WEBVTT - Weary Market Eager To Look Beyond Trump Chaos: Ritholtz

0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's bring in a very Riddles Spoomberg opinion,

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>host of Masters in Business and of course founder of

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Riddle's Wealth Management. Very great to have you on the

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 1>first time since we got an election results, and really

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the first time since that long long count, and we've

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>seen markets churn both on that and of course fiser news.

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>How are you supposed to read these markets? What are

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>they pricing in? That's a really good Welcome to the

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomer Markets Podcast. I'm All Sweeney, along with my co

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>host of Quiz. Every business day we bring you interviews

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>from CEOs, market rows, and Bloomberg experts, along with essential

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>marketing news. Kind the Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple podcast

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you on the podcast and on Bloomer dot com.

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats ruining both well. The tradeoff is we're likely

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to see much more fiscal stimulus, but we're also likely

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to see somewhat higher taxes and and that's quite a

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that's quite a challenge. Um right now, the assumption seems

0:00:57.800 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to be that we're going to have some form of

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>DIVI I did government and arguably that's not the worst

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>situation under normal times for the markets. I will say

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of an emergency or a crisis like

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic. You do want to see cooperation across the all.

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>You do want to see both parties try and working together.

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I have said on the show before, I am shocked

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that we have not gotten a follow through to the

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>stimulus from the first quarter heading into the election, and

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>now we've been hearing noise that the Trump administration has

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>no interest in pursuing it between now and and the

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>formal inauguration on January, So the economy could get a

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>little dicey over the next two months. Right. In fact,

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the latest just out for Marcella Wilson saying that the

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration is actually stepping back, according to people familiar

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>with the situation, and that's leaving it up to you know,

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi, which really is not are

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you consoling at all? Nancy Pelosi wanting you know, something

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>like two point four trillion dollars and Ms McConnell doesn't

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:12.679
<v Speaker 1>even want a trillion. Really, that's a huge, huge difference. Barry, Yes, yeah,

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>well a trillion dollars, go figure, it's a lot of money.

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And so it makes those two races in Georgia really

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>really significant. I think while everybody is looking in the

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.679
<v Speaker 1>wrong direction, we're all looking at this this all the

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>silly litigation trying to fight the uh the results. I

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>think the legal team of the Trump administration is now

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>over twelve um or arguably one for thirteen if you

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>count moving ten feet away to six ft away as

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 1>a victory. But other than that, you know, courts don't

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>fool around you when you're there as an officer of

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the court, as an attorney on either side, and there

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>are all sorts of rules. You can't what you could

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>get away with on Fox News, you can't get away

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>with in front of a judge and say there was fraud,

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.119
<v Speaker 1>and they ask you for evidence, and if you don't

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.679
<v Speaker 1>have any, you're putting your license in your career at risk.

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>And so the track record has been pretty weak for

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for all these broad claims of nationwide fraud. So far

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no evidence, and the companies involved, some of the

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>law firms involved, to putting themselves at risk. Yeah, I

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>mean I guess, um, I guess they're taking the business

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>for now. Barry. When you talk to you know, your

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>clients and also some of your wealthy investor friends, What

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>are they saying to you about the situation. I presume

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that they're pretty happy with everything, and except obviously for

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus still raging around the world. Well, those who

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>have sort of stepped away from the markets are are

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>not exactly happy. And we've seen a number of hedge

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>funds and others sort of take the let's wait until

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the dust clears, which is turns out not to be

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a great decision at least this time around. Generally speaking,

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the expectation is that markets are going to continue doing

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing regardless of what happens with the election.

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>We we've noticed this, you know, throughout history, whether it

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 1>was Pearl Harbor or JFK assassination or you know, go

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>go down the list of of earth shaking events, markets

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>have a tendency to wobble for a little bit and

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>then just go right back to what they were doing.

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>So personally, I'm looking forward to the noise levels coming down.

