WEBVTT - Fire Drill 026: Cut Day at the U.S. Open

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>But it changes weekly. We're used to having guys being

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.559
<v Speaker 1>number one in the world. I mean we had Gregg

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>for ten years and then we had Tiger for twenty

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>years and changes week to week. I mean, Scottie clearly

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>was the best goal from the world the first four

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>months of the year, but not even close. You know,

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Dustin said his turn. I mean John's had his turn,

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's JT's clearly. When I see JT play

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>up close, I'm like, it's amazing to me that anyone

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>can beat that guy. So I just think it's, um,

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit more fluid than it's ever been. We've

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>never had this many people capable of meting number one.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Put another log on the fire nobody hears give it time. Hello,

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another Fire Drill podcast. Is Alan Shipnuk

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>coming from the country Club in Brookline, Massachusetts. On my

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 1>left is Michael Bamberger. On my right Ryan France beamed

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in from Melbourne, Australia. Jeff Ogilvie. Guys is a pretty

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>eclectic leaderboard. There's some there's some world class players, there's

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a nice mix of underdogs. Kind a chance to watch

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.559
<v Speaker 1>the country club play out now for two rounds. Let's

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>get just opening thoughts on what we think about this

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>United States Open. We'll start with you, Ryan, I mean,

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I love it. We're looking at the board right now.

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>We have in the top five. Hayden Buckley won a

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>playoff in a qualifier Tuesday morning to get in. Nick

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Hardy won a playoff to become a first alternate that

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>took five holes in fourth. Matt Naysmith, Patrick Rogers, I mean,

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a dream come true. Jeff, what have you

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>seen so far from you know, watching on your Telly

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and what's really captured your your fancy there? I don't know,

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it was a bit of a different day, right.

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>The course has played a lot easier this afternoon. I

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>think the early late guy's got a bit stiff on

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the draw. It appears they're having a bit of a

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>good time this afternoon. Rory looked like he could make

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a twelve. There was out in the third hole. Yeah,

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>but he made a miraculous double, really good double, and

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>he's back in the mix. It rhymes in the mix.

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Colin's playing well and as Ryan says, as a mix

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of qualifiers and sort of other players. I mean, Hayden

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Buckley's gonna have a big day tomorrow. Is probably gonna

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:42.239
<v Speaker 1>be out in the last group on Saturday in the Open.

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be a big day for him. That'll

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>be exciting. So yeah, some heavy hitters floating around, Brian

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Harmon's going to be sneaky. It'd be a pretty good

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>course for Brian Harmon. I would have thought sort of

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>scrambling sort of place. So yeah, it's interesting at the moment.

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's kind of perfect in that no one's

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>getting too beaten up and the guys who are playing

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>well a scoring well. I like the Jeff has always

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>tuned into the draw like that. I got that's how

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>pros think. You and Justine Reid, you're really focused on

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the draw on a comparison. Yeah, my good double is

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>not a phrase you're here too often either, And it

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>was an incredible double honestly. I mean yeah, like Jeff said,

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>he could have blown himself. Roy could have blown himself

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>right out of that tournament. And h he's bounced back

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>with a couple of birdies. So he's now as we speak,

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 1>he's tied for forth with a couple of holes to go.

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>What have you seen that you like, Michael, Well, it's

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:28.839
<v Speaker 1>just neat just as you're framing this thing. I mean,

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, major major stars in the game and

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the major people that you know that Ryan has in

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>his phone book but others do not. But you know,

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we haven't mentioned Scottie Scheffler. Scott a show for when

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the Master's Golf Tournament this year, and here he is

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>contending on a completely different kind of golf course, which

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>tells you that he must be very damn good at golf,

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>which we know he is. I mean, Scheffler makes back

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to back bogie's the middle of his front nine, he's

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>at plus two that the cut is projected for plus three.

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's he's on the cut line and then

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>he roars home in thirty one guess to three hundred harum.

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean we haven't. We had a nice little break

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>from Scottie Shelfer for a few weeks, but here he

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is again. It's it's weird when you look at the board,

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like the good scoring, Oh, it seems to just

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>come in bunches for you know, three or four holes

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in the stretch of nine holes and the other nine

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 1>might be very ordinary. But we've seen a lot of that. Yeah,

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that you know, there was a there's been a little

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>flakum that I've detected on golf Twitter because they were

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>watering the greens this morning and then a little a

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>little rainstorm came through and it's like some people think, oh,

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>they've already lost control of course on Friday morning. Others like, oh,

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the usg has gotten soft. But Jeff, you're discerning eye.

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you like the way of the greens are holding,

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>releasing and running out? Well, I'll go back to the

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>draw thing a little bit. I think it's a little

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>fair for the guys who've played light early for that

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing to go on, you know. Um, But

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's sometimes you get right out of no way, right.

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>You don't really expected if they felt like they need

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to put a bit of water on the grains um

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>to sort of protect the integrity, and it doesn't so

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>it didn't get to it out of hand, and um,

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>they didn't lose the grains in the middle of the tournament.

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess that's the right call, but it's

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>always disappointing when you get on the wrong side of that.

