WEBVTT - How Libs Launder Ideas

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. Conan the Wonder Dog

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>visits the White House, the impeachment timetable, and the wishful

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Frenzy Democrats are actually Putin's puppet. Let's be thankful for

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>incredible employment in this country. A federal animal cruelty law

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>goes into effect, and Twitter suspending people for putting out

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>facts that are more coming up. This is the Buck

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American,

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>You're a great American. Again, the Buck Sexton Show begins, analysts,

0:00:51.760 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>he's a great guy. Now, so this is right now

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>probably the world's most famous dog. I don't think I

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>have to use the word probably. And Conan is a

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>incredible It's an incredible story. I learned a lot about

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>this particular type of dog, and we just gave Conan

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a medal and a plaque and it's really uh And

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I actually think Conan knew exactly what was going on.

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bucks Acton show. Conan the dog that

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>chased down Abe Baker bug Daddy who went to the

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>White House yesterday. One thing that I'm I'm just surprised.

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>We can't see to get an answer on and people

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>keep saying Conan is male, Conan is female. I understand

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that we are in a time of a particular sensitivity

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>about about about gender, but I mean, this is a

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>very straightforward process. Do we know, guys, I've seen it

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>reported that Conan's a boy dog and Conan's a girl dog. Well,

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Conan's a wonder dog. That much is for sure. We

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>know that. And there were a lot of folks that

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>were smiling yesterday as the President brought Conan, the Special

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Operations dog to the White House. Sure enough, if you

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>thought that, there would be no way that the journos

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>would make this something that Trump did wrong or that

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump is to be criticized for. There were people who

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>were saying that they didn't like Trump bringing the dog

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to the White House. They didn't like that Trump made

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>a joke about the dog going after reporters. Nothing is

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>allowed to be funny, nothing is allowed to be lighthearted.

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>It all has to be always and at all times

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>destroy the Trump residency if you deviate from that for

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>even a moment, even just to say wow, look at

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the really cool Belgian Malinois that is at

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the White House that was involved in a very high

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>level and successful US military raid to go after the

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>most wanted terrorists really in the world. I think you

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>would argue, or you could argue, Abubakara Baghdatis more wanted

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>than I'm in Olswaheri. By the way, as we are

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>here in New York City, there is also a I

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know what is going on down the hallway. There's

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a whole a slew of puppies from what is it,

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>from the ASPCA. This is a sign They come to

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>iHeart once a year, I believe. And I just went

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to walk and get water and there were just a

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>bunch of puppies that just adorable. There's just a whole

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>there's just little puppies all play with. There's like six

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of them. They're all they're they're about fifteen feet from

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>our studio right now and they're absolutely adorable and they

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>want they need homes. They need exactly. They do adoption

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>drives every year before the holiday. You know, it would

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>be a great wedding wedding gift. Producer Mark I live

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in an apartments. A dog I held is going to

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>be huge if you look at its pause. Yeah, it's

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be huge. He's gonna make him get a get

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a house though. Yeah, you gotta you gotta have room

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>for the puppies and for a little marks and little

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>marquettes that are gonna be coming. Puppies first, then we'll

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about That's what I always say, Puppies first, all right.

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>So the good news about this week is that the

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>journos are all pretty much on early Vaca because they

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>work so hard, so we get to talk about whatever

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we want here in the Freedom up. There are some

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting things breaking. There's some stories that we can dive

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>into a little bit more deeply because we're not in

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the midst of I saw. I think it was Jonathan

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Swan over at Axios who referred to democrats impeachment mania

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>as a wishful frenzy. I've said that was very as

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a nice turn of phrase from mister Swan. I agree

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>with that, a wishful frenzy. Indeed, Oh it's coming, it's happening.

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>That's why we had producer Mark play a montage. We

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>need a montage. I haven't seen Team Americans so long

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>that I might actually go back and watch it again

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>over the holidays, and they never made a sequel, which

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I was promised. I was told there would be a sequel,

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and there was not a sequel. But we had a

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>montage for you and it was from twenty seventeen and

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it was everybody from you know, Don Lemon to Joe

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Scarborough and everybody else. The walls are finally closed again

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>on this president. He's gone too far. It's all over

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>for him. The beginning of the end. That's what I'm

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 1>trying to think. What the other ken phrases are that

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we always hear. It turns out it's not the beginning

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>of the end, to borrow from Churchill, it is the

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>end of the beginning. However, in this impeachment process, we

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 1>are now in the midst of it. And some interesting

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>notes on the timeline. I wanted to establish today where

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's all just going for a moment, so that we

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>can have an expectation as they try to they're going

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to come back. Congress is going to come back, and

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>right now they're in recess. They're staffs that were working

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 1>furiously on this report. So I want us to know

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>what to expect going forward, because there's going to be

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a race to the finish, because you know, the members

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of Congress are not going to spend Christmas and the

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>holiday in DC working. No, no, no, Congress doesn't do

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. So they're going to have to

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>cram and ram all this stuff so that it gets

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>done within the timeline. It's almost like politics and the

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>political time line, specifically of a Democratic primary. He's pushing

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing and that it's not about the sanctity

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of our republic and protecting the foundations of our constitution.

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi's weeping, weeping at the notion that they have

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to impeach the president. They really don't want to. He's

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>just such a big, mean meaning that they have to

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>impeach him. No, they don't really have to impeach him

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>at all. As we know, they were going to impeach

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>him no matter what. But let's now look at what's

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. There's been a clear drop in the

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>polls in support for certainly removal of the president and

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:43.119
<v Speaker 1>even impeachment of the president. Some are saying, I believe

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>it was Ari Fleischer, who's a savvy political observer. He said,

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>perhaps now would be a good time for them to

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>just go for a vote of censure instead of going

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>all the way here and voting for a an actual

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>impeachment of the president. And I'm telling you Democrats can't

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 1>do that because we have to remember what the first

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>purpose of all of this is. It's not to get

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to the truth. It's not to protect the Constitution. It's

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>not to give a full accounting of the facts to

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the American people about an incident that no one's even

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>really going to remember. And six months, maybe even six

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>days after at least this whole thing is over. It

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>is about trying to make sure the president of the

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>United States is at a disadvantage in the election, using

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the process as a weapon against President Trump's reelection chances.

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>That's all this is. That's all this is, ultimately, in

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of its purpose. The left demands this. The Democrat base,

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the progressive maniacs who stand outside of college amphitheaters and

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>chant by the thousands of curses and swears and call

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone racist, and all that component of the Democratic Party,

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>which is increasingly the Democratic Party, the mainstream of it.

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>They insist that a president that they have called a traitor,

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a criminal, a rapist, certainly a liar, many many many

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>times crazy. I can't think of I'm probably leaving a

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>few out that they've called all those things. How could

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats say all that and then not impeach him

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>as far as the left is concerned, So we are

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>going to an impeachment vote that is I think a

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>fate at Holm Plea. There's not a better way to

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.079
<v Speaker 1>say it than the French way. Sometimes the French have

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>got it. It's like the Germans. Sometimes the Germans have

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>some super long word that means something very specific, and

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>when you need that word, say it in the German.

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, is there a better way to say zeitgeist

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>than zeitgeist? I don't think so. That's not a long one,

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>but there's some really long ones too. So the timeline

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>then becomes really important. As we're going into the holiday,

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>we have a moment to catch our breath here and say,

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow we'll talk about turkey, stuffing, coffee, you know, no

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>big whoop, We'll talk about all those things too. The

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the perennial fight year and in year out. Is turkey

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a worthwhile primary protein on your Thanksgiving table? I'm seeing

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>some people start some noise on the on the Twitter

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and on the Facebook that maybe you just maybe just

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>see her Ribbi and just stop with all this gobble

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>gobble nonsense. You know, maybe just go with your favorite

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>food and be thankful that you can eat it and

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>celebrate in that way. Or is that sacrilege? I don't

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>even want to know a producer Mark Things, producer Brandon.

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 1>We'll find out from him tomorrow where he stands out.

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>But you're a turkey guy, aren't you. Of course you've

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>probably you're probably one of those maniacs who eats turkey,

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>not on Thanksgiving. I mean, what do you mean, maniacs

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>that eats turkey out? I'm like a whole turkey or

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>like like you'll eat turkey at other points of the year.

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>You will skip over the far superior meats and eat

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>turkey anyway. Yeah, I'll have a turkey sandwich like slice

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Deli meat, maybe a turkey burger occasionally. This is part

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of this is part of the problem here. We need

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>we need truth in turkey. I don't see what the

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>problem is. Turkey's just not worthwhile. Now, are you gonna

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>hate me that I say I'm a dark meat turkey

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>type of guy. No, no, no, I like the dark meat,

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>dark meat turkey, dark meat chicken. You only live once

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 1>go with the dark meat. It's more that's it's higher

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>fat content that who cares, it's delicious, Brandon, you a

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>turkey guy. I guess we're getting this done today. Yeah. No,

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I like turkey, turkey and cheese because I told you

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I eat like a ten year old nice turkey and cheese,

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>And I like the one you gonna have like a slice.

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Are you gonna have like turkey and then some mashed

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>potatoes then like a slice of American cheese? Is that

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>what you go for? What's your Yeah? That sounds good.

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, all right, yeah, lunches on you good talk.

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So the impeachment timeline instead of the turkey timeline, this

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is what's gonna happen. If you look back at the

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>impeachment process from the Clinton era when I was I

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>was just a young lad. I was in high school.

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember much about this. I do remember seeing

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the snippets of the interview on TV and going, whoa,

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>there's some stuff that happens with the president that's really surprising.

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>But it started and finished within a matter of a

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>few months. This time around, they're going to have to

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>do the same thing. Why it's not because democracy dictates

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>it be. So it's not because the vision of the

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>founders blah blah, it's none of that. It is because

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have to get this thing done before. You have

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of Democrats senators who need to be showing

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>up in the Iowa caucuses and in the first New

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Hampshire primary in early February. This thing has got to

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>get done before then. Now question that. I so. So

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that's why they're trying to ram this thing through. They're

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>going to have the report out, maybe as soon as

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>next week. I'm seeing you're also going to have the

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Horowitz report schedule. This is the report from within the

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice looking into Fiser abuse. We've already talked

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>about this a little bit on the show. I believe

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it's December or ninth or the tenth of the eleventh,

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Second week December, you have the Fiser

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Report coming out. I don't know how they're going to

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>try to time this with the release of the impeachment report,

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>but we already know what the impeachment report's going to say.

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>It's just going to be another version of the recitation

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of bloviation and exaggerated disconnected factoids that Adam Schiff has

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>been reading out at the start of each proceeding. All

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that's all it will be. They may tack onto it

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>some other things. And right now they're probably furiously looking

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>at the data to decide do we call it bribery,

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>do we call it extortion? Do we call it abuse

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of power? Abuse of power has the most leeway. It's

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>not bribery and it's not extortion, so they can call

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it that. But now they're just making now and now

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>they're just crazy, and which I guess they are. But

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a leap. Everybody knows that's a leap. But they

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>have to get this thing done before the Iowa CAUCUSUS

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>rolls around or else they're going to start to have

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>some problem. It's going to look like they didn't really

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>think this thing through. I think it's quite possible they

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't really think this thing through. That brings me to

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>my main man, Cocaine, Mitch Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>He and his Senate Republican colleagues will be in a

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>position to drag using the process just like Democrats do.

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>To drag the Democrats through an annoying, difficult stretch just

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to sort of show the country as much dirty laundry

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>from the Democrats side as possible on all of this.

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Get Hunter Biden out there, call Adam Shift. I worry

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that this is where Republicans say, oh, well, we're just

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Republicans in the Senate. I mean we'll say, oh, well,

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we're through all that, We're too good to do that.

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Now we're not going to do that. No, No, this

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 1>is we are going into the twenty twenty election. My friends.

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>This is an eye for an eye territory. This is

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>time to make the Democrats live by the rules that

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 1>they established for all of us. And the only rule

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is that there are no rules when they have power.

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So maybe it's time they get a taste of their

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>own medicine. I hope cocaine Mitch decides to exact a

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>terrible price from the Democrats through the Senate trial. We

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>will see if he does. But now you know it's

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 1>got to happen really in a matter of weeks. They

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>do not have months unless they plan on just allowing

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment proceeding in the Senate to hijack the Democrat primary.

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And given that Bloomberg just got in, everybody understands that

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>this Democrat primary, there's no front runner. There's no one

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>who's particularly inspiring or great. I don't think they want

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to add to their troubles, unless, of course, you want

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to make the argument that Hillary Clinton is behind all

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of this on the sidelines, you know, be in the shadows,

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>just waiting for her moment to emerge as the consensus candidate.

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>But let's not get too conspiratorial. Not today, maybe tomorrow.

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even sure if we came to an agreement

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>today that it would be enough time. I'm not even

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>sure if we came to an agreement today that it

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>would be enough time. I'm not even sure if we

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>came to an agreement today. So we had Nancy Pelosi

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>there talking about the US Mexico Canada Agreement, and we

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of turned it into the remix. It's fine, whatever

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I might even today enough time. You get the idea.

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Our point here is that they feel like they don't

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>have time for this in the Congress. I'm here to

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>just remind everybody that they got time for this sham

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and beachment trial. The US Mexico Canada Agreement, which does

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>need a cooler name. I am not gonna lie to you.

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>It needs a cooler name. For sure, would benefit American workers,

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>would help this economy, would help the country. It's the

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>dare I say, the right thing to do. If Congress

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>took its job seriously, if the Democrat majority in the

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>House wasn't entirely consumed with and only concerned with harmon

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's electoral prospects, then they would most certainly take

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>action on this item. They would do what they could

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to pass this. But it seems they have no interest

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever in that because legislation that would pass going into

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>an election year would benefit the president. I think this

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>is necessary context for evaluating all of the sanctimonious speeches

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you will hear from Democrats in the days ahead about how, oh,

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>our duty to protect the American people, we have to

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>protect them from trumpy so evil. Well, they could still

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>say all the horrible things they say about Trump and

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>try to damage him in all the ways that they

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>do and do business that helps the American people. They

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have to make these things mutually exclusive. They make

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it mutually exclusive because anything that is good that comes

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>out of government right now is to the benefit of Trump,

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and he is the president of the United States, despite

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>their delusions otherwise, so they have no interest in really

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>helping people. I also mentioned I believe that not the

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>show that we should be thank full for the employment

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.120
<v Speaker 1>numbers at this time of year. A lot of people

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>going into this Thanksgiving and have jobs that we were

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>told would not exist based on the numbers of even

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the projections back in twenty fourteen. We are at you know,

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:18.719
<v Speaker 1>for people to try to say, this is the Obama economy,

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's preposterous, that's a joke. We are at a

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty year low. It has been fifty years since we

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>have had so many people, particularly of prime working age

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>from twenty five to fifty four, which I leave is

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>also the demo for media stuff, right, twenty five fifty four, Yeah,

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>consider that prime working age two. It's been fifty years

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>since we've had so many people of that age range

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in the workplace gainfully employed. The country right now, despite

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.959
<v Speaker 1>the absence of this narrative in the media, the country

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>is doing very well. Trump's policies and decision making has

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>been working. It is bringing benefits to you and to me.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.360
<v Speaker 1>We should be a bit thankful if the fact remains

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we have a president, a commander in chief who has

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>no respect for the rule of law and no concern

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever for ethics or honor or for the values that

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>truly make America great. No respect for law. That's what

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they say about this president. Meanwhile, you have had forty

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>nationwide injunctions by liberal activist judges against this president. That

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is twenty x what you had under the Obama presidency.

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Because people who are of the leftist mindset, they are

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 1>increasingly totalitarian in their aims. They want control of everything.

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>They want to punish you for speech, for thoughts, even

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>if they can, if they can find a way. I

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>do believe as we find out more about the way

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese use algorithms and the mass surveillance state to

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>try and demand obedience of people and even do education

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in real time online of anyone who would dissent from

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the dominant view, that a lot of liberals look at

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that with some degree of envy. If only we could

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>do that here. Meanwhile, a lot of us look at

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 1>this and say, they already have near information dominance because

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of the way social media works, because of the way

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>are broadcasting networks have just they have adopted this narrative

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that liberalism is now liberalism and the truth are synonymous.

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>So anything a liberal thinks must be true. It's not

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're liberal, it's that it's just the way it is.

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a stunning, stunning departure from good faith journalism,

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>from good faith provision of information. But meanwhile, Michael Bloomberg

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>runs around saying that we are to be terrified of

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>what the president will do in this country, and he

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>has no respect them for the rule of law, no

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>respect for ethics or honor. You mean like the Clintons.

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a family with a lot of respect for ethics

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and honor. Right, that was what we were told we

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>should That was the option we should have taken the

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>last time around. The same people lecturing you right now

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>about how Trump is so unethical and so they're also

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the same people who pretend that Hunter Biden getting millions

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of dollars to do a no show job in Ukraine

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>while his dad is pointment on policy there. That's fine,

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, no problem, nothing to see there. It's not illegal. Yeah,

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>well neither us. What the president did with Ukraine is it?

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that the standard or not. I'm just curious. The

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>standard changes every day, though, depends on whatever they want.

