WEBVTT - Jon Morosi, MLB Negotiating Table

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Boom. If you thought four hours a day, minutes a

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>week was enough, I think again. He's the last remnants

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of the old republic, a sole fashion of fairness. He

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>treats crackheads in the ghetto cutter the same as the

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>rich pill poppers in the penthouse the clearing House of

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>hot takes break free for something special. The Fifth Hour

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>with Ben Maller starts right now in the air everywhere,

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and a very very happy Friday to you. Do we

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>have baseball ow hell now, but we do have the

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Fifth Hour with Ben Maller and Danny g back for

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>another weekend here. And we're always debating the the balance,

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>But who do we have on on Friday? We like

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to bring somebody in and chat. And so this week,

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>considering the big story that we've talked a lot about

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>on the Overnight Show has been the labor dispute in

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball. Who better to comment on that. That's

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>someone that has covered baseball for years, that is a

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine. I've known this guy for many, many

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>years from MLB Network and he's all over this here

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.199
<v Speaker 1>on Fox Sports Radio all the time. You have seeing

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>him over the years as a reporter on baseball coverage

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>on Fox Sports and FS one, and he's multidimensional. He

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>covers hockey as well for the NHL Network. John Paul

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Morossi better known It's just John Morrossi, and he joins

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>us now on the Fifth Hour with Ben Maller and

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Danny g to talk all things baseball, labor. What We're

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna try to make this relatable in layman's terms, because listen,

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that bright. So let's just get into it

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>right now, and we welcome to John to the show.

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>And the thing that has annoyed so many, including yours

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>truly who love baseball, John, is the delay in getting

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the talk started. Now. I know they talked a lot recently,

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>but this should have been done months ago. Why do

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you think both sides ended up procrastinating so long to

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>get the negotiation jump started. Well, Ben, it's an excellent question,

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's been asked by people close to the process

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and people who are fans of the game and love

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the game. I think the reality is that both sides

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>perhaps needed the deadline, which effectively was the deadline that

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we saw pass on Monday or Tuesday. We should say,

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>uh to not sacrifice any regular season games that perhaps

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we were not going to see a real negotiation, a

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>real grinding of those last details until that arrived. So

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>I do think if there is any blame on that,

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it's somewhat universal to say that there were aspects of

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this that could have been worked through earlier. But I

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>suppose the facts that deadlines tend to motivate was perhaps

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>evident by the reality that we didn't see a deadline

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>missed on Tuesday, and then a deal happened the next day.

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>This is I think on some level we are all

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>creatures of deadlines and and routines, and in this respect,

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and for better or worse, this is a deadline sort

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>of a game, whether it's a trade deadline or arbitration

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>salary figure deadline. Unfortunately been this was one deadline that

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>was missed, and I think the blame is is shared

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>around the game, and the reality is the fans of

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>those that are are suffering the most right now. All right,

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>So I have a theory, John. I was on the radio,

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I do the Overnight show and whatnot, and we were

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>on the air when all this was was going down,

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and because they went past two in the morning, and

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>my theory is if they had just stayed there until

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the sun came up. They if you believe the reporting,

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>they were close to a deal on Monday and that's

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>why they came back on Tuesday to to finish it.

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>My theory is they would have gotten something done they

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the moment they left. Both sides left. Then then other

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>people entered the conversation and were able to change their mind.

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>People go to bed, they wake up, they have different

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>feelings from the night before. Uh. Do you agree with that?

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you think if they just stayed a few more hours,

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we would have had a deal done Monday At six

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>in the morning, they would have gone out and had

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>eggs and bacon and then played baseball. It's possible, Ben,

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I suppose we'll never know. A couple of points on

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that where I I believe that that your argument is

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>valid in a couple of different ways. Number One, even

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday morning, we heard different different opinions between the

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>union side and the league side as exactly how close

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>they were the night before. Perhaps MLB thought they were

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>close to a deal, the Union seemed to think they

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>were close enough to continue talking. And those are two

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>different related but to different conceptions of what was going on. Uh.

