WEBVTT - Polygraphs and Scent Dogs

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna place your left hand on the Bible

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and raise your right hand, and please repeat after me

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and I do solemnly swear theven titled action find the

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>defendant guilty of the crime. It makes no sense, it

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't fit. If it doesn't fit, you must equit. We

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>all took the same of office. We're all bound by

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that common commitment to support and defend the Constitution. Do you

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you bear true faith and allegiance to the same that

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 1>you faithfully discharge the duties of our office? Do you

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>but the truth. From Tenderfoot TV and I Heart Radio,

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>this is Sworn. I'm your host, Philip Holloway. My name

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is William Michael Dillon. I was arrested for murder in August,

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>for a crime I didn't commit. I'm released in November eighteen,

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight. Thank you for the keepers of

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>justice took me away when I was a teen, not

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>really mar than the far justly sent to Hell's prison

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to see my faith, only my will to survived. Let

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>me read that game. Let me read that again. We

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>read that a game dead said like roads and like justice.

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Third it will be done like go to lock. Lady

0:01:46.160 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>just has lost its war. Song you heard at the

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the episode is called Black Robes and Lawyers

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>by William Dillon. William is another innocent man who we

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>met through the California Innocence Project. He was convicted after

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a series of mistakes and misconduct in the legal system.

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>His story caught my attention because of faulty forensic evidence.

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>I'll let him tell you about it. Before I went

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to prisoner was very shy when I was released. Through

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>this journey got this voice to start talking about the journey.

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>As horrific as it was, it was also inspiring to

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>look back on, like walking through the fire and coming

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>out in shiny air. When I was wrongfully convicted, I

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was sitting in Florida State Prison, total hellhole, and I

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>had been put in isolation for being assaulted. They didn't

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>allow me to have anything, so I started writing Robes

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and Lawyers on the toilet paper with a little plastic

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>vendible pen that they gave me. It wasn't a song.

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>It was sort of like a testament to the fact

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that nobody was listening to me, so I felt that

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>this was a way to speak it out. My journey

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>started in I was twenty years old, six days away

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>from me in one and I was arrested for murder

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of a man on a beach. My brother part we

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>were checking out the waves. The detectives came up to

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the car and told us they were investigating a murder.

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:42.119
<v Speaker 1>A man had been beaten on a beach. I told

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>him that I didn't have anything to do with and

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it didn't know anything about it other than the fact

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that it happened over on over that side over there,

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and to that point that they began to ask me

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to get out of the car. I told him that

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I had a prior engagements whatever that we needed to go,

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and they said, okay, that's fine. Can you come back

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow at the Sheriff's office. I said, sure, no problem,

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>And that was basically just to get out of there.

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't involved and I didn't want to be involved

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in it personally. Days past, I had forgotten all about

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>our interview, and next thing you know, seems that the

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>police had come down to a beach a few miles

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 1>north of that beach to where my brother was and

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>asked him if he had seen me. I show up

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>there a little while later, and he says, Bill, the

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>police were here. I called him and I told him

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>where I was, and within a matter of minutes they

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>were coming with sirens. Blaren came and all the exits

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and says, we have to take you downtown. I was

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a little a little scared about it, but I went

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:54.119
<v Speaker 1>with him. They questioned me, of course I really didn't

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of the answers answering questions of ten

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>days prior, and one of them, where were you? I

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>honestly did no, So I gave them a bunch of

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>places that I might have been. It just so happens

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that I frequent in a bar that was across the

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 1>street of the place where the man was killed. I

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>see instances like this in my work all the time,

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Innocent people who talk to the police because they've got

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 1>nothing to hide, at least in their mind, But unwittingly

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>they wind up giving authorities incriminating information anyway, even if

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.559
<v Speaker 1>they had nothing at all to do with the case.