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of rooting in after that election for Okay,

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 1>now we're done with politics, can we get back to

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 1>our normal life. The I think people are somewhat shocked

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that post we really never returned to normal. It it

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it was like a continuous campaign for twenty four years.

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>For four years, right, I would love to just put

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>politics on the back burner and focus a little it

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>on other things in life. It would be nice to

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>see my Twitter feed just sort of calm down a bit. Yeah,

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>those notifications were very definitely, very grueling, and we won't

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>have that from the Biden team, that's for sure. So

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>very you know, now that the dust is settling a

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit, we still have everything else out there, right,

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.919
<v Speaker 1>lack of stimulus, coronavirus just going exponential in the United

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>States and across the world, and markets still keep, you know,

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>pumping away. I mean, what's going to burst the bubble

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in this market? I'm not suggesting it's it's a bubble

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>in the traditional sense, but there's very definitely some exuberance

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>in there, isn't there. You know, things that are unsustainable

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>eventually run out of steam, eventually stopped running. It's arguable

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that this market is uh is getting tired. There. There

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>are some signs that the stock market has been pricey,

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>but just look around at some of the earnings that

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>have had to come out. We we may end up

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>being surprised by how quickly the profit side of this recovers,

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and to me, that's what that's what is going to

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>drive this That there are two factors that we look at.

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>One is multiple expansion, and that's certainly responsible for a

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>big part of the games people wanting to pay more

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and more to own the same stock. But increasing profits

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is something we should not underestimate. And let me just

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>remind everybody, over the course of the next year, all

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>these companies are going to have really really easy comparables.

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Profits were way low and the market was looking past them.

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>And so when we're in Q two of of or

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Q three, we're looking back at an environment where profits

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>were either tiny or non existent. And so maybe that's

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 1>part of what the market is looking at and seeing

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>over the next four quarters. But comps can doors, can

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>they barry? I mean sure, there's a baseline of economic

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>activity that the market needs in order to be you know,

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>happy with particular stalks. Yeah, um, no doubt about it.

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>And the I would you know, we all tend to

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>create these narratives after the fact. I'm wondering if some

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of the market enthusiasm is the thought that, hey, the

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>new White House is gonna you know, nobody wants to

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>do the difficult decisions up front, the painful decisions, so

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that you can thrive in the future. I think the

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration is going to do all of the difficult

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen related things, a national mask mandate, a temporary

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>lockdown um, some form of a CARES Act, to some

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>form of a stimulus, maybe even invoking the Defense Authorization

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Act to get more PPE where it has to go.

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>And so that had we done that a year ago,

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the economy would be much better off. Had we done

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that in the beginning of we would probably not be

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>dealing with as much of a spike as we're seeing.

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have to get through the next three

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>or four months. It's not going to be easy, but

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the expectation is on the other side, will all be

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>closer to getting back to normal under this administration, then

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the sort of lais ay fair, don't worry about the

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus will take care of itself. Approach of the current administration.

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>We're waiting FED Chair J Powell, ECB President Christine Lagarde,

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and BOE Governor Andrew Bailey to address the CBS Annual

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Forum that they'll be discussing central banks in a shifting world.

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>While we wait for the start of that, we can

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>ask Barry Riddles about central banks in a shifting world.

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Barry Riddles, of course, Master's in Business podcast host, among

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>other things. Barry, you know, the world shifted twelve years

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>ago when we have the financial crisis and central banks

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>got on board, and they sort of feel like they

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>stretched that elastic band, right. Where can they go to

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 1>from here? Well, I think if we learned anything from

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the first core or of it's it's time to pass

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the baton to the fiscal side of things, not the

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>monetary side of things. When when you're at the zero

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>bound um, what do we somewhere something like in of

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>um of sovereign bonds are now yielding negative rates. I

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>mean that is a quite quite a statistic, and there

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>are all sorts of problems with negative rates or potential problems.