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I also think that to your point, it's a correct

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>point to make that both sides of this are made

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>up of rather diverse constituencies. And on the MLB side,

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>this is not always the will and the best negotiating

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>wisdom of Rob Manford Dan Halum. It is what can

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I put out there that two thirds of the owners

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>will ratify. And on the player side, it's the same

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>thing between large salary earning players and those that are

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>earning closer to the minimum. The analogy I've made is

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to a majority leader or a minority leader of the Senate,

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and when a negotiation is happening on legislation, the individual

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>whims or beliefs of that majority or minority leader might

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>be X. But if that set of values is not

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>going to pass with the three the two thirds majority

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of of your constituency, of your caucus, if you will

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to use this example, it's not gonna work. And so

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 1>I really think Ben that this is a time where

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 1>the beliefs along those uh continuums of players and owners

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>are quite diverse. There are a lot of different interests

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that the Dodgers have or the Yankees have that are

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally and perhaps diametrically in opposition to the Rays or

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the Pirates or the Royals. It's there's a different set

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of circumstances. And what I think has happened right now, Ben,

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is there's been a real difficulty in arriving at what

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that compromised point is. That the final point I'll make

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>on this this particular topic is it is disappointing, vexing, confusing,

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever word you'd like to choose. That the issue that

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>is probably the most significant one right now, which the

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>CBT threshold and what that number is going to be,

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is in it a number and a behavior that is

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>entirely within the purview of the teams. Nothing in this CBA,

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Ben says the cb A threshold, or the CBT threshold

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>rather is two twenty million dollars and everybody's got to

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>spend that amount of money. That's not at all what

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it says. It just says that's the maximum that you

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>could spend before you begin incurring penalties, which is entirely different.

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>And so it really is up to to the discretion

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of each team if you want to spend up to

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that level or not. And the irony is that you

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>consider the World Series two years ago, you had the Dodgers,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the richest teams in the game. We're pushed

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to a sixth game and perhaps could have been a

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>seventh had a decision been different with respect to pitching

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>against the team with one of the lowest payrolls in

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the sport. So, I I don't know. It's really you

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>take a take a step back and consider where the

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>economics of the game are on either side. It is

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to meet a little bit baffling that the number that's

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>holding everybody up is the number that affects half a

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>dozen teams. Really, and even then, is that the discretion

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>ben of those teams. No one is ever forcing a

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>team to spend close to at or above the CBT threshold.

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>And yet it's that number that seems to be the reason,

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the chief reason at least why we don't have spring

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>training open right now. Well, and the other thing to John,

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>just to follow up and piggyback on what you were

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>saying that I used to work in San Diego and

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the Padres always kind of small market team. I remember

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>many fire sales for the Padres back in the day

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>when I was getting started in radio, and they are

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>they're a big swinger now and there you know, to

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>my knowledge, the San Diego market has not changed that

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>they're one of the smaller market teams in baseball. And

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 1>is it true, John, that there's other teams that are

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>upset with the Podres because they went out and spent

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a gazillion dollars on Manny Machado and a couple other guys,

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And so they've got a a hey roll which is

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>near the very top of baseball and a market where

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you compare them to some of these other teams like

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh and whatnot that have have spent no money like

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the Podres are upsetting the Apple card, if you will.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that a legitimate opinion. I'm sure there's a lot

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of truth to that. And Ben, that's also not it's

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>not a novel concept in the game. Remember back to

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the stories of of when the A Rod deal was

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>signed with Texas back in two thousands. Uh and and

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>there was the famous press conference given by Sandy Alderson,

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>who was obviously not not the GM of the Rangers

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>outside the Winter Meetings room where the deal was announced,

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and he was lamb basting the deal about what a

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>terrible deal is was for baseball because uh now it

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>was going to create this inflation effect on all the

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>different wages and oh my gosh, where are we going

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in the sports? So it's that has been a part

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 1>of the game for as long as there has been

