WEBVTT - Boeing Cash Burn, Tesla Earnings

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple car Playing and broud Otto with the

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Looking at Boeing, Boeing burned through three point nine to

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 2>three billion in cash in the first quarter. That's a

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 2>less dramatic dream than analys had expected. That's accounting for

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 2>the stock moving higher as the embattled planemaker continues to

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 2>slow output to get a handle on its manufacturing issues.

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.639
<v Speaker 2>So I guess trying to really focus on quality as

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 2>opposed to as opposed to quantity. George Ferguson, he's been

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 2>helping us along the way here with this Boeing story.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 3>All along.

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 2>He covers airspace, he covers the airlines for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 2>He also is enjoying our Princeton campus.

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 4>With Hallie Lucis sate show from Princeton is coming is strong.

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're going to We're going down to Princeton.

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, God forbid you take a train into the world's

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 2>financial capital.

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 3>George Ferguson doesn't have to do that. People come to George.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 3>George talk to us about what we saw from Boeing

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 3>in their results. What were the key takeaways for you?

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 5>So I think we saw it not a lot, not

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 5>a lot of detail inside here about what matters most

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 5>going ahead. We did see cash burn for one Q,

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 5>like you said, you know, combined with capex free cash

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 5>flow usage, well three point nine billion. CFO had sort

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 5>of told us that we would see something between four

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 5>and four and a half billion. That came in lighter

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 5>than that. The markets, I think are a little bit

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 5>happier about that, but you can't live here long, right.

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 5>I guess the big takeaway here too, is that there's

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 5>about seven billion dollars in cash and equivalence on the

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 5>balance sheet that's dwindling pretty quickly. They paid four point

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 5>four billion I think it was in debt during the quarter.

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 5>So something has to happen, right. They want to they

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 5>want to buy Spirit Aerosystems. I hear all kinds of

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 5>conflicting reports, but essentially I think it's break. You know,

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 5>there's a lot of challenges around negotiating getting Airbus out

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 5>of Spirit Aerosystems. So Boeing can buy it. They've talked

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 5>about using cash to buy Spirit or I guess debt maybe.

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 5>I think it's a company doesn't want to add a

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 5>lot more debt to their balance sheet. Spirits market cap

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 5>around four billion, you only have seven billion left in

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 5>the balance sheet. Something's got to happen. You got to

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 5>raise some capital here. You can't do this soll cash

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 5>or you got to use Boeing stock and just the

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 5>numbers they're getting small, right, the cash numbers are getting small.

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 5>You're running out a runway here. They need to come

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 5>up with this plan with the FAA and how they're

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 5>going to stabilize production, start building airplanes, start generating cash

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 5>because you can't do this many quarters.

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 4>So, George Lyne, do you think that there's a risk

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 4>that we could be hearing about some kind of financing

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 4>activity from Boeing coming up? I mean, like you just said,

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's I think it'd be kind of hard

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 4>to envision them doing a debt sale right now. That

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 4>sounds like a little bit of maybe a red flag

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 4>to me. But if they would do, I don't know.

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 4>The equity is not worth a whole lot, Like what

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 4>do you do from here?

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so agreed, I think you know, what I heard

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 5>from you is that could be hard to do a

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 5>debt deal here. I think so. I mean, I think

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 5>they wouldn't let four point four billion get repaid without

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 5>sort of plumbing the markets and thinking about whether they

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 5>would do an issuance here. But I mean, you know,

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 5>you wouldn't want to raise equity here. I feel like

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 5>it'd be hard to raise debt. You got a lot

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 5>of You got a lot of money wrapped up at

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 5>inventory on the balance sheet. Airplanes that have already been

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 5>built haven't been delivered to customers that they've done. They've

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 5>shipped some of those in the last quarter, which is

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 5>free up some cash. But I think you really got

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 5>to get the manufacturing, you know, process going again and

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 5>genering cash that way. I think that would get folks

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 5>more comfortable about giving more debt or equity.

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know I could get a debt deal done

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 3>in this marketplace.

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 4>You personally, Paul, I could go sell.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Some Boeing debt back in the day, if I had

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 3>my seat back, Maybe some investment debt. Sure, no problem,

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 3>all right, George, talk to us about deliveries. Where are

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 3>we today? I'm kind of focusing on the seven fifty seven.

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of the main beast is, as you've told

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 2>us in the past, where are we all on you know, deliveries.

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Today and where do they want to get to? And

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 3>you have confidence that they can get there.

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So I think we don't necessarily know where we

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 5>are on deliveries today. We're going to find that out,

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 5>I hope on the earnings call here in a couple

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 5>of minutes. Again, I think that a number of the

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 5>airplanes they delivered in in uh March and in February,

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 5>we're probably out of inventory that we're already built. So

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 5>you know, what I'm getting back is what the real

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 5>build rate is. I've heard numbers in the twenties ish

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 5>where they want to be. They should be at thirty eight,

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.919
<v Speaker 5>and they right now a month in the seven thirties

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 5>Evan breaking to forty two, you know, near the end

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 5>of the year, had they not had this problem with

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 5>the panel blowout in the Alaska Airlines. So what I

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 5>think we heard from the CFO at the Bank of

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 5>America event, you know, a conference earlier this quarter and

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 5>one quarter sorry one Q was that they want to

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 5>be at thirty eight by the end of the year.

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 5>Look around thirty eight. I think they were doing okay financially.

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 5>They need to be breaking up into the forties and fifties.

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 5>That's going to make them a lot more healthy, that's

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 5>going to make their supplier base a lot healthier. Spirit

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 5>couldn't really survive down at that thirty ish, you know,

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 5>thirty eight level of build rate. So again, I think

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 5>where they where they want to be is up in

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, up in the forties and fifties, where Airbus is.

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 5>Airbus is getting ready to break into the you know,

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 5>fifties and sixties. They want to be up there, but

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 5>they're I mean from a fifty rate, I think they're

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 5>or a year and a half away at least right now.

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 4>And of course Airbus has just been like riding this

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 4>whole Boeing disaster wave quite nicely to their benefits. So

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 4>going well for our friends abroad over there. But you

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 4>started off, George by saying that, you know, there's not

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 4>a whole lot to go off of here that you know.

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Of course, Boeing didn't provide earnings guidance for the year.

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 4>We've got some management changes coming up sometime within the year.

