WEBVTT - XFL Week 1 Recap, MLB Trades, NFBC ADP Desk 

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoomo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Forever show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences. Yeah,

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>we bake your host Friday from Fin God Rob Say

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Francis practice standfall, ladies and gentlemen, your b fs. It's

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>with that we want you inside up Studio thirty four.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>This he's in the FX. He's Frank Staff. I am

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Greg Sauceman right out. I was having a month, Greggy,

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Happy Monday to you. We're back and we've got face

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Ball to talk about later on in the show because

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we gotta get to some XFL. How is your weekend?

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Had you sleep last night? But I didn't sleep great, Frank,

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of my work, My weekend felt like a lot of work,

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you. Yeah, I was here on

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Greg, I didn't see I didn't see any Greg

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Susterman aroun on on a Sunday, right, don't worry. I

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>was on the phone with your producers on Sunday and

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday. And here we are today, Frank, so feeling great,

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>feeling great, feeling great. How did How did you sleep, Frank?

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I slept very well. Probably stayed up too late like

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I always do, but I slept very well at a

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.239
<v Speaker 1>had a solid weekend. Did you watch the Oscars? I

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>watched a little bit of the oscars? True story. I

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>only turned the Oscars on because I saw that Eminem

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>was performing. By the time I turned the Oscars on,

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>he was already done performing. And then I just left

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it on in the background and heard Parasite pretty much

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>win everything. Yes, spoiler alert. For those didn't watch the Oscars, well,

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:35.959
<v Speaker 1>you should have watched it by now, or if you haven't,

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you probably heard. For an update on everything that's not

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the Oscars, here's Alex Fasana Sports grade news update. I

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>am Alex Fassana with your sports grid news update here

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy b f FS, It's finally official in

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball. Mooky Bets and David Price are finally

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>headed to Los Angeles. Source has told ESPN's Jeff Passing

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that a deal had been agreed upon to send the

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>players to the l A Dodgers for a package that

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>includes Alex Verdugo, shortstop Jeeter Downs, and catcher Connor Wong,

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>all of which will go to Boston. A blockbuster three

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>team deal was agreed upon almost a week ago. However,

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox were nervous about grad Role. Bruce dal

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>grad Role, a prospect from the Twins who had Tommy's

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>john surgery missed time in two thousand and nineteen. The

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>rework deal still has Bets and Price going to Los Angeles,

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Red Sox have agreed to pay half of

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the ninety six million dollars left on prices deal. In

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>also Major League Baseball, the Los Angeles Dodgers are sending

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>right hander Kenta Maeda and cash to the Minnesota Twins

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>for right hander Bruce dal Grad, roll off, outfield prospect

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Luke Rayley, and the sixties seven pick in draft. A

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>different version of the deal was originally reported to be

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>as part of a three team deal with the Red

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Sox and Mookie Bets. However, the Red Sox again had

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>issues with the prospects medical reviews. The Athletic was the

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>first to report this new Twins Dodgers deal, and in

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the end f L Philip Rivers will officially enter free

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>agency this offseason. He ends his sixteen year run with

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Chargers. The Chargers and Rivers jointly announced

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the veterans quarterback's decision on Monday, with general manager Tom

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Talsco saying that the timing of the announcement will allow

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:19.359
<v Speaker 1>everybody to put themselves in the best position for success

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in Philip Rivers turns thirty eight this year. He is

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the most prolific passer in the Chargers history. He finished

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the twenty nineteen season with four thousand, six hundred and

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen yards, twenty three touchdowns, and twenty interceptions. The Chargers

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>finished five and eleven and last place in the a

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>f C West. All right, that doesn't for me, Gonna

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>send it back to the BFFs. This was your sportscrid

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>news update. I'm Alex Fasano. There you go, that's Fasano's news.

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh day, fantastic job breaking down the trades. We're gonna

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>do that in a little bit, breakdown both of the

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>trades actually happened this weekend, including Mookie bats, including Maddie

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Margo finally no longer a padre, but to a situation

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that somehow is worse than the padre. Uh, it's remarkable.

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna do that. We're gonna have some fun a

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>little bit later on, but we're gonna start. There's this

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is the XFL. Frankie, did you watch I saw you

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 1>tweeting how set you were that you couldn't play. I

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>was sad. I was said that I could not play

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>XFL dfs. I had to get my football fixed in

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend. I caught some action here and there.

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I was out at brunch on a double date, and

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I did have my phone playing XFL on YouTube TV

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>enrager fiance, No, no, no no, I mean it's two couples.

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>The girls were talking, the guys were talking, and you

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>weren't talking. Had it in the back of it. Got

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to the point it was on your phone looking at

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the XFL. This is what we're doing, Like we have

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the stream of the XFL on our phones. Now, you

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>don't need the money on the game. Let me know

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>when it's my turn to talk, right, because I'm pretty sure.

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>It was my turn to talk, and you rudely interrupted

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>turns on this show. It's a conversation. Here's what I'll say.

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't like Ronald UNA's debut. And I was with

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you at Yankee Stadium also watching Ronald da Cuna on

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>my phone at the same time. I had it on

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in the background. I just wanted to see if any

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>big plays were happening, if anything crazy was going on,

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 1>So I caught some xfl action this weekend. Probably shouldn't

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 1>have watched as much as I could have, but I

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>did see some highlights as well, and I thought it

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. We have football all year round. Let's go Guardians,

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>New York's football team. The best football team in New York, Craig,

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not hard, it's not hard, but the best team

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that plays in MetLife. There you go. The Guardians defeated

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the Vipers three for a little bit. Well man, Aaron

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Murray on the Vipers got benched. Uh Matt mcgloy fifty

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>nine two through for a touchdown, which was wonderful, right you, Oh,

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Matt mcgloyd and Kevin gilbrid an apology based on what

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you said. I don't like put it right in your eye. Though.

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this. My doorman when I left this morning,

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>he's like, hey, did you watched the Guardians? Like, Frank,

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>what are we doing? What do we And just to clarify,

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>your doorman's name is Frank, because I'm not Gregg's doorman,

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>right right, So Frank the doorman, not Frank Staffle. But

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the fight. The doorman was like, oh, I'm pretty excited.