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much more we can ask of

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>our central banks. Um. I don't want to say they're

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>out of AMMO, but you're at a certain point you're

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>you're just asking. You're using the wrong tool for the job.

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think we've been asking too much of our

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of our central bankers around the world. Yeah, I mean

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I was speaking with distress to investor Whoose Richards yesterday,

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, he talked about after month of the

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis and how it took a couple of years

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to get four trillion dollars you know, through the federals

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>are system and into the economy. It happened in five

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>weeks after the pandemic, after the FED went to action

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>this time around. I mean, that's some crazy acceleration right there. Berry, Well,

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind, it was it was the one to

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:17.959
<v Speaker 1>punch the combination of monetary policy and a three trillion

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar fiscal stimulus. You know, what the FED does has

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to work its way through a series of mechanisms typically

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 1>associated with credit and borrowing, and that doesn't happen instantly,

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>especially in the midst of a pandemic. If you recall,

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>lots and lots of small businesses and and households were

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>complaining that in the middle of the pandemic, the credit

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>market had tightened up so much and banks really weren't

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>lending so so that really hamstrings the Fed's ability to

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>affect a lot of the local economies. On the other hand,

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal stimulus, the direct lending to small business companies,

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that promised not to uh layoff staff. Um uh, that

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that has an immediate impact, so too, uh, it does

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the proposal to use federal funds to steer money to

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>states and municipalities that, unlike the federal government, are unable

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:26.239
<v Speaker 1>to deficit spend and so were there in a genuine

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>danger of running out of money before the year ends.

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>And that includes things like police and fire and and

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>ambulance and teachers and hospitals. They're in a bad way.

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>And the hope was that the new fiscal stimulus would

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>steer a trillion dollars or so to local states and cities.

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Um Uh. There was some back and forth that this

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 1>was a blue state phenomena, and therefore the Trump administration

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>was very much against it. But when you look at

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>where the pandemic is now running amuck, it's as many

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>red states, if not more, than blue states. And I

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised if as this gets worse and worse,

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the tone amongst whoever is running the Senate starts to

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>soften because some of the projections are pretty horrific. Over

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the next three or four months, Yeah, for sure, Barry,

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>you're about to go to the panel. But who is

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>your guest for Master's in Business next Oh, this week

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Penny Pennington one of the highest ranking women in finance.

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>She's they call it managing partner, but she's really the

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:37.319
<v Speaker 1>CEO of ed Jones. With Edward Jones, they manage one

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>point three trillion dollars. Yes, indeed, Barry, how do you

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>always get to my guests before I do? I'll be

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>tuning in. Thanks for that, Barry. You at alls time

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to bring in Ty Lopez now executive chairman of retail

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>e commerce Ventures and Tight deals with basically distressed retailed brands.

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>So Ty, what what exactly do you do and and

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of how much choice do you have these days? Hey,

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me on. Yeah, there's a lot of

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 1>choice choices growing here. You know, we've got to interesting

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>environment with COVID. We started buying before covid. We bought

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Dress Barn last year in November nineteen, so the opportunity

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>has been there, but it's certainly there's more choice and

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>more attractive valuations that we can purchase at. You now

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>tell us exactly what you're buying, because so some of

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the brands that you bought our Dress Barn as you said,

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>also U Pure One Models, also Linens and things. So

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>these were bankruptcies that we sort of watched happen in

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>front of our very eyes. Did you just buy the names,

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>did you buy the assets, did you buy the intellectual property?

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 1>And how much for? Yeah? So each deal has been different.

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Some of the brands were off market, like Franklin Men

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>and Linens and things. Those weren't bankruptcies when we bought them.

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>They have been, you know, in the past. Franklin Mint

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>was never bankrupt, so everyone was different. Pure One we

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>bought it an auction in July for thirty one million.