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>The advice I give to people is not to talk

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to the police ever. Just don't do it. Hell, even

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the police will tell you it's in your best interest

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>not to talk to them. It's counterintuitive. People think that

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>if they talk to the police, they can prove their innocence.

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.119
<v Speaker 1>But I've seen over and over again people give away

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>information that just happens to connect them with a crime,

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>even one they didn't commit, things like in William's case,

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>going to a bar nearby knowing that the crime took

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>place at all, or even knowing someone distantly connected to

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the case. If you give the police, or any government

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>authority for that matter, the kind of information that even

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>remotely connects you to a crime, or even the area

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of a crime, then suddenly you were involved. There are

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 1>no consequences. However, if you refuse to talk to the police,

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you have an absolute right to remain silent. It's a

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>constitutional right. It's one that our servicemen and women have

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>fought and died for for generations. The police know this,

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>judges know this, and juries are not ever even told

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>if someone exercises their right to remain silent. Next thing,

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, she says, can you sign this piece of paper?

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>So I looked at the paper, make sure it wasn't

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a confession of any kind, and it was some sort

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of agreements to do something or whatever that didn't involve

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>me in my mind. So I signed the paper. She

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>told me, before you go, we don't need this paper.

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead and waded up and throw it in the

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>trash can. So I took the paper and waded it

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>up through in the trash can. She says, no, waded

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 1>up real good. So I took both my hands and

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.679
<v Speaker 1>bawled it up like a baseball. That night, the police

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>came back. They knocked on the door and my dad

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>answered the door. They said, we have some questions for

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>your son. If he passes these tests, we won't bother

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>him anymore. They took me down to a courthouse. Finally,

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a man came out of another door. He says, come

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>with me. He doesn't say who he is or nothing,

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>he just says come with me. So I walked with him,

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and just to my left as I go in the

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>door as another door with a big mirror on it.

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>It's one way glass and there's a chair to the right,

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a big sofa chair. He takes that chair and turns

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that chair towards is facing the door, and then he

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>tells me to sit in the chair, and he says,

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>hold up, before you do that, face that wall, which

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>is my left ear facing the door, and he says,

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>take your right hand and pull your hair all the

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>way over to the right. Now my hair is on

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>my shoulders. Description that they put out for the killer

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is short haired with a dark, medium length mustache. I've

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>never had a mustache in my life. So what he

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted me to do was look like I had short

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>hair to somebody was behind the glass. I did not

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>know this at the time, and it didn't occur to me.

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I was just passing their test. Supposedly, the man that

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>had picked up the killer was behind the glass, and

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>he was supposed to be identifying whoever it was that

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they had in the room. I was supposed to look

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>like I was a passenger in his vehicle, so if

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>he looks at me, he's looking at my left side.

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>He was legally blind, but of course he was driving

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a car, and I've always asked that question, how can

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody be legally blind and driving a truck. So what

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>they did is they made me come in and look

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>at the wall, pull my hair all the way over

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to the right, so it looked like I had short

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 1>hair to a person that can't see that well. Eyewitness

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>testimony is questionable and dangerous to begin with, But when

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>William was telling me this story, I was shocked at

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the links these investigators took to match him with the

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>description of the criminal. I have never in my career

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>heard of an instance where a suspect was asked to

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>alter his or her appearance to better fit an eyewitness description,

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>let alone from a man who is legally blind. There

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>have been huge advances in what we now know about

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>eyewitness testimony and the problems associated with it since this

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>case occurred, But I'm honestly shocked that this kind of

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>procedure happened in my lifetime. Facts be known as the

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>guy did not ide me, but they lied. They said

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that he did, and then they started to tumble from

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that point on. Within a matter of minutes, doors slam's

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>open and a big, huge, gentleman shepherd starts, I mean

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>into the room. The dog's name was harassed too. He

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>came over by me, sniffed all around me. It was

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of frightening. The officer pulled him back and says,

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>how does it feel to be tracked by? Harassed too?

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>He walked out the room and never saw him again.

