WEBVTT - Generous Portion: FTC, CMG, ETF

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to The Money Stuff podcast, your weekly

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 2>podcast where we talk about stuff related to money. I'm

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:20.799
<v Speaker 2>Matt Levie and I are at the Money Stuff column for.

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberger Painton, and I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>News and an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 2>What are we talking about today?

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Arbageddon? I hope I said that right, and then.

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 2>We're currently spelled it because it's not a real word.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to correct this.

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>That's good. There's an upside there. We're going to talk

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>about securities fraud in the burrito market, and then we're

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about leverage. Warren Buffett. Let's see how

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:56.639
<v Speaker 1>it goes. I didn't look at anything, so I don't

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>know if I did that. I don't know if I

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>did that in the right order, but I did it.

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 2>In order of your own interest, which is interest. Yeah,

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>that's what we need, all right.

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I am intoxicated with power anyway. Merger arb arbageddon, Arbageddon.

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 2>I think arbageddon is a term that has applied to

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 2>like something that happened in my twenty fourteen It doesn't matter,

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, does the.

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Term arbageddon apply here. No, yeah, So why are we

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>saying it's an arbageddon?

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, we're not. So what happened is that there

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 2>have been over the years bad things that happened to

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 2>merger arb firms, most recently when the handbag deal blew up,

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 2>which is what is it a tapestry in Capri or

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 2>the companies that it's like a very narrow market segment

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 2>definition which is like expensive but not very expensive handbags as.

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Far as I can affordable luxury.

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Afordable luxury, something like that. And so those companies dominate

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 2>the market for affordable luxury. And so they announced the

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 2>merger merger arbit treasure is loaded up on Capri stock,

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 2>I think, and then the Federal Trade Commissions sued to

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 2>block the deal. A judge agreed at the FT and

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 2>blocked the deal. Capri's stock fell like forty nine percent,

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 2>and some merger ARBs they lost a lot of money. Yeah,

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and more generally, like in the last few years, the

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 2>FTC has been gung ho on sewing to block deals.

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it has succeeded, and the result of that is

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 2>bad news for merger arms, and some number of them

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 2>have lost their jobs. According to a Wall Street Journal

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 2>article that was published earlier this week.

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was messy. The headline of the Wall Street

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Journal article is that basically arbageddon potentially is over.

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the Arbageddon's have occurred, but like the assumption is

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 2>that Donald Trump will and least animal spirits in the

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 2>merger market.

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>That is the region consensus right now. I don't know

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>how many we're so back memes that you've seen over

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the past week, but that is most of my social

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>media right now.

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 2>M and A Bankers.

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, me. I didn't know that I followed so many

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>financial meme accounts, but apparently I do. And in light

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of that, it was interesting to see the tapestry and

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>could pre deal fall apart. We're recording this on Thursday,

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and the headline crossed this morning that they're walking away

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>from the deal. And the reason that the companies gave

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>was that it's in the best interest of both companies

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>as the required closing condition of receiving necessary US regulatory

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.119
<v Speaker 1>approvals was unlikely to be met by the outside date

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of February tenth. By February tenth, of course, there will

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.519
<v Speaker 1>be a new administration, at least in the White House.

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's cutting Yeah, it's a little close. Yeah, once

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 2>you have a judge ruling that your deal is an

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 2>antitost violation, it's like hard to walk that back. It's

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 2>not completely impossible, but it's hard and it's harder to do.

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 2>And you know, three weeks after, you know, the new

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 2>administration is inaugurated. So there, and it's a lot of

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 2>uncertainty between now and then. Yeah.

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I just I liked this story because it

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit of reality that there are going

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to be some lost causes when it comes to the

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>deal landscape right now. After the election last week, you

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>saw so many potential deal stocks just shoot up. I'm

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about like Capital One and Discovery in particular, and

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not commenting on those odds, but not all of

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>those deals are going to go through. Some of them

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>will die on the vine before things actually change, right, There's.

