WEBVTT - History of Electricity Part One

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Get technology with tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com.

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm a senior writer for how stuff works

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and today we're gonna take a look at

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the history of electricity, from the earliest experiments all the

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>way up to the formation of today's power grid and

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>how it all works. Well, at least in this part,

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna explore the first section of that history. But

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, the history of our experimentation and

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of electricity is exhaustive and I would really need

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to do more than one episode. So this is part

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>one of what is likely to be a two part

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>episode about the history of electricity. I'll try to limit

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the number of electricity based puns I will drop in

0:00:57.680 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>this episode, but don't be shocked if you hear a

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>few of them. So first, let's define what electricity is,

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>or rather, instead of letting me define it, let's use

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Miriam Webster, because that's kind of their job. Electricity is

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental form of energy, observable in positive and negative forms,

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that occurs naturally as in lightening, or is produced as

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in a generator, and that is expressed in terms of

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the movement and interaction of electrons. That's actually kind of

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a little simplistic. It's talking about the move of electrons.

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>It's really more about the move of electric charge and

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>not of electrons. Specifically, if you had some other carrier

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that was carrying electric charge, it would be more about

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.559
<v Speaker 1>the movement of that carrier. As it turns out, electrons

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>are the naturally occurring negatively charged particles sub atomic particles

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that are concerned, especially with electronics. So it's understandable, but

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I just want to point that out that it's really

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>more about electric charge and less about the actual sub

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>stomic particles. Uh, don't worry, even though we'll be talking

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot about electrons. I promise this show won't be

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>too negative. And I'm seriously done with puns for just

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit now. To further define electricity, it helps if

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>we get some basic ideas established. Now, keep in mind

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>these aspects of electricity were not understood for centuries. So

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>when I go into the history of electricity, remember that

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>for the vast majority of our experience working with and

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>trying to understand electricity, we did not have any knowledge

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>of the underpinning foundational physics. Right. We were making observations

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and we were even building things that could take advantage

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff, but we didn't actually understand what it

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>was doing or how it was working, which I always

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>find really fascinating, this idea that we can harness something

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>without fully understanding what it is and how it works.

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's good for us, as in myself and you

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 1>guys the audience, to understand some of these basics before

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>we get too far into the discussion. Otherwise I have

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to keep interrupting the history lesson for science lessons, and

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>then it gets kind of a little complicated. Some of

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna happen anyway, but I want to get the

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>foundation out of the way. So the most important thing

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to remember here is that we're talking electric charge, and

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>we want to make sure we can make sense of this.

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>It's time to get current on our terms. So I

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>guess that really wasn't the last pun I'll be talking about.

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>So electric charge comes in two flavors, positive and negative,

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>positive charge and negative charge. You're probably very familiar with

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>us on the sub atomic particle level. Pot you know,

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we have we have our our protons those are positively charged.

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>We have our electrons, those are negatively charged. Now, opposite

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>charges attract one another in circuits. A carrier moves negative

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>charges to a source of positive charge. So some sort

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of subatomic particle needs to carry that negative charge throughout

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the circuit until it can get to the source of

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a positive charge. Because negative quote unquote wants to be

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>with positive. It doesn't really want anything, it's just that's

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the natural tendency, right these for these two different charges

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to attract one another. Now, in practical terms, the carrier

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>is an electron. So that's why we talk about electricity.

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>It's when we talk about electronics. Um it's the subatomic

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>particle that possesses negative charge. So if we do a

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>basic electrostatic experiment where we take a block of wax

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and we rub that block of wax with some wool,

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we will build up an electrostatic charge. So what's happening

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>is we are imparting a negative charge to the wax

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and creating a positive charge to the wool. So, in

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>practical terms, that means the wax has a surplus of

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>electrons and the wool has a efficiency of electrons. Effectively,

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you are rubbing some of the electrons from the wool

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>onto the wax. That makes the overall charge of the

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>surface of the wax negative. It makes the overall charge

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of the surface of the wool positive. And if we

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>create a pathway that electrons can follow from the wax

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to the wool, then electrons will take that pathway, pop

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>back over to the wool and sort of repair that

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>deficiency where that that deficiency of electrons will be balanced out,

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>where electrons will journey back over and rejoin, and they'll

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 1>probably be a big party, you know, or at least

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a subatomic one. And that's that's the basics for electric charge.

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>So now we have to build on this foundation. There

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>are three other basic concepts that we need to understand,

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and those are voltage, current, and resistance. Now these will

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>be important throughout the discussion of electricity, particularly as people

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>begin to get a deeper understanding of what was actually

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 1>happening with electricity. Voltage is probably the trickiest one for

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>people who aren't inclined toward electronics and electricity. It's all

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>about potential energy, specifically the potential energy represented by a

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>pair of different electric charges. So voltage is sort of

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>like pressure. You can imagine it as a force that

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>pushes electrons through a conductor, which is oversimplifying, but it's

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>helpful when you imagine it that way. So voltage is

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the pressure in the system. The higher the voltage, the

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>greater the pressure, the stronger that push is. A low

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>voltage has very little push, while high voltage has a

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of push, And we need voltage to make

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>electronics work. Otherwise nothing is going to cause a current

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to flow through a circuit. You can also kind of

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 1>think of it as like potential energy in the form

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of as an analogy of kinetic energy. So let's say

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that you have a level surface pond which you've got

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>a two little corrals of marbles. They don't really have

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>any potential energy with respect to one another. They're on

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the same level. But let's say you raise one of

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>those up, you tilt it, and you raise it up,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>so the corral is still holding the marble's in. But

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>now the marbles have potential energy because they're at a

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>higher level than the lower marbles. And then let's say

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you were to connect a little slide between the top

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>corral and the bottom corral and allow the marbles to

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>roll down the hill. Well, this would be sort of

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>like a copper wire connecting an area that has a

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>surplus of electrons to an area that has a deficiency

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of electrons. It's allowing for the movement of those electrons. Now,

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in the case of voltage, we're really talking about electric

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>potential here. We're not talking about kinetic energy or potential

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>energy that can be converted into kinetic energy. Is really

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>just meant as an analogy. So when we talk about

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>volta age, we talk about it with respect of two

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.119
<v Speaker 1>points on a circuit. So a voltage difference between two

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>points on a single circuit and their potential difference really

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>which we may also call a voltage drop. The potential

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>difference between two points is measured in a unit called volts.

