WEBVTT - Camille Fournier on Building Tech at Two Sigma

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisn't Thal and I'm Tracy all Away. So, Tracy,

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've had a number of episodes, um, not

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>that many, but certainly a handful of them. One of

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>our themes is like quantitative finance quant stuff. We always

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of talk about it from a sort of very

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>big theoretical level, like what's happening with different factors, alpha decay,

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that always sort of like tends to be

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>at the sort of big picture abstraction level. I would say, yeah,

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. We talk a lot about the

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>future of quantitative finance. What's most important, I guess when

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it comes to running a successful quant strategy, like whether

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the actual formula or program that you're using, or

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 1>whether it's something like the data set that you're using.

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>We've discussed all of those. Yeah, absolutely, And you know,

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>so we talked about theoretically, we talked about it academically,

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>but one thing that we haven't really discussed is you know,

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>when you like think about quantitative finance, you think about

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>lots of really smart people, mathematicians, people using computers to

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>find data, to analyze huge amounts of data. We've never

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>really liked talked about it from the bottoms up, like

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 1>the actual process of using computers, using technology to uh

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to perform all these calculations and too in theory um

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>beat the market. Yeah, I think that's right. And I'm

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>going to go ahead and admit that I don't know

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that much about engineering in the financial industry. We can

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot about what gives a competitive edge when

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it comes to quant strategies, but a competitive edge when

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it comes to engineering when it comes to in stalling

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>particular products or systems. I really have no idea what

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that looks like nowadays. No, I literally have have no idea.

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's kind of, you know, it's this huge whole

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>component of it, and every financial firm, whether it's a

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>major bank, whether it's a fund, want to advertise their

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>tech stack, their tech advantage, uh so to speak. But

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I really I don't really know much about the actual

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>process of like building that tech and how you build

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a competitive edge from that tech. And Yeah, it's like

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a whole sort of facet of this that I

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think we've I don't think most people know very

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>much about. Yeah, and I'm also interested in knowing whether

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the culture of being an engineer at a financial company

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is different to the culture of being say a trader

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>or a banker at a financial company. And I'm definitely

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>interested in knowing whether or not the culture of being

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>an engineer at a financial company is different to being

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>an engineer at say Google or Apple or something like that. Right,

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm extremely curious about this as well, because again, it's

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>like one of these things where in theory more and

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>more financial institutions would like to be competitive for talent

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>against the likes of Google and Facebook and other startups

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and so on. But it raises the question of like,

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>how similar differences and what how the too, how the

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to compare? Yeah, absolutely, this is going to be a

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>fun episode, I can tell. Yeah. I'm super excited about

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this one. This is a conversation I've wanted to have

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. Today, our guest is Camille Fourgnier.

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>She is the managing director or a managing director head

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of platform engineering at two Sigma, which is a big

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>financial services company. It has a hedge fund and also

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>does VC stuff. Veryous sort of well known famous firm

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in the space. Camille was previously the CTO at rent,

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the runway, the popular fat and I don't know how

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you describe it, but I guess you like people rent

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>dresses onto temporary basis or rent clothes on temporary basis.

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>And prior to that, Camille was at Goldman sach so

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>has seen all of this from both sides, the tech

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>hemisphere of all these services. So Camille, thank you very

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Yeah, thank you for having me

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>excited to be here. Yeah, I'm really looking forward to this. So, UM,

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>before we get going, why don't you sort of give

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>us the quick summary of your career. How did you

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>get to be? Uh, your path to being the head

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of platform engineering at two Sigma. Sure, I have something

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>I have. I guess I have a fairly standard educational background.

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>So I have a computer science degree from Carnegie Mellon.

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>For my undergraduate degree, I worked at Microsoft for a

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.679
<v Speaker 1>hot second. UM went to graduate school at the University

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of Wisconsin. Um decided I didn't want to get a PhD.

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I did want to live in New York City, and

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>so ended up getting a job at this company that

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I had literally never heard of until I interviewed there,

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>called Goldman Sachs, which I'm sure will be very amusing

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to your listeners. UH. You know, went to Goldman UH

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>and was there for about six and a half years.

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>And I worked in risk technology for a long time,

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>which was actually like really awesome area to work in,

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>building a lot of really big scaled systems to do uh,

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, really massive risk analysis. UM. And then I

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>also worked in similar kind of technology group to the

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>one that I run today UM for a couple of years. UM.

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>And then around two thousand and eleven, I decided that,

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wasn't quite ready to be settled down

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and like making a career at a giant company like Goldman,

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to try something new. And the startup

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>world was really, you know, getting to be very hot,

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>very popular, UM. Even in New York. There were lots

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of interesting startups. And UM, I got approached by Rent

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the Runway and I had also not heard Rent the

0:05:57.760 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Runway until I I interviewed there, But of course they

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>were very small, small startup at the time. UM, and

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I was just so blown away by the product idea.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>It was one of those things where every time I

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>described the product to another woman, she immediately understood what

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about when it comes to consumer facing startups,

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that's really such an important sign of a good idea

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>is just how fast your potential customer gets it. So

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I was like, all right, like this company seems like

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>it has really shart business people. Right. The founders were

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>just incredibly smart, you know, Harvard NBA's um PhDs with

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>operations to a starch backgrounds on the data side. So

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>it was like they're really smart people in the in

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the leadership team, and the technology was a complete mess um,

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>And so I was like, great, I'm a great engineer

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and I want to like, you know, become a leader.

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So this is a great opportunity for me to you know,

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>join this company and the fixing the tech will be

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>easy and you know this is going to be a

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>slam dunk, and of course life never works out that way. Um.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 1>It was significantly more challenging to come in to a

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>startup that's sort of in the growth stage and uh,

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, both do a lot of work to really

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>turn the technology around and make it really stable and

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>scalable and easy to add new stuff too. Because that's

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>really a lot of the challenge in a in a

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>startup is how fast can you iterate how fast can

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you do new things? UM? And it's also just that

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>was a you know, a massively challenging learning experience to

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>learn how to become a manager and an executive and

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a leader. But I did that. I did that for

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>four years. So I became the CTO UM. You know,

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I was there for about four years, and it was

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a really it was an amazing, amazing learning experience. You know.

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>After after four years, I sort of felt like I

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>had done what I came to do it. I had

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>come to learn a lot. I had come to establish

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>myself a little bit as as a leader in the

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in the industry. Frankly, I did want to have more

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of a public career than I was able to have

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it Goldman. At the time, Golden was still very secretive.

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>They didn't really want you, you know, out there in

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>public talking about your work. And I like talking about

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>my work. I like sharing my ideas. You know. I

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot about being a leader. I grew the team,

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I stabilized the technology, UM. And then I decided that

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, I wanted to you know, being at the

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>start ups exhausting. So I was like, all right, I'm

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a break I'm gonna think about starting my

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>own company. I actually wrote a book about engineering management

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in the year and a half that I was doing

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>various things. Was how I like to describe it. And

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>then I was like, all right, you know what I'm

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>this me starting a startup by myself is not working

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>out because I don't have any great ideas and you know,

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is not the right thing for me to

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>be doing right now. So I was like, Okay, I

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>need a job. And I got approached by two Sigma.

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would talked to a bunch of company

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I talked to Google, I talked to a bunch of

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>smaller startups and you know, if I'll be honest, When

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I was approached by two Sigma, UM, my first reaction was,

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I had actually I know a lot

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of people who worked at two Sigma already, and my

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>impression was actually that the company was really academic. I

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't sure how well I would fit in in uh,

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in a super academic culture. UM. But I went and

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>interviewed and I was actually blown away by just how

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>smart and nice everyone was, and you know, the role

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that they wanted me to come in to run their

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>platform engineering organization was a really interesting role, UM, really

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of getting back to my technical roots as you know,

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a large systems developer. It's really kind of the technology

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 1>area that I'm most interested in personally. UM. And it

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>was a great, you know, great team I got to

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm part of the engineering leadership team at

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>two Stigma UM, and so you know, I took the

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>job and you know, here we are today and it's been, uh,

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's been really a great experience so far.