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Like so much of a like immediate psychological shift in

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 2>how people see the new administration, like even before it's

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 2>in place, and my general sense is that the wheels

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 2>grind kind of slowly and it is hard to reverse course. Now,

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 2>this is clearly an administration that is not you know,

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 2>a respector of norms and procedures, and so the wheels

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 2>will grind a little faster than they usually do. But right, like,

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 2>once you have a court decision, it's pretty tough. The

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 2>other thing that I think is weird is like everyone

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of assumes that this will be a far more

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 2>merger friendly administration, and the backing of all these business

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 2>people and bankers suggest that there's some reason to assume that.

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 2>But like Jennie Vance has praised Lena co On, the

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 2>head of the FTC, who's been very relatant about blocking

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 2>big mergers, it's not obvious that a sort of heterodox

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 2>populist Republican administration will actually be that much more pro merger,

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 2>or that they'll be pro merger in all the ways

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 2>that people want them to be. Yeah, but you know

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 2>that is everyone's assumption, so we are.

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a good point. I do wonder, and I

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want to talk about politics, but I do wonder.

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 1>You know how much of us, say jd Vance, is

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>going to happen.

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, none, none, But but but I'm not you know,

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure anyone.

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like a, yeah, there's going to be.

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.119
<v Speaker 2>Some random television personalities, but in charge of the FTC,

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 2>and who knows what that person thinks, right, Like, who knows? Oh,

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Katie is pointing to herself. Kat Katie as a television personality,

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 2>should be put in charge of the FTC. That's a

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 2>that's a good uh.

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>It would be an honor to serve my country. Specific

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to Tapestry and Capri. Though you point out that it's

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>a quick turnaround. Two weeks is not a lot of time.

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>But also I wonder, Yeah, one thing that could happen

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 2>is that, like a deal gets dropped and it goes away,

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 2>and then like six months they start negotiating again. It

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 2>circumstances the change. You have an argument that I was

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 2>not anti coompetitive now and like you have much friendlier

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 2>de FTC and you know it all works out, But

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 2>that's pretty risky for you know, a jilted merger target.

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>At that point, it does seem like Tapestry shareholders do

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>not want this deal to happen.

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 2>There sure, I mean, like if both sides wanted this

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 2>deal to happen, like you say, well, appeal and you

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 2>know there's a deadline at February time, that doesn't matter.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 2>You can you can mutually get together and wave the deadline.

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 2>But if you don't want to mutually get together, then

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 2>it deals off, you know.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>But also, this isn't eighteen month saga, like this deal

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>has been going on for a long time. Things have

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>been pretty good at Tapestry. Their earnings have been solid.

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>They recently raised guidance for the year. Apparently the Coach

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>brand is popping off, and it seems like things have

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of been deteriorating at Capri during that time. So

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's a sigh of relief here.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, definitely. It is often the case that when

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 2>a deal is blocked and people are like, ah, it

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 2>was blocked. Often what that means is that one side

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 2>is kind of relieved it was blocked, right, like circumstances

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 2>of changing, you know, like or want to do the deal,

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 2>and you can't just back out of the deal. But

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 2>if there's some regulatory impediment, you can do things like

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 2>not agreed to extend the deadline.

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And then there you are, Yeah, we gave it the

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>good college trial. It's not going to work out, you guys,

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have.

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 2>An obligation to give it a words or like use

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, all reasonable best efforts. But then once you

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 2>do that, you're done. Yeah, I do think that. Like

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 2>there's just the more general point of like the you know,

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 2>the merger ARB business, which has been difficult but lucrative

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 2>in the last few years. Right, So like merger IR right,

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 2>think of as like being sort of almost like market

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 2>making business, where like you're doing a lot of trades.