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what changed here. It wasn't long ago that

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Michael Bloomberg, who was the latest entry into the Democrat primary,

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Michael Bloomberg, said that he was too old. Would you producer, Brandon,

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 1>would you play clips seventeen? Please? But it's just not

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>going to happen on a national level for somebody like

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>me starting where I am, unless I was willing to

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>change all my views and go on what CNN called

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>an apology tour. Joe Biden went out and apologized for

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>being male over fifty white. He apologized for the one

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>piece of legislation which is actually a pretty good anti

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>crime bill, which if the Liberals ever read it, most

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of the things they like would be easy in that bill.

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>They should have loved that. They don't even bother to

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>read it. Your anti crime, you must be anti populist,

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>and so everybody else. And Betto whatever his name is,

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>he's apologized for being born I don't mean van kind

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and people's a lot of people love him and says

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a smart guy, and if he wins, I'd certainly support him.

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I just like him, so sorry that I was born

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>a sis gender hetero male who is white named Betto

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>even I mean, I took the name betto, but I'm

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>still a white sis Nermel. It's true what he says

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>here about how you have to go around and apologize

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>all the time. In fact, there's data that Andy know

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>who will be talking about again here in a minute.

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>There's data that is circulating right now that the only

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>the only racial group in America that views its own

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>racial group negatively white liberals. White liberals do have white

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>liberal guilt. This is a real thing. And this is

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a poll that's been circulating all week. And my friend

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know, if he is no longer suspended from Twitter,

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to that. You could see it in his

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in his feed. Now, let me just first say that

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>no one should ever feel badly about their race. It is.

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>It is a bizarre and immoral thing to take the

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>view that one race is is. Let you know that

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:51.479
<v Speaker 1>your own race would be less than another race. This

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is This is completely contrary to sound and ethical thinking

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>for anybody. All races are the same, All race are

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>just human beings. It doesn't these are superficial characteristics of

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>no importance to us as people. And yet white liberals

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>think that there's something wrong with being white we've all

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>had this suspicion for a while. People have talked about

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>white guilt since I was remember hearing the phrase eman

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>back when I was in high school, and it's a

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>very real phenomenon. You have these these white liberals they've

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>adopted because they believe so much in the power of

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>victimhood and victim's status. They talk about this for all

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>these other individuals. The only way that they can then

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>leverage the victimhood status of other so called the press

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>groups is for them to say that they're sorry, that

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>they realize they are, by nature white liberals, by nature

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of their skin color, are part of the oppressive class,

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and therefore they have to make amends. And to make

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>amends they want to elevate all of the allegedly victimized

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>classes and all that way they become the good people,

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 1>and the good people who also need to be in power.

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I might add, this is where you get these sanctimonious

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>white liberals who will walk around constant people like Betto

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>orc a perfect example. It's country is so racist. It's

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>just like the most racist country ever. And I just

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>understand that by telling everybody how racist in his like,

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Betto is not racist because he's saying it's always like

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>so racist. That's where we are. That is where white

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 1>liberals are and their beliefs about all of this. But

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:35.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, Bloomberg is right on some things, and the

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>things that he's right on will be a problem for

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>him in the prim area, the Democratic primary. You're not

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>allowed to say stuff like lower more aggressive policing to

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>lower crime can be a good idea, whether you believe

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in stopping frisk or not. There was a lot of

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>other stuff that went on in New York City to

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>bring the crime rate down down dramatically, down, so dramatically

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that it feels like an entirely different city from what

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it did when I was when I was growing up here.

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>But I mentioned to you, Andy know before, and I

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to touch on this topic because it ties

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>into a few things. One of my favorite podcasts, as

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know that, I've listened to it a long time,

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and I don't I don't have the time to listen

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to really any other because this is the best podcast.

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't only have a lot of time to listen

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to other podcasts, but once in a while someone will say,

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you gotta listen to this, and I listened to Joe

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Rogan and Neval Ravocant talk to each other on the

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe Rogan Show. And since that, I've been following Nevall's

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>work a little bit more when I can, and he

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>tweeted out I think it was earlier this week that

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>they want to police your speech because they can't police

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts. The idea of being if they could police

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts, they would they would like to get into

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that is the ultimate control. And for people who think

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that controlling others is necessary for a good society, for

0:25:55.760 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>people who think that control of the population through government

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 1>that is benevolent but all powerful, right, this is the

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 1>government in place of God. This is central to the

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>entire progressive thesis, a progressive approach to America, to any country.

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>And this is why they also want one world government.

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>They'll be one super government that has all the right ideas,

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that takes care of us all so well. I mean,

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>this has resulted in misery, deprivation, slaughter, and genocide in

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 1>other countries, the same thinking taken to its ultimate ends.

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>But liberals still think in this country that they'll get

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>it right, and so they're just creeping along. There's just

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this edging along toward total control and control of thoughts

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>is certainly a part of that process. We see this

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>in China. I mean they're trying to leverage technology. Now

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you have the social credit system, you have a mass

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>surveillance state, and now they're using algorithms to determine who's

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>a problem, who is not on board with the ideology

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that they are supposed to be or that they are

0:26:56.119 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>told they need to be. We see this working all

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the time, and unfortunately has also seeped into our own,

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 1>our own system of censorship. It's not quite as pernicious here,

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>it's not quite as as powerful as it is in

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the context of China. But Andy No, who is best

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>known for being a guy who will go out there

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and cover Antifa, well, Andy No responded to somebody who

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>said that essentially transgender individuals are under murderous assault in

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this country, that there is a plague of violence against

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>trans gender Oh, by the way, he also I found

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>here Andy's this is a twenty eighteen survey from a

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>n S. I don't even know what that is, but

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Andy tweeted this out. Mean in group bias by Raith resnicity,

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and you have a huge disparity of white liberals who

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>do not like do not like the fact that they

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>are that they are white, which is a thing that

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not surprising to any of us, but it is

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>noteworthy as we see what's going on. I'm trying to

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>find this other one where you have an Andy No

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Twitter suspense conservative journalist Andy Know and here's why he

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 1>committed hateful conduct according to Twitter. You might wonder, what

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>does a journalist. By the way, Andy is, Andy is

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a minority, He's Asian American. He's also openly he's gay.

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>What did Andy No do that was hateful such that

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>in response to a Chelsea Clinton tweet, ah, white liberal,

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>there we go. In response to a Chelsea Clinton tweet,

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Twitter would suspend him. Well, Chelsea Clinton tweeted out the following.

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Since twenty thirteen, more than one hundred and fifty trans

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>people have been murdered in the US. The majority are

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>black transgender women. An epidemic of violence and hate. Now

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.959
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty over the course of six years.

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>To call that an epidemic in a country of three

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty million people would seem to be a

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of a stretch, right, What is the overall number?

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>What is the overall population and how much What is

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the homicide rate for them versus the homicide rate for

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>black transgender females. It turns out that there is no

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly high rate. But see you start to ask these

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>questions and people get angry at you. What are you saying?

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not no, of course, it's it's a horrible thing

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that anybody would would murder anyone of any gender identity

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>or endy, any race, anything. It's the most heinous crime

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>out there. You cannot murder people. We're all opposed to murder.

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>But if we're talking about public policy, and if we're

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about the numbers, then can't we be honest about it?

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Andy wrote that the one hundred and fifty deaths over

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>several years, we're in a nation of more than three

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred million people. That's hardly an epidemic. He said, the

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>US is one of the safest countries in the world

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>for trans people. The murder rate of trans victims is

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>actually lower than for the CIS population, meaning for the

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>for the heterosexual population. And he also then tweeted out

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the following, also, who is behind a vast majority of

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>these murders of black transgender females, African American males not allowed.

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, this this is statistically he is correct,

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>This is true, This is a fact. This is not

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a for debate. In fact, there's only a handful of

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>these one hundred and fifty murders that Chelsea Clinton that

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>she's going to run for Senate and then president. By

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, just you heard it here if I haven't

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>heard it somewhere else. Chelsea Clinton, she thinks she should

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>be the leader of the free world because mommy and

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>daddy are famous. But and we're politicians. Obviously Dad was president.

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Mom thought she was going to be president, still does.

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 1>But one hundred and fifty murders over the course of

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>six years, we're told this is an epidemic. It's not

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>an epidemic. Every single life lost is sad, is wrong,

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and there should be a full investigation and the perpetrator

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>should be punished. But this is not an epidemic. So

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Chelsea Clinton has millions of followers. Why is she saying this, Oh,

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's about it. It's the virtue signaling of look

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>at this particularly oppressed group, and how concerned Chelsea Clinton

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is with this oppressed group. Andy Know comes out and says, well,

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that's actually not a lot of people. By the numbers

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>per capita nationwide, it's not and it's lower than the

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>national average for people being killed in this country outside

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of any victimized group, and a vast majority of the

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>perpetrators happened to be African American males, which he just

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>pointed out. That's just a sit that's also true. So

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the people that are killing these black transcender females are

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmingly and I think was only a handful of acceptance

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to this blackmails just he just shared that, and this

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is data. You can check it up on the check

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it out on the FBI website. You can check it

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>out online. This is data. Twitter suspended him for this

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>for hateful conduct. Why is this hateful? Why is this hateful?

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about numbers. We're talking about a public policy

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>issue of importance. Why is the number okay to share

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and then analyze it, but then contra or rather other numbers,

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>additional numbers to give context, are not allowed to be shared, all,

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>my friends, because unfortunately the left has already adopted this

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>position for a long time, and you're going to see

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>more and more of it. Facts can be hateful. Numbers

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>can be hateful. It's whatever they determine, that's what is hateful. Twitter, Facebook, Google,

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>all the different news organizations. They get to decide what

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is hateful because they get to decide what is speech

0:32:56.680 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and what is allowable. We getting pushed closer and closer

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to a society where we no longer really have freedom

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of speech. We seem to be forgetting this. They tell

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>us what, oh, we're going to get into, by the way,

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>pronoun users Later on in the show, too, they tell

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>us what we can say about other individuals, and they

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>tell us, now the force of law will be used.

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>They're openly advocating for hate crime laws that criminalize speech.

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Say the wrong word and you can go to prison.

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Journalists who are supposed to live and die by the

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>First Amendment. Anything to protect the First Amendment. Journalists are saying, yeah,

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>well except for really hateful stuff. This is the country

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>we are increasingly living in. And I think we are

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit of the boiling frog in the pot here.

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>We are not paying close enough attention to how quickly

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>our rights are routing on this at all. I hope

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Andy gets his Twitter account back. I got to check

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and see, but it's just a matter of time before

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 1>yours truly gets suspended. You watch God's used imperfect people

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>all through history. King David wasn't perfect, Saul wasn't perfect,

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Salomon wasn't perfect. And I actually gave the president a

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>little one pager on those old Testament kings about a

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>month ago, and I shared with him. I said, mister President,

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I know there are people that say, you know, you

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>said you were the chosen one, and and I said

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you were. I said, if if you're a believing Christian,

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you understand God's plan for the people who rule and

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 1>and and judge over us on this planet, in our

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:37.720
<v Speaker 1>in our government, pretty uncontroversial stuff if you're a believing

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Christian from Governor Rick Perry, now energy sectary Rick Perry

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and liberals freak out about it. Why because they're okay

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>with Democrats in office talking about God. But when Republican

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 1>does it, the theocracy has arrived. I just had to do.

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>But this was so absurd, so silly. This became a

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>news story yesterday that Rick Perry. Christians is that God

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>chooses leaders and that God's hand is at work in

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>all things in the world. God has a plan. This

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is now controversial. Got to have background checks done for

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 1>your business. That's where my friends at Global Verification Network

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>come in. They're the only dual certified, veteran owned background

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>investigation and vetting company. Now, I understand that there are

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other people out there who are doing

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 1>background checks by getting the work to people overseas. You

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>don't want that. You want someone who's doing it all

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:28.240
<v Speaker 1>here in the US of A. You want to support

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 1>a veteran owned company and a company that does not

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>outsource its work its investigations overseas. It also means better

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>control over the data and better customer service. When you

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 1>call Global Verification Network, you're going to get somebody on

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the phone who can answer any questions you have fast

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:47.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever size business you're in anywhere across the country. Please

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>use my friends at Global Verification Network for all of

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>your background check needs. Give them a call at eight

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>seven seven six nine five one one seven nine again

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>that's eight seven seven six nine five eleven seventy nine.

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Or you can go to MYGVN dot com. Again, that's

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:15.399
<v Speaker 1>my GVN dot com. Cisgender, fat shaming, heteronormativity, intersectionality, patriarchy,

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:19.840
<v Speaker 1>rape culture. These are all terms that you have probably

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>become familiar with, if not from listening to this show,

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 1>just because they're out there now in the discourse. They

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 1>sound like they should mean something because you hear them

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot. But where did they come from? In fact,

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I told you all, what was it now? Maybe a

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago, that I had just heard this

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>term cisgender for the first time, which struck me as

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 1>odd because, starting at a very young age, I had

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>a pretty expansive vocabulary. I'd never heard of this thing before.

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Where did it come from? Intersectionality? Where did it? Where

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>did it come from? Well, there is a fantastic article

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:58.959
<v Speaker 1>in the Wall Street Journal by Peter Bagozian about something

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 1>called idea laundering. This really matters, by the way, even

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 1>if you don't care about what crazy academics are saying

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>on campuses, this is you often have heard me say

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>that campuses are the laboratories for left wing craziness. That's

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 1>where they're doing the most experimentation, in a place where

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 1>there are really no constraints on the stupidity, on the

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 1>absurdity of their ideas, and they come out of these

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>laboratories with these ideas. The campuses propagate these different words

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>and concepts into the broader society with the stamp of

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:38.879
<v Speaker 1>approval of well, it's comes from university professors who have

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>peer review journals, and Bogosian walks us through what he

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>calls idea laundering. This is really interesting because this is

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:51.880
<v Speaker 1>how it all happens. The reason why your kids, for

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 1>those of you who have kids about this age, will

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>be coming home from school, certainly from high school, being

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>told about gender identity versus sex. What's the difference? The

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 1>reason your kids will come home and be told that

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>intersectionality is the truth of all American society, that there

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>are different groups that are constantly in a battle for

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 1>who is oppressing who. Heteronormativity a fancy way of saying

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:25.840
<v Speaker 1>most people are heterosexual, that's all that, that's what, and

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 1>then they extrapolate all these things from that concept. That's

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the heteronormativity is that the dominant culture, the dominant perception

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that people have of sexuality is that men are attracted

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to women and women are attracted to men. It's not

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the case that that's the only way things are in

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>this or any other society, but that has been the

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>dominant paradigm. How do you get these ideas. Oh, fat

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>shaming is the one that actually Bogosian singles in on here.

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:58.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you do if you are a particularly activist

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>minded academic, how do you create concepts that then will

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>get fed into the broader society and have a real influence.

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean you look at, for example, the Obama administration.

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>The Obama administration's policy on bathroom usage for people that

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 1>have gender identity issues was you better allow the you know,

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the twelve year old boy to use the twelve year

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:28.720
<v Speaker 1>old girls locker room, or else we will consider pulling

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Department of Education funding under discrimination discrimination accusations that you're

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>being discriminatory. So this goes all the wayp About rape culture,

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>This was another one I kept hearing about all the time,

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>rape culture on college campuses. CNN even had a documentary.

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't watch it because it's CNN and CNN's crap,

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 1>but CNN had a documentary I think called The Hunting

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Ground about college campuses. There were these journals who were

0:39:55.480 --> 0:40:00.239
<v Speaker 1>so very gullable, not just in the Duke lac Loss

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 1>case where there was no rape and there was a

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>really a deranged accuser who tried to ruin a bunch

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of people's lives and a power mad Democrat prosecutor knifeong

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:14.879
<v Speaker 1>try to ruin some young boys lives. Media went along

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>with that, because you know, there's this culture of rape

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.879
<v Speaker 1>on campus. Rape is a felony. You know, you sit

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>down to have lunch with somebody and you tell them

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that you got caught up in a stock scam ten

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago, you served a little time. They might say, yeah,

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we all make mistakes. You know, you served

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 1>your debt. Decide you sit down and say that you

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 1>were convicted of rape. The person's going to rightly want

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to end the lunch and say, what the heck is this?

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a rape culture that just the notion that that's

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a phrase that should be in common usage is absurd

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>on college campuses, That's what they say. Where does all

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:56.919
<v Speaker 1>of this come from? It comes from campuses. It comes

0:40:57.000 --> 0:41:02.399
<v Speaker 1>from the takeover of academia by left wing activists with

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:06.840
<v Speaker 1>degrees in social studies without really much to add to

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the discourse, and who don't really view their role as

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 1>making sure that people who go to school know things

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 1>and gain certain skills. They view their role as making

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 1>sure they only know certain things that they tell them.

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>They have to know for the purposes of being the

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>shock troops of the left, when they are going through

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 1>adulthood and then raising their own children, they are indoctrination factories.