0:09:55.920 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been there for almost four years now. So you

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned when you moved from Goldman to Rent the Runway,

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>which was a startup at the time and has really

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, like I have used the runway and

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it's blown up a lot since then and pretty much UM.

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>All of the women that you might ask about this

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>probably no about it. UM. But when you moved from

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Goldman to Read the Runway, you mentioned that it was

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>more challenging than you had expected. Can you go into

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more detail on on why that was

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and what was the difference between either the technology that

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.439
<v Speaker 1>you were actually working on Goldman versus the technology and

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Rent the Runway, or maybe the differences in in the

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>ways the companies actually operated and did things. There were

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.959
<v Speaker 1>a few things. So first of all, like at at Goldman,

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly at the time, and the areas that I was in,

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I was just not used to working in, So I

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>was not used to working in an environment a sort

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of combined being very needing to move really really fast,

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>right so needing to build new stuff really quickly. There

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>are areas of Goldmen that are like this, but that

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really where I was working and having really high

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of uptime requirements. So I think one of the

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 1>interesting things about the difference between a lot of parts

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of finance and consumer technology is that it is still

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>possible in a lot of parts of finance to work

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>on systems that actually don't have to be up seven,

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>meaning that they don't run on the weekend sometimes right

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the markets are closed, so the system

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't actually need to be running for example. Um, that

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is not the case with consumer technology, right. The the

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>expectation is if you're building a product, you're building you know,

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a website or an app or whatever that you know

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>consumers are going to use, then it's going to be

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>available when they want to use it. And that is

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>actually a really big technical difference because it really does

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>mean that you know, if something goes wrong on you know,

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>two o'clock in the morning on the Sunday, you have

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to do deal with it. Someone has to deal with it, right.

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>It can't just like leave it until, you know sometime

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>when you're more wide awake and all right, like we've

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>got to get this ready for you know, open business

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>open on Monday morning, but we've got some time, right,

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>which is often the case in finance. Um, that's really

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>not the case in consumer. And so I think that

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>is actually a really big different kind of challenge that

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wasn't totally thinking about, I think when

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:30.599
<v Speaker 1>I when I came in. So I think that was

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a big challenge. UM. And then there's just like a

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of technology pieces that you know, when you're building, um,

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>when you're building for consumers, particularly frankly in fashion, where

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>things need to look and feel good right in the

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>technology there's a you know, there's sort of a spit

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and polish and you know, branding and elements to everything

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that you're building that you know a lot of times

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in finance, you know you're building an interface for you know,

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a trader or you know, a risk analyst or whatever.

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>It just needs to work. It doesn't need to be beautiful. Um. So,

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, really having to think much much more about

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the customer who isn't sitting you know, in

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the desk next to you telling you exactly what they need.

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, because the customer is you know, thousands and

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of women all over the country who

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, each has kind of different preferences, right, so

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>how do you figure out what to build for them?

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>How do you you know, how do you build something

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>great without necessarily having you know, the person telling you

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>exactly what it is that they want built. Those are

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the challenges just on the kind of technical

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>side that it was really a very different kind of

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>both you know, some of the technical challenges on availability,

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but also on you know, the actual way you decide

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>what to build is really different. Um. And then you know,

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>look big company to small company. You know, obviously you've

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 1>got a lot you don't even notice the things that

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>are prepared provided for you in big companies like you

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>O HR and training and i T and all of

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that stuff that's just kind of there and working and

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>has been established over years and years you you have

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to establish it yourself at a small company, and that's fun,

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's a lot of work. So you mentioned between

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Rent the Runway and your current job, which will get

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>too soon. You did write this book, and I meant

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to plug it in the beginning, and I'll plug it

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>at the end. But the Manager's Path a guide for

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>tech leaders navigating growth and change. And so I have

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to imagine like during that time, like coming to Rent

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the Runway when it was a small startup and then

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>leaving when it was this household name. I have to

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>imagine that like your role in your evolved a lot

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>during this time. My assumption would be that in the beginning, um,

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you were doing a lot more like hands on technical stuff.

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>By the end, my guests would be a lot more management.

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>And per your book, I imagined that that's a really

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>tough progression for a lot of people. And engineering and

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>management they're very different jobs. It's kind of like in

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>our industry, like being a journalist and being sorry, being

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a reporter and being an editor. They're very different jobs,

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>even though a lot of people go on that trajectory. Now,

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess this is you know, this is a book

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>length topic. But for you like sort of like what

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>are the big pain points that people experience or that

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you experienced on that journey to actually sort of uh,

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>managing engineers as opposed to building technology directly. Yeah, you're

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right that it is a book length topic.

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think some of the highlights are in the

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>early days you can still sort of manage and write

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>code or you know, be kind of somewhat hands on

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>for a while, but as your team grows, you start

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to you have to consciously like ease off and pick

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>out what you're going to work on if you're gonna

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>be hands on. And then at some point you just

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>can't be hands on anymore, right, you can't. You know,

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you cannot really be writing production quality software if you're

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in meetings six to eight hours a day because you're

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to be focused, and then you're gonna

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>be working. You know, maybe you're writing that code at

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>night after your day is done. But you know, in

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>engineering teams, right, you don't just like write code and

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>then it's done. You write code, someone has to review it,

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you whether it's good or not. Um, you know,

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you've got to make sure it actually works. You've got

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to actually get it running in in you know, two customers.

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Customers have to be actually using it, um and if

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it breaks, it has to be fixed. And so when

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>managers who are really managing very large teams right code,

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>they may be able to do the writing part, but

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>they often can't do the rest of those parts. And

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that's actually really frustrating as an engineer. I've been I've

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>been an engineer with managers who have like throwing code

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>at me that way, and it's it's really h it's

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>really frustrating to experience that. So, you know, I really

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>strongly advise you know, managers, once they get to a

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>certain point, to stop doing that. Stop writing code, right,

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 1>that's not really your job. You can do it as

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a hobby on the weekends, but don't do it for

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>like your actual team because they'll probably get mad at you. Actually, um.

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>But that transition is so painful because as engineers, we're

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>taught for years and years and years that our value

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is in the software that we create. That like, that

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>is what we are rewarded for, is you know, writing

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>good software, building good systems and being clever and fixing

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, fixing hard bugs and being being smart about

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>that thing, and it really feels very it's very scary

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to stop doing it. Um. You know, also because everyone

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>tells you, you know, and there's just kind of you know,

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>tech is a very ageist industry, right, and there's this

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>great sense of like, if I stop writing code, you know,

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm immediately on the path to obsolescence and my technical

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 1>knowledge is going to fade and I'm not going I'm

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>not going to be taken seriously by the people that

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm managing anymore. And you know, that is a very so.

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's like you've got all these cultural messages that

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>are like your value is in software, but you can't

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>really do your job well if you're writing a lot

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of software as a manager of a large team, um,

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and you have to kind of get over that and

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to feel like you're still staying technically

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in the loop. UM. Incredible without you know, having you know,

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>writing code being your your main job. UM. So I

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>think that was that was a huge transition for me,

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:48.199
<v Speaker 1>um and a huge transition for a lot of engineers.

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's that's a huge one. And then

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, there are a lot of them

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>like as your team gets larger, you also have to

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to develop the skill of helping your your

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>organization make good technical decisions without knowing every single detail

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of what they're doing. And that's sort of a it's

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of a similar challenge but a little bit different. Right,

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>So when you're actually again writing the code, reading the code,

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 1>very much in the details of the work you and

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you're probably an expert if you've been you know, you're

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>getting into management, you've been doing this for a long time.

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, generally speaking, people they get promoted into management

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>do tend to be viewed as technically credible by their teams.

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't think you should always just promote

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the best engineers as managers because they're the best engineers

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>they might actually like writing code. But you know, sometimes

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>right like there, you know, you do want to promote

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>people into management who are technically credible, um and you know,

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>have good judgment, because that is part of your job

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 1>as an engineering manager is sort of helping your team

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>make good decisions. But you uh, you definitely need to

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>still be able to help them make those good decisions

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>even as a team it's larger and larger, and you

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.479
<v Speaker 1>get farther away from the details of the problems, and

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's the other really challenging transition that

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of managers go through and that I certainly

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 1>went through, which was like, how do you, like, how

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>do you get the right information and get sort of

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:19.479
<v Speaker 1>about what's going on in a team that's maybe you know,

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't even you're managing the manager of their manager, uh,

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, or whatever you're you're you're like several management

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>layers away from it, but you kind of need to know, oh,

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>something's going wrong here, because if it goes too wrong,

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it could affect, you know, the ability for your whole

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>organization to get stuff done right, or it could affect

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna make you look bad because something is late

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>or it's broken, or you know, it's constantly falling over.