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Each trade is like kind of a small spread you

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 2>make the spread and expectation and every soft and you

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 2>like absolutely run over on a deal like tap a

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 2>stry Capri, where like you lose you know, fifty percent

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 2>of your investment or whatever. In this scenario where like

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.239
<v Speaker 2>Lena Khan is running the FTC and the FTC sues

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 2>to block a lot of deals that then they lose

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 2>in court. Like that's a really fun environment for merger

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 2>ARB because you can do things like buy Target stock

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 2>after the FTC sues and like the stock has gone down,

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 2>and then the FDC loses and the stock goes up

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 2>and you make a lot of money. Right, it's anything

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 2>else Like if you think of like merger ARB as

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 2>a market making business, then market makers make more money

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 2>in volatile periods, right, And so if you have a

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 2>volatile period where some mergers don't go through, some mergers

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 2>do go through. Some mergers get sued and they go down,

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 2>and then like they go through and they go up.

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 2>You can make a lot of money in this like

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of liquidity provision business where you buy stocks when

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the merger's announced and sort of sell them into the

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 2>merger when the merger closes. So it's a good lucrative business,

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 2>but it's also a business where you can get blown up, right,

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 2>and if you just make a couple of the wrong bets,

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 2>you get blown up and you're you're out of the business.

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Whereas the assumption is that in a TRUBI administration, you

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:55.599
<v Speaker 2>know there'll be a lot of mergers, so you'll have

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of volume. You know, if you think of

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 2>it as a market making business, you'll have a lot

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 2>of deals to do and they'll all go through, so

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 2>you won't really have a lot of risk and you

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 2>won't get blown up. The flip side of that, it

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 2>spreads will compress and you'll just make a sort of

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 2>more modest profit and not make tons of money and

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 2>h deal, but like you'll have an easier life.

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>What a pleasant and sedate landscape that sounds like I

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the high octane.

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that almost everything about financial markets and

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 2>the world will be like less sedate under a Trump administration.

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 2>But like you know, mahade your arb, it'll be like yeah,

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 2>they all they all go, they all close, yeah or

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 2>not or not right or there will be you know,

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.839
<v Speaker 2>a confounding expectations and they'll suit a block every deal.

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the good stuff. What's that burritos and

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.359
<v Speaker 1>how little meat is in Chipotle burritos?

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 2>The lost suit that we're going to talk about also

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 2>points out that some of these burritos skimp on the

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 2>rice and beans.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Unbelievable.

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 2>It's not just the expense of it's it's everything.

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been to a Chipotle in like fifteen.

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Years when I worked at deal Breaker, my job before this,

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 2>we were upstairs from a Chipotle, and there was a

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 2>period right at Chipotle like three times a week for

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 2>months on end, and probably never since then. I don't

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 2>like a burrito with like a like a regular burrito.

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, regular guy, I.

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Think I got. I don't even remember what I what

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 2>meat I had of my.

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Probably was it a true burrito, not a burrito bowl.

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I've ever eaten neverat a.

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Ball Wow, we're different people.

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I found it off putting. It's like

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 2>a very wrong salad.

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's like a salad but more fun, with less

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>carbs than a burrito, but still a lot of more

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>carbs than a salad because there's rice.

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 2>The tortilla is so thin.

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>How many who would shock you?

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Anyway? I've never had a burrito bo but I've had

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of or at least dozens of Chipotle burritos. I'm

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 2>pretty good.

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>What were the portion sizes?

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Like, I don't remember, but this is more than a

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 2>decade ago, and so I think they were ample. I

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 2>think this was.

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Before chip Well, apparently things have deteriorated since then. If

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 1>you spend any time on social media, this has been

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a long running issue. By long running issue, I mean

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at least a couple of months.

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's been like a thing this year.

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Maybe maybe last year too, but I think it was

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 2>like really sort of took off and like Spring Suwheer

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty four. Like people on social media, I'm

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 2>not on the YouTube channels where people are.

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Like YouTube like wherever TikTok, Yeah, wherever people are going

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to like post videos about their disappointment with their burritos.

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not on those channels, no, but they exist and

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 2>they're hugely influential, and I guess some people have posted

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 2>serious complaints about the size of Chipotle burrito balls, to

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 2>the point that Wells Fargo equity research analysts went and

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 2>did a study where I remember this, They ordered seventy

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 2>five quote like for like burrito bowls across eight locations

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.319
<v Speaker 2>of Chipotle in New York City and found the smallest

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 2>bawl was thirteen point eight ounces and the largest was

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty six point eight ounces.

