WEBVTT - AlixPartners' Simon Freakley on Why Being a CEO Is Tougher Than Ever

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I was walking down the street in the States a

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of years and twenty years ago and my phone,

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>my mobile phone. I didn't recognize that. I picked it up,

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>and this guy said, hello, is that sign of Freeplus?

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I said, I said, no, this is Richard Branson here,

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>because I'd never met him before in my life. So

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, is that Richard Branson Richard Branson, who said yes,

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Richard Branson. Richard Branson. So he said, I have

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a my friend has a problem, and I'm told that

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you're the person that can solve it. And so I

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>laughed and said, You've no idea how many times people

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.479
<v Speaker 1>say that to me, Richard, that my friend has a problem.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>It turned out that George Michael had bought what he

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>thought was John Lennon's piano and paid a vast amount

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of money for it, millions of pounds for it, to

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>only find that it was just any old piano and

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't John Lennon's at all, And so he's trying

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to get George Michael's five million pounds bag.

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Where did you buy it?

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:48.959
<v Speaker 1>Like brought to an auction house? And did you get

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it back? We did? Yeah? I did, No, No, we

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>did No, it was a complete fraud.

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 2>But how did you so what you call the auction

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 2>house and say, well, we just.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Did the profdance on the piano and good that it

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the right piano.

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 2>What a story.

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:04.559
<v Speaker 1>It was a bizarre moment.

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 3>I must say, that was a story there from our

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 3>guests this week, Simon Freakley, who's the chief executive officer

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 3>of restructuring group.

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Alex Partners now Dave. To be fair, we caught the

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 2>anecdote just as he sat down in the podcast studio,

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 2>but frankly was too good nut to keep and he

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 2>kindly let us keep it in the podcast because it's

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 2>a story about problem solving.

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 3>That's right, you know, Elton John Pianos. I mean, we

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 3>always get the best stuff beginning right before we actually

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 3>start talking. But luckily he's happy for us to keep

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 3>it in. But you know, as you say, this is

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 3>a story about fixing problems. Chief executives across the globe

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 3>turned to Simon and Alex Partners for help when they

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 3>are facing some of the biggest hurdles that are happening

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 3>in the world right now.

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's not all about Pianos. I think maybe at

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 2>the moment. It's more about market volatility and inflation, how

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 2>you deal with all of that, but really how you

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 2>also communicate your vision more effectively.

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm David Merritt and I'm Francine Laqua and this is

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 3>in the City, Bloombo's podcast, connecting you to the conversations

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 3>at the heart of the City of London.

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Now this week, Dave, what advice are city leaders seeking

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 2>from the boss of one of the biggest restructuring firms.

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 3>That's right, we ask Simon Freakley, chief executive officer of

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 3>Alex Partners, an international business advisory firm known for its

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 3>work in corporate turnarounds.

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 2>And we've seen the name Alex Partners quite a lot

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 2>around the potential sale of the Telegraph newspapers and Spectator magazine.

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 3>In our conversation we talk about how the challenges CEO's

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 3>face have changed over the last twenty years.

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 2>We're joined by Simon Freakley, chief executive officer of Alex Partners. Simon,

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for joining us. So when you

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 2>introduce yourself to someone new, what do you say. I'm

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 2>like the restructuring guy. I advise on all matters. There's

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 2>nothing I can't fix.

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't do anything as grand as that. I just

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>say I'm run a consulting firm that specialses in difficult problems,

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>often problems that need to be solved at speed, and

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 1>we're somewhat industry and geography agnostic. We just tackle difficult.

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Things, talk us through those difficult things on at the moment.

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 3>How does how difficult is the economy at the moment,

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 3>and the sort of problems that are crossing your desk.

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>The UK, of course has had the triple calamity of Brexit,

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>then the pandemic, and now of course this awful human

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>tragedy which is the Russian invasion of Ukraine. So I

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>think those three things have had individually a massive impact

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>on Europe generally and the UK specifically. And these disruptions

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>layer on top of each other. And of course it

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't as if nothing else has been going on. You know,

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>we've come to the end of a thirty year supercycle,

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>so everybody's been forecasting a recession. It looks like a

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>small R rather than a big R recession, and it's

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>yet to really bite. But here we are with double

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>digit core inflation. It's a very challenging time.

