WEBVTT - Déjà vu, Anxiety and Dreams

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to stot to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>we're back with another closet edition. Uh So this week

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>we got kind of hijacked off on the side trail

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't quite expect at the beginning of this

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>week because of a personal experience you had, right, Robert, Yeah,

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.279
<v Speaker 1>this this would have happened Wednesday, and it's got me

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>researching some other topics and looking into it, and I

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it to you and the next thing we know,

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>we were putting notes together for a couple of episodes.

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's great because this is also a topic. It

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>gets into some topics that have been requested by listeners

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>as well. So Lenny said, a little background for for

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>what I'm about to describe. So give us your origin story. Yeah,

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>my origin story, such as it as it is. When

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid, maybe seven or eight years old,

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>which is which is uh the age of my own

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>son today, I had a very vivid and unsettling mental experience.

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't really a nightmare, but much like a nightmare,

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>there was this ineffable quality to it. You know, like

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>even as I try to explain it, uh, my words

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>can't really relate how it made me feel and how

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it still makes me feel. Like when I when I

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>remember it, when I think back on it, I can

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>still feel a bit of the terror that I felt then. Uh,

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>even though just a flat description of it sounds kind

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of dumb. Yeah, that's often how nightmares are. It's like

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the thing that was really scary in your dream wouldn't

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>necessarily make a good horror movie because it's hard to

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>communicate why it was scary. Yeah, exactly, Like I once

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>had a nightmare about a polar bear that was peeking

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>into a house with a periscope, and somehow that was

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>terrifying in the dream, but outside of the dream, it's

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>just ridiculous and comical. So uh, but this particular situation,

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it was, it was not a nightmare. Um, I was

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in my bed and I have always slept with white noise,

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>so even then I had this like oversized box fan

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in my my childhood room. And I should also explain

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that I watched a lot of TV in those days,

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and the you know, my family would watch TV together

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and there were various shows on TBS that we would

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>regularly check out, and one of them was the sitcom

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Sanford and Son. You remember Sanford and Son, right, Oh yeah,

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>totally yeah, Red Fox uh uh so uh. You know,

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to use the verb here or heard here,

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's not like I actually heard sound. It's

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>not like I experienced an auditory hallucination. It's more that

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I suddenly remembered it as I lay there in bed.

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>It was like a jagged memory that was suddenly embedded

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in my my psyche. And it was the sound of

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the Sanford and Son character Fred Sanford speaking in slow

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>motion through the back of a box fan, addressing the

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>character Grady in this drawn out, oscillating voice. So that's

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>great because that that has that perfect quality of something

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 1>that would be terrifying in like a dream like memory,

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>but you just can't see it from the outside. It's

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>like I had a horrifying dream about Bob Sagett from

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Full House. Yeah, it's I mean, it's just so ridiculously dumb,

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Like if I were to to fictionalize it even a

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit, I feel like I'd want to change it completely,

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you know. Um, but but but the thing is like,

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it definitely filled me with terror, and I can I

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>can remember that terror, and I can. I can really

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>compare it only to the stark sort of terror that

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>one feels in a nightmare, you know, especially with the

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>nonsensical elements to it. And uh and indeed it also

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it did not feel like I was remembering something specifically

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>from watching TV. And it didn't feel like I was dreaming.

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I it was, I guess, in some ways, like I

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>was remembering a dream that I had never had. But

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in the sensation passed, the anxiety of it passed, although

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I I've always been able to feel like a tinge

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of it when I think back on the experience. So

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I've never I was never really sure what it was exactly.

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I kind of always just sort of thought, well, okay,

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it was, you know, something like a dream or a nightmare.

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Um. And and looking back, I think

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>there perhaps times in my life where I had like

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>similar experiences in the years after that, but but pretty

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, far flung from each other, far less intense.

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:23.119
<v Speaker 1>And because of these factors, I've never really connected those

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>experiences with this childhood experience. You know, when I think

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>about experiences like that, especially involving lying in bed as

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a child. I think one thing that's often going on

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>there is that in our memories we are having a

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>hard time sorting the demarcation line between wakefulness and sleep. Um.

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is definitely characteristic of memories I have as

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a child, Like there are things that I feel like

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I remember as happening while I was lying in bed

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>awake as a kid, But in fact I think they

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 1>probably were some sort of like you know, edge of

0:04:55.880 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>sleep hallucination, hypnogogic or hypnopompic hallucination, uh, dreams bleeding over

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>into wakefulness. But that it's it's hard to sort out

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>what's what at that age. Yeah, And I would say,

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>prior to this week, if you really put me to

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>task on on what that experience was I had as

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a kid, I would have probably leaned on on the

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, hypnogogic explanation of for what was happening. You know,

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>like I was somewhere between wakefulness and sleep, and therefore

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>my mind was susceptible to this kind of semi paranormal experience.

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>And these kind of experiences are super common, by the way.

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>That's nothing especially like pathological about them, right, Yeah, So

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I also don't want to make it sound

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>like this like shaped me as an experience, you know.

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>S Yeah, like I continue to watch Sanford the Sun

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>after it. Clearly it didn't. It didn't affect me in

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that capacity. No night terror can make Red Fox unfunny.

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh So so that was that was, you know, my

0:05:54.720 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>life up until this week, uh, Wednesday, March. I then

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>experienced what we're basically four of these in a single day.

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>So I can I can kind of explain two of them,

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>I guess. Um. So I've been I've been obsessed with

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Peter Lori this week, you know, the famed actor. Um.

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>And I've been feeding that obsession, you know, to try

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>and get my mind off of more stressful matters. And

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I was in the in the process of actually responding

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to an email to you, Joe about we had a

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>slight sort back and forth about the ninety six movie

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Mad Love, which I have not seen, but I've been

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>meaning to see for years because it has one of

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the best trailers of all time, Like the the two

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>minute long trailer for this movie is more entertaining than

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>most entire movies. It's got Peter Lorie sitting on the

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>couch at his house and he's got this giant dog

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>next to him, this bigger than he is. And then

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 1>he gets a phone call from beautiful actress to like

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>tell him what a wonderful actor he is. And then

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>he starts explaining the new movie he's in, and it's

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Mad Love the movie that this is a trailer or

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>fo yeah, and it's it's a wild movie. Um, I

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like it doesn't. It doesn't. It's not remembered as

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>well as it should be. It has so many bizarre

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>elements in it. There's there's knife throwing, there's their hand transplants,

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>there's tragic mad scientists love stories. We gotta come back

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and do this as a as a full movie episode sometime.