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>The dog Harassed Too was used to snip on the

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>paper that I watered up. Then they supposedly watered up

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>four other pieces of paper put it in the lineup,

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and harass Too is supposed to have picked my piece

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of paper off of a shirt that the killer left

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in a truck. And that's really what made me the suspect.

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Along with that salty eyewitness testimony, this aspect of William's case,

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the use of a scent dog, struck me as an

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 1>important aspect of the legal system. What scientific processes are

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>police investigators using to find criminals and what happens when

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that science is not used the right When I'm not

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>working on this podcast or working on my own cases

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in court, sometimes I'm brought into our sister podcast Up

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and vanished. Fans of that show might recognize the next

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>woman we spoke with, Tracy Sergeant, is a certified canine

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>search and rescue specialist. After hearing about how William's case

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>was led astray by a scent dog, I wanted to

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>speak with Tracy about how she uses her canines and

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the ways in which they should and should not be used,

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly in criminal cases. My name is Tracy Trace Sergeant.

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I've been involved with canine operations for about twenty seven years,

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>currently involved in investigations and missing person cases as well

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>as production work. The question I get quite often is

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that how do you make your dogs do this, Tracy?

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, oh, I do not. I'm really the

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>chauffeur so to speak, to transport the dogs to the

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>locations that we need them to serve, and then we

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>just let the magic happen. My dogs are specifically trained

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to find missing persons, both dead and alive, and that's

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>all they do. They tell us two things every time

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 1>that they are used, regardless of the case, whether it's

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a life person or a deceased person. Those two things

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>are they'll tell us where something is, and they'll tell

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>us where something isn't. And it's interesting, Phil, When I

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:31.319
<v Speaker 1>started this, I was really blindfolded and you know, focusing

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>on finding what we're looking for. Through the years and

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>my experience, I've discovered that knowing where somebody isn't it

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>is just as important and as helpful as whereas somebody is.

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>For a life sent dog, we all smell very unique

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and different to that dog. But when we die, regardless

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of our background, whether we're male or female, or demographics

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>where we live. It is a matter to the dog.

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Death is life's perfect equalizer. Human remains scent is human

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>remains scent to the dogs, regardless of how long that

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>person has been deceased. I asked Tracy what made dogs

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in particular a good resource for finding missing people. They

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>have to have that keen sense of smell just to survive. Also,

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 1>their body is actually designed in such a way that

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>makes them the perfect scent detecting machine, so to speak.

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>The way their brain is shaped and design their nose,

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>their ears, their drive to want to use that nose.

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>We live through our eyes. Dogs live through their nose.

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>When you look at it from that perspective, it really

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is a different way of looking at the world. And

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I would say the biggest difference between them and let's

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>say other animals that also have a very keen sense

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 1>of smell is that bond and relationship that dogs want

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to have with us naturally, and that's what sets them apart.

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>They are truly the epitome of man's best friend. In

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>one part, it's a unique situation. They are a partner,

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>they are part of the investigative team, They are also

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a very unique resource or tool in the toolbox the

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>investigators use. However, dogs should not be associated with That's

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that this case is going to stand on.

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>We are a very small part of this investigative puzzle

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're trying to put together. We meaning myself, other investigators,

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement, the family, even the media. Whatever my dogs

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>do or don't do, it's not quote a smoking gun,

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. It's simply part of the investigation. It

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>should be based on the strength of the evidence and

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>compounded by whatever additional evidence they have in addition to

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>what the dogs do or don't do. Can your dogs

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>identify someone in the lineup from evidence that's found at

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a crime scene? In other words, can they match a

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>specific person with a specific item of evidence. I would say,

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you can train a dog if it has the right

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>drives and temperament and personality, you can train them for

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>almost anything. So I would say, as a broad stroke answer, yes,

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's not something that I do personally. My dogs

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>aren't trained to do that, nor would I train my

0:15:56.600 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>dogs to do that. Dog handlers and dogs themselves, everybody

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is different. How they approach something might be a little

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>bit different. But nonetheless the same amount of professionalism, ethics,

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and integrity and character and honesty, preparation, preparing yourself as

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a handler, that means mentally physically in the training, preparing

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the dog, and again that means physically mentally in training.