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Your industry has come under quite a lot of fire.

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Right there's this new book by Mariana Matsukada, how the

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 2>consulting industry weakens our businesses and fantalizes our governments and

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 2>warps our economies. Do you feel like you're included in that?

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Have you had to justify consultancy firm fees and just

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 2>your work?

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>In general, everybody's entitled to a point of view, and

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>I think how you use consultants, of course is tailored

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to the circumstances. But consultants who don't deliver value for

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>money are always wide open to those accusations. And of

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>course there are many stories of people talking about being

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>infested with consultants and ones then they can't get rid

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of them. But I think ultimately the way in which

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>consultants make a difference is to make things happen with

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>clients that they can't get done on their own. And

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>ultimately we're only as good as our last job.

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned the triple whammy that's hit Britain, the problems

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 3>harder to fix right now, And are you having the

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 3>success with these restructurings with the consulting that you're doing

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 3>with companies?

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Well? Interesting David, Probably restructuring is only twenty percent of

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>what we do. Eighty percent of what we do is

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>helping healthy companies reposition themselves or grow faster. And we

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>talked about those three specific disruptions just now, but there

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>are profound shifts going on around technology, around environmental pressures,

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>and it's the multiplicity of these pressures that are so

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>challenging for executive teams and chief executives because they layer

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>on top of each other. These disruptions are getting quicker

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the cycles that companies need to go

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>through to respond to them. And so what we're finding

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is that the companies that do best, the leaders that

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>do best, are ones that don't wait for perfection. They

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>do it nearly right, but do it now. They have

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a preponderance to move to action because the markets are

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 1>changing so quickly. If they don't move to action quickly,

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>they will simply be left behind.

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you think Simon that the consultancy industry is sometimes

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 2>used as scapegoat, so even if you add value, it's

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 2>easier for each executive rather than taking the hard decisions,

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 2>say look, I'm going to have a third party tell

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 2>me this, and so it keeps me popular within my company.

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 1>The challenge Francine, I think with a description of the

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>consulting industry is a very very broad description of what

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>are really quite different offerings. So clearly there are the

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>strategy consultants, there are operational consultants, there are crisis consultants.

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think, depending on the nature of the problem

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to be solved, you know, some of these challenges are fair.

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately a consultant pointed at a problem where they

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>can really make a difference, will give speed to insight,

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to understand what the choices are and therefore inform the

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>executive teams what their real choices are, and then, having

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>focused on their best choice, speed to execution. And it's

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the speed to execution that really makes a difference, because

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, it's very difficult to do surgery on yourself,

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and so companies do find it hard to pivot in

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>their operating models, or carve out non core activities, or

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>do difficult things, and often it is helpful to have

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a catalyst to change agent to make that happen.

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 2>So something this would be like what an Elon Musk

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 2>calling you and saying, I've lost half of my advertisers.

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>What do I do talking about self inflicted injuries. I mean,

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that appointing an independent chief executive is probably

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the most sensible thing that he's done in the last

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. And of course, you know, bringing in an

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>expert who has seemingly made in a relatively short time

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a difference. So I mean, obviously Elon Musk is an

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>exceptional person, an exceptional business leader, but he's not a

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.679
<v Speaker 1>specialist in advertising, he's not a specialist in social media.

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So oftentimes the consultant's role is to work out what

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the real choices are and then to support teams move

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to action and make the critical things happen on a schedule.

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 3>What are the biggest challenges that you think CEOs have

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 3>at the moment or what's on their mind? Is it

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 3>how do we harness AI?

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it?

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 3>How do we cope with rising interest rates? What are

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 3>the problems of twenty twenty three the most kind of

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:02.559
<v Speaker 3>front at center of people's minds?

