>if they have a finite amount of time, all of

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, it cures one of like golf fans who

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>watch on TV's biggest issues with the sport show the

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>more shots. Right, if you know when players are hitting

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and where it is in the in the shot clock,

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, you can go to them like

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you have like you have markers. It makes covering the

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>sport from a telecast standpoint way easier, as I imagine

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>baseball like baseball does different shots. You know, announcers like

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I admire so much, and I

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>think golf needs more of the baseball announcer, Like you know,

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll never forget like Pat Hughes on radio telecast and

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Chicago talking about like where baseball's were made, like in

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the dead time, like it's spanning like two innings, I'm

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about the process of making a baseball Like I

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know why that memory sticks in my head for

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes. But like now I've imagined the sport's probably

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot easier to telecast, like the announcers have to

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>be like way more locked in.

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I do think you're right about the golf telecasts,

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 2>Like you know, those producers are super super talented, and

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 2>I think like, for the most part, I really enjoy

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 2>golf telecasts, even though I agree with you that you

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 2>know that the main complaint is show more shots. But

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 2>if you if you have a hard clock on a

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 2>guy and you don't have to make if you're a producer,

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to make that choice of oh my god,

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 2>when is this guy going to pull the trigger? You

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 2>know when the trigger is going to be pulled. You've

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 2>got your screens up here and you know what's going

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 2>on elsewhere. It's a lot I'd never been in that role.

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I have to imagine would be a lot easier to

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 2>plan and have the end result be over the course

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 2>of X hours we've seen why more golf shots like that?

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 2>That would be very, very meaningful to the to the

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 2>television product for sure.

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Now for a quick break from our sponsor, Club Champion.

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Club Champion is just is there the best It is

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the best way to go get fit for golf clubs.

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>They have the widest selection of golf manufacturers. They have

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.959
<v Speaker 1>every major golf brand. So what you get to do?

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, I use this analogy the other day. If

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you're going to buy a car, you're test driving a

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>bunch of cars So with Club Champion, what I love

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>about it is you get to go test drive a

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>bunch of different shafts, a bunch of different club heads,

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and you get to find what's best for you. I've

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.719
<v Speaker 1>been going to them forever really, from you know, the

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>beginning of my golf life. I've been using Club Champion,

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Like I started using them when I was in high school.

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>That was right when they were starting their business out

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of you know, a small little shop in Chicago, and Uh,

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I love the I love their brand and what they do.

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I love the idea of trying a bunch of clubs

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and figuring out what's best for you. To me, that

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:30.959
<v Speaker 1>makes the most sense go into it. You know, you

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 1>can have your preferences on on what manufacturer you might like,

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>but I think that at the end of the day,

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you know what you want to do, and what everybody's

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to do is get the best performance out of

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the game. As as many listeners probably know, I've been uh,

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've been playing kind of a retro set

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>uh for the last year. But the big news, and

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>reason one of the reasons is Mike, all my clubs broke.

0:30:57.000 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Big news. I scheduled my club Champion fitting. I'm it's

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in the books. I'm gonna go get some new sticks.

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait. I'm ready to having played the seventieth

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Bladze for a while, I'm just ready for some modern forgiveness.

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready if I if I catch it a little

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>off the toe for it not to be automatically ten

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>yards short. So looking forward to that and can't wait. So,

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for some new clubs some increased performance,

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Club Champions are spot to schedule a fitting. They're doing

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent off the fitting with the purchase of a club.

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>So you're getting fifty percent off your fitting with the

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>purchase of a club if you use the promo code

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Frida Egg. So use the promo code Frieda Egg when

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you schedule your fitting and you'll get fifty percent off

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a club fitting with a club purchase. So go to

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Club Champion, check it out, and thank you to them

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for partnering with us and supporting the podcast. Now back

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to Barry. So, you know, as we we've gotten into

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the weeds, you know this hasn't gone as as planned,

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>but I kind of want to keep moving this conversation

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>along because we could we could talk about this for hours,

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I think. But so to sum up kind of baseball

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:15.479
<v Speaker 1>in a state, you know, people had felt like some

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of the intricacy of the game had been lost. The

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>game had fundamentally changed, you know, in the sense of

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>what skills were recorded, rewarded and thrived. And maybe not

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody agreed for the better. I imagine that there were

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>some that said the game is better and healthier, and

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into some of that. And the

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>games were getting longer and longer. It was taking longer

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to play than ever really before. Would you say that

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>sums up kind of the main thesis of what was

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>going on in baseball.

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, if you want to distill it down

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 2>to maybe one sentence or one catchphrase, it was a

0:32:55.760 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 2>lot more time for a lot less action. So I mean,

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 2>you take we can if you want to get really

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 2>into the weeds, like batting average is not a really

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 2>good way to evaluate an individual player, but league batting

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 2>average is. You know, what does an average major league

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 2>hitter hit is a way to tell how much action

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 2>there is in the game, and that had dipped down

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 2>last year. Two I'm going to get the number not

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 2>exactly right, but to around two forty like in in

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 2>when I was growing up in the eighties, a two

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 2>forty hitter was like, you better be a really good

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 2>defender to stay in the in the lineup because you're

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 2>not doing your pulling your weight offensively. When that's the

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 2>average hitter across the league, that tells you that the

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 2>ball's not in play enough, there's not enough enough action.

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 2>And then you couple that with okay, all that action

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 2>is spread out over three hours rather than contained to

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 2>two and a half. That was a major, major impetus

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 2>for the rule changes. And one of the things you

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't mention in rule changes that is important as well

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 2>is they've limited pickoff attempts for when you're throwing for

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:04.959
<v Speaker 2>a pitcher throwing to a base, you can do it

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 2>twice the third time. Uh, it's it's a buck if

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 2>you don't get them that. That, along with the larger bases,

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 2>has stolen base attempts up and when you when you

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 2>Major League Baseball did a survey I think it was

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 2>two or three years ago that they didn't widely publicize,

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 2>but they asked fans, what are your more most exciting

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 2>were the plays you get most excited about? Stolen base

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 2>attempts was up there. Great defensive plays was up there,

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 2>the triple was up there. I'm probably forgetting something, but

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 2>it was not. It was not the home run. It

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 2>was these things that involve athleticism, anticipation, that kind of

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 2>excitement they've started to instill. We don't know the full

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 2>summer play out of Like is batting average going to

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 2>rise over the course of the summer. It hasn't changed,

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, Guys still throw one hundred and they still

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.320
<v Speaker 2>use a lot of relievers all that kind of stuff,

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 2>but they've they've started to get at least the running

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 2>game going again, and that matters. It totally matters in

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 2>your enjoyment of a specific play, a specific inning, a

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 2>specific game.

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think, let's say would be said with golf,

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 1>with with law everybody, you know, what's the most exciting

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 1>shot in golf? What are the most memorable shots in golf?

