WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Game Over

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:09.319
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Let's go. Are you

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>ready for a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah? And so much for that.

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>It is Monday, January fourth, two thousand, twenty one, Season sixteen,

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>episode number ninety one. Welcome to the latest edition of

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>The Break. We're presented by Geico. We are live from

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the s WBC Mortgage studios at the Star and we're

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>talking Cowboys football. Cowboys lose their final game of the

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>season to the New York Giants twenty three to night team,

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a game that they needed in order to keep themselves

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>alive until Sunday night. We're gonna talk about all the

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.119
<v Speaker 1>things that happened in that game and why Dallas ended

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>up losing. Before we do, though, we got to talk

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about why it didn't matter at the

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, because as of last night they

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>would have needed the Philadelphia Eagles to beat the Washington

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>football team. That did not happen, and it did not

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>happen for a bit of a I don't know if

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>it was a strange reason, but it certainly was a

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>reason that I didn't really buy much. And we'll talk

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>about that a little bit. Let's start first, I guess

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>real quick before we get into the Cowboys game, with

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>what happened last night and what Philadelphia did. Obviously, into

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, they had Jalen Hurts starting. There were

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of their players that were out, most of

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>them I assume had legitimate injuries, either coming from the

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>previous game or games before that, but they had Jalen

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Hurts playing. They get into the fourth quarter, it is

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a ball game, it's less than one score, and they

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>decide to pull Hurts. Did you have a problem with that?

0:01:56.120 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Just as an NFL fan and as a Cowboys observer, Nick, Honestly,

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see the first half of the game. I

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>got in about about half time. By the time, I

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't really know all what was going on, but I

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely heard and then I, um, yeah, problem with that,

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean a problem with with how I mean we

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>always say it just in life, you know, we use

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 1>the joke about coaches and you coach your team I'll

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>coach my team, okay, And here it is. I mean

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>here he's coaching his team and he's doing it this way.

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know you're trying to get a better

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>draft pick. That's what it is. And then you know

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you got an assistant coach saying where this is a

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>no hat game, we're not having a hat. Well, that's

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>bs you. You're you're passing it out, you know. So

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, just I think you said it. Just don't

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>don't insolt our intel just here here by saying it's

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>one thing when it's not. I mean, you were trying

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to lose, you wanted a better draft pick. It is

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>what it is. Yea, Nay, I know you got a

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 1>different opinion on this. What's your thoughts? I do, And

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm comfortable in the knowledge that you know, maybe

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm a bad person or a petty sports fan, but uh,

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>hating your right els is just as fun of a

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>part of sports as loving your team, in my opinion.

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not going to go as far as to

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>say I applaud what Philly did, but I don't. I

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>don't have a problem with it. You know, they had

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing to gain by winning that game. And it seemed

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to me that they wanted to make as many of

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>their rivals miserable as possible. So you know, they pissed

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>off the Giants and gave and gave Washington division got

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a better draft pick out of it. Probably not the

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>coolest thing in the world, but I respect the pettiness

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of it all. It's what division rivalries are all about.

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And I promise you I would feel the same way

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>if they had done it to the Cowboys. Sorry, I

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>just it is what it is. And you know, first

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of all, don't put your fate in the hands of

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>another team, and definitely don't put your fate in the

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>hands of a team that hates your guts. And I

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>think the Giants learned that last night. Yeah, that's all true,

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and I agree with a lot of that. What I

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>will say, though, is I think it's I think it's

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>bush league to say something thing different than what you're doing.

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna be petty, say you're gonna be petty,

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>like that's a part of the whole thing, Like you

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>want to do this, and say, hey, we're gonna do this.

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Because the NFC shouldn't be trying to win their championships

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>off of us. Then okay, say that, say I'm not

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you I'm not gonna hand you anything, New

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>York Giants, or if the Cowboys would have won, I'm

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 1>not gonna hand you anything, Dallas Cowboys. I'm okay with

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that if you're willing to say it, but don't didn't

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>come to the press conference and say no, we were

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>really trying to win. We just decided at the end

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of the game that we were gonna pull the guy

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that had scored both the scores that we had and

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna put in a guy who has not played

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>all season to play quarterback and somehow win this game

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>for us. Like that, to me is is where I

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>think it was bush League, And I think if you're

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be petty, be petty and own your pettiness, right,

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would have I would have applauded it

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>if Doug Peterson had gone to the podium and been like, yeah,

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we are you gonna do about it? But you know

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>he didn't. That's yeah, I mean, I don't disagree with

0:04:55.680 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you by just I'm not gonna lose sleep. Well. That's

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>also the interesting thing. I wonder if if if the

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>commissioner would have or still might do something about all

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>this if he thinks that that is not in a

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>good spirit of the game. Yeah. I mean that's how

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>you save yourself from me. You say what you what

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>he said, and he pisses you off and all that,

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 1>But you say that so you don't get fined, because

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>if you come out Mark Cuban and admit that, then

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>he's then he's getting fine. It's embarrassment to the NFL.

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 1>They're the ones that said, hey, we're gonna put this

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>game on there, this will be a good game. Yeah,

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>And then all of a sudden, in the middle of

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, Al Michaels is yelling at his producer

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>like is it Sudfeld or a suit I don't know

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>who is this guy? You know, when Chris Collinsworth went

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in on it too, like they all and that that

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>was a part of kind of the whole thing. I

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>will say this, yeah, And I mean everything y'all saying

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>is valid. It's it's not a good look for the league.

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not really a good look for the Eagles, even

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>though I don't care um, but just the nature of

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the league and the way that this is all designed.

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I just I have a hard time getting too worked

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>up about it because it's so hard to wind up

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>in these situations. Actually, a lot of people have pointed

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>out this happened five years ago. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>were fighting for the number one overall pick the year

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>they draft. They wound up drafting Jamis Winston. They were

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>up twenty to seven on the Saints in a meaningless

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Week seventeen game, and they pulled like they pulled Mike Evans,

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>They pulled like three or four of their best players,

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and they gave up a thirteen point lead in the

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>second half to make sure they could draft number one.