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>We bought the I P, the intellectual property. I mean

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty much, you get the whole brand and you get

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the all that that includes. But we've chosen, because we're

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>e commerce specialists, to let the stores for the most

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>part closed. The stores are already closing. We still have

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the option to open back brick and mortar, but obviously

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>we want to see how COVID shakes out before we start,

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, opening a whole bunch of stores. These stores

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>are kind of worked out. These brands in trouble not

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>just because of COVID, but because they signed leases assuming

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of people were would visit brick and mortar,

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>but every day Amazon and e cooms take a stronger

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>place exactly, So what is your plan? Why even but

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean thirty one million dollars doesn't sound like a

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>lot for pure one, let's put it that way. But

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>why even spend that if you know the business? It

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't work anymore. Yeah, So it takes Pier one

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>or dress Bar, and these brands are beloved. Um if

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you watch the social media, you know, and when Pierre

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>one was going out, people were sad and people have

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>been shopping there. It's a sixty year old brand. So

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>we don't actually think that the brands are broken. We

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>think that the trust uh is there as strong as

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>ever with the brand. People have a white pier One

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's hard if you try to you know, a

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of entrepreneurs try to build businesses from scratch. I've

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>done that before. My business partner and I have done

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that before. But it takes a long time to build

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>um what we call branded awareness. So if you look

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:45.359
<v Speaker 1>at Pier one has over branded awareness out of ten Americans.

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>If you say do you know pier One, nine say yes.

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's really hard to do that. If you start

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a brand from scratch, it's almost impossible. I mean Google

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>did it obviously, But for the most part, I think

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that piggybacking off the trust that's already there and bringing

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the brands into the new e commerce world is a

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>very viable and it's going very well with dress More

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and in the brands we've been doing so far. Are

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you trying to put everything you buy in in one

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>retail marketplace or what will be the future for for

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>these brands? Me my business part, we're just talking about that. Certainly,

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>there's an option to create, you know, and you have

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>all the brands there right now. Each brand has its

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>own website, but we are switching more to a marketplace model,

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>which was Amazon Jeff Bezos kind of thesis. So, for example,

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>on Pier one, we're not only selling Pier one branded products.

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>If you look at Wayfair, which has gone from a

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>nine billion valuation earlier this year to they allow other people,

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>any vendor to sell. So we're kind of hybridizing the

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>old Pier One with the newer business model like Amazon

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>and Wayfair. Yeah, that's fascinating. Now, will you continue to

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of buy willy nilly sort of? So you know, clothes, furniture, sports,

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Linen's or will you try to specialize in one area.

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean that, no, No, it's there's a little

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>method to our madness. But I think we like the

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>thought of going into different verticals, different industries. So we've

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>done that on purpose. So for example, instead of buying

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>five clothing brands, we'd like to buy one strong one

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and then buy one home goods, and then we bought

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>models as Sportings and Franklin men Is collectibles, and so

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we like, we like branching out. You know, there's last

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I counted, there's about thirteen trilli thirteen industries that do that.

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 1>I have over a trillion of revenue. We'd like to

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>be an all thirteen of those. My kind of mentor

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that I've never met is Warren Buffett In. I like

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>his approach to building a real diversified holding company. We're

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>holding company, We're not a fund, so we actually own

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the assets, you know, so we like

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the diversity. So ty we're out of time, But what

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>what will be next? I mean, where do you go

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 1>to look for these auctions? How do they pop up

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>for you? We're looking more at off market deals. The

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>auction space is getting more crowded and more competitive. We

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>have a new acquisition that I'll be able to announce

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in a week. So it's a bigger it's the biggest

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>brand we've ever bought. And oh my gosh, we have

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to do a competition for our listeners to write in

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and whoever gets it right gets chanced to Alright, well

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it's out there now you know how to reach us. Ty,

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining Ti Lopez, Executive Chairman of Retail e

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Commerce Venture. Is a fascinating conversation and it is time

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to bring in Sarah Pons, like now class a reporter

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>here at Bloomberg. So we were looking at equities with

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Dave Wilson earlier, Sarah. What we didn't really talk about