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>No big surprise there. A volt is the amount of

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>energy needed to force an electrical current of one ampier

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>more on that in a second, through a resistance of

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>one ohm more on that in a second, to at

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a particular temperature. Now, you can have a voltage between

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 1>two points without having any connection between them. So you

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>can have a voltage between two things that do not

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>have an active pathway between the two. If the distance

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 1>between the two points is decreased, then that electrostatic field

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:56.479
<v Speaker 1>that the voltage difference creates will intensify. If you increase

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the space between those two points, the electrostatic yield will diminish.

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So distance plays a factor, not just the difference in voltage.

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>So that covers voltage. But now let's talk about current.

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>So technically the current is a flow of electrical charge,

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and we commonly think of it as the movement of electrons,

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>but again that's an oversimplification. You can actually have a

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>flow of positive charge and that would still be a current.

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>If you add a flow of positive charge, that's technically

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a current. But when we're talking about circuits and electronics,

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>were really talking about electrons, not positively charged electrical charges.

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.599
<v Speaker 1>So we tend to simplify it and say it's the

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>flow of electrons. Just keep in mind that that is

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>an oversimplification, uh, because electrons are the charge carriers of

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>negative charge. Now, in a way, you could think of

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>it as electrons are the messengers and the electric charge

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>they carry is the message, and that's what's really important.

0:09:56.720 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>But in practical terms, we can just so aplify it

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to electrons. We measure current in ampiers, uh, and that

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>gives us a sense of the intensity or quantity of

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a charge. So voltage is the force behind moving a charge,

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and amperage tells you how much charge is actually moving.

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And this can help if you start to imagine voltage

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>as being a locomotive engine and the amperage as being

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a series of train cars. So a low amperage current

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you might think of as just being two or three

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>train cars being pushed by a locomotive engine, but you

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>might think of high amperage as being a series of

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>train cars like fifteen or twenty being pushed by that

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>same locomotive engine. In both cases, the locomotive engine is

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>putting out the same amount of force. It's just that

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in one case it's pushing a relatively small number of

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>train cars and the other one that's pushing a larger number.

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>But the amount of force it's using for both is

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the same. So that's the difference between current and voltage,

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>or if you prefer amperage and volts. Uh. Now, current

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>will get a bit more confusing when we start talking

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>about the direction of flow. And that's thanks to a

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>certain founding father of the United States. But I don't

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>want to jump ahead. We'll get there when we get there.

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll save that for a little bit later in this episode. Finally,

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we have the concept of resistance, and as the name suggests,

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>this is the property of a material to resist the

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>flow of electric charge. A material with a very high

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>resistance is an insulator. It does not allow electric charge

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to pass through it very easily. You would have to

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>use a great deal of energy to move an electric

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>charge through that kind of material. A material with very

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 1>low resistance is a conductor. It will allow electric charge

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to flow through relatively easily. Now, even conductors have resistance.

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>You have to get to very low temperatures, like super

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>frozen temperatures almost close to absolute zero to get to

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>super conductivity, where you have zero resistance and a conductor

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>becomes an ideal or perfect conductor. But at other temperatures

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>there's some resistance. You can get around that by making

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a cable thicker. Thin cables have a higher resistance than

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>thicker cables. But that's kind of beyond what we're talking

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>about here. We measure resistance in Ohms and Ohm. George Home,

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>who is a physician who kind of figured all this

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff out, uh, developed Ohm's law. Now that tells us

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that voltage is equal to current times resistance, or you

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>could say current is equal to voltage divided by resistance,

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>or that resistance is equal to voltage divided by current.

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>It's this relationship between current, resistance and voltage that is

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>inherent in electricity and electronics. Now, those basic concepts are

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the very foundation for all electronics. Now, obviously it gets

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>more comp located. Uh, and you can add in all

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>sorts of different elements besides that, with like diodes and

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>things of that nature. But I just wanted to get

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that covered as the basis for the conversation that follows.

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>And now we're going to dive into a history lesson.

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>So humans have known about electricity in some form for millennia.

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Fails of melitas, and I know I mispronouncing that, So

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to all my my Greek historians out there, I deeply apologize,

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>but I have little Latin and less Greek. Along with

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>my my buddy Shakespeare. Anyway, he had noted that amber,

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the material amber, would attract light materials to its surface

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>after being rubbed. So if you rubbed amber with a

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>cloth and then held it towards feathers, for example, you

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>would notice that feathers would have a tendency to be

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>attracted to the amber. Now, later on we would understand

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that this is static electricity, this is building an electrostatic

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>charge using amber. But this was more of an observation

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>back in those times and and this centuries before uh

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 1>the common era. And in fact, the word electricity comes

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>from the Latin electron, which in turn comes from the

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Greek electron, which means amber. So when we talked about electrons,

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that means that's the Greek word for amber. And it's

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>because of this initial well not even initial, but this

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>early observation. I just thought that was kind of interesting,

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and you would eventually learned that a future engineer. Scientists

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>named this whole process electricity in honor of this early observation.

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Now in nineteen thirty six, we're jumping ahead just to

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about another discovery about ancient civilizations. There was a

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>railroad project that ended up excavating some um some ruins

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>southeast to Baghdad, and they revealed what we have commonly

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>referred to as the Baghdad batteries. These were vessels that

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>appeared to have been designed specifically to generate electricity, at

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>least that's one of the hypotheses about these uh, these vessels.

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Some people disagree, but it's a very popular one. Now

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you probably have heard about this in some form of

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>another or another. You may have even seen the MythBusters

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>episode where they talked about this. The team and MythBusters

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about the possible applications for these so called batteries,

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>which could include a thing that you would use in

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>religious ceremonies where you would have these metal coded vessels

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that if you were to touch them, you would create

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a circuit and you would allow electricity to flow through

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you and that would create a tingling or numbing sensation

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>in your hands, thus akin to some sort of mystical

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>experience and thus being part of a religious experience. Or

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it could be that it was more of a practical

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>approach toward something like electro plating, and I thought that

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>was really cool. So let's talk about what electroplating is,

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise, you know, it doesn't really mean anything to you.