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 1>They're usually chip shots or approach shots. You know, Yeah,

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>there's a coup, there's a handful of drives, and those

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>are like when you drive a green, you know, and

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you know that if you you know, like, but for

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the most part, the predominant shot that you think about,

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 1>like if you remember iconic shots. A lot of them

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>are approach shots or chip shots. So how did how

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>did this the rules changes get started? And like what

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>was like the kind of undercurrent of this whole, this

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 1>big change that happened this year. And I think to

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>your point about the rules changes, like you're not going

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to see the big impact of these rules changes at

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>baseball until you can zoom out from like five or

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 1>ten years and see where the game goes, because it

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>takes a while for you know, strategies and different things

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to change personnel too.

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, Well, I mean, I think it's also again probably

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 2>similar to the discussions going in golf if you have

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 2>a slower product in a you know, being played to

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 2>generations that are used to rapid fire in whatever they want,

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, whether it's social media or texting or whatever.

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Kids are not sitting on the couch being like Okay,

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:41.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to see one pitch every ninety seconds or whatever.

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:43.879
<v Speaker 2>Like that's not compelling in any way. So you're you're

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 2>you're dealing with a sport that has an aging fan

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 2>base to begin with. You have to find a way

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:55.879
<v Speaker 2>to replenish the fans on the young end and get

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.359
<v Speaker 2>that demographic and have a future for the sport and

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 2>have it be something that even resembled the national past time.

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think it baseball has seated that spot

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 2>a long time ago, but it just wasn't sustainable down

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 2>the path that it was going. And it took smart

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.760
<v Speaker 2>people at Major League Baseball and with the players Union

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 2>to say we got to do something here. So when

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 2>I think we both admires theo Epstein, who was a

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 2>formal general manager with the Red Sox and the Cobs,

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 2>he became a point person for MLB on thinking through

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 2>these problems and saying, Okay, what what can we do

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:41.479
<v Speaker 2>here to restore some of the balance between pitcher and hitter,

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 2>to instill more action into the game so that it's

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 2>moving at a faster pace and there's more exciting stuff

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 2>to watch. And you come up with a pretty interesting

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:54.800
<v Speaker 2>package that they you know, they were able to test

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 2>in the in the minors. And I remember hearing the

0:37:57.360 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 2>first data points when the pitchclock was used in a

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 2>couple of minor league leagues a couple of years ago,

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 2>where they were saying, oh, the game time is down

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 2>to two twenty eight here whatever, I'm picking a number.

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 2>The game time's down to two and a half hours

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 2>in this league is single a league in California that

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:19.400
<v Speaker 2>we tried it, It's just made this huge difference. I

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:24.359
<v Speaker 2>was like, that can't possibly be true. Like, if that's true,

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 2>why aren't we doing it right now? And it's after

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:31.800
<v Speaker 2>less than a month of the pitchclock being in the majors.

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think it'll be mid season before the

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 2>wide percentage of the fan base is saying isn't saying

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 2>what's up with this pitchclock? They're saying, how did we

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.720
<v Speaker 2>not have a pitch clock for the last twenty years?

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I mean, you know, I haven't been excited for

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a baseball season for a while. And part of that,

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, my Cubs are we might be on the

0:38:57.440 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 1>up and up, but it's been a rough a couple

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of years. But I mean, like I was with my

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Dad's a huge baseball man, and I was with him

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>on spring break right before you know, uh, the season started,

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and like we were like talking baseball and how like

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>how excited? You know? And it was opening day and

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I had I turned baseball on. I was like, I

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>couldn't wait to watch baseball, you know, because of this clock.

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to see what was going on? And I

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 1>think like the thing that golf and baseball share here

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is like you talked about the pace, this younger generation pace,

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Like what do you do if you know NBA playoffs

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>are on right now? When when a game goes to commercial,

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:41.479
<v Speaker 1>what's what's your first inclination if you're sitting on the couch,

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>what do you do?

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 2>You go and get a drink, you go to the bathroom,

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean you look at your phone, you do something, or.

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 2>You click to something else, Like your attention is distracted.

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, So it's just the same thing with golf. It's

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 1>like if you have ninety seconds between a pitch or

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:59.360
<v Speaker 1>ninety seconds between a shot, it's extremely likely that somebody's

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>not gonna watch shot because they're going to get distracted

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and do something else, right, And that's the idea, is

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>giving people a clock to measure against. Like, Okay, I

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>know I have to pay attention. Here is a fascinating

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it just like it makes sense and like what you said,

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>like you get into it, you get into the miners

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing it, and it's like, why why haven't

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we been doing this? What were the main detractors to

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>these rules changes, saying and like, who who did they represent?

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 2>Well? I mean, I think you know people who romanticize

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:36.280
<v Speaker 2>about baseball, and I think that the two most romanticized

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 2>sports from people within them are golf and baseball. People

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 2>they there are people in my job as sports writers

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 2>who I think in both of these sports almost see

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 2>themselves as protectors and promoters of the game. No, we don't.

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 2>We've never had a clock in baseball. Baseball's beauty is

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 2>in fact that it is untimed, and you'll be stripping

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 2>away a fundamental element of the game. Now, was that

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 2>over romanticized and was it outdated because of what has

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 2>happened and the way pitchers and hitters were manipulating the

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 2>fact that they were not timed. Yeah, I would argue absolutely.

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:19.800
<v Speaker 2>And you're not in either of these sports. Are you

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 2>going to please everybody if you make changes? I mean

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 2>it's there's that debate with the ball in golf as well, right, Like,

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, are we would if the ball is real? Back?

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:35.319
<v Speaker 2>Are we stripping these guys of you know, these more

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 2>athletic players of something that they've worked hard to attain.

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 2>We can you know, that's a totally different path that

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 2>I know, you guys talk about a lot, but there

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 2>are in any of it. There are people who would say,

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 2>it's the sport is going to evolve. We should allow

0:41:54.920 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 2>it to evolve naturally, not by putting artificial implement that's

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 2>in that say, okay, now we have a structure that

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 2>we've never had before. And I would argue that the

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 2>one change that they did that I think more people

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 2>are queasy about than even the pitch clock is the

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:20.279
<v Speaker 2>banning of shifts, because the argument would be, there's never

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 2>been assigned defensive positions by rule other than the pitcher

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 2>has to stand on the rubber and the catcher has

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 2>to be in the catcher's box. The other seven guys

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 2>could all stand in left field if they thought that

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:32.320
<v Speaker 2>was the most.

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Effect, not have a catcher. It would be a bad idea,

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>But you like.

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 2>That would be bad, right. But the point is, I

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 2>think the thing that people are uneasy about there is

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 2>no have the offense. Part of this evolution should be

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 2>can't be offense? Figure out how to beat three infielders

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 2>to the right side of second base, that kind of thing.

0:42:55.719 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 2>So I get that debate, but as a package has

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 2>had to happen because the sport was killing itself essentially

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 2>by what it had become.

