WEBVTT - Inside Pfizer’s Vaccine Distribution

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanavak. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:33.959
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. We talked about New York

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>City receiving its first delivery of the one J and

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>J vaccine. But you are seeing Tim vaccine manufacturers facing

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>a global shortage of raw materials that actually came from

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the head of the world's biggest vaccine maker and also

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the World Health Organization. So you know here we are.

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 1>You're in. Vaccines are rolling out, but now we're trying

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to find the vaccinators and the places to do it. Yes,

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we've learned over the past few months it is very

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>complicated to roll out of vaccine globally, not to mention

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>just develop bit in such a short period of time. G. G.

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Grand Ball is Senior Scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>for Health Security at the Bloomberg School of Public Health.

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Joins us right now on the phone from Baltimore. GG,

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us. UM, what are you watching right now?

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>What is the most important thing when it comes to

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic recovery? To keep an eye on the vaccination rates?

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>For sure? UM? They right now we have in the US,

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>we have three vaccines with the use authorization. Hopefully we'll

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>have more globally. There's a few others. Um. It's it's

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>really just about trying to get as many people vaccinated

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>so that um, we can Um that plus masks and

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>social distancing spread the stop to spread of this virus.

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>We're doing a pretty good job though, right, I mean

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Vaccine Tracker. As of yesterday, we hit just

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>over two million vaccine doses given per day according to

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the seven day rolling average. That's that's a pretty pretty

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>good rollout, right. Oh, it's really so encouraging to see, um.

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And and we definitely it couldn't happen at a better time,

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>because you know, we have as you know these variants

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that are that are emerging that we're keeping, that we're

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>tracking more diligently now UM, and some of them are

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>more transmissible. So we really do need to get people

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated as well as stick with the other stuff UM

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to be able to stop the spread of this virus.

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>So g G, this is what I want to know.

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>You guys, you scientists, You understand kind of viruses, what

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>they can do, how they can mutate, the variants that

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>can come out there, and then you've got on the

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>other side the vaccine that's fighting it. So what is

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of the mix between how quickly we have to

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>get x percentage of our population vaccinated to stay ahead

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of the variants. And I know it's never like black

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and white here and very clear, but tell me kind

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of what you are keeping an eye on here. Well,

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people who UM, you know, all

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of these things and models because there's so many variables

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:04.679
<v Speaker 1>to be able to project how many people need to

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>be vaccinated to be able to keep variants of bay etcetera.

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>And we have the whole population of children that are

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.839
<v Speaker 1>not even right now being planned to get vaccinated UM,

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and so you know it's going to take a while

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>before we get anything towards what we've been you know,

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about her immunity or anything like that. UM. But

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>so I I just UM would like to see the

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>demand UM and supply match up a little better for

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine and UM and so that you know, people

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>pharmacies are more aggressively advertising it and trying to get

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>those people who are hesitant to sign up, and and

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to show that these vaccines are have a good safety

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>record and that they have really amazing efficacy to be

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>able especially to prevent hospitalizations and deaths based on the

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>current rate on the modeling that you're seeing, When is

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that equilibrium going to to be reached? When is demand

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to exceed supply? UM? I I mean, so

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the President UM said that every adult should be able

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to be vaccinated in the US by May. UM. That

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>would be fantastic. I'm also waiting, UM. But then we

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>were going to have kids, UM, and there are trials

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that are starting up. I'm hoping that that will be

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>before the end of the year that kids can start

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 1>being vaccinated UM. Hopefully much neoner than that. UM. And

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>then of course kids have to be vaccinated. Forgive me

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for saying that. But I'm just curious. Do we have

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to have kids vaccinated in order to get hurt immunity?

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>And it is that is that got to be part

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>of the process. Um, I don't I think that that

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>disease could be uh stopped in other ways. I mean,

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we know that we can stop spread of disease with

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, good ventilation, masks, etcetera. Um, and and these

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>things will change over time. But um, but I think

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just pure public health and etcetera. Would be great

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to have kids be vaccinated so that if there are

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>any long term effects of the disease, that we're limiting that.

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Um in children? How do you do clinical trial when

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it comes to a vaccine on a on a child?

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean these are people who are under eighteen and

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>have to get consent from their parents obviously, but how

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>does that work? I mean that sounds very complicated and sticky. Well, Um,

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>kids participate in clinical trials all the time. UM and

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>uh and so yes does involve consent for their parents?

