WEBVTT - SPAC Speculation in Hollywood and Beyond From Harry Sloan

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of Strictly Business, the podcast where

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>we talk with some of the brightest minds working in

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>the media business today. I'm Andrew Wallenstein with Variety. The

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>talk of Wall Street in recent years has been the

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>rise of SPACs otherwise known as special purpose acquisition companies

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>as an alternative to the traditional I p O. Well,

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no one better than today's guest to talk SPACs.

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Harry Sloan has launched and completed more of them than

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>anyone else, and one of them, DraftKings, may be the

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 1>most successful one of the hundreds out there, having delivered

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and fifty return on investment. But SPACs are

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a tricky business to say the least, particularly in the

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>media and entertainment industries, where Harry certainly knows a thing

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>or two, having enjoyed a long career in Hollywood, is

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of MGM, so you better believe he's also

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>got some thoughts on that pending Amazon An acquisition. We'll

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>be right back with Harry Sloan. Welcome back to the

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Strictly Business podcast where my guest is Harry Sloan. He's

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>gone on from a successful Hollywood career to a second chapter.

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>As a spack deal specialist both in and outside of

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the media business, I interviewed him on November four at

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the annual Techtainment Conference at Loyola Law School. I want

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you to give your sense of what the spack marketplace

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>is right now as we talk in early November, because

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the data, it looks at while

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>undoubtedly saw an explosion in these deals, that burst was

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>really contained of the first quarter. You could see the

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>numbers have come down, although October seems to be yielding

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>fresh activity. So walk us through what you're seeing with

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the status this back market. Andrew Um, when we did DraftKings,

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we closed it in March of last year, in the

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>middle of COVID March of there were about forties pacts.

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Today there's six Um. I think one thing has a

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:17.679
<v Speaker 1>lot to do with the other. I think success the

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings was the first big, very notice successful spac with

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the name brand, and I think that did trigger it.

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>The six D spacts are looking for deals. Most of

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>them won't find a deal. Many of them won't find

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a deal. If they don't find a deal in two years,

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever amount of money they raised. In the case of

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the Draft kings back, we had four under million. The

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>case of our last spact, which bot King Cobra works

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>one seven billion. It all has to be returned to

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the investors, so the spact sponsor has two years now.

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes the deals are down in the eighteen months a

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>last two years, find it company to acquire file the

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>appropriate UH prison patients and disclosures that the SEC haven't approved.

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Have the deal closed all in two years or money

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>goes back. What do I think it's going to happen?

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>With six hundred spects out there, A lot of them

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>are not going to end well, uh, including the one

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that I think we're just talking about, which is the

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>one acquiring the trump um agreement to launch uh social

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 1>media or whatever they're actually trying to do. Well. We'll

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>get to Trump in a second. UM. What I'm curious though,

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 1>is also it seems like correct me if I'm wrong,

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that there's been some regulatory scrutiny with the SEC starting

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to pay more attention people on the hill paying more attention. UM.

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Has that not had a chilling effect here as we

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the numbers and see that that big spike

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that deals from March seems to have petered out in

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>subsequent months. Well, the reason they petered out has nothing

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to do with the potential regulations. Potential regulations to to

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>kicking in when the Biden administration took over, and also

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>as you alluded to the Senate. But the which you

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>were showing on that chart, which is that there's so

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>many fewer spacts right now being launched, was because there

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>was way too much speculation going on in the spack world,

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and there was in order to have fifty or hundred

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>spacks a month, the hunded I saw in one month,

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to have buyers, you have to have money

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to invest, and the banks were lending incredible amount of

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>money to hedge funds. Hedge funds were investing it in spacts.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>SPACs are all doing well, so they kept wanting to

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>do that. It looked like easy money. But the more

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 1>spacts there were, they more SPACs needed to find a deal.

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And when they actually find a deal, at that point,

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the investors in this back have the option of leaving

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>their money in or taking it out. If they decided

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to leave it in, they actually have to come up

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>with true capital as opposed to bank Yet anyway, there

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>was crazy speculation going on there was other kinds of

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>speculation which came from the market being so overheated. That's

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>why there's less SPACs. Also, you know, if you try

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to go after a company to acquire it and take

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>a public and a spack and you've got ten others

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>back competing, you start seeing out the company way. So

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it was the marketplace that has caused the SPAC speculation

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and the overheated market to slow down. The regulatory side

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>is another issue. And there's a bunch of lawyers here, um,

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>and the congratulations Joe going to grade law school, Um,

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer point of view, the regulation, I think becomes interesting.