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean baseball's undergone ball deadening too, right, yeap,

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean did now that question? This is I didn't

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 1>plan on asking this question. But do you feel like

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that when they deadened the ball, that athletic, powerful baseball

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>players were had things stripped away from them?

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 2>No? No, no, no. And and in fact, you know,

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 2>you go back to something you said very originally like

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 2>homers are more interesting when they're less prevalent, right, Like,

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:37.919
<v Speaker 2>so if it took more to hit a homer, then

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 2>then that's fine. The other thing about the you know, athleticism.

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:48.759
<v Speaker 2>One thing that shifting did, uh, was minimize athleticism. Because

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:50.239
<v Speaker 2>if if you've got three guys to the right of

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:53.399
<v Speaker 2>second base and there's a hard ground ball over there,

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, Ryan Sandberg doesn't have to die for it

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:59.760
<v Speaker 2>because he's got somebody playing behind him in short right field.

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 2>You're like, okay, we've got this covered. There's less exciting

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 2>defensive plays. I mean, again, theof seen in a conversation

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 2>I had with him probably a couple of years ago. Now,

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 2>put it this way, we have better athletes than we've

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 2>ever had playing this sport and we are limiting the

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:25.719
<v Speaker 2>ways that they can show their athleticism. So you know,

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 2>the same could be said, uh. I think for for golf,

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:35.760
<v Speaker 2>you want things to be rare. Rare means exciting.

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, how did players feel about it? Like, what was

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:43.239
<v Speaker 1>there the general discourse with players? Obviously they don't have

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:46.839
<v Speaker 1>as uh I would say, outside of an influence as

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:50.840
<v Speaker 1>UH as golfers do, where they they are the owners

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:53.719
<v Speaker 1>of the sport and the UH and the players, right

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>there is a little bit different setup. But what was

0:44:56.800 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the what was the general feeling of players?

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean there was you know, some pushback and

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:11.319
<v Speaker 2>some reluctance because it's hard for players. I mean, one

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 2>way that baseball players are similar to golfers is in

0:45:16.280 --> 0:45:19.200
<v Speaker 2>a way they're all their individual corporations. Right. Yes, they're

0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:21.320
<v Speaker 2>a member of a team and the team's success matters

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:23.960
<v Speaker 2>and that's part of their legacy. But in a in

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:27.799
<v Speaker 2>a vacuum, in a selfish way, their job, over the

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:31.359
<v Speaker 2>course of their very finance career is to earn as

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:34.319
<v Speaker 2>much as they can, and so part of that is

0:45:34.360 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 2>like what is my routine, what is my routine in

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:40.399
<v Speaker 2>leading into a game, and what was my routine in

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 2>that game very analogous to golf, Like your pre shot

0:45:45.640 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 2>routine is really important to you. My pre pitch routine

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:51.279
<v Speaker 2>before I throw a pitch is very important to me.

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 2>If you're fundamentally changing that, I might I might be

0:45:56.400 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 2>really reluctant. I would give. And I think the gives

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 2>players an enormous amount of credit for not complaining left

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:10.879
<v Speaker 2>and right. You have there been individual instances where you know,

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:13.880
<v Speaker 2>how can how can that be? Like I get this penalty,

0:46:14.680 --> 0:46:18.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, a ball four when I was fractionally late

0:46:18.640 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 2>on something. Yes, and there will be those going going forward.

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:25.759
<v Speaker 2>But in general, because they had an entire spring to

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 2>get used to it, and spring training in baseball is

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 2>essentially seven weeks, the buy in has been tremendous. And

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:38.319
<v Speaker 2>even guys joke about like, well, you know, it's kind

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 2>of nice being home at nine forty five and not

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:44.600
<v Speaker 2>ten forty five after a night game. There are they

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 2>I think they can see that they haven't been so

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 2>disturbed in their pre pitch or pre shot routine that

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 2>it's fundamentally affecting how they do their jobs. And there

0:46:56.680 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 2>are ancillary benefits like they have more time with their

0:46:59.200 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 2>kids or whatever.

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, you're talking eighty hours of like not

0:47:04.239 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 1>competing is extraordinarily that's like very relevant. Well and in

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of like how you're gonna feel and mentally in

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the body, Like the mental aspect of being on field

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:24.760
<v Speaker 1>for thirty extra minutes is extreme. Like anybody that's played

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:28.880
<v Speaker 1>competitive golf, like you, you feel a difference when you

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>get off the course when it's a five hour competitive

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 1>round versus a four and a half hour competitive round,

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 1>like that stuff. And if you do it, you know,

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:40.800
<v Speaker 1>four days in a row, just like baseball, Just like golf,

0:47:40.920 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like if you have four games in a row, two

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:49.239
<v Speaker 1>extra hours of that intense focus, like you know, both

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of them, I think people would say are not like

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the most physically grueling sports. Sure do you need to

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:56.759
<v Speaker 1>be physically tuned to play them, but like they are

0:47:56.800 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 1>not like basketball or tennis, where you're just like holy cow,

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:04.240
<v Speaker 1>like I can't believe the endurance, you know, but they

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:07.000
<v Speaker 1>they they have a mental aspect of them that those

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 1>other sports might not carry as much in terms of

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:16.200
<v Speaker 1>like the just the anguish in the amount of focus

0:48:16.239 --> 0:48:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that's required in short bursts.

0:48:18.120 --> 0:48:21.719
<v Speaker 2>So I also think that that so there's the totality

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 2>of what you're talking about, like the extra half hour

0:48:24.480 --> 0:48:26.359
<v Speaker 2>adding on to an extra half hour the next night,

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 2>adding on to an extra half hour in the third

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:33.160
<v Speaker 2>game of the series or whatever. But there's also the

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:38.880
<v Speaker 2>possibility and probability of losing focus in between pitches, like, Oh,

0:48:38.920 --> 0:48:41.799
<v Speaker 2>I'm oh, it's going to be you know, seventy five

0:48:41.840 --> 0:48:44.239
<v Speaker 2>seconds before this guy's what I'm looking in the stands.

0:48:44.239 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, that's a real thing. You see, Guys have

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 2>to be more engaged on every pitch because every pitch

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:58.759
<v Speaker 2>is coming more quickly. I think that there's a and

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 2>this is probably down a rabbit hole. But there's a

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 2>sports psychology element to all of this that plays to

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:12.759
<v Speaker 2>both golf and baseball, where you know an individual players

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:17.360
<v Speaker 2>in either sports, sports psychologists is saying you control what

0:49:17.480 --> 0:49:21.359
<v Speaker 2>you can control, and what you can control is your

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 2>preparation for not only that day, but for each and

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 2>every event within that day. That I think, it's inarguable,

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:35.040
<v Speaker 2>has contributed to slow play in either of those sports.