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>And so you have to still be able to influence

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>their technical decisions, but without actually like looking through their

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>code and reading it and actually knowing all the details

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of their systems designs. So how do you do that?

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Um And I think that is a similar challenge to

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people go through, and certainly that I

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 1>that I went through. And so those are those are

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>some of the challenges that I talk about in my book,

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>among many others. So I may be projecting here, but

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I see a lot of parallels between the the engineering

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>profession and how it um. Sorry, let me rephrase that.

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>So I may be projecting a little bit here, but

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there are quite a few parallels between

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 1>journalists who transition from reporters to editors or some other

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of management job in journalism and engineers who do

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>something similar. You know, journalists are judged by their output,

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the quality and maybe sometimes the quantity of the stories

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>they produce, and once you move into an editing role

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>or a management role, um, it's hard to come up

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>with new ways of judging your performance. But the other

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that tends to happen in journalism is journalists, in particular,

0:21:54.040 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>reporters are competitive people who often have an anti authority streak,

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>like they like calling authority up on the decisions that

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>they're making, and therefore sometimes they do not make the

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>greatest managers. So one thing I'm wondering is in tech

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of similar, right, you have a lot of

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>competitive people who want to move fast and break things.

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think there, at least for a long time,

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>there was this culture of management being bad and that

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you should have fewer managers, you should just hire good

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>people and let them do their own thing. How did

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you deal with with that aspect of it? And and

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think that managers are are more widely accepted

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in tech as a lot of the players get bigger. Oh, yes,

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>this is a this is a very very interesting area.

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I one of my friends and I sometimes refer to

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>ourselves as punk managers because we're kind of both both

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.959
<v Speaker 1>a little bit punks and in various ways, you know,

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And I do think absolutely so. Actually think tech is

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of interesting. There are definitely the sort of anti

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 1>authority types of which I'm sort of one in some ways,

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>right um where you know, I mean, part of the

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>reason that I ended up getting into management is that

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I looked around and I was like, look, I think

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I can make better decisions than other people. I think

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I can, you know, I think I think I make

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>good decisions. I think I make better decisions on the whole.

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm you know, going to do a better

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>job of treating people well and you know, creating healthy,

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 1>healthy organizations. But I mean also i think I'm gonna, like,

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we're going to be more successful

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>under me because I've you know, I've got what it takes, right.

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I do think there is some of that, But there

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:47.479
<v Speaker 1>are actually plenty of people in tech who are you know,

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>very rule abiding thoughtful. I mean, look, tech, part of

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>part of being an engineer, being a really good engineer,

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 1>is actually like learning the rules of the systems really well. Right.

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>You're you're sort of writing very very very precise rules

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>into you know, into software as you write software, right,

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And so there are actually plenty of people in tech

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>who I think are are you know, our rule abiding

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and quite quite willing to kind of um, I don't know,

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're definitely not like anti authority necessarily, um,

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but you're absolutely right that. For a long time that really,

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>back when I started it round the runway, this was

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 1>like really very popular, the idea that like managers are

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a waste. There are you know, again higher st front

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 1>people and get out of their way and let them,

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they'll just figure it out. And you know,

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 1>managers are deadweight, right. Both engineers and like vcs would

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>say this, right. Frankly, part of the reason I started

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>blogging about management and ended up writing the book was that.

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I just thought that was so so ridiculous because it's

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>so obvious to me that, look, modern engineering is is

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>building very complex systems that required large teams of people

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to build and maintain and evolve. Um it is a

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>team sport, is what a lot of people say, right,

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's true. I don't think that you know,

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that isn't that is a somewhat more modern evolution of

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>software engineering, right, you know, thirty years ago or the

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>early days of software engineering, lone wolves could do more

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>by themselves. Um, But as systems have grown and grown

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in complexity and they're more components and more things that

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>need to be done, it's just much harder to build

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, a really interesting and compelling product, as you know,

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a lone wolf for as a team of like sort

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of individuals just working on their own stuff. And so

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think that when you need that really like

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 1>team based coordination UM to go really well, you do

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>need capable management to help with that. You know, you

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>need the coach, You need the person who is you know,

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>observing everything that's happening and making sure that you're covering

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>all the pieces that need to be covered, making sure

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that the groups were well together, because you know, when

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the group isn't working well together, they're not as productive,

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not as happy. You know, you get a lot

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of conflict, you get a lot of you know, you're

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>just you're you're getting bad results out of that, right. Um.

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to get the greatest creativity out of

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the overall group when they're you know, when they're not

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>collaborating well. Right. Um. And so I do think that

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>you know that there was I just, in my opinion, frankly,

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>like kind of a you know, legacy attitude about management

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>that I think, for the most part, has gone away,

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>although I'm always waiting for the backlash to happen. You know, inevitably,

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:36.199
<v Speaker 1>there will be a backlash and people will be like,

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, we have too many managers and everyone

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>wants to be a manager, and you know, we're wasting

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>all this overhead on management, you know. So I'm just

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of waiting for that to to drop personally. But

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I do like, I think that management. I do think

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that management became more accepted even at startups in tech

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of people were suffering from the lack

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of it. A lot of teams are just not efficient

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 1>even small teams that startups, Like, it's really hard to

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>run an efficient it's really hard to like build a

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>multiperson product group effort if you don't have leadership and

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you know, you need someone who's willing

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to to do that. You know, both the good and

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the bad work though, right, you know, the fund work

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe if sometimes you get to you know, you get

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to be the final decision maker on some stuff, maybe, right.

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 1>But the grunt work of like, actually you have to

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:30.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of influence a lot of people, and you know,

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to deal with a lot of conflict, and

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to you know, have hard conversations, and so

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I do think that management has become more

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>popular in tech, not just because the big tech companies

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>have grown up, but actually because everyone has just realized that,

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>like it makes their teams happier and more effective. So

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>let's uh skip ahead, or let's skip to your current role.

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>UM introduced you, Managing director, Head of Platform Engineering at

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>two Sigma. What is the head flaff engineering at Too Sigma? Do? Yeah,

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So I run the team that builds the software systems

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that anyone at Too Sigma who writes software themselves will use.

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 1>So that could be other engineers or modelers. But we

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>build things like our data storage products. Um, you know,

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you do all of our sort of public cloud work.

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Um we build Uh, we build tools for software developers

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 1>to you know, test their code and and execute their code.

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>UM we build framework. So you know, really it's all

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of the all of the software that other people who

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>write software use, is you know, foundational software is built

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>by by min How different is an engineer at a

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>financial services firms such as to Sigma to an engineer

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>at a tech company or or some sort of startup,

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Like does it take a different skill set or does

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it take a different personality? I think that depends a

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Um. So, like in my team, we are

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>actually have a lot of people. I mean to Sigma

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.239
<v Speaker 1>in general has like six of the staff is not

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>from financial background financial company backgrounds, right, So so we

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely you know, to Sigma in general is like a

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>very um diverse in terms of a former employer background

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of company. Um. And my team is actually very

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>heavily populated by people who have worked in the tech

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>industry before coming to to Sigma because a lot of

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the products that we build are very much like it's

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>very tech heavy. The team that I run. You would

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>see similar kinds of teams at all kinds of big

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>tech companies, UM, they would be much much larger than

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the team that I run. But you know, it's very

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it's very kind of like UM transferable work. So I

0:29:56.640 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>think that the some of the differences that i've I've

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>noticed between engineers certainly at startups versus some somewhat larger

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>UM either tech or finance companies. I do think that

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you know that as you get larger or you know

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>more that you can you can hire more specialists and

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>more depth experts, and so I do think that what

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you'll see if you look at a startup is you're

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna see a lot more generalists, and you'll see engineers

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>who are not necessarily the best engineer in terms of

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>like real like sort of deep expertise and you know

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>they know everything about you know, this kind of deep

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>technical system or whatever, right, or you know they're they're

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>much this. The skills that startups tend of value are

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>much more about people who could just be like, all right,

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>like how quickly can I get through this problem and

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>onto the next thing? And that is not that is

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>value to UM at big companies to some extent, but

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I think big companies tend to have more time to

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>spend on solving problems, and so they'd rather spend the

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>time to solve a problem right or more right than

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to just get it, you know, get something out there,

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and we want to the next thing. So I think

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that is a difference. I also actually think one

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of the one of the really one of the things

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that I learned and Rent the Runway and that I've

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>brought to my team at Sigma Up is that UM.

