WEBVTT - The ETF Ticker Premium

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So here we go. Welcome to Trallians. I'm Joel Weber

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Eric bell Shones. Eric, one of my most

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>favorite things about the e g F universe are tickers,

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's just like, it's so much fun. When you

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>see somebody get a good ticker and I have a

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>good E t F idea that goes with it, it

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>just speaks to one of the reasons that this industry

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>can be so much fun. Absolutely, I mean, everybody loves tickers.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Remember when I first did E t F hits on

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Blueberg Television. The anchor at the time, Adam Johnson, UM,

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:41.959
<v Speaker 1>he loved the tickers. And even my mom can get

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>into them. They're very accessible, they're fun, they can communicate

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot quickly, and and on our team we call

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it the ticker Premium. We believe that a good ticker

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>can give you a little extra juice in the marketing

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>efforts of an e t F and UM. I was

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 1>down in Florida at the Money Show, my first physical conference,

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and ran into a UM a couple of E t

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>F pros and had some drinks and some of the

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff they were telling me about their trials and tribulations

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of reserving tickers. I thought, this dish really is a

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>perfect podcast. Plus sometimes I'm asked about ticker reservations and

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>whether you can like sell a ticker, how long it lasts,

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>and I can't quite technically answer all their questions. So

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to really nail this down finally how it works.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So joining us Uh, a couple of your friends from Florida,

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>and then we widened the circle, filled back with signal

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>advisors Mike Venudo with Torosso, Laura Morrison with Cibo, and

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>then joining us from Bloomberg News Claire Balentine, this time

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>on Trillions Tickers. Phil, Mike, Laura, Claire. Welcome to Trillions. Thanks. Okay,

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.559
<v Speaker 1>so I'm really excited about this. Um, let's just start

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>with some basics. What do I have to do to

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>hold a ticker? So, in order for a client of

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>an exchange to reserve a ticker, they simply need to

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>reach out to the exchange and make the request. It's

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty simple and straightforward. If the ticker is available, we

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>reserve it for them. If it's already reserved by another exchange,

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>we can place ourselves on the wait list and anticipation

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of it potentially becoming available or we can reach out

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to the exchange that has it reserved and ask it,

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.679
<v Speaker 1>ask them if they'd be willing to release it. So

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 1>is this like, go daddy, though, Do I like pay?

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Should I pay? Do I pay? And I just plunked

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>down some like twenty bucks and I get to sit

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>on the u R O. No. No, you actually don't

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>need to pay anything in order to reserve tickers. The

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>exchange doesn't look at that as a revenue line. Nobody

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.119
<v Speaker 1>really owns tickers, to be honest with you, I mean,

0:02:56.160 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>just by way of background, and this is going way back. Um,

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>when I started my career at the New York Stock

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Exchange in corporate listenings, there was literally one guy. He

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>sat in a very small office with a huge ledger.

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking it was maybe two ft by three feet

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in size. It was leather bound, and you'd walk in

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>there and you'd have to bring a piece of paper

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>actually in triplicate and asked to reserve the sticker. Um.

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>It was very manual at the time. Exchange is eventually

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>utilized other software technology, but it was all individual by exchanges.

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Fast forward to today, there's this concept of the intermarket

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>symbol Reservation Authority Israel, and it is all under the

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>regulation reagain a mess National Market System Plan and filed

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>with the SEC. So it's much more um, much much

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>more specific as it relates to the ability to be

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>able to reserve tickers in for how long. So so

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>essentially each exchange has the opportunity to reserve up to symbols,

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and the symbols reserved for twenty four months, and if

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that exchange hasn't used that and applied it to a listing,

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>then they actually lose that reservation and it goes to

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 1>the next person, the next exchange on the wait list.

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 1>But like I said, it's not like Go Daddy, where

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>exchanges can just sit on the symbols and reserve what

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>they think will be the next hot symbol. They we

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>really have to keep documentation to to prove that there's

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>an intent by an issuer to use this symbol within

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the next twenty four months. So, Eric, I know you

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>always like the analogies. It does sound a lot like

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bureaucrats and the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, right

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's weird, you walk in, you don't know

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. But I think one thing, Laura said

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>at the end there that's really important is it's not

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>like anybody off the street can just call up the

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>exchange and reserve a ticker. There has to be evidence

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're actually have and intend to launch something with it.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it does. It's not like a commodity that has

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>value to somebody who's not going to launch that they

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>can transfer our sell Well, and what's that evidence that

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:17.679
<v Speaker 1>you intend to launch something? What qualifies as evidence? I mean, Ali,

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Laura hit that one, because you know, usually if somebody

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>cause I run a white labeled business, if somebody wants

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to launch an ETF, they're more likely to get it

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>reserved the ticker by coming through me because it exchanges

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>know that we have the ability to actually launch. But

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I just wrote down a great idea on a napkin.

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Does that count yep? Laura, you have the ability to launch.

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>As we get to know our clients. It comes in

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>through the process of listening, so as we um appreciate

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>how sophisticated and knowledgeable they are about what their intentions

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>are than you know, it gets to a certain point

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we're like, okay, well let's talk about symbols. So then

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it's brought up at the appropriate time. There are some

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>instances where are we we get prospects because their first

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>question is may I reserve this symbol? But then we

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>go through further exploration to be sure that you know

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it truly is a um an opportunity for us to

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>do business. UM let's talk about it from the issuer

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>point of view. So this is I think what most

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>people fantasize about. Okay, I've got this idea. I'm an

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>independent issuer. A lot of times on Twitter, somebody will

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>bring up something and people will start imagining what the

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>ticker should be. So you, guys, Mike phill or our issuers,

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>how many tickers do you reserve? How do you go

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>about it? How important is it? Uh? Start with Phil?

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>How much time do you spend thinking about it? I

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>guess I have a lot of questions. It's really one

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of the first things you do. It's one of the

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>first things you do as soon as you have the

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>concept of the fund, before you've nailed down to details,

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>before you've written the perspectives. You grab those good tickers

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>because you know they're hot item and they're gonna go.

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 1>The language of trading desks and asset allocators is the ticker,

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>not the fun name. So some of the fun names

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>sound like law firms, you've got you know, issuer, index, provider,

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>asset class, blah blah blah, fund um. But the ticker

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>is a great The tickers are more fun um. The

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>ones that don't work as well are probably the acronyms,

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:20.679
<v Speaker 1>the ones that stand for a long in a series

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of of you know, parties that are involved in the fund.

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>But the ones that really hit the nail on the

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>head can really you know, be very sticky and memorable,

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's an incredible edge, is an incredible marketing tool. Yeah,

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>premium is the right word here, because I was telling

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you back in Florida, feel that I got together to

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>run a separate businesses together eventually culminating and me buying

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Phil's company, all because of the ticker bl okay. Right um.

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>And one thing that you think about when you're reserving

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>tickers is what are the competitors that are gonna come

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and what are they going to reserve? So I own

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>some derivations of bl okay as well, right because like

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>go daddy, I don't want somebody to have you know,

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>roso dot net or Taroso dot or all those sorts

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of things, so that premium is very powerful. When we

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>first came out with block we weren't allowed to use

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>blockchain in the name, but the ticker was explicitly clear,

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and we launched the same day as another fund and

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>literally doubled their assets. All in my opinion, in the

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>early days were about ticker premium. This was like right

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>at the peak time when everyone was saying blockchain not

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>big cooin, right, and the blockchain was just getting super hot,

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and we were looking to launch a blockchain theme fund.

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>There weren't that many public securities that were really pure

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>plays in the space that were just coming up, and

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we're getting to that point, and there were two other companies,

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Mike's Company another company, that were also working on a

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>blockchain fund, and I didn't know if we could beat

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>them to market. We had other priorities we're working on

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the things. Really what we're focused on was automating our

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>trading desk. So I said to Macan said, listen, I

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think I could beat you to market. Why don't

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you take the ticker, you launch it, but we'll do

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the trading and subadvisory work for you, because that's where

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>we're focused and it turned into a wonderful partnership not

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>only on a fund but for our businesses. One of

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the stories that we went over down there that I

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>think really exemplifies how it works is Mike, your story

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 1>with the ticker d O g E. So explain, you know, Okay,

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you thought of it, you registered it, and then and

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>then what happened? Tell me that your history with this

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>ticker and what's happening here. Yeah, so let's start with

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>this is not an endorsement for dose coin, So so

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>we're all protected. Um that said, I am a fan,

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>but you know, three years ago we reserved that ticker

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>um with the idea that maybe we would do like

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a gray scale thing around doze or something, since you know,

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and we were way early. Um, and by the time

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, that was something viable was maybe a month

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>or two ago, and by then it was expiring. Now

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 1>I knew that I wanted to reapply for it, right,

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>but somebody else was already on the waiting list. I'm

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>guessing Barry got it. Uh So, so yeah, you know,

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you could have something and be thinking about if for years,

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>but if you don't use it, you lose it. Another

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>example of that is I had Hell as a ticker

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 1>H E A L. And we didn't have a great

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>product for it yet, but we knew we would eventually,

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>so we spent the legal money to file so that

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we'd get the extension um. Eventually, we still let it

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>go because we never came to an idea that would

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>fit it. But you will go out of your way

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep a good ticker if you can see the

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>product that could fit with it at sometime. And one

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>last thing I want to add to the going and

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>getting tickers thing is a lot of us think about families, right,

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>So I've done the risk on risk off row row,

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I've got Jojo coming, I've got other ones that are similar.

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 1>So when you're thinking about a fund, you're usually thinking

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>about a family of funds and what tickers can come

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>together around that family of funds. So you'll see a

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of these new groups that come out with like

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>options overlay, they'll put an A in front of everything

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>like Asymmetric or things like that, or or got them

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>with the g spy, So you'll you'll see people build

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.839
<v Speaker 1>as bet best as possible families. And the last thing

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is anything with E S G in it is gone

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and nobody can get it right. They all the E

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>s G tickers are gone. So um, there you go.

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>There's some inside baseball. How often would you say it

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>happens that you think of the ticker and that are

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>looking for a fun to fit with it versus the

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>other way around, because I would think you have the

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>fun first, and then you figure out a ticker oil

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you want to take that one. And there are very

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>few tickers that are good enough that you would build

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a strategy around it. But there are some out there.

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we've seen some maybe in the cannabis space,

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, where there's some real you know, premode tickers

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and the space was just exploding. Um, there are some,

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>but I think you know, there's two kinds of of

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of product, um, like target markets. Right, You've got your

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful uh let's say, quantitative strategy or active value you

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>know value strategy, which is, you know, really it's gonna

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>be ground up, it's gonna be an E Smith manager

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>who was a philosophy that they've developed over years. And

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>then you've got your fast money retail stuff right, which

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is like you know a weed fund or blockchain fund,

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and that stuff can come quick. And you've got to

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>be fast, because the only way it works is really

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>if your first maybe second to market. Um. And those

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 1>are the ones where the ticker can in some cases

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>drive the product development. I think that would be rare,

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>but I could see a couple of tickers good enough

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>where that could happen. Yeah. I think it goes back

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>to the family concept, right, So this will be close

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to you, folks. UM. We had this idea a couple

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>of years ago that all the major like family offices

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and big names out there will eventually have their own ETFs.

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>So we reserved a bunch of names including I'm looking

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>at it, b LMR, with the idea that Michael would

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>someday launch his own ETF. Bloom was not available, so

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>but we had Zuck and things like that. Um. Now

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't come through, But if you're thinking ahead of

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>where the industry might be going, owning that ticker premium

0:12:57.840 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>early could be very valuable. I think what you're saying

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that you you think of a billionaires, Yeah, because they

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>would embrace the tax benefits at some point. But just

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, you can't sell that. I cannot. Only

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>you can only build an e t F around it

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully they'll be involved, but you can't like sell

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that to them for a certain amount of money. No,

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>But what more likely happens is what Phil said, Right,

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we figure out ways to work with each other and

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>further the industry of Phil and I call it the

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>rebel alliance, you know, like me, him, meb West, all

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the smaller guys and girls working together. Um, the indies, Yeah,

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the indies have the best tickers. I mean, there's definitely

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a correlation there, Meb. You said, uh Med has toke

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to me, that is Mount Rushmore. I like herbs. We

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know these names. Me Med favor is the CEO

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of Cambria UM and he has UM. He also has

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I heard he has h O d L, which to

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>me is you could probably sell that for a million

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars to one of these bitcoinis. I know, but you

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>probably could. Mike you you talked about um the premium

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.959
<v Speaker 1>and also this family idea. You know. Another trend that

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Eric and I have have notice and talked about before

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>on the show is like when there are e t

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 1>f uh tickers that are verbs that seems to be

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>also really effective, like hack being a really famous one.

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>You said, he'll I thought what that was that triggered

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that idea for me, Like, how much do you think

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a premium goes for for tickers that are can also

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>be verbs? So I think the key is that the

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>ticker tells the story. If you can find a ticker

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that tells the whole et f story and one word,

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it's amazingly half powerful, like hack block, you know what

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>they are, and it's it's just done. Um. The other

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>thing that's very powerful with a ticker is I know

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I've Joel, I've heard you on your podcast here talk

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>about some of the stupid names we have to deal with.

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Believe it or not, Those stupid names come from our

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>regulators trying to protect um. Right. So so if I

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>say I want to do something, they say will prove

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to me that of the revenue is coming from there,

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>And I say, yeah, right fine, Like, and it's really

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>about pigeon holing in with the naming convention rules. If

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a ticker can get across what we're doing better than

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the name, it's super super powerful. Just to be clear,

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about like your block, which we've been mentioning

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>over and over. Sorry, official name not here to pitch. Yeah, no, Um,

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the official name is Amplified Transformational Data Sharing e t F. Correct. Yeah,

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>so thank god for block. Yes, if that was a

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>t d S, good luck, But it happens with a

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of them, like these hydrogen economies. And remember when

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>there was the Whear e t F. The name of

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the E t F was the same as the symbol,

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and it was supposed to be about wearables and then

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the SEC said no more of that. So the person

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>who who governs how we use a ticker is Laura

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>or UG or one of the exchanges and their self

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>regulatory organizations. The person's the entity that regulates what the

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>name is is the SEC inus. So so there's a

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>lot more leeway with the ticker because you're not getting

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a regulator saying no unless it's a cash management product

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>UM low duration stuff. So I had mentioned to you

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I have a t M. I was told I couldn't

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>use it for short duration fixed income fund because it

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>would imply its cash I think another thing is, you know,

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>we tend to take ourselves real seriously in the sm

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>management industry, and the tickers that don't take themselves too seriously,

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the tickers that are more fun seem to do really well,

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>like I had a fun called the Reverse cap waited

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>US Large Cap et F and for the ticker, I

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>shows reverse r vrs to spell out reverse and it

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of fell flat for the most part. When we

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>launched a fund, Ben Johnson and Morning Star putt saying, oh,

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>this should be YPS for spy spy backwards YPS, and

0:16:57.800 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it got a great reaction on Twitter. I'm like, I

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>miss did well. We ended up a couple of years

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.959
<v Speaker 1>later selling the fund to Arrow Funds and Joe Barrado

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 1>at Arrow Funds is like, hey, let's use now we're

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>moving it over, let's use YPS. It's much you know,

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>it's much lighter, it's much more fun, and it doesn't

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>tell the whole story right there. Um, And he didn't.

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Immediately we got another like eight or nine million into

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the funds. So you know, it was that that it

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>can't have an effect. Yeah, you could have the opposite

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>effect with a bad ticker, which you've teased me about

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>on bolth Twitter and on various shows. Yeah, wait, E

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>t F Industry E t F. It should have been meta,

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>should have been meta, or there was other ideas, but

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>T E t F just well, So what we learned

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>was t E t F everybody I thought that that

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.479
<v Speaker 1>meant it owns all the E t F s, right,

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 1>so like total E t F s or something like that.

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>So we figured out way too late in the game

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that our ticker gave the wrong message. And that's even

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>that's instead of ticker premium, what is that ticker deficiency

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>ticker dysfunction? Okay, well, wait, I gotta go. I got

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>a good follow of that. Like, okay, So one of

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the things that we've talked about before is like the

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>E t F graveyard where we we see a fund

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that you know is no longer viable and get sunseted.

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>And how often are you keeping an eye in the

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>graveyard to see if you can, you know, steal something

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>from beyond the grave and bring it bring it back

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to something else. So I have a list here of

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple of these because I was talking with Phil

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>about the last night. So, uh, the only ticker that's

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>been used for the same et F twice is s

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>E A, which was used for the shipping so it closed, reopen,

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>closed again. And now, um, I mean the filings out there,

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>but I'm bringing something similar back as boat b A

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>B O A T Why y Y closed as a

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>weird fund. It was one of the first ever active funds,

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>and then it was reopened as a passive fund at etc.

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And then Amplify and then um I mentioned the risk

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>on risk off right, So State Street had that. Ironically

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>when we launched it UM in our trust separately after

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>they died, there immediately was approved at all the wirehouses

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>because they thought it was still the State Street fund.

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>So we're getting orders in and then like three days

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>later they're getting rescented because the order books that the

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>wires still were connected to the old fund and the

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>old ticker. So all kinds of weird things happen from

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>tickers and the graveyard. Can I jump in here with

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the story. And we saw recently where uh BTC, which

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>clearly is going to be a coveted ticker for a

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin ETF. I mean that's like gold um gray Scale

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>took a position in this smaller issuer who had a

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>fixed income fund. They changed their ticker but not the

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>strategy from like something appropriate to BTC, and then they

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>undid it. So I'm guessing the SEC sort of sent

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>them an email. Is that is that fair? But that's

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>also how valuable the ticker is that gray Scale was

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 1>willing to like do this whole maneuver just to hold

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>onto BTC in the hopes they can convert GBTC to

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>an e t F. Do I have that right? I

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know if any of us have the specifics of

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that case or would know you know, what the SEC

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and may or may not have said. But I have

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to say that the idea of buying a separate fund

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>just to stick it with the ticker, to take the

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>ticker off the table because they already have GBTC, so

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't need more ticker recognition. They just need to

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>prevent somebody else. I think it's an incredibly I mean,

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that's just a brilliant defensive move. It's brilliant. But it

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>was kind of interesting. I was watching that from AFAR

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. There are other things that exchanges do is

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>just try to eliminate confusion, so reducing confusion the like

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, Mike, like what you said, if a fund closes,

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>we typically put that ticker on the shelf for seventy

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>five days or so, just so that there's not an

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>immediate confusion and misunderstanding for actually what you're investing in.

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>If if you're just focused on tickers. M One thing

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that we did, like when v XX relaunched as the

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>new v x X, we actually didn't give it the

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>v XX ticker immediately. Um, we would have liked to

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>put the VXX ticker on it sooner, but we just said, okay,

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>let's just make sure that there's there's time in between that.

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But then there's also the standpoint of, you know, BTC

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>ticker means something, and it put a BTC ticker on

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, the intermediate fixed income e t f is.

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>We were just there's got to be an ulterior motive here, right, Yeah,

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that's ultimately it's just probably not the right thing to do.

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not it's misleading. Yeah, I can't explain that one.

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>That one looked bungled to me. I'm curious to find

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>out if it was truly strategic or a complete, you

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>know cluster. What do you think the ticker premium is

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>actually worth? Is there a way to quantify it? I

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's a case by case Joel. It depends on

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>if you have a competitor at that time. It depends

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>on a million different things. If if the theme is

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 1>hot and the messages in the war single word. I mean,

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the hack is where it is because of that ticker

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that they launched it in two days

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>later you had the Sony hack. Like right, I think

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>sometimes all else equal, it seems to be worth a lot,

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>but it's not worth a lot on its own. It's

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hard to it's like an art to it.

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>It just but it can actually, like you said, I

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>think it can confuse people. One story that comes to mind,

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if somebody can share the details on

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>this one UM is t r x T, which was

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bill Gross ETF which launched from PIMCO. That's not

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a great ticker, especially for you know, Bill Gross at

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the time was like king of Active Management and like

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>three months later, bam, they got bonbed. So I thought

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, like the Godfather, Bill made an offer

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to somebody they couldn't refuse. UM. But any I don't know,

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>anyone know the background there. The story is not that good.

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately I was. I was involved in that listing at

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the time, and we were we went to celebrate the

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.959
<v Speaker 1>launch on the day of and actually I was at

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>their headquarters in California and Newport Beach and Bill looked

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>at me and said, why don't we have b O

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>n D? And then I looked at his team and

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I did some research and I was able to obtain

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the ticker b O n D and apply it to

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>this fund. Prior to that, it was reserved elsewhere, and

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the entity that had at reserved was willing to let

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it go. They were willing to let it go because

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Laura asked them in a way where they were willing

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to let it go. But prior to all that happening,

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>they had gone to their rep and and y see,

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>he asked for the ticker bond. The rep at the

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>time was me and I said, I tried, I couldn't

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>get it. So they got stuck with t r XT,

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>which was a terrible ticker that when they went to Laura,

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Laura was magically able to free it up after they're

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>already launched with a bad picker. So, as you might imagine,

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>there's launch time they ever asked me for anything. Okay,

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that's an amazing story. Um. You know, there's a really

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>basic one Laura that I that I have to ask you,

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>which is I can think of a lot of bad

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 1>words that are usually four letters. Um, and how do

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>you evaluate you know, the bad words that that people

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>come and I'm sure it happens not infrequently. How you

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>get some of those inquiries? Yeah, that's true. We um

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and like when I, like I mentioned before, we get

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>an inquiry for every letter, every potentially available symbol that

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>starts with X, whatever that is. You pull that list

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and you have to scan it before you send it

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to the company, because I want to make sure that

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 1>none of those those are included in that Excels friendsheet

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that you're sending. To be honest with you, So, so

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>do you have to go to like Urban Dictionary just

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to keep up with like slang? Yes, I'd like to

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>think that we're pretty well up on things, but there

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>are a few things that slipped by asad. And what

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>happens if you if you did send that list out

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to somebody and they they've spotted something, do you do

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you have an ability to to like walk it back

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>before something launches just in case? Okay, yes, yeah, because

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>once you send in the list, then they come back

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to you and say, this is what we'd like. You know,

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we were going to be launching one fund. This is

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>our order priority would really like number one, number two

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and number three and then we go through that process

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to try to secure it for them. Um, so that's

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 1>when that's when we catch it. One of the things

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that I wanted to do here was sort of imagine

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that we were issuers and that we were going to

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>reserve tickers for things we might launch, which is a

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>show we did. Uh, but two years ago we had

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a competition for it was like a shark tank for

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>who had the best DTF idea. So, um, each of

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>us has got five tickers or so that we wanted

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to see if they were available and if we could

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>reserve them, just to see what our rate is like

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>our hit rate, uh, and how much is reserved. I

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>thought that'd be fun. So um, we each have what five, five,

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 1>six tickers. It was hard to find. It was hard

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep it at fun, but you know it was.

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>It was a fun exercise. So so I I can

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>go first, Um, and Phil, how did you find out

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>if this was taken or not? So I went to

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the incomparable Raw Morocco at Cibo, who works with Laura Morrison. Um,

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know he was able to go through

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>each one with me and tell me which ones were

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>available and which ones were not. And I honestly, I

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 1>don't think you guys are gonna be very happy with

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the availability here. But let's see where we got. Okay,

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Rob Morocco is an amazing name, uh

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that the character will have to revisit it sometime. Okay.

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>My first one was ACME, as in, you know, you know,

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>watching a lot of uh Saturday morning cartoons with my

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>kid ACME brand. That just struck me as something like

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it is, but like ACME is

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that one available as of today, as of this recording,

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>ACME is available? Look at you chill, one for one,

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 1>one for one. Okay, Next, well, I don't know what

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that would be. An ETM, you know you'll figure it out. Yeah, explosives,

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>dynamite and coyotes. There you go, there go, Yeah, weapons,

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>weapons manufacturers. That's pretty good. Okay. What about what about

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 1>hot with two T s or one either way? H

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>O T T is currently reserved? What about what about meme?

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Meme is reserved? I know who has that. It's a

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>round hill. Make him o an offer they can't refuse,

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 1>and I'll just yeah, I think they're really trying to

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.719
<v Speaker 1>do a meme TF. Okay, what about not as an

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>n O T N O T is available. Okay, wow,

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>I hit right pretty high. Okay, what about l G

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:08.479
<v Speaker 1>S T that I was thinking like long short? Okay, uh,

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 1>l G S T is reserved currently. Yeah, okay, Now

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>this was like the one that I thought was the best.

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Um funk funk is available? Ah, I don't know what

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I do know what would that be for? That would

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>be good for the the q J kind of concept.

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, music streaming, that's got us. I'm good at this.

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I have more, but I feel like I should put

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>this down before I started striking out. So I just

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>want to tell you that the not one does not

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>surprise me because we all avoid anything negative, right, I

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>know who has risk and a couple of these other ones.

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>You never want anything negative in the ticker, just so

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you Yeah, well that's just like your opinion. While I

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>was striking Joel, I also checked for the ticker Joel

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>j O E L, which was available reserve for you.

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I have to throw it back because there's

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>no intention to use it unless you quickly come up

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>with a fund that we can file. Um, but as

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of this moment, I do have it for you. So

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way this idea of reserving random names, uh

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>not Zuck and Mike and those, I just I do

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>think that there will be point um like like random

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street bet type people will emerge from the underground

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and you'll see tickers just like Greg. It's just like

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>what this dude Greg likes and he just happens to

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>be very good and followed. I do think we'll see that.

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>But what about like a Dave E t F like

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Dave Portnoy. Yeah, like his just his picks what he likes,

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and just follow him and you just now your own

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:50.959
<v Speaker 1>Dave stuff. Yeah, that's simple, that's kind of like public.

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly. I love that concept. Yes, some superstars from

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:58.959
<v Speaker 1>there will could get their own E t F tickers,

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and so I think names far were you guys, I'd

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>reserve like all the famous names. Yeah, like you know,

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody needs to get Did you check on Eric? Eric

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is an active symbol right now, and of course I

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>checked Phil and Back are also active. Claire, I couldn't

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>quite fit your I couldn't quite fit your name into

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>into four syllables. So yeah, ce L A R maybe,

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>But okay, I'm gonna quit while I'm ahead. I felt

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty good about that, and by the end of the episode,

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>let me see if I can come up with something

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>for my own uh name, But Claire, do you want

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to take a shot at yours? Sure? Okay, so um

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>we talked about some of mine. I had Doge and

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Meme on my list too, but related. I had WSB

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>for Wall Street bets. That's a great one. It's already reserved.

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I bet it's round hill um. And then I also

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>had I don't know, does this violate any like profanity

0:30:55.680 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>bands if the ticker l m A O that, I

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think it would. It is currently reserved as well.

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>So by the way l m AO is used for

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a spack, does that mean it could not be used

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>as an E t F Also, yes, that's correct, that's

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>why it's taken. Yeah, that's actually like a spack, all right.

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>And then I had um food f O O D

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>for like a restaurant et F food is currently reserved,

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>not available. Not surprised, um. And then I had Life

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>l I F E reserve not available. I don't know

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>what that would be for everything, but the CTF is life.

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>That would be like a pro life version of the

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>SMP or something like that. Yeah, yeah, yeah, that Catholic

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>value thing, or or you could do like genome, but yeah,

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not as clear. Now. I didn't have this

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>on my list, but I'm wondering if this would be possible.

0:31:57.960 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Could you have an E t F with the two

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>grew E t F. So I went through this because

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I had t E t F. So the E t

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>F ticker was actually owned by a closed end fund

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>when I launched, which was just ironic ironic, like like

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Morrissett song like literally defined by the

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that a closed in fund has the ticker E

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>t F, and I think they got rid of it,

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know if it's available anymore. Okay, Eric,

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>let's hear it. Okay, the first one I have is God.

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>God is currently reserved and not available. Who has that?

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Probably the uh you know what are they called? There's

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a Bible ETF. So, so, Eric, just a little inside baseball,

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you, Lord Jesus Pope, all of those

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>are not available either. Not surprising, although that would be

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>some E t F anyway, all right, um, here's another one.

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>This is one that I had my idea for an

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>E t F, which was the s p X Mondays.

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So you just invest Tuesday through Friday because Mondays are

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>always horrible. Traditionally that's when the worst sell offs happen.

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Q mom q q m o N. That is available.

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a oh, that's a great one. Eric, Um, here's

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>another one that I think would be great, and it's negative.

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>But I'll explain why evil. So I was really surprised.

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>But evil is available. Okay, So here's so much to do.

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>If any issuers listening. What you do is take the

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>least the worst E s G rank stocks, called the

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>anti E s G t F, slap evil on it,

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and you'll get investors who are just so sick and

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>tired of the E s G righteousness who will buy

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it just for just to send a message. I can't

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>believe this doesn't exist. Yeah, Mike's buying this as we speak. Now,

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that's it's not my Eric pitched this one to me

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple times. I don't disagree with it as a

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>good investment idea, but as like you know, we all

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>have these gate sepers. We deal with all these things.

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>So like you're always thinking about will this product affect

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>by other products? Right? So how am I going to

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:11.720
<v Speaker 1>have a social justice fund and a Shariah compliant fund

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:16.399
<v Speaker 1>in my trust next to Evil. It's not gonna happen. Yeah,

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 1>there's only a few issuers who I think could like

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>do this and it would not mess with their other products.

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 1>But it could be a family there, Mike, come on,

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I think this is for Advisor shares. Let's

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>send it to Noah. By the way, Evil was Suzanne

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Woollie's idea for E t F on our E t

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>F Chank episode a couple of years ago. All right,

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>here's another one UM which I thought r j k T,

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>which is for reject because we have this idea for

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>factor rejects. Our j KT is available, all right, so Ethanacio,

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>so my team will be happy about that. Here's another

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>one b r r R for money printer go burr.

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh Man, you know what. You sent me that one,

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't seem it's not on my list here,

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't check that. I bet it's taken. I mean

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I would that that should be scooped up in a

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 1>heartbeat anyway. All right, well, speaking of that, I also

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 1>asked about fed F E d F E D is

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:21.359
<v Speaker 1>currently reserved. Of course, you think do you think Jay

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>sitting on that one? Did you check j pow? J Pow?

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I checked, and j pow is also reserved. Somebody reserved

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 1>j p That's awesome. That's hardcore. I may have come

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>up with something for my name, but Eric, can you

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>think of anything better for for what to do with

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>my name? No, I would just think of like stocks,

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 1>stroll likes. Yeah, that was what I was going to

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 1>go with, which I think that will be a thing.

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll stand over my shortlist, foul. I have a question

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>back to back to Claire's question about l m What

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 1>was it l M AO, what about like O M

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.399
<v Speaker 1>f G. Not really think if it's available, but whether

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>or not that would violent rules? Like Laura, if I

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>came to you, would you edit me out for even

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to get up? That's awesome because there's there's an

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Oppenheimer fund O MFL and every time I see it,

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, man one degree away from you might have

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>a pretty fun job. There's a lot of side chat

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>chatter coming out of that equation. Yeah, that's great. One

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>probably sees things all right before we wrap. We we

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>always end with asking people their favorite tickers. That is

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>not that is not your own, Mike, what's your favorite

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>ticker that is not your own? So karma k R

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>m A um. Two reasons. I love the concept, you

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:48.479
<v Speaker 1>get it one second. And second reason is my business partner,

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Guillermo came up with it and I love it just

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 1>like it's. Every time I see that fund, I think

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of him. Laura, I have to say the favorite ticker,

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but it was never used because the company decided not

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 1>to use it as fool. Very political of you, but

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:08.919
<v Speaker 1>I like that. That was good. Um. And and Phil,

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you know I love tail the tail risk funds from Cambria.

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:14.959
<v Speaker 1>It's real simple, straightforward. But I especially love it because

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.879
<v Speaker 1>it pars now with fail for the global tail risks,

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>which is perfect. Good. Yeah, that's the family concept. He's

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 1>got jail and for chunk as well. He's got a

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of them, all in the family, Mike, Laura, Phil Claire,

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us on Trillions. This is

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>one I appreciate it. Bill. You better say something thank you.

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought I did right now. Thanks thanks for listening

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 1>to Trillions until next time. You can find us on

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcast, Spotify, and

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>whatever else. You'd like to listen. We'd love to hear

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>from you. We're on Twitter. I'm at Joel Webber Show.

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>He's at Eric Baltunas. This episode of Tryan's was produced

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 1>by Magnus Hendrickson. Francesca Levie is the head of Bloomberg

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast by m h m hm m m m