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>They were pretty good and they want to watch them

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this season. People are actually into the XFL. Three point

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>three million people watch the XFL this weekend. Look, there

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>is a desire for football year round, and the XFL

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>are doing things a little bit differently. They're interviewing kickers

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>as soon as they miss kicks. They're interviewing yeah the

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>interview that there, I didn't. I'm pretty sure they interviewed

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback as soon as you throw an interception, like

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>what do you say in that moment? So they're doing

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>some interesting things obviously. And yes, the Guardians won three

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to three. Matt mcloyn did enough. He also had a

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdown. Greg, come well, man, let's go Guardians. I

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>can't believe you were talking to Smack about Matt mcgloyne

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>on on Friday and you were backing Aaron Murray. How

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>did that work out? Six for thirty four with two

0:07:56.000 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>interceptions against that elite Guardians. He didn't look good a lot,

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you. He looked very, very bad.

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, also look bad. I was excited to get

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>into this with you, with the Renegades and the battle Hawks,

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the St. Louis battle Hawks to be the Renegades fift nine.

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I really like Dallas on this one. But these running

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>backs that you were so high on because you knew

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>their names, Cameron Artist, Pain the Cap and Kristen Michael.

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Don't you read there stats, Frank, I don't know what

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about. Greg. I can't find them all of

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a sudden. It's crazy, but I'll be happy to read him.

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I have him off here. Kristin Michael carry the ball

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>seven times? The battle Hawks with a Christen Michael like

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>zero yards? Whoa Greg? Can you talk about the rushing

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>leader of the St. Louis battle Hawks who was also

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 1>a former NFL player. While we're at it, No, Matt

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Jones had twenty one attempts for eighty five rushing yards.

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty good game. Christie Michael not so much.

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But Cameron artists Pain did not too much on the

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>ground either. Two rushes for six yards. He did have

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>four receptions for thirteen yards. So if you played on

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Draft Kings the PPR format, that helped you out. But yeah,

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the one big takeaway I think from this weekend.

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Greg and I heard Gabe talking about this on Twitter

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend. The offensive line play was not great,

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's not surprising because the offensive line play is

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>not great in the NFL either, Like it's hard to

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>find quality offensive line play and it takes time for

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>these guys to play together. Before you know, maybe they'll

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>start to gel a little bit. But the biggest takeaway

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>for me was that there was not a lot of

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>great rushing performances any running backs this weekend. That show

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>is the only one. Matt Jones performed very well for

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Matt Jones. If you look at like the Redding Gads,

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>they they're leading Russia. I had five carries. It was

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Lansdown bar so NFL player as well, but again didn't

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>do much with it. No, there's just not that much rushing.

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>You go to the Wildcasts who felt at the US

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Roughnecks thirty seven and seventeen. Leading rusher was a lot

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of Hood twelve carries for forty three yards. Right then,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>they're not really rushing the ball. I think teams obviously

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>still trying to figure it out. But your guyd J Walker,

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>whereas yesterday p J Walker, Man, he was awesome and

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>he rushed a little bit as well. He added twenty

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>six rushing yards. This was the guy that I did

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>have in my fake DFS lineup, which I tried to

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>submit and then found out that you can't play New

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>York dfs on XFL dfs in New York. I still

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>got to kind of clarify that because I don't know

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>what's going on there Greg, but apparently you can in

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, so I think we're gonna have to do

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that this upcoming week. But p J Walker was great

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns as well. Sammy Coats, Alex Passano non Sarah's

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>big Steelers fan. You're reminded of why Sammy Coats is

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>no longer a Pittsburgh Steeler. Nine targets, just two receptions,

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>dropping the ball everywhere as well. Uh did not get

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>much done this weekend, but p J Walker was someone

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>who certainly did. Nelson Spruce was great for the Wildcats,

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>eleven for one oh three franc and fifteen targets. What

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>there's your PPR beast Eli Rogers to Eli Rogers had

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>like six or seven catches. Defenders defeated the Dragons. Not

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 1>much rushing there either. Rickey Pearl's kid five eight and

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>two touched as looked pretty good. That Cardello Jones goes

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>for two, five and two, and as we mentioned before,

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Eli Rogers goes six for seventy three. So that's someone

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to target in DFS this upcoming weekend. That

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>was the as out. When we come back, Mookie bats

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>straight at Jack Peterson. Not let's tell you what happened

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend. Are you ready for the nation's first

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>and only, free, twenty four hour network dedicated to you

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the betting and fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will provide

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 1>you with a real time content, statistics and gaming intelligence

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>unlike anything you've ever seen before. Located both in the

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>heart of New York City and inside the FanDuel Sports

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>book at the meadow Lands Sports Crade, He's live eighteen

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>hours a day here to serve you the fanatic. This

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is sports Crade, get all the grid. We are live

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>here in Studio thirty four. This is gonna be He's Frank,

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Greg, Thanks for hanging out. Coast Coast coming up

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>next Scott for real and the gang will hide to cover.

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh by Game Marcy in Game Live all night long

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on NBA All Star Break coming to the weekend, which

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>is maybe they all star like picks um later in

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the week I'm down. He still owe me a player? Sure,

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I just have to pick a player in the NFL.

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I just haven't picked a player yet, right, Yeah, that's fair.

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'll just tell e why he has to

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>pay for it, because he has a lot more money

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>than I do, so that seems fair. I don't disagree.

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>You'll get your shirt somehow, some way from Eric Young.

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>You do your thing, man, Yeah, yeah, probably. Did you

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>win any fantasy football league this year? Greg, I'm gonna

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>guess did you come close? Yeah? Gave me a second. Alright,

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>So who who was like the best player on that

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 1>team or like a few of your favorite players from

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:45.559
<v Speaker 1>that team. The best player on that team was Nick Chubb,

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook. I mean those are cool player shirts to have, No,

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, you don't like the nice brown and orange

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>all over your body, Greg trant to see who the

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>best player of that team was. Do that during the break?

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean you wrote it up now, so Tyreek Hill,

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't like you. Probably don't want to Tyreek Hill

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>shirt on your back, Gregan. They don't. I want to

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>get like an uncool shirt like Jack Doyle. Don't please

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. All right, let's get back into baseball, Frank,

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Because the long awaited Mookie Bets trade was finally completed

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend with some alterations. Basically, it seems like

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>it seems like what happened was the prospect that was

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>going from Minnesota to Boston. The Medicals then kind of

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>add up and the Red Sox exactly, the Red Sox

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>thought of him as a reliever when he was valued

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>as a starter because the Medicals it's called bs basically,

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox and all this backlash, they didn't get

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it enough for Wiki bats and demanded more exactly, and

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>because the Dodgers, um, I didn't want to lose on

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the Mookie bats and have a very plentiful system, like

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you know what, f you guys, We'll give you Jeter

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>downs will make this happen. If that makes you feel better,

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and now it's done. Movie Vets and David Price are

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 1>bold members of the Los Angeles Dodgers. Jeter Downs and

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Alex Verdugo are now members of the Boston Red Sox,

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.559
<v Speaker 1>and Kenda Mariana and now a member over the Minnesota Twins.

