WEBVTT - Early MLB Trade Deadline Targets & Marlins-Cardinals Series Reaction

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey, this is Kyle Stowers and you're listening to Fish

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>on First.

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Fish on First Live, part of the Foul

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Territory Network. Eli Sussman, Kevin Barrall, I'm Jeremiah Geiger. Marlins

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 2>take another series win. They take two out of three

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 2>from the Saint Louis Cardinals on the road. They're four

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>games under five over five hundred. Couldn't get the sweep today,

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>but still a successful start to a three city road trip.

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna break down the series, but also so the

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>focus of today's show, we're gonna be starting to look

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 2>at some early trade deadline targets because the Fish right

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 2>now half a game back of the wild Card, their

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 2>contenders at this point in time, at this point in time,

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 2>after a terrific month of June. But but as always

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 2>be going reverse order, We'll start with this series and

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 2>talk about today's loan loss. In this one, it was

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 2>a two to one loss, a tough loss. You really

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 2>wanted to get the sweep, Kevin, but Tyler Phillips, I

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 2>felt pitched phenomenal and gave his team a real shot

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 2>to win this one. The Bats just just didn't have enough.

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Phillips, was great. Another way to say it, just

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess one bad pitch. I didn't actually see how

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>gave up the run. I'm assuming it was a two

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>run homer. Yeah, and yeah, you know, tough one. Really

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>another way to put it offense really couldn't get a

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>lot going. I believe it was only four hits on

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the night or five. Very weird decision there to go

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>with four straight pinch hitters. I don't for merely for

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>one believer to was Ojo Romero, and then you know

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the last one was I guess you put in Joe

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>macfron Alvaretto, which was a fine move at that point,

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>but I really don't see why you put in Leo

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Jimenez for Grand Polly and you make all these pinch hits.

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, at this point you just have to

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>come to live with it. And except that this team

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 1>is gonna go extremely platoon heavy, splits heavy, whatever you

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>want to call it. And if on in Casey's three

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>for three, they're still gonna bench him. If if there's

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a lefty on the mound, so uh, you know what.

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Overall though, you'll take it. The Models are in a

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>position where, if we're gonna talk about it more. But

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have to buy like they have to buy.

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>They're in this point where they're half a game out.

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be probably a little less than that now

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>because the Padres are losing to the Dodgers, So that

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>should at least tie them for that, tie them in

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.119
<v Speaker 1>with the Padres or put them just ahead of them

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Cardinals. I don't know. I'm not totally convinced

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that the Cardinals. What I saw wasn't great. Their bullpen

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.519
<v Speaker 1>is a little interesting. They have some pieces that are good,

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>but they're starting pitching probably isn't the greatest. So that team,

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, is going to fall off just a

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 1>little bit. And we're already seeing some other teams fall off.

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>So but you know what, overall, it is a good

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>series for the Marlins, and shout out grand Poli for

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the first game comes in and pretty much helps this

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 1>team out. And yeah, it's good to see that he's

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of he got to go into these last two

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:23.839
<v Speaker 1>games back, but you obviously need to see that through

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a larger sample size and hope that maybe that trip

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to Jacksonville helped him.

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, some things on Phillips to shout him out seven

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 3>and a third innings today, he wanted to go even deeper.

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 3>The Marlins are trying to get him all the way

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 3>through the game, Like they gave him a couple of

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 3>batters in that eighth inning, which would have been essentially

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 3>a complete game because it wasn't any bottom of the night.

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 3>They were trying to get him that complete game, and

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 3>they almost did only using Kaid Gibson, really saving the

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 3>bullpen in a way that's going to be very important

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 3>for this entire next week. This is the first leg

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 3>of a three game, three city road trip, and the

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 3>way that they were able to conserve the bullpen in

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 3>this series with Phillips in this final game, Max Meyern

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 3>the series opener, in the way that the bullpen game

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 3>right in the middle, which was a Ryan Gusto l

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 3>At bullen game that went so smoothly, like the pen

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 3>is in very good shape in terms of being available

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to coming up moving forward. So not

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 3>only did they win the series, but did it incredible

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 3>in terms of run prevention. So that's kind of why

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 3>you're kicking yourself that they didn't sweep the series. When

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 3>you hold the team just to throw it up again,

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 3>three total runs allowed in the series, and yet you

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 3>somehow lost one of those games. That's gonna be a

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 3>bit of a frustrating part of it that they weren't

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 3>didn't get completely done. To hop onto what Kevin was

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 3>touching on with the pinch hitters, it's one thing to

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 3>like respect the differences of respect individual matchups and how

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 3>platooning can give you an important advantage. It just the

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 3>personnel really does matter. It's not always that a righty

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 3>is going to be better than a left in this situation,

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 3>and vice versa when your rights, in particular in this

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Marlins team still include Brian Navaretto and Leo Jimenez. In

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 3>this case, he Meantez being I got that actually got

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 3>a pinch had in this situation. But this Marlins roster

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 3>is currently constructed, there are a couple weak links that

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 3>if they're on the bench late in a game, they

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 3>can't really help you win. All due respect to him, then,

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 3>is there's really not much he offers this team whatsoever

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 3>other than being there in case somebody gets injured in

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 3>the course of the middle of the game. And so's

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 3>that's a problem with this team. A limitation. I would

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 3>say that even though they're very good starting wise at

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 3>almost every position, the bench is still limited. They moved

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 3>on from Christopher Morel as well, and they sent down

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Connor Norby, so those were two weak links as well.

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 3>But I think there's another Leo Hemantez is kind of

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 3>in that same category where he stuck around as kind

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 3>of as a placeholder until I guess the team is

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 3>back at full full strength until a certain prospect maybe

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 3>breaks through. But I think he is now getting towards

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 3>the end of his rope at this point. And I

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 3>don't know, it's not you can't entirely blame Clayton and

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 3>you can't entirely blame the front offense. It's kind of

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 3>a mix of both where I don't think that was

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 3>an appropriate way to use the guys off the bench

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 3>in that situation. At the same time, if the roster

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 3>itself is a little bit better, a little bit deeper

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 3>in terms of guys that can actually make an offensive impact,

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 3>then you're not in that spot in the first place.

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, overall, though, a good series, so don't want

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 3>to nitpick it too much. Winning series on the road

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 3>has been hard for this Marlins team. They've won plenty

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 3>at home, but the fact that they were able to

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 3>beat a pretty competitive team on the road in this situation. Overall,

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 3>this was another mini step forward for them.

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>That's the one thing I wanted to take away from

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it too, Like those first two games were like legit games,

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Like those were fun games. Like it was close for

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the most partly throughout most of the first game, it

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>was pretty close, and pitching was good. Max Meyer was

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>on it, Like we have to talk about Max, you know,

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>for the go on the bereaven list and come back

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden and do what he did is

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like cements it, like this guy should

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>be in Philly representing the Miami MARDINLS in the All

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Star Game. What would And honestly, if I had to assume,

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>he maybe would have gotten the eighth had there not

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>been a rain delay in there. So he was he

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>was moving quick man, like if it wasn't for that

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>final inning that he was out there. He had won

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>inning where he threw about twenty pitches. He was at

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>sixty six pitches through I think six and then the

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>seventh he really got went a little bit downhill there.

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>He got out of it, but you know, he could

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>have potentially thrown a complete game had he gotten out

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of that inning. Scotch Free a little bit quicker, but

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Max Meyer just continues to show, you know that this

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>is legit. What we're seeing out of Max Meyer is legit.

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>It's consistent, and he's been by far the most consistent

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>pitcher the Marlins have had all season long. That that

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>goes for like any starter or reliever. So and they're

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna need it more because now Janson Junk potentially out

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>for a little longer than expected, unfortunately with the yeah

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>hit by a pitch or hit by a drive on

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the wrist, Yeah, comebacker, So they're gonna need to come

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>on Max. Sandy Yuri shout out to Ryan Gusto. He

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>looked really good too, like surprising, but good for him.

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>And he was fired up too, and he kind of

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>felt like he wanted to go a little bit deeper

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>into the game too. So if you're getting that Gusto

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.679
<v Speaker 1>by all means. But yeah, no, pitching was great this series.

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the biggest takeaway. The offense got their

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>runs when they had to, like we mentioned with Poly,

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>but those first two games really were fun to watch,

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>like from start to finish, there were good games, and

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the Marlins showed that, like, hey, they could beat better

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>team teams that are technically ahead of them or have

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a better record, and they've shown that through this whole run.

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>In June, the Rays, the Nationals at that point they

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>were over five hundred, the Pirates were over five hundred.

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Like they they're beating good teams. It's not like they're

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>beating bottom of the barrel opponents. They're beating teams that

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>are either right with them or just a little bit

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of ahead. And that's that's one of the biggest taways,

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>not just for this series but in June as well,

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and continues to push the narrative like this team should

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>buy in the deadline. I'm not saying go crazy and

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>clear out the farm, but you got to make some

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 1>moves to address certain spots, which we'll talk about later,

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>where this team needs it. You know, they need bench bats,

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>as the ELI mentioned, they need a third baseman, they

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>could probably use another starter, assuming Junks can be out

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit longer, Like they need pieces and

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have to address that at the deadline.

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 2>And then talk about Max Meyer a little bit more

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 2>on his start. What I was so impressed with was

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 2>his pitch selection. This is a guy that historically, you know,

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 2>ever since he came out of the University of Minnesota.

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Throughout the miners, it was He's gonna throw a slider

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 2>fifty sixty percent of the time and whatever else is gravy.

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.719
<v Speaker 2>You know, try to develop that third pitch because the

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 2>fastball wasn't very good. And now the narrative has kind

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 2>of started to shift. I I was on this website

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 2>pitcher list the other day and it was for Fantasy

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Baseball and they analyzed, you know, what pitcher you should

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 2>start and whatnot, and someone described Max Meyer his start

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 2>against the Cardinals, go out and do it because his

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 2>heater is that good. And I was like, is this

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 2>the first time that national you know, writer's pundits are

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 2>noticing Max's development with the fastball because he trusts it

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 2>now and pitching coach Daniel Moscus trusts it as well.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 2>He threw the sweeper thirty nine percent of the time,

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 2>then it was the four seen fastball at twenty six percent,

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 2>and then the slider two years ago. Year ago, you

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 2>don't see that from Max Meyer. That slider was leading

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 2>the charge each and every time the fastball is a

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 2>good pitch. It's an objectively good pitch. Now the sweeper

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 2>is a very good pitch, and of course the slider

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 2>is so elite that when you have finally come into

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.079
<v Speaker 2>your own as a pitcher, you've become a complete pitcher

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 2>where hitters aren't just sitting dead red on the slider anymore.

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 2>This is the results that are gonna have happen. Two

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 2>point six year od er and seventeen starts, he's been phenomenal.

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 2>He should be an All Star. And he's not just

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 2>been one of the most consistent pitchers for the Marlins,

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 2>but in the entire National League. He's been that good.

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it's great to see. The only thing for

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 2>me is just stay healthy, right because this Marlin's rotation

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 2>is at a point where they really can't afford another injury.

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 2>The Jansen junk, I was really hoping to have him

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 2>back because I don't know about you guys, but the

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Gusto situation, he looked good, but they kind of still

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 2>treat him as almost an opener where they're not going

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 2>to give him five innings six innings. That's not going

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 2>to happen with Gusto. There's still very much a hole

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 2>in that back half of the rotation, and with Snelling's

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 2>injury ELI it makes it even more clear to me

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 2>that this team's going to have to go shopping for

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 2>a starting pitcher.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 3>It does, and now, I mean, I guess the silver

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 3>lining very premature. We haven't gotten a diagnosis yet. Junk

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 3>was hit on the non throwing hand or non throwing wrist.

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 3>I should say, so I'll be able to keep his

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 3>actual throwing arm in shape for however long this setback last.

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:31.839
<v Speaker 3>It's just that I think we talked about this when

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 3>he went down. It's not like he's a Knight in

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 3>Shining Armor. It's not like if he comes back he's

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 3>necessarily going to change much.

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 4>He was fine.

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 3>He was better last year than he was at the

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 3>first half of this year. He has his strength, but

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 3>the ceiling is just not especially high with Junk. He's

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 3>not a guy that you depend on to come back

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 3>and that you think is going to really move the

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 3>needle for you. If you get him back and you

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 3>get a slightly better version than we saw the first

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 3>half of this year, than great at some point.

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 4>But again, yeah, I absolutely agree.

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 3>Where you make plans not really expecting all that much

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 3>from him, and certainly not trusting Gusto to give you

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 3>all that much other than one and a half times

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 3>through the order seems to be the plan with him

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 3>where that's when they have yanked him the previous couple

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 3>of times. Good results when he's in there, just not

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 3>somebody that they trust to go multiple times through a

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 3>lineup and continue to avoid hard contact.

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I'm totally kind of in.

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 3>That camp where they got to that's something seem there

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 3>was more urgency.

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 4>A few weeks ago. They've they've proved us wrong.

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 3>To be fair, like a lot of these bullpen games

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 3>have gone better than anybody could have realistically hoped. The

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 3>fact that they've played their best baseball of the season,

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 3>one of the best stretches in franchise history the last

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 3>few weeks is by being so short handed with their rotation.

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 3>You need to actually tip your cap to this team

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 3>for sticking with their guys and getting those amazing results.

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 3>At the same time, that's not going to sustain itself

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 3>throughout the entire rest of the season. They do have

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 3>to I think I have to look at a wide

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 3>variety of arms that are available on the market, and.

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 1>One thing to note too real quick is like Junk

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't pitching well at all before the injury, Like he

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>was actually the worst pitcher in the rotation at that time.

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, it was between him and Urie, and Uri

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>ended up finally, you know, beginning to look good, but

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Junk just never really turned it around. So you gotta wonder,

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, are you gonna keep using Junk assuming he's

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna come back and as Eli said, gonna be this

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Knight and whatever, like he's gonna get shining armor, Yeah,

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Knight in shining armor. Yeah, Or are you gonna get

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the junk that he got beforehand? And you're probably gonna

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>go out there and not wave the white flag every

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>fifth day, but begin to be at a disadvantage every

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>fifth day. I think you need to go out and

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>find a starting picture. And I think Junk fits much

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.719
<v Speaker 1>better than Marlins bullpen than as a starter. I think

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we saw that last year where he was in this role,

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>where he was a long man out of the pen,

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and who knows, maybe it's a combo of Gusto and

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Junk for the short term and maybe it works out

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of like what we saw last year was Calum

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Junk I'm not saying that's the best option right now,

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>but in the short term, assuming nothing really, assuming junk

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't very much set back, I think you could see

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that until they decide if they want to go out

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and find a starting pitcher out in the trade deadline market.

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's one that I know. Robbie Ray's one that

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Lewis wrote about in an article. We're gonna be dropping

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>here in the next day or two as an option

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>for this team, So that would be pretty cool. That'd

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>be a good option for them, for sure.

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Robbie, Robbie Ray. For me, I just I don't

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 2>know if I want to see the Marlin spot. I'd

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 2>preferably like to see them go with more youth in

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 2>terms of guys that are approaching the end of their

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 2>first contract, you know, those arbitration years on teams that

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 2>are really going nowhere. And that's just because an expiring contract.

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 2>With Robbie Ray in particular, he's I hate to say,

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 2>he's just not that good anymore. He's had a couple

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 2>of good starts, but it's very inconsistent. I don't know

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 2>how much of a boost he's realistically going to give

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 2>this rotation and that's an organizational philosophy that hasn't been

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 2>tested yet. This Marlins team hasn't bought, so we don't

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 2>know if they're gonna try to get guys with a

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 2>couple years of control at the major league level, or

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 2>a rental or a mixture of both. But we're going

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 2>to continue to talk about pitching targets, trade deadline targets

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 2>as a whole. Right after this from our friends over

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 2>at sea Geek.

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 5>With over thirty five million downloads, seageek is the number

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 5>one rated ticketing app and krats. There are many many

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 5>baseball games on the inventory to check out all summer long.

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 5>This is the season now, it is baseball baseball season.

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 5>Not many other options for you sports wise. I know

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 5>you can go anywhere you want to go with Seakeek.

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 5>There's so many tickets to choose from, but baseball's center

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 5>stage now for the next couple months.

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 6>School's out, I'm going to watch some baseball games, some

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 6>big league games, all in my area, and I want

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 6>to know exactly what it looks like.

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And I also want the best deal, So I'm looking

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>for the green, not the red.

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 5>The green hooks you up with the best deals on

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 5>the app. Of course, we have the code it's Territory

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 5>ten for ten percent off your next set of tickets

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 5>at Sea Geek. That's ten percent off any MLB ticket

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 5>with the promo code Territory one zero. Make sure you

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 5>click the link in the description of this episode that'll

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 5>download the app if you don't have it already, and

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 5>you'll have the code automatically added to your account so

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 5>that you can use that code later. Thank you, seek.

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 4>Robers a good moment.

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Just to just to finish the conversation on robb Ray today,

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 3>shut out today one unearned run, so yeah, eight and

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 3>zero earned runs against the Braves Lowers is Zra to

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 3>three three nine and again that he's striking out less

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 3>guys than usual this year. The results have been pretty good.

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 3>But you guys touched on the other elements where a

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 3>rental a pretty expensive rental as well, so the money

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 3>would be an interesting factor there. And just in his

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 3>age thirty four season, but yeah, we can now hop

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 3>into a bunch of other guys that kind of fall

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 3>into that category.

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>He's having an awesome month of June though he has

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a one three six ra thirty three innings, but he's

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>thrown back the bad games of eight innings like shutout

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>too well, both of them with one unearned run. Funny enough,

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>but he's thrown three straight games of shutout baseball by

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the earned runs, like the guy

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna give you some innings, he's gonna get outs.

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate it. Like I know it's on the

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>older side, and I think that's what you're gonna have

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>to target, some older guys, because guys who are on

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>an expiring contract or maybe have one more year left

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or a team option. You know, that's what you're gonna

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have to target. As much as I would love talking

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>about the targets, I am super like curious to see

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>how they attacked, how the Marlin specifically attack this from

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>up from a prospect standpoint, and how Peter attacks this

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>trade deadline. How will he value his players, how will

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:39.719
<v Speaker 1>he value his prospects? Well, who's the untouchables? Who are

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the guys that he feels he could maybe cash in

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.719
<v Speaker 1>on right now? Right that's the biggest question here, And

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>how willing he's going to be to move on from

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>guys and how much he really believes in this team

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day. You could go out

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and you could say, I think this team's gonna win.

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:55.479
<v Speaker 1>I think we were gonna try to win every single day.

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 4>Whatever.

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>But if if you really believe it, you'll go out,

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>then you'll make the big moves that could go to

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>go do that? Will Peter do that? I don't know,

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's one of the biggest questions that

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>comes up with this trade deadline.

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 2>It truly is a mystery because this team hasn't been

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 2>under the Bendix era in this position before the last

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 2>time they were in a position to buy was twenty

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty three under Kim Ang.

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 4>We know what they did.

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 2>They got a couple of bats, traded away their former

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 2>number one draft pick and Khalil Watson to do so,

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 2>but they were very aggressive. It paid off in the

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 2>sense that they made the playoffs, but that front office

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 2>regime quickly dispersed and we all know what happened. It

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 2>was a terrible year the next year. So too, I

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 2>can't wait to see what Bendix does because when I

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 2>look at this team, how many untouchable prospects are there

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 2>really in this system? And that's the question I have

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 2>in my mind. I think Thomas White Robbie Snelling untouchable.

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I think you look at a guy like Iva Arquette,

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Carson mill Brandt.

0:18:58.800 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 4>Then I don't know.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, because there's there's teams that would be

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 2>lining up to get these guys in their system, and

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 2>you could get a younger, more controllable major league piece,

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 2>whether that's a Redebt Merse from the from the Angels,

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.959
<v Speaker 2>who I think would be a great addition because of

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 2>the two additional years of control. But I want to

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 2>ask you, Eli and and you as well, Kevin, is

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 2>there guys that stand out to you where you're just like,

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.360
<v Speaker 2>no matter what, the Marlins aren't going to trade these

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 2>these players.

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 3>I think you actually described it pretty well because as

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 3>we're kind of preparing to update our fof Top thirty

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 3>prospects list, it was pretty simple. Why it is still

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 3>number one for us, Robbie Stilling still number two, and

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 3>then there's a lot of different directions you could go

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 3>with number three, And I think that just reflects that

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 3>there is that is a different tier, that it is

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 3>a different tier of building block player. Once you get

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 3>past number two, there are several guys having amazing years.

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 3>The one at the top of mind is cam Canerella.

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 3>He's just been absolutely spectacular at first at high A,

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 3>and he's kept it going, if not elevated his game

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more since the promotion at Double A.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 3>The numbers are off the charts for a guy that

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 3>is also going to stick in center field and his

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 3>pedigree like later during the middle of his college career,

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of people would put him in

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 3>this kind of category of a potential foundational player for

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 3>an organization. It's just been a real It's still a

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 3>small sample size at the pro level. There's still some

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 3>limitations to his game, and the power department hasn't been

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 3>really using his legs to steal bases. Like without going

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 3>too deep into one particular guy, I think you could

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 3>pull coals into everybody else aside from those top two.

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Carson Milbrandt statistically amazing year, but ever since that promotion

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 3>to TRIPAA, the control issues that kind of held him

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 3>back his entire career to this point have turned their

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 3>head again. Where you can he has not solved for

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 3>that yet. That is still a very big question for

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.199
<v Speaker 3>him when it comes to being a long term starting pitcher.

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 3>So I think to answer your questions, distinctly. I really

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 3>do think there are no untouchables among the prospects outside

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.239
<v Speaker 3>those top two. It's more so we want to be

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 3>really creative. Is how many untouchables are there on the

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 3>major league roster? I wouldn't move in this situation, like

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 3>we were talking about Jacob Marcy entering this year, a

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 3>guy that is really not helping them win too many

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 3>games this year despite how valuable he was as a rookie, Like,

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 3>is that a guy that would be in a creative

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 3>significant piece of like a big trade that you make.

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 3>And I think all the other relatively young pre ARB

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 3>and R player even well most almost everybody's pre ARB

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 3>among the position players on this Marlin's roster, that it's

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 3>a question of how many of them are definitely locked in.

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 3>You feel like Otto is locked in that the way

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 3>that Kyle Stowers has hit the last month or so.

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:33.239
<v Speaker 4>He's locked in.

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 3>But then there's a lot of these other moving pieces

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 3>that are I think are interesting variables and comes to

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 3>what they would trade. But yeah, that being said, on

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 3>the prospect side, they a lot of players are having

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 3>good years. But I would say that they if they

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 3>are motivated to do so, that I wouldn't really be

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 3>shocked to see almost anybody traded outside of Thomas White

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 3>Robbie Snelling.

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I look at it like this, Thomas White and Robbie

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Snelling are by far the untouchable, and looking at our

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>list specifically like the Frank Lewis and Caba and Arquette,

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I think those guys are on the unlikely like those

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>are unlikely. Now you look at it from like Alderman, Head,

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>mill Brandt, probably Canderella, Covid Like like those guys, I

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>could see them getting moved. I don't know about Canerella.

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>They really like him and they really liked him coming

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:22.959
<v Speaker 1>out of the draft clearly to take him even with

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the doubts of you know, the the shoulder injury or whatever.

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>It was like he's a guy who has been really good,

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 1>like really really good. Milbrand is the one who great

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 1>like he's broken out. Now can he sustain that?

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 6>Can he do that?

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Because the first couple of years of Carson Millbrand I

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of changes went into why he is

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>what he is this season, But can he be up

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>middle to front end starter in a rotation?

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Probably not.

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>He's probably like a middle to low to like four

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>or five in a rotation right now. For the Marbles,

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>he's a four or five so or three, like that's

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>the three, So I don't know that's a guy. I

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 1>could definitely see them trying to capitalize and cash in

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>on as soon as possible. It also depends who's out

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>there in the trade market, Like I wouldn't do that

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>for a reliever, Like if you're gonna make a trade,

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>I think realistically you got to look for bats and

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a starting pitcher. I don't think there's any need to

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>add relievers to this team. Maybe one just just in case,

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>but like, yeah, from a prospect standpoint, I think anyone's

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>on the table. As Eli said, I'll just categorize it

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>on untouchables and then like the unlikely category, which is

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>like for us like three through like six or seven

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>on the on the prospect rankings, the current one that

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we have up right now.

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's important to understand too when it

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:43.479
<v Speaker 2>comes to handling prospects. There's there's those fans, those people

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 2>that just want to prospect hoard, you know, like we're

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 2>not gonna trade from this group the top ten, top

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 2>fifteen or whatever. But there's organizations that go into a

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 2>season expecting to compete, expecting to buy and then use

0:23:58.520 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 2>a good farm.

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 4>System as trade ships.

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 2>They know what they have and going into the year,

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 2>they say, hey, if the right offer is available, he's

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 2>not gonna ever play for us at the major league level.

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna be used as trade bait. And I think

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to controllable assets at the major league level,

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't have a problem if it meant getting guys

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 2>with two to three years to two years of team

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 2>control minimum before they hit that you know, unrestricted free

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 2>agency period, because at that point you're cashing in on

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 2>an unknown lottery ticket like Iva Arquette. He might be

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 2>a perennial All Star, he might not be. We don't know.

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 2>That's just how the nature of the draft works. It's

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 2>how the nature of farm systems work. And I'm of

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the opinion that that's kind of how a competitive team

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 2>should operate. They should use their prospects as trade chips. Now,

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 2>does that mean being like aj Preller and just throwing

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 2>caution to the wind and sending everybody out to another team. No,

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily. But to Brian's comment here, like twenty three,

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 2>this farm system is in an infinitely better spot than

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 2>it was back then. The twenty twenty three team did

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 2>not have the talent, so when they made those trades,

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 2>it was gut it already. I mean, Jake Eaterer was

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 2>a top ten prospect for goodness sake. This team has

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 2>an organization, has a much deeper farm system to be

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 2>able to trade from right.

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 3>I brought that common up just because I think this

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 3>is a good time to review the actual prospects they traded.

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 3>They did relatively go all in with the prospects that

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 3>they had available, but it wasn't much. And just to

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 3>off the top of my head checking in on the

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 3>guys that they traded away at the deadline in twenty

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 3>three to go for it the headline, I guess the

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 3>biggest prospect at the time overall was well, in terms

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 3>of prospect value, it was Jake eater in that Burger trade,

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 3>and Eaters made it to the big leagues, but he's

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 3>been on the waiver wire the last couple of years.

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 3>He's a he's exactly what. He's a replacement level, low

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 3>leverage reliever who's currently the Dodger system hasn't really materialized

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 3>into much of anything in terms of actually winning games.

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 3>The biggest name, the most polar rising one was Khalil Watson.

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 3>They included him with Jeene Segura and the salary dump

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 3>to get Josh Bell, and Watson just made it to

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 3>the big leagues. Like this past week has put up

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 3>very good numbers in the upper miners, but there is

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 3>underlying strikeout issues.

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 6>There.

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Used to be a shortstop and now he's more of

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 3>a corner outfielder. So we'll see how that goes. Like.

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 3>The jury is still out on Watson as a big leaguer,

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:24.360
<v Speaker 3>but more likely than that he's gonna be a part

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 3>time player and one who is gonna have some severe

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 3>limitations in terms of just making contact and getting on base.

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 3>They traded I remember Marco Vargas, Marco Vargas and Ronald Hernandez.

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I remember Alex Carver being quite high on Ronald Hernandez

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 3>at the time. And those guys, I don't even need

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 3>to check they're they're not there. I don't even know

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 3>if either of them are in the Mets system right now.

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 3>If they had, their careers have stalled quite a bit.

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 4>That was nothing.

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 3>They traded those two guys to get David Robertson. I

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 3>remember it felt like an overpay at the time, and

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 3>that's like it kind of looks like a lose lose trade.

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, the Marlins weren't too happy with Robertson, but

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 3>the Mets aren't going to get anything out of that

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 3>side of the deal, even though those guys looked very

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 3>promising as teenagers when they were in the Complex League.

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 3>And I think that covers most of it in from

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 3>the actual prospect capital that they parted with at the time,

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 3>where it really at the time, it did feel like

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 3>it hurt them.

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 4>It did put them in that situation that.

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 3>Made their outlook look so gloomy that they were willing

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 3>to part ways with Kim Ng and look for somebody

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 3>else to rebuild that system. So those are both sides

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 3>of it where you don't I would be very surprised

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 3>to see them dealing that many notable prospects at a

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 3>time this time around. But the thing is they do

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 3>have higher quality players available where they could trade a

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 3>smaller number of them, and if they are going to

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 3>do so, that would bring back guys that could really

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 3>change the ceiling of this current team here.

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 4>And now.

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 2>The other aspect of that when it comes to trading

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 2>Kevin mentioned this earlier, is we kind of know what

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 2>they need already. It's not bullpen, it's not the middle endfield.

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 2>I would argue you don't really need a first baseman,

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 2>depending how you feel with Kyle Sowers moving there, which

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of for the experiment. As long as he

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 2>hits and can play adequate at first base and catch

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 2>the ball, maybe that's a move that's permanent. For me.

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 2>It's third base, and it's the rotation. And when I

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 2>look at a third base trade chips around Major League Baseball,

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 2>there's a couple that come to mind. Number One, Matt Chapman.

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Matt Chapman in San Francisco. San Francisco is not going anywhere.

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Now here's the question, do you want to take on salary?

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 2>Because he does have a very expensive contract. San Francisco

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 2>is going to be wanting prospects capital in order to

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 2>offset the salary if the Giants pay for it, or

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 2>does Miami take on some payroll. And that's another aspect

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 2>of this trade deadline that they're going to have to

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 2>work around when it comes to these expiring contracts or

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 2>more expensive rentals, is how much prospect capital are you

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 2>going to pay in order to buide that salary because

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 2>right now the Marlins are in a pretty good position

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 2>to take on some payroll. I think that's been the

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 2>story for the last few years, to be quite honest

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 2>with you. There's another player. I don't know if he'll

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 2>be available, but again we're talking about this a month away,

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 2>and it just lines up for me with where the

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Marlins are going as an organization with this current window.

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 2>And that's Josh Young of the Texas Rangers. Controllable has

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 2>two more additional years of control. He's been really good

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 2>this season, hitting two ninety three eight bombs, thirty one

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 2>RBIs ops, approaching eight hundred, and he's having the best

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 2>season of his career. Now, does Texas feel like they're

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 2>in a position to they themselves buy at the deadline?

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 2>That Al West is very tight. Maybe, but let's say

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 2>they lose, you know, go on a losing streak here.

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 2>I know they just swept Toronto, but again, anything can happen.

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Miami could go in and get their third baseman for

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the next two years and forget about it, set and forget.

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 2>And that's kind of what I want to see is

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 2>controllable players where it's not just a rental because so

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 2>many times rentals just don't work out. I mean, look

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 2>at Seattle with you Hennios Frez, he just wasn't good

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 2>after he moved on from Arizona and then signs elsewhere.

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 2>So what do you guys feel about potentially getting Josh

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.239
<v Speaker 2>Young and just him being the third baseman of the

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 2>foreseeable future because he's cheap, he's affordable, and it's what.

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>The Marlins would need real quick. With Chapman, I don't

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>think many people know this. Matt Chapman has a no

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>trade clause. So regardless of the Marlins have the capital

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>they want to take on the money, Matt Chapman has

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to say he wants to be a Miami Marlin. The

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>likelihood of that happening, I would have to him was

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty low right now. Although and he's really like offensively,

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>he just has not been great. He got off to

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a terrible star, then he really heated up, which really

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>boosted up the numbers. And he's kind of in this

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>weird spot you know right here, and when jung with

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Josh Young, like it's another weird guy because like you noted,

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>two years of control Young, play good player. I think

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>this is one where you just have to wait and

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:05.479
<v Speaker 1>see if they want to move on and if they

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>even have someone in the minor leagues ready to kind

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of either replace him or they think they have someone

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 1>ready there that will take up that spot. Because if,

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, two years of control, this is a

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty high draftic. If I recall from the Rangers back

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in the time, back when they did make the selection,

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a good player they really like. I'm sure

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>they like him. I believe they actually hit a home

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>er in the series against the Marlins like this is

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a good option, but it'll definitely be a

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>lot more on the prospects side than what I would think,

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>like a Matt Chapman would do. I think the two

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>names that I'm gonna mention real quick, he's not good.

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>There you go, you sak Peretti's he lie lines up perfectly.

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>One year deal, one year left on the deal. He

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>has a club option for twenty twenty seven. So if

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the models say, hey, let's just ride out the year,

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>see what happens, they're not. You know, he was fine,

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>but they don't want to take on. I think it's

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>like thirteen million for the next year. They could just

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>decline it and that's it. That's it, move on and

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that's it. You know how to do the payroll. He

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>slid player definitely add some juice to the lineup, which

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you really need. I think anytime you can add power

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to the line if you do it. He's not striking

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>out a lot either, he's walking a lot too. I

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>like Perettis defensively, he won't provide too much value there,

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>but I think sometimes you could just sacrifice the defense

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to gain more offense, and that's what Paritis would be doing.

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>He could play a little bit of first base. He

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>could fill out the dhrol if ever needed. So I

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>think people need to know this, like the Marlins at

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.719
<v Speaker 1>third base the season offensively are the worst team in baseball.

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>It's like a forty something WRC plus. It probably went down,

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Actually it probably went up because Grandpaly helped you out

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. But the other nam I'll mention is Eli

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>brought this from up and I'll let Eli talk more

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>about this. JB. Crawford of the Mariners, the Marriagers aren't

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in no position to sell, but but they currently have

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>this guy named Cole Emerson playing shortstop, which is shift.

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 1>JP Crawford over the third base, and Brendan Donovan is

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>coming back, so it's it's a little bit of a

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>weird spot. Crawford's not making a lot. I think he's

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>only making twelve million dollars this season, and the Martins

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously won't have to pay the whole thing, And I

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>think it would be a low cost guy like you

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>don't have trade a lot. He walks a lot, gets

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>on base, doesn't really steal a lot of bas it's

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>actually do just barely steal, which I was surprised to

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>see when I looked at it. But you can hit

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for some power and he's an everyday player, so I

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>think that'll be a solid option. So so those are

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the two third basement I was thinking. Obviously, Chapman is

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the one that comes to mind, but again he has

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to accept the trade to Miami to even make that possible.

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Right, So, as much as it is fun to dream

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 3>about these guys that are both good and controllable for

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 3>multiple years, just history says that those guys rarely get

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 3>moved at the deadline. You could, you could take it out,

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 3>especially if you look beyond more than two years of control.

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 3>It's almost unheard of for those guys to move just

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 3>because of the all the ramifications of those decisions that

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 3>he usually waits until the off season. It's it's why

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 3>like when Juan Soto gets traded, it's one of the

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 3>craziest events ever transactionally, and there have been a few

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 3>since then, where like the Rafael Devers one was fair polarizing,

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 3>where it was a guy that theoretically was in his prime,

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 3>he had all these years of control. He was just

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 3>so expensive at the time, and a guy that doesn't

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 3>traditionally age as well as you'd probably want. Where there

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 3>was enough risk involved in that to kind of push

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 3>it over the finish line, and that got some point

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 3>where both teams early on seem to be regretting that

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:20.439
<v Speaker 3>particular trade. Just doesn't happen very often with that, which

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 3>is why my focus goes very modestly to those who

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:27.479
<v Speaker 3>are pending free agents, like JP Crawford, who I think,

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 3>just to emphasize what Kevin was mentioning, I think he

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:31.919
<v Speaker 3>barely have to give up much of anything at all

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 3>for a guy to especially if you take on the

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 3>rest of his money. I think his salary this year

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 3>is twelve million, so at this I want to get

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 3>to the deadline, it's only going to be less than

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 3>four million so left for this year, which even for

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 3>the Marlins is a very managuable sum for a guy that,

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 3>aside from being adaptable to play third base and aside

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 3>from being just consistently very disciplined at the plate, has

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 3>he can move over to shortstop if anything, God forbid,

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 3>goes wrong with Otto Lopez. I mean, think about it

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 3>right now. If Otto he's been playing a actually every

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.399
<v Speaker 3>single game this year, and what happens if he gets hurt?

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 4>What would they do?

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 3>I guess it'd be very reliant all of a sudden

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 3>on Javiers and Oha. The options in Triple A are

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 3>not particularly good right there for a team that I

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 3>think has to be not only thinking about improving as

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 3>an overall team, but also needs to make sure that

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:19.320
<v Speaker 3>they have the depth to weather any sort of injury

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 3>setbacks to any position as a year goes on. I

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 3>don't think they're really well set up right now to

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 3>handle an injury to Auto in particular, and so getting

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:29.399
<v Speaker 3>somebody like Crawford would really help with that. And maybe

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 3>you give up one of your top thirty prospects in

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 3>that kind of trade. That again, that's the benefit of

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 3>trading for pending free agent, a guy who's a little

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 3>bit past his prime in the process, but still does

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 3>enough things well that you can see a scenario where

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 3>for a couple months at a time he has a

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 3>three point fifty on base percentage and provides a win

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 3>or a win and a half in value and actually

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 3>makes a difference in a playoff push. In the comments,

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 3>somebody brought up even a more modest version of that,

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 3>au Henio Suarez, who just last year he was one

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:59.320
<v Speaker 3>of the sexiest names on the He was the sexiest

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 3>third basement the market last year, if not one of

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 3>the sexiest trade candidates overall last year when he ended

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 3>up hitting forty seven, forty nine home runs, whatever it was,

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 3>and he was on an even better pace with the

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 3>d decks before the trade deadline. And this year he's

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 3>a very volatile player, has seen this year where he's

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 3>having one of the worst years of his career offensively.

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:20.399
<v Speaker 3>But that's the kind of guy that, given his track

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 3>rider is very recent track record of being one of

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 3>the preeminent sluggers in all of baseball. I don't think

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 3>you can overlook that, especially at the Reds fade. They're

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 3>in this position where I think it's more likely than

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:31.959
<v Speaker 3>not that they're going to be sellers. It's a little

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 3>too early to.

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 4>Say either way.

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 3>The same exact same scenario as Josh Young, where I

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 3>think it's he could really go either way in terms

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 3>of his availability. But Suarez, because of how much he's

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 3>struggling this year and because of the fact that there's

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 3>no control of him beyond this year, that's a guy

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 3>that would be available. That's a guy that, for what

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 3>it's worth, has the certain intangibles, a guy that I

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 3>think has an amazing reputation as a teammates, and he

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 3>has been a part of a lot of contending teams.

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 4>In the past.

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.479
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to totally overlook him in that discussion either.

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 3>And then ultimately we spent a lot of time on

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:04.439
<v Speaker 3>third baseman. But it is worth mentioning that, yes, granm

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 3>paully just got called up and when his last season

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 3>falled a very similar cycle where it didn't hit early on,

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 3>got sent down to Jacksonville, came back up and just

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 3>was a very good all around player for the middle

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 3>of last season. So when you make this trade, we

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 3>just want to feel pretty confident that whoever you're bringing

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 3>in is going to be an upgrade over that. I'm

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:27.799
<v Speaker 3>of the opinion that they should invest in some other

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 3>third baseman. It's just that I can also see the

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 3>other side of it, just not having too short of

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 3>a memory and thinking back to what we thought about

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 3>Grand Polly at essentially this time last year, when he

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 3>was playing third on a pretty consistent basis and doing

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.799
<v Speaker 3>well both offensively and defensively. Like, I'm open to hearing

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 3>the other side of that that maybe, even though the

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:50.839
<v Speaker 3>other to this point in the season, third base has

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 3>been a big weakness, but maybe Paully is not the

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 3>worst possible. Sticking with Paully necessarily isn't the worst thing

0:37:58.520 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 3>in the world if they don't get the value of

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 3>one for any of these trade candidates.

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 2>And I think last year, if you had told me

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 2>that Grand Pauli was going to continue the trajectory he

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 2>would be for this season compared to last season, I

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 2>would have been fine with Pauli being the name at

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 2>third base. In the offseason, I said the same thing.

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 2>I wanted Grand Paula to be the starter because his

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 2>defense was so elite.

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 4>Last year.

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Now, remember, teams value that at the hot corner. Actually,

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati made a trade at the deadline with the Indivision

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 2>rival for the Pirates Geek to acquire key Brian Hayes,

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 2>who notoriously has been elite defensively at the hot corner,

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:38.399
<v Speaker 2>but he can't hit at all.

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 4>And then there.

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Came a year this year in particular, where the glove

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 2>finally started to slow down and the bat was so bad.

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:47.959
<v Speaker 2>Reds fans are saying, get this guy off the team,

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 2>but they traded for him at the deadline last year

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 2>to try to make a playoff push because that left

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 2>side of the infield was so bad. So for me,

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:59.240
<v Speaker 2>I thought, okay, if Grand PAULI can play elite defense,

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 2>whatever happens with the bat, I'll take. Kind of like

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Joe Mack. He's there for his defense. As long as

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 2>he hits semi enough, you're gonna be happy with him.

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:10.279
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna be a positive war player. And that has

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 2>not been the case with Polly defensively this year.

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 2>The playing time has been inconsistent, but the metrics indicate

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 2>he just isn't the level of defender that he was

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 2>last year and that I expected him to be coming

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 2>into this season. Because if he was, I'm of the

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:29.839
<v Speaker 2>opinion that you that you just can ride it out

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 2>with Polly and you know, hope the bat makes progress

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:35.240
<v Speaker 2>because he could. He does get in these hot streaks

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 2>and real quick. ELI wanted to mention with you, Hennio Scorrez.

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 2>He does have a mutual option next year, but it's

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 2>for fifteen million dollars or sixteen million dollars. And then

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 2>you look at the metrics behind his bat. If he's

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 2>not hitting for power in Cincinnati like Miami, would be

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 2>even worse. I mean, his power has dropped off significantly,

0:39:57.239 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 2>whereas last year he was a forty eight, forty nine

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:02.279
<v Speaker 2>home run guy. I know it was in Arizona, but

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I would have felt more comfortable not for Thomas White.

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 4>Though not for Thomas.

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 2>White for the record, but Uhennios Los last year was

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 2>a much more attractive option than he is this season.

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 2>In particular, just because the power, which has been his

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:17.239
<v Speaker 2>calling card his entire career, it seems like it's just

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of falling off. He's not hitting the ball hard.

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it's been a weird development to see Suarez,

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.760
<v Speaker 2>of all people in Cincinnati struggle in the power department.

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:28.399
<v Speaker 1>One name I want to mention on the pitching side,

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and this would how like this could be a conversation

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>we'd have towards the end of July if if the

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Diamondbacks continue to slip away. They're currently three games out

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of it, so and that and that that three games

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>continues to become a little bit more now or means more.

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 1>But Michael Soroka would be a great option for this one.

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 1>So I mean's on an expiring contract. He's been actually

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 1>really good, Like this is like the Soroka that the

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>braid that we saw with the Braves. He has a

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>three zero r, a two nine to four FIP. He's

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 1>barely walking anybody, the lowest walk walk per nine of

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>his career. You know. Like he's a good, solid pitcher

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 1>and if they need pitching, that's the guy to go after.

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is the guy who's been moved

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 1>so many times already. He goes with the Cubs. I

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>believe he got traded to the Nationals at one point

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>or signed with the Nationals. Something happened there. So I

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I think that's a solid option. I don't

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's one that's actually been brought up yet. The

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 1>only other name I'd mentioned on the reliever side of

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the Marbins were to ever actually commit money to one,

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>would be Luke Weaver. That dude's been nasty as hell

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this year. I think it's unlikely. That would also have

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to be like you're thinking about twenty twenty seven, assuming

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Fairbanks wouldn't return to the Marrow, and so that's the

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of reliever salary that you put on there. It's

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 1>very similar to Fairbanks. You'd be making twelve million, Fairbanks

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 1>just making one million more. So that's the only the

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>name I threw out there. But Sorok I would like

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 1>on the starting pitching side. I know Lewis wrote about

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Ray. Let's be very clear, no Joe Ryan, no

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Trek Scoogles. You will never hear those names after I

0:41:57.840 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned them. But they're they're gonna need to find

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>something out in the trade deadline as a starter. I

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>know Steth Lougo Waka are also two names that could

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 1>be other potential options for this team. We'll definitely find

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:13.919
<v Speaker 1>out more, I think within the next two weeks during

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the All Star break where the Marnins really stand because

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not easy from here. The four against the Rockies,

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and you never know what happens in course field. Then

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:23.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to play a team in the as that

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 1>they could hit man, they could hit for power. And

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:32.400
<v Speaker 1>then after that it's it's Seattle and Cleveland, two very

0:42:32.440 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 1>good teams. So it's it's this is a super important

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>stretch here right before the All Star break.

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna continue to wrap up this conversation about the

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 2>trade deadline and then preview the Rocky series. Marlin's head

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.880
<v Speaker 2>over to Colorado for four but quickly, this message from

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 2>our friends at FanDuel.

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:53.840
<v Speaker 6>This episode is brought to you by fan Duel Baseball Fans,

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:56.760
<v Speaker 6>the MLB season is in full swing and fan Duel

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 6>is giving you a chance to call your shot with

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 6>Daily Dinger. Joining the action is easy. Just make your

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 6>free pick on who's hitting a home run in their game,

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 6>and if you're right, you'll get a profit boost to

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 6>use on your next bet for a chance at extra winnings.

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 6>It's just another reason why FanDuel is the home of

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:14.839
<v Speaker 6>home runs. So are you ready to play your game?

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 6>Head over to FanDuel dot com slash podcast to get started.

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 6>That's FanDuel dot Com Slash podcast To opt in for

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 6>daily dingers and make your free pick on who's hitting

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:29.839
<v Speaker 6>a homer, playball and swing for the fences on FanDuel,

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 6>an official partner of Major League Baseball. No purchase necessary,

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:38.240
<v Speaker 6>opt in required. Bonus issued as non withdrawable profit boost tokens.

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:43.000
<v Speaker 6>Restrictions apply, including any token expiration and max wager amount.

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 6>See terms at sportsbook dot FanDuel dot com. Gambling problem

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 6>call or text one eight hundred gambler.

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 2>There's a name I want to mention before we talk

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 2>about the Colorado Rockies series that I'm surprised I haven't

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 2>heard anyone mention really in the last couple of weeks

0:44:01.120 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 2>once the Marlins started this hot streak. He is an

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:07.160
<v Speaker 2>impending free agent on a team that has just gotten swept.

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:09.839
<v Speaker 2>I know they were expected to be contenders, and that's

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the Toronto Blue Jays. The Toronto blue Jays are having

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:16.400
<v Speaker 2>a down year and they could consider selling. Kevin Gosman

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:18.800
<v Speaker 2>is a free agent after this year. He's an impending

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:23.279
<v Speaker 2>free agent, would be a rental, and I know there's

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:26.720
<v Speaker 2>some inconsistency with his game. He can have eight shutout,

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:29.399
<v Speaker 2>he could go six and give up seven runs. There's

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:32.399
<v Speaker 2>a lot of you know mixed results, but I think

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 2>it's fair to say that's he would be a huge

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 2>boost to this particular rotation what the Marlins need, and

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:41.279
<v Speaker 2>he wouldn't cost a ton. I mean, he would cost

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 2>a couple prospects, but because of his contract situation. I

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:47.320
<v Speaker 2>just wanted to get your thoughts on gosman Eli before

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:48.400
<v Speaker 2>we move on.

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:52.839
<v Speaker 3>I think as a player, I do like him quite

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:56.360
<v Speaker 3>a bit, and his durability has been under the radar,

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 3>inspiring the last for so much of his career. Ever

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 3>since signing with Toronto. Maybe he hasn't been on the IL.

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't think a single time during all of his

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:08.760
<v Speaker 3>years there. This wrapping up his fifth year now, and

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:10.960
<v Speaker 3>he's a guy that goes without saying now. Has some

0:45:11.080 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 3>high quality playoff experience, including last year as deep a

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 3>run as they went on, he was pretty integral to

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:18.960
<v Speaker 3>them getting that far. He made six appearances in five

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 3>starts during that playoff run. He is an older pitcher

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 3>where even though you have an amazing track record a durability,

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 3>he kind of have that reputation until you don't like

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:30.680
<v Speaker 3>very Suddenly that can that narrative can flip on you.

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:32.839
<v Speaker 3>So it makes me a little bit nervous there, except

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:34.720
<v Speaker 3>for the fact that, as you mentioned, it's no strings

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:37.360
<v Speaker 3>attached beyond this year. That this is a situation where

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 3>it's to me, it's desirable to have a player like

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:42.400
<v Speaker 3>this who's about to be a free agent, because you

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 3>don't want to be on the hook for a very

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 3>big number, a guy that makes about twenty two million

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 3>dollars a year. You don't be on the hook for

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 3>that for any full season if you're the Marlins. Just

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:56.359
<v Speaker 3>knowing how limited the resources are as a whole with him,

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 3>the other pretty big factor.

0:45:58.120 --> 0:45:59.759
<v Speaker 4>Actually, i'll correct myself right here.

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 3>I was gonna say that he would have like ten

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:04.839
<v Speaker 3>in five rights that as a player that had spent

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 3>ten years in the big leagues and five with his

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:09.200
<v Speaker 3>current team, he'd be have full no trade protection. So

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:11.080
<v Speaker 3>the thing is he hasn't spent five fold years of

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:12.440
<v Speaker 3>the Blue Jays yet he's in the middle of that

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:14.919
<v Speaker 3>fifth year, so he is in that sweet spot where

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of out of his hands in order to

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 3>make that deal. At the same time, as bad as

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:21.879
<v Speaker 3>the Blue Jays have been relative to expectations, I don't

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 3>think they're gonna throw in the towel. Part of that

0:46:24.239 --> 0:46:27.279
<v Speaker 3>is just because of how mediocre all the American League is.

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:29.719
<v Speaker 3>Like I can double check right now things are going

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 3>there for the blue Jays. Two and a half back

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:35.279
<v Speaker 3>of a wild card spot for the blue Jays right now, So.

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:37.080
<v Speaker 4>The record is hideous.

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:40.280
<v Speaker 3>At the same time, there's no there's nobody pulling away

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 3>in the AL. I mean, we kind of can say

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 3>that about the National League too, but it's even more

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 3>extreme in the AL, where that their roster is still

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:49.399
<v Speaker 3>really talented. They themselves if they're going to get back

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 3>into it. I know that they've had a series of

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:54.400
<v Speaker 3>starting pitching setbacks, so I think that's kind of the

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:56.799
<v Speaker 3>area where they're least likely to trade away. I think

0:46:56.800 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 3>it is worth bringing up, really any of these any

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 3>pending for agent on a team that's significantly worse record

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:04.440
<v Speaker 3>wise than the Marlins are right now. Like, I think

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 3>it's totally fine to bring him up. I just think

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:09.280
<v Speaker 3>it's a long shot that they move him in this situation,

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 3>as as bad as things have been for them recently.

0:47:13.480 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Kevin, any thoughts on the trade deadline before we talk

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 2>about the Rockies.

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Here, Yeah, I mean with Gosman, it kind of goes

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:21.960
<v Speaker 1>back to like the Soroka thing. You're gonna have to

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 1>wait maybe a couple more weeks to really make a

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 1>full on assessment there. And I find it hard that

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the Blue Jays will sell they're I think they have

0:47:28.480 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>good players, You're good enough team. Every team runs into

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:34.399
<v Speaker 1>a bad patch of games or losing straight. We saw

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that with the Marlins earlier this season. A lot of

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:39.480
<v Speaker 1>teams go through this. I'm sure they'll bounce back and

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:42.359
<v Speaker 1>they'll be in a better position. It's a little tough

0:47:42.360 --> 0:47:44.319
<v Speaker 1>for obviously now because the Rays are in there and

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees have been really good this year, So those

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:49.400
<v Speaker 1>are somethings to keep in mind. But I think at

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:51.879
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, I think we're not gonna

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:55.040
<v Speaker 1>make a great assessment on this situation until like two

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:56.759
<v Speaker 1>weeks from now, until we're in the All Star break.

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:00.399
<v Speaker 1>We're I think we could finally start saying like, hey,

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:03.919
<v Speaker 1>like here we go, this is this is real now,

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Like it feels real at the moment because the Marlins

0:48:05.760 --> 0:48:08.400
<v Speaker 1>are a really good spot and the Padres just lost too,

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So now they're tied with the Padres uh and the

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 1>standings like exactly tied with the five twenty four one

0:48:13.520 --> 0:48:18.320
<v Speaker 1>percentage so not just a matter of waiting and seeing

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 1>what happens and seeing how everything plays out. Although I

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>will say the National League is kind of beginning to

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>take more shape than the American League. So I think

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:27.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna start working the phones, you start with

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the National League teams like the Rock He's the Giants,

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the Mets, Shoot, the Diamondbacks are gonna get there soon.

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:35.960
<v Speaker 1>One name I would love to mention really quick, I

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly what contract situation it is, really quickly

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:40.560
<v Speaker 1>get third base Nolan Arenaw. It's kind of like rejuvenated

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:42.560
<v Speaker 1>himself with the Dimonbacks. I don't know that's still the case,

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:45.759
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it would be like a nice little

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:47.759
<v Speaker 1>cool thing for him. He again, he would have to

0:48:47.920 --> 0:48:50.960
<v Speaker 1>accept the trade to the Marlins, so that makes it

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit tougher. But he is a Cuban American

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:56.399
<v Speaker 1>or son of Cuban parents, so I guess somewhat cool there.

0:48:56.880 --> 0:48:59.319
<v Speaker 1>But you know, he's he's all. He's been a great

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Defender's old care No, definitely help on the defensive, and

0:49:01.920 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know exact what the offensive numbers look like,

0:49:03.760 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, exactly So yeah.

0:49:06.840 --> 0:49:09.799
<v Speaker 3>For a minute, are not was looking great offensively when

0:49:09.840 --> 0:49:12.360
<v Speaker 3>in like the middle of May, the middle of April,

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 3>late April, early May, and now he's kind of back

0:49:15.280 --> 0:49:17.200
<v Speaker 3>more or less to who's been the past couple of

0:49:17.239 --> 0:49:18.840
<v Speaker 3>years with Oh, I.

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:21.840
<v Speaker 4>Don't I don't think so.

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 3>That's another guy where you're relying a lot on the

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:27.840
<v Speaker 3>intangibles and depending on how you value his defense. Not

0:49:28.200 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 3>a crazy thing again, just to I think one thing

0:49:30.520 --> 0:49:33.480
<v Speaker 3>we should really underscore is that, especially if you get

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 3>a right handed hitter, I think that is specifically a

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:39.800
<v Speaker 3>good fit for this team. Like today's game kind of

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:43.840
<v Speaker 3>being underlining the lack of quality right handed hitting options

0:49:43.880 --> 0:49:46.280
<v Speaker 3>that they have either on the bench or to platoon

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:48.920
<v Speaker 3>in certain situations. So whenever it's a right handed hitter,

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:51.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to give them like extra consideration. That's kind

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 3>of why I brought up Suarez despite his bad year.

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:55.920
<v Speaker 3>That's why I think even are not despite being very

0:49:56.040 --> 0:49:59.400
<v Speaker 3>clearly in decline at this point, is I think that

0:49:59.719 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 3>would make a more well rounded roster. You're just looking

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:04.719
<v Speaker 3>for a right handed hitter that can offer more than

0:50:04.880 --> 0:50:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Leo Jimenez. Don't mean to continue picking on him, It's

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:10.080
<v Speaker 3>just that now he kind of does stick out like

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:12.759
<v Speaker 3>a sore thumb in terms of the weakest link on

0:50:12.800 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 3>this roster, and if they could get any third baseman,

0:50:16.280 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 3>any even a variety of positions that is, a right

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:22.120
<v Speaker 3>handed hitter that has either more power or more speed

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:24.560
<v Speaker 3>or more of both. It's really not that rare to

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:27.840
<v Speaker 3>find a guy with potentially more of both than Jimenez

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 3>than I think that's just a there's a wide variety

0:50:31.000 --> 0:50:34.560
<v Speaker 3>you guys available that can fit that very that can

0:50:34.600 --> 0:50:37.759
<v Speaker 3>clear the Jimenez threshold. So to me, that is in

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:38.839
<v Speaker 3>addition to starting pitching.

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:39.440
<v Speaker 4>We touched on that.

0:50:39.600 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that continues to be that'll have to be

0:50:42.040 --> 0:50:45.320
<v Speaker 3>the priority, especially if there's I think, no matter what

0:50:45.440 --> 0:50:47.040
<v Speaker 3>at this point, it's it's clear that they're going to

0:50:47.080 --> 0:50:50.200
<v Speaker 3>need one more starter of some kind that they can

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:54.120
<v Speaker 3>trust to eat endings down the stretch. That those are

0:50:54.320 --> 0:50:56.960
<v Speaker 3>really the two buckets that I look at, starting pitchers

0:50:57.120 --> 0:50:59.000
<v Speaker 3>and any sort of right handed hitter.

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And really quick like the Nation, I say that the

0:51:01.520 --> 0:51:04.399
<v Speaker 1>National League's beginning to take shape, because like three games

0:51:04.440 --> 0:51:06.480
<v Speaker 1>out at this point is quite a bit. You have

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to jump one, two, three, four teams, including the two

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:13.200
<v Speaker 1>at the top, you know, the second and third wildcard

0:51:13.239 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 1>team because those aren't. I don't think those are locks

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 1>by any means yet. I think the Phillies at this

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:19.040
<v Speaker 1>point you may as well just say that they are

0:51:19.120 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be the first wildcard and who knows, maybe

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:23.680
<v Speaker 1>even fighting for the Braves or the division title at

0:51:23.680 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 1>this point. So, uh, three games out feels like a

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:29.200
<v Speaker 1>little a good bit and Diamonds have lost three straight.

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Pirates and Natch are the two teams that you have

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to kind of look out for and see, like, let's

0:51:33.160 --> 0:51:34.879
<v Speaker 1>see what happens here within the next couple of weeks.

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 1>But the Marlins aren't a really good spot to where

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:39.279
<v Speaker 1>they could say, hey, let's let's go out here, let's

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:41.040
<v Speaker 1>get a starting pitcher, let's get a third basement, maybe

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 1>want two bats and a starter, and see what happens.

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:48.640
<v Speaker 2>The next stop for the Marlins on this road trip,

0:51:48.800 --> 0:51:51.719
<v Speaker 2>it's a rare, rare occasion where you play a game

0:51:51.800 --> 0:51:54.240
<v Speaker 2>every single day. This week they're going to Course Field

0:51:54.680 --> 0:51:58.280
<v Speaker 2>for four game set against the Rockies. Old friend Troy

0:51:58.480 --> 0:52:01.799
<v Speaker 2>Johnston gets to see him again, and guys, he's heaving

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 2>himself a hell of a year. He's second in Major

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:07.680
<v Speaker 2>League Baseball in doubles with twenty two. Right Pye Roffee

0:52:07.680 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Devers hitting three point fifteen ops comfortably in the eight hundreds,

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 2>and now he's played in a lot of games Troy

0:52:17.200 --> 0:52:19.880
<v Speaker 2>but gets pinch hit for a lot, so just two

0:52:20.000 --> 0:52:21.839
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty at bats, but it's still a really

0:52:21.880 --> 0:52:25.279
<v Speaker 2>good number for a player that just the Marlins didn't

0:52:25.280 --> 0:52:27.600
<v Speaker 2>want to give him a shot. They let him go.

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:29.920
<v Speaker 2>The Rockies picked him up, and they have some pieces

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:33.239
<v Speaker 2>eli this Rockies team. They're not good by any means.

0:52:33.239 --> 0:52:36.120
<v Speaker 2>They're thirty three and fifty one, they're gonna finish last

0:52:36.280 --> 0:52:39.359
<v Speaker 2>in the in the National League West. But offensively they

0:52:39.440 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 2>have some real standout players.

0:52:42.160 --> 0:52:43.160
<v Speaker 4>You have TJ.

0:52:43.360 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Rumfield, who's played a lot for them. They're catcher Hunter Goodman,

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:49.560
<v Speaker 2>who's an absolute power threat. He's on track to hit

0:52:49.920 --> 0:52:52.960
<v Speaker 2>around forty home runs, if not more. He's and he's

0:52:53.040 --> 0:52:56.640
<v Speaker 2>hurt the Marlins historically throughout his young career. This Rockies team,

0:52:56.719 --> 0:52:59.279
<v Speaker 2>you can't go into coors Field and just expect to

0:52:59.360 --> 0:53:02.680
<v Speaker 2>walk all over for them, because again, this is an

0:53:02.760 --> 0:53:07.600
<v Speaker 2>offensive ballpark with a lot of offensive, offensively minded players.

0:53:08.160 --> 0:53:09.200
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be a fun series.

0:53:10.960 --> 0:53:13.360
<v Speaker 3>A fun series. I'll mention it now, I'll reierate it.

0:53:13.520 --> 0:53:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Later before predicting time. That is a four game series,

0:53:16.080 --> 0:53:18.319
<v Speaker 3>the first four game series in a while for this team.

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:22.279
<v Speaker 3>So that's I guess Marlins fans their first instinct is

0:53:22.360 --> 0:53:24.520
<v Speaker 3>that's a blessing because you're playing as many games as

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:26.600
<v Speaker 3>possible against a team that has one of the very

0:53:26.640 --> 0:53:27.720
<v Speaker 3>worst records in the majors.

0:53:28.000 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 4>That seems good.

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 3>As you laid out, they are better than they were

0:53:30.760 --> 0:53:33.120
<v Speaker 3>last year. The last season they were a team that

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:36.480
<v Speaker 3>flirted with the record for losses in a single season

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:39.480
<v Speaker 3>and so many games that were just completely non competitive

0:53:39.520 --> 0:53:41.640
<v Speaker 3>and then got blown out. So that's really the difference

0:53:41.760 --> 0:53:44.080
<v Speaker 3>between last year and this year is that they're competitive

0:53:44.120 --> 0:53:47.600
<v Speaker 3>in almost every single game. Occasionally they're starting pitching really

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:50.839
<v Speaker 3>sinks them early on, but more often than not they

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 3>are still alive in these later endings. They do have

0:53:53.760 --> 0:53:56.320
<v Speaker 3>some legit lineup depth. Troy's as a big part of

0:53:56.400 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 3>that kind of as you alluded to, they are platooning

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:01.839
<v Speaker 3>him pretty strictly, so they are kept managing him very

0:54:01.880 --> 0:54:04.880
<v Speaker 3>much like the Marlins did, where it's somewhat unusual for

0:54:04.960 --> 0:54:06.880
<v Speaker 3>him to play an entire game start to finish just

0:54:06.960 --> 0:54:09.680
<v Speaker 3>because once a left he comes in to face him

0:54:09.719 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 3>they'll usually go to the bench and look for somebody else,

0:54:12.000 --> 0:54:14.600
<v Speaker 3>and if there's a LEFTI starting the game, then he

0:54:15.080 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 3>often won't be in there in the first place. You

0:54:17.000 --> 0:54:18.719
<v Speaker 3>would think this is a good series for him because

0:54:18.719 --> 0:54:21.919
<v Speaker 3>the Martins don't have any lefty starters, so he could

0:54:21.960 --> 0:54:23.959
<v Speaker 3>be in the lineup for all four of these upcoming games.

0:54:24.040 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 3>A revenge series against a team that gave him the

0:54:26.520 --> 0:54:28.560
<v Speaker 3>first opportunity in the big league level, but it was

0:54:28.600 --> 0:54:32.120
<v Speaker 3>a very belated opportunity. They really made him earn it

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:35.360
<v Speaker 3>down in the minors and bide his time before finally

0:54:35.360 --> 0:54:36.080
<v Speaker 3>getting called up.

0:54:36.440 --> 0:54:37.880
<v Speaker 4>So it just happen to see him succeed.

0:54:38.600 --> 0:54:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Not the star of this team you mentioned him already,

0:54:41.040 --> 0:54:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Goodman is the one that really sticks out where he

0:54:43.480 --> 0:54:45.799
<v Speaker 3>had a great year last season and now I think

0:54:45.920 --> 0:54:47.960
<v Speaker 3>just recently a three home run game that now puts

0:54:48.000 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 3>him well ahead of even that pace. Right now, he's

0:54:51.800 --> 0:54:54.120
<v Speaker 3>he's like a very legitimate All Star at a time

0:54:54.120 --> 0:54:57.760
<v Speaker 3>where the catcher position is kind of wide open across baseball,

0:54:57.920 --> 0:55:00.120
<v Speaker 3>Like he's kind of staking his claim to being in

0:55:00.239 --> 0:55:03.080
<v Speaker 3>the conversation for best of that position with how well

0:55:03.120 --> 0:55:04.080
<v Speaker 3>he is offensively.

0:55:04.960 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, as a team overall, though, they're still pretty limited. Again.

0:55:08.200 --> 0:55:11.040
<v Speaker 4>It goes back to that starting pitching thing. Relatively weak.

0:55:12.480 --> 0:55:15.200
<v Speaker 3>There's not a single starter that you could comfortably say

0:55:15.320 --> 0:55:18.160
<v Speaker 3>is even an average quality starter that they have in

0:55:18.200 --> 0:55:21.880
<v Speaker 3>their rotation right now. So that's kind of the Marlins

0:55:21.960 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 3>coming off a series where they didn't do particularly good offensively,

0:55:25.120 --> 0:55:27.560
<v Speaker 3>this should be a get right series for their bats.

0:55:27.640 --> 0:55:29.279
<v Speaker 3>As a team that puts a lot of balls in

0:55:29.280 --> 0:55:31.320
<v Speaker 3>play to begin with. Then I'll go into a ballpark

0:55:31.400 --> 0:55:33.800
<v Speaker 3>that rewards balls and play more than any other in

0:55:33.880 --> 0:55:35.920
<v Speaker 3>course field. So this is going to be a very

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:37.600
<v Speaker 3>different type of series in the previous one. I think

0:55:37.680 --> 0:55:40.480
<v Speaker 3>the Marlins are gonna win it. It's because they're averaging

0:55:41.040 --> 0:55:44.719
<v Speaker 3>six seven runs a game at a minimum against Colorado in.

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:46.880
<v Speaker 1>The one Rockies pitcher that actually been really good for them,

0:55:46.960 --> 0:55:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Chase Dolanders not for the year, so they're in a

0:55:50.000 --> 0:55:52.759
<v Speaker 1>good spot. The Marlins are going into the course really

0:55:52.840 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 1>quickly with Troy like, it's not like the course field

0:55:56.040 --> 0:55:58.719
<v Speaker 1>effect where he's only hitting at home, like he has

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:01.399
<v Speaker 1>seven to seven the ops on the road and he's

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:03.759
<v Speaker 1>playing right now and he he already has an RBI,

0:56:03.840 --> 0:56:05.160
<v Speaker 1>so I'm assuming he was a sack fly because he

0:56:05.200 --> 0:56:06.839
<v Speaker 1>struck out twice. No, no, he has a two hit day,

0:56:06.960 --> 0:56:11.040
<v Speaker 1>so good day for Troy on a Sunday. So yeah.

0:56:11.480 --> 0:56:16.480
<v Speaker 1>And then he doubles on me, Chuck, Uh No, no, doubles,

0:56:16.520 --> 0:56:18.960
<v Speaker 1>two singles, an RBI and two strikeouts. He must have

0:56:19.000 --> 0:56:22.960
<v Speaker 1>played the whole game because clearly he put up a

0:56:23.000 --> 0:56:26.279
<v Speaker 1>good amount of the bats. But uh, they'll get to

0:56:26.320 --> 0:56:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess face former pitching coach alone like Himan, although

0:56:29.239 --> 0:56:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't been a very good run for him over

0:56:30.760 --> 0:56:32.800
<v Speaker 1>there so far, that they would be worst starting pitching

0:56:32.880 --> 0:56:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the r A in baseball, and they are. They have

0:56:35.280 --> 0:56:37.799
<v Speaker 1>the third worst Bullpenny r in baseball. I thought they

0:56:37.840 --> 0:56:40.000
<v Speaker 1>had finally like solved a little bit of this pitching issue,

0:56:40.080 --> 0:56:42.319
<v Speaker 1>but it seems like it really hasn't. They got off

0:56:42.360 --> 0:56:44.799
<v Speaker 1>to like such a good start pitching, But I guess

0:56:44.840 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 1>when you have like who do you who? Do they

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:49.840
<v Speaker 1>even have like Tomoyuki Suganas over there.

0:56:52.239 --> 0:56:53.640
<v Speaker 4>With their pitching.

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:56.800
<v Speaker 2>The wheels have just completely fallen off this season for

0:56:56.920 --> 0:56:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Freeland. Freeland has been a rocky for he's a

0:57:01.120 --> 0:57:04.520
<v Speaker 2>but you look at the numbers. Fourteen starts, seven point

0:57:04.680 --> 0:57:08.960
<v Speaker 2>five ERA opponents are hitting three to nineteen against him,

0:57:09.040 --> 0:57:12.600
<v Speaker 2>and that's better than Michael Lorenzen, where opponents are hitting

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:16.160
<v Speaker 2>three thirty eight against Michael Lorenzen. I mean, they are

0:57:16.240 --> 0:57:19.160
<v Speaker 2>getting absolutely crushed. And the good news for the Fish

0:57:19.520 --> 0:57:22.160
<v Speaker 2>is that you are gonna face both of them. According

0:57:22.240 --> 0:57:26.400
<v Speaker 2>to Fangraft's probable rotations. Of course, nothing's set in stone,

0:57:26.440 --> 0:57:29.520
<v Speaker 2>but it looks like Freeland will start that second game

0:57:29.720 --> 0:57:34.040
<v Speaker 2>and Lorenzen will start that Thursday Day game for for

0:57:34.440 --> 0:57:38.640
<v Speaker 2>the Rockies. But yeah, this is a chance for Miami

0:57:39.000 --> 0:57:42.360
<v Speaker 2>where they can go in and three out of four

0:57:42.480 --> 0:57:44.560
<v Speaker 2>for me, at least is the minimum. If you're the

0:57:44.640 --> 0:57:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Marlins at this point in the season, you gotta win

0:57:47.200 --> 0:57:50.240
<v Speaker 2>three out of four minimum if you If you split,

0:57:50.360 --> 0:57:51.360
<v Speaker 2>that's disappointing to me.

0:57:51.960 --> 0:57:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Freelan is starting the second game. It's a TBD

0:57:54.400 --> 0:57:58.200
<v Speaker 1>for game one, and then for the third game it's

0:57:58.240 --> 0:58:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Max Yukisugan know, and the Thursday, the finale, it's gonna

0:58:03.640 --> 0:58:05.760
<v Speaker 1>be Michael lorenzom so so they have to in the Marins.

0:58:05.840 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 1>At the TVD, I just realized Sandy and Yurie are

0:58:08.440 --> 0:58:10.880
<v Speaker 1>pitching in this series. Oh boy, I don't know how

0:58:10.880 --> 0:58:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to feel about that. Two guys who well one guy

0:58:13.200 --> 0:58:15.600
<v Speaker 1>who relies off the ground ball quite a bit. So

0:58:15.840 --> 0:58:18.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll see and then we'll see where the Urie. I

0:58:18.200 --> 0:58:20.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know how these guys actually pitched in Colorado. I

0:58:20.040 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 1>think Yuri has I'm not sure.

0:58:21.800 --> 0:58:23.920
<v Speaker 3>I definitely, off the top of my head, remember a

0:58:24.080 --> 0:58:27.400
<v Speaker 3>terrible Sandy starting course back in the day. But he,

0:58:27.520 --> 0:58:30.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, over all these years. I guess I can

0:58:30.240 --> 0:58:32.520
<v Speaker 3>pull the numbers, but I don't think it's particularly important.

0:58:32.760 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 3>I'll find other than I know you'll be able to

0:58:35.400 --> 0:58:37.600
<v Speaker 3>find at least one like awful start where he went

0:58:37.880 --> 0:58:40.200
<v Speaker 3>less than three innings and allowed at least seven eight

0:58:40.320 --> 0:58:43.960
<v Speaker 3>runs Like it's as you point out, Yeah, with Sandy,

0:58:44.000 --> 0:58:46.800
<v Speaker 3>even though he's he's been very good, especially of late,

0:58:47.120 --> 0:58:49.640
<v Speaker 3>but he's still very reliant on balls and play. And

0:58:49.880 --> 0:58:51.520
<v Speaker 3>one thing we kind of glossed over with the previous

0:58:51.560 --> 0:58:53.800
<v Speaker 3>series is Marlins did play excellent defense.

0:58:53.560 --> 0:58:54.240
<v Speaker 4>This past weekend.

0:58:54.440 --> 0:58:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Really were pretty high up there in terms of overall defense,

0:58:57.080 --> 0:58:59.720
<v Speaker 3>between Joe Mack and Jacob Marci and now Graham poly

0:58:59.800 --> 0:59:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Ding back in the folds and Paully had a couple

0:59:02.960 --> 0:59:06.080
<v Speaker 3>several great plays defensively at third base as well. Yeah,

0:59:06.120 --> 0:59:08.200
<v Speaker 3>that's gonna be there's a premium on defense when you

0:59:08.240 --> 0:59:11.280
<v Speaker 3>play at course fields. So that's going to be Yeah,

0:59:11.320 --> 0:59:13.880
<v Speaker 3>that's gonna be crucial to follow over these next few days.

0:59:13.880 --> 0:59:16.120
<v Speaker 3>If they're able to do it like that, if they're

0:59:16.120 --> 0:59:19.000
<v Speaker 3>able to get some surprising production from some of their

0:59:19.080 --> 0:59:22.600
<v Speaker 3>other defenders that aren't as highly touted, that's that really

0:59:22.680 --> 0:59:26.600
<v Speaker 3>makes a difference. That's what ends puts endings away, gets

0:59:26.600 --> 0:59:29.600
<v Speaker 3>you out of jams versus what leads to crooked numbers

0:59:29.640 --> 0:59:32.720
<v Speaker 3>going on this scoreboard. Like with Colorado, the margin for

0:59:32.880 --> 0:59:35.680
<v Speaker 3>error is just really thin defensively because of how much

0:59:35.720 --> 0:59:36.520
<v Speaker 3>ground you have to cover.

0:59:38.000 --> 0:59:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Sing me up five six el for Sandy and Chors

0:59:40.480 --> 0:59:42.360
<v Speaker 1>by the way, not great. So we'll see.

0:59:44.320 --> 0:59:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully the Marlins can get it done. Prediction time coming

0:59:49.720 --> 0:59:53.600
<v Speaker 2>up here. But first we have this ad from our

0:59:53.680 --> 0:59:57.520
<v Speaker 2>friends over at jet Ski Rentals of South Florida.

0:59:57.640 --> 0:59:59.640
<v Speaker 4>Eli, you want to take it away, Indeed we do.

1:00:00.920 --> 1:00:03.480
<v Speaker 3>This podcast is brought to you by jet Ski Rentals

1:00:03.600 --> 1:00:07.960
<v Speaker 3>of South Florida, offering Miami's best jet skiing boat adventures.

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:10.280
<v Speaker 3>With six jet Ski locations and over one hundred and

1:00:10.400 --> 1:00:13.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty boats, there's something for every style and every budget.

1:00:13.840 --> 1:00:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Right Jetski is right in front of the downtown Skyline

1:00:15.880 --> 1:00:18.280
<v Speaker 3>and ferris Wheel, or book your own private boat starting

1:00:18.320 --> 1:00:20.760
<v Speaker 3>as low as three hundred dollars with a captain included.

1:00:21.040 --> 1:00:22.919
<v Speaker 3>Bring your drinks to your friends and enjoy the water

1:00:23.000 --> 1:00:25.320
<v Speaker 3>your way. The boat is completely yours for the time

1:00:25.360 --> 1:00:27.680
<v Speaker 3>you reserve it. I think this upcoming week is about

1:00:27.680 --> 1:00:30.040
<v Speaker 3>as busy as they get July fourth weekends, so the

1:00:30.120 --> 1:00:31.200
<v Speaker 3>reservation based only.

1:00:31.560 --> 1:00:32.680
<v Speaker 4>To book, you gotta call.

1:00:32.680 --> 1:00:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Three oh five nine nine oh two one nine two

1:00:34.920 --> 1:00:37.600
<v Speaker 3>or check them out online at sf jetski rentals dot com.

1:00:37.960 --> 1:00:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Make sure to use our promo code fish on first

1:00:41.320 --> 1:00:43.760
<v Speaker 3>to save ten percent off your next booking. Again, that's

1:00:43.760 --> 1:00:46.160
<v Speaker 3>three oh five nine to nine oh two one nine two,

1:00:46.400 --> 1:00:49.600
<v Speaker 3>or online at sf jetski rentals dot com.

1:00:51.640 --> 1:00:56.720
<v Speaker 4>This is prediction time. That's my prediction, but who knows?

1:01:00.320 --> 1:01:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Prediction time for this four game series against the Rockies. Yes,

1:01:05.960 --> 1:01:08.880
<v Speaker 3>very important to note, not the usual three gamer that

1:01:09.000 --> 1:01:12.240
<v Speaker 3>we've seen so often this season. Very hard to win

1:01:12.360 --> 1:01:14.520
<v Speaker 3>any four game series, regardless of the opponent. There's a

1:01:14.560 --> 1:01:17.480
<v Speaker 3>look at our prediction time leader board. A perfect series

1:01:17.560 --> 1:01:21.080
<v Speaker 3>for Jeremiah has expanded his lead atop the standing Still

1:01:21.160 --> 1:01:22.640
<v Speaker 3>so long to go, but we keep track of it

1:01:22.720 --> 1:01:25.360
<v Speaker 3>all season long, from our fish on, first staffers, our

1:01:25.440 --> 1:01:28.520
<v Speaker 3>super subs, our last team guests, and you get points

1:01:28.560 --> 1:01:30.520
<v Speaker 3>for predicting how many games the Marlins will win in

1:01:30.600 --> 1:01:32.920
<v Speaker 3>the series, who will be the series MVP, as determined

1:01:32.960 --> 1:01:36.760
<v Speaker 3>by win probability. Added one more reminder four game series,

1:01:36.840 --> 1:01:39.680
<v Speaker 3>picking four games instead of three. But other than that,

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:41.800
<v Speaker 3>I think we're all ready to go. So I'll turn

1:01:41.880 --> 1:01:44.200
<v Speaker 3>on the music and I guess we'll start with Kevin.

1:01:44.320 --> 1:01:44.960
<v Speaker 4>As we often do.

1:01:47.880 --> 1:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Marlins will take three out of four in cores and

1:01:51.720 --> 1:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I will never forget when Eli chows. I think it

1:01:54.040 --> 1:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>was Anthony Bassos the series MVP and coorps and he

1:01:56.520 --> 1:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>got it. So I'm gonna choose a pitcher. I'm gonna

1:01:58.360 --> 1:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>go with Max Smeyer to be the series sevent I

1:02:00.320 --> 1:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>think you'll shove you will continue to only expand his case.

1:02:04.160 --> 1:02:09.320
<v Speaker 4>That's who I should be an all star. I'll bring

1:02:09.440 --> 1:02:10.080
<v Speaker 4>up myself next.

1:02:10.120 --> 1:02:11.920
<v Speaker 3>We want to save the best for last, and jere

1:02:12.080 --> 1:02:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Jeremiah has been the best at this, so I'll go

1:02:14.240 --> 1:02:17.000
<v Speaker 3>with the series split. You really have to, so often

1:02:17.080 --> 1:02:20.040
<v Speaker 3>these four game sets get split down the middle, regardless

1:02:20.080 --> 1:02:23.080
<v Speaker 3>of other factors. So that's where I'll have it against

1:02:23.120 --> 1:02:27.960
<v Speaker 3>this Rockies team. For my series MVP, I'm gonna go

1:02:28.040 --> 1:02:32.479
<v Speaker 3>with Uri Uri Perez. I've I was cautiously optimistic about

1:02:32.480 --> 1:02:33.840
<v Speaker 3>what I was seeing right before he went down with

1:02:33.920 --> 1:02:36.280
<v Speaker 3>his injury. Pretty good in his first start back from

1:02:36.280 --> 1:02:39.360
<v Speaker 3>the IL, So I think Yuri is going to shove

1:02:39.520 --> 1:02:41.200
<v Speaker 3>and at least that's one of the games of the

1:02:41.240 --> 1:02:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Marlins takeaway. So I think that's gonna be the first

1:02:44.240 --> 1:02:46.720
<v Speaker 3>time this season where I picked him as my MVP.

1:02:47.240 --> 1:02:49.640
<v Speaker 3>And uh yeah, two wins a piece for the Marlins

1:02:49.680 --> 1:02:51.000
<v Speaker 3>and Rockies this current week.

1:02:52.880 --> 1:02:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I said that in order to have a successful series

1:02:55.560 --> 1:02:57.720
<v Speaker 2>at Courts, Marlins have to win the out of four.

1:02:58.920 --> 1:03:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I really want to pick them to do, so I

1:03:01.120 --> 1:03:04.000
<v Speaker 2>think it's gonna be a series split through to two.

1:03:04.280 --> 1:03:08.480
<v Speaker 2>This Rockies offense, it's a little bit scary. Cours always

1:03:08.520 --> 1:03:11.800
<v Speaker 2>has some crazy games. I'm gonna go with former Marlin

1:03:12.120 --> 1:03:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Troy Johnston as series MVP. It's gonna have a monster

1:03:15.960 --> 1:03:18.080
<v Speaker 2>revenge series against this pitching staff.

1:03:18.120 --> 1:03:20.720
<v Speaker 4>But Marlin's leaseplit.

1:03:25.200 --> 1:03:28.240
<v Speaker 2>And that is going to do it. For today's stream,

1:03:28.320 --> 1:03:32.000
<v Speaker 2>we recap the Marlins Cardinals series. Of course, talked about

1:03:32.560 --> 1:03:35.240
<v Speaker 2>trade deadline targets. We still have a lot of time

1:03:35.600 --> 1:03:38.720
<v Speaker 2>to go before the actual trade deadline that's gonna be

1:03:38.760 --> 1:03:41.640
<v Speaker 2>August fourth, so plenty of time. There's gonna be new

1:03:41.720 --> 1:03:43.840
<v Speaker 2>teams that fall in and out of contention. It's gonna

1:03:43.840 --> 1:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>be fun. But thank you guys for joining us today,

1:03:47.880 --> 1:03:50.720
<v Speaker 2>and of course we will be back next week after

1:03:50.840 --> 1:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>the Colorado Series. For Eli Suspen, for Kevin Barrall. I've

1:03:54.680 --> 1:03:58.280
<v Speaker 2>been Jeremih Geiger host in the stream until next time.

1:03:58.360 --> 1:04:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Guys, stay safe and let's go fish