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a divergence in team spending. Happens, probably since the dawn

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of free agency. So notable, yes, novel, not at all,

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:12.599
<v Speaker 1>And and I do think it is representative of of

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess what I would say, Ben, is one data

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>point because you might have an agent who says to

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>another team just let's just say the Rockies for example,

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>they're in the same division. Hey, listen, the Padres are

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>spending this amount of money. You had better sign my

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>player and and bring your money more in line with

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>what the Padres have and and the Rockies GM could say,

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we wait a minute, the Padres this past year, we're

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 1>a colossal failure. And teams that were paying significantly less money,

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>like the Rays were a success. Why do I have

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to spend for your player at all? So I think, Benny,

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it it's the system. It's it's interesting because we can

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about the money, and obviously the money is huge

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>part of this at the top line, but at the

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, for the vast majority of teams.

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.719
<v Speaker 1>If you've raft well and develop well and keep your

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>talent and build a good culture, and have a good manager,

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and and and check all these boxes, you're probably going

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a successful, sustainable team, even if you're not

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>spending the most money. It's it's it certainly said. Yes,

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got two teams that spent over the wax Street

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Tax Dodgers pod Race. One was a very good team

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and one wasn't. So there are still multiple pathways to

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 1>getting this this success in baseball that every team is

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is pursuing. And the point men that I would make

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that I think should guide everybody in this conversation. The

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Players Union set out to say at the outset of this,

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>we want younger players to be paid more well. In

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the last proposal, the minimum seller ran up more than

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand dollars and and to the credit of

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the union they should be congratulated for that number. And

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>also the creation of the arbitration bonus pool to pay

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>for the players who have not yet achieved salary arbitration,

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>so that the players who have between two and three

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>years of service, that is new money, found money, if

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you will, thirty million dollars just put into that to

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>incentivize great performances by superior young talent. Then to me,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that seems pretty darn good. Maybe you could argue that

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that numbers should go up more. But because we've never

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>had it before and the Union has put put press

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>for it, and mL we put it in there, it's

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>really hard for us to know what the fair number is.

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>It's never existed. It's like putting something on the market

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, what what is this worth? Well, we've

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>never seen this before, so I don't know. I don't

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>know what it's worth. And I think that's part of

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the issue that they're dealing with right now, is what

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>that number ought to be. That certainly there are still

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>some distances been to be able to bridge. I'm encouraged

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that on on this Thursday, there was a smaller conversation

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 1>reportedly between Dan Ailum and Bruce Meyer, the lead negotiator

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>for MLB, the negotiator for the union, Great Small group Workshop.

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>The ideas talk about a lot of different ideas, and

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I am still opal that there's enough sense here on

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.719
<v Speaker 1>what this agreement could look like that there is no

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>reason for us to lose all of April. And I've

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>heard plenty of conversation about well, the national TV contracts

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>they pick up in May and the owners will make

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that they'll make more, or that they'll be coming out

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>just fine if they don't pay any wages in April

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and then come back and May. That might be true

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>for the balance sheets of April and May of two.

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>But whether it's the owners or the players, then you

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you host a show that talks about all different sports.

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>You understand this frankly better than I do because I

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>work largely in baseball and hockey, so I've got my

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>two sports that I focus on. This is an issue

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>where if if baseball goes away for a while and

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and and fans and people around the country find other

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>things to spend their summer evenings doing, they might not

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>come back. And then what you gained with some pyric

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 1>victory in April or May of evaporates because the overall

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>business is not growing in the fashion that you expected

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>to grow. And so ben as much as there's a

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of points being scored on either side, frankly, both

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>camps have to take a step back listen to what

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the people who are actually paying the tickets have to

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>say for them. For themselves, and realize that if we

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>don't get this game back on the field and improve

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the quality of the product, with the with the pace

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of play, a lot of other issues, if we can't

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>get to a point where we can talk about these things,

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the business is going to shrink. It will become continually

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>less relevant, not irrelevant, but just less relevant, which is

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>which is to me concerning I love the game, the