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>It's got the line in the trailer, a poor peasant

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>have conquered science. Why can't I conquer love? Yes, it's

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>such a great moment. But but in our email, you

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>specifically mentioned a face that Peter Lare makes when uh,

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>when when a previous film is mentioned to him, And

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and it was weird. When I was about to respond

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to that, I was like gonna type, and then suddenly

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I had like this kind of like mash up in

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>my head, like a memory of his face in that trailer,

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and then kind of this this the fact that Laura

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>is deceased, I don't know, just kind of like as

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>if they were kind of floating in my head. And

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I suddenly had this just this czar deja vou like

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>experience that was like really overwhelming, and I had to

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I had to get up, and I had to go

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>go lay down. And then uh, there was a just

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a little later in the day, I I had another

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>experience like that. Again. I was at a computer. I

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>was looking over some of the telescool activities that my

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>son had done in Google classroom, and I was making

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>sure that everything was checked off, and it was like

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>checked off in two different places, and you know, this

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>juggling act of like eight different learning apps. And then

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>suddenly I have this jagged chunk of deja vu like

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>mental energy that, um, though quite vague this time, felt

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>like a fragment from some old TV show, maybe Carol

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Burnett or something. If I had to guess, but I

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>but I really that would be just guessing and like

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>reshaping the memory. But again it hit me so hard

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that I had to get up. I had to go

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>into another room. I like, I could feel my um,

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it felt like a like an anxiety attack, and I

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>had to I had to, I had to lay down

0:08:58.120 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit. And then in both of those

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>cases when I when I laid down, there was kind

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of an echo of the initial experience where I had

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>like kind of another one and um and and then

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I was fine. But it was really weird to to

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to experience that, especially having not really experienced anything like

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that since I was a kid. All right, So I'm

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to sort out the elements of what it is

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 1>you're describing here. So you're saying that there was there

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>was an element of like sudden onset overwhelming anxiety, but

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 1>also uh, sort of some mental imagery and a feeling

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of deja vu, like familiarity with whatever thoughts were currently

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>entering your mind. Is that it right? Yeah? And And

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>while the first one, the one with Peter LORI did

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 1>have I guess there was some sort of contemplation of

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>death in there, I guess, And and so that one

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>was a little loaded, but but the other one had

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.079
<v Speaker 1>no like nightmare imagery. It was just kind of like

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit of TV shrapnel. And actually I had I

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>had one more last night where I was just making

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>I was making a drink. I was like, like making

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>us some sort of tiki cocktail, uh, standing in the

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>same place they normally do, and then there was just

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>some sort of nondescript image, uh that that that gave

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>me a similar sensation, and that passed. So you've had

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>So these are like multiple instances of deja vu like

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>experience in the course of a couple of days. How

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>common is that for you? Normally? Would you say that

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you have a feeling of deja vu? Maybe once a

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>year more or less. It's an interesting question because it's

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a question that definitely comes up in some of the

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>studies that we're gonna look at where they ask people

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>how how many deja experiences do you have? Is it,

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, once a week, a couple of times a month.

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd be really hard pressed to say, because normally when

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I have deja vu, it is so mild and uninteresting.

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just kind of like, huh, that's a bit of

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>deja vu, and then I move on, you know, like

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it's never like this. So I would if I would

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to to to take just a wild guess, I'd say

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe, like once every couple of months. That that

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>sounds about right for me. Maybe a little bit less

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>frequently now for me. I one thing I've noticed, and

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>this is going to line up absolutely with some of

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the research we look at later. I definitely feel like

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I got deja vu like experiences much more often when

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I was a young child. UM, when I was younger.

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I I think I may have actually mentioned this on

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the show before. I have one very specific instance of

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>deja vu like feelings that stand out in my memory, UM,

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and it was when I was a kid. I don't

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>remember what age, but you know, I was young enough

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to be playing out in the front yard with friends.

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we were like running around, chasing each other

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>with sticks and stuff. And there was a low hanging

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>branch that was coming off of a tree hanging over

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>our front yard, and I guess I was distracted. I

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>was looking back at a friend of mine or something,

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and I turned around and I ran into this low

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>hanging branch and hit my face. I think I ended

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>up getting a black eye from running into the branch.

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>And right then I had this powerful sensation like this

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is all happened before. He was standing right there where

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>he was and I was here and I ran into

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the branch, and it was this time of day, this

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>time of year. And I never knew how to make

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>sense of that when I was a kid, because like,

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I pretty quickly understood that, like, no, this

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>has not actually happened before. I even as a child,

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I attached any kind of magical significance

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to it, Like I didn't think that I was clairvoyant

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>or something. It was just very odd. I was like,

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>why do I feel like this exact thing happened before

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>when I know it didn't. Yeah, the the stat about

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it occurring more when you're younger definitely comes up, which,

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 1>of course it doesn't really help me out explaining this

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>because I'm what forty one now, and it seems like

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I should have had the bulk of this earlier on um.

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>But but I mean that's just on average. I mean,

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody's different. Some people have it much more frequently than

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>other people do. I'd say it's pretty rare for me now.

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>I think I probably it at least a few times

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.959
<v Speaker 1>a year. Well after after I had these experiences, I

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I initially asked, well, what's a different right,

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what you you can always uh, you know, use

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to deduct right things that are that are different

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>this week. Yeah, yeah, I mean, first of all, it's

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought, well, maybe there's this panicky aspect to it.

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I had two innch of coffee, but no, it's

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a usual amount of coffee for the day. I thought, maybe,

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, had something to do with steering at screens

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>too much because I was working, you know, at my

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 1>own laptop and then having to go in and help

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.559
<v Speaker 1>my son with his laptop. But I dismissed that pretty

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>quickly as well, because it seems like the connection to

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>some sort of anxiety was unavoidable. Because, you know, while

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>while my family and I are objectively you know, lucky

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and fortunate compared to plenty of other people going through

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen, social distancing, shelter and place mandates or actual

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you know illness, there there are a lot of things

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 1>to be anxious about right now. I mean, there's the

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>pandemic itself, local individual, national response is to it, household

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>protocols to stay safe, my son's tell us schooling, my

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 1>own attempts to make my work function remotely, trying to

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>follow the World Health Organization recommendations to only check the

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>news once or twice a day, that sort of thing. Yeah,

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>how's that going? I think I'm I'm still exceeding the

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>recommended dosage of news per day, but it is helping

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>me cut down a bit. Uh. And and like some

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of the times when I'll reach for my phone to

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the news, I will put it down instead.

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's it's some advice to take to heart. Yeah,

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel like looking up that stats, it's like looking

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>up you know, like how many alcoholic drinks are you

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>supposed to have a day. It's like yeah, uh, it's

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>like maybe if you find yourself googling that, it's it's

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>worth considering that you should consume less. Yeah, exactly. Um.

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Another another bit of of infoll throw out on the anxiety.

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh part of it is that I know on Wednesday

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I did go on a walk, but otherwise I didn't

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>really leave my front porch or my house, and I

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>ended up not doing yoga or any other kind of

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>mindfulness exercise that day. Um, so that could have also

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>been a factor. It's like, well, I did less to

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of get out of the default mode network and

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to escape panic that day. Uh. So maybe I was

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>more susceptible to it. Yesterday I did do yoga um

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and only had one of these episodes. So uh, you know, again,

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that supports the idea that, well, there's something

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>going on here with anxiety, right, And and to be sure,

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I can be an anxious person in the best of circumstances,

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and I've gone through, you know, some stressful times in

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>my life without having any episodes like this before. But

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought, well, maybe this is kind of the accumulation

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of things, right, death by a thousand cuts. Right, There's

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>just all these little things and some extra things to

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>be anxious about, and it kind of builds up. Yeah,

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that kind of doesn't make sense for having anomalous I

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know types of mental phenomena. But then again, one

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that strikes me is interesting about this is that

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't formally associate deja vu like sensations with anxiety. Yeah.