0:49:35.080 --> 0:49:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Because I'm the pitcher, I'm in control. I'm not going

0:49:37.920 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 2>to do this until i'm ready. I'm a golfer, I'm

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:42.760
<v Speaker 2>not going to stand over this ball until i'm very

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:45.879
<v Speaker 2>clear in how I'm visualizing this shot. I've sorted out

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:48.200
<v Speaker 2>all the variables and now I'm in control of my

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 2>swing that contributes to longer processes period across the board

0:49:55.480 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 2>whatever you're trying to execute.

0:49:57.440 --> 0:50:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I completely agree with this in I think that's

0:50:01.440 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 1>like one of the failings up until nowt of baseball

0:50:04.960 --> 0:50:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and golf is not rewarding the skill of somebody who's

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:14.400
<v Speaker 1>able to a process information quickly and able to be

0:50:15.160 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 1>get themselves mentally ready to hit a shot or throw

0:50:18.640 --> 0:50:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a pitch or taken a bat in a short amount

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of time. That is a talent and a skill and

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 1>one that should be rewarded because that's a huge differentiator

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:32.239
<v Speaker 1>right mentally being that player. I always use this comparison.

0:50:32.320 --> 0:50:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I saw KVV Kevin Bev Balkenberg use this as in

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:39.759
<v Speaker 1>an article he wrote about slow play on No Laying

0:50:39.840 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Up dot com. But the idea of like what made

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady the greatest quarterback of all time was his

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:55.239
<v Speaker 1>ability to process a defense in a split second, be

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:59.759
<v Speaker 1>able to read a defense, understand his progressions, and throw

0:50:59.800 --> 0:51:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the pass faster. You know, there's a load of people

0:51:03.560 --> 0:51:07.920
<v Speaker 1>who had more physical traits for physical attributes like every year, Like,

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:10.560
<v Speaker 1>what's the big discourse this year with the NFL draft

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:14.239
<v Speaker 1>this this week this weekend is can Anthony Richardson? Like?

0:51:14.400 --> 0:51:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Is he he has these physical traits? But can he

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:20.480
<v Speaker 1>go through the progressions? Can he run an offense? Can

0:51:20.480 --> 0:51:23.359
<v Speaker 1>he handle the new Like when you remove all the time,

0:51:23.400 --> 0:51:27.560
<v Speaker 1>if you remove the pass rush and the need to

0:51:27.600 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball and go through these progressions quickly, all

0:51:30.560 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, Tom Brady might not have been the

0:51:32.600 --> 0:51:36.720
<v Speaker 1>greatest quarterback of all time. That is important in sports.

0:51:36.800 --> 0:51:39.319
<v Speaker 1>That's the same thing with why is Lebron great? Like

0:51:39.440 --> 0:51:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Lebron like you watch him at age? What is he

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:45.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine or thirty eight now? And you watch him

0:51:45.200 --> 0:51:48.239
<v Speaker 1>like just like they just get into the exact thing

0:51:48.320 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they want all the time, and he just hunts and

0:51:51.040 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 1>picks apart defenses. It's not quite as prevalent as it

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 1>used to be, but his ability to just and it's

0:51:56.800 --> 0:51:59.479
<v Speaker 1>in a twenty four second shot clock. That's what makes

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:03.360
<v Speaker 1>NBA offense so incredible is the finite amount of time

0:52:03.680 --> 0:52:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that they have to run the offense. How much different

0:52:06.360 --> 0:52:08.320
<v Speaker 1>would the NBA look if there was no time?

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:11.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, well, you'd have a four corners offense which

0:52:11.160 --> 0:52:12.520
<v Speaker 2>you used to have, like, Okay, we have an eight

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:15.120
<v Speaker 2>point lead with ten minutes left, Like why in the

0:52:15.120 --> 0:52:17.719
<v Speaker 2>world would we shoot, Like we don't have to. I mean, so,

0:52:17.960 --> 0:52:22.160
<v Speaker 2>just to bring it back to golf real quickly, competitive

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:28.239
<v Speaker 2>decisiveness and decision making in a specified amount of time

0:52:28.440 --> 0:52:32.320
<v Speaker 2>should be rewarded. At the Masters this year, on Sunday

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:38.959
<v Speaker 2>walk in the final group, rom and Kopka Brooks hits

0:52:38.960 --> 0:52:42.560
<v Speaker 2>his drive at a way left into the trees. I'm

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:46.880
<v Speaker 2>almost positive this, yeah, And so I was probably with

0:52:47.000 --> 0:52:51.360
<v Speaker 2>KVB standing there on the left side of the fairway

0:52:51.880 --> 0:52:55.919
<v Speaker 2>and he's got this evaluation to make and he's gonna

0:52:55.920 --> 0:52:57.879
<v Speaker 2>have to punch back out right. It's a birdie hole.

0:52:57.960 --> 0:53:01.839
<v Speaker 2>This is a disastrous things ramist and to turn the momentum.

0:53:02.360 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 2>And I just remember he got in there, he looked

0:53:05.160 --> 0:53:07.960
<v Speaker 2>at it, he talked to his caddy, he went through

0:53:08.000 --> 0:53:11.000
<v Speaker 2>the thing, and I'm, you know, up ahead a little

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 2>bit but trying to keep an eye into the trees,

0:53:14.320 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 2>and all of a sudden, the ball's coming out, and

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:20.000
<v Speaker 2>I was like, oh my goodness. Like he went in there,

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 2>he evaluated all the information that he needed to evaluate,

0:53:23.280 --> 0:53:25.920
<v Speaker 2>and he made a decision and he whacked it out

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:27.319
<v Speaker 2>and it was a good like you know, whatever he

0:53:27.360 --> 0:53:32.040
<v Speaker 2>made par I think, but it why, you know, we

0:53:32.040 --> 0:53:33.880
<v Speaker 2>can I'm not gonna list the players who would have

0:53:33.880 --> 0:53:36.400
<v Speaker 2>gone in there and spent ten minutes, but it's a

0:53:36.440 --> 0:53:38.040
<v Speaker 2>longer list that would have gone in there and then

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:41.680
<v Speaker 2>spent you know, seventy five seconds and it and it

0:53:42.000 --> 0:53:46.280
<v Speaker 2>moved the game. It was it was I just remember

0:53:46.280 --> 0:53:48.400
<v Speaker 2>being struck by Wow. No one does things that fast

0:53:48.400 --> 0:53:50.799
<v Speaker 2>that that should be, that should be more the norm

0:53:51.360 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 2>than than the opposite.

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:55.400
<v Speaker 1>A couple of years ago, I you know, when Bryson

0:53:55.520 --> 0:53:57.960
<v Speaker 1>was being accused of slow play. I went to the

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:00.960
<v Speaker 1>US Open in a time I spent like a Friday

0:54:01.360 --> 0:54:05.120
<v Speaker 1>timing every every player in the group for nine holes

0:54:05.200 --> 0:54:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and it was him, JT, Kevin Kissinger, and Kevin Kissinger

0:54:08.840 --> 0:54:11.400
<v Speaker 1>was incredible. I mean, like, you know, kind of in

0:54:11.440 --> 0:54:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the vein of Matt Fitzpatrick where he was just ready

0:54:13.920 --> 0:54:17.279
<v Speaker 1>to hit after you know, if he was the second

0:54:17.320 --> 0:54:19.719
<v Speaker 1>player to hit, he was hitting in like twelve seconds.