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, David, it's all of the above. And this is

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the big challenge for business leaders now because everything is

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>moving so quickly. We do this survey every year three

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand executives around the world. We ask them what's top

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of mind for them. One of the interesting stistics that

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>came out this time round from those interviews, at ninety

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>five percent of all three thousand respondents felt that they

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>had to fundamentally change their business model in the next

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>three years. Seventy five percent of them felt they weren't

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>making swift enough progress and doing it. So to give

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you a sense of the velocity of change that's going on,

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>which is the compounding effect of all of these different

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.839
<v Speaker 1>forces and pressures, it's overwhelming for CEOs.

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 3>And sorry, is that stat much higher than it was

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 3>a few years ago.

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Significantly higher than it was a few years ago. Another

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>stet which you'll be interested in. I think we also ask,

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, CEOs, what's top of mind for them? What

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>are they anxious about? Well, seventy percent of them this

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>year were anxious about losing their jobs, up twenty points

0:08:57.520 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>from last year. So I rather joke that we should

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>call our disrupt index the anxiety Index, because that anxiety

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is becoming real.

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to play Devil's advocate that if ninety five

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 2>percent are wondering about their business model and the fact

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 2>that they need to radically rechange, are these companies that

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 2>should even.

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Survive, well, some of them won't, but some of them

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>will thrive. What our work in this area is also

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated is that there are winners and losers at times

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of profound disruption, and the winners use those disruptions to

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>capitalize on the opportunities that those disruptions present. And so

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>we talk a lot about technological disruption. When you look

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>inside that and look at connectivity. For instance, the connectivity

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that's facilitated by the three billion or so smartphones and

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>tablets around the world allow consumers to create their own

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem of news of products by reference to values of organizations.

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>And so it's an example of how using new technologies

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.959
<v Speaker 1>companies can pivot and actually thrive on the back of

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.559
<v Speaker 1>these disruptions. But sure there'll be winners and they'll be losers.

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Disruption to be or can be a good word. Can't say,

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 3>you know it must probably cause himself a disruptor. But

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 3>then married with this anxiety that actually the disruption is

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 3>going to possibly see the end of their firm that fills.

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 3>What's different at the moment are the levels of anxiety

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 3>higher in Britain than in the rest of your global clients.

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, David, I mean, I think it's

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a general it's a general condition for CEOs. I mean,

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>let's just sort of put a fine point in it.

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>The job of CEO now is much more demanding that's

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>ever been. Why is that. Well, the corresponsibilities of revenue

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 1>growth and earnings growth dividends to shareholders remain, but there

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:38.839
<v Speaker 1>are additional pressures that simply weren't there twenty years ago

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>or even ten years ago. The need, for instance, to

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>have a voice about the values of the organization, the

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>purpose of the organization, and to comment on important issues

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of the day. You know, whether it's social justice issues,

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>or whether it's Row versus Wade if you're in the US,

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>or whether it's voting changes. CEOs are expected to have

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a voice on the things that are relevant not just

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to their companies, but to their customers, to their employees,

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to their other stakeholders. And so it's overwhelming for executives.

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, they have a lot more

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 2>data than the twenty years ago, so that presumably also

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 2>makes their job easier.

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, funnily enough, we found it makes it more difficult

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>because often people are data rich but insight pau So

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>back to David's question about you know, in the UK

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and maybe more globally, is the pressure on chief executives

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>higher than it was? It absolutely is, and.

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 2>This is not because the quality of leaders is inferior

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 2>to twenty years ago.

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not because the quality of leaders is inferior. In fact,

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I think one could argue that it gets better all

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the time.

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 3>So do you help these anxious chief executives through this

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 3>process to advise on things like how to communicate a

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 3>political point of view?

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>That example, David, would not be something that we would

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>advise on. They're a specialists that do that and that's

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>not in our field of expertise. But we would absolutely

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>advise chief executives and executive teams about, you know, how

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>their market is moving, where the opportunities in that market

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>might be, how they capitalize on those opportunities, and how

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.719
<v Speaker 1>they move quickly to action, how they do it nearly right,

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>but do it now. Because what are analysis and in

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>fact all of our stories from the front line of

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>working with our clients have demonstrated, is that the people

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that have a preponderance for action, even if they change

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>their mind and pivot the strategies, on average, do much

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>better than those that actually are more careful and deliberate

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and bake out strategies without moving to action quickly.