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 1>You see this all the time. How often do you

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>have a left wing speaker show up at a college

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 1>campus and thou people challenge me on this. By the way,

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>when we talked about the a Culter speech at Berkeley,

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I said I had brought this up in the show,

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and someone, some blue check journal idiot was saying, to me,

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:50.880
<v Speaker 1>who this happens, look at the look at a Trump rally? Said, well,

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>am I talking about political rallies, talking about invited speakers

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to a college campus. Name me one time that a

0:41:57.320 --> 0:41:59.760
<v Speaker 1>left wing speaker has shown up at a college campus

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and there have been a thousand, two thousand, angry, screaming, profane, shrill,

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>shrieking conservatives saying you're not allowed to speak here. How

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 1>many I could sit here and run through, off the

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:18.359
<v Speaker 1>top of my head, dozens of speeches where that has

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>happened with leftists. I mean, I don't know if the

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:22.759
<v Speaker 1>number was one thousand or one hundred protests, but you

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>know where they try to shut it down, shut it down,

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>don't allow people to be heard. The ideas are too dangerous,

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 1>you see, including ideas that in many cases have been

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>considered consensus or status quo within the academy, stretching back

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:40.719
<v Speaker 1>for decades. How do they do this? How do they

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>change the conversation so abruptly so that now we have

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to use terminology that they set for us. Ah, let

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 1>me bring you back to this Pagosian piece, an idea

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:56.919
<v Speaker 1>laundering its fabulous piece, really important, because this is why

0:42:56.960 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you're again while your kids are coming home saying sis

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:00.920
<v Speaker 1>gender and gender idea and all the stuff. You're like,

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:03.919
<v Speaker 1>what it all starts in the campus. Here's what they do.

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:06.359
<v Speaker 1>You got a bunch of people that feel a certain

0:43:06.400 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>way in academia. We feel like fat shaming, for example,

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is wrong. Now being mean to anyone is wrong. Being

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:16.959
<v Speaker 1>mean to anyone because their weight. I think I'll vast

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>majority of us all have different times or we're struggling

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:20.839
<v Speaker 1>with weight, or we're trying to get a little healthier,

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to drop some pounds. There's a lot that

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 1>goes into weight, including genetics, including people's socioeconomic circumstances. You know,

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:31.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just not as simple as oh, just show willpower.

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's there's a lot that goes into it,

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and people should be considered about that, and it's a

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>struggle that I think a lot of us all share.

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 1>But that's different than creating an academic discipline around fat shaming,

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 1>which is what colleges have done. How they do it

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:51.800
<v Speaker 1>will they start a journal, an academic journal. In this case,

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it was called Fat Studies. They created an academic periodical

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>called Fat Studies. And they had than other academics right

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>about how talking about fat as a bad thing, or

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:10.720
<v Speaker 1>being overweight or obesi is a bad thing was psychologically

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 1>harmful and distressing and all. And then they have other

0:44:13.080 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>academics who peer review this. But they see the peer

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:23.359
<v Speaker 1>review process is supposed to be, and this goes back

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:26.279
<v Speaker 1>to the roots of the academy. It's supposed to be

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a process of distilling truth through opposition to what is

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>being written there or looking for flaws, looking for counter arguments,

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>looking for ways that this that the peer review is

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be. Is this thing unassailable? Is it true?

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Try to show us that it's not true. That's not

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 1>how peer review works. And social social studies departments or whatever,

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:52.759
<v Speaker 1>social science is rather which are not science. As a

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 1>political science major, it can tell you there was no

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:56.799
<v Speaker 1>science to it at all. The few times we looked

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.839
<v Speaker 1>at regression analysis and statistics and things, everybody's eyes rolled

0:44:59.880 --> 0:45:01.399
<v Speaker 1>that in their head and they said, let's argue more

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:04.920
<v Speaker 1>about you know, abortion rights. Nobody cared about any of

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that other stuff. There's really no science to it. But

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the social sciences across the academy,

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>which you find out is that as long as you're

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:18.400
<v Speaker 1>taking a left wing point of view, the peer review

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:22.239
<v Speaker 1>process for these journals that they just make up is

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:26.319
<v Speaker 1>meant to just consolidate the opinion around whatever is being promulgated.

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So they all they all go, yeah, it's great. You know,

0:45:28.880 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the kind of fat shaming is a terrible thing. And

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:34.960
<v Speaker 1>then when people say, well, what about the health risks

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and the I mean, that's the biggest public health epidemic

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 1>we really face actually now has to do directly with

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>diseases of excess, disease of excess calories and the type

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>two diabetes, among other things, and they just shout all

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that down with excuse me, we have a fat studies

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>journal that explains all of this. It is peer reviewed.

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>It is the science now, but it's not the science.

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:03.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just the consolidation of like minded opinion in something

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 1>they are calling a journal that they are saying is

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:12.880
<v Speaker 1>peer reviewed that is really just there forwarding of a narrative,

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 1>a narrative based on emotion and feeling, a narrative that

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:20.880
<v Speaker 1>is not rooted in any reality. Here's an example in

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Fat Studies, the Journal Toward a Fat Pedagogy, a study

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of pedagogical approaches aimed at challenging obesity discourse in post

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:34.319
<v Speaker 1>secondary education. Does anyone even know? I mean, I just

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>read that to you, dude. I read it. I've read

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it before, I read the piece before it came on error.

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't evenally know what they think they're saying here.

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:43.879
<v Speaker 1>And that's part of this as well. They dress up

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>flimsy thoughts with fancy words because then most people just

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:52.279
<v Speaker 1>sort of say, Okay, it looks it looks like it's academic,

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:59.759
<v Speaker 1>and therefore there's some impremature on the fact that this

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 1>is coming out of a college or a university. There

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>must be some truth to it. I always say that

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>word a little bit funny because I feel like I

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 1>say it wrong sometimes. But whatever, I learned words by

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:13.239
<v Speaker 1>reading them, not by hearing them. These articles tell us

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that obesity is a narrative such as being healthy at

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:18.399
<v Speaker 1>and there's another narrative such as being healthy at ever

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 1>at every size, and there's no reason to privilege one

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:23.800
<v Speaker 1>narrative over another. Is to see this. The reason why

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:26.200
<v Speaker 1>he focused in on fat studies here in this piece

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:29.239
<v Speaker 1>is because that's just not true. Being morbidly obese is very,

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:31.879
<v Speaker 1>very dangerous for your health. There is no alternative. There

0:47:31.920 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is no scientific alternative narrative about how being morbidly obeses

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:38.319
<v Speaker 1>is okay for your health. This is not the same

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:39.920
<v Speaker 1>thing as don't be mean to people that are struggling

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 1>with weight. I've struggled with weight. Lots of people want

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to struggle with weight. Everybody struggles with weight. Really, that

0:47:43.719 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you know you come across in a day to day

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 1>basis just they don't necessarily talk about it. But to

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 1>say that, yeah, you know you weigh you weigh a

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 1>thousand pounds, that's fine, that's the way you know, that's

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:56.279
<v Speaker 1>the way God made you is not This is not

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:59.000
<v Speaker 1>based in any science. This is just narrative. And then

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>when you start to take this and look at Okay,

0:48:02.080 --> 0:48:05.359
<v Speaker 1>what about cis gender and heteronormativity and all these other

0:48:05.520 --> 0:48:09.640
<v Speaker 1>concepts that come out they're giving fancy words to. Well,

0:48:09.680 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 1>we have a feeling that people shouldn't just think that

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:17.279
<v Speaker 1>being heterosexual is the normal thing. Well, normal is a

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:20.239
<v Speaker 1>word that it views some value judgment on things, but

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 1>it is certainly the majority, and then there's no reason

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to believe that that's going to change anytime soon. Intersectionality,

0:48:27.239 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>they're different groups that are all filled with oppression against

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>each other, and that there's an actual hierarchy of oppression

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that the left looks at throughout American society. You know,

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:39.680
<v Speaker 1>are you black? Are you Latino? Are you white? Are

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you Asian? Are you trans? Are you? All these different things?

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And that every discussion of politics has to the first

0:48:47.000 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>thing you do is put somebody on that board, if

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 1>you will, not chessboard, on that playing field, before you

0:48:55.239 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 1>can discuss the merits of an argument, the drawbacks of

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 1>an argument, what's true, what's fair, it's good, what's decent?

0:49:01.080 --> 0:49:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Now forget all that first, Where where does this person

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:09.319
<v Speaker 1>go in the intersectional hierarchy? This all comes from academia.

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 1>This is a problem for the kids who have to

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:14.720
<v Speaker 1>study these places. This is from the Bogosian piece. Quote.

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Students leave the academy believing they know things they do

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:21.320
<v Speaker 1>not know. They bring this knowledge to their places of employment,

0:49:21.320 --> 0:49:25.480
<v Speaker 1>where over time laundered ideas and the terminology that accompanies

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 1>them become normative, giving them even more unearned legitimacy. This

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:32.120
<v Speaker 1>is why you've heard of some of the terms we

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:37.680
<v Speaker 1>began with sis, gender, fat shaming, heteronormativity, intersectionality, patriarchy, rape, culture,

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and whiteness. They've been laundered through the pure reviewed literature

0:49:41.960 --> 0:49:45.880
<v Speaker 1>by activist scholars, then widely taught for years before being

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:52.680
<v Speaker 1>brought into the world. This is not knowledge. These are

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:58.240
<v Speaker 1>just feelings dressed up by academia to make it seem

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:01.839
<v Speaker 1>like if you argue with this, you are breaking with

0:50:01.880 --> 0:50:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the consensus of the super smart people who all they

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:07.359
<v Speaker 1>do is sit around thinking about this stuff, and yet

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it's full of jargon and absurdity. This is where you

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:13.080
<v Speaker 1>got that piece that was published in a peer review journal,

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and the title of the piece was and I quote

0:50:17.960 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the penis as social construct end quote. It was published

0:50:23.200 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and peer reviewed by an academic journal that claimed to

0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:34.439
<v Speaker 1>be the authority on different genders studies and they put

0:50:34.480 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>this thing out there because they're so steeped in this

0:50:38.600 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of thinking, and they're so used to taking ideas

0:50:41.560 --> 0:50:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that are that are just really about either political or

0:50:45.920 --> 0:50:50.759
<v Speaker 1>cultural proclivities and prejudices and make it seem like there's

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:53.720
<v Speaker 1>something behind this, or then will I feel this way.

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:56.040
<v Speaker 1>It would be like if I if I created an

0:50:56.080 --> 0:51:01.880
<v Speaker 1>academic journal about how marzipan is a greatly underrated food

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that everybody should eat more and should be more readily

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:07.160
<v Speaker 1>available because it's delicious and I just don't see it

0:51:07.200 --> 0:51:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in enough places. And I got a bunch of other

0:51:09.200 --> 0:51:11.439
<v Speaker 1>people that love marzapan to come together and say, hey,

0:51:12.200 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 1>we reviewed this, and he's right, you should have more marzapan,

0:51:14.680 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 1>especially around the holidays. I'm starting a movement. I'm not

0:51:18.600 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 1>building any science. This is a Lynskyite community organizing in

0:51:25.960 --> 0:51:31.400
<v Speaker 1>place of academic intellectual rigor and pursuit of the truth

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:36.399
<v Speaker 1>that it has overtaken our college campuses and universities. It's

0:51:36.440 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 1>why these kids come out spouting these things, and they

0:51:40.120 --> 0:51:44.200
<v Speaker 1>get so defensive and so angry when you challenge it,

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:46.560
<v Speaker 1>because these ideas are not supposed to be challenged. It's

0:51:46.560 --> 0:51:48.560
<v Speaker 1>peer reviewed, it's put out in the journal. Professor so

0:51:48.719 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and so and Professor so and so use this and

0:51:51.520 --> 0:51:53.799
<v Speaker 1>you get to sound smart because use these big, new

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 1>fancy words. But what does it all mean? Nothing? I

0:51:59.760 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 1>antand what it's like to go through the process of

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:03.960
<v Speaker 1>buying life insurance. I had to do it before I

0:52:04.000 --> 0:52:06.880
<v Speaker 1>went overseas. It felt a little bit weird. But that's

0:52:06.880 --> 0:52:09.520
<v Speaker 1>why you need to check out my friends and Ethos

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Life Insurance because they make sure that there's no hassle,

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:16.160
<v Speaker 1>no nonsense, and they'll find a plan that allows you

0:52:16.440 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that your family is prepared for an

0:52:19.120 --> 0:52:21.719
<v Speaker 1>uncertain future. This is something you've got to do. It's

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:24.799
<v Speaker 1>the responsible choice and Blink makes it easy for you.

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 1>There's no fine print or silly appointments or fees that

0:52:28.480 --> 0:52:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you just really can't afford. Ethos Is approach is simple

0:52:31.680 --> 0:52:34.719
<v Speaker 1>to blend industry expertise, technology and the human touch that

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:37.360
<v Speaker 1>helps you find the right policy for you to protect

0:52:37.360 --> 0:52:39.319
<v Speaker 1>your loved ones. It only takes about ten minutes to

0:52:39.360 --> 0:52:43.560
<v Speaker 1>apply and ethos is already trusted by thousands. Get a fast,

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:49.480
<v Speaker 1>free and personalized quote right now at Ethoslife dot com. Again,

0:52:49.600 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that's Ethoslife dot com. Ethos Life Insurance is life insurance

0:52:55.719 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that actually fits your life. That's what I don't know.

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:02.120
<v Speaker 1>This is a real story. Because I mentioned marzipan and

0:53:02.200 --> 0:53:05.239
<v Speaker 1>my my activism in favor, I wanted to pick something

0:53:05.320 --> 0:53:07.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of random, but I do really, I mean, marzipan

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and chocolate. You ever eat it? No, that's too it's

0:53:09.520 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 1>like way too, You're not. That's not a burger with

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:14.719
<v Speaker 1>no bun and American cheese on it. I don't even

0:53:14.760 --> 0:53:18.640
<v Speaker 1>know what marzipan is. Are you serious? Sweetened almond paste,

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing. It's liking candy sometimes anything with paste. So

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you usually you think you can. You can give your

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:28.320
<v Speaker 1>your takes on food, and you're allowed because food is

0:53:28.600 --> 0:53:31.279
<v Speaker 1>literally about taste, right. We use the word taste for

0:53:31.360 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 1>things we like. Food though, is like how does this

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:36.359
<v Speaker 1>taste to me? And it is inherently subjective and people

0:53:36.400 --> 0:53:39.760
<v Speaker 1>have different taste buds. And don't use too much hot sauce, folks.

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Over time, it starts to you you're the burning and

0:53:43.400 --> 0:53:47.520
<v Speaker 1>everything that can actually dully. I'm just telling you hashtag science.

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I like hot sauce too, but don't go too crazy

0:53:49.560 --> 0:53:56.319
<v Speaker 1>with it, Tom Nichols. Tom and I know each other

0:53:56.320 --> 0:53:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I've had them on the show in

0:53:57.560 --> 0:53:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the past. Tom is now a Democrat, he used to

0:53:59.160 --> 0:54:02.080
<v Speaker 1>be a conservative, umbroke him. I don't know what to say,

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:06.000
<v Speaker 1>he tweeted out. I think people often pretend to like

0:54:06.120 --> 0:54:09.440
<v Speaker 1>non American cuisines as a way of showing sophistication. I'm

0:54:09.600 --> 0:54:12.400
<v Speaker 1>honest enough to say, my mostly Irish taste buds cannot

0:54:12.400 --> 0:54:15.040
<v Speaker 1>handle whatever it is, whatever's called Indian food in the

0:54:15.080 --> 0:54:17.680
<v Speaker 1>US and the UK. You may continue with your outrage.

0:54:18.800 --> 0:54:24.239
<v Speaker 1>And you know what's amazing. There was outrage. People were

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:27.240
<v Speaker 1>saying this was racist. People were saying should get fired.

0:54:27.400 --> 0:54:30.360
<v Speaker 1>You are not allowed to not like Indian food. I

0:54:30.520 --> 0:54:33.880
<v Speaker 1>guarantee you. If you trashed American food as a white male,

0:54:34.560 --> 0:54:37.480
<v Speaker 1>people would say, oh yeah, so of course America America

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:39.960
<v Speaker 1>people like you know, what's considered sophisticated among liberals to

0:54:39.960 --> 0:54:46.640
<v Speaker 1>say America has no culture. Yeah, We're just the most wealthy, powerful, sophisticated,

0:54:46.680 --> 0:54:50.640
<v Speaker 1>culturally dominant country in the history of the planet, and

0:54:50.719 --> 0:54:53.680
<v Speaker 1>we have no culture. That's a really, that's a smart take.

0:54:54.960 --> 0:54:58.319
<v Speaker 1>People say this stuff all the time, but this is

0:54:58.320 --> 0:55:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a BBC News story. All right, Say you don't like

0:55:00.920 --> 0:55:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Indian food and you get trashed globally for being a racist.

0:55:05.360 --> 0:55:07.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the world we live in now. I also

0:55:07.239 --> 0:55:09.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to just point something out here, you know, I

0:55:09.719 --> 0:55:14.480
<v Speaker 1>like to dive into the left wing desire to control

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 1>speech and to make us use certain words. And I

0:55:16.640 --> 0:55:19.800
<v Speaker 1>do think we're heading into a place where the idea

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:25.240
<v Speaker 1>laundering that the grievance scholars engages in has already become

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the way that you are judged by in social media interactions.

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>You can now be banned. We talked about Andy No

0:55:30.640 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 1>getting suspended because of hateful posts. It's not hateful, it's

0:55:34.600 --> 0:55:38.480
<v Speaker 1>just stating facts. But stating facts can be hateful to leftists.

