WEBVTT - The Ultimate Infield Guide (EP. 759)

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Fantasy Pros. This is the Fantasy

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Baseball Podcast. Its met Joey b Joe Pusia, and today

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 1>it's time for the Ultimate Infield Guy. That's right, there's

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>no other guide as ultimate as this one. The Welsh

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and I are gonna take you through all the infield

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.279
<v Speaker 1>positions first base, second base, third base, shortstop, and even

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>some catchers. We're gonna talk about the top twenty guys

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>or so at each position, talk about the tiers, talk

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 1>about our favorite values, our favorite premium guys. Well, you're

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>always my favorite premium guy. I just want you to

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>know that. And speaking of premium, don't forget to go

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>premium this year. With all of our Fantasy Pros tools

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>for Fantasy Baseball season and for free, sink your leagues today.

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Did you hear that? For free sink your leagues? Make

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>sure you're utilizing all of the amazing tools for our

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>draft software here at Fantasy Pros. And also don't forget

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.319
<v Speaker 1>about the d season tools as well. We have the

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>best suite of tools. It will help you manage all

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of your leagues, set all your lineups from one app

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>on Fantasy Pros. It's about as good as it gets.

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And remember, our draft kit is live now Fantasy bros

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>dot Com slash Draft Kit. So is our mock draft

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 1>draft Wizard Fantasy bros dot Com slash mock. Go ahead

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and run a million simulations in about what like I

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I mean, how many drafts have can you

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>do in an hour? I think I mean only do

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty in an hour?

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 2>A million would be a lot. Oh, I don't know.

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 2>You know we should do that.

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>How many drafts can we do in an hour?

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 3>But like, actually you have to do our picks. We

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 3>should do shul almost like simultaneously. Be like, I like that,

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 3>we could go I like that.

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>What I mean cheat sheets?

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean if it was five minutes in theory, would

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 2>be twelve drafts?

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Too much? I guess though, that's that's too much. Well

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>not if I had multiple devices. Ah see what I did? Loan,

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to the infield. Let's start at

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>first base here and obviously a place we're looking for power,

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for run potential. RBIs all of the above.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's start here with the expert consensus rankings. Freddie Freeman

0:01:58.120 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is at the top of the first base board, follow

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>by Matt Olsen, Bryce Harper, who last year came off

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the injury obviously maybe a little too soon, as we

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>were saying back in the summertime, but he's such a gamer,

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that dude, Vlad Guerrero Junior looking for a bounce back,

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and Pete Alonzo at number five Welsh to me, this

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is the definitive tier of the top first baseman, because

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>after this we dropped to Cody Bell and Drew West

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to repeat a very strong season Chicago, where still as

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a recording is don't know where he is going to

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>play in twenty twenty four and Goldschmid and some others.

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Freeman, Olsen, Harper, Vlad pe Alonzo. Your

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on this upper tier. Somebody want to move in,

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody want to move out of the top tier first basement.

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so for our well, I am going to argue it. Yes,

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 3>you're right, except I do think we can split these

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 3>and I think you could look at this if you

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 3>want to like be a little bit more you know,

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 3>uh analytical or find tooth fine cone.

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 2>What's the what's the jack?

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't sass him at the top of the show,

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a fun.

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Is it the fine fine tooth comb.

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>What did you say a tooth fine comb?

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't, but what does that even mean? What is

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 2>a tooth?

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>It means, well, you're asking the bald guy about the

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>fine tooth comb. What it is is you know when

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.399
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of looking for something, you know, like when

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the kid gets lice in the class and they're trying

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to pull it like the little tiny.

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 2>No, no, I know the analogy, but like the fine

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 2>tooth comb.

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you do.

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 3>But if you, I know a version of it. There's

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.119
<v Speaker 3>something in my brain. It's called the Welshism. So this, yes,

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 3>it is like a five tier, but I think you

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 3>can break it apart. And the top three are almost

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 3>in there.

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 2>And this is how I view tears. This is how

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 2>I've always took tears.

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Is like there's no way I would move the guy

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 3>below above. So I agree that, like definitively, these five

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 3>are the core first basemen that you want bogin.

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 2>And I did this. Look at you take like Roto.

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 3>And you take what championship teams look like and what

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 3>starters and we took that. What did all the starters

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 3>at first base cumulatively get? And the common first baseman.

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 3>The type of first baseman you want is a guy

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 3>that hits I think around twenty eight stolen bases, around

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 3>two seventy basis, I'm sorry, twenty eight home runs, really

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 3>no stolen bases, and then high RBI and high run.

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.119
<v Speaker 2>So who are the guys that do that? All these

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 2>guys do that.

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 3>But there isn't a scenario where I'm gonna put Vlad

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Guerrero as much as I'm into him this year above

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Bryce Harper right now, so I would break the Freeman

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Olsen Harper as probably one A, Vlad and Alonzo one B.

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 3>And then here's the big thing, though it's a pretty

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 3>stark drop off on all these guys, but these are

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 3>the core guys, all giving you big homers everything you need.

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 3>The only difference is number one who actually can get

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 3>you great out of position stolen bases in Freddie Freeman.

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 3>But I agree with this tier by the way, this is.

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 2>How I tier them out.

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Not everybody has it, because some like Harper over Olsen,

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 3>some like Alonzo over Vlad Guerrero. But this is actually

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 3>my definitive first base.

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Run Matt Olsen coming off a year with fifty four

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>bombs by the way. I mean, come on, now, I'm

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>with you. I would even argue, I mean further because

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Italian, because I like to argue Freeman Olsen their

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>own tier. Harper probably in that grouping as well, but

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's his own little you know, maybe there's one A,

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>one B and then one C being Alonzo Guerrero. Again,

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I just want to see Harper kind of bounce back completely,

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>although you know, end of the year he certainly looked

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>more like himself. They hit two ninety three last year,

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty one bombs. But I mean, I do agree with

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. There's an elite tier where there's a

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>super elite tier within there. So if you want to

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>call them the A tier and then the S tier,

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the S tier is freedom A team.

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Can we call them the A team?

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>We can be a baracas, mister t all of those

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 1>guys I love, who doesn't draft mat For those of

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>you who are too young for the A Team. The

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>end of every episode, they basically had a van or

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>some sort of you know, vehicle that they found and

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>turned it into a tank and then took on bad guys.

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Was that much the show?

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 3>That's like a great day, just like every day, just

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 3>turning something into a tank.

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you that turned something into a tank.

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, these two are tanks. Vlad and Pede Alonso the

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 3>one B tier. What's interesting about them is they are

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 3>the positive side. Like Alonzo put up huge, massive homers

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 3>last year with bad batting average. Vlad really had a

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 3>mediocre year. They are both big boosted players. I think

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 3>it's the expected batting average to come back up for

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Alonzo with forty plus homers. And if you're looking at

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Vlad Carrero, he is probably the biggest projection monster because

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 3>big all like everything was like relatively sustainable across the board.

