WEBVTT - The "Carbon Dominance" Strategy Driving Trump's Anti-Renewables Spree

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome back to Drill. I'm Amy Westerveld are

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>slapped and Carbon Bros. Seasons have wrapped and we'll be

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>bringing you a new season later this month. In the meantime,

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 1>we have a whole bunch of interviews to bring you,

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>starting with this great conversation our Australia reporter Royce Kermilov's

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>had last month with Brown University professor Mark Blythe and

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>what he calls the strategy of carbon dominance and how

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that strategy play out in an all out

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>attack on renewable energy in the US and beyond.

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Hope enjoy it.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for being here to talk to

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 3>you about this. I've been very much looking forward to

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 3>this conversation for some time after what your talk at

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 3>the run Square of Economics about carbon dominance, where you

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 3>describe the politics of climate change and you put it

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 3>through the lens of both carbon and power. Would you

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 3>mind walking as sorry, what is the strategy of carbon dominance?

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 2>So no, essentially, carbon dominance is what I would call

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 2>what's going on in the United States just now, and

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 2>that requires a little bit of unparking so you can

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 2>focus on the politics and obviously it's Trump. Obviously, it's Maga, Obviously,

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 2>it's bright wing populism, et cetera, et cetera. But there's

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 2>also something weird going on in all this. You probably knows,

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 2>like yesterday when the EU basically said yes, please to

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 2>a fifteen percent tax on everything they do. He then

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 2>went on this really weird brant about and the one

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 2>thing that I'll do, my Trump and the one thing

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 2>we'll never do is is build up windmill. The EU

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 2>will have no windmills in America. And he starts going

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 2>this whole thing about windmills, and it's just, you know,

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 2>you think it's bizarre, you've got a hatred against windmills,

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 2>but it's actually far deeper than that. And the sort

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 2>of the short version of the story goes like this,

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 2>where does populism and Trump and all this stuff come from.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Why they have an anti carbon twinge? So two things.

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 2>One is basically what you might call the strategic power

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 2>side of this. We'll park that for a minute, bullet's

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 2>come back to it. What's the domestic politics of this?

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Go back to nineteen seventy five, and the three biggest

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 2>employers in the United States were, if I remember correctly,

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 2>General Moores, the company that became x on It, and

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 2>another big manufacturer I can't remember who the hell it was.

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 2>Now you go to today and what do you get you?

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Basically your top three are Walmart, the Home Deco, and

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Amazing Logistic. So they've gone from a business model for

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 2>a country that makes lots of things to ones that

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 2>sells lots of things, watch of which has made in

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 2>other places. And this is the whole the industrialization thing,

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 2>and China Shop and so on and so forth. Right,

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 2>and I go back to about nineteen seventy one, just

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 2>before that period, and what have you got. You've got

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of an encompassing political coalition whereby one in five

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 2>jobs is in the auro sector and one and three

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 2>are unbelated sectors that feed into this. So what does

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 2>politics look like in this period? It looks like Tweedle,

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 2>dumb and tweedl day, every political scientus in the world

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:10.519
<v Speaker 2>will be writing about how there's no difference between the

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Republicans and the Democrats. They agree on everything, So what

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 2>are they doing. They're basically arguing over the distributions within

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 2>what we would call a stable growth model. And what

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 2>was that growth model? It was a carbon based growth model.

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 2>What powered American growth for the nineteenth century, for the

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 2>twentieth century, particularly postwar, is the East Texas basin. It's

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 2>cheap shield. It's basically having cheap fuel which powered chief electricity.

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 2>You can produce its scale manufacturing, so on and so forth.

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 2>So you have this very sort of encompassing coalition. Everybody's

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 2>basically part of the same growth model. Thirty percent of

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 2>people are working in unions. Is industrial economy. Move forwards

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 2>through the eighties, the nineties into the China Shop the

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 2>two thousands, and what have you got. You've got a

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Republican coalition that looks like this. Start in Alaska. We've

0:03:56.320 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 2>got a north to Kora, South Dakora, Oklahoma, Kansas, East Texas,

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 2>through Texas, through the Panhandle, Mississippi, Alabama, come up to

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 2>West Virginia. What have you got? You've got the core

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 2>of the Republican states, the reddest states. What did they

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 2>all do? They're the residual from the old growth model.

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 2>They're the carbon coaliction. What they do is food, farms, fuel, fertilizer, feedstock, plastics, petrochemicals, manufacturing.

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 2>That's their core business model. So when Biden comes along

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 2>and says we are going to do decarbonization. They regardless

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 2>as an existential threat to their growth model because basically

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 2>they're going to shut them down. And you can tell

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 2>them all the stories about we're going to help you

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 2>transit and all this sort of stuff, but they basically

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 2>look at the Midwest and go, now, we don't believe

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 2>you will stick with ours. This is basically an existential struggle. Now,

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 2>part that for a second, and then think about how

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 2>we used to think about stranded assets. Stranded assets was

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 2>something that would happen to carbon assets because as the

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 2>world got warmer and as governments got serious about climate change,

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 2>they would tighten, if you will, regulations and it become

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 2>too expensive to have these things or produce these things,

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 2>and companies would rationally disinvest from them, and investors would

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 2>disinvest from them, and they would become stranded assets, and

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 2>therefore they'll be we want to hold them. And that's

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 2>how you basically power a transition towards green ticket cetera,

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. But what have you flipped that on its

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 2>head and you say that there's an existential struggle between

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 2>green and carbon asset, and we now hold the White

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 2>House and the Senate and the House. So what are

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.119
<v Speaker 2>we going to do. Well, basically, we're going to protect

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 2>our assets. So how do you do that? You dominate

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 2>the other sectors. Yeah, we're not going to ban it completely.

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 2>We're going to get rid of all the subsidies, We're

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 2>going to get rid of any scientific support. We're going

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 2>to lean into all the stuff that doesn't really matter.

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 2>For example, last week was the pitch that the American

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 2>government's no longer going to recognized greenhouse gases in any

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 2>way harmful, you know, being lots of other things like this.

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 2>But essentially what they're doing is they've got a strategy

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 2>of we're going to allow you to build that windmill

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 2>in Texas because that'll help us keep the air conditioning on,

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 2>But in no way do you replace the carbon that's

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 2>powering the economy and moreover, that's where we get the power.

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Go back to the power stuff. With parts of a

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 2>while ago, that has been the sort of the secret

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 2>to American growth. Partly is the dollar, which I'm happy

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 2>to talk about, but the dollar very much rises and

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 2>falls historically with the price of oil. Because even though

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Saudi for a while was the biggest producer in America,

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 2>is now the largest net producer. It's American oil companies,

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 2>it's American LNG. It's a huge part of what America does,

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 2>and it also gives them a huge advantage in growth. So,

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 2>for example, the cost of energy in the United States

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 2>approximately one third the cost of word is in the

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 2>United Kindom. So if you have that as your advantage

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and you basically are part of that coalition that sees

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 2>carbon is basically your strategic advantage. When the rest of

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 2>the world is decarbonizing, you have two choices. You can

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 2>either go for splendid hemispheric isolation from Greenland to Argentina

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 2>based on carbon, which might be one option, or you

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 2>can do what they're also doing, which is actively discouraged

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 2>through a coergon and bribery and other methods to do

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 2>with tariffs and others to get others not to make

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 2>a green transition and instead to sign very long contracts

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 2>for American lerg et cetera. C So, carbon dominance is

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 2>basically when you turn stranding assets into a political strategy,

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 2>and that is essentially what's going on right now.

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 3>So I think the phrase it's essentially you're trying to

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 3>frown the competitive industry that is green tech, that is

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, renewable solar wind. You're trying to drown the

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 3>baby in the bata before it becomes established, before it

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 3>becomes a threat.

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Got it.

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 3>And So just looking a bit to what you said

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 3>about the tariffs, I mean, the tariffs have been integral

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 3>to Trump's strategy and there's trying to erect that tariff wall.

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 3>In their view, it seems to rebuild American industry. How

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 3>is that playing into this broader strategy, because, as the

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 3>narrative goes, tariff's a profound act of self harm.

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, are they right in the sense that the problem

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 2>with thinking about tariffs is always has this, you know,

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 2>the economous caveat on it, which is cateris part of us.

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 2>All things remain equal, but they're never equal. So if

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 2>you think about the fact that corporate profits, particularly American profits,

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 2>but everybody's profits have never been higher. If you throw

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 2>up tariffs, do you think those companies can eat that

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 2>a little bit while reducing their margins. Yes. In other words,

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 2>things don't remain equal. So some of it will end

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 2>up on the American consumer, some of it will end

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 2>up in producers. You'll be able to effectively tax those

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 2>producers and then redistribute that cash. They've already raised a

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 2>couple of hundred billion with it. It's not exactly chump change.

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 2>In terms of the broader strategy. You know, will have

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 2>fifteen percent tariffs lead to American reindustrillization. No, WITHUD have

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.719
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent tariff, Well, yeah, because you'd stop trading and

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 2>therefore you would literally have to make this stuff yourself.

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 2>So on its own as a reindustrialization vehicle, absence any

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 2>sense of investment policy or industrial policy, which you had

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 2>with Biden, then it's probably not going to work. But nonetheless,

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 2>does it sort of like work in terms of a

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 2>political stratage. Yes, If you think about the nineteenth century,

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 2>what would the Republican policy towards the working class to

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 2>protect them the tariff, keep out foreign competition, have ruthless

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 2>domestic competition, keep your markets really flexible, keep your energy

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 2>costs really really low. In fact, use carbon to make

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.599
<v Speaker 2>them the lowest in the world. Never mind all this

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 2>stuff about the level ased cost of electricity being cheaper

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 2>with green stuff. If we really pumping off carbon, we

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 2>can be competitive, and we can do that in such

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 2>a way that we can ignore and basically obviate this

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 2>green transition.

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Why I'm with NATA kind of the picture be on

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 3>the u US for a moment. But there was something

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned in your talk to Ansul of Economics which

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 3>was a lot of this stuff that works around the

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.079
<v Speaker 3>idea of I think you used the praise minimum viable coalitions.

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, minimal winning coalitions.

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yes, So what is that? Just to be clear

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 3>about what that is.

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 2>So the basic if you think about politics under that

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 2>old Regima talked about when Democrats are tuedo dominic, Republicans

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 2>of tweedle d how did you win elections? That's when

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 2>political sciences in love with the thing called median voter theorem.

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 2>So that's some dude who's in the middle, and they

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 2>really have middle preferences, And because votes are very large

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 2>number of things, ultimately you have a kind of quasi

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 2>normal distribution of preferences, which is to say, there are

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 2>very few communists and very few fascists, and most people

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 2>are just uncle nice in the middle. So you need

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 2>to move your polity free towards captain as many Uncle

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 2>nice as possible, and the Republicans will by saying, hey,

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 2>taxis are good for Uncle Nice. And then the Democrats

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 2>will say, no, actually, redistribution is really good for Uncle Nice,

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 2>and that's what we should do. But essentially Tweedle Dumb

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 2>and Twio default over this median voter. The median voter

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 2>has largely disappeared. What you've basically got are the action

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 2>is no longer in a sort of normal distribution. What

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 2>you've got are very hetrogeneous preferences. And what you try

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 2>and do is build a minimum winning coalition rather than

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 2>an encompassing coalition. You basically go to your base and

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 2>work out from the tale to as far into the

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.719
<v Speaker 2>middle as you need to go, basically working with your activists,

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 2>working with gerrymandering districts, working with keeping them agitated and

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 2>angry all the time. And in that way, the Republicans

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 2>have been much more successful than the Democrats. And it's

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 2>that ability to build up minimum winning coalition and keep

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 2>that going means that you don't have to compromise anything

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 2>with the other side.

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 3>So taking those ideas, something I was picking up on

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.839
<v Speaker 3>my reporting in isolation was that there have been attempts

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 3>elsewhere to replicate this strategy. I mean, we see this

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of in New Zealand, where the government's coupled together.

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 3>We see this in Australia with different Australian states that

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Queensland now is currently doing something similar and also it

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 3>looks like the UK might be going down that path. Yeah,

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 3>and so my question is how does it say, how

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 3>do we see this kind of bawling out from the

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 3>US to other places right now?

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's a way in which it doesn't work, which is,

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 2>if you really want to destroy a right wing political movement,

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 2>just get endorsed by Trump. So you know, that's what

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Albanize showed us, That's what Canada showed us, right, I

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 2>mean that was basically like you cut, Trump comes out

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>for the other guy and it's a kiss of death.

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, there are deep, sort of endogenous

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 2>reasons for these countries to embrace this type of politics.

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 2>So what is this type of politics? The type of

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 2>politics basically says three things. There's a self serving elite

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 2>called the top ten to twenty percent. They've run off

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 2>with all the cash. We've got nothing and screw them.

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 2>They hate us, and that's up. Basically, there's one is

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 2>basically that. Then there's a sort of nationalist ethno nationalist

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 2>version of that. That's the anti immigration thing is basically

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 2>all these foreigners coming in and living off welfare, and

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 2>when the one paying taxes, so on and so forth.

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 2>And then there's the anti green one. Right, it's all

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.199
<v Speaker 2>a hoax and we don't need to do this. And

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 2>those different factions coalesce because all of those are basically

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 2>whether the legitimate gradiances are not a leave up to

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>whoever's listening to this, but they work together as a set,

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 2>and they're all real things in each of these countries.

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Is it the case that basically, in the eyes of many,

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 2>a self serving political coal that cares more about decarbonization

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 2>than the fact of your kid's schools falling down? Yes,

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 2>what about wage stagnation, Well, it hasn't hammed for the

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 2>top twenty percent, it's hard for everyone else. They don't

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 2>seem to give a damn about us. Yes, right, So

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 2>those conditions are there, and what Trump has done is

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 2>to provide a model of how to do this, of

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 2>what this is and what these agents should be thinking about,

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.959
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. And they'll have different national cadences and different

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 2>national flavors, but the formula is essentially the same. So

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 2>we have this world in which those grievances have real valance,

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 2>if you will, for people. They mobilize around them to

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 2>a certain extent. The United States provides a ten plate

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 2>for it, but you have to then dial it back

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 2>in terms of particularities of your local economy, et cetera.

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 2>They can't just take these ideas off the shelf and

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 2>dump them down and do the playbook. They have to

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 2>be played with in certain ways. And then does the

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 2>figure of Trump himself, who is immensely unpopular side of

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 2>the United States and actually inside the United States. So

0:13:57.320 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 2>that kind of cuts the other way. But you know,

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 2>that's sort of the broadway in which I think about it.

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 3>So when we think about this as kind of international conservatives,

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 3>we might find parallels between places like Hungary, the US,

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 3>and other places around, but ultimately these are American ideas

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 3>and they don't necessarily transplant as easily to other countries.

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Other communities are the places.

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, if you think about Hungary, right, I

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 2>mean Orban's big thing, along with a lot of the

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of nationalists right in Eastern Europe. It began with

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 2>central banks. It began basically a central banks as agents

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 2>of the money lenders and all of the antisemitic tropes

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 2>that went with that. They're sort of the anti Surus thing,

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. Then it became sort of, you know, along

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 2>with putting the much more nationalist version of this. Hungary

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 2>then became very critical of the EU and then the

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 2>ethno nationalism et cetera, et cetera. So there's a playbook

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 2>which has developed very much uniquely in those places and

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 2>it predates Trump. But what Trump did was basically take

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 2>this kind of latent call it of basically angry working

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 2>class people and low and middle class people who had

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 2>been hit by a combination of financial crisis, austerity, wage stagnation,

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 2>and a seeming favoritism towards foreigners rather than the domestic population.

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 2>And he was able to weaponize that. And that's been

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 2>layered on top of those politics and other places. So

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 2>again to think of, you know, the La Pen, La

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Pen's very different, The National Front's very different to this.

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 2>They've talked very much towards the center to be left

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 2>economically but right on immigration, et cetera. It's quite different

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 2>from the Maga approach box in Spain, very much more

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 2>like the Maga approach reform. It's really kind of a

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 2>vehicle for forage rather than anything else. So there's a

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 2>trumpy aspect of this, but the politics aren't particularly maga

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 2>in that respect. So again it's a very mixed bag.

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting is at this moment you see this everywhere

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 2>in different versions, and it behooves us to go world. Why.

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 3>One of the questions I had was, I mean, so

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 3>we have this kind of international conservatives and building, we

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 3>have this template being set up by Trump and his friends.

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 3>We also have this strategy of carbon dominance that we've outlined.

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 3>But opposed to that, we have the example apparently being

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 3>said by China, where China is moving very fast to

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 3>mean I think in May, and the sort of Sweden's

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 3>worth of solo it's the people is expected in China

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 3>by twenty twenty seven. I could have that wrong, but

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, and we're starting to see you know, kind

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 3>of incredible statistics coming out about you know, the right

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 3>baby production battle.

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Of like eleven fifteen sectors all the rest.

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 3>But absolutely, and then we had the US Secretary of

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 3>General just the other day of at least that report

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 3>basically saying, hey, solar is still the cheapest thing ever

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 3>and batteries are coming down and everything's changing now. So

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 3>when we view what's going on in the US in

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 3>opposition to China, what are we looking at?

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 2>So this is where you move out to the other

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 2>side of Trump's circle, away from the national conservatives, the

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 2>ban and wing, the marginally tailors, and you move away

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 2>from the finance people who are interested in stable coins

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 2>and sort of reworking the role of the dollar, and

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 2>you get back to those folks used to be mainstream Republicans,

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 2>the ones that are like Marco Rubio. And you said, well,

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 2>what are they worry about? What they worry about is China,

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 2>And they worry about China in the following sense they

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 2>are if you will. And my friend and colleague Dan

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Brisco must get a shout out for this because he's

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:17.959
<v Speaker 2>writing an offhead on this and I just read it,

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 2>so it's in my head. But essentially I think Dan's

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.959
<v Speaker 2>right on this, that that group of people are what

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 2>you might call really hardcore form policy of realists, and

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 2>they're a very materialistic bunch of realists in the sense

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 2>that they've got no time for America. Is the shining

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 2>light on the hill or any of that sort of stuff.

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 2>This is naked self interest and what is naked self

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 2>interest dictate The history is written by the people who

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 2>control the source of energy. The nineteenth century, it was

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 2>coal that was the United Kingdom with a technological lead.

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Once it moved to oil and gas, it became the

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 2>United States. Russia was able to maintain itself in large

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 2>part of the coal war because it was completely self

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 2>sufficient and oil and gas. And if you control that stuff,

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 2>then then you know you control the future. But if

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 2>you've got a world in which greenhouse gases and other

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 2>warming agents are seriously threatening everything from biowebs to human survival,

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 2>then you have to be carbonized. Now, whoever gets there first,

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 2>whoever locks that in, whoever creates the tech, they're the

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:17.479
<v Speaker 2>ones that are going to be the next hedge and one.

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 2>They're the ones that are going to be selling the

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 2>stuff you need to survive to everybody else. And Biden's

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 2>crew recognized this and wanted had they won the election,

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 2>their idea would have been IRA two, IRA three, build

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 2>on this, build more and more, actually get ahead of

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the technological curve, try and sort of anticipate before China

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 2>gets their way to go. And instead what we did

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 2>was we voted in Trump and we basically said to

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 2>the tech lords, why don't you just do ai instead,

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 2>because I'm sure it'll end up being something someday. So

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of where it's ended up. And we've seeded

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.719
<v Speaker 2>that to China. Now have you seed that to China?

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 2>And you're a foreign policy realist, what do you do?

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 2>You have to stop them. This is why they're serious

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 2>about Taiwan, is why they're not spoiling for a fight,

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 2>quite willing to have one. Now, the interesting thing about

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 2>the Crump coalition is these people are quite vocal and

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 2>quite a large prominent part of it, but so far

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 2>they seem to be completely sidelined because neither the tech

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 2>laws nor the National Conservatives really want to get to

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 2>a shooting More of the China they're quite fine to

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 2>have the Communist Party is the ideological enemy and so

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 2>on and so forth, and they're pushing green tech around

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 2>the world, and it's all just bullshitting. We shouldn't be

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 2>doing it. Why don't you love our coal industry? Et cetera,

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. But they don't really want to get into

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 2>a shooting match that could be the final shooting match.

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 2>So there's real tensions in this coalition. But the basic

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>idea is whoever controls the energy infrastructure in the twenty

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 2>first century runs the world. And the Americans are very

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 2>scared it's not going to be oil and gas, and

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:46.479
<v Speaker 2>they're doing everything they can to make sure that it

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 2>is well.

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 3>On that in terms of material reality that this is

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 3>describing here, I mean, one of the things that is

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 3>very interesting to me is you have China. I think

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 3>there was a report out yesterday the day before that

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 3>China is now basically planning to a limit it's oil imports.

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 3>At the same time, you have Japan basically buying more

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 3>gas than what it needs and now that it's Nucleus

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 3>timing back on and reselling Australian gas wiolets on the water.

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 3>You have Pakistan doing the same thing, and Pakistan Pakistan

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 3>Southwest Asian economy, considered to be one that was going

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 3>to be growth, is now leap progging over kind of

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 3>carbon acids just to solve it. You have China supplying

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 3>evs to Africa, so you have the potential for a

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 3>laite throg effect there. You know, So in combination with

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of the US tariffs that may drive up prices

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 3>on steel and steel labor and the anti immigration policies

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>that compromise your ability to do skills, and the reality

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 3>that there are going to be a lot less people

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 3>buying this stuff down the track. Where does that leave

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 3>the US in terms of the material reality?

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 2>This is where the story falls apart, because at the

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, the problem is we have too

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 2>much carbon. We have too many carbon assets. If you

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>start to think about the basil salt fields that you've

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 2>got off of Argentina, off of Brazil, Indonesia, Guyana, as

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 2>well as the LNG that you're talking about, Qatar, all

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 2>these other places, there's too much of this stuff. Now.

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 2>From the one hand, you could imagine on an argument

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 2>that would say, well, that's fine, because ultimately we are

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 2>the swing producer. Saudi will still have the lowest possible price,

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 2>highest possible quality, but they can't do everything. There's going

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 2>to be a bunch of stuff we can't decarbonize in

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 2>any conceivable time frames, such as air travel and so

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 2>on and so forth. Cements a bit of a tough one.

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 2>So we're still going to be able to do that,

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 2>and if price is fall that's great because that gives

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 2>us a way of staying in the game vias ave

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 2>via these alternative green technologies, But ultimately, if it becomes

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 2>so cheap that you can't really make a profit out

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 2>of it, right, ultimately the capex is bigger than the opics,

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 2>then you've got a bit of a problem. And ultimately

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 2>that thing that usually kills green transitions or experimental technology

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 2>is the valley of death between basically piloting and then

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 2>getting it to scale and then making some money off

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 2>of it. You get a weird version of that, whereby

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 2>what's the point in opening up another fracking field in

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma if at the end of the day the world

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 2>price is twenty bucks because everything's so saturated. So in

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 2>a sense, it's sort of double edged. You want the cheapness.

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 2>It keeps you in the game, but if it gets

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 2>too cheap, you knock out your own producers. And also,

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the day, if it is the case,

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 2>the barer technology gets better, et cetera, et cetera. And

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 2>China strategically just doesn't want to deal with the vulnerabilities

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 2>that come with oil, and India also falls very much

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 2>into this category. India's neuralgia has always been oil imports

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 2>and the ability to pay for them. So if you

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 2>get India, Pakistan, China, the rest of Southeast Asia, particularly Malaysia,

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Indonesia making a green transition, the Americans, unfortunately, they are

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 2>going to be the last people hanging around driving F

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 2>one fifties that cost two hundred thousand dollars.

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 3>One kind of question is something I want to ask

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 3>because I feel that it's always left Holiday's analysis. What

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 3>do you see as the role of you know, what

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 3>is called greenflation, you know, the price of stuff rising

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 3>as climate impactums change and things become more variable when

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 3>you've got disasters. It is something that seems to be

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 3>universally recognized that climate change will drive up the cost

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 3>of stuff over time. But it and we also know,

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, you can look at the Biden administration where

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 3>inflation spikes kind of become the mandate of heaven, where

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 3>if it's spikes, you loose government pretty quickly. And as

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 3>you say, I think you've got a very good phrase

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 3>of this nature always batch last. And so if we're

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 3>seeing as an inevitability, how does that figure into this

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 3>politics as a factor.

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 2>So if you had Biden administration two point or that

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 2>was continuing down this path, you would take a leaf

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 2>out of a Deblavator's book. You would build up buffer stocks.

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 2>You would try and think about things that you need

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 2>to have strategic supplies of so you could release them

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 2>if there were shocks, et cetera. But the problem with

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 2>that is that you didn't win the election. And the

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 2>second thing is buffer stocks are really expensive. You could

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 2>be doing something else with the money, and that might

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.199
<v Speaker 2>not be the thing that you run out of. So

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 2>what is there to do? Well? Ultimately, what you try

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 2>and do with these things is to have options. In

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 2>the sense of optionality. You want to cover your downside

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 2>as much as you can and then position yourself in

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 2>such a way that you might get the upside on

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 2>it if it comes to pass. What might that look like? Well,

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 2>in terms of let's say agriculture in the United States,

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 2>absolutely the case that some places have become too hot

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 2>for particular strands of wheat. Okay, so what do you do?

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 2>You move the wheat production elsewhere, and you start to

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 2>do something else in the place. You plan ahead, You

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 2>try and get ahead of the curve. Is that a

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 2>full proof solution to this? Absolutely not. We already have

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 2>estimates from the prop the Potsdam Institute for climate research

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 2>on greenflation, you think it's already significant. So a recent

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 2>European report that essentially said it's showing up already. It

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 2>takes about sixty days from a weather shock to basically

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 2>show up in food prices. So as these patterns continue,

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 2>the problem is the nonlinear in them. You don't know

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 2>what's going to happen and when it's going to happen,

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 2>in which part of the BioWeb is going to be impact.

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 2>It becomes very difficult to cover that with any type

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 2>of options. So there's no great solution to it, and

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.959
<v Speaker 2>it's baked into the cake. What does this do to politics?

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's already there in the sense that for

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years, five years ago, six years ago,

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 2>you couldn't respectably stand up and say, unless you just

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 2>want to be a crack, that windmills were evil. And

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 2>when there was a period whereby you had people like

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 2>the head of the EFD railing against windmills and somehow

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 2>this was okay. It was like green fatigue or something

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.479
<v Speaker 2>like this. I think now in Europe, when every summer

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 2>is hotter than the prior one, when there are wildfires

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 2>in Scotland which never ever happens right when people's actual

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 2>experience is finally, oh, it's getting really hot in here,

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 2>isn't it? And none of us are their conditioning. I

0:25:56.440 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 2>think that tempers down the absurd claims of anti climate

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 2>action and basically allows us to refocus. So I think

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 2>that sort of you know, at the end of the day,

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 2>what's the phrase, nothing gets your attention better than pain?

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 2>Right that you know there is something to that, and

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 2>it has a way of filtering out the politics. Quite

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 2>how Trump deals with this, we don't know. I mean,

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 2>you don't know if he's going to be done by

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 2>the midterms. You don't know if he's going to be

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 2>two terms, if this lasts, if the Democrats are the

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 2>shambles that they are just now and continue to be.

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 2>So the problem being that as the party of the

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 2>state is CO who kind of likes things the way

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 2>they are, it's very hard for him to argue for

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 2>anything else that that just hands it in a sense

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 2>of the Republicans. And if we get two terms of

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 2>these guys, then that's when you get the full carbon

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 2>dominance strategy. And by that point you have seen such

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 2>a big break with China, the rest, with East Asia,

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 2>with South Asia and the world will be very much

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 2>two different places. One that's still holding onto carbon trying

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 2>to promote its use, and one that's basically postcarbon.

0:26:58.480 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 3>So essentially that moral luck.

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, it's part of the pen If the Democrats

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 2>came back in on a landslide and we're able to

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 2>get two back to back victories and we're able to

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 2>do a whole restoration of green industrial policy. The damage

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 2>that these people have done in the meantime is so large.

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Think about it from the point of view basic R

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 2>and D. You're threatening top universities with funding, You're threatening

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 2>with one growing students. You're banning f one visas for

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 2>your top researchers. You're basically saying we don't care about

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 2>this stuff. So if you're one of those researchers, one

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 2>of those scientists, why would you want to be here,

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 2>particularly if all the options somewhere else. There's a way

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 2>in which they're embedding policies which even if you get

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 2>a change of administration, it's very hard to undo. The

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 2>trust has gone.

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 3>It's funny you say that. I'm and not to get

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 3>too perertial, but a lot of the stuff that's happening

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 3>with Trump makes me sometimes think, and this is unscientific,

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 3>but about what's happening in the US is the Australianization

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 3>of US politics, because we went through a similar pace

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 3>with this in twenty thirteen with the election of Tony

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Abbott and the Raiser Gain that came through and just

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 3>happed the budget and just cut everything to pieces, and

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 3>the decisions that were made done have profound changes and

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 3>as you describe, locked in a series of policies. But

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 3>you know that continued to exist for the decade of

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 3>a three different coalition administrations. And what it seems to

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 3>be the response from the center left, which is Labor

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Party here soorts to essentially weight them out, and that

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 3>the approach seemed to have been We're going to present

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 3>the reasonable, the sensible response to this. When all this

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 3>fizzles out, will be able to step into the breach

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 3>promise to rebuild. And the first term of the Albernesi

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 3>administration was very much just about repairing, was about putting

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 3>back things, and which has left a lot of people

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 3>very jaded and frustrated in many ways about kind of

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 3>where things are going. And I wonder whether the Democrats

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 3>are essentially playing the same strategy weight this out.

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I think some of them would like to wait it out.

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 2>But the problem is if you have someone that's in power,

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 2>like you know, before the Razor gam you had Howard

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 2>as well, who you know, was not exactly a shining

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 2>example of public investment. When you've had that degree of damage,

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 2>you do have to spend a lot of time doing repair,

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:13.479
<v Speaker 2>and it's a bit where it's kind of obvious to

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 2>everyone that this is wrong and it's okay to go

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 2>and do that stuff. Britain finds itself in a really

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 2>weird position because that's exactly where they are with the

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 2>thirteen years of the Conservative But the government is so

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 2>afraid of its own fiscal shadow and so timid that

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 2>they literally are hamstrung not by anything except their own

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 2>fear of the bond market. The bond market itself is

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 2>not the problem, but just afraid of it, so they

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 2>are unable to do it, and that really gets people

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 2>pissed off and shaded. I suspect what's happening in Australia

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 2>is where the Democrats would like to find themselves. That

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 2>is to say, we would be back in power, we

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 2>would be credible, people would recognize the damage. I don't

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 2>think America is there yet. I think a lot of

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 2>people don't think at all of it this is damage.

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 2>You think this is what we need to do. There

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 2>is a certain logic to it. If you basically are

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 2>a kind of realists in the international relation sense, and

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 2>you think the most important thing isn't how the global

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 2>welfare optimum is generated. You think it's how America does.

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 2>In America should be running things, then a strategy of

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 2>carbon dominance and at least hemispheric dominance would make sense

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 2>to you. And allowing China to run off with everything

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 2>is not what you want. So it depends what you

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 2>value at the end of the day.

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 3>And Mark, before I let you go, We've talked to

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 3>them many things today. But is there anything else you're

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 3>think we've missed all you want to highlight or bring

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 3>out in this conversation.

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a really interesting one is to think

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 2>about the fact that while China continues to basically dominate

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 2>sector after sector to invest in battery technology, etc. They've

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 2>got an approach to AI, but they're not betting the

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 2>farm on it, and the United States is betting the

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 2>farm on it. And this is very different from what

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 2>you usually do. Usually, what the United States does is

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 2>run a kind of hidden developmental state through universities, through

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 2>agencies like DARPA, Defense Advanced Research Projects, and then you know,

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 2>we make these things and then they spill out into

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 2>the private sector. And the great example is Mariana Masakoto

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 2>did the cigner booking the competition state. All the key

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 2>technologies in the iPhone were basically made it in public

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 2>and private universities with federal money, and they had defense applications.

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 2>And then Steve comes along, put it in a shiny

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 2>box and changes the world. Right, And this is very different.

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 2>This is now a part where we've got these massive

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 2>companies whose investment budgets are orders of magnitude bigger than

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 2>anything that the universities could muster or even the public

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 2>sector would put out. And they're run by man children

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 2>with massive egos. So if you think about meta, I mean,

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Meta has squandered almost a trillion dollars on the metaverse.

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's just.

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Bollocks, right, the Cambridge's legs no, exactly and exactly, and

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 4>you've got you know, so you have this sort of

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 4>incredible arms race for this thing called generative AI which

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 4>is never going to happen.

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 2>It's a complete camera. You don't get count. You know,

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 2>it's it's almost a very Soviet way of thinking. It's like,

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 2>if we have enough of a quantum of transformation, you

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 2>get a quality of transformation. Like, no, that's not how

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 2>it happens. But nonetheless, we'll spend all this money on

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 2>this sort of stuff and it's insane arngeries and that

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 2>the people at the top still can't tell you what

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the final use case is. Meanwhile, China is just going

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 2>sector after sector, Let's do batteries, let's do this, let's

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 2>do this. It really is the strange moment where we

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 2>the cult of the entrepreneur in the United States has

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 2>blinded the country to what actually we need to do

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 2>in long term investment, and we've bet the househol in

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 2>this one critical technology, which, as far as I've concerned,

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 2>all it seems to be able to do is to

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 2>bugger up higher education and people's ability to write things. So,

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, that would be my side worry on top

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 2>of all this stuff.

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 3>But there's a there's an aspect to that where the

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 3>use of AI appears. If if we look at this

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 3>in terms of power I've written about this actually for

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Droid where there was an extension to which II the

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 3>next link in the evolutionary trend from the way economic

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 3>modeling was used to argue against doing anything about climate change,

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 3>which was another Australian pioneering invention. By the way, you

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 3>can see how you know, the hype and the focus

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 3>and artificial intelligence as a climate solution and as it

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 3>will fix everything, it will create new materials is very

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 3>much a distraction in a very convenient way, to turn

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 3>people away from investing in and focusing on to just

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 3>going all in on. You know, wind solar batteries.

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Got out sodium batteries, you get rid of the need

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 2>for thermal protection. The cost of EV's dropped by thirty percent.

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 2>It's very simple. It's not nearly as sexy as we

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 2>are making god box.

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 3>And with that that might be a good point to

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 3>end on. Mark, thank you so much for take making

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 3>a box.

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 2>P