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, as I mentioned I think a little earlier,

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the big things that you have to do

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to be successful at a startup, particularly like a consumer

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>facing startup like Rent the Runway is really understand and

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>figure out what your customer is gonna want UM and

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to build things and how to know

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>when if the feature or the product feature that you're

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>building is actually something that people want UM. And that

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of product management skill set and acknowledge and even

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>engineers have to have it. So there is a there

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is a formal role called product manager exists, you know,

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 1>most startups in most technopanies, and two Sigma has these

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>folks as well. UM, But you know, when you're at

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a startup, even the engineers are kind of expected to

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>understand and sort of have that customer empathy and that

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that knowledge of kind of knowing how to think about

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that has actually been really useful for me to bring

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to two Sigma because you know, we have customers for

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>my team. There are other people at two Sigma, UM,

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>but they're not you know, we don't we don't have

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, a trading desk telling us to build X,

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Y or Z. Right, We've got you know, hundreds of

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>people that use our software and they all have slightly

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>different means, and so it's really important that my team

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>UM be able to hear lots of different pieces of

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>feedback and sort of generalize that into Okay, where do

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 1>we actually need to go with the products that we're building,

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>so that we're building something that's great for other people

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to use, it's easy for them to use, it makes

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>them productive, and it kind of anticipates the future needs

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of this business. So yeah, I mean, I was that's

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of where I was gonna go next. I mean,

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>when you describe figuring out the needs of rent the runway,

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about tens of thousands of women around the

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>country and how they might want to search and have

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a article of clothing shipped to them. Describe a little

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>bit more that process when it's internal, when it's at

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a financial services company. What are the types of things

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that your your clients, your customers, your internal customers are

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>looking for. What do they need, what kind of problems

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>are they trying to solve, and what are they looking

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to you specifically to build for them or to help

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>them build so that they can do their job more effectively. Yeah, So,

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, one of the big problems that they

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>they're always going to need, um, is just the demand

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>for more you know, more data, uh, more data and

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>more computational power. And so my team, um, you know,

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>my team doesn't do the actual data on boarding, right,

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's a data engineering team that's really responsible

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>for that part of things, but my team owns the

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 1>storage systems, right and you know, recently, right we were

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>serving we've been serving like fifteen petabytes a day of data.

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>So just to like contextualize that for your users, if

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got an iPhone with two fifty six gigs of storage,

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that's like sixty tho iPhones worth of storage that we're

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of serving in a day. UM. So you know,

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:27.439
<v Speaker 1>we have these really massive amounts of data and there's

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>always demand for you know, I want more data, I

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>want it faster, I need it. You know, I need

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to be able to access this data in particular ways

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:38.320
<v Speaker 1>because you know, like I'm looking across a time series

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of data and trying to you know, detect changes or

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>what have you. And so you know, and as we

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, as new kinds of machine learning algorithms are adopted,

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they have different kinds of data requirements UM, and data

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>serving requirements that my team will need to be able

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to to keep up with. Right. And you know, so

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I think there's always that a man for bigger and

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 1>faster um you know, on the on the and and

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>then on the compute computational capacity side, right Like you know, again,

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>as as we get more data, we want to process

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it faster. You know, we want to run lots and

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>lots and lots of experiments. Um. You know, we have

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>workloads that peek at like half a million cores of processing.

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So again that's like you know, your laptop might have

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.280
<v Speaker 1>sixteen cores if you've got like a really hefty laptop,

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>so you know, huge huge volumes of computational processing, and

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to do that requires pretty complex systems under the covers

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to actually you know, coordinate all of that work. Um,

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, enable people to sort of submit work to

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>these systems to run and get results. You know. The

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 1>way that my team will will understand this is we

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>really have to work with our partners, both in engineering

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and modeling to hear about Okay, like you know, what's

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>what's coming up next? Right? Okay, if we're moving to uh,

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:00.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we're moving to doing a lot more

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>deep learning in this area, what is that going to

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 1>mean for the platform? Right? What? Okay? You know, what

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 1>does what are the real heavyweight requirements? You need access

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to GPU processors, right, you know, those those processors that

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>are great for certain kinds of matrix math, and that's

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>what um you know, okay deep learning really needs on GPUs,

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 1>So my systems are going to need to support that.

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's that's one side of it, and

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>then I think another side of it is just um

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the same way that if you're at

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:33.439
<v Speaker 1>a at a business serving external customers where you can't

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 1>just talk to each customer individually. You want to look

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>actually at the data about how people are using your

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>product and detect trends um or opportunities for improvements. Right, So,

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:46.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at the data about the way people

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>are using your systems and you see that like a

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:53.879
<v Speaker 1>particular very commonly run command is really slow, you can

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of accept that that actually is probably slowing people

0:36:56.480 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>down and and and interrupting their their low and their creativity.

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's an opportunity where if we could make that

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 1>commonly used command faster in some way, they're going to

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>be more productive. They're going to be you know, happier

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's just gonna be a lot easier for them

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to get their work done. Right. So, those are some

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of the ways that we kind of approach trying to

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>figure out what to build. So presumably making the core

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>systems faster and able to process larger amounts of data

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>like that is how engineering contributes to a competitive edge

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>for two sigma um. First of all, is that correct?

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And then secondly, if that's true, does that mean that

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:44.800
<v Speaker 1>does that mean as as quant shops kind of get

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:50.879
<v Speaker 1>bigger and faster, that scale matters much much more than

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>it used to, and does that mean that the competitive

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>advantage is always going to lie with the biggest firms

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 1>with the most resources. Does that makes them yeah, you know,

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I will so. I do think that a lot of

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the advantage that engineers bring to companies like to Sigma

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is just our ability to build platforms, um to build

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>platforms that can enable scale and productivity. I do think

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that's you know that and and being you know and

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:25.280
<v Speaker 1>then and I do think that that engineers also bring

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 1>bring a degree of innovation with them, right. This is

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason that you know, companies do put put

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a premium on really great engineers. And you know, it's

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>not just because like the skill set is rare, because

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:40.240
<v Speaker 1>more and more people are learning how to write code,

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think it is becoming it's not

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 1>as hard as it once was to write code. But

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 1>I think the best engineers are not only capable of

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>writing code, but there they are innovators and they have

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, they can see ideas for how to do

0:38:55.719 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>things that you know, you wouldn't necessarily predict as an

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 1>as an outsider, even as an outsider who is an

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>engineer but not deep in the details of a particular area,

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I think It's an interesting question as to whether scale

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is always a competitive advantage for companies like to Sigma.

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I am not an expert in you know, the quantitative

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 1>finance hedge fund industry. Um. I've only worked at two

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Sigma when it comes to you know, hedge funds and

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and so I don't have a ton of you know, experience.

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>More broadly, I mean, I do think though that you know,

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you do see scale. Um. I do think scale matters,

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and scale matters in a lot of ways in these businesses.

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, I think scale matters in your ability

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to get good costs and trading right, which is, you know,

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:48.839
<v Speaker 1>get get your costs down in those areas, get your

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:51.399
<v Speaker 1>lending costs down. But I do think that scale from

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a from a technology point of view, it will matter

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:59.280
<v Speaker 1>if the way, you know, if the way to find

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 1>good valuable ideas comes from processing larger and larger and

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>larger sets of data. Yes, scale is always going to

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 1>be a competitive advantage. Now, if you can find ways

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of getting good ideas that don't require processing massive amounts

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of data UM or you know, don't require running really

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>large computational experiments to determine, then you know, scale is

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily an advantage, and scale certainly comes with its downsides, right,

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:32.719
<v Speaker 1>So I think too Sigma has really invested heavily in

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>building out platforms UM. Not just in my team, but

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 1>you know even in our our model or tools from modelers, right.