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>As the name implies, electroplating involves using electricity to cover

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>or plate one material with another material. Typically you are

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>plating one type of metal, not necessarily metal, but the

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>early version of electro plating was metal, but one type

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of metal with a more precious metal. So the reason

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:38.239
<v Speaker 1>you might do this is to make really pretty expensive

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>looking stuff without using too much of the actual precious material.

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>So you might gold plate a copper bowl, for example,

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>because you want the gold bowl. Gold is more precious

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>than copper, but you don't want to actually have to

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>go out and dig as much gold as you would

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>need to build a gold bowl, so you want to

0:16:56.240 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>plate the copper bowl with gold. That way, it looks

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly the way you wanted to, but you didn't have

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to spend all that time and effort getting all that gold.

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>In other words, we can thank the laziness and greed

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of human beings for some of the early advances as

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>far as electricity is concerned, So you might want to

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>use electroplating to do that. We also use electroplating for

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>other purposes, like putting rust resistant coatings onto stuff that

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>otherwise would corrode. Uh. You can also use it to

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>produce alloys like bronze and brass. But let's go back

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to electroplating. So let's say these ancient people were using

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the so called Bagdad batteries in order to electroplate gold

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>onto copper. How would you do this well, First you

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>have to make sure that the copper is totally clean,

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>because if it has any Schmutz on it, the gold

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>will not properly adhere to the copper and it'll flake off.

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So you typically would clean copper this way by dipping

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it in a solution that either is a really powerful

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 1>alkaline solution or a very powerful acidic solution to to

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>truly clean it. Once you did that, you would then

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>attach a conductor from the battery to the copper that

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you're playing on on electroplating. So if it's a bowl,

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 1>then you would want to make sure that the terminal,

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the proper terminal from the Baghdad battery is in contact

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>with that copper bowl. Then you would put that whole thing,

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the copper bowl with the um the terminal into an

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>electro light solution, which is in this case a gold

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:40.239
<v Speaker 1>based electro light, so you have gold particles within the

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>electrolyte itself. Now electrolytes, by the way, our materials that

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>dissociate into ions when dissolved in a suitable medium and

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>become a conductor of electricity. So ions, of course, are

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>are our variations of atoms that have a net charge

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on them. They're not neutral. They have either a net

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>negative or a net positive charge. So when you do this,

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you've got your gold ions in this electrolyte solution. You

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>then put the electrodes together so that not together, but

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>within the solution, so that a current can pass through

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the electrodes. Allow the current to go through the electrolight

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>into the other terminal or the other electrode, and you've

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 1>got a negative in a positive electrode. So when the

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>current passes through the electro light, the electrolyte splits up

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and some of the metal atoms contained within the electrolyte

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>are deposited on one of the two electrodes that you

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>inserted into the electrolyte. So what's really happening is the

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>metal atoms are ions. They hold that charge. They're attracted

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>to the electrode that has the opposite charge, and they

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>attached to it. So if you have a negatively charged

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>terminal and you have positively charged gold ions, that opposite

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>attract rule still takes place and the gold will plate

0:19:55.920 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>onto the copper electrode or bowl in this case, and

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 1>then you've got your gold plated copper thing of a

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>jig which is kind of cool. Now there's some who

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>put forth the hypothesis that perhaps ancient people has made

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>other uses of electricity, all the way up to even

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>powering lights in ancient Egypt, but most scholars that I

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>have consulted dismiss this as unrealistic. I haven't really seen

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>much evidence to support this apart from some circumstantial evidence.

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Some supporters cite a hieroglyphic relief that shows what to

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>our modern eyes appears to be an enormous lightbulb, but

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the accepted interpretation of that hieroglyph seems to be that

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a lotus leaf with the figure of a snake

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on it, not a huge ancient lightbulb. Still, it seems

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that there was at least some knowledge of the existence

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of electricity, if not what it actually could do or

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>what it was. Now that's a trend that would last

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>for centuries. In fact, we were making use of electricity

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>well before anyone really knew what was going on with it.

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And again, to me, that is one of the phenomenal

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 1>things about human history is when we come across these

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 1>moments where people have figured out something or how to

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>use something without really fully understanding why it is that

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>could be dangerous. Clearly, there were plenty of cases of

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that in the nineteen fifties with radiation, where people thought

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that radiation didn't have any particular harmful effects. You might

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.679
<v Speaker 1>have seen things about like using X rays in shoe

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 1>stores so that people could see their feet through the

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>shoes that they were trying on. And then only later

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>did we realize that X rays are an ionizing form

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of radiation and that we probably should not or definitely

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>should not have been doing that. Um same sort of

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>thing with electricity. We were putting it to use before

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>we ever really understood what was going on there. Uh.

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>But of course electricity isn't ionizing radiation, so it does

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>have very different effects then radiation does. But what follows

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is a brief history of the developments that unfolded as

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>very very smart people figured out what the heck electricity is.

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>So in the fifteen hundreds you had an English physician

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and proto scientist named William Gilbert who began to experiment

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>with magnets and static electricity. So he used loadstone, which

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>is naturally magnetic iron ore, and he published his work

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen hundred under the title De magnete or a

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>de magnet magneti. It's magneto but with a knee. He

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>was able to describe magnetism and static electricity as distinct phenomena,

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>though he wasn't really sure what was actually causing it.

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>His hypothesis was that there was some sort of fluid

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:52.479
<v Speaker 1>or humor, as in the various humors of the body.

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>There was another prevailing physical theory at the time, and

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that this was the cause of attraction with static electricity,

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and that if you rubbed amber, what you were actually

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>doing was removing some of that fluid from the amber,

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:09.239
<v Speaker 1>which created a hole or like a vacuum around it,

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is why light objects would become attracted to

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the amber. He called it a fluvium and described it

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>as an electric effect. In sixteen sixty an inventor named

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Otto von Gerrika built a machine using a globe made

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>of sulfur, and if you rubbed the globe as it turned,

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you could build up a charge, an electrostatic charge, causing

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>it to attract small light objects such as feathers or

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>scraps of paper. Garrika also observed that his invention would

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 1>cause a spark if you rubbed the globe for long enough.