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's a lot of angry boys in their

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>hotels this afternoon watching this and the wind dies down

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>and it's a bit softer than than it was for

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 1>them yesterday afternoon. So, um, you've got to you've got

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to do what you've got to do. It's always a

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>shame when they maybe kind of get it a bit

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>wrong before the day, if they have to bring water

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>out during the day, But you've gotta do what you

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>gotta do. Yeah, well, it was you know, it was

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be forecast to be in the in the

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>high eighties, which I think it is right now, But

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in the morning it was a little cooler, and they

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>thought there was going to be a storm that might

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>come in, and then they forecast it was going to

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>blow away, and then it actually did come and dump.

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's been Yeah, the meteorologists have been out foxed

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>by the golf guards. They kind of were wrong a

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.919
<v Speaker 1>couple times. But it's that that's the greatness of an

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>outdoor sport. I mean, it's it's it's quirky and you

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>just never know what gonna get. But from from watching

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>from a far Jeff, you like to where the golf

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>course is playing. All that said, I mean, it looks

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>perfect as I said, it looks like it's rewarding the

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>guys who are playing well. It looks super tough, looks

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>like you can get in a lot of trouble, which

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is like a US Open. You can be playing really

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>well and you just go along and you get one

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>little bad shot. You're getting a really awkward spot and

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you make a double really quickly. But as I said

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that the good shots seem to be going in a

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>good place that they're getting home on part fives, which

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I think is fun. Sometimes you get these opens and

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>they just make the part fives. No one can get home.

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of fun to see eagles and a

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>few birdies and a few others. And as I said,

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm always I don't really the score relative to part

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it is that important. People think it is,

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it's important at all. I just think, well,

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you want to identify the best players for the week,

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and this looks like it's identifying some pretty good players.

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Still a lot of guys in there, so it's obviously

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>not crazy hard yet. But I'm sure the USG you'll

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's maybe been a bit easy this afternoon,

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and that it'll be a little different tomorrow morning. Yeah.

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>I think it looks like it's playing great. It looks

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>like a really fun place to play. I'm not a

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>fun place if you're not playing well, but if you're

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>playing well, it looks like that's sort of an enjoyable

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>open to play it from afar, I wonder if any

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of you guys have insight into this, because I surely

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>do not. They had a great US Open here in

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty three, a great US opreneur Needy. They had a

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>great Writer Cup here in ninety nine. It looks like

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna a really great US Open here. Why is

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>this golf club not getting the respectrum love that it deserves?

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Witness that oak Mine is like they're playing the US

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Open there every other year from here to eternity. And

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this place can't catch a cold. Because my uber took

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half hours to get here. I believe

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it's infastrul. I don't know. It's an awesome place. Yeah, well,

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're onto something there, Ryan. I mean it's

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a it's a smaller build out. They just don't have

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the footprint here, which it seems expansive. You know, we're

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in this giant whatever racketball facility or whatever it is.

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>But there's when you walk around, there's there's not the

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>gigantic corporate villages and there's not as many tents, and

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think this is not as financially rewarding a venue.

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>They just they can't they can't get bring in the

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>corporate entertainment. And I don't know, I haven't delved into

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the ticket sales, but I feel like the crowds are

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:19.239
<v Speaker 1>not as big as they have been at some other opens.

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's just a little bandbox. It's hemmed in.

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>As Ryan said, it's hard to get people in and out.

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's the Fenway Park of golf courses. That's a

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>perfect comparison. So I just I think that's probably you know,

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a great insight as you said before, follow the money.

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's one of those deals where it's a

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>net place. They're going to come back every every Periodley

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>so we can talk about Francis we met and all

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that that fun stuff, but it's not in the rotation

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.719
<v Speaker 1>because it might. It's just not a lucrative venue. And um,

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it's sad, but you know, the USGA, the US Open,

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>we all know kind of floats whole organizations, so if

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>if they can take a big hit, they just can't

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.719
<v Speaker 1>do it that often. Yep, it makes Jeff, do you

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>have any any insight into that at all from your

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>USJA conversations over the years. I think that's unfortunately. Alan's

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. I think it's a commercial operation and they

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>fund the whole the whole year based on the back

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of the us Open, so they have to do it. Yeah, commercially,

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the places like um that are a bit

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>easier to get to. Obviously Oakmont a winner for them,

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Pebbles obviously a winner for them, the merchandise

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and that sort of stuff. So yeah, I think it's

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>purely that sort of decision, which is a shame, but

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the it's the realities of the modern world, right.

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>We need the USGA to keep control of golf, you

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, in the country and a lot

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of the world. So they need to fund their operation.

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>If this is their main vehicle for it, it's you've

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>got to do it. But you need to have these

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 1>ones somewhat regularly, not always maybe the country club, but

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the venues like this, because it just adds just a

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of credibility to the tournament, a lot of charm,

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and you need that history and you need that the

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>old stories to sort of keep the US Open being

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the US Open, right, So you've got to put it

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in every now and then. This is really far afield,

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>But since I'll make this very brief, it's sort of

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>my theme for the day, Jeff, have you become a

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>student of US Open history at all? Because I've got

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a very narrow question. On the chance that you have,

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>probably not all by the sounds of your I'm gonna

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:17.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give it a try. I'm probably the only

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>person is just hit in this thing. Everybody knows that

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Francis we Met is the first American to win the

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>US Open, except for the fact that he's not. Johnny

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>McDermott is the first American when the US Open and

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Francis I went to the we Met house today, which

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>was super cool and interesting, but I'm just a little

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>freaked out. I happened from Philadelphia, where McDermott was from.

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Francis we Met was a twenty year

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>old caddy. Well you know McDermott was a Philadelphia caddy

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 1>as well. Why does we met get all the credit.