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>What's going on the regulatory side is new SEC chairman.

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>New SEC is appointed after Biden's elected, comes in at

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a time when there's a lot of concerns over spacts,

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the speculation I just talked about too much easy money

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>flowing around. If you remember in January and February, there

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of talk in the government about these

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>retail trading brokers, robin Hood and all those stocks like

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>games Stop and a m C that we're trading at

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>crazy molecules. Because there was some exercise and democracy or

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>some excuse for people's and stimulus checks or for whatever reason,

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>craziness around retail trading. Retail investors started buying spects. That

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>was all going on, and the SEC said, wait a minute,

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.559
<v Speaker 1>we need to look at all of that. My view

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>is that the SEC has announced several things that they

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>want to look at with regardless of facts, none of

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>which are the major issues they should be looking at.

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>The SEC has said publicly, be aware of spects that

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>have famous people. You know, there's a spect that the

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Shack has involved in. There's an expect that a Rod

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>has involved in. There's fact that you know, be aware

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of that. Well, and what does that mean? Uh? The

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>SEC has said we want to look at some very

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>complicated warrant accounting. Well, I mean we weren't accounting was

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 1>very technical. All the lawyers and accounts they're looking at

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>her thinking, okay, this is just paperwork. The real concern

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>about SPACs is the trading that goes on in the

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:17.239
<v Speaker 1>SPAC shares itself based on rumors and you know, uninformative

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>announcements of deals that may or may not happen. And

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't have asked for a better example of what

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the SEC and and all the SEC lawyers need to

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>think about, which has been demonstrated by this so called

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump's back. Um, all we've seen is a very general

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>power point. There's almost nothing in there about That's back

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and what Trump's track record is and the other businesses

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and what's really in there. There's a promise that this

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.239
<v Speaker 1>spac is going to be able to launch social media

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>with with Trump. What does that mean? There's there's very

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>there's no detail whatsoever yet that stock has a spack

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>was training a ten dollars traded his eyes a hundred

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and seventy dollars. It's still fifty eight dollars a year,

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>which is six x on where this back was trading

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>when it was announced. Three hundred million shares traded the

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>first day, probably been five hundred million shares traded. Since

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>this announcement or whatever it was, a league, twenty or

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty billion dollars has been invested in this stock at

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between fifty and hundred dollars a share. Now, if

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work out, there's a lot of reasons that

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it might not work out. Not all of them do.

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>The stock goes back to ten and people lose that

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty billion dollars And I'm gonna guess whether it's Trump's

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>supporters or whether it's just kids who are trading on

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>these retail platforms. It's not a group of people who

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>would be in any position to lose that kind of money.

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not Fidelity, Wellington Franklin Fund Capital Group, it's not

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>these trillion dollar mutual funds. It's a lot of individuals,

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>patriotic Americans who think they're doing something good for either

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump for the Republicans. It's going to be a ship

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>show if it falls apart. And that's the kind of

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>thing the SEC should be looking at, not what they've

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 1>announced so far. As far as Congress, we can get

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to that later if you want. Sure, Well, I guess

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>what I'm wondering though, is given this frothy marketplace that

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you're describing, how does that impact your strategy, your approach.

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>You've just completed a seventh deal, but is you know,

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>do you need to sort of sit back and wait

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>till things calm down before you try an eighth or ninth.

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I definitely want to pay attention to the regulatory environment.

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I think all we have now out of the SEC

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>ears two weeks about things they're looking at. There isn't

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>anything they're looking at that would deter me or would

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>defer those of you out there that are thinking about

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>being involved in fact for wanting to do them. Um,

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing going on. I'm other than they're looking into

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it in the Senate. Um, I don't smell that there's

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be regulations that make Trump that sorry, that

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, an audium slip that makes spects, um impossible.

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>So no, I mean, I think we'll be okay. Um,

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't anticipate anything coming out of the

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>regulatory side. I do anticipate a lot more sanity and

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>less speculation amongst back investors, and therefore much less spects.

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Will there be six hundred a year from now? No,

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.719
<v Speaker 1>will it be two? Will be a lot less, it

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>will it'll be way less important than it is now.

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:48.239
<v Speaker 1>So let's go to the Congress side of this equation.