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:46.719
<v Speaker 1>You could then touch something metal like a brass knob

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and see a spark fly between the electrostatically charged object

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and the grounded piece of metal. Stephen Gray, another English scientist,

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>observed in seventeen twenty nine that some stuff doesn't can

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>duct electricity at all. So he thought some materials would

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>allow the fluid of electricity to flow through and other

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>materials would hamper the flow of this fluid electricity, which

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is sort of true when you get to electrical resistance,

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>only we're not talking about a fluid really. Later that century,

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Dutch inventor's Pietr von Musen book and evolved von Kleist

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>created what we now call the Layden jar, and there

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>are actually two variations on basic Layden jars, which store

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 1>electrostatic charges. They're essentially capacitors, So you build up an

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>electric static charge in this thing, and then when you

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>touch the the charged component, you allow that electro static

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>charge to discharge to spark um. So they release all

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of that charged energy in an instant, unlike a battery,

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>which releases UH which which creates the voltage difference and

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>allows for electric electric current to flow over time. A

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>capacitor releases it in a in a a moment. There

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>are two basic versions of the Leyden jar, and the

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>first one uses a metal container inside which you have

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>a glass vessel nestled inside that metal container, and inside

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the glass vessel you have a second metal container nestled

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>inside that. So it's kind of like a sandwich where

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the bread is metal container and the and the meat

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>inside is glass. I don't recommend eating that sandwich, it

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>would not taste good and probably hurt you, but it

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>was that layer metal glass metal, and you would then

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>also have a rod of metal that would extend up

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>from the base of that interior lining. So imagine like

0:25:55.640 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>a column rising up from that internal metal cup inside

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 1>the glass vessel, which in turn is inside a larger

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>metal vessel. The second variation has a metal vessel filled

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>with a conductive fluid like water that's got a salt

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>dissolved in it. Water on in its own will conduct

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>electricity as long as it has some impurities in it,

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>but you can make it conduct electricity more effectively by

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>adding or doping the water with some of those impurities,

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and it would have a metal rod sticking out from

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>the water. Now, both versions would allow you to do

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially the same thing, which is store up that electro

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 1>static charge. And you do this by building up an

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>electric static charge in something else. So you might take

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>some amber, for example, and rub the amber. Then you

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>would bring that into contact with that metal bar that's

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 1>extending upward from the jar. That would introduce a charge

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to one plate in this capacity, and that would create

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the opposite charge in the opposing plate. Uh in this

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>case that exterior metal casing, you would need to ground

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the outer metal case, which you could just do by

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>touching it yourself, or you could run a wire from

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>the exterior metal case to the ground or to a

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>metal pipe. And when you create a pathway between the

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>two plates by touching the charged rod, it creates a

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>spark as the charge is able to equalize, and that

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 1>could be a significant shock, depending on how much you've

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>built up inside this laden jar, to the point where

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 1>it could really hurt or possibly do serious damage. Both

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Klaised and Moose musten Brook had shocking experiences with the

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>respective laden jars, and neither was really sure exactly what

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:37.360
<v Speaker 1>was happening. Now we've got a lot ward to talk

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>about with the early discoveries surrounding electricity. But before we

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>get a charge out of all that, let's take a

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>quick break to thank our sponsors. All right, we're up

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen fifty two, and that's when we revisit the

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the great founding father I had mentioned earlier, Benjamin Franklin.

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>That's when we got the legendary experiments that Franklin conducted um.

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>He was friends with a scientist named Peter Collinson over

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, and Collinson had sent Franklin and electricity tube. Franklin,

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>like his predecessors, thought electricity was a type of fluid,

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and he hypothesized that lightning itself was an electric spark,

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>very much like the kind a latent jar could produce

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>if you built up enough of an electrostatic charge, and

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>thus charged forces would cause a lightning strike. And he

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>further hypothesized that you could use a metal rod to

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>draw lightning to a specific location, which could end up

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>saving structures from being struck by lightning. So if you

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>had a house and it got hit by lightning back

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in those days, your house would very much be damaged,

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>possibly burned down as a result. So he thought, well,

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could draw lightning away using long metal rods.

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>But problem was he couldn't build a metal rod tall

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>enough to dwarf the structures. He thought that he was

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to build something that could almost reach the

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>skies themselves, which made it too big of a challenge.

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh So he came up with this idea of using

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a kite instead. Meanwhile, over in France, Thomas Francois d'allebard

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>decided to put Franklin's ideas to the test. He actually

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>constructed a large metal pole to try and conduct electricity

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and declared that Franklin was absolutely right that in fact,

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that metal rod does draw lightning. But this news didn't

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>travel back to America that fast. I mean, it took

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a really long time for information to go from one

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>place to another, so Franklin was unaware that his hypothesis

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>had proven correct. So that same year, Franklin reportedly conducted

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.959
<v Speaker 1>his experiment using a silk kite with a key tied

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to the silk kite down to the string, and as

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>legend goes, he flew the kite up during a thunderstorm

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>until the key drew lightning to it, and then used

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that key to charge a laden jar. So the electric

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>charge and the key was then transferred to a laden jar,

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>which again holds electrostatic charge. Now, I say reportedly because

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Franklin's writings never outright said that that was what happened.

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>He never specifically said that he himself had performed the experiment. Now,

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>he did say that he did a simplified version of

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>this plan and that it happened in Philadelphia, But it's

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>unclear who was actually flying the kite at the time.

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And according to modern scientists, if Franklin had conducted the

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>experiment as it has generally been reported, Franklin would have

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>been toasted. He would have been fried scientifically speaking. So

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the general theory about this not scientific theory, but you know,

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the general idea of what actually happened was that Franklin,

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>if he conducted the experiment at all, was able to

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>pick up an electrostatic charge by flying the kite near

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a storm, but that the kite was never directly struck

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>by lightning. It just rather picked up a charge by

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>being lightning adjacent. I guess you could say, all quibbling aside.

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.719
<v Speaker 1>By this time, it became established that lightning was in

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>fact a really big spark. Therefore, part of this concept

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of electricity. Franklin made practical use out of this knowledge

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>by inventing the lightning rod. Now, the purpose of a

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>lightning rod is to attract a bolt of lightning to

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the rod and then channel the electricity down to the ground.

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh This spares structures from being hit by lightning and

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>thus being damaged. So your lightning rod typically has a

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>metal cable that extends down from the rod and then

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is bury. It has like a conductive steak as well

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that's buried in the ground and that channels the the

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the current from the lightning down into the ground. Or

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>really it just gives the current a different direction to travel, honestly,

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>but if you look at lightning, current goes from the

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>ground up to the sky. It doesn't matter. The point

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>being that he was able to figure out a way

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of sparing houses by using lightning rods. So he also

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>established something about electricity that vexes folks when they're first

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>learning about it. Franklin established electricity is having two natures.

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:21.479
<v Speaker 1>He called it the resinous electricity, which he viewed as

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a dip in the electric fluid from the normal amount

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and thus negative. So this is where the charge is

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>flowing too. This would be akin to that idea of

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum. You have a lack of something a hole,

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and thus something else goes to fill the whole. Then

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>there was what he called vitreous electricity, which was an

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>excess of electric fluid and thus a positive amount. So

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Franklin said, the movement of electricity goes from positive to negative.

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>You have an overabundance of this electric fluid, and it

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>moves to where you have a deficiency of electric fluid.

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>So the this is somewhat confusing if you're looking at

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the scientific description of what's happening with your basic electric circuit,

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>where you're having negatively charged particles, that is, electrons go

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>from an area of high concentration to an area of

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>low concentration. It's the it's going from negative to positive,

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>not positive to negative. But it's because you're looking at

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>two different definitions of what is positive and what is negative.

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>That's where the real confusion lies. Uh So, when we

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about electronics and we talk about electron flow and

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at it purely from a charge perspective, we're

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at negative particles moving towards a positive side. But

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>let's make it even more confusing than that. There are

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>really two major ways to illustrate charge flow in circuits.

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>One of them is called conventional flow notation, which is

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the way electrical engineers tend to describe electrical flow, and

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this follows Franklin's approach. It goes from positive to negative,

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>so electricity flows from the positive terminal to the negative

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 1>terminal because we're talking about the surplus of electrons to

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the deficiency of electrons. We're not talking about the the

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>electric charge, we're talking about the number. There's more electrons

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>over here than they're over there, so that's why this

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be the positive terminal with more electrons and

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the negative terminal has fewer electrons because we're talking about

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 1>surplus and deficiency. But there's also electron flow notation now

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that one looks at the actual charges, not the numbers.

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So in that case, the negative terminal is where the

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 1>electrons are and it flows to the positive terminal. Both

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>illustrations can describe the exact same circuit, but they're going

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to show a difference in what is positive and negative terminals,

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and so it can get really confusing. Uh. Engineers tend

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to use that conventional flow notation. Professional scientists tend to

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>prefer the electron flow notation, and thus we're all left

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 1>scratching our heads. All that being said, an enlightened person

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 1>might argue that Franklin's description is perfectly suitable if we

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 1>look at other examples of electric charge moving across an area,

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Because yes, in wires, we're talking about those negatively charged electrons,

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>but in other substances you might talk about protons or

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>positively charged ions moving due to a difference in charge.

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And because you have these positively charged ions or even

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>sub atomic particles and their movement can also be described

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>as electricity. It it's perfectly valid. It's just not what

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we see with electronic circuits. So there's that. Still a

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks bemoan the fact that Franklin's decision to

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>name things as he did was kind of based on

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a whim and it made things more complicated as we

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>learned more later on. But honestly, there was no way

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:52.760
<v Speaker 1>for him to know at the time. It's not really

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>his fault. It just kind of turned out that way. Anyway,

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 1>back to the timeline, since we won't learn about electrons

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:03.879
<v Speaker 1>or a couple of hundred years after Benjamin Franklin's work

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 1>with lightning, we should just go back to what people

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>were experimenting with and learning about. So a few decades

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 1>after Franklin's experiments, there was a guy named Charles Augustine

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 1>de Colombe who made some significant contributions to our understanding

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 1>of electricity. He published multiple papers on the subjects of

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>electricity and magnetism between seventeen eighty five and seventeen ninety one,

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and he had done a lot of work leading up

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to those publications. Among his discoveries was the relationship between

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>the strength of opposite charges and that distance between them.

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>He developed what we now call Coulomb's law. Now, this

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 1>law states the electrical or magnetic force depends upon the

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 1>strength and nature of the charges of the two objects

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and the distance between those two objects. So, if you

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 1>have two similarly charged objects, like two positives, they repel

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>one another with a non contact force. To opposite charged

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>objects a negative and a positive will attract one another

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 1>with a non contact force. These forces are vector quantities,

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 1>which means they have both a magnitude and a direction,

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and the distance between the two objects affects the amount

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of force. The closer the objects are to one another,

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the greater the force is between them, or in other words,

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that the magnitude of the electrosthetic force of attraction between

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 1>two point charges is directly proportional to the product of

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the magnitudes of charges and inversely proportional to the square

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of the distance between them. That's the technical description of

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Coulomb's law. There's also a constant that you have to

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>use when you're working with equations using Coulomb's law, but

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't need to really dive into that, the point

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 1>being that he realized that distance definitely plays a factor

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>with these other forces that we still didn't fully understand

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>at that point. Then you have Alessandro Volta, from whom

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we get the word volt He was an Italian physicist

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 1>who became interested in the study of electricity. Now we

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:11.720
<v Speaker 1>normally credit Volta with the invention of the electric battery,

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 1>those Baghdad batteries set aside. He began by building on

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the work of another physicist named Johann Carl Vilk, who

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>had invented the electro forests. The electro forest was a

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 1>simple capacitive generator that could build up an electrostatic charge

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for use and experiments. So all these scientists really wanted

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to study electricity. But to do that you had to

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>build up these electrostatic charges so that when you discharge them,

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:39.399
<v Speaker 1>you had something to study. So this was a guy

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>who had developed the electro forests as a way of

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:48.720
<v Speaker 1>making that easier to do. Um Volta's buddy Luigi Galvani

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 1>had observed something really unusual himself. He noted that when

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>he used two different types of metal to make contact

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>with the muscle of a frog, an electric current would

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 1>pass between the two, and so he thought the source

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>of the electricity was from the frog itself, and he

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>called it animal electricity. Volta disagreed, saying that the frog

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>was just a conductor, not the generator, and so he

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>was calling it metallic electricity. And this was a big

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 1>debate in circles at the time. So in Volta began

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to experiment on metals used, often using his own tongue

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>as the laboratory. He would put two different discs of

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 1>metal on his tongue and feel the tingling on his

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 1>tongue and say, yep, there's there's an electric current passing there.