0:55:39.520 --> 0:55:41.960
<v Speaker 1>But also if you have to remember that even if

0:55:41.960 --> 0:55:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you give them what they want, in some cases, what

0:55:45.080 --> 0:55:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the left wants now in discourse is often absurd and

0:55:49.920 --> 0:55:54.839
<v Speaker 1>self contradictory. It is destined to only result in more

0:55:55.040 --> 0:55:57.480
<v Speaker 1>demands about what you can say and how you can

0:55:57.560 --> 0:56:01.239
<v Speaker 1>say it. So don't think that you buy them off

0:56:01.960 --> 0:56:05.200
<v Speaker 1>by just by conceding on this or conceding on that issue.

0:56:05.520 --> 0:56:07.120
<v Speaker 1>You concede to what you think is right, what you

0:56:07.120 --> 0:56:09.600
<v Speaker 1>think is morel For example, I've always said if somebody

0:56:09.600 --> 0:56:11.040
<v Speaker 1>wants to change their name, everyone has a right to

0:56:11.120 --> 0:56:13.520
<v Speaker 1>change their name. So if a guy named Bob now

0:56:13.560 --> 0:56:17.799
<v Speaker 1>wants to be called, you know, Claudette's, I will call

0:56:17.880 --> 0:56:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Bob Claudette the same way that you know. My middle

0:56:21.000 --> 0:56:22.880
<v Speaker 1>name is Buckman, and people call me a buck and

0:56:22.880 --> 0:56:24.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone goes, why do you such a weird name? I

0:56:24.360 --> 0:56:26.319
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Ask my parents. They wanted to make life

0:56:26.320 --> 0:56:28.080
<v Speaker 1>harder than it had to be. I love you, mom

0:56:28.080 --> 0:56:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and dad. But you know it's this is people allowed

0:56:31.920 --> 0:56:34.319
<v Speaker 1>to choose you allowed to choose your name. You're allowed

0:56:34.360 --> 0:56:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to choose your name. That's different though, than saying you

0:56:39.400 --> 0:56:41.880
<v Speaker 1>have to be a party to falsehood or a fraud.

0:56:42.000 --> 0:56:45.239
<v Speaker 1>To say that, you have to be willing to agree

0:56:46.360 --> 0:56:49.839
<v Speaker 1>to say things that you know to be untrue. And

0:56:49.960 --> 0:56:52.879
<v Speaker 1>here's something that I that I thought was very very

0:56:52.880 --> 0:56:59.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting today looking at the argument around announcing your pronouns

0:56:59.840 --> 0:57:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is thing you're supposed to do. You know, my pronouns

0:57:01.800 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 1>are he and him, and people do this and you

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:09.080
<v Speaker 1>know you're at a It's really become something like the

0:57:09.200 --> 0:57:14.759
<v Speaker 1>secret handshake at a left wing rally group. Anything you

0:57:14.800 --> 0:57:17.120
<v Speaker 1>stand up and you say, and this reruinds me. During

0:57:17.160 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the Occupy Wall Street days, remember that protest movement people

0:57:20.040 --> 0:57:22.000
<v Speaker 1>would do. They would do this thing where they would

0:57:22.600 --> 0:57:24.840
<v Speaker 1>twinkle their fingers in the air as a way of

0:57:24.880 --> 0:57:28.840
<v Speaker 1>showing applause. Um. They would also they would snap instead

0:57:28.840 --> 0:57:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of clap, and they would do this thing called mic check.

0:57:32.440 --> 0:57:34.880
<v Speaker 1>They go mike check, my check. And you know, one

0:57:34.920 --> 0:57:37.120
<v Speaker 1>person says something that everyone repeats it as a way

0:57:37.160 --> 0:57:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of amplifying the message. These were These were cultural signifiers

0:57:42.800 --> 0:57:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of being and good being in the in group with

0:57:45.320 --> 0:57:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the left, of being in the in the cool kid group,

0:57:48.000 --> 0:57:51.160
<v Speaker 1>if you will. For most people, because a very very

0:57:51.160 --> 0:57:54.160
<v Speaker 1>small percentage of the country has a problem with its gender,

0:57:54.320 --> 0:57:57.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't understand its gender. It's less than one percent of

0:57:57.120 --> 0:58:02.160
<v Speaker 1>this country. For most people, saying what your pronouns are

0:58:02.200 --> 0:58:05.680
<v Speaker 1>would seem to just be an enormous waste of time.

0:58:07.040 --> 0:58:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But here's the issue with that. The reason that you

0:58:11.800 --> 0:58:15.720
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to say what your preferred pronouns are now,

0:58:15.760 --> 0:58:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and this is according to leftist doctrine, this is now

0:58:18.400 --> 0:58:19.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to be you know, you've had this

0:58:19.920 --> 0:58:21.720
<v Speaker 1>at you know, CNM when they had their town hall

0:58:21.760 --> 0:58:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Cuomo pro Cuomo made his joke a year

0:58:24.040 --> 0:58:29.080
<v Speaker 1>here my pronouns, and everybody's like, not funny, not funny.

0:58:30.560 --> 0:58:33.840
<v Speaker 1>But the reason you say it is that it is

0:58:33.920 --> 0:58:38.760
<v Speaker 1>meant to show that there's nothing out of the ordinary,

0:58:38.840 --> 0:58:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and therefore there should be no disapproval heaped on people

0:58:43.600 --> 0:58:49.280
<v Speaker 1>who do not seem visually to align with whatever their

0:58:49.280 --> 0:58:53.400
<v Speaker 1>preferred pronouns are. So so the point here is to

0:58:53.400 --> 0:58:58.360
<v Speaker 1>make it that if everybody announces their pronouns, then when

0:58:58.400 --> 0:59:03.760
<v Speaker 1>people feel compelled to announced their pronouns, they won't be

0:59:04.240 --> 0:59:07.760
<v Speaker 1>automatically singled out for being strange for announcing their pronouns.

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:11.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's like we all do it, and therefore, um,

0:59:12.360 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, nobody should feel left out. I mean, it

0:59:15.680 --> 0:59:18.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of reminds me of I think it Wasn't Saved

0:59:18.200 --> 0:59:22.560
<v Speaker 1>by the Bell where Lisa Turtle Sprain. Remember this, Lisa

0:59:22.560 --> 0:59:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Turtle sprained her ankle and she had to go to

0:59:24.960 --> 0:59:28.360
<v Speaker 1>prom and they did a dance called the Sprain where

0:59:28.360 --> 0:59:30.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody was pretending that they because she didn't want to

0:59:30.680 --> 0:59:32.560
<v Speaker 1>feel left out, so everyone showing the sprain. You know

0:59:32.600 --> 0:59:35.280
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking about? Remember that? Yeah? Yeah, I think

0:59:35.280 --> 0:59:38.680
<v Speaker 1>she went with Screech right, yes, but grudgingly. Yeah, who

0:59:38.680 --> 0:59:43.120
<v Speaker 1>had quite a career afterwards, career in jail of Stuffy

0:59:44.000 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Dustin Diamond. I watched that show so many times I

0:59:46.280 --> 0:59:50.840
<v Speaker 1>even remember their names. I believe her name was Lark Vorhees, Yes,

0:59:50.920 --> 0:59:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and there was Mark Paul Goslar and of course Mario Lopez.

0:59:56.320 --> 0:59:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I believe. I believe it was a little right of center,

0:59:58.360 --> 1:00:01.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I I've been the host of the

1:00:01.960 --> 1:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Vecture or something like that of those anyway, So everyone

1:00:05.240 --> 1:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>danced like they had a spring ankle, because then no

1:00:06.880 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>one felt like they were left out with the spring.

1:00:08.440 --> 1:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>That was the whole idea. If everyone announces their pronouns,

1:00:10.760 --> 1:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>then no one's left out when they have to announce

1:00:12.360 --> 1:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>their pronouns. That's the or it feels feels weird. Here's

1:00:15.200 --> 1:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the problem. This is why I'm starting with. This is

1:00:16.600 --> 1:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>why I'm trying to tell you the left is absurd.

1:00:18.240 --> 1:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make any sense when people announce their pronouns,

1:00:24.280 --> 1:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and everyone is announcing their pronouns and the pronouns align

1:00:28.040 --> 1:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>with what you would expect them to be in a

1:00:29.520 --> 1:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of cases. Then when someone is expected to

1:00:32.320 --> 1:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>announce their pronouns and they have a different gender identity,

1:00:36.400 --> 1:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>they will clearly be different than the people that are

1:00:40.360 --> 1:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>announcing their pronouns. So just by announcing, and it doesn't

1:00:44.320 --> 1:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>change the basic fact that you have somebody who perhaps

1:00:47.280 --> 1:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>appears to be male who says, my pronouns are you know, she,

1:00:50.920 --> 1:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>her and hers, So you haven't dealt with the issue

1:00:53.960 --> 1:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>at all. And then when it just turns into is

1:00:56.760 --> 1:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>well now you're being Now everyone is announcing their pronouns,

1:01:00.120 --> 1:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>is therefore playing into perhaps the stereotypes around who does

1:01:05.400 --> 1:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and does not conform to their general identity. So we're

1:01:07.680 --> 1:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>just back where we started. It doesn't do anything. It

1:01:10.440 --> 1:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>makes no sense to announce your pronouns. It's supposed to

1:01:13.520 --> 1:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>be some kind of concession to a group that feels

1:01:17.960 --> 1:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>aggrieved and put upon. But if we all actually did

1:01:21.000 --> 1:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>what they tell us to do, the next demand would be, well,

1:01:24.960 --> 1:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, now we can't announce our problems because when

1:01:27.280 --> 1:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we do, it's just showing the people that announce them

1:01:29.480 --> 1:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that they're different. It's like they're having to proclaim it

1:01:32.800 --> 1:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to everybody, their differentness. It changes nothing. This is stupid,

1:01:38.040 --> 1:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>it is absurd. But it's really not about being kind.

1:01:41.400 --> 1:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not about being decent. If it were, i'd be

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in favor of those things. It's about getting you to

1:01:46.120 --> 1:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>bend the knee. You bend the knee on announcing your pronouns,

1:01:49.440 --> 1:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and then you bend the knee on nobody announces your pronouns.

1:01:53.200 --> 1:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, you bend the knee on saying that somebody

1:01:56.920 --> 1:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>is a she when it's a he. And then you've

1:01:58.960 --> 1:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>bend the knee when you say that we're not allowed

1:02:00.720 --> 1:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to use any gender specific pronouns for anyone anymore. And

1:02:05.560 --> 1:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>then this of course also influences how we can talk

1:02:08.000 --> 1:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>about policy. You know, are you are you allowed to

1:02:12.040 --> 1:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>object to a transgender female biologically male being the counselor

1:02:18.280 --> 1:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>for a day camp for you know, a bunch of

1:02:21.560 --> 1:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, young girls. Is that is that's on there?

1:02:23.760 --> 1:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>You're allowed to look at gender identity that way? It's

1:02:27.120 --> 1:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they just expect you bend the knee

1:02:30.680 --> 1:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>or they will destroy you. And this is why we

1:02:33.560 --> 1:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>spend time on these issues here on the show, because

1:02:35.920 --> 1:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the way you're allowed to talk about things, and the

1:02:38.080 --> 1:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>way that society insists that you only use certain words,

1:02:42.760 --> 1:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>whether it's undocumented or you know, cis gender or any

1:02:47.160 --> 1:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of these things. This is all for a purpose, and

1:02:50.040 --> 1:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the purpose is not being polite. The purpose is getting

1:02:52.520 --> 1:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you to bend. The purpose is getting you to say, okay, fine,

1:02:56.240 --> 1:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I submit, I'll do what you tell me to do,

1:02:58.720 --> 1:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>because once they get you to start the habit of

1:03:01.320 --> 1:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>submitting to their absurd and constantly changing demands, then they

1:03:06.720 --> 1:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>can just continue on with that momentum and get you

1:03:09.120 --> 1:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to just start conceding to other things too. And they

1:03:11.120 --> 1:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>know that. You know, once you say fine, fine, leave

1:03:13.760 --> 1:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>me alone, then you'll say, fine, leave me alone. I'll

1:03:16.040 --> 1:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>do it on this other thing too. You know, I

1:03:18.320 --> 1:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>won't go to Chick fil A anymore because you know

1:03:20.320 --> 1:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chick fil A is so big at it. You know,

1:03:23.040 --> 1:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I won't do this. I want to just please just

1:03:25.120 --> 1:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>let me live my life in peace. I'll do whatever

1:03:26.800 --> 1:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you want. This is what they want, that sentiment, that

1:03:30.120 --> 1:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>feeling of I'll do anything in order to prevent the

1:03:33.080 --> 1:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>continue to intellectual psychological harassment. That's what they want. Don't

1:03:40.880 --> 1:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>give it to them. Think this stuff through on your own.

1:03:45.280 --> 1:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>That's why we've got the Freedom Hunt Friends, big headline

1:03:47.920 --> 1:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>right now on foxnews dot Com Collision Course long Away

1:03:52.200 --> 1:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to report on Five's abuse from the Inspector General could

1:03:55.120 --> 1:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>scramble DEM's impeachment plans. Some of us have been saying

1:04:03.840 --> 1:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>by some of us I mean, certainly me all along

1:04:06.800 --> 1:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps the imperative for impeachment at all costs isn't

1:04:11.600 --> 1:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>only driven by the desire to thwart the twenty twenty

1:04:15.600 --> 1:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>election that's the primary one, but also perhaps to get ahead.

1:04:19.160 --> 1:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe I said this on Brett Bear Show a

1:04:20.840 --> 1:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, to get ahead of the report

1:04:27.440 --> 1:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that's going to make things look pretty bad for the Democrats.

1:04:29.800 --> 1:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Here's where we are right now on the whole fish abuse.

1:04:34.000 --> 1:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>People call it spygate. I think that's a little too broad.

1:04:37.520 --> 1:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like almost calling it like bad gate or something

1:04:39.840 --> 1:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>like spygate is it's not. That doesn't really work for

1:04:42.880 --> 1:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>me as a term. But you know, look, there's no

1:04:44.320 --> 1:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>good term for it, I understand. But the effort, the

1:04:49.160 --> 1:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>effort to use the intelligence apparatus of the United States

1:04:52.320 --> 1:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>government against a presidential campaign, that that has somehow been

1:04:59.080 --> 1:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>treated as is normal, that that has found its way

1:05:04.360 --> 1:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>into our discussions about what's going on with the presidency.

1:05:08.520 --> 1:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>And people say, yeah, well, of course, of course they

1:05:10.040 --> 1:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>surveiled Carter Page, and of course they did. No, it's

1:05:13.800 --> 1:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>not an of course situation, this low level lawyer. That

1:05:18.440 --> 1:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>was the report we had last week from within the

1:05:21.200 --> 1:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice who was removed and maybe criminally prosecuted

1:05:24.800 --> 1:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>for changing something that went into a Fizer report. They're

1:05:29.760 --> 1:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>going to try to say that this was just a

1:05:31.160 --> 1:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>lone actor once again, somebody else doing something that only

1:05:35.600 --> 1:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>makes sense if they have a feverish hatred of Donald

1:05:41.800 --> 1:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump and are willing to do anything, including getting fired

1:05:45.160 --> 1:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and losing their job and losing perhaps their freedom, to

1:05:47.640 --> 1:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>stop Trump. But we're told that this is this is

1:05:49.800 --> 1:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a one off, this is a one off. This isn't

1:05:53.000 --> 1:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody this lawyer that they're saying, change the FIZA. There's

1:05:59.400 --> 1:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>nothing to be worth about here, nothing to be concerned

1:06:01.200 --> 1:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>about here. I disagree. I disagree. The problem that we're

1:06:07.720 --> 1:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>going to face here is that they first of all,

1:06:10.880 --> 1:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>they've brought over to CNN, so anything you can see

1:06:12.840 --> 1:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>from CNS is kind of hilarious. They've got McCabe over there,

1:06:15.920 --> 1:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>They've got the former General Counsel Baker I believe, of

1:06:20.200 --> 1:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the FBI. This guy is over there on CNN all

1:06:22.760 --> 1:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the time, and they were the ones in power, and

1:06:25.200 --> 1:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>CNN has people analyzing essentially their own actions as though

1:06:29.440 --> 1:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they're fair minded experts on these issues. They're putting them

1:06:34.240 --> 1:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in front of you, because CNN was in on this

1:06:35.720 --> 1:06:40.479
<v Speaker 1>whole thing too. Tapper found out about the dossier being

1:06:40.560 --> 1:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>brief to Trump, you know, within two days, and then

1:06:44.400 --> 1:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>he got all mad at Ben Smith from BuzzFeed because

1:06:47.240 --> 1:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Ben Smith actually showed people what the dossier was. And

1:06:49.680 --> 1:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Tapper wanted to squeeze as much as he could out

1:06:51.680 --> 1:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of that whole dossier story as long as he could

1:06:53.680 --> 1:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>because he's a hack and a fraud. But yeah, that

1:06:58.240 --> 1:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>was the that was the way this thing was all going.

1:07:01.640 --> 1:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And yet now we look at it and say to ourselves, huh, maybe,

1:07:07.640 --> 1:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>just maybe what we will see when this Fiser report

1:07:11.200 --> 1:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>comes out is that there was an effort to pretend

1:07:17.880 --> 1:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that people were very dumb and had very bad judgment

1:07:21.200 --> 1:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>at senior levels of the United States government, when really

1:07:25.040 --> 1:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>what they were doing was playing dumb as that they

1:07:27.240 --> 1:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>could make mistakes that what happened to be negative for Trump.

