WEBVTT - Nvidia Earnings and Looming US Default

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Vallet Nbon.

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Lovelove.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm scarlettfu in for Caroline Hide at Bloomberg's world headquarters

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 3>in New York, and.

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm Alex Franka in for Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 3>In video's blowout forecast sparks a two hundred and sixty

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar AI rally. We'll break down the results in

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 3>how to trade the red hot technology.

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 5>And as a catastrophic US default. Looms will speak to

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 5>one tech industry veteran who joined CEOs in signing an

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 5>open letter to the President and Congress over their extreme

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 5>concerns on the matter.

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Plus a one point eight billion dollar deal in a

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 3>three D printing space. We'll discuss why Stratusists is acquiring

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 3>desk Metal.

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 4>With its CEO. All that and a lot.

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 3>More coming up, But first we want to get your

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 3>check on the markets. Here at midday on this Thursday,

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 3>and you have the S and P five hundred moving

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 3>higher by half of one percent, all thanks to technology.

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Look at the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index hired by almost six

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 3>percent thanks to video is better than expected sales forecast.

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Alex will get into that a little bit later, but

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 3>it's not as if all chip makers are rising. You

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 3>actually have weakness in Intel and analog devices as well.

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of anks to over the debt ceiling

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 3>and how little progress seems to be there seems to

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.639
<v Speaker 3>be right now as we get closer to June.

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 4>First, you can see the yield on the two.

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 3>You're moving up by seven basis points to four point

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 3>four or five percent. This is actually the tenth straight

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.199
<v Speaker 3>day that yields have been moving up, reflecting a persistent

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 3>decline in demand for that security. Fitch actually put the

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 3>US on credit watch for a possible downgrade, even as

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 3>it says it does expect some kind of deal at

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 3>the last minute. Markets are also pricing in increase odds

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 3>that the Federal Reserve will possibly raise interest rates at

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 3>one of its next two meetings. Data is showing inflation

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 3>remains fairly sticky, and in fact, the GDP report showed

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 3>a faster rate of growth than what had been previously estimated.

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 3>So with the US dollar strength thing, let's change up

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 3>the boards here. What you'll see is that commodities are lower,

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 3>especially those price in US dollars like New York crud

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 3>WTI off by four percent at the moment, snapping a

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 3>three day advance. Saudi Arabia this week saying that people

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 3>shorting the oil market should watch out, although that was

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 3>follow up by Russia saying that it's unlikely OPEK and

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 3>its partners, including Russia, will be cutting production in the

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 3>near term. Gold future is also down by nine tens

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 3>of one percent. I bring this up only because I

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 3>was reading somewhere Alex that one analyst said institutional messters,

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 3>when they are looking for someplace to hide out, they

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 3>hide out in gold. When individual mesters are looking for

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 3>somewhere to hide out, they go to bitcoin. Right now,

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 3>neither of these safe havens is catching a bid, but

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 3>it's an interesting explanation of gold versus coin, Alex.

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 5>I'll get to some of those safe havens Scarlet, but

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 5>first I want to bring you to some of the red.

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 5>On the day Snowflake is taking its biggest plunge in

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 5>over a year, it reported disappointing sales outlook for the

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 5>current quarter. That software company is known for charging customers

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 5>on a pay as you go model, but it told

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 5>investors that the uncertain economic conditions have clients slowing down

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 5>on using their products.

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 4>Now let's move into some of that grain.

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 5>Dish is surging the most in six months on a

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 5>Wall Street Journal report that it's in talks to sell

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 5>its new mobile phone service through Amazon.

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 5>Dish already uses Amazon's cloud to run core elements of

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 5>the FIG network it's developing, but this move would give

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 5>the company access to Amazon's millions of customers. Now into

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 5>some of our bigger movers of the day, Microsoft is

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 5>trading at a sixteen month high. Investors are really on

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 5>the hunt for the next AI trade.

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 4>We've been talking about.

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 5>Save Haven's and this company has been out front on

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 5>that AI trade. It's not new news that Microsoft has

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 5>been out front in AI. It's the biggest stakeholder in

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 5>open AI and brand and is already bringing artificial intelligence

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 5>to its cloud offerings and its software. What is giving

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 5>it a little bit of a lift today is perhaps

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 5>a bit of the halo effect from the top stock

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 5>I'm watching today, which I will take us to. Now,

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 5>let's go to Nvidia. I told you everyone's looking for

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 5>the next AI trade. This is why in Video's up

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 5>a whopping twenty seven percent at record high levels and

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 5>flirting with that big sticker one trillion dollar valuation. The

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 5>chip maker reported a revenue forecast that surprised even the

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 5>most bullish of analysts on sales of its processors used

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 5>in you guessed it AI technology, It sells to customers

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 5>like Microsoft, like Alphabet and others. Analysts at Susquehanna even

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 5>called this the greatest beat of all time of any.

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Earnings report they've seen.

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 5>This stock also could be benefiting from that safe haven

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 5>effect we've seen in tech stocks lately. We'll dig in

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 5>to that shortly, but first I want to get more

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 5>on in Vidia and that AI demand that's been booming.

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 5>So let's bring in Bloomberg's Ian King and big report

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 5>out of in Vidia yesterday. Lots of excitement on the forecast.

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 5>Dig into the numbers here for.

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 7>Us, Yeah, I mean the embarrassed Wall Street. The prediction

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 7>of eleven billion, which would be their biggest quarter ever

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 7>for the current period, fifty three percent higher than where

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 7>the average expectation was, and the numbers on the quarter

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 7>were similarly a lot stronger. Even the poultry long forgotten

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 7>nobody cares about PC businesses looking better for them as well.