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 4>We know that CEO Dave Calhoun is going to step

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 4>down by the end of twenty twenty four. Do you

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 4>think we'll get a little bit more guidance on that

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 4>on the earnings call?

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 5>Not sure, right? I think that. I think that if

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 5>we knew something about the next CEO, I think they

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 5>probably would have even told us before the earnings call.

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 5>That's such a huge overhang in this company right now, right,

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 5>I imagine, you know, we got this announcement. What I mean,

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 5>it seems like we move in dog years here at Boeing,

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 5>right one day is like seven anymore? I don't know.

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 5>I think we got this a month ago, a couple

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 5>of weeks ago, you know. I imagine there's a lot

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 5>of work going on the search right now and feeling

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 5>out constituents as to whether or not the folks they

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 5>identify are the right people. So, and I think as

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 5>soon as they know what they that they have someone

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 5>in place, they'd announce it, because again, it's such a

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 5>huge overhang. I think they need to get someone in place,

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 5>and they need to have their plan fleshed out and

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 5>bring that to the marketplace as soon as possible. I

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 5>think that's going to create again a lot more comfort

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 5>with investors. So I don't think they would hold that back.

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 5>And I don't think that Dave Calhoun's going to be

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 5>the one that's going to announce it either, And so

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 5>I don't think anybody on the call would be a

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 5>person announcing it. But I could be wrong. But again,

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that they're anywhere on that right now.

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 5>And that's super important.

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Hey, George, Boeing's customers, the big airlines, what are their

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 2>needs these days?

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Do they need more aircraft?

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Like if Boeing was it fifty or sixty percent production,

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 2>would there be demand there for that?

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 5>They need more faster, you know, as soon as possible.

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 5>I guess. Look, I think if you take United as

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, one of the core customers, you know, there's

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 5>sort of a there's a demand to fleet refresh around

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:20.679
<v Speaker 5>the world. Right The new Max is fifteen twenty percent

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 5>more efficient than the old seven thirty seven or the

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 5>A three twenty. Airlines want that efficiency as soon as

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 5>possible in their fleets. The market I think is going

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 5>to is looking fairly competitive. It may not, you know,

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 5>this summer may be a little bit less competitive than

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.839
<v Speaker 5>we expect to give in Boeing's problems and some of

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 5>the geared turbofan problems at raytheon that knocks on airplanes

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 5>out of service. But fuels rising, airlines want to be

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 5>very competitive. They need the most fuel efficient aircraft, so

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 5>they want them as soon as possible, And like in

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 5>the United's case, almost everybody is increasing size right. Size

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 5>of aircraft are rising because pilot's got twenty percent plus,

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.719
<v Speaker 5>you know, wage increases. You got to find a way

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 5>to drive down costs. One of the things we heard

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 5>out of Jet Blue yesterday they're looking for ways to

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 5>drive down costs. One of the things you always do

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 5>is increase aircraft size, and therefore you're flying more passengers

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 5>for the same cost of that pilot up front. That

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 5>helps you improve efficiencies. They all want it, so they're

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 5>all trying to find bigger aircraft to fly with more seats.

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 5>And so yes, airlines want airplanes as soon as possible.

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 5>If you're a Boeing customer, what also really ticks you

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 5>off is you look across the street at the folks

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 5>flying the Airbus airplane and they probably have little to

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 5>no interruption this summer in their schedules. You're worried about

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 5>what deliveries you're going to get. And your ability to

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 5>fly your schedule, and that hurts if you're the bowing customer. Right,

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 5>the airbus customers.

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Are smiling all right, George, thanks so much again for

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 2>giving us an update there on the aerospace airline industry.

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.599
<v Speaker 2>George Ferguson he covers all the airlines and airspace for

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple card Play and

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.719
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>station Just say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 3>Right smack in the middle of earning season.

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you that was a very very important earnings

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 2>release and conference call last night for one Tesla, and.

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 3>It looks like Elon Musk got the job done. The

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 3>stocks up fifteen percent.

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Here today, let's break down what we did see from

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Tessa and what we did hear from mister Elon Musk.

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 3>We'll check out with Steve Man.

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 2>He's a global autos and industrials and analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 2>He's down in Princeton, New Jersey. Very comfortable down in Princeton.

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 2>He's not coming in to New York, he's not taking

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the train, He's done all that malarkey.

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 4>But we love the studio guests. When we can get one.

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes and we need to go down to Princeton to

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 3>our OFFICEA I got to show you that it is awesome.

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 4>Especially with all of our BI friends, and that we

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 4>should do a remote broadcast.

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 3>We're going to do that. I'll put that in the books.

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 2>We're going to great food and that's where we built

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 2>BI from day one. Hey, Steve, thanks so much for

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 2>joining us here. What are your takeaways from what we

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 2>saw from UH Tesla and the results and what we

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 2>heard from Elon Musk.

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, thanks, Paul.

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 6>Uh.

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 7>It's a sigh of relief. I think for a lot

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 7>of investors. You know, if you look at the valuation

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 7>of Tesla, there's actually two groups. You can actually break

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 7>it down two groups investors. One who thinks is just

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 7>a Tesla, is just an automotive company. The other really

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 7>believes in the long term, the AI, the tons vehicle.

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:36.319
<v Speaker 7>I think yesterday's call and yesterday's announcement it sues a

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 7>lot of the concerns that both parties had Yesterday especially

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 7>with the announcement that they're going to pull forward, not

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 7>just launch, but pull forward the The launch of the

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 7>affordable EV.

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Is that something that you give a lot of credence

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 4>to Steve because I feel like with Elon and with

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 4>Tesla and the past, there have been these promises and

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, maybe not all of them have quite come

0:11:58.400 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 4>to fruition.

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 7>I think the you know, so, I think the affordable

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 7>EV is is a real thing. You know, like you

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 7>guys talked about earlier robo Taxi. I think there's still

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 7>needs time for development. But if you look at the

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 7>affordable EV actually kills two birds in one stone. You know,

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 7>it actually increases a scale for Tesla, and you know,

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 7>we're going to see revenue growth, we potentially see profit

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.599
<v Speaker 7>growth from that affordable EV. And that's exactly what the

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 7>market needs. It's more affordable vehicles to increase penetration of

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:40.479
<v Speaker 7>EV's the other thing that's really important with this affordable

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 7>EV launches. It actually helps Tesla increases reach globally because

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:49.599
<v Speaker 7>you know, you have a lot of emerging markets that

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 7>you know a lot of people, a lot of consumers

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 7>there cannot afford an expensive fifty thousand dollars vehicle forty

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 7>thousand dollars vehicles, So up twenty thirty up thirty thousand

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 7>vehicle is the right product for them to expand geographically.