1:07:32.120 --> 1:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>That would allow, for example, different communications that Carter Page

1:07:37.760 --> 1:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>had with anybody in the Trump campaigned to be looked

1:07:41.040 --> 1:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>at to be part of the collection process under that

1:07:45.080 --> 1:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>fires a warrant, and you know, Papadopoulos and these different

1:07:48.800 --> 1:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>investigations that were going at this time. This is not possible.

1:07:55.400 --> 1:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>None of this is possible in a good faith law

1:08:00.160 --> 1:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>enforcement effort, where people would say, we'll hold on a

1:08:02.280 --> 1:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>second carter Page, who had worked alongside the FBI against

1:08:08.440 --> 1:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Russian spies, was known to the FBI, I'd already met

1:08:11.320 --> 1:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>with the FBI, and who the FBI knew Russian spies,

1:08:14.280 --> 1:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>said was kind of an idiot. He's the nexus for

1:08:18.920 --> 1:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>this whole Russia Trump conspiracy. And remember this, my friends,

1:08:23.280 --> 1:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>even if they tell you that they had a legitimate

1:08:26.160 --> 1:08:30.599
<v Speaker 1>justification for looking at Russian interference in the election, which

1:08:30.680 --> 1:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe they did, that is a big leap from Okay.

1:08:36.120 --> 1:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>We also have to make sure that we can investigate

1:08:39.840 --> 1:08:44.599
<v Speaker 1>the presidential campaign and then the presidency itself of Donald

1:08:44.600 --> 1:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump because of this theory that Trump and his campaign

1:08:49.280 --> 1:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>were working with the Russians. Where does that come from?

1:08:54.600 --> 1:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Who originated that idea? This is what we really have

1:08:58.160 --> 1:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to know. I mean, I think people would say, right now,

1:09:00.720 --> 1:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you might be guessing, you know, Brandon and Clapper and

1:09:04.040 --> 1:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>there are a few people that come to mind, but

1:09:08.280 --> 1:09:10.519
<v Speaker 1>we're what were the real origins of all of this.

1:09:11.320 --> 1:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>We may get closer to that with this report that

1:09:15.280 --> 1:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>comes out on FISA We'll also find out those of

1:09:18.960 --> 1:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>us who were saying the dossier was necessary. Without the dossier,

1:09:25.960 --> 1:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>it probably wouldn't have been able to get to the

1:09:28.160 --> 1:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>level of the FISA request they had on Carter page.

1:09:31.720 --> 1:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how accurate that was. We also, though, have

1:09:36.160 --> 1:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the problem of the bureaucracy covering for itself, which I

1:09:39.400 --> 1:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>think is you're going you're going to see that that's

1:09:42.680 --> 1:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that's going to happen here. I wish it weren't the case.

1:09:46.200 --> 1:09:50.639
<v Speaker 1>It will be the case. The bureaucracy will be covering

1:09:50.640 --> 1:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>for itself at some level. They will say that bad

1:09:52.840 --> 1:09:55.439
<v Speaker 1>judgment is not criminal, and bad judgment in matters of

1:09:56.120 --> 1:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>using the fearsome powers of the federal government against the

1:09:59.120 --> 1:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>presidential campaig that just comes down to bad judgment, that's all.

1:10:06.160 --> 1:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Bad judgment isn't about politics, it's not about criminality. You

1:10:10.720 --> 1:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>can't think that there really is a deep state just

1:10:12.720 --> 1:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>because these guys kept on bending the rules and making

1:10:17.080 --> 1:10:21.639
<v Speaker 1>poor decisions that all happen to go toward getting dirt

1:10:21.800 --> 1:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>on Trump. That's right. They love to talk about Trump

1:10:24.000 --> 1:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>getting dirt on Hunter Biden. Our own FBI under the

1:10:30.120 --> 1:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration was trying to get dirt on President Trump

1:10:35.120 --> 1:10:40.519
<v Speaker 1>and use FISA to do it if they can. Let

1:10:40.520 --> 1:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>me let me just say this. If they can get

1:10:42.240 --> 1:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a fis a warrant on Carter Page, they can get

1:10:44.760 --> 1:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a FIS A warrant on anybody. You can always come

1:10:47.200 --> 1:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>up with some pretext. You again, any friends in a

1:10:48.720 --> 1:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>foreign country. Yeah, you know those friends probably have foreign

1:10:51.240 --> 1:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>friends who are bad. Let's just run a FIES on.

1:10:52.840 --> 1:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a joke. It's absurd. You know they talk to

1:10:57.040 --> 1:10:59.479
<v Speaker 1>people like me. Oh well, he has friends in foreign countries,

1:10:59.479 --> 1:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and he knows in the intelligence services, and we know

1:11:01.439 --> 1:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>we better, we better monitor him. So I'm I don't

1:11:05.280 --> 1:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>have high hopes, which now reminds me of the Buddha Judge,

1:11:10.120 --> 1:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>like the Buddha Judge song and d have seeing this

1:11:11.960 --> 1:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the the high hope stance that everyone's doing now for

1:11:15.360 --> 1:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Buddha Judge. This is like his followers did. They was

1:11:18.680 --> 1:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>mocked on SNL this weekend. Oh it was. They said

1:11:20.960 --> 1:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>he was trying to get a negative percentage of the

1:11:22.960 --> 1:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>black vote. Wow, I did not see that. But I

1:11:27.320 --> 1:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>do not have high hopes for the Inspector General report

1:11:30.360 --> 1:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>being a massive blow to the deep state. I do

1:11:33.920 --> 1:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>think though, that they're gonna want us to swallow. It'll

1:11:37.240 --> 1:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>be like the other Inspector General report where they said

1:11:39.320 --> 1:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that there was no bias in the Hillary Clinton email investigation,

1:11:41.760 --> 1:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>which was not true. There was bias. They showed us

1:11:44.720 --> 1:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>all this bias and they said there wasn't bias. They're

1:11:46.880 --> 1:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna show us all kinds of abuse of FISA, but

1:11:49.400 --> 1:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>then in order to protect the institution of the Department

1:11:52.080 --> 1:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of Justice and the FBI, they're gonna say it wasn't

1:11:55.000 --> 1:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>political though, So there really isn't any abuse that went

1:11:59.040 --> 1:12:02.479
<v Speaker 1>on here. Oh no, there was abuse a team. I know,

1:12:02.520 --> 1:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>we're going into the Thanksgiving holiday and a proser Marketer's

1:12:05.479 --> 1:12:07.439
<v Speaker 1>football over the Thanksgiving holiday, Right, that's the thing that

1:12:07.479 --> 1:12:09.719
<v Speaker 1>happens that people. I see it in the background sometimes

1:12:09.760 --> 1:12:12.519
<v Speaker 1>at the various homes where I've been for Yeah, there's

1:12:12.520 --> 1:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the football thing that happens. But there's been some big

1:12:14.760 --> 1:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>stories in the news for football, and I don't want

1:12:16.920 --> 1:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>to skip over them entirely. But I figured i'd bring

1:12:18.720 --> 1:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody in who, for example, unlike me, knows that the

1:12:22.160 --> 1:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Rams now play in Los Angeles and not Saint Louis.

1:12:25.160 --> 1:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>You learned something new every day, especially for me in

1:12:27.240 --> 1:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the world of sports. We got a sports expert with

1:12:29.320 --> 1:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>us though our friend Clay Travis is with us now.

1:12:31.280 --> 1:12:35.519
<v Speaker 1>He is the OutKick, the coverage host, also author of

1:12:35.520 --> 1:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the book Republicans by Sneakers. To Clay, thanks for coming back, hey, ap.

1:12:41.120 --> 1:12:44.759
<v Speaker 1>So let's start with this editorial New York Times editorial,

1:12:44.800 --> 1:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>which is how it came into my vision my daily

1:12:49.000 --> 1:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>deep dive here from Tennessee Coates the cancelation of Colin Kaepernick.

1:12:55.680 --> 1:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>He's making the argument here that Colin Kaepernick is a

1:12:58.479 --> 1:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>victim of cancel culture. After well everything but also this tryout.

1:13:03.479 --> 1:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>What really happened with Colin Kaepernick both at this tryout

1:13:07.080 --> 1:13:09.719
<v Speaker 1>and also tell me, what do you think the reality

1:13:09.800 --> 1:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is of whether he's part of cancel culture? Well, I

1:13:12.640 --> 1:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>think that Colin Kaepernick has realized that as a barter

1:13:16.720 --> 1:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>he is more valuable than he is as a backup

1:13:19.360 --> 1:13:21.479
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in the NFL, which is the job that he

1:13:21.479 --> 1:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>would have if he really wanted to continue to play sports.

1:13:25.800 --> 1:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I think he made a conscious decision to

1:13:28.960 --> 1:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>where the Consequente T shirt and to perform in the

1:13:34.920 --> 1:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>fashion that he did with his own camera crew there

1:13:37.120 --> 1:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and everything else because he wanted to continue to be

1:13:41.320 --> 1:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a social justice warrior martyr for the woke sports media

1:13:45.800 --> 1:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>out there, and the reality is what this guy is

1:13:49.280 --> 1:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a backup quarterback, and backup quarterbacks are not necessarily given

1:13:53.800 --> 1:13:56.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention in the NFL, certainly not if

1:13:56.479 --> 1:13:59.639
<v Speaker 1>their starting quarterback is healthy. And I think Colin Kaepernick

1:13:59.720 --> 1:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>is aware that if he is on the sideline, not

1:14:02.840 --> 1:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>actually playing, that his value as a martyr declines precipitously,

1:14:07.720 --> 1:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and so I think in many ways he sabotaged the

1:14:10.760 --> 1:14:13.439
<v Speaker 1>tryout that the NFL tried to set up for him. Now,

1:14:13.439 --> 1:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that comes up when people talk

1:14:15.240 --> 1:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>about about Kaepernick, I mean, it was pretty amazing reading

1:14:17.920 --> 1:14:20.679
<v Speaker 1>this this New York Times piece, and if you saw

1:14:20.760 --> 1:14:23.599
<v Speaker 1>the Coats editorial I read, I read it. I mean

1:14:23.640 --> 1:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it was it was totally absurd and ridiculous. And the

1:14:26.160 --> 1:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that that guy is considered to be some sort

1:14:28.800 --> 1:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of intellectual heavyweight oftentimes just kind of bottles my mind. Yeah,

1:14:33.000 --> 1:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>because well, what I've told from my friends who actually

1:14:36.200 --> 1:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>paid pretty close attention to the NFL is that Kaepernick,

1:14:39.640 --> 1:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>before the whole taking anything, he was already dropping down

1:14:44.040 --> 1:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the depth chart and people didn't really care, and his

1:14:46.280 --> 1:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>career wasn't looking so good, that's correct, he get in fact,

1:14:49.360 --> 1:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>had lost his starting job to blame Gabbert, who is

1:14:52.320 --> 1:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>not a well known or well received quarterback in his

1:14:55.880 --> 1:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>own right. And so yeah, well the baling was I

1:14:59.400 --> 1:15:02.679
<v Speaker 1>think a trans parent employ to draw attention to himself

1:15:02.680 --> 1:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>when he recognized that he was otherwise not going to

1:15:05.479 --> 1:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>be receiving very my attention. And again, I mean, he

1:15:09.520 --> 1:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>had a contractual obligation to stand for the national anthem,

1:15:12.080 --> 1:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>just like the NBA players do, and and to equate

1:15:15.479 --> 1:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>him with cancel culture is frankly just absurd. Look everybody

1:15:19.080 --> 1:15:22.479
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, whether you are the most talented quarterback

1:15:22.560 --> 1:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in the league or the guy hanging on by his

1:15:25.200 --> 1:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>flinges to a special stop, they're all subject to an

1:15:30.960 --> 1:15:33.439
<v Speaker 1>equation that I would like to say, which is, so

1:15:33.560 --> 1:15:36.719
<v Speaker 1>long as your talent exceeds of problems, you will always

1:15:36.720 --> 1:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>be employed. And the problem that Colin Kaepernick has is

1:15:40.240 --> 1:15:44.679
<v Speaker 1>if Aaron Rodgers or Russell Wilson or Patrick Mahomes couk

1:15:44.680 --> 1:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a need to protest anything, they would still be employed

1:15:48.120 --> 1:15:50.839
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL because they're three of the best, arguably

1:15:51.000 --> 1:15:54.599
<v Speaker 1>the three best quarterbacks in the NFL right now in

1:15:54.600 --> 1:15:58.599
<v Speaker 1>this league right historically and proven wise. And so if

1:15:58.920 --> 1:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>if those guys decide that they wanted to make a

1:16:01.000 --> 1:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>political statement, they might get fined, they might face a

1:16:04.040 --> 1:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>substantial blowback, But every team, I believe, would continue to

1:16:07.720 --> 1:16:10.679
<v Speaker 1>employ them because they're that good at playing the position

1:16:10.720 --> 1:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in which is so difficult to find talent quarterback. The

1:16:13.360 --> 1:16:15.679
<v Speaker 1>problem Colin Kaepernick had was not that he took a knee.

1:16:15.760 --> 1:16:17.559
<v Speaker 1>It was that he took a knee, and his talent

1:16:17.680 --> 1:16:20.759
<v Speaker 1>no longer was sufficient enough for teams to be willing

1:16:20.800 --> 1:16:22.679
<v Speaker 1>to put up with the challenges he brought to bear

1:16:23.360 --> 1:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>from a protest perspective. And I've kind of made this

1:16:26.800 --> 1:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>joke before, using it from a hyperbolic sense, but look,

1:16:30.439 --> 1:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Aaron Rodgers could take a knee and say

1:16:33.160 --> 1:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that he thinks Isis was unfitly treated by the Trump administration,

1:16:37.120 --> 1:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and somebody would probably still employ him to play quarterback

1:16:40.040 --> 1:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>because he's just that good of a quarterback. And people

1:16:42.240 --> 1:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>would roll their eyes and say, I really don't care

1:16:43.960 --> 1:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>about the politics that he espouses. And the problem for

1:16:47.120 --> 1:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Colin Kaepernick is he's not that good of a quarterback,

1:16:49.439 --> 1:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>so people do care because again, his problems exceed his

1:16:52.640 --> 1:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>talents now speaking of people that are having problems on

1:16:55.120 --> 1:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and now off the field. I did see because it

1:16:58.080 --> 1:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>became a viralo moment that dominated the news cycle for

1:17:01.960 --> 1:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a few hours. This incident with Myles Garrett where he

1:17:05.960 --> 1:17:08.479
<v Speaker 1>swung his helmet. Just tell us give us the quick

1:17:08.479 --> 1:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>backstory of what happened there and then the aftermath, because

1:17:11.920 --> 1:17:15.519
<v Speaker 1>I did see the storyline percolate for at least a

1:17:15.520 --> 1:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>few hours. A couple of days ago, there was a

1:17:17.920 --> 1:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>claim that there might have been a racist component that

1:17:21.160 --> 1:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>led to the swing of the helmet, which a lot

1:17:23.320 --> 1:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of people, myself included thoughts sounded rather dubious under the circumstances.

