WEBVTT - Rob Gronkowski is a Buccaneer & Final Pre-Draft Breakdown | Bucs Insider 0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:08.920 Welcome to Buccaneers in satur Live presented by Miller like 0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:10.960 Casey Phillips and Scott Smith here and this is where 0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:13.240 we take all of your questions. So go ahead and 0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:15.239 watch on the Facebook page if you're not already, They're 0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:17.520 going to the comments section and you can leave all 0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.599 of your thoughts, comments, questions leading up to a lot 0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:22.160 of things that could be happening over the course of 0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:24.079 the next week. We were finally in that period where 0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.440 we have been guessing at things and hypothetical things, and 0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.160 we are finally going to know something, hopefully, but unfortunately 0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:32.280 not quite as soon as we thought we would, just 0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.760 when we thought we were so close. Uh So, in 0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.040 case people haven't heard all the news, what has happened 0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.680 in terms of the timing of everything, you know of 0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:42.919 the franchise tag, the CBA voting and how all these 0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.840 affect each Other's a very fluid situation and usually this 0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:48.600 you don't see this very often in the NFL. Generally 0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:50.680 you have specific dates and they don't ever change, so 0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:52.360 you know exactly what your deadlines are going to be. 0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:56.320 But it's a different landscape right now because deciding upon 0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.640 whether or not to reach agreement on the c b 0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:00.960 A obviously is the most important thing then that's going 0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.720 to affect the next decade of this league, so you 0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.240 just kind of have to wait. Uh, they pushed the 0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.280 the NFL p A pushed their deadline for players to 0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.320 get their votes in back to Saturday. So subsequently, the 0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.959 NFL pushed the deadline for putting franchise or transition tags 0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.720 to Monday, which makes sense because the way it was 0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:21.959 laid out before where you had to get the transition 0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:23.800 that you had to have those tags in by four 0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.319 o'clock on Thursday, but players were still voting till Thursday, 0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.160 didn't really make a lot of sense. It was. It 0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.720 was kind of a messed up timeline because if the 0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:33.520 new c b A and everybody, I think most people 0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:35.640 already know this, but if there's a new cb A, 0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.600 it will likely change the rules for this season on 0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:40.200 how you can use tags. This is sort of an 0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.200 unusual season in that the last year of the c 0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.399 b A, by rule, you can use both the franchise 0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.480 and transition tags in the same year. So there's there's 0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:48.720 not a lot of teams that would need to do 0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.000 that anyway, but there's a couple that are probably considering it. 0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:53.640 We could possibly be one of them, and you know, 0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.280 maybe Dallas like that. So the timeline is different, but 0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:58.920 the decisions are still the same. We're trying to give 0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:00.800 you the chance to make the decisions with all the 0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.160 available information rather than guessing. Which is good and helpful. 0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:06.200 It makes sense, it does. It kills us because we've 0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.880 been dying to know things. But there's another deadline coming 0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.160 because the eighteen, which is a week from today, I 0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:15.520 believe for is the start free agency. So you know, 0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:17.360 we better know by then. We got to know things 0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.200 by that point. Um and I saw another piece of 0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:21.760 news that came out. We had a question already about 0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.440 a Gilbert asked, what does the compensatory pick mean for us? Well, 0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.720 it means we get another pick. We got a fourth 0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.960 round pick, number one thirty nine overall, which is the 0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.960 highest compensatory pick we have gotten since two thousand and three. 0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.480 I believe that one didn't really work out. We picked now. 0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.160 While I applaud the Buccaneers anytime they pick a player 0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.840 from Northwestern, Northwestern Center, Austin King didn't work didn't really 0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:45.959 work out for us, But a fourth round pick is 0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.200 pretty valuable. I mean what's a recent fourth round pick? 0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.480 Jordan whit Kwan Alexander Right, Yeah, starters. So, um, it 0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:54.480 can be very valuable, not only for the fact that 0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:58.679 you might grab another valuable player, but it also since 0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.200 two thousand seventeen, you can trade those picks. Before you 0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.440 were not allowed to, but now gives Jason had a 0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.600 little more ammunition for moving up and down around around 0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.040 the board if he wants to. But uh, it's good. 0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.000 It's it's the highest pick we've had in a long time. 0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.440 Generally when we've gotten them, they've been seventh rounders, and 0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.640 and no offense to the seventh rounders we've taken, but 0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:17.600 not many of them really pan out. So this is 0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:21.480 a much more significant one. And the most significant player 0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:25.720 we've ever taken with a compensory pick compensatory pick was 0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.920 a linebacker Al Shremand Singleton. He ended up being a 0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.320 starter on the Super Bowl team, So it can happen. Uh. 0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.000 It also finalizes the draft order, so we know where 0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.520 all our picks are exactly like one seen in the 0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:41.240 fourth round and so on. So I got a story 0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.760 about that up on Buccaneers here on Bucaneers dot com 0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:45.360 or on buckaneers dot com. If you want to go 0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.040 check it out. Okay, perfect, I thought this question was funny. 