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I had not really either, because again I didn't I

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>had never really thought of of that experience for my

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>childhood as being really connected to deja vu. But but

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>after these, uh, these experiences on Wednesday, I started doing

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a few searches looking around, and indeed a quick glance

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>around the internet for deja vu panic attacks indeed turned

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>up some hits like there was someone on an epilepsy

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>website with a post titled deja Vu slash panic attacks

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>very tired of being undiagnosed. Another health board nightmarish deja

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>vu and anxiety attacks. What's going on? Um? And in

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>both of these posts people responding with like, yeah, I

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>get this too. Uh, I hate it when this happens,

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. And granted, we're talking about message

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>boards where people are, you know, engaging in varying degrees

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of self self diagnosis, et cetera. But it was enough

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to make me think, well, maybe there is more to this.

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And and uh, you know, I I've never really researched

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>deja vu itself all that much, so I should look

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>a little deeper. So in these episodes, that's what we

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>thought we'd do. We take a little time to explore

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>deja vu and to explore the connection between deja vu

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and anxiety and deja vu and dreams. All right, well,

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>then maybe we should take a quick break and then

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>when we come back, we can dive into the memory fog.

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank thank alright, we're back deja vu. Uh, a term

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that I guess most people are familiar with, but you

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>might not. You might not necessarily be able to define

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it off the top of your head. Um, you should

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>probably just talk about what it means, right, So deja

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>vu comes from the French. It literally means already seen. Uh. Now,

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>there are actually a number of different terms for similar,

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>overlapping experiences that often kind of get blended together and

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>blurred together. For example, there's another term that's sometimes used.

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>It's deja vit coup, which means already lived. And so

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>there's like a lot of things that we call old

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>deja vu meaning already seen or probably you know, probably

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>could be categorized as deja viku, meaning like I've already

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>been through this situation or I've already lived at this moment. Yeah,

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>they're they're about like twenty different variations of this and

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>uh and I'll get to some more of them in

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the second episode of this series. Yes, But basically, whatever

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it is, deja vu, deja viku, uh, it means that

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you are having some kind of experience of a stimulus.

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at something, you're hearing something, you're feeling something,

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>you're going through a situation, and you suddenly get the

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>feeling that this has already happened. I've already seen that,

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 1>or I've already been here, this has happened sometime in

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>my past, despite evidence to the contrary that like, you're

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>not seeing something you've already seen, you're not living through

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a moment that has already happened. I feel very confident that,

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, in my in my experience as a child,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that I had not already been playing with those same

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>friends and run into a branch and gotten a black

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>eye and all that. For some reason I felt like

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I had. Yeah. Likewise, my childhood experience was it was

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>again not that the feeling that there was an actual

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 1>voice in the room with me. It wasn't It wasn't

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>like that. It was just this feeling that, you know,

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the terror was associated with the fact that I didn't

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>understand like what the sensation came from, not that it

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>was real. I guess with your original sensation as a child.

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 1>There's another level of complexity though, and that'll get into

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff we'll talk about more in the second episode, with

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:34.479
<v Speaker 1>ideas like de jaureev which do you like that? How

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>I said that French word? Oh yeah, you hit the

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>fresh nicely on that, which means already dreamed. So like

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>there are some cases where you're not even experiencing real

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>external stimuli. You know, it would be like I already

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>had this experience as a dream. But then maybe the

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>current experience isn't is just an imaginative moment. So it

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 1>can get very complicated in meta um. But I mean,

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>especially since just the the vast differences that are possible

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 1>from from brain to brain, from mind to mind. Um,

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of the sense I get from a lot

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of this research is that when you're dealing with the

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>basic broad deja vu experience, uh, you know, one size

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is not gonna fit all. Like, it seems like it's

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be a slightly different experience, slightly different frequency,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 1>depending on the individual and the current state of the individual. Right,

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>I would maybe categorize all of this stuff under an

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>umbrella that we could just call anomalous familiarity, a sense

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 1>of familiarity with something that you have no reason to

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>be familiar with. So credit for the term deja vu

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is usually given to a French philosopher, writer, and parapsychologist

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>named Amil warrock Uh. He used the term in a

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>letter to the editor of an academic journal in eighteen

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>seventy six. Though I do not think Barak made a

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>distinction from what I can tell, between deja vu is

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>like a normal psychological phenomenon versus the supposed psychic power

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>of clairvoyants. And this is something that comes up a

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>bit throughout the history of research on deja vu. Um.

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more recently that deja vu has been

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>has gotten a lot of attention as a like just

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>serious subjective phenomenon, as opposed to people looking at it

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to find evidence that it's like literal precognition. It's weird,

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>isn't that. This this kind of idea about deja vu

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is really reflected in the Matrix movies, remember where uh,

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>if you see a black cat twice or whatever, it's

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>just a glitch in the matrix and it's not really treated.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not really a major plot point. It's just kind

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of like, huh, isn't that interesting? Uh? Nothing, you should

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 1>waste your time with neo just to keep keep on course. Well,

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you could look at that two different ways. You could

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>look at that as like, oh, it's just a little thing,

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>or you could also look at it as at least

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Matrix movies, it is giving you real information

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>about the external world. And oh, and one thing that

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we will come back too is there are some theories

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of deja vu in which the experience of deja vu

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.959
<v Speaker 1>is giving you some real information about the external world.

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 1>But it's not clairvoyant or precognitive. You're not having the

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>sensation because you actually saw the future from the past.

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It's more likely having to do with the brains straining

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to connect memories that that may not be exactly how

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 1>they feel. Yeah, but one thing that I found was

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>interesting is that before it was fully described and named

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in the clinical or scientific context, deja vu was observed

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>by a number of authors and poets throughout history. Yeah.

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I was reading a little bit about this from the

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 1>deja vu researcher Art Funk. Howser will come back to

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>some of his some of some work that he was

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>involved with the paper that he was a co author on. Yeah,

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later. Uh, but but he pointed out

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a few different early examples. Uh. One of the earliest,

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the earliest that he identified, Well, he's pointing

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to the writings of St. Augustine, but to understand what

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Augustine's critiquing. You have to go back to the Roman

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>poem uh Avid, who lived forty three b C. Through

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>seventeen C. So Avid had written about the human soul

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>is a thing quote deathless and ever quote when they

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have left their former seat, do they live in new

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>abodes and dwell in the bodies that have received them?

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>So all of it is getting into ideas of precognition

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and more specifically the survival of the human soul. So a.

