1 00:00:02,800 --> 00:00:08,840 Speaker 1: Zone media, I'm better off line and this is ed Zetron. Wait, 2 00:00:20,680 --> 00:00:23,480 Speaker 1: that's right, folks. We're here for part two of our 3 00:00:23,560 --> 00:00:27,040 Speaker 1: multi part series about the final casualty of the incertification 4 00:00:27,200 --> 00:00:30,560 Speaker 1: process the financial markets. You see, we're in a world 5 00:00:30,560 --> 00:00:33,800 Speaker 1: where because companies can no longer stimulate growth by just 6 00:00:33,880 --> 00:00:37,800 Speaker 1: script mining their individual and business users, they've now resorted 7 00:00:37,840 --> 00:00:42,080 Speaker 1: to just lying. And lying is an interesting word because 8 00:00:42,120 --> 00:00:44,800 Speaker 1: they will claim we're not lying, we used words to 9 00:00:44,880 --> 00:00:49,080 Speaker 1: vaguely avoid telling you the truth, or we were technically 10 00:00:49,120 --> 00:00:51,640 Speaker 1: true in what we say. There are various kinds of 11 00:00:51,680 --> 00:00:54,160 Speaker 1: lies that don't have to just be I told you 12 00:00:54,200 --> 00:00:58,240 Speaker 1: something that was not categorically yes or no force. I mean, 13 00:00:58,720 --> 00:01:01,440 Speaker 1: you've spoken to other people, but they will say this 14 00:01:01,440 --> 00:01:05,280 Speaker 1: for legal purposes. So fine, it's not technically lying, it's 15 00:01:05,440 --> 00:01:08,399 Speaker 1: just bullshit. But I think it's important to give you 16 00:01:08,440 --> 00:01:11,000 Speaker 1: some examples and to talk about how analyst in the 17 00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:15,399 Speaker 1: media simply allowed these lights to propagate unchecked. Let me 18 00:01:15,440 --> 00:01:18,800 Speaker 1: set the scene. Our story begins on September tenth, twenty 19 00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:21,560 Speaker 1: twenty five. I was for some reason in Los Angeles 20 00:01:21,560 --> 00:01:24,600 Speaker 1: that I can't remember. Maybe a concert, maybe an interview. 21 00:01:24,800 --> 00:01:29,280 Speaker 1: Truly don't know. Oracle announced its unfillable, unpayable, three hundred 22 00:01:29,319 --> 00:01:32,160 Speaker 1: billion dollar deal with open AI, which they didn't have 23 00:01:32,160 --> 00:01:34,360 Speaker 1: the capacity to serve, and open a I didn't have 24 00:01:34,400 --> 00:01:36,280 Speaker 1: the cash to pay them, and this led to a 25 00:01:36,319 --> 00:01:39,840 Speaker 1: thirty percent or more bump in stock price. Analysts who 26 00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:43,280 Speaker 1: should extensibly be able to count, called it momentous and 27 00:01:43,319 --> 00:01:46,640 Speaker 1: said they were in shock. On September twenty second, twenty 28 00:01:46,680 --> 00:01:52,240 Speaker 1: twenty five, CEO Saffracats stepped down. She stepped down from oraclen. 29 00:01:52,680 --> 00:01:57,280 Speaker 1: Nobody seemed to think that was weird or suspicious or worrying. 30 00:01:57,440 --> 00:01:59,920 Speaker 1: This was this was meant to be the beginning of 31 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:03,480 Speaker 1: the AI like boom too. I mean, we kind of 32 00:02:03,520 --> 00:02:05,960 Speaker 1: really in the AI bool, but this was meant to 33 00:02:06,040 --> 00:02:09,000 Speaker 1: be the even more bigger one, right, Why would you 34 00:02:09,320 --> 00:02:11,720 Speaker 1: step down? Why would you step down? Why would you 35 00:02:11,760 --> 00:02:14,560 Speaker 1: step down? And then have two guys like two different 36 00:02:14,600 --> 00:02:18,040 Speaker 1: They have co CEOs. Very sorry to my friend Jim, 37 00:02:18,120 --> 00:02:21,800 Speaker 1: but co CEOs don't usually do well. Look at BlackBerry. 38 00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:25,000 Speaker 1: But anyway, two months after that, Oracle stock was down 39 00:02:25,040 --> 00:02:28,720 Speaker 1: forty percent, with investors worried about Oracle's growing capex, which 40 00:02:28,760 --> 00:02:31,200 Speaker 1: is surprising. I suppose if you didn't think about how 41 00:02:31,280 --> 00:02:34,120 Speaker 1: Oracle would build the data centers to serve the three 42 00:02:34,200 --> 00:02:39,320 Speaker 1: hundred billion dollar deal. A makes me feel insane when 43 00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:42,320 Speaker 1: I say these things out how loud, But just to 44 00:02:42,360 --> 00:02:47,000 Speaker 1: be clear, anybody who traded on that got burned. Now 45 00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:50,160 Speaker 1: another thing happened on September twenty second, twenty twenty five, 46 00:02:50,480 --> 00:02:53,560 Speaker 1: in Vidio announced what they called a strategic partnership to 47 00:02:53,600 --> 00:02:56,919 Speaker 1: invest up to one hundred billion dollars and build ten 48 00:02:57,040 --> 00:03:00,000 Speaker 1: gigawads of data centers with open Ai, with the first 49 00:03:00,200 --> 00:03:02,400 Speaker 1: to gigawatt to be deployed in the second half of 50 00:03:02,440 --> 00:03:06,480 Speaker 1: twenty twenty six. Just a few questions from me personally, 51 00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:09,480 Speaker 1: where would the data centers go, How would open Ai 52 00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:12,959 Speaker 1: afford to build them? How would open Ai build a 53 00:03:13,000 --> 00:03:17,080 Speaker 1: gigawa in data centers in less than a year? Don't 54 00:03:17,120 --> 00:03:21,000 Speaker 1: ask questions. Pig back in your cage now. In video 55 00:03:21,080 --> 00:03:23,680 Speaker 1: stock bumped from one hundred and seventy five point three 56 00:03:23,880 --> 00:03:25,720 Speaker 1: to one hundred and eighty one dollars in the space 57 00:03:25,760 --> 00:03:28,080 Speaker 1: of a day. Said they're very normally moving on and 58 00:03:28,120 --> 00:03:29,839 Speaker 1: the media wrote about the story as if the deal 59 00:03:29,960 --> 00:03:32,360 Speaker 1: was done, with CNBC claiming that and I quote the 60 00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:35,760 Speaker 1: initial ten billion dollar tranch was expected to close within 61 00:03:35,800 --> 00:03:38,960 Speaker 1: a month or so once the transaction had been finalized. 62 00:03:39,160 --> 00:03:41,760 Speaker 1: I read at least ten stories that said in Video 63 00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:45,640 Speaker 1: had invested one hundred billion dollars in open Ai. Analysts 64 00:03:45,640 --> 00:03:47,680 Speaker 1: would go on to say that in Video was locking 65 00:03:47,720 --> 00:03:50,400 Speaker 1: in open Ai and I quote again to remain the 66 00:03:50,400 --> 00:03:54,120 Speaker 1: backbone of the next gen AI infrastructure, and that demand 67 00:03:54,160 --> 00:03:57,240 Speaker 1: for in video GPUs is effectively baked into the development 68 00:03:57,280 --> 00:04:00,960 Speaker 1: of frontier AI models, and that the deal, the partnership 69 00:04:00,960 --> 00:04:04,000 Speaker 1: between the two companies and Validate did in Vidia's long 70 00:04:04,080 --> 00:04:07,280 Speaker 1: term growth numbers with so much volume and compute capacity. 71 00:04:07,800 --> 00:04:10,200 Speaker 1: Others would say that in Video was enabling open Ai 72 00:04:10,280 --> 00:04:14,320 Speaker 1: to meet surging demand. Three analysts, rask Gone at Bernstein Laurier, 73 00:04:14,480 --> 00:04:17,640 Speaker 1: DA Davidson, and Wagner at Aaptors Capital all raised circular 74 00:04:17,680 --> 00:04:19,920 Speaker 1: deal concerns, but they were in the minority, and those 75 00:04:19,920 --> 00:04:22,880 Speaker 1: concerns were still often buried under buoyant optimism around the 76 00:04:22,880 --> 00:04:26,640 Speaker 1: prospects of the company, and nobody just fucking saying the words, Hey, 77 00:04:26,760 --> 00:04:29,680 Speaker 1: no one could afford any of the Oracle can't afford 78 00:04:29,720 --> 00:04:32,000 Speaker 1: to build it, they don't have the capacity, they ust 79 00:04:32,040 --> 00:04:35,440 Speaker 1: can't get paid by open Ai. Open Ai doesn't have 80 00:04:35,480 --> 00:04:39,640 Speaker 1: the money. But in Vidia, this deal also doesn't make sense. 81 00:04:39,720 --> 00:04:42,159 Speaker 1: You know. It feels like open ai is just promising 82 00:04:42,200 --> 00:04:46,320 Speaker 1: everyone's stuff they can't afford. All of these things seemed 83 00:04:46,360 --> 00:04:48,679 Speaker 1: like very obvious questions, but people just kind of clapped 84 00:04:48,680 --> 00:04:50,840 Speaker 1: their hands and went, fuck, yeah, we're doing Ai even 85 00:04:50,880 --> 00:04:54,240 Speaker 1: more now. But then there was this other thing about 86 00:04:54,240 --> 00:04:58,359 Speaker 1: the Nvidia deal. It's this quincy teeny weeny quincy little 87 00:04:58,400 --> 00:05:02,800 Speaker 1: problem one little pro everyone about the Invidia deal. The 88 00:05:02,839 --> 00:05:05,440 Speaker 1: deal that everyone said was done. It was a letter 89 00:05:05,480 --> 00:05:08,560 Speaker 1: of intent. It said so in the announcement and on 90 00:05:08,600 --> 00:05:11,680 Speaker 1: Invidia's November runnings it said that it had entered into 91 00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:15,520 Speaker 1: a letter of intent with an opportunity to invest in 92 00:05:15,560 --> 00:05:18,880 Speaker 1: open Ai. It turns out the deal didn't exist, and 93 00:05:18,960 --> 00:05:22,800 Speaker 1: everybody fell for him. Invidia hasn't sent a diamond, likely won't. 94 00:05:23,120 --> 00:05:25,359 Speaker 1: A letter of intent is also known as the concept 95 00:05:25,400 --> 00:05:28,560 Speaker 1: of a plan. A little over two weeks later, on 96 00:05:28,600 --> 00:05:32,240 Speaker 1: October first, twenty twenty five, Reuters reported that Samsung and 97 00:05:32,400 --> 00:05:35,520 Speaker 1: sk Heinex had signed letters of intent to supply memory 98 00:05:35,600 --> 00:05:39,640 Speaker 1: chips for open AI's data centers, with South Korea's Presidential 99 00:05:39,640 --> 00:05:42,960 Speaker 1: Office saying that said chip demand was expected to reach 100 00:05:43,279 --> 00:05:46,520 Speaker 1: nine hundred thousand wafers