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 1>But he could also use other stuff as well, and

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 1>he was able to observe that in fact, it was

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the metals that were important, not the creature. This also

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>inspired Volta to look into electricity further, which culminated with

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the design of the first real battery as far as

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>modern science is concerned. It was an eighteen hundred that

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Volta invented the voltaic pile, also known as the voltaic column.

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 1>This battery consisted of alternating layers of zinc and silver,

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>or of alternating layers of copper and pewter, with layers

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of paper or cloth soaked in a salt solution in

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 1>between the different metal disks. This arrangement could create a

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:16.760
<v Speaker 1>steady electric current that didn't need recharging like a Leyden

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:20.280
<v Speaker 1>jar did, so this was a great solution for engineers

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and scientists who wanted to be able to work with electricity,

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>but didn't want to have to stop every time they

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:29.399
<v Speaker 1>discharged Leyden jar to build up another electrostatic charge. This

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:32.959
<v Speaker 1>was a a steady source, so it was a huge boon.

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Although he didn't really have any other practical applications for

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:41.800
<v Speaker 1>electricity just yet. But six weeks after Volta published his findings,

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 1>English scientists William Nicholson and Anthony Carlyle experimented with a

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>voltaic pile and electrodes placed in water, and the electric

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:54.279
<v Speaker 1>current that passed through the water caused the water to

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 1>decompose into hydrogen and oxygen, breaking the molecules of water

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 1>apart art. And this is a process that we call electrolysis,

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>specifically with water, but with other things as well, using

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:11.320
<v Speaker 1>electrical electrical charges to break those molecular bonds. By eighteen

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>o two, William Crookshank had designed the first electric battery

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>for mass production, using copper and zinc in a wooden

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>box filled with an electrolyte of brine and sealed to

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>prevent leaking. So a big think of a big wooden

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>battery akin to something like a car battery would be

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>like this today. So Volta died in eighty seven, and

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:37.800
<v Speaker 1>it was an eighty one that the scientific community decided

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>to name the unit of electromotive force the vault, after him,

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 1>so he was. He did not live to see his

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>name used to describe electromotive force, but he certainly was

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:52.919
<v Speaker 1>the inspiration for it, and other inventors and scientists would

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>improve upon Volta's design, including chemist John F. Daniel and

0:41:57.040 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>later a physician from France named Gaston p Ande, who

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>designed the first rechargeable lead acid battery. So Plante's design

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is the basis for modern lead acid batteries today, like

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the kind you would find in internal combustion engine vehicles.

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 1>That has its roots back in the early, well early

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to mid nineteenth century. It's kind of incredible. Later on

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you would see other improvements with battery technology. Might as

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>well stick with that for right now. That would include

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the nickel cadmium battery, which was first designed by Valdemar

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Jongner from Sweden in eight and the nickel iron battery

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 1>designed by Thomas Edison, or at least Thomas Edison's team

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of engineers and scientists. There's always a caveat whenever you

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>say Thomas Edison's invention, because he had a whole lot

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of people working for him who were busy research in

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:54.399
<v Speaker 1>developing all sorts of different technologies, and Edison's name gets

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>attached to a lot of it. Edison himself was a

0:42:56.600 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 1>brilliant guy, uh but he larged. He was brilliant in

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:05.600
<v Speaker 1>bringing people to work on these cool ideas, um sometimes

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:08.920
<v Speaker 1>contributing to him directly. Sometimes he wasn't, but he was

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 1>providing the space for that kind of work to happen anyway.

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>He helped develop the first nickel iron battery in nineteen

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 1>o one. But I've talked a lot about batteries, so

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:24.320
<v Speaker 1>what I'll do in the next section is talk about

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:27.359
<v Speaker 1>other developments in electricity. But before I jump into that,

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 1>let's take another quick break to thank our sponsor. So

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 1>one of Volta's contemporaries was Andre Marie Ampere. We talked

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>about amps and amperage. It comes from Ampaire, so his

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 1>name also serves as a type of scientific unit, basically

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 1>one describing current as opposed to voltage. And Pierre noted

0:43:57.160 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen twenty that a wire carrying an electric cur

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>was sometimes attracted to and other times repelled by other

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:07.360
<v Speaker 1>such wires. So he was starting to notice this magnetic

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>attraction along current carrying wires, and in eighteen thirty one,

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>another fellow, Michael Faraday, explored this idea further, and he

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 1>discovered that if he revolved a copper disc inside a

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:26.279
<v Speaker 1>strong magnetic field, it would generate an electric current inside

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the copper disk. Faraday and a guy named Humphrey Davy

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>would later build an early electric generator using this discovery.

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:37.240
<v Speaker 1>The generator consisted of a coil of copper that would

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 1>be moved past a magnet. And this is the very

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 1>very rough basic idea for electric generators today. Moving a

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:48.920
<v Speaker 1>conductor through a magnetic field induces electricity to flow through

0:44:48.920 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the conductor. That's the simplified version. Now more specifically, the

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 1>greatest current flows through a conductor when the conductor is

0:44:57.520 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 1>moving through the most lines of magnetic flux at it

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the fastest rate. So magnetic flux is a magnetic field

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:11.320
<v Speaker 1>passing through a surface. You've probably seen illustrations of magnetic fields.

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Imagine a bar magnet. It's just a simple rectangle. You

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 1>have a north pole of the bar magnet and a

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 1>south pole of the bar magnet. You would draw lines

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:25.399
<v Speaker 1>extending outward from the north pole. These lines would start

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to loop back down towards the south pole in ever

0:45:29.680 --> 0:45:34.800
<v Speaker 1>increasing but less strong uh magnetic lines that go further

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 1>out until you get a couple that don't even loop

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:39.720
<v Speaker 1>back down to the south pole. They just go outward.