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>It is not talking about deja vu here, but what

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about like basically the idea of reincarnation, about

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 1>the soul passing from one life to the next. Uh So,

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>three hundred years later, St. Augustine is critiquing of its

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>words and he writes the following quote for we must

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>not acquiesce in their story. Who assert that as Samian

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Pythagoras recollected some things which he experienced when he was

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 1>previously here in another body, and others that they experienced

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>something of the same sort in their minds. But it

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>may be conjectured that these were untrue recollections, such as

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 1>we commonly experience in sleep when we fancy we remember,

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>as though we had done it or seen it what

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>we never did or saw at all, And that the

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>minds of these persons, even though awake, were affected in

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>this way at the suggestion of malignant and deep deceitful

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>spirits whose care it is to confirm or to sow

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>some false belief concerning the changes of souls in order

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to deceive men. And that is from Augustine's on the Trinity.

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, so basically he's he's saying, okay, of it is, uh,

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't listen of it because he might just

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>be talking about this thing that we have all have

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>some experience with. And funk howser saying that that Augustine

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is is probably talking about deja vu. Here. Yeah, I

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>found another great example by the British poet Alfred Lord Tennyson,

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:58.199
<v Speaker 1>who wrote a poem around eighteen thirty three or eighteen

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 1>thirty four called The Two Voices. Uh. This poem was

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>written during a period of just deep misery and despair

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>for Tennyson. The basic form it takes is of an

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>internal argument between two parts of himself about whether or

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>not to commit suicide, which he describes saying, quote, pain

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>rises up old pleasures Paul, there is one remedy for

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it all. It's actually very similar in many ways to

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the famous to be or Not to be soliloquy from

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>hamlet Um. It's certainly one of Tennyson's darkest works, but

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of strange beauty and insight in this

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>passage where he discusses the sensation of false memory, which

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>did not yet have the name deja vu h. So

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Tennyson writes much more, if first I floated free as

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>naked essence, must I be incompetent of memory for memory

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>dealing but with time and he with matter? Could she

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>climb beyond her own material prime? Moreover, something is or

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>seems that touches me with mystic gleams, like glimpses of

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>forgotten dreams, of something felt like something here, of something

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>done I know not where such has no language. May

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>declare that's nice. I also I am. I don't know

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>if I'm alone here, but I feel like you could

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 1>probably drop a beat behind Tennyson and it would have

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>some serious flow to it. There's another one from British

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>poetry that I found. It's kind of on a happier occasion,

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>though it's by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and he manages to

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.400
<v Speaker 1>take the happy occasion of a poem and and go

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in very dark places with it. But anyway, this is

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>from a sonnet by Cole Ridge called composed on a

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>journey homeward, the author having received intelligence of the birth

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of a son. He begins by about it exactly, I

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>love it, But he writes, um off to or my

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>brain does that strange fancy roll which makes the present

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>while the flash doth last seem a mere semblance of

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>some unknown past. And then one more. Charles Dickens writes

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>about it in pretty straightforwardly in in his novel David Copperfield,

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>he writes, we have all some experience of a feeling

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>which comes over us occasionally, of what we are saying

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and doing having been said or done before in a

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>remote time, of our having been surrounded dim ages ago

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 1>by the same faces, objects and circumstances, of our knowing

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>perfectly what will be said next, as if we suddenly

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>remembered it. I like the part about dim ages ago

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>because I think that is also a very consistent and

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting feature of deja vu experiences, at least in my life,

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and as I've often read about them is so you

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>have the incorrect sensation of remembering present events or present

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>stimuli from the past, but you can't place it. So

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't think like I had an experience like this

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>four months ago, or you know, I had an experience

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>like this two years ago. It's more like it had

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>been in this inaccessible, kind of vague other time, which

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe the reason that a lot of people

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:10.199
<v Speaker 1>chalk this up to memory of past lives. Yeah, you

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>can definitely see where if you wanted to believe in

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>past lives, this is the sort of the sort of

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff you could turn to and sort of you know,

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>warp into evidence. Um now, Yeah, And indeed, most examples

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that that I mean I've experienced. I think all the

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>examples I've experienced have that vagueness to them, and you

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 1>do see that in most of the reporting. However, when

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>we eventually turned to the link between deja vu and dreams,

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>there are some specific cases where people have a strong

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>connection between like the deja vu experience they're having now

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in a specific dream that they remember. Um. So, I

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>guess just a reminder that, yeah, with with deja vu experiences,

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>with this broad category of DejaVu experiences. There's there's a

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of variety and so there even though that the

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>trend seems to be towards just you know, the things,

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the damn ages, there are occasions where it doesn't seem

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>so dim to the person experiencing it, which is very interesting.

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>It makes you wonder what's different about those cases. And

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into some of that probably in the second episode. Well,

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>are you ready to jump into some basic facts and

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>findings about deja vu from scientific research? Yeah, let's do it.

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's just start talking about what we know and

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>what some of the theories are regarding the true nature

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of deja vu. All right, let us jump on this

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>ghost train. Uh So, first thing is, occasional cases of

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>deja vu are very common for neurologically typical people. Deja

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>vu as I think we alluded to this earlier, but

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.719
<v Speaker 1>it does not typically a sign of any kind of

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>known pathology. It's just pretty common for people to experience it.

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Approximately sixty percent of people report having experience to deja

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>vu at some point. Yeah, we're we're of course going

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to hear a lot from listeners about their particular experience

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>with deja vu. And I just want to mind you

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>if you have not if you were one of these, uh,

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>these people that have not experienced deja vu at some

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>point in your life, I want to know about that.

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear what that's like, and then how

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and how you process other people's reportings of of deja Yeah,

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting. I wonder if I guess it's fairly straightforward

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to explain, so you could know what it was, but

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you might not be able to understand how it feels

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>if you've never felt it, even though you could. I mean,

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody can explain to you, like what the frequency of

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>light of the color red is, but you might not

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>really be able to understand it if you've never been

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:40.959
<v Speaker 1>able to see red. Yeah, because uh, deja vu in particular,

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>My take on it is that it it feels at

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>least casually weird. You know, every time it happens, it

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is at least notable for a second where like huh,

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>well that's that's odd, and then then you move on. Well, No,

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I do think that's interesting because to me, deja vu

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>feels inherently weird. It's just weird because you realize that

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it couldn't be correct, Like, it's not just weird because

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you logically recognize the misperception. For me, deja vu feels

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>weird the moment you experience it, before you even realize

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>anything's wrong. It is accompanied by a strange sensation. See

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that that's interesting because it makes me think of But

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>between the two of us, like your, your typical deja

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>vu experience might be maybe more intense or at least, uh,

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you end up contemplating it more I don't know than

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>than I do. Uh. And then of course the episodes

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 1>like I've had this week are certainly more pronounced than

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>than either of these cases. So I don't know. But

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.719
<v Speaker 1>when when I experience like just typical deja vu, it is,

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it is generally just so casual that I might mention

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it if I am, you know, if i'm you know,

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>around somebody that I'm close to, But otherwise it's just

0:31:56.080 --> 0:32:00.479
<v Speaker 1>it's like seeing a bird flyover that's fun, like, oh, well,

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>there's another bird. I'm not going to point it out

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's not a special bird, it's just another bird. Well,

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is another thing for listeners to tell us about.