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Steve, what do we know about the economics of such

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 2>a new or lower cost vehicle? Can they produce that

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 2>at a profitable basis on a per unit basis?

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, there's there's a couple of ways they can approach this.

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:22.119
<v Speaker 7>I think, you know, they can develop a totally new platform.

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 7>But you know, in the other segments I've done with you,

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 7>we've talked about vertical integration, and vertical integration has actually

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 7>reduced the cost of you know, car production. So for them,

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 7>you know, for TESTA, it's the only company that's profitable

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 7>in producing evs. So the other option is actually think about,

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.719
<v Speaker 7>you know, what they can do with the three and

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 7>the Y. You know, can they offer you know, lower trims,

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 7>maybe even you know, you know, a smaller battery that's

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 7>going to allow them to cut costs and also you know,

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 7>make that available to the consumer at a lower price.

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 4>So this obviously was the best part of the report.

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 4>This is what the stock is rallying on right now.

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 4>But you still had elsewhere in the earnings report, we

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 4>had falling vehicle sales, we had worse than expected revenue

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 4>and profit and a pretty significant cash burn figure. So

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Steve, are you totally optimistic here? What kind

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 4>of concerns do you still have here?

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 7>I've always said, you know, I think this year and

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 7>even into next year, there's some bumps on the road.

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 7>You know, cyber truck is still ramping up. It's a

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 7>very difficult vehicle to build. They're still working on those issues.

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 7>We don't think the EV market actually, especially in the US,

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 7>will pick back up until twenty twenty five, late twenty

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 7>twenty five, in the twenty twenty six because the market

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 7>really needs a lower cost, more affordable EV to entice

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 7>kind of more new buyers into the market. So long term,

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 7>long term, I'm very positive. I think I think this

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 7>this company has done everything right in terms of you know,

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 7>looking at AI, looking at AV. I still believe the

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 7>e V, the the e V, uh, you know, shift

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 7>has actually sailed. We're gonna have evs for the long terms.

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 7>And I think that subscription based software based vehicle that

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 7>they're trying to build is is the right move right

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 7>strategy for the industry.

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Steve, what did the elon say or to what extent

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 2>did he address just kind of the developments in China,

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 2>how things are developing there from a competitive standpoint, a

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 2>sales standpoint and all that.

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's uh, I actually see that. We'll continue to

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 7>be bumpy.

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 7>They probably likely to lose market share, continue to lose

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 7>some market share there. But I think you know, Tesla

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 7>is leveraging China, not just for sales, but it's a

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 7>low cost manufat actoring base for the company. The Shanghai

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 7>factory still pumps out a million vehicles, close to a

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 7>million vehicles a year at a very low cost. They

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 7>still are able to source battery from companies like c

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 7>at L, the largest EV battery maker in the world,

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 7>at a very attractive price given their volume. So, you know,

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 7>China sales will probably slow. There's it's a hyper competitive market,

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 7>shall me, which is a you know, a major cell

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 7>phone maker in China. They're launching a vehicles that's also

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 7>very affordable, so they're gonna see more competition in China.

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 7>So but again, China is not just a sales for sales,

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 7>it's a manufacturing, low cost manufacturing base.

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 8>For them.

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 4>So something else on the call, Steve that Elon had

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 4>took a dig at the car makers that are pairing

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 4>back on the EV production plans and going more to

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 4>the gas electric hybrids instead. You didn't call them out,

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 4>but GM and Ford are among those ones. And but

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 4>it's that really where consumers are going more proportionally right now,

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 4>more into the plug in hybrid space, or maybe non

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 4>plug in hybrid, but just hybrids in general versus full

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 4>on evs.

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think the consumer I think you know, we

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 7>did a survey not so long ago. I think what

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 7>we got from that survey was that I think the

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 7>consumer needs to trial evs. They actually need to be

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 7>educated on, you know, how to make EV works work

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 7>in their daily life. So, you know, PHVs plug in

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 7>hybrids hybrids is actually good transition into full evs.

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 4>They alleviate some of.

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 7>The concerns in terms of range, in terms of the

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 7>lack of infrastructure that that we you know, that that's

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 7>for the EV market right now. So PHIV and EV

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 7>are a good transitional product, but it's not a long

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 7>term product because if you look at some of the

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 7>emission standards, it's continued to continue to be tighter and tighter.

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 7>Eventually hybrids and phgvs are probably won't even meet the lower,

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 7>the more stringent emission standards down you know, in the

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 7>next decade.

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Steve thirty seconds. What's the call here on just Elon?

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Has he focused on Tesla?

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 7>He has focused on task Site. There was a question

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 7>last night on that and he reiterated that, you know,

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 7>I mean this is his baby, you know, AI his baby,

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 7>that's his that's his I want to say, that's his

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 7>dream YEP is to make cars, robots and timeless. So

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 7>he's he's laser focused on that.

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, good stuff, Steve Man, thanks so much for

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 2>joining us as always Global Autos and Industrials research channels

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 2>for Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us from Prince New Jersey via

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 2>zoom here.

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 3>And the investors certainly liked what they heard last night. Molly,

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 3>oh my gosh.

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that stock is ripping today, and how didn't Nora

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 4>just send I mean it was down quite a bit

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 4>on the year, so this is uh, I mean, remember,

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean the job cuts too have been like really

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 4>quite something. In our colleagues, I'm out in San Francisco,

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Dana Hall and Ed Ludlow and all over that. So

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 4>I think the marketing division that was the most recent

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 4>one to go right that we've decided that ads are

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 4>no longer worth it. Ye, people are just gonna buy

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 4>the car.

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Word of mouth.

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah it's yeah, it's word of mouth and it's the

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 2>it's the strength of the brand out there.

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 3>So the stock is up fourteen don't.

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 4>Know if I really disagree with that.

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't.

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't you known, you know.

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 2>So anyway, it's got a market cap of four and

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty five billion dollars, So we'll see how this plays out.

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 3>So a good day for the shareholders of Tesla.

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Car playing Android

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Down Paul Sweeney. We're live on our Bloomberg Interactive Brooker's studio,

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 3>and we're also.