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 7>It really just you know, wildly surprised everybody on the

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 7>upside and gave investors exactly what they were looking for,

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.799
<v Speaker 7>which is like, show me the company that's actually making

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 7>money out of this AI thing.

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it seems like it's hitting on all cylinders. Ian

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 3>how is it when you zoom out a little bit here,

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 3>that in video always seems to be on the front

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 3>lines of whatever the new hot thing in tech is.

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 3>I remember super high in video games in videos there,

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Bitcoin mining in videos there, and now AI in videos there.

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean it's you know, to hear it on

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 7>a fundamental level from their CEO, we're talking about what

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 7>he calls a shift in computing to accelerated computing. That's

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 7>the idea that instead of using a type of chip

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 7>that kind of does everything quite well, which would be

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 7>an Intel CPU, you're using a chip for a very

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 7>specific purpose that's really good at doing things in a

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 7>very simple things relatively, but in a very parallelized way.

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 7>So it's going to give a huge rush to say

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 7>training AI software or actually taking that software and doing

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 7>the implementation of it, recognizing you know, cats in videos

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 7>or what you're saying to your Alexa speaker and making

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 7>that much more efficient and much better now.

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 5>And I don't want to damper on the day for

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 5>in Video they're having a big one.

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 4>But this does make me wonder when.

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 5>You think about the hyperscalers that it sells to. When

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 5>you think about folks like Meta, a lot of those

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 5>companies are known for wanting to vertically integrate their entire

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 5>infrastructure stack. How long are invidious processors kind of the

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 5>bell of the ball. At what point do you see

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 5>some of the customers actually pushing into creating their own silicon.

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 7>I mean you nailed it. I mean you wrote about

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 7>it recently. This is absolutely the question that's hanging over them,

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 7>and in Video has two answers to that. One is

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 7>we're going to run faster than they can because we've

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 7>got a head start on this. We're good at it.

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 7>And the second answer to this is if AI is

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 7>only the preserve of Microsoft, of Meta, of Amazon Notable US,

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 7>then that's not good enough. It needs to be a

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 7>type of technology that every company that doesn't have these

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 7>these abilities can just walk into. So what they've been

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 7>doing is making devices, is making cloud services, and their

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 7>own software that would help pharmaceutical companies, robots companies, automotive

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 7>companies get into this. So they're kind of trying to

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 7>hedge their bets there and stay ahead of the game.

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they've done a great job as seeing ahead of

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 4>the game.

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, we've been talking about how Wall Street strategists

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 3>like Michael Hartnet of Bank of America have talked about

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 3>how there is this mini bubble in AI and a

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 3>bubble technology. Is there any acknowledgment of this in San Francisco,

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 3>ground zero of all this technology that perhaps things are

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 3>getting a bit frothy.

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 7>Well, if you look at the the inbox of any journalist,

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 7>it's going to be full of pitches with the words

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 7>AI in it. So what does that tell you? I mean,

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 7>we've been through this before, obviously, but no, I think,

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 7>you know, in Vidia is a real good case in point,

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 7>and the way the market has reacted is also a

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 7>good case in point. Not every chip stock is up today.

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 7>Intel is down right, and some of the others aren't

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 7>sling out. So I think there's a little bit more sobriety,

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 7>at least in my sector. In terms of other areas,

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 7>who knows, there's a lot of talk.

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well in videos delivering and it is profitable compared

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 3>to some of the companies in past moments of excesses.

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 4>Ian Hiking. Thank you so much.

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Ian, with his decades of experience covering semiconductors.

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 4>In Asia and the US.

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's get more on the markets and bring in Mona Mahajan.

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 3>She is Edward Jones's senior investment strategist. Mona, I know

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 3>that you were listening to us talk to Ian just now.

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious with the S and P five hundred six

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 3>tens of one percent, clearly powered by Nvidia in these

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 3>big tech names, but the now losing ground by four

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 3>tenths of one percent because it doesn't have that AI exposure.

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Is this overall a strong stock market or a fragile

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 3>stock market given how narrow the winners are.

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a great question.

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Stcarlett, and look this year the SMP broadly is up

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>about seven percent plus, but it has been very narrow leadership.

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>In fact, only three sectors are outperforming the broader market.

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Those are of course, technology, comm services, and consumer discretionary.

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>So those growth parts of the market, quality growth parts

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of the market. Some of those sectors are up twenty

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>percent plus, so back in bull market territory. And meanwhile,

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the cyclical and more defensive parts of the market are lagging.

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.079
<v Speaker 1>So you know, as long term investors, we would certainly

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>like to see a broader participation in a market rally

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that to us is a more healthy sign that the

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>economy of the underlying fundamentals and the market broadly has.

0:09:57.880 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 4>More room to run.

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Now, this narrow leadership not only driven by a few

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>sectors and a few names. We're also seeing valuation expansion

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>creep back into the marketplace as well.

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 4>Keep in mind earnings.

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Although earnings growth this past quarter did exceed expectations, we're

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>still looking at negative earnings growth and really now three

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>back to back negative earnings quarters, So valuation is expanding.

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 4>Breath has been narrow.

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>But what we will say broadly is that some of

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>the reasons that investors have gotten back into the market

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>they do have this alternative sitting in cash and cash

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>like instruments, is because some of these technology players have

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>provided a compelling reason to get involved.