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>All of that is the important part of it. After

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>talking with Tracy, I feel like I had a better

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>handle on how canines can be used as just one

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of many tools in an investigation. But I know from

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the cases that I see all the time that some

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>science is junk science and it simply should not be

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>used at all, or at least not in the way

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>that it is commonly used in the criminal justice system.

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Some of this so called science has become outdated, it's

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>become debunked. I wanted to speak with an expert on

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the legal ramifications of debunk science, somebody who sees these

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>types of cases all the time. This is Amelia max Field.

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm the forensic science specialist at the Pennsylvania Innocence Project.

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>To the bulk of our work is trying to rectify

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a wrongful conviction. On the back end, my caseload is

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>primarily flawed forensic science cases, cases where a person was

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>convicted based on a science that either was invalid at

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the time or was used improperly. It's so hard to

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>pick mistakes on the back end. If we can make

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a difference on the front end and educating judges and

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>juries and lawyers about these issues, and in trying to

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>keep unreliable forensic sciences out of court in the first place,

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we can make a bigger difference in ensuring that block

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>forensic sciences aren't being used in court. Forensic science developed

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in the law enforcement community, save for DNA testing, which

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>was developed as an actual science, all other forensic sciences

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>were developed as front fighting tools, not as sciences. These

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>things were admitted in court for work decades without anyone

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>questioning whether or not they were valid. In two thousand nine,

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the National Academies of Science issued kind of a landmark

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>report looking at forensic science, and they found that everything

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>except for nuclear DNA testing lacked scientific validity. Essentially, it

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>undermined every forensic science except for straightforward nuclear DNA testing,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>so that even doesn't include things like DNA mixture analysis,

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 1>which has some limits as well. I asked Amelia which

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>forensic sciences are the most unreliable and just why some

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of these common law enforcement tools can be considered more

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>subjective than scientific any discipline where as a human is

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>just looking at the futures of one item and then

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at the features of another item and comparing them

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to determine whether they match or not. Things like white

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>mark care comparison, tire shot analysis, old school arts and analysis,

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 1>and even where you are just looking at a pattern

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and not even includes fingerprint analysis. Fingerprint analysis and ARSON

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>are the only ones since two thousand nine that have

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>gone back and tried to validy, But traditionally fingerprint analysis

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>is just a person comparing two pictures of fingerprints and

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 1>determining for themselves whether or not they matched. I think

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>if you pulled the average criminal defense layer an average prosecutor,

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't really know how a fingerprint is examined. They

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>would assume it's like C S I and someone puts

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it into a fancily computer and then it spits out

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a match. That's actually not how it works at all.

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Working in a state lab is a grueling job. You

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>have an extremely high caseload, you are not paid extremely well,

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and your access to continuing education into proper training is

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty limited. Most people are expected to sort of learn

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>on the job, whereas we should be training experts in

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a uniform and unbiased way. Most labs are in the

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>control of the state, so even though individual analysts don't

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>necessarily think of themselves as an arm of the prosecution,

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>they really are part of the prosecution team. They're funding

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>typically comes through the state and the district attorney's budget.

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes we should have some sort of licensing body, something

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>similar to the f d A, to test out emerging

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>forensic sciences to be sure that they're valid before they're

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>admitted in court. Many of these unreliable forensic sciences were

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>first admitted in very high profile cases. The first time

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>bite marks were admitted in Florida was in the Ted

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bundy case. The prosecution really needs a conviction, so they

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>reach outside of the bounds of what the discipline can

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>actually say and admit an unvalid discipline, And in a

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>case like that, a judge is much less likely to

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>not admit evidence that could convict someone because the stakes

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>are higher. I think we need some sort of body

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to validate these disciplines as they emerge. Science inherently evolved.