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the twenty five cent Francis we met

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>stamp is sales for about two hundred dollars on eb

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>right now, And nobody ever talks about poor Johnny McDermott.

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.719
<v Speaker 1>It's well, it's the Eddie Lowry photo, you know, the

0:10:55.960 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>little the little sea urchin or a street urchin, you know,

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 1>thirteen years old trailing down the ferry. That photo is

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>so iconic, and it's just there's so much folklore and

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>beating you know, Ted Ray and Harry Varton, like, who

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>did Johnny mcdermotby? Can you tell us right now? Michael Student,

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>student of US Open History. Yeah, that's what I thought.

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>There you go, you just answered your own question. I mean,

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, these they were the two dominant You had

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the US the under the gritty underdog against the imperial

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>power of England. I mean, there's so many things going

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>on there, but yeah, I think you answered your own question. Yeah,

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. Do you have you ever even looked into

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this or thought about it? Not until now? Yeah? Yeah,

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably pretty good in US opens back into the

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>eighties and the seventies, maybe even not that fat back.

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Don know, lou Graham's putting style. Now, Jeffy did win

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 1>at me Dinah, but he was elbows out, crazily elbows out.

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, we move on, I will say. I mean,

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the fun thing about excavating history is by getting to

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>watch all the Curtis Strain highlights this week, because of

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 1>course he wanted at the country club such a I

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>love his action. But the white shirt, hot red pants,

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>white shoes is undefeated. What a look. It's just gorgeous.

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And seven stall that look, or maybe Curtis stall it

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>from Stubby and Curtis is inside. He's really coming inside,

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I know. But it just works, man, it's here. Yeah,

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing is neat. So Ryan, let let's go

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>back to some of the names on the board, because

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you know Hayden Buckley, well let's call Mark cow had

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>just made a birdie on his seventeenth hole, so Buckley's

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>now dropped to a second place. But what can you

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:36.599
<v Speaker 1>tell us about this guy? And if there's any of

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 1>the other somewhat unknowns on the board, who who you're

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>interested in? This is this is your stage where let's

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.839
<v Speaker 1>hear it yet. Actually I was just pulling up a

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>screen shot to tweet out it is super interesting of

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Hayden Buckley's story. It was an interview I did with

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>him when I was writing for the PGA Tour, and

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>he was not recruited so at all, like literally at all.

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>He didn't have any college offers at all, didn't play

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>any big junior events, and his swing coach, Chris Harder,

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:16.719
<v Speaker 1>played for the coach played at Austin p for a

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>coach named Mark Larow and Marc Laro eventually went to

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 1>the University of missus Missouri. So Chris Harder, who was

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 1>Hayden buckley swing coach at the time, called Mark LaRoe

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>and said, Hey, I'm telling you this kid is going

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to be really good, and Marc Laroux was like, I'll

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>take him almost as like a favor as a favor. Yeah,

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Hayden Buckley got one percent scholarship to go to the

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>University of un Missouri. And now I was leading, well

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a minute ago, was leading the US Open. That's so cool.

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>How about Nie Smith or any of the other guys?

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Who else do you want to I mean, Nick Hardy

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>uh posted a story today about he pulled the Billy

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>Madison with a with a player in the Big Ten Championship.

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>A teammate of his at went to the went into

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the woods to take a piss pete all over his pants.

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Was a freshman, super embarrassed, and Nick Hardy went into

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the woods pete on himself so his thing would feel comfortable.

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>They went on to win the Big Ten Championship. Very

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>true story. It's it's trending currently on Twitter. Couldn't he

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>have just offered him a pep talk? Did he really

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>have to take it that far? It seems aggressive, but

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's fine. But he is a great kid, super talented,

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>as battles some injuries this year on the tour, and

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously he doesn't care. No one's thinking about it. But

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>he's way way down at FedEx Cup points and like

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>he has to in the back of his mind have

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to think about even keeping his card, So this week

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>is just hugely important from that aspect. Obviously he's not

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking about that now he's won back at the US Open,

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>but a good a good week will go a long

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>way in just getting his card. I love it. The

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>stories never stopped being interesting and as you've said already

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a few times on this podcast platform, it that's really

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>what this tournament's all about. But also, uh, just the

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>spring of the variety of of of names and embody

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>types on the board. I mean, could there be anyone

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>more slender than than Matthew Fitzpatrick in this field? And

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean Will's elet would Will's eleturs? Okay? Uh, Brian

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Harmon is diminutive, and then you got enormous oversized people

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>like like Scottie Scheffler and uh. But Mark cow is

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>very normal physic But I guess like when we first

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>started seeing Tiger Emerge and VJ and others, it was like, oh,

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's going to be the end of

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the Larry Mises, but it's really not. Actually, there's a

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of different ways to get the game, to get

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball around the golf course, well, especially of course

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>like this that's you know, playing sevent two hundred yards

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>maximum and they're setting up a little bit shorter like

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>so it really is more finesse and more position, more precision.

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>But um me, no, I love that this is I

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>called Rory a wee lad in a tweet and and

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>some people took exception you could deal with the short

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>guys on Twitter are like that's he's an average height.

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I said, really, oh please, he's a little wee, right,

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>he's short. Yeah, that's what I mean. I'm towering over

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>him and he hits it seventeen d past me. I'm sure.

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean I said he's become the most towering figure

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in the game. I mean, I was having some fun.