1:17:27.640 --> 1:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>But what happened and where are we now? Well, for

1:17:30.720 --> 1:17:34.759
<v Speaker 1>six days there was no succestion. After the swarm helmet

1:17:34.880 --> 1:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>hit Mason Rudolf on the head Miles Garrett place in

1:17:37.280 --> 1:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Grounds, Mason Rudolfs beclore the Backs floy to

1:17:39.760 --> 1:17:42.479
<v Speaker 1>the Spokes Steelers and at the end of their Thursday

1:17:42.560 --> 1:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>night football game, which happened what I guess a week

1:17:47.240 --> 1:17:49.679
<v Speaker 1>or almost two weeks ago. Now, as we moved closer

1:17:49.720 --> 1:17:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the Thanksgiving we had Mason reactive in the head with

1:17:54.280 --> 1:17:56.519
<v Speaker 1>a helmet which kind of unheard of falling at him

1:17:56.520 --> 1:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>by this defensive player, And for six days nothing was

1:18:00.600 --> 1:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>said about the motivation other than Miles Garrett lost his temper,

1:18:03.920 --> 1:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>he apologized, he was saying all of that, and then

1:18:07.360 --> 1:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>at the end of that six day window, suddenly news

1:18:11.280 --> 1:18:13.679
<v Speaker 1>came out that he was claiming that somebody, Mason Rudolph,

1:18:13.720 --> 1:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>had said a racial flaurer to him and that was

1:18:16.120 --> 1:18:19.400
<v Speaker 1>what prompted the attack, and the NFL said they had

1:18:19.400 --> 1:18:22.519
<v Speaker 1>investigated it, found no evidence, and upheld his suspension. He

1:18:22.560 --> 1:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>made that claim in an appeal to hearing. So what

1:18:25.479 --> 1:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I just described it as was a racism hail Marry

1:18:29.479 --> 1:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that his attempt at the last minute was to try

1:18:32.600 --> 1:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in some way justify his behavior by sighting the way

1:18:36.000 --> 1:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that he had been treated, and I think that's just

1:18:38.240 --> 1:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>laughably absurd. Is the punishment appropriate here for Miles Garrett

1:18:42.960 --> 1:18:45.879
<v Speaker 1>for the crime. I mean, I think it's a significant punishment,

1:18:45.920 --> 1:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think the NFL knows that the importance of

1:18:49.000 --> 1:18:51.880
<v Speaker 1>setting a precedent here is that using a helmet as

1:18:51.920 --> 1:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a weapon in the dangerous position to be in. Mason

1:18:54.840 --> 1:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph was not seriously injured, luckily for him, but he

1:18:57.920 --> 1:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>could have been, and I think the FL needs to

1:19:01.400 --> 1:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>have its players know that this is this behavior that

1:19:05.080 --> 1:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is simply unacceptable. So make Miles Garrett's going to be

1:19:08.600 --> 1:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>out for the rest of the season. Uh, And we'll

1:19:11.200 --> 1:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>see what happens at the end of the year with

1:19:14.400 --> 1:19:16.519
<v Speaker 1>whether he's allowed to return to start next year, which

1:19:16.560 --> 1:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you will. And the six game suspension feels

1:19:19.160 --> 1:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>about right to me. Can I just ask you a

1:19:20.840 --> 1:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>quick lightning round of some stuff before Thanksgiving so I

1:19:23.240 --> 1:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>can pretend that I know something got football and I'm

1:19:25.040 --> 1:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>with my aldish yeshoho. Who is the best quarterback in

1:19:28.760 --> 1:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the NFL right now? Oh man, you just stepped into

1:19:32.120 --> 1:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a huge debate. I think the best quarterback in the

1:19:35.240 --> 1:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>NFL right now is Russell Wilson. I think there's a

1:19:37.200 --> 1:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>strong argument for Patrick Mahomes, for Aaron Rodgers. Those are

1:19:40.400 --> 1:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the three best. Lamar Jackson is having an incredible season

1:19:43.760 --> 1:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and he may be the favorite for the MVP, but

1:19:45.760 --> 1:19:47.559
<v Speaker 1>those are the four that I would that I would

1:19:47.600 --> 1:19:50.519
<v Speaker 1>name off the top. Tom Brady interestingly not having that

1:19:50.560 --> 1:19:52.559
<v Speaker 1>great of a season. So if you want those five

1:19:52.680 --> 1:19:54.880
<v Speaker 1>names and that information I just gave you, you can

1:19:54.920 --> 1:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>fake it to your make it there. Yeah, well I

1:19:56.880 --> 1:19:58.759
<v Speaker 1>got one more. What is the what is the worst

1:19:58.800 --> 1:20:01.479
<v Speaker 1>coach team in the NFL right now? Yeah? Well, no

1:20:01.640 --> 1:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>team that's under fire the most right now. Jason Garrett

1:20:04.400 --> 1:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>is the head coach of the Dallas Cowboys and they

1:20:06.439 --> 1:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>just lost to the New England Patriots. And he has

1:20:09.080 --> 1:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>done a really poor job of maximizing his talent. He's

1:20:12.880 --> 1:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>been on sort of the chopping block for a long

1:20:14.920 --> 1:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>time now, and the Dallas Cowboys sort of perpetually swing

1:20:19.560 --> 1:20:24.200
<v Speaker 1>from you know, the excitement and enjoy and pure jubilation

1:20:24.360 --> 1:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of hey, We're going to go to the super Bowl

1:20:26.240 --> 1:20:29.519
<v Speaker 1>to the depths of despair after every loss. They're six

1:20:29.520 --> 1:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and five, may win their division, likely to make the playoff,

1:20:32.360 --> 1:20:34.559
<v Speaker 1>but Jason Garrett has not endured himself to the fan

1:20:34.600 --> 1:20:36.640
<v Speaker 1>base for yet another season. And who do you think

1:20:36.680 --> 1:20:39.479
<v Speaker 1>is going to win the Super Bowl? I gotta ask? Yeah. So,

1:20:39.640 --> 1:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>if if I were predicting right now, I think it's

1:20:41.120 --> 1:20:43.559
<v Speaker 1>hard to say anything against the Patriots. So I picked

1:20:43.560 --> 1:20:45.519
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots out of the AFC, and I would pick

1:20:45.600 --> 1:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the forty nine ers out of the NFC, And god,

1:20:49.439 --> 1:20:51.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean it sinks to continue to pick him. But

1:20:51.600 --> 1:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Brady and Belichick of the greatest coaching player combo in

1:20:54.840 --> 1:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>NFL history. And they aren't dead yet, and so as

1:20:57.439 --> 1:20:59.439
<v Speaker 1>long as that's the case, I feel like they will

1:20:59.479 --> 1:21:02.519
<v Speaker 1>find a way to triumph into the season. Even know,

1:21:02.760 --> 1:21:04.559
<v Speaker 1>I think, like a lot of your listeners, i'd prefer

1:21:04.680 --> 1:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that not be the case. If you guys want somebody

1:21:06.320 --> 1:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>who knows about sports and really breaks it all down

1:21:08.360 --> 1:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>for you, you've just heard it here. But Clay Travis

1:21:10.840 --> 1:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>has his own podcast out Kick the Coverage, or you

1:21:13.280 --> 1:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>can check out Also his book is Republicans Buy Sneakers two,

1:21:16.840 --> 1:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>which I know is true because I'm a Republican and

1:21:18.520 --> 1:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I buy sneakers. Clay, I have a very happy Thanksgiving man,

1:21:21.400 --> 1:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for giving us your time, and we'll talk to

1:21:23.000 --> 1:21:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you after the holiday. I appreciate that I have a

1:21:25.160 --> 1:21:27.880
<v Speaker 1>good Thanksgiving as well with everybody else out there as well.

1:21:27.920 --> 1:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>If everybody has a green holiday, all right, geem When

1:21:30.920 --> 1:21:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to spot that burglar when he's casing your

1:21:33.120 --> 1:21:35.360
<v Speaker 1>home or after he's in, well you could ask John

1:21:35.640 --> 1:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>who's blink camera alerted him to burglars trying to break

1:21:38.200 --> 1:21:40.719
<v Speaker 1>in while he and his family were home, Or Shannon,

1:21:40.760 --> 1:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>who's blink camera caught a feat stealing packages. Both times,

1:21:44.000 --> 1:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Blink video clips were sent to police to help convict

1:21:46.360 --> 1:21:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the crooks. Blink Motion activated indoor and outdoor cameras are

1:21:49.520 --> 1:21:51.679
<v Speaker 1>wire free, set up in minutes, and run on two

1:21:51.800 --> 1:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>lithium batteries that last up to two years. And when

1:21:54.800 --> 1:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you're away, blinks Live feed option lets you monitor your

1:21:57.200 --> 1:21:59.599
<v Speaker 1>home and checking on kids and pets from anywhere using

1:21:59.600 --> 1:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>your smartphone app. No contracts, totally affordable. In fact, Blink

1:22:03.960 --> 1:22:06.880
<v Speaker 1>systems start at just seventy nine ninety nine. Thanks to

1:22:06.920 --> 1:22:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Blink home security just got easier. Visit blink Protect dot Com,

1:22:10.600 --> 1:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>slash Buck, blink Protect dot Com, slash Buck one more time.

1:22:14.960 --> 1:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Team Blink Protect dot Com slash Buck also available on

1:22:19.360 --> 1:22:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Amazon and at best Buy. Blink is an Amazon company,

1:22:23.200 --> 1:22:28.479
<v Speaker 1>and it works with Alexa, blink Protect dot Com, slash Buck.

1:22:28.960 --> 1:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So there's a story team that's making the rounds right

1:22:31.320 --> 1:22:37.599
<v Speaker 1>now in some places on on the right. I haven't

1:22:37.600 --> 1:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>really seen it elsewhere, but here's the basics of it.

1:22:42.120 --> 1:22:45.360
<v Speaker 1>And I just want to say that I can't really

1:22:45.400 --> 1:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>assess this other than to say that people that I

1:22:47.760 --> 1:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>know and think have good judgments say this is probably crap.

1:22:52.760 --> 1:22:55.679
<v Speaker 1>But even when there's a story that is not true,

1:22:55.800 --> 1:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes there are some elements in the background of the

1:22:58.960 --> 1:23:01.599
<v Speaker 1>story that are worth noting. But I also I don't

1:23:01.600 --> 1:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>know that it's not true. So, and it's reported the

1:23:03.680 --> 1:23:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Jerusalem Post, which is a reputable publication, and it is

1:23:08.520 --> 1:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not Ilahan Omar is an asset of Cutter.

1:23:14.479 --> 1:23:17.360
<v Speaker 1>This is the story that's out there. A witness in

1:23:17.400 --> 1:23:21.559
<v Speaker 1>a deposition in a federal court in Florida has gone

1:23:21.560 --> 1:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>on the record to say and give some details about this.

1:23:26.080 --> 1:23:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Here's the basics of the story. Congresswoman Ilhan Omar was

1:23:29.400 --> 1:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>recruited by a foreign government, received funding from a foreign government,

1:23:33.120 --> 1:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and passed sensitive information through intermarries intermediaries to Iran. A

1:23:38.479 --> 1:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Florida court has been told that's not That doesn't mean

1:23:41.280 --> 1:23:43.759
<v Speaker 1>the court has found nor has anyone brought charges. Okay.

1:23:44.240 --> 1:23:49.439
<v Speaker 1>The claims came during testimony by Kuwaiti born Canadian businessman

1:23:49.520 --> 1:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Alan Bender, who was giving evidence in the trial of

1:23:52.880 --> 1:24:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Sheikh Khalid Binhamed Alfani, the Qatari Emir's brother, stand is

1:24:00.160 --> 1:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>accused of ordering his American bodyguard to murder two people

1:24:04.680 --> 1:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and of holding an American citizen hostage. His deposition obtained

1:24:09.240 --> 1:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>by Al Arabia English was authenticated by the attorney for

1:24:12.800 --> 1:24:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the plaintiffs, according to the publication. All right, now, a

1:24:18.960 --> 1:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of people on the right really don't like ilhan

1:24:21.400 --> 1:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Omar because of her politics, because of what she says,

1:24:23.840 --> 1:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>because of the anti Semitic stuff she has said in

1:24:26.439 --> 1:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the past. So people see this and they immediately jump

1:24:30.000 --> 1:24:31.400
<v Speaker 1>with the story. I've seen a lot of people that

1:24:31.479 --> 1:24:36.519
<v Speaker 1>follow the follow ilhan Omar's career and they've been following

1:24:36.560 --> 1:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the other controversies, possible campaign finance stuff, the

1:24:41.080 --> 1:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>whole situation with her, you know, the husband, and then

1:24:44.760 --> 1:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the other situation with the brother and the what's going

1:24:47.280 --> 1:24:51.759
<v Speaker 1>on with the possible the allegation, I should say, of

1:24:52.880 --> 1:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a marriage fraud, which believe in marriage fraud is a

1:24:56.320 --> 1:24:58.599
<v Speaker 1>crime punishment about the five years in federal prison when

1:24:58.600 --> 1:25:02.599
<v Speaker 1>it involves an immigration vile. So if you marry somebody

1:25:02.640 --> 1:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>but you're not really getting married, you're just doing it

1:25:04.240 --> 1:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>so they can get a green card to be here,

1:25:06.680 --> 1:25:08.519
<v Speaker 1>and you're found out, you're going to prison for that,

1:25:08.680 --> 1:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>and they do occasionally enforce that, which is so interesting

1:25:11.880 --> 1:25:16.360
<v Speaker 1>because so much of the rest of immigration law is

1:25:16.479 --> 1:25:19.400
<v Speaker 1>left as like, you know, who cares, doesn't matter. We

1:25:19.439 --> 1:25:24.439
<v Speaker 1>don't have to really enforce this stuff. But the Ilhanomar story,

1:25:24.760 --> 1:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>people are saying this is it's flimsy. It's an allegation

1:25:28.080 --> 1:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in court. Yeah, the guy's under oath, but you know

1:25:30.920 --> 1:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>who knows if they can and he's just saying he

1:25:33.160 --> 1:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>was told this. There's no there's no proof, so I'm

1:25:35.800 --> 1:25:38.479
<v Speaker 1>not there no proof. Usually what I want to know

1:25:38.520 --> 1:25:43.360
<v Speaker 1>about ill Hanomar. It is a bad thing when it

1:25:43.520 --> 1:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>is so very clear that the press has no interest

1:25:47.960 --> 1:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>in vetting, investigating and looking at a person in politics

1:25:53.800 --> 1:25:58.519
<v Speaker 1>because of that person's political political beliefs and also because

1:25:58.520 --> 1:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of that person's background. The media does not want to

1:26:03.040 --> 1:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>be seen as even investigating. And you could say that

1:26:06.160 --> 1:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>through an investigation of ilahan Omar, not just on this

1:26:09.280 --> 1:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Qatari thing, because this might be complete garbage. And I'm

1:26:13.200 --> 1:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>being honestly that it doesn't seem to me like it's

1:26:16.520 --> 1:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is it theoretically possible. I mean maybe sure,

1:26:24.200 --> 1:26:27.360
<v Speaker 1>given her view of American foreign policy and her view

1:26:27.400 --> 1:26:29.679
<v Speaker 1>of the rest of the world, could you see maybe

1:26:30.040 --> 1:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>some people using her as an agent of influence in

1:26:33.160 --> 1:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the United States against foreign policy that would be in

1:26:35.760 --> 1:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the us interest. Yes, but that's very different than having

1:26:39.400 --> 1:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>any actual proof of the allegation, which which we don't have.

1:26:43.880 --> 1:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>But these stories, a story like this, get more oxygen,

1:26:48.800 --> 1:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>get more attention, in part because we know we cannot

1:26:53.120 --> 1:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>trust the mainstream press to do what they would normally

1:26:58.640 --> 1:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>say they're doing, which is to vet a person, looking

1:27:02.080 --> 1:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to that person's background and bring the public the truth

1:27:08.880 --> 1:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>about a situation which they don't know. I mean, we

1:27:11.000 --> 1:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>know that they don't do that as a general rule,

1:27:12.479 --> 1:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>but they particularly are hands off about certain people, and

1:27:15.880 --> 1:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>ilhan Omar as one of them. So I would just

1:27:17.960 --> 1:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>note that I don't know the story is true or not.

1:27:22.280 --> 1:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>It strikes me as unlikely. But I also know that

1:27:25.760 --> 1:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we can't trust the press to tell us how much

1:27:28.120 --> 1:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>investigation has there been of ilhan Omar by journalists regarding

1:27:33.560 --> 1:27:37.479
<v Speaker 1>a campaign finance issues and also the situation with the

1:27:37.520 --> 1:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>brother and the husband and the I mean, I don't

1:27:39.080 --> 1:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>even know the but nobody wants. Nobody wants to touch

1:27:42.280 --> 1:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. Nobody wants to go near any of it.

1:27:44.240 --> 1:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Usually journalists when they have am This is a member

1:27:45.840 --> 1:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of Congress, a public figure elected office. You would think

1:27:49.360 --> 1:27:52.479
<v Speaker 1>that there could be some belief some understanding that this

1:27:52.520 --> 1:27:56.479
<v Speaker 1>person would be subject to a degree of scrutiny that's

1:27:56.560 --> 1:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>not dictated by politics and by intersectionality and wokeness and

1:28:00.920 --> 1:28:03.519
<v Speaker 1>all the rest of it. But no, that is, in

1:28:03.600 --> 1:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>fact the the overriding consideration that they that they have here.

1:28:08.680 --> 1:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>So for those who were going to ask me about this,

1:28:10.760 --> 1:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't. I don't have much more, m

1:28:14.640 --> 1:28:16.439
<v Speaker 1>much more on this than just to say it doesn't

1:28:16.439 --> 1:28:19.719
<v Speaker 1>strike me as particularly, it doesn't strike me as likely.

1:28:19.840 --> 1:28:23.120
<v Speaker 1>But you can't trust the press to find out any

1:28:23.120 --> 1:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>truth about ilhan Omar that would be problematic for her.

1:28:26.240 --> 1:28:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of where that's kind of where we are.

1:28:29.360 --> 1:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I was iding you to mention this before I find it,

1:28:31.439 --> 1:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know I keep saying nice things about

1:28:33.800 --> 1:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Yang and Tulsi on the show, and I'm not I'm

1:28:35.800 --> 1:28:37.559
<v Speaker 1>not trying to just do this as a as a

1:28:37.560 --> 1:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>as a thing, as a bit that I do on

1:28:39.040 --> 1:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the show. Where we get we get into why Yang

1:28:42.280 --> 1:28:44.559
<v Speaker 1>and Tulsi are the most likable of Democrats, although I

1:28:44.560 --> 1:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>think they are. I saw this piece though the weekend.