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>This had to be interns, I don't know, sending them

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>out to various locations and having them.

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 2>Pick up I hear you, but like I mean sounds.

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Like a summer project or something.

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's probably right, but didn't they fun? But also

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 2>like I don't know, like like what a fun that

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 2>you're an equity researchology, Like I'm going to get out

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 2>of the building and order seventy five burrito balls like

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 2>that's funny. I don't know. I don't know.

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Wells Fargo stock should fall because this is how their

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>analysts are spending their time.

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 2>But what I was supposed to spend their times.

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>A groundbreaking conclusion.

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Did they find the biggest bowl is the twice as

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 2>big as the smallest ball.

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty bad.

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty bad. Yeah, and it prompted endless, endless soul

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 2>searching from Chipotle. Yeah, the CEO and the July Ironers

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 2>call said, before I give an update on our five

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 2>key strategies, I want to take a minute to address

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 2>the portion concerns that have been brought up in social media. First,

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 2>there was never a directive to provide less to our customers.

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Generous portion is a core brand equity of Chipotle.

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I know what that means.

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 2>It always has been and always will be. With that said,

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 2>getting the feedback caused us to relook at our execution

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 2>across our entire system, with the intention to always serve

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 2>our guests delicious, fresh custom burritos and bowls with generous portions.

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Was this still Brian Nicol Yeah. Yeah. By the way,

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>if they make the Starbucks drinks smaller, I am going

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to riot sure.

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Well you'll see. Yeah, we're getting away from the point,

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 2>which is that. Okay, I feel I have complained about

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 2>various small consumer indignities on the internet forever, but like

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 2>there's this incredible modern technology, the securities road lawsuit that

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 2>allows you to turn this into a multi billion dollar lossuit. Right,

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 2>You're like, oh, the portions of my burrito are too small.

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 2>What can you do a you're gonna sue because you're

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 2>burritos too small. You don't have a class action. We

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 2>get everyone else's butos too small. It's crazy, right, But Like,

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 2>what happens here is that these reports come out and

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 2>the stock goes down a little bit. Chipotle actually announces earnings,

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 2>like most recently, like their earnings for Q three, which

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 2>i'd like just a couple of weeks ago, and their

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 2>earnings have like an increase in cost of good sold

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 2>because they're putting more meat in the burritos. They're like, like,

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>we did a throw audit of our portions and we

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 2>found that some stores were not putting enough in and

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 2>so we're putting more in everything. That's not exactly what

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 2>they said, but like they're putting more in everything. Yeah,

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 2>And so the stock goes down. Why is this not

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 2>go down? Well, it's earnings released. There's a number of

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 2>reasons that stock could go down, and one of them,

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, might be that the future cost of good

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 2>sold is higher. And another one might be that you

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 2>worry that you've lost some brand value by you know, yeah,

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 2>getting yelled at for skimping on portions. All we know

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 2>is the stock goes down, right, and the stock goes

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 2>down by like a single digit number of percentage points.

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 2>That translates into billions of dollars of losses, right, And

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 2>so if your securities are you just like slapped that

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 2>in a lawsuit, you're like, they said the portions were big.

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 2>In fact, the portions were small. They were lying. It's frawed.

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 2>The stock went down when the fraud came out, so

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 2>everyone who bought the stock was defrauded out of you know,

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 2>billions of dollars. And then you sue and then you know,

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 2>it's like kind of ridiculous, but like maybe you settle

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 2>it for like, you know, pennies on the dollar and

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 2>you collected you know, multimillion dollar legal fee for bringing

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 2>this lawsuit. It's amazing, it.

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Is amazing, and I'm excited to see how this turns out.

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 2>I read all the time everything is security is fraud.

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 2>It's like an amazing like use of the American legal

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 2>system to go after like really incredible complais You.