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I would love to hear from them, so

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>we know it happens every now and then at least

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty frequently to even typical otherwise healthy people. But is

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>there any psychological or neurological condition consistently associated with deja vu?

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say the answer to this is um. The

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>actual evidence for the link might be a little more

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>tenuous than has sometimes been suggested, But in the history

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of research on deja vu, there appears to be one

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>major answer here, and that is temporal lobe epilepsy or

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>t l E. So, temporal lobe epilepsy is characterized by

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>focal seizures that begin in the temporal lobe of the brain.

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And the temporal lobe is very important. It's a crucial

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>part of the brain that's been associated with major brain

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>functions like emotional association, visual and short term memory. Does

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff with memory, like understanding and processing language.

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot that goes on there. So where does

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the deja Vu come in? Are people with temporal lobe

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>epilepsy just more likely to have deja vu experiences? The

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>answer there is no. Instead, there is a specific case

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>where people with temporal lobe epilepsy tend to report deja vu,

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and that is in what's known as the aura before

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the onset of a seizure, so people with recurrent seizures

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>often get this weird combination of feelings right before seizure happens.

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it's sometimes described as a kind of like series

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of warning signs. So these might include sudden, unexpected emotions

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>like you have elation or fear with no cause. Another

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>one might be numbness in parts of the body, weird

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>smells or tastes from out of nowhere, like I smell oranges.

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Another one is known as epigastric phenomena. This refers to

0:33:57.400 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a weird feeling in the abdomen. I've read it some

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>times described as a rising feeling, like when you're plummeting

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>on a roller coaster. Um epigastric specifically, I think, refers

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>to higher up on the abdomen, so very often it's

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>like right below the chest, above the stomach, you know,

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>right sort of where your solo plexus is. But then finally,

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>another recognized symptom of of the aura for temporal lobe

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 1>epilepsy is deja vu, which is interesting, right, yeah, because

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>this this makes us look to causes in the brain,

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>like like more specifically, it's it's it seems like there

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 1>must be some sort of uh in neurophysical origin for

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>what is occurring. Yes, But on the other hand, I

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>think we should also acknowledge that deja vu is, as

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 1>we've said, pretty common in people with no otherwise identified

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:52.280
<v Speaker 1>medical or neurological conditions. Um. And I want to quote

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>now from somebody I'm going to be referring to a

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 1>lot throughout this couple of episodes. This is Alan S. Brown,

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>who published a big review of of deja vous research

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand three in the journal Psychological Bulletin. And

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>this is an older paper and we will have to

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 1>refer to some more recent ones to supplement it, but

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>up to that point, it's a really fantastic review of

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>all the research leading up to the early two thousands. Uh.

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>And So Brown writes about the association between temporal lobe

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>epilepsy and deja vu that despite the fact that it

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 1>is a recognized symptom of a t L a seizure

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>on set, deja vu doesn't appear to be more common

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in general in people with epilepsy. Quote. The weight of

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>evidence argues against deja vu being more common in people

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>with epilepsy or being diagnostic of seizure pathology. So there's

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things to weigh. They're on one hand,

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it is a recognized feature that a lot of people

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>report when they're about to have a temporal lobe epileptic seizure.

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, it doesn't appear that people

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>with temporal lobe epilepsy have deja vu more often than

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>people in general. And uh yeah, And for for that

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 1>to make sense, I have to do is just think

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>back to some of these other symptoms uh we were listing,

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>uh that are part of the TLA. Like, none of

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>these other symptoms are things that are exclusive to people

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that are experiencing uh, epileptic seizures or anything. Uh So

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just deja vu is thrown in the mix, but

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 1>it's not exclusive to people with this condition, right uh now,

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:30.919
<v Speaker 1>deja vu appears to be that this is one that

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>that does look pretty solid in in the research. It

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is associated with stress and fatigue. You are more likely

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:41.399
<v Speaker 1>to have an episode of deja vu when you are

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>tired and when you are agitated and you've got your

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>stress hormones you're pumping your no adrenaline and cortisol. And

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>this is interesting because I wonder how I mean it's

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>not exactly the same thing as Robert. You're talking about

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:59.399
<v Speaker 1>your experience with UH sudden anxiety producing episodes of deja vu.

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>But it makes me wonder if there's some kind of

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>connection here. Yeah, I mean, when I ran across the

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>same information, I I lined it up with what I

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 1>had experienced, and Okay, you know, obviously there's the stress level,

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>which I've already touched on, but also, um, all the

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>experiences I had were in the afternoon or the early evening.

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:21.879
<v Speaker 1>They were not in the morning. You know, I did

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>not experience them like when I in the first few

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>hours after waking up or anything like that. So it's

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>possible that, yeah, I'm throughout the day, I'm getting getting

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.720
<v Speaker 1>more tired, I'm having you know, I have less energy

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to handle sort of the ambient stress that is around

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>me and UH, and that could potentially have some connection

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to the deja vu H like experiences that I had. Yeah, totally. Now,

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:46.879
<v Speaker 1>the next thing that I thought was interesting is that

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Brown reports that some studies have found that people who

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>travel experience deja vu more than people who don't. For example,

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at the paper by Richardson and Winnaker

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:04.840
<v Speaker 1>from nineteen sixty seven. It was summarizing an earlier study

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 1>by Chapman and Mench from nineteen fifty two. But this

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>study had defined travel as going more than fifty miles

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 1>away from home, and it reported findings that quote, non

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>travelers experienced deja vu in only eleven per cent of

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>their number, and in those who traveled twenty five percent

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of their number. There was no relationship with the frequency

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of travel. And so that part about no relationship with

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the frequency of travel makes me wonder, like, why would

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 1>it be that people who like if this effect is real,

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:41.319
<v Speaker 1>why would it be that people who travel some have

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>more deja vu than people who don't travel at all.

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>But if you travel a lot, you don't appear to

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 1>have it much more than people who travel a little. Well, well,

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the I guess the main potential answer that comes to

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>my mind is that if we're thinking about deja vu

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:03.320
<v Speaker 1>as this experience by the novel seems familiar, if something

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 1>new seems like something old, then perhaps there would be

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>more potential to experience it if you live the sort

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of life in general, uh, either via travel or you know,

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:19.839
<v Speaker 1>via other acts that line up with this personality type. Uh.

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, the more novelty in your life, the more

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>potential there is to then have that turn around and

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:29.439
<v Speaker 1>be made a seemingly mundane through deja vu. Oh yeah,

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>well no, I've actually seen that hypothesized by a researcher

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:35.399
<v Speaker 1>who who I think we're going to talk about more

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:39.919
<v Speaker 1>later and Cleary who's done work on on deja vu.