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:41.239
<v Speaker 1>We try to think about that is building a platform

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of tools that are modelers can use, it all work together,

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:47.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, some companies of my impression is that there

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>are companies where, like you know, practically like every desk

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>will have its own sort of engineering team in its

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 1>own set of tools. And those are two very different approaches,

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and they have pros and cons. I think that the

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>platform approach, you can you can do bigger things, right.

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like comparing like a cruise ship or

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a big container ship with like a speedboat. Right,

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:12.320
<v Speaker 1>so like you know, you can go a lot farther

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and you can do a lot more and can carry

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot more in a big ship, but you cannot

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:19.800
<v Speaker 1>turn quickly, right, Whereas if you're in a speedboat you

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 1>can reactually really really really fast. You just can't. You know,

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got sort of a limited amount that you can

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>actually do with that UM. And so I do think

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, platforms have a lot of advantage and

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>this ability to scale and this you know, investment in

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 1>being able to scale does give you a lot of

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>advantages in terms of, you know, the scope of things

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:43.359
<v Speaker 1>you can do, but it does have downsides in that

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to invest a lot of technology and time

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and effort into being able to do that in the

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 1>first place, and that means that changing your approach becomes

0:41:52.520 --> 0:42:14.759
<v Speaker 1>somewhat more expensive. So I'm curious about the evaluation process

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of new endeavors. So presumably anyone who is you know,

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>doing trying to build some sort of machine learning AI

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:29.800
<v Speaker 1>trading system would always like more data and faster access

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to the data and so forth. But you or the

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:37.479
<v Speaker 1>engineers have to evaluate, I presume like, okay, well, what's

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a worthy investment and does this really make sense to

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>build out this capacity and will it really deliver adequate returns?

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about those kinds of problems when

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a team comes to you with some sort of need

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 1>or with some sort of when they're bumping up against

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the limitations of the existing platform, of the existing technology,

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 1>evaluating what what aspect of capacity is actually worth investing in,

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:07.880
<v Speaker 1>because presumably it's a very very costly time money also

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:13.359
<v Speaker 1>with uncertain uncertain returns. Yeah, so I have have sort

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of two different approaches. So one of them is that,

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, if you see a pattern of people coming

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to you, or you can attect a pattern of requests,

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you should probably build it. Because now you're seeing, all right,

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 1>like I've seen several different people are thinking about problems

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that if we had a solution that served time series

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:36.880
<v Speaker 1>data ten times faster or whatever, right, Um, we would

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:39.359
<v Speaker 1>be killing a lot of birds with that stone, right.

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 1>And so definitely part of the job is looking for

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 1>those patterns and knowing what people are working on and

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>being able to to decompose it into Okay, actually, you

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 1>know these are very similar things, and we need to

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 1>solve for this pattern. Um. But another approach that I

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like to do is sometimes you're not sure, and so

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the best approach is to partner with the team, particularly

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>if it's coming from an engineering team that's requesting something.

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Is a partner of the team, and build out some

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of proof of concept. You know, where you're you're

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:16.280
<v Speaker 1>investing enough to get something built, but you're not committing

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to turning it into like a big platform system. Um.

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know what you do. When when you do that,

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:26.239
<v Speaker 1>it's like, first of all, you learn, uh, you learn

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about the problem more and more and a really more

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:33.359
<v Speaker 1>like specific way. And then if you build this sort

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of proof of concept for a team and nobody else

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:40.279
<v Speaker 1>sees it and says, oh, I really want that too,

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 1>or this is super useful. I can see how I

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 1>could use something like this in my area. Then you

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>can say, okay, you know what like this isn't gonna

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:48.799
<v Speaker 1>be a platform team we've you know, we've partnered with you,

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 1>but you're gonna this is your your thing now, so

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 1>take it, run with it, you know, use it for

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>your small area, but we're not going to extend it

0:44:57.160 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to be something generalized. But sometimes you build out that

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>proof of concept and you do see people asking for

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:07.239
<v Speaker 1>well maybe not quite that thing, but something that looks

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of similar, and it gives you a much clearer

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 1>idea of what the actual need is. And again I

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 1>think that is this is a very much you know,

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:18.319
<v Speaker 1>something that I've taken from startup life right where it's

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, how can I how can I learn quickly

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 1>where I should be going? And sometimes the best way

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 1>to learn quickly is so just to build something that

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:30.920
<v Speaker 1>isn't the ideal, um, you know, big in system, but

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:34.879
<v Speaker 1>that if we launch it with a partner, will learn

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the area and whether or not it's

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:40.800
<v Speaker 1>worth investing in. So I have a slightly weird question,

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 1>which is how do financial services firms feel about open

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:50.800
<v Speaker 1>source software nowadays? Because I remember, I guess five or

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 1>six years ago when I was writing about Wall Street,

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>I remember there were one or two banks that we're

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:59.439
<v Speaker 1>trying to make an open source push because they thought

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it could make everything more efficient and cut down on costs.

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of cost pressure at the banks

0:46:05.120 --> 0:46:08.360
<v Speaker 1>after the financial crisis. But it was sort of an

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:11.839
<v Speaker 1>uphill battle for them because most of the banks were

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty competitive, and I guess they thought all their technology

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:17.800
<v Speaker 1>was very proprietary and they didn't really want to share.

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Has has that changed at all? Is there more cooperation

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 1>across the financial industry when it comes to software. There's

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:29.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly a lot more open source um. Actually, you know,

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons that I left Goldman was that

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I actually was working in open source there and I

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>felt like it was such an uphill battle to be

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:41.279
<v Speaker 1>allowed to work an open source at the time. I

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:44.239
<v Speaker 1>think they've changed that process quite a bit, and you know,

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:46.719
<v Speaker 1>in recent years. But you know, when I was there,

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it was like, well, we'll let you do this because

0:46:51.480 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 1>we like you and we trust you. But it wasn't

0:46:53.800 --> 0:46:57.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of a generalized process that lots of people could

0:46:57.560 --> 0:47:00.840
<v Speaker 1>do UM and I do think that's changed dramatically in

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the last ten years. So two Sigma dos a ton

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of open source UM. We both contribute to big popular

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 1>open source projects like pandas UM. We also open source

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 1>some of our own software. UM. So I definitely think

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that you're seeing a lot more open source in the

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:20.440
<v Speaker 1>financial industry now, it's still you know, it's still different,

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I think than the tech industry in that you know,

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it's still a bit more bureaucratic probably to to you know,

0:47:28.600 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 1>create open source. There is certainly concern about I P

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and what is going to give our you know, competitors

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:40.239
<v Speaker 1>and advantage if we open source versus you know, what

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 1>helps helps with our brand in the industry, right, you know,

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:47.799
<v Speaker 1>because open source is good partly because it helps you

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 1>recruit engineers. Engineers tend to like companies that do open source.

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:54.640
<v Speaker 1>You know. In my opinion, I think it's just like

0:47:54.840 --> 0:47:57.239
<v Speaker 1>it shows that you're a good corporate citizen when you

0:47:57.360 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 1>contribute to open source, and you you know, because everyone

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 1>uses open source, and open source is expensive to keep

0:48:03.760 --> 0:48:05.759
<v Speaker 1>up for the open source maintainers, right, you know, a

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of them are volunteers. And so when you look

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:11.400
<v Speaker 1>at a company and you see that they you know,

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:13.720
<v Speaker 1>they use open source, because every company that does software

0:48:13.719 --> 0:48:16.400
<v Speaker 1>is using open source, but they absolutely do not contribute

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 1>back to it, you think, Okay, this company isn't going

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 1>corporate citizen in that way. What does that mean for

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the way that they think about, you know, engineering?