0:54:20.000 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, Bryson was always and he's done a great

0:54:22.640 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 1>job of speeding up. I think that you know, you

0:54:25.160 --> 0:54:27.040
<v Speaker 1>have to give him props. He has sped up his

0:54:27.160 --> 0:54:29.759
<v Speaker 1>pace of play from this moment, but he was he

0:54:29.880 --> 0:54:32.040
<v Speaker 1>was taking one and a half two minutes to hit

0:54:32.080 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a shot every every time. But what I noticed, everybody's

0:54:36.080 --> 0:54:40.400
<v Speaker 1>slow at the green. And that's perhaps where skill is

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 1>most would be most rewarded of, Like I can read

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a green quickly and be confident and stand over a shot.

0:54:47.760 --> 0:54:50.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you think about where golf like, you know

0:54:50.080 --> 0:54:52.719
<v Speaker 1>what happened with the Masters to go back to this,

0:54:52.800 --> 0:54:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is where it really started to bubble.

0:54:55.520 --> 0:54:59.160
<v Speaker 1>This discourse is bubbled and blown up to where you know,

0:54:59.200 --> 0:55:01.359
<v Speaker 1>we're getting to p point where I don't think, like

0:55:01.440 --> 0:55:04.360
<v Speaker 1>golf like people are going to stand for this for

0:55:04.440 --> 0:55:07.560
<v Speaker 1>much longer with how you know, like something has to

0:55:07.640 --> 0:55:12.560
<v Speaker 1>happen eventually because you know, Brooks and Rom are putting

0:55:12.920 --> 0:55:15.680
<v Speaker 1>on they're getting to the green. I saw like John

0:55:15.760 --> 0:55:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Rom's caddy was visually upset on the fifteenth green about

0:55:19.800 --> 0:55:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Cantley and Victor Hovelin and to can't lay in

0:55:22.760 --> 0:55:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Hovelin's credit like they were waiting on fifteen. Yes, you

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:30.719
<v Speaker 1>know this, this this was a This wasn't just a

0:55:30.760 --> 0:55:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Patrick cantlay problem. Is he a slow player? Absolutely, But

0:55:35.040 --> 0:55:39.399
<v Speaker 1>there are probably one hundred slow players on the PGA Tour.

0:55:40.880 --> 0:55:44.200
<v Speaker 1>So anyways, he goes to the green at like, uh, Rom,

0:55:44.440 --> 0:55:47.080
<v Speaker 1>they're on the fifteenth green. Those guys are walking to

0:55:47.120 --> 0:55:51.319
<v Speaker 1>the sixteenth green. They're on the sixteenth green and they're

0:55:51.360 --> 0:55:55.680
<v Speaker 1>still putting on the fifteenth green. They finished putting. Rom

0:55:55.760 --> 0:55:58.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously has opened up this lead at this point. Kepkaz

0:55:58.440 --> 0:56:01.520
<v Speaker 1>like looks just like flabbergast when he's on the sixteenth tee.

0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:03.879
<v Speaker 1>They walk to the sixteenth te not a close walk,

0:56:04.120 --> 0:56:07.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's forty fifty yards. They get there, Rob

0:56:07.920 --> 0:56:11.040
<v Speaker 1>goes to the bathroom, comes back. Patrick Cantley, who's out

0:56:11.280 --> 0:56:15.520
<v Speaker 1>still has not hit his putt. Yes, and that's just

0:56:16.280 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that can't happen.

0:56:17.320 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 2>It can't happen. It can't happen. And if you take

0:56:20.360 --> 0:56:24.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think this debate in golf can be

0:56:24.320 --> 0:56:28.319
<v Speaker 2>applied at all levels, like the we've both played with

0:56:28.440 --> 0:56:34.360
<v Speaker 2>people who watch whoever else is in the group do

0:56:34.520 --> 0:56:37.640
<v Speaker 2>whatever they're doing with their shot, and then they begin

0:56:37.760 --> 0:56:40.440
<v Speaker 2>their preparation for their shot. Okay, what's my yard? Like

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:44.720
<v Speaker 2>just stop it stop get ready, like, don't that's happening

0:56:44.719 --> 0:56:48.240
<v Speaker 2>over there, don't worry about it. Yeah, I love playing

0:56:48.280 --> 0:56:51.120
<v Speaker 2>with the regular people that I play with, who I know.

0:56:51.880 --> 0:56:56.960
<v Speaker 2>If they're having a problem an issue, they're they're solving

0:56:57.000 --> 0:56:58.960
<v Speaker 2>it quickly and not worried about where I'm on the

0:56:59.040 --> 0:57:01.759
<v Speaker 2>left side of the fairway. We're all your look across, Okay,

0:57:01.760 --> 0:57:04.520
<v Speaker 2>he's not ready, I'm playing right now. Why can't Why

0:57:04.520 --> 0:57:08.240
<v Speaker 2>can't that be the flow of a professional round of golf?

0:57:08.280 --> 0:57:10.480
<v Speaker 2>And that's from t to green? Whatever is it hard

0:57:10.480 --> 0:57:12.640
<v Speaker 2>to read a pot? And like should they take some time?

0:57:12.680 --> 0:57:15.440
<v Speaker 2>You don't want to have guys just like getting up

0:57:15.480 --> 0:57:17.960
<v Speaker 2>there and doing stuff they're not prepared for, because that

0:57:18.000 --> 0:57:22.040
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't bring out the best performance. But it's it is

0:57:22.560 --> 0:57:25.080
<v Speaker 2>out of control. And the example that you you used

0:57:25.080 --> 0:57:26.280
<v Speaker 2>at fifteen and sixteen is a.

0:57:26.200 --> 0:57:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Good one in your in you're just having watched this

0:57:30.440 --> 0:57:34.960
<v Speaker 1>baseball and play out and covering golf. You know, what

0:57:35.000 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 1>would you like to see golf do? What do you

0:57:37.680 --> 0:57:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you know? Obviously they have the distance thing is on

0:57:40.320 --> 0:57:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the table. It looks like it's gonna happen at some

0:57:43.800 --> 0:57:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you know events, which obviously will relieve pace of play.

0:57:48.720 --> 0:57:52.240
<v Speaker 1>If less guys can get home into they're less driveable

0:57:52.280 --> 0:57:56.040
<v Speaker 1>part fours that will relieve pace of play. But you

0:57:56.040 --> 0:57:58.880
<v Speaker 1>know what, what else do you think the baseball should

0:57:58.880 --> 0:57:59.440
<v Speaker 1>be looking at.