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 2>Streaming live on YouTube so that you can hit over

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 2>to YouTube dot com search Bloomberg Podcast and that's where

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 2>you find all right. Facebook kids call it.

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Meta heads the professionals Facebook for me.

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 2>Stock's up forty percent, year to date, it's up one

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty percent over the last twelve months. When

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 2>you see stock that's had that kind of performance.

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 4>Since the bar high bai, I mean what else do?

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 2>And it means they better, they better really deliver on

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 2>their earnings. And they're going to report earnings I think

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 2>after the close tonight. So let's get a little preview.

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Man Deep saying Joints is here a senior technology channels

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 2>for Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us here in studio as he does.

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 2>He does not mail it in from home or from Princeton.

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 2>He comes into the world.

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 3>Capital of Big gold Star for that as opposed to

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 3>his management team, which will leave that Man Deep, Stock's

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 3>had a heck of a run here. What do they

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 3>need to do here with their next earnings report?

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:48.199
<v Speaker 9>Just keep executing.

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 8>I mean what they have done over the last eighteen

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 8>months is one you know, really the focus on cost

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 8>cuts and the eurof efficiency which was twenty twenty three

0:20:58.760 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 8>has really paid.

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 4>Off aka job cuts.

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 8>I mean, look, I think you could argue with a

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 8>lot of the tech companies their cost structure was bloated

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 8>coming out of the pandemic because they overhired.

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 9>Looking at the growth and so they had to course correct.

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 8>In the case of Meta, I mean, this is a

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 8>great business model, over fifty percent operating margin, and for

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 8>good reason. I mean, the fixed costs are almost negligible

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 8>after you know, you have the infrastructure of the scale

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 8>of what Meta has created, you know, for their family

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 8>of apps. And so the way I look at it

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 8>is Instagram clearly still has a ton of runway. The

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 8>blue app is losing engagement, but they have been able

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 8>to make up for that with their reals product, and

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 8>Reels was the equivalent of TikTok. Remember, TikTok really was

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 8>a scary proposition for them in terms of taking away engagement.

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 8>They managed to create a product that was comparable to TikTok.

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 8>And now if the TikTok app is banned, that's actually

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 8>a great positive because they're gonna get a lot of

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 8>the creators come over from TikTok to Reels.

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 4>Is that a lot of why the stock has had

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 4>the run it's on right now because of the prospect

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 4>of TikTok being banned or is it really more the

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 4>Ai story.

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 8>It's actually the execution that they have shown over the

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 8>past twelve months, and as I mentioned cost cuts have

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 8>played a big role because now their EPs expectations have

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 8>gone up forty percent. So in their case for share

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 8>earnings for share, it's not just multiple expansion, it's EPs.

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 8>Growth expectations have also caught up. And I think in

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 8>terms of the top line, they've been able to grow

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 8>top line twenty five percent after laying off twenty five

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 8>percent of the staff. So that tells you how much

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 8>leverage there is in the business model. And look, their

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 8>scale really is what differentiates Meta from like a Snap

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 8>or a pinterest Snap and Pinterests are still struggling.

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 9>With that pricing.

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 8>Not so much for Meta because they have the best

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 8>at targeting and that's what gets reflected in their numbers.

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, So you mentioned the TikTok issue, and again

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 2>that legislation, the financial the Aid Package, ninety five billion

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 2>dollar package signed into law by the President today.

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Part of it includes TikTok.

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 2>So we spoke to Matt Shuttingholm, he's our litigation analyts

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 2>for Bloomberg Intelligence yesterday.

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 3>He says, this is going to court.

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 2>When you talk to investors that invest in Meta YouTube,

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 2>all the competitors to TikTok, is there feeling in the marketplace.

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 3>How this might play out.

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think overall it's a net positive for both

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 8>those companies, I mean, Meta and Alphabet YouTube because even

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 8>if let's say the court overturns or decides, you know,

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 8>the app needs to make some remedies and can still operate.

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 8>I think TikTok has a tough problem in terms of

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 8>retaining their creators. So it's one thing, you know, Yeah,

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 8>you've got you know, viewers who come to your app

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 8>for content, but ultimately it's the user generated content that's

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 8>what makes TikTok unique. And if they lose those creators

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 8>over to YouTube or to Instagram, then those creators aren't

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 8>going to come back, even if the app can operate

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 8>down the line. So in the case of Internet, it's

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 8>all about engagement, and the way you maintain engagement is

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 8>through unique content, in this case user generated content.

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 9>So they can't afford to lose those creators.

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Definitely. Yeah, they drive a lot of views in the

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 4>ad space for sure. I mean, I just taking a guess.

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm not on TikTok. I'm not that young, cool person,

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 4>but I've heard.

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Our young and cool as opposed to John Tucker. I

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 3>mean assumption that John Talker is not on TikTok, I

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 3>haven't said anything.

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, as John John likes to fly through anonymously through

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 4>this John.

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 3>J YouTube guy.

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 2>He goes on and he he You watch the like

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 2>the professors who teach classes and stuff like that.

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 3>You learn a lot of physics courses and you know, oh, that's.

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 4>Really what YouTube was created for. Anyways, keeps moving with Meta.

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 4>Thank you John for joining us today. Mandy coming back

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 4>to Meta here. So we've been talking about this stock rally.

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 4>It's added like close to almost four hundred billion dollars

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 4>in market value on this run. But this stock compared

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 4>to the peers that you were mentioning snap Pinterest, Reddit.

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 5>This is cheap.

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 4>How does that work? Tell us about this earnings multiple?

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 4>And how that's why this stock is trading at a discount.

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 8>Well, so large caps always trade at a slightly lower

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 8>multiple than your small cap companies, and for good reason.

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 8>You know, there's only so much runway you have as

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 8>a company that already generates over one hundred and fifty

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 8>billion dollars in annual revenue. So look, I think in

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 8>the case of Meta, the sentiment yes can be positive

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 8>if they deliver on not only their core business but

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 8>also AI. So right now everyone is focused on what

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 8>additional revenue you can generate from AI. And in the

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 8>case of Meta, they were losing sixteen billion dollars a

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 8>year on Metaverse. Now they seem to have made that

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 8>pivot where they're more focused on AI. They've released a

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 8>third version of their Lama model, which is what everyone

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 8>is focused on.

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 4>Myself, we have to ask what is the MAMA model?