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>game is my liveli and did it matters a ton

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to me. We have to find a way to get

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it back, end the deal, to talk about the things

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that will actually resonate with the people who buy the tickets,

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and then that will hopefully allow this national pastime to

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>get to a better place. All right, So, John, you

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>know I've known you for a long time. I love

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>baseball as well, and I do talk about everything on

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the Overnight Show. And so I'm at the point now

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the fan issue where I am

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>convinced both the owners and players they both use the

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>fans as ponds, but I don't think they truly either

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>side is really concerned about the fan. I think it's

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>just rhetoric that they toss out and it's a good

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>talking point. People like it, but I'll tell you what's

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen, John, What's gonna happens. People are just they're

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>not gonna worry about baseball. They're gonna do other things.

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>We saw this a couple of years ago when the

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>pandemic started and there was no sports for a hundred days.

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>People just you know, they find Netflix or whatever else

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to watch and then if sports come back. I think

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>this is this is the argument that the owners and

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the players both both will make that if it's July

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's eighty degrees and you want to take your

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>family out to a game, and you know the weather

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>is wonderful and you want entertainment, it's an experience, you're

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it. And so I'm convinced both sides know

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that whenever they get a deal done, assuming there's baseball,

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll be they'll be out there. But in terms of relevance, yeah,

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean pretty much all we do in sports radio

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>these days is obsessed about different free agents in the NFL.

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty much what we do. And it's it's very frustrating,

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, from that perspective, because you know, everyone's

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about the fans, both Tony Clark and uh and

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>also Rob Manford all these other guys that if issue

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>statements is all about the fans, this that you listen.

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's be honest here, John, just like you and I,

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>if we're in the negotiation, you're looking at the players

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>are looking out for the players, the owners are looking

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>out for the owners, and you know the fans are

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>somewhere down the list here. And so I every time

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I hear the fans this the fans lad from owners

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and players, I kind of cringe because being completely transparent,

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case. You you buy that or you

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>don't buy that. Well, I mean been on some levels

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>they have to on a macro basis listen to the

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>fans because they're their customers and whether or not they

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they are truly considering the fans wishes.

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And I believe certainly with MLBS moved to the change

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>pace of play, eliminate the shift, universal d H, some

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>other things that fans want, I do believe they are

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 1>listening to the fans in that respect and want to

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>change and improve the game because all these the rule

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>change has been When you consider where we're at with

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of different sports, rule changes happened quite

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>frequently all the time in fact, for baseball, that there

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 1>is this retstance change the game too much because it

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>is sort of this high bound traditionalist sport. And look around.

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know what again better than I do

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>when you consider the popularity of the NFL, the popularity

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.199
<v Speaker 1>of the NBA. Uh, certainly you look at soccer. Soccer

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is in a very differ in place now that it

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>was when when best when baseball was last on strike.

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>So there is a tremendous competition for the hearts and

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>minds of of people, and certainly young people. And if

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you cannot find a way to develop a passionate following

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>among younger people to watch the game for three hours,

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>three and a half hours, it's a long time. It's

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a long time for it. Don't to sit and watch

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>one thing. And so if we are going to grow

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the game, as we always talk about, so the the

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Zeit guys were talking to hear about growth, mindset, growth,

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>business probably going to grow the business, how are we

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna make families and young people believe that a baseball

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>game traffic, paying for the tickets, paying for the concessions,

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, it is worth our time and money

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>and if your point been, a lot of people in

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>the last two years have reevaluated what that time and

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>money ought to go to, and there's been a lot

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of soul searching for out of of a reason, and

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that that process is very much ongoing, and I would

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>say been the worst thing that you can do. The

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>worst thing that you can do is remove your your

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>conversation piece, your sports, your brand from shows like yours.

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you take baseball off the airwaves, you take

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>baseball out of circulation for a while. Consumer preferences and

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>what kids are into and what all people are into

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>change so quickly. Now, Ben, and we know this that

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>if you take yourself out of circulation for a period

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>of time, there's no guarantee that you're ever going to

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>get back in the rotation of of the family's mindset.