0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:49.600 David said, how many people do you think we'll ask 0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:53.080 about Teddy Bridgewater and Tom Brady today? Well at least 0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.760 one already. So yeah, basically, why don't we just talk 0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.480 about overall, uh, those two guys, what you know, what 0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:00.280 we've kind of heard in general, how they might fit 0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.360 um within this system or the likelihood and just you know, 0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:05.160 we know that this is this is what everyone's talking about, 0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:06.720 not just for the Buccaneers but around the league, that 0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.160 the quarterback carousel is the story right now. By the way, 0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.880 I think in previous years when we've been confronted with 0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.200 questions such as this before the start of fredency, we 0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.919 usually declined because we were afraid that we'd be violating 0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:21.239 tampering policy as NFL employees. But we have since learned 0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.080 that it's okay for us to do it right. Yes, 0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:28.200 because I think they finally realized we actually have no authority, 0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:31.279 no power, no influence whatsoever. And I think that it 0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.279 was probably too big of a compliment that they thought 0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.520 that us saying something on this show would probably have 0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.560 an effect. So Teddy Bridgewater and Tom Brady. Um. I 0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.080 don't think you really look at Tom Brady and go, wow, 0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:42.480 is he a fit for this offense? You look on 0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.599 and go, he's maybe the greatest quarterback of all time, 0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.520 still playing at a high level. So um, if that's 0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:50.360 an option, it's hard to feel bad about that, right. 0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.760 Teddy Bridgewater obviously less of a body of work, but 0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:55.960 really played well last year for New Orleans. And I 0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:57.719 know there's a lot of people out there to say 0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.800 Teddy Bridgewater isn't a perfect fit proce Arians for Bruce 0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.000 Arians his offense, And they apply the same logic to 0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.640 any quarterback, like say a quarterback in the draft, like 0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:08.480 Jacob Eeson who has a big, strong arm, Like, well, 0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.479 there's there's a Bruce Arians quarterback. Teddy Bridgewater maybe not 0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.560 as powerful of an arm quarterback, so therefore not a fit. 0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:17.520 But I think that's a little bit overblown. I think 0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:22.479 Teddy Bridgewater could easily command uh Bruce Arianss offense. Uh. Certainly, 0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.040 what you'd have is an accurate passer and one who 0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.080 has done a real good job throughout his career and 0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.600 last year of keeping the interception right down. And that's 0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.600 obviously would be a big change from what we've been experiencing. Right, Um, 0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:35.880 and back to the c b A a a little bit 0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:37.960 to Kwan had asked, what are the rules of cb 0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.520 A voting? Is it a majority rule? Yeah, it's just 0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:42.680 a simple majority of whoever votes. And I know that's 0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.479 a big deal. It's like a microcosm of you know, 0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.000 the country when we're having these elections. The big deal 0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:49.840 for a lot of people is just trying to urge 0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.320 as many people as possible to actually exercise the right 0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.360 to vote. So I know there's people, there's players in 0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.279 the like on the executive committee or or more involved 0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.400 in the union who, um are really involved in this 0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:03.600 and know all the ins and outs of the proposal. 0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.440 But what they really want is for as many of 0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.200 the players in the rank and file to actually look 0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.680 at it and to vote, because not everybody's going to vote, 0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:12.080 but they like to get as many as possible to 0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.560 do so. Um And so yeah, once they do, it'll 0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.400 be a simple majority of that vote. Yeah. And they 0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:19.440 have made the rule that guys can't change their vote, 0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:24.400 which I don't know if I feel good about that. Yeah, 0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:25.680 I have. I have mixed reviews, but I mean, I 0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:26.920 guess if you think about it. You don't get to 0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:29.440 change your presidential vote. You know, just most times, once 0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.280 you vote, you vote. That's just typically how it works. 0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.840 Now they do it. Seems like with technology that wouldn't 0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.159 be that hard. But yeah, I mean I get what 0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.120 they said, where if you voted, that meant you felt 0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.800 like you had enough information to do the vote. Yeah, 0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.920 So procedurally I understand, and it's hard to argue with. 0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.320 But if you're a person who's rooting for the CBIA 0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.040 to pass, and you know, I don't, I'm not picking 0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.080 a side here between owners and players, but I want 0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.200 a new CBA in place. Person. Yeah whatever, we're not 0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:57.640 going to say anything about what's in it. We have 0:06:57.680 --> 0:06:59.760 no you know, dog in that type, but just we 0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:01.840 there to be well. I hope the players get what 0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:03.880 they want and the teams get what they want. Um. 0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:05.400 You know, it's obviously you have to meet in the 0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.240 middle somewhere. And the classic line is if neither side 0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:10.880 is happy, then it's probably a good deal. But the 0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.800 back to