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 2>What's the biggest most common mistake that chief executives make.

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>There are a number of things one could point to.

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the days of the hero CEO are over.

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, it takes a team. You know, group heroics

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>will always always try and triumph over individual heroics. So

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>clearly it's important to have a team. It's important to

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>have a diverse team for diverse perspectives. And that isn't

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>just gender and ethnicity, it's also in terms of age group,

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>having an environment, a culture in which challenge is encouraged

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>so that there isn't group think, ensuring that people do

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>have not just the data, but the insights, which of

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>course requires digital tools to be able to read where

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>their customers are going, read what their employees want in

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of quality of work experience. That helps them then

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>inch ahead of their competition.

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 3>So the hero CEO is a thing of the past.

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:20.599
<v Speaker 3>So which is the other most important role? Is the

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 3>chief financial officer more important these days than they were

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 3>in the past.

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's difficult to rank people, you know, whether

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it's this CFO chief financial officer, whether it's a general

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>counsel or there are different roles of course in different businesses.

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>It takes a team. The CFO of course is very

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 1>important in public markets, you know as a public company

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>or has public debt. But the team composition, I think

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>is the most important thing rather than just the individual position.

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 2>So how does it work concretely? So I'm a CEO,

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 2>I have, you know, a disaster on my hands. I

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 2>have to respond to the price, I have to fix something.

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Do I call you and then you build a team

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 2>for me? Do you have like lead partners in industries?

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 2>And actually what kind of servers do I get?

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>What we aspire to be is on people's speed doal

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>So when people have a problem, we may not know

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they should do in that given moment, will

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>have a good set, good idea as to what they

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>should do to assemble a point of view. And of

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>course we all have these speed down numbers we reach

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>out to for different types of problems. Some problems, of course,

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>don't elegantly fit into something one should phone a lawyer about,

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>or someone something one should phone a consultant about. But

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that a trusted business advisor is critical in

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>those moments, and we aspire to be that for our clients.

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Can you give us an example.

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>The pandemic, of course gave us some very real challenges

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and urgent challenges. So the pandemic profoundly disrupted supply chains,

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and so when people find that these wonderful just in

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>time supply chains of course no longer worked. It then

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>became a matter of how do we have a strategy

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that's just in case, not just in time, and so

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>how to very quickly second source materials critical for a

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>production facility to continue. So an example would be an

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>automotive client of ours found, as with so many people

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>in the automotive sector and others, that they couldn't source

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>enough of the right silicon chips for their production process,

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and so asked us to help with what became a

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>very urgent and important matter because they were literally going

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to end up with stall production. And so we ended

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>up using generative artificial intelligence to analyze all of the

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>import data into the US to identify not just where

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the which the countries were to produce the necessary chips,

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>but narrowed it down to the factories we're able to

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>model by triangulating different public source information what we thought

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>their surplus capacity might be, and then in a matter

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of days managed to book that surplus capacity and those

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>factories in multiple countries to be able to second source

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>for the automotive manufacturer, and indeed they didn't have a

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>delay or an interruption to their production facility.

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 3>How do you think Britain's doing in the to kind

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 3>of assimilate AI into corporate life, do you know?

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there are any further ahead than anybody else.

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, tragically, I think that the UK hasn't been

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>relevant in the technology race. If you look at UK

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>public companies compared, for instance, to US public companies, we're

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of nowhere in technology. We missed that boat. Now.

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there's all sorts of reasons for that. I

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>think that there's been a better availability of venture capital

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in the US, particularly on the West Coast, to sort

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of seed so many of these enterprises that have now

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>become unicorns. Whether that mistake will be repeated with AI,

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the fact that Rishisuna went on to

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the front for to talk about regulation. I think it's

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a good thing, but I think it's very difficult to

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>know how to regulate AI. I don't think people have

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a clue at the moment, and I'm always very suspicious

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>when the industry itself starts to tell governments that they

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>should take the lead on regulation.

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Samon, if you think we've missed the boat on technology

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 2>in the UK, I mean a's UKPLC cooked. I mean

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 2>all of our economies is based on technology and how

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 2>we use it.