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>And um, there are I mean not just this uh

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>these vaccines, but all kinds of medical treatments. UM. Where

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the balance are sometimes kids uh, you know, especially older

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>kids really enjoy participating in it and UH and giving

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>back and participating in the science. So it's something everyone

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>can do. UM. I have my one of my kids

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in a in a brain study to study the team

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the teen brain for for ten years, and so it's

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of fun and interesting testing. How important is it

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that we continue to do testing for the virus? Yeah,

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.239
<v Speaker 1>it's really important, and strangely, for a lot of different reasons,

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>people are still trying to figure out. Testing has been

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>down recently, so UM we need testing to be able

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to figure out, you know, not only how many people

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>are positive and how how many cases we have, but

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>also UM, an increasing number of those positive cases are

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>getting sequenced so that we can keep a track on

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the variants so and see which, you know, new ones

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>are emerging and which ones are are more present than

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>than we'd like them to be. So UM testing is

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>really important. But for whatever reason, whether it's bad weather

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>or people are sick of this, or resources are devoted

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to vaccines versus testing, it has been down recently. I

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if that's also because people are seeing numbers

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>go down, and maybe it's down also because you know,

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we aren't really around any major holidays like we were

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago. UM g D I I do

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>wonder when it comes to this, just what things look

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>like on the other side. I ran to a friend

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of mine in the lobby of our building yesterday. She

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>lives really close to us, she's a neighbor. It's been

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a year since we've gotten to hang out with with

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>her and her family. And I was saying, hey, we're

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>so close, like you know, just a few months, and

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>she looked at me, gave me this look, and she's like, no,

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be with us forever. UM, where

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>do you fall? Well, I think some things will be

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>will be different forever and and it'll probably take us

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>some time to realize just how much thing have changed

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and what's UM, what's going to stick around? UM? But

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean post vaccine and when cases are low, I

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>think things are going to be a lot better for

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>for most people with UM. I think you know the

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>recommendations for people who are vaccinated to continue to wear masks.

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>It's because community transmission is still so high. So the

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>vaccine doesn't protect you from getting infected, it protects you

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>from the combing to that illness and UM. And so

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>we're still trying to figure out what that means for everyone.

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>But it should really help to reduce bread and when

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>spread goes down, then we all benefit and I think

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll be able to hang out a lot more. But

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>g two Tim's point and Tim's friends point. You know,

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a story on the Bloomberg about you know, where

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>we are and hunting for the coronavirus's origin. We still

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>don't really exactly know where this came from or how

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it came about. At the same time, we have talked

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of folks too the virus, you know,

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>hunters that are out there that said there's another two

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred or I don't know how many that are out

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>there that can be just as problematic. I mean, do

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we need to then, ultimately going forward, live in a

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>world where we're constantly on kind of pins and needles

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.959
<v Speaker 1>and worried about wait a minute, where did you come from?

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you brought something into this country. Well, I hope

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that we are doing we'll do a lot better job

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of figuring out and responding to pathogens as they emerge

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot faster. I mean, the vaccine, it's amazing we

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 1>have I mean vaccine, multiple vaccines in a year. I

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>don't want to say that that isn't amazing, that it's

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>totally amazing, but UM, you know, the science of making

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 1>sure that we, you know, figure out what things are

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>likely to emerge. UM, maybe have a more broad coronavirus

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus vaccine that can protect against multiple types of strains

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that we think are going to emerge. All these things

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>require UM a lot more dedication of resources and thinking

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>about all of these health security issues as really a

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>national security priority. I mean, this is this is devastating

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to the US and UM, and we could have been

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>better prepared. G. We only have like fifteen seconds left

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>because MR and A vaccines are are being used now

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and we were able to develop them so quickly. Does

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>this mean in the future we can respond very very quickly.

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I hope. So, I hope. So. It's so exciting that

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>those vaccines were so quick to develop and that they

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>work so well. I think it's going to be a

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>new age for for that kind of technology and vaccines

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>in general. Yeah. Right. The collaboration too, and the way

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>they were able to move so quickly. G. Thank you

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>so much. UM. G. G. Gronville, Senior scholar at Johns

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins Center for Health Security at Bloomberg School of Public

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Health on the phone from Baltimore, and just a reminder,

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, uh, the school supported by Michael R. Bloomberg,

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>founder of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies. This is Bloomberg

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Stinovic from Bloomberg Radio. Well, the cover story in the

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>magazine this week, we mentioned it earlier. It's about fer

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Fightser uh and really kind of their vaccine capitalism and

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>going inside Fiser's I love this headline fast fraud and

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>lucrative vaccine distribution, and I really feel like they're being

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>given accolades, but they're also getting a bunch of heat.