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 1>But I think I also saw her mention at some

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>point that there's some research indicating that people who watch

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 1>more movies are also more likely to experience higher deja

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 1>vu frequency. Interesting now, now one I have to catch

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>myself though at the same time, because when I think

0:39:56.719 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 1>back about deja vu experiences I've had in the past,

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them have not They have not occurred

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>while I'm traveling. They occurred like if I'm if they're

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>occurring during novel experiences, they're only mildly novel, you know, like, oh,

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:14.320
<v Speaker 1>like I've never maybe I've never stood in my backyard

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>with a coffee mug, you know, at this particular spot before.

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's hardly on par with say, traveling you know,

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>around the world to to Bangkok or something. I was

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>sailing to Byzantium. Yeah, um it was. So there's an

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing that Alan Brown notes in his review, combining

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of facts, the idea that deja vu

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 1>appears to be strongly associated with stress and fatigue and

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the association with with travel um He he notes that

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 1>there it was at least one clinician in the nineteen

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>fifties who observed that reports of deja vu were especially

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:53.879
<v Speaker 1>common among soldiers heading into battle. Weird, but it would

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>combine those things, right, Heading into battle tends to combine stress, fatigue,

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and travel into new locations. Yeah, yeah, you're really piling

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>those up. Yeah. Now there's another one, which is that

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 1>frequency of deja vu experience also shows a positive relationship

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 1>with socioeconomic status and level of education. On average, people

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>who are wealthier and people who have attained higher levels

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of education experience more frequency of deja vu, or at

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>least report more frequency of deja vu on average, And

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that does complicate some other findings by the way, Like

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 1>for I think Brown actually mentions, I wonder if like

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>this is acting on the travel variable, right, that, like,

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>people who have more money or probably more likely to

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>travel more frequently, So something could be going on there. Yeah,

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>And of course it also makes me wonder about the

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>populations that are polled for these kind of studies. You know, um,

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I know that there's going to be at least one

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 1>study later on that that the researchers point out that, well,

0:41:57.480 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>we we looked at like four people, but they were

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:06.720
<v Speaker 1>mostly psychology students, you know, so common with psychology research.

0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, not to because I don't know the particulars

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 1>of the data that they're referring to here. You know,

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:16.879
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the polling data is uh is the survey data

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is more robust than I'm giving it credit to. But

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously that's always a potential problem when you're

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 1>when you're considering information like this. Absolutely another thing I

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 1>thought this was interesting. Men and women seem to experience

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>deja vu at about the same rate. There have been

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a few studies here and there that found gender differences,

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 1>but they were not directionally consistent, and combining all the

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 1>results together did not find any differences for gender. Now,

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:44.919
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about overlap with neurological conditions, but here's one

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that should be very interesting. What about drugs. Do do

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 1>any drugs cause increased uh chances of deja vou? Well,

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:55.920
<v Speaker 1>there are some isolated reports of certain drugs yes and

0:42:56.280 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 1>causing very frequent episodes of dejav For example, I was

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at a paper from the Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand one where authors A. Tarot timon In

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and Satu K. Jones Yaskalainen. I think UH report the

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:19.760
<v Speaker 1>case of quote a thirty nine year old Caucasian, healthy

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>male physician who developed intense recurrent deja vu experiences within

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours of initiating concommitant UH. And this is

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of drugs. I'll try the names here, amantadine

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and UH phenal propanelamine UH. Those are treatments against influenza.

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 1>So the day he was started taking these two drugs

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:46.919
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, amantadine and phenal propanelamine and UH,

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:49.839
<v Speaker 1>and then the deja vu experiences stopped as soon as

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>he stopped taking the medication. Now, amantadine is a drug

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that has multiple effects. It's used to promote dopamine in

0:43:57.040 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 1>patients with some neurological conditions I think, like Parkinson's disease,

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's also used as an anti viral against influenza

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 1>type A. Meanwhile, phenal propanelamine is a decongestion that is

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:11.880
<v Speaker 1>sometimes used as a cough and cold medicine. Um and

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I should note I also found at least one other

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 1>case report from the nineties of psychosis in an otherwise

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:20.920
<v Speaker 1>healthy patient brought on by this exact same drug combination.

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So this appears to be related to the ability of

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:28.360
<v Speaker 1>these drugs to mess around with your dopamine levels. But

0:44:28.440 --> 0:44:30.719
<v Speaker 1>we don't know for sure. And I must say that

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 1>that would be such a strange symptom to report to

0:44:34.239 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>your doctor. You know, they say take two and call

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:38.759
<v Speaker 1>me in the morning, and you call her back and say, Doc,

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I am I am experiencing deja vu every five minutes. Yeah,

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that would that would be something. But again,

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean there are other medications that have, you know,

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 1>weird side effects like this. There's a there's a particular

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 1>malaria treatment. I remember. I remember being on vacation and

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 1>chatting with another couple that was on vacation, but I

0:44:57.719 --> 0:44:59.919
<v Speaker 1>believe this was in Costa Rica years and years ago,

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and the older couple we were talking to they were

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:08.319
<v Speaker 1>both on this, uh, this anti malarial medication. Uh, you know,

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just just in case. But they were talking about

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the vivid dreams they would have every night because of it. Yeah,

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was quite interesting. It makes me want

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to come back and do an episode on malaria drugs

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:22.319
<v Speaker 1>because there are some there's some interesting stories about UH

0:45:22.400 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 1>side effects and complications that have occurred with some of them. Well,

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:27.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should take another quick break and the when

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we can discuss maybe the single most

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 1>consistent finding in the literature on deja vu. Thank alright,

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 1>we're back all right now. I think Brown actually notes

0:45:39.440 --> 0:45:42.759
<v Speaker 1>this in his review that that probably the single most

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>consistent finding in the literature on deja vu is that

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:51.719
<v Speaker 1>frequency of deja vu decreases with age. Isn't that strange?

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Like there there's a graph that's included in UH in

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Brown's paper here that shows UH like it takes average

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:01.840
<v Speaker 1>yearly experiences like the san of number number of yearly

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>experiences people report. And I imagine that there must be

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guessing because if you're like us, we

0:46:07.960 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>don't exactly remember, but you know people people are estimating,

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you look at it and people in there,

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:17.360
<v Speaker 1>like early twenties, there's this spike and that they're reporting

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between like two and a half and three UH

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 1>experiences on average every year of deja vu. But it's

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:28.319
<v Speaker 1>it's sharply curves down. You're down to like one or

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:30.719
<v Speaker 1>a half by the time you're in your late thirties,

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and then people in their like sixties are reporting extremely

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>little with the internet. You know, it's a good thing

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 1>we did the episode. If we if we kept going,

0:46:38.760 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you and I are just going to get older and

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>older and we'll have fewer fresh memories of deja vu

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. Oh, we just got to keep our

0:46:44.520 --> 0:46:46.840
<v Speaker 1>stress and fatigue up and then we can buck the trend.

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 1>You know. Now here's another big trend about deja vu

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:54.680
<v Speaker 1>experiences that we see reflected in you know all a

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:57.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of these different variations of it, including it's what

0:46:57.440 --> 0:47:00.759
<v Speaker 1>is often held up is its opposite Jimmy's oh yeah,

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:03.719
<v Speaker 1>and that means uh, something like never seen. It's the

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 1>inverse it would be, uh, you know, deja vu is

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you see something new and you think I've seen this before.