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Want to speculate on how it might shake out. Do

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you think that they're actually going to settle?

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't, Actually, I don't. I always like write out

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 2>these people. When people file them, A lot of them

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 2>do not go very far. Some of them settle.

0:15:58.920 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know.

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 2>It takes you like an hour to write this complaint.

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 2>It's so funny. And then like maybe they said it

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 2>and you get a few million dollars.

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, if it does go that route, I wonder, like,

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>does this set any precedent for what you could sue for?

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Like I've been writing this for years. You can see

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 2>for anything if it's a public company. Anything.

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>If a company sells marbles, for example, and it says like, oh,

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>people are loving the green marbles, and then on their

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>earnings call they have to say, actually, people didn't love

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the green marbles that much. You can sue for that.

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Of course, wow, for anything.

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Not all these cases win, but like enough make money

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 2>that Like it's a lucrative business for a plaintiffs, for

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 2>security layers.

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't know. Maybe if I don't, you know,

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>become the next FTC head. This is something I could do.

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Brian nicol knew that people were upset about the Chipotle

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>portion sizes. There was this amazing article by Fortune in

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>late May. The headline is, Chipotle, our portion sizes aren't

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>getting smaller, but you can get more food with a

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>secret look. Do you remember this? Did this enter your

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>sphere of knowledge? Okay, I'm so excited to tell you

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>about this. In an interview with Fortune, Nicol said portions

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>have not gotten smaller and offered disappointed customers seeking an

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>even bigger burrito or bowl a pro tip. Give the

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>workers a secret look. This is a direct quote. One

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of the things I think is great about Chipotle is

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>if you come into the restaurant and you want a

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>little more rice, or you want a little more pico

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>de gallo, Nicol told Fortune, who then widened his eyes

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>slightly and did I say that wrong? What did I say?

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Did I really sorry? I said that? Okay? If you

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>want more cheese on your case adilla, or you want

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 1>more gilapanos, this is a direct quote. One of the

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>things I think is great.

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 2>She's gonna play the tape of himself.

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I think is great about Chipotle

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is if you come into the restaurant. If you I'm

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna start saying that though we used to call it

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that in my family. One of the things I think

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is great about Chipotle is if you come into the

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>restaurant and you want a little more rice, or you

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>want a little more Pico the gayo, I say, what

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is it? Wait? How do I say it? Now? I'm

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in my own head Pico to Gio, Nickel told Fortune,

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>who then widened his eyes slightly and nodded his head.

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Usually our guys and women give them a little more scoop,

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>so he was aware of the complaints. And I just

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>love the suggestion of giving like a secret nod and

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 1>like maybe a wink to one of the Chipotle workers.

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I just think it's like, you know, it is not

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 2>a factory produced product should have exactly the same way

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 2>each time. It's like you're talking to a person who's

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 2>like using a spoon, right, Like you can you can

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 2>do that, You can give it. You could even say,

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 2>could get bet a little more on that. I don't know,

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I haven't done this in ten years, but it does

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 2>seem like a thing you could do. And you know,

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 2>then like Wells Fargo is going out, and like I

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 2>wonder if Wells Farger like controlled for like the books, right, Yeah,

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 2>like there's maybe the big the twenty six ounce ball

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 2>was like they like I looked at the worker a

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 2>little bit too intensely, and the workers like, all right,

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:27.239
<v Speaker 2>here's it more.

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we do need to know the methodology, like did they.

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Make right Like one intern like was making more eye

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 2>contact than the other intern and got.

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>More smile perhaps or or glare. Yeah, all of these

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of influenced results. Maybe this is a good case

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>for AI. You know, maybe if the robots made your bowls,

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>then you get a perfect measurement every time. But humans

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>still rule this planet and this is just a byproduct

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of that.

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that said everything we did say about this.

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 1>I think I said too much poorly.

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I hope we're keeping most of that.

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>We can keep some of it. I don't wantn't sound

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>too much like a blubbering idiot. It's really hard being

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>on TV because my worst instincts when it comes to pronunciation,

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>always win, always win. What do you think Warren Buffett's.