a month, with and I quote 101 00:05:46,640 --> 00:05:49,560 Speaker 1: much of that from Samsung and esk Heinex, which was 102 00:05:49,640 --> 00:05:53,800 Speaker 1: quickly extrapolated to meet around forty percent of global dram 103 00:05:53,839 --> 00:05:57,800 Speaker 1: outpum stocks in both companies to quote Reuter's Sword, with 104 00:05:57,920 --> 00:06:00,680 Speaker 1: Samsung climbing four percent and sk Heinex more than twelve 105 00:06:00,680 --> 00:06:04,440 Speaker 1: percent to an all time high. Analyst Jeff Kim KB 106 00:06:04,560 --> 00:06:07,560 Speaker 1: Securities said that and I quote, there have been worries 107 00:06:07,600 --> 00:06:11,880 Speaker 1: about high bandwidth memory prices falling next year on intensifying competition, 108 00:06:11,960 --> 00:06:14,640 Speaker 1: but such worries will now be easily resolved by the 109 00:06:14,760 --> 00:06:18,480 Speaker 1: strategic partnership, adding that since Stargate is a key project 110 00:06:18,560 --> 00:06:21,680 Speaker 1: led by President Trump, wrong lie, there also is a 111 00:06:21,720 --> 00:06:24,920 Speaker 1: possibility that partnership will have a positive impact on South 112 00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:28,839 Speaker 1: Korea's trade negotiations with the US, which is just to 113 00:06:28,880 --> 00:06:33,839 Speaker 1: be clear, total and utter bollocks. It's wank, it's scrap, 114 00:06:34,040 --> 00:06:37,800 Speaker 1: it's nonsense, boop them above all the technical terms. Donald 115 00:06:37,839 --> 00:06:40,840 Speaker 1: Trump is not leading Stargate. Stargate is a name used 116 00:06:40,880 --> 00:06:43,440 Speaker 1: to refer to data centers built by open Ai, by 117 00:06:43,440 --> 00:06:45,719 Speaker 1: which I mean other people building them for open Ai. 118 00:06:46,279 --> 00:06:49,120 Speaker 1: KB Securities is around forty three billion dollars of assets 119 00:06:49,200 --> 00:06:52,360 Speaker 1: under management. This is the level of analysis you get 120 00:06:52,360 --> 00:06:56,440 Speaker 1: from these analysts. This is how much they know. There 121 00:06:56,480 --> 00:07:00,200 Speaker 1: are people that study JoJo's bizarre adventure that have more 122 00:07:00,240 --> 00:07:04,520 Speaker 1: economic analysis than any of these fucking people. Most Star 123 00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:07,240 Speaker 1: Wars fans who have just memorized all the names of 124 00:07:07,279 --> 00:07:09,800 Speaker 1: the glop shittos of the world have better analysis than this. 125 00:07:11,280 --> 00:07:14,280 Speaker 1: But nevertheless, you'd think, right that these companies have made 126 00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:16,600 Speaker 1: all this noise, and they've talked about this stuff, the 127 00:07:16,640 --> 00:07:19,120 Speaker 1: Presidential Office all involved, you think we'd be able to 128 00:07:19,240 --> 00:07:22,559 Speaker 1: get a whiff of that on their earning scores, right well. 129 00:07:23,400 --> 00:07:26,560 Speaker 1: On I sk Hihenex's October twenty ninth, twenty twenty five 130 00:07:26,560 --> 00:07:30,480 Speaker 1: earning score. Weeks after the announcement, it's CEO Kim Wu 131 00:07:30,640 --> 00:07:33,480 Speaker 1: Yun was asked a question about high bandwidth memory growth 132 00:07:33,480 --> 00:07:38,120 Speaker 1: by Eskkim from Daiwa Securities and I quote, so this 133 00:07:38,280 --> 00:07:41,120 Speaker 1: is this is SKKM asking the question. Thank you very 134 00:07:41,200 --> 00:07:43,720 Speaker 1: much for taking my question. It is on demand now. 135 00:07:43,760 --> 00:07:45,960 Speaker 1: There have been a series of announcements of GPU and 136 00:07:46,000 --> 00:07:49,240 Speaker 1: a six supply cooperation between big techs and AI companies, 137 00:07:49,480 --> 00:07:53,080 Speaker 1: fueling expectations of further AI market growth. Then, against this 138 00:07:53,160 --> 00:07:56,040 Speaker 1: back drop, what is the company's outlook on high bend 139 00:07:56,080 --> 00:07:59,360 Speaker 1: with memory demand as well as a broadening of the 140 00:07:59,360 --> 00:08:03,040 Speaker 1: customer base, es sk Heinex. Thank you for the question. Now, 141 00:08:03,080 --> 00:08:06,080 Speaker 1: with upward adjustment in big text CAPEX and increasing investment 142 00:08:06,280 --> 00:08:09,400 Speaker 1: by AI companies, the high bandwidth memory market, even by 143 00:08:09,400 --> 00:08:11,800 Speaker 1: a conservative vestmer, will keep growing at an average of 144 00:08:12,360 --> 00:08:14,960 Speaker 1: over thirty percent for the next five years. I will 145 00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:17,520 Speaker 1: point to our recent letter of intent with open Ai 146 00:08:17,680 --> 00:08:20,800 Speaker 1: for large scale DRAM supply as an example of the 147 00:08:20,920 --> 00:08:24,040 Speaker 1: very strong demand for AI as well as the need 148 00:08:24,080 --> 00:08:26,840 Speaker 1: to secure AI memory based on HBM more than anything 149 00:08:26,840 --> 00:08:31,480 Speaker 1: else went developing AI technology. That is it. That is 150 00:08:31,520 --> 00:08:35,760 Speaker 1: the only mention of open AI. That's it. No other 151 00:08:35,800 --> 00:08:39,720 Speaker 1: mentions otherwise, sk Heinex has not added any guidance that 152 00:08:39,760 --> 00:08:42,560 Speaker 1: would suggest that it's DRAM sales will spike beyond overall 153 00:08:42,600 --> 00:08:44,640 Speaker 1: growth where it's already grown because everyone's running out of 154 00:08:44,679 --> 00:08:47,640 Speaker 1: ramthanks to fucking AI. Other than mentioning that it had 155 00:08:47,720 --> 00:08:50,640 Speaker 1: an I quote completed year twenty twenty six supply discussions 156 00:08:50,679 --> 00:08:53,240 Speaker 1: with key customers, there is no mention of open AI 157 00:08:53,400 --> 00:08:56,600 Speaker 1: in any earning's presentation. Now You may think there were 158 00:08:56,600 --> 00:08:59,000 Speaker 1: two companies. You said two company names. There were Samsung 159 00:08:59,040 --> 00:09:02,200 Speaker 1: as well. Right well. On Samsung's October thirtieth, twenty twenty 160 00:09:02,240 --> 00:09:05,480 Speaker 1: five earning school Samsung mentioned the term d RAM eighteen 161 00:09:05,520 --> 00:09:08,400 Speaker 1: times and neither mentioned open AI nor any letters of 162 00:09:08,400 --> 00:09:11,400 Speaker 1: intent of any kind. In its Q three twenty twenty 163 00:09:11,400 --> 00:09:15,199 Speaker 1: five earnings presentation, Samsung mentions it will a quote prioritize 164 00:09:15,200 --> 00:09:18,520 Speaker 1: the expansion of high bandwidth memory four business with differentiate 165 00:09:18,559 --> 00:09:23,200 Speaker 1: performance to address increasing AI demand. Great place to mention 166 00:09:23,280 --> 00:09:26,360 Speaker 1: open AI. Right, yeah, that would be if the money 167 00:09:26,400 --> 00:09:29,480 Speaker 1: existed and they were gonna do anything Now, analysts do 168 00:09:29,520 --> 00:09:31,360 Speaker 1: not appear to have noticed the lack of revenue from 169 00:09:31,400 --> 00:09:33,439 Speaker 1: an apparent deal for forty percent of the world's RAM. 170 00:09:33,720 --> 00:09:37,320 Speaker 1: Oh well, Pobody's perfect right. My frustration, you hear in 171 00:09:37,320 --> 00:09:40,280 Speaker 1: my voice is that I'm a guy with a Google doc. 172 00:09:41,040 --> 00:09:44,120 Speaker 1: I'm not a financial analyst, but I appeared to be 173 00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:45,960 Speaker 1: able to do what they're doing because I'm able to 174 00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:50,480 Speaker 1: fucking read a Both Samsung and s k Heinez's stocks 175 00:09:50,520 --> 00:09:52,600 Speaker 1: have continued to write since, and you'd be forgiven for 176 00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:54,760 Speaker 1: thinking this deal was something to do with it, even 177 00:09:54,800 --> 00:09:59,360 Speaker 1: though it was not. But silly season was not yet over, however, 178 00:09:59,400 --> 00:10:02,120 Speaker 1: and on October fifth, twenty twenty five, AMD announced that 179 00:10:02,120 --> 00:10:04,560 Speaker 1: it had entered a multi year, multi generation agreement with 180 00:10:04,600 --> 00:10:07,760 Speaker 1: open Ai to build six goddamn gigawads of data centers, 181 00:10:07,840 --> 00:10:10,000 Speaker 1: with the first one gig what deployment said to begin 182 00:10:10,080 --> 00:10:12,440 Speaker 1: in the second half of twenty twenty six, calling the 183 00:10:12,480 --> 00:10:15,240 Speaker 1: agreement definitive with terms that allowed open ai to buy 184 00:10:15,480 --> 00:10:19,400 Speaker 1: up to ten percent of AMD stock, festing over specific 185 00:10:19,480 --> 00:10:21,640 Speaker 1: milestones that started with the first giga what of data 186 00:10:21,640 --> 00:10:24,600 Speaker 1: center development, said data centers would use AMDs yet to 187 00:10:24,600 --> 00:10:27,559 Speaker 1: be released four to fifty GPUs. The deal would per 188 00:10:27,640 --> 00:10:31,760 Speaker 1: reuters bring in tens of billions of dollars of revenue. Now, 189 00:10:32,440 --> 00:10:34,920 Speaker 1: I know, hate to be an asshole, right, I know, 190 00:10:35,080 --> 00:10:37,719 Speaker 1: I'm always on this shit, right Yeah? Where would those 191 00:10:37,800 --> 00:10:41,160 Speaker 1: data centers go? How much? How much would they cost? 192 00:10:41,160 --> 00:10:43,400 Speaker 1: How would open Ai pay for them? Would the jips 193 00:10:43,440 --> 00:10:47,040 Speaker 1: be ready in time? Silence? Well, how dare you ask questions? 