WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: The Story of the Sony Walkman

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Ask Hey, it's Cara Price, host of tech Stuff. We're

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>taking a week off, but we'll have fresh episodes for

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you next Wednesday. You won't want to miss Oz's conversation

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>with the co founder and CEO of Roadblocks. If you've

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>always wondered what draws ninety five million people to a

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 1>gaming platform, definitely check out their conversation next week. In

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>lieu of the headlines today, we wanted to share an

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>episode of tech Stuff from September twenty twenty four about

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>what makes the Sony Walkman one of the most influential

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.959
<v Speaker 1>gadgets of all time. In the episode you're about to hear,

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland tells us how the Walkman came to be

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and about its lasting impact on how we experience music.

0:00:48.479 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Take a listen. Welcome to tech Stuff, production from iHeartRadio.

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 2>how the tech are you So? Back in twenty sixteen,

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 2>an actual a group of writers writing for Time magazine

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 2>or at least Time dot Com, assembled a list of

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 2>what they called the fifty most influential gadgets of all time.

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 2>They said that the list was quote ordered by influence

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 2>end quote, and maybe that's the case. I do find

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 2>it a little hard to swallow because number fifty on

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 2>their list, as in the bottom of the list, was

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 2>the Apple iPhone. Now, y'all, I am not the biggest

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 2>fan of Apple. I don't own an iPhone, but I

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 2>think if I were to make a list of most

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 2>influential gadgets of all time, the iPhone would be way

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 2>higher up on that list than the very bottom. You know,

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 2>the iPhone really ushered in the era of the consumer smartphone.

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 2>It was not the first smartphone. Apple rarely ever brings

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 2>a product to market as the first of its kind.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 2>They bring refined products to the market, and it was

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 2>the first smartphone to see huge success with a mainstream audience,

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 2>not just you know, executives on the go or executives

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 2>who wanted to have a technological status symbol. Plus, I mean,

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 2>the entire nature of the web changed due to a

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 2>shift toward mobile computing, and I think we have to

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 2>lay that largely at the feet of the Apple iPhone.

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 2>While the iPhone is not the most popular smartphone in

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 2>the world, I think that it's really what got the

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:56.519
<v Speaker 2>trend moving toward mobile computing, and that in turn changed

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 2>really like the entire web. So I would put it

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 2>higher on the list. Then my guess is that making

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 2>a list of the fifty most influential gadgets is hard.

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 2>And anyway, today's episode is not about the iPhone at all.

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 2>It's just this was the article that kind of launched

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 2>me into where I wanted to go today. So instead

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 2>of talking about number fifty, because I've done episodes about

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 2>the iPhone before, I thought we would talk about number

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 2>forty seven on this list. So this is more influential

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 2>than the iPhone according to that group of writers, and

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 2>it's the Sony Walkman, as in the portable cassette player.

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 2>It's still not very high up on the list, but

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, what can you do? So the Walkman created

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 2>the chance for folks to experience pre recorded audio in

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 2>a pretty new way, a way that was portable, and

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>it let them create a kind of bubble around themselves

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 2>even if they were walking around in public. And it

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 2>meant you weren't tethered to like a wall outlet or

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 2>lugging around a large tape deck or tape recorder, so

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 2>that you could listen to your pre recorded cassettes. You

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 2>could just PLoP in some batteries, a pair of double

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 2>A batteries into this thing. You put in your favorite

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 2>audio cassette, You plug in your headphones, put them on

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>your ears, you push play, you head out into the world.

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it's easy for us to take for granted

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 2>how portable the music experience is today. You know, the

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 2>fact that we had MP three players, iPods, and then

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 2>smartphones and streaming services and all that that's transformed the

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 2>way we experience music in large part, but once upon

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 2>a time that wasn't so much of an option. So

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 2>let's turn back the clock and learn about the development,

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 2>the release, and the impact of the Sony Walkman. And

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 2>before we get to that, we have to have some preamble,

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 2>because you know, this is tech stuff. You know tech stuff.

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 2>I like to talk about the history of technologies, and

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 2>not just the technology, but the stuff that led to

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 2>the development of that tech. So let's talk about recorded

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 2>media and the development of the cassette tape medium. Now

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 2>I've done full episodes about the en of recorded media.

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 2>How one of the earliest versions was recording sound to

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 2>cylinders that were coated in wax. Recording to a wax

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 2>cylinder essentially involved shouting into an acoustic horn, and that

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 2>acoustic horn at the narrow end had a little membrane

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 2>that was connected to a needle, and the membrane would

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 2>vibrate when sound waves would come into the horn. The

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 2>needle that vibrates would carve into the wax on the cylinder.