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Doing leveraging now?

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 1>What He's probably not thinking about this strange etf filing

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>based off of Berkshire Hathaway. Tell me, okay, so one

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 1>of South Korea's largest retail Brokeaches has teamed up with

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>this white label issuer named Title to create a double

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>leveraged fund that will track, if approved, Class B shares

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of Berkshire Hathaway. So this is another leverage single stock

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>ETF And I know that we've talked about them a lot,

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe more than the listeners want, but listen, this one

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is weird and interesting just because Berkshire Hathaway shares are

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>so boring that this is like antithetical to the single

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>stock leveraged wrapper.

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 2>What is the purpose of the single stalking leverge rapper?

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 2>To me, it is just marketing, right, and so.

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Like it's fun, yeah, but like.

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 2>If you have some like snazzy thing, you can be like, yeah,

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 2>a snazzy thing, and then you get money and then

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 2>like you yeah, well, like this is not as snazzy

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 2>as like Tesla being is not that valuable, but it's like, yeah,

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 2>like weren Buffett over there, It's like being Warren Buffett.

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's snazzy.

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Snazzy is not the word I think, but like has

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 2>some retail appeal to someone.

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Someone, maybe to South Korean investors, because in this article

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it is pointed out that individual investors from South Korea

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>do follow and hold a lot of Berkshire shares, and

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>they also love leverage single stock ETFs, namely the tessel ones.

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>But this one is strange because, okay, you have the

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>snazzy marketing thing, but like the fun in it is

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>watching it go up and down a lot. If you

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>look at some of the numbers behind Berkshire, it's just

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>not very exciting. The stocks ninety day volatility is like

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 1>nineteen percent. You compare that to in video in videos

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>is fifty nine percent, and then micro strategy, which is

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>very popular in these wrappers, is like ninety eight percent.

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's not going to be exciting.

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So a couple of things, first of all, come on,

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 2>like making it a levertytf makes it more exciting, right,

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Like there's some no like twice is exciting. There's some

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 2>level of volatility and expected high returns from Berkshire othay, and.

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>You get twice as much in the instead of seven

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>tenths of a percent, it went up one point four percent.

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Sure. The other thing though, is that you know, when

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 2>we talk about these levertytfs, I like very vo little stocks.

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:00.919
<v Speaker 2>They are a great one day gap link product, but

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 2>they're a mess to hold for a long time because

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 2>you have the volatility drag of like if you hold

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 2>them over time, you don't get necessarily two times of

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 2>the return or three times the return of the underlying

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 2>You get like some weird, horrible thing that is often

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 2>lower than the returns on the underline. Not always, but

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 2>often lower than like two times the returns on the underline.

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 2>With a not very volatile stock, you get less volatility drag.

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 2>And it's a little bit I'm sure they're not like

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 2>this is a buy and hold forever product, because it's

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's a risky way to buy and hold forever.

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 2>But it's like you could hold it for longer and

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 2>probably get closer to two times the returns of Berkshire

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 2>Hathaway than you would if you were holding you know,

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 2>a two x micro strategies for a year.

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's true. I mean I was thinking about it,

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>like could it make sense as buy and hold, and

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>then I was remembering all of our conversations about volatility drag.

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.199
<v Speaker 2>Right, it's just less so it's not you know, eliminated,

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 2>but it's it's just less so here because it's a

0:23:58.920 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 2>less volatile stock.

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>If I had that much conviction about Berkshire Hathaway. And

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a journalist, so I don't have any opinions, but

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I would just buy more shares of Berkshire Hathway. Like

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>instead of spending buying one share, maybe I would buy

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>two shares. That's what I would do.

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is a way to buy two shares.

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but that's going to cost me some money. This

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is a plan ETF. We should note that it hasn't

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>been launched and TVD if it does launch.

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Sure we talked about talked about that.

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey I Warren buff Yeah we did.

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 2>That's like a vague gesture in the direction of Warren Buffett.