the changing the votes, I understand procedurally why 0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:15.480 they would say no, and I get it, but if 0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.040 your person rooting for this to pass, you kind of 0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.560 probably wish they would because from what what I understand, 0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.320 the thought is that the majority of the players who 0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.080 want to change their votes want to change from a 0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.280 no to a yes because it's more of your rank 0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:30.160 and file type, the ones who are not going to 0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.160 command the biggest salaries, and um, maybe some of them 0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.200 were lad to believe. Uh, we're convinced by some of 0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.640 the more star power players, the ones with the who 0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:40.320 are going to get the huge contracts, that this was 0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.400 not a good deal for them, and now they're starting 0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:44.200 to feel with more information, hey, this is a good 0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.720 deal for me. Maybe I should have voted yes. Interesting, Yeah, 0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.720 that'll be interesting to see. Um. Garrett asked, do you 0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.920 see Sue stain Um and just in general as far 0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:54.880 as the front seven goes, He said, we could use 0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.280 that again this season. Number one run defense. Absolutely, we 0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.680 want that. I know you could. Every time they talk 0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.560 about it Bruce arians and Jason Light, which they did 0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:07.720 most recently at the Combine, there's no hesitation in what 0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.520 they want. They want to bring all of those guys back, 0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.920 and Bruce or Jason was asked specifically about the three 0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:19.280 of Shack Barrett and Dominican Sioux and Jason Pierre Paul 0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.239 and that's why I'm I'm telling you he was asked 0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.360 that specifically, because I don't want to act like I'm 0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.600 ignoring like Karl Massum or somebody like that. But he 0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:28.960 was specifically asked, can you keep all three of those? 0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.360 And he said, I hope so, I think so. So 0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:33.679 they want to and we all want to because it 0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.600 was the thing that worked the best on defense from 0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:38.520 beginning to end, you know, the secondary kind of turning 0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.640 things around. Devin White kind of developed, went through some injuries, 0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.520 but from the beginning of the league the year to 0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:47.720 the end, the defensive front was really good. And and 0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.560 Bruce arians has said, we need to keep that intact 0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.040 and it won't matter who we have a quarterback if 0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.480 we can't keep that defense. So um Patrick asked, what 0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:59.680 is the front office looking to handle in free agency 0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:03.360 and raft positions? First? So I guess essentially the top 0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.640 priorities and is it the same in both or or 0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.120 maybe different. Well, what we were just talking about, I 0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.040 think would be their priority priority and free agency and 0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:14.640 um at the combine again, they were talking about this 0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.520 and they said, yes, there's some there's some really good 0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:19.920 prospects that could be available. Some big guys on the 0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.840 interior line and some pass rushers at pick number fourteen, 0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.000 and if you look at mock drafts, you'll see a 0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.240 lot of them. Give us guys like Calevan Chason an 0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.320 edge rusher or Javon kin law Uh, you know, an 0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.600 interior lineman who can put on some pressure, and those 0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.400 would be good picks in those areas. But Bruce said, 0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:40.840 you know, let's or maybe it's Jason Cameron, which one. 0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.679 Those are good prospects and that that's an option for us, 0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.000 but let's see what we can get back first and 0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:47.800 then see what we have to fill in. So I 0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.319 think free agency in terms of the defensive front is 0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.679 the priority when it comes to things like maybe you 0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.040 need another safety, that might be another thing you address, 0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.920 and free agency, Um, when it comes to something like 0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.800 offensive line, that seems like something you probably try to 0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.040 do in the draft, you know, because you already have 0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:09.520 three really highly paid starters on your offensive line and 0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.280 it's kind of hard to imagine putting another big contract 0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.240 on a free agent on that unit, whereas if you 0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.800 draft a guy, you get a pretty cost controlled asset. Right, Yeah, 0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.440 that's a good point. Um, This is an initesting question. 0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:23.280 We haven't actually had it at we've we've been asked 0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.000 about Jamis. I thought every which way possible. I think 0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:27.600 we finally have a new way, So I figured I'd 0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.280 use this one. Carlos said, since Winston has had LASIX 0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.840 fixed his knee and his thumb, would that make you 0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:36.160 give him more likely to give him another chance? So 0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.400 does that change things now that you know that those 0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:41.880 things have been to me? No, Um, the knee and 0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.480 the thumb things, those were obviously going to be done. 0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:46.520 You were and it was it was impressive that he 0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:50.360 played through those things. Let's for that. His toughness has 0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.640 never been never been a question. And um, and he's 0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.080 still there were too many picks obviously in the last month, 0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.559 but he still also was putting up some big numbers, 0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.840 you know, in terms of yards and touchdowns and and 0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.000 to do all that with the two injuries, that was impressive. 