0:58:00.080 --> 0:58:03.600
<v Speaker 2>That's a really interesting question because I'm still kind of

0:58:03.640 --> 0:58:10.400
<v Speaker 2>processing the first month of pretty unprecedented. I mean, you

0:58:10.440 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 2>have to go back to nineteen sixty eight when they

0:58:14.440 --> 0:58:17.120
<v Speaker 2>lowered I'm sorry, sixty nine, after the year the pitcher.

0:58:17.120 --> 0:58:21.000
<v Speaker 2>In sixty eight they made a uniformly lower mound because

0:58:21.040 --> 0:58:23.480
<v Speaker 2>pitchers had too great an advantage and there was less

0:58:23.920 --> 0:58:27.760
<v Speaker 2>action in the game. There's so much to digest with

0:58:28.680 --> 0:58:31.880
<v Speaker 2>what's happened over you know, only the first twenty eight

0:58:31.960 --> 0:58:36.200
<v Speaker 2>days of the season that what next steps might be

0:58:38.120 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 2>are a little bit hard to envision. They are trying

0:58:41.600 --> 0:58:46.920
<v Speaker 2>in an independent league something called the double hook rule,

0:58:47.360 --> 0:58:52.360
<v Speaker 2>which would incentifize teams to leave their starters in longer.

0:58:52.720 --> 0:58:55.440
<v Speaker 2>The idea is, if you pull your starter before he's

0:58:55.480 --> 0:58:59.680
<v Speaker 2>completed five innings, you lose the designated hitter and the

0:58:59.720 --> 0:59:02.360
<v Speaker 2>pitch has to hit in that that's the pitcher spot.

0:59:03.320 --> 0:59:05.400
<v Speaker 1>So that would be amazing.

0:59:05.680 --> 0:59:08.080
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting. Way to get back to that thing

0:59:08.080 --> 0:59:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I was talking about at the very beginning of what's

0:59:09.680 --> 0:59:12.240
<v Speaker 2>the narrative of any day of baseball is like, Okay,

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:14.880
<v Speaker 2>who's pitching? If that person's not going to be you know,

0:59:14.920 --> 0:59:17.840
<v Speaker 2>there's this whole idea of the Tampa Bay Rays and

0:59:17.840 --> 0:59:22.400
<v Speaker 2>other teams using openers, essentially starting a pitcher who's they

0:59:22.440 --> 0:59:24.840
<v Speaker 2>know is only going to pitch two innings and building

0:59:24.920 --> 0:59:28.160
<v Speaker 2>a game plan of guys that are only going to

0:59:28.200 --> 0:59:30.800
<v Speaker 2>pitch one or one or two innings. That takes away

0:59:30.800 --> 0:59:35.960
<v Speaker 2>that starting pitcher narrative completely. Maybe that double hook rule

0:59:36.080 --> 0:59:39.800
<v Speaker 2>is the next thing that you you stick in there

0:59:39.840 --> 0:59:43.200
<v Speaker 2>to Again, you're not trying to do to get to

0:59:43.240 --> 0:59:46.080
<v Speaker 2>the game to a place that it's never been before.

0:59:46.120 --> 0:59:49.960
<v Speaker 2>You're actually trying to restore it to how it always

0:59:50.120 --> 0:59:54.400
<v Speaker 2>was played. I mean, if you Tom Boswell, who had

0:59:54.760 --> 0:59:57.720
<v Speaker 2>my job at the Washington Post for ever and ever

0:59:57.760 --> 1:00:02.960
<v Speaker 2>and ever and covered baseball and go as well. He's retired,

1:00:02.960 --> 1:00:05.040
<v Speaker 2>but he wrote a column going into this baseball season

1:00:06.600 --> 1:00:10.600
<v Speaker 2>after having watched spring training games saying, essentially, this isn't new.

1:00:10.720 --> 1:00:15.040
<v Speaker 2>The pitch clock isn't making the game something we haven't

1:00:15.040 --> 1:00:17.360
<v Speaker 2>seen before. It's actually restoring it to the way it

1:00:17.440 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 2>was played forty and fifty years ago, which is refreshing

1:00:21.360 --> 1:00:24.360
<v Speaker 2>and which I think would be perfect for golf, because

1:00:24.840 --> 1:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, Jack Nicholas didn't stand over a shot for

1:00:28.600 --> 1:00:32.760
<v Speaker 2>ninety seconds or two minutes. He evaluated, stepped up and

1:00:32.960 --> 1:00:35.120
<v Speaker 2>executed it to the best of visibility in that in

1:00:35.120 --> 1:00:36.920
<v Speaker 2>that moment. That should be rewarded somehow.

1:00:37.560 --> 1:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think something that you just hit on

1:00:39.840 --> 1:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is all these all these leagues, with the exception of golf.

1:00:46.760 --> 1:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the NBA is constantly experimenting in it's like

1:00:51.400 --> 1:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>lower level leagues, you know they are, and the idea

1:00:54.960 --> 1:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that MLB is now in this era of experimentation. You know,

1:00:58.880 --> 1:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the NFL changed his rules regularly. The only sport that's

1:01:04.440 --> 1:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>just like kind of just no, we're not doing anything.

1:01:07.680 --> 1:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>We aren't going to try and evolve at this point,

1:01:10.320 --> 1:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, and any any of the only evolution that

1:01:14.120 --> 1:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>has been introduced has been met with sharp, you know,

1:01:18.400 --> 1:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>detractors criticism is golf.

1:01:22.280 --> 1:01:25.560
<v Speaker 2>And I think when you strip away, I mean, I

1:01:25.560 --> 1:01:27.880
<v Speaker 2>talked earlier about the protectors of the game in both

1:01:27.920 --> 1:01:31.120
<v Speaker 2>baseball and golf, and I feel like, for whatever reason

1:01:31.440 --> 1:01:35.760
<v Speaker 2>those sports have, they have such a reverence for their history,

1:01:35.880 --> 1:01:39.080
<v Speaker 2>right like in baseball even more than golf, the numbers

1:01:39.080 --> 1:01:42.680
<v Speaker 2>of their history and anything that could alter what sixty

1:01:42.680 --> 1:01:46.919
<v Speaker 2>one homers by Roger Marris meant in nineteen sixty one

1:01:47.520 --> 1:01:50.080
<v Speaker 2>or any of those, you know, the career home run

1:01:50.160 --> 1:01:53.440
<v Speaker 2>mark that you debate, like, is Hank Aaron still the

1:01:53.480 --> 1:01:57.080
<v Speaker 2>all time greatest because Bonds was on steroids. Blah blah blah.