194 00:10:47,040 --> 00:10:49,680 Speaker 1: How dare you? Why are you asking questions? Number? Go up? 195 00:10:50,120 --> 00:10:53,080 Speaker 1: Number go up? Look look at number? Go up. AMD 196 00:10:53,240 --> 00:10:56,560 Speaker 1: shares searched by thirty four percent, with the analyst Dan 197 00:10:56,600 --> 00:10:58,880 Speaker 1: Ives of Webbush, who appears to dress like the San 198 00:10:58,960 --> 00:11:02,880 Speaker 1: Diego Padres Didy connect Jerseys, saying that this was a 199 00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:06,480 Speaker 1: major evaluation moment for AMD. As in the side, I've 200 00:11:06,520 --> 00:11:08,400 Speaker 1: said that in video would benefit from the meta verse 201 00:11:08,440 --> 00:11:10,959 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty one, and told CBS News in November 202 00:11:11,320 --> 00:11:14,120 Speaker 1: on November twenty second, twenty twenty one, that and I quote, 203 00:11:14,160 --> 00:11:17,040 Speaker 1: the metaverse was real and that Wall Street was looking 204 00:11:17,080 --> 00:11:22,800 Speaker 1: for winners, were they dan? Now one more thing, that 205 00:11:22,840 --> 00:11:26,280 Speaker 1: AMD's November earnings a month after that announcement might be 206 00:11:26,280 --> 00:11:29,280 Speaker 1: a barn burner full of remaining performance obligations from Open AI. 207 00:11:29,679 --> 00:11:32,000 Speaker 1: Things that Open appaying them moost tens of billions of 208 00:11:32,000 --> 00:11:35,560 Speaker 1: dollars of revenues right. In fact, CEO Lisa Sun who 209 00:11:35,760 --> 00:11:39,400 Speaker 1: said that AMD expected this partnership will significantly accelerated Stata 210 00:11:39,440 --> 00:11:42,160 Speaker 1: Center AI business and with the potential to generate well 211 00:11:42,200 --> 00:11:44,160 Speaker 1: over one hundred billion dollars in revenue over the next 212 00:11:44,160 --> 00:11:47,559 Speaker 1: few years in the announcement, and here's how AMD's ten 213 00:11:47,640 --> 00:11:50,440 Speaker 1: Q filing referred to it, and I quote. As of 214 00:11:50,440 --> 00:11:53,960 Speaker 1: September twenty seventh, twenty twenty five, the Aggagut transaction price 215 00:11:54,200 --> 00:11:56,880 Speaker 1: allocated to remaining performance applications on the contracts with an 216 00:11:56,920 --> 00:12:00,120 Speaker 1: original expected duration of more than one year. It was 217 00:12:00,120 --> 00:12:02,160 Speaker 1: two hundred and seventy nine million dollars, of which one 218 00:12:02,240 --> 00:12:04,320 Speaker 1: hundred and thirty nine million dollars is expected to be 219 00:12:04,360 --> 00:12:07,160 Speaker 1: recognized in the next twelve months. The revenue allocated to 220 00:12:07,200 --> 00:12:11,000 Speaker 1: remaining performance applications does not include amounts whichever original expected 221 00:12:11,040 --> 00:12:15,560 Speaker 1: duration of one year or less. Now, I don't know 222 00:12:15,600 --> 00:12:18,720 Speaker 1: about you. I did not I didn't do economics in school, 223 00:12:18,800 --> 00:12:21,760 Speaker 1: didn't do anythin like that, didn't do well at maths 224 00:12:21,760 --> 00:12:25,559 Speaker 1: in school. But two hundred and seventy nine million dollars 225 00:12:25,720 --> 00:12:30,640 Speaker 1: seems lower than over one hundred billion dollars. So I 226 00:12:30,640 --> 00:12:34,880 Speaker 1: guess just just no revenue from open AI, no revenue 227 00:12:34,920 --> 00:12:39,079 Speaker 1: of any kind. I guess. Now, AMD did raise guidance 228 00:12:39,080 --> 00:12:41,920 Speaker 1: by thirty five percent of the next five years, and 229 00:12:42,200 --> 00:12:44,880 Speaker 1: they're trailing. Twelve month revenue is thirty two billion dollars. 230 00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:47,559 Speaker 1: Tens of billions of dollars would surely lead to more 231 00:12:47,559 --> 00:12:50,520 Speaker 1: than a thirty five percent boost, because that would be 232 00:12:50,600 --> 00:12:54,440 Speaker 1: like eleven billion. That's just eleven billion dollars. That's a 233 00:12:54,480 --> 00:12:58,280 Speaker 1: lot less. That's a lot less than one hundred billion dollars. 234 00:12:58,280 --> 00:13:02,280 Speaker 1: I don't know guess all that was for nothing. No 235 00:13:02,360 --> 00:13:04,520 Speaker 1: follow up from the media, no questions from analysts, just 236 00:13:04,520 --> 00:13:07,040 Speaker 1: the shrug and we all move on. They were at ces. 237 00:13:07,160 --> 00:13:11,160 Speaker 1: Greg Brockman came on AMD's Lisa Sue said something about 238 00:13:11,240 --> 00:13:14,960 Speaker 1: Yachta flops, which really just pissed me off to think about. 239 00:13:16,360 --> 00:13:19,520 Speaker 1: Still nothing anyway. AMD stock is now down from a 240 00:13:19,559 --> 00:13:21,160 Speaker 1: high of two hundred and fifty nine bucks at the 241 00:13:21,240 --> 00:13:24,880 Speaker 1: end of October to around let's see md stocks understand 242 00:13:25,000 --> 00:13:28,040 Speaker 1: about two hundred and thirty one bucks right now. Everybody 243 00:13:28,040 --> 00:13:30,160 Speaker 1: who traded in based on an analyst and media comments 244 00:13:30,200 --> 00:13:44,360 Speaker 1: got fucked. Now let's go to my favor them, and 245 00:13:44,360 --> 00:13:48,800 Speaker 1: that's a little company named Broadcom. So back on September fifth, 246 00:13:48,800 --> 00:13:50,840 Speaker 1: Broadcom send and it's earning school that it had a 247 00:13:50,880 --> 00:13:54,640 Speaker 1: ten billion dollar order from a mysterious customer, which analysts 248 00:13:54,679 --> 00:13:57,760 Speaker 1: quickly assumed was open Ai, leading to Broadcom stock probably 249 00:13:57,800 --> 00:13:59,640 Speaker 1: nine percent and gradually increasing to a high of a 250 00:13:59,679 --> 00:14:02,679 Speaker 1: three hundred and sixty nine dollars on September tenth, before 251 00:14:02,720 --> 00:14:06,080 Speaker 1: declining a little until October thirteenth, when Broadcom announced a 252 00:14:06,200 --> 00:14:09,240 Speaker 1: ridiculous ten gigawa deal with open Ai, claiming that it 253 00:14:09,280 --> 00:14:11,720 Speaker 1: would deploy ten gigawats of open Ai designed chips, with 254 00:14:11,760 --> 00:14:14,360 Speaker 1: the first ranks to deploy the second half of twenty 255 00:14:14,360 --> 00:14:16,880 Speaker 1: twenty six and the entire deployment completed by the end 256 00:14:16,880 --> 00:14:19,400 Speaker 1: of twenty twenty ninth. So three fucking years for ten 257 00:14:19,440 --> 00:14:22,640 Speaker 1: fucking gigawatts. Just to give you an idea, it's about 258 00:14:22,760 --> 00:14:24,880 Speaker 1: two and a half years a gigawat right now. And 259 00:14:24,920 --> 00:14:27,200 Speaker 1: that's for open Ai slush fun projects, the ones that 260 00:14:27,240 --> 00:14:29,920 Speaker 1: have all the money and none of the oversight. Now. 261 00:14:29,960 --> 00:14:33,520 Speaker 1: The same day, President of Semiconductor Solutions Charlie Cowas added 262 00:14:33,520 --> 00:14:38,240 Speaker 1: that said mystery customers actually not open Ai, and I quote, 263 00:14:38,440 --> 00:14:40,640 Speaker 1: I would love to take a ten billion dollar purchase 264 00:14:40,760 --> 00:14:43,880 Speaker 1: order from my good friend Greg Brockman, CEO of open Ai, 265 00:14:44,040 --> 00:14:48,520 Speaker 1: Cowas said he has not given me that purchase order yet. Nevertheless, 266 00:14:48,520 --> 00:14:50,960 Speaker 1: Broadcom stock popped nine percent on the news about the 267 00:14:50,960 --> 00:14:53,440 Speaker 1: ten gigawa deal with CMBC, adding that the companies have 268 00:14:53,560 --> 00:14:56,440 Speaker 1: been working together for eighteen months because it's open Ai. 269 00:14:56,560 --> 00:15:00,000 Speaker 1: Nobody sat and thought about whether somebody at Broadcom was saying, wow, 270 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:02,720 Speaker 1: well open has yet to ward these chips, yeah, and 271 00:15:02,760 --> 00:15:04,960 Speaker 1: whether that was a problem. In fact, the answer to 272 00:15:05,200 --> 00:15:08,360 Speaker 1: how does open Ai thought this appeared to be they'd 273 00:15:08,360 --> 00:15:11,720 Speaker 1: afford it when it came to analysts. Now I'm gonna 274 00:15:11,720 --> 00:15:14,360 Speaker 1: I'm about to read you a quote that is so 275 00:15:14,560 --> 00:15:17,160 Speaker 1: funny when you realize that this is someone who makes 276 00:15:17,240 --> 00:15:20,680 Speaker 1: like a shit ton of money. Ahem. The twenty twenty 277 00:15:20,720 --> 00:15:22,960 Speaker 1: six timelines set out by open Ai for the buildout 278 00:15:23,000 --> 00:15:25,640 Speaker 1: is aggressive, but the startup is also best position to 279 00:15:25,720 --> 00:15:28,600 Speaker 1: raise funds required for the project given the heights of 280 00:15:28,640 --> 00:15:33,680 Speaker 1: investor confidence, said gad Joe Sevilla, an analyst eMarketer. Financing 281 00:15:33,720 --> 00:15:36,160 Speaker 1: such a large chip deal will likely require a combination 282 00:15:36,240 --> 00:15:40,360 Speaker 1: of funding grounds pre orders, strategic investments and support from Microsoft, 283 00:15:40,480 --> 00:15:46,640 Speaker 1: as well as leveraging future revenue streams and potential credit facilities. Hogwash, 284 00:15:47,200 --> 00:15:53,880 Speaker 1: just complete, complete bollocks. Insane that people pay these analysts bullshit. Okay, 285 00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:56,800 Speaker 1: So just let's just break this down financing such a 286 00:15:56,840 --> 00:15:58,840 Speaker 1: large chip deal. So ten gigawats, you're going to be 287 00:15:58,880 --> 00:16:01,080 Speaker 1: looking at fifty bill dollars a gig was you look 288 00:16:01,120 --> 00:16:03,640 Speaker 1: at that half a trillion dollars. So to do this 289 00:16:03,960 --> 00:16:08,520 Speaker 1: for this aggressive buildout, which was ten giga Watson three years, 290 00:16:08,600 --> 00:16:12,560 Speaker 1: just not possible. They would fund this by pre orders, 291 00:16:13,240 --> 00:16:17,200 Speaker 1: pre orders for what exactly, because pre orders would be 292 00:16:17,200 --> 00:16:20,640 Speaker 1: then pre ordering something from Broadcom. Not really sure how 293 00:16:20,720 --> 00:16:25,200 Speaker 1: that fixed the problem. Strategic investments from whom just funding 294 00:16:25,240 --> 00:16:28,360 Speaker 1: I guess, support from Microsoft funding again, I guess, And 295 00:16:28,400 --> 00:16:30,680 Speaker 1: I don't know why Microsoft be paying for that, as 296 00:16:30,680 --> 00:16:36,560 Speaker 1: well as leveraging future revenue streams and potential credit for 297 00:16:36,640 --> 00:16:42,160 Speaker 1: say what what does that mean? Saving money doing like 298 00:16:42,560 --> 00:16:45,920 