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think we lad of it. I'll stand by that. Um,

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about a couple of the names at the

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>top of the board. Because Colin Mark Cow somehow all

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>he's accomplished in his career already, he seems somewhat overlooked.

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And if you were to get a third major championship here,

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it would just it would be gangbusters. And this is

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>what I wanted to ask you about, Jeff, because you know,

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Mark Cow has always played this beautiful sort of butter

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>cut and highly reliable, and he just started decided to

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>start drawing the ball and I was like, yeah, I

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>decided to play a draw and so learning to trust it.

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Like it always amazed me when guys get to the

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>mountaintop and they seem to have the game figured out,

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>they keep tweaking and experimenting. What is it in the

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>golfers mentality that makes you keep experimenting? When when you're

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>playing great golf and you seemingly have achieved your dreams, Like,

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>why keep messing around? I don't know, we're all doing

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>We're idiots, really, I don't know. It's the nature of

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the game. I mean, we're sort of strivers to get

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to this point of golf. You're kind of pretty stubborn anyway,

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you know you have to be. It's just the nature

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>of the sport. So I I don't know. We've all

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>done it. Chase something that we don't have. He swings

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it so good, he'll work it out. I don't know why.

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when he's universally praised as the best iron

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>player on tour, he would sort of mess with that.

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, maybe he had a run of three

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>or four tournaments in a row where he had where

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>he had sort of left right winds and left pins

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and he couldn't get anywhere near him and it was

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>frustrating him a little bit, a few weeks in a row.

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And we'd come to home one day and says, I'm

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>going in a draw if I want to compete with

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Rory or something like that, And it gets your head

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and then we all think none of us, or at

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>least I didn't, and I think most of us you

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's anything you can't do, you know, so

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>stubbornly you just work on it, and you just assume

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>when everything's going well and you don't hit any bad

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>shots like Colin did for so long, you just assume

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>that you can just keep doing that any way you

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>want to. You know, it's not until you sort of

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>open Pandora's box a little bit that you start realizing, my,

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 1>perhaps I shouldn't have gone down that alleyway because it's

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>hard to find your way back. I don't know. We

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>all do it, though, I mean commented it for a

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>long time. Westwood struggled for a long time in his

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>middle of his career. I mean, well even Finch he

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>did it with his driving, trying to hit a bit further.

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>He just come off the open, you know what I mean.

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>There's we've all it's history shows that golfers have been

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>doing that sort of thing forever. But clearly he's managing

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it fine and he's on top of the leaderboard. But yeah,

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just a stubborn golfers, I think, and I

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>think you get bored. I think practicing the same thing

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>day and day in and day out, and you just

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>want to want to try. I know Curtis has said that,

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, he felt like you needed to try different

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>things because he's getting tired of working on the same

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>thing day after day after day. But having said that,

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, a couple of casual comments or

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe not so casual mint comments and interviews, we can

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>run with it all day long. But the reality is,

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it's a left pin, right pin, short

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>long pin at Markows skill level, he's going to play

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the shot he needs to play. He's gonna fade it

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>or draw. It's not like he abandoned one shot and

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>one swing in the favor of something else. You know,

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 1>they're way way I mean, Jeff would know this far

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>better than I. They're way too fine tuned machines to

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>completely get rid of one swing in favor of another.

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Would that be accurate, Jeff, Yeah, I mean you're right.

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean he can hit every shot. I mean it's

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 1>probably yeah, he can hit every shot. I mean he's

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to. You just want to be complete, you know,

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you just you want to be able to get to

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 1>left pins and rock pins and hit all those shots.

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And it can be frustrating. As I said, if you

0:19:57.920 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>can only move it one way and you get in,

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you're only fighting, and you get left right wins with

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>left pins. It feels like for a week a week,

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you just you just can't compete one week. It's frustrating,

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, so you kind of want the complete thing.

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>And he's to be fair, he seems a very he's

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a very peaceful sort of guy. He's got that great

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 1>golf mentality. He's never going to get too far off.

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Golan gentlemen, I have to exit. I'm

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 1>going to go talk to the twenty twenty two US

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Open winner, Hayden Buckley. I'm gonna try to get a

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>one on one. If you do well, then you better

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>see our new friends, who are the sports gamblers. Since

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you seemed already know the answer, that's right. This is

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a fire drill first, like someone just stormed

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>off the set. I mean, this is this is history. Um, Jeff,

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna be next in leaving with ship and

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a cologne are you? Can you imagine the listenership would

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>plummet if Jeff left, We could we could lose Ryan.

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.719
<v Speaker 1>But if Jeff goes we're in trouble. Um, So how

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>about John Ram, who's who's looking to defend his championship.

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>He's making a great run. Yeah, he's got one whole

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>left to play right now, he's in second place, one

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 1>one stroke at he's been a little quiet. I mean,

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>for even last year, there was no doubt that he

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>was the most efficient golfer in the world. He look

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>at all the numbers, all the strokes gained. He was

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>better at golf anybody else. But he only had the

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>one win, which was the US Open. It's a good

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>one obviously, but and of course he probably would have

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>won Amoral, but the COVID stuff knocked him out. That

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that was a bad beat. But again, his trivial show.