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 3>He just had poor results, better launch angle. He's projected

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 3>to have almost ten more homers this year, big run

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 3>in RBI, So that one BE tier. Maybe there's some

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 3>queasiness that's a little bit involved, and that's why they're

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 3>one be But they are heavily projected because projections are

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 3>waiting over the last three years.

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 2>But they're great. But then we're about to take a

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 2>big old step off of the first base ladder.

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Cody Bellinger again, great season last year, twenty twenty season.

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Can he repeat it? We'll see the batting average bounced

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>way back from where it had been in previous seasons.

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Paul gold Schmidt, I know the power dipped a little

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>bit so of the average, but I think the Cardinals

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>just overall were just a team that just struggled last see,

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and so I think gold Schmid has another thirty home

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>run season in him. Christian Walker in this grouping as well,

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>back to back thirty home run seasons for him. I

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>feel good about him. Tristan Cassis comes in at number

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>ten on this list, twenty four bombs for him last year.

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of people are very high on him.

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm very high on Nolan Jones also in this tier,

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and then Spencer Torklssen in this grouping as well, who

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>was one of our favorite bilos last year. If you recall,

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>there were videos we did about Spencer Togletzen leading off

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>episodes we did about hey, now's the time in Dynasty

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and redrafted by this guy because it hit rock bottom

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and then the second half was great thirty one home runs,

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>ninety five rubies. Last year he hit just two thirty four.

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>But for me, it's gold Schmidt ahead of Bellinger. I

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>would even take Christian Walker possibly ahead of Bellinger. To

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, Nolan Jones and Bellinger, we could

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>have that conversation than Cassis and Torkosen, I think are

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>close to each other. What are your thoughts here in

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>this grouping? Do you think you would move the tier

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>or adjust it slightly?

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I'm not super big into Bellinger, but I'm

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 3>open to the possibility whatever he changed is the new thing.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 3>But he changed was completely lowered to strikeouts, but he

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 3>stopped hitting the ball hard barely everything that went down

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 3>hard hit percentage like absolutely plummeted. Those aren't great things

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 3>for like long term sustainable power, But it doesn't mean

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 3>he's just not going to just be a really good

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 3>contact hitter with pure raw power that doesn't strike out.

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 3>But I think there's more variance with him, and he's

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 3>shown it, so I'm not super excited about him.

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 2>I love Goldie.

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 3>This year, you look at Goldie's profile, He's another one

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 3>of those guys underperforming.

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 2>But to what degree?

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 3>It just looked like he had a little bit less

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 3>exit velocity, launch angle kind of dropped across all pitches

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 2>I put that up to.

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Bat speed and guess what drive line this year he

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 3>spent the offseason, specifically working on bat speed a drive line.

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 3>So I really like Goldie in this front. Nolan Jones,

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 3>you and I have gone back and forth with I

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 3>think this is I think it's some version of Bellinger, Goldie,

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Nolan Jones, Christian Walker, and I would say Cassis Cossus

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 3>is the one I would jump in here because I

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 3>think I just did a social short talking about players

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 3>that are going to boost their power. Cosis is one

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 3>of those guys. I think that is going to do that.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 3>He's going to take a big step up this year.

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Big hard hit numbers, good barreling, he does everything right,

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 3>it's just more games and he's projected at almost thirty

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 3>home runs.

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 2>So I think that is kind of a rough tier.

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 3>So I did Bellie, I said, Bellinger, Goldie, Nolan Jones, Walker,

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 3>and Cossas's kind of I guess that's two, right, Yeah,

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 3>we're doing one A, one B and then two.

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>That's fairly something to that effect.

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Number all three.

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Spencer Steer another guy who's hovering around this grouping. In fact,

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>if you look over fantasypros dot com for the MOB

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>rankings right now, you can see that Steer is put

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>himself into this number twelve overall conversation right now, do

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you think of him in the same group of like, Okay,

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a twelve te mixed league, that's about

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>where you're starting first basement? Are I know Josh Nail

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>or Yondi Diaz are also kind of on that bubble.

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a preference of Steer Diaz a Nailor

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of ranking?

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 3>So I'm actually like a really big Josh Naylor guy

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 3>this year, Josh Naylor, We're okay, we're starting to get

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 3>in to the territory in my eyes where boy, these

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 3>are high plus r P fee corner infielders like corner,

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 3>Like if you get these guys in the corner infield,

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 3>you're doing awesome. But in fifteen team, it's not what

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 3>you can do. So if you missed out on first base.

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Josh Naylor specifically is somebody that I love because it's

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 3>really high batting average, great hard hit numbers. Power is

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.719
<v Speaker 3>a little bit in question, But big RBIs he put

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 3>up because he hits in the middle of the order.

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Steer is kind of in this same range. But I

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 3>have a hard time and maybe it's just more clerical

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 3>about it, Like I have a hard time viewing him

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 3>as the first baseman. He's gonna play in the outfield.

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of potential tuning in this roster still,

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 3>but he still puts up stats. He's kind of a

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty guy. So I like Josh Naylor a lot.

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 3>I would then go to Spencer Steer for the stolen bases,

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 3>and Yandy Diaz is kind of a little bit of

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 3>the grown up version of Naylor, but I think Naylor's

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 3>upside is higher. So those guys do belong in a tier.

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 3>But YONDI and Naylor a little bit closer, Steer is

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 3>a different animal. Love him as a corner infielder though.

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 1>All right, so we've got basically our top twelve ish,

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe even at fifteen. Again, if you're in those deeper leagues,

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I agree with one hundred percent on Nailor, by the way,

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>looking at the fancy pros projections to twenty two homers,

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>eighty five rbi, eight steals, two eighty batting average. That's

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty solid numbers wise. After that grouping, we're gonna get

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>into this next group here, which involves guys like Santander

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>coming off another season. Again, you know, we could talk

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 1>about who gets squeezed out maybe in Baltimore at some point,

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>but he had twenty eight homers last year ninety five RBI.

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>You got guys like Vinnie Pascuentino, Christian Strand, who qualifies there,

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Reee Hoskins coming off the injury signing with Milwaukee, Alec Bohm,

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Nathaniel Lowe, Like, there's a lot of guys here that

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of are in this mix in the corner infield

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>from the first base perspective spot, is there one guy

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>or two guys that stand out to you as players

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that you feel like, yeah, this is a really good

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>value or a guy that could really outperform as adp

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Reece Hoskins.

0:11:56.000 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Reee Hoskins is absolutely that guy going to Milwaukee. You

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 3>do worry if they like completely deplete the team. But

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, the last big run we saw with him,

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 3>it was still good hard hit numbers. It was still

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 3>solid double digit barrel percentage. I think he's going to

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 3>just kind of jump right back into the fold of

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.599
<v Speaker 3>who he was before, and who he was before was

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 3>a dude that put up twenty seven homers in twenty

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty one, thirty homers in twenty twenty two. I think

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 3>we can get back to that spot in Milwaukee's a good,

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 3>good hitting environment. He would be one of my choices

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 3>if I was chasing batting average. Pasquentino probably. I don't

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 3>know if the power is going to get there, but

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 3>that team is going to be a little bit more

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 3>aggressive this year. They got guys that can run at

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 3>the top in Michael Garcia and Bobby wit Junior, so

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Paspuentino and Reese Hoskins would be the later guys.