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Let me broaden out our conversation a little bit here,

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 3>because obviously the excitement over Nvidia and any company that

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 3>has ties to AI is papering over some weak spots

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 3>in the overall market and the economy. Fitch, for instance,

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 3>put US on watch for a possible downgrade of its

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 3>credit rating. Does it matter that it's Fitch versus SMP

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 3>or Moody's, or is any one of the three big

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 3>ratings companies downgrading the US potentially enough for investors to

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 3>have to sell. I'm just trying to get ahead of

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 3>what we could see if the worst happens.

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, it's an interesting question. And look, I

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>think our base case continues to be that the US

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>does not default on its debt, and in fact, both

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>sides of Congress come together in a negotiated resolution.

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 4>We've seen some historic precedent for that.

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>In fact, seventy eight times has Congress come together to

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>raise the debt ceiling since nineteen sixty. Twenty of those

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>times have been since twenty eleven, and six of those

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>have been in using extraordinary measures. So there is precedent

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>for this, and we do think that will be the

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>most likely path forward. But in the meanwhile, we will

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly get consternation, and the Fitch warning is certainly one

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>signal of that. We would say, if you know, in

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>that tail risk scenario that the US does default, any

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of the rating agency downgrades will be meaningful, and not

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>only that we will have broader impacts and equity bond markets,

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>but also things like payments to you know, key areas

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of the economy, social, secure, medicare, defense, etc. So there

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>are real meaningful impacts of not only the downgrade but

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the default itself.

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 4>But we're still hopeful.

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>That, you know, as we approach the X state, really

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>both sides can come together, and both sides will probably

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>have to concede to some extent, but we'll get that

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>negotiated resolution.

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 5>Mana, if we do have that, as you say, kind

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 5>of outside case of default. Even if we don't, some

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 5>economists are saying that this whole back and forth could

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 5>push us into something of a mild recession. If that

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 5>does happen, here, where do you rotate your investments?

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 4>Is it back to cash? What are you looking at?

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 5>If that is kind of the scenario we see over

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 5>the next twelve eighteen months.

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, look, I think certainly the mild recession

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>scenario is one that is now somewhat baked into markets.

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, if you look at the Bloomberg Consensus estimate's

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Q three and Q four two back to back quarters.

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>They are looking for negative or calling for negative GDP.

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>It's minor negative point five percent, but still sub zero

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>GDP for two quarters, and that is now probably the

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 1>most well advertised mild recession on the horizon.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 4>If we do get more.

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Meaningful volatility around the debt ceiling, that could create just

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>feedback loops around the consumer pulls back. There's hesitation to invest,

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>even in safe haven assets, and that does have an

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>impact and a ripple effect through equity and bond markets.

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>We'd say, in that scenario, you certainly want to be

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>more defensive, and in that scenario defensive probably still means

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>areas of the market like staples, health care utilities, but

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 1>also still overweight some of those cash and cash like instruments.

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So that kind of bar belle between the equity and

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the bond market on the defense side. Now, as we do,

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, if that does not occur, and as we

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>do get through a resolution and the economy goes through

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a mild recession and looks towards recovery, that's when really

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we think about a more broadening participation. As we talked

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>about earlier, that recovery playbook should include leadership from areas

0:13:56.040 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>like small cap stocks like international em equities, and also

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of course longer duration bonds and cyclical parts of the market.

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 4>So not just tech leading the way.

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>We do think as we look towards the back half

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of the year and towards potential recovery, we'll have a

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>more sustainable, broader leadership in the market as well.

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 5>I have to ask one last one on tech. We

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 5>did see during the pandemic era era, the tech, particularly

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 5>big tech was really gaining, particularly on digital advertising strength

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 5>e commerce.

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 4>But when that kind of time.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 5>Period ended, investors turned back to the fundamentals. Cost structure

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 5>was in play, fundamentals of these companies were in play.

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 5>Is there a risk here for these big tech names

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 5>that are really getting a lot of love these days

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 5>from the equity markets that if we have a quarter

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 5>of maybe shakeier fundamentals, that you could see a big

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 5>sell off in that sector in particular.

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, look, there's certainly a case to be made,

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>an a credible case that we're getting into overbought territories

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and a pullback and period of consolidation we think probably

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>would be normal healthy in some cases, given the excess

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>moves that we've seen. That being said, you know, in

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>an era of low growth, the low economic growth, investors

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>do tend to gravitate towards higher growth parts of the market,

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>especially those with defenseable business models, strong free cash flow,

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and those that are returning value to shareholders through buybacks.

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>So there is you know, perhaps a little bit of

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>consolidation volatility ahead, but the long term picture we think

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>looks a little bit more balanced and still healthy for technology.

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 5>Mona Mahazan, thank you for taking us through today and

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 5>in the future.

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 4>That's Mona Mahazan and Edward Jones.

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 5>I appreciate you joining us all right.

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 3>In the three D printing world, Stratasists agree to acquire

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Desktop Metal. It is an all stock deal that'll create

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 3>a leading company in the industry at about one point

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 3>eight billion dollars. Joining us now is yav zeif STRATUSUS CEO,

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Yov thank you so much for joining us. Your company

0:15:56.440 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 3>recently rejected a takeover offer from rival. I know Dimension,

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 3>yet here you are getting ready to buy just top Metal.

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Why does this particular combination make sense.

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 6>Because it will reshape the industry, the three D printing

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 6>industry or auditive manufacturing for years is failing to deliver

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 6>what manufacturing really needs. But with the combination, we'll create

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 6>the scale to deliver.

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 5>And with that scale, are there certain clients or certain

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 5>slices of industry that you think you can really sell

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 5>into now that you're pulling in this additional functionality with

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 5>this acquisition.