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>As we said earlier, Yeah, they are. Look, there is

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>no playbook to how a company responds to a pandemic,

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's pretty much. That's that's what one of

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the things that the piece goes into. Joining us right

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>now on the access line is Joel Webber, editor at

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week, and Stephanie Baker, one of the reporters

0:10:55.920 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>on this piece, Financial Investigation, senior writer at Bloomberg News. Joel,

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>why was was this the the perfect story for the

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>cover this week. Well, I think the Fighter um shot

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and vaccine is one of the biggest success stories ever Frankly,

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, to go from a pandemic to a

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>vaccine in a year is is a wonder and we've

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we've written about that. But what we hadn't ever explored

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>UM and with Stephanie and her co author Cynthia drove

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>into in this story is is sort of behind the

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>scenes UM logistics and distribution challenges and and also keep

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in mind here like the Fighter is a publicly traded

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>company that did not take money from the government and

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 1>because of that, they didn't have any strings on on

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>how they went about even pricing that, and that I

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>thought was a really interesting angle, uh and one that

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you know speaks to also just the legacy of what

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we know about the pharmaceutical industry, which pricing has always

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>been an issue with and it was actually the issue

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that Albert Borla, who's the CEO of Fightser, was expecting

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to deal with when he took over the job at

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>FISER a year before the pandemic happened. So so Stephanielle,

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I just want to turn it over to you because

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought so much of the reporting in this was

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>was spot on and really interesting. And tell us, how

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>does FIGHTSER going to go about deciding who gets the vaccine? Well,

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a pretty opaque process still despite all

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>our digging. I think it is a mix of your

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>place in the queue, when did you get your order

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in your order size, production, forecast calls from world leaders. Um.

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, we went into detail about how Israel managed

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to get its hands on so many doses. And as

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, Israel is a world leader in terms of

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>vaccination rates and that is thanks to FISER because they

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>are almost exclusively used in FISER for the vaccination campaign.

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And UH Israel's Prime Minister of Benjamin Netanyah, who spoke

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to UH FISER CEO Albert Bola more than twenty times.

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Um uh. And you know one of the reasons why

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Israel got priority access was well a paid more paid

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>about thirty dollars ago, about more than the US did,

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and be it Um offered to use Israel as a

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>real world case study for how effective the vaccine is

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and that has UM generated a stream of positive headlines

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>about how effective the Fiser vaccine is. Um. You know,

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Israel was vaccinating sixteen to eighteen year olds at a

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>time when Europe was still waiting to vaccinate eight year olds.

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of what we went into is how

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>did that happen? Um? Why was Europe so behind in

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of Fiser's distribution, and and why did Israel pull ahead?

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And really came down to these few things. Uh, the

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>EU European Union of course was late to place their order.

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>That was one factor. But um, you know, Israel obviously

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 1>offered a very unique opportunity for the company to showcase

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>how great their macnine is. Yeah, exactly. There's a line

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>in your story, um, the story that you and your

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>colleagues did, Stephanie, where you talk about Fiser not bound

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to serve a global health agenda. Um, but having said

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that that there will come a day where there will

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>be an autopsy of the pandemic and that one of

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the main questions will be how a single company came

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to hold such power over so many Because Fiser is

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>in that position. Yeah, absolutely, I mean, I think Fiser

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>really stands out because it's the biggest player taking a

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>commercial approach to COVID vaccines. Obviously, there are other players

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>on the market. There's Maderna. They don't really have the

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>capacity to produce at the level that Fiser does. UM.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>There's Astra Zeneca, which does have a huge production capability,

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>but they've promised to sell their vaccine on a not

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>for profit basis for just a few dollars of dose

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic UM. So Fiser's really cut a very

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>commercial approach to this. And you know, when I was

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at vaccine access, who was getting shots, who was

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>behind you know, I realized that Fiser didn't really didn't

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>finalize their deal with Kovacs this who back to facility

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to distribute vaccines to low income countries until January and

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it was only for about forty million doses. That was

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>two percent of visors projected output this year. And just

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to put that into context, Astra did a deal for

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventy million doses. Johnson and Johnson has

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a preliminary deal with Kovacs for five hundred million, So

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that really kind of puts it into perspective that they're

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>pushing this out on a commercial basis, doing bilateral deals

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>with countries. More than sixty countries have signed up and