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>So lines extend out from the north pole and go

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:47.839
<v Speaker 1>into the south pole, and you designate this by drawing

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 1>little arrows on the lines to show the direction of this.

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 1>The vector quality of this at the south pole you've

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:00.360
<v Speaker 1>got all those incoming lines, including a couple from apparently

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:04.800
<v Speaker 1>external sources. When you look at the illustrations of magnetic fields,

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:08.240
<v Speaker 1>so if you move a conductor through these magnetic fields,

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it sort of breaks those lines. It moves through those

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:16.120
<v Speaker 1>those lines of magnetic force um and you do it quickly,

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:20.440
<v Speaker 1>current will flow through the conductor. It induces current to flow,

0:46:21.480 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and the most current will flow when the conductor moves

0:46:24.640 --> 0:46:28.319
<v Speaker 1>through the ninety degree perpendicular plane with respect to the

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>magnetic field. So again, if you've got let's imagine that

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the conductor is a a square. We've got a square

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of copper. It's it's not solid copper. It's just a

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 1>copper wire that's been shaped in the form of a square.

0:46:44.440 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 1>It's got two prongs at the base of it that

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:49.719
<v Speaker 1>go down to where there's a crank. So I can

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 1>turn the crank and this will rotate the square. Right now,

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:56.080
<v Speaker 1>let's say to either side of the square, I put

0:46:56.120 --> 0:46:59.800
<v Speaker 1>two very powerful magnets. One of them has the north

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>goal facing into the gap. The other one has its

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>south pole facing into the gap. The squares in the

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:11.360
<v Speaker 1>center in between these two magnets. When I turned the

0:47:11.360 --> 0:47:15.920
<v Speaker 1>square so that it is perpendicular to the magnetic field

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 1>extending out from these magnets. That is the moment when

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it's going to have the most current flowing through the

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 1>square as it as it moves. It has to be

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>moving for this to really work. When you get it

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:33.720
<v Speaker 1>parallel with the magnetic fields, you will have the least

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 1>amount of current. In fact, you have no current at

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 1>all flowing through it at that moment. If you keep

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it turning, then you will be able to generate current

0:47:44.440 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 1>h fairly consistently. It does actually pulse, it's not it's

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:52.920
<v Speaker 1>not steady. If you were to measure it out, you

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 1>would actually see it pulsing. And only does it pulse,

0:47:55.719 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the direction of current will change. Uh, so it's actually

0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:04.880
<v Speaker 1>alternating current. But we'll talk about that again in a

0:48:04.920 --> 0:48:07.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit more a little bit later to really get

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 1>into alternating current. Because in eighteen thirty two there was

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>a French inventor named Pixie p I x I I M.

0:48:16.080 --> 0:48:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Hippolyte Pixie or Hippolyta if you prefer, But he built

0:48:22.360 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 1>an electrical generator based off of Faraday's discoveries that was

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 1>very similar to what I just described. Had these permanent

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>magnets that had a rotating conductor, that would um actually

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>really had a spinning magnet and a steady conductor. But

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>same same principle. Right, you've got a spinning magnet and

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a steady conductor. You could rearrange that as a spinning

0:48:42.400 --> 0:48:46.640
<v Speaker 1>conductor in a steady magnet. Doesn't really matter. He found

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that the current direction changed each time the north pole

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 1>passed over the coil after the south pole had passed

0:48:52.400 --> 0:48:55.840
<v Speaker 1>over the coil. And this was an early alternating current generator,

0:48:55.960 --> 0:48:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but there was no real use for alternating current at

0:48:59.120 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that time, so and Here advised Pixie to design a

0:49:02.520 --> 0:49:06.960
<v Speaker 1>generator with a device known as a commutator. Commutators are

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:11.400
<v Speaker 1>meant to change alternating current to direct current. So the

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:15.080
<v Speaker 1>difference between alternating current and direct current is alternating current

0:49:15.280 --> 0:49:19.600
<v Speaker 1>changes the direction of the current. So you have electrons

0:49:19.640 --> 0:49:23.160
<v Speaker 1>flowing through a circuit in one direction, and then they

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:28.280
<v Speaker 1>will reverse and flow into the other direction with alternating current,

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and they do this many times every second. Then you

0:49:33.719 --> 0:49:37.280
<v Speaker 1>have direct current, where the direction of flow is always

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the same. It goes from if you're doing the conventional

0:49:41.080 --> 0:49:43.880
<v Speaker 1>flow diagram, it goes from the positive terminal to the

0:49:43.920 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 1>negative terminal and it's never gonna change. It's always gonna

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:51.719
<v Speaker 1>follow that batteries give off direct current. Power plants that

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 1>use a C generators give off a C current. And

0:49:54.040 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk more about that in part two. But why

0:49:57.040 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>do generators create alternating current? And how do commutators work? Well,

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:03.239
<v Speaker 1>remember that example I just gave. You've got this square

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:09.320
<v Speaker 1>rotating conductor copper wire. It's in between the two magnets. Uh.

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that you've got your square position between the

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:14.160
<v Speaker 1>south pole of one magnet the north pole of the

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:16.640
<v Speaker 1>other magnet. And at the moment you're holding the square

0:50:16.640 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 1>steady between the two magnets, and you put put a

0:50:20.160 --> 0:50:23.760
<v Speaker 1>piece of blue tape on the side that's facing magnet

0:50:23.920 --> 0:50:26.600
<v Speaker 1>number one, which has the south pole facing into the gap,

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and you put a piece of red tape on the

0:50:29.640 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 1>side facing magnet two, which is the north pole of

0:50:32.760 --> 0:50:35.279
<v Speaker 1>the other magnet. And then you rotate the square so

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:40.239
<v Speaker 1>that it moves down or back with respect to magnet one,

0:50:40.320 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and up or forward with respect to magnet two. So

0:50:44.160 --> 0:50:46.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're staring at this, you see that blue tape

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 1>start to move down. Let's say that we've got this

0:50:50.800 --> 0:50:56.040
<v Speaker 1>horizontally aligned. It appears to move down with respect to

0:50:56.080 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the magnets. The red tape moves up with respect to

0:50:59.000 --> 0:51:01.759
<v Speaker 1>the magnets, and as it does, this induces current to

0:51:01.800 --> 0:51:04.760
<v Speaker 1>flow in one direction in the copper wire. But once

0:51:04.840 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the square hits that parallel position with the magnetic fields

0:51:09.280 --> 0:51:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and then continues its turn, the side that was going

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:15.200
<v Speaker 1>up is now going down through a magnetic field, and

0:51:15.239 --> 0:51:17.319
<v Speaker 1>the side that was going down through a magnetic field

0:51:17.360 --> 0:51:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is now going up through a magnetic field. So the

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:22.879
<v Speaker 1>red tape takes this turn starts moving downward. The red

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:25.120
<v Speaker 1>blue tape is making its turn and moving upward, and

0:51:25.200 --> 0:51:28.320
<v Speaker 1>at that moment, when the conductor breaks that parallel plane,

0:51:29.160 --> 0:51:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the current reverses direction. Turning the conductor quickly will induce

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:36.600
<v Speaker 1>more current to flow and increase the number of cycles

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the current flow reverses per given unit of time. Now,

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:43.600
<v Speaker 1>as I said, this is alternating current, but the early

0:51:43.640 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 1>experiments for the day, they really needed direct current, not

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 1>alternating current, which means you have to find a way

0:51:49.040 --> 0:51:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to make the current flow stable in a single direction,

0:51:52.120 --> 0:51:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's where a commutator comes in. A simple commutator

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 1>is a split ring where the two sides of the

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:02.319
<v Speaker 1>ring are made up of conductive material, but they're insulated

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:06.800
<v Speaker 1>from each other with an insulating material in between them.

0:52:06.880 --> 0:52:11.040
<v Speaker 1>So imagine a ring that has one tiny sliver cut

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:13.840
<v Speaker 1>out of the ring, so it's like two halves of

0:52:13.880 --> 0:52:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a ring, and then you have an insulator in between

0:52:16.880 --> 0:52:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the two halves. On either side of this uh split ring,

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you have elements that we call brushes. These are just

0:52:26.360 --> 0:52:31.439
<v Speaker 1>conductive materials that are stationary contacts. They make contact with

0:52:31.520 --> 0:52:36.400
<v Speaker 1>this rotating split ring. So as the conductor turns, so

0:52:36.520 --> 0:52:38.840
<v Speaker 1>does the split ring. And while the direction of current

0:52:38.960 --> 0:52:42.080
<v Speaker 1>changes within the conductor, the nature of the split ring

0:52:42.160 --> 0:52:45.600
<v Speaker 1>makes the flow of current and the overall circuit unidirectional.

0:52:46.200 --> 0:52:48.879
<v Speaker 1>Now I realized this is really difficult to visualize without help,

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:51.880
<v Speaker 1>so I actually recommend that you go look up videos

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:55.600
<v Speaker 1>about d C generators to get a better idea of

0:52:55.640 --> 0:52:59.040
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking about. Because a DC generator, and it's

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:02.680
<v Speaker 1>most basic level, is really an a C generator with

0:53:02.719 --> 0:53:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a commutator attached to it. The important thing note is

0:53:06.480 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that the basic generator makes al dre and current and

0:53:09.719 --> 0:53:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the commutator makes it into direct current. Now, at this stage,

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:17.799
<v Speaker 1>electricity was still something scientists and engineers would experiment with

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:21.200
<v Speaker 1>they still didn't have any real practical uses for electricity

0:53:21.320 --> 0:53:23.399
<v Speaker 1>right now, not on a massive scale at any rate.

0:53:24.160 --> 0:53:27.280
<v Speaker 1>But over the course of the nineteenth century, it became

0:53:27.320 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 1>clear that electricity had the potential. It's another electricity pun

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:34.800
<v Speaker 1>for you to change the world. So in our next episode,

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:37.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna look at the discovery of the actual electron,

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:40.959
<v Speaker 1>which happened at the very tail end of the nineteenth century.

0:53:41.040 --> 0:53:44.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about the atomic physics involved in electricity. We'll

0:53:44.239 --> 0:53:47.399
<v Speaker 1>also talk about d C versus a C as far

0:53:47.440 --> 0:53:51.240
<v Speaker 1>as the current wars were concerned, and Edison versus Tesla

0:53:51.560 --> 0:53:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and why Edison versus Tesla is really an oversimplification of

0:53:55.560 --> 0:53:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that actual battle. And we'll talk about the rise of

0:53:59.080 --> 0:54:01.440
<v Speaker 1>power grids and the various methods that we use to

0:54:01.640 --> 0:54:06.160
<v Speaker 1>actually generate electricity, from coal plants to nuclear reactors. In

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, if you guys have any suggestions for future

0:54:08.680 --> 0:54:11.120
<v Speaker 1>episodes of tech Stuff, I recommend you get in touch

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:15.319
<v Speaker 1>with me. My email address is text stuff at how

0:54:15.400 --> 0:54:17.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff Works dot com, or you can drop me a

0:54:17.880 --> 0:54:21.120
<v Speaker 1>line on Twitter or Facebook. The handle for the show

0:54:21.120 --> 0:54:24.040
<v Speaker 1>at both of those is text Stuff H s W.

0:54:24.920 --> 0:54:27.879
<v Speaker 1>As always, I'm happy to hear any suggestions you might have,

0:54:27.920 --> 0:54:30.200
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a topic for a show or a guest

0:54:30.239 --> 0:54:32.279
<v Speaker 1>I should have on the show, Get in touch with

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:34.800
<v Speaker 1>me and let me know. Also, remember you can watch

0:54:34.840 --> 0:54:38.960
<v Speaker 1>me record these things live on Twitch. Just go to

0:54:39.040 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 1>twitch dot tv slash tech stuff to see the schedule.

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:44.560
<v Speaker 1>And I hope I will see you guys in there

0:54:44.600 --> 0:54:46.640
<v Speaker 1>because it's a fun time and you get to talk

0:54:46.680 --> 0:54:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to me a lot while I record these things. And meanwhile,

0:54:51.000 --> 0:54:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you guys again really soon. For more

0:54:59.719 --> 0:55:02.040
<v Speaker 1>on us and thousands of other topics is at how

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:12.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com.