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 1>Nobody remembers that because this almost never has a chance

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>to happen. It's an unfortunate set of circumstances where the

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 1>league didn't have a great game to choose from in

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Week seventeen, which very rarely happens. And I just don't

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>think this is a trend because it's it's hard to

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>tank in the NFL because there's too much parody and

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>single games mean too much. So I think it's a

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 1>one off. I bet we won't have to talk about

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>something like this for another five or six years. Yeah,

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I will say this. I don't. I'm not really worked

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>up about it because at the end of the day,

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't the Cowboys. Cowboys are at already, they were

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.239
<v Speaker 1>already out of it. I will tell you this though,

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>if that game would have been different Cowboys versus Giants,

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I would have been a little bit more

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>worked up by it, because obviously that was what you

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>were looking at, and you saw the Giants players. They

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>were reacting to it on social media because again they

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>saw it as their opportunity, and the Eagles were in

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the game and they just basically decided in the fourth quarter,

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't choose to win this game. And I think

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the part that rolls people wrong. Now, let's jump

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>into the storylines of the Cowboys game. The Cowboys lose

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty three to nineteen and or first you up first

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to tell me what what what's the big storyline that

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you take from this game? Obviously the season's over, But

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>was there a big storyline that you take from this game? Well,

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the season is over, and but this is when the

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>real work starts. I mean, there's a lot of work

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to dude right now, and there should be no days off.

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>No one deserves a vacation, they should get right into work,

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, Actually, let me mean a little bit nice

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>or take a couple of days to let the horrible

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>season really sink in and reflect on yourself and the

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>bad things that you did or didn't do this year.

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>But in reality, there's just so much work. Honestly, since

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the time I started working here, I've never felt like

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>there's so much to be done in an off season

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>as I feel right now. And the problem is that

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>there's not an easy an easy fix. There's not like, oh,

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we're just missing this piece. And I know there's a

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of hope when it comes to Dak Prescott signing

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>him and then getting some of these guys that were

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>hurt in the old line back healthy and all that,

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>but but we have to to keep reality and be aware,

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like there's there's just so much more than just getting

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>some of these guys back into the field healthy. There's

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of things to work on and fix.

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna be, um, yeah, it's gonna be a busy,

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>busy off season, and I hope they're able to hopefully

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you figure it out this year so that we can

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>finally have a actually make a run for it all right, Nick,

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought, you know, the offensive line just got their

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>ass kicked and and it was that's really where the game,

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, was lost. Every time they've tried to do anything,

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>they took a step back in the game, they got sacked.

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the game, they couldn't I mean,

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>they just the line just couldn't block. And that's you know,

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it was just the strength. And that's when we see

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>teams when they when you face a team that that

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is their strength, like Washington. They couldn't even stay on

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the field with Washington. And then the Giants, you know,

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>they not this time around because you know, they didn't

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>have Zach Martin as they did the first meeting. It

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>was just it was ugly and everybody was getting killed.

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And I look at those five guys and I think,

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if any of these five should be

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 1>a starter next year. So that's that's, you know, I

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>don't agree with everything Amber says about how much work

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 1>is to be done. I think this team a lot

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>closer to competing than, you know, than people think, but

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that offensive line is not close and that's got to

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>get fixed, whether it be bringing the guys back and

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 1>then getting better investment on when that things happen, you

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>got to have better resources than what they had, Dave.

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think I think Nick is absolutely right.

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It's it all stems from the offensive line. But because

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of that, it just kind of goes back to a

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>theme from the season of like they didn't have an

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>identity yesterday at all, and they haven't had one for

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>most of the season, and mainly because of the Giants front.

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton didn't have time to throw. When he did

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>have time to throw, he held onto the ball too long.

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>None of your three great receivers had more than fifty

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>yards receiving. Michael Gallup has another bad day after arguably

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>his best day, So the passing game's not working for

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a variety of reasons. Zeke Elliott averaged three yards per carry,

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and like, you know, this wasn't like a situation where

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>they had to throw their way back into the game.

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>They pulled it within four points midway through the third quarter,

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and the running games still really wasn't part of what

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to do, and probably because they couldn't

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>get anywhere doing it. You know, they averaged just over

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>four yards per carry. The I mean, no, just at

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>four yards per carry. The long run of the day

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>was probably Andy's fourth down keeper, which was awesome, but

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that's not a sign that you're winning in the on

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the line of scrimmage. So they, I mean, they just

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't do anything. They're like, they didn't have anything

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>they could lean on. They didn't have anything they felt

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>confident about, and that kind of describes the whole year. Yeah,

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it was. To me, it was a microcosm

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of the season. And I think I agree with you Nick,

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the biggest problem this team had all season. And I

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>heard your radio call this morning, I was thinking the

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>exact same thing. I thought it for several weeks now.

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>It was not the loss of Dak Prescott. It was

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a loss of your two tackles. I think that offensive

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>line has held later. Yeah, it has held this team

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.719
<v Speaker 1>back significantly because they just couldn't do the things that

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>go to Dave's point, that gave them their identity, like

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>what they were expecting to be able to be this

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>year offensively, that all got killed when their offensive line

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>when they started the season with basically with three guys

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that were starters last year not being there for most

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of the season, and then you lost the fourth and

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>so I agree with you. I don't think that. I

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's a single guy on that offensive line

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>by the end of this season that I necessarily think

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is a great option to start next year. I think,

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:31.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, I do think Connor Williams has been a

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit better this year than I expected him to

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>be in a little bit better maybe than he was

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>last year. I still don't know if it's good enough.

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's good enough if you have all those other

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>guys in place. But all that being said, I think

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>this is just a microcosm of what's happened this season.

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>This offensive line has not been good enough, and yesterday

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Dallas could not stop They could not stop the New

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>York Giant defensive front. They were just too good and

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>they were overpowering. All right, we're gonna take our first back.

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>When we come back. We're going to get into some

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of the details of the game, some of the moments

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that mattered in this game and where the game turned

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:01.599
<v Speaker 1>earn I'll do that when we come right back. This

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. There's nothing as unique

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>as our eyes, which is why Selor Pioneers weighs to

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>make lenses as unique as you. Varilux for super sharp vision,

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Essential Blue for protection, and Crisolve for freedom from glare.

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Three cutting at solutions in a single unique lens. So

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever your needs, insist on selor visit your local slor

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 1>experts and find a perfect lens for you. Seemore do

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Moore Slore. Since eighteen sixty five, Stetson hats are American

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>made with pride right here in Texas, and Stetson is

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field with America's team. Want

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.319
<v Speaker 1>to show your Texas and team pride too, You can

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>by purchasing your own Stetson. You can look just like

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>how the flag guys do on field at every home game.

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Stetson hats the official crown of all self respecting Cowboys

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and your favorite football team. Get yours today at shop

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot com or at Stetson dot com. I'm

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Jay Novachek, former tight end for the Dallas Cowboys. Back

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in the day, I was the guy who always got

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the tough yards and that's why I run with John

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Deer today. In fact, I have a John Deer three

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>zero twenty five E tractor that can handle any yard

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>work I need. To do even the tough yards way

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>out back. So if you have one acre or a thousand,

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>John Deer has the equipment that's just right for you.

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Visit a John Deer dealer today and run with us.

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>We are the official tractor provider of your Dallas Cowboys.

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Here it's nineteen o eight. Don't you think we should

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>get electricity and stop using candles to see at night?

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just electricity lights up the room fast. It's more

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>reliable than candles blowing out, and people seem to love

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it nationwide. Well, candles, dare did you just run into

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the wall? I have a new candle please. Historically, switching

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to new technology is a no brainer. Today it's AT

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and T five G, fast, reliable, secure and nationwide. Switch

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to AT and T five G. It's not complicated. Five

0:14:58.120 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>G requires compatible plant may not be in your A.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I see at dot com slash five for you for details.

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Back to the break. Get the ultimate fan experience For

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate Cowboys fan joins Dallas Cowboys dot com Dallas

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys United presented by Global Life starting at just twenty dollars.

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>You can join now on Dallas Cowboys dot com Slash United.

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>That's Dallas Cowboys United. Welcome back to the second segment

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Break Life in the s WBC Morria Studios.

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>At the start, we are presented by Geico. We're talking

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>about the Cowboys loss to the New York Giants to

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>finish the season. They lose twenty three to nineteen. Let's

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>get into some of the moments that matter, some of

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the finer details of this game. Nick, let's start with you.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>What was your moment that mattered in this game? Well,

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying I actually disagree with the call, but

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it definitely mattered in hindsight that you know,

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you get late in the game like that and you're

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>expecting to score a little bit more. It's twenty to nine,

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they score a touchdown, they decide to kick the extra point.

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>At the time, I was fine with it. I'm fine

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>with it now it's twenty to sixteen. You know, you're

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you're rolling, you're feeling, you're feeling better about things and

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>how you're moving the ball, and you expect it, you know,

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to not to try to chase points, and as it

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>turns out, you only got one more field goal and

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's twenty to nineteen. And you know,

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and then it's twenty three nineteen and you had a

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>shot at late in the game, you could have been

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>kicking the field goal had you gone for two. I mean,

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that moment turned out to matter. Again, I

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>don't disagree with the call, but you know, if you

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>would have told me you're only going to score three

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>more points and they're only gonna get three more points,

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, you definitely do it. Yeah, so that that

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>proved to matter. But that's just the style that McCarthy

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to, you know, try to chase the point

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>if if he didn't get it, one of the one

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of the things go ahead. Amber. I was just gonna say,

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>like I don't have a problem with that like during

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the game or whatever. But what I have a problem

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>with is the logic behind it. If you if we

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>go back, I really forgot why game that was earlier

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in the year where we had like why did McCarthy

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>try to go for it? And then he explained he's like, well,

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather know earlier on in the game. So it's like, okay,

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>if that's your your logic behind it all, then then

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>why not continue with that kind of same reasoning and

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>do that now like that that's my problem. It's like, Okay,

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>what what are you really trying to do or like,

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>what's really your strategy behind it? Don't tell me you

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>want to you rather find out earlier on and then

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>in a game like this, you don't go for that.

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>And and I get that every game is different and

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>all that, but at the same time, I guess that's

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>just the part that actually bothers me that we heard

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.239
<v Speaker 1>that logic before and then now we don't get to

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>see it. And then it's like, this is an important game,

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 1>so why and so I don't know, But there's a

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of different If you don't, you don't know. Well,

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that game I think was the Falcons game, and there's

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.719
<v Speaker 1>five minutes to go and in this case there's twenty

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>minutes or twenty five minutes to go in the game,

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>so there's a lot more time. But see the way

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>they were playing, Yeah, I mean the way they were playing.

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't disagree really any like a lot of confidence,

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Well just just know this, like if if you don't

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>get it, you're down by five. Okay, they score a touchdown,

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and that it comes down to your confidence in the defense.

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>If the Giants go and score a touchdown, then you

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>are definitely down by two scores. You're down by two touchdowns.

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 1>You're down by twelve. If you keeping it for and

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you somehow give up a touchdown, it's eleven. You're still

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're still kind of in it. You're still

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. So that's that's kind of why it's like

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>too early to be chasing points. Just kick and see

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>what happens. As it turned out, Yeah that he should

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>have done it, you know, But I don't know if

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>next year he's gonna change his strategy on that. I

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Yeah, they've all asked you, do you think

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>it's It was kind of um interesting that all season.

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I think a consistent storyline has been how aggressive this

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 1>coach has been in this play call, I mean, and

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>all the things that they do special teams when they

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 1>decide to go for it, Like they've been really aggressive thing,

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>way more aggressive than we've been used to seeing. But

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in this game, in this moment, he decides to opt

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>for just taking the extra point. Does that stand out

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to you as something and did you agree with the call?

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it kind of goes back to the whole

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>like not having an identity thing because I would agree

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>with you, like overall they've been aggressive, but I don't

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>know if there's consistency to it. Like I think AG

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>makes a pretty good point that it can swing wildly

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>from one game to the next, where it's like, well,

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the numbers say we needed to go for two,

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>and then the next week it's we don't want to

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>chase points. Like it doesn't seem like there is a

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>just an in like a strict philosophy that guides these

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>decisions and you know that they're going to be consistent

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>from week to week. Me personally, I really didn't have

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a problem with it. I think it's the epitome of

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Monday morning quarterbacking, to be honest with you, because I mean,

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>if you miss, if you miss that try and all

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the Giants get as a field goal, now you're down eight,

0:19:57.720 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and now you're in a situation where probably in the

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.719
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter you're gonna have to score a touchdown and

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>go for two just to tie it because of a

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>decision that you made. Yeah, I don't like the second

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>guess those types of calls unless they're just like egregious.

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>So I will say it's it's weird that Mike McCarthy's

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>not more consistent with his philosophy in my opinion. But

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't hate that decision, you know, very much at all.

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And I agree with what you guys are saying that

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the inconsistency. But that's why I think that analytics can

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>be useful, but you can't lean on it, and there

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>are holes in analytics because because you can't, there's just

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>not a steady rule that this is how we do things.

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>This is not montell Jordan. You can't just say this

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>is how we do it all the time because when

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got situations like this, well, this is how you

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>do it. When you have Tyran Smith and you have

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Zach Martin and you're on the two yard line and

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you feel like you can run it in you have

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Dak and a good runner and all that, but two

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>yards to this offensive line against that team it seems

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>like twenty. So it's different. There's not just a chart

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>for that that has asterix and it says, well, what

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>if your center sucks? Oh yeah, it says here, don't

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>don't go for two if your centers up. I mean,

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying Joe Lunis, I'm just saying in general,

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>So analytics sounds good, but you have to take it

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>case by case, and that's why I think there's inconsistency.

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure, Dave. You might know more about

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>this because you get into the analytics world a little

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>bit more than I do. But I don't even know

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>if the analytics chart said that they should have gone

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>forward in that situation. I just think there are a

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who feel like, hey, you could have

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>drawn within three, and at the end of the game,

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>three might have mattered, right, But Amber's point is right.

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna sit up here and say I need

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>all the time I know to need what you know,

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to know what I need to do, well,

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>then go for together and you know that you need

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown for sure. All right, let's let's go on, Amber,

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's get your moment. That mattered to me. I mean,

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>there were many things that led to this point, but

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it was that Dalton interception towards the end of the

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>game the Giants, they were twenty three nineteen. It was

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a third and goal. I mean it was like a

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>minute and twenty seconds left or something like that in

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the game. And yes, he got he felt the pressure,

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>but if you go back and look at the game

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and that play specifically, there was no need for him

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to just throw that ball towards the end zone just

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>like that, so careless. And it's one of those things

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that you still had another chance where you could have

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>made something happen, just throw it away to the side

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>or just hold on to the ball, but there was

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no need for a quarterback that is a veteran

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>guy that has the experience many many years, that knows

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>the game, that understands and is aware. And yes, he

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>was having a horrible game yesterday, but you just you

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>can't at that point. You cannot be making those kinds

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of decisions and mistake. That was absolutely rookie mentality in

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:55.679
<v Speaker 1>my mind, and it should not have happened, and that

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously led to the Cowboys just completely losing that game

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>when they actually had their final chance, that was their

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 1>final chance to get some points on there, and they

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't because of that decision. Yeah, I think that's a

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>good I think you pointed out something really interesting there, Amber,

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 1>because if you look at it, you immediately want to

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>think Brandon Knight was the problem, which he was. He

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>did he could not block Wood and he couldn't block

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Williams all day. That was a problem for him. But

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you're right, like a veteran quarterback should have known in

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that situation, Hey live to fight another day. Here, get

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>rid of the ball, get the ball out, throw it

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to the sideline, do something. There's an opportunity here to

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>at least get another play rather than just chunk up

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a prayer into the end zone. I know what he

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>was doing. Dalton Schultz was back there. He kind of

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>fluttered it out, So I don't know if if the

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>ball didn't have enough on it and that was you know,

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what happened there, But you're right, that

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 1>was probably just as much as fault as it was

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Brian Knight's fault. Dave, give a share your moment that mattered.

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know this for sure. And you know, I

0:23:57.560 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't get to talk to Andy because I was on

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>the other telephone line with the other players when he talked.

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>But for a veteran quarterback to make a decision like

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that in that situation almost makes me think he thought

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it was fourth down. Honestly, I like it was the

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>end of the game, that was the last play. Yeah,

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't I can't come up with a reason why

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a veteran quarterback would throw that ball otherwise. H And

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that's that whole sequence. To me, it's all about that.

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we can talk about the we can

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about the challenge controversy, the Dante Pattis catch. I'm

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>sure we will. But like for me, it was their

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>best drive of the day. Seventeen plays, four minutes. It's

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>their longest drive of the day in terms of plays

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and time. You know, you got the Andy keeper on

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>fourth down. You do all this great stuff to get

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in position to win the game. One fifty three to play.

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Giants have one time out left, You're on the seven

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>yard line, and like, that just might be the worst

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>three play sequence I've seen in a long time. And

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can lame Terrence Steele and Brandon Knight.

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton gets sacked on first down. Why on earth

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 1>are you empty? Why? Why are you not even why

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>are you not even going to give the impression that

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Zeke might touch the ball on you know, again, it's

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>first down, Giants have one timeout, So like, not only

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>are you in position to score, but you have a

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>chance to force them to burn timeouts and burn clock like,

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>if you do your job very well, you can take

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the lead and give the ball back to the Giants

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>with one minute to play and no timeouts. It's a

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>very good situation of being You go empty, so nobody's

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>even buying that you're going to run the ball with

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>your ninety million dollars running back. You get sacked because

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>your offensive line has been getting its ass whipped all day.

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But quick Brook quick Dave that they didn't even get

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>whipped on that play. They literally just decided we're not

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna touch, Like he just ran right by him and

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>nobody touched. Yeah, yeah, it was a protection breakdown. I

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>get that, and I mean that maybe the play works

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.679
<v Speaker 1>if that doesn't happen, But again, like, why are you empty?

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you even want somebody to think that you

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>might run the ball. And then you know, CD with

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>just probably his worst drop of the season given the circumstances,

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and then we already talked about what happened on third down.

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was just a total meltdown. If they

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>even you know, if they even just charge into the

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>line twice and don't gain yards, you're still burning a

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 1>time out, You're still burning clock. And then you got

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>two plays to make it happen. I'm not saying it

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>would have, but like just a what a colossal failure

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and it cost him the game. Obviously. Let me ask

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you guys this question, And I know this may sound

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>like an overreaction, so feel free to say it is

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 1>an overreaction. But are you at all concerned about moments

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.199
<v Speaker 1>when Ceedee Lamb has had drops this season? Because this

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 1>isn't the first time when he's had opportunities and just

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>couldn't make the catch, couldn't bring it down, and in

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>some instances they weren't tough catches. He just seemed almost

0:26:57.960 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like he just kind of had a lapse in concentration.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Are you all concerned about that? Nick? Um? Yeah, I

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>mean I think you expect things. You expect rookies to make,

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, to have some inconsistent moments, and so he

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>had some. Um, this is not a cold weather team,

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that mean at all. I don't know if they're a

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>warm weather team either. Like they're just not that good.

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean we as we know they're not that good,

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>but they seem to make more plays. The passing game

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>really struggles, and so it goes back to that first

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Washington game. You need to be able to be a tough,

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>grind it out. We're better than you, tougher than you team,

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't matter what the weather's like. You could run

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the football and do all those things Nate that they

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously can't do that, not not in this shape. But

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's a little it's a little concerning.

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>That drop was the I agree with Dave, it's the

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>worst one. You know. I don't call a droptail Mary

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:56.360
<v Speaker 1>really a problem. The Washington game was in the end zone.

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>That was a big play. But but this one, yeah,

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're talking five our line. Maybe, Yeah, I

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>mean he might be able to break a tackle and

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>get in. You expect he's gonna make it interesting. He

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>was definitely gonna make it interesting. He'd be down there

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>close enough to where you could actually maybe decided to

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>run it on second down. Who knows. He's a really,

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>really good wide receiver. He had a really good year,

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>had one of the best years ever as a rookie

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in Cowboys history. He's a good player. Won't for this

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable draft class, you know, we would be talking about

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit higher. The receivers this year were

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>really really good and he's one of them. Yeah, Amber,

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you at all concerned? No, not really, I mean mainly

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>because he has given us a lot of great moments

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and to me, those outweigh these bad drops obviously, things

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that need to be addressed and he needs to work on.

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>But again, just like Nick mentioned, you gotta remember he's

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>still a rookie, and those are things that you know,

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>even though it's seem like he should have caught that,

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it can happen. It can happen to veteran guys as well.

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'd like to believe that he's gonna get a

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>lot better next year and become a lot better, and

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>based on the things we've seen from him, he has

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely has the capability and the ability to get there.

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not really worried right now. Dave seventy four

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>catches for nine hundred and thirty five yards, you know,

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the catch in Minnesota, the touchdown catch many times, has

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>gone over the middle and made great catches while getting blasted. No,

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean he has. He's had some mental lapses. I mean,

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not just completely writing it off. This has

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>happened across four or five games. He's got some improving

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to do. But no, I mean, I'm thrilled about CD's upside,

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's again I've never I still have not met him.

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when I will. But from the side,

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>he strikes me, Yeah, for sure. Well, he strikes me

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>as the type of guy that's going to internalize this

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and use it as fuel to get better in the offseason.

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>He just seems like that type of guy. I agree

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>with that he is. He is that type of guy.

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I've met him a few times. You know, this stuff

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>matters to him. But this talking about him being a rookie,

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>he's not a rookie anymore. After the game, pr staff

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>comes over, He's like, hey, you know, you want to

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>go over and talk to Nick. He's like, nah, I'm good,

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll catch you later. Man, I'm good, I'll catch you

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>later on the season anymore. All that coming in saying

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>yes sir, no, sir, Like that that's gone he's doing

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is a vet. Now. He turned out an interview which

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Delon did the exact same thing. I gotta get you.

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I think many guys necessarily want to talk after that.

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't think give us some did yell the coat?

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, Well, we're gonna get to that. There was

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>one guy I know that did talk and actually we

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>got a quote we want to talk about from him.

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>But before we do that, we're gonna take our final break.

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we got to talk about Mike

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy and the one coaching decision that a lot of

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>people are pointing to as the most important moment of

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that game, and it was a decision he decided not

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to not to actually look at We'll do that talk

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>about that when we come right back. This is Dallas

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Radio. We're back in a tasty treat

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds. It's new Doctor Pepper

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and Cream Soda. Let's take a listen, Doctor Pepper and

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Cream Soda. Is he a new combo? Let's music to

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>my ears? Okay, Doctor Pepper time already music to my

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>ears and mouth. New Doctor Pepper and Cream Soda A

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>delicious doe. There's nothing as unique as our eyes, which

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is why Selor pioneers ways to make lenses as unique

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>as you. Varilux were super sharp vision, Essential Blue for protection,

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and Crisol for freedom from glare. Three cutting xe solutions

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in a single unique lens. So whatever your needs, insist

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>on selor visit your local slor experts and find a

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>perfect lens for you to see more. Do more. Selre

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys Way. We're sixteen Hall of Famers and five

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>championship shows us what success looks like. Where turkey is

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>always the second best part of Thanksgiving Day, where we

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>are all defined by one single thing, the star, where

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>we as fans know it's our job to keep the

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>tradition going. Bank of America is proud to be the

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>official bank of the Dallas Cowboys and to support the

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>quest of living life The Cowboys Way. Copyright twenty twenty

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Corporation. Dear, it's nineteen oh eight. Don't

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you think we should get electricity and stop using candles

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to see it night? It's just electricity lights up the

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>room fast, It's more reliable than candles blowing out, and

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>people seem to love it nationwide. Candles, Dear, did you

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>just run into the wall? I have a new candle. Please. Historically,

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>switching to new technology is a no brainer. Today it's

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>AT and T five G fast, reliable, secure, and nationwide.

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Switch to AT and T five G. It's not complicated.

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Five G requires compatible plant may not be in your area.

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>See att dot com slash five G for you for details.

0:32:54.760 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Break, let's see playoff tickets for so. Sorry,

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>we had a few reads here some what if reads?

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>These aren't it? How about finals didn't work out? Yeah? Yeah,

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>this is this one doesn't apply. Find out why this

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>year's Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders making the Team is the most competitive. Yeah,

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>don't miss the new episode of season fifteen every Tuesday

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>night at nine pm Central on CMT. That is DCC

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>making the team though, that's consistency fifteen years in a row.

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>We go all right, Final segment of The Break live

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>in the SWBC Mortgage studios. At the start, we're presented

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>by Geico. There was one other moment that I wanted

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you guys about yesterday. Late in the game,

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are down one point. It's twenty nineteen in the

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter. New York had driven from their twenty and

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>gotten all the way to the Dallas thirty two. Donovan

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Wilson gets a sack that moves them back to the

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Dallas forty two, so they got him out of field

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>goal range. Then on third and sixteen at the Dallas

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>forty two. They complete a past Pettis for ten yards

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that gets them back to the Dallas thirty to an

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>interfield goal range. There was a question, though, was that

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a catch or was it not a catch? Regardless of

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>how you feel about whether it was a catch, and

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear from you guys on whether you

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>think it was a catch. Do you think it was

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.919
<v Speaker 1>the right decision by Mike McCarthy not to at least

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 1>challenge it and force the referees to take a second look.

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's start first with you Amber, Okay, putting aside the

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 1>NFL's inconsistency in what's defined the catch and all this

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that has been talked about for years. Putting that aside

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>and looking at the play, I guess I'm not as

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:38.800
<v Speaker 1>upset as many people are as far as the decision

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 1>because after watching the result of it, in my eyes,

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it was a catch and to me therefore, I'm not

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:48.439
<v Speaker 1>as upset as to Mike McCarthy not challenging that play

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 1>or not. But if you want to look at it,

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you get what two challenges a game? So why not

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 1>do it? I mean, in a game that's as important

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>if there is a slight slight uncertainty with something like that,

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>just go ahead and do it. Just go ahead. I mean,

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>this is you gotta give it your roll in this game,

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.879
<v Speaker 1>because that's it, that's all you have. So if you're

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at it that way, I would have said, yeah,

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and throw it. And I know, I know

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it's easier said than done because we watch it from

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>afar and when you're down there, I'm sure it's a

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>lot harder for you to really see exactly what happened

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:29.800
<v Speaker 1>or have a better clue. But even before the replay,

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a catch in my eyes, So

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I can see why Mike McCarthy made the decision as

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to not throw the flag and challenge it Dave, having

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>had almost twenty four hours to think about it, I

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:50.280
<v Speaker 1>will I will say they had all three of their timeouts. Yeah, sure,

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>take a look at it if you want to, like,

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not gonna kill Mike McCarthy for it. And

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I pissed everybody off yesterday because it was a catch.

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it was. I don't even I don't see

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>what the furreer is about. Pettis had both of his

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>hands underneath it, part of the ball hit the ground,

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 1>but did not move at all, like it looked firmly secured,

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>and it was ruled a catch on the field, which

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 1>we all know and don't bring up the des thing

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>because they've changed the rules significantly since then. If it's

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 1>ruled to catch on the field, you gotta see crazy

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 1>evidence to the contrary to overturn it. So the odds

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that that would have happened, in my opinion, are very slim.

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>And then the irony is that it didn't work out

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>this way. But this happened with six and a half

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>minutes to play in the game, a game that featured

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>eleven punts, like nobody was sustaining drives in this game

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>at all, So it stands to reason the Cowboys might

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>have had to give the Giants the ball back before

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>they could have an opportunity to win the game in

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>these circumstances, and you want as many timeouts as possible

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>if that's the case. So with all of that in mind,

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't blame Mike McCarthy for not doing it, and

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that upsets some people, and I don't care because I

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 1>think it was a catch. Nick Yeah, I mean I yeah,

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 1>I think he probably should have challenged you know, you're down,

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>he's keeps them out of field goal range. You should challenge.

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>You're you're also down, and you know, six minutes to

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>go too early to be calling time outs. But I

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 1>mean if you call time out, I mean, if you

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>if you burn the challenge and you don't get it,

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and you at least you you know, you're also stopping

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the clock of me. You are down and you're about

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to be down here, you know even more so you

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 1>might you might as well. I mean, I just think

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that you should have. I'm like killing him for it,

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 1>because again I agree, I don't know if it would

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have been over overturned. But it's all hindsight, you know,

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's just like that's what's so tough about coaching.

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they should have gone for two, but

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>now it's like, well I probably should have, and he

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>probably should have challenged it, you know, just based on

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>what you know. But but you know what happens if

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys act actually stopped them. You know, let's say

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that they after the interception, they don't give up a

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>long run, they stop them, they use all three of

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>their timeouts, they get the ball back they do you know,

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>we would come back and go. Man, if you want

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to challenged that and lost the timeout, the game would

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>have been over. So it's it's just the way, you know,

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:18.319
<v Speaker 1>that's what armchair quarterbacks do. Yeah, you know. One of

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:20.839
<v Speaker 1>the interesting things is I think I know for a

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that Aikman and Buck were saying that they thought

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:26.359
<v Speaker 1>it was not a catch. And I want to say,

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know this for fact, Dave and Amber,

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you guys were there with me. Do you recall whether

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 1>they had their their former referee expert come on and

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>did he say the same thing, Because yeah, Pereira came

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>on and said it that he thought it wasn't a catch, right,

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's the reason why I think they should have

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>at least challenged because if you have another person who's

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 1>well aware of the rules, understands what referees are looking

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:53.359
<v Speaker 1>for when they're making calls, if he has doubt and

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he says, hey, I don't think this is a catch,

0:38:55.680 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 1>then that tells me there's at least a good chance

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that the guy who would be under the hood reviewing

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:03.359
<v Speaker 1>it might come to the same conclusion. And at that

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>point in the game, with everything you got at risk

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>there either giving three points or giving no points. I

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>think it was worth a shot. And that's where I

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's probably a better idea for him, And

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm I think you kind of use your challenges. I

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>think the coach. It's part of the reason why I

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>don't like the challenge system. Challenges in the NFL and

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 1>getting it right have become a part of strategy. It

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be a part of strategy. It should be about

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 1>just getting it right. But if it's going to be strategy,

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think then the coaches have to think about

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it from a strategic standpoint. If you're in a situation

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>where overturning a call can make a huge impact in

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the game, and there's at least a small, even a

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 1>small chance that you can get something out of it,

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that's huge, it's worth the risk, is worth the reward

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in that opinion. In my opinion there and so that's

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.720
<v Speaker 1>where I think in that instance, I think Mike McCarthy

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 1>made the wrong decision. Now, there's a lot of questions

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>about how he came to it. Was he able to

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 1>see it in stadium? Who knows were the people that

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 1>were in the press box who would normally give him

0:39:57.920 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that information, Were they able to see it. What was

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>their assessment, Like, there's a lot of questions that we

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>really don't know, but all things being considered based on

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>what we know right now, I think he made a

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 1>nill informed decision. I think he should have at least

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:13.919
<v Speaker 1>tested it and made them rule that what they called

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 1>on the field was correct. We don't know what was

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>in his ear. And I mean the NFL teams, you know,

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 1>even in the stadium, you don't have to show a

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 1>replay right then. You do when they get in the hood,

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but not right then, and you can take your time

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 1>showing it. Yeah, yeah it was. If it was on

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 1>our arts, our guy, they're not going to see it

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>until they force you to see it. But if it

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>was the other way around, well you'll see it sixteen times,

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you know someone that's what they do that. But but

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't put it on McCarthy. I put it on

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>whoever was in his ear. Yeah, you know. And this

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>is this is so freaking annoying because the NFL they

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.360
<v Speaker 1>need to come out with like a very instructional video

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of where they show every possible catch and say catch,

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 1>no catch, because there's no reason why there should be

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:03.839
<v Speaker 1>such a debate where you have some people right now saying, oh,

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that was in a catch, some people that say that

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it was a catch, when you've got some footage that

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:12.359
<v Speaker 1>clearly shows what happened there. Because we know that there

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>are some places that you can hardly see where the

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 1>ball landed, and there's some confusion there. But when you

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>look at the footage, there's clear, it's very clear as

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to what happened. So my problem is why is there

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:28.759
<v Speaker 1>such a confusion when what you're able to see is

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 1>so clear. Why is there people just debating on whether

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 1>or not it was a catch. Well, that's the thing.

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that to me, go ahead, go ahead,

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>And I was just gonna say, I don't I don't

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 1>know that it was clear. I think it was clear

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>for us to see. I don't know if it was

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>clear and what happened. What I mean by that is

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>like Dave said, he thought he had his hands on

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and when the ball hit the ground, he

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't move at all. When I saw it, I thought

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 1>the ball did move a little bit. I don't think

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>he lost control of it. And so that's the part

0:41:57.360 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>where it becomes great. Even though we all see it,

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>and we all see the exact same thing. I think

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the interpretation of it can be very great to take

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>it out then, and the NFL should take it out.

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:08.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the ball hits the ground, it's it's an

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>incomplete make it. I mean that's unfair because I but

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 1>that would make it real clear. It would make it.

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>If the ball hits the ground, it's an incomplete pass.

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So I'll tell your quarterback to throw it up right

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>or tell your guy that he's got to keep it

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 1>from hitting again. That that would be one way. That's

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 1>how you wind up. That's how you wind up not

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 1>having a das catch it at the goal line. Just

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're okay with that, Yeah, well that's literally, I

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:34.439
<v Speaker 1>mean that's well, I mean that was the wrong call.

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 1>It was. It was the wrong call. I mean, but see,

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and that that issue goes back to a play earlier

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in the game that that I don't even know if

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that was a catch. I mean, I don't even know

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>if it was a drop pass as that much as

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 1>it was it was a fumble. Yeah, because you know,

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 1>we've the dead thing. He caught it, he turned it,

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>he moved it to the left hand, he cupped it,

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 1>he drove, he extended I mean, catching the ball was

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 1>so yesterday day's news for Daz. He was already thinking

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 1>moving on, and that's what was unfortunate. Same with this,

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>the touchdown that the Giants guy had. I mean he

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 1>caught it. He it was diving, he was down. It

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 1>was very similar to the des thing. But they got

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>it right because they got it wrong six years ago.

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys think that that would have I obviously

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Dave and Amber, I think you guys agree that that

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you caught. The right call was made. Nick, did you

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>think that was the right call? Yeah, that was a catch.

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I do. At the time, I didn't even know we

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 1>were even. I didn't I'd tell you this. I didn't

0:43:32.040 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>bother to turn around and I had to go and

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>find a new replay. I didn't even bother to look

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>for that. I was looked like a catch to me

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 1>of the whole time. I was a little surprised afterwards, like,

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>oh did he not? So I don't know if it

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 1>would have been overturned. But you know, if Amari Cooper

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>makes that catch, everybody's like, yeah, he caught that, like

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:52.840
<v Speaker 1>cowboy cowboy. Yeah, they're only mad about this because it

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 1>was a Giants player that caught it, yeah, which is

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 1>how it goes most of the time. Right, you give

0:43:56.840 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 1>if it's your team, you give a little bit more

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>difference if it's not your team, and you're like, ah,

0:44:01.120 --> 0:44:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that ball move, you know, so yeah that happened. So

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:06.359
<v Speaker 1>what happens is is then let's say it's incomplete. They

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 1>pun it to the eight nine yard line. Now you

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 1>just need a field goal, you know, and you have

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:15.239
<v Speaker 1>a kicker that's really kicking the last time. Unless you

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:18.879
<v Speaker 1>would have gone to right winning then I don't forget

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:20.840
<v Speaker 1>John spission next for four two. So I mean, it

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>all kind of shakes out here, um, which at the

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>end of the day is it's kind of the point

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:27.719
<v Speaker 1>of all of this, Like we're making a lot of

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 1>these little small moments, but at the end of the day,

0:44:30.680 --> 0:44:32.880
<v Speaker 1>but you just weren't good enough, Like you just weren't

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 1>good enough to win the game. Okay, this is about

0:44:35.080 --> 0:44:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the time we're supposed to end the show. If the

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys had won the game, this would have been the

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 1>time we would have been starting to talk about the

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>game because you you would have gone all anti Philly

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>for the first twenty minutes and you know, right, just

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to see but the whole thing. Don't forget this. If Philly,

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>if the Cowboys had one, Jalen Hurts wouldn't have probably

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 1>played at all. I mean like I would have been

0:44:56.560 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 1>more okay with or they would have they would have

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:00.400
<v Speaker 1>pulled the plug on this thing way before four. Like

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, dude, I actually would have been okay if

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 1>they win to this game and said, hey, we're gonna

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 1>start Sudfille. We're just gonna sit Jalen. We don't think

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>he's we don't want to play him. We're just gonna

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:12.399
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna give set Field all the reps this week.

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get him ready to play our best effort.

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I would have been more okay with that than playing

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts up until the fourth quarter and you're in

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the game and then saying we're gonna go and start

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 1>put somebody else in, Like that's just that's the part. Yeah,

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:26.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's just not good for the game.

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Has never met herm Edwards every even they don't even

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>know who each other are. Yesterday was such an insane

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 1>range of emotions because when you wake up, you're like,

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, cowboys gotta win, gotta root for Washington to lose,

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 1>gotta make the playoffs. Let's go Cowboys lose, that sucks.

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:48.799
<v Speaker 1>I guess we actually want Washington to win because that

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 1>helps our draftstre And then by the end of by

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the end of the night, you're like, oh, thank god

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys lost, because it would be a nightmare if

0:45:57.040 --> 0:46:00.439
<v Speaker 1>we were faced with this situation had any was winning

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:04.279
<v Speaker 1>gotten the Cowboys into the playoffs, Like thank Honestly, I

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I could handle that news cycle. That

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>would have been rough. So I would all I mean

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and an unfortunate day. But I guess it worked out.

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And where where did the Cowboys pick if they if

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:19.480
<v Speaker 1>they would have won, Well, the Giants are picking one

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:24.200
<v Speaker 1>spot behind him, right, so pick eleven eleven? Yeah, Well,

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:28.319
<v Speaker 1>so if if Washington had lost, I think they would

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:31.360
<v Speaker 1>pick ten and the Cowboys would pick eleven. Yeah, and

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the Giants would have jumped up to nineteen. Yeah, got it.

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it was it. I think it all

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>ended as it should, because I know I would have

0:46:39.239 --> 0:46:41.759
<v Speaker 1>broken my TV if if that would happen after the

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys won, I would have had some feelings about that.

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:46.799
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, it worked out and we move on to

0:46:46.840 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the off season and Dave gets to talk to us

0:46:49.080 --> 0:46:51.799
<v Speaker 1>about about the draft for the next four months. All right,

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 1>so we appreciate you guys, Joannus, we'll be back. Actually,

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we're starting our off season schedule, so we're gonna be

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesdays. The Cowboys Break will be on every Wednesday

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 1>at eleven thirty am Central Time, So make sure you

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 1>check us out this Wednesday and every Wednesday after this.

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll check out the website for a full schedule of

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:09.399
<v Speaker 1>all the shows. We'll have a show every day. One

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:11.879
<v Speaker 1>of our podcasts will go every day. Again. The Break

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:14.040
<v Speaker 1>will be on on Wednesdays until then for Nick Eatman,

0:47:14.080 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Dave helm and Amber Garcia, IP Derek Hickleton. This has

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 1>been The Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio.

0:47:21.480 --> 0:47:24.320
<v Speaker 1>All right. This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:27.040
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.