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Those the primary pieces of where everybody has gone. But

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm still trying to understand is why the Dodgers decided

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>they need they did not need the trade Jock Peterson anymore.

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know it was the Angels that says, screw this,

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>we're walking away, um, But that trade wind up not happening.

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>So a lot to kind of uncover here, Frank, we

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>now know it's official. Let me start from the Red

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Sock side of things. I know we did a whole

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>um segment previously on Alex Verdugo. Um we really talking

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>about Jeter Downs because it wasn't in the trade. People

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>have kind of speculator of the Jeter Downs at some

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>point in the near future. Could replace be the replacement

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>for Dustin for Joy at second base? Obviously Michael Javis

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>played there last year, But what do you think of

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the Jeter Downs addition to the Boston Red Sox. I

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>thought it was great that they were able to add

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>another prospect. I agree with you completely. It's like someone

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in a fantasy baseball leagu getting fleeced for a trade,

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and then when they hear the backlash from everyone else,

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>they're like, oh, can you please veto my trade so

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that I can try and get more out of someone else.

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>That's basically what happened here. The Red Sox got absolutely fleeced,

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and even with adding Jeter Downs, I still don't agree

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that they should have traded Mooky Betts, but it does

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>look better on paper now that they get a prospect

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>with the pedigree of Jeter. It was really interesting that

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think Verdugo is going to be

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a stunt. I really do believe that. So I don't

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>know what the agenda is here. I was trying to

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. But multiple times this weekend, John Hayman

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>tweeted out Alex for duto has like Clint Fraser like problems.

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that means it's just like Cravy Fielder

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>or some personality issues that I think it's personality stuff

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>because I've heard I've heard things like that before as

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>well above her Dugo, so I had not heard that,

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe under the leadership of like A J. D. Martinez.

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>And I always like young players being surrounded by, you know,

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>veterans who have been around a while. The same thing

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that happened last year with Miguel Snow with Nelson Cruz

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>coming in, I thought that would have a positive impact

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>on him. I'm not sure if that's the direct correlation

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that made Miguel Snow be awesome last year, but I

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>do like when these older players are on teams and

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>they can take youngsters under their wings. So we'll see

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>what happens when it comes to Alex Verdugo. I think

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna play every day. I think he's either gonna

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>lead off for bad fifth for the Boston Red Sox.

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And I tweeted this out Roster resources. I tweeted this

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>out on Friday, Greg. The pre trade NFBC cost for

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Alex Verdugo was twenty seven and since the trade happens,

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>so from Wednesday on, his ADP was and if you

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>remember what I told you, I said he was going

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to move up about fifty spots and he might move

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>up even more than that. I think Verdugo has Michael

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Brantley type upside, maybe not like his first full season,

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>but eventually I think that that's what his upside can be.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Verdugo is still twenty three years old, and according to

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>roster resource right now for the Boston Red Sox, Verdugo

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is projected to that seventh in this lineup. So what

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>do they have leading off attendee followed by Dever's, Bogart's J. D. Martinez,

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Moreland, Michael Javis, Verdugo, Christian Vaska is j B

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>J Right, So they might put it might leave Verdugo

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit lower in the line up to start.

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to put too much pressure on him.

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>But he's he's gonna make his way up there. Like

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he's better than Mitch Moreland. Now, Jeter Downs,

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I know to cut you off, but he was a

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>good prospect. Could get you said, why is that he's

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>like a top fifty prospect in baseball, one of the

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 1>better prospects in the Dodgers organization. You look at what

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>he just did this past year at power speed combination.

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Twenty one years old at between double A and high

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 1>A ball of this past year twenty four home runs,

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>twenty four stolen bases. He hit to seventy six with

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>eight o ps, so there's upside there. It's just very

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>weird that there's a person named Jeter in the Boston

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox organization now, but you're right. I think his

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>long term future is he probably takes over at second

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>base Greg they still have Bogarts locked up at shortstop,

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and then they'll eventually probably move Michael Javis back to

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>his original position, which is first base. I think Mitch

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Moreland is just kind of a place holder for maybe

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 1>this year. I don't think we're gonna see Jeter downs

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>this year, but maybe like a September ish call up.

0:17:57.440 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>If not, then the following year he'll probably be like

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a mid season all up. I think that's fair to say.

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So then let me kind of follow that up with

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the player that played second based last year for the

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:05.959
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox, with Michael Chavis and just told you he's

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>betting six in this lineup. What do you think of

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Michael Javis this season? I'm interested, obviously batting in the

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>middle of a really good ballpark, a ballpark that plays

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>for right handed power, and that's exactly what Javis has

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, he was their top prospect for a while.

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't really a great farm system obviously, but I

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>think he proved something last year. Greg. I mean, the

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>power is legit. You watched the batspeed, Like the kid

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>has bat speed. I think his power is gonna play,

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>especially in Fenway. The problem is he's got to cut

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>down the strikeouts. Plate discipline was a dreadful from Michael

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Javis last year, and he struggled a little bit in

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the minors with strike out. With strikeouts, you know, he's

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>normally in like that mid twenty percentage. So even if

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>he was, you know, around thirty percent, you can live

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>with that. Like Fernando Tatis jr. Ist ideally you wanted

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to be better, but thirty three is a lot, Greg,

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 1>So Michael Javis has to be better in terms of

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>plate discipline and cutting down on those strikeouts. But I

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>liked what I saw this year. Eighteen home runs in

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety five games a full season with Boston. I think

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you should be able to hit home runs from the

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>middle endfield. There's value. Their hard hit percentage last year

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for Michael Javis thirty three point six. It's no, it's

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>not great, you know, strike evercentage ulversentage at I'm not

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.439
<v Speaker 1>a Michael Javis. You're out Michael Jas. But the thing

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 1>is he's young enough where like he's years old right now. Yeah,

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>like he can he can easily you know, improve his

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>launch angle, cut down the strikeouts, and in before you

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>know it, he's like a two seventy hitter who's hitting

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five home runs. You can pump the brakes. But

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the thing is he's not He's like not going early

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 1>in drafts right now. Who in the NFBC in the

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>month of February six, that's nothing. I'm not pretty much

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>out on him though, because like, give me Cole Hamiles

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>two spots before him. I agree with you know, I

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>love col Hamiles, right, give me Mitch Kella going just

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>ahead of him as well. But look at some of

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the hitters in this range, like Eric cosmer Man fine

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to seventy home runs. It is what it is, Geo Orshella,

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't really know how the play time is gonna

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>shake out there with the Yankees at least what Chavis.