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 2>And also, this is just buying two shares of Berkshire Hathaway.

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I will know this has been done before. Sure

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a two times no, no, no, there's a two times

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett ETF in Europe. It launched in twenty twenty

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>two and it has about two point three million dollars

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in assets, which is not very much. And I don't

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>know you think about the marketing. And obviously Warren Buffett

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is a name, but it's a name that doesn't seem

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to appeal to the cohort of individual traders who buy

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>single stock ETFs.

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 2>But maybe maybe this is like broadening that audience. Maybe

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 2>this is like you think you don't like levered single

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 2>stockings because they're on crazy stocks, but here is a

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 2>levered single stocky up and a nice little stock, a

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 2>nice or nice big stock, a nice Calm Warren Buffetty

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Value Eddy Eddie.

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I don't know.

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm not it's not my head.

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to with so many with so many of

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.479
<v Speaker 1>these products. I am excited to see them launch, and

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to then check on them in like six months.

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I just feel like technology and like, know, how are

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 2>going to progress to the point where you can like

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 2>viably run a five million dollar ETF. Right, you can

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 2>just be like, we offer a suite of twenty thousand ETFs,

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 2>and you know, if each of them raises five million dollars,

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 2>it's fine, And then you have whatever dune thing you

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 2>want in an ETF. You can have heard two times

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 2>every single stock and if someone wants it, they can

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 2>buy it. And like this is like the sort of

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 2>thing it's like less appealing than like Tesla and Nvidia

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 2>for this thing, but like more appealing than like some

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 2>stock you've never heard of. But they're going to keep

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 2>going down the list.

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we are approaching the point where there's going to

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>be more US listed ETFs than US listed companies, which

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>will be fun.

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 2>And all should It's like the power set of you

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 2>has listed companies. It's like every possible combination of companies

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 2>is going.

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>To be averaged to end in verse.

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Every possible single stock two stock, three stock.

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:37.479
<v Speaker 1>Pir trades, seven stocks, YEAHWY three stock, any number. Oh

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>my god, this sky's the limit. But I was chatting

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>with some of my colleagues on my print team who

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>cover ETFs with me at Bloomberg News. I don't know

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>why it's such a preamble, And we chat to a

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of white label issuers because they're really interesting. They

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>work with a lot of different clients. And we were

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about what it costs to launch an ETF. Costs

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>have come down mightily, and depending on what your strategy is,

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you can launch an ETF for like fifty grand And

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I heard that and I was like, why you have

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>an ETF? Why don't I have an idea? And that

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>also explains why we've just seened so many launches. It

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>is just silly season out there.

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 2>It's like barely a product. It's like a It's just

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 2>a combination of stocks, and they can just you can

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 2>just any combination you can dream of. You pay a

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 2>small fee and then you can offer it and maybe

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 2>a litle bike side of it. There is we're not

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 2>there yet. We're getting there.

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>There is some break even level of asket.

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Shure s show shure. We're not there yet where this

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 2>is like the future.

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 1>The future is right. We're gonna have a ton of

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>MM and A every deal is going to go through,

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and boy, we're just gonna have thousands of ETFs and

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 1>so much meat in our burritos.

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 2>And that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Livian and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 2>You can find my work by subscribing to the money

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg dot com.

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And you can find me on Bloomberg TV every day

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>on an interest between nine to eleven am Eastern.

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:04.479
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 2>email to you Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net. Ask us

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 2>a question and we might answer it on air.

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>people find the show.

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 2>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anamasarakis and Moses

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 2>on Them.

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Our theme music was composed by Blake Naples.

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Brendan Francis Nunham is our executive.

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Producer, and Stage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts.

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff podcasts. We'll be

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 2>back next week with more stuff.

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff podcast. If you

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>never want to miss a story, become a bloomberg dot

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>com subscriber today. Check out our special intro offer right

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>now at bloomberg dot com Slash Podcast Offer, or click

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the link in our show notes. You'll also unlock deep

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>reporting data and analysis from reporters around the world.