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>In Illinois, in Michigan, in Nebraska, in Texas, in California,

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>wherever it might be, they'll move on. And I think

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>expecting America to have routines like America has always had

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>routines is not really a winning strategy at this point

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in time. You have to stay above and in the

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>head of the curve and and just fate and you

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>cannot do those things if your product is not being

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>played at a given time. So how much money we

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about? I read that the salaries per game that

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>has been canceled. I read a number. It was like

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty million dollars per day if you know all the

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>games are canceled, which we've already seen some in the

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>teams are gonna lose like a hundred thousand per per

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 1>home game in in revenue. Do those numbers sound right?

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that? Does that sound like a ball? That seems

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>low to me? On both sides? Is that is that

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>where we are? And that is that we've heard there's

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>differing estimates, I think based on market size, based on team, uh,

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:42.199
<v Speaker 1>depending on circumstances. Again, obviously, the the national TV revenues

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 1>for baseball, and that's that's real. Where that that really

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 1>starts to kick in and may there are some make

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>goods that exist for the local regional television piece that

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>only really start to become a factor if you have

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>missed twenty games or more. So those things are admittedly

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit on the line, but it's not forever. And oh,

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, April fifteen is Jackie Robinson Day, anniversary

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of his debut, and that to me is as sacred

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of an occasion as we have, certainly in baseball, definitely

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>in sports, and arguably in our country when you think

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>about what that day means, uh, in American history. And

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>so that is to me one of the most hall

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>old days that we have to observe in our in

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>our corner of the sports universe. And and darned if

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 1>we cannot find a way to get major league games

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>played on the seventy anniversary of Jackie Robinson's debut, and

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>shame on all of us. Really, I mean, there's there's

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>no there is no credible excuse for that for anybody.

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's it's unforgivable from what I said. If

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that's if that's the outcome, so uh, And if that's

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be the outcome. To avoid that, we've got

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to get a deal about the next ten days, which,

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>by the way, they can do the number I'll repeat

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the number that is the most significant pediment here is

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the competitive Palace Tax special, which is an entirely discretionary

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>amount of spending on a per team basis. If you say,

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>as a team, I don't really want it to be

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>two thirty eight I wanted to be too twenty. Okay,

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>then don't spend more than two twenty. You have that

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>right as a team. And and we have seen many,

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>many times that teams that spend more money don't always

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>benefit from those expenditures. And and so I just I am,

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>I am a little bit just dumbfounded, frankly as to

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>why that number is the big issue here when it

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is one that a team like Tampa Bay or Pittsburgh

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>or Kansas City will never even come close to. So

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>what's the difference to them? I just, I just I

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>don't I do not get the reluctance of of of

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the teams, frankly to move that number up a little bit,

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 1>because they that's not the concern of a majority of

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the teams on a functional basis, right look at them.

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>It is not a number that is entirely relevant to

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that many teams. Well, and I don't, like, you know,

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>my head is spinning by all the numbers in these

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>negotiations and all the you know, I'm not a math guy,

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>but the I'm generally against salary caps and salary floors.

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>But that really sounds like the issue that the players,

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>they're big complaint. They want a salary floor in here

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>where every team has to spend X number of dollars.

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>But as we have seen John over the last ten

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 1>years fifteen years in baseball, the owners, uh to their credit,

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>are tremendous robber barons of baseball. They they have figured

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:44.360
<v Speaker 1>out how to bend whatever rules they have. When you're

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about Tampa Bay, which is like a Frankenstein's Lab

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>for baseball with what they've been able to do with

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>finding players off the scrap heep and all that. So

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever rules are in place, they're just gonna go out

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 1>and hire a new crop of IVY League guys to

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>come in or wherever they find the next crop of GMS,

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>and they'll just bend the rules. But it's it's like

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the middle class in baseball just doesn't exist, and is

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>there really any way to get back to that. You