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 6>Definitely, we are leading in the aerospace and automotive markets,

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 6>and we're also leading in dental and medical, but we

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 6>didn't have the metal paths we are focusing on polymer

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 6>Now together there we are setting to the same customer

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 6>through the same channels, a much bigger portfolio, broader portfolio,

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 6>and will be very profitable to leverage our scale.

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, if you say profitability, talk to us day one.

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 5>What is the financial impact on Stratasis from bringing this

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 5>company in the fold? Are we talking in immediate revenue boost?

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 5>Is there a margin accretion? Kind of talk us through

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 5>the financial side of this acquisition.

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 8>Great question. We are the only profitable strategies.

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 6>Is the only profitable business in the three D printing arena?

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 6>Desktop Metal announced that there will be profitable by the

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 6>end of the year. When we combine us together, we'll

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 6>be the first above one billion dollar company in this industry,

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 6>this is huge. In twenty twenty five will sell one

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 6>point one billion with even the imagin of ten to

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 6>twelve percent. This is something that does not exist today

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 6>in editing manufacturing because we are not mature enough yet.

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 3>And I appreciate your pointing out that you are profitable

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:44.959
<v Speaker 3>and you're a leader in that space. Three D printing

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 3>seems to be a pretty fragmented space right now. Give

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 3>us a sense of who wants you combine with desktop,

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 3>you'll be able to better compete with. Now, even beyond

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 3>the three D printing ecosystem.

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 6>We will be better equipped to comp with the entire

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 6>you know, second tiered for fifth because we are number one,

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 6>and the main reason is the broadest portfolio, unmixed material portfolio,

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 6>material and software is key in our industry and those

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 6>are also the one that generate the profit. So when

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 6>we are coming to customers, we have two huge advantages.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 6>One is that we are selling in whatever it needs,

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 6>not we have what we have because we are covering

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 6>the whole technological space, so we are not selling what

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 6>he needs.

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 8>We sell what he needs.

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 6>The second thing is that we have a full solution,

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 6>including the material and the software, so the customer does.

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.959
<v Speaker 8>Not need to look outside our platforms.

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Another advantage you could have or you could tap into

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 3>is the shareholders of desktop Desktop Metal went public in

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty through respect and one of it's biggest shareholders

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 3>is Alphabet with about a three percent stake in the company.

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Do you anticipate working more closely with Alphabet as a

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 3>result of this transaction.

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 6>No doubt that we can benefit and cooperate with the

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 6>great shareholder base of desktop Metal. It's a group of

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 6>people that believe in innovation. Desktop Metal is bringing the

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 6>innovation to the table, but we are bringing the establishment,

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 6>the go to market, the infrastructure to make this innovation

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 6>a real product, the deliver values to the best mankey

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 6>customers in the world.

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 5>You say you look at them for help on innovation

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 5>and bring in that innovative spirit.

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 4>What specifically are we talking about.

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 5>When you think about the alphabets of the world and

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 5>how they can kind of lend some of that innovative

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 5>spirit to you as well.

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 8>The stop Meta located in Boston.

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 6>They are highly linked to MIT and that tells the

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 6>entire story. It's so hard to find talent in our

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 6>industry and the ability to have great links in the academia,

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 6>great shareholder that are interested.

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 8>In breakthrough technologies. I think it's a great way to

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 8>stick forward.

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, thanks for walking us through this acquisition today. Stratasi's CEO,

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 5>yov Ziff, appreciate you joining us. More coming up, Microsoft

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 5>is pushing back. It's formally filing to appeal the UK

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 5>decision to block its mega merger with Activision Blizzard.

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 4>More on that next.

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg and keeping our eyes on shares of Splunk.

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 5>The software company reported first quarter revenue that beat expectations

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 5>and gave a second quarter forecast that's ahead of the

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 5>CONCESSUS consensus estimates. The shares are coming down on the

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 5>days they were up this morning, now write about unchanged.

0:20:44.560 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 4>We'll continue watching throughout the show. This is Bloomberg. It's

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 4>time now for talking tech.

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 5>First Up Grabs co founder is stepping down from her

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 5>operational roles at the company by year's end. She helps

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 5>start the Singapore based ride handling and food delivery company

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 5>more than a decade ago, and currently leads its technology

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 5>and corporate strategy teams. Tan will also give up her

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 5>seat on the board, though she will remain an advisor

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 5>to the company and Microsoft president Brad Smith says the

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 5>US should make a new agency to regulate artificial intelligence

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 5>and the licensing requirements necessary to operate those AI tools.

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 5>Smith outlined the company's policy regarding AI and echoed sentiments

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 5>from OpenAI Sam Altman, saying that government oversight quote will

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 5>ensure that humans remain in control of the technology. And

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 5>In other Microsoft news, the company has formally filed its

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 5>appeal against the UK's Competition and Markets Authority after the

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 5>Anti Trust agency blocks its sixty nine billion dollars deal

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 5>to buy Activision Blizzard. The CMA says it stands by

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 5>its decision, arguing it would enable Microsoft to set the

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 5>terms of the gaming market and sticking with video games,

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 5>look at shares of Nintendo over the last few weeks.

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 5>It took just three days for the latest installment in

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 5>the Legend of Zelda franchise to some more than ten

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 5>million copies worldwide. Four million of those were in the

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 5>America's where the new game became Nintendo's fastest selling game ever.

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 4>From New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg.

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Alex Brankan San Francisco,

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 5>and I'm Scarlett Foo in New York. Let's get a

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 5>check on the markets.

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Right now, because the NASAC is flying high at the

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 3>moment thanks to Nvidia's blowout sales forecast on the back

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 3>of demand for its AI chips. And you look at

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 3>the New York Fang Index, in which in Nvidia has

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 3>the biggest waiting a thirteen percent waiting. It's flying even

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 3>higher of more than three percent. And of course let's

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 3>look at Nvidia itself gaining.