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to be using evidence that changes and

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>developed to secure conviction, you have to be open to

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>revisiting that conviction as the science or the evidence changes

0:21:43.040 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and evolved. Because so many of these wrongful conviction cases

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>include flawed forensic science. There's a lot more to cover here,

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly as Amelia mentioned the problems with bite marks. But

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a perfect storm of circumstances came together in William's case

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that led to his wrongful conviction, and there's more to

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>his story. So they take me and put me in

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a room with a bunch of police officers. It's not

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>like the television where they put you in a room

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>and there's two guys come in and talk to you.

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is like five, six of them. They were

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 1>all different places, and they're all talking to me at

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>once about different things. And I kept admirably denying any

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>involvement in I didn't know any answers. I wasn't involved. Finally,

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they said, will you take a lot of detector tests?

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>And I said, sure, I will. So they put me

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in a jail cell, gave me this plastic mattress with

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>no sheets, no pellos, no nothing. I go up to

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the lie detector, do everything he tells me to do.

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>The chief investigator, he says, we got you your lying.

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I said, you got the wrong guys said, and I

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have anything to do with it. Must be something

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>wrong with your machine. The results of polygraph tests or

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>lie detectors are not admissible in court. And there's a

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 1>good reason. I know from first hand personal experience that

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>it is possible to fail a lot of detector tests

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on purpose. It is possible to pass a lot detector

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>tests when you have lied, and it is possible to

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>fail a lot of detector tests when you have told

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the truth. Polygraphs and a lot of detectors are simply unreliable,

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>and the only people that I know who advocate for

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>their use these days are the polygraph examiners themselves, the

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>people who have an interest in the business surviving. Eventually,

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>they had gotten tired and they were ranting, and Raven

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and I kept putting up to say a thing, and

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>finally I said, Okay, we'll offer you five years manslaughter.

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry about it. You'll do the two years and

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll be on your own. You'll beat free. I said,

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not taking any deals. I didn't have anything to

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>do with it. I'm not taking no kind of deal. Finally,

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I said, okay, we're gonna put you in an electric chair.

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna be arrested for first degree murder felony murder.

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I said, you got the wrong guy. They locked me

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>up and sent me to the county jail. Another commonality

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>that we see among people who are wrongfully in prison

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>is the situation where the government comes along and they

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 1>offer an incredible deal if someone just pleads guilty. I

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>was arrested on August and I was convicted by November.

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I saw my lawyer twice. He asked me to write

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>down what I remember about the night. The next time

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I saw him was to get a haircut. When William

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>told me he only saw his lawyer twice before his trial,

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I was horrified. That's just not enough time to get

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>the job done right now. I get the defense council,

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>particularly public defenders. They're often stretched thin, but it's like

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>going to a good barber with bad scissors. They may

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>have the best of intentions, but if they don't have

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the tools or the time to get the job done,

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get a bad result. My experience in

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the trial was very aggravating for me, not factual in

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>any way. Most of the information came from people that

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I had given the police, people I might have been

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>with on the night of the murder took place. Their

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>statements initially were that I wasn't involved, but progressively their

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>statements got worse and worse as time went on. The

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>next thing, I knew my friends that I told him

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 1>I was either at their place or somewhere, have me

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>with blood on me in a shirt that was found

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>in the truck. And also I was saying that I

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>did something terrible. One of the most shocking things William

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>told us was that the state's main witness was a

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.239
<v Speaker 1>woman William had been on a handful of dates with.

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>She testified that William was at the scene of the crime,

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 1>covered in blood, vocally admitting to the murder. It came

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>out only after his trial was over that this woman

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>was having a sexual affair with the chief investigator on

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>William's case. But for his friends to also turn on

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>him means that they were probably some other kinds of

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>deals being made behind the scenes. He was promising our

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>jobs and certain things, and they got the guys that

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>were involved that we're selling weed or doing this or

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that there that they would look the other way or

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't bother him with this if they just saw

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:49.959
<v Speaker 1>me in the shirt or just put me at a

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>certain place. It only lasted four days, I think, convicted

0:26:55.520 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>me within forty five minutes. My father chester five. My

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>sister testified. When I took the stand, I felt like,

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>now I was going to get the truth out. The

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>factually is that I actually don't remember the night as

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>far as it goes, you know, to put it down

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to pin points, that I was right here at this point,

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>at this certain time. That didn't help the situation. But

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I didn't make me a murderer either.

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was being as truthful as I could.

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess if I was a murderer, i'd

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>have an out by at least close to something. One

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>question I'll always remember prosecutor asking me, She says, Mr Dillon,

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>do you mean to tell me that all the people

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>here are lying and that you're the only one telling

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 1>the truth. And I said, yes, ma'am, not just the

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>way it seems to me. And it took twenty seven years,

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>but I proved it. I was sentenced life with the

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>mandatory quarter I had to serve at least twenty five

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 1>years before I was eligible for parole. I had served

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.199
<v Speaker 1>every single day of maximum security, and I went up

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>for parole, I to my twenty six year and he

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>gave me a date. It was like thirty years off.

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>So I was never gonna see any freedom. They weren't

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>going to release me. William was exonerated in two thousand

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and eight with the help of the Innocence Project of

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Florida and DNA testing from the shirt found in the

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>witnesses truck. He has been cleared of all charges after

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>spending twenty seven years of his life locked away in

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a prison. There's so much to talk about in the

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>area of forensic science, particularly junk science, so we're going

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to spend next week's episode covering more stories. Next time

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>on sworn. Our system in California here is probably one

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest prison systems in the world. We have

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>more people in prison here than most countries. I kind

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of described it like being the bottom of a well.

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>You're looking up at this you know you're innocent only

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>with their sayings a lie, but you can't get any representation.

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>NET would stand up and present this. Let a description

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>be jumping out of airplane without a parachute. You know

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna die, but you just keep lapping your ears anyway.

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Sworn is a production of Tenderfoot TV and I Heart Radio.

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Our lead producer is Christina Dana. Executive producers are Payne

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay and Donald Albright for Tenderfoot TV, Matt Frederick and

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Alex Williams for I Heart Radio, and myself Philip Holloway.

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Additional production by Trevor Young, Mason Lindsay, Mike Rooney, Jamie Albright,

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and Halle Beadall original music and sound designed by Makeup

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and Vanity Set. Our theme song is Blood in the

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Water by Layup. Show art and design is by Trevor Eisler,

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>editing by Christina Dana, Mixing and mastering by Mike Rooney

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and Cooper Skinner. Special thanks to the team at I

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio from u t a or In Rosenbound and

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Grace Royer, Ryan Nord and Matthew Papa from the Nord

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Group back Media and Marketing, and Station sixteen. I'd also

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>like to extend a very personal and special thanks to

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>all of our contributors and guests who have helped to

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>make all of these episodes possible. You can find Sworn

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram at sworn podcast and follow

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>me your host, Philip Holloway on Twitter at phil Holloway

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>e s Q. Our website is sworn podcast dot com

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and you can check out other Tenderfoot TV podcasts at

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>www dot tenderfoot dot tv. If you have questions or comments,

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at Sworn at tenderfoot dot tv

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>or leave us a voicemail at four zero four for

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>one zero zero four four one as always and I

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>for listening, Tell us what the Axono E Band is.

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 1>The Axonorey Band is a group of guys that have

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>all been wrongfully convicted for numbers of years, And myself,

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Raymond Taler, Antoine Day, Eddie Lowry and uh Ted Bradford

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and all of those people were wrongfully convicted, every one

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of them. Wow.