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is the Domar Index, for example, which is been very,

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>very volatile. We're down below again. Some of this of

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 1>course on euro and Sterling, because that's they're the two

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest components for the d X Y. But what else

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is going on? There was some discussion that we would

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>see the safe haven trade of the dollar return, but

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>like you said, we have seen fluctuations lately, volatility. If

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I look at the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index for example,

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>higher on Monday, lower on Tuesday, higher yesterday, and today

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we are just about flat. It's really difficult to disseminate

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>any direct trend here. It is notable, though, to point

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>out the fact that if you zoom out and you

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>look at a more historical perspective, we're still hovering just

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>around this lowest level since eighteen so still dealing with

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>a depressed dollar, not seeing too much reaction or change

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that would change the trend any which way. But also

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>very notable today is just the bond market. Yes, tenure

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>treasury yield still above ninety basis points. I look at

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>my screen right now point three percent. However, that is

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>down from above ninety seven basis points just yesterday and

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this morning as well earlier overnight. So we are seeing

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>this change take hold, albeit a relatively small one, but

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>still down six basis points or so on the day

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>this after that cp I print came in lighter than expected.

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Some economists are now starting to wonder if it's true that, yes,

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>we had seen inflation start to pick up after those

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 1>immediate initial lockdowns. Well, are we going to get to

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a point now where it's going to start fading? We

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>might see the trend even trend downwards if we start

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to see worries restrictions over rising COVID nineteen case take

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>hold as well, and at that point we have restrictions

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>coming through from governments. Being here in New York City,

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we know what we are about to phase starting tomorrow

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>with relatively light restrictions, but we don't know what's going

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to be coming down the pipeline. At the same time,

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to wonder if people are going to self

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>govern and self restricts, self police, get worried themselves and

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>start pulling back on economic activity, and then the impact

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that has inflation and the expectations for the reflation trade

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>going forwards. I mean, that's what the FED would say,

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>right The FED doesn't see any inflation anywhere in the future,

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not. We know the FED would like to be

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>on hold for the next couple of years. They have

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>baked it into their forecast. They don't expect inflation to

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 1>get above two percent. Even if inflation does get above

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>two percent, we know that they have now changed their

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>outlook their ways of governing to fate the flexible average

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>inflation targeting methods, so they're likely not to increase interest

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 1>rates even if we are just above two percent for

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>some time now, we have not seen how this is

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>going to work. Actually, in practice, we're not entirely sure,

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to have to pay attention to the

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Fed's words going forwards. But the feds promise and wall

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Streets take of the Fed's promise is that we are

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to see interest rates rise for some time.

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>So that begs the question, even if we are seeing

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>nominal rates rise, how high can nominal rates go if

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 1>we know that the FED is not going to step

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>off the old curve. Oil today is a big story.

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing the barrel of w t iBOT two dollars

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>of borrow, which you know, in the face of it

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sound like much, but it's been a long time

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 1>since we've seen forty two dollars plus this because OPEC

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>is sort of trying to face reality as opposed to

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>what it would like the world look like. Right, it's

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>all reality, all relative when you when you talk about

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>oil prices, we were stuck around forty dollars for so

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>long when it comes to W t I crude oil.

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>The fact that we are now nearing it on forty

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>two dollars a barrel. Well, it seems like maybe you're

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>getting a little bit of a breakout. This is the

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>highest in September. Back then prices were forty two seventy

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>six a barrel, So we do see prices trending higher.

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>It does help with OPEC on the supply side of

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the equation. You also just have to factor in the

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>positive news that we got from Fiser on the vaccine front.