1:01:57.240 --> 1:02:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Anything that threatens that kind of sanctity of that history

1:02:03.520 --> 1:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>is seen as evil. I do think if there's a

1:02:06.840 --> 1:02:11.160
<v Speaker 2>relationship between the two sports and the problems that they

1:02:11.200 --> 1:02:16.280
<v Speaker 2>have with an aging audience and an audience that, you know,

1:02:16.720 --> 1:02:20.040
<v Speaker 2>a younger audience that wants to see more and more action,

1:02:20.360 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 2>is baseball has now stripped away some of that reverence

1:02:25.760 --> 1:02:28.680
<v Speaker 2>for this is the way that we've always done things.

1:02:28.720 --> 1:02:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Therefore we will always do them going forward. Golf might

1:02:32.720 --> 1:02:35.280
<v Speaker 2>want to look over there and say, Okay, they had

1:02:35.320 --> 1:02:40.440
<v Speaker 2>a similar They honored their history and valued their history

1:02:40.480 --> 1:02:44.160
<v Speaker 2>in a similar way. They've done some pretty radical things,

1:02:44.200 --> 1:02:49.120
<v Speaker 2>and they that radical stuff involved buy in from all parties,

1:02:49.480 --> 1:02:52.000
<v Speaker 2>reluctant by in in some cases, but people that have

1:02:52.040 --> 1:02:55.640
<v Speaker 2>come around and understand it, couldn't we do the same

1:02:55.880 --> 1:02:59.560
<v Speaker 2>in the name of saving our sport, not just at

1:02:59.560 --> 1:03:03.040
<v Speaker 2>the profession level, but at the recreational level and getting

1:03:03.120 --> 1:03:06.200
<v Speaker 2>more people involved, because you know, we all make those

1:03:06.200 --> 1:03:08.479
<v Speaker 2>evaluations when we're gonna go play golf. Am I gonna

1:03:08.480 --> 1:03:11.120
<v Speaker 2>play on a Saturday morning when I know it's going

1:03:11.200 --> 1:03:13.200
<v Speaker 2>to kill you know, I'm not going to be home

1:03:13.280 --> 1:03:14.960
<v Speaker 2>until two or three because this round is going to

1:03:15.040 --> 1:03:18.440
<v Speaker 2>take five hours. Like that's a real life evaluation that

1:03:18.520 --> 1:03:21.720
<v Speaker 2>has nothing to do with whether TV producers watching Patrick

1:03:21.760 --> 1:03:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Cantlay stand over a ball for two minutes, like, but

1:03:24.040 --> 1:03:25.800
<v Speaker 2>they're related.

1:03:25.280 --> 1:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean absolutely, it's uh. I think one of

1:03:29.240 --> 1:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the things like that's interesting about golf is I think

1:03:32.240 --> 1:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the people that hold the most reverence for the history

1:03:34.600 --> 1:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of the game are the ones that want to change

1:03:37.120 --> 1:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the most.

1:03:38.120 --> 1:03:40.000
<v Speaker 2>That could be true, I mean it, and you think

1:03:40.040 --> 1:03:45.600
<v Speaker 2>about it, like because whatever, like Jack Nicholas and Gary

1:03:45.600 --> 1:03:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Player and Arnold Palmer when he was alive and now

1:03:47.480 --> 1:03:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Tom Watson. They do the honorary shot thing at the Masters,

1:03:51.480 --> 1:03:53.600
<v Speaker 2>and they come in for a press conference like early

1:03:53.640 --> 1:03:57.480
<v Speaker 2>that Thursday morning, and of course they're they're asked state

1:03:57.480 --> 1:04:02.400
<v Speaker 2>of the game questions because their their opinion matters. If

1:04:02.440 --> 1:04:05.800
<v Speaker 2>you go back to the thirteenth hole, you know they're

1:04:05.840 --> 1:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>talking about, well, we're evaluating whether to hit four iron

1:04:09.000 --> 1:04:11.680
<v Speaker 2>into that green. We would like these guys to have

1:04:11.800 --> 1:04:16.800
<v Speaker 2>that same evaluation. It's you know, eagling it with eight

1:04:16.840 --> 1:04:19.720
<v Speaker 2>iron in your hand is not the same. So you're right,

1:04:19.840 --> 1:04:26.360
<v Speaker 2>like the historical figures are hyper aware that the challenge

1:04:26.440 --> 1:04:29.320
<v Speaker 2>is not the same that they faced both on a

1:04:29.520 --> 1:04:31.880
<v Speaker 2>day to day basis and a shot by shot basis.

1:04:32.360 --> 1:04:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Restoring that would be would be good for everybody.

1:04:36.000 --> 1:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I think last question and we'll get you out of here.

1:04:40.440 --> 1:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for the time. But do you

1:04:42.720 --> 1:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>think a pitch clock or a shot clock is feasible

1:04:46.600 --> 1:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>for golf?

1:04:48.000 --> 1:04:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I think you have to you. Instead of phrasing it

1:04:51.160 --> 1:04:54.400
<v Speaker 2>that way, I think it should be phrased why is

1:04:54.440 --> 1:04:58.360
<v Speaker 2>it not feasible? Like why can we not be aggressive

1:04:59.040 --> 1:05:03.480
<v Speaker 2>in a address identifying and addressing a problem that is

1:05:03.520 --> 1:05:07.280
<v Speaker 2>affecting the game from the top level to the entry level,

1:05:07.840 --> 1:05:12.560
<v Speaker 2>and that includes players who young players who are really

1:05:12.600 --> 1:05:14.760
<v Speaker 2>into golf. If you're lucky enough to have hooked somebody

1:05:14.800 --> 1:05:18.640
<v Speaker 2>on the sport and they're watching a round of golf

1:05:18.720 --> 1:05:21.800
<v Speaker 2>and they see player A, B, and C on TV

1:05:23.080 --> 1:05:25.800
<v Speaker 2>taking all this time, evaluating all these things and not

1:05:26.000 --> 1:05:28.200
<v Speaker 2>stepping up there and decisively hitting a shot, what are

1:05:28.200 --> 1:05:30.440
<v Speaker 2>they going to do? You mimic? You know, if you're

1:05:30.440 --> 1:05:34.240
<v Speaker 2>a left handed hitter as a kid, you're mimicking Ken

1:05:34.280 --> 1:05:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Griffy's stance, right like you you learn from your heroes.

1:05:38.880 --> 1:05:43.080
<v Speaker 2>If you're learning that taking however much time you want

1:05:43.480 --> 1:05:48.080
<v Speaker 2>is rewarded or not penalized, then there's the train has left.

1:05:48.080 --> 1:05:52.360
<v Speaker 2>It's it's it's impossible to stop. I think golf should

1:05:52.360 --> 1:05:56.120
<v Speaker 2>be asking the question, we know we have this problem,

1:05:56.920 --> 1:06:01.040
<v Speaker 2>we have to take steps to reel it in. For

1:06:01.320 --> 1:06:03.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, we have to figure out logistically what does

1:06:03.800 --> 1:06:06.920
<v Speaker 2>a shot clock mean? How do we penalize people? How

1:06:06.960 --> 1:06:10.040
<v Speaker 2>do we implement it? Rather than saying well, it's so

1:06:10.160 --> 1:06:11.840
<v Speaker 2>it would be so hard, I think you got to

1:06:11.840 --> 1:06:13.080
<v Speaker 2>get more aggressive about it.