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 4>More than twenty five percent.

0:22:57.720 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 3>And in fact, there's a great story on the Bloomberg

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 3>that betting against Nvidia have suffered massive losses. We're talking

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 3>about a two point three billion dollar paper loss just

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 3>today alone because of its big, big spike higher. Now,

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 3>on the downside, you have the ETF that tracks shorter

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.199
<v Speaker 3>duration treasuries. We're talking one to three hour maturities. It

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 3>is down for an eighth straight day, the longest losing

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 3>streak in nineteen years, believe it or not. When there's

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 3>a sell off in bonds, yields go up, reflecting the

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 3>increased payouts that investors demand to buy the securities. And

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 3>that's where I want to go next, because of course,

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 3>the debt sealing drama dominates even as the market overall

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 3>is hired. Today. Take a look at this next chart.

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 3>It is a snapshot of the US government's checking account.

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 3>This is the amount it has on hand to pay

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 3>its bills, whether it's paying interest on its debt or

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 3>sending out Social Security checks. As of Tuesday afternoon, it

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 3>had about seventy six billion dollars. That move higher in

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 3>mid April, which you can see that little blip in

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 3>the last part of the chart was a result of

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 3>people and companies paying their taxes. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 3>has identified June first as a date the government may

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 3>run out of money to honors obligations.

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 4>According to economists of Goldmen.

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Sex, this cash level that we're looking at here will

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 3>drop below thirty billion by June eighth or June knife.

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 3>That is seen as the bare minimum for meeting federal

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 3>obligations that come do alex.

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.679
<v Speaker 5>And While as the negotiations in Washington over the US

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 5>debt limit persists, the risk of defaulting for that first

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 5>time is growing. That's why more than one hundred and

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 5>forty CEOs and Wall Street executives have been sounding the

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 5>alarm bells and a letter to the President and congressional leaders.

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 4>The group rights quote, high.

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 5>Inflation has created stresses in our financial system, including several

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 5>recent bank failures. Much worse will occur if the nation

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 5>default on our debt obligations. We strongly urge that in

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 5>a cord be reached quickly so that the country can

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 5>invert this potentially disast devastating scenario. Joining us now with

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 5>more insight is Charles Phillips, managing partner and co founder

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 5>of Recognized Partners. He's also one of the many that

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 5>signed that letter. Now, Charles, that letter was set May sixteenth.

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 5>It's been a few days since the and we've had

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 5>a headlines cross like Speaker Kevin McCarthy saying today, quote,

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if we'll have a deal today. He

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.239
<v Speaker 5>also said yesterday they need seventy two hours. They're going

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 5>to take the seventy two hours to review and pass

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 5>any bill that.

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 4>Does come through.

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 5>How has the urgency changed since you and your fellow

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 5>CEOs and leaders wrote that letter just a little over

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 5>a week ago.

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 9>Well, there's a reason the markets are starting to react.

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 9>You can see the credit default swats forager of changing

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 9>and there's plenty of indicators out there, so it's gotten

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 9>more urgent. It just so happens. And recognize we own

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 9>a bunch of technology colpanies who had our annual meeting

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 9>this week, so all of our companies were in, all

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 9>of our investors were in. And normally you talk about

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 9>technology changes, evaluation, operational improvements, and now we have to

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 9>talk about this. We just went through a banking crisis, wondering,

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 9>you know, kind of cost of credit. We had some

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 9>SVV problems in FRB. We've solved those, and now we

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 9>have to deal with this. Will your cost of capital

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 9>be hire in six months? And three months and a month?

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.239
<v Speaker 9>That did you know about? So the planning aspect of

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 9>this is we can have a gun people and so

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 9>the uncertainty is the thing that people don't like dealing

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 9>with right now.

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 3>So that's interesting that you've been having these meetings and

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 3>it keeps coming up. How are some of the leaders

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 3>and the executives planning around this or through this?

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 9>Well, fortunately we don't use a lot of leverage in

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 9>our portfolio. We have some companies, but it certainly made

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 9>us think differently about it. Don't count on that because

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 9>we don't know what the cost is going to be.

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 9>We may have to use more equity, but not everybody

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 9>has that leeway to do that, so it means perhaps

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 9>fewer deals get done, or you get done at a

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 9>different price. The second thing is we rely on certain

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 9>state and local government budgets, so we have companies that

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 9>sell into that market. With the slugs windows closed, they

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 9>can't fund the infrastructure spending that they normally rely on.

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 9>We need those state and local governments to be spending

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 9>because we have companies that rely on those contracts. So

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 9>it has implications that ripples down to the state and

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 9>local level as well.

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 3>That's really interesting and something that perhaps a lot of

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 3>lawmakers in Washington may not be immediately aware of. In

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 3>your current role, you're obviously around entrepreneurs all the time,

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 3>learning about new technologies from them, in turn helping them

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 3>think through strategies, recruiting, connecting with customers. What do you

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 3>think Congress and the White House as well don't fully

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.199
<v Speaker 3>understand about how their actions reverberate in the private sector.

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 9>I think they don't understand that the US brand around

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 9>the world accrues to each one of our companies that

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 9>we're viewed as understanding business, very innovative, but coming from

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 9>an economy that's rock solid, that is risk free treasuries,

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 9>so that we have fiscal discipline and so we all

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 9>kind of benefit from that brand. When you start to

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 9>question that a bit, well, okay, you know, different from US,

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 9>you get a certain patino around that, and that people

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 9>believe that we know what we're doing because we're from

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 9>the US, and so the brand aspect of that, I

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 9>think people just don't quite understand that it hurts all

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 9>over the companies.