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 1>That certainly helps oil prices as well, because if you

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>think about if we do get a vaccine sooner rather

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>than later, what is that going to help. What is

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that going to inspire. Well, maybe it will reintroduce airline travel,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>will reintroduce cruise line travel. People maybe getting in their

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>cars more often. Well, that means we need more gasoline,

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we need more oil. So therefore we could see oil

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.919
<v Speaker 1>prices rise off of the ack of not just supply

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>but also the demand picture too. That also just filtering

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>into energy prices pretty unbelievable. If you look through the

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>closes yesterday, the SMP five hundred energy sector the best

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>performing sector up. That's on track for the best week

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>on record ever for the energy sector. Interestingly, gold which

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>did gain when we were waiting for the five years old,

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is way down now at below an eighteen hundred and

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>eighty dollars and ounce right there. Right. So I was

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>speaking with a strategist over at Manned Solutions yesterday who

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>works in their multi asset solutions group, and I was

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 1>asking him about gold because it has been a little

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>bit wonky lately, considering the fact that earlier in the

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>year the story was that gold was acting as a

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 1>hedge against inflation. Well, what happened earlier this week? It

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>was that we got the positive vaccine news, the reflation

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 1>trade took hold, We saw yields rise, we saw inflation

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>expectations rise, yet gold moved lower, So it wasn't necessarily

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 1>acting as that inflation hedge. It was acting as the opposite.

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And he said, gold has an interesting one, and it's

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>been really difficult when you look at cross asset correlations

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>this year, gold has been correlated to both bonds and

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 1>stocks in different ways and at different times. So really

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>nailing down the gold trade, uh is a hard one

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>over the short term because it still acts as a

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>short term hedge against inflation, but also it's a safe

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 1>haven asset, so those are two different stories. The inflation

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>bed is a positive one, one of growth, one of reflation,

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Whereas if you are looking for a safe haven and gold,

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>that's not necessarily the same story. So interesting takes on

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.679
<v Speaker 1>gold there and investors are saying it's it's kind of

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>been a difficult one to play as of light real quick.

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 1>What will you be working on today? Sarah working on today?

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm actually working on a story about retail investors.

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>It will be for the weekend, so keep an eye

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>on it. Basically, the moral of the story is have

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>retail investor has been lucky this year? Or are they skillful? Wow?

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Are a great story account? Wait to read your conclusions

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>and the conclusions of those who speak to that is

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Ponza, chief costs asset reporter here at Bloomberg, and

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 1>she's chief cause as a reporter in the studio anyway,

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 1>and she'll be acted us later on what are you

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do with these markets? One day of one

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>day down, vaccine news sending markets higher, and then market

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of getting a dose of reality the next day.

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Hans Olsen is chief investment officer for Fiduciary Trust in

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Boston and joins US now with hopefully some advice. Hans

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.439
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining. What are we supposed to make of

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>these markets and whether they're correctly priced and what exactly

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is priced in Yeah, yeah, good morning, Vanni. I think

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>we're what we're seeing is sort of the the inevitable

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>churn after a very nice move over the last month,

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:49.199
<v Speaker 1>and I think you have to step back in and

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>first look at the path of the economy, and then

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>from there then you can adjust your portfolio accordingly. From

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that perspective, our base case continue used to be that

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see a W shaped type of recovery.

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So we've seen the first V and that was pretty pronounced,

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and we are in the beginning stages of I think

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>what the second V. And the question is whether it

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>will be severe or not. I don't tend to think so,

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>but it was certainly is going to be impacted by

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the winter wave of COVID infections and then of course

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 1>that next round of stimulus that we've all been waiting for.

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and once we start to see that, I

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>think markets can stage a more convincing rally. From here,

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>without a doubt, markets appear to be pricing a recovery.

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing it in the broadening and the deepening of stocks.

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing it in the shape of the yield curve

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and indeed even in the in the price action or

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the yield of the yield on the ten year treasury. UM.

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>All are very encouraging signs, UM. But it's still a

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>bit early. How can you have a recovery with the

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>six point unemployment rate? Well, you know, that's that's the thing, right,

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's where it's coming down from, and we

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>would hopefully continue to see unemployment fall. The numbers that

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we had this morning are encouraging, UM. But we're not

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>there yet, and you know, by all accounts, we're probably

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 1>another year away from um, you know, getting to where

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we would really like to be in all of this.