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Jama vu is you see something you should be familiar

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 1>with and you think it's brand new, You've never seen

0:47:15.640 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it before. Well, well, one of the an attribute that

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:21.960
<v Speaker 1>one tends to encounter in all of these experiences is

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that people with intact reality testing do not have a

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:30.319
<v Speaker 1>problem identifying the deja vu as inherently unreal. And this

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 1>comes back to something we were talking about with our

0:47:32.239 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 1>own experiences, you know, like even these really pronounced experiences

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:37.759
<v Speaker 1>I had yesterday, even the experience I had as a

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:40.479
<v Speaker 1>as a kid, like my my brain kind of fact

0:47:40.520 --> 0:47:43.000
<v Speaker 1>checked them and said, is this real? Is there really?

0:47:43.360 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Is Fred Stanford really in my bedroom speaking through a fan?

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Uh No, he's not. This is something else, you know, yes,

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and that it's not. That's not a function of you

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:57.000
<v Speaker 1>being like a hyper skeptical person or something that that's like,

0:47:57.120 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that's normal for human brains. Yeah. So I was looking

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>at reading around a little bit about reality testing, and

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:09.480
<v Speaker 1>according to the University of Adelaide philosophy professor Philip Grands,

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it's basically the system by which the brain monitors the

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:18.400
<v Speaker 1>brain's own storytelling system, the very narrative of our lives.

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:23.719
<v Speaker 1>So it ends up testing and rejecting ideas about reality. Now,

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I was running across uh, um, this is actually a

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:30.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and fourteen press release and or an interview

0:48:30.520 --> 0:48:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that was published on Eureka Alerts and uh. In this,

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Grands used the example of wondering if a common headache

0:48:39.200 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 1>is a brain tumor. Like you get a headache and

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh boy, I've got a headache right now.

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if this is a brain tumor. Well, in

0:48:45.560 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a typical mind, this sort of thought is probably quickly rejected.

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 1>You're like, no, this is just a normal headache. I

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 1>had one of these last week and it wasn't you know,

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:55.800
<v Speaker 1>when't a brain tumor, then it's not a brain tumor. Today.

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>It's nothing to get upset about. Okay. But but if

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:03.160
<v Speaker 1>one's reality testing is faulty, the notion that this might

0:49:03.200 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 1>be a brain tumor, it might persist, It might even

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 1>become more dominant, It might you know, become the thought

0:49:09.560 --> 0:49:14.400
<v Speaker 1>itself becomes a malignancy. Uh So this, you know, faulty

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:20.160
<v Speaker 1>reality testing plays into various delusions, especially delusions that are

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:23.759
<v Speaker 1>tied to the way our brains process the familiar and

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the novel. And one of the examples that Grand's points

0:49:27.480 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to is cop cross delusion, which we've discussed in the

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 1>show before. Yeah, Cap craws, where you believe that um

0:49:34.600 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that people you know have been replaced by doubles. So

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:40.480
<v Speaker 1>like you might see you know, it often results from

0:49:40.520 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a particular brain injury or neurodegenerative disease or something that

0:49:44.760 --> 0:49:48.800
<v Speaker 1>um causes a dysfunction of the part of the brain

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that accused the feeling of familiarity when you recognize familiar faces.

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:56.319
<v Speaker 1>So you might see members of your family and you

0:49:56.480 --> 0:50:00.040
<v Speaker 1>recognize them, you say, that looks just like dad. What

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't feel familiar and thus you think that's not

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:06.160
<v Speaker 1>him though, so you think that he's been replaced by

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:09.319
<v Speaker 1>a doppelganger or look alike. Yeah. So, so we can

0:50:09.320 --> 0:50:11.920
<v Speaker 1>see that as kind of an extreme example of an

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:17.040
<v Speaker 1>illusion that's tied to malfunctioning reality testing. Uh and uh

0:50:17.080 --> 0:50:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and deja vou is also an example of a mental

0:50:19.800 --> 0:50:23.880
<v Speaker 1>experience that is subjected to reality testing in a typical brain,

0:50:24.080 --> 0:50:27.879
<v Speaker 1>and indeed, it will generally fail a reality test even

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:31.279
<v Speaker 1>if it's distracting. Part of the distraction for us is

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:34.879
<v Speaker 1>generally realizing that it's not real. Like just this week,

0:50:34.920 --> 0:50:37.719
<v Speaker 1>those experiences I had, like one of the super distracting

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:40.839
<v Speaker 1>things was that I realized that this wasn't you know,

0:50:41.080 --> 0:50:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that this something was weird here that you know, it

0:50:43.640 --> 0:50:47.280
<v Speaker 1>made me question the software, the hardware involved a little

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:49.160
<v Speaker 1>bit but it didn't make me think you know that,

0:50:49.840 --> 0:50:52.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, mind flavors are sending thought beams into my

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:55.359
<v Speaker 1>brain or anything. Yeah, I mean this is generally an

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:59.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting question. How how the brain tells what's real? I mean,

0:50:59.640 --> 0:51:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we we could do episode after episode

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:05.359
<v Speaker 1>on this subject. Actually, but like, like this came up

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>not too long ago when we were talking about visual imagination.

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I think this was an episode from last summer. Um

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:16.080
<v Speaker 1>how there is evidence indicating that the brain uses some

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of the same infrastructure for imagining visual images that it

0:51:21.280 --> 0:51:24.239
<v Speaker 1>uses for seeing with the eyes. And so if it

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 1>does that, if there's stuff going on in the visual

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 1>processing centers of the brain, just like when you actually

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 1>look at a basketball, uh as when you imagine a basketball,

0:51:32.600 --> 0:51:36.080
<v Speaker 1>how does your brain know that when you are imagining

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a basketball, you're not really seeing one. Clearly, there can

0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:42.920
<v Speaker 1>be cases where that that reality testing fails. And this

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:45.319
<v Speaker 1>would be like you imagine seeing something and then you

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:48.919
<v Speaker 1>think it's really there. This is you know, I think

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:51.759
<v Speaker 1>what's generally accepted to happen in psychosis is like your

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:55.680
<v Speaker 1>your reality testing fails in the line between what is

0:51:55.719 --> 0:52:00.360
<v Speaker 1>imagined and what is perceived as reality breaks and this

0:52:00.400 --> 0:52:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, applies yet to dreams as well. Grant's pointed

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:08.359
<v Speaker 1>out that during dreams are reality testing is effectively switched off,

0:52:08.719 --> 0:52:13.720
<v Speaker 1>so we simply have experiences. We don't have beliefs about experiences,

0:52:13.800 --> 0:52:17.360
<v Speaker 1>which was interesting. I I don't think i'd ever you know,

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:19.719
<v Speaker 1>certainly we've covered dreams in the nature of dreams and

0:52:19.760 --> 0:52:22.160
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about dreams in the show before, but I don't