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 4>Please tell us.

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 8>So in the world of generative AI, it's about having

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 8>your own foundational model. Think of open AI as GPT.

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 8>What powers chat GPT is an underlying foundational model where

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 8>you have got a very large size model with you know,

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 8>billions of parameters and weights, and that's what makes it intelligent.

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 8>Now Meta has actually trained its own model using in

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 8>video GPUs and that is comparable to GPT or you know,

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 8>Google Gemini in terms of performance. So what it tells

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 8>you is they're not dependent on anybody to deploy their

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 8>technology or they don't need to partner. In fact, we

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 8>did a survey at BI and Meta emerged as a

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 8>contender for GENAI based search. So think of what chat

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 8>GPT is doing or perplexity is doing. Meta actually is

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 8>being used as a search platform now because they have

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 8>rolled out Meta AI on whatsapppen on Instagram, and over

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 8>time maybe they take share from Google Search.

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 4>And that's what's called Lama.

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 9>Lama is the model.

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 8>We also know why that just harm That's cool, Silicon

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 8>Valuay that Lama model can be used for all types

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 8>of use cases.

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 9>Search is just one of them.

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm clearly not an engineer.

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 3>That's beyond me exactly.

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Fortunately, Man deepsins we get to chat with it. Thirty

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 2>seconds left a metaverse.

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.199
<v Speaker 3>We're all on that. You mentioned that it was at

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 3>a Runwright loss of sixteen billion.

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 8>I mean, as long as they keep growing over twenty percent,

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 8>market is forgiving. When it comes to losing four billion

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 8>dollars a quarter, they don't care.

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 3>And that's still the kind of that's still the and

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 3>we don't have any more he's not backing away.

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 9>If he's not backing away and we.

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 8>Don't have any markers on what he's losing four billion

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 8>dollars on, maybe he's subsidizing all the v are in

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 8>the ar glasses that.

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 9>People are buying, and that could be one way you

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 9>justify that.

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 4>I haven't seen what. I don't know if someone single

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 4>person who's on the metaverse, I couldn't tell you a

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 4>single thing about it.

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 9>No, And I think ar glasses.

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 8>I think some people I was talking to that Murray

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 8>she owns one of the air glasses, and there's few

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 8>people who what do you do with them?

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, you use it to consume content or to you know,

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 9>just like convenience is laughing here.

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 4>I think he's a use that. I also have no

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 4>idea what's going on.

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 8>You're the same boat as I.

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm all right, well just look, I think for the

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 2>stock as long as they don't talk about it, yes,

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 2>that that's good for the stock. Man Deep saying thank

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 2>you for again explaining what's happening in the world of technology.

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Man Deep seeing one of the best tech animals on

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street, and he covers all the tech stuff I've

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 2>got Anna rog Rana. Also they're doing it from a

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 2>senior perspective. We got technology team all over the globe

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 2>following technology in Asia, Europe.

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 3>What is in Europe? And certainly the US man Deep seen.

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us Live

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecar Play and Android

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 2>We're live here in on O Bloomberg Interactive, Brokers Studio,

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 2>streaming live on YouTube as well to check in on

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.719
<v Speaker 2>bloom YouTube dot com and search Bloomberg Podcasts.

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News.

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Along with Morning Console, they have an ongoing poll where

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 2>they do some polling data as it rates to the

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 2>current political situation and key battleground states.

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 4>That's the key part, right, It's been a really good series. Yeain,

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 4>Gregory Cordy has been all over eighties, our Bloomberg News

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 4>White House and political correspondent, and he's going to join

0:29:58.080 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 4>us now. Gregory, what can you tell us about the

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 4>big takeaways from this iteration of the poll.

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So, as you said, we've been doing this every month.

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 10>This is the seventh iteration of this poll in seven

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 10>key battleground states, and for the first five months it

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 10>was a pretty stable race with former President Trump with

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 10>a slight lead over President Biden. Then after the State

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 10>of the Union address, we got a little bit of

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 10>good economic news and we saw last month President Biden

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 10>pretty much bring it even he was winning or even

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 10>in the ross belt states, the blue Wall states we

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 10>call them of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin made it, gave

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 10>him a fighting chance. But now we're seeing in this month,

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 10>in the April poll sort of reversion back to the

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 10>mean what we had been seeing all along with former

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 10>President Trump having across these seven battle ground states a

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 10>six point lead, and that's significant. Biden can't win this

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.719
<v Speaker 10>without getting at least those blue Wall states and probably

0:30:56.800 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 10>another one. And he's now down in Pennsylvany within the

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 10>margin of error, but significantly down in Wisconsin. Michigan. Interestingly,

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 10>is this bright spot? And who would have known because

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 10>there are a lot of concerns there about a large

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 10>population of Muslim voters union workers, but he seems to

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 10>be holding his own there.

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Gregory, what are the key drivers are key influencers in

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 3>his poll? What what kind of moves the numbers around?

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 10>It's really the economy and with that, you see that

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 10>with any incumbent president, their numbers move up and down

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 10>with the economy. And what we're seeing in this poll

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 10>is deep pessimism about where we're going to be by

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 10>the end of the year. You see here the numbers,

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 10>UH majorities think that the inflation rate is going to

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 10>be higher by the end of the year, that the

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 10>economy overall is going to be worse, and UH also

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 10>that interest rates are going to be higher by the

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 10>end of the year. Now, these are are this, These

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 10>are voters talking, and they're they're sort of giving us

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 10>their perspective within this political framework where this this might

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 10>differ a little bit from the University of Michigan survey

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 10>when we're talking to consumers and and people making different

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 10>kinds of decisions. But the fact that President Biden is

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 10>so tied to the state of this economy and that

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 10>people are pessimistic about the economy is not a good

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 10>sign for the president.

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 4>This is so fascinating to me as somebody who covers

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 4>the economy, just like the I mean, this is something wait,

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, Gregory, we're no stranger to this, but just

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 4>like the mismatch, and like where the economy is actually

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 4>performing and how people actually perceive it to be performing.

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 4>And it's so interesting to me that like this mismatch continues.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 4>Hear me, We're about to get a GDP report tomorrow

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 4>that's gonna be is it tomorrow? Yeah, tomorrow, it's gonna

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 4>be pretty pretty strong. I mean you're gonna have growth

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 4>like what up in like you know, near the two

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 4>and a half three percent area. The unemployment rate is

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 4>below four percent. Yeah, inflation has been stalling. I guess

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 4>when you say to me that, you know that. So

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 4>a majority of swing state voters see the economy worsening.

