Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Shoulder to Shoulder Shields. Welcome
Speaker 1: to the Buck Sexton Show team. Welcome to the Freedom
Speaker 1: Hunt Friday, January sixth edition of the program. And it's Friday,
Speaker 1: so we've got some things to discussed, like the second
Speaker 1: year anniversary of January six. Biden talking about this today
Speaker 1: and doing the usual trying to browbeat Republicans into abandoning
Speaker 1: everything that they believe in stand for because of a
Speaker 1: riot involving a thousand people that was over in a
Speaker 1: couple of hours. We're all supposed to just sit around
Speaker 1: and do whatever we're told as a result of this.
Speaker 1: I say no, we'll discuss that. More stuff going on
Speaker 1: on Capitol Hill. I think they're on vote thirteen or
Speaker 1: fourteen or something now, and I think it's thirteen. Looks
Speaker 1: like there will in fact be a speaker soon because
Speaker 1: a bunch of the holdouts have gone toward the McCarthy count.
Speaker 1: And then also what is Biden's trip to El Paso
Speaker 1: on Sunday likely to bring about when it comes to
Speaker 1: immigration policy and the discussions about illegal immigration that are
Speaker 1: underway right now, But let's start with this January sixth situation.
Speaker 1: I want everyone to be reminded of the context in
Speaker 1: which January sixth happened. You have a couple of major
Speaker 1: historical events that are swept aside, swept under the rug,
Speaker 1: ignored as it pertains to January sixth. One of them
Speaker 1: is the months of PLM riots that occurred before it,
Speaker 1: where the Democrat Party overall, they didn't condemn them. They
Speaker 1: were saying they were mostly peaceful, even when they were
Speaker 1: burning down buildings. They were saying they were about racist police,
Speaker 1: even though there are lies that the Left constantly tells
Speaker 1: about police violence, particularly against police violence against unarmed black men,
Speaker 1: the exaggeration that they engage in when they talk about
Speaker 1: how often that actually happens or how systemic that problem is.
Speaker 1: But the country in twenty twenty was in the midst
Speaker 1: of a pandemic, and it was while everybody was scared.
Speaker 1: It was while people and frightened by the government, told
Speaker 1: to stay in their homes, told that they should shut
Speaker 1: up and obey or else they would lose their life
Speaker 1: or perhaps even the life of a loved one. It
Speaker 1: would be their fault they didn't mask up properly or whatever.
Speaker 1: It was in that moment that the BLM riots began
Speaker 1: once again, and we were told that that was necessary
Speaker 1: for public health to allow those riots. Couldn't protest lockdowns,
Speaker 1: that was a violation of lockdowns, but protesting racist police.
Speaker 1: This is an emotion that's pretending to be a policy argument.
Speaker 1: This is people who want validation for their anger, their
Speaker 1: rage against the system or against whatever it may be.
Speaker 1: But that was what the BLM movement really did, and
Speaker 1: it made everything worse for everybody, as I've said, particularly
Speaker 1: for African American males in this country. As a function
Speaker 1: of numbers and statistics, far more murders, far more assaults
Speaker 1: after the BLM riots than before, all across the country.
Speaker 1: And we also had a twenty twenty election in which
Speaker 1: people boarded up stores and were prepared for massive Remember
Speaker 1: the BLM riots in June and July of twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: we're believed to be and they continue to even into
Speaker 1: August in some places, but they were believed to be
Speaker 1: a preview of the massive riots that would occur. Far
Speaker 1: more destructive riots would occur if Joe Biden didn't win
Speaker 1: the election, and you know, they take anyone's word for this.
Speaker 1: You go back and see there were store owners, there
Speaker 1: were businesses who were boarding up and were preparing for
Speaker 1: the storm that they believed was to come if Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: the president in office, was to be reelected. So that
Speaker 1: election was held under duress dress in a number of capacities,
Speaker 1: but certainly from the threat of left wing riots Biden
Speaker 1: voter riots that would have happened and torn the country
Speaker 1: up if Joe Biden hadn't won, if the absolute imbecile
Speaker 1: mediocrity Joe Biden hadn't become president of the United States.
Speaker 1: And then there's also because they're going to lecture us
Speaker 1: a lot today. I mean, Joe Biden certainly did it
Speaker 1: when he's speaking about January six. There's gonna be a
Speaker 1: lot of lectures that are given tonight on the left
Speaker 1: wing cable news channels about the attempt to overthrow a
Speaker 1: president or a would be presidency with Joe Biden. And
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, but I remember that it was Democrats who
Speaker 1: spent three years as the real collusion, as we know,
Speaker 1: was between the Democrat aligne media, the Democrat Party, the
Speaker 1: Hillary campaign, elements in the FBI, elements in the CIA
Speaker 1: and the Intelligence community, Director of National Intelligence Office, and
Speaker 1: probably the DNI himself tried to undo the twenty sixteen
Speaker 1: election with a massive lie. What would they call it.
Speaker 1: Let's say they were successful and they told a big lie.
Speaker 1: It was a big lie about Donald Trump, that he
Speaker 1: colluded with Russia to steal the election. Let's say they
Speaker 1: were successful in with that lie, getting a removal of
Speaker 1: Donald Trump from office and a prosecution prosecution under the
Speaker 1: DJ and under the Special Counsel's mandate to pass along
Speaker 1: a determination or a designation of whether they think there
Speaker 1: should be a prosecution. Isn't that a soft coup? I mean,
Speaker 1: it's all a lie, right, So they're willing to undo
Speaker 1: an election by telling a crazy story about Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: They're willing to undo an election by saying that Russia
Speaker 1: collusion happened, when no sane person really believed that, and
Speaker 1: we are supposed to forget that and ignore it. On
Speaker 1: January sixth, this is the only riot that Democrats ever
Speaker 1: talk about, And this is the only time it seems
Speaker 1: that Democrats are deeply favorable toward law enforcement and believe
Speaker 1: very strongly in backing law enforcement. Okay, so we look
Speaker 1: at all of this, and we find ourselves seeing, I think,
Speaker 1: a tremendous amount of hypocrisy. And that's never something that
Speaker 1: is enough when you come to democrat. When it comes
Speaker 1: to Democrats, hypocrisy is who they are. They don't care,
Speaker 1: they're not embarrassed by it. Sure we're aware of it,
Speaker 1: we pointed out, but they have the power to get
Speaker 1: away with it is the real point. That's how they
Speaker 1: really think of it, and their hypocrisy with the riot
Speaker 1: of January sixth versus all the other riots, all the
Speaker 1: other political pressure, or all the other lies and abuses
Speaker 1: of power they've engaged in to deny election results as
Speaker 1: they did in twenty sixteen, as it did in two thousand,
Speaker 1: as well, to deny election results and to have interference
Speaker 1: in the election, which certainly happened, certainly happened in the
Speaker 1: case of the social media companies actively colluding with Democrat
Speaker 1: elements in the government blatant first aeroment violation to make
Speaker 1: sure that a Democrat actually won the presidency. So that's
Speaker 1: what I think of on January sixth, And of course
Speaker 1: there's going to be the wild exaggerations about, oh my god,
Speaker 1: it's worse than nine to eleven, worse than Pearl Harbor,
Speaker 1: all these things that they say, which are outrageous, honestly,
Speaker 1: deeply outrageous and stupid, but I think meant to be
Speaker 1: because if you're willing to say that January sixth was
Speaker 1: worse than nine to eleven, as some respected Democrat talking
Speaker 1: heads and politicians have or so called respected or you know,
Speaker 1: among Democrats, if you're willing to say that, I think
Speaker 1: you're willing to say basically anything. I think that there
Speaker 1: is no outer limit to the degree of crazy you
Speaker 1: will spew. And so that really at least allows them
Speaker 1: to prove their fealty to the party. It proves their
Speaker 1: loyalty to Democrat cause if they're willing to say that,
Speaker 1: what are they not willing to say? Right? What are
Speaker 1: they not willing to push as part of a lie?
Speaker 1: So I do think it's important. I think it's important
Speaker 1: that we see this for what it is. And let's
Speaker 1: also be very honest with the fact that if Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is a Republican nominee, this will be a centerpiece
Speaker 1: in their effort to defeat him. Now you can say
Speaker 1: that it won't matter, and that's an argument that we
Speaker 1: could have or that's a debate that the Republicans can
Speaker 1: have and will have. But this gives them something that
Speaker 1: as much as you and I may see it as
Speaker 1: an exaggeration, may see it as it Just talking about
Speaker 1: it and the propaganda that comes from it exhausts independence.
Speaker 1: It exhausts people who are swing voters. They go, oh god,
Speaker 1: this again, all right, fine, and I'll I'll vote for
Speaker 1: anybody as long as you stop talking about this stuff.
Speaker 1: That's a big problem. That's a big problem going into
Speaker 1: the twenty twenty four election. Now, let's talk about the
Speaker 1: situation in Congress right now where they've got oh my
Speaker 1: or on the fourteenth round of voting. Here. I feel
Speaker 1: like I was one of the earliest ones if you
Speaker 1: go back in the show. Certainly two days ago, I
Speaker 1: was saying, it doesn't really matter, it's all gonna be fine.