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren has been particularly out front. Um, certainly this

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is I feel like it's just the beginning in terms

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 1>of the kind of scrutiny that's going to come from

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Hill. What do you think, Um, it's too early

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to tell. Um, it's really more in the per view

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of the SEC to make sure that investors understand what

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>they're getting involved in, which is a disclosure, which is

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>like all the various documents, whether it's the S one

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>which is an IPO document, or a SPOT which is

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a merger, both are involved in this back. For those

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of you that are you know, looking at the technical

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>side of this back begins as a regular way I

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 1>p O and S one, and when it makes a

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>deal to acquire company, it files an S four, which

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is a simple merger has to be voted on the shareholders.

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>It's within those documents that the SEC has plenty of

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to make changes. But I don't anticipate changes they're

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna hurt that are gonna hurt legitimate, um honest SPAC sponsors.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>As far as as far as the Congress is concerned,

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason right now to believe that there's any

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>particular legislative action. Also, there's so much going on in

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>other areas, you know, whether it's the build back America

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>or whether it's the the infrastructure bail and means what

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the priorities in the in the Congress right now don't

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>seem to be looking at regulating spects are really much

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>wall street regulation. God, it's interesting looking at your track

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>record in the spack market because so many different kinds

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of companies. You started out with, you know, delivering WiFi,

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>two airlines, the Indian satellite business, media plays. Uh, not

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>surprising coming from you, but then you kind of went

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in some very interesting directions with sports betting, synthetic biology.

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>What is it? You know, what is it in terms

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of what you look for in a company that makes

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it a good spack target. Good question. Yeah, during the

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>spack sterea, and I think maybe it's still the case today.

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>There is a view among many people that companies are

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>better off going public through this back process again by

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>merging into US back as opposed to regular way I

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>p O. You know, I don't feel that way. I

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>think most deals are still better off going regular way.

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 1>I p O. If for no other reason that the

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>spec sponsors we add friction, we take you a nice,

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>healthy piece of the company for doing it, and if

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>we're not adding credible value, it doesn't make sense to

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>do that. Um, there are at least two categories that

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say that make more sense for a spect

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's talk about DraftKings. To start with DraftKings could

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>not go public regular way, and it needed money. DraftKings

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>could not go public regular way because on its own,

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>because its story would have been raised more money. Use

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it for marketing fandueling. DraftKings are being their brains out publicly.

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a view out there that just giving them more

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>money is going to spend on marketing. They needed a

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>different story. The story that made sense for them was

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a transformative acquisition to buy a company called sp Tech,

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>which was their tech supplier, so they would be able

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to save to the market. We're not going to compete

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>on how much money we spend an advertising and marketing,

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>how many commercials you guys all see right now on

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the on the World Series or on football. We're going

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to compete because we're gonna have the best products. We're

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna have the best technology. We're gonna have in game betting,

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>for example, where you know, if if I'm thinking of

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers right now, because the COVID bit of Aaron Rodgers,

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you know has a ball in the two minute drill,

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you can bet right during the game on whether or

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>not he's gonna score a touchdown or a field goal.

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>You can bet on on whether a kick to be successful,

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>so products that would be good that how they were

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>going to compete anyway. In order to do that, they

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>had to acquire sp tech. So what they were doing

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>was two companies were going public at the same time.

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>You can't do that as a regular way. I you know,

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to um, you have to have consolidated financials,

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to share operating history, you have to show

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the synergies. It would have taken your only way to

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>take two companies public at the same time. In this

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>case DraftKings and Specht thro uspact. Now basically this back

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>just buy both companies, So a three way merger two

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>companies who want to get together. That makes sense in respect.

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>The other one is what we did with Gego Synthetic Biology,

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's what we call a category of one company.

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So most companies are not category of one. Most company

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>have several other businesses who compete with them. Whatever the

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>industry is, whether it's automnosetails, whatever it is, there are

0:15:56.640 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>many what you call cops comparables. So if you take

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a company public, you can value it based on its

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>performance against someone else. However, if you have a company,

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and this comes often often of the out of the

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>tech world, which is we call category one. There is

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>no one else doing what they're doing. There's no way

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to value them versus other companies in the market. Right

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>if we were taking variety in public Andrew, we could

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>value it against by Reporter, we could value against other

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>publishing companies, of value against New York Times, Washington Post,

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>all these public companies, Synthetic Biology. The only company of