1:28:48.240 --> 1:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>It was so remarkable to me that Andrew Andrew Yang

1:28:51.640 --> 1:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>hashtag Yangang Andrew Yang makes jokes, sometimes self deprecating jokes

1:28:59.280 --> 1:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>about Asian American stereotypes. And this was interesting because usually

1:29:05.000 --> 1:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>what you see is that you're never allowed to make

1:29:07.200 --> 1:29:10.439
<v Speaker 1>jokes about any even if it's it's really meant to

1:29:10.439 --> 1:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>be playful and it's not supposed to be degrading in

1:29:13.760 --> 1:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>any way, but you're not allowed to make jokes about

1:29:15.280 --> 1:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it about any non white ethnicity, as as particularly as

1:29:17.760 --> 1:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a white person anymore. It had been the case. I

1:29:21.120 --> 1:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>had thought that you could, though make self deprecating jokes

1:29:25.280 --> 1:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>about an ethnicity if you were of that ethnicity, But

1:29:27.840 --> 1:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>even that rule in this current era of extreme wokeness

1:29:33.680 --> 1:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>seems to be changing a little bit. There is a

1:29:40.200 --> 1:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>concern that was is Andrew Yang quote reclaiming stereotypes with

1:29:47.439 --> 1:29:51.639
<v Speaker 1>Asian jokes. Experts say not so much. First of all,

1:29:52.160 --> 1:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>experts in jokes, Who are these people? This is NBC News,

1:29:57.120 --> 1:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>experts in being funny? Well, what were they experts? We're

1:30:00.840 --> 1:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about here? That's always good expertise is a very

1:30:04.040 --> 1:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>abused claim. But they're saying that he isn't doing a

1:30:11.760 --> 1:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>good thing by trying to reclaim stereotypes. They see, this

1:30:14.600 --> 1:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>is what they change the rules all the time. You

1:30:16.720 --> 1:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>know some ethnicities, for example, can use slurs against that

1:30:19.960 --> 1:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>ethnicity as a means of reclaiming the term. We're told

1:30:22.120 --> 1:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that all the time, But you can't use it if

1:30:23.600 --> 1:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you're not of that ethnicity. But you can if you are.

1:30:25.600 --> 1:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>But now you can't make jokes about your own ethnicity.

1:30:29.560 --> 1:30:31.519
<v Speaker 1>And I think the reason that they feel this way,

1:30:31.960 --> 1:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>although who knows, they probably changed the logic beyond this

1:30:34.360 --> 1:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>all the time, is because then it lightens everybody up

1:30:38.160 --> 1:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit where they might think it's they don't

1:30:40.400 --> 1:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>have to be quite so woke and quite so on guard.

1:30:43.040 --> 1:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And maybe somebody would get the idea that you could

1:30:45.200 --> 1:30:48.559
<v Speaker 1>make some jokes based on stereotypes we are laughing with

1:30:48.760 --> 1:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and not at an ethnicity. That would be an idea

1:30:53.120 --> 1:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that the left considers dangerous. So I can't have that.

1:30:55.160 --> 1:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>So Yang is not allowed to make jokes about Asian stereotypes,

1:30:59.200 --> 1:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>even as an Asian American. That's the reality of the

1:31:01.720 --> 1:31:03.519
<v Speaker 1>left today. I just want to note that what we

1:31:03.600 --> 1:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>will do is have what we will do. What we

1:31:08.160 --> 1:31:11.879
<v Speaker 1>will do is have a four percent tax on income

1:31:12.320 --> 1:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>excepting the first twenty nine thousand dolls. All right, good,

1:31:17.360 --> 1:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you're better at arithmetic than I am, guess what that

1:31:21.280 --> 1:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>means is if you have that average family in the

1:31:23.840 --> 1:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>middle will make sixty thousand a year, that means we're

1:31:27.160 --> 1:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>going to tax you on thirty one thousand at four percent.

1:31:32.439 --> 1:31:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Anybod who believes this is a fool, that this is

1:31:34.479 --> 1:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>where this will stop. They're going to create just a

1:31:37.720 --> 1:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>little carve out tax to give you free healthcare. This

1:31:39.720 --> 1:31:42.439
<v Speaker 1>is the Bernie Plan. Now, this is the latest version

1:31:42.479 --> 1:31:44.479
<v Speaker 1>of what we're being told the Bernie Plan is going

1:31:44.520 --> 1:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to be. But what they're saying here is that or

1:31:48.320 --> 1:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Bernie saying rather, is that four percent above twenty nine

1:31:52.280 --> 1:31:55.719
<v Speaker 1>thousand and you'll never have to worry about healthcare again.

1:31:56.360 --> 1:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>My friends, No way, no way, it's not gonna work.

1:32:01.120 --> 1:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not gonna happen. That four percent tax won't be enough.

1:32:04.560 --> 1:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Then you know what happens. It becomes a five percent

1:32:07.280 --> 1:32:11.559
<v Speaker 1>and then a six percent tax. You have to fund

1:32:11.640 --> 1:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the programs that Bertie Sanders is talking, but even begin

1:32:13.960 --> 1:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to fund them, you would have to raise taxes dramatically,

1:32:18.479 --> 1:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>not just on millionaires and billionaires, this is the essential

1:32:21.360 --> 1:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>lie that they keep telling, but on everybody, and taxes

1:32:25.280 --> 1:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that get raised that much, on people across the board.

1:32:28.600 --> 1:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Are going to have all kinds of implications for jobs,

1:32:31.080 --> 1:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>for productivity, for just wealth creation. Overall. We are in

1:32:36.479 --> 1:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a remarkable period right now, the longest bullmark in the

1:32:39.200 --> 1:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>history of the United States, lowest unemployment in fifty years.

1:32:42.240 --> 1:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Things are very prosperous right now. Why would we start

1:32:46.360 --> 1:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to the socialists at this point in time? You know,

1:32:50.640 --> 1:32:53.559
<v Speaker 1>if America goes down this path of socialism in twenty twenty,

1:32:53.600 --> 1:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you know we're gonna get what we deserve. We're gonna

1:32:55.080 --> 1:32:56.559
<v Speaker 1>get along and hard. It's going to be a rough

1:32:57.520 --> 1:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>way forward. We have all the empirical evidence we need.

1:33:01.800 --> 1:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>We have all of the data, and just look around

1:33:04.840 --> 1:33:07.639
<v Speaker 1>you what's going on in the country right now, Look

1:33:07.680 --> 1:33:09.479
<v Speaker 1>at all the ways that we can try to judge

1:33:09.600 --> 1:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>on the numbers, how things are going. You're going to

1:33:12.760 --> 1:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>hand over control of the economy to Bernie Sanders wing

1:33:15.960 --> 1:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Democratic Party. I mean, I know you won't

1:33:17.880 --> 1:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>listening to the show. There's some liberals who listen, which

1:33:20.400 --> 1:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate. Liberals are like, he's he's a bit of

1:33:24.439 --> 1:33:26.479
<v Speaker 1>a savvy fellow, this sexton. We've got to keep an

1:33:26.479 --> 1:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>eye on him, make sure it doesn't get a little

1:33:28.800 --> 1:33:33.639
<v Speaker 1>too puppulo listen too powerful. But the truth is Bernie Sanders'

1:33:33.920 --> 1:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>plan would be a disaster for you. And I know

1:33:35.880 --> 1:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that, but there's so many people who don't

1:33:38.200 --> 1:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>believe it. When I was at Politicon debating Bernie Sanders

1:33:41.200 --> 1:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>healthcare spokesperson, the person a Signers campaign, she's just living

1:33:44.760 --> 1:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in a fantasyland. You're gonna have great doctors, great healthcare.

1:33:48.680 --> 1:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Everything can be super efficient. It's gonna be it's gonna

1:33:51.800 --> 1:33:53.639
<v Speaker 1>be fantastic, and you never have to worry about paying

1:33:53.640 --> 1:33:57.679
<v Speaker 1>for any of this ever. Again, well, it's not true.

1:33:57.760 --> 1:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>By the way. By the time you figure out it's

1:33:59.280 --> 1:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>not true, you'll have had one You'll probably have had

1:34:01.400 --> 1:34:04.519
<v Speaker 1>one generation that has gotten used to having their healthcare

1:34:05.280 --> 1:34:07.479
<v Speaker 1>paid for by the government. It won't be very good,

1:34:07.479 --> 1:34:08.800
<v Speaker 1>but they'll get used to paying for it, and then

1:34:08.840 --> 1:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>they'll just put this unsustainable burden on future generations of

1:34:12.720 --> 1:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>paying for the health that they've already gotten. This is

1:34:16.200 --> 1:34:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the doomsday machine within our own political and economic system

1:34:19.840 --> 1:34:21.879
<v Speaker 1>that no one is willing to face up to. Nobody

1:34:21.960 --> 1:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>is willing to diffuse the debt bomb. Nobody is willing

1:34:24.920 --> 1:34:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to say that you can't keep doing this promising things,

1:34:28.520 --> 1:34:31.320
<v Speaker 1>giving things today and then promising that somebody else will

1:34:31.320 --> 1:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>pay for it in the future. And this becomes the

1:34:34.000 --> 1:34:36.479
<v Speaker 1>easiest scam in the world. I mean, if your taxes

1:34:36.479 --> 1:34:38.360
<v Speaker 1>are never going to get raised in your lifetime, why

1:34:38.400 --> 1:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't you say, yeah, give me all the benefits you

1:34:40.120 --> 1:34:44.280
<v Speaker 1>want right now. Make it somebody else's problem. This is

1:34:44.360 --> 1:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>just intergenerational socialism, that's all it is. And this is

1:34:47.120 --> 1:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>what Bernie Sanders is promising you without saying as much,

1:34:50.880 --> 1:34:52.639
<v Speaker 1>by claiming that they're going to pay for your healthcare

1:34:52.640 --> 1:34:54.599
<v Speaker 1>and everything's going to be fine and all the rest

1:34:54.600 --> 1:34:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of it. But this might even be a worse analysis

1:34:58.800 --> 1:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>from the guy who's supposed to be the smart one

1:35:03.200 --> 1:35:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Democrat candidates or the smartest one of the

1:35:05.760 --> 1:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrat candidates now mayor Pete Buddha judge. He has this

1:35:11.120 --> 1:35:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to say about the Syrian Civil War play Cliff ten Oh.

1:35:17.720 --> 1:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>This is very important because we are already seeing evidence

1:35:21.360 --> 1:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that a conflict in migration crisis are increased because of

1:35:25.960 --> 1:35:30.519
<v Speaker 1>things like drafts and fires that are accelerated by the

1:35:30.560 --> 1:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>problems in our climate. There's some evidence that this contributed,

1:35:34.800 --> 1:35:38.240
<v Speaker 1>true example, to the Syrian Civil War. I mean, this

1:35:38.320 --> 1:35:42.439
<v Speaker 1>is an absurd stupidity. Climate change contributed to the Syrian

1:35:42.479 --> 1:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Civil War? What this is? This is so beyond bonkers.

1:35:49.120 --> 1:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>But I've heard other people say this too, because you know,

1:35:52.000 --> 1:35:55.360
<v Speaker 1>climate climate chan is a religions climate change. Climate involves everything, right, Oh,

1:35:55.439 --> 1:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it's warmer outside, so then it's more likely that people

1:35:57.960 --> 1:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>might be outside. And then you know, climate change is

1:35:59.840 --> 1:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>called using murders in the streets of Chicago because it's warmer, right,

1:36:03.120 --> 1:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and murders in the streets of New Orleans or New

1:36:05.080 --> 1:36:08.960
<v Speaker 1>York or wherever. I mean, it's kind of true. But

1:36:10.040 --> 1:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>is a climate change it's causing people to murder people

1:36:12.280 --> 1:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>or people murdering people. This is absurd. This is The

1:36:16.640 --> 1:36:23.400
<v Speaker 1>fallacies of causation here are truly mind blowing. And you

1:36:23.439 --> 1:36:27.760
<v Speaker 1>know when you have this supposedly the supposed genius really

1:36:27.800 --> 1:36:29.439
<v Speaker 1>of the Democrat, I always a Rhode scar but I

1:36:29.640 --> 1:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>told people are RhoD Scholar. Not that impressive, don't that's all.

1:36:33.000 --> 1:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like, it's the RhoD Scholar now is like the

1:36:34.920 --> 1:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Nobel Peace Prize. Anybody who knows anything knows that was like,

1:36:37.320 --> 1:36:42.280
<v Speaker 1>come on, very political, But yeah, climate change is the

1:36:42.320 --> 1:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>cause of the Syrians Civil War. You have to stretch

1:36:45.040 --> 1:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>hard to think of ways that liberals could be crazier

1:36:48.120 --> 1:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>these days. And this is why, you know, I saw

1:36:51.040 --> 1:36:54.479
<v Speaker 1>the segment last night the Tucker did on his show

1:36:56.360 --> 1:36:58.760
<v Speaker 1>where he said that the only person in the Democratic

1:36:58.800 --> 1:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Party who could unify the entire Democratic Party has the

1:37:02.800 --> 1:37:06.840
<v Speaker 1>national recognition and favorables and everything to wipe away all

1:37:06.880 --> 1:37:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats problems right now from the primaries is Michelle Obama.

1:37:12.439 --> 1:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>And she says she doesn't want oh, but he played

1:37:15.040 --> 1:37:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a clip of Obama saying in two thousand and six, oh, no,

1:37:17.320 --> 1:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not running. Of course, I'm definitely not running. And

1:37:20.120 --> 1:37:22.479
<v Speaker 1>if we end up having Obama's president for eight years,

1:37:25.200 --> 1:37:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm talking about the outlie or possibility of

1:37:27.880 --> 1:37:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a Hillary Hillary Clinton run and I don't think it

1:37:30.439 --> 1:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is likely, but I don't think it's impossible. I think

1:37:34.080 --> 1:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you also would have to say it is not impossible

1:37:37.200 --> 1:37:40.720
<v Speaker 1>for there to be a Michelle Obama candidacy and a

1:37:40.760 --> 1:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Obama presidency. She would be make no mistake about it.

1:37:45.160 --> 1:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>She would be formidable, my friends. And you know, we're

1:37:50.000 --> 1:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>used to seeing these deeply uninspiring Democrat candidates with all

1:37:55.439 --> 1:37:58.240
<v Speaker 1>kinds of problems and negatives. And unfavorables and all this stuff.

1:37:59.040 --> 1:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Obama is a widely beloved figure and has all

1:38:06.160 --> 1:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the connections and all the name recognition the Democratic Party

1:38:09.200 --> 1:38:12.519
<v Speaker 1>could ever want. And then some do I think she's

1:38:12.600 --> 1:38:14.439
<v Speaker 1>going to get into I wouldn't put money on it,

1:38:14.479 --> 1:38:18.640
<v Speaker 1>but if she did, I do believe she would be

1:38:18.680 --> 1:38:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the candidate, and I do believe that Trump would have

1:38:21.280 --> 1:38:24.960
<v Speaker 1>his handsful. I think that that's true. You've got to

1:38:25.000 --> 1:38:27.519
<v Speaker 1>just think back to, you know, the narratives of the

1:38:27.520 --> 1:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration and the feelings of the you know, what

1:38:31.200 --> 1:38:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Obama left the Democratic Party with after he was no

1:38:35.320 --> 1:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>longer in office. I mean, you know, we've been saying

1:38:37.360 --> 1:38:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the only way to set right twenty sixteen is if

1:38:39.520 --> 1:38:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Hillary somehow becomes a candidate and beats Trump. Now in

1:38:42.320 --> 1:38:45.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. That's one narrative, for sure, But think about

1:38:45.760 --> 1:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the narrative of Michelle Obama and the Democratic Party going

1:38:49.200 --> 1:38:52.679
<v Speaker 1>forward if she were to run. I don't I don't know. Look,

1:38:52.760 --> 1:38:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I've never talked to Michelle. I don't know. Everyone says, oh,

1:38:55.280 --> 1:38:58.280
<v Speaker 1>she'll never do it, she'll never do it. Does anyone

1:38:58.280 --> 1:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>doubt that if Michelle Obama announced that she would first

1:39:00.880 --> 1:39:04.519
<v Speaker 1>of all, Joe Biden support would evaporate overnight. Everybody right

1:39:04.560 --> 1:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>now that would vote for Joe Biden would be like,

1:39:06.680 --> 1:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>oh sorry, Joe back there now. Now we're going to

1:39:09.080 --> 1:39:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Obama. See you let so so in the national poll,

1:39:11.680 --> 1:39:13.479
<v Speaker 1>she would be the front runner at that I am

1:39:13.520 --> 1:39:17.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely confident of. And then look at some of the

1:39:17.240 --> 1:39:20.439
<v Speaker 1>other candidates out there too. You know what, what what support? Really?

1:39:20.880 --> 1:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>What support lingers for Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris and

1:39:25.280 --> 1:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Obama and I we're thinking a little bit outside

1:39:29.200 --> 1:39:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the box here, my friends. The way the Democrats can

1:39:32.439 --> 1:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>turn this whole thing around is something like a game

1:39:38.280 --> 1:39:41.919
<v Speaker 1>change moment. And in this case, the game change candidate

1:39:41.960 --> 1:39:44.320
<v Speaker 1>would be would be Michelle Obama. And you know, look,

1:39:44.360 --> 1:39:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I was not a fan of the Obama presidencies policies

1:39:47.800 --> 1:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>at all. As you know, I went, I went to

1:39:50.120 --> 1:39:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the mat trying to fight against them when I first

1:39:52.360 --> 1:39:57.439
<v Speaker 1>got into this world of media. This is the one

1:39:57.520 --> 1:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that I don't think Democrats have the strategic foresight

1:40:01.200 --> 1:40:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to bring, you know, to make this happen. I don't think.