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 4>I just wonder, like what metric are they referring to?

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 4>And I know that they're not looking at the economy

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 4>based on like, oh, well, we think manufacturings this, but

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 4>like what what what are they looking at? Is it

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 4>really just inflation?

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:06.479
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, voters look at the economy differently than economists look

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 10>at the infla economy. And one of the interesting things

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 10>even in this poll, there's an inconsistency and it's a

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 10>little inscrutable. But when you ask people about the national economy,

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 10>two thirds of them to say it's bad. When you

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 10>ask people about their local economy, a majority say it's

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 10>actually pretty good. And so people are differentiating between their

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 10>own personal economic situation and what they see in the

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 10>economy writ large. Why is that it may be because

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 10>of their king off of negative political coverage. It might

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 10>be because we have this political polarization where when they're

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 10>saying the economy is bad, they're really trying to make

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 10>a statement about the president who they don't like. It

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 10>may just be that the they view inflation as a

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 10>national issue and inflation is high. Unemployment they might see

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 10>as a local issue because they have a job and

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 10>their neighbor has a job, and so they might see

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 10>as local issue, and so therefore their local economy is

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 10>doing well. There's a lot to parse out there, but

0:33:57.760 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 10>certainly people are giving us mixed signals about the state

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 10>of economy.

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 3>And what do you think the Biden administration needs to do?

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps differently, going to Molly's point about saying, hey, the

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 2>economy is in pretty darn good shape.

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Here's what we've done. How do you think they should

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 3>be messaging this?

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 10>They have been trying with that message for months now,

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 10>and it's been a tough message to get across. At

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 10>one point, they tried to take this pejorative label of

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 10>the economy that Republicans try to brand it with of Bidenomics,

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 10>and turn that into a positive. That did not work.

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 10>They did not change the public perception of Bidenomics, they

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 10>moved a little bit away from that messaging. Right now,

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 10>they can talk all they want about the Infrastructure Bill,

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 10>the Inflation Reduction Act, the Chips Act, all these things

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 10>that we know we've been tracking is starting to make

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 10>a difference, and we'll make a difference in manufacturing on

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 10>sharing a lot of technology. But those aren't really resonating

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:53.800
<v Speaker 10>with people. People don't really connect with bills being passed.

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 10>They want to see actual stuff getting done, and some

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 10>of that is on a longer time ramps. So maybe

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 10>it's just giving it time. We have six more now.

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:03.320
<v Speaker 10>But the problem for Biden is that now the second

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 10>quarter of an election year is really when people start

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:08.359
<v Speaker 10>to make up their minds about the economy, really sort

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 10>of solidify how they think the economy is, and they're

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 10>going to carry that with them into November.

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 4>And another problem with all this too gregory and that

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 4>you point out in the story, is that it really

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 4>doesn't matter, like for whatever reason that the economy is

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:23.800
<v Speaker 4>performing the way it is, but voter's perception is that

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 4>if it's doing poorly, you put that blame on the president,

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 4>whether it's you know, deserves to be there or not.

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 4>So you know, Biden tried shifting that a bit, you know,

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 4>saying the inflation stuff is stemming from you know, Russia's

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 4>invasion of Ukraine. That message didn't really sit Can he

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 4>really shift the blame elsewhere anymore?

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, we asked that's a very specific question. In this

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 10>iteration of the poll. We asked who is responsible for

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 10>the economy? And the number one answer, of course, it's

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 10>the president. There is some political polarization there. Republicans are

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 10>more willing to hold him accountable than Democrats. Democrats are

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 10>more likely to say, well, you know, Congress also plays

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 10>a role, the Fed plays a role, Wall Street corporations

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 10>all role. For Republicans, they want to put this entirely

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 10>at the feet of the president. So the issue is

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 10>going to be how to independency, How those swing voters

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 10>see it. Do they give Biden a little bit of

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 10>a pass given that this post pandemic economy has had

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 10>a whole bunch of struggles that may or may not

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 10>be outside the president's control. That's the debate that we're

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 10>going to have to have in the next six months

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 10>or so.

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 3>Gregory, how aware do you think the White House is

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 3>of polling data like this than you so much.

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 10>I don't necessarily want to get into every conversation that

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 10>I have with the White House and the Biden campaign

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 10>on this, but suffice it to say they're very aware.

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 10>You know, the public messaging is going to be. We

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 10>don't dictate policy by the way polls are from day

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 10>to day. But look, they look particularly at these polls.

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 10>You'll see a lot of poles out there that have

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 10>the national number, the popular vote number, and that's actually

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 10>pretty even. Trump and Biden are pretty much neck and

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 10>neck in those national numbers. But because of the way

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 10>the electoral college is constructed, it's these seven states that

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 10>are most likely going to decide this and that's where

0:36:59.840 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 10>that six point differential makes a difference. And so they're

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 10>looking not just the national numbers. They would obviously like

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:07.279
<v Speaker 10>to see an upward trend in the national numbers, but

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:10.439
<v Speaker 10>they're looking state by state by state to see where

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 10>they're doing, where they're up, where they're down. And this

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 10>is going to be especially important going in the summer

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 10>and fall into where they deploy the resources, where they

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 10>spend money on ads, where they put volunteers on the ground,

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 10>where they knock on doors, where they do they get

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:23.360
<v Speaker 10>out on the vote efforts, and this is going to

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 10>be a very shifting campaign over the next six months.

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 10>We're going to see both the Trump and Biden campaigns

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 10>look at these polls and decide where the poy of

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 10>their resources because this is actually an awfully small chessboard.

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 10>This is not a fifty state campaign. This is a

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.359
<v Speaker 10>seven state campaign and maybe even smaller than that at

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 10>this point.

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 2>And Gregor, is there any reason to think in your

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 2>polling data, do you say anything about the president former

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 2>President Trump's legal issues being a weight on him?

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't appear to be.

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:51.879
<v Speaker 10>We asked that, not this month, but the previous month.

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:55.800
<v Speaker 10>We asked whether people would change their minds if the

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 10>president's convicted on anything, and a majority said that they

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 10>would not vote for Trump if you were convicted on something.