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 5>Charles, That reputational risk is really interesting. I'm curious with

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 5>you as an investor yourself at recognize, does that reputational

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 5>risk of these kind of chaotic conversations of the banking

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 5>crisis that's gone on with some of the important funders

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 5>of places like the tech sector like SVB, does that

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 5>reputational risk post some challenges for you as you're looking

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 5>for your growth investments going forward.

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 9>Sure, so we're competing with other investors around the world,

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 9>and so we want to look like we have an edge.

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 9>Part of it is we have an operational background. Part

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 9>of it is we're from the US, and part of

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 9>it is we have a lower cost to capital win.

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 9>So any one of those things that starts to break down,

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:32.919
<v Speaker 9>you look not as strong as you would otherwise, and

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 9>you don't want people asking the question in the room

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 9>what's going on over there? And so I just think

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 9>the implications for the job market in general. If we

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 9>can't pay our bills, social Security or whether it's our

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 9>military or whatever, these things start to break down, it

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 9>just looks like chaos everybody. And I think people thought

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 9>that this couldn't really happen. You know, maybe they're playing

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 9>a game of chicken, but they always work it out.

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 9>But now you never know because things have gotten so

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 9>PARTI sand it could actually happen. So that's what's different now,

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 9>as people say, this could be a real thing that happens.

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 5>So then do you start looking geographically to regions outside

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 5>the US where the companies aren't sitting in a room

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 5>and having to cope with uncertainty or a kind of

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 5>a pause in really innovative strategies because there's too much

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 5>chaos potentially looming for the economy here.

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 4>In the US.

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, we've always been global, so we have companies in Ukraine,

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 9>do in Latin America, all over the world, and so

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 9>but relative to where we could be investing. Does it

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 9>make perhaps the US look a little less attractive than

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 9>it would otherwise, Sure, but that's like any global investor,

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 9>So that's the everything. Capital can flow anywhere these days.

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 3>You served on President Obama's Economic Recovery Board. You also

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 3>served on the board of the New York Fed, so

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 3>you've seen the fallout from political intransigence and also I've

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 3>been in rooms with policymakers to discuss the economy. How

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 3>do you think the twenty twenty three debt ceilings standoff

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 3>differs from what we've seen in the past or is

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 3>this just business as usual?

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 4>To some extent, this.

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 9>One seems more severe. It was shorter back then in

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 9>twenty eleven, but we still have lost two point four

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 9>trigg in a market cap, a big and three and

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 9>extra interest cause so it still had implications this could

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 9>go on longer because the size of it is so

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 9>much larger, and so we had certain faith back them

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 9>that people had to work it out. They didn't want

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 9>alimal getting to happen. We're not sure that right now,

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 9>so it makes it seem worse than it is.

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 5>Charles, Thank you for breaking down down those private sector implications.

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 5>Of US for US thanks to Charles Phillips, managing partner

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 5>and co founder of Recognized Partners.

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 4>Still coming up.

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 5>The impact of generative AI on retail.

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 4>We'll discuss all that and more with.

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 5>The CEO of Buy Now, Pay Later platform klarnap next.

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 5>Speaking of buy Now, Pay Later, we're also watching shares

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 5>of best vive first quarter profits top estimates, and the

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 5>company reiterated its annual target. Best Buy CEO of views

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 5>this year as the bottom for the decline in tech demand.

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg.

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 5>Let's now take a look at the future of retail,

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 5>which could be more personalized and tech focused in the

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 5>context of the generative AI revolution. At least that's a

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.479
<v Speaker 5>projection laid out in Clarna's new Future of Retail report.

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 5>Clarna CEO Sebastian Shimantowski joins us now for more on this.

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 4>Sebastian, you are.

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 5>Looking ahead to how people are going to be opening

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 5>their pocketbooks. How will AI really start to show itself

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 5>in terms of where people are spending in retail?

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 8>Right?

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:40.479
<v Speaker 10>I think first of all, was like, I mean I

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 10>tried this my first in November. When it got you know,

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 10>stopped trending on Twitter or whatever, and I was like,

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 10>what's this thing? And I got to tell you that

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 10>it was magic to me, like I felt like when

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 10>I opened Internet the first time twenty years ago. So

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 10>I think it's you know, super impressive. We I know

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 10>instantly got in touch with Sam and I said, look,

0:31:58.080 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 10>I want clon out to be your favorite guinea pig.

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 10>We're at open AI. Like you know, you throw it

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 10>at as, we'll try it will learn. And I think

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 10>that's the way to deal with these things. When you

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 10>see a dramatic shift like this, you just want to learn,

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 10>iterate and understand it. And I even coded myself on

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 10>the lank chain the other day, so I feel quite cold.

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 10>Never done that before. As one of my biggest regrets,

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 10>I never became an engineer. With that said, look, I

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 10>think what's very clear here is that the tool is

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 10>out there. The applications that are really changing things and

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 10>not yet, but they're going to come in the next

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 10>six to twelve months. We are going to see better

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 10>shopping experiences, you know, shopping assistance providing you a you know,

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 10>a higher conversion rate for the retailers, you know, assisting

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 10>consumers to find better prices, better offers, et cetera. So

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 10>I'm expecting to see an explosion of new tools and

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 10>services coming in the next twelve months, which will you know,

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 10>utilize these technology to provide a much richer and more

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 10>accurate experience for consumers.

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 2>So super super interesting to follow.

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 10>And also there seems to be, as the study shows

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 10>of ours, a huge, you know, big opening among consumers.

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 10>They're willing to try and test these things, and they

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 10>also believe that it can make a difference for them.

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 5>When I think about kind of the evolution of retail,

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 5>we had kind of the mall start to bring things

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 5>together on a regional.

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 4>Basis or a town based basis.

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 5>Then we had online shopping where you could buy anything

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 5>from anywhere. Then the e commerce players showed up. But

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 5>that's kind of evolved to this world where you almost

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 5>have too much choice, right if you log onto any

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 5>of the e commerce platforms, it's almost hard to narrow

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 5>it down if you don't know exactly what you're looking for.

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 5>So is that kind of a problem that you expect

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 5>some of those early applications might be a really kind

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 5>of low hanging fruit one to solve when it comes

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 5>to bringing AI in perhaps to help folks discover things

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 5>based on their own preferences a little bit more easily.

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 2>I think you totally spot on look.

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 10>I mean, remember, like when you were living in a

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 10>like I did, in a small city of two hundred

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 10>thousan people. It's growing up there, there was one department

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 10>store and they had very nicely curated everything we needed

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 10>to buy for us. So everything was there. We didn't

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 10>need to look elsewhere. And nowadays you're like, you know,

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 10>overwashed with all this stuff. But I think in general

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 10>you should think about retail as three things. You think

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 10>about the products and the brand themselves. You think about

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 10>the curation, and then you think about, you know, the

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 10>technology and the logistics to bring the product to the

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 10>consumer at the time they wanted and at the right

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 10>price and so forth. Right, And I think on the

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 10>curation side, Internet has gone crazy, right We've seen everything

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 10>from Instagram shopping, you know, shoppable valuables, you know Instagram

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 10>people trying to affect you to like, or influencers recommending products,

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 10>but also obviously the retailers and you know, the brands

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 10>themselves trying to curate. I think the curation, to your point,

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 10>is one of the areas there is a huge opportunity

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 10>to offer better creation.

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 2>We launched search in the US.

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 10>I mean, there's been nobody launching search in the US

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 10>against Amazon for the last fifteen years, and we see

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 10>in tremendous traction to reinvent product search just like these

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 10>these things. Right, So, how do you both intent driven

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 10>discovery where you're looking for the exact right product but

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:02.839
<v Speaker 10>right price, you know, et cetera, But also the kind

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 10>of inspirational That's definitely an area where I.

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Think and curation is so critical. I want it to

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 2>be personal to be right.

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 10>You take is a good example of that in China,

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 10>you know it's nowadays it's used to be eighty percent search,

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 10>twenty percent was recommendations by AI. Currently eighty percent of

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 10>what people buy on TMOL et cetera are recommendations by

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 10>AI that are specific to means an individual and not

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 10>search anymore. So that just shows you like what this

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.359
<v Speaker 10>technology can mean as.

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 3>A shift, yeah, and certainly making things more efficient in

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 3>the process. Google CEO wrote in and not ed recently

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 3>that building AI responsibly is the only race that matters

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to building up your AI chops, and he

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 3>also brought up regulation there too. What are you seeing

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 3>as some of the potential problems or pitfalls or areas

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 3>that might be concerning that would result from the use

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 3>or integration of AI in.

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 4>Shopping, for instance, in your world?

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.399
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think as also since we're a payments company,

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 10>obviously fraud is a big, big cluss, right, and we

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 10>can see that this is going to have implications on

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 10>fraud protection. I think, what you know, there's a lot

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 10>I think on a societal level as a society, and

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 10>I actually I respect that a lot. When I speak

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:15.359
<v Speaker 10>to people tech leads, I am very happy to hear

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 10>them not only promote the amazing opportunities that this presents,

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 10>but also kind of highlight the risks and that we

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 10>treat this in a mindful way. But that's more from

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 10>a society perspective. If I think more of my business,

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 10>I think there's one critical thing that could actually make

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:31.760
<v Speaker 10>a huge difference from politicians in some markets in Europe.

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 10>Sweden is a good example where based currently we have

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 10>an electronic identification that is available to everyone.

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Everyone has it on the phone.

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 10>That means there is no fraud, there is no problems

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 10>with people pretending to be somebody else. There's much less

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 10>fraud than in many other markets that we see. It's

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 10>a simple thing a digital pathport and digital identification. And

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:55.919
<v Speaker 10>I think another law that we should expect to see

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 10>is if I interact with something, I want to know

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 10>if it's a computer or human. I think you have

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 10>the responsibility to be very very transparent about that. So

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 10>I think those are two very simple things that could

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 10>actually mitigate some of the early risks and changes that

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 10>for to your point, AI will come, We'll.

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Bring There are people who are out there who might

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 3>say that Karna is pivoting towards AI and a commitment

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 3>to AI as regulation comes forth. On by now pay

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.760
<v Speaker 3>later in Australia, for instance, potentially in the UK as well,

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 3>how would you respond to that?

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 2>We'll get it.

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 10>But I think the buy now, pay later is a

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 10>fantastic credit product for consumers because you know, everyone should

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 10>watch Sorry to make some marketing here for somebody else here,

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 10>but you should watch credit Cards Explain on Netflix and

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 10>you'll get a twenty five minute quick summary of all

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 10>the bad practices of all the stuff the banks have

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 10>been doing with credit cards, how they really try you

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 10>to build up the biggest balance to revolve on it

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 10>on the longest period of time. I mean, the average

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 10>balance in the US right now stands it's five three

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 10>hundred dollars compared to one hundred fifty dollars for our

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 10>binapay later products. So I think that like it's interest free,

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 10>it's fixed installments. We don't push a credit limit in

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 10>your face to try to make you believe that you

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 10>can spend more than you have. I mean, we're trying

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 10>to build a responsible credit card. Like, no, it's still credit,

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:17.320
<v Speaker 10>so obviously all you know, credit has risks in itself

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:19.400
<v Speaker 10>and needs to be offered in a responsible way. But

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 10>as a credit form, it is superior to the credit

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 10>at the credit cards, and it's actually also better for

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 10>us in an uncertain economical environment because we underwrite every transaction.

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 10>That's why we're seeing forty percent below credit card industry

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:35.479
<v Speaker 10>standard losses because when we shift our underwriting, it takes

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 10>me two months and half of my balance sheet is

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 10>underwriting on the new methodology. So I can really adjuct

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 10>quickly change to an economical environment like this one, while

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 10>you know, banks will wait two years before they see

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 10>the shift in their balance sheet due to the changes

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 10>in underwriting.

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 5>Sebashian and I want to ask one more quick one on

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 5>ai because we've been talking about that the race is on.

0:38:57.520 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 4>The race is probably also on for talent.

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 5>I know you jumped in really quickly to work with

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 5>open Ai, but what does hiring like look like internally

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 5>at Karna? Where are you finding kind of the individuals

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 5>who can make sure that that type of technology can

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 5>be seamlessly tested and integrated into what you're rolling out

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 5>for consumers?

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:15.879
<v Speaker 2>You know what?

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 10>I think it's obviously an important question, and obviously, you know,

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 10>data scientists and so forth are in higher demand.

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:22.920
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't say.

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 10>That's the case, but I also want to get again

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:28.799
<v Speaker 10>how much this is just about, you know, curiosity and

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 10>encouraging people within your culture to innovate and.

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 2>To try and to test.

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 10>I you know, one way that I measure right now

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 10>clonas ai involvement is I look, we offer all of

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 10>our employees a chat city before powered open Ai account,

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 10>and we're just looking at how many are actually using it.

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 10>And I think right now we're at about one thousand,

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 10>five hundred among five thousand employees. I want to get

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:54.279
<v Speaker 10>to five thousand. I want each one of them to

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 10>experiment and learn how to utilize this technology. I mean

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:59.399
<v Speaker 10>it took years for people to really discover the power

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:01.720
<v Speaker 10>of Google twenty years ago and how much that could

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 10>save you time and make you more efficient and more productive.

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 10>So like I think also like one shouldn't underestimate, just

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 10>like encouraging and.

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Inspiring people in timely to adult to eat different pride.

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 3>So it's about experimenting and engaging right now before we

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:18.399
<v Speaker 3>can draw any big conclusions.

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Really appreciate your joining us.

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Sebastian Simia Kowski, the CEO of Clarina, joining us from

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 3>Stockholm at the moment. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis' live event

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 3>on Twitter was more by technical glitches with servers struggling

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 3>to handle the demand, and led to his announcement being

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 3>hosted on venture capitalist David Sax's account instead.

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 4>Sax was moderating, that was insane.

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, we are actually doing this from David Taxis Twitter

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:54.800
<v Speaker 2>account because it looks like doing it from mine basically

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 2>broke the Twitter system.

0:40:58.280 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now to break down the launch of dis

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 3>this his presidential run on Twitter is Bloomberg's Sarah Fryer, Sarah,

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:06.359
<v Speaker 3>how much of this technical train wreck can you tie

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 3>back directly to Elon Musk's staff firings and various cost cuts.

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 11>Well, they don't have a lot of the people that

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 11>they used to have who were working on this kind

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 11>of infrastructure stability. They got rid of use of a

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 11>data center that they had in Zacramento, which increased the

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 11>stress on their systems, and they've been making product changes.

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 11>So those factors plus the fact that they didn't really

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 11>prepare for this moment. It seems like they didn't stress

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 11>test their systems or this wouldn't have happened.

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 5>I was tuning in yesterday and Elon muss said, hopefully

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 5>this can be a platform with people of divergent political

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:47.879
<v Speaker 5>views to exchange those views. I have to ask, though,

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 5>in the course of that conversation, did they put diverse

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 5>political views on display.

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 4>With this Ron DeSantis announcement?

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely not. It was questions by people who were favorable

0:41:57.360 --> 0:42:00.399
<v Speaker 11>to that campaign, and listen, this could blow back on

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 11>Musk and Twitter's business because historically social media executives have

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 11>not tried to align themselves with a particular party. They've

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 11>tried to be neutral because what they're trying to do

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 11>is have the widest possible user base and the widest

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 11>possible set of advertisers who want to spend money reaching

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 11>those users. And if Twitter positions itself as you know,

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 11>we are more friendly to one political party over the other,

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 11>then I do think that some advertisers will shy away

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 11>from that.

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 4>But I did.

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 11>See the new CEO, Linda Yakarino in the room.

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 4>She was there. She was there, and so were you.

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 4>She could fix it. Maybe we'll see.

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 5>Thank you Sarah for wrapping that up for us. Thanks

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:42.320
<v Speaker 5>to Bloomberg.

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:43.239
<v Speaker 4>Sarah Friar and.

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:45.840
<v Speaker 5>David Sacks will be joining Bloomberg TV in thirty minutes

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 5>to talk about this more. That does it for this

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 5>edition of Bloomberg Technology. Don't forget to check out the

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 5>b Tech podcast. You can find it on the terminal

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:58.479
<v Speaker 5>as well as online on Apple, Spotify. iHeart and this

0:42:58.800 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 5>is Bloomberg.

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:03.320
<v Speaker 8>He doesn't decide it when you don't. The hype w