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>either have guys that are making, by baseball standards, not

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money, and then all of a sudden

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>they get two hundred, three hundred million dollar contracts, but

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 1>there's there's no middle ground. It's not like you don't

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>go from zero to a hundred in real life. You

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>normally have to stop somewhere in the middle. And then

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>go all the way up. But in baseball, it's either

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you're at the very bottom or you're at the very top,

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and you're not in the middle. And I, frankly, John,

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:37.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe you're you're smarter than me. I don't know how

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you get that middle class at baseball back. I don't

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>see a path to that. Is there a path to that? Well,

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>A couple of things. I mean, number one, do you

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>look at the NLCS this past year, Braves Dodgers, the

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>team with low pay roll one Houston. They had the

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>richest player, ryland Or was not was not pitching because

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>he's hurt. They weren't able to resign Garritt Cole George

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Or left, and they got to the World Series again.

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's an interesting dichotomy there. And I should

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>point out before I go any further, the players. Briefly

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the notion of a salary floor was on the table,

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>but then it was discarded. So the players are not

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>even asking for that anymore either. So there is no

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>there is no minimum to hit that is that is

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>not part of the conversation right now. It's just the maximum.

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And even then it's it's it's not a hard it's

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>not a salary cap at all. It's not a hard cap.

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>It's something that you can go over if you want to.

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>You just have to pay a tax on it. That's

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that's all that means. So I think the Braves have

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>been a team has been successful while spending somewhere in

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>the middle range. Obviously, the Dodgers, they don't win the

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>World Series without Mookie Betts, and he's someone that their

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>market size allowed them to sign to a multi year

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>deal and keep long term. Now, of course, the Dodgers

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:58.400
<v Speaker 1>they lost Corey Seeger. They can't even spend on everybody,

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, someone are you It's not even always

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in your best interest to spend on the biggest superstar.

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Look at the free agent contracts of for example, Robinson Canoe,

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Albert Pools, who the biggest contracts ever signed. Uh, they

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>have not necessarily aged as well towards the back end

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of those deals. And then, to me, this is a

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a granular point in baseball, but I'll

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>make it because I think it's important. The players ought

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to be thrilled with the reality that there is no

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>longer direct draft pick compensation tied to free agent signings.

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Once upon a time as recently as less for example,

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>last offseason, I would be talking to team executives and say, listen,

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>this player is a good fit for you. Why don't

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you sign him? And the answer would beat John off

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the record. I can't give up the draft pick because

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>the draft is the most efficient way that I can

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>add talent to my organization, and I'm not going to

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>give up that ability to sign a player to a

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 1>multi year deal into his thirties when I'm not entirely

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>sure if he's gonna be worth that money the longer

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>e place. I might be willing to take that risk

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>if I didn't also have to give up a draft pick.

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>That draftick compensation Ben is now gone. That is a

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>huge deal on a level that I wonder if the

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>players fully appreciate how significant that victory is for them

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in this negotiation. I think that part of this Ben

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>has not been talked about nearly enough when you consider

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>how important that's going to be in the free agent market.

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, yeah, I haven't really read much about that.

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:29.239
<v Speaker 1>But let me ask you this, Jane. As far as

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the rule changes, I've talked to a number I want

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the shift here because there's always a

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>pet peep of mind. You talk to some of these

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 1>old time guys that played in the seventies and the

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>eighties back in the day, and they will tell you

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 1>they know how to beat the shift. It's called choking

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>up on the bat and you're hitting the ball the

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>other way. The players are so stubborn that the owners

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>have to put the ban of the shift and they

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 1>have to implement an actual rule because the players are

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>unable to adapt that. That to me is very frustrated

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>when just like basic baseball, just choke up on the bat,

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>hit the ball the other way, get a base it

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 1>They're giving you the entire side of the field. It's

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>very frustrated they have to do that. And the pitch clock, Uh,

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's also the's like certain pictures just take forever. And

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in baseball has always prided itself on not having a clock. This,

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 1>that and the other thing. Uh, those two things. I

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think the base thing, the oversized base thing, is

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 1>that that big a deal. But the banning of the

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>shift seems unnecessary. And and the pitch clock is that

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is that going to go over like a lead balloon? John?