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>He only won one tournament last year, even though he

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>was playing at such an incredibly high level. So it's

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>not like we're down on John Rom. But how is

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>it important it for him to pick off another big

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>win at this juncture in his career. I think it

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>would be astounding him because this golf course is so

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>different from where he won last year, Totally different grass,

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>totally different demands in terms of drivery game. I mean,

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be really a big statement for

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>John rom to win on this little golf course, he

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>would get more credit than he's He deserves a lot

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>of credit for being a really outstanding golfer. But I

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>think it would absolutely raise him to the real elite

0:21:55.920 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of the elite. Yeah, Jeff, your thoughts on that, Oh yeah, absolutely.

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's hard to keep that level up. You know,

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not like that's not that long since this time

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>last year. You know, he's kind of one of the

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>guys you have to pick before every one of these

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>big tournaments. But yeah, to win it on the West Coast,

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean about as far geographically a part as you

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>can get in the US to win two US Opens.

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>As you said, different grass, but I think it. I mean,

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>he's clearly a US Open style player. It's the ball great,

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>he can hit the ball high, it's the ball miles

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in his short game when he gets scrambling, he's incredible.

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's just I think I said on the

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>TV before I was he only hit ball greens on

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the front nine and was one under or something. So

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty impressive. That's US Open stuff, you know, to

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of weather the storm for nine holes when you're

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>not hitting that very well and sort of not too

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>too much damage, and history shows when he gets in

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the mix he usually stays there. You know. He loves

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the moment. The closer you get to the seventy second,

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>closer you get to the seventy second hole, the better

0:22:56.480 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>he is. And he has that sort of tiger like

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>knack to come up with really really cool stuff on

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the last two or three holes. He's done it a lot,

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, So if he gets there in the mix,

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>if he'd be seems to be a really hard guy

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to get in front of on Sunday, you know, in

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the last few holes. So fun to see him play. Yeah,

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it would be a massive feather in your cap and

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>two us opens it a road. Not many people have

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>done that, so that would be pretty amazing. Jeff, have

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>you ever played with Ron Ron? I played with him

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times as an amateur. Actually, when Phil

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>was we played some practice rounds with Phil out there.

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be a while ago now. When he was

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>at ASU, he goes, this kid's going to be one

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of the best players you've ever seen, and I thought, oh, yeah,

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>he's all right, you know, but he just got better

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and better and better. And better and better. Also remember

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>at wis Brocks. I've seen him there a little bit

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in Scottsdale. So incredibly nice man and just golf does

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>seem quite It's just such a simple way he plays,

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it just doesn't seem like there's a lot

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>that can go wrong. Yea brilliant, fantastic golfer. But he

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 1>runs hot like Sevey did another Spanish gulp. I mean,

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 1>not to reduce these people to country cliches at all,

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>but he does run hot, and that's part of his

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>greatness from what I've seen. I think, as I was

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of saying a bit about Rory yesterday, I think

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a it's an attribute if you can kind of

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>get a handle on it, you know, like to be fair.

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Tiger was very very well, not always very

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 1>good at hiding it, but he sort of was running

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 1>pretty hot most of the time, you know, when he

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>was at his best. So it's it's just the nature

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of sort of getting the best out of yourself, I think,

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and he really really wants it and sometimes if you

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>if you push yourself to the aids, Like you said,

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a race, I mean, it's like a race car.

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like you've got to sort of risk it breaking

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>to get the most out of it. And so he

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of has to risk risk the blowouts if he's

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the mental blowouts if he's going to play his best,

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>because he obviously has to be right there and fired up.

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>And that's probably why so great in the last two

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>or three holes of a magic you know, Um, it's uh,

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>it's just the way some people up right and need

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to opright. So at the risk of trafficking in stereotypes,

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>when I asked last year at the US Open, I

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>asked Paul Casey, what do you love most about John

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Ram's game? And Casey said, Spanish hands. Imagine being a

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>young lad in Spain and you're in you're a terrible chipper,

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 1>and picture that was you're drenched in shave. Yeah, if

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>there are any there are any indeed, Jeff can I

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>can I ask you this because I don't know if

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how widely known this is. But when

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>people talk about, you know, the country club takes the

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>driver out of hand, and you know it's not just

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>for bombers, and that's true. I mean, if you look

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>at the holes and you see their shots that they're

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>playing off the tee that that is an extra true fact.

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>But length is always an advantage period. Uh And Jeff,

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if you could just take that sentence and

0:25:55.760 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>explain why that's true to our listenership. Well, yeah, I

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>mean it's even more of an advantage. I think when

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't have driver on every hole. I think because

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that you can hit less club, you can safely get

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>it to the same place. I mean, some guys might

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:15.959
<v Speaker 1>have to hit three would where already can hit four

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>on under a fairway. You know, it's just it's an

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 1>infinite advantage because you're always going to be hitting less.

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>It's always more, it's always more accurate to hit less club.

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, if you have to hit a two

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty yards off it t, it's going to

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>be easier if you're already hit bo on than it's

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>for some guys hit three would. You know, it's just

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be a straighter club to hit. And also,

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>length generally is power, and power lets you create more spin,

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you can hit the ball higher, you can get the

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>ball out of the rough more. It's just never not

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be an advantage. It's like having power in

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 1>your car. Even if you don't use it. It's still

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>an advantage to have power in your car. It's the

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 1>same when you play golf, even if you're hitting it

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>to the same places if you're hitting less if you

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>can hit less club to the same places, or you

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>can hit it easy, you don't have to hit it

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>quite as hard, or it's a little bit more under control.