0:52:22.160 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>think I've ever heard it put so succinctly before. Yeah. Well,

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we have talked about the idea that in dreams,

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:32.799
<v Speaker 1>clearly critical thinking is reduced. Yes, yes, definitely that that

0:52:32.880 --> 0:52:36.040
<v Speaker 1>seems to be an extremely common feature of dream cognition,

0:52:36.360 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and not just the kind of deliberate, effortful critical thinking

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that you do when you're like, okay, and I'm trying

0:52:41.560 --> 0:52:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to understand is there a problem with this scientific claim

0:52:44.120 --> 0:52:47.960
<v Speaker 1>or something. I mean, the normal automatic critical thinking that

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we do that forms the basis of our intuitive reality testing,

0:52:51.360 --> 0:52:54.240
<v Speaker 1>even that is sort of turned off sometimes in dreams,

0:52:54.440 --> 0:52:58.000
<v Speaker 1>or at least greatly diminished. Yeah, it's the kind of

0:52:58.000 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 1>statement that makes me feel better about being such a

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:02.279
<v Speaker 1>horrible lucid dreamer. Not that I put in a lot

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:05.239
<v Speaker 1>of work on it. But I have frequently noticed that

0:53:05.800 --> 0:53:08.080
<v Speaker 1>at times, the rare times where I feel like I

0:53:08.120 --> 0:53:11.560
<v Speaker 1>could have lucid dreamed, I clearly didn't have it in me.

0:53:11.800 --> 0:53:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Like I just fell right back into into just experiencing

0:53:15.560 --> 0:53:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and certainly not having any beliefs or thoughts about the experience.

0:53:18.800 --> 0:53:22.040
<v Speaker 1>This is so embarrassing. I'm such a dream loser. I've

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:25.759
<v Speaker 1>probably told you this before, but a very common experience

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I have in dreams is stopping in the middle of

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a dream and thinking, hold on a second, I'm dreaming

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:37.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, right is this a dream? And then in

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the dream I try to pursue that question and interrogate it,

0:53:41.320 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and then I, invariably every single time, end up concluding no,

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:52.000
<v Speaker 1>this is definitely real. Uh See, I've had I've probably

0:53:52.000 --> 0:53:55.040
<v Speaker 1>shared this before too. I'll have experiences where I'm dreaming,

0:53:55.160 --> 0:53:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I realized I'm dreaming, and then I just click it

0:53:57.520 --> 0:53:59.319
<v Speaker 1>right back off again, and then I just fall right

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:01.319
<v Speaker 1>back into the dream. I had that moment where I

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:05.000
<v Speaker 1>was like raising my my head above the waters, and

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I could concede like that seems the time to take

0:54:07.680 --> 0:54:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the reins of of the dream and and then engage

0:54:10.520 --> 0:54:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in lucid dreaming. But I don't. I just fall right

0:54:12.640 --> 0:54:15.080
<v Speaker 1>back underwater. This is funny. So we've got similar things

0:54:15.160 --> 0:54:17.759
<v Speaker 1>going on, actually, except I just like I address it

0:54:17.800 --> 0:54:22.800
<v Speaker 1>more head on and still fail. By the way, Grande

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:25.719
<v Speaker 1>is the author of the Measure of Madness, Philosophy and

0:54:25.760 --> 0:54:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, which was published by m T Press if

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 1>anybody wants to to look up more of their work.

0:54:32.120 --> 0:54:36.080
<v Speaker 1>But uh, in general, though, just about the connection between

0:54:36.120 --> 0:54:38.719
<v Speaker 1>deja vu and dreams, I guess it's gonna be the

0:54:38.760 --> 0:54:41.319
<v Speaker 1>next episode of Stuff to Blow your mind where we'll

0:54:41.360 --> 0:54:45.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely touch on on some studies related to that, but

0:54:45.080 --> 0:54:47.760
<v Speaker 1>then we'll also get into really some of the core

0:54:48.239 --> 0:54:52.719
<v Speaker 1>theories regarding that the true nature of deja vu itself. Yeah,

0:54:52.800 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 1>next time we're gonna explore scientific theories that have tried

0:54:56.000 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to explain why the brain creates the feeling of deja vu,

0:54:59.680 --> 0:55:02.839
<v Speaker 1>what comes from, and we'll look into dreams, we'll look

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:06.520
<v Speaker 1>into anxiety and more. I think it's gonna be very fun. Yeah,

0:55:06.560 --> 0:55:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and certainly feel free to reach out to us in

0:55:09.120 --> 0:55:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, knowing, of course that there's about to be

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:14.440
<v Speaker 1>another episode where we'll we'll probably answer some of your

0:55:14.520 --> 0:55:16.960
<v Speaker 1>questions but hey, maybe not. Uh So it's always good

0:55:17.000 --> 0:55:19.359
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you either way. In the meantime, if

0:55:19.400 --> 0:55:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to check out other episodes to Stuff to

0:55:21.320 --> 0:55:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind, you can find us wherever you find

0:55:23.920 --> 0:55:27.320
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts, wherever that happens to be. Just support the

0:55:27.360 --> 0:55:31.160
<v Speaker 1>show by rating, reviewing, and subscribing, uh though. That's the

0:55:31.440 --> 0:55:34.200
<v Speaker 1>trinity of actions that help our show out. And if

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you just go to stuff to Blow your Mind dot com,

0:55:36.160 --> 0:55:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that will shoot you to the I heart listing for

0:55:38.800 --> 0:55:41.440
<v Speaker 1>our show where you can basically do all three of

0:55:41.480 --> 0:55:44.319
<v Speaker 1>those things as well. Hughes. Thanks as always to our

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:47.839
<v Speaker 1>excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson, who, again I just

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:51.040
<v Speaker 1>want to emphasize, has been doing really heroic work while

0:55:51.280 --> 0:55:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Robert and I and all of us are trying to

0:55:53.200 --> 0:55:56.239
<v Speaker 1>work from home and do social distancing. Uh. Seth has

0:55:56.239 --> 0:56:00.840
<v Speaker 1>helped us figure out all manner of gear stuff, closet stuff,

0:56:00.880 --> 0:56:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and then today I couldn't even understand why my microphone

0:56:03.560 --> 0:56:05.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't working for the first half hour we tried this,

0:56:05.960 --> 0:56:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So thank you, Seth. Thank you Seth. Uh. If you

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:11.000
<v Speaker 1>would like to get in touch with us with feedback

0:56:11.040 --> 0:56:13.799
<v Speaker 1>on this episode or any other to suggest something for

0:56:13.840 --> 0:56:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the future, or just to say Hi, let's know how

0:56:16.440 --> 0:56:19.319
<v Speaker 1>you found out about the show, what's going on with you,

0:56:19.400 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, you can email us at contact at

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow

0:56:32.360 --> 0:56:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind is production of I Heart Radio. For more

0:56:34.920 --> 0:56:37.520
<v Speaker 1>podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:56:37.719 --> 0:56:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.