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we still don't know a lot. You know, there's a

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>lot that we set out to try to find out

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't we didn't get to the bottom of

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to continue to record it out to

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>try to find out exactly how this system worked. So,

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>just on the idea of vaccine capitalism, Stephanie, how does

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Fightser's efforts and money money making abilities and all that

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>compared with with other uh, with the other vaccine efforts

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that are out there and staff we only have about

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds here. Unfortunately, well you know it it is um,

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it is looking at a commercial approach. It is looking

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>at a post pandemic approach as well, where it's updating

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's vaccine so it can tackle these new mutant variants.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's looking at a at a way

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to up the price when and um, we're in a

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>post pandemic world. Um, you know, it will still probably

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>be you know, charging kind of more commercial rates than

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>than Astro Seneca and Johnson and Johnson. So I think

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that's how it stands out. All right, We're gonna leave

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>at that. Listen, this is a must read. There's so much.

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>As Joel mentioned, the reporting on this is just killer.

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie Baker, Financial Investigation Senior writer at Bloomberg News or

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks to her along with Joel Webber, editor Bloomberg business Week,

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it's the cover story. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio.

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>So we've got a little check on tech right now

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 1>because Twitter having a plan to fact check tweets. I

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>think this is something do you guys talked about on

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Quickcake right? Well, you know, I gotta I gotta be honest.

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>We were trying our hardest to get Kurt on the

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>show today and I think he was busy, which is okay, Kurt,

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 1>because we got Kurt now. Yeah, but thank god you

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it. Bloomberg Tech reporter Kurt Wagner joining us on

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:44.479
<v Speaker 1>the phone. We're gonna talk about Twitter. Were also going

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to talk about Square doing a deal in the music industry,

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 1>but let's start with Twitter fact check tweets. Tell us

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>about this and their plan. Is it a good one?

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Because often times when you think of fact can you

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>think of the route that Facebook is taking, which is

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>they're partnering with you know, outside experts, right. But Twitter's

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>idea here, it's called bird watch, and what they want

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to do is turn all of their users into pseudo

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>fact checkers. And so if you're on Twitter and you

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>come across a tweet that you know looks like it

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.959
<v Speaker 1>needs more context or it needs additional information, you can

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>actually submit a note that could be attached to that

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 1>tweet kind of um, you know, fact check it yourself.

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And so they want to turn their entire user base

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>into pseudo fact checkers. Okay, So when I think about this,

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I think of Wikipedia, and you know, this is a

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>place where where that actually works pretty well on Wikipedia,

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't translate to other corners of the Internet.

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't worked well to stop disinformation from spreading on

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the platforms that that you write about so much. What

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>makes Twitter think it will work on Twitter? Well? I

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>think that they would argue that they already see people

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 1>doing this, they just don't do it in this exact format, right.

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how often have you've seen someone reply to

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a tweet and and say, hey, you know this is wrong,

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>or hey you you didn't mention x, or they quote

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>tweet it right and they had their own commentary that way.

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>So Twitter would say, hey, listen, people are already doing

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>a version of this. We just haven't really you know,

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>built it as its own kind of fact checking product,

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and they think that if they do that, they can

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of take all of those inputs that people are

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>already providing, which just make them easier for other people

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to find. So one of the challenging things about this

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 1>about fact checking on Twitter as it as it stands

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>now is oftentimes the tweet with the misinformation gets retweeted

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and so many more times, and it gets so much

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>more engagement than any corrected tweet or any sort of

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>fact check that is a reply. How does Twitter handle

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that well in this instance, So, imagine a hundred people

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>submit a note for a particular tweet, right Twitter would

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>use an algorithm to basically pick the one or two

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>most helpful replies to that, and then they would actually

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>pend those notes to the original tweets. So, in theory,

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>anytime that that tweet is sent around, if it's retweeted,

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>even if it's screenshot, at somehow they want those notes,

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, those replies to exist with the original tweets

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>so that you would see them side by side. It's

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 1>a little bit clunky right now, because again it doesn't

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>exist just yet, but at least in sirie, all of

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the notes and the fact checks would kind of ride

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>along with the original. You know, it's funny when Tim said, uh, Wikipedia,

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>I thought of that too, And I also thought of

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>um ways, like this whole idea of community involvement, like

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're saying when there's a cop ground or

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a traffic accident, or you know, like you don't

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>have to be a part of it, but you do,

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you like you kind of want to help out. Could

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>this possibly set the stage for a model going forward

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>for social in terms of policing itself. I think that

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>would be the hope if this does work. I mean,

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>why not implement this on Facebook right or in Instagram.

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that we're looking right now at a bunch

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of regulators in Washington who want to change the rules

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>around speech online, and we're seeing companies try to come

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>up with creative ways to you know, basically appease them

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>without necessarily changing the rules. And so I think this

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>is one of those examples where Twitter saying, hey, we're

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna we're gonna give this a shot, and in this works,

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is the best way to sack check or police.

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, these big platforms online and and we'll do it,

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and we'll let you know the regulators decide whether or

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>not they want to require other companies to do the same. Hey, Kurt,

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to hit another story that you filed earlier

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>today about the music service title Square buying the company

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>for close to three million dollars in a stock in

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>cash deal. When I tweeted this out this morning, Kurt,

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody replied to me and said, Oh, I had forgotten

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>about Title that even existed. This is this is I

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>think a head scratcher of a deal for a lot

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of people. What is Square going to do with Title?

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh and I'm kind of bearing the lead here. Jay

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Z is joining squares board. Oops. Right, yeah, you may

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>have heard of jay Z before. Yeah, going to be

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>involved now. Um No, I think it is a little

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>bit of a head scratcher on the surface, But all

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of explain how Squares thinking of this, right, which

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>is that they're saying, listen, we have built an entire

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>business around helping entrepreneurs, small businesses, you know, build their business. Well,

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>musicians are entrepreneurs as well, and they're trying to build

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>a business. They're trying to sell merchandise to trying to

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>sell tickets, albums, whatever it may be. And so they

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 1>see this kind of as an extension of what they

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>already do, but into a new industry. Now the question

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is did they need to buy a streaming music service

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to do that? I would say probably not.

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>But when you really think about how much money this is,

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the very small amount of money for a company like Square,

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>and if they can get someone like jay Z on

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>their board and get someone like jay Z involved in

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of this idea of commerce around music, you know,

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>that might be a three d dollars well spent. So

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 1>it's a little early to tell um, but it is

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a head scratcher. But you could see,

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess in fury maybe where they're thinking, you don't

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>sound convinced just quickly. I'm a little on the fence.

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I know that you know, Jack Dorsey

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and jay Z are buddy, and so part of me

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>wonders how much of this is, you know, one friend

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 1>buying another friends company. But again, it's a small amount

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of money for Squares, so maybe it's the that worth

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>taking right right exactly all right, Kurt, thank you so much.

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Kurt Wagner, Technology Porter, Bloomberg News joining us on the

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>phone from San Francisco. But it is interesting to see

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>some of these kind of collaborations for certainly what I

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>would consider the new tech tech companies. Also some cool

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>pictures that Square released earlier today of Jay z and

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>And and Jack Dorsey. I want to be on that board.

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm roam a journal. Yeah, but you let me drive?

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no no, no, honey, please, I'll do the

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>right revel I want to drive, just drive. Good question,

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's try the drive to the globe. Thanks Wells on

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. All right, just about eleven minutes left in

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 1>today's trading session. We are seeing stocks certainly off their

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>loads of the session, but definitely off their highs of

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the session as well. Let's see what our next guest

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>has to say. Brian Jacobson is with US, multi asset

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>strategist at Wells Fargo Asset Management six hundred three billion

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars in assets under management, with us on the phone

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 1>from Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Hey Brian, good to have you here

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>with Tim and myself on Bloomberg. Gotta start with technology.

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>How do you see the pullback in tech stocks? What

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>does it say to you? Yeah? Thanks for having me

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>on Yeah, pull back in technology, We actually weren't really

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>all that surprised about my way My team has been

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>positioning portfolios has been really more favoring in the what

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>has been dubbed, you know, the reopening trade. As far

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>as you know, people are getting a little bit tired

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of doing their video meetings and things like that, might

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>actually want to get out and see people face to face.

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>So does that mean selling tech names? Selling tech names

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>are just not adding to positions? Well, the our approach

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is to not focus on individual names, but as far

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 1>as like the futures contracts and the broad indexes, and

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 1>one of our favorite trades has been going longer the

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>small cap stocks and then shorting larger cap stocks. And

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we did take off our trade, which was long nas

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>deck a few weeks ago, and so it's not necessarily

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>outright shorting it, except for to the extent that the

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of positioning, as far as favoring smaller cap stocks

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>over larger cap stocks, is reflecting a short bias towards

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>some of those names. Hey, what did you make of

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>fitchri Pal's comments today? Said an online event that he'd

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>be quote concerned by disorderly markets, but he stopped short

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>of offering steps to curb heightened volatility. What do you

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 1>make of it? Uh? Yeah, I think that like a

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are just a little disappointed. I wasn't

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>really expecting him to come out and say, Hey, we're

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna do yield curve control or we're gonna, you know,

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.719
<v Speaker 1>actually go out and extend the maturity of our our portfolio.

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know, his unwillingness to be a little

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>bit more I guess forth right, or to commit to

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 1>doing something I think got people a little bit nervous.

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, their policy meeting is coming up on March seventeenth,

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and so a lot of people are going to be

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of looking or we're looking to this as being

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe one of the last opportunities before the meeting to

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>get some indication about whether or not they're actually going

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to do something about the rise in the longer term

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>yields that we have seen. You know, there's a lot

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>going on in the treasury market as far as with

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>increase in inflation expectations, people getting excited about the growth outlook,

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>so that can push up real interest rates. And then

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>plus you also have issues going on with the supplemental

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>leverage ratio that the THUD still hasn't taken action on

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>as far as you know, the lid that banks calculates

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 1>um one of their leverage ratios. That could possibly affect

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the treasury market as well. So there's a lot going

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>on there, and so understandably there's quite a bit of

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>bond market volatility. There's nothing going on, Brian Jacobson, There's

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot going on, and I do think

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to understand, you know, is the treasury market

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of catching up to the run up that we've

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>seen off of the lows on the equity side of things.

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Is the treasury market getting ready for Yeah, it's going

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to be better in the second half of the year,

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean it's going to be a runaway market. We

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.479
<v Speaker 1>still have millions of people out of work, and I

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>do wonder how much you anticipate that holding back economic

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>growth or it won't and we'll just continue to see

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>even deeper moves and that K shaped recovery and we'll

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>see that reflected uh in the financial markets. Well, you know,

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>hopefully as the economy reopens and with the federal Reserve

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 1>staying very loose for a long time and focusing on

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the the shadow unemployment rate or whatever you might want

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to call it. As far as you know, the idea

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people are being misclassified so it's

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>closer to ten percent as opposed to the six percent

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>that's being published, is that maybe that can help close

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the k a little bit, to make it a little

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a V for more people. Hey, I

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>want to hear your thoughts on international relations right now,

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 1>because you said that big wild cards when it comes

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to the market could be relations between the U S

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and China and the US and iran Um. What could

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>happen Let's start with China. Yeah, and maybe this is

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>just because just looking at what are some of the

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>old fears trying to recycle from those as well, because

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>they really haven't gone away. Right. We know that at

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of two thousand twenty, one of the big

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>concerns was the relationships between US and iran UM and

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>just under President Biden. Now as far as with the

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>rocket launch in Syria, you know, it's like what's going

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to be happening next in the Middle East. It's kind

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of always a wild card there. And then as far

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>as with the relationship with China, we know that President Biden.

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Our expectation was that not much was going to change

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>except for perhaps the tone and the willingness to work

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>through more of the multi national or the um you know,

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of in a concerted effort with our allies on

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>some of these incredibly important topics. With China, obviously, the

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the economic numbers have been just outstanding, but we do

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>think that, you know, that's always one of those things

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that you can worry about as far as what will

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that relationship look like going forward. Um, the US has

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>already shown it's willing to impose sanctions, you know, the

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>President Biden has shown that he's wanting to pose sanctions

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>on countries that aren't necessarily abiding by the rules of

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the road. Well, is there a trade here for you

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>on that or concern about it? Well, a little bit.

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>One of the ways in which we're positioning our portfolios

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is that we still do like emerging markets. But emerging markets,

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a very broad area. Well, China, we

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>think that can has done very well. If you think

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>about em Asia, uh, you know, is it e m

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Asia x China that is the more attractively priced area.

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>If you think about momentum that's been favoring China, but

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>from like evaluation, not that valuations always mattered too much,

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>but as far as you know the fundamentals with the earnings,

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>there are other areas like let's say with India, Indonesia, Korea,

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>other places within the Asia Pacific region that are probably

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more attractively priced for us. All Right,

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave it on that note. Listen. Thank you so much, Brian,

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Brian Jacobson, multi assets strategist at Wells Fargo

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management. We did cover a lot of asset classes there.

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>He's got about or Wells Farger I should say, about

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>six three billion dollars in assets on the management. Brian

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from Milwaukee. Thanks for listening

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. Download a podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News