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's so interesting when when looks at UK public

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:09.479
<v Speaker 1>companies as a certainly in the major exchanges, we are

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>overweight in things like mining, we're overweight in energy, We're

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>really nowhere in technology. Now why is that? Well? I

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>think that the UK markets, UK investors have largely prized

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>dividends rather than growth. The US exchanges of prioritized growth.

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>The US has a much much larger pool of liquidity.

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Valuations tend to be a little higher over there, so

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it's been an inevitable pool of companies from the UK

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to the US exchanges. Now is that reversible? Probably not.

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that UKPLC is dead, but I do

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>think that, you know, Brexit hasn't helped us. I think

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we have lost significance in terms of

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>being a world financial center. Notwithstanding, by the way that

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, financial and professional services set generated sixty four

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>billion pounds worth of surplus last year, larger than any

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of the other developed Western nations. But notwithstanding that, I

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>think that we have lost our footing.

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 3>And you divide your time between New York and London,

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:17.719
<v Speaker 3>simon looking forward a few years, do you see London

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 3>continuing decline in relative importance versus New York as a

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 3>financial center?

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I think so. Unfortunately. I think that my own view

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>is that Brexit was disastrous. I think that we lost

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 1>some significance in the eyes of the US as it

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>related to our position in Europe. Is no mistake. I

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>think that President Biden's first international visit after he was

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 1>elected president was to France, not to the UK. I

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>think that we talk a lot in the UK about

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the special relationship with the US. Boris Johnson always used

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to say that that sounded rather needy, and I think

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>he was right. We are in the Five Eyes from

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>an intelligence and security point of view, along with Canada,

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Australia and New Zealand. But I think when you look

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>at the flow of commerce and the significance of London's

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>financial center, I think we have lost our footing and

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's reversible.

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 2>So what happens next? As a consultant, like, what would

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 2>you advise UKPLC to do well?

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I think UKPLC has got to make sure that its

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>regulatory environment is attractive for business. Obviously, a robust regulatory environment,

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a regulatary environment that encourages business to keep on building

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>their foundations here. I think that there have to be

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>tax strategies that make that attractive for people. I think

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that we have to make sure that our talent is

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>fit for purpose. We know we talk a lot about

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the being the shrinkage of talent, but the talent war

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 1>is actually not nearly as significant as the skills or

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the skills that people need. Particularly in a digital environment

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that's accelerating fast. The skills war is critical. So how

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>do we make sure we have enough people of the

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>right skills to be able to keep the business in

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the U.

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Are there any particular sectors that you've got your eye

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 3>on in terms of stress where you feel like there

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 3>might be more restructurings or maybe you know household names

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 3>going out of business in the next year.

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean retail of course has been profoundly disrupted

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>now for quite a number of years, and that's not

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>going to slow down anytime soon. So I think we'll

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 1>keep on seeing real challenges in the retail sector. Energy

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I think will continue to be a challenge, of course,

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's even before the profound disruption cause by this

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>humanitarian disaster over in the Ukraine. And so I do

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 1>think that those two sectors will be high up on

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>the list. But I think that you know, in an

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>environment where food inflation is still in the mid teens

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and we've got significant industrial action now all around the country,

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>where you know, understandably people are resisting small single digit

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>pay rises in what is a double digit and core

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>inflation more than just double digit inflationary environment, I think

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is a very very challenging time.

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you ever think that I guess M and A

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 2>between two distress companies is a good idea, or even

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 2>one distress company and one healthy company.

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>It can work, of course, I mean it's the old

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of adage of two drowning people trying to hang

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>on to each other to float, but sometimes it can

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>scale can make a difference in a market. So if

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the putting together are two companies, does course scale that

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally changes that market position, then of course that is

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a good thing.

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Like the rest of the world, here at Plinberg, we're

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 3>obsessed with a lot of the distressed MNA happening in

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 3>the finance sector. How do you see those deals now

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 3>a couple of months down the line. I guess the

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 3>mother of all the stressed MNA was the Credit Swiss

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 3>UBS deal. I mean, how is that panning out? Do

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 3>you think?