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And first of all, I agree with you on the

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>on the shifting aspect, we shouldn't have to do it,

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but here we are. And I would point out too,

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the thing then that I just shake my

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>head every single year. You look at the way the

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>playoffs playoff, look at the look at the Nationals. Okay,

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>when they won the World Series. Who is the player

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that the Dodgers couldn't get out and that even the

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Astros couldn't get out that year? Howarde Kendrick, one of

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the oldest players in that World Series, someone who didn't

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>really ever have like a forty homer season, but he

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>put the ball in play, had good at baths with short,

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>simple approaches late in the game, and Howie Kendricks was

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the reason why the Nationals won the World Series. And

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>every year, every winter bend, there are players on the

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>open market like Howie Kendrick, and they never get the

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>respect they deserve because the skill of putting the ball

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in play, moving runners, having a professional late late inning

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>at bath is totally forgotten about until it comes time

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to decide the championship. And everybody says, you know what,

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>why fill in the blank? How many times do we

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>read the obituary of a particular team in particular series.

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, we struck out too much. We couldn't

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>catch up to their Their relief pitchers were throwing up

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine and we just couldn't catch up. We struck

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>out too much. But yeah, jeez, you could have signed

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Howie Kendrick ten months ago for a song and you

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't do it. What were you doing back then? It's

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>not like Howie Kendrick won the World Series. In the

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>World Series was was in like a black and white

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>movie reel from that was like two years ago. And

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I think teams just don't they don't watch. They just

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>don't watch the games. You know, they don't watch. When

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>when the Royals won the World Series seven years ago,

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>putting the ball and play al city Is Escobar, uh,

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>players like him, Eric Cosmer, These guys were not like

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty Homer players and they were winning players. Okay, they won,

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and I just I it baffles me every year react like,

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, I've never seen this before. Yeah, yeah

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you did. It was like in the World Series two

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>years ago, Howie Kendrick, Alfis Escobar, Eric Cosmer, Lorenzo Caine.

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Players like that win you championships, So go sign them.

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And they're not gonna cost you fifty million bucks a year.

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>So I I think I'm with you on the frustration

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of the lack of an adjustment. The pitch clock works

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and part of the reason then why it works is

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have to spend a minute to shift

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody from one side of the field to the other,

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>get the ball and go. Your defense is more active, Uh,

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>throw more strikes. But again when when the whole focus

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is you gotta throw a hundred thirty five hour to

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.239
<v Speaker 1>get scouted now, and and the ball is spraying all

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>over the place because they can't control it because they've

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>been focused on just throwing the ball to the radar

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 1>gun for their whole lives. Yeah, you get problems with command,

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and they don't work as fast, and you don't have

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Mark Burley's anymore unfortunately. So it's just

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's funny to me because a lot of

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>these things were talking about. Now, this is not like

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an analytical genius. I'm not a genius at all.

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I just watched the games and and these are common

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>sense things that that are there for any of us

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that actually take the time to watch. And I just

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>think there's way way too many calculations, and there's too

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>much reliance on the numbers, not enough reliance observing the

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>way the game is played and and making your decisions

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>based on that. I'm hoping that the CB will represent

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>some of these concerns and address them and getting better

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in players like Howie Kendrick respected and paid what they

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>deserve in the market. But there are a lot of

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>issues right now, Ben, I think we've we've touched on

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them over the last half hour, but

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>there are certainly other things that still sort through here

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in the in the days of weeks to come. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>The PR battle is also a big part of this, John,

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I know you a little little time left, So the

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>PR battle is not particularly great. Rob Manford did not

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>have a good day on Tuesday when he was smiling

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and chuckling and all that. The the other part of

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>this is the players and social media. Now. I did

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a rant on my radio show the other night about this.