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break in the action and tell

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you about Underdog Fantasy. MLB draft season is here, and

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the easiest place to play fantasy baseball is it Underdog Fantasy.

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>We've already been active in their best ball FORMATT fantasy drafts,

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>where you draft your team over twenty rounds at The

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>best score from your team that you drafted becomes your

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>score for each week in the MLBA season. Drafts are

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>constantly filling each and every day, So go to Underdog

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy right now and draft in the dinger for your

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>share for seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars in prizes,

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>with first place being a cool one hundred k. It's

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>only ten dollars a draft and The tournament closes on

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>opening day March twenty eighth, So jump in now, sign

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>up for Underdog and use that promo code fp MLB.

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>That's fp MLB to get your first deposit match up

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to one hundred dollars that's ten free dinger drafts. And

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that promo code is fp MLB. And join the Underdog

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>today and get drafting in the upcoming MLB season. And

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>now back to the action. All right, let's move on

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to the second base grouping here, and no surprise at

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the top, you're gonna find Mookie Betts, as you should.

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Ozzie Albi's our favorite guy last year, who we just said,

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was just crazy. The value on Albi's

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>last year was so good. And you know what, I'm

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>willing to pay the premium this year because I don't

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>love second base this year at all, coming off a

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>year where he had thirty three bombs one hundred and nine.

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Ribi's ninety six runs, score hit two eighty also stole

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>thirteen bases. So if you can't get Moogie Betts in

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the top five picks a year, draft Alice Albi's is

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a really nice consolation prize. After that, we move on

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to Marcus Simeon. I think this is where the tier

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 1>stops because after this we're jumping to al Tuove and

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>just too many injuries at this point. For Altuove, the

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>last few years, the missing, the amount of time. I

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>still think he is a great player, but he does

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of tread on the tire. So for

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>me personally, I'm gonna knock him down. Maybe it's another

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>like one a scenario for people. But Bets Albis Simeon

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to me is the elite tier. Do you agree or disagree?

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Betts is the elite tier. He is his own oh tier.

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes these guys like O Kunya kun We'll do an

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 3>episode we're talking about overall, Kunya gets his own tier. Bets,

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 3>in my mind, gets his own tier, then Albi's and Simeon,

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 3>they occupy that next tier, that second round pick. I

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 3>love Albi's, love the stolen bases. I love Atlanta's offense,

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 3>I love the power. There's no doubt about it. Marcus

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Simeon is consistent. Of course, secret misses some time we'll

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 3>see and he can get into some bad slumps. Here's

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the only thing that happens with me because I disagree

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 3>with you. I actually like second base. I think there's

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of good later second base values. And here's

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 3>what has happened to me multiple times in drafts. I

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 3>pull the trigger Albi's or Mookie bets I've done and

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 3>then I get this like, ooh, what's going on in

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 3>the sixth round. I'm like, Glabor Torres is still here,

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 3>could tell Marte ends up falling, and get I get

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 3>this sense of like, ah, man, I screwed up. I

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 3>should have taken another position, or with Mooki Bets, I

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 3>move them to the outfield, and I still draft draft

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Labor Torres. So I actually think there are quite a

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 3>few second base options in general. It shouldn't necessarily take

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 3>away from the good value of those top guys. But

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 3>what I will say is those are the elite, and

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 3>I think the tier differences the gap isn't as big

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 3>as some other positions. That gap in my mind between

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 3>who the Alonso and Bellinger, that's like that's a huge gap.

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 3>My gap between Simeon to like Altuve Maclain it's not

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 3>that big. And then the tier difference going down to

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Glaber and like could tell Mary from those guys, it's

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 3>not massive. So I actually kind of like the position,

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 3>but it is Mooki, and then it is Albi's and Simeon,

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 3>and then you know you're not having these big tear

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 3>drops when we start moving to who I have Matt

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 3>McClain and al tuv and I think the ranks also

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 3>show that.

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>All right. So after Albi's and Simeon, Altuove comes in

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>at four on Fantasy Pros, the Matt McLain, Nico Horner, Glaber, Torres,

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>hass Young, Kim Mikhtel Marte. So let's talk about this

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>grouping here as we get from five to ten at

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Bryson Stoppi and guy number ten is they're a favorite

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of yours in this grouping. I know, Nico Horner you've

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>expressed to me, you know when you're doing the Black

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Book write ups for Infield, which Welch wrote all those

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>up there. You can go check it out on Amazon

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. When you were doing those, you had some

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>concerns about Nico Horner being able to repeat his season.

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Kim was a guy who stole a lot of basses

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>last year. So who do you like to target here?

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>As we get to more of that next tier, that

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>next grouping at second base.

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you nailed that.

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm not into Nico Horner, like that's not I'm

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 3>also I kind of want to be into has Sun Kim,

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 3>but there's a couple guys like they felt like they

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 3>just did everything right and they just got the right

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 3>bounce in some spots, And all I'm saying is like,

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure has Sun Kim is a high teens

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 3>to twenty home run hitter. He might be a lower

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 3>and if the stolen bases ticked down a little bit.

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Same thing with Nikohrner. Niicohner is not a double digit

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 3>power guy. He is lifted up by what we should

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 3>acknowledge elite runs and batting average. But I'm just not sure.

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry stolen base and uh, batting average and runs

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of, but I just don't think the stolen bases

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 3>are going to be completely repeatable and it's a dip

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 3>and I don't like paying that price for those stolen bases.

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>There.

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 3>I love Glabor Torres. Glaber Torres expected numbers across the

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 3>board up, he stole more bases, he was closing in

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 3>on thirty homers. I think we can get there this year.

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Glabor Torres is a major target for me, and I

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 3>think Homer is a aside like I like kateell Marte

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 3>because he's going to hit high in the Diamondbacks lineup

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 3>between Christian Walker, Lordus Guriel, and Corbyn Carroll, and he

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 3>goes late.

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 2>He just consistently goes late. And he's not a big

0:17:58.400 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 2>stolen base guy.

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 3>But twenty two twenty five Homers, big runs, big rbuys,

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 3>he'd get moved into the three spots sometimes. So those

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 3>labor Tories and cautel Marte are kind of some of

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 3>my favorites. I pass on Nico, I pass on has

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Sun Kim and that's kind of my grouping.

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Torres was my guy too. He actually had a ten

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>point higher xbau two eighty three, as most was two

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>seventy three. Average. Also roses OBP up to three forty seven,

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>which to me tells me he started to take a

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>better approach at the plate, getting on baseball, you know,

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>starting that evolution. You know Torres been waiting a long

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>time for him to really find this, you know, really

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>strong productivity lower.

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 3>He lowered a strikeout rate right so almost to the

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 3>level of what of what Bellinger did, but while still

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 3>being a significant power hitter, and he stopped chasing sliders,

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 3>which was his big deal. He really cut down on

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 3>how he chased sliders. It made him such a better hitter.

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 3>And he's going to carry that in, by the way,

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 3>with a healthy judge and Juan Soto.

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>So look, it's his best year since twenty nineteen Torres,

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think if he can get back to being

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that player here consistently at this juncture in his career,

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>we're all going to be very very pleased with that.

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>ADP The next grouping here, when you're looking at outside

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the top ten, Andre Semeniz and gel Off from Oakland,

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>you have Spencer Steer, Luisa Raie. So I know Welsh

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>has feelings about Luisa Rise Again, he is a batting

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>average player. You say it all the time, Estrada, Nolan Gorman,

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Edmund My Boy, Edward Julian Jonathan India. You're not a

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>fan of Brandon Drury at twenty and then it's the

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Parades and the Polancos of the world who are outside

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>this top twenty, maybe Brandon Lau Here. Here's my question

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to you, Welsh, this is why I don't love second base,

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>which is why I'm looking to you know, if I

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>don't get Ozzie Albi's glamor, Torres is a good fallback.

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind Marte, but the rest of this grouping

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>when it gets a little deeper here, especially in leagues

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing middle infielders, I don't love this grouping.

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel really warm and fuzzy about them. Who

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>are some of the guys in this ten through twenty

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>range that are targets of yours this draft season.

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 3>So one of the things we found when we were

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 3>doing the what do you need out of your positions

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 3>when you're trying to accumulate? And obviously it's like a

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 3>roto conversation, but it can be a applied to categories.

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Maybe not so much points that you need. You need

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 3>like premium stolen bases where you can unless you're going

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 3>to make up for it significantly somewhere else at second

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 3>base and at shortstop.

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 2>So Andrasimenez is actually a player that I really like.

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Where everybody is reaching for the sky for Nico Horner

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 3>because he hit you know, two ninety and had the

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 3>forty something stolen bases, you can probably get thirty out

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 3>of Andres Himenez with more power and not a big

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 3>major dip in batting average, I mean different from Nico,

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 3>but not one that's going to like completely deplete your team.

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 3>So I don't mind andras him in, especially from a

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 3>little bit.

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Of a speed deficienty.

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>It's ten less homer. I mean it's had ten less

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>deals and twice as many homers potentially as what you're looking.

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 3>At it, and it's like it's probably like fifty sixty

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 3>spots lower on the overall. I'm not looking what is

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Jimenez overall? He's one well over Horner sixty four. It's

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 3>almost it's almost half the costs. So you don't want

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 3>to do this exercise all the time. It was good,

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 3>but you know what, Jimenez has more power, almost as

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 3>many stolen bases. You're gonna score some runs maybe RB

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 3>Like I think Kamenez is a great fallback, especially if

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 3>you got maybe like you know, Judge er Lely, or

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 3>you got Matt Olson and you don't have big significant

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 3>stolen bases. I love Jimenez. I love getting him there.

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm kind of down with Bryson Scott. You mentioned the

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 3>Arise thing. The only thing I'll say is like he

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 3>is fine, but I can't fathom the ooing and the aweing.

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 2>We do over a guy that literally.

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Does one category. He's okay in runs, but that's a

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 3>one and a half player. Now he's the best player

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 3>at that one spot, but he doesn't get the treatment

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 3>of Estuary Ruiz and but everyone like he's a better

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 3>real life player than he is a fantasy player. He's

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 3>better in points, he's an elite fantasy player in points,

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 3>he's not in head to head categories. Rodo, so I

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 3>don't have as much interest in him. But this is

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 3>also why that position is not the worst. You could

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 3>suffice with Luisa Rise on your team as your starting

0:21:57.760 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 3>second basement, and he's a fourteenth.

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Off the board, I would just suggest against it.

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Fair enough, Let's move on to the third base position.

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Jose Ramirez at the top, again, coming off slightly down

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>year from what we're you know, used to with him.

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Usually we're well above the one hundred RBI total, just

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>eighty last year. But again we can look at that

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Guardians offense and poke holes all day, because it really

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>just did not do a whole lot. In fact, it

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>feels like that meme where they're poking it with a

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>stick and they're like, come on do something, but hopefully

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>nailer and nailer and maybe there's a third dam like

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you get a third nailer in Cleveland?

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.959
<v Speaker 3>Actually is there is John Wait, there is Boe Nailor,

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 3>and there is another nailor, Miles Naylor who plays for

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 3>the Oakland As who just got drafted.

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>But Jose Ramirez to me, Whilsh's still just above everybody

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>because the soul base potential, even Austin Riley back to

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>back thirty five home run plus if you want to say,

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it's Riley, Devers and Ramirez at the top and they're

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>all one group. I still have Ramirez slightly above those

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>guys in my own tier because I do think, you know,

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 1>this year, maybe we get back to that super elite

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>first round level guy. Do you agree or disagree? Yeah?

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Now I agree with you. Like again, tell everybody what's

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 3>my what's my deal with tears? Would I take Austin

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Riley over Jose Ramirez, No it would not. Would I

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 3>take Raphael Devers over Ramirez?

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 2>No it would not.

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm not as speed hungry as some or even as

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 3>I've been in the past.

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 2>It's just because there's a lot to go around now.

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 3>I do think you should always focus on when you

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 3>can get an elite and when you can step ahead

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 3>of everybody else. But getting a guy that steals like

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty five bases, I don't think that makes them no.

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Look, of those three guys, Ramirez is the only potential

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty thirty guy that's it. At the end of the day,

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>he has hundred guy And I think that's that potential alone,

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>because he's the only guy really at this position who

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>can give you that. I think it's or at least

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that we were counting on giving us that potentially. In

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four, he's his own tier. Gunner Henderson at

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>number four, a guy that last year had a miserable

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>first half but was so good of the second. He

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>still scored one hundred runs, still drove in eighty two,

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>stole ten bags, hit two fifty five with twenty eight bombs.

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Then after Gunner Henderson, you have Elie de la Cruz,

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Many Machado, Royce Lewis, and then of course Alex Bregman

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>at eight. Now I'm gonna stop there and pump the

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 1>brakes here because I think this is where big time

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>conversations can happen. Henderson, Dela Cruz, Machado, Royce, Lewis Bregman.

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>What's the Welsh order of these guys, because I feel

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>like it's going to be very different potentially of what

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it is right now in FP okay.

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 3>And now there's one caveat I want to do to

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 3>this because I didn't get to say it. I think

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 3>that Raphael Devers real quick might be one of the

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 3>most underrated players. And I have seen instances n n

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 3>FBC specifically where Ellie De la Cruz and Gunner Henderson

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 3>go ahead of him, and I think Devers is as

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 3>great of a plan B to Missing Riley or Jose

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Ramirez as there is with those elite hard hit numbers,

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 3>highest of his career fifty five point one, second highest

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 3>barrel percentage.

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he is just a monster. He's just a thirty.

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Plus hundred hundred guy with high batting average that you love.

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 3>So now you go from like the safest dude, Austin

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 3>Riley and Raphael Devers are like the safest of safe

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 3>third basemen. You know you're getting awesome four categories they're

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 3>all going to play. Then you start coming down to

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 3>like Elie de la Cruz and Gunner Henderson.

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 2>So you asked me, how do I have these guys

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 2>set up?

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 3>I've gone back and forth on the Gunner and the Ellie,

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 3>and I will tell you I continuously do that. I

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 3>flip those two quite a bit. And I know some

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 3>people are gonna have Ellie out at this moment. I

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 3>am prioritizing Ellie over Gunner Henderson. And I know I'm critical.

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 1>About Ellie Delac you are, I'm surprised.

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 3>But one of the things, especially when you pay attention

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 3>to projections, and a lot of people have talked about

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 3>one of the deficiencies of Elie de la Cruz built

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 3>in is playing time, and a lot.

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Of people talk about that. Yet you still see big numbers.

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 3>You see like almost twenty forty out of a lot

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 3>of projection systems, and his cost isn't.

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 2>As big in a lot of leagues.

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 3>Everybody here is playing, like if you play FBC, is

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 3>gonna be like a top twenty player, top twenty two player.

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 3>But that doesn't happen in probably seventy five percent of

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 3>most leagues because there is fear strikeout problems. If he

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 3>does struggle, could he be sent down. They've got a

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 3>plethora of great players that they could throw in there

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 3>at any time, so it's not unfeasible that he could

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 3>not be on this roster.

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 2>But he also puts up absolutely top.

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Percentile hard hit numbers, top percentile speed numbers, and I

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 3>think he's gonna just continuously hit at the top of

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 3>the lineup until the wheels fall off. So the reason

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 3>he is down for a lot of these people saying

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 3>he's overrated is because they are projecting lower playing time

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 3>because it might fall apart. I'm gonna not I'm gonna

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 3>take a chance. In ten team, you can take bigger chances.

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 3>In twelve team, you can take it. Fifteen's a little

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 3>bit diceier. I'll go Ellie with those monster stats, even

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 3>though Gunner is pretty solid and then many Manny and

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Royce is the next kind of tier of this position.

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Manny also, by the way, looking like he is going

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 3>to start the season at least being able to DH

0:26:57.880 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 3>is a great sign, so he should come up.

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>We had this conversation a month ago. It was like,

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>this whole concern about Machado is completely overblown. If his

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>ADP and early drafts and Best Ball or stuff like that,

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 1>it's floating around there, just take advantage of it. Even

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>if it was a week or two in April, who cares.

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's gonna be fine socially with the DH

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in the National League last couple of years. Lewis is

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>the guy that I'm targeting in this group. To me,

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 1>he's the best ROI. He gives you sole base potential,

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>which is something Bregman going right around that same spot

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>won't give you. He gives you batting average, which could

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>be higher than Bregman as well. So I'm fine with Alex.

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Bregman is kind of like that. That's like a line

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of drawing. I mean, if you want to

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about Nolan Aeronaudo, a guy's been very steady throughout

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>his career, I feel like Bregman and Aeronaudo are kind

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 1>of I'm fine with them. Like third base to me,

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 1>is one of the deeper positions where I'm very comfortable

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>looking late for these guys. If I end up with

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a Bregman, If I end up with an Aeronado, that's fine.

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 1>But Lewis is the guy that I want to target

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>because he gives me the upside for the batting average

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and the upside for the stone bases and I think

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>power wise, he's gonna be in that twenty five is

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>range as well, just like those guys. But he's gonna

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 1>give me a little something extra. It's healthy, but that's

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a big right now.

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 2>I think he's in his I think he's in the

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 2>above tier.

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 3>I you like Bregman a little bit more than me,

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 3>and maybe that is also some of the points that

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 3>sits in your head.

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't really like him, iron infect his floor,

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think often we get so wrapped up in

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>he gets so wrapped up in the potential of the

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>led other cruise of the world, who I also love

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>just like you. I mean, gosh, it was like the

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>unofficial mascot of the show last year. But at the

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>same time, especially if we're talking about salary cap drafts, right,

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're telling me it's going to cost me an

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>extra fifteen dollars for that player, I'll take Bregman, I'll

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 1>take Aeronauto, I'll take you know, we're even ten dollars,

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, potentially difference between him and Royce Lewis. Okay,

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll save the ten bucks and I'll take Royce Lewis.

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think that's important, Like Eronado, is someone I

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 3>target because he just keeps falling like Bregman kind of falls.

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Ernado is the last of all of those, and I

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 3>took him in my first DC I did, and I

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 3>will target him because I think you can get back in,

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 3>especially if this team kicks back, you can get back

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 3>into a twenty five to thirty one hundred hundred decent

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 3>batting average player. I think he is massively underrated. I

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 3>just don't believe Bregman has the power upside anymore. And

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 3>he does have a floor, but I think like Aeronaudo's

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 3>floor to his ceiling just feels better than what Bregman provides.

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 3>So like I'm just more down I guess on Bregman overall.

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 3>But I do agree with you on Aeronado and in

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 3>salary cap you're doing anything like that, Yeah, you do

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 3>pay attention to the dollar month.

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 2>That is important.

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 3>There's a huge difference of you getting Aeronautu at seven

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.959
<v Speaker 3>dollars and having to pay fifty five for Ellie.

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I would say it converts also to you know,

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the same concept of rounds, like if you want to

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>get that extra pitcher and slide him in there in

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>those you know, mid early rounds. There you go, which

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Ani round, which I tend to also because that's the

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>range where I like the pitchers so much in that ADP.

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So to me, it makes a little bit more sense

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to wait potentially on that outside of this top ten.

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:48.959
<v Speaker 1>Now you're going to Josh Young, Spencer Steeer coming off

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a great season, qualifies everywhere, which is good because you

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>figure get him in the lineup. Max Munsey, who I

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>don't care how many home runs yet I'm not touching

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>with a ten foot pole. Jake Berger coming off a

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly fun season boom noelve, Marte Yandy Diaz, Cabrian Hayes,

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>who I just I don't know why we're still chasing that.

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>And then Perettis Nolan Gorman. I know some of our

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>friends in the industry. Still hio on Nolan Gorman two

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven bombs still strikes out a lot for me.

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>But that's see that. This is the thing. It's like,

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I like third base. Let me rephrase, I love third base.

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>When we get about ten deep after that, I don't

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>like it as much. I think this is where the

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>drop off gets very steep. Your thoughts, Yeah, I.

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Think versus starters, like when you look and you're like, oh,

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 3>mid mid tier third baseman, I got Nolan Ernado or Lewis,

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 3>and then the lower on a fifteen team is like,

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, they're like I'm starting Alec Boom.

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, Like it's not that.

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Marte can be a great player. I do.

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I think noelve, Marti has a lot to offer. I

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>think Diaz is a player. You know, we saw the

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>best of Daz last year, a career high twenty two

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>home runs, hit three thirty. Big fan of his as well,

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, but he's you know, plays one hundred and

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven games every year, so it's like, you know,

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to get a guy he was playing one

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty five.

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well a lot of these guys.

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 3>What's weird is like Boom I think is good batting

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 3>average but low power. Yanda Diez can be the same thing,

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 3>really good batting average on base skills, but the power

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 3>doesn't really go key. Brian Hayes, he started hitting the

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 3>ball harder, tapping into those expected stats, but he steals bases,

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have big power. So it's like, you know, you

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 3>want the consistent, big power bats, you've got to go

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:22.959
<v Speaker 3>a little bit higher. I know you hate it. I

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 3>like Max Max Munsey. Still I'm still gonna take him.

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 3>I do think you have to pay attention to the

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 3>build because the batting average could be a problem. But

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 3>he had a two thirty five expected batting average, where

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 3>if he's hitting two thirty two forty you can live.

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 3>He had one of the you had a top ten

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 3>percentile expected slug this past year.

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 2>He huge walk still big.

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Power numbers when the batting average struggled, and it's the

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 3>fricking Dodgers, like that team is ridiculous, and current roster

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 3>resources got him around four or five in that lineup.

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 3>So RBIs are going to go over a hundred. He

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 3>hit over one hundred RBIs while hitting garbage last year.

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 3>So if you see an improvement, Max Munsey might be

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 3>a really great, big power bet that you can't get

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 3>in later rounds. But you do got to pay attention to,

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 3>like what's the rest of your bill. You don't want

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 3>like the lees, or you don't want like super low

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 3>batting average, or you're gonna end up punting the position.

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 3>But Max Munsey is probably a target for me. But

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 3>again I will say I little want to cheat a

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 3>little bit like I love these guys just my corner infielders.

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 3>I love the idea of Max Mounsey as a corner

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 3>infielder for the flexibility and not as a starter. So

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I am prioritizing getting a higher third baseman. Nolan Aernado's

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of my cutoff of what I want at third base.

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 3>If i'm you know, if I have the choice. Sometimes

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 3>you don't deep fifteen teen leagues, you're screwed.

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 2>But in ten and.

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 3>Twelve team leagues, I don't want to let the position

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 3>fall off because I'd rather take the elite guys and

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 3>then depth I can play at the corner, the corner spot.

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Max Munsey had a great April and a great July,

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and everything else outside of that was ah, we're talking.

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>He hit one eleven in June, he hit one eighty

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>six in May. I mean two seventeen in July to

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty six in September. If the power starts to drop

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>off at all, it's going to be a dangerous, dangerous slope.

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, let's get to shortstop because that's a

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>lot more fun. Bobby Wood Junior at the top, Trey

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Turner at number two, Corey Seger at number three. Francisco

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Lindor another guy. Last year we talked about why is

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Lindor being faded so much in drafts? It was stupid

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>because he had a thirty thirty season. I know he

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>hit two fifty four, but I don't care ninety eight RBI,

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and eight run scored. He is an elite

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>fantasy player still, folks, even if the Mets are far

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>from an elite team. That to me is the grouping

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>those four guys. I assume you want to put Bobby

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Wit on a pedestal above them, though, yes.

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Yep, I'm putting the win on a pedestal for sure,

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 3>and then Turner, Seger, and Lindor are their own.

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think that makes a ton of sense.

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I feel very comfortable with that. Lindor, once again,

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about salary cap leagues, maybe the best value,

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>because he probably will become the cheapest of them most likely.

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>The Turner cost is going to be interesting this year

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>because you know, at the end of the day, you

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>step back and you look at what happened, and I know,

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, people were just bringing their hands most of

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the season, but at the end of the day still

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>was a twenty five Homer thirty steel guy. As we

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about many times here on the show so far

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>this year, the evolution or re evolution and reinvention of

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the game with stolen bases being so much easier to find,

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is Trey Turner still in your mind and asset people

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>should be chasing or you better off I don't know,

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of sitting back and waiting if you don't get

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Witt and maybe going with some other names we're

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about on this list that are going

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to come at a cheaper cost.

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Man, I wish you didn't ask it like that, because

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 3>it's a great question. I kind of think I'm not

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.800
<v Speaker 3>into Trey Turner, like to what you're saying, he doesn't

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 3>provide elite stolen bases. Power definitely upticked. It was a

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 3>little bit streakul like he's a great player. But like

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned, Corey Seeger, Corey Seeger is going to be

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:52.359
<v Speaker 3>a value this year because of that hernia surgery, which

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 3>the expectation is he's going to be ready for the

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 3>opening day because he's just gonna ramp up. Wasn't going

0:34:57.560 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 3>to play a whole bunch and he can DH for

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 3>the team and he could end up being a value.

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 3>So here's the problem. Can Trey Turner still return his value? Yes,

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 3>of course I think that's a possibility. But when you

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.800
<v Speaker 3>start to look at the returns in other spots, Corey

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Seger now going from where he was in the high

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 3>teens to in a twelve team league, an instance is

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:19.399
<v Speaker 3>going in the third round. I'd rather have that same

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 3>thing with lind Or. Lindor between a second and third

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 3>round player, I think the return is better for the

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 3>big bats we've talked about that you can take instead

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 3>of Turner, and then you go down the list, they're

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 3>definitely is value. I mean shortstop nine to short stop

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean shortstop twelve on this list is my have

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 3>to draft every single team this year player. So yes,

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I think without the big hardcore eliteness, he's just a

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 3>totally fine player that to me gets lost in the

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 3>wind a little bit, and I don't prioritize him anymore

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 3>because he's not like fifty sixty stolen bases.

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>So Gunnar Henderson I have five over on Fantasy Pros

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>than Bob Baschett, whose stolen bases have been cut in half.

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Two consecutive seasons, by the way, So that's a guy

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the real blue Stone base hasn't gone down the right direction. Yeah,

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>so that's over. Elie Dela Cruz CJ Abrams, a guy

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 1>who we talked about last year on the show being

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>one of those great values that is gonna cost you

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing to find out and guess what forty seven stone

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>bases later. I know he's a divisive figure. We'll talk

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>about him in a second. Matt McClain at ten, Nico

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Horner at eleven, and then O'Neil Cruz at twelve. I

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. If you're gonna take a shot in

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the dark here as you get later, why not O'Neil Cruz.

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I've said it like a good jillion times over.

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 2>It's so annoying.

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 3>Someone tweeted me, I think like as we were doing

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 3>this about about like there's gonna.

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Bead I should have.

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:39.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't blame I don't blame them again.

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 3>By the way, they tweeted Welsh just twenty year burners

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 3>one of if I can you know cheat again. I

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:51.240
<v Speaker 3>love the idea of O'Neill as my middle infielder. It's

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 3>unfair to others. That's what I love about it. If

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:56.240
<v Speaker 3>you do it, you might be taken away for another spot,

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 3>So it just might not be ideal. But he is

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 3>the player I want to draft on every even if

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 3>I have a shortstop, because there's obviously some injury worries,

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 3>so if I have the ability, I think I've said

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:09.760
<v Speaker 3>this on one of the episodes we did, Bobaschett and O'Neal,

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Cruise might be an incredible pairing O'Neill or Bobaschet. High

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 3>batting average, You're gonna have good run, good RBI totals,

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 3>if the power comes back, he doesn't steal. You could

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 3>pair him with a Cruise that might have a deficiency

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:23.840
<v Speaker 3>in batting average, but he's going to hit for power,

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.879
<v Speaker 3>he's going to have stolen bases. I more aggressive than

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 3>any other position, trying to get too top twelve to

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 3>two top fifteen shortstops, one to start and one in

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 3>my middle infield, and it's usually not Bobachet. Unfortunately, it's

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 3>usually not Abrams because of the high cost. It is

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.359
<v Speaker 3>something more like I took an Elite one and then

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 3>I take O'Neal Cruise later, and if that doesn't happen,

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 3>the other pairing.

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 2>I love.

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 3>He's a player we haven't talked about yet. I would

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 3>go O'Neal cruise in Sandra Bogart.

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, stole it from me, you jerk, all right,

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>So Kim at thirteen, Bogart's was the guy that I

0:37:56.520 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 1>was all hyped up to talk about. You can still

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>be here to do it. That's not the same now,

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but he look in nineteen nineteen season twenty twenty basically

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 1>last year, you remember wash, I was like, he's being

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 1>overdrafted last year and here's the perfect example. Like it's

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>not that I hate the player. I hated the ADP

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>last year and he drove in just fifty eight runs.

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>He did it too, eighty five. He was fine, But

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we got to get those RBI back up.

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>We got to, you know, get that working a little bit.

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>But to me, Bogarts is that perfect guy where if

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna wait on short stop, Bogarts is the dude

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 1>for me. I think we have our new.

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 2>I think we have our first shirt of twenty twenty four.

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Don't hate the player, hate the eighty ADP instead of

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:35.479
<v Speaker 3>the game. I think that's our first Fantasy Pro shirt.

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's doing other things I'm full of a lot of stuff.

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Xander bogarts at fourteen, Dansby Swanson comes in at fifteen. Uh,

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>not surprised with the drop off. There another guy too

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>where the rules change and he stole less basis, so

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>go figure. The batting average went back down to the

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>two forties after being at two seventy seven, So you know, look, Swanson,

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you maybe adjustment to Chicago. Whatever it is, the power

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>was still there. He's also fine. William Damas another guy

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 1>who you know, I think we all look at in

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of this. These guys feel like a clump to

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>me that I'm okay with. And that's the thing. It's

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>like short stop for me. It's like if I don't

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>get Bobby witt or Lindor at a good price, I'm

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in a bargain shop here for Xander Boguards, even Swanson.

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I look, I've watched a lot Anthony Volpie in person,

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:18.839
<v Speaker 1>and I know he's a much better player than when

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 1>he showed last year. And I would not be surprised.

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, even with all his struggles, he was still

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a twenty twenty player last year. His batting average is

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be much better this season. I'm telling you he's

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 1>just a much better player. I think he's just he

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 1>just pressed so hard last year. He is a very

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Dustin Pedroia esque sort of guy in terms of makeup

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and in terms of game. I know, other side of

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the plate, but still like when I watched him, that's

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 1>the kind of player he reminded me of. And I

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>think he is another one that I'm circling Layton drafts

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna take another shot at Oolpy.

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Listen, dude, you if I screw up this O'Neil cruiz

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.280
<v Speaker 3>thing and it gets too high, Anthony Volpi might bolby

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 3>that version. Yeah, it could be an easy twenty five

0:39:57.480 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 3>to twenty five guy. He has proven to hit for

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 3>average in the past, and he is overcombatting average issues

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 3>in a hit or friendly environment.

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it is.

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Ridiculous to say that Volpi, if you look at value

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 3>at this point, might be one of the best values

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 3>on the counting stats.

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 2>That you can get.

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 3>So again, go take a safe one, get yourself as

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 3>Xander Bogart's if you missed out, or you go super

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 3>high and get a Corey Seeger come back later middle infield,

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 3>get Anthony Volpi.

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I I love Volger. Yeah, Bogart's ball good. It's Harry Palta.

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:31.880
<v Speaker 1>What's your Patrones Yeah, yours is yours is Rico program.

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 2>I'll show you.

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But seriously, I like that the Volpi is the secondary guy.

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:42.760
<v Speaker 1>With Bolger, you're only your go Bogarts has that floor again,

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 1>which we need to respect the floor a little bit more.

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just something that in fantasy baseball some

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of get too locked into projectability and not enough

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 1>about well, you know, the Alex Bregman's of the world,

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>but the Xander Brograts of the world. Those guys are

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>just gonna win you leagues because they're coming at really

0:40:57.080 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 1>solid ADPs. And it's natural progression because the youth of

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball the last two to three seasons has

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:06.719
<v Speaker 1>been off the charts good. So there's that anticipation of

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>wanting to be ahead of the curve all the time.

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>We sort of neglect the proven assets and it's something

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that this season, the way the ADP structures

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 1>out totally like that. Let's talk about the catchers. We'll

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>get these guys in your Adley Rutchman, he is the

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 1>one the catcher. No debate about that yes, uh yeah, absolutely, Okay,

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Now you're putting him in a tier, or you're gonna

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>put Real Muto, will Smith Contreras with.

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Him adly is in his own tier, and then the

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 3>next tier is empty because I wouldn't take them, and

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 3>then the next tier after that, the third tier is

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:38.320
<v Speaker 3>where we'll start to consider some players.

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:40.320
<v Speaker 1>So where does that start for you? So it's Real Muto,

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Will Smith, Contreras, stop me when you want to start

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>drafting somebody.

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Now it's really oh that I want to start drafting somebody.

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, so start over, because.

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 1>This is like the game on the price is right

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>with the little yodeler guy has he continues to go op.

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 3>So start at the very tippy start at the very

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.319
<v Speaker 3>tippy top, and I will I'll yodel when I'll take

0:41:58.360 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 3>a guy.

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Okay, perfect, even though we're going down the hill, it's

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the metaphors still.

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they got so.

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Rutchman, we love him. After that, Real Muto will Smith

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 1>number four, Contreras number five, Diaz number six, cal Rawley seven, Salparez, Yo,

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you're really going here? Sean Murphy at eight, Wilson Contreras, Francisco. Yeah,

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:24.919
<v Speaker 1>let's go Francisco Alvarez. Let's talk about him. He can't

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 1>finished last year with twenty five bombs. I know he

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>hit just two o eight, but again, a better hitter

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:31.279
<v Speaker 1>in the minor leagues that we saw in the major

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:33.960
<v Speaker 1>league level. This is another player that we already seen

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the power. Now we just got to put the rest

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:37.839
<v Speaker 1>of the game together. And I always think it's tough

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 1>for rookie catchers. Young catchers, they're managing pitching staffs, they

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 1>got a lot in their mind. Offense tends to come

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a little later for these guys. So why do you

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>like Alvarez so much?

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's gotten into incredible shape this past offseason that

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:53.399
<v Speaker 3>he has spent the entire offseason working through trimming down,

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 3>which is going to just improve more bat speed. You

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 3>had power last year, you have small sample size too.

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Improvement into a sophomore year, I think he's going to

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:05.600
<v Speaker 3>take a big, big step forward. He is an offensive

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 3>first catcher, he always has been. So the point of this,

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:12.880
<v Speaker 3>I actually was yodling at Wilson Contreras, but Alvarez was

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:13.439
<v Speaker 3>the same thing.

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 2>I want Lake catchers.

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:18.280
<v Speaker 3>If I had I thought you I was gonna expense,

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 3>but it was I kind of was actually going like,

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 3>do I want to do this Alvarez to contraraers. I

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 3>want both of those guys, and actually Alvarez is a

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 3>dramatic target, but I want Moreno, I want Alvarez and

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 3>I want.

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Contrerasts because they're going to go near the bottom.

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 3>And I think the difference between them and what you're

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 3>getting at the top is minute. I don't think it

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:39.399
<v Speaker 3>is big enough to pay a top one hundred cost. Now,

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 3>last thing, real quick. The cost is inflated because of NFBC.

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 3>I say this all the time. So the rankings of

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 3>catchers look weird, and it screws up ADPs because they

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 3>are two catcher leagues building them up. There's one catcher

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:54.279
<v Speaker 3>in the top ten I probably reach for in a

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 3>single and it's Yon your Diaz because of the big

0:43:56.400 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 3>numbers with the Astros. But Alvarez, Contreras, Mario, Ohapi, Garver,

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:06.319
<v Speaker 3>those are my targets fifteen team teams later. Two catcher

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 3>leagues are different.

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I'm surprised you put Marina on that conversation

0:44:08.920 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 1>with Contreras and Alvarez just because the best batting average

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>hit well, I guess that's the whole thing. It's the

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>batting average, you know, give up there.

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Power is gonna come.

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I believe early.

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:22.879
<v Speaker 3>I think I think you're gonna get to You're gonna

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 3>get seventeen to twenty this year. He gets high batting average,

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 3>he might even hit three for this team whilst they

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 3>did it in the World Series, and they did in

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs. And if he gets back into that spot,

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna have RBI numbers come up.

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:34.720
<v Speaker 2>They love marine.

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>If he hits three hundred or two eighty five with

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:39.360
<v Speaker 1>seventeen homers, he's going to be the number three catcher

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 1>on this list of them, and it is.

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:43.799
<v Speaker 3>Possible all of all the catchers on this I think

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 3>he is the most likely to be one of those

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 3>tippy top guys.

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 2>Plus he can steal a little bit. Moreno is an

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:49.919
<v Speaker 2>incredible athlete.

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 1>So him's a twelve. Then o'hapi, who you mentioned. That's

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:54.439
<v Speaker 1>a guy that I like to target late too. In fact,

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in single catcher leagues, give me Ohape, give me Alvarez.

0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Moreno's fine towo, especially in points because I do like

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the batting average and head to head points leagues. After that,

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you're going with ruiz Bow Naylor, Mitch Garver, Campusano, Stevenson Kirk,

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and then Diaz in Colorado at twenty Danny Jansen just

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 1>outside the top twenty. But in two catcher leagues, for

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:17.279
<v Speaker 1>those of you who are still playing them, Welsh, what

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 1>your approach you're just trying to hammer that middle or

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>do you want to just you know, kind of take

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:24.799
<v Speaker 1>one steady guy, maybe one reach and then one you know,

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:26.239
<v Speaker 1>star scrub kind of thing.

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:28.799
<v Speaker 3>So my two DC's one of them I took, like,

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 3>excuse me, I took like a middle guy.

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to remember who. I think it was Sean Murphy.

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Who fell, and then I ended up taking a later

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 3>got Mitch Garver, I think it was. And then in

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 3>my other one, I waited really late and I took

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Luis Campusano, and I ended up before you signed. It

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 3>took Gary Sanchez, and Gary Sanchez signed.

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:48.239
<v Speaker 2>To be the backup in Milwaukee.

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:50.520
<v Speaker 3>But don't look now, because you're not going to pay

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 3>him what they did for him to not play games.

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 2>He might catch.

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:55.439
<v Speaker 3>The contres has played in the outfield before I could

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:57.799
<v Speaker 3>see them switching it around. So the bottom line is,

0:45:57.800 --> 0:46:00.759
<v Speaker 3>in two catcher leagues, I'm not gonna pay up for two.

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 3>I will be fine for paying for one, but I'm

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 3>probably hitting one of the middle tier guys, targetingy on

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Ere or Murphy or Salvi or like we said, the

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 3>contraras Alvarez. And then I'm gonna push a little bit down.

0:46:13.120 --> 0:46:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Give me a Mitch Garver who's gonna DH for the Mariners,

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:17.719
<v Speaker 3>or Luis Campusano who's gonna start for the Padres.

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 2>That's my two catcher strategy.

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, there you have it, folks, that's our rundown of

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate infield guy. But who are your favorites of

0:46:24.640 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 1>each position? We want to hear from? You? Drop your

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:31.360
<v Speaker 1>comments below in the YouTube comments there. Subscribe to Fantasy

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Pros MLB Channel two and make sure you ring the

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:35.959
<v Speaker 1>bell for notifications so you know every time a piece

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of content drops here on the channel. We've got the

0:46:37.600 --> 0:46:39.880
<v Speaker 1>top ten list, we got the top twelve list, we

0:46:39.960 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 1>got the short form videos. If you have no attention span,

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 1>like well, sometimes who drifts off in the middle of

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 1>anything I'm saying, which I don't blame him most of

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the time. Also, all the podcasts, all the mock drafts,

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:52.439
<v Speaker 1>everything's gonna be here on the channel, including leading off

0:46:52.840 --> 0:46:55.799
<v Speaker 1>starting I believe in April, maybe March. I don't know.

0:46:55.840 --> 0:46:57.879
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how things go here, but we'll be live

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 1>every single day here on the channel for you, talking fantasy,

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:04.759
<v Speaker 1>talking wagering, talking baseball, every single day. Beautiful time to

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>be alive. That'll do it for us, But the story

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of the game goes on for the Welsh. I'm Joey P.

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you next time, kids. Joey