0:48:25.239 --> 0:48:28.280
<v Speaker 1>So I do think that you know, savvy companies realize

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that preventing their engineers from contributing to open source is

0:48:33.000 --> 0:48:37.360
<v Speaker 1>actually bad branding in a lot of ways. But there's

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 1>still certainly is that concern of Okay, how do we

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 1>make sure that engineers are not accidentally leaking something that

0:48:44.239 --> 0:48:47.799
<v Speaker 1>is in fact really like proprietary and valuable um. And

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I do think, you know, that's going to be a

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:54.280
<v Speaker 1>concern probably forever, given that there are you know, algorithms

0:48:54.320 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and pieces of code in finance that really are quite

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:00.920
<v Speaker 1>valuable in and of themselves, right, And so you know,

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:03.880
<v Speaker 1>when you can you can do something significantly faster than

0:49:03.920 --> 0:49:07.959
<v Speaker 1>your competitor because you've thought of this great mathematical algorithmic trick,

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Like you don't really want that getting out there um

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to the wider world accidentally leaked as a piece of

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 1>open source software. You know, I'm curious. I mean, at

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the beginning you mentioned two Sigma's reputation as being kind

0:49:23.040 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of academic. But I'm thinking, like from the perspective of

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>an engineer, like maybe thinking about going to a place

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:31.760
<v Speaker 1>like two Sigma versus going to a place like Google.

0:49:31.800 --> 0:49:34.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like I don't know if Google still has it,

0:49:34.400 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>but of course they used to be famous for like

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the thing and getting to work on your own projects

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and I and they still have all those other like

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 1>side bets, which are just a bunch of businesses that

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:45.919
<v Speaker 1>lose money. And I also have to imagine that even

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:47.839
<v Speaker 1>in the core Google, there's probably a lot of people

0:49:47.880 --> 0:49:50.520
<v Speaker 1>working on things that don't make money and are never

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:52.840
<v Speaker 1>expected to make money. And they're just a bunch of people,

0:49:53.200 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, eating the lunches and working on their

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 1>projects and stuff. But I had had a fund that

0:49:58.120 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a hedge fund, I can't imagine that there is a

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:03.440
<v Speaker 1>much space for that kind of thing where it just

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:07.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of like intellectual explorations or long pursuits of things

0:50:07.600 --> 0:50:10.839
<v Speaker 1>that may never get monetized or product tized and so forth.

0:50:11.239 --> 0:50:13.839
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm curious like about like, is that how

0:50:13.920 --> 0:50:17.479
<v Speaker 1>much of it different that is internally at a place

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 1>like two Sigma versus a large established tech company like

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a Google or Facebook or Microsoft. So I think, look,

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:31.319
<v Speaker 1>I think that that UM to Sigma definitely has I

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:35.960
<v Speaker 1>mean people doing technical research. We have a labs team UM,

0:50:36.000 --> 0:50:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and we do try to provide room for people to

0:50:40.360 --> 0:50:44.560
<v Speaker 1>explore ideas, which again, as I said, innovation you know,

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:48.840
<v Speaker 1>comes from surprising places and engineering. And you know, while

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Google is not always particularly efficient probably in the way

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it allocates its engineers, at least to an outsider, UM,

0:50:57.520 --> 0:51:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know that that it does come a place of

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:03.880
<v Speaker 1>recognition that like engineers, when left to their own devices

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and but given clear you know, ideas, maybe clear problem statements,

0:51:09.239 --> 0:51:12.520
<v Speaker 1>will innovate in surprising ways. UM. And so I do

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:15.479
<v Speaker 1>think that at least at Too Sigma, we we try

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:19.279
<v Speaker 1>to do a reasonable job of balancing, like being very

0:51:19.320 --> 0:51:21.920
<v Speaker 1>pragmatic and focused on we've got to ship things for

0:51:21.920 --> 0:51:24.439
<v Speaker 1>this business, right Obviously, you know, we're not a huge

0:51:24.440 --> 0:51:26.960
<v Speaker 1>company or you know, eight hundred some engineers, so it's

0:51:27.000 --> 0:51:30.400
<v Speaker 1>not like, you know, we have infinite resources to do whatever,

0:51:30.920 --> 0:51:34.719
<v Speaker 1>but being culturally aligned with that desire of engineers to

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:38.600
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit of freedom to explore and innovate

0:51:38.880 --> 0:51:42.319
<v Speaker 1>and you know, try new things. You know, I do

0:51:42.360 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 1>think too, Sam actually does a pretty good job of that,

0:51:45.080 --> 0:51:46.759
<v Speaker 1>partly by the fact that we just have like a

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:50.400
<v Speaker 1>great learning culture, so you know, we really support people

0:51:51.200 --> 0:51:54.359
<v Speaker 1>learning new things, whether it's going to conferences or doing

0:51:54.400 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 1>training or reading academic papers together. You see a lot

0:51:57.160 --> 0:52:00.120
<v Speaker 1>of that kind of thing at two Sigma, and I

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 1>think we're very eager to take ideas from academia and

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:06.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of more cutting edge ideas from the wider world

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and figure out how to apply them, which I think

0:52:08.880 --> 0:52:11.560
<v Speaker 1>is a competitive advantage for us. So, you know, I

0:52:12.160 --> 0:52:15.480
<v Speaker 1>think that you know, if you're an engineer deciding between

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Google and two Sigma, you know, there's a lot of

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:21.160
<v Speaker 1>different things you're going to be deciding on. I actually

0:52:21.160 --> 0:52:22.839
<v Speaker 1>would guess that one of the major things you're really

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:24.440
<v Speaker 1>deciding on, though, is do you want to work at

0:52:24.480 --> 0:52:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a giant company or do you want to work at

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:28.799
<v Speaker 1>a small company, you know, right, because if you want

0:52:28.800 --> 0:52:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to work at a giant company, you know, giant companies

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:34.440
<v Speaker 1>have pluses and minuses, right, There's lots of different things

0:52:34.440 --> 0:52:36.719
<v Speaker 1>you could do, but you are going to be a

0:52:36.880 --> 0:52:40.400
<v Speaker 1>small fish and a very very very very very big pond,

0:52:40.920 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, whereas at two sigma you can you know,

0:52:44.200 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you can make a difference, you know, even as a

0:52:47.560 --> 0:52:50.839
<v Speaker 1>college graduate, you know, coming into the company. We're not

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 1>so big that people don't make a big noticeable difference

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:59.200
<v Speaker 1>even early in their career, um, if they find the

0:52:59.280 --> 0:53:02.360
<v Speaker 1>right problem to solved. So I think that that's really

0:53:02.360 --> 0:53:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the that's the bigger difference, um, you know, than the

0:53:06.760 --> 0:53:09.759
<v Speaker 1>than the time concept or any any of the rest

0:53:09.760 --> 0:53:14.319
<v Speaker 1>of it. Um. I'm curious how intense the competition is

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for engineers at the moment. So, you know, obviously there

0:53:18.239 --> 0:53:21.719
<v Speaker 1>was a lot written about how banks were competing with

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:25.319
<v Speaker 1>the big tech firms to get the best talent, particularly

0:53:25.360 --> 0:53:28.640
<v Speaker 1>around the time that Goldman announced that it was actually

0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a tech firm. And there are all these stories about

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:35.840
<v Speaker 1>financial services firms putting in uh, you know, pool tables

0:53:36.000 --> 0:53:38.960
<v Speaker 1>or ping pong tables and free lunches or whatever to

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:42.359
<v Speaker 1>try to entice people that would normally go to some

0:53:42.480 --> 0:53:46.839
<v Speaker 1>campus in Silicon Valley. Is that still the case or

0:53:47.360 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is that starting to um perhaps ease off of it.

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I do. My impression is that that the

0:53:55.480 --> 0:53:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the competition for engineers is still very hot. You know, people,

0:53:58.920 --> 0:54:03.080
<v Speaker 1>can you compete with different people? So I don't. I

0:54:03.320 --> 0:54:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we compete with big tech companies and other funds.

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:10.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't compete. My impression is not that we compete

0:54:10.480 --> 0:54:12.880
<v Speaker 1>as much with Goldman. I do think that Goldman can

0:54:12.920 --> 0:54:16.839
<v Speaker 1>stay there a tech company, but uh, culturally they are

0:54:16.960 --> 0:54:19.640
<v Speaker 1>an investment bank, um and for good and for bad.