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I there are many people saying how great this is

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>now because we didn't have Twitter and Instagram back the

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>last time there was that elongated work stoppage. But I

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>say this is actually bad for the players, because there's

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>many more players than owners John, and the chances that

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the players are going to be united on social media

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and some of these guys are gonna start snapping are

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>very low. So I think this will actually turn out

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a net negative for the players. What say you,

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a fair question. I don't know, to

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, where where the um where the

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>public opinion will come down. I think that if if

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 1>anything has been instructive to us in recent years, I

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly just know it just from my own experience reporting

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and and uh having to exist in the social media

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>sphere that typically you you you don't often hear the

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>concordance of agreement from everybody. It's more often than the criticisms.

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>So I would imagine that most people involved in the

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>process are hearing more negative feedback than positive. We all

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>want to see the game on the field. It's not there,

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>so we're frustrated. And if we're gonna say anything to anybody,

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>let's think about it. We're not gonna say, hey, we

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't have baseball right now, good job everyone. No,

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's that's not what anybody is saying right now.

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the feedback universally to everybody is negative.

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>The players themselves are are perhaps a bit more accessible

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>than the owners in terms of their their public profile,

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and I point this out to it and I heard

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Tim Kirkson talk about this recently on them We Net,

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>We're Radio. I think it's a very good point. We

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>don't really hear as much from the owners themselves anymore.

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:22.399
<v Speaker 1>They are not people who are frequently quoted and seeing again,

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe they don't want to say the wrong thing and

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>have it live forever on social media, whatever it might be.

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>But they've been very careful. We don't hear much from

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>them individually, and again that's their choice, but I think

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it it's a little harder maybe for the fan to

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>understand what the owner wants to do, what the plan is,

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>when they only hear from that person a time or

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>two a year. And I do think that that just

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>accountability availability that helps. And perhaps after this is done,

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it will be important for the owners to get out

0:34:57.640 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in front of this, be out in front of their fans,

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 1>um be humble about things. The players have to be

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>humble about it too, I think once this deal is

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>done and focus on how do we grow the game

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>at that point in time, once the games have started.

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that if you pulled fifty thousand fans

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of Dodger Stadium, they're not gonna be talking about who

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>was right, who was wrong, CBT. They don't care. They

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>just want to see the game back on the field,

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and they want to see the people who are on

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the field and managing the games. Front office folks. Owners

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 1>realize that this is a public trust. Realize that this

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is not uh, this is not the most serious thing

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>happening in the world right now, clearly, and so we

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>have to have a certain humility about that and and

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>earn back the trust of the fans through word and deed,

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and have that ethic hopefully carried the day going forward.

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Yeah, that's say that is the great point.

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>We remember when I was a kid, we had bigger

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>than life owners that seem to always be quoted in

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 1>a newspaper. We don't have that. I I I don't

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>some of these owners. I don't even know who they are.

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.720
<v Speaker 1>But we'll get you out of here on this, John,

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>your crystal ball, the John Morosi crystal ball. Is this

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a short term situation or are we gonna be talking

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to you two months from now and there's still no baseball.

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll certainly have baseball, I believe, Ben. By my hope

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is by the early part of May at the latest.

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:20.879
<v Speaker 1>And I really believe that that there is still a chance,

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and I am an optimist in my core, there is

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>still a chance that we have baseball on Jackie Robinson

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Day April. I'm gonna that will be my prayer, by

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>hope in the days I had my friend, and let's uh,

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 1>let's all work together towards that goal. Let's hope that

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the negotiations progress. And so I'm gonna say April fifteenth

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>is the one that I've got circled for for a

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:44.280
<v Speaker 1>positive reason for it to be Jackie Robinson Day with baseball. Awesome.

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, John, Ben, my pleasure, my friend. Keep up

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>all they're gonna work that you do. I always enjoy

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>listening to you, especially when I'm out the West Coast.

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll plate you do a great job of keeping the

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>conversation going all through the night, keeping us going all

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the time, Benny, So I always love catching up