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just a little bit easier to do. That always

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>an advantage. Never, never not the shorter In fact, it

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>been length. It's probably more of an advantage on a

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>shorter course than it is on a longer course. Sometimes

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>because of that, you can hit less clubs everywhere, and

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you can, as I said, you can generally spin the

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>ball really well and hit the ball higher. And yeah,

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just power is an advantage. I mean it's not

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you can beat power if you're really good. I mean,

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Colin can beat John Rome this weekend without even thinking

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>about it, while he's proof that he can. But there's

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>still it's still just easier to hit less club you know,

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>from the same spot. It just is always going to

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 1>be Yeah and Jeff along on those same lines. How

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>about when you have enormous leg strength like John Ram

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>has and like you know, Nicholas certainly had and other

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>greats through the years. The ordinary fan wouldn't think of

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that being an advantage in one's putting game, but it

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>is very leg strength really is an advantage in the

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And again I'm wondering if you might be able to

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>explain why why that is. I've never actually really thought

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>about it, but it would be for sure. I mean,

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>just the more stable you are, for one of them,

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 1>me and John Rahman, Jack Nicholas, with all the affection

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Bottom heavy golfers, um, but in a

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 1>good way. I mean all the great golfers, Trevino, not

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>all the great of a lot of them. If you

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.479
<v Speaker 1>actually look back at Jones and Snead and they all

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of got bigger down load, you know. And I

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>think that's because the great great golf swings are using

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>their legs a lot, and they just as they grow up,

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 1>they're using their legs so much that they just get

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>bigger and bigger and bigger in that area because that's

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>where they need to be strong. But yeah, and the

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>pudding game, just the more stable you can be and

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the less you move around, I think clearly, and putting

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it's clearly less of a less of an advantage that

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it is in the long game, you know. I mean

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>there's some pretty good skinny leg putters around, but yeah,

0:28:58.200 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the leg strength is just going to be in a

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>h It's a bit like length as a golfer, it's

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>just probably always going to be an advantage leg strength,

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>especially core sort of in the bomb gloats Hips area.

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Most really long term great golfers have been big and

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>strong in that area. So it's clearly an advantage. Yea.

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And even with Carrie Webb, you see it, even when

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>when Anica got big and strong sack. So that's a

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>great example. She looks so solid over the ball, every

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>shot right through the back, including the putter. Yeah, well

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>this is not going to impress Jeff. But I did

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>win the putting competition with the Uncle Tony Invitational back

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to back of years, and one competitor complained that because

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I have size thirteen feet, I had two touches of advantage.

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I was so stable over the ball and he wanted

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>me to have to put barefoot when I was going

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>for a three peet, but I fended that off. But

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it was, as you're saying, Michael, you know we've left

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>out of these conversations. Who's really protetypical? But Gary Woodland

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>he looks like he's not going anywhere, you know, when

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>he's over those putts. Baby got back for sure, Jeff,

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I heard a great sound ter day, Gary Woodland walking

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>down a brick path. You can guess why. It's the

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>best noise in golfers. It was so rare. Everyone's like

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>him and are looking or whoever. I was with Bill

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Pennington from the Times. Wow, that's a great sound. I

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>missed that sound. I mean, it's I know, it's so

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>much better for the greens and the surfaces, so much better.

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if I wouldn't be happy to

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>just go back and hear that, especially the old leather,

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>so old classics and stuff. They just sounded so amazing

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>walking out walking to the clubhouse and you hear it

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the two is the only place you ever hear it anymore,

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and you hear the odd guy doing it. It's yeah.

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the kids these days probably think it's ridiculous

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that guys wear those things, and they don't understand. They

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have the romance. But there's nothing like sparks walking

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>through a parking What kind of shoes are you sounding gold?

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>What kind of shoes were you wearing when you won?

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I had sparkes at Wingfoot, Yeah, I varied, I alternated.

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I have generally up to about there. I was always

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>wearing spikes most of the time, sort of. I was

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>wearing soft spikes sort of after that sort of era.

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:07.239
<v Speaker 1>And the shoes are so good and so comfortable now,

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and they've they've sort of kind of worked out the

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>soft spikes traction thing pretty well. But I always wore

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>metal spikes at the Masters, the side slopes and greasy

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>mostly for the second shot on thirteen actually bore away

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>above my feet. I used to get the chef like

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>going there pretty regularly on my second shot there, and

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it freaked me out. So I'd wear metal spikes for

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the second shot on thirteen. I don't go generally, but

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that was towards the end that was the only place

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd wear it. It's wild everything we've done in our

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>journalistic careers, Michael has brought us this moment to listen

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to you and Jeff blacked poetic about metal spikes on

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a parking lot that there's nothing I've never been happier

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in my entire life? Can I ask one last shoe question?

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>This already begins with your size thirteen shoe. Had you

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>not started there, we probably wouldn't go into the spot. Jeff,

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>this may precede you're involving in the game, but your

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>parents and Adam Scott's and others might have had it.

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>There was sometimes a leather covering of the laces. Do

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm referring to the flap side of

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the laces, the flaps over the laces. I look ridiculous,

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>but that was so good. Do you know what that?

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>You know? There's a term you had him? Oh yeahs

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to stop the water getting in your licenses like it

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>was because that was the vulnerable spot in your shoes.