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>scale out there is get Go Bioworks. So if you

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>take it public regular way, the way a regular way

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>i PO goes is the company goes down in the

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>road show, it meets with investors, it sits down with

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Capital Group of Fidelity or Willington. It's been sporty five

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>minutes going through its business and its valuation, and Thursday

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>at four o'clock everybody has to share their car. Examput

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>comes by DAN. A spact doesn't work that way. The

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 1>process of selling two investors a SPAC merger is much

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>more involved. You go to the investors, there's no time limit,

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no forty five minute meeting. You can have as

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>long a meeting as you want. You can have a

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>follow up meeting, you can have a phone coll and

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>CFO DraftKings perfect example of this. When we took DraftKings

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:28.719
<v Speaker 1>public two years ago, there was there was only sports

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>spending allowed in one state, New Jersey, but the Supreme

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Court had passed it had had invalidated the federal law

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>which had prohibited sports betting and said no state by

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>state can allow sports betting. So each state had to

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>go through some kind of regulatory process. How long would

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that take? California, New York, Florida, Texas, the four biggest

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>states two years later, still don't have sports pidding. We

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>may never have sports meeting in California. Depends on whether

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you think the influ onto the tribes who control betting

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and casinos are going to be able to prevent it.

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Florida it's the seminal of Youse. I mean, you don't know.

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Texas it's the it's the churches who are opposing it.

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>So how does an investor decide two years ago, when

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>only one state had sports betting, what was the value

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 1>of a sports betting? How big is the business going

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to be? We call the TAM total addressable market? How

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>big a share is the draftings? So you needed someone

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in our case to put together projection. Okay, within one

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>year six stays, here's one you think within two years

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of twelve stays. Here's what the business books of the maturity.

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>You can't do that in a regular way i P.

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>You can't make five year projections. You can't make one

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>year projections because you take on liability. So in aspect

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you can provide much more information. You can give long

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>term projections. The investors don't have to believe them. They

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 1>can say, you know what, let's have the CFO come

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in and see us. We think he's full of ship.

0:18:57.880 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to buy the stock. But you're able

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to go through a long process. And so for a

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>company that's a category of one where it's a drafting

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>or whether it's a game coincynthetic biology, or skills the

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>company of skilled gaming, which is which is video games

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>like the sports, but casually sports you can play against

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>other people for money. Those are companies. There's no other

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>company like them. There's no cocks. They make sense to

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>goose as back. We're going to take a quick break,

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but we'll be right back with Harry Sloan. And we're

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 1>back with Harry Sloan, who's talking about spack deals. He's

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>done out of his equal equity partner's outfit. Talking about

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the media business, you know, you are are far from

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>alone in terms of people in the media world being

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 1>active in the spack space. We're seeing all sorts of

0:19:55.240 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>activity from from people like uh uh tadd Bully, Joe

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 1>I and Ello from CBS, gregma Fee from Liberty. What

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think it is about the media and entertainment

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>space that makes it sort of spack friendly? Didn't know

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of Kevin Mayer and Tom Staggs. Yeah,

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they've done I think they've done two SPACs.

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Todd just announced he's doing any vivid seats to think

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the Draft Kings may be invested in. Um. Yeah, Look,

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I think SPACs are covering every aspect every industry. I

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>mean there's a hundred biotech SPACs. A year ago there

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>were no biotech spacts. Uh. SPACs have become the flavor

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of the month for biotech. Um, I think you haven't

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>really become the flavor yet for entertainment. There's been a

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>few deals. It's against my partner, Jeps, against him, my

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>great partner for many years. Um. You know he has

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 1>a background in entertainment. He was he ran CBS he

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>ran Sony Pictures eleven years ago, and he had I

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>launched our first spac. We specifically said we were the

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>first ones actually specifically said that we're targeting companies in

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>the met We're all generalists, they're financial people, but we

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>had both come out of the entertainment Industry's funny that

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>we um. I was in my late fifties, he was

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in maybe his mid fifties. I've been running MGM at

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the time. He had been running something else, and and

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>we had said to investors, we said, look, we'll find

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a company, but we both run public companies. If something

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>goes wrong, uh, you know, we could step in and

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>run the company. And that was a terrible, terrible marketing

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>approach because the companies we then want to acquire be worried,

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, would they with the founders and the and

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the CEOs lose their job because Jeff or I would

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>actually we're trying to do it just to get a

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>job for ourselves. So we got quickly off of that

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and never you know, even talked about it, nor haven't

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>jumped into any companies into the management. But we targeted

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>media entertainment and what we said then this is two

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand eleven, we had said that traditional media entertainment, television, movies,

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>cable telling, Asian satellite, all of that stuff, there was

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>no great growth. The only growth in those days was

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be digital. It was one pot over two point.

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it was. So we sent to

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the investors and we raised that spect. We said what

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of deal you're looking for, and said, well, if

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it's in the US, there's nothing in traditional media that

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you could I p O, meaning that would have this

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of growth. So if we did something in the US,

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>we would do something in what was then called new

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>media digital media. However, if we're going to do traditional media,

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll do it outside the US and some of high

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>growth market that hasn't been you know, over overbuilt already.

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So we go to an emerging territory like an India

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>or in Indonesia, and in those cases you could do

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>satellite or cable, and ironically I've worked out that way.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>The first fact we did was a company called Globally Entertainment,

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>which provided Wi Fi connections for airlines and content. So

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we bought the biggest beny that controlled content supply. The

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>airlines had all the airlines and contract and a company

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that had the technology to provide Wi Fi via satellite.

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So now you take WiFi by granted, you know, granted

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>on airlines and you get all your movies that way.

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>But ten years ago it was a very beginning business.

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>So our first back, as we said, if we do

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>something domestically this was mainly domestic, we would do something

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in new media. You couldn't get any more new media

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eleven. Then then WiFi of the

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>airlines it's still rest very well established. Uh and technically

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to sign on when you're on a flight.

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>And the second spectam we did actually we took a

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>satellite TV company traditional media public but in India an

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>emerging territory, so this traditional media is going to be

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 1>a high growth emerging territory. In the US, it had

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to be new media. So it doesn't it doesn't sound

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>as if you think, say, you know, SPACs could have

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>a uniquele in reshaping a media and entertainment business that

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>that seems to be going through some pretty big changes

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>right now. Um, you know, I think our next back,

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>if we do one, um might look along those lines.

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I do think the cards are going to be reshuffled.

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there's gonna be some orphan companies that come

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>out of these big mergers as they continue to go on.

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>UM you know, an example would be the one of

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the great I p o s of this year was

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Warner Media was what was not word It was that

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Warner Music, which during the time Warner merger was an

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>orphaned asset. They didn't think much of you know, music

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>industry in those days, and lend a lot and they

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>bought it for like three billion dollars and they took

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a public this year for thirty billion dollars. You'd find

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>something like that, an asset that out of one of

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>these mergers that doesn't necessarily belong or you get a

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>company like a T and T Time Warner where they're

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>investing themselves, you know, Soldborner Media, for example, to Discovery.

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>There may be some opportunities. Those are also very very

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>big deals, and you would need a very very big

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 1>spac um and there are there aren't any right now.

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Are The biggest one was the one we had um

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Sore with one point seven billion. It did a fifteen

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar deal. As I may have mentioned earlier, the

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>biggest one out there now is maybe a billion. They

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>could do a five to ten billion our deal. Those

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>big media deals could be bigger than that, so possible.

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Particularly it's our aspect, which could probably raise a big

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>enough fund to be able to do a bigger deal.

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like what you're describing with these potential orphans

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and the opportunities there spacks sort of step into the

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:47.360
<v Speaker 1>mold that private equity has been in previous years. They've

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>they've been sort of the white knights that have rescued

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>some distressed companies. Yeah, TPG came in and picked up

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>direct TV, right, Um, you're absolutely right. SPAC is somewhere

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>between Late States private investment and I p O. So

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>one thing that public investors don't like is these private companies,

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>especially in the tech world. Um, we saw this with

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>with app Lovin, We saw it with Roadblocks recently, the

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>last private round would be done in case the Roadblocks

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is like a four billion valuation by the time they

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 1>did their I p O is forty, So in one year,

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the public investors had to pay forty billion dollars, whereas

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the private investors were investing in four and the public

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>investors are saying, we need to get in sooner. Spac

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>actually is a way to take those companies public sooner.

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>In the case of private equity, You're absolutely right, spack

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is an alternative. So if a company is looking to

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>spin off an asset like Warner the Warner Music in

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>those days, um or Direct to You was spinning off

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>a q T, spinning off direct TV, they look at

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.479
<v Speaker 1>private equity, they look at selling it to TPG, as

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>they did in this case, but they also look it's past.

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm also curious what you think of the fate that

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>has uh the fallen MGM, which of course you used

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to run and now m Amazon could be scooping up.

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever forst see that kind of acquisition When

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>I was running MGM, I didn't see the tech companies,

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>but they weren't in streaming because I I I only

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>read MGM two through two thousand and ten. There was

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a period of time, though, I'm guessing it was about

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>five or six years ago, seven years ago, when the

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 1>tech companies came to Hollywood and they really did kick

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the tires on MGM. They kicked tires on lions Gate,

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>they the tires on Sony Pictures, a lot of the

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, uh, standalone production and library companies.

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple was was in town. Amazon was in town. Google

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>was in town. Microsoft. Remember, they all came through and

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, there were no deals. And I think

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>what's happened is the more of these big platforms for streaming.

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, So now you've got Apple and you've got

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>this plus, you've got Netflix, and you've got Amazon Prime

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>and you've got their amount of Plus and you've got Stars,

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>and you know that there's a there's a shortage of

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>content and if you don't have a historical library like

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Disney had, and even they didn't have enough, that's why

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>they acquired Fox. You do need to look at the

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 1>MGMs and Alliance Gates and the ponies, because there's just

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>not enough. There's not enough library, there's not enough bault,

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>there's not enough deep library to fill the streaming platforms.

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>So no, I didn't anticipate it when I was an MGM,

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>was too early. I didn't see it take place when

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>they kicked the tires five or six years ago and

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>said no thanks. And I do see it being the

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>trend now. I mean, I I mean my opinion that

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the best TV library out there by far is CBS,

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know why Apple doesn't just buy that

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they or or or any or or Google if they

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>decided to go back in streaming business, but they may not,

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>or or Amazon. So I would I would think that,

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I would think Sony, I would think lions Gate all

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>all our good ideas for them to acquire. And I

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>think in two years you'll see one of those deals

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>get done, maybe all of them with a tech cover. Yeah.

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Now if Amazon gets turned down, I mean there's a possibility.

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>The you know what happens with these mergers is those

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of you that I am I trust students. They're either

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>assigned to the f TC, the Federal Trade Commission, or

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the d o J, the Department of Justice. And I

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>think the Amazon acquisition of MGM is it f TC.

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think the FTC chairman did she write her master's,

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>her doctoral thesis on breaking up Amazon. So and maybe

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 1>for that reason it's not there. Maybe I don't know

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>where it is its d o J. But if that

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>isn't allowed to take place, and I think it should,

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>If that isn't allowed to take place, that would put

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a question mark around all this. But again, so nys TPS,

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>lions Gate, MGM, you know, all of them should be

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>consolidated into the big platforms. I don't see the big

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Standalon's so you see consolidation coming. No surprise there. What

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>do you think of the so called streaming wars that

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>were enveloped in right now from Netflix on down? Uh?

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever foresee a time where the business would

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:43.479
<v Speaker 1>be in a position like this and and and how

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's going to play out? Uh? Well,

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>did I ever think that the majority of people in

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the world would be watching all of their content on there,

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>over the internet, whether whatever device, whether it's the computer

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>or whether it's the TV. I've only started thinking that

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>probably when you started thinking that was just the last

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>three or four years, when we realized that, you know,

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>being able to watch shows whenever you wanted them without commercials,

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and all those advantages are just so clear. Um. I

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't think until the incredibly successful launch of Disney Plus

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that everybody would be doing it, or even then, everybody

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>has to do it. Um, So I may have missed

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that one. I wouldn't have anticipated it happening this fast

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and this fast all over the world. Is not just

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that these guys are cutting into the traditional networks ABC, CBS,

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>NBC's audience, even though those players are off streaming. It's

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>happening everywhere every one of the TV network stocks in

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the world, whether it's I t V and UK or

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Telesinko and Spain or anywhere in the world, every every

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>traditional television, satellite, cable, everyone else's stocks just you know,

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>hurt um. So it's happened fast. Everywhere we're streaming has

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>has taken over. You know, As far as what it

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>would look like a what I anticipate what it would

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>look like. I could not have anticipated the amount of

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>new content. I could not have anticipated that we'd have

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a scenario now where Netflix is spending sixteen billion dollars

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>alone every year on content. That's more than all four

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>networks combined, plus HBO and Showtime five years ago. And

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, Disney spending what ten or twelve billion,

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon spending ten billion, and Apple plus. I mean,

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>it never could have anticipated that, you know, spending on

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>production would go from fifteen billion to fifty or sixty

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>billion in the last several years. So you're you're well

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>into this second career now in in spack Land, and

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious how you got here and what you learned

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>in your Hollywood days that sort of led the way

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to where you are now. Well, look, I always like

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>public companies, um my so called Hollywood days. I mean,

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the first company that we created and took to public

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:11.479
<v Speaker 1>was New World Entertainment five before most of these students

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>were born. That was a successful public stock. Uh and

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>we sold it in nine eighty nine to run Proman.

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>The next two sps broadcasting was TV Stations outside the US.

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Took that pub but sold it to KKR and Premier

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>A two thousand five. And then I ran MGM, and

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I was working for private equity. And I can't blame

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it on private equity, but the company was so leveraged

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that when two thousand and eight came around in the

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis, you know, it had to be restructured. It

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>was a failure. Um and I didn't really like working

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>for private equity. UM I did much better and I

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed it much more working at public companies. And uh

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>So after MGM, it's now two thousand and ten. I'm

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think I was still chairman until the

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning of eleven or I forget what it was. But

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:01.719
<v Speaker 1>when I got through with that, I looked back at

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>my career and said, I've had two public companies were

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>extremely successful. I've been in a private equity company that

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was really hard for me to constuate

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:13.439
<v Speaker 1>and wanted if I stayed there, would I have sold

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it for eight billion dollars to Amazon? I don't know,

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's not restructured like one point five so to me, Um,

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wasn't able to do what I would

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>have liked to have done there. So then I hear

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>about SPACs in two thousand and ten. I'm told you

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>could raise money on your good looks or on your

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>on your traffic, on your track record, and uh, and

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>buy a company. And I wanted to run another company

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to be involved in as another company. What

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>were my options? I could dust up my resume and

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>go to boards and you know, try and apply for

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a job. That's not very attractive. Um. I could try

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and buy a company, but the size company that I

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>could afford to buy I didn't meet my appetite of

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the kind of company I wanted to run. After MGM

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and SPS, A new world all that, and then I

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>heard are these facts that you can raise write a

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 1>bunch of cash and use that leverage it up. You

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>could raise two three we raise too edit on our

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>first one by a billion dollar company, and even wouldn't

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>necessarily run up, but could have control over it. And

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>that's what attracted me to it. It was looked at

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>me to be the best options. And I like public markets.

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I like public public markets because if investors don't like

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing, they sell your stock and they go away. UM.

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>In private actor, if they don't like what you're doing,

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>they sell the company right out from under you, or

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>they fire you. I just don't think it's a management

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>friendly UM model. I think it's a fair weather model.

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:45.439
<v Speaker 1>I think when things are going well, um, they're looking

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:48.919
<v Speaker 1>to sell the company. When things aren't looking well, they're

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>firing the management and looking to a dump the company.

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 1>So I just, you know, public just much much more

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>attractive to me to control public companies, where I think

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you get a fairersh jac from relatively docile institutional investors.

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>Got it one year from now. I'm curious if we're

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>talking again, Uh, do you expect to add X number

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of new spack deals to the marketplace or you're you're

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>just tending to the seven you've got going uh, give

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 1>us a preview. UM. As far as planning the seven

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 1>I have going, you know, some of them have been

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>acquired at the moment, there's only that's the ones that

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to DraftKings. I'm I'm vice chairman, lead director Skills,

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm director Income the director. So there's only three that

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 1>I have an ongoing role with. The others have either

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 1>been merged into another company, or they've been sold or

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 1>or something happened different with the company. UM. I think personally,

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I think personally a year from now, I'm too old

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to be, you know, out doing a job as a

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>as a chairman or a CEO. And when we rang

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the bill two weeks ago with Ginko, UM, that was

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the first time in thirty seven years that I was

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>at chairman or CEO of public company. So I think

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be words. UM, I think it's gonna be

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>putting deals together. But I think I've seen my last

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>chairman and CEO. The last back which I was chairman

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and CEO is probably the last one you know that active.

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of Strictly Business. Tune in

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>next week for another helping of scintillating conversation with media

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:42.840
<v Speaker 1>movers and shakers, and please make sure you subscribe to

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the podcast to hear future episodes. Also leave a review

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in Apple Podcasts and let us know how we're doing