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>You know he's gonna play every day. Someone who's going

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later on though that I do love

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hayes is here last year too. Love Austin Hayes

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>every year. Greg, alright, fair enough, let me go to

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers. Let me have the Dodgers side of things. Obviously,

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>no Mookie Betts. He has really solidified being in the

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>top five. I think he's I personally find him to

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>be like the clear fourth hitter off the board. With

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Cody Bellinger his teammate being five. I think your first

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>five doesn't include Garrett Cole or um Jacob Degraham. I

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>think that's kind of six seven for me. But your

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>top five, I think it's set Mookie Bets, Cody Bellinger

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>both in it. Yeah, I mean it may personally in

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the deeper leagues, I would make the argument for getting

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the ace starting pitcher, just giving yourself that base of

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>picture list does not agree. Pitcher list does not agree.

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, look they kind of cater more to

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>twelve team category, which is fine in that format. Look,

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 1>I would say that the hitter, what you're gonna get

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>from the hitter is safer than what you can expect

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>from any picture. Because I'll ask you for a friend here, Frank,

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>if all five of those guys are gone and the

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>next hitter happens to be Alex Bregman or Francisco Lindore.

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Would you take one of the pictures? No, yes, I

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>would definitely take the picture. You are cool, Jacob dem

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I have Jacob Graham as my sp one switch I

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>said that, Oh along, I switched. I think you did.

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Surprise surprise. Greg can't get away from the pin stripes

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 1>fair enough. We'll see what happens. I was originally Garrett Cole.

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I think a come more and Jacob de Gram, but

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll say, yeah, look, Betts is gonna go inside the

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>top five picks in most strafts, and I think it

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 1>makes sense still a five category player. You worry, maybe

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit about the sixteen stolen basses last year.

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's his floor. I think he probably gives

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you between fifteen and twenty stolen basses and he's gonna

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>contribute everywhere else. His expected batting average last year was

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 1>actually like fifteen twenty points higher than his actual batting average,

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>so I think there's actually some positive regression coming from

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>mookie beats as well. What will we ask you this one?

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Also abouting this trade currently going at one A three

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in the NFBC in the month of February. Is David

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Price going at two? That's Kenza Maana. We refer to

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>this uh last We referred to this um last week

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 1>on the show that they were going very very close together.

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>But I'll ask you again that trades official, Frank, would

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you rather have in Fantasy Baseball this year Kenza Mayanna

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>or David Price? Yeah? I think they're both risky. I

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>think at some point, like Kenta Maita is probably gonna

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>be slowed down. I don't know that you could defend

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>depend on him for more than a hundred and fifty

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and sixty endings this year, even with the

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Twins. That's just not the picture that Kenta may

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>has been. Same thing with David Price. You know, he's

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly gonna miss some time throughout the course of

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>this season. But I will take David Price. I think

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>that both teams are gonna get tremendous run support. But

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>there's just something about the Dodgers, right. It's like every

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>starting picture that winds up with the Dodgers, it's a

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>lot like the Houston Astros. These guys are just phenomenal

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and if you look at David Price from last year.

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>The strikeouts actually bounced back in a big way. A

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight percent strikeout rate for David Price last year

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>was the highest of his career, so he actually was

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>pitching well. I think he had. He was unlucky last

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 1>year as well. Four to eight e ar a, Greg,

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you see the X fit down at three seven three.

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the whip was a little bit unlucky as well.

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>The strike outs the highest of his career. I think

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>these guys are close. But give me David Price over

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>kent to Maada. I think both guys are players that

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I want on my team's kids in MYDA. Pitching a

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:25.239
<v Speaker 1>full season as a starting pitcher, if he holds up,

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he's in a good spot. I to rely

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>before well, David Price, first time pitching in the National

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>League's gonna be helpful. Some pieces value go. I'm in

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>on both of these guys. He gets to face the

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>Giants like five times a year. Greg, it's awesome. All right,

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll take a break, we'll come back one another. Trea,

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you gotta get into just stay around. Well, not more

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>coming your ways. Are you ready for the nation's first

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and only free twenty four hour network dedicated to you

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the betting and fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will provide

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you with a real time content, statistics and gaming intelligence

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>unlike anything you've ever seen before. Located both in the

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>horror of New York City and inside the FanDuel Sports

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>book at the meadow Lands Sports Crade, He's live eighteen

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>hours a day. You just serve you the fanatic. This

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is Sports Crade. Get on the grid. So we mentioned

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the Red Sox Dodgers Twins trade here, Frank,

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>before we move on, any idea from your perspective why

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers didn't consummate the trade with the Angels. I

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.959
<v Speaker 1>think it was related from to the Angels, like just

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>just kind of backing out of it and that it

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>was taking too long. I don't know exactly the details.

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>That's what I saw on Twitter a little bit people

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>talking about, but it kind of it seems weird to

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>me that the Angels wouldn't still go through with it, because, yes,

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.719
<v Speaker 1>while they have more rotation arms now, it seems like

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>they can never have enough depth because that Andrewheney has

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>always hurt Hyotani. You don't really know what you're gonna

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>get out of him. So I think they should have

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>went through with it. And you get an outfielder like

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Jack Peterson who already knows the area he plays with

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers and probably could have hit your thirty home

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>runs playing every day and in right field there. I

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>think that made a lot of sense for the Angels.

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, getting a picture like Ross Striplinger,

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, look, we've seen upside out of Ross Stripling.

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>He was an All Star in ten, like he had

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>a stretch where he was phenomenal as a starting pitcher

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and really good curveball as well. The strikeout numbers are solid,

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>but has this really good command, doesn't walk all that

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>many guys. So I thought that getting Ross Stripling for

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the Angels would have been great for their rotation, and

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it would have been great for fantasy right because we

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>would have unleashed Kent to my Ada, we would have

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 1>unleashed Ross Stripling at the same time. Now we still

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of have these question marks. We have like five

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>six players for the Dodgers, Greg to fill two rotation

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>spots with Julio Eurias and with Jimmy Nelson, Dustin May,

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Alex Wood, Alex Wood, Ross strippling, so you still have

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 1>five guys to fill two rotation spots and it's frustrating

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.199
<v Speaker 1>from a fantasy perspective. Now that glut reminds me of

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>what we also know in Tampa Bay, where the Tampa

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Bay Raised that a lot this offseason, but it feels

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>like none of its made it our jobs any clearer

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>by any means. Over the weekend, the Raised round up

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 1>training away Emilio Pagan. They're closer this past season for

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Manny Margot and those other pieces that are involved in that.

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:23.919
<v Speaker 1>But more go and put on the two big pieces

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>traded away, right, yes, okay, so those are the two

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>major pieces. It's Plagan that goes over to San Diego

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that he's gonna help their bullpen in front of Kurby

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Yates or place Kurby Ights who is a free agent

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to be if he gets traded away, and you have

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Manuel Margo, so they will play the outfield for Tampa Bay,

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>much like his old teammate Hunter renefro being traded away

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>from San Diego to Tampa. But Tama has had a

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of players in the mix including Renafro in including

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>um Kevin Kermeyer. For instance, Kevin Kiermyer, Yoshi Suitsugo, you

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>have Nate Low, you have Jose Martinez. You have basically

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>six or seven guys greg that are trying to fill

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, right field, d H and first base. And

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>again this reminds me of the Dodgers, where it's frustrating

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>from a fantasy perspective, but it's a great problem to

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>have if you're the Tampa Bay Rays, You're just going

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>to continue to play the matchups, right, So Austin Meadows

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>is gonna play every single day in left field, and

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna have a combination of Kevin Kermeyer and

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Manny Margot in center field, you know, maybe just a

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>straight up platoon with ker Meyer playing against right handed

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>pitching and Margot playing against left handed pitching. And then

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>again in right field, you have if Margot is not

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 1>playing that day, you could put him in right field,

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>or you can get one of Jose Martinez out there,

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>or Uhunter Renfro or a Yoshi Sasugo, and then whoever

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>isn't playing there you can use as your d H

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 1>and in your first base. And all the while we

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>have Nate Low, who you know, has all this prospect

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>pedigree and he's been mashing in the minor leagues, doesn't

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>have a spot to play, doesn't have an opportunity here

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>with the Tampa Bay Rays. So uh, it's definitely a

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>frustrating situation from a fantasy perspective, Greg with the Tampa

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Bay Rays offense, and we haven't even gotten to their bullpen,

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>so I can. Man, it's a complete mess. It's a

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>complete utter mess. And you look at the bullpen and

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>I'll try to figure it out. Um, who will be

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the closer when it's all said and done. I don't

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>know the problem with the raises. The closer on day

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>one could be the starter on day two. I mean

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that quite literally. And the same goes for the outfield.

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 1>The entire starting outfield can be replaced on day from

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>day one to day two. That's how many pieces they

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>have here. And Margot, is he going to be a starter?

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Like you trade away your closer for someone's gonna be

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a fourth or fifth outfielder for you. I wouldn't think so. No,

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 1>this is was like making money. No, it's a it's

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a buy low opportunity for the Tampa Bay Rays. They're

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at a player that you know was once regarded

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>as one of the top outfield prospects in baseball, and

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>he went over to the San Diego Potters in the

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>trade from the Red Sox years ago. He hasn't panned

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>out with the San Diego Padres, and now the Tampa

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Bay Rays are buying low on him and potentially selling high.

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess on Pagan. I don't know why they wouldn't

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>like Pagan because, as you mentioned, Greg, and he was

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>damn good last year over twelve strikeouts per nine, under

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>two walks per nine, two point three one e r

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a a three point one five exit, a zero point

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>eight three whip Miliel. Pagan was great last year, So

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know why the Rays would want to

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>give up on him. Maybe there's something they know that

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't. But he led this team last year with

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty saves, and then of course we had Diego Castillo

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in the mix who had a few saves, and we

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>also had Jose Alvarado, so it was Diego Castillo with

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>eight and it was Jose Alvarado with seven saves, and

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Alvarado took a huge step back the year before he

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>had over thirty saves. Greg and we know that he

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>has filthy stuff. His his swing and miss stuff is

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is phenomenal, but his walks per nine were up over eight.

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about Robbie Ray territory out here, Greg with

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>those types of walks. I think Diego Castio is really good,

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>but oftentimes they use him as an opener, so you

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know what you're gonna expect there from Castillo. I

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>think Nick Anderson is gonna get the first shot, and

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>even if they kind of play matchups, I think you

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>can expect him to get two thirds of the save

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunities this upcoming season, something similar to what we saw

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>from Pagan last year when he had twenty saves and

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>these other two guys had seven each. Um, I think

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Nick Anderson is legit. Greg had a forty one percent

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>strikeout rate last year that was second among relievers behind

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>only Josh Hayder, so he's really damn good. The strikeouts

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>are legit when it comes to Nick Anderson, I get.

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he gets the first opportunity, but I also

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>think Diego Castillo and Jose Alvarado are going to be

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in that mix depending on matchups. Fair enough, I think

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like I said, a mess there and we can

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>speculate as much as we want. It's just not going

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to be clear. But you're gonna want the closer ideally

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>because the race he's like, they're good, They're good exactly.

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Craig set the over under for Nick Anderson's saves this

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>year for eleven and a half on F s T

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>number That seems low to me if he's the closure.

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>If he's Poggan had twenty last year, and I think

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Nick Anderson could step into that role. Plegon could wind

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>up getting some saves this year, as I mentioned. If

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Kirby yet it gets traded. But Nanuel Largo traded away

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>from the outfield, how does that outfield in San Diego

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>now shape up? Yeah, so we're looking at Francie Cordero

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>on the strong side of a platoon. He struggled big

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>time against left handed pitching in his major league career,

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>but it looks like Francie Cordero is going to be

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the uh strong side of a platoon in center field,

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>playing against right handed pitching regularly. And they're obviously you know,

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>they traded for Trent Grisham as well, and it seems

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 1>like they like him a lot because they gave up

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Luis Urias to get Grisham, and Urias was once regarded

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>as one of the top prospects in baseball. Uh And

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of course they traded for Tommy fam with Tampa Bay

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Ray's earlier in the off season. So their outfield team

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>set you have Famine left field, Grisham, and right field.

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Cordero plays against right handed pitching in center field,

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and then against lefties. They'll get Will Myers in center field,

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps Will Myers fills in a little bit against

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>left handed pitching to give Trent Christian a day off

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>because he is a left handed batter as well. But

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of a trade them for Chie Cordero. Greg

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Remember a couple of years ago, Matt Modica was all

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>over Francie Cordero, and he's someone that does have a

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a power speed combination. Back ineen in

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the minor leagues, he had three six with seventeen home

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>runs and fifteen stolen bases. The year before that eleven

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>home runs and twenty three steals for Francie Cordero. He's

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>still just twenty five years old, and in fact, I

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>just took him in an NFBC Draft Champions League that

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm in right now, Greg. I took him in the

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixth round as my sixth outfielder, so at that

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>point a little bit of a power speed combination. I

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>think he plays most of the time in center field.

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>If he struggles, we could see Taylor Trammel, the prospect

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Padres traded for last year, get an opportunity

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>later on in the season. Yeah, he was the former

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>top prospect for the Cincinnati Reds, I believe, and that's correct.

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I remember what he was traded. We were all like,

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>what what are you doing? And he's gonna have a spot.

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I was reading the article he tweeted out, UM from

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and will be dot com and regards to San Diego

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Padre listen, Jamelle. Obviously, um his closers would offer to

0:32:59.920 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you to need than he was. But he hasn't really

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>hasn't playing Triple A yet, so we had a lot

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of time before. We're gonna lots of strikeouts for tailors exactly,

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>so we have some time. I think this opens up

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot a lot of opportunity for Will Myers, who

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>they haven't been able to get rid of. So Will

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Meyer's is still gonna get a chance to play here

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Myers and Um Cordero clearly the biggest beneficiaries. Yere, you

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>like Trent Grisham, where is Grishaman? Gun Risham is going

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>in the month of February four thirty four, so he's

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>basically free as well. And in the draft that I'm

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>doing right now, he went in the nineteenth round, so

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>he Trent Grishmaan goes in the nineteenth round, and I

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:40.959
<v Speaker 1>got franch to Cordero seven rounds later in a fifteen

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>team draft. It was good and turned Christmaan broke out

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>last year in the minor leagues. But the thing with

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>him was how much of that is legit? Because that

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>was far and away the best minor league season he

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>ever had. Again, last year with the Milwaukee Brewers, between

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Double A and Triple A, he had twenty six home

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>runs with twelve stolen bases and a three batting average

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>when an opius over a thousand. So Grisham has some

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>upside here, Greg, But that was really the first season

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>that he broke out like that. I believe he did

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>something different to his swing, Like he changed his swing

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 1>up mechanically, and uh that's why he was able to

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:16.879
<v Speaker 1>uh kind of make this adjustment and make this jump

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in the minors. Uh, and then the Padres go out

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and trade for him, Greg, Yeah, fair enough? All right.

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, Frank, let's get in the first

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a DP desk of the season. I pick a number.

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Frank is then going to talk about said player at

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the number. Does he like him? Does he hate him?

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Does he want nothing to do with him? Or is

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>he all in? He's gonna answer all of those questions

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>or we come back sick? Are aud? The ADP desk

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 1>is next. You're on the b f S. Are you

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>ready for the nation's first and only, free, twenty four

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>hour network dedicated to you, the betting and fantasy sports enthusiast.

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Sports Grade will provide you with a real time content,

0:34:55.960 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>statistics and gaming intelligence unlike anything you've ever seen before.

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Located both in the Harvor of New York City and

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:06.479
<v Speaker 1>inside the FanDuel Sports book at the meadow Lands Sports Crede,

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 1>he's live eighteen hours a day here to serve you

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the fanatic. This is sports Crade. Get on the grid.

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 1>Al right back here, pf FS, It's time the first

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a D D the season. Are you y excited? I'm

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:33.479
<v Speaker 1>very excited. Using the NNBC a DP in the month

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of February. Greg Susman is gonna give me a number,

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna talk about said players. Even a number

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>phrase let it come from my head. Oh yeah, You're

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>not just gonna think of a random number. So how

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna do this? Greg Susman's reaching under the

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 1>table and he gets the trustee. Let's spin the wheel,

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Rubbert Duck. Let's spend the wheel of ducks the number

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:55.919
<v Speaker 1>on each duck. Let's go and away we go. Before

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I do this, we have no idea what numbers are. Well,

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you wrote the numbers. We don't know which players. They

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>are not completely random. All right, I'm gonna start before

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I go to the ducks. I'm gonna go a number

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 1>two eight Kobe Bryant, number two forty eight, Kobe Bryant

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>NFC in the mother February. Who is number? That would

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>be Dan's by Swanson? All right, of the Atlanta Brave

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 1>talking hands be Swanson. Uh kind of broke out a

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit last year. I remember he was a popular

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire pick up. Was Dan's by Swanson? Again? Former

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>first round picks still just twenty You know what I

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say twenty years old. He turned twenty six

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>years old tomorrow actually, so happy birthday to Dan's be Swanson.

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>But he did break out a little bit last year

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 1>seventeen home runs, ten stolen bases, two fifty one batting average.

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that the offense is ever going to

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 1>get to the point that maybe people expected it too.

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I know he was more so regarded as a complete prospect,

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 1>someone who is a great defender as well, but he

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>does offer a little bit of a power to speed

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 1>ish combination. I don't know that there's a lot of

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>upside with a dance by Swanson. I love the lineup

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Atlanta Braves, but I think a fair projection, Well,

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you had seventeen on runs in a hundred and twenty

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 1>seven games, so if he could stay healthy, maybe there's

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 1>a chance we started to see him mature and get

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 1>to that twenty home run plateau greg with ten to

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve stolen bases and no not a great batting average.

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what you can expect, right, He's probably

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you between the two forty and two. Swatson

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>did have, as you mentioned, a little bit of a breakout.

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 1>There's a time in the middle of the season, You're like,

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, it's happening right then? It didn't you know?