Speaker 1: a revenue trade deal? Like what are you talking about? Anyway, 299 00:16:45,960 --> 00:16:48,240 Speaker 1: you don't need to worry because open ai solution to 300 00:16:48,280 --> 00:16:51,560 Speaker 1: this was far simpler. It didn't order anything. During Broadcom's 301 00:16:51,640 --> 00:16:54,400 Speaker 1: November earning school, where Broadcom revealed that the ten billion 302 00:16:54,440 --> 00:16:57,040 Speaker 1: dollar order was actually from Anthropic, another l of them 303 00:16:57,040 --> 00:17:00,240 Speaker 1: started that burnst billions of dollars, which was actually buying 304 00:17:00,280 --> 00:17:05,880 Speaker 1: Google's TPUs from Broadcom, and he also added the Anthropic 305 00:17:05,920 --> 00:17:08,679 Speaker 1: had made a second eleven billion dollar deal. Alice somehow 306 00:17:08,680 --> 00:17:12,320 Speaker 1: believed that Anthropic is positioned to spend heavily despite being 307 00:17:12,359 --> 00:17:15,280 Speaker 1: yet another venture backed welfare recipient in the same flavor 308 00:17:15,280 --> 00:17:21,119 Speaker 1: as open Ai. Oh right, right, sorry, okay, Broadcom. You 309 00:17:21,119 --> 00:17:23,000 Speaker 1: may be wondering about the ten gig what deal though, 310 00:17:23,000 --> 00:17:26,240 Speaker 1: because those earnings right well, Broadcom CEO hoc Tan said 311 00:17:26,240 --> 00:17:28,560 Speaker 1: that he did not expect much in twenty twenty six 312 00:17:28,600 --> 00:17:32,080 Speaker 1: from the deal, and guidance did not change to reflect it. Now, 313 00:17:32,119 --> 00:17:34,119 Speaker 1: what was great about this as well? And I linked 314 00:17:34,119 --> 00:17:37,040 Speaker 1: to this in the newsletter. I really need you to 315 00:17:37,080 --> 00:17:39,760 Speaker 1: go and look up how hoc Tan had the conversation 316 00:17:39,840 --> 00:17:42,560 Speaker 1: because someone asked him for more detail and he just 317 00:17:42,560 --> 00:17:44,840 Speaker 1: straight up said, like, I don't want to talk about it. 318 00:17:44,840 --> 00:17:48,080 Speaker 1: It rocks. I honestly fucking love that. Anyway, Broadcom climbed 319 00:17:48,080 --> 00:17:50,920 Speaker 1: to a higher four hundred and twelve dollars a share 320 00:17:51,040 --> 00:17:52,840 Speaker 1: leading up to its earnings, and I imagine it did 321 00:17:52,840 --> 00:17:54,680 Speaker 1: so based on people trading on the belief that open 322 00:17:54,720 --> 00:17:57,080 Speaker 1: Air and Broadcom were doing a deal of some sort together, 323 00:17:57,200 --> 00:18:00,439 Speaker 1: which does not appear to be happening. While there is 324 00:18:00,440 --> 00:18:04,440 Speaker 1: an alleged seventy three billion dollar backlog for Broadcom, every 325 00:18:04,480 --> 00:18:07,600 Speaker 1: dollar from Anthropic is utterly questionable. Now, some of you 326 00:18:07,720 --> 00:18:11,800 Speaker 1: might say, ed, we can't just automatically distrust public companies. Actually, 327 00:18:11,920 --> 00:18:15,280 Speaker 1: yes we can. I'm doing it right now. Whenever a 328 00:18:15,359 --> 00:18:17,480 Speaker 1: company says a litter of intent, as in Video and 329 00:18:17,600 --> 00:18:20,800 Speaker 1: sk Heinez and Samsung did, it's important to immediately stop 330 00:18:20,800 --> 00:18:23,359 Speaker 1: taking the deal. Seriously until you get to a specific 331 00:18:23,400 --> 00:18:28,400 Speaker 1: word contract, not agreement or deal or announcement, but contract, 332 00:18:28,400 --> 00:18:33,040 Speaker 1: because contracts are the only thing that actually matters. A 333 00:18:33,080 --> 00:18:37,200 Speaker 1: great example of this is in in Video's last earnings, 334 00:18:37,200 --> 00:18:39,760 Speaker 1: they said they would be investing up to ten billion 335 00:18:39,800 --> 00:18:42,879 Speaker 1: dollars in Anthropic. Right, you'll notice that that was in 336 00:18:42,920 --> 00:18:45,480 Speaker 1: the middle of November. It's now January and we haven't 337 00:18:45,520 --> 00:18:49,280 Speaker 1: heard boo about it. It's probably because nothing's fucking happening. 338 00:18:49,520 --> 00:18:52,399 Speaker 1: And also that phrase up to as well means that 339 00:18:52,600 --> 00:18:55,000 Speaker 1: it will be However much in Video wants to invest, 340 00:18:55,320 --> 00:18:59,880 Speaker 1: if at all. They only just did their Intel investment. Anyway, 341 00:19:00,080 --> 00:19:03,359 Speaker 1: whenever they say these terms, you need to just get suspicious. 342 00:19:03,400 --> 00:19:06,280 Speaker 1: It's time. It's time to stop trusting them, because they've 343 00:19:06,280 --> 00:19:09,639 Speaker 1: played enough hide the sausage for one EPOC. I think 344 00:19:09,960 --> 00:19:13,160 Speaker 1: it's time for everybody, analysts, the media, members of Congress, 345 00:19:13,160 --> 00:19:15,560 Speaker 1: the fucking pope. I don't care, to start treating these 346 00:19:15,600 --> 00:19:20,440 Speaker 1: companies with actual suspicion and to start demanding timelines like 347 00:19:20,480 --> 00:19:23,080 Speaker 1: I said. In Video and Microsoft announced that fifteen billion 348 00:19:23,119 --> 00:19:26,479 Speaker 1: dollar investment, and in Anthropic, where's the money? Why does 349 00:19:26,520 --> 00:19:29,600 Speaker 1: the agreement say up to ten billion for in Video 350 00:19:29,680 --> 00:19:33,359 Speaker 1: and up to five billion for Microsoft. Where's the money? 351 00:19:34,720 --> 00:19:37,480 Speaker 1: Where is it? We haven't heard shit about it since. 352 00:19:37,800 --> 00:19:40,000 Speaker 1: What we have heard is that Anthropic is raising either 353 00:19:40,040 --> 00:19:42,080 Speaker 1: ten billion dollars or twenty five billion dollars at a 354 00:19:42,080 --> 00:19:45,000 Speaker 1: three hundred and fifty billion dollar valuation. Where'd the money go? 355 00:19:45,440 --> 00:19:49,200 Speaker 1: Where the money go from? Those fuck nuts? But they go, Sorry, 356 00:19:49,480 --> 00:19:51,880 Speaker 1: Jensen won for calling you a fuck n All right, 357 00:19:52,320 --> 00:19:56,800 Speaker 1: you're acting like one though, mate. Anyway, these deals are 358 00:19:56,840 --> 00:19:59,600 Speaker 1: announced with the intention of suggesting there is more revenue 359 00:19:59,760 --> 00:20:04,000 Speaker 1: and money and generative AI that actually exists. Furthermore, it 360 00:20:04,080 --> 00:20:07,640 Speaker 1: is irresponsible and actively harmful for analysts in the media 361 00:20:07,680 --> 00:20:10,360 Speaker 1: to continually act as if these deals will actually get 362 00:20:10,400 --> 00:20:13,639 Speaker 1: paid when you consider the financial conditions of these companies. 363 00:20:14,440 --> 00:20:16,919 Speaker 1: As part of its alleged funding announcement within Video and 364 00:20:16,960 --> 00:20:20,080 Speaker 1: Microsoft and Thropic also agreed to purchase thirty billion dollars 365 00:20:20,240 --> 00:20:22,640 Speaker 1: as your Compute, which is, for those of you who 366 00:20:22,680 --> 00:20:26,159 Speaker 1: don't know, the compute cloud platform, the competitors to Amazon 367 00:20:26,200 --> 00:20:29,760 Speaker 1: Web Services and Google Cloud that Microsoft runs. It also 368 00:20:29,800 --> 00:20:32,879 Speaker 1: agreed to Anthropic agreed to spend tens of billions of 369 00:20:32,880 --> 00:20:35,639 Speaker 1: dollars with Google Cloud. They ordered ten billion dollars of 370 00:20:35,720 --> 00:20:38,240 Speaker 1: chips from broad Coom earlier in twenty twenty five, and 371 00:20:38,280 --> 00:20:41,320 Speaker 1: apparently another eleven billion dollars of them in the last 372 00:20:41,320 --> 00:20:47,159 Speaker 1: fiscal quarter. How does Anthropic pay for them? How Anthropic 373 00:20:47,200 --> 00:20:50,359 Speaker 1: allegedly burned two point eight billion dollars last year twenty 374 00:20:50,400 --> 00:20:52,800 Speaker 1: twenty five, though I think they burn much more and 375 00:20:52,880 --> 00:20:56,280 Speaker 1: raise sixteen point five billion dollars in funding before Microsoft 376 00:20:56,320 --> 00:21:00,520 Speaker 1: and then Videa's imaginary money. How are investors tolerating Broadcom 377 00:21:00,520 --> 00:21:03,479 Speaker 1: not directly stating the future financial condition of this company 378 00:21:03,520 --> 00:21:06,640 Speaker 1: is questionable? Has Broadcom created a reserve for this deal? 379 00:21:07,000 --> 00:21:09,639 Speaker 1: If not, why not? Anthropic will make no more than 380 00:21:09,680 --> 00:21:11,840 Speaker 1: five billion dollars in twenty twenty five, I'm sure of it, 381 00:21:12,080 --> 00:21:15,040 Speaker 1: and raised about seventeen point five billion dollars with another 382 00:21:15,119 --> 00:21:18,000 Speaker 1: two point five billion dollars coming in debt. How can 383 00:21:18,000 --> 00:21:20,680 Speaker 1: it foreseeably afford to pay ten billion, eleven billion or 384 00:21:20,720 --> 00:21:24,119 Speaker 1: twenty one billion dollars considering it's already massive losses and 385 00:21:24,160 --> 00:21:27,480 Speaker 1: all those other obligations I mentioned. Will Jensen one hand 386 00:21:27,480 --> 00:21:29,600 Speaker 1: over ten billion dollars so that Anthropic can hand it 387 00:21:29,640 --> 00:21:33,600 Speaker 1: straight to Broadcom? I don't think so. I realize the 388 00:21:33,640 --> 00:21:35,840 Speaker 1: counter argument is that the companies aren't responsible for the 389 00:21:35,880 --> 00:21:38,560 Speaker 1: counterparty's financial health. But my argument is that it's the 390 00:21:38,600 --> 00:21:41,680 Speaker 1: responsibility of any public company to give a realistic view 391 00:21:41,680 --> 00:21:44,600 Speaker 1: of its financial health and revenue sources, which includes not 392 00:21:44,720 --> 00:21:46,560 Speaker 1: to give a chunk of its revenues from a startup 393 00:21:46,600 --> 00:21:48,760 Speaker 1: that can't afford to pay for its orders. There's no 394 00:21:48,840 --> 00:21:51,960 Speaker 1: counter for that. Anthropic cannot afford to pay broad Com 395 00:21:51,960 --> 00:21:54,600 Speaker 1: ten billion dollars right now or eleven billion dollars in 396 00:21:54,600 --> 00:21:57,240 Speaker 1: a few months. Where is the money coming from. They're 397 00:21:57,240 --> 00:22:00,360 Speaker 1: allegedly raising twenty five billion dollars. Great that ac shud 398 00:22:00,400 --> 00:22:04,080 Speaker 1: lead them with four billion dollars to pay for what 399 00:22:04,520 --> 00:22:09,119 Speaker 1: like thirty forty fifty billion dollars of compute costs. I 400 00:22:09,160 --> 00:22:13,120 Speaker 1: don't know. Again, I ain't no mathematician, but I can 401 00:22:13,160 --> 00:22:16,080 Speaker 1: put those numbers together and I can say that's a 402 00:22:16,119 --> 00:22:18,760 Speaker 1: pretty big minus. Again, I'm not even trying to be 403 00:22:18,880 --> 00:22:23,320 Speaker 1: sarcastic here. The things I'm saying are actually very rational. 