0:54:19.680 --> 0:54:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I learned a lot in my time working at Goldman.

0:54:21.840 --> 0:54:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Goldman has some really great aspects of their culture.

0:54:24.719 --> 0:54:26.719
<v Speaker 1>But you do not spend a hundred years as an

0:54:26.719 --> 0:54:29.279
<v Speaker 1>investment bank and then say you're a tech company and

0:54:29.320 --> 0:54:32.279
<v Speaker 1>become a tech company. That's just not just foundationally, like,

0:54:32.320 --> 0:54:35.480
<v Speaker 1>not the way it works like. I actually sort of personally,

0:54:35.520 --> 0:54:39.000
<v Speaker 1>quite strongly believe that the founding culture of a company

0:54:39.080 --> 0:54:41.560
<v Speaker 1>is very hard to shake. And so if you have

0:54:41.640 --> 0:54:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a founding culture of engineers, which two Sigma does, right.

0:54:45.080 --> 0:54:47.279
<v Speaker 1>So one of the co founders of two Sigma is,

0:54:47.640 --> 0:54:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, an engineer. Um, I do think you've got

0:54:50.600 --> 0:54:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a very strong technical culture built in from day zero.

0:54:55.320 --> 0:54:57.920
<v Speaker 1>If you have a founding culture of bankers, it's going

0:54:57.960 --> 0:55:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a different culture. And you can make it

0:55:00.600 --> 0:55:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a good place for engineers to work. And there's you know,

0:55:02.520 --> 0:55:04.360
<v Speaker 1>lots to do and lots to learn, but it's going

0:55:04.400 --> 0:55:07.239
<v Speaker 1>to feel different. And I think you know, engineers are

0:55:07.239 --> 0:55:10.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna are going to recognize and see that, and so

0:55:10.520 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I but the competition for engineers is definitely still quite hot,

0:55:14.800 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, between you know, financial companies and tech companies

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:21.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know, frankly everything in between. Right software, software

0:55:21.760 --> 0:55:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is eating the world, as it were, and you know,

0:55:24.160 --> 0:55:28.319
<v Speaker 1>everybody needs technical talents to to get ahead. Like one

0:55:28.360 --> 0:55:32.080
<v Speaker 1>more question sort of about the transition from a tech

0:55:32.120 --> 0:55:36.319
<v Speaker 1>company to two Sigma. I mean, obviously, I assume there's

0:55:36.320 --> 0:55:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a many things that are similar, um, you know, the

0:55:40.000 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of pure tech aspect of it. But I'm curiously

0:55:43.840 --> 0:55:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and I guess you know, you had did have the

0:55:45.920 --> 0:55:49.480
<v Speaker 1>financial experience, Ed Goldman, But how much did going from

0:55:49.960 --> 0:55:54.000
<v Speaker 1>tech to a financial services firm or to a fund

0:55:54.440 --> 0:55:58.719
<v Speaker 1>require you to sort of learn the language of finance more?

0:55:58.800 --> 0:56:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And how challenging was that? I mean, I I understand

0:56:02.239 --> 0:56:05.480
<v Speaker 1>most of your work is working with other engineers, but

0:56:05.600 --> 0:56:08.399
<v Speaker 1>in terms of you know, the way people talk about

0:56:08.400 --> 0:56:12.280
<v Speaker 1>analyzing time series and so forth, how did you approach

0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:14.239
<v Speaker 1>that And how much of a challenge is that Being

0:56:14.280 --> 0:56:18.280
<v Speaker 1>able to sort of meld the communication between tech people

0:56:18.360 --> 0:56:22.600
<v Speaker 1>engineers versus the more purely uh finance side, It is

0:56:22.640 --> 0:56:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a challenge. Um, you know, I think one of the

0:56:25.960 --> 0:56:28.959
<v Speaker 1>big challenges frankly for me at two Sigma is I'm

0:56:29.120 --> 0:56:33.440
<v Speaker 1>not I don't have a like huge heavy math background,

0:56:33.920 --> 0:56:37.759
<v Speaker 1>and so there is you know, even more than like Goldman,

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the math at two Sigma is intimidating to me, I

0:56:43.560 --> 0:56:46.600
<v Speaker 1>will say. And you know, so I think a lot

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of this is just learning the language

0:56:52.040 --> 0:56:55.239
<v Speaker 1>of the company and how to how to speak to

0:56:55.640 --> 0:56:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the language of the company. We like to talk about

0:56:58.000 --> 0:57:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Epsilon's and Omega's and you know it's like, okay, like

0:57:02.719 --> 0:57:06.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of small steps and like big you know, big ideas. Okay,

0:57:06.719 --> 0:57:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I can I can sort of translate that, right, I

0:57:09.400 --> 0:57:11.719
<v Speaker 1>guess I find, especially for the role that I'm in now,

0:57:12.040 --> 0:57:13.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what I really need to do and

0:57:13.719 --> 0:57:15.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what I really need to translate is

0:57:15.320 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 1>really getting people to out of the details of their

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:23.960
<v Speaker 1>area again, whether it's my area details or the details

0:57:24.000 --> 0:57:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the need of some some modeler or

0:57:26.880 --> 0:57:31.720
<v Speaker 1>some of our engineering team into kind of the the

0:57:31.720 --> 0:57:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the higher level problem that they're trying to solve. So

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:38.919
<v Speaker 1>helping helping us all get to kind of the generalized

0:57:39.000 --> 0:57:41.800
<v Speaker 1>common ground. I don't necessary. I don't need to understand

0:57:41.840 --> 0:57:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the math at a detailed level to understand that you

0:57:45.640 --> 0:57:48.840
<v Speaker 1>need ten times the data that you used to need, right,

0:57:49.000 --> 0:57:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to understand, um, the details of you know,

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:58.760
<v Speaker 1>dealing with prime brokers to understand that this team needs

0:57:58.760 --> 0:58:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to build systems are going to iterate

0:58:01.120 --> 0:58:04.360
<v Speaker 1>much faster and you know, have you know, have these

0:58:04.480 --> 0:58:08.439
<v Speaker 1>characteristics because of the way that they need to pull

0:58:08.520 --> 0:58:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the different prime reverse. I don't know now now I'm

0:58:11.480 --> 0:58:13.640
<v Speaker 1>way way out of my depth, but you know so,

0:58:13.640 --> 0:58:15.440
<v Speaker 1>so I think a lot of a lot of my

0:58:15.560 --> 0:58:18.800
<v Speaker 1>job anywhere that it's been in leadership, has been how

0:58:18.840 --> 0:58:21.840
<v Speaker 1>do I get everyone to speak to get to a

0:58:21.880 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 1>common ground of of talking about their problems at a

0:58:26.160 --> 0:58:28.720
<v Speaker 1>high enough level that each can kind of appreciate it

0:58:29.080 --> 0:58:33.360
<v Speaker 1>um without forcing everyone to know all of the known

0:58:33.440 --> 0:58:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll understand all the details. So I do think that

0:58:36.080 --> 0:58:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it's fun to know the details sometimes, but a lot

0:58:39.200 --> 0:58:42.959
<v Speaker 1>of times engineers can get lost in the details, and

0:58:43.360 --> 0:58:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the details aren't the important thing, right, The

0:58:46.040 --> 0:58:48.280
<v Speaker 1>important thing is kind of the narrative of how is

0:58:48.320 --> 0:58:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the work that we're doing making an impact on your

0:58:51.960 --> 0:58:54.400
<v Speaker 1>day to day life, making your job easier, helping this

0:58:54.480 --> 0:58:59.160
<v Speaker 1>company scale, helping this company grow, you know, get where

0:58:59.160 --> 0:59:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it needs to go. UM. And I think that's that's

0:59:02.160 --> 0:59:04.960
<v Speaker 1>really that's the most important thing that I do is

0:59:05.480 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>help is create and and and share narratives that almost

0:59:10.360 --> 0:59:12.760
<v Speaker 1>anyone can understand, because you know, I may need to

0:59:12.800 --> 0:59:15.720
<v Speaker 1>talk to you know, modelers, I may need to talk

0:59:15.720 --> 0:59:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to people in legal I mean need to talk to

0:59:17.640 --> 0:59:20.400
<v Speaker 1>people in you know, uh, you know, in the on

0:59:20.400 --> 0:59:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the corporate side or an HR right uh and and

0:59:23.440 --> 0:59:25.760
<v Speaker 1>all of those folks need to understand the value that

0:59:25.800 --> 0:59:29.120
<v Speaker 1>my team is bringing UM to the company. And I

0:59:29.200 --> 0:59:32.600
<v Speaker 1>need to understand that at the high level of their problems, UM,

0:59:32.640 --> 0:59:34.320
<v Speaker 1>so that I can make sure that I'm meeting them.