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>He was ringing endorsement very similar speed last year. Ten

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>steels in each year caught four or five times. You know,

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 1>I think at twenties, what six years old? Now he's

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be who is And I don't know if

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that's good enough. There's a lot of guys doing

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 1>swantson Does I do like the hard percentage two and

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a half percent currently projected to bad eighth for the

0:37:56.600 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta bra Thats another issue. So are you interruted dances? Well,

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably going to be out and just looking at

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>other players in this range to kind of compare the

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>middle infield position. Not a lot of middle infielders in

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this range. Luisa Riya's is going ahead of him. I

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>don't really like Luisa Riya's either, but Austin Hayes is

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in this ring. Come just it all comes back to

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hayes. Shinto Chow is going after him as well.

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Sintu Chu undervalued every season, Greg Great, Frank tomorrow, you

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Nancy sass birthday, that is to eleven. Let go

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to number two eleven oh, number two eleven. What do

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>we have here? Hell, yeah, that would be Oh, this

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting one. Marcus Stroman the New York Mets.

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So I looked into Marcus Stroman last week. I'm happy

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 1>you did because he changed things up a little bit.

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Like I like Marcus Stroman. Yeah, I was talking about

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about Stroman with Matt Modica on Twitter

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:52.800
<v Speaker 1>because I didn't understand the disparity between Stroman and Kiko,

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:55.839
<v Speaker 1>because they don't really seem that dissimilar. They both get

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of groundballs, not enough strikeouts, and they walk

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>too many guys. I will say, Stroman is younger and

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the Swingen strike rade is like two percent higher. So

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 1>does that mean that there should be a sixty pick

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 1>difference between those guys? No, probably not in my opinion.

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>But then Matt Moodika brought up how Stroman kind of

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 1>changed his pitch mix a little bit in UH in

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.879
<v Speaker 1>September and he started getting more Swingen strikes, started getting

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 1>more strikeouts. So maybe there's perceived more upside for Stroman,

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>But I still don't think that there should be that

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 1>big of a gap between him and Dallas k I

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>think that's fine. I like Stroman in the National League.

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>He he didn't have a semblance of good luck last year.

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:35.920
<v Speaker 1>He came home baby back to New York. I like Stroman,

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>he could get traded a end midseason obviously. UM, I

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>like Marcus Stroman, I can get You know, Marcus Stroman

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 1>at two eleven who the players just going around, going

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>right around Marcus Stroman. We have lost the first second. Sorry, Greggy.

0:39:52.640 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Stroman at two fifteen, six spots earlier draft, No, Musgrove.

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking Joe Musgrove over Marcus Stroman. Just behind Marcus Stroman,

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:09.839
<v Speaker 1>we have Griffin Canning, who was a popular breakout stide

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:13.439
<v Speaker 1>of picture this year as well, Massa Hero tanaka Joey Luke,

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Casey Jose or Queedy, Haleb Smith, Dustin May. Those are

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:21.919
<v Speaker 1>like the six seven starting pictures that are going after

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Stroman. Just ahead of him, you have Joe Musgrove.

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 1>You have a closer in Ian Kennedy, correct, Mike Fultonevitch

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Atlanta Brave, someone who we are slightly interested

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in as well. And then Andrew Heeney. Great can I

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 1>interested in Andrew heiny He's going about fifteen spots ahead.

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Of Marcus Stroman's the whole round. Really wait round Stroman,

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that, that's fay. But Stroman I did

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>want to just bring this up. In the month of

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>September saw his k per nine go to the highest

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't any month, nine point to five k per nine,

0:40:57.719 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's walks per nine dropped to two point nine

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>walks for nine. So if he can get that command down,

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:05.720
<v Speaker 1>lower the walks a little bit, continue to this recent

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:08.399
<v Speaker 1>surge of strikeouts that he had. Once he came over

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to the New York Mets, they probably figured something out

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>with him a little bit, and there's probably a decent

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>amount of upside here for Marcus Strumman being drafted in

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:19.839
<v Speaker 1>the spot. All right, there you go. Hello here, we're

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>hearing that all is so, uh, make sure guys downstairs

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we hit the right button for will uh that's uh?

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Where everything's on this side? That window? Will I love window?

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Will I'm on the show? Why not? I guess it

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 1>was an it was really in or not not over there?

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 1>All right, whatever, So we'll go back at the ADPSK.

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Here we go. Let's go number one thirty eight, Frankie,

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 1>number one thirty eight in the month of February. What

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:51.439
<v Speaker 1>we're getting some good ones today. It is our boy,

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:56.839
<v Speaker 1>Max Freed, Max Free. Everyone loves Max Free. We're talking

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 1>about Free. Last week, Matt Modica has Max Freed ranked

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>is his s he twenty four the Top Stars, and

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 1>we spoke about, you know, some of the hype guys

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>this upcoming season. Frankie Montoss I think is in this mix.

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Zach Gallen is in this whole segment on

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:13.879
<v Speaker 1>this last week. Yeah, I like Max Freed a lot

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. I probably still would prefer to take Zac

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Gallant ahead of him, although there was a report over

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:21.919
<v Speaker 1>the weekend that Zack Gallan has to earn the fifth

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>starting pitcher job for the Arizona Diamondbacks. But I like

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Max Freed a lotman and I had Modica on FSC

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:30.959
<v Speaker 1>last week, Greg on Friday, and he said Max Freed

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of reminds him of Shane Bieber from last year.

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 1>So not saying that that same thing is going to

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>happen kind of get it. You can you can kind

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of see the parallels there. I kind of get it.

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I kind of get like. I like I like Freed

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 1>as a breakout this year as well. Uh, let's continue

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 1>on WEEKA, which Zack Gallan has moved ahead of Max

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Freed and ADP. You think I'm the one fueling that Greg.

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>People must be watching the BFFs up next number three

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:59.439
<v Speaker 1>fourteen we have so when we just spoke about during

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the break, Travis Shaw now with the Toronto Blue Jays,

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 1>So again, I brought up Travis Shaw last week to

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Craig Mission on a seat and he said, what's the

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>floor with this guy? Like there's a chance that he's

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 1>cut from the Blue Jays like mid season. He was

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 1>dreadful last year with the Milwaukee Brewers, and it's hard

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:20.919
<v Speaker 1>to defend that he's been really bad against left handed

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 1>pitching the past couple of years with the Brewers. But

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we also can't forget that he had two

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 1>seasons in a row where he was thirty plus home runs.