1:06:13.720 --> 1:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you if you're worried about solving a problem

1:06:17.040 --> 1:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and the solution being too hard, is you're thinking about

1:06:20.040 --> 1:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it completely the wrong way. And I think, like you know,

1:06:23.040 --> 1:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>important anecdote to what you said, you know, the distance debate.

1:06:28.440 --> 1:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>A lot of what's fueled some of the something needs

1:06:31.520 --> 1:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to change is looking at college golf and seeing, wow,

1:06:35.400 --> 1:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>these kids are longer than the PGA tour, Like this

1:06:38.680 --> 1:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is a problem that is going to continue. You hear

1:06:40.920 --> 1:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Mike Wan talk about this, right, you know, it is

1:06:43.480 --> 1:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>just going to keep becoming a bigger problem because the

1:06:46.240 --> 1:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>kids are longer and longer. The same thing for pace

1:06:48.920 --> 1:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to play. If you go to a college event, it

1:06:51.240 --> 1:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is so slow. If you go to a junior event,

1:06:53.920 --> 1:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>so slow. And it is just become going to continue

1:06:57.680 --> 1:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to become a bigger problem with the sport because it

1:07:01.160 --> 1:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is a self perpetuating problem, and.

1:07:04.240 --> 1:07:10.000
<v Speaker 2>You're you're in there, somewhere in there, you're stifling creativity

1:07:10.320 --> 1:07:17.120
<v Speaker 2>and individuality because you're creating these robotic you know, go

1:07:17.200 --> 1:07:21.280
<v Speaker 2>back to baseball. If you're fetishizing velocity in baseball, it's

1:07:21.320 --> 1:07:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the same thing as fetishizing length in golf. It takes

1:07:26.240 --> 1:07:31.000
<v Speaker 2>some you know, finesse. Pitchers are not They don't get

1:07:31.040 --> 1:07:34.960
<v Speaker 2>a Jamie Moyer doesn't get a shot anymore. Greg Maddox,

1:07:35.280 --> 1:07:38.520
<v Speaker 2>you know who I'm sure you loved. I mean, does

1:07:38.520 --> 1:07:41.040
<v Speaker 2>he not get a shot? He's not valued the same way.

1:07:41.080 --> 1:07:42.240
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't get the chance to.

1:07:42.520 --> 1:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>What about Mark Burley, Yeah, exactly, the best best player

1:07:45.960 --> 1:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot. When you saw Mark Burley is on the mound,

1:07:48.680 --> 1:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>You're just like, ah, this is awesome. It's gonna be

1:07:50.600 --> 1:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>like a two hour game.

1:07:51.640 --> 1:07:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Hour and fifty five minutes and he's gonna allow three

1:07:53.880 --> 1:07:56.560
<v Speaker 2>hits and this is gonna be awesome. There's there's fun

1:07:56.680 --> 1:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>in that, and there's creativity and individuality, and it's not

1:08:00.600 --> 1:08:05.040
<v Speaker 2>just you know, some six' five broad shouldered kid from

1:08:05.120 --> 1:08:08.080
<v Speaker 2>the prairie who's thrown ninety nine with a ninety two

1:08:08.160 --> 1:08:10.600
<v Speaker 2>mile an hour slider that dives at the bottom of the.

1:08:10.680 --> 1:08:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Zone it's the same thing As, okay everybody hits a three. Forty,

1:08:14.680 --> 1:08:20.000
<v Speaker 2>now you, know there's not as much individuality and, creativity

1:08:20.000 --> 1:08:23.800
<v Speaker 2>and the characters are are less distinct when everybody does

1:08:23.840 --> 1:08:26.760
<v Speaker 2>the same, thing and the skills are our level across the.

1:08:26.760 --> 1:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Board all, Right, barry thank you so much for coming.

1:08:30.040 --> 1:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>On that was. GREAT i you, KNOW i thought this

1:08:33.000 --> 1:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>might be a fun conversation and it exceeded WHAT i was.

1:08:36.640 --> 1:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Hoping you people can find You you're you're right at

1:08:40.920 --> 1:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>The Washington. Post it's a publication a few people may

1:08:44.439 --> 1:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>have heard. Of you also have written a few books about,

1:08:48.000 --> 1:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Baseball The, Grind Inside Baseball's Endless season And National, Pastime sports,

1:08:54.320 --> 1:08:57.519
<v Speaker 1>politics and the return of baseball To, WASHINGTON. Dc so

1:08:57.960 --> 1:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>people can find you On twitter and find your writing

1:09:01.560 --> 1:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>at very very many.

1:09:04.560 --> 1:09:07.559
<v Speaker 2>OUTLETS i appreciate you, Plugging, matt and thanks for handing

1:09:07.760 --> 1:09:09.040
<v Speaker 2>having Me. Andy it was a fun.

1:09:09.080 --> 1:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Conversation, Yeah i'll see you see you at THE Us.

1:09:11.520 --> 1:09:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Open yeah sounds. Good all, right.

1:09:23.800 --> 1:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to another edition of The Friday.

1:09:26.840 --> 1:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Podcast today's episode was edited By Matt. Rushes thank, You.

1:09:31.320 --> 1:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt we are gonna be on the. Road we got

1:09:34.240 --> 1:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a ton of stuff going on this. Weekend but as

1:09:37.720 --> 1:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a quick, reminder we're humming in In CLUB. Tf we've

1:09:41.040 --> 1:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of great content, recently great photography AND

1:09:46.720 --> 1:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>i think some words that match up with. It our

1:09:49.720 --> 1:09:53.719
<v Speaker 1>most recent course profiles have been kind OF i think standout.

1:09:53.720 --> 1:09:56.599
<v Speaker 1>Once we've done a hoopy Match Club Chicago Golf Club

1:09:57.280 --> 1:10:00.599
<v Speaker 1>belvedere was the most recent. One we've got some new

1:10:00.640 --> 1:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>ones coming in every. Week we now HAVE i think

1:10:05.280 --> 1:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty in, total almost Twenty may eighteen or eighteen or

1:10:08.720 --> 1:10:12.519
<v Speaker 1>nineteen in. Total so go check it. Out obviously you

1:10:12.560 --> 1:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>get access to the whole back catalog if you haven't.

1:10:15.280 --> 1:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Joined it is thefridagg dot com slash. Membership you can

1:10:19.240 --> 1:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>find out more details ON. Clubtfe it's one hundred and

1:10:22.360 --> 1:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars a year and it really helps us continue

1:10:26.000 --> 1:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to produce great. Content this is the best way you

1:10:28.760 --> 1:10:32.719
<v Speaker 1>can Support Frida. Egg thank you and we'll be back

1:10:32.800 --> 1:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>next week with a couple. Episodes