0:59:34.320 --> 0:59:37.280
<v Speaker 1>But again, you know, I don't need to necessarily understand

0:59:37.360 --> 0:59:39.600
<v Speaker 1>all of the details of how they do their jobs

0:59:39.800 --> 0:59:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to deliver the solutions for the kinds of software that

0:59:43.280 --> 0:59:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I need to build. I really enjoy. I mean, it's

0:59:47.360 --> 0:59:50.720
<v Speaker 1>such a sort of new area for us, for me

0:59:50.720 --> 0:59:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and Tracy, and I think for probably most of our listeners.

0:59:53.360 --> 0:59:57.000
<v Speaker 1>So really appreciate you taking the time and walking us

0:59:57.040 --> 0:59:59.680
<v Speaker 1>through your job and your career and the whole landscape

0:59:59.800 --> 1:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>at really absolutely fascinating stuff. Well, yeah, thank you for

1:00:03.160 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>having me on. It was fun. Thanks, that was great, Tracy.

1:00:27.760 --> 1:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, like I said in the beginning, that was

1:00:29.200 --> 1:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a conversation I've kind of wanted to have for a

1:00:32.200 --> 1:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>long time to like talk about the sort of nuts

1:00:35.240 --> 1:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and bolts of just how all of this works. And

1:00:38.560 --> 1:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I found that really super interesting. Yeah. Absolutely, And um,

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think about what to like focus on

1:00:46.120 --> 1:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>here because it was such a wide ranging conversation. But

1:00:48.720 --> 1:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I did think the idea about banks sort of like

1:00:53.680 --> 1:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>creating or financial services firms creating um an open source

1:00:58.640 --> 1:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>culture and the evolution of that. I thought that was

1:01:01.000 --> 1:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. In this idea of being a good corporate

1:01:05.000 --> 1:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>citizen when it comes to producing open source software, that's

1:01:08.920 --> 1:01:11.919
<v Speaker 1>such a it's such a sea change to the way

1:01:11.960 --> 1:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>banks used to operate. And Camille was sort of giving

1:01:15.400 --> 1:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a flavor of that with with her description of her

1:01:17.560 --> 1:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>work at Goldman UM. And we're still only on the

1:01:20.680 --> 1:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>edges of it. But I'm interested to see how that goes,

1:01:24.480 --> 1:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>because as you have more financial companies that like to

1:01:28.840 --> 1:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>declare that they are in fact tech firms and that

1:01:31.320 --> 1:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>they're competitive, edge also comes from tech, Like does that

1:01:35.720 --> 1:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>does that spark a similar culture to what we see

1:01:40.880 --> 1:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on the West Coast in Silicon Valley when it comes

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to open source or does that cause banks to sort

1:01:45.240 --> 1:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of double down on being competitive and keeping their tech

1:01:48.760 --> 1:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>as a proprietary thing. Does that make sense? Now? It

1:01:51.680 --> 1:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense. I like her point. That's like,

1:01:54.120 --> 1:01:56.439
<v Speaker 1>in the end, like a company like Goldman, it's a bank,

1:01:56.560 --> 1:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it's an investment bank. And maybe maybe UH an engineering

1:02:03.000 --> 1:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>founded firm like two Sigma can genuinely have a tech culture.

1:02:08.200 --> 1:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But I have to I suspect she's right that for

1:02:11.120 --> 1:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the Protestations Goldman affirm like Goldman can never

1:02:16.040 --> 1:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>really be a tech firm. That would just be my guests.

1:02:18.120 --> 1:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe we'll have someone from Goldman on at some

1:02:20.680 --> 1:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>point to make the counter case. I think both of

1:02:23.520 --> 1:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>us sort of had the thought at the same time

1:02:26.280 --> 1:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of like there are some similarities between going from being

1:02:30.240 --> 1:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>an engineer to a manager to going from being a

1:02:33.320 --> 1:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>reporter to a journalist. And you know, I think, um,

1:02:36.680 --> 1:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what she said really resonated with me,

1:02:40.200 --> 1:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>including that last bit about like the sort of the

1:02:43.920 --> 1:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>uh the need to create a common language that everyone understands.

1:02:47.400 --> 1:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And I see that all the time, like in a

1:02:49.080 --> 1:02:53.959
<v Speaker 1>newsroom where you have different teams very focused on one thing,

1:02:54.600 --> 1:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>but the best managers within the newsroom are people that

1:02:57.720 --> 1:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>are very good at sort of essentially describing in plain

1:03:00.360 --> 1:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>English to everyone else in the news room that doesn't

1:03:02.480 --> 1:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>really know about this stuff, why what they're working on

1:03:05.920 --> 1:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is interesting, so that there's some sort of level of um,

1:03:09.880 --> 1:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, uniform understanding about what the news, what's going

1:03:12.680 --> 1:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>on in the news room. Yeah, there's also the issue

1:03:15.320 --> 1:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of creating a sort of language around the type of

1:03:18.680 --> 1:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>news product that you're offering, like because writing, you know,

1:03:23.040 --> 1:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>if I say to someone, oh, why don't you just

1:03:24.840 --> 1:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>write a quick and short story about this, quick and

1:03:28.400 --> 1:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>short can mean different things to lots of different people,

1:03:31.120 --> 1:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and so even just creating like an artificial term for

1:03:34.760 --> 1:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>what that might be, like creating this artificial structure that

1:03:38.080 --> 1:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone can eventually recognize and come to understand. Yeah, there

1:03:41.840 --> 1:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of parallels between engineering and journalism management apparently, so, um,

1:03:47.640 --> 1:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't expect that. And I feel like I'm going

1:03:49.320 --> 1:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to have to go out and buy Camille's book now

1:03:52.160 --> 1:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and read it and learn more about it. Yeah. No,

1:03:56.040 --> 1:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to. I want to read it too, even

1:03:57.720 --> 1:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>though it's probably not for me per se, I'm for tech.

1:04:01.240 --> 1:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>It definitely seems like, um, it will be very useful.

1:04:04.680 --> 1:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>It's but or at least to see the same processes

1:04:06.920 --> 1:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>replicated elsbere I know. I just really enjoyed that a lot,

1:04:09.880 --> 1:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like I learned a ton in the

1:04:11.560 --> 1:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>last hour. Yeah. Same, A bit different to the usual

1:04:15.320 --> 1:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>All thoughts fair in a good way. All right. Shall

1:04:18.160 --> 1:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>we leave it there? Yeah, let's leave it there. Okay.

1:04:20.920 --> 1:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

1:04:24.040 --> 1:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

1:04:26.760 --> 1:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe wisn't Thal. You can follow

1:04:30.200 --> 1:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow our guest on Twitter,

1:04:34.640 --> 1:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Camille Fournier. Her handle is at scamill s K A

1:04:38.920 --> 1:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>M I L L E. And she is the author

1:04:41.920 --> 1:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Manager's Path, a guide for tech leaders navigating

1:04:45.640 --> 1:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>growth and change, which I'm going to download to my

1:04:48.800 --> 1:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Kindle asap. UH. Follow our producer Laura Carlson. She's at

1:04:53.400 --> 1:04:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Laura M. Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesca

1:04:57.120 --> 1:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Levi at Francesca Today, and check out all of our

1:05:00.480 --> 1:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>podcast said Bloomberg under the handle ad podcast. Thanks for listening.