1:40:03.240 --> 1:40:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the Democratic Party is too at war with

1:40:06.479 --> 1:40:08.400
<v Speaker 1>itself in too many ways. And maybe Michelle Obama just

1:40:08.479 --> 1:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>also doesn't want to do it. She'd rather just be

1:40:10.120 --> 1:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>super famous and super rich and like have everyone talked

1:40:12.120 --> 1:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>about how wonderful she has all the time when she

1:40:14.240 --> 1:40:15.720
<v Speaker 1>just had to be the first lady. That's it, just

1:40:15.760 --> 1:40:17.599
<v Speaker 1>had to be first lady. He's the most wonderful person ever.

1:40:20.000 --> 1:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>But you never know. Tucker did a segment on the

1:40:22.640 --> 1:40:23.880
<v Speaker 1>last time I was watching it, and I was like,

1:40:23.960 --> 1:40:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I think this is uh. I think I think he

1:40:26.920 --> 1:40:29.400
<v Speaker 1>would be onto something if this a reality, But right

1:40:29.439 --> 1:40:33.519
<v Speaker 1>now it is just speculation, which pundits in political season

1:40:33.600 --> 1:40:37.559
<v Speaker 1>love to do. Like soft butter on warm toast. Time

1:40:37.600 --> 1:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to spread some freedom coast to coast. It's time for

1:40:49.320 --> 1:40:53.240
<v Speaker 1>roll call, Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton for roll

1:40:53.280 --> 1:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>call or team Bucket. iHeartMedia dot com. So, by the way,

1:41:00.000 --> 1:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it's one quick note. I got a little I got

1:41:01.360 --> 1:41:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a tweet last night. This is very nice. I said.

1:41:04.560 --> 1:41:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I just said something about my friend Sarah Carters. I

1:41:06.760 --> 1:41:08.479
<v Speaker 1>saw her. I watched a little Fox last night. Usually

1:41:08.520 --> 1:41:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm too busy, but I watched some Fox last night

1:41:10.840 --> 1:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and I said something. I said, I was watching my

1:41:13.200 --> 1:41:15.559
<v Speaker 1>buddy Sarah Carter be awesome on the Hannity Show. She's

1:41:15.600 --> 1:41:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a great journal lit some one of the nicest people

1:41:17.160 --> 1:41:20.519
<v Speaker 1>out there you'd ever meet. And Johnny Joey Jones, who's

1:41:20.520 --> 1:41:25.519
<v Speaker 1>also a super nice guy, Purple Heart recipient, military EO

1:41:25.600 --> 1:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>D veteran. He responded to me, from my experience, buck

1:41:30.040 --> 1:41:32.280
<v Speaker 1>climbs the ladder with one hand and reaches down with

1:41:32.360 --> 1:41:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the other. That's rare in this business. And I applaud

1:41:34.960 --> 1:41:36.479
<v Speaker 1>it when I see it, and I told him that

1:41:36.520 --> 1:41:37.720
<v Speaker 1>was very nice, and then I made my day. It

1:41:37.760 --> 1:41:41.320
<v Speaker 1>was very nice of very nice of Johnny Joey Over.

1:41:41.400 --> 1:41:43.400
<v Speaker 1>He's now a Fox contributor, Very nice of him to

1:41:43.439 --> 1:41:46.519
<v Speaker 1>say that. And you know, not that I do, and

1:41:46.560 --> 1:41:50.040
<v Speaker 1>not that I help people behind the scenes for accolades,

1:41:50.240 --> 1:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but I've helped a lot of people behind the scenes

1:41:53.000 --> 1:41:54.759
<v Speaker 1>for somebody without a lot of cloud in the business.

1:41:54.840 --> 1:41:57.479
<v Speaker 1>So it was nice to get a I do because

1:41:57.520 --> 1:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I like to do it. I think it's the right

1:41:58.640 --> 1:42:00.040
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. But it was nice to get a

1:42:00.080 --> 1:42:04.639
<v Speaker 1>shout out from jj Over at Fox News, Johnny Joey

1:42:04.720 --> 1:42:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Jones about that, well, I guess that would be JJJ,

1:42:07.520 --> 1:42:09.599
<v Speaker 1>but about that one, So it was very nice of him.

1:42:09.640 --> 1:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>All Right, let's uh let's get into the royal call,

1:42:13.760 --> 1:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>shall we. Justin, it's going to kick us off here.

1:42:16.840 --> 1:42:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey Buck, working in pharmaceutical supply chain, I can tell

1:42:19.840 --> 1:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you how to reduce prescription medication costs starting today with

1:42:24.200 --> 1:42:27.400
<v Speaker 1>no effort by the government. Today, our patents expire after

1:42:27.400 --> 1:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty years, and it can take up to ten years

1:42:29.400 --> 1:42:32.519
<v Speaker 1>from filing to get them into the market. That means

1:42:32.560 --> 1:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the millions and billions of dollars we spend on R

1:42:34.680 --> 1:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and D and other activities have to have to be

1:42:37.360 --> 1:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>recouped and a profit made in ten years before a

1:42:41.320 --> 1:42:45.320
<v Speaker 1>product goes generic. Is actually hurts the early adopters of

1:42:45.360 --> 1:42:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a new treatment the most, as they are the most

1:42:47.920 --> 1:42:51.679
<v Speaker 1>likely as they are most likely the most sick and

1:42:51.760 --> 1:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the current treatments aren't working. As such, they pay the

1:42:55.160 --> 1:42:58.920
<v Speaker 1>brunt of this. If the patents were extended another ten years,

1:42:59.240 --> 1:43:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that could literally cut the costs in half, as we

1:43:01.400 --> 1:43:05.439
<v Speaker 1>would we could amortize the cost even further and reduce

1:43:05.520 --> 1:43:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the cost produced as we'll be living more prior to

1:43:07.880 --> 1:43:11.320
<v Speaker 1>losing our patents. Justin, that's interesting. I mean, I just

1:43:11.320 --> 1:43:14.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like you're kind of dispersing the cost more over

1:43:14.400 --> 1:43:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a longer period of time, which ultimately means that consumers

1:43:18.240 --> 1:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>are still paying the same amount, but it would mean

1:43:20.040 --> 1:43:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that in the short term, as you point out, people

1:43:21.960 --> 1:43:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that are desperate for very for new drugs for things,

1:43:24.439 --> 1:43:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and when they have drugs that aren't working that might

1:43:27.760 --> 1:43:32.080
<v Speaker 1>help them. So certainly interesting an interesting way to approach it.

1:43:32.120 --> 1:43:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd have to look at how the math would work

1:43:33.840 --> 1:43:36.479
<v Speaker 1>out on that. Let's keep in mind, I mean patents

1:43:36.520 --> 1:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>are in the sense of government intrusion in the marketplace, right,

1:43:40.200 --> 1:43:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're giving people to incentivize research and development.

1:43:44.920 --> 1:43:50.080
<v Speaker 1>You are giving a temporary monopoly to a company, monopoly

1:43:50.160 --> 1:43:57.120
<v Speaker 1>via government regulation, government legislation, so you know, you're not

1:43:57.320 --> 1:43:59.280
<v Speaker 1>really you know, it's not just the market operating and

1:43:59.320 --> 1:44:01.439
<v Speaker 1>you've got a product, somebody else can make that product. Well,

1:44:01.960 --> 1:44:06.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, patents are open to interpretation and there's a

1:44:06.439 --> 1:44:10.280
<v Speaker 1>balancing test that has done of how long. But I mean,

1:44:10.320 --> 1:44:12.759
<v Speaker 1>for example, I think like Mickey Mouse or is still

1:44:12.840 --> 1:44:14.559
<v Speaker 1>under I mean things that are there are things that

1:44:14.600 --> 1:44:16.400
<v Speaker 1>are patented that are now going on like one hundred

1:44:16.520 --> 1:44:19.080
<v Speaker 1>years old that are still a copyrighted I'm sorry, not

1:44:19.080 --> 1:44:22.759
<v Speaker 1>patented so and people argue that that wasn't initially supposed

1:44:22.760 --> 1:44:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to be the way the copyrights worked. You know the

1:44:24.840 --> 1:44:27.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Beatles catalog from the sixties is still

1:44:27.400 --> 1:44:31.240
<v Speaker 1>worth billions of dollars or whatever it is, At what

1:44:31.280 --> 1:44:33.400
<v Speaker 1>point does it fall into common usage? And you know,

1:44:33.439 --> 1:44:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we could play a Beatles song here and not worry

1:44:35.160 --> 1:44:42.599
<v Speaker 1>about getting sued. I'm just saying, TJ. Did producer Mark

1:44:42.920 --> 1:44:47.720
<v Speaker 1>say that he shucked corn and skinned a cow over

1:44:47.760 --> 1:44:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the weekend? Wow? What a standard American? Sounds like. Buck

1:44:51.880 --> 1:44:53.759
<v Speaker 1>needs to hang out with Mark Moore in the off time.

1:44:53.800 --> 1:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I bet Mark catches catfish from dust till dawn. Not

1:44:57.920 --> 1:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to mention, he can probably skin a buck and run

1:45:00.920 --> 1:45:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a trot line. Uh yeah, do you know how to

1:45:04.880 --> 1:45:06.840
<v Speaker 1>do all those things? Yeah? Of course. I go fishing

1:45:06.840 --> 1:45:10.439
<v Speaker 1>in the Hudson River often. I just have to get

1:45:10.920 --> 1:45:13.320
<v Speaker 1>rid of the dead bodies. Also, so I'm actually part

1:45:13.479 --> 1:45:16.519
<v Speaker 1>NYPD agent. I help them with the dead bodies and

1:45:16.640 --> 1:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I go fishing at the same time. Well, funny man,

1:45:18.760 --> 1:45:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that I've actually gone fishing in

1:45:20.160 --> 1:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the East River. Why for what? Stripe bass that you

1:45:24.160 --> 1:45:27.799
<v Speaker 1>would eat that? We took it to a fancy restaurant

1:45:27.840 --> 1:45:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on the Upper east Side and they fillated for as. No,

1:45:31.479 --> 1:45:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it's an estuary comes in right from the ocean. Do

1:45:33.840 --> 1:45:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you know the disgusting things that are probably in that river? Yeah,

1:45:36.800 --> 1:45:40.000
<v Speaker 1>But if you're saying the fish, they have a filtration process,

1:45:40.000 --> 1:45:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the gills and stuff, it's fine. Next you say you're

1:45:42.439 --> 1:45:44.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna drop something on the floor of the subway and

1:45:44.360 --> 1:45:46.320
<v Speaker 1>then eat it, that's the same thing. I mean, I

1:45:46.360 --> 1:45:49.240
<v Speaker 1>have a strong immune system, you know. Trying to make sure.

1:45:49.360 --> 1:45:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Even Producer Brandon look back on that one. He was

1:45:51.120 --> 1:45:53.360
<v Speaker 1>like that, I need to get some glass between you

1:45:53.400 --> 1:45:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and I here. I mean, it's gonna be flu season soon,

1:45:56.360 --> 1:45:57.760
<v Speaker 1>so get after it. And by the way, do you

1:45:57.800 --> 1:46:00.360
<v Speaker 1>get a flu shot? No? Are your flu shot? Guy Brandon?

1:46:01.160 --> 1:46:02.599
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna get one because I don't want

1:46:02.640 --> 1:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to miss a whole week of the show because I

1:46:04.080 --> 1:46:07.439
<v Speaker 1>had the flu three years ago and for a week

1:46:07.479 --> 1:46:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I was immobilized. I couldn't do anything. What happens if

1:46:09.800 --> 1:46:11.960
<v Speaker 1>both of us get the flu and then Producer Brandon

1:46:11.960 --> 1:46:13.840
<v Speaker 1>gets to run the show and do the show, and

1:46:13.880 --> 1:46:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you'll hear a lot about guns n' rosie. Yeah, appetite

1:46:17.760 --> 1:46:21.599
<v Speaker 1>for distraction? What is it? Distortion? Yeah? You can yell,

1:46:21.640 --> 1:46:26.559
<v Speaker 1>we could. I'll repeat what you say after the mic. Aaron, WHOA,

1:46:26.600 --> 1:46:28.080
<v Speaker 1>this is long buck. I was wondering if you could

1:46:28.080 --> 1:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>address COPA when you return from the holiday. It was

1:46:31.560 --> 1:46:35.480
<v Speaker 1>all pass in nineteen ninety eight, of course, authored by Democrat. Recently,

1:46:35.640 --> 1:46:37.479
<v Speaker 1>YouTube had to settled with the FTC for one hundred

1:46:37.479 --> 1:46:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and seventy million and changes rules as a result. That

1:46:40.200 --> 1:46:42.439
<v Speaker 1>means that a lot of good, clean family content will

1:46:42.479 --> 1:46:45.400
<v Speaker 1>be wiped out financially, for one, because they're not allowed

1:46:45.400 --> 1:46:47.519
<v Speaker 1>to use targeted ads. This makes no sense to me,

1:46:47.680 --> 1:46:49.840
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera. I love free market. I hate

1:46:49.840 --> 1:46:53.879
<v Speaker 1>to see regulation. Aaron, I don't know much about COPA.

1:46:54.000 --> 1:46:57.599
<v Speaker 1>All I know this is Coppa, not like COPA Ka

1:46:57.800 --> 1:47:03.559
<v Speaker 1>band different, Right that's a different or the right, Yes,

1:47:03.640 --> 1:47:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a different, or the COPA mundial the World Cup

1:47:06.920 --> 1:47:09.000
<v Speaker 1>for those of us who like to watch little soccer

1:47:09.040 --> 1:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>because we're barely American, Uh, Aaron, I don't know much

1:47:12.720 --> 1:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>about the CEO PPAM other than what I saw on

1:47:17.000 --> 1:47:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the show Silicon Valley, which I do find to be

1:47:18.800 --> 1:47:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a very funny show, quite quite a clever show. Um

1:47:22.680 --> 1:47:23.960
<v Speaker 1>So I got nothing for you on that right now?

1:47:23.960 --> 1:47:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Then I'll have to look at it. Maybe'll come back

1:47:25.280 --> 1:47:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to it after the holiday. A producer Mark reminds me.

1:47:27.280 --> 1:47:29.519
<v Speaker 1>Usually he guilts me and he says, you promised the audience.

1:47:29.560 --> 1:47:31.479
<v Speaker 1>He's he's your advocate here in the hut. I just

1:47:31.520 --> 1:47:33.080
<v Speaker 1>want to do what I want to do. I'm an

1:47:33.160 --> 1:47:35.160
<v Speaker 1>artiste here in the hut. He makes sure that I

1:47:35.240 --> 1:47:37.240
<v Speaker 1>keep promises to the degree that I can all up

1:47:37.240 --> 1:47:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to Producer Brandon after Thanksgiving. That's sure. Actually, Producer Mark

1:47:40.200 --> 1:47:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to be not thinking about us as he

1:47:42.360 --> 1:47:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is downing. You know, mudslides and my ties in Jamaica,

1:47:49.040 --> 1:47:52.439
<v Speaker 1>love those, all of those things. We are going to

1:47:52.520 --> 1:47:54.679
<v Speaker 1>do a live show tomorrow, my friends, so you should

1:47:54.760 --> 1:47:59.519
<v Speaker 1>listen tomorrow. We'll have a special Thanksgiving extravaganza. Also over

1:47:59.560 --> 1:48:01.559
<v Speaker 1>the holiday, when you're talking to friends and family, what

1:48:01.560 --> 1:48:04.240
<v Speaker 1>are you going to tell them? Download the buck sect

1:48:04.240 --> 1:48:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and show. Subscribe on iTunes. Best podcast out there. Talk

1:48:08.160 --> 1:48:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to you tomorrow. Shields High. I understand what it's like

1:48:11.920 --> 1:48:14.439
<v Speaker 1>to go through the process of buying life insurance. I

1:48:14.479 --> 1:48:16.120
<v Speaker 1>had to do it before I went overseas. It felt

1:48:16.160 --> 1:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit weird. But that's why you need to

1:48:19.040 --> 1:48:22.760
<v Speaker 1>check out my Friends and Ethos Life Insurance because they

1:48:22.800 --> 1:48:25.880
<v Speaker 1>make sure that there's no hassle, no nonsense, and they'll

1:48:25.920 --> 1:48:28.400
<v Speaker 1>find a plan that allows you to make sure that

1:48:28.439 --> 1:48:31.920
<v Speaker 1>your family is prepared for an uncertain future. This is

1:48:31.920 --> 1:48:34.120
<v Speaker 1>something you've got to do. It's the responsible choice, and

1:48:34.200 --> 1:48:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Blink makes it easy for you. There's no fine print

1:48:37.720 --> 1:48:40.919
<v Speaker 1>or silly appointments or fees that you just really can't afford.

1:48:41.200 --> 1:48:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Ethos's approach is simple to blend industry expertise, technology and

1:48:44.920 --> 1:48:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the human touch that helps you find the right policy

1:48:47.720 --> 1:48:49.599
<v Speaker 1>for you to protect your loved ones. It only takes

1:48:49.640 --> 1:48:52.839
<v Speaker 1>about ten minutes to apply, and Ethos is already trusted

1:48:52.840 --> 1:48:56.960
<v Speaker 1>by thousands. Get a fast, free and personalized quote right

1:48:57.000 --> 1:49:04.240
<v Speaker 1>now at Ethoslife dot com. Again, that's Ethoslife dot com.

1:49:04.479 --> 1:49:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Ethos Life Insurance is life insurance that actually fits your life.