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.719
<v Speaker 1>So you're walking through the rockets, it protected uh, your

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>shoe from getting water in there. Alan, do you think

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>there's anybody in this press tent who's going to use

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the word vulnerable better than Jeff Ogilvy just did. Yeah,

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>in the context of their word, I stand in awe,

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>but I'll really stand it off. You know the answer

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to the following question, do you know that the flap

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>as you say, which is the perfect word, but there

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is a term of golf for that flap. Do you

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>know it? Um, I'm sure you'll remind me. I've heard.

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Is it quilty? Oh, he's good. Is it kilt? I'm

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Surelie heard it from you, so I would. I kind

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of got the answers from the teacher. But this is

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago. Yeah, I use that word in

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a long time because it looks like a little kilt skirt. Yeah,

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I can see that, speak of which. I saw a

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>crunshot today and we talked about him. Where he was.

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>He was playing your field and a kilt and and

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>his caddy was carrying his bag without clubs. And his

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>caddy was Herb Wind. He was playing with hickory shafted

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>clubs for some reason. Herb was cadding for and you

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>had to laugh about that. It was funny. But he

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>had one club and had about six clubs. Yeah, so

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it was there was a few clubs in the bag,

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>but there was no bag. Herb just had him in here.

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I see. I couldn't even understand. It was like when

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I played Peter. Hey, you know I've got like three wedges. Yeah,

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I get it. Yeah, that's funny. Um, all right, last

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>thing and then we'll end this very Breezy Um podcast.

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>To me, one of the underlying issues in the highest

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>level of the game is who is the best golfer

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in the world right now? You can make a case

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>for Mari Kawa, especially if wins here, that might end

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the debate. But GT with his second major, Ram has

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>got all the strokes, game numbers. Scheffler has been on

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 1>this heater. Rory often looks like the best player, but

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>then he kind of stumbles at times. You know, Dustin

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 1>used to be in the conversation. He's fallen off a

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But put your guys on the spot. Who

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is the best golf in the world right now this moment? Jeff,

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't think does it matter you say this? It's

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>an issue, like does it really matter? Isn't this unbelievable

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:38.839
<v Speaker 1>that we've got this many good players? Like I think

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 1>right now as it stands, I mean probably Rory and

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Rory probably because the last week and he's one behind

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>and on the leaderboard, but it changes weekly. We're used

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to having guys being number one in the world. I mean,

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>we had Greg for ten years and then we had

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Tiger for twenty years, and we kind of got it.

0:34:57.600 --> 0:34:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Made you guys lazy. You have to go and sort

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of do something work now and workout who's the best.

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>It's going to change, it changes week to week. I mean,

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Scottie clearly was the best goal from the world the

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>first four months of the year, but not even close.

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, m Dustin said his turn. I mean John's

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:16.800
<v Speaker 1>had his turn, like it's it's JT's Clearly. When I

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>say JT play up close, I'm like, it's amazing to

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>me that anyone can beat that guy. So I just

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 1>think it's, um, it's a bit more fluid than it's

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 1>ever been. We've never had this many people capable of

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>meting number one, have we? At the same time, it's incredible. Yeah, well,

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>a couple things I'd like to respond to there, Jeff,

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it matters, but none of this matters

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is we're having fun and something to talk about. Secondly,

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 1>did you did you note that embedded in that answer

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>was another critique of how we do our job's calling

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 1>us lazy. I mean, yesterday both Ryan and Jeff were

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>on our ass about, you know, turn into like a

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 1>media criticism podcast. I would just I would just criticize

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the the golf media again in general. You were the

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>only person interviewing mister Hardy. No, no, the questions that

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Hayden Buckley was just asked or like like the guy

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>just walked it off the street. I mean, was an

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>All American at Missouri one on the corn Ferry tour

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, and you spell your name with a

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 1>why why? Anyway, Ryan French back on the podcast, still

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>spitting fire. We were just about to end it. I

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>think we're still gonna end it. But do you have

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:27.760
<v Speaker 1>an insight you can share with us from Yon Buckley's

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna win the US Open. You said it on the

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 1>way out, so I'm not saying it. I've talked to

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>him just now. I'm one hundred percent confitent. Now, okay,

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you give us one reason why besides your fantastical you know, desires. So, Hayden,

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the story I told one phone call his Corn Ferry

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:51.479
<v Speaker 1>win was he was first alternate Thursday morning on the range.

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Jeff's ever been a first alternate

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:57.439
<v Speaker 1>in a PGA Tour event or corn Ferry, but Jeff

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>knows enough to know what that is like. And a

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:05.359
<v Speaker 1>guy slammed his hand in the door and he got

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>into the event. Truth. I broke the story that the

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>guy slammed his hand in the door and he went

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 1>on to win that week. That's awesome. He's supposed to

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>He's only in Canada. It's like some travel nightmares. Barely

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>got there. It's like all the times, and this time

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 1>he won a five whole playoff. It's like, it's kind

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of the stars are aligning. Okay, I like it. We

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:29.399
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about who's the who's the best golf

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in the world right now? And um, Michael, what's your

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>answer to that? You know, I'm really I'm right right

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 1>with with Jeff. If Scottie Shuffler wins, of course he's

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the answer. But you know, over the last five years,

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess Rory or Dustin Johnson's the answer is. I'm

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>more likely to just enjoy the fact I have so

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>many good golfers at the moment. Of course, if more

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowho wins, he would be the answer. But it's just

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:56.399
<v Speaker 1>neat to see so many good players playing good golf

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:58.919
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. All Right, I'm gonna say, JT,

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>do you want do you want to weigh in who's

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the best golfer in the world? Don't don't watch them

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>don't watch the top guys. That's such a good answer.