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>And again it's all going to be depended upon do

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we get a vaccine, is it distributed at scale and

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>its effectiveness? Um so. And of course the companion to

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that is, do we get another round of stimulus to

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>help the economy along until we get to resolution of

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic? Does that come up payback time haunts for

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>all the stimulus? Well, that's the problem, right. So we

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>have spent in an enormous amount of money in the

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 1>service of supporting the economy during the pandemic. The budget

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>deficits has exploded. We're going to have to finance uh,

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between another what two to three trillion dollars this year,

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>depending upon what the stimulus looks like supporting. Remember, even

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>before this happened, Vonnie, the pandemic broke out, we were

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>running a trillion dollar deficit, which is pretty unusual at

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that point in the at the point that we were

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>in the economic cycle, when things were really quite good. Um.

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So that does have to get financed, and the price

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>at which that gets financed remains an open question. How

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>much the Fed is going to have to buy versus

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the price at which um, you know, the private investor

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>will buy treasury debt will will have to be seen

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>at this point. So, Hans, you know, if you have

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>been a retail investor and you decided you didn't know

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>what was going on, so we're just going to sort

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of leave everything where it was, you probably wouldn't have

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>done too badly, right, But is that continuing to be

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the advice from from somebody like you? Well, I think

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the notion of not trying to trade an

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>election is a very good notion. Indeed, and we saw

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that the exactly the case in this election, given all

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the sturm and drawing around uh, the election and the

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>run up to it. Um, you know, from some clients

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I've heard I heard from you know, one would have

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>thought that it was the end of the world, and

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>clearly it wasn't. Right. Everything is going to work out fine.

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the larger question is is the market ready

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to rotate um from the covid led stocks of the

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>last nine months or so into a broader market participation.

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.479
<v Speaker 1>And I think the answer there is yes, We're starting

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to see efforts at that. It's never linear, right, It

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>never happens overnight. It takes time for that that that

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that sort of rotation wave to form. But I think

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that's going to play out over the next four to

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>six months that we should start to see some of

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the out of favorite names start to participate, and indeed

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>we might even see some of the you know, the

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>terrible laggards in the international markets finally begin to perk up.

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'm cautiously optimistic on that is still the way

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:54.959
<v Speaker 1>to go. Yeah, that's that's going to be the sixty

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>four million dollar question, right, Um, I think it is

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of evolving. Yes for for the most part, but I

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>think in order to maintain um uh, you're spending power,

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have to spend total return, which is

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>going to force fawnie, I think higher portfolio turnover than

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it has in the past, which is which is going

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a bit of a mindset on the part

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of some investors. So yes for now, but um with

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the qualifications that you're going to have to realize some

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of your capital appreciation in order to maintain your spending power.

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you are going to stay sixty forty, be

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more active than you might normally be exactly,

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and with the way you get that forty and how

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you invest that forty is going to be very different

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>than the way you've done in the past. So you know,

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it's mortgages, credit, different types of credit and the like.

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>It can no longer be simply sovereign debt or munies. Finally, Hans,

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and briefly, are you invested or would you? I mean

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>your finishing we trust, So you're invested everywhere, I guess,

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>But how much outside the US would you be looking? Yeah, well,

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>we've been underweight the US of our equity expos're we're

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>probably about thirty of that right now outside the US.

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I would love an opportunity to to bring some of

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that money abroad again, um, but not quite yet. That

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating. That is a good chunk of the portfolio. Hans.

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to get you back soon to talk about

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>what exactly is in their Hans Olsen is chief investment

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>officer for Fiduciary Trust in Boston, and we appreciate his

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>time today. Some sage advice there, and of course everybody

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>doing their best to try to figure out what is

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly going on in the world and how long it's

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>going to continue on for Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn.

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney.

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.