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know specifically how is panning out? I clearly

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Ubs was the right partner. But you know, if you

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>also look at you know, Jamie Diamond and JP Morgan,

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they are the solution of choice for the

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>FED in the US, and of course they have to

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>make sure or they buy at a price that is

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>good for their own shareholders. But the profound disruption that's

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>been going on with regional banks and community banks in

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the US, you know, not just Signature Bank or or

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>others like that, it is ripe for consolidation. So in

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the US I think we'll see real consolidation in the

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>banking industry. In the UK, of course we've seen that

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>consolidation already, but you know HSBC, it is it a

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>UK bank, Is it a Chinese bank? I mean, there's

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a big discussion now as to really where the center

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>of gravity of HSBC is, and so I think the

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:39.640
<v Speaker 1>banking industry is in a period of profound change. Actually,

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>what's the.

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Most exciting piece of business you've ever worked on?

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I remember being dropped in as interim chief executive of

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 1>a very major Eastern European bank some years ago, and

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we had sixty days to work out, you know, where

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the money had gone and was the bank saveable? And

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>so that was an extreme, ordinarily intense period, a team

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of sixty people working night and day to get to

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 1>the answer, which we did. But often that is an

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>adrenaline fueled period and very satisfying if indeed one can

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>get to an answer and execute it. Oftentimes, of course,

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>things aren't quite that intense, but the speed to insight

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>is important because the time really matters in these situations

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to working out what the best move isn't taking it.

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's very rewarding actually to partner with clients when

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>they're in those moments.

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Simon, Frankly, thank you so much for joining us.

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for having me, David.

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting almost listening to Simon Freakly with a

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 2>blueprint of, you know, the most common mistakes that chief

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 2>executive make which they should look out for. I don't

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 2>know whether it's like a thirty page document that he

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 2>presents a lot of these chief executives with. Of course,

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 2>it's long term planning. He talks about, you know, being

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 2>able to build a team, and what really struck me

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 2>is the fact that he thinks it's much harder being

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 2>a chief executive now than it was twenty years ago.

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people may disagree with him, because we're

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 2>also helped by being able to recruit talent across the world,

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 2>which maybe twenty years ago was much more hard because

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 2>people didn't work from home.

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's always obviously supposed to be the toughest

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 3>job as chief executive. And I'm not sure there'll be

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 3>huge amounts of sympathy out there for the anxiety levels

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 3>of these the fifteen hundred bosses. But I thought it

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 3>was fascinating how it seems those levels of anxiousness are

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 3>getting much worse in the current climate, and kind of

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 3>how these bosses don't seem to be able to navigate

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 3>all of these challenges being thrown at them. At the

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 3>same time, I.

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Think the question is how do you measure success. Does

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 2>a consultancy firm or a consultant only become really good

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 2>at their job when the chief executive no longer employs them? Yeah,

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 2>exactly once you can do it internally.

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, which is why I thought it was interesting about AI.

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think it's part of the chief executive's job,

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 3>of course right now, to understand how to harness artificial

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 3>intelligence to make their job, but they don't seem to

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 3>be capable of doing it. They have to phone a

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 3>consultant to get that kind of insight.

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was an interesting conversation also, just him not

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 2>being very optimistic about the future of the UK, saying

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 2>that actually New York is so much better at doing

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 2>these things, and him asking for a better regulation, certainly

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 2>in London, to help the City of London thrive.

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 3>I know, when when you're going to get someone on

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 3>this podcast, Francine he's optimistic about I'm just you know,

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm feeling a bit maybe we should just all move

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 3>to New York.

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>What do you think.

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 2>I can't live without guinness and fish and chips, Dave

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 2>or fair enough.

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening to this week's in the City.

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next.

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Week, but in the meantime, if you like our show,

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 2>please head on over to Apple Podcasts or wherever you

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 2>listen to podcasts, and rate review on Subscribe.

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 3>This episode was hosted by Me David.

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Merritt and Me Francis Lackwell.

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 3>It was produced by Sersadi and Moses Andam additional editing

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 3>by blake Mate and special thanks to cyber Freakly