404 00:22:24,240 --> 00:22:27,440 Speaker 1: They're very reasonable. Anthropic even if they raised twenty five 405 00:22:27,480 --> 00:22:30,399 Speaker 1: billion dollars, cannot pay even like a quarter of the 406 00:22:30,440 --> 00:22:34,040 Speaker 1: things they've agreed to their existent revenue sources. Even if 407 00:22:34,080 --> 00:22:36,359 Speaker 1: they made twenty billion dollars in twenty twenty six, which 408 00:22:36,359 --> 00:22:39,719 Speaker 1: they will not. By the way, they are absolutely I 409 00:22:39,840 --> 00:22:42,600 Speaker 1: just don't believe them about their revenues at all or 410 00:22:42,600 --> 00:22:47,359 Speaker 1: any of the estimates. But the problem is that in 411 00:22:47,400 --> 00:22:51,159 Speaker 1: any bubble, being really stupid and ignorant works right up 412 00:22:51,240 --> 00:22:53,960 Speaker 1: until it doesn't. And however harsh the dot com bubble 413 00:22:54,040 --> 00:22:56,680 Speaker 1: might have been, it wasn't harsh enough, and those who 414 00:22:56,720 --> 00:23:00,920 Speaker 1: were responsible were left unpunished and unashamed, and that guaranteed 415 00:23:00,920 --> 00:23:03,600 Speaker 1: that the cycle would happen again, and then it would 416 00:23:03,600 --> 00:23:08,800 Speaker 1: be worse. I want to be really abundantly clear about 417 00:23:08,800 --> 00:23:14,800 Speaker 1: what's happening. Every single stock you see growing because of AI, 418 00:23:15,040 --> 00:23:18,600 Speaker 1: outside of those selling RAM and GPUs, is actually growing 419 00:23:18,640 --> 00:23:23,880 Speaker 1: because of something else. Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Meta all 420 00:23:23,920 --> 00:23:26,480 Speaker 1: have other products that are making the money and are 421 00:23:26,520 --> 00:23:30,680 Speaker 1: still growing. AI is not growing them. And because analysts 422 00:23:30,680 --> 00:23:32,880 Speaker 1: and investors in the media do not think about things 423 00:23:32,880 --> 00:23:35,480 Speaker 1: for two seconds, they have allowed themselves to be beaten 424 00:23:35,520 --> 00:23:39,159 Speaker 1: down and turned into supplicants for future public stock growth. 425 00:23:40,080 --> 00:23:42,880 Speaker 1: Investors have allowed themselves to be played, and the results 426 00:23:42,960 --> 00:23:46,040 Speaker 1: will be worse than the dot com bubble bursting by 427 00:23:46,040 --> 00:23:50,760 Speaker 1: several echelons and perhaps the biggest victims will be venture capital, 428 00:23:50,840 --> 00:23:53,679 Speaker 1: which is existentially threatened by the AI bubble, But the 429 00:23:53,720 --> 00:23:56,679 Speaker 1: actual victims will be regular people who made the mistake 430 00:23:56,720 --> 00:23:59,200 Speaker 1: of trusting analysts or anyone who told them to invest 431 00:23:59,200 --> 00:24:02,480 Speaker 1: in the markets. But I'm going to be really simplistic 432 00:24:02,560 --> 00:24:06,840 Speaker 1: for a second. I am skeptical of AI because everybody 433 00:24:06,880 --> 00:24:11,080 Speaker 1: loses money. I believe every AI company is unprofitable with 434 00:24:11,200 --> 00:24:14,240 Speaker 1: margins that are getting increasingly worse as they scale, and 435 00:24:14,280 --> 00:24:17,080 Speaker 1: as a result, none of them will be able to 436 00:24:17,080 --> 00:24:20,879 Speaker 1: get acquired or go public. This means that venture capitalists 437 00:24:20,880 --> 00:24:24,000 Speaker 1: that have sunk money into AI stocks and private AI stocks, 438 00:24:24,000 --> 00:24:25,800 Speaker 1: I should be clear, are going to be sitting on 439 00:24:25,840 --> 00:24:29,040 Speaker 1: a bunch of assets under management AEM the same assets 440 00:24:29,080 --> 00:24:31,560 Speaker 1: they collect fees on because that's how venture capitalists make 441 00:24:31,600 --> 00:24:34,520 Speaker 1: money that will eventually creter or go to zero because 442 00:24:34,520 --> 00:24:36,840 Speaker 1: there will be no way for any liquidity events so 443 00:24:37,000 --> 00:24:41,080 Speaker 1: taken in public or selling someone to occur. This is 444 00:24:41,119 --> 00:24:44,400 Speaker 1: at a time of historically low liquidity for venture capitalists, 445 00:24:44,440 --> 00:24:47,359 Speaker 1: with Pitchbook estimating that there would be only one hundred 446 00:24:47,440 --> 00:24:50,520 Speaker 1: point eight billion dollars in venture capital funds available at 447 00:24:50,560 --> 00:24:54,080 Speaker 1: the end of last year. Venture capitalists raise money from 448 00:24:54,119 --> 00:24:56,840 Speaker 1: limited partners who invest in venture capital with the hope 449 00:24:56,840 --> 00:25:00,440 Speaker 1: of returns that outpace investing in the public markets. Venture 450 00:25:00,480 --> 00:25:04,080 Speaker 1: capital vastly overinvested in twenty twenty one and twenty twenty 451 00:25:04,080 --> 00:25:06,600 Speaker 1: two as well, and this was also a problem with 452 00:25:06,640 --> 00:25:09,960 Speaker 1: private equity. In simple terms, this means that these funds 453 00:25:09,960 --> 00:25:12,400 Speaker 1: are sitting on tons of stock that they cannot shift, 454 00:25:12,600 --> 00:25:14,159 Speaker 1: and the longer it takes for a company to w 455 00:25:14,160 --> 00:25:16,600 Speaker 1: either go public or required, the more likely it is 456 00:25:16,640 --> 00:25:18,359 Speaker 1: the VC or the P firm will have to mark 457 00:25:18,400 --> 00:25:22,240 Speaker 1: down its value to something more realistic. This is so 458 00:25:22,440 --> 00:25:25,920 Speaker 1: bad that, according to Carter, as of August twenty twenty four, 459 00:25:25,960 --> 00:25:29,680 Speaker 1: and that CARTA some of you can't understand how I talk. 460 00:25:30,040 --> 00:25:32,520 Speaker 1: As of August twenty twenty four, less than ten percent 461 00:25:32,520 --> 00:25:35,600 Speaker 1: of VC funds raised in twenty twenty one have made 462 00:25:35,640 --> 00:25:39,040 Speaker 1: any distributions to their investors, that's handing any kind of 463 00:25:39,080 --> 00:25:42,760 Speaker 1: cash out. In a piece from September twenty twenty five, 464 00:25:43,080 --> 00:25:45,639 Speaker 1: Carter also revealed that about fifteen percent of funds from 465 00:25:45,640 --> 00:25:49,719 Speaker 1: twenty twenty three have generated any disbursements as of Q two, 466 00:25:49,760 --> 00:25:52,480 Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, and the media net internal rate of 467 00:25:52,480 --> 00:25:55,160 Speaker 1: return was a median zero point one percent, meaning that 468 00:25:55,440 --> 00:25:59,439 Speaker 1: at best most investors got their money back and absolutely 469 00:25:59,440 --> 00:26:03,000 Speaker 1: nothing else. And just to be clear, you don't invest 470 00:26:03,640 --> 00:26:06,280 Speaker 1: so you can get an exact amount. You don't give 471 00:26:06,320 --> 00:26:08,600 Speaker 1: someone a dollar, wait four years and then get a 472 00:26:08,640 --> 00:26:11,960 Speaker 1: dollar back. That's not investing, that's just putting money in 473 00:26:11,960 --> 00:26:14,439 Speaker 1: a box. And in fact, investing in venture capital has 474 00:26:14,520 --> 00:26:17,320 Speaker 1: kind of fucking sugged for a while. According to Carter, 475 00:26:17,680 --> 00:26:20,160 Speaker 1: as of the end of Q two, most VC funds 476 00:26:20,160 --> 00:26:23,359 Speaker 1: across all recent vintages that's after twenty eighteen had a 477 00:26:23,400 --> 00:26:26,520 Speaker 1: TVPI somewhere between zero point eight x and two x 478 00:26:26,880 --> 00:26:29,320 Speaker 1: TVPI I'll get to in a second, but there are 479 00:26:29,320 --> 00:26:33,320 Speaker 1: some areas where standout tvpis are surfacing. TVPI means total 480 00:26:33,359 --> 00:26:35,280 Speaker 1: value to paid in capital, or the amount of money 481 00:26:35,320 --> 00:26:38,600 Speaker 1: you made for each dollar invested. So if you invested 482 00:26:38,640 --> 00:26:42,280 Speaker 1: a dollar point eight x would mean you got eighty 483 00:26:42,320 --> 00:26:44,240 Speaker 1: cents back, and if you invested a dollar you get 484 00:26:44,240 --> 00:26:46,880 Speaker 1: two bucks on two X. I hope that makes sense. Now, 485 00:26:46,920 --> 00:26:49,000 Speaker 1: there's a chart in the newsletter version of this episode, 486 00:26:49,000 --> 00:26:50,800 Speaker 1: which I encourage you to check out, but it tells 487 00:26:50,880 --> 00:26:53,200 Speaker 1: you that for the most part, vcs have struggled to 488 00:26:53,200 --> 00:26:57,840 Speaker 1: provide even money returns. Since twenty seventeen, decent TVPI is 489 00:26:57,880 --> 00:27:00,359 Speaker 1: two point five x, and as you'll see from the chart, 490 00:27:01,359 --> 00:27:05,520 Speaker 1: things basically collapsed since twenty twenty one. Companies are not 491 00:27:05,560 --> 00:27:07,960 Speaker 1: going public or being acquired at the same rate, meaning 492 00:27:08,040 --> 00:27:11,040 Speaker 1: that investor capital is increasingly locked up, meaning that limited 493 00:27:11,080 --> 00:27:14,480 Speaker 1: partners are still wing for a payoff from the last bubbles. 494 00:27:14,920 --> 00:27:18,160 Speaker 1: Let learn this one now. Carter would update the chart 495 00:27:18,160 --> 00:27:21,960 Speaker 1: in December twenty twenty five, and things would somehow get worse. 496 00:27:22,280 --> 00:27:25,600 Speaker 1: TVPI soured further, suggesting a further lack of exits across 497 00:27:25,640 --> 00:27:28,600 Speaker 1: the board. The only slight improvement was the median IRR, 498 00:27:28,920 --> 00:27:31,479 Speaker 1: which rose from zero point five percent from funds from 499 00:27:31,520 --> 00:27:35,000 Speaker 1: twenty twenty one and zero point one percent for funds 500 00:27:35,040 --> 00:27:39,960 Speaker 1: from twenty twenty two. Those are still real, fucking terrible. 501 00:27:40,080 --> 00:27:46,679 Speaker 1: Those are absolutely astonishing. I mean, a good IRR is 502 00:27:46,720 --> 00:27:53,760 Speaker 1: ideally like fifteen to twenty percent, not zero point five percent. 503 00:27:53,840 --> 00:27:56,600 Speaker 1: I don't know, but in simpler terms, we are looking 504 00:27:56,640 --> 00:27:59,520 Speaker 1: at years of locked up capital, even venture capital cash starved, 505 00:27:59,520 --> 00:28:16,399 Speaker 1: and a little ESPRA. The worst part is that all 506 00:28:16,440 --> 00:28:18,720 Speaker 1: of this is happening during a generational increase in the 507 00:28:18,760 --> 00:28:21,680 Speaker 1: amounts that startups need to raise thanks to the ruinous 508 00:28:21,680 --> 00:28:24,920 Speaker 1: costs of generative AI and the negative margins of AI 509 00:28:25,000 --> 00:28:27,480 Speaker 1: powered services. Now, I'm going to quote myself from a 510 00:28:27,480 --> 00:28:31,800 Speaker 1: December fifth newsletter called the Ways the AI Bubble Might Burst. Cursor, 511 00:28:31,880 --> 00:28:34,520 Speaker 1: Anthropic's largest customer and now it's biggest competitor in the 512 00:28:34,560 --> 00:28:37,159 Speaker 1: AAI coding sphere, raised two point three billion dollars in 513 00:28:37,200 --> 00:28:40,360 Speaker 1: November after raising nine hundred million dollars in June. Now 514 00:28:40,920 --> 00:28:43,360 Speaker 1: for twenty twenty five, and I should add these are 515 00:28:43,440 --> 00:28:46,840 Speaker 1: on revenues of eighty three million dollars in the month 516 00:28:46,920 --> 00:28:51,120 Speaker 1: of I think November October, because they said annualized revenues 517 00:28:51,160 --> 00:28:53,720 Speaker 1: of one billion dollars. Is dogship perplexity one of the 518 00:28:53,720 --> 00:28:57,960 Speaker 1: most And I say this presitantly popular AI companies raised 519 00:28:57,960 --> 00:29:00,600 Speaker 1: two hundred million dollars in September after using one hundred 520 00:29:00,640 --> 00:29:02,800 Speaker 1: million dollars in July, after seeming to fail to raise 521 00:29:02,840 --> 00:29:05,680 Speaker 1: five hundred million dollars in May. After raising five hundred 522 00:29:05,760 --> 00:29:08,640 Speaker 1: million dollars in December twenty twenty four for a fucking 523 00:29:08,800 --> 00:29:13,000 Speaker 1: search engine, Cognition raised four hundred million dollars in September 524 00:29:13,080 --> 00:29:15,680 Speaker 1: after raising three hundred million dollars In March, Coher raised 525 00:29:15,680 --> 00:29:18,040 Speaker 1: one hundred million dollars in said temper, a month after 526 00:29:18,080 --> 00:29:22,160 Speaker 1: it raised five hundred million dollars. That's a lot of money, 527 00:29:22,440 --> 00:29:24,320 Speaker 1: and that's a lot of money in a very small 528 00:29:24,440 --> 00:29:28,000 Speaker 1: amount of time, and that's taking money away from everyone 529 00:29:28,000 --> 00:29:32,320 Speaker 1: else because they need that money. You need the money 530 00:29:32,360 --> 00:29:34,640 Speaker 1: to invest in the stops. But none of these companies 531 00:29:34,640 --> 00:29:36,440 Speaker 1: are profitable, nor do they have a path to end 532 00:29:36,560 --> 00:29:40,320 Speaker 1: acquisition or IBO. And why do you say, why why 533 00:29:40,360 --> 00:29:42,880 Speaker 1: do you ask? Ede? You're being so horrible? What's because 534 00:29:42,960 --> 00:29:46,360 Speaker 1: even the most advanced AI software companies ultimately prompting open 535 00:29:46,440 --> 00:29:49,880 Speaker 1: AI or Anthropics models, meaning that their only real intellectual 536 00:29:49,880 --> 00:29:52,720 Speaker 1: property is those prompts and their staff and whatever they 537 00:29:52,760 --> 00:29:54,920 Speaker 1: can build around the models they don't control, which has 538 00:29:54,960 --> 00:29:58,560 Speaker 1: been obvious from the meager acquisitions we've seen so far. 539 00:29:59,000 --> 00:30:03,400 Speaker 1: Another fun fact, Anthropic ended up cutting off people that 540 00:30:03,480 --> 00:30:06,760 Speaker 1: worked to Xai that were using Cursor from using their models. So, 541 00:30:06,960 --> 00:30:10,840 Speaker 1: just to be clear, Cursor completely different company Anthropic. If 542 00:30:10,880 --> 00:30:13,120 Speaker 1: you work at a company at Anthropic doesn't like and 543 00:30:13,160 --> 00:30:15,000 Speaker 1: I know we don't, we don't like elon mask, I 544 00:30:15,120 --> 00:30:18,800 Speaker 1: get that. But if Anthropic can arbitrarily cut off their 545 00:30:18,800 --> 00:30:24,040 Speaker 1: models from somebody's completely independent product. Just because they're deciding 546 00:30:24,080 --> 00:30:27,600 Speaker 1: to cut off a competitor, they're just going to broaden 547 00:30:27,680 --> 00:30:30,840 Speaker 1: the term competitor to mean anyone they don't like, anyone 548 00:30:30,880 --> 00:30:35,200 Speaker 1: that gets in the way. Now, Windsurf, which was allegedly 549 00:30:35,240 --> 00:30:37,840 Speaker 1: being sold to open Ai last year, ended up selling 550 00:30:37,840 --> 00:30:40,680 Speaker 1: its assets to Cognition in July twenty twenty five, with 551 00:30:40,760 --> 00:30:43,280 Speaker 1: Google paying two point four billion dollars just to hire 552 00:30:43,280 --> 00:30:46,960 Speaker 1: its co founders. And this nebulous licensing agreement similar to 553 00:30:46,960 --> 00:30:49,160 Speaker 1: the thing it did with Character to AI, where it 554 00:30:49,160 --> 00:30:51,800 Speaker 1: paid two point seven billion dollars to reheigh Nome Shazir, 555 00:30:52,160 --> 00:30:54,479 Speaker 1: who he was one of the authors of the Attention 556 00:30:54,560 --> 00:30:57,440 Speaker 1: is All You Need paper that started this spars licenses 557 00:30:57,520 --> 00:30:59,959 Speaker 1: tech can pay off the stock of its remaining staff. 558 00:31:00,000 --> 00:31:02,480 Speaker 1: This is also exactly what Microsoft did with Inflection AI 559 00:31:02,520 --> 00:31:05,560 Speaker 1: and it's co founder, mister Suliman, who, and I quote 560 00:31:05,560 --> 00:31:10,640 Speaker 1: someone who messaged me really recently, is a huge fucking asshole. Now, 561 00:31:11,080 --> 00:31:13,520 Speaker 1: mister Sulliman, if you hear this, I'm just quoting someone 562 00:31:13,560 --> 00:31:16,240 Speaker 1: that works for you. If they're saying that about you, 563 00:31:16,240 --> 00:31:18,680 Speaker 1: perhaps it's worth asking why are people calling me a 564 00:31:18,680 --> 00:31:21,280 Speaker 1: big fucking asshole. I don't know. Must Far come on 565 00:31:21,280 --> 00:31:24,560 Speaker 1: the show and ask me yourself. Now open Aiyes, acquisitions 566 00:31:24,560 --> 00:31:27,760 Speaker 1: of Statsic one point one billion dollars, Ioproducts six point 567 00:31:27,760 --> 00:31:30,400 Speaker 1: five billion dollars, in Neptune four hundred million dollars. We're 568 00:31:30,440 --> 00:31:35,880 Speaker 1: all in stock. Every other major acquisition of this era, Wiz, Confluence, Confluent, 569 00:31:35,920 --> 00:31:39,280 Speaker 1: even Informatica and so on, is either someone trying to 570 00:31:39,320 --> 00:31:42,480 Speaker 1: pretend that something is related to AI, like Wiz, or 571 00:31:42,640 --> 00:31:45,240 Speaker 1: trying to say that a data streaming platform is heavily 572 00:31:45,320 --> 00:31:50,080 Speaker 1: AI related because AI needs data, which which may be true, 573 00:31:50,240 --> 00:31:53,880 Speaker 1: but it doesn't mean that AI companies are selling and 574 00:31:53,920 --> 00:31:56,040 Speaker 1: they're not, by the way, which is a problem. As 575 00:31:56,080 --> 00:31:58,480 Speaker 1: forty one percent of US venture dollars in twenty twenty 576 00:31:58,480 --> 00:32:01,600 Speaker 1: five went to AI as of August, and according to Axios, 577 00:32:01,600 --> 00:32:04,720 Speaker 1: the global number was around fifty one percent. A crisis 578 00:32:04,800 --> 00:32:07,680 Speaker 1: is brewing. NERD Lawyer back in October wrote about the 579 00:32:07,720 --> 00:32:11,560 Speaker 1: explosive growth of secondary markets, and I quote enter the 580 00:32:11,600 --> 00:32:14,400 Speaker 1: secondary market a once niche corner of venture capital that 581 00:32:14,480 --> 00:32:19,280 Speaker 1: has transferred into a primary liquidity mechanism. What's remarkable is 582 00:32:19,320 --> 00:32:22,480 Speaker 1: how quickly this market is matured at least five major 583 00:32:22,560 --> 00:32:25,760 Speaker 1: venture funds have hired full time staff dedicated to manufacturing 584 00:32:25,800 --> 00:32:30,680 Speaker 1: non traditional exits. As Hans Swilden's CEO of Industry Ventures explained, 585 00:32:31,160 --> 00:32:33,480 Speaker 1: all the brand named funds are all staffing and thinking 586 00:32:33,480 --> 00:32:38,160 Speaker 1: through liquidity structures and professional buyers have flooded in. Megafunds 587 00:32:38,200 --> 00:32:42,800 Speaker 1: specializing in secondaries have raised unprecedented amounts. Lexington raised a 588 00:32:42,840 --> 00:32:46,160 Speaker 1: record twenty three billion dollars, or harbor Vest, Ardient and 589 00:32:46,200 --> 00:32:49,040 Speaker 1: Collar Capital have raised funds in the ten to twenty 590 00:32:49,080 --> 00:32:53,120 Speaker 1: billion dollar range. In simpler terms, there are now hot 591 00:32:53,120 --> 00:32:57,400 Speaker 1: potato funds where either another limited partner buys and other's allocation, 592 00:32:57,840 --> 00:33:00,480 Speaker 1: the companies themselves by back their stock, or the stock 593 00:33:00,560 --> 00:33:03,719 Speaker 1: is resold to other private investors who are building venture 594 00:33:03,720 --> 00:33:08,560 Speaker 1: capital firms out of shit. The venture capitalists can't sell. 595 00:33:09,120 --> 00:33:11,840 Speaker 1: You're seeing where the problem might be. Eventually, someone's going 596 00:33:11,880 --> 00:33:15,720 Speaker 1: to be. It's not Bomberman. It's not good now from 597 00:33:15,760 --> 00:33:18,720 Speaker 1: the same NERD lawyer piece and I quote again, and 598 00:33:18,760 --> 00:33:22,080 Speaker 1: they're not alone. The secondary market is projected to handle 599 00:33:22,080 --> 00:33:24,320 Speaker 1: one hundred and twenty two billion dollars in assets in 600 00:33:24,360 --> 00:33:27,400 Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, Yet that still represents just one point 601 00:33:27,480 --> 00:33:29,600 Speaker 1: nine percent of the total Unicorn value. As in the 602 00:33:29,680 --> 00:33:31,959 Speaker 1: side of Unicorn is a company worth a billion dollars, 603 00:33:32,360 --> 00:33:36,880 Speaker 1: there's six plus trillion dollars in untapped liquidity potential as 604 00:33:36,920 --> 00:33:39,920 Speaker 1: aside here. That's a really nice way of looking at this. 605 00:33:41,400 --> 00:33:44,480 Speaker 1: The transformation of the secondary market from emergency tool to 606 00:33:44,560 --> 00:33:48,800 Speaker 1: standard operating procedure represents the most significant structural shift in 607 00:33:48,880 --> 00:33:51,880 Speaker 1: venture capital since the rise of unicorns. It's not a 608 00:33:51,920 --> 00:33:55,880 Speaker 1: temporary fix. It's a permanent evolution driven by misaligned timeframes 609 00:33:56,000 --> 00:33:59,640 Speaker 1: between fund life cycles ten years and company maturation eleven 610 00:33:59,680 --> 00:34:03,240 Speaker 1: plus years. I read that it's not just a temporary 611 00:34:03,280 --> 00:34:05,840 Speaker 1: fix thing. I'm like, is this ai anyway back to 612 00:34:05,960 --> 00:34:08,680 Speaker 1: quoting for better or worse? This is the new reality 613 00:34:08,680 --> 00:34:11,760 Speaker 1: of startup funding. Vizs can no longer afford to simply 614 00:34:11,800 --> 00:34:14,440 Speaker 1: spray and pray and wait for exits. They need active 615 00:34:14,480 --> 00:34:18,160 Speaker 1: liquidity management strategies, and that fundamentally changes what kind of 616 00:34:18,200 --> 00:34:20,759 Speaker 1: companies are getting funded and how. I'm just going to 617 00:34:20,840 --> 00:34:24,200 Speaker 1: be honest. That last parts bullshit. I wrote this in 618 00:34:24,239 --> 00:34:26,759 Speaker 1: the newsletter. That last part is whang. This is not 619 00:34:26,880 --> 00:34:29,839 Speaker 1: changing anything about what companies get funded or how they're 620 00:34:29,840 --> 00:34:34,120 Speaker 1: still funding these unprofitable monstrosities. Nothing has changed, and I 621 00:34:34,160 --> 00:34:36,960 Speaker 1: would argue this piece frames that as a positive when 622 00:34:37,000 --> 00:34:40,000 Speaker 1: the reality is far grimmer. Venture capitalists are sitting on 623 00:34:40,040 --> 00:34:42,560 Speaker 1: piles of immovable equity and companies worth far less than 624 00:34:42,600 --> 00:34:44,840 Speaker 1: they invested in. And the answer, it appears, is to 625 00:34:44,840 --> 00:34:47,520 Speaker 1: find somebody else who is able to buy the dead weight. 626 00:34:48,000 --> 00:34:52,719 Speaker 1: I assume because they are stupid, Like I mean, I 627 00:34:52,760 --> 00:34:55,560 Speaker 1: realize someone is going to say, well, actually, it means 628 00:34:55,600 --> 00:34:57,319 Speaker 1: maybe they see maybe they can afford to hold it 629 00:34:57,360 --> 00:35:00,760 Speaker 1: for longer. No. Now, if you're buying anything since twenty 630 00:35:00,760 --> 00:35:04,879 Speaker 1: twenty one, you're probably get swindled. And according to Newcomer Only, 631 00:35:04,920 --> 00:35:08,120 Speaker 1: oney one hundred and seventeen venture funds closed in twenty 632 00:35:08,160 --> 00:35:11,080 Speaker 1: twenty five, down from twenty one hundred and twenty twenty four, 633 00:35:11,280 --> 00:35:13,640 Speaker 1: and forty three percent of dollars raised went to the 634 00:35:13,719 --> 00:35:16,360 Speaker 1: largest venture funds, per The New York Times and Pitchbook, 635 00:35:16,600 --> 00:35:20,080 Speaker 1: suggesting limited partners are becoming less interested in pumping cash 636 00:35:20,120 --> 00:35:22,560 Speaker 1: into the system at a time when AI startups are 637 00:35:22,600 --> 00:35:26,239 Speaker 1: demanding more capital than has ever been raised. How long 638 00:35:26,239 --> 00:35:29,160 Speaker 1: can the venture capital industry keep handing out one hundred 639 00:35:29,200 --> 00:35:32,120 Speaker 1: million to five hundred million dollars to multiple startups a year, 640 00:35:32,520 --> 00:35:34,680 Speaker 1: because all the signs suggest that the current pace of 641 00:35:34,680 --> 00:35:37,839 Speaker 1: funding must continue in perpetuity as nobody appears to have 642 00:35:37,840 --> 00:35:41,160 Speaker 1: worked out the generative AI is inherently unprofitable, and thus 643 00:35:41,239 --> 00:35:44,440 Speaker 1: every single company is on the Silicon Valley welfare system 644 00:35:44,480 --> 00:35:47,680 Speaker 1: until somebody or everybody gives up or the system itself 645 00:35:47,680 --> 00:35:51,560 Speaker 1: cannot sustain the pressure. I've read too many people make 646 00:35:51,600 --> 00:35:54,760 Speaker 1: offhanded comments about this being like the dot com boom, 647 00:35:54,760 --> 00:35:57,359 Speaker 1: and saying that lots of startups might die, but what's 648 00:35:57,440 --> 00:35:59,680 Speaker 1: left over will be good. And I hate them. I 649 00:35:59,719 --> 00:36:02,880 Speaker 1: hate so much. I hate them both for their flippancy 650 00:36:03,200 --> 00:36:06,440 Speaker 1: and for their ignorance. None of the current stack of 651 00:36:06,480 --> 00:36:09,080 Speaker 1: AI companies can survive on their own, meaning that the 652 00:36:09,160 --> 00:36:12,160 Speaker 1: venture capital industry is holding them up. If even one 653 00:36:12,200 --> 00:36:15,960 Speaker 1: of these companies faulters and dies, the entire narrative dies 654 00:36:16,000 --> 00:36:18,440 Speaker 1: with it. If that happens, it will be harder for 655 00:36:18,560 --> 00:36:21,560 Speaker 1: other AI companies to raise and even harder to sell 656 00:36:21,600 --> 00:36:24,040 Speaker 1: an AI company to somebody else. And if you can, 657 00:36:24,320 --> 00:36:27,799 Speaker 1: you'll be selling it for less. This is a punishment 658 00:36:27,880 --> 00:36:31,080 Speaker 1: for a decade plus of hubris, where companies were invested 659 00:36:31,080 --> 00:36:34,960 Speaker 1: in without ever considering a path to profitability. Venture capital 660 00:36:35,000 --> 00:36:37,640 Speaker 1: has made the same mistake again and again and again, 661 00:36:38,000 --> 00:36:41,239 Speaker 1: believing that because Uber or Facebook or Airbnb or any 662 00:36:41,320 --> 00:36:43,640 Speaker 1: number of other companies found in nearly twenty years ago 663 00:36:43,680 --> 00:36:47,239 Speaker 1: were unprofitable, at some point with past the profitability, I 664 00:36:47,320 --> 00:36:51,000 Speaker 1: might add, it was totally okay to keep pumping, pumpaning, pumping, 665 00:36:51,040 --> 00:36:53,440 Speaker 1: I'm just saying it, pumping up companies that have had 666 00:36:53,560 --> 00:36:57,000 Speaker 1: no path to profitability, which eventually became had no apparent 667 00:36:57,040 --> 00:37:00,520 Speaker 1: business models see the metaversal Web three, which eventually have 668 00:37:00,640 --> 00:37:03,920 Speaker 1: negative margins so severe, evaluation so high that we will 669 00:37:03,960 --> 00:37:06,480 Speaker 1: need an IPO at the a market cap higher than 670 00:37:06,520 --> 00:37:11,320 Speaker 1: Netflix at minimum. This is Silicon Valley's rot economy, the 671 00:37:11,440 --> 00:37:14,360 Speaker 1: desperate growth at all costs attachment the startups where you 672 00:37:14,440 --> 00:37:16,920 Speaker 1: and I quote really liked the founder, where and I 673 00:37:17,120 --> 00:37:19,239 Speaker 1: quote again the market could be huge who knows if 674 00:37:19,239 --> 00:37:21,480 Speaker 1: it is, and where you just don't need to worry 675 00:37:21,520 --> 00:37:26,279 Speaker 1: about profitability because IPOs and exits were easy. Yeah, you see, 676 00:37:26,360 --> 00:37:29,120 Speaker 1: venture capital used to be real easy because we were 677 00:37:29,120 --> 00:37:31,120 Speaker 1: still in an era of hypergrowth. You could be a 678 00:37:31,200 --> 00:37:33,279 Speaker 1: stupid asshole who doesn't know anything, but there were so 679 00:37:33,280 --> 00:37:35,080 Speaker 1: many good deals, and the more well known you were 680 00:37:35,200 --> 00:37:38,400 Speaker 1: the more likely be brought them first, guaranteeing a bigger payout, 681 00:37:38,600 --> 00:37:42,040 Speaker 1: guaranteeing more LP capital, guaranteeing more opportunities that were of 682 00:37:42,040 --> 00:37:44,560 Speaker 1: a higher quality. Because you were a big name. It 683 00:37:44,600 --> 00:37:47,160 Speaker 1: wasn't about being smart and knowing the fundamentals. It was 684 00:37:47,200 --> 00:37:49,719 Speaker 1: about being handed things. It was easier to make a 685 00:37:49,800 --> 00:37:52,440 Speaker 1: valuable company too, easier to get funded, and easier to 686 00:37:52,440 --> 00:37:54,520 Speaker 1: sell because the goal was always get funded, grow as 687 00:37:54,600 --> 00:37:58,400 Speaker 1: large as possible, or well go public. And here's the 688 00:37:58,440 --> 00:38:01,400 Speaker 1: thing about that as well. They were just more ideas. 689 00:38:01,600 --> 00:38:03,680 Speaker 1: They want more ideas to do. Like I said with 690 00:38:03,719 --> 00:38:06,359 Speaker 1: the rock com bubble, they were just there were more 691 00:38:06,360 --> 00:38:11,040 Speaker 1: things that people could create. That's the thing that ideas 692 00:38:11,040 --> 00:38:15,279 Speaker 1: are a finite source. And when you incentivize this kind 693 00:38:15,360 --> 00:38:19,879 Speaker 1: of thinking, you eventually stop incentivizing good ideas. You incentivize 694 00:38:19,920 --> 00:38:23,279 Speaker 1: the growth. And as a result, venture capital encouraged growth 695 00:38:23,280 --> 00:38:26,799 Speaker 1: at all cost, thinking above everything else. In twenty ten, 696 00:38:26,880 --> 00:38:29,319 Speaker 1: ben Horowitz said and I quote that the only thing 697 00:38:29,400 --> 00:38:32,480 Speaker 1: worse for an entrepreneur than startup hell, which was bankruptcy, 698 00:38:32,719 --> 00:38:36,800 Speaker 1: is startup purgatory. And I quote when you don't go bankrupt, 699 00:38:36,880 --> 00:38:38,520 Speaker 1: but you fail to build the Number one product in 700 00:38:38,560 --> 00:38:42,400 Speaker 1: the space that's purgatory. You have enough money with your 701 00:38:42,400 --> 00:38:44,759 Speaker 1: conservative burn rate to last for many years. You may 702 00:38:44,800 --> 00:38:47,640 Speaker 1: even be cash flow positive. However, you have zero chance 703 00:38:47,680 --> 00:38:50,000 Speaker 1: to becoming a high growth company. You have zero chance 704 00:38:50,040 --> 00:38:53,480 Speaker 1: of being anything but a very small technology business. From 705 00:38:53,480 --> 00:38:55,759 Speaker 1: the entrepreneur's point of view, this can be worse than 706 00:38:55,800 --> 00:38:59,160 Speaker 1: start up hell, since you're stuck with the small company. 707 00:39:00,080 --> 00:39:05,120 Speaker 1: What a fucking, noxious, ugly, horrifying thing to say. Let 708 00:39:05,120 --> 00:39:06,680 Speaker 1: me put it like this. If you run a good 709 00:39:06,680 --> 00:39:08,920 Speaker 1: business that people like and it's profitable, and you have 710 00:39:08,960 --> 00:39:12,399 Speaker 1: good your employees like it, your customers like it, that's 711 00:39:12,440 --> 00:39:14,279 Speaker 1: a good company. That isn't hell. And if you think 712 00:39:14,320 --> 00:39:17,440 Speaker 1: that way, you're a fucking psychopath. You're an actual nutter. 713 00:39:18,040 --> 00:39:20,560 Speaker 1: And this poisonous theory sadly paid off for him in 714 00:39:20,600 --> 00:39:23,120 Speaker 1: that startups got used to building high growth, low margin 715 00:39:23,200 --> 00:39:25,160 Speaker 1: companies that would easily sell to other companies of the 716 00:39:25,160 --> 00:39:29,879 Speaker 1: markets themselves, right up until it didn't. Of course, per 717 00:39:29,920 --> 00:39:32,919 Speaker 1: nerd Lawyer, IPOs have collapsed as next sit route along 718 00:39:32,960 --> 00:39:35,600 Speaker 1: with easy to raise capital. Per pitch Book, since twenty 719 00:39:35,600 --> 00:39:38,760 Speaker 1: twenty two, seventy percent of VC backed exits were valued 720 00:39:38,760 --> 00:39:40,799 Speaker 1: at less than the capital put in, with more than 721 00:39:40,800 --> 00:39:43,360 Speaker 1: a third of them being startups buying other startups. In 722 00:39:43,400 --> 00:39:46,000 Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, the money is drying up as the 723 00:39:46,080 --> 00:39:48,839 Speaker 1: value of VC's assets is decreasing at a time when 724 00:39:48,920 --> 00:39:51,360 Speaker 1: vcs need more money than ever because everybody is heavily 725 00:39:51,400 --> 00:39:54,400 Speaker 1: leveraged in the single most expensive funding climate in history, 726 00:39:55,120 --> 00:39:57,839 Speaker 1: and as we hit this historical liquidity crisis, the two 727 00:39:57,920 --> 00:40:01,120 Speaker 1: largest companies, open aron Anthropic are becoming drains on the 728 00:40:01,160 --> 00:40:04,160 Speaker 1: system that in a very real sense, are participating in 729 00:40:04,160 --> 00:40:07,480 Speaker 1: a massive redistribution of capital reserved for startups to one 730 00:40:07,520 --> 00:40:10,279 Speaker 1: of a few public companies. No really hear me out. 731 00:40:11,080 --> 00:40:12,920 Speaker 1: Open Ai is trying to raise as much as one 732 00:40:12,960 --> 00:40:15,680 Speaker 1: hundred billion dollars in funding so it can continue to 733 00:40:15,719 --> 00:40:18,320 Speaker 1: pass money to one of a few public companies, thirty 734 00:40:18,320 --> 00:40:21,280 Speaker 1: eight billion dollars to Amazon Web Services over seven years, 735 00:40:21,440 --> 00:40:23,919 Speaker 1: twenty two point four billion dollars to Core We've over 736 00:40:24,000 --> 00:40:26,440 Speaker 1: five years, and two hundred and fifty billion dollars over 737 00:40:26,480 --> 00:40:30,720 Speaker 1: an indeterminate period on Microsoft Azure. If successful, open AI's 738 00:40:30,800 --> 00:40:32,839 Speaker 1: venture Telethon will raise more money than it has ever 739 00:40:32,880 --> 00:40:35,480 Speaker 1: been raised in a single round, draining funds that actual 740 00:40:35,520 --> 00:40:38,919 Speaker 1: startups need. Anthropic has agreed, as I mentioned, to over 741 00:40:39,000 --> 00:40:42,480 Speaker 1: seventy billion dollars in compute and chips deal across Google, Amazon, 742 00:40:42,480 --> 00:40:45,600 Speaker 1: and Broadcom. And that's not including this hut eight compute 743 00:40:45,600 --> 00:40:47,719 Speaker 1: deal at Google is backing that I don't even really 744 00:40:47,760 --> 00:40:52,200 Speaker 1: want to think about. Think about it, just pre or 745 00:40:52,280 --> 00:40:56,560 Speaker 1: simple for a second. Instead of venture capital going to startups, 746 00:40:56,800 --> 00:41:00,000 Speaker 1: you know, early stage companies taking a risk that much 747 00:41:00,320 --> 00:41:02,600 Speaker 1: is going to Open AI and Anthropic so they can 748 00:41:02,600 --> 00:41:05,680 Speaker 1: hand it to big tech. This is big tech stealing 749 00:41:05,680 --> 00:41:08,080 Speaker 1: from Silicon Valley and to see it as anything else 750 00:41:08,320 --> 00:41:11,800 Speaker 1: is naive. And this money will come from what remains 751 00:41:11,840 --> 00:41:15,439 Speaker 1: of venture capital, private equity, and whatever hyperscalers will hand 752 00:41:15,480 --> 00:41:18,760 Speaker 1: over yet elsewhere, even the money that goes to regular 753 00:41:18,800 --> 00:41:22,440 Speaker 1: startups is ultimately being sent to those hyperscalers. That AI 754 00:41:22,560 --> 00:41:24,919 Speaker 1: startup that needs to keep raising one hundred billion dollars 755 00:41:24,960 --> 00:41:27,600 Speaker 1: in a single round isn't sending that cash to other startups. 756 00:41:27,680 --> 00:41:31,960 Speaker 1: It's mostly going to Open Ai, who sends it to Microsoft, Amazon, Core, Evil, Google, 757 00:41:32,400 --> 00:41:35,040 Speaker 1: Anthropic who sends it to Google, Microsoft or Amazon or 758 00:41:35,040 --> 00:41:38,520 Speaker 1: one of the large hyperscalers such as Amazon, Microsoft or Google. 759 00:41:39,840 --> 00:41:42,640 Speaker 1: Silicon Valley didn't birth the next big tech firm. It 760 00:41:42,719 --> 00:41:47,080 Speaker 1: incubated yet another hyperscalar level parasite, except instead of just 761 00:41:47,160 --> 00:41:50,319 Speaker 1: spending money on hyperscalar services and raising money to do so, 762 00:41:50,560 --> 00:41:53,600 Speaker 1: both Anthropic and open ai actively drain the venture capital 763 00:41:53,680 --> 00:41:56,920 Speaker 1: system as well as they both burn billions of dollars 764 00:41:57,080 --> 00:41:59,760 Speaker 1: and need those billions of dollars to keep running the models. 765 00:42:00,080 --> 00:42:03,879 Speaker 1: The AI startups can pay them by creating something that's 766 00:42:03,920 --> 00:42:07,640 Speaker 1: incredibly expensive to run, so destructively expensive to run, they 767 00:42:07,640 --> 00:42:11,120 Speaker 1: can naturally create startups more dependent on the venture capital system, 768 00:42:11,200 --> 00:42:13,440 Speaker 1: and the venture capital system has no idea what to 769 00:42:13,480 --> 00:42:17,120 Speaker 1: do other than say, just grow baby. Both open ai 770 00:42:17,200 --> 00:42:19,279 Speaker 1: and anthropics models might be getting cheaper on a per 771 00:42:19,360 --> 00:42:23,120 Speaker 1: million token basis, but they use more tokens, which increases 772 00:42:23,160 --> 00:42:25,680 Speaker 1: the cost of inference, which in turn increases the cost 773 00:42:25,760 --> 00:42:28,719 Speaker 1: of startups doing business, which in turn means Open Ai, 774 00:42:28,840 --> 00:42:32,080 Speaker 1: Anthropic and all connected startups lose more money, which increases 775 00:42:32,120 --> 00:42:35,800 Speaker 1: the burn on venture capital. This is a doom spiral, 776 00:42:35,960 --> 00:42:37,920 Speaker 1: one that can only be reversed through the most magical 777 00:42:37,960 --> 00:42:40,640 Speaker 1: and aggressive turnaround we will see in history, and it 778 00:42:40,680 --> 00:42:42,680 Speaker 1: will have to happen in the next year without fail, 779 00:42:44,640 --> 00:42:47,279 Speaker 1: and it won't. It's not going to happen and to 780 00:42:47,280 --> 00:42:50,000 Speaker 1: find out why. You just have to join me tomorrow 781 00:42:50,120 --> 00:42:53,839 Speaker 1: for part three of the in shitter financial Crisis. I'm 782 00:42:53,880 --> 00:43:06,000 Speaker 1: Better Offline. This is ed z trn fuck. Thank you 783 00:43:06,080 --> 00:43:07,440 Speaker 1: for listening to Better Offline. 784 00:43:07,560 --> 00:43:10,000 Speaker 2: The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song 785 00:43:10,080 --> 00:43:12,719 Speaker 2: is Matasowski. You can check out more of his music 786 00:43:12,760 --> 00:43:16,399 Speaker 2: and audio projects at Matasowski dot com, M A T 787 00:43:16,400 --> 00:43:20,880 Speaker 2: T O S O W s ki dot com. You 788 00:43:20,880 --> 00:43:23,400 Speaker 2: can email me at easy at Better offline dot com 789 00:43:23,480 --> 00:43:25,800 Speaker 2: or visit Better Offline dot com to find more podcast 790 00:43:25,840 --> 00:43:29,160 Speaker 2: links and of course, my newsletter. I also really recommend 791 00:43:29,200 --> 00:43:31,120 Speaker 2: you go to chat dot Where's youreaed dot at to 792 00:43:31,239 --> 00:43:33,680 Speaker 2: visit the discord, and go to our slash Better. 793 00:43:33,560 --> 00:43:36,719 Speaker 1: Offline to check out our reddit. Thank you so much 794 00:43:36,760 --> 00:43:37,280 Speaker 1: for listening. 795 00:43:38,120 --> 00:43:40,799 Speaker 3: Better Offline is a production of cool Zone Media. For 796 00:43:40,920 --> 00:43:44,080 Speaker 3: more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool Zonemedia 797 00:43:44,160 --> 00:43:47,000 Speaker 3: dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, 798 00:43:47,040 --> 00:44:02,680 Speaker 3: Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts, film 799 00:44:05,840 --> 00:44:06,000 Speaker 1: Scho