WEBVTT - Here's Why Getting US Election Results Is So Complicated

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:10.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm Stephen Carol and this is Here's Why, where we

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:13.239
<v Speaker 2>take one news story and explain it in just a

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 2>few minutes with our experts here at Bloomberg. This election

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 2>season in the US, there's one question that keeps coming up,

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 2>and it's not who's going to win, but how long

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 2>will it take to get a result.

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of concerns on Wall Street that

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we could go through several days of uncertainty, not unlike

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>four years ago. And we know how much the markets

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>love that.

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 2>You're looking at a coin flip election and everyone wants

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 2>to know who gets it if it lands on its edge.

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 2>All this weight, we want the result we want to

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 2>see after this really chaotic, tumultuous campaign and outcome. In reality,

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 2>there are fifty one different elections, one in each state

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 2>and in the District of Columbia. Each one follows its

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>own rules on where, when, and how ballots are cast,

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 2>which can affect when votes are counted and results are known.

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty, it took almost four days to find

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 2>out who's been elected president. In two thousand, the decision

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 2>from the Supreme Court didn't come until mid December. So

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 2>here's why getting US election results is so complicated. Megan Crane,

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 2>who's an editor in our Washington bureau, joins us now

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 2>for more. Megan, great to talk to you. So different

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 2>states have these different rules for the elections. How much

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 2>divergence is there when it comes to counting.

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I would say there's fifty different ways of doing it

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>really between the fifty states. Some count their ballots as

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>they come in early, Some allow for ballots to come

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in after election day, and some don't. Some allow people

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to come in and do what's called curing of their ballots.

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>We can talk about that more for quite some time,

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and many don't, so it just really is up to

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>each and every state.

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's pretty different than depending on where you are

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 2>talking about curing of balance. How does that work?

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>A cured ballot is basically if you send in a

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>mail ballot or an absentee ballot. Sometimes they don't get

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>counted for a variety of reasons. Someone forgets to sign

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the envelope they come in, somebody doesn't get the right postmark,

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>or for whatever reason they're not counted. You can actually

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>track that online. I voted early and I was able

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to look and see that they had my ballot and

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it had been noted. So you can look at that

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and say, oh, I sent in my absentee belt, but

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>they never got it or they rejected it for some reason.

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And then you can go in in most jurisdictions and

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>say I want to do a new one and that

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>will then count instead of the previous ballot. The reason

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that really impacts counting is, for example, some states have

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>like days after the election where they allow people to

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>do that. North Carolina is until November fourteenth, where someone

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>can come in and check their ballot make sure it

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>was counted. You can't really like change your vote, but

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 1>you can make sure that the ballot that you sent

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>was counted. You know. If we're down to the wire

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and North Carolina is as close as everyone says it

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>might be, that's what several days for us to be

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>even waiting until they can decide they have their last ballots.

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 2>And that touches on the really key part that mail

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 2>in ballots play in this election. And that's something that's

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 2>changed over time as well.

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>It has. Yeah, mail in ballots are new ish, I

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't say they're a new phenomenon. And out West largely

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>where they have really a history of clean elections is

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>probably where that comes from. Like an Oregon, for example,

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>there's only mail in ballots. There's one like very rural

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>county where they still have polling places, but it's quite unusual.

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Washington State is almost exclusively mail in ballots. Arizona has

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a number of mail in ballots. People have that sort

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of tradition and expectation there. In other places it wasn't

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>so common. And then, of course in twenty twenty we

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>were in the middle of COVID and they change the

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>rules in a lot of places making it easier to

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>vote by mail or drop off your ballot off hours

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to keep crowds down and things like that, And so

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>we really don't have that much to compare it to

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>historically speaking, because those were new in twenty twenty, and

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>then people got used to it, right, so then they

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>expected to be able to keep doing that. In some places.

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>We have a huge turnout of early vote this year,

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>much more so than expected.

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 2>I think back in the last election, counting of the

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 2>mail in ballots was one of the things that took

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 2>so long in Pennsylvania for them to be able to

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 2>declare a result how much has changed in that process

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 2>since the last election, Right.

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>So, Pennsylvania's process has been standardized in this election and

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>is actually expected to be quite slow. They made a

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>rule that they cannot even open the envelopes of mail

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in ballots until seven AM on election day, So that

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>means they can't you get them ready, sort of verify

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the signatures, flatten them so they can go through the machines,

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>all that sort of stuff that would speed up that process.

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>They cannot do that until the morning of election day.

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.359
<v Speaker 1>They cannot start counting those votes until eight PM on

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>election day. So if they're all prepped and ready, I

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>suppose that process could go pretty quickly through the machines.

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>But that does make sort of a big open question

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>as to what will happen this year as far as

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>how long it takes to count in Pennsylvania, especially considering

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:10.799
<v Speaker 1>that it's expected to be so close.

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 2>What are the other things that can make counting some

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 2>of these votes quite complicated? Is the fact that you

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 2>have so many races on the same ballot, and in

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 2>some places there are other voting initiatives that are happening

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>on election day as well. How does that affect the

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 2>overall process of counting the results.

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what counting necessarily gets delayed by that,

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>but certainly like verification of the results gets complicated when

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of vote splitting, for example, and

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the results don't really seem logical to an outside observer,

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Say the top of the ticket goes heavily to one

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>party and everybody else goes heavily to a different party.

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>That can sort of raise questions about, you know, how

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>things work. There's also questions about like long lines on

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>election day, and then the rules I think in every

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>jurisdiction is that if you're in line when the polls close,

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>you have to be allowed to vote. Well, if the

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>lines are really that can be hours before the polls close,

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>And if the rules in that particular state are that

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>they can't count the votes until the polls close, you're

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>pushing things back by hours and hours.

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Is it just a feeling or is the wait for

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 2>results actually getting longer from election to election.

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I think on the presidential level it's not necessarily getting longer.

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we didn't have a result in two thousand,

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>which was, you know, twenty four years ago, until December.

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>That result came after a long court fight, but we did,

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in fact have those results pretty quickly. I think the

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>results have actually started to come faster in some ways

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>because we have all these mechanical ways to count votes,

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're looking at a long historical trend,

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>but the country is so divided and the process is

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>so meticulous that it does feel I think it feels

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>like it's taking longer, partly because we want immediate answers,

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and also because the stakes are so high and people

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>just feel so entrenched and everybody wants to get it right,

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and it feels like it takes weeks longer. You know,

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it took several days last cycle, but before that, it didn't. Right.

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>We had a winner pretty much the night of election

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>night on twenty sixteen. Hillary Clinton didn't concede, but he

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>had won that night. We knew that by then that

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>was true. In twenty twelve was maybe one day, if

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to remember exactly. Two thousand and eight we

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>knew on election night. So you know, it's kind of

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>hard to.

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Say when we just have shorter our attentionspons, and that's

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 2>why it might feel like, Yeah, I think.

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>That might be some of it. Yeah, we sort of

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>expect an immediate result. Yeah.

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 2>In advance of this election, we've been talking about both

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 2>campaigns preparing lawyers in case of legal challenges. What should

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 2>we be thinking about in terms of what challenges might

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 2>delay a result.

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>When you're thinking about delaying a result like an actual

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of inauguration, what would be the most interesting are

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuits that are basically fighting each county or each

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>state's ability to certify their count. You know, we all

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot about that in the last process, about

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>how certification works. You never get a perfect count a

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>perfect there is no perfect process. There has to be

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:08.119
<v Speaker 1>some official system in which you say, okay, we're done now,

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the time. We have done enough counting, enough

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>looking through this to decide that this is our result.

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And there will be legal challenges to that, probably from

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>both sides. Those people who make those decisions are often partisan.

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>They're elected as partisans to nonpartisan rules. It can be

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>quite difficult to reach a consensus.

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Briefly, Megan, has anyone ever thought about harmonizing this process

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 2>across the US to perhaps fed it up. Oh, people think.

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>About that a lot. But I would say if you

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>really talk to election experts, the messiness of our process

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>is in some ways its genius in that it is,

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in fact, some would say, impossible to steal a United

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>States election. You cannot change the vote in so many

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>different places, using different technology, different ballots, different processes to

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>decide who certifies what. That becomes essentially impossible to fix.

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And that is in some ways it's genius. Right. It

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>can be messed with on the corners. It certainly probably

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>used to be more when there was less sort of

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>transparency in the process. But Bloomberg did a lot of

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>reporting on this after the twenty twenty election and really

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>found that it is essentially impossible to steal a national

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>election in the United States.

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Meghan Crane from Bloomberg's Washington, DC bureau. For

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 2>more explanations like this from our team of twenty seven

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred journalists and analysts around the world, search for Quick

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:36.079
<v Speaker 2>Take on the Bloomberg website or Bloomberg Business app. I'm

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Carol. This is here's why. I'll be back next

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 2>week with more. Thanks for listening.