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Greg really good ballpark in Toronto, good division to hit

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 1>in with other really good ballparks. He's projected to hit

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 1>fifth in a lineup with Vladimir Guerrero Jr. With West,

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>with Laura's Gariel Jr. We're all excited about those guys.

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:44.759
<v Speaker 1>If Travis Saw is heading in the middle of this

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 1>line of Greg. I think there's some upside, especially at

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>what three or fourteen pretty good spots Again him, it's okay,

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, so for all the reasons we lay Travis

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Shaw over the last couple of years, that's why you're

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 1>buying Mackie and like figure out something went wrong maybe

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:02.719
<v Speaker 1>in his personal life this past year and for whatever reason,

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:06.320
<v Speaker 1>like we love you and I love the Travis Shaw season.

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Him and Mike Muss we were you know, both of them.

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I know you're still in on Moose. But the Travis

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Shaw thing, the value is there. He's in a good

0:44:13.840 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 1>line of it. He can just find that stroke again

0:44:15.680 --> 0:44:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and play every day. He might get platooned against left

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>hand but again, like going this late, like you're gonna

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>find a war with every hitter or pitcher that's being

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 1>drafted outside the top three hundred, right, So there's a

0:44:28.680 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 1>reason why they're going this late. And again he is

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:34.280
<v Speaker 1>projected to be a platoon player according to Roster Resource

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:38.279
<v Speaker 1>with who former Yankee great Brandon Drury. So we'll see

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 1>what happened them. But I do like Travis Shaw as

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a corner infielder in a deeper league, maybe an a

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 1>l only as your third Baseman. I think he's someone

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that can bounce back and there's gonna be RBI opportunities

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of that Blue Jay's line up. Greg

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:55.840
<v Speaker 1>right up next, Bragan number one sive, number one, sixty

0:44:56.040 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>five in NFBC a DP in the month of Februar. Right,

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:02.960
<v Speaker 1>he's so excited. I don't know it is so excited.

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 1>It's actually someone on my team, in my current track champion.

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>It is not. It might be after that injury. Right. Uh,

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it's Edwin Incarnacion with the Chicago White Sox. Very interesting.

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So here's the thing with Edwin Incarnacion, and this will

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:20.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of tell you about how I feel about Pete

0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Alonso too. I'm gonna try and intertwine these two guys.

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Pete Alonso, based on his profile, is going to strike

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 1>out a lot this year. It's probably gonna hit you

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:31.759
<v Speaker 1>around to fifty I think, similar to what he did

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 1>last year. He makes great contact when he makes contact,

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:38.319
<v Speaker 1>but he still strikes out a lot. And I'm here

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to tell you that if you want a profile of

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 1>someone who's gonna hit you to fifty in thirty five

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 1>plus home runs with a hundred plus r B, I

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:51.279
<v Speaker 1>why are you taking Pete Alonso in the third round

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of an NFBC draft when you can get Edwin and

0:45:53.480 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Carnacion in the tenth or eleventh, I understand. Pete Alonso

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is way younger, the upside is way higher, and he's

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:01.239
<v Speaker 1>coming off the season where just hit fifty three home runs,

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 1>albeit in a season with the juice ball. We don't

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 1>know what type of ball is going to be used

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 1>this season in baseball, but one thing we do know

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:11.759
<v Speaker 1>for sure is the consistency that we've gotten from Edwin

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and Carnassion for the past decade plus. So I think

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>he's another lock for thirty plus home runs and in

0:46:18.239 --> 0:46:20.799
<v Speaker 1>that White Sox lineup, Greig, you could argue is one

0:46:20.840 --> 0:46:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of the best, maybe the best line up in baseball

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:24.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, one of the most exciting. I think that

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 1>these guys have similar profiles. Give me Edwin and Cornassion

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:30.399
<v Speaker 1>in the tenth or eleventh versus Peterlanso in the third. Listen,

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with you, because Edwin Cornassion when he

0:46:33.000 --> 0:46:35.359
<v Speaker 1>is healthy, he's the same guy that he has been

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>his entire career. Playing a good White Flux lineup right

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the order, I think you have

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to like Edwin and Carnassio in that spot. I give it.

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:45.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm down at that number. Here, give it to me, Um,

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I have as my starting first baseman, which it might

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:50.839
<v Speaker 1>not be ideal. You might like him more as a corner.

0:46:50.920 --> 0:46:55.040
<v Speaker 1>But again to forty plus plus home run, Yes, this

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>would you Cornascio in that spot or the guy we

0:46:57.239 --> 0:47:00.919
<v Speaker 1>really like five rounds earlier. So that's the thing. They're

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a similar profile as well. Right, So I

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:06.440
<v Speaker 1>kept looking at Reese Hoskins, and I asked myself, why

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 1>don't I just wait a couple of rounds and take Edwin?

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think that Edwin and Carnacion is dissimilar

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:13.839
<v Speaker 1>from a Reese Hoskins. Greg, let's hit one more before

0:47:13.880 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the break? One more. It's eight DP end of the show.

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:26.239
<v Speaker 1>That's correct. That one is I'm trying to get. For

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>some reason, it's not Jose Barrios of the Minnesota Twins.

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Greig doesn't like that one. He's just like, I don't

0:47:33.480 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about Jose Brias. Why not? Greg? I

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>don't mind him, I don't. I think that he kind

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of just is who he is. When Frank says that

0:47:45.560 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not he's not a target, that's for sure. He's

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:50.160
<v Speaker 1>not a target. But he's not like an a void either.

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:54.319
<v Speaker 1>If you need an s P three, s P two

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and he Rios Brand Woodruff. But they're close in my rankings,

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 1>very close. Gon FBC two for all goes it goes

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 1>up next next to Sean and Alex down stairs for

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Frank sample. I'm Greg Susman. We'll do it all gonnamorrow,

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:16.719
<v Speaker 1>We hope. Are you ready for the nation's first and

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 1>only free, twenty four hour network dedicated to you the

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 1>betting and fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will provide you

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:27.760
<v Speaker 1>with a real time content, statistics and gaming intelligence unlike

0:48:27.840 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 1>anything you've ever seen before. Located both in the heart

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:33.879
<v Speaker 1>of New York City and inside the FanDuel Sports book

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:36.799
<v Speaker 1>at the meadow Lands, sports Crade is live eighteen hours

0:48:36.840 --> 0:48:40.759
<v Speaker 1>a day, here to serve you the fanatic. This is

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 1>sports Gride. Get off the grid.