Speaker 1: Have heard a lot of people say that. Now. The latest,
Speaker 1: as you might know as you hear this, is that
Speaker 1: all but six voters, six Republicans, i should say, have
Speaker 1: gone with Kevin McCarthy. So there's a very a smaller
Speaker 1: group of holdouts now than there had been before, and
Speaker 1: it's very unlikely I think that this will continue. That
Speaker 1: much longer. I spoke to Annapolina Luna today about what
Speaker 1: this is really going to accomplish. Got some general statements,
Speaker 1: but she said because of the negotiations, she wasn't going
Speaker 1: to give me more specifics on what they're trying to
Speaker 1: achieve with all this. So that's something that we have
Speaker 1: to take into account here. But look, I think it's
Speaker 1: we are fighting with the Democrat left, with these commies
Speaker 1: who are doing so much to undermine not just not
Speaker 1: just to push bad policies, but to really undermine our
Speaker 1: American civilization in a lot of ways. We have to
Speaker 1: have a battle hardened and ready to go Republican party
Speaker 1: for twenty twenty four, and that means there are going
Speaker 1: to be some uncomfortable conversations. There's gonna be fights, there's
Speaker 1: gonna be arguments, there's going to be pushing people around
Speaker 1: a little bit. And that's a necessary part of this.
Speaker 1: You know, if you're if you're preparing for a big fight,
Speaker 1: you got a spar you gotta train, you gotta sweat.
Speaker 1: There are things that have to be done in that process.
Speaker 1: So I think this is all just a part of that.
Speaker 1: And the freak outs we've seen, oh my gosh, it's
Speaker 1: chaos because members of Congress are talking for a couple
Speaker 1: of days, making speeches, having votes on the record. Isn't
Speaker 1: this what they're supposed to do? Oh? No, I see,
Speaker 1: Congress is actually supposed to vote for five thousand page bills.
Speaker 1: That's been trillions of dollars with all kinds of laws
Speaker 1: and no one has any idea within them. That's what
Speaker 1: Congress is supposed to do. Now that's what it has
Speaker 1: devolved into. Well, the answer is yes, that is what
Speaker 1: it has devolved into. But where are we on this
Speaker 1: in our future? And what's happening? Why do we want
Speaker 1: this to continue? If we want it to stop, we
Speaker 1: have to come up with a way I believe to
Speaker 1: make it stop. And then there's a Biden visit to
Speaker 1: the border on Sunday. This will be interesting. You're going
Speaker 1: to see a lot of talk about dreamers. I'm sure
Speaker 1: you're going to see a focus from the Biden administration
Speaker 1: on aspects of immigration that are either the most sympathetic
Speaker 1: or the most opaque, meeting most difficult to understand. Really
Speaker 1: what's going on. What you will not see is a
Speaker 1: concerted effort to do interior enforcement, to deport people who
Speaker 1: stay in the country beyond when they're legally allowed to.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think of all the laws that I
Speaker 1: have to obey that I think are really stupid, and
Speaker 1: all the you know, the paperwork I have to do,
Speaker 1: and the registration of this and that, with the government
Speaker 1: paying of taxes, and no one even knows how how
Speaker 1: much they owe in terms of taxes. They hold you
Speaker 1: to account for law that are so complicated and so
Speaker 1: obviously skewed towards certain interests, without respect to whether or
Speaker 1: not this is fair. And yet when it comes to
Speaker 1: illegal immigration, we're supposed to just forget that the rule
Speaker 1: of law is a thing. And you have now fifteen
Speaker 1: to twenty million people who are in the country illegally.
Speaker 1: At least some would say it's thirty million. And I
Speaker 1: won't argue with them, because I think the number is
Speaker 1: substantially higher. Certain I know it's substantially higher than the
Speaker 1: government's official numbers, and I think it's even a lot
Speaker 1: higher than some of the estimates of people who recognize
Speaker 1: that this is a problem. So Biden will go there
Speaker 1: and he'll come, He'll give a speech, maybe on Monday
Speaker 1: or something, probably on Monday Sunday he'll do the Sunday
Speaker 1: shows talk about how there's the borders in crisis and
Speaker 1: it's broken. Do you know how they're going to say
Speaker 1: we have to fix it. Amnesty. That's the way that
Speaker 1: they say this gets fixed. That's the only way they
Speaker 1: say it gets fixed. And a part of that amnesty
Speaker 1: is to streamline even further the processing of illegals coming
Speaker 1: in to this country. And at some point we're going
Speaker 1: to have to have speaking of the Republican Party, we're
Speaker 1: going to have to have a conversation about whether or
Speaker 1: not we are a sovereign nation if we don't have
Speaker 1: control of our borders. You know, at some point that
Speaker 1: has to be where we turn our focus. And I
Speaker 1: think we're heading toward it. We're hurtling toward it faster
Speaker 1: than anybody realizes right now. Appreciate your rolling with me,
Speaker 1: Have a great weekend, and I'll be back with you
Speaker 1: on Monday. Shields High