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 10>Now we'll see if he were to be convicted whether

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 10>people might change their minds and discount these Obviously, President

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 10>Trump is out there every day trying to dismiss these

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 10>as partisan political persecutions of him, So we'll have to

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 10>see whether an actual conviction changes that dynamic at all.

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 10>People really aren't differentiating between these cases at all. The

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 10>Alvin Bragg case that's going on Manhattan. Now, the two

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 10>federal cases and the Georgia case. People kind of throw

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 10>them all in the same bucket, and so we'll just

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:36.240
<v Speaker 10>have to see if there's an actual conviction. How people

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 10>process that information.

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:39.879
<v Speaker 4>It certainly is a lot to keep track of from

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 4>a voter's perspective, So I can't necessarily say I blame

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 4>them if you do lump them altogether. Something else you

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 4>touched on in this version of the survey, Gregory, is

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 4>abortion and how important that will be in deciding the

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 4>next president. How did that one rank versus the economy.

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 10>This poll was in the field when we had that

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 10>Arizona Supreme Court decision that upheld a nineteenth century abortion

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 10>restriction law that was in effect up until Roe v. Wade,

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 10>the Supreme Court case in nineteen seventy three, and so

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 10>we're reverting back to the pre row law in Arizona.

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 10>Very controversial, obviously, and we do see an uptick of

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 10>voters saying that abortion is a very important issue for them,

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 10>and especially obviously among democratic women, among independent women a

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 10>little less so. But suburban women is the key demographic

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 10>that we all look at. An uptick there and especially

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 10>in Arizona. Now the question is going to be whether

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 10>these are people who already those votes were baked in,

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 10>Those were votes that President Biden was already going to get.

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 10>It may help him, though in terms of enthusiasm. There

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 10>seems to be an enthusiasm gap here, and so Joe Biden,

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 10>even if he's not winning any new voters on the

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 10>abortion issue, he needs that issue to really motivate those

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 10>Democratic voters to show up in November, because there might

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 10>be a lot of reasons why they they Otherwise, Mike

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:02.479
<v Speaker 10>decide to set this one out all.

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Right, Gregy, thank you so much for joining us. Appreciate

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 3>your reporting.

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Gregory Cordy, white House and political correspondent for Bloomberg News,

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 2>joining us from Washington, DCU.

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:16.959
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:20.879
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecardplay and Android Auto

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live on

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just say Alexa,

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:29.720
<v Speaker 1>playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Mollie Smith, she's sitting here for Alex Steele this week,

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 2>who's on vacation On Paul Sweeney. You're live here in

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 2>our Bloomberg Interactive Brooker Studio or streaming live on YouTube.

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 3>That's the video.

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.280
<v Speaker 2>So go over to YouTube dot com and search Bloomberg

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Podcast and that's where you will find us.

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 3>You know, Molly.

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 2>One of the most amazing stories to me in financial

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 2>services over the last decade or so has been the

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 2>growth of ETFs.

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 4>Huge just can're.

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Amazed at the fun flows to ETFs and it makes

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of sense.

0:40:57.120 --> 0:40:58.399
<v Speaker 3>And fortunately we have people like Eric.

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 2>Pauchunis at Bloomberg Intelligence who keeps us update on what's

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 2>going on there. But we wanted to talk to one

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 2>of the practitioners in the business. Jennifer Grancio joins us.

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 2>She's global head of distribution at TCW. Little firm on

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 2>the West coast, huge firm on the West face and

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 2>they're into the ETF business.

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Jennifer, thanks for joining us here in our studio.

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 2>What is the TCW ETF business? Tell us kind of

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 2>how you guys are in that business.

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 6>Happy to you, great to be here. So from a

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 6>TCW perspective, a lot of people think of us as

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 6>you know, the core of the fixed income portfolio, which

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 6>we are for many investors with the TCW or met

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 6>West funds, and now we're growing the equity business as well,

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 6>so a lot of that will be ETFs, and we

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:44.320
<v Speaker 6>also were going to do ETFs in the fixed income space.

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 4>When you say you do ETFs, are you the one

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 4>that you're like deciding what goes into each one or

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:52.320
<v Speaker 4>like tell us, like what your role is in this marketplace?

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah for sure.

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 6>So so from an equity perspective at TCW, we have

0:41:57.280 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 6>some great core strategies we run in mutual funds and

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 6>SMA through the end to number one acquisition, and then

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 6>also we're converting a couple of legacy TCW active mutual funds.

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:10.480
<v Speaker 6>We're going to have a very impressive range of megatrend

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 6>thematic products for clients. And if you think about why

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 6>and what's the role and why does the world need that.

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 6>There's a lot of index ETF option out there. A

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 6>lot of people are very indexed in their portfolios, which

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 6>has this real concentration bias now in large tech, and

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 6>so we're offering the market a range of ETFs on

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 6>energy and power transformation, reshoring of supply chains, artificial intelligence

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:35.600
<v Speaker 6>that let you take some money out of the core

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:40.280
<v Speaker 6>and really go after outperformance in alpha in portfolio.

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 3>So by definition are those active ETFs.

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:46.840
<v Speaker 6>They are very concentrated portfolios and active. And if you

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 6>think about the markets, money's not free anymore. Rates you're

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 6>much higher. So we think the next ten twenty years

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 6>are our great market for active managers that can outperform.

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 6>So all of these ETFs on the thematic side will

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 6>be active. Yeah, so let's talk about some of those themes.

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:03.760
<v Speaker 6>I mean you had mentioned, you know, related to energy

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 6>transition supply chains. What are some of the ones that

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 6>you guys are really paying a lot of attention to

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 6>right now. Yeah, I mean, those are two big ones,

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 6>and they're not small, tactical, narrow trends. They're huge. They're

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 6>going to be here for many decades. And so one

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 6>of the ETFs is net Z and etz and that's

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:23.799
<v Speaker 6>about energy and power transformation. And so if you think

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:26.839
<v Speaker 6>about that, we are going to need to more than

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 6>double our power and energy in the next twenty years.

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:33.840
<v Speaker 6>So think about that, more than double. And so companies

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 6>that are at the forefront of how we service the

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 6>need and demand and kind of monster demand we have

0:43:39.600 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 6>for power, as well as companies that are more efficient,

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 6>have a huge opportunity to outperform and so that's a

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 6>big theme. And now in that theme, we own companies

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 6>that are energy better, energy producers. We own Vertive, which

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 6>cools data centers. We own waste and garbage companies that

0:43:57.080 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 6>are finding ways to create natural gas and energy out

0:43:59.480 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 6>of landfill.

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 6>So it's a very diverse portfolio and very complementary and

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:05.879
<v Speaker 6>different than what you might hold in an index fund.

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:09.319
<v Speaker 2>When I started my equity research business way way back

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:11.359
<v Speaker 2>in the day, it starts within eight you know, back

0:44:11.400 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 2>in the eighties, it covered railroads. Really, we wrote the

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:19.279
<v Speaker 2>first research report on Consolidated Railroad, which the company which

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 2>the government, US government was privatizing via an IPO. We

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 2>wrote about two hundred page report on that owned that.

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 4>Stock for you, you want to give us a nice

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:26.840
<v Speaker 4>summary of that right now.

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was a great cost cutting thing. Taking railroad

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 3>crews from five to two tripled your margins.

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 6>And that's and the other big trend is supply the

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:37.359
<v Speaker 6>supply chain.

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 2>So I know you've got an ETF on a railroads.

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:42.360
<v Speaker 2>That's why I bring it up. Is that again I

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 2>think about the railroads in supply chain. I guess we

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:47.320
<v Speaker 2>all got really smart about supply Chaine and the delicate

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:49.280
<v Speaker 2>nature of supply chains during the pandemic.

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 3>How do you guys think about that.

0:44:50.840 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So the sort of reassuring of supply chains and

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.960
<v Speaker 6>manufacturing to America and North America is again it's a

0:44:57.080 --> 0:45:00.439
<v Speaker 6>monster trend. It started during COVID. So if I'm deer

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:02.440
<v Speaker 6>and I'm trying to make a tractor and my bolt

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 6>is made in Asia, i couldn't get my bolt. It

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 6>was really bad for business. So we're seeing that trend

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 6>already having started. And then on top of that, we've

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 6>now got geopolitical issues that make us more nervous about

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:17.400
<v Speaker 6>doing things like semiconductors outside of the US. So again huge,

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:21.320
<v Speaker 6>very broad multisector trend. And what we own in sup

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 6>or the reshoring of supply chain ETF is all the

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:27.920
<v Speaker 6>way from railroads, So how are we going to transport

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:31.640
<v Speaker 6>things if we're manufacturing all over North America. It's fantastic

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 6>for railroads and they've been undervalued. So that's a big

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 6>performance opportunity. And early in the cycle where I think

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 6>we have three trillion of committed projects of new manufacturing,

0:45:41.320 --> 0:45:43.960
<v Speaker 6>more than we've ever had in the US. Early in

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 6>the cycle, we invest a lot in what we call

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 6>picks and shovels, so Martin, Marrietta, Vulcan companies that make materials.

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 6>So as we build all of these factors factories, pardon me,

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 6>and then we own a lot of semiconductor names as well,

0:45:57.080 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 6>because all of these factors are going to have AI

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 6>and rows and they have much higher demand for content

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 6>from a semiconductor perspective.

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:06.759
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to ask you about the AI theme next.

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:08.359
<v Speaker 4>That's certainly got to be a big one of these

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 4>thematic trends that you're focusing on. So how are you

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 4>positioning around AI right now?

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So in the case of AI, it's in those

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 6>two portfolios to some extent. And then we have a

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 6>mutual fund at TCW which we're converting to an ETF,

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:22.320
<v Speaker 6>So watch the space for that.

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:25.239
<v Speaker 4>And the advantage of that is it just like you know,

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 4>I guess, because ETFs tend to be a bit cheaper

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 4>for like a more consumer friendly product. Is that the idea?

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, in this case it's an active fund, so it's

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 6>not a sort of a cheap index fund. But the argument,

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:38.360
<v Speaker 6>and I think you see a lot of active managers

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:41.920
<v Speaker 6>converting where it makes sense, is that the market likes CTFs,

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 6>It likes the ability to click through and see the

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:48.840
<v Speaker 6>underlying holdings on the website, It likes the tax advantages

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:50.839
<v Speaker 6>of an ETF, And so in the case of these

0:46:50.880 --> 0:46:54.320
<v Speaker 6>mega trends, we see the market in general buying ETFs,

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 6>not funds. So we have a very long track record

0:46:57.080 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 6>on the TCW Artificial Intelligence Fund and we're converting it

0:47:01.000 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 6>to an ETF and a little bit like what we

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:05.479
<v Speaker 6>talked about in the case of net Z and sub,

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 6>the AI fund has an ability to invest in different

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 6>things as we move through time.

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:10.839
<v Speaker 4>So it's not all big tech.

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 6>It's also systems and enablers and hardware that is going

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 6>to grow aggressively as all these companies are doing more

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:17.879
<v Speaker 6>in AI.

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:19.600
<v Speaker 3>So it's safe to say, you, guys at tc there'll

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 3>be a big believers in AI. We are, okay, because

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:22.880
<v Speaker 3>I was.

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:26.680
<v Speaker 2>I guess my skeptical self SI and analyst nature is like,

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 2>where did this come from?

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Is this just big data from three or four years ago?

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Is this just big tech?

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Is growing as a percentage of GDP of twenty years ago?

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 2>What's new about AI?

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:40.520
<v Speaker 6>I think we're in We're in the next evolution of

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 6>training systems, asking systems questions with all these models and

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:47.920
<v Speaker 6>natural language models asking questions in a way that we

0:47:48.080 --> 0:47:50.320
<v Speaker 6>just get faster and faster and better output. And so

0:47:50.480 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 6>that's really that's good for everyone. And so it'll start slowly,

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:56.320
<v Speaker 6>but as more people learn to get that leverage, I

0:47:56.400 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 6>think we're going to see is it going to see

0:47:58.600 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 6>a boom?

0:47:59.040 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Yep?

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:02.200
<v Speaker 2>And it's you know, we hear every company in the

0:48:02.320 --> 0:48:04.640
<v Speaker 2>S and PT on their confer without it on their

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 2>conference call talking about you know, AI and how it's

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:09.799
<v Speaker 2>getting to be critical to their business. Jennifer Grancio, thanks

0:48:09.800 --> 0:48:11.839
<v Speaker 2>so much for joining us. Jennifer is a global head

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:14.839
<v Speaker 2>of distribution for TCW. We appreciate her coming into our

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Interactor Proper Studio in New York City.

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:22.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:32.239
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:35.400
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal