WEBVTT - Netflix Earnings Preview and Ye Buys Parler

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power callive

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Caroline Hyde in New York. I'm in

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Firmili Chang. This is Bloomberg Technology coming up in the

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>next hour. Netflix kicks off big tech earnings Tuesday, followed

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>by Tesla and of course Snap. How low is the

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>bar already set this quarter? And will stocks continue to

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>fall even after earnings beats the turnaround today? Of course,

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>plus Kanye West or years is now known by the

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>social media platform that is embraced by conservatives who departed

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Twitter over allegations of political censorship. We're talking with the

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Parlor about the deal and Texas needs more

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>details from ft X and Sam mcmun Freed's deal to

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>buy Voyages assets will have more on the investigation into

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the cryptomogil First and foremost, let's have a talk a

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about well the on again, off again,

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 1>risk on, risk off sort of violent moves we see

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in the market and whether any of the valuations are

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>currently at a buying opportunity. Dan morganam piece to say

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is with us Sonova's trust portfolio manager Dan, before we

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>get into the integrity of the earnings and what you

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>expect just at these levels the whipsawing we do see

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>day in day out. Are you ultimately thinking that the

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>erosion in value does mean that we're some sort of

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>buying point in growth stocks, Well, Caroly, I don't know

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>if we can put the flag in the sand and

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:39.839
<v Speaker 1>saying we're a buying point, but just kind of reiterate

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>where you're talking about earlier. I mean, going into this

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>upcoming third quarter, the consensus right now is calling for

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the overall technology sector to drop and earnings by about

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>seven percent. The semiconductors, which we've talked about before with

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and Video and Micron last couple of weeks, that's expect

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to drop fourteen percent. So I think the expectations are

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>so low that if they get any growth out of

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>any of the fang stocks, including Netflix, even as top

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>line growth, I think people would be pretty happy. So

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>but I still think we've got to work through these

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>FED increases before we can draw the line the sand

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>and say Okay, here's the inflection point we can move

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>on and start feeling really positive about tech. Interesting, So

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of the macro dictates the micro at the moment,

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>but talk to us about the micro took to us

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that's informast about Netflix and kicks off. What are you

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>expecting any sort of steer on on resilience from the

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>consumer right now? We have to bear in mind, Caroline,

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the Netflix has reported two consecutive quarters of negative subscriber growth.

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Coming into this quarter, we're looking for a little over

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a million new subscribers. We know they're talking about going

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to a new platform in terms of advertising revenue. How's

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that going to affect them? They've been working on their

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>password sharing issues. I think the big bogey Caroline, will

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>be honest with the going this quarter on Netflix is

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>do you know what consensus is for the fourth quarter?

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Looking for war million new subscribers? To me, that seems

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit high. Yeah, yeah, notable that we're still

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>being very British perhaps so there's news advertising models and

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>they're like, I'm interested in what you think of of Tesla,

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 1>which of course in many ways is so retail dictated

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and has been very prone to just being moved as

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a stock on sentiment. But what do you like to

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>see in terms of a steer on growth on a

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>particularly as we see the more competition come in Mercedes

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, the news there today, Caroline, we don't follow

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Tesla unfortunately because it is an auto stock, it doesn't

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>fit in our bracket in terms of technology. So I

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>really unfortunately, I don't want have much to add. Apologies

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>for that been a bit of a misfi fire and steer.

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for bearing with me. Let's talk a little

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>bit though about where you are go and me guiding

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a like IBM, for example, this is a company that

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>has been relatively equisitive, relatively in growth mode. But are

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you likely to see the corporate side of demands stay resolute, yeah, Caroline.

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting because they had a pretty good number

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>on the last quarter of their second quarter. Coming into

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this third quarter, there are concerns about how wage growth

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to impact their consulting business. They're expected to

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>take on about an eight percentage point uh negative impact

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>from from currency um But if you look at their model,

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of interesting because they generate about seventy their

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>business from software and consulting, and about fifty of their

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>revenues are reoccurring, so they are very high cash flow.

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Stock would be something your listeners could look at. The

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>dividend is over five pent um and it's only down

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>thirteen percent year to date, where the SMP is down

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. So look at IBM. A is a value

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>stock with very good cash flow. What has been so

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting is over the last couple of earning seasons, Snap

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>has almost dictated sentiment, leading them into the matters, into

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the other Googles and the likes that are focused on

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>advertising as a model. We've seen them become a sort

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of bell weather. Are you expecting them to be that

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>this week? And to the upside of the town side

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>where you're right, Caroline. Last quarter they came out and

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>a acted trading with Twitter, with Google, with Amazon. Everybody

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>followed them Meta. We have to remember in the second

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>quarter revenues room only up thirty percent, and they guided

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>for third quarter revenues to be flat. But since then

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>things have improved a little bit. They're actually looking for

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>revenues to grow six percent. They've had challenges, as you know, Caroline,

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the change in privacy with Apple. Uh.

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>They've also had competitive issues with TikTok. But you're right, Caroline,

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>their company that's going to dictate what happens with Alphabet

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Meta in terms of advertising revenue online and

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>how that health of that business is going. And of

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>course you have Twitter exposure as well. Is Twitter going

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>to be anything about the story of M and A

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>or are you're actually going to be really focused on fundamentals, Caroline.

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is a tough company because they don't seem to

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>ever grow their subscriber base. It's been very flat. You've

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>got all the hype about Elon Musk wanting to buy

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the company and change it around, but if you look

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>at their core growth trajectory, it's been very benign compared

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to let's say a Snap or a Meta or an

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet over let's say the last five years. So they

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>still have a lot of challenges, not only in the

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>overall ad spend market, which is expected slow this year,

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>only at about six from thirty six percent last year,

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>but they have issues in terms of how they're structured.

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Their average user of time is only about forty five

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>seconds or about two minutes, compared to Facebook or Meta

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that was thirty minutes. To give you an idea of

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>how long people stay on it and actually look at it,

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it's usually a quick interchange. So that's another challenge. For

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitter going forward. So it's gonna be a tough quarter

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I would expect for them. Um, we want to thank

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.239
<v Speaker 1>you so much for giving us your expertise, your years

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of experience and managing money and getting into the right

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>stocks and nervous trust a force Port Phonio manager there,

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>We thank him. Yeah, formerly known as Kanye West has

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a green need to buy Parlor. Of course, that's a

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 1>social media platform that it's been embraced by conservatives who

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>perhaps have left Twitter over allegations of political censorship. Parliament

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Technology CEO that's a parent company, Odd Parlor is George Farmer.

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>He oversees currently the happenings joining us now for the

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>future under Yeah, first and foremost, what does he bring

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you because you're still gonna be doing the underlying technology

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>if I'm right, So what does he bring in leadership?

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>In ownership? Yeah? Well thanks Caroline voving me on. I

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>think it brings a vision to the platform that as

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>much needed. You've seen the rise of personalities surrounding social

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>media apps, whether it be Elon Musk and Twitter or

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump and truth Social I think that Parlor very

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>much looks to a charismatic leader, and I think that

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we're in year, we have one who is going to

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>take the platform forward in terms of vision and direction,

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>both creatively from a marketing perspective, from an outreach perspective.

0:07:58.200 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to bring a lot of necessary

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>talent to the platform. We're excited to work with him.

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Um and of course it puts us back on the map,

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, something that we've long aspired to

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>be back on. Were you worried about not being on

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the map, had you been losing members or users? Well,

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say that the competitive landscape

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>has become a lot more competitive. When Parlia was founded

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in it really was the only kind of what I

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>quote sort of free speeches of business social media app

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>around And of course in the intervening forward to five years,

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that landscape has become that much a bit more competitive.

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>It needs the leadership of a charismatic personality, you know,

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>much as I like to complement myself as sort of

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>being a charismatic leader, it's it's just a different game

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to outreach and presence in existing in

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 1>existing social media app So you know, kran Years obviously

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is presence on Instagram and Twitter is enormous. His outreaches

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>is global and as a result, this puts us into

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a position where he can help acceller at the brand

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>growth and he can grow the platform into something that

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>he wants it to be as well as as well

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>as compliment our existing technology infrastructure. What does he think

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the platform and the brand currently is? How long has

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>he been a user? How old did this all unfold? Well,

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it came about quite quickly. I would say the deal

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>really took shape in the last couple of weeks, um.

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>And the reason being is because obviously he himself has

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>fallen victim to the cancel culture narrative which deep platformed

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>him from Twitter and Instagram. Um. He he has been

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a he has been a proponent of free speech for

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a very long time. But I think that the scales

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of fell from his eyes in regards to big

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>tech censorship in the last in the last couple of weeks,

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And that was really when the conversation began in earnest

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And really the deal took shape in about the last week.

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we're putting together obviously the final touches.

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>We haven't yet concluded the deal. As I mentioned in

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the press release, it should be concluded in Q. Four.

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>But we were queen keen to get this statement out

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to give a statement of intent of whether the plat

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>forms going. I'm interested. Of course he has been de

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>platformed because of accusations of anti Semitic posts. How do

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you ensure that you have the right line of what's

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>free speech and what's hate speech? Sure so, I I

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>think philosophically, I take that back to a slightly higher question,

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>which is who is in the position to make that decision? Um?

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>And my question always in response to that is if

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm making the decision, then what right do I have

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to make the decision. Parlor has community guidelines which outlie

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>which outlaws on the platform pornography, financial dogs, seeing gore,

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and violence, and of course those are stripped from the

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>platform when they're put up, and we also have a

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>very rigorous spot determinant which removes thoughts from the platform

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. Beyond that, of course, Parlor is a free

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>speech side, and we believe in maximum allowable free speech.

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>We believe in various studies which have proven that more

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>speech actually he cures bad speech in some ways. So

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to show to show a bad idea a good idea

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:07.719
<v Speaker 1>is the best way to cure the bad idea in terms,

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of what we believe in terms of

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>ideas of this deal. It's been noted by many that

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>your wife, Candace Owens is in some way, you know,

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>than someone who has been helping see well. Certainly Kanye

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>West himself came to her movie, has been talking about

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the things she's shown a light on my

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested as to how much she had played a

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>part and role in the in the deal in some way.

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, my wife is an integral part of my life.

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Be difficult to divorce everything that we do from each other. Um. Look,

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean we we're a team. And for sure, she

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously has a relationship with Kanye. They talked very extensively

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>about culture. You know, she's deep in the trenches on

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>various cultural aspects, including of course fine to his fashion

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>show Harris a couple of weeks ago. Um. And so

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wouldn't have had my introduction to to

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>year if it wasn't for her. Um. You know, the

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>negotiation of the deal itself, of course, is completely left

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to me, and you know, I'm I'm more of that

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>aspect of our life. The technology aspect, the business aspect.

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>She has her own business ventures which are highly successful.

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>She's a very successful businesswoman in her own rights, and

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>so she brought him into the into the conversation. But

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the deal itself was negotiated by me. What

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>about deals of the future. We've just seen a tweet

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>put out by in a mask, an amusing one, an

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting one, I thought, provoking one, but him and Yeah

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>becoming some sort of team in some way with him

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>as Twitter and Yeah with Parla. What do you make

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of that? Is that a future you'd want for the

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>company you built? Yeah? I mean I think that I

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>was highly entertained to see that that tweet. Obviously, um, look,

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 1>strategic partnerships on the table absolutely. Um. I said this morning,

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 1>I think in a in a in a comment that

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I gave that we are at the the end of

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the start of the patriot economy. Right

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the beginning of the patriot economy.

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 1>This is I think. I think in the last five

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>years you've seen a massive land grab in terms of

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>companies launching and trying to take positioning in this space.

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're now seeing it in banking You're seeing

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.239
<v Speaker 1>it in social media, You're seeing it in payment processing,

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing it in everything from insurance to coffee, I

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>mean to everything in the world. And I think what's

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>happening now is that the space has become quite crowded

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to see consolidation. I think you're potentially

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>going to see more M and A in this space, um,

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's very exciting. Look, the decision is

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>now yes, um, you know, and we are excited to

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>work with him on that possibility. There's absolutely a possibility

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that he could want to turn the company around and

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and and sell it and make it something part of

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>much bigger or in turn he could be looking for

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>acquisitions himself. That's a discussion that I have yet to

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 1>have with him. So I think this is very exciting. George,

0:13:55.520 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the time. Thank you. George Farmer, Parliament Technologies CEO. Meanwhile,

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, women talking about social media the landscape, Peter

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 1>tells we're backing some of those new entrants to the

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>conservative social media platform area. And meanwhile, and German startup

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>delivering drones to Ukraine just got a big boost from

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the Musque's close partners Quantum Systems has received

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>sevve million dollars in new funding from investors, including billionaire

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Peter tell. Tel says Quantum Systems is leaps ahead of

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the competition. It's applied at least for two drones to

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>support the Ukraine Army coming up. Instacott has last yets

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>valuation multiple times this year. Is they coverted unicorn status

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>on being wow deemed across at the moment killed in

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the world of big tech. We'll have to work out

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>whether Unicorn should really be a name anymore. My next

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>guest thinks, so this is Bloomberg. Our next guest says

0:14:55.880 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that by four we'll have redefined the term you Nicorn

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>entering have stalled Winnian era for the tech sector. Greg

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Martin's venture capitalists behind companies including GoPro, hub Spot and

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Rainmaker Securities, one of the largest platforms

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of trading shares of private tech companies now first and foremost.

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Walk us through before we get to Darwinism. Talk to

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>us about why Unicorn maybe the time doesn't make sense. Well, Caroline,

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me. You know, if you look

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>at the end of one we had over a thousand

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>what we call uniform private technology companies that are market

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>caps in excess of a billion, which represented about four

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>point three trillion of market cap, just unprecedented levels the

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>size of companies. Now, certainly there's a lot of great

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>companies in that thousand that do deserve to have the

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>billion plus market cap and and and those companies will

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>go public and be large companies in the public markets someday.

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>But a good percentage of them got way out over

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>their skis on valuation. And you know, partially because investors

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>were chasing yield, they were looking for growth, and they

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>were looking for the next snowflake, if you will. Um.

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is, there are very few companies that

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>really can aspire to those kinds of heights. And I

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's why we're going to see a lot of

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>these companies not not sustained unicorn status in the future.

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Will we see the fading, Do we see more m

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and aid we see what does dolwinisn't look like? For you?

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>A Dewinian era in that respect, Well, listen, I think

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you will see there are truly companies that

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>are of the size and scale and market leadership that

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>will go public and they will they will they will

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>grow their valuations. I think there are a lot of

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>these companies that unfortunately, uh you know, their valuations were

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>set very high. Their businesses are still subscale. They were

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they were given a lot of cash to grow, grow, grow,

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and the reality is the growth just isn't there for

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>some of these businesses, and I think those businesses will

0:16:56.080 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>struggle um to ever become profitable. And so I think

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>for those people, and I think there's a good number

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of companies that are good in that category, they will

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>be looking for a home. I think the private private

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>financing markets are drying up for some of these companies,

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 1>and so they will be looking for a home. Now.

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>The good news is many of them have great products

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and there will there is going to be a very

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>vibrant MP and A market I believe in the next

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>two years. Okay, M and A. Maybe it'd rather better

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>valuations and previously for the buyer at least. I'm interested therefore,

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 1>as the seller and as a talent member in these

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>companies that are suddenly eroding their market value. Suddenly, people

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>who have been promised certain exits or certain inquidity moments,

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>or indeed being paid in chares, How does that look

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>like for them. What does this mean for the talent

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>going forward? It's a big problem, and you can see

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>some companies are being very proactive about that. You know

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>INSTATCRT for example, that they just you know, lowered their

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>internal valuation yet again UM, which which means the bar

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>for an new employee or executive coming in as much

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>lower UM. If the bar is too high than the

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>your options or shares or whatever you get when you

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>join the company are always going to be out of

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the money. So I think we're going to see a

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of repricing of internal options in order to keep

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>employee morale up, because the last thing you want to

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>be doing is working for a company that's worth ten

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.360
<v Speaker 1>billion in the in the with your options it's only

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>worth a billion, because when you're there for equity, you

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure your equity has values. So I

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's something we're going to see a lot more

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of what instacart did today. Uh, do you see future

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.199
<v Speaker 1>unicorns being born in this era? Many people feel that

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of in the toughest of times, great stars are

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>born out of them. Do you see that this could

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>be an era of ingenuity of innovation or is this

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be one of stealth and and lower growth.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.360
<v Speaker 1>For the timing. I absolutely think that we will have

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 1>many new unicorns that are born during this period. I mean,

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that covid you really accelerated was

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the adoption of new technology, and a lot of the

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>incommon players were left behind. A lot of the legacy

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>technology is behind the times, and so it's really created

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>an opening for innovative entrepreneurial businesses to sort of seize

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the day and seize the moment and start businesses that

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that sort of are the path of progress, the next

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>generation of where technology is going. So I actually think

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>now is a good time to start a company. I

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>just think we won't see as many unicorns as we

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>did in one and let's he even get started on

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Decacorn's Greg Martin. We want to thank you so much,

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Rainmaker Securities, talking us through his hypothesis

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of where we go for the big company valuations going forward.

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Blomberg Technology. I'm Caroline Hyde in New York.

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to the markets. Let's get back to

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the chip sector. In particular, Bloemberg were the latest numbers

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of semiconductor delivery times it was interesting, h interesting.

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Lead times for the semi conductor in industry average twenty

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>six point three weeks in the month of September. That

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>data coming from Susquehanna Financial Group, twenty six point three weeks,

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>down four days from the previous month. Four days doesn't

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>sound like a lot, but this is actually the biggest

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>month or month drop in lead times since the firm

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>started recording the data. The lead time, of course, being

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the gap between when an order for a chip is

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>placed and when it's delivered. There are still pockets of

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>tightness in supply, according to the firm, particularly in micro

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>controllers and in automotive specialized chips. But you see that chart,

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>we're in very elevated levels. Still, this is still a

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>market where supplier is an issue, but at least we're

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>now heading in the right direction. At the same time,

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we also hear all these worrying signals Caroline about demand.

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, of course, about a m D whose third

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>quarter sales estimates missed projections by a billion dollars. We reported,

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>according to sources, that Intel is going to be laying

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>off thousands of workers because demand for PC chips in

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>particular has dropped off so it's gonna be really interesting.

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Has been so much pain in the semi conductor sector,

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>at least in the equity market perspective so far in

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>two this is a really key earnings period where we

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>try and work out what that balance is where the

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>demand is disappearing and the supplier is improving, and where

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we net out for an industry that you and I

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>have been glued too for good two years now suddenly

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>have been Thanks for keeping us up to speed with

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the moves on the day and indeed some of the

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>lead times going forward. Let's get back to some of

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the views that's happening in terms of valuations in the

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 1>private part of the market as yet, because let's talk

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>venture capital, we want to talk about gender, we want

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to talk about equity within lack thereof, but some steps

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>be made forward. Next few Ventures just announced when it

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>was closer two on a million dollar new funding around.

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>It's got this largest RAYS to date and it's bringing

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 1>on Stephanie Palmia, founding partner of all Rays and of

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>course for Mark partner at Uncork as an equal partner.

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>She joins me alongside of course the partner Melody Co.

0:21:56.080 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Both of you now at Next few congratulations on the arering,

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the beefing up of the team, the two hundred million.

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk first and foremost melody about the two million

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and the opportunities within seed funding, within smaller checks being

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>put to work. Is now the right time where you're

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 1>going to see great businesses built. We're pretty excited, you know,

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's not a better time to be

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>investing early stage company at the formation stage. As always,

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>we're very excited to partner with founders just at concept stage,

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>or founders who begin a little bit of traction post launch.

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, with the new two hundred million under

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>commitment across both of our early stage C fund as

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>well as the first opportunity fund that we call all Access,

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we really can partner with founders across the entire early

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>stage PREC to C spectrum. So we're yes, we're excited.

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>And what's so impressive is the previous hundred million investment vehicle.

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, you put your money where your mouth is

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of talking about backing diverse founders, and Stephanie,

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure many ways this experience, this proofpoint was what

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>attracted you to joining next few ventures, and I'm interested

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>as to how you remain and build on that commitment,

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>having of course been one of the key founders over

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>at All Rays. Yeah, absolutely. You know, I think at

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, diverse teams invest in more

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.919
<v Speaker 1>diverse founders, And you know, I'm really proud of the

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that our team at next to you is very representative,

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and we could still be more representative of the what

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>we want to see in our industry. And so, you know,

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 1>at the end of day, it was really important to

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>me to join a team that not only is diverse itself,

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>but also values that in the founders that invests in

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think for us, diversity means many things. It

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 1>means background, experience, ethnicity, race, gender, um as well as geography.

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Interested melody on when you see a downturn, how it

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>tends to affect women, people of color building businesses when

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you go more macro. When I look at the jobs data,

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>for example, very sad lead within the numbers, you're seeing

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>women being the first one in, well last one in

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 1>the first one out. We're seeing already the participation rate

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>being eroded. Are you worried that in some way people

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>start backing away from the commitments they made during one

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 1>to back diverse leaders. Yeah, I think that, you know,

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>during times like this, there's definitely a risk of us

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 1>uh going backwards. You know. I think venture as an

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>industry is fairly insulated and very relationship driven. So during

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>times like this there is um there is a challenge

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.439
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of investors. Hopefully not but a lot

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 1>investors might go back to their inner circles and founders

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that look more pro quoting for proven on paper. So

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that's something that we definitely want

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to be conscious of, and you know, hopefully the industry

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>at large can't really you know, try to pay extra attention,

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>especially during time like this when it's easy to fall

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>back to bad habits. Indeed, and always of course Stephanie

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>as something was meant to help accelerate bring China light

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>on people who called a women who are building great

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>businesses and help accelerate their growth. Support them. At this time,

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>how are you finding the next exciting investments? Where are

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>you looking? You're going to be bicoastal. We've got New

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>York offices, San Francisco, But are you looking across the US?

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>You're looking globally? How do you find these leaders? Yes,

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm really proud to say that we're looking across North

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>America and we're you know, tapping obviously into our diverse

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>networks that we have within the next few team as

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>well as UM. You know, more broadly speaking, you know,

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>we we look at the founders that we've backed in

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the past, the folks we co invest with, and we

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 1>have a flexibility to invest, you know, not just in

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the markets in which our offices are based, but yeah,

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>like I said, all across North America, and we'll be

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>looking for great founders because you really believe that great

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>ideas can come from anywhere. And I think what's been

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>really interesting is, you know, Next to You has invested

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>with this broad geographic focus since its inception. UM However,

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've certainly been a broader friend in the market,

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, in this kind of post COVID environment in

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 1>which companies are being built with more and more distributed teams.

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's not surprising to me that we're seeing early

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>companies start in more and more places and will continue

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to be an outlet for founders to tap into the

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>major funding markets in San Francisco, New York, in Boston

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>where we have home offices. Manady is there particular industries

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>that attract you at this moment in time, and then

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>particular areas or problems you think will become ever more

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>evidently need to be fixed in this particular period. You know,

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the next few we're focused on fixing

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the broken user experiences across a lot of everyday user

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>categories and habitual moments where whether it's at work or

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at home where a lot of people spend time. So

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there are a lot of interesting

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 1>UM challenges right now. You know, one example can be

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody's during a hybrid work by home and into offices,

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of everyday working moments that can

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>continue to be redefined and and you know, make Better

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is similarly, there are lots of challenges at home, you know,

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>using that same context, and we talked about women earlier.

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>You know a lot of working parents and mothers are

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>really you know struggling to juggle between um, you know,

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>hybrid work and doing things like this on screen, and

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>then you know, turn around having to deal with childcare.

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>So many last week of a couple of kids coming in.

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's still there, it's still on that. Yeah, for sure,

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I love that that you're focusing in on that, and

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the balance is always real and we're at

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the cold face of it in many ways, Stephanie. I'm

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 1>interested in what the Bay Area has to offer right

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>now and whether you're feeling this push full of remote

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>people leaving at the moment. Do you feel that you

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>sense that are people wanting to build businesses in other

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>places than San Francisco? Yeah, I think I think the

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>big difference here is the very is still a great

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>place to old business, but the barriers to building a

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>great startup in terms of access to talent, access to capital,

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that's become more and more distributed. So it's not shocking

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to me that we're seeing more companies built in more

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>emerging tech markets. What I do think is true is

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>that there's still a tremendous amount of energy here and

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>there's still a tremendous amount of dollars both at seed

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 1>but also in follow on dollars. And if you think

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>about Melanie and my job as seed investors, you know

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we're writing that first early check into companies, really founders

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>who are getting a business off the ground and running.

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>But far and away we're not the last check, the

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>last capital into these companies, and so really, I think

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the reality is there's a lot of capital concentrated here.

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>And again, I think founders are always gonna benefit from

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>having one more note, one more access point to that capital.

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And Melodie like, we laugh about all the cameos the

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>kids coming in us being in a cold face, but

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we're not. Actually because we're lucky, we're able to afford childcare.

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>We are in quote unquote privileged women leading incredible lives.

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'm interested is to how you fix problems across

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>socioeconomic divides as well as people that problems that affect

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>all areas of diversity, whether they are women or people

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of color, but also the socioeconomic variety and inequality that

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>we still see in the US. Well, that's that's the

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>big job, not just you know. I think we talk

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>about this concept. We call it everyday economy. So within

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that term, we think a lot about all different types

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of everyday person. And you know, I think if with

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that framing in mind, we're reminding ourselves every day to

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>look for solutions not just for people like you and me,

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but for other different types of everyday user. And I

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's also important for the rest of the industry,

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, our entire asset class to really think about

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>finding solutions, not just for um you know I call

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>coastal elites, right, but you know, really truly focusing on

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>mass market problems and in leveraging technology to better that.

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>We want to thank you both so much for putting

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>so much thought across the board in terms of investing

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>for good and for diverse endpoints of MELODYO Stephanie Palmery,

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations on the new fund and indeed on the new

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>team building the next few ventures. San Francisco Mayor London

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Breed is preparing her city to move beyond its tech

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>dominated landscape, now acknowledging that many remote workers will never

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>fully return. So we're just discussing. But he said, quote

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>life as we knew it before the pandemic is not

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be back. The comments now show a shift

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>for Breed, who has spent much of this year working

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to lure people back to their offices as the city's

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>return to office rates remain stuck. Coming up, why Texas

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>regulators are investigating stand Bank went freed more on that.

0:30:45.920 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's back and it's time now for our daily Crypto report.

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>A lot going on as always with f t X,

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>but sometime not freed. It's being eyed by Texas right now,

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Blak is here to explain what exactly what paut of

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>SPS SINTA agreement and recent doings is Texas looking at.

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question for right now because it's tied

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to a deal. This is all revealed in the vein

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of their purchase of assets from for your Judgital. The

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Texas regulator is now saying that they shouldn't move forward

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>with that one point four billion dollar purchase of those assets,

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's partially because of this dispute over whether these

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>are securities or not. When you look at the yielding

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>assets that are being under f t XS purview here,

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting is it's not just f t X training,

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it is also sam maigment free that they are looking at.

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But you also have not just a deal in play here,

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>but also that classic question about who's overseeing the yield

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>products that are under the purview of all of these

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>large exchanges that are increasingly getting bigger in this game.

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So interesting, So the White Night hypothesis of some im

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>free sort of being put onto the spotlight to allarge

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:07.239
<v Speaker 1>extent here yeah, and it's worth taking a look at

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>what they had to say in response to this. They

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>said they have an active application for a license that

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>has been pending, and they believe that they're operating fully

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>within the bounds of what they can do in the interim.

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the other reason this is interesting is because

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you know that f t X has been operating in

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bahamas, separately in the US, separately in different jurisdictions

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>around the world. And so how does Texas as a

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>regulator fall in line with what's happening on the broader

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>scale globally as well as with the SEC and c FTC. Okay,

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the other regulators that stok about the

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>eyeing of three Hours Capital. I mean, what is going

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>on there? I understand that is an CFTC issue at

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Yeah. Interestingly, the SEC and CFTC are looking

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>at whether they should have registered in the United States.

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So even if you're operating abroad, and as we know

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that the location of the founders has been under dispute,

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>has they've been very hard to reach in the process

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of these bankruptcy filings where they need to be paying

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>certain creditors back. You do now have the SEC and

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>c f TC coming in and saying that or not

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>saying that. These are people familiar with a matter of

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>told Bloomberg that they are looking at, in particular whether

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>they had violated rules by misleading investors and should have

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>been registering in the US in the first place. So

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>again that global issue coming into play on how investors

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>globally are treated without certain disclosures and regulations. So this

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 1>is instead of certain products being sold here, we're looking

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>at the very nature of how Three Arrows had operated

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in itself. Just bring us up to speed with where

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>we are in the whole liquidation process. I mean, this

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>is never done before, certainly not on this scale. And

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>suddenly with these some new types of assets and securities.

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting when you ask certain people who had been

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>interacted with Three Arrows, you have to ask them whether

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they think they'll get their money back in the first place,

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>because again, who is owed what and what part of

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the capital structure. This is not your typical debt proceeding

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>where there has been the waterfall is not as clear

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>as it would be exactly. But Tonio has been appointed

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>as an intermediary here to to work on this. But

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>again even they have not been able to really access

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the founders in the first place. So how does a

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcy proceeding happen globally without the founders being able to

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>come up to the table? Zoom cam work for everything

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Twitter either Twitter messages is how they've been trying to

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 1>be aged by many a party in this feels quite

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:31.959
<v Speaker 1>old school. We thank you so much. She's always across

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 1>everything when it comes to crypto, and don't miss putting

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>the crypto every Tuesday at one pm Eastern for even

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>more of a deep dive. Meanwhile, coming up words of

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 1>warning coming from Chinese President Chooting vowing to speed up

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>innovation and air is vital technology self reliance. More on

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>what this all means, particularly the chip sector miss a

0:34:49.400 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>bring back Charini's President Chujing Ping pledged his nation will

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>prevail in its fight to develop strategically important technology. There's

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>underscoring Beijing's concern over a US campaign to separate it

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>from cunning edge ship capabilities, because, of course, is all

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>at the twentieth Party Conference of the current administration. Let's

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>bring in Bloomberg's Debbie Wu for more on this, because

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the great gathering is upon us. The Communist Party over

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in China, big speeches, big push forward as to whether

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 1>or not choojing Ping will indeed maintain control over the

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:30.439
<v Speaker 1>next ten years as well. But in the here and now,

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>what are we hearing in terms of pushback against the

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>latest moves by US to come off access to key technologies.

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 1>So he said on Sunday that China will continue to

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>innovate to a reach tech self reliance. But the building

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that the question is whether Beijing can indeed push forward

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>with its efforts after the new RONDOL for US export

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>control rules, the newer measures that the Washington is starting

0:35:57.080 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to hear that the China's tech development broad and then

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>we have seen that even no, none of US companies

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 1>like that equipment supplier SML, has been not ensnarled in

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>the new wroungal for restrictions. So yeah, one of the

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>broadest spent is about this sub restrictions for US persons

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to assist with China chip technology development. And then this

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>is like the impact the far from this is something

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that we are still trying to get there better understanding about.

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, do you think that you know this is

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 1>going to be a larger problem on China's economy. At

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the moment, we know that they're of course being beset

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>by COVID lockdown. Still that restraining the economy. We know

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that the overall the real estate has been a particular

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>area of concern. How much of a worry and the

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 1>list that they have is the limitation of US expertise

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and indeed technology. In the near term, probably this is

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to cause a major problem for China's economy,

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>But in the long run this will saw the effect

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:05.360
<v Speaker 1>bising's ambitions to better compete with the US and several fronts,

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:10.439
<v Speaker 1>particularly on emerging technologies including a artificial intelligence and self

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 1>driving uh technologies. So in the long run this could

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>pose uh uh a problem to China's efforts to uh

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:23.879
<v Speaker 1>uh sort of drive its ecomy with cutting edge technologies.

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>It has continued to be a deteriorating situation between the

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>US and China. Will this be expeeding this up? How

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>do you foresee relations and folding between the two key

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:43.280
<v Speaker 1>economies in the world. So with your latest US EXCO

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>expo control measures, it is already up causing some more

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 1>uh problems, some issues between the relationship between the two

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 1>great powers. So there are already a report saying that

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the Beijing is now a stone warding US efforts to

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>uh set up agenda for the coming meeting between the

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>she Jumping and Brill and Joe Biden next month during

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the twenty submit. So whether this is going to have

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:14.320
<v Speaker 1>uh sort of like more fault from the US measures

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>including maybe a baiting is going to consider ramping up

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:20.359
<v Speaker 1>pressure on Kaiwan and it re meant to be seen.

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>But what we are sure of is that the deteriorating

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a relationship between not Beijing and Washington suddenly will make

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>investors your more jutary about the markets, and it's certainly

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>being reflected in many of the chipmaker's stock prices at

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Debbie, we we want to thank you so

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>much for the areas of expertise when it comes to chips,

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Taiwan, when it comes to hardware

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. Now that does it for this edition of

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. But you do not want to be missing

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow because we of course have a key voice coming

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 1>from Mackenzie and Lenin's Rachel Thomas talk about women in

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the workplaces the annual report that's coming out. Don't forget

0:38:58.040 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to check out. Of course, the podcast. You can find

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>did on the terminal as well as online on Apple,

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:06.800
<v Speaker 1>on Spotify, on course on my heart. But amid what

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:09.359
<v Speaker 1>was a bumper day in terms of on them they

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 1>moves for stocks, particularly in the growth area in technology stocks.

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 1>We leave you with preparation, perhaps a more volatile one

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>coming out tomorrow. We brace for earnings of course for

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Netflix from New York and from San Francisco. This is

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>bloom Bag