WEBVTT - Apple Product Launch, HSBC Mulls Merging Divisions

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple card Playing and Broud Auto with the

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, so we know a big, big day out

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 2>in the Bay Area today with Apple and their new

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>iPhone and new product launches. Mark German he covers all

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.279
<v Speaker 2>the technology stuff out there for Bloomberg News. Mark, I've

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>already informed Tim Cook that I am, in fact going

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 2>to be upgrading my phone here in the not too

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:43.279
<v Speaker 2>distant future to the iPhone sixteen. I guess I am

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 2>who cares and they're very excited. Are people excited for

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>this event here today?

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 3>And if so, why, Yes, it's all about the iPhone

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 3>this year. This is actually going to be more of

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 3>a muted release, right, So this is not a big

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 3>year over year overhaul. Remember last year they added the

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Titanium show. Well, this year is more about refinements, increased

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 3>processing performance to better support artificial intelligence, improve displays on

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 3>the Pro model, so slightly bigger screens is about a

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 3>five percent display increase, but because the bezels around the

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 3>display are smaller, that increase is actually going to be

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 3>more noticeable than a five percent increase would normally suggest

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 3>if you heard that. The other big enhancement is going

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 3>to be a camera button. This is going to be

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 3>on all four new models, both the low end and

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 3>the high end models, and it basically works the same

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 3>as a DSLR button, right, So you soft touch it

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 3>to autofocus on a subject, you press it in in

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 3>order to actually take that photo or a video. You're

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 3>also going to be able to swipe on it up

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 3>and down or left to right in order to zoom

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 3>in and out of the subject. So it's essentially the

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 3>same camera controls that you've had on the display now

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 3>relegated to a harbor button on the side of the phone.

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 3>And the bet there is that will help people take

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 3>more pictures and maybe better pictures, which of course is

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 3>going to translate to people needing to buy iPhone with

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 3>more storage base, which obviously costs more, and bigger iCloud

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 3>storage plans, which obviously will generate more revenue for Apple

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 3>on both of those things, right, So it's I guess

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 3>a win for consumers and a double win for Apple.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 4>Does that imply then a supercycle definitely taking hold in

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 4>twenty four to twenty five.

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 5>There's no iPhone supercycle.

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 3>There have been some analyst claims over the last several

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 3>weeks about a supercycle coming with these new iPhones. I

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 3>would have to say that they're either making things up,

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 3>or getting bad information, or just trying to pump the

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 3>stock price for their own self interests.

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 3>The reality is that the numbers that we're seeing in

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 3>terms of iPhone orders from the supply chain probably indicate

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 3>an annual decline.

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 5>On iPhone unit shipments.

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Now, an annual decline doesn't necessarily mean a revenue decline, right,

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Because they're adding new features through these higher end models,

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 3>particularly making the lower end Pro model even better at

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 3>one thousand dollars price point. You may be seeing people

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 3>who normally would buy the seven ninety nine version go

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 3>to the nine nine version, which could raise overall asps.

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.839
<v Speaker 3>In terms of an iPhone supercycle, that normally means big

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 3>hardware changes, We're not getting that this time around. It

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 3>also would mean that Apple intelligence would be ready to go,

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 3>but I would say it's half baked.

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 5>If even that.

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 3>A lot of the new features aren't coming until December,

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 3>and many more aren't coming until the middle of next year.

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 5>So if you're anticipating an.

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 3>iPhone supercycle, if you believe there will ever be an

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 3>iPhone supercycle again, a I would say, adjust your expectations

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 3>for twenty twenty four, maybe focused on September twenty twenty five,

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 3>when the iPhone seventeen launches with more significant enhancements.

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 6>What is Apple Intelligence?

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Apple Intelligence is artificial intelligence for Apple customers, right, So

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 3>that's the Apple branded version of their AI platform coming

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.279
<v Speaker 3>as part of iOS eighteen point one sometime in October.

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 3>That's including summaries of notifications. That's including phone call recording

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 3>and automated transcriptions. That's including transcriptions and voice memos is

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 3>including voice recording, and the nosapp. It's including gen Mojis,

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 3>which uses artificial intelligence to create your own emoji characters.

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 4>My daughter loves that, by the way, like they're making emojis,

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Like she takes my phone and does the things and

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 4>she makes chiffs and all this stuff. Like the young kids,

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 4>they love it.

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 3>I think the gen moojis are going to be incredibly popular.

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 3>I think it's going to be at the center of

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 3>many of Apple's advertisements for these features, but that's not

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 3>coming until December.

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 5>So I'm not sure.

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 3>How that can sell new iPhones in September if it's

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 3>not going to be available until December.

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 5>So I have some big.

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Questions about where analysts get their information from, why they

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 3>say the things they do, and why some.

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 5>Of them are considered reputable.

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 3>So I think that people need to be able to

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 3>separate the signal from the noise. And that's why I'm

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 3>so happy to come on here and explain and provide

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 3>a dose of reality.

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 4>So but the dumb question, So Paul gets his new

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 4>phone in October, can he just update the stuff when

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 4>the cool things like the emoji stuff comes out?

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, he can'tolutely and it's not a dumb question, right,

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 3>So what we're going to see our Apple Intelligence features

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 3>rolling out probably over the course the next six to

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 3>nine months, with constant software updates. Now this is new

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 3>for Apple. This is not something they've done in the past.

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 3>Usually you get one big software update every September and

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 3>you're pretty.

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 5>Much set safe for buck mixes and.

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Maybe a couple of enhancements here or there until the

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 3>following September. This time around is going to be a

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 3>gradual release. Now, why are they doing that, because Apple

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence simply is not ready. There's a lot of testing

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 3>that needs to go into this. And the reason Apple

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence has been behind is because they're responding late to

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 3>this AI praise. They really didn't start getting to work

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 3>on these AI enhancements until the second half of twenty

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty two after they saw chat GPT launch. Right, this

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 3>was really something that was developed over the course of

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three and into the first half of twenty

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty four.

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 5>And their development.

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Cycles for major new initiatives like this, these normally can

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 3>take three to four years, right, but they did it

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 3>basically in half the time.

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, you raised a good point earlier, mark that

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 2>there's a reasonable scenario, just given the size of the market,

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 2>that there really are no supercycles unlikely to be a

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 2>super cycle again for the Apple iPhone. Is that a

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 2>belief that's widely held out there.

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 3>It's widely held by me, and I think it's widely

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 3>held by people who really understand this stuff.

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 5>You know, the last time we.

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Got a true, true iPhone supercycle was back in twenty fourteen,

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 3>ten years ago, with the release of the iPhone six

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 3>and six plus two reasons.

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 5>That was the first time.

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 3>That they made substantial screen size increases to the iPhone.

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 3>That was your first Apple fablet, right, moving to the

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 3>four point seven to five point five in screen sizes.

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 5>Massive.

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Also, that was the same year where they struck the

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 3>carrier agreement with China Mobile in China, the biggest wireless

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 3>carrier in the world, adding an addressable market, an additional

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 3>addressable market of one billion people, right, So that is

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 3>what really elicited that supercycle, and that was a two

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 3>three year thing, So that was great for Apple. We

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 3>saw another big bounce in twenty seventeen with the iPhone ten.

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Obviously that was major in terms of asps or great

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 3>the starting price right by three hundred dollars from seven

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 3>hundred and two one thousand. That was a big upgrade

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 3>with face idea. Then we saw that again with the

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 3>iPhone twelve, five G all four models at the tail

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 3>end of twenty twenty, at the top of COVID when

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 3>people were splurging on money, right, So that was a

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:16.119
<v Speaker 3>big one.

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 5>But since the iPhone twelve and twenty twenty and the

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 5>advent of five G for Apple.

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.239
<v Speaker 3>We haven't seen major, major, major significant changes.

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 5>Maybe they're coming at the end of next year. Maybe

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 5>that will.

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Create a supercycle, but I want people to know, don't

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 3>expect one this year.

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 4>All Right, We're on't up more Apple in just a moment. Also, Hey,

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 4>Mark Ourman, Thanks lot really appreciated. Bloomer Technology senior reporter

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 4>joining us from California.

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Car Play and

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of sectors, good to look at. Looking at Apple,

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 4>it's about one point three percent today. It is their

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 4>glow time event, as we've been talking about. But Bloomberg

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 4>Big Take had a fantastic piece today and we wanted

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 4>to dive into Austin car technology reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 4>It's titled Apple's Rise from Rebel to three point four

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 4>trillion dollar world power. It's great to get you on this, Austin.

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 4>It was a wonderful piece. Distracted me from my whole

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 4>car ride.

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Into the office.

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 4>Can you just connect all the dots from like the

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 4>eighties until now.

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 7>You want me to summarize forty years and a minute,

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 7>I can you bet you've got okay? Well, well, really,

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 7>what this story does is chart why and how Apple

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 7>found in its position today, facing a big anti trust

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 7>lawsuit in the US, a lot of regulatory pressure in Europe,

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 7>as well as a lot of really just skepticism and

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 7>criticism for a lot of the partners and developers that

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 7>have depended on Apple over the years. And it charts

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 7>how basically Apple has changed from thatnineteen eighty four era

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 7>when it released the Mac it was seen as this

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 7>sort of disruptive force in the technology industry to twenty

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 7>twenty four when a lot of people think that this

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 7>is a sort of domineering force that needs to be disrupted.

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 7>So we go through from the Mac to the iPod

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 7>and iPhone up through present day with the release of

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 7>the iPhone, the new iPhone sixteen later today, and it's

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 7>just really just putting all the pieces together about how

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 7>Apple finds itself.

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 5>In that position now.

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 2>And Austin along with Max Chafkin, you guys reported this story.

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 6>Just fantastic work.

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 2>But for me, Cameron Galley who does all the illustrations

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 2>just made it really cool and really interactive, some awesome

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 2>stuff as always.

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 6>So Austin, where do you think Apple goes from here?

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 6>What's is it just new products?

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Is it maybe getting more ingrained in our daily lives?

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 6>If that's even possible.

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 2>What do you think kind of a longer term vision

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 2>is for the folks in Kupertino?

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 7>Look, I mean, I think a really good question for

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 7>listeners right now or even you guys, is just, you know,

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 7>going to release this new iPhone. If you guys are

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 7>Apple users, have you ever seriously considered switching to a

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 7>different device or is it just the default? Now that

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 7>I'm going to upgrade to the iPhone sixteen? Maybe at default?

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 7>And so I think the question is how long can

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 7>that last where it is just sort of the default?

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 7>I mean, even their new features that are going to

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 7>release today are all about you know, AI and how

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 7>that ties into some of its hardware. But in all honesty,

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 7>they're two years late to AI. A lot of the features.

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 7>Mark German or Apple colleague, is reporting that won't really

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 7>release until twenty twenty five, at which point maybe you

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 7>should just wait for the iPhone seventeen and I just

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 7>think there's a big question about you know, Apple's products

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 7>are still good. They still make you know, the best laptop,

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 7>the best you know, watch and earbuds. I'm talking through

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 7>my AirPods right now. But at the same time, when

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 7>they don't face that type of pressure, does their products

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 7>just become too incremental and too boring? And I think

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 7>that is when you're going to see a lot more

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 7>disruptives trying to change the way computing works and work

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 7>outside of the Apple ecosystem. But the problem for consumers

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 7>like us is we're kind of stuck in it. I'm

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 7>not going to switch anytime soon for sure.

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 4>Well then to that point, but I found also interesting,

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 4>and I didn't know in the piece that you wrote,

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 4>was sort of Tim Cook's role in managing Apple supply chain,

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 4>and you dug deep into Apple would have a supply

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 4>chain partner and then in essence look to manufacture that

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 4>in house, and then booed that company, which is really

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 4>messed up tons of companies around the world. Can you

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 4>give us some detail on that. Sure.

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 7>The most infamous example actually goes back about a decade ago.

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 7>Apple was developing these new sapphire screams that were going

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 7>to be altered durable instead of the glass that they

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 7>currently use, and they sort of outsourced it to a

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 7>partner and then left that partner on the hook with

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 7>all the liability when Apple decided not to go that

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 7>route because the sapphire wasn't quite going as fast as

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 7>they could develop it for the iPhone. And I think

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 7>that we sort of positioned that as symbolic of what

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 7>Apple has seen with a few of the partners they've

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 7>worked with over the years, not just in the supply chain,

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.119
<v Speaker 7>but also on the software ecosystem side. It's really fascinating

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 7>all this sort of trend that we see of a

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 7>partner really excited to work with Apple in the beginning,

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 7>like Goldman Sachs on the Apple Card or even General Motors.

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 7>We side as another example of working them on CarPlay,

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 7>and then years go by and suddenly they're not so

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 7>happy with the relationship with the Apple anymore. And I

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 7>think that really has become our trend in recent years

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 7>as the company has grown to this massive, multi trillion

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 7>dollar force that essentially it's Apple's where or the highway.

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 7>And I'm just curious how long that will last with

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 7>partners before they say you know what enough is enough, and.

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, Austin, I think for a lot of investors,

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 2>one of the longer term issues that's still always out

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 2>there and is probably increasing in concern. It's just the

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 2>regulatory risk for not just Apple but kind of big

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 2>tech in general, but certainly for Apple given their marketing position.

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>How do you think the companies kind of how do

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 2>they react to that? And just in terms of a

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 2>long term thread or headwind.

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 7>Well, actually, I mean the DOJ case in the US.

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 7>You know, they just released their complaint in March. Apple

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 7>is pushed to dismiss it just earlier in August. That's

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 7>going to play out over the course of years. I

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 7>think that, you know, the preceding cases with the DOJ

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 7>and IBM, or DJ and Microsoft. I mean this last many,

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 7>many years, but we're already seeing sort of a precursor

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 7>to that, and what's happening in Europe with the Digital

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 7>Markets Act, which has already pushed Apple to change a

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 7>ton In fact right now in Europe, because of those

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 7>regulatory changes, you can get an alternative marketplace, meaning you

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 7>don't just have to rely on Apple's app store. You're

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 7>you're actually able to delete a lot of native Apple

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 7>apps that you can't delete the US, you can delete Safari.

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 7>You'll eventually be able to delete your phone app, your

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 7>camera app, the app store and just use alternative products

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 7>from the third party ecosystem. And so what you're seeing

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 7>in Europe is this almost two track system where they

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 7>have a lot more flexible sort of computing platform than

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 7>anywhere else if you're an Apple user. So I think

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 7>what they've sort of done is take this almost whack

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 7>a mole approach to regulation and the EU, and even

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 7>in some of the pressure they've seen in the US,

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 7>they've had to open up that walled garden that, as

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 7>we refer to it, sort of their closed ecosystem a

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 7>little bit more in a way that Apple doesn't like

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 7>because they lose control. But for consumers in a lot

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 7>of ways, it's a little bit interesting to watch this

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 7>company have to change and not just have it the

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 7>Apple approach. They're going to have to, at least in

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 7>Europe so far, open up their walled garden a little bit,

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 7>allows some more players within their ecosystem to run some

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 7>of those fundamental parts.

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, which is why it's so interesting to read the

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 4>piece because it really reminds us that Apple wasn't the

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 4>leader forty years ago, that it was a very different

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 4>world when it came to PCs. You can definitely read

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 4>this Big Take and more on the Bloomberg and at

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg dot com slash Big Take. Definitely check it out,

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 4>really wonderful stuff. Plus, if you're joining us from Boston, Massachusetts,

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 4>like Austin is, if you're listening to us in Boston,

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 4>does now ninety two nine FM in Boston. I could

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 4>have done a little bit better, but I did it

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 4>all right, Austin, Thanks a lot, Austin Car Technology Reporter.

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecar playing Android OUTO

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business That listener on demand wherever you

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Okay, let's get to another chap story here that we're

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 4>looking on. That's HSBC is looking at potentially merging it's

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 4>commercial and investment bank to cut some cost. We wanted

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 4>to get more on that with too much netsl senior

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 4>US Banks analyst. He joins us from Bloomberg Intelligence from London.

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 4>Can you just walk me through why and sort of

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 4>what this would look like.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 8>Yes, hey, hey guys, thank you very much for having me.

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 8>So cost cutting, yes, so that's definitely something on top

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 8>of our gendle of the new new HSBCCO who has

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 8>just started started his position a couple of days ago.

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 8>So why cost cutting? First of all, we are seeing

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 8>a revenue weekending outdocouse weekending because of interest rates are

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 8>going down the next two years and the hedges. We

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 8>need to do something to keep the profitability and they

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 8>would love to stay at around the meeting's rot and

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 8>in order to achieve that, they need to cost codes

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 8>because there's little options to do with revenues.

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 2>So what is the competitive position for hs SPC. Just

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 2>break it down for it because I think a lot

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 2>of our listeners and viewers some don't have a great

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 2>handle on it.

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So first of all, we need to understand that

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 8>HSBC is very much heavily emerging market focused bank. If

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 8>you are emerging market focused bank, of course you have

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 8>much better opportunity to grow your revenues, your growth your lending.

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 8>But if you look into the outlook, it's not had

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 8>to rose the story anymore because now we have much

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 8>higher interest rates, red are going to go down. GDP

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 8>is not so growing south fast as it does in

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 8>the past, so revenue is going to flat in the

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 8>next two three years. But if you look, if you

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 8>are emerging market focused bank as well, you are facing

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 8>higher inflation costs and because of the higher wage inflation

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 8>those markets, etc. Your costs, but it is growing. On

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 8>top of that, you have to invest in digitalization, transformation,

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 8>et cetera. So everybody is doing this globally, so there

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 8>is massive cost pressure. And looking at HSBC, which is

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 8>spread across more than fifty markets, mainly in Asia right

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 8>now after recent recent restructuring, you know there's a massive

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 8>and they have to do something about this to streamline

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 8>the operations. They have started this already a couple of

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 8>years ago under no Queen and they've done quite good

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 8>job cutting costs by more than five billions. However, there

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:12.719
<v Speaker 8>are still lots of things to be done, and one

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 8>of those aspects we definitely head counts and then maybe

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 8>looking into cost base and look at headcounts and try

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 8>to have some synergies in those two businesses, which will

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 8>combined have around forty billions in revenues, will be the biggest,

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 8>biggest revenue driver for HSBC Marke bigger than wealth and

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 8>every which is the key focus of the bank at

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 8>the moment.

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 4>It's something damn question. But if it's such a it

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 4>makes so much sense. Why haven't they done it already?

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's a good question for.

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 8>The four CEO who just left no queen and the

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 8>new guy is coming and he has to deliver something

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 8>and he has to why he hadn't done before Because

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 8>we were living in different interest rate environments right here

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 8>linking in the interest rates environment that we're supporting revenues,

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 8>but the condition has changed. Environments has changed now that

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.719
<v Speaker 8>the expectations for US rates, global rates are going up

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 8>and down. The volatility is quite high, but I think

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 8>we now expect, we know more or less that the

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 8>rest is going to come down and the sensit and

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 8>EDGESBC is one of the most sensitive bank to cut

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 8>in indust right, so they have to do something quickly

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 8>and definitely the new CEO needs to deliver something, needs

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 8>to convince market that he can get the handle of

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 8>on cost causes. Definitely the big issue. Have been writing

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.239
<v Speaker 8>about this quite a lot. You want to deliver. If

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 8>you are Amergic focused bank, you want to deliver revenue

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 8>revenue Manda's cost which recall operating joes. You want to

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 8>have a round one to three percent. And at the

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 8>moment they're running negative jobs into the future, so it's

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 8>not the compelling story for HSBC. Hence cost focus right

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 8>now is very important, and they would replicate possibly what

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 8>Standard Charge did at the beginning of the year where

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 8>they also plan to merge to you and its just

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 8>to cost cut costs and they are able to keep

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 8>cost flatish in the next two years, and possibly HBC

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 8>is going to follow the same path.

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 6>Tomash.

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm just looking at the p GEO function to see

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 2>where they get their revenue from a geographic perspective, and

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 2>again about you know there at half the revenues comes

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 2>out of Asia, about almost forty percent comes out of Europe,

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 2>only about ten percent out of North America. So have

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 2>they can they be a significantly profitable and generate the

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 2>types of returns they need to without having a bigger

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 2>presence in North America.

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, if you look at they have been very much

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 8>dealer reading themselves or they were the risking themselves when

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 8>they were you know, they existed France, Canada, they have

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 8>some US as well. They cut on operations over there

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 8>now heavily focusing on Asia at the moment, and Asia

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 8>growth is what they want to level and embark on.

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.239
<v Speaker 8>They definitely look into wealth management and if you look

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 8>at new stories over the bloom work, there's a lots

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 8>of stories. They're hiring people more people in Hong Kong

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 8>or in Singapore because they want to really compete with

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 8>wealth management and this is the area of their growth.

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 8>And whenever they talk about interest rate cutting just or

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 8>lending growth is very difficult and the moment, so wealth

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 8>management is definitely something they want to they want to

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 8>explore further and that's the area of growth for them.

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 8>It's in Asia, but also in Middle East where where

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 8>we have the largest non millionaires billionaires come to the market,

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 8>and they want to definitely couple supports meeting this in

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 8>this AREO.

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 4>All right, Tamash, thanks a lot. Tamash Netzel joining us

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 4>senior EU Banks analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 4>Alex Steel here alongside Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio.

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 4>We cover all the tap news in business, economics and

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 4>finance or lens of our Bloomberg Intelligence folks. They cover

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 4>two thousand companies in one hundred and thirty industries all

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 4>around the world. We also like to take a broader

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 4>view and kind of step back and look at what

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 4>the pros are doing. And for that we go to

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 4>Chuck Lieberman, co founder and chief investment officer and Advisor's

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 4>Capital Management. They have just under eight billion dollars in

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 4>assets under management.

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Great great person.

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 4>To talk to, Chuck. Do you care if the FED

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 4>twenty five or fifty at the next meeting, if they

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 4>cut seventy five or fifty for the rest of the year.

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 9>I do care because of the message that it sends

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 9>in terms of the economic impact that's likely to be

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 9>small twenty five or fifty. I don't think the market

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 9>is on board with what they're likely to do. I

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 9>think they're going to do less rather than more. The

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 9>market's price for one hundred and twenty five basis points

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 9>between now and the end of the year. I just

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 9>don't see that as feasible without a recession.

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 2>So we had a wholesal of economic data last week.

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Comment leading with the jobs number on Friday, it appears

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 2>economy slowing. Is it slung at a rate that a

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Do you agree with that? And are you concerned that

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's slowing too much?

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 9>It is definitely slowing. But as I joked, good luck

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 9>trying to avoid getting a traffic ticket. If you tell

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 9>the cop you slowed from one hundred and you slowed

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 9>down to one hundred miles an hour in a seventy zone,

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 9>that's not going to fly very well. The economy has slow.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 9>We're growing at a more moderate rate, but we're still

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 9>growing north of two percent, and fundamentally that's a very

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 9>solid growth rate. Productivity is adding one one and a

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 9>half percent a year, labor force is adding, domestic labor

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 9>force is adding a half a percent a year. Maybe

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 9>all of the rest is coming from immigration, and so

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:22.959
<v Speaker 9>we have the capacity to grow at two percent a year.

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 9>We're doing that. So that's very solid growth.

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 4>So if we have that solid growth, is it that

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 4>the FED will cut less in the short term? But

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 4>the amount of cuts over all in the cycle is

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 4>the same. Or do you think that we need to

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 4>start and we I mean investors, you can start pairing

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 4>back what they think neutral is.

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think that the market has a bad sense

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 9>of what neutral is. And one way to see that

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 9>is people say that monetary policy is very tight. They

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 9>look at the funds rate and they look at inflation

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 9>and they say interest rates are high. True, if you

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 9>look at the tenure however, relative to inflation, the real

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 9>rate on the ten year is is not very high.

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 9>And yet that's the rate that matters much more for corporations,

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 9>it matters more for mortgage rates. It's a much more

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 9>critical interest rate. And on that basis, monetary policy is

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 9>not tight. It might even be considered loose.

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 2>So given that backdrop, with the economy, with the federal reserve,

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 2>where are the best opportunities these days for you?

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 6>Do you find them in the equity markets? In fixed gum?

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 6>Are there certain sectors that screen well for you?

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 9>Fixed income is not that attractive, especially because the market

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 9>is anticipating a lot more cuts than I think are

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 9>likely to come. But the equity market I think offers

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 9>good value, especially the disliked, unloved SMP four ninety three,

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 9>the MAGS seven obviously are through the roof, and I

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 9>think a reasonable case can be made that justifies that

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 9>they all have high growth rates. They have enormous growth potential.

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 9>Companies are typically doing very, very well. I think you

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 9>can look at you have to look at them actually

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 9>one at a time and judge their prospects. The four

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 9>ninety three are relatively ignored, and there's great value across

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 9>the board and whole sectors. So it's not hard to

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 9>find stocks with good, solid prospects, good dividends and trading

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 9>it ten times earnings or even less. So that's real value.

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So where I guess what spaces like? Are you

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 4>going to go like deep cyclical there? Do you just

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.239
<v Speaker 4>look for value? Is it dividend players? Is it going

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:31.360
<v Speaker 4>to be just safety trades in those four ninety.

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 9>Three Well, I manage a portfolio that is income oriented.

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 9>We call it growth excuse me, income with growth, So

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 9>it's an equity based, income oriented portfolio. I've got lots

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 9>of exposure to the energy sector through Master Limited Partnership,

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 9>Soil and Guests partnerships. I've got lots of exposure to

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 9>business development companies, very high yielding companies because they're required

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 9>to pay out their profits. I've got exposure to parts

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 9>of the market where I think there's real value. And

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 9>then the banking sector of the financials. The financials are

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 9>typically still cheap, still offer very good dividends, and they're

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 9>very well capitalized, and the companies will do well.

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned banks financials, Do you have exposure to

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 2>regional banks as well, Yeah, a couple. And how concerned

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 2>are you about commercial real estate and the exposure there,

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 2>because I mean, alex linees is something we probably try

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 2>to get as many guests on as we kind of

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 2>talk about commercial real estate in general.

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 9>Well, there's no question that the office space market is problematical,

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 9>but that's only a small fraction of the overall real

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 9>estate market. I've seen numbers like six or seven percent

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 9>of the total commercial real estate market is office. The

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 9>rest of it is fine. The part of the market

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 9>that I really like are nursing homes. They got crushed

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 9>during the pandemic for obvious reasons. The stocks are still cheap.

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 9>Businesses recovering, not surprisingly, occupancy is rising, rates are rising.

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 9>Their biggest problem is getting labor labor costs arising, but

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 9>profitability is improving. They pay high dividends, perfect for my

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 9>strategy of income with growth. We're producing over six percent

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 9>yields on that strategy and we've still got some growth

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 9>embedded in there as well. So it's a great way

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 9>to generate income in a cheap part of the market.

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 4>So staying on that for a second. With commercial real estate,

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 4>aside from office, we generally hear like student housing, senior housing,

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 4>and also wear housing. Is there like another leg or

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 4>something to that that's also interesting to you in that space?

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's all one offs. So for example, there's a

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 9>APR Properties which does experiential type of things. They own

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 9>top golf outlets, say they own movie theaters. The movie

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 9>theater business is struggling obviously, but it is coming back

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 9>and top golf and other parts are doing well. So

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 9>that's an interesting play.

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 5>We own it.

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 9>So there are lots of opportunities.

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 5>You just have to dig.

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 2>So when you talk about your dividends strategy, I guess

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 2>almost biygn ific definition, you don't have a big exposure

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 2>to technology because I look at a company today. The

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 2>story today is Apple and the new phone launch and

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 2>we're covering it like crazy here at Bloomberg. But you

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 2>look at this company that got one hundred and fifty

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 2>billion in cash. You're going to throw off one hundred

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 2>million dollars a year in free cash flow no dividend.

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 4>You you should know that this is a point of

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 4>He gets very upset by this.

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 6>I argue with Tim Cook about this all the time.

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 6>I do, usually over a cocktail.

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 2>But what do you say, how do you think about

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 2>the technology companies and dividend given all the cash flow

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 2>they have.

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 9>Okay, so as a fiduciary, we've got to diversified portfolio,

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 9>so we have to have some exposure to technology. Okay,

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 9>there are companies that pay dividends and they're still doing fine.

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 9>Seagate Technology is one of the ones that we own.

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 9>Broadcom is another. We've owned that one for a while.

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 9>These are among our lowest yielding holdings in the portfolio strategy. Nonetheless,

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 9>it gives us some exposure to technology, and Broadcomm is

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 9>going to benefit from AI. So we're playing that game too.

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 4>And it's been one of the most undervalued players versus

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 4>like an Nvidia. It's really underperformed from that perspective.

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's undervaluant in that it hasn't performed as well

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 9>as in video, but then few things have. But it's

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 9>great value and we'll do fine. And that's where long

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 9>term players, we're not trying to make the buck in

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 9>the next twenty minutes.

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Tax policy, it's an election year. Tax policies can be

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 2>front and center here for both candidates. What's it mean

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 2>for again, an income investor like.

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 9>You, it matters a lot. So one of the things

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 9>that we look at is how is the tax treatment

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 9>of the dividends that we produce. We prefer ones where

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 9>there's some shelter, which MLPs do. It's great reads do

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 9>as well. Interest is taxed at full income tax rates,

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 9>so that's not as great and we don't have a

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 9>large exposure there. And actually our exposure to fixed income

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 9>is a little bit below average, which rather be eighty

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 9>equity twenty percent fixed, we're more like fifteen closer to

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 9>fifteen fixed right now because we don't see the bond

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 9>market is particularly attractive.

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 4>So if to say are raised, does that change then

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 4>the dividend payout situation that you're talking about, it.

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 9>Will hurt, but it will hurt everything. All stocks will

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 9>be worth less because of a higher dividend a higher

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 9>tax rate. So you have to pick your poison, and

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 9>the question is which ones will be hurt the least. Again,

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 9>if it's a matter of full tax applicability for interest,

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 9>that gets hurt even more than stocks. In the case

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 9>of stock, some pay return of capital, they will be

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 9>hurt the least. So, yeah, it will affect some of

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 9>our allocations.

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 2>When you sit down with the management teams of the

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 2>companies you own and you talked about use of cash

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 2>and cash repatriation, buybacks versus dividends, what's your what's the discussion?

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 5>Like?

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 6>What points do you?

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 5>Maan?

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 9>I love it when they do buybacks, but often they

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 9>feel like they've got to do some dividends to play

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 9>care shareholders. I look how whoever they return capital is good.

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 9>If they're producing enough free cash flow that they can

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 9>afford to buy back or pay out higher dividends. Either

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 9>one works for me. Theoretically, I shouldn't care. That's what

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 9>the mathematics say. As long as they return capital, are

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 9>profitable and they're growing their earnings and they return on

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 9>capital is high, I'm.

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 4>Happy if we see increase in capital gains tax does that.

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 6>How do you think about that again, that hurts.

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 9>It hurts the valuation of these companies and so, but

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 9>it's in across the board type of damage. It will

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 9>hurt the valuation of the entire stock market.

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 6>So what's the big issue that you're focusing on right

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 6>now with your team?

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think the issue that everyone's struggling with or

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 9>talking about is whether or not the economy is likely

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 9>to lapse in recession anytime soon. I think the answer

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 9>is no. When I look at the economy, I have

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 9>a tough time constructing a recession scenario. The easiest way

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 9>to make that case is to say that interest rates

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 9>have gone up a lot and that will cause a recession. Well,

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 9>we've been sitting in that boat for a long time

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 9>and it hasn't happened. And is a reason it hasn't happened.

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 9>The consumer is in very good shape. Job growth is

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 9>still solid. Income growth is even more solid. So consumers

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 9>have the capacity to spend, and that's seventy percent of

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 9>the economy. Capital investment. We're trying to promote green initiatives.

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 9>We're trying to bring business back to the US, manufacturing

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 9>back to the US. That's a tailwind for the economy.

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 9>We happen to have a severe housing shortage, so even

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 9>though mortgage rates are high, it hasn't crushed the housing

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 9>market as much as it would have if we didn't

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 9>have that housing shortage. And if interest rates dip, you're

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 9>going to see housing takeoffs like a bansheet.

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 4>All right, great stuff, Really appreciate It'm s so good

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 4>talking to you. Chuck Lieberman, co founder and chief investment

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 4>officer Advisor's Capital Management, Joining us there.

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 4>So one soccer're watching today that is doing absolutely nothing

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:20.959
<v Speaker 4>is Starbucks waiting at ninety one dollars sixteen cents. It's

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 4>literally flat on the day, But it's a big day

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 4>because incoming chief executive officer Brian Nicol has to live

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 4>up to the hype that really propelled Cheryl's higher. It's

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 4>his first day a CEO of Starbucks. Michael Hale and

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:37.479
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg intelligence senior restaurant and food service analyst is joining us. Now,

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 4>what First of all, how long do you think the

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 4>market gives him before they judge him.

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's tough to say, right, you know, I think

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 10>really it's going to take some time. You know, you

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 10>don't turn around an aircraft carrier on a dime. You know,

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 10>Starbucks is a behemoth of a company, So I think

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 10>the market gives him some time. He's got phenomenal track record,

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 10>right what he's done at Taco Bell and then Chipotle,

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 10>obviously we're very impressive, you know, and he's really you know,

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 10>the first thing he's going to do, I think is

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 10>just try to change that culture, right, bringing in a

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 10>culture of transparency, accountability, talking about he's going to talk

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 10>about hard work and compensating his employees for doing a

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 10>good job, because you know, those are some of the

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 10>things he talked about changing at Chipotle on his first

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 10>earnings call there. So you know, all that stuff's going

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 10>to take a little bit of time, and because of

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 10>his track record, he'll get he'll get a pretty long leash.

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 6>I think, what what are the challenges facing this company?

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Because just as a consumer, I mean the Starbucks and

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Route thirty five and.

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 6>Wall Township, New Jersey.

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 2>They do a great job.

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 6>People are great.

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 2>It just works like a charm. Stores in great shape.

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 2>The one in Summit's good, It's always packed.

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 6>What do they need to do here? I don't think

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 6>anything's broken.

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 10>Well, it depends on the store.

0:33:57.440 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:33:57.680 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 10>It sounds like that location is doing pretty well. But

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 10>they have of thousands and thousands of locations across the globe.

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 10>I mean, you know, in the US, operations is a

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 10>big issue. You know, drink orders have become more complicated.

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 10>Digital orders have kind of changed the experience for the

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 10>in cafe customer, right Like it was it became popular

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 10>because the briests knew your name, right, and the level

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 10>of service was phenomenal for a chain of that size, right,

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 10>And through digital ordering and these very complicated orders, you know,

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 10>they've lost some of that, right And so so operations,

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:39.439
<v Speaker 10>you know, they're losing a lot of orders because people

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 10>are trying to place them on the app and the

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 10>wait times are kind of obnoxious at times, right, And

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 10>so I think operations is going to be his primary focus.

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 10>Running the best cafes possible is really going to be

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:57.800
<v Speaker 10>job number one. But there's a bunch of different issues,

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 10>you know, operations is just one of them. Politics has

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:05.800
<v Speaker 10>been an issue, right. Starbucks has always been a brand

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 10>that that kind of puts their politics in your face,

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 10>and I think I think Brian Nichol is gonna want

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 10>to step back from that, right because of.

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 1>All of the the.

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 10>You know, all the issues they've had with their customer base. Right,

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 10>people haven't been happy with you know, there's been some

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 10>boycott talks online about their stance on the Israel Hamas War,

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 10>about their stance and how they've handled the union negotiations,

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 10>you know, so that's a big thing. And then you know,

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 10>we think eventually, once they have the stores running really

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:39.879
<v Speaker 10>really well, they're going to start spending some more money

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 10>on marketing. Maybe not a ton of money, but we

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 10>would expect them to start spending on marketing.

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 10>It's not something that that Starbucks has traditionally done. But

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.800
<v Speaker 10>it also wasn't something that Chipotle had traditionally done, and

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 10>it's been paying them dividends now for a handful of years.

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 4>So I think with Chipotle, though, we just maybe Paul

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 4>can attest. Is it like there's a menu and it's basic,

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 4>Like they're add ons, right, but like it's a basic menu.

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 4>Starbucks menu is like explosive, Like they can't even have

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 4>all the options up on the ordering board because they're

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 4>just too many. So it does working with operations and

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 4>getting that better, I mean, they have to pair back

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:17.760
<v Speaker 4>their menu and get back to their base.

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Probably.

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 10>You know, we had been critical of the previous management

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 10>team because they kept rolling out new menu platforms and

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 10>then in the next breath talking about improving throughput. But

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 10>you can't have both. So we fully expect them to

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 10>pair back this menu, make it easier to execute in

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 10>the cafes, right, make lives easier for their employees, and

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 10>get the orders out faster. So yeah, I think that's

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 10>going to be a major part of what they do

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 10>going forward.

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Bloomberg had a story from last in twenty

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty three where I mean the variations if you add

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:58.760
<v Speaker 2>all the potential options, there's like billions of different types

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 2>of drinks that could be oh yeah, you know, so

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 2>it's just at.

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:03.359
<v Speaker 4>It and there's like the cold drink, there's the tea,

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 4>there's the refreshers, then there's the frozen refreshers and the

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 4>blended refreshers, And I know this because my daughter likes

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 4>those things. By sometimes you get them frozen and sometimes

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 4>they're not. It's very cold.

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 2>I know, I don't know how they do it, and

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 2>my power, you know, my hats off to them. All right,

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 2>let's step back and look at the restaurants space in

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 2>general here. You've got some research out recently restaurant promotions

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 2>marketing heat up. That's not what.

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 6>Shareholders want to hear, do they.

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 10>No, But restaurants are kind of desperate right now to

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 10>get some traffic into their stores. Low income consumers. Spending

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 10>has been very weak. This seems to be spreading to

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:42.399
<v Speaker 10>the middle income consumers, right, based on the industry data

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:47.439
<v Speaker 10>that we've seen, which showed an improvement you know, last

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 10>month in August, but it was still negative at casual

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 10>dining restaurants, at family dining restaurants and a quick service, right,

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 10>and so they bounced from that horrific July numbers that

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 10>we saw, but still or negative. And so yeah, restaurants

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 10>are trying to do whatever they can to bring you know,

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 10>those low income consumers and middle income consumers back into

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 10>their restaurants. You know, just for example, it was you know,

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:14.240
<v Speaker 10>I think it's thirty five out of the last thirty

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 10>seven quarters quick service chains have had negative traffic, right,

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:21.760
<v Speaker 10>And so that's that's not a sustainable type of situation

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 10>when you have same source sales rising because your prices

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 10>are going up, but traffic can continues to decline. Eventually,

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 10>there's a tipping point, and that's what we've seen this year.

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 4>So to that point, then which ones are do you

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 4>have faith that can maintain some kind of margin and

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 4>also grow their top line.

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 10>You know, it's some of these chains that have a

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 10>big gap on pricing, you know, in terms of you know,

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 10>they've been pricing less than their competitors, right, So if

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 10>you're providing a lot of value, and value can be

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 10>two ways. It can be a better price, but it

0:38:57.440 --> 0:38:59.919
<v Speaker 10>also can be a lot more food for what you pay.

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 10>But some of these companies that that you know, people

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 10>see value at, you know, Rank, Wingstop, Chipotle, Texas Roadhouse.

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 10>These are all of the chains that have been outperforming.

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 10>These all of the chains that have been able to

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 10>drive traffic, and a big part of it is being

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:21.320
<v Speaker 10>priced below competitors. You know, wink Stops raised prices about

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 10>half as much as their competitors, and on their last

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 10>earnings call. They credited that as a big reason for

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:29.760
<v Speaker 10>their for their phenomenal quorder.

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, Michael Halen, thank you so much for joining us.

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Michaelin he's a senior restaurant and food service anamals Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.239
<v Speaker 2>joining us from Princeton. Tuck a little Starbucks first day

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 2>for the new CEO there. I'm happy with my Starbucks.

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 6>Uh interesting Starbucks. I went, I go like once a week.

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:47.439
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, I used to go more of it. But yeah,

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 2>double short mocha very easy.

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 6>What's your go to?

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, he's gonna okay, it is an Americano sometimes

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 4>I sometimes not half calf alma milk to Stevia.

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 6>Wow, that's which.

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 4>Actually for a Starbucks order, isn't really that bad? Like

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.359
<v Speaker 4>there's no syrup, there's no Whippi things. It's not it's

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, okay.

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the younger you are, the more CREATI if

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 2>you are with your coffee orders, I thank you.

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 6>I'm just so sweet.

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, and the kids, some of the kids come

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:18.279
<v Speaker 2>out with these things. I'm like, you know, how many

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 2>druiders of a basic cup of coffee can you have? There?

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:25.760
<v Speaker 6>But apparently there's a lot. But again, Strawbucks. Who knew.

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:34.760
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 4>Alex Steel here alongside Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio.

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 4>We bring you all the news and business, economic and

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.360
<v Speaker 4>finance through our lens of our Bloomberg Intelligence analysts. They

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 4>cover two thousand companies and one hundred and thirty industries

0:40:57.080 --> 0:41:00.040
<v Speaker 4>all around the world every Monday at this time. And

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 4>we like to bring you another arm of Bloomberg, and

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:06.239
<v Speaker 4>that's Bloomberg n e F originally or previously known as

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 4>New Energy Finance. So the team in Bloomberg that tracks

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:14.280
<v Speaker 4>and analyzes the energy transition from commodities to power, to transport, industry,

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 4>buildings and agg sectors. And here with us for more

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:22.280
<v Speaker 4>is Brenna Casey, Bloomberg b n e F Carbon Capture Analyst. Brenna.

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 4>We take a look at, say, how carbon capture has grown,

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 4>the amount of money that's been put in Oh oh,

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:28.439
<v Speaker 4>so Sorry, Paul's a question.

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Pre question, Can you define what carbon capture is probably

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 2>the better question.

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 11>Yes, Yeah, So basically simply CCUS carbon capture, utilization, and storage.

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 11>It's kind of just a way to abate emissions from

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 11>heavy industry, so things like petrochemical refineries, integrated steel mills,

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:49.760
<v Speaker 11>hydrogen blue hydrogen.

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 6>Okay.

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 11>Natural gas processing is a huge historical and use sector.

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 4>So basically there's some sectors that you cannot decarbonize and

0:41:57.239 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 4>you and they have to exist, like you need cement

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 4>for example, So this is a way to kind of

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 4>get them out of the air. And then the question

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:03.319
<v Speaker 4>is kind of.

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:03.800
<v Speaker 2>What do you do with it?

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Do you reuse it somewhere? Do you put it somewhere?

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 4>Do you store it in a rock or somewhere else?

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:10.800
<v Speaker 4>And it's been a huge focus for a lot of companies,

0:42:12.360 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 4>energy companies and a like in oil companies for example,

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 4>what has been the investment cycle like and where are

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 4>we now in that cycle?

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So if we're looking particularly to the US following

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 11>the Inflation Reduction Act, we saw this catalysis of not

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:30.320
<v Speaker 11>only project announcements but kind of you know Series A,

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 11>you know, lots of equity financing into that into the

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 11>market right now. As you know, the IRS is still

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 11>yet to address forty five Q. So that's the inflation

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 11>reduction Yeah, yeah, so the Inflation Reduction Act, which was

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.359
<v Speaker 11>signed into law, you know, two years ago. Forty five

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 11>q's in investment tax credit that the government is proposing

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 11>to you know, heavy emitters. They can if they meet X,

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 11>y Z requirements, then then they can take this credit

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:59.080
<v Speaker 11>and apply it to their tax burden. And you know,

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 11>kind of how to mitigate the cost of ccs because

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:03.240
<v Speaker 11>it's extremely capexx intensive.

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:05.319
<v Speaker 4>So if you store your carbon er get it out

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 4>of the air, you get a text crdit.

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:08.719
<v Speaker 11>Okay, yeah, it's like eighty five dollars per ton if

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 11>you store it, and then sixty if you reutilize it.

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly.

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 11>However, the IRS has yet to finalize the criteria, so

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:20.880
<v Speaker 11>developers don't know what actually constitutes as a project that

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 11>can qualify for these sorts of credits, and so what

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 11>we've actually seen is not only investment taper off, but

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 11>just announcements of you know, future projects into the sector.

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 11>Which what's kind of ironic is that if you look

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 11>at investment numbers for last year for ccs in total,

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 11>it was globally eleven point three billion higher than it's

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 11>ever been before, the US to come around two point

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 11>eight billion of that. However, that is all bolstered by

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 11>just d OEE grants. So the DOE has, you know,

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 11>these direct air capture hubs. They're trying to throw money

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:55.920
<v Speaker 11>at growing out midstream infrastructure, so trans like pipelines, the

0:43:56.000 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 11>storage like storage basins you mentioned earlier. But there's really

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 11>no FID is being taken in the sector at all. Besides,

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 11>I think it was the hydrogen Bomont complex last year.

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 4>So FID is Foreign Investment Decision Final best finstation. Sorry,

0:44:11.080 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 4>And it basically means like, Okay, I have enough and

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 4>I understand enough of the economics where I can actually

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 4>like put money in the ground and like put a

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 4>shovel on the ground and do some stuff. And that's

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 4>where we're really lacking. Which rates of the question is

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:24.960
<v Speaker 4>it a is it building this stuff is still too complicated?

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:27.360
<v Speaker 4>Or is it the demand side? So I'm a company

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 4>and I'm like, I can capture your carbon and I

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 4>can store it for you, but how much are you

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 4>willing to pay for that? Is that part of the

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 4>issue now?

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's definitely kind of a sector by sector issue.

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 11>So if you look to power, we're seeing the most

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:45.320
<v Speaker 11>cancelations in the power sector just because CCS is tremendously expensive,

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 11>and so for seeing a project announced around, you know,

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 11>thirty percent of those projects in the power sector are

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 11>like they're probably going to get canceled. And that's because

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:56.840
<v Speaker 11>retrofitting with CCS adds around fifty six percent to the

0:44:56.920 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 11>total l COE. So it's eight hundred million plus capex investments.

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 11>If you look to something which.

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 4>How did they recoup that? Because that's about power, it's

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:07.319
<v Speaker 4>either the company is paying for it or like, I'm

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 4>paying for it in my bills, right, and that's the

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:10.760
<v Speaker 4>definite way of how they recoup that cash.

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 11>Especially if you know the forty five Q credit if

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 11>you are in a bit or two qualify, it only

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:17.439
<v Speaker 11>lasts twelve years. A lot of these lifetimes are twenty

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:20.399
<v Speaker 11>twenty five years, and so yeah, how do you kind

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:21.840
<v Speaker 11>of make that investment back carp.

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 2>And capture losing some momentum because maybe just the transition

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 2>to green in the US has become a little politicized

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:31.360
<v Speaker 2>and maybe it's losing a little bit of impetus.

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 6>Are we falling behind other countries.

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 5>For example, I.

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 11>Mean, the US is definitely the market leader. So globally

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 11>there's around four hundred and twenty four million metric tons

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 11>of CU two capture capacity do to come online by

0:45:44.239 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 11>twenty thirty five. Now, out of that, around one hundred

0:45:47.160 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 11>and sixty I think it's one sixty three million tons

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 11>is based in the US and following you know, the

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.920
<v Speaker 11>forty five q Invice Reduction Act. Even though there's you know,

0:45:57.040 --> 0:46:02.279
<v Speaker 11>hiccups here, hiccups with transparence or permitting, we do see

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 11>the United States as the best place in the world

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 11>is to kind of build one of these projects.

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:08.480
<v Speaker 4>So what companies do you feel like have the real deal?

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 4>It's I talk to a lot of companies and they're

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 4>all going to try and sell me their carbon capture

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 4>products and like why they're the best and how their

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:17.759
<v Speaker 4>economics work and all that stuff. Who actually can make

0:46:17.800 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 4>this work?

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:21.840
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean, if we're looking at power and hydrogen,

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 11>which are the two leaders right now, kind of the

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 11>biggest players here, we're seeing occidental energy. So not only

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 11>are they looking to retrofit there, you know, natural gas

0:46:30.200 --> 0:46:33.840
<v Speaker 11>assets with carbon capture, but they're also kind of taking

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:37.240
<v Speaker 11>this first mover run into the direct air capture space.

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 11>So that's a really interesting company to watch in that

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:44.000
<v Speaker 11>kind of little corner. There's also you know, like air

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:47.360
<v Speaker 11>products for hydrogen excellon Mo. It's primarily these oil and

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:50.759
<v Speaker 11>gas majors that are moving around in the market because

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:54.440
<v Speaker 11>they have you know, just previous expertise, but they also

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.120
<v Speaker 11>understand the geology, how to store these things, how to

0:46:57.239 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 11>build you know, these big expensive projects. So yeah, air

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 11>products Oxy so oxy.

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 4>Is one of the peer players for eanps for oil

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:07.319
<v Speaker 4>and gas. We talked to the CEO and she wants

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 4>to eventually basically be a rent for higher direct air capture,

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:13.720
<v Speaker 4>So meaning like, hey, I need you to capture some stuff,

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:15.920
<v Speaker 4>and you build a plant near a factory or somewhere

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 4>else and you just suck carbon out of the air

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:19.719
<v Speaker 4>and then therefore you're able to separate it and then

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 4>store it somewhere or reuse it, and that's like what

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:24.360
<v Speaker 4>they want that business model to be. Amazon signed an

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 4>off take with them. They wouldn't tell me the price.

0:47:26.200 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 4>They're like it was really hard, Like you can get

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 4>the off takes and like the buyers like an Amazon,

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 4>but it is really expensive. Yet like it hasn't become

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:36.359
<v Speaker 4>easy on that sense, all right, Brenda, thanks a lot,

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:41.080
<v Speaker 4>really appreciated. Branda Casey, Bloomberg B and if carbon capture analyst.

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:44.920
<v Speaker 4>I obviously find this really interesting, I know. And the

0:47:45.000 --> 0:47:46.759
<v Speaker 4>idea is, like you can do green all you want,

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 4>but like we're not starting over from scratch, so you

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:53.399
<v Speaker 4>actually need carbon capture to get the existing emissions out

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:55.400
<v Speaker 4>because how else do you filter that. You can get trees,

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 4>and that's awesome, and like we want trees, right, maybe

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 4>the ocean, but we need all the things. Let's make

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 4>all work.

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:06.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:09.799
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:48:09.880 --> 0:48:13.040
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:19.840
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:48:20.080 --> 0:48:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal