1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:02,880 Speaker 1: Hi everyone. So net zero you've probably heard it in 2 00:00:02,920 --> 00:00:05,040 Speaker 1: the news recently. It's when an entity balances out its 3 00:00:05,080 --> 00:00:08,320 Speaker 1: greenhouse gas emissions with other activities that store, reduce, and 4 00:00:08,560 --> 00:00:10,840 Speaker 1: or offset those emissions, so in the end, what you're 5 00:00:10,840 --> 00:00:14,240 Speaker 1: putting up into the airs effectively well nothing. These entities 6 00:00:14,240 --> 00:00:16,680 Speaker 1: can be countries. For example, last year, the UK put 7 00:00:16,680 --> 00:00:18,799 Speaker 1: into law a net zero by twenty fifty target, and 8 00:00:18,840 --> 00:00:21,439 Speaker 1: earlier this year, China made headlines when it announced the 9 00:00:21,480 --> 00:00:24,239 Speaker 1: twenty sixty net zero target, followed soon thereafter by South 10 00:00:24,320 --> 00:00:26,479 Speaker 1: Korea and Japan. But these aren't the only ones. A 11 00:00:26,600 --> 00:00:29,200 Speaker 1: rapidly growing list of countries have announced plans for net zero, 12 00:00:29,240 --> 00:00:31,720 Speaker 1: and you can find extensive coverage on this on countries 13 00:00:31,720 --> 00:00:34,400 Speaker 1: ambitions throughout be net research. But these entities can also 14 00:00:34,440 --> 00:00:37,440 Speaker 1: be companies. Google, Amazon, and Apple have all set ambitious 15 00:00:37,440 --> 00:00:39,879 Speaker 1: net zero targets. Microsoft has gone even further with a 16 00:00:39,880 --> 00:00:42,360 Speaker 1: carbon negative target. But it's not just tech. Groups of 17 00:00:42,400 --> 00:00:44,280 Speaker 1: companies in what seems like every sector have made their 18 00:00:44,320 --> 00:00:46,760 Speaker 1: climate ambition. Is known, but why now? Why are we 19 00:00:46,800 --> 00:00:49,360 Speaker 1: seeing more and more companies make these commitments. This week 20 00:00:49,360 --> 00:00:52,599 Speaker 1: on the show, We've got benf corporate sustainability analyst Kyle Harrison. 21 00:00:52,680 --> 00:00:55,040 Speaker 1: He'll tell us about what's driving corporate net zero targets, 22 00:00:55,160 --> 00:00:57,800 Speaker 1: the why now, what net zero actually means in practice, 23 00:00:58,120 --> 00:01:00,280 Speaker 1: and the bumpy right ahead for those going down this road. 24 00:01:00,400 --> 00:01:03,000 Speaker 1: Our discussion is based on report titled Corporate net Zero 25 00:01:03,040 --> 00:01:05,760 Speaker 1: Targets Primer Jump on the bandwagon being if users can 26 00:01:05,760 --> 00:01:08,080 Speaker 1: get this report on BNF dot com, the BENF mobile app, 27 00:01:08,160 --> 00:01:10,440 Speaker 1: and the Bloomberg terminal as a reminder being to stop 28 00:01:10,480 --> 00:01:12,600 Speaker 1: provide investment or strategy advice, and you can hear the 29 00:01:12,600 --> 00:01:14,520 Speaker 1: full disclaimer at the end of the show. I'm Mark 30 00:01:14,560 --> 00:01:17,160 Speaker 1: Taylor and you're listening to Switch on the BNF podcast. 31 00:01:23,600 --> 00:01:26,120 Speaker 1: Hey Kyle, thank you for coming on the show today. Yeah, 32 00:01:26,200 --> 00:01:28,240 Speaker 1: thanks for having me. You know, it seems like every 33 00:01:28,240 --> 00:01:29,959 Speaker 1: time I look at the news, I see a new 34 00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:33,520 Speaker 1: net zero announcement, whether it be a country or a company. 35 00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:35,880 Speaker 1: We're here today to talk about net zero, So Kyle, 36 00:01:35,959 --> 00:01:37,800 Speaker 1: can you just start us off? What is net zero? 37 00:01:38,200 --> 00:01:41,360 Speaker 1: Net zero is is a company taking all of its 38 00:01:41,400 --> 00:01:46,119 Speaker 1: greenhouse gas emissions across its entire value chain down to zero, 39 00:01:46,240 --> 00:01:48,960 Speaker 1: effectively in a lot of ways, balancing out its emissions 40 00:01:49,320 --> 00:01:54,560 Speaker 1: with some type of activity that reduces or stores those emissions. 41 00:01:54,800 --> 00:01:56,360 Speaker 1: Is that the same as when I hear a country 42 00:01:56,360 --> 00:01:59,480 Speaker 1: say net zero as well? On paper? Um, it should 43 00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:01,920 Speaker 1: be the same things. So you know, there's there's a 44 00:02:01,920 --> 00:02:05,320 Speaker 1: bunch of different terminology that companies are using now when 45 00:02:05,320 --> 00:02:08,919 Speaker 1: they set a net zero target or equivalent. Right. So, um, 46 00:02:08,960 --> 00:02:11,919 Speaker 1: you hear companies say things like carbon neutral or climate 47 00:02:11,960 --> 00:02:14,799 Speaker 1: positive or carbon negative, and a lot of those things 48 00:02:14,800 --> 00:02:18,919 Speaker 1: are used interchangeably, those phrases, but by definition they actually 49 00:02:18,960 --> 00:02:21,880 Speaker 1: all mean different things. So when a company sets a 50 00:02:21,919 --> 00:02:24,720 Speaker 1: net zero target, it should really again apply to their 51 00:02:24,840 --> 00:02:28,640 Speaker 1: entire value chain for all greenhouse gas emissions. But if 52 00:02:28,639 --> 00:02:32,440 Speaker 1: you think about something like carbon neutral, that's only carbon dioxide, right, 53 00:02:32,480 --> 00:02:36,440 Speaker 1: it doesn't include other greenhouse gases like nitrous oxide and methane. 54 00:02:36,960 --> 00:02:40,440 Speaker 1: And then something like carbon negative actually involves taking your 55 00:02:40,440 --> 00:02:44,320 Speaker 1: emissions below zero. So beyond just your emissions netting out 56 00:02:44,320 --> 00:02:49,280 Speaker 1: at zero, you're investing in additional technologies or purchasing carbon credits, 57 00:02:49,680 --> 00:02:53,080 Speaker 1: um that are effectively netting those emissions out below zero. 58 00:02:53,400 --> 00:02:55,720 Speaker 1: So with a lot of these definitions, some of them 59 00:02:55,760 --> 00:02:58,280 Speaker 1: say carbon, some of them say emission. So that distinction 60 00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:00,440 Speaker 1: was really great for you to just point out. It 61 00:03:00,440 --> 00:03:03,280 Speaker 1: looks like a lot of them are measuring the absence 62 00:03:03,400 --> 00:03:07,560 Speaker 1: of emissions or carbon. And there's one term that you 63 00:03:07,840 --> 00:03:10,560 Speaker 1: pointed out in the research note that we're talking about 64 00:03:10,600 --> 00:03:14,799 Speaker 1: today and its climate positive. What does climate positive mean? 65 00:03:15,160 --> 00:03:17,920 Speaker 1: So the key point, the key thing to keep an 66 00:03:17,960 --> 00:03:20,480 Speaker 1: eye out for when you look at the terminology is 67 00:03:20,880 --> 00:03:24,239 Speaker 1: is really the use of carbon or climate. Right, So 68 00:03:24,320 --> 00:03:26,880 Speaker 1: when you think about any target or any phrase that 69 00:03:26,960 --> 00:03:30,800 Speaker 1: uses carbon, again, that just applies to carbon dioxide. When 70 00:03:30,880 --> 00:03:34,920 Speaker 1: the company phrases their target as climate positive or climate negative, 71 00:03:35,120 --> 00:03:38,200 Speaker 1: which is effectively the same thing that applies to all 72 00:03:38,240 --> 00:03:41,240 Speaker 1: greenhouse gas emissions, or at least it should on paper, right. 73 00:03:41,520 --> 00:03:45,080 Speaker 1: So climate positive is very similar to a carbon negative 74 00:03:45,080 --> 00:03:48,240 Speaker 1: goal or a carbon positive target, but again it just 75 00:03:48,320 --> 00:03:52,280 Speaker 1: extends to methane and things like nitrous oxide as well 76 00:03:52,320 --> 00:03:54,840 Speaker 1: as carbon dioxide. So that's kind of the key differentiator. 77 00:03:55,240 --> 00:03:57,640 Speaker 1: But if you think about this, I mean from an 78 00:03:57,640 --> 00:04:00,960 Speaker 1: investor standpoint, it becomes really different coal to actually sift 79 00:04:01,000 --> 00:04:04,480 Speaker 1: through all these targets and compare them apples to apples, right, 80 00:04:04,640 --> 00:04:06,760 Speaker 1: investors actually need to go ahead and look at these 81 00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:10,800 Speaker 1: companies sustainability reports and those announcements specifically to see what 82 00:04:10,880 --> 00:04:13,760 Speaker 1: those targets entails. And that's definitely one of the things 83 00:04:13,800 --> 00:04:17,000 Speaker 1: that is potentially holding this market back at the current time. 84 00:04:17,200 --> 00:04:20,440 Speaker 1: Let's get into the standards and and certification in a second, 85 00:04:20,440 --> 00:04:23,480 Speaker 1: but really, can we go back to why our companies 86 00:04:23,520 --> 00:04:26,280 Speaker 1: doing this at all? Is it pr is it having 87 00:04:26,279 --> 00:04:30,280 Speaker 1: an edge in their competitors, Is it the consumer value proposition, 88 00:04:30,560 --> 00:04:33,360 Speaker 1: or does it make them more investable or a combination 89 00:04:33,400 --> 00:04:35,919 Speaker 1: of the all of the above. It's a combination of 90 00:04:35,920 --> 00:04:38,960 Speaker 1: all the above. I would say that the biggest driver 91 00:04:39,120 --> 00:04:43,280 Speaker 1: is definitely that investor pressure, right, So increasingly investors want 92 00:04:43,320 --> 00:04:47,160 Speaker 1: to put their money in companies that mitigate their susceptibility 93 00:04:47,200 --> 00:04:50,359 Speaker 1: to what we call climate risk and transition risk. So 94 00:04:50,480 --> 00:04:54,040 Speaker 1: climate risk is your exposure to these physical climate related 95 00:04:54,040 --> 00:04:57,880 Speaker 1: events like forest fires and droughts and electricity grid blackouts. 96 00:04:58,440 --> 00:05:01,240 Speaker 1: And then transition risk is as we pivot to a 97 00:05:01,279 --> 00:05:04,240 Speaker 1: low carbon economy and you have more low carbon regulation, 98 00:05:04,720 --> 00:05:09,560 Speaker 1: you have changing consumer preferences. Companies again become increasingly susceptible 99 00:05:09,640 --> 00:05:12,360 Speaker 1: to these types of risks. So by setting a net 100 00:05:12,440 --> 00:05:16,800 Speaker 1: zero goal or an emission reduction strategy more broadly, companies 101 00:05:16,839 --> 00:05:19,960 Speaker 1: actually make themselves safer to invest in because they're mitigating 102 00:05:20,160 --> 00:05:22,560 Speaker 1: their exposure to some of those risks. If I'm an 103 00:05:22,560 --> 00:05:26,640 Speaker 1: oil and gas company and I start investing in clean 104 00:05:26,720 --> 00:05:29,919 Speaker 1: power or electric vehicles, like some of these oil majors 105 00:05:29,960 --> 00:05:32,360 Speaker 1: are already doing, those are businesses that we think are 106 00:05:32,400 --> 00:05:34,880 Speaker 1: going to you know, make up a larger part of 107 00:05:34,920 --> 00:05:37,960 Speaker 1: the low carbon economy moving forward, more so than you know, 108 00:05:38,040 --> 00:05:41,080 Speaker 1: fossil fuels. So that's, you know, one great example of 109 00:05:41,120 --> 00:05:43,960 Speaker 1: how companies can kind of pivot and be more attractive 110 00:05:43,960 --> 00:05:47,560 Speaker 1: from an investment standpoint. So net zero targets are really 111 00:05:47,640 --> 00:05:49,800 Speaker 1: kind of the cream of the crop or the gold 112 00:05:49,839 --> 00:05:52,920 Speaker 1: standard when it comes to emission reductions goals. So if 113 00:05:52,920 --> 00:05:55,040 Speaker 1: you want to make an investor happy, really the best 114 00:05:55,040 --> 00:05:57,360 Speaker 1: way to do it is to set a net zero target. 115 00:05:57,800 --> 00:05:59,880 Speaker 1: What I would say, though, and you mentioned this earl 116 00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:03,200 Speaker 1: of mark, is there's definitely a degree of one upsmanship here. 117 00:06:03,600 --> 00:06:07,600 Speaker 1: So via a large technology company or utility or an 118 00:06:07,600 --> 00:06:10,719 Speaker 1: oil and gas company, one of your biggest competitors sets 119 00:06:10,760 --> 00:06:12,960 Speaker 1: in net zero goal. Um, that's driven a lot of 120 00:06:12,960 --> 00:06:15,800 Speaker 1: other companies to set targets of their own to kind 121 00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:18,320 Speaker 1: of keep pace with their competitors. So really it is 122 00:06:18,360 --> 00:06:22,040 Speaker 1: a combination of many things. But I would say satiating 123 00:06:22,040 --> 00:06:25,640 Speaker 1: investors and making investors happy is the biggest driver, followed 124 00:06:25,680 --> 00:06:27,480 Speaker 1: by you know the fact that it's a great way 125 00:06:27,520 --> 00:06:30,200 Speaker 1: to one up your peers and sustainability, so net zero 126 00:06:30,240 --> 00:06:33,160 Speaker 1: peer pressure. So actually that leads me to another thought 127 00:06:33,160 --> 00:06:35,240 Speaker 1: because if I'm looking at all of these kind of 128 00:06:35,400 --> 00:06:37,800 Speaker 1: in theory and isolation, I'm watching the news cycle and 129 00:06:37,839 --> 00:06:41,640 Speaker 1: I'm seeing different companies make net zero targets. Which industries 130 00:06:42,200 --> 00:06:46,160 Speaker 1: are kind of leading in these target making endeavors. It's 131 00:06:46,200 --> 00:06:49,720 Speaker 1: a bit cliche, but I would say that technology companies 132 00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:52,760 Speaker 1: are definitely the leaders here. So they're not as emissions 133 00:06:52,800 --> 00:06:56,320 Speaker 1: intensive as again companies in the oil and gas sector 134 00:06:56,240 --> 00:07:00,600 Speaker 1: or utilities, but technology companies are setting to targets that 135 00:07:00,640 --> 00:07:03,520 Speaker 1: need to be achieved much earlier than other sectors. So 136 00:07:03,560 --> 00:07:05,600 Speaker 1: if you look at some of the leading tech companies 137 00:07:05,600 --> 00:07:10,240 Speaker 1: that have set these goals like Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and Amazon, 138 00:07:10,960 --> 00:07:15,200 Speaker 1: their targets are expected to be met in and that's 139 00:07:15,280 --> 00:07:17,920 Speaker 1: ten years or twenty years earlier than the Paris Agreement. 140 00:07:18,400 --> 00:07:20,720 Speaker 1: But it's also ten or twenty years earlier than most 141 00:07:20,760 --> 00:07:24,080 Speaker 1: other net zero targets that are being set in other sectors. 142 00:07:24,400 --> 00:07:27,200 Speaker 1: And why is this? They're just more ambitious, I would 143 00:07:27,200 --> 00:07:29,640 Speaker 1: say part of it is the fact that they're they're 144 00:07:29,640 --> 00:07:32,280 Speaker 1: just setting more ambitious goals. The other important thing to 145 00:07:32,320 --> 00:07:36,080 Speaker 1: note is a huge portion of the carbon footprints for 146 00:07:36,120 --> 00:07:39,400 Speaker 1: tech companies is what we would classify as scope too, 147 00:07:40,240 --> 00:07:42,760 Speaker 1: and that means it's your indirect emissions that come from 148 00:07:42,800 --> 00:07:46,240 Speaker 1: the electricity grid. So the most effective way to reduce 149 00:07:46,280 --> 00:07:49,080 Speaker 1: your scope to emissions is to purchase clean energy. So 150 00:07:49,160 --> 00:07:51,640 Speaker 1: that's kind of my long winded answer of saying they 151 00:07:51,680 --> 00:07:54,680 Speaker 1: have a one size fits all solution to reduce a 152 00:07:54,760 --> 00:07:57,440 Speaker 1: large portion of their carbon footprint. But the last thing 153 00:07:57,440 --> 00:08:00,440 Speaker 1: I want to highlight that really makes the big tech 154 00:08:00,480 --> 00:08:04,360 Speaker 1: companies stand out is there again setting net zero targets 155 00:08:04,400 --> 00:08:07,280 Speaker 1: that also address their Scope three emissions, and those are 156 00:08:07,320 --> 00:08:10,680 Speaker 1: your indirect emissions that come up and downstream along the 157 00:08:10,760 --> 00:08:13,320 Speaker 1: value chain. So if you think of a company like Apple, 158 00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:18,240 Speaker 1: that's from its product manufacturing upstream, so those large companies 159 00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:21,520 Speaker 1: like Fox con and Taiwan Semiconductor, Whereas for an oil 160 00:08:21,560 --> 00:08:24,600 Speaker 1: and gas company, their Scope three emissions largely come from 161 00:08:24,640 --> 00:08:27,480 Speaker 1: the use of their products downstream, so think of things 162 00:08:27,560 --> 00:08:30,160 Speaker 1: like burning road fuel and jet fuel. So a lot 163 00:08:30,200 --> 00:08:33,480 Speaker 1: of tech companies are setting scope three targets as well. 164 00:08:33,559 --> 00:08:36,360 Speaker 1: That actually ultimately end up at zero, and that's something 165 00:08:36,400 --> 00:08:38,240 Speaker 1: that a lot of other sectors have not yet done. 166 00:08:38,640 --> 00:08:41,000 Speaker 1: So they deserve high marks in that regard as well. 167 00:08:41,120 --> 00:08:44,600 Speaker 1: I've been wondering why now. I still can't quite get it. 168 00:08:44,679 --> 00:08:47,600 Speaker 1: Is it more pressure you feel like you hear these 169 00:08:47,640 --> 00:08:50,040 Speaker 1: announcements all the time, as Dana said, right, is it 170 00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:53,520 Speaker 1: more pressure from investors? Or is it the one upsmanship 171 00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:56,280 Speaker 1: you know that's driving all these announcements now? Or did 172 00:08:56,280 --> 00:08:58,240 Speaker 1: Paris and the I p c C in the one 173 00:08:58,280 --> 00:09:01,079 Speaker 1: point five degree scenario have a huge impact? I mean, 174 00:09:01,200 --> 00:09:03,880 Speaker 1: is this the resulting catalyst from that? So on the 175 00:09:03,920 --> 00:09:08,360 Speaker 1: investor from you have massive asset managers and investors that 176 00:09:08,400 --> 00:09:12,120 Speaker 1: are setting what we would call net zero finance dimissions. 177 00:09:12,160 --> 00:09:15,080 Speaker 1: And I am aware that I'm throwing another term into 178 00:09:15,080 --> 00:09:18,320 Speaker 1: the mix, heer, I apologize, But asset managers like black 179 00:09:18,440 --> 00:09:21,760 Speaker 1: Rock and banks like Morgan Stanley are now making commitments 180 00:09:22,080 --> 00:09:26,840 Speaker 1: where the emissions of their portfolios by will also be 181 00:09:26,920 --> 00:09:29,280 Speaker 1: net zero um and again we call that net zero 182 00:09:29,320 --> 00:09:31,600 Speaker 1: finance dimissions. Okay, So if you want to stay in 183 00:09:31,679 --> 00:09:34,440 Speaker 1: you gotta you gotta perform exactly, And a lot of 184 00:09:34,480 --> 00:09:38,200 Speaker 1: these companies are joining their specific initiatives for the investment 185 00:09:38,240 --> 00:09:41,640 Speaker 1: community UM that that focus on these areas. So a 186 00:09:41,679 --> 00:09:44,120 Speaker 1: great example is what we would call the Climate Action 187 00:09:44,160 --> 00:09:46,960 Speaker 1: one hundred plus and that's a group of now over 188 00:09:47,080 --> 00:09:50,960 Speaker 1: five hundred investors and asset managers that are pledging to 189 00:09:51,000 --> 00:09:55,360 Speaker 1: get their portfolio companies to report better environmental, social and 190 00:09:55,400 --> 00:09:59,520 Speaker 1: governance data but also to reduce their emissions. So again, 191 00:09:59,559 --> 00:10:01,640 Speaker 1: you know, a lot of it is being catalyzed by 192 00:10:01,640 --> 00:10:06,320 Speaker 1: that investor pressure. But the other exciting component to this is, 193 00:10:06,360 --> 00:10:08,439 Speaker 1: and you know, Danny, you mentioned this in the beginning, 194 00:10:09,080 --> 00:10:12,080 Speaker 1: you're starting to see a lot of countries now putting 195 00:10:12,080 --> 00:10:15,000 Speaker 1: forward legislation for net zero um So, in the last 196 00:10:15,080 --> 00:10:18,760 Speaker 1: month we've seen China, South Korea, and Japan all put 197 00:10:18,800 --> 00:10:21,600 Speaker 1: forward legislation for a net zero target. And what that's 198 00:10:21,640 --> 00:10:23,640 Speaker 1: really gonna do is it's going to kind of open 199 00:10:23,679 --> 00:10:27,400 Speaker 1: the door and really trail blaze the way for the 200 00:10:27,440 --> 00:10:30,600 Speaker 1: private sector within those countries to go ahead and set 201 00:10:30,600 --> 00:10:33,040 Speaker 1: in net zero goes of their own. Because China is 202 00:10:33,040 --> 00:10:36,120 Speaker 1: going to need to expedite it's retirement and fossil fuels, 203 00:10:36,400 --> 00:10:38,839 Speaker 1: it's going to need to expedite it's clean energy, it's 204 00:10:38,880 --> 00:10:41,760 Speaker 1: e V fleet rollouts, all those types of things are 205 00:10:41,760 --> 00:10:44,880 Speaker 1: going to benefit private sector players. You know, that's further 206 00:10:44,960 --> 00:10:48,480 Speaker 1: incentive for these companies to set targets of their own. Well, so, yeah, 207 00:10:48,520 --> 00:10:51,120 Speaker 1: let's talk a little bit about accountability, because you referenced 208 00:10:51,160 --> 00:10:53,560 Speaker 1: kind of two things just now, which is one the 209 00:10:53,600 --> 00:10:56,880 Speaker 1: net zero targets that countries are making, which invariably does 210 00:10:56,920 --> 00:10:58,920 Speaker 1: have to do with the companies that operate within it, 211 00:10:59,240 --> 00:11:03,600 Speaker 1: and to financial community, which is demanding more information and 212 00:11:03,800 --> 00:11:06,880 Speaker 1: presumably a lot of these companies to join and make 213 00:11:06,960 --> 00:11:10,480 Speaker 1: commitments with third parties that are actually kind of at 214 00:11:10,559 --> 00:11:13,120 Speaker 1: least systematizing this stuff or making it transparent in a 215 00:11:13,120 --> 00:11:15,760 Speaker 1: way that they can use. So where do you think 216 00:11:15,840 --> 00:11:18,319 Speaker 1: most of the pressure is and is going to come from? 217 00:11:18,360 --> 00:11:20,600 Speaker 1: Will it be the finance community, will it be governments, 218 00:11:20,679 --> 00:11:23,280 Speaker 1: or will it be something else? A lot of it 219 00:11:23,320 --> 00:11:26,600 Speaker 1: will again come from from the finance community, but you 220 00:11:26,600 --> 00:11:29,000 Speaker 1: do have a number of initiatives, many of which are 221 00:11:29,040 --> 00:11:31,880 Speaker 1: competing with each other, that are now being rolled out 222 00:11:31,960 --> 00:11:36,040 Speaker 1: to help standardize, you know, this net zero movement. So 223 00:11:36,080 --> 00:11:39,239 Speaker 1: I guess we can kind of start from the broadest level. 224 00:11:39,280 --> 00:11:41,719 Speaker 1: So the u N has convened what they call Race 225 00:11:41,800 --> 00:11:44,920 Speaker 1: to net Zero. That's now a group of over eleven 226 00:11:45,960 --> 00:11:48,520 Speaker 1: corporations that have set some form of a net zero 227 00:11:48,559 --> 00:11:50,959 Speaker 1: target mark and Dan, I think you guys will will 228 00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:53,520 Speaker 1: get this analogy. But you know when you're growing up 229 00:11:53,520 --> 00:11:56,040 Speaker 1: and basically all the kids in in the United States, 230 00:11:56,080 --> 00:11:58,520 Speaker 1: they go ahead and they play Little League baseball, right, 231 00:11:58,800 --> 00:12:01,679 Speaker 1: and everyone is accepted into that Little League Baseball league. 232 00:12:01,880 --> 00:12:03,240 Speaker 1: That's kind of the way that I would think of 233 00:12:03,440 --> 00:12:06,880 Speaker 1: Race to Zero. It doesn't really have any stringent rules. 234 00:12:07,080 --> 00:12:09,240 Speaker 1: Any company can join UM, and you have a lot 235 00:12:09,240 --> 00:12:10,960 Speaker 1: of kind of mom and pop shops that are part 236 00:12:10,960 --> 00:12:13,319 Speaker 1: of that UM. So that's kind of at the broadest level. 237 00:12:14,160 --> 00:12:16,120 Speaker 1: And one of the things that Race to Zero wants 238 00:12:16,120 --> 00:12:18,560 Speaker 1: to do is kind of help move the needle on policy. 239 00:12:18,679 --> 00:12:21,520 Speaker 1: So if you can kind of show up to the 240 00:12:21,559 --> 00:12:25,760 Speaker 1: negotiating table as a consortium of over a thousand companies UM, 241 00:12:25,760 --> 00:12:27,400 Speaker 1: the hope there is that it can open the door 242 00:12:27,480 --> 00:12:30,520 Speaker 1: for more access to clean energy buying and things like 243 00:12:30,559 --> 00:12:32,680 Speaker 1: e V procurement. But then you also have a number 244 00:12:32,720 --> 00:12:36,400 Speaker 1: of actually private set of lead initiatives. So two ones 245 00:12:36,440 --> 00:12:39,480 Speaker 1: that I would highlight our Amazon's Climate Pledge UM and 246 00:12:39,520 --> 00:12:42,320 Speaker 1: they even named their new arena in Seattle after this 247 00:12:42,360 --> 00:12:44,959 Speaker 1: climate Pledge, So that's a group of companies that have 248 00:12:45,280 --> 00:12:48,960 Speaker 1: planned or planned to go net zero. Then you also 249 00:12:49,040 --> 00:12:52,040 Speaker 1: have transformed to net zero, which is rolled out by Microsoft. 250 00:12:52,200 --> 00:12:55,640 Speaker 1: So these types of corporate lead initiatives are you know, 251 00:12:56,080 --> 00:12:59,120 Speaker 1: partially driven by you know, a need for better PR. 252 00:12:59,520 --> 00:13:02,320 Speaker 1: So as a company, I can align myself with a 253 00:13:02,640 --> 00:13:05,320 Speaker 1: with a leader like Microsoft or Amazon, and that really 254 00:13:05,360 --> 00:13:08,040 Speaker 1: does help from a PR standpoint. But what I would 255 00:13:08,040 --> 00:13:11,160 Speaker 1: say that's really exciting about these these private sector lead 256 00:13:11,200 --> 00:13:14,600 Speaker 1: initiatives is um they facilitate collaboration and that's one of 257 00:13:14,600 --> 00:13:18,040 Speaker 1: the reasons they've been created. So for example, Amazon went 258 00:13:18,080 --> 00:13:22,800 Speaker 1: ahead and purchased electric vehicles from Mercedes Benz, which is 259 00:13:22,920 --> 00:13:25,440 Speaker 1: also part of the Climate Pledge, and they said that 260 00:13:25,440 --> 00:13:28,920 Speaker 1: that transaction was actually facilitated by these two companies joining 261 00:13:28,920 --> 00:13:32,160 Speaker 1: this initiative together. You know, they're planning for very similar 262 00:13:32,160 --> 00:13:35,960 Speaker 1: collaboration to happen between the companies. So these private sector 263 00:13:36,040 --> 00:13:38,920 Speaker 1: initiatives are are really exciting. But the one that I 264 00:13:38,960 --> 00:13:43,800 Speaker 1: think any relevant stakeholder and investor, or a corporate sustainability practitioner, 265 00:13:44,040 --> 00:13:45,880 Speaker 1: the one that everyone should be keeping an eye out on, 266 00:13:46,240 --> 00:13:48,440 Speaker 1: is the net zero framework that's going to be rolled 267 00:13:48,440 --> 00:13:51,280 Speaker 1: out by the Science Based Targets Initiative. So they're gonna 268 00:13:51,320 --> 00:13:55,080 Speaker 1: be basically create a methodology in the next year or so. UM, 269 00:13:55,080 --> 00:13:57,840 Speaker 1: that's gonna lay out a clear pathway for Again, what 270 00:13:58,040 --> 00:13:59,760 Speaker 1: is net zero? So if you want to set a 271 00:13:59,840 --> 00:14:03,079 Speaker 1: net zero target as part of the Science Based Targets initiative, 272 00:14:03,120 --> 00:14:06,120 Speaker 1: it needs to meet certain criteria. But they're also laying 273 00:14:06,120 --> 00:14:08,840 Speaker 1: out clear guidelines on how you actually achieve that goal. 274 00:14:09,320 --> 00:14:11,640 Speaker 1: So what type of carbon credits you can use, what 275 00:14:11,720 --> 00:14:14,280 Speaker 1: type of technologies you can use, how you have to 276 00:14:14,320 --> 00:14:16,680 Speaker 1: reduce your gross emissions before you can use any of 277 00:14:16,679 --> 00:14:19,400 Speaker 1: these technologies. All of that type of stuff is going 278 00:14:19,440 --> 00:14:22,240 Speaker 1: to be made very clear, um and laid out within 279 00:14:22,280 --> 00:14:25,000 Speaker 1: this Science Based Targets framework. UM. And I think you 280 00:14:25,040 --> 00:14:27,680 Speaker 1: know to your point data about accountability. UM, that's going 281 00:14:27,720 --> 00:14:29,720 Speaker 1: to go a long way and making sure that these 282 00:14:29,760 --> 00:14:33,080 Speaker 1: companies are held accountable. Two questions, why are you confident 283 00:14:33,120 --> 00:14:36,080 Speaker 1: in the Science Based Targets initiatives in particular? And can 284 00:14:36,120 --> 00:14:37,600 Speaker 1: you give us a preview of what some of those 285 00:14:37,600 --> 00:14:40,160 Speaker 1: things are carbon credits are or whatever they're called in 286 00:14:40,200 --> 00:14:43,240 Speaker 1: there that a company can use to actually reach the target. 287 00:14:43,480 --> 00:14:46,360 Speaker 1: So the reason I'm confident in the Science Based Targets 288 00:14:46,400 --> 00:14:49,800 Speaker 1: Initiative is because you know, we have historical data. I mean, 289 00:14:49,800 --> 00:14:53,120 Speaker 1: this is an initiative that has existed for for several 290 00:14:53,200 --> 00:14:55,560 Speaker 1: years now, right, and at this point you have over 291 00:14:55,600 --> 00:14:59,000 Speaker 1: a thousand companies that have pledged to set what we 292 00:14:59,040 --> 00:15:01,640 Speaker 1: call a science based target, and that means that they 293 00:15:01,680 --> 00:15:04,640 Speaker 1: will reduce their emissions in line with a well below 294 00:15:04,720 --> 00:15:07,600 Speaker 1: two degree scenario, which is outlined in the Paris Agreement. 295 00:15:08,040 --> 00:15:11,200 Speaker 1: So theoretically, on paper, the way the Science Based Targets 296 00:15:11,240 --> 00:15:14,400 Speaker 1: Initiative works is if all the countries in the world 297 00:15:14,360 --> 00:15:16,760 Speaker 1: they're not doing their part to get us well below 298 00:15:16,840 --> 00:15:20,680 Speaker 1: two degrees, what if every single private sector player in 299 00:15:20,720 --> 00:15:22,800 Speaker 1: the entire world went ahead and set a target of 300 00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:25,680 Speaker 1: their own. That's the way that the Science Based Targets 301 00:15:25,680 --> 00:15:29,600 Speaker 1: Initiative is expected to work. This campaign, this initiative has 302 00:15:29,640 --> 00:15:33,000 Speaker 1: more momentum than any other sustainability commitment that currently exists 303 00:15:33,040 --> 00:15:36,080 Speaker 1: out there. So this year you've had over four companies 304 00:15:36,560 --> 00:15:39,240 Speaker 1: pledged to set one of these goals. For the net 305 00:15:39,360 --> 00:15:43,600 Speaker 1: zero component of the Science Based Targets Initiative, it's basically 306 00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:46,480 Speaker 1: going to be taking those goals that companies are setting 307 00:15:46,520 --> 00:15:49,480 Speaker 1: in line with the Parish trajectory and basically taking it 308 00:15:49,520 --> 00:15:52,560 Speaker 1: a step further. Um. So, Mark, you talked about kind 309 00:15:52,560 --> 00:15:56,760 Speaker 1: of the ways in which the Science Based Targets Initiative 310 00:15:57,080 --> 00:16:00,520 Speaker 1: outlines that you can hit your goal. First, inform a 311 00:16:00,520 --> 00:16:02,760 Speaker 1: a company that would join this initiative, they need to 312 00:16:02,760 --> 00:16:05,080 Speaker 1: go ahead and they need to reduce their gross emissions 313 00:16:05,640 --> 00:16:08,440 Speaker 1: in line with that Powish trajectory. Um. And again that's 314 00:16:08,480 --> 00:16:11,640 Speaker 1: something that any company with a science based target already 315 00:16:11,640 --> 00:16:14,560 Speaker 1: has to do. And then only then once you've kind 316 00:16:14,560 --> 00:16:17,720 Speaker 1: of reduced your gross emissions by you know, again pivoting 317 00:16:17,800 --> 00:16:21,720 Speaker 1: your your business model away from emissions intensive practices or 318 00:16:21,760 --> 00:16:25,200 Speaker 1: investing in low carbon technologies. Once you've done those types 319 00:16:25,240 --> 00:16:28,360 Speaker 1: of things, you can go ahead and purchase carbon credits 320 00:16:28,400 --> 00:16:30,920 Speaker 1: to kind of net out the remainder of your emissions 321 00:16:30,960 --> 00:16:34,360 Speaker 1: and take them to zero. But the key differentiator that 322 00:16:34,440 --> 00:16:38,240 Speaker 1: the Science Based Targets Initiative lays out is only carbon 323 00:16:38,280 --> 00:16:41,880 Speaker 1: credits that actually remove carbon from the atmosphere or sequester 324 00:16:41,960 --> 00:16:45,080 Speaker 1: or carbon can be used to achieve that target. So 325 00:16:45,120 --> 00:16:47,640 Speaker 1: if you think about a company like Walmart that just 326 00:16:47,720 --> 00:16:49,680 Speaker 1: made this announcement a couple of months ago that they're 327 00:16:49,680 --> 00:16:54,800 Speaker 1: going to basically planned several million acres of forest UM 328 00:16:54,840 --> 00:16:58,120 Speaker 1: and also restore I think a million square miles of ocean. 329 00:16:58,320 --> 00:17:01,200 Speaker 1: That type of activity will go ahead and create carbon 330 00:17:01,240 --> 00:17:05,400 Speaker 1: credits that again store sequester carbon. So those credits would 331 00:17:05,400 --> 00:17:08,320 Speaker 1: be accepted under the science Based Targets initiative. But if 332 00:17:08,359 --> 00:17:11,280 Speaker 1: I purchase a carbon credit that simply offsets my mission, 333 00:17:11,680 --> 00:17:15,639 Speaker 1: say from a clean energy project or clean cookstone distribution, 334 00:17:16,160 --> 00:17:19,520 Speaker 1: those would not be considered a viable means to achieve 335 00:17:19,560 --> 00:17:22,320 Speaker 1: your science based target. So they're gonna set again a 336 00:17:22,400 --> 00:17:25,960 Speaker 1: very stringent methodology for what is and what isn't accepted 337 00:17:26,000 --> 00:17:28,280 Speaker 1: to achieve these goals UM. And again, I think that's 338 00:17:28,280 --> 00:17:32,439 Speaker 1: going to turn this net zero landscape that we you know, 339 00:17:32,520 --> 00:17:34,399 Speaker 1: talk about in our report and we define as the 340 00:17:34,440 --> 00:17:38,320 Speaker 1: wild West of sustainability targets UM. It's going to take 341 00:17:38,320 --> 00:17:40,600 Speaker 1: this from a wild West to kind of again a 342 00:17:40,640 --> 00:17:47,920 Speaker 1: really standardized emission reductions movement. Are planting trees and doing 343 00:17:47,920 --> 00:17:50,760 Speaker 1: those sorts of projects in addition to actually working on 344 00:17:50,920 --> 00:17:54,280 Speaker 1: your businesses more direct emissions to what they do day today. 345 00:17:54,440 --> 00:17:57,399 Speaker 1: Is that proving to be increasingly popular? It is if 346 00:17:57,440 --> 00:18:01,560 Speaker 1: you look at the existing landscape of of carbon credits 347 00:18:01,800 --> 00:18:05,680 Speaker 1: UM in the market. Forestry projects, which we broadly abbreviate 348 00:18:05,760 --> 00:18:09,160 Speaker 1: as red plus because there's so many different kind of 349 00:18:09,840 --> 00:18:13,679 Speaker 1: projects that fit into this category, including agriculture. Red plus 350 00:18:13,680 --> 00:18:17,200 Speaker 1: projects make up about a quarter of the total carbon 351 00:18:17,200 --> 00:18:20,640 Speaker 1: offset market today. That sector is growing faster than any 352 00:18:20,640 --> 00:18:24,800 Speaker 1: other one. So energy generation projects, you know, from clean energy, 353 00:18:25,280 --> 00:18:28,199 Speaker 1: those are the most common projects that exist, but a 354 00:18:28,200 --> 00:18:31,520 Speaker 1: lot of those are legacy projects and they've existed for 355 00:18:31,520 --> 00:18:33,960 Speaker 1: for you know, a decade now or more than a 356 00:18:34,000 --> 00:18:37,639 Speaker 1: decade um, and they actually came from compliance carbon markets 357 00:18:37,640 --> 00:18:40,160 Speaker 1: long ago, and some of those credits have been earmarked 358 00:18:40,240 --> 00:18:43,440 Speaker 1: for corporations to use. So that's the biggest sector now. 359 00:18:43,480 --> 00:18:45,600 Speaker 1: But if you look at what's growing the fastest, it's 360 00:18:45,640 --> 00:18:49,840 Speaker 1: definitely forestry projects um. And you know, there's the opportunity 361 00:18:49,920 --> 00:18:53,920 Speaker 1: to generate carbon credits from forestry projects all around the world. 362 00:18:54,040 --> 00:18:56,399 Speaker 1: I mean, that's definitely one of the exciting um and 363 00:18:56,440 --> 00:18:58,640 Speaker 1: one of the biggest drivers for for companies to look 364 00:18:58,640 --> 00:19:01,200 Speaker 1: at this segment of the mark it. You mentioned ocean 365 00:19:01,200 --> 00:19:04,600 Speaker 1: as well, So is that like areas where they're seaweed 366 00:19:04,640 --> 00:19:08,040 Speaker 1: and seaweed is seen as a absorbing carbon or is 367 00:19:08,080 --> 00:19:10,560 Speaker 1: there something else there? So I would say that anything 368 00:19:10,600 --> 00:19:13,280 Speaker 1: related to ocean is kind of a niche part of 369 00:19:13,320 --> 00:19:16,720 Speaker 1: the carbon markets now, you know. Again, I think Walmart's 370 00:19:16,720 --> 00:19:19,359 Speaker 1: announcement was pretty groundbreaking. They want to be what they 371 00:19:19,400 --> 00:19:23,640 Speaker 1: call a regenerative company moving forward. I don't think that 372 00:19:23,800 --> 00:19:28,680 Speaker 1: ocean and water related carbon projects are going to be 373 00:19:28,760 --> 00:19:31,200 Speaker 1: this this huge sector moving forward. I think again, there's 374 00:19:31,200 --> 00:19:33,639 Speaker 1: gonna be a lot more focus on on four stream 375 00:19:33,680 --> 00:19:37,560 Speaker 1: agriculture because there's a huge opportunity to sequester and store 376 00:19:37,720 --> 00:19:40,600 Speaker 1: large amounts of carbon. But yeah, that's definitely you know, 377 00:19:40,720 --> 00:19:43,239 Speaker 1: A way that companies can kind of again serve as 378 00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:46,560 Speaker 1: a trailblazer in this area is is purchasing carbon credits 379 00:19:46,720 --> 00:19:49,960 Speaker 1: from brand new projects that you know, other companies aren't 380 00:19:49,960 --> 00:19:53,200 Speaker 1: already looking into. One of my favorite episodes we've done 381 00:19:53,480 --> 00:19:55,159 Speaker 1: it was a few months ago with you and it 382 00:19:55,200 --> 00:19:58,359 Speaker 1: was about carbon offsets and we talked about red plus 383 00:19:58,400 --> 00:20:03,160 Speaker 1: in there, and we talked about the difficulty of certifying 384 00:20:03,240 --> 00:20:06,600 Speaker 1: these projects. I imagine it's the same thing here, right, 385 00:20:06,680 --> 00:20:10,040 Speaker 1: Who is going to be certifying these carbon credits that 386 00:20:10,160 --> 00:20:13,640 Speaker 1: the company says they have or that an investor wants 387 00:20:13,640 --> 00:20:16,680 Speaker 1: to see is proven. So in terms of carbon credits, 388 00:20:16,800 --> 00:20:20,399 Speaker 1: all the certification will be carried out by the four 389 00:20:20,560 --> 00:20:25,119 Speaker 1: major registries that kind of preside over the voluntary carbon market. 390 00:20:25,280 --> 00:20:28,960 Speaker 1: So the Verified Carbon Standard is the largest. Then you 391 00:20:29,000 --> 00:20:32,080 Speaker 1: have the Gold Standard, the Climate Action Reserve, and the 392 00:20:32,119 --> 00:20:36,720 Speaker 1: American Carbon Registry. So those four markets will again really 393 00:20:36,880 --> 00:20:39,600 Speaker 1: make sure that every carbon credit that is that is 394 00:20:39,680 --> 00:20:43,760 Speaker 1: created comes from a verified, legitimate project. So companies will 395 00:20:43,800 --> 00:20:46,720 Speaker 1: will continue to rely on those registries. But there's going 396 00:20:46,760 --> 00:20:50,480 Speaker 1: to need to be a channel of communication opened between 397 00:20:50,520 --> 00:20:52,960 Speaker 1: some of these net zero initiatives that I've talked about, 398 00:20:53,280 --> 00:20:56,640 Speaker 1: like the Science Based Targets initiative and Transformed to net 399 00:20:56,720 --> 00:21:00,280 Speaker 1: zero and some of these other corporate lead initiatives. There's 400 00:21:00,320 --> 00:21:02,280 Speaker 1: going to need to be, you know, again an open 401 00:21:02,359 --> 00:21:05,280 Speaker 1: channel of communication so that when a registry says that 402 00:21:05,320 --> 00:21:08,760 Speaker 1: a carbon credit is permitted, that those net zero initiatives 403 00:21:08,800 --> 00:21:10,960 Speaker 1: are made aware of that, and therefore they can go 404 00:21:11,000 --> 00:21:14,080 Speaker 1: ahead and and basically put their seal of approval on 405 00:21:14,119 --> 00:21:17,480 Speaker 1: a company achieving in net zero target um. So that's something, 406 00:21:17,560 --> 00:21:20,040 Speaker 1: you know, a very important development that will need to 407 00:21:20,040 --> 00:21:22,919 Speaker 1: see in the market moving forward. Have you seen startups 408 00:21:23,520 --> 00:21:26,240 Speaker 1: pop up, you know to either subcontract to these net 409 00:21:26,320 --> 00:21:29,879 Speaker 1: zero initiatives or are the initiatives, you know, doing this 410 00:21:29,920 --> 00:21:32,960 Speaker 1: in house or how's that going to work? No startups 411 00:21:32,960 --> 00:21:35,800 Speaker 1: that are focused specifically on net zero. If you again, 412 00:21:35,800 --> 00:21:37,439 Speaker 1: if you want to go back to the carbon markets, 413 00:21:37,480 --> 00:21:41,320 Speaker 1: there's a lot of really exciting things happening to further 414 00:21:41,440 --> 00:21:45,080 Speaker 1: improve the measurability of carbon credits. So you know, if 415 00:21:45,080 --> 00:21:47,959 Speaker 1: I plant that tree in that rainforest, actually you know, 416 00:21:48,000 --> 00:21:51,080 Speaker 1: actively measuring how much carbon that tree is storing and 417 00:21:51,160 --> 00:21:53,120 Speaker 1: also you know, making sure that that tree is still 418 00:21:53,160 --> 00:21:55,480 Speaker 1: there ten years from now. UM. So you have really 419 00:21:55,480 --> 00:21:58,800 Speaker 1: cool companies like Pachama UM that are looking at light 420 00:21:59,000 --> 00:22:02,600 Speaker 1: R and SAT to like imagery and artificial intelligence and 421 00:22:02,600 --> 00:22:07,919 Speaker 1: and all these emerging technologies two more actively measure carbon 422 00:22:08,160 --> 00:22:11,119 Speaker 1: storage within the in the carbon markets. UM. And then 423 00:22:11,119 --> 00:22:13,600 Speaker 1: you also have a company like Nori that's awful offering 424 00:22:14,119 --> 00:22:17,280 Speaker 1: very similar technology for the agriculture sector. So again, if 425 00:22:17,280 --> 00:22:20,160 Speaker 1: you think of something like regenerative agriculture being able to 426 00:22:20,200 --> 00:22:24,719 Speaker 1: actively measure carbon sequestration from those processes, that's what these 427 00:22:24,720 --> 00:22:27,119 Speaker 1: startups are focused on. And I think you know again 428 00:22:27,160 --> 00:22:30,760 Speaker 1: they're those companies operate in the carbon markets. But the 429 00:22:30,800 --> 00:22:33,760 Speaker 1: carbon markets are going to be so important for hitting 430 00:22:33,760 --> 00:22:36,680 Speaker 1: a net zero goal that there's bound to be overlap, right. 431 00:22:36,920 --> 00:22:40,160 Speaker 1: The other thing I would just highlight is there's gonna 432 00:22:40,200 --> 00:22:44,320 Speaker 1: be a big reliance on on carbon capture technologies for 433 00:22:44,359 --> 00:22:47,040 Speaker 1: companies to hit in net zero. So a great example 434 00:22:47,119 --> 00:22:50,200 Speaker 1: is Occidental Petroleum, one of the big US oil majors. 435 00:22:50,920 --> 00:22:55,119 Speaker 1: They set a really exciting and groundbreaking net zero target 436 00:22:55,200 --> 00:22:58,119 Speaker 1: just last week. The reason it's groundbreaking is because it 437 00:22:58,160 --> 00:23:01,560 Speaker 1: addresses their Scope one and Scope twomissions, which actually come 438 00:23:01,640 --> 00:23:05,080 Speaker 1: from their direct operations, but then it also includes their 439 00:23:05,080 --> 00:23:07,879 Speaker 1: Scope three emissions and taking those down to zero. And 440 00:23:07,960 --> 00:23:11,920 Speaker 1: one of the interesting parts of Occidentals announcement is they're 441 00:23:11,920 --> 00:23:15,280 Speaker 1: taking what they call a contrarian approach to hitting their 442 00:23:15,320 --> 00:23:17,560 Speaker 1: net zero goal um. And that means they're actually they're 443 00:23:17,560 --> 00:23:20,199 Speaker 1: not going to pivot away from fossil fuels at all. Um. 444 00:23:20,200 --> 00:23:24,040 Speaker 1: They're gonna rely heavily on carbon capture and carbon removal 445 00:23:24,080 --> 00:23:27,679 Speaker 1: technologies to hit that goal. Their their target ears is 446 00:23:27,760 --> 00:23:31,200 Speaker 1: a ways away, right, it's not until so a lot 447 00:23:31,240 --> 00:23:33,480 Speaker 1: can change between now and then. But I think a 448 00:23:33,520 --> 00:23:36,080 Speaker 1: lot of companies are really, you know, putting a lot 449 00:23:36,080 --> 00:23:39,640 Speaker 1: of money and betting a lot on carbon removal technologies 450 00:23:39,680 --> 00:23:43,280 Speaker 1: like carbon capture utilization and storage coming within cost parity 451 00:23:43,280 --> 00:23:45,040 Speaker 1: in the next couple of years. Are you saying that 452 00:23:45,119 --> 00:23:48,520 Speaker 1: differs from other oil and gas companies in that the 453 00:23:48,560 --> 00:23:51,760 Speaker 1: other companies are pivoting away from oil and gas as 454 00:23:51,760 --> 00:23:55,240 Speaker 1: a course strategy. Exactly, and and just for some backgrounds, 455 00:23:55,320 --> 00:23:59,040 Speaker 1: so European oil majors have really lead when it comes 456 00:23:59,080 --> 00:24:02,880 Speaker 1: to setting net zero targets. And you know, again this 457 00:24:02,920 --> 00:24:05,520 Speaker 1: is kind of where this terminology issue comes into play. 458 00:24:05,560 --> 00:24:08,879 Speaker 1: In reality, most oil and gas companies are setting carbon 459 00:24:08,920 --> 00:24:13,320 Speaker 1: neutral targets, so they're pledging to reduce their carbon emissions 460 00:24:13,359 --> 00:24:16,560 Speaker 1: specifically from their own operations so their scope one in 461 00:24:16,560 --> 00:24:20,879 Speaker 1: their scope to emissions. Again, you have leading European oil 462 00:24:20,880 --> 00:24:25,960 Speaker 1: majors like Shell, Totel, VP any all these companies are 463 00:24:26,000 --> 00:24:29,240 Speaker 1: are setting carbon carbon neutral targets for their scope one 464 00:24:29,240 --> 00:24:32,160 Speaker 1: in scope to emissions. But you do have a handful 465 00:24:32,680 --> 00:24:36,040 Speaker 1: of oil and gas companies that are also setting net 466 00:24:36,119 --> 00:24:39,719 Speaker 1: zero targets that address their scope three emissions. Um So, 467 00:24:39,800 --> 00:24:43,560 Speaker 1: Equinor and Repsol are the two leading again European oil 468 00:24:43,600 --> 00:24:46,240 Speaker 1: majors that have done this, and now you have Occidental 469 00:24:46,520 --> 00:24:48,520 Speaker 1: um in the US that have done the same thing. 470 00:24:48,960 --> 00:24:51,560 Speaker 1: Um So these companies are really kind of paving the 471 00:24:51,600 --> 00:24:55,399 Speaker 1: way moving forward. But if you look at you actually 472 00:24:55,600 --> 00:24:58,280 Speaker 1: look at how some of these companies plan on on 473 00:24:58,320 --> 00:25:01,119 Speaker 1: achieving these goals. Yeah, Mark, like you mentioned, it's going 474 00:25:01,160 --> 00:25:03,800 Speaker 1: to be a pivot away from their traditional core business. 475 00:25:04,359 --> 00:25:06,960 Speaker 1: So Shell, you know, has made you know, they've announced 476 00:25:07,000 --> 00:25:09,280 Speaker 1: that they aim to be the world's largest power company 477 00:25:09,359 --> 00:25:11,760 Speaker 1: in the next couple of years. And they've invested heavily 478 00:25:11,760 --> 00:25:16,000 Speaker 1: in clean energy and electric vehicles and distributed energy UM 479 00:25:16,000 --> 00:25:18,560 Speaker 1: and a bunch of other exciting areas. You know, bp 480 00:25:19,200 --> 00:25:20,720 Speaker 1: UM has has said that they're going to be moving 481 00:25:20,720 --> 00:25:23,200 Speaker 1: away from oil entirely. And then you have a company 482 00:25:23,280 --> 00:25:27,200 Speaker 1: like Total that two months ago they signed the largest 483 00:25:27,640 --> 00:25:31,320 Speaker 1: corporate power purchase agreement, so they signed they signed an 484 00:25:31,359 --> 00:25:34,960 Speaker 1: agreement to purchase three giga watts of solar power in 485 00:25:35,119 --> 00:25:38,760 Speaker 1: Spain to offset their scope to emissions. UM in Total 486 00:25:38,920 --> 00:25:41,920 Speaker 1: has a much broader renewable energy goal where they want 487 00:25:41,920 --> 00:25:44,439 Speaker 1: to be a huge renewable energy developer as well, so 488 00:25:44,480 --> 00:25:47,200 Speaker 1: they want to sell power to utilities. So again, these 489 00:25:47,200 --> 00:25:50,320 Speaker 1: companies are are really making holistic changes in the way 490 00:25:50,359 --> 00:25:52,960 Speaker 1: they conduct business. I think that you know, the oil 491 00:25:53,000 --> 00:25:55,720 Speaker 1: and gas sectors is going to be impacted in this 492 00:25:55,760 --> 00:25:58,520 Speaker 1: way more than any other sector. Really, when I'm thinking 493 00:25:58,560 --> 00:26:00,880 Speaker 1: about the net zero targets in the benieth that are announcing. 494 00:26:00,920 --> 00:26:03,879 Speaker 1: You know, you previously mentioned about Amazon, and this has 495 00:26:03,920 --> 00:26:05,880 Speaker 1: been a pretty big year for Amazon. COVID has meant 496 00:26:05,920 --> 00:26:10,080 Speaker 1: a lot more packages being delivered. And meanwhile, um, I 497 00:26:10,119 --> 00:26:12,720 Speaker 1: think I did see that announcement just last week regarding 498 00:26:12,760 --> 00:26:15,919 Speaker 1: some of their recent initiatives in the carbon space. So 499 00:26:16,000 --> 00:26:20,160 Speaker 1: is that initiative something that's happening, you know, at a 500 00:26:20,280 --> 00:26:23,200 Speaker 1: very senior level that you know, Jeff Bezos ultimately is 501 00:26:23,600 --> 00:26:26,080 Speaker 1: handling very closely, or is it something that's kind of 502 00:26:26,480 --> 00:26:28,880 Speaker 1: deeper within the rest of the business is being given 503 00:26:28,920 --> 00:26:31,840 Speaker 1: to the individual business units to handle. I think this 504 00:26:31,880 --> 00:26:35,720 Speaker 1: is a thematic kind of internal area that we've that 505 00:26:35,760 --> 00:26:38,880 Speaker 1: we've seen within corporations, and you know, it applies to Amazon, 506 00:26:38,960 --> 00:26:42,040 Speaker 1: but it also applies to those oil and gas companies 507 00:26:42,040 --> 00:26:44,840 Speaker 1: that we were just talking about. Um. So just for 508 00:26:44,920 --> 00:26:48,280 Speaker 1: some context, when the company sets a clean energy goal 509 00:26:48,520 --> 00:26:51,960 Speaker 1: or a broader emission reductions target, you know, you need 510 00:26:52,040 --> 00:26:55,639 Speaker 1: input from all different you know, various internal departments to 511 00:26:55,680 --> 00:26:57,959 Speaker 1: achieve that goal, right, So you need to get your 512 00:26:57,960 --> 00:27:01,399 Speaker 1: accounting department on board. You need data from your facilities team, 513 00:27:01,480 --> 00:27:03,919 Speaker 1: you need your PR team on board. But kind of 514 00:27:03,920 --> 00:27:08,680 Speaker 1: the central team that is carrying out the sustainability strategy 515 00:27:08,720 --> 00:27:12,879 Speaker 1: is your sustainability department, right um, and they're working with 516 00:27:12,920 --> 00:27:16,119 Speaker 1: all these other departments in some way, shape or form. 517 00:27:16,240 --> 00:27:19,000 Speaker 1: The key difference between a net zero target and these 518 00:27:19,000 --> 00:27:21,840 Speaker 1: targets that I was just discussing is to your point 519 00:27:21,920 --> 00:27:25,040 Speaker 1: in that you need executive leadership to carry out these 520 00:27:25,080 --> 00:27:28,520 Speaker 1: types of goals. So again, for a company that is 521 00:27:28,560 --> 00:27:31,760 Speaker 1: heading is working on hitting in net zero target, that 522 00:27:31,880 --> 00:27:34,040 Speaker 1: means that they're going to make need to make holistic 523 00:27:34,119 --> 00:27:36,560 Speaker 1: changes in the way that they do business. So for 524 00:27:36,600 --> 00:27:39,439 Speaker 1: the oil and gas sector, that means moving away from 525 00:27:39,480 --> 00:27:44,159 Speaker 1: fossil fuels potentially. For utilities, that means moving into renewables. 526 00:27:44,160 --> 00:27:47,919 Speaker 1: For tech that means offering more software and other products 527 00:27:48,200 --> 00:27:51,040 Speaker 1: to help their customers decarbonize. And all these types of 528 00:27:51,119 --> 00:27:53,640 Speaker 1: huge changes that you know filter all the way down 529 00:27:53,640 --> 00:27:56,320 Speaker 1: even to R and D and product those really can't 530 00:27:56,359 --> 00:27:59,960 Speaker 1: be carried out unless you have executive level level leadership 531 00:28:00,000 --> 00:28:02,280 Speaker 1: on board. Amazon is a great example of that. So 532 00:28:02,800 --> 00:28:06,800 Speaker 1: they've developed this Climate Pledge initiative, but they also now 533 00:28:06,840 --> 00:28:09,120 Speaker 1: have this Climate Pledge fund. Right, it's this two billion 534 00:28:09,160 --> 00:28:12,160 Speaker 1: dollar fund where they're going to invest directly in startups 535 00:28:12,160 --> 00:28:15,480 Speaker 1: and other exciting technologies that are going to help companies 536 00:28:15,800 --> 00:28:19,040 Speaker 1: achieve net zero and Jeff Bezos is intimately involved in 537 00:28:19,080 --> 00:28:21,920 Speaker 1: that entire process. He just announced the first round last week, 538 00:28:22,000 --> 00:28:26,399 Speaker 1: right exactly exactly, So having that executive level buying is 539 00:28:26,400 --> 00:28:28,960 Speaker 1: really important. And we actually we looked at this in 540 00:28:28,960 --> 00:28:32,600 Speaker 1: our report. But I mentioned the Climate Action one hundred 541 00:28:32,640 --> 00:28:37,040 Speaker 1: plus before, and that's investors that are pressuring their portfolio 542 00:28:37,119 --> 00:28:40,760 Speaker 1: companies to decarbonize. And I realized this is a bit confusing, 543 00:28:40,840 --> 00:28:44,480 Speaker 1: but within the Climate Action one hundred plus, the portfolio 544 00:28:44,520 --> 00:28:47,800 Speaker 1: companies that are facing the most heat to decarbonize are 545 00:28:47,880 --> 00:28:51,440 Speaker 1: these one hundred and sixty one companies that have been 546 00:28:51,440 --> 00:28:54,160 Speaker 1: deemed as Focus companies, and they're considered to be the 547 00:28:54,160 --> 00:28:57,280 Speaker 1: heaviest emitting companies in the world, So they're the ones 548 00:28:57,320 --> 00:28:59,760 Speaker 1: that are facing the heat from investors the most. And 549 00:28:59,840 --> 00:29:02,360 Speaker 1: a lot of these companies have set in net zero targets. 550 00:29:02,880 --> 00:29:05,120 Speaker 1: I mean if you kind of look company by company 551 00:29:05,160 --> 00:29:07,880 Speaker 1: at those one hundred and sixty one Focus companies, over 552 00:29:08,000 --> 00:29:11,080 Speaker 1: three quarters of those companies now have a board seat 553 00:29:11,200 --> 00:29:14,600 Speaker 1: that is specifically focused around climate um So you now 554 00:29:14,640 --> 00:29:19,080 Speaker 1: have board level representation that's thinking about planning and executing 555 00:29:19,160 --> 00:29:22,120 Speaker 1: on a sustainability strategy. So I think that right there 556 00:29:22,160 --> 00:29:25,000 Speaker 1: is a is a testament to how important that executive 557 00:29:25,040 --> 00:29:28,480 Speaker 1: level leadership is with sustainability in general. But I would 558 00:29:28,520 --> 00:29:31,160 Speaker 1: say for net zero, it's it's not a nice to have, 559 00:29:31,280 --> 00:29:33,920 Speaker 1: it's it's a requirement. With all of these net zero 560 00:29:33,960 --> 00:29:37,320 Speaker 1: targets being made at the company level, I want to 561 00:29:37,360 --> 00:29:39,640 Speaker 1: know whether or not this is going to make a 562 00:29:39,640 --> 00:29:43,520 Speaker 1: big difference or a small difference if these companies actually 563 00:29:43,560 --> 00:29:46,240 Speaker 1: do end up getting to their net zero targets in 564 00:29:46,280 --> 00:29:48,719 Speaker 1: the timelines that they outline. So if you look at 565 00:29:48,760 --> 00:29:53,320 Speaker 1: the six leading European oil majors that have set a 566 00:29:53,320 --> 00:29:55,800 Speaker 1: again a carbon neutral goal for their scope one in 567 00:29:55,880 --> 00:30:01,720 Speaker 1: scope to emissions, so that's Shell, Totel, b Any, Repsol, 568 00:30:01,800 --> 00:30:04,720 Speaker 1: and equinor for them to just reduce their Scope one 569 00:30:04,720 --> 00:30:07,480 Speaker 1: and Scope two emissions, it would result in two hundred 570 00:30:07,520 --> 00:30:10,320 Speaker 1: and sixty five million metric tons of c O two 571 00:30:10,400 --> 00:30:14,040 Speaker 1: removed on an annual basis, and again very similar to 572 00:30:14,040 --> 00:30:16,760 Speaker 1: to Spain's annual missions. If you broaden that out and 573 00:30:16,800 --> 00:30:19,360 Speaker 1: you look at the scope three emissions of the oil 574 00:30:19,400 --> 00:30:22,480 Speaker 1: and gas sector, You're looking at several orders of magnitude 575 00:30:22,800 --> 00:30:26,680 Speaker 1: more decarbonization from those six companies alone. So the impact 576 00:30:26,760 --> 00:30:29,160 Speaker 1: is is huge. And just to throw out one more 577 00:30:29,240 --> 00:30:32,040 Speaker 1: number here, so I mentioned those one hundred and sixty 578 00:30:32,040 --> 00:30:35,560 Speaker 1: one focused companies that are outlined in the Climate Action 579 00:30:35,600 --> 00:30:40,680 Speaker 1: one hundred. So they actually they estimate that those companies, 580 00:30:40,720 --> 00:30:44,400 Speaker 1: those one hundred and sixty one focused companies are responsible 581 00:30:44,480 --> 00:30:48,880 Speaker 1: for eight of industrial missions in the world. So again, 582 00:30:48,920 --> 00:30:51,960 Speaker 1: a huge amount of impact can be made by getting 583 00:30:52,000 --> 00:30:55,120 Speaker 1: the private sector to set net zero targets. So like 584 00:30:55,200 --> 00:30:57,760 Speaker 1: a lot of Spains, a lot of Spains, a lot 585 00:30:57,800 --> 00:31:00,320 Speaker 1: of Spains, a lot of Frances I love, I love 586 00:31:00,360 --> 00:31:03,720 Speaker 1: my country comparisons. There you go. I guess I have 587 00:31:03,800 --> 00:31:06,600 Speaker 1: one more question is this was a primery, this report, 588 00:31:06,760 --> 00:31:08,560 Speaker 1: So if you haven't looked at it yet, everybody, please 589 00:31:08,560 --> 00:31:11,120 Speaker 1: go look at it. It's really fantastic. What are the 590 00:31:11,200 --> 00:31:14,360 Speaker 1: next questions or next reports you want to do in 591 00:31:14,400 --> 00:31:17,640 Speaker 1: this in this theme? So I think the thing that 592 00:31:17,680 --> 00:31:19,480 Speaker 1: will continue to do, at at a minimum in the 593 00:31:19,520 --> 00:31:23,200 Speaker 1: short term is as new companies set net zero targets, which, 594 00:31:23,280 --> 00:31:26,520 Speaker 1: like Danta mentioned, is at this point basically a weekly occurrence. 595 00:31:26,920 --> 00:31:30,719 Speaker 1: We want to continue to make those those company level comparisons. Again, 596 00:31:31,080 --> 00:31:34,720 Speaker 1: for an investor, there's there's so much terminology, there's such 597 00:31:34,920 --> 00:31:38,480 Speaker 1: little lack of regulation currently that it becomes very difficult 598 00:31:38,520 --> 00:31:41,440 Speaker 1: for investors to compare these targets apples to apples. So 599 00:31:41,480 --> 00:31:42,960 Speaker 1: I think, you know, one of the things that we 600 00:31:43,000 --> 00:31:45,200 Speaker 1: want to continue to do is is look at these 601 00:31:45,200 --> 00:31:48,160 Speaker 1: companies and see who's setting the most ambitious goal and 602 00:31:48,160 --> 00:31:50,560 Speaker 1: and why is that the case. I would say that 603 00:31:50,720 --> 00:31:52,800 Speaker 1: the next kind of big thing that we're waiting for 604 00:31:52,880 --> 00:31:56,240 Speaker 1: is again that that frameworker that methodology to be laid 605 00:31:56,240 --> 00:31:59,200 Speaker 1: out by the Science Based Targets Initiative, because that's going 606 00:31:59,240 --> 00:32:01,360 Speaker 1: to really kind of push this into hyper drive. It's 607 00:32:01,360 --> 00:32:04,160 Speaker 1: going to expedite a lot of companies to start making 608 00:32:04,160 --> 00:32:06,720 Speaker 1: these goals and them again, it's gonna go along wayne 609 00:32:07,040 --> 00:32:10,400 Speaker 1: kind of creating and standardizing targets. So those are kind 610 00:32:10,400 --> 00:32:13,280 Speaker 1: of the main things. And then I would just highlight 611 00:32:13,360 --> 00:32:16,560 Speaker 1: in the report, we look at the ways that leading 612 00:32:16,600 --> 00:32:21,320 Speaker 1: tech companies, materials companies, utilities, and oil and gas companies 613 00:32:21,360 --> 00:32:24,040 Speaker 1: can achieve their targets right, because it's it's different for 614 00:32:24,080 --> 00:32:26,760 Speaker 1: every single sector. But I would just add that, of course, 615 00:32:26,800 --> 00:32:29,000 Speaker 1: you know a lot of the research that BNF does 616 00:32:29,000 --> 00:32:32,360 Speaker 1: on the technology side and our forecasts, UM, a lot 617 00:32:32,400 --> 00:32:35,720 Speaker 1: of that plays really well into the strategies and the 618 00:32:35,720 --> 00:32:39,760 Speaker 1: thought processes of companies that have set in the zero target, 619 00:32:39,920 --> 00:32:41,360 Speaker 1: and they're gonna need to rely on a lot of 620 00:32:41,360 --> 00:32:43,600 Speaker 1: the things that be NF writes about. So that's something 621 00:32:43,600 --> 00:32:46,440 Speaker 1: that will continue to monitor as well as as technology 622 00:32:46,440 --> 00:32:50,880 Speaker 1: costs come down, things like carbon credits get boosts and legitimacy, 623 00:32:51,320 --> 00:32:53,120 Speaker 1: all those types of things are prompts for us to 624 00:32:53,240 --> 00:32:55,720 Speaker 1: continue to look into this more Peppered throughout the report, 625 00:32:55,760 --> 00:32:59,760 Speaker 1: you have several mini tables that include leaders in laggards 626 00:32:59,760 --> 00:33:02,959 Speaker 1: and each sector. Should we expect to see some rankings coming. 627 00:33:03,200 --> 00:33:05,560 Speaker 1: I would certainly love to do that. I will say 628 00:33:05,720 --> 00:33:09,000 Speaker 1: even making those tables alone was very difficult, and I 629 00:33:09,000 --> 00:33:11,800 Speaker 1: think we did have to leave the important caveat under 630 00:33:11,800 --> 00:33:14,600 Speaker 1: each of these tables that all these companies really are 631 00:33:14,680 --> 00:33:17,040 Speaker 1: technically leaders, right UM, And when we call a company 632 00:33:17,040 --> 00:33:20,760 Speaker 1: a laggerate here, they're a laborate among the again eight 633 00:33:20,880 --> 00:33:23,080 Speaker 1: or nine oil and gas companies that are setting a 634 00:33:23,120 --> 00:33:26,200 Speaker 1: carbon neutral goal, or the five big tech companies that 635 00:33:26,240 --> 00:33:29,480 Speaker 1: are really kind of trailblazing here. Um, so I think 636 00:33:29,480 --> 00:33:31,520 Speaker 1: that's important to do. But yeah, I think I think 637 00:33:31,560 --> 00:33:36,400 Speaker 1: it's essential again for investors and sustainability professionals to get 638 00:33:36,400 --> 00:33:38,720 Speaker 1: a better idea of if I look at five targets, 639 00:33:39,080 --> 00:33:40,640 Speaker 1: which of these is the best and which of these 640 00:33:40,680 --> 00:33:42,840 Speaker 1: is the worst. And I think that we are you know, 641 00:33:42,880 --> 00:33:46,080 Speaker 1: BNF is well positioned to make a statement on that. Kyle, 642 00:33:46,120 --> 00:33:48,440 Speaker 1: Thanks for joining us. Happy, happy to talk to you guys. 643 00:33:56,280 --> 00:33:58,840 Speaker 1: Today's episode of Switched On was edited by Rex Warner 644 00:33:58,960 --> 00:34:01,800 Speaker 1: with Grace Stoke Media. Bloombergnia F is a service provided 645 00:34:01,800 --> 00:34:04,680 Speaker 1: by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates. This recording does 646 00:34:04,720 --> 00:34:07,760 Speaker 1: not constitute, nor should it be construed as investment advice, 647 00:34:07,880 --> 00:34:11,400 Speaker 1: investment recommendations, or a recommendation as to an investment or 648 00:34:11,440 --> 00:34:15,000 Speaker 1: other strategy. Bloombergenia should not be considered as information sufficient 649 00:34:15,080 --> 00:34:18,200 Speaker 1: upon which to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance 650 00:34:18,320 --> 00:34:21,560 Speaker 1: LP nor any of its affiliates makes any representation or 651 00:34:21,560 --> 00:34:24,480 Speaker 1: warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information 652 00:34:24,560 --> 00:34:27,240 Speaker 1: contained in this recording, and any liability as a result 653 00:34:27,280 --> 00:34:39,279 Speaker 1: of this recording. Did express the disclaim