0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.200 But there was never any doubt that those things are 0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.199 going to be fixed. And they weren't injuries. There weren't 0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:12.800 procedures that were going to be long term deals. Like 0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:14.800 it wasn't like a replacement of a N A. C. L. 0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:20.600 It's just I think it was a meniscus, the lasing thing. 0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.520 I'm glad for him as a human that he got. 0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:27.920 You know, somebody who's um, let's see was near set 0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.120 right the as you trouble seeing farce, So we had 0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.000 trouble reading the boards. It would squint. Um. We knew 0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.320 this already. I mean, Bruce has answered a question about 0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:36.800 it at his last press conference at the end of 0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:38.839 the season. He says, yeah, he has to squint to 0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.319 see the board, but doesn't have any problem seeing his receivers. 0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:45.320 So it's if it could possibly help him play quarterback. 0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:47.920 But I don't think it necessarily will and I don't 0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:49.480 think it was holding him back, you see what I'm saying. 0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:51.760 So I don't think you took Jamison. You made him 0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:55.160 a much better quarterback by getting lace. I think it's 0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:56.600 good that he got it for him, and I'm glad 0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:57.960 for him. And if he thinks that will help him 0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.480 play football, he would know better than I know. To me, 0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.000 that doesn't really change the price tame. Okay. And then 0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:06.480 we were talking about also the new potential rules being 0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:08.360 put forward that the owners meetings are in a couple 0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.760 of weeks, and that's always something that they debate there 0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:12.640 every year if they want to implement any of these 0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:14.199 new rules. So what are some of the ones that 0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:16.920 if people haven't heard yet, that um, you find interesting 0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.160 or that could really impact the games. So like, in 0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.840 addition to the Competition Committee being able to come up 0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.839 with ideas to put out for a vote, teams can 0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.760 submit ideas and teams, various teams I think Philadelphia was 0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:31.720 involved in four of them have put together seven rule 0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.240 proposals that will now be discussed at the league meetings. 0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.040 And I think the couple that I find most interesting 0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.640 are one they want to have another option for on 0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.120 site kicks, and this is one that's been discussed before, 0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.120 so it's not a new idea. But as you know, 0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:50.280 UM kicks have dropped in percentage of how many are successful. 0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.079 I mean it's seven points last year, I think. But um, 0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:56.800 that's because they have the rules where you can only 0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:58.480 have so many guys on each side of the kicker. 0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.200 And that's good because it was it was just another 0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.800 safety thing and so pretty much when you pass safety rules, 0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:05.320 you don't go backwards. So I don't think they're going 0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.400 to change that. So the onsite kick is not a 0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.880 high percentage play at all. And I guess teams want 0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:12.880 to have an option where hey, it doesn't feel like 0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.040 we're just going through the motions. It's never gonna work right. 0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:16.679 When you see an honest like kick nowadays, you you 0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.319 don't think it's gonna work right. So I think it 0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.360 was Philadelphia proposed that one that's been bandied about the 0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:26.079 last couple of years of you, after you score, if 0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.839 you want this option for an onside kick, you get 0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.160 the ball your own twenty five facing fourth and fifteen 0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:32.840 and if you can convert that and then you keep it. 0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.559 If not, the obviously you're giving the ball in your territory. 0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:40.240 So it's kind of the same two possible outcomes a 0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:42.200 little more punitive in this case because you're giving them 0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.319 ball you're five or thirty or something like that. Um, 0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.640 but it's the same idea. You get it's a tough play, 0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:49.320 but if you get it, you get possession. If not, 0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:51.600 then you're getting the ball in in your own territory. 0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:53.840 So it's an interesting idea. And then the other one 0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.439 that I thought was significant was a proposal to move 0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.520 over time back from timids to fifteen, which I don't 0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:03.200 think will asked because again it's another player's safety. But 0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.280 I thought that rule of changing to ten was dumb. 0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:08.640 I don't think it's had good consequences, and I wish 0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.560 they would change it back to fifteen. The ten minute period. 0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.760 If one team has a relatively lengthy drive but doesn't 0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:16.800 score or scores a field goal, you know, then the 0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:18.959 other team gets shot. There's often not a whole lot 0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.800 of time left. Yeah, I wish they would change that back, 0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:23.320 but I doubt it will happen. All right, Well, that's 0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:24.920 gonna do it for us on this edition of Buccaneers 0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.280 Insider Live, presented by Miller Lyte. Thinks, as always to 0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.040 everyone who's submitted questions, will be back here next week, 0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.280 hopefully with some answers, and if not, it's at least 0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:38.040 the beginning of what tampering periods by the yes, we will. 0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:39.880 All right, Well, thanks again and we'll see you next week.