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:09.839
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, uh, this is like you know, Sein

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 1>felt the end. This is a podcast about nothing, and

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 1>yet it was it was quite entertaining. So uh, any

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>any parting thoughts for now, It's just I think what

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I think what Ryan just said about. You know, whoever

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to win this thing. You know, if it's

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:25.800
<v Speaker 1>not a big name that that we're so familiar with,

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and that happens, you know, Scott Simpsons won and Steve

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Jones's won, and guys win that you don't really know

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that well, but it really it's when it happens at

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a US Open it's especially great because it just reminds

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you this thing really is a dream machine. I'm just

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.760
<v Speaker 1>as a quick side note, I only learned this recently.

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Fewer than twenty thousand people have played Major League Baseball.

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Hundreds of millions of people have had the dream at

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>some moment. You know, maybe not hundreds of millions, but

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 1>millions of millions have had the dreaming they're going to

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 1>play it. And that's really what this US Opened, or

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>any British Open for that matter, Open championship is really

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>all about. It's it's about to dream of the odds

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of Jeff Ogilvie growing up, or Scott Simpson or anybody

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>else growing up and getting good enough at the game

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 1>to Winnie's US Open. It's astronomical. If you look at

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 1>like I was looking at Billy Andreate's record today, to

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>play twenty or thirty major championships, it's astounding because there

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>are millions of people would love to do it, and

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:20.839
<v Speaker 1>so if you do it, so it's just it's neat

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:22.879
<v Speaker 1>being at a national Open, whether it's a British Open

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>or US Open. And I thank Ryan for getting us

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>back in touch with the dream machine part of it,

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>inside a machine, just the dream of it all. That's

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of the podcast right there. That was quite elegant.

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:39.280
<v Speaker 1>We can't top that. I have to know why. Thank you, Michael.

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that. It's very awesome. Also, I have to

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>know why you were thirteen Billy andreates playing career today.

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 1>As we say in AUGUSTA appreciate you. We're supposed to

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 1>thank power Point power points. Appreciate power points. Yeah, we appreciate,

0:39:56.680 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you. Did you get it all that up? No?

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Don't Yeah, don't edit that up? Fu fuck it, we'll

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.239
<v Speaker 1>do it live. We'll do it live. Jeff. Have you

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>ever met Jeff? I'm sure you have. Bill of Paine

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>pain pain. What do you call him when you see him?

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Came Paine? You called chairman? What do you call him?

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I bumped into him at the lounge at Lax Airport

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.239
<v Speaker 1>one day and said, I hate Billy, it's Jeff. How

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>are you going? And I thought afterwards I regretted. I'm like, oh,

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>when am I supposed to say? You missed the chairman anymore? No,

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>you're not absolutely respectful. Yeah, but did you say why

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 1>are you're not Why are you're not playing private? I mean,

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>come on, you know a lot of bris. What's you said?

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 1>We were comparing good, comparing states. Yeah, we was drinking

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>nice wine, I guess in the lounge. Yeah, he was great.

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Who'd you who'd you play with? That cypress point? That

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:55.720
<v Speaker 1>day at the nineteen US Open, I played with Steve Jones,

0:40:55.760 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 1>who's fantastic? Um, well, Cambo huh and someone else. It

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>was a bit of a shame. The best part about

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 1>that day was sitting on the first tea and you

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>said you were there so you might remember this, but no,

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it was maybe Jack and Jack and Tom and that

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>like hitting off Watson hitting off the first day and

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Trevino was chirping him. Yeah, just didn't shut up, and

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 1>it was like forty years ago and Trevino is just

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 1>flapping off on the tea, just getting into Watson and

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas and all that. On the first day, it was

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 1>just like, this is just the best thing I've ever seen.

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I've got to just sat there all day and listen

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to Trevino sort of give Nicholas and Tom Watson ship.

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:37.919
<v Speaker 1>It was fantastic, just the best. That was great. Steve

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Jones said a funky grip, didn't he Yeah, very yeah

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:43.320
<v Speaker 1>he didn't. He have a finger accident or something. He

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 1>had overlapped it right, the porn of finger on his

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:49.439
<v Speaker 1>left hand or something. Yeah, we need to Oh sorry, Jeff,

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I apologize. We need to think Part Points. I mean yeah,

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're trying to make art here and all

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you care about is the commerce. Yeah, I apologize, Jedi.

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank I cut off a Steve Jones finger broken story.

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:07.839
<v Speaker 1>But we do need to thank Part Points. A great app.

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Should download it a new way to score. It's awesome.

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I love it. It's great for the whole family. If

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you take out different skill levels and all sorts of things,

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it's really cool download part points. All right, fabulous. Well

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to end the podcasts seven minutes after

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 1>I tried to end it, but that was fun. I

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:30.280
<v Speaker 1>like the digressions. There's been another fire drill. It's Friday

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 1>at the US. Wouldn't we do this again the next

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:35.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of rounds? And thanks for listening. Everything we do

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>we do for you the listener. Not to be pretentious,

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:41.839
<v Speaker 1>but we wouldn't exist without all you guys, So thanks

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>for tuning in. Jeff, thanks for coming all the way

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 1>from Melbourne. For Michael Bamberger, Ryan French, I'm Alan SHIPNUK

0:42:49.160 --> 0:43:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're back at it tomorrow. Thanks put another log

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 1>on the fire nobody hears. Get the time