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 2>The cylinder would be turned and the needle would start

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 2>to carve a spiral into the cylinder. You could take

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the carved cylinder and put that into a player, which

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 2>essentially did the same process, but in reverse. You would

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 2>put a stylist like another needle, and fit it into

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 2>the groove in the cylinder. You would begin to rotate

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.919
<v Speaker 2>the cylinder. The needle would travel through the groove and

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 2>it would vibrate as it did so, which would cause

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 2>a memor brain to vibrate at the narrow end of

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 2>an acoustic horn, And if you listened real carefully at

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 2>the wide end of the acoustic horn, you would be

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 2>able to hear the recorded sound, the playback of whatever

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 2>sound had been recorded originally. Now, it didn't take too

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 2>much longer after the invention of the cylinder for various

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 2>folks to come up with flat recorded discs as an alternative,

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 2>so instead of a cylinder, you would just have a

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 2>flat disc with audio recorded on one and then eventually

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 2>both sides of the disc. These would ultimately become easier

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 2>to store and to produce than wax cylinders were. They

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 2>were originally made all of stuff like shell ac, which

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 2>is essentially something that you get from insects. But eventually

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 2>companies would make the shift to vinyl. While different music

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 2>companies battled it out over formats, we would mostly settle

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 2>on albums playing back at either forty five revolutions or

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 2>thirty three and a third revolutions per minent on turntables.

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Some older albums would actually play it like seventy eight

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 2>revolutions per minuent. Now, the record album traces its history

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 2>back to the late nineteenth century. By the nineteen sixties,

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, more than half a century later, vinyl albums

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>were the dominant form of recorded media for home use.

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 2>In fact, they were almost exclusively the media format for

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.119
<v Speaker 2>home use unless you were really well off or maybe

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 2>you worked in the music industry or something, because then

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 2>you might have a real to real player. But otherwise

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 2>there just wasn't any call for that. So the music

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 2>industry had been relying upon real to reel players for

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 2>a while in order to make master recordings of performances,

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 2>as well as to edit and put together that master

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 2>in the first place. And this, of course is magnetic

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 2>tape we're talking about now. Magnetic tape also traces its

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 2>evolution back to the late nineteen teenth century, though at

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 2>that point we weren't yet talking about tape. So back

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 2>in the eighteen eighties, there was this feller named Oberlin Smith,

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 2>which what a name, What a great name, Oberlin Smith.

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Oberlin reckoned that you could use magnetization to record sound

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 2>onto a magnetic medium, and it would have to obviously

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 2>be a medium that would respond to magnetic fields. So

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 2>his suggestion was using like silk thread that had been

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>coded in steel particles. And here's how he proposed such

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 2>a device would work. So first, for recording, you would

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 2>have a microphone. So sound goes into the microphone, like

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 2>speaking into the microphone, would then generate an alternating current.

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 2>I've done episodes about how microphones work, but essentially what

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about is similar to what we were talking

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 2>about with recording with wax cylinders, except instead of the

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 2>membrane moving a needle to carve into wax, the vibrating

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 2>membrane would interact with an electromagnet and create a current,

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 2>a variable current. That current you could then use to

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 2>represent the sound. You could actually just send that current

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 2>to an amplifier and then to a speaker, a loud speaker,

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 2>and that's how you get microphone to loudspeaker amplified sound. Well,

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 2>in this case, you wouldn't be sending it to a loudspeaker. Instead,

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 2>you'd be using that current to go to an electromagnet

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 2>create a fluctuating magnetic field. And meanwhile, you would run

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 2>the steel dust coded string past this electromagnet, and that

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 2>fluctuating magnetic field would cause the particles on that string

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 2>to align a certain way according to whatever the magnetic

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 2>field was at the moment that the string was running

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 2>past it. And because that field is in flux, the

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 2>direction of those particles would vary over time, So the

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 2>string would actually become a record of the magnetic fluctuations

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 2>over time. And you know, obviously the rate at which

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>you pulled the string past this electromagnet would determine the

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 2>speed of recording. So to play it back, you would

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 2>put the string near a conductor essentially connected to some

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 2>sort of playback device like a speaker, with an amplifier

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 2>in between. Because the signal you're going to get is

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 2>going to be too weak to really drive a speaker.

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 2>So the magnetized particles on the string when you pull

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 2>it past a conductor, then you can induce current to

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 2>flow through that conductor, and that current, when amplified and

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 2>then sent to a speaker, would play back the recorded

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 2>sound used to create the record on the string in

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 2>the first place. Now, all Obey never build a working

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 2>model of his idea. However, a Danish inventor named Valdemar

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Poulsen built upon this note. He either had read about

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 2>the previous concept or had come to the same conclusion independently.

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 2>It's not clear which is the case. But you know

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Obey didn't build it. So Valdemar creates a patent for

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 2>a similar invention that he called the telegraphone, and he

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 2>got the patent. He was awarded the patent for this

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 2>invention in the late eighteen hundreds, and he landed essentially

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 2>a licensing deal here in America. He also landed other

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 2>deals elsewhere in the world. But in America he got

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 2>some folks to buy into it and they created the

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 2>American Telegraphone Company of Washington, DC. So that device used

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 2>like steel wire to record upon, but same sort of

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 2>basic idea. What you would run the steel wire past

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>a magnet that would magnetize the wire in various alignments,

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 2>and then running it back across a reader would play

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 2>back the recorded medium or media I should say. In

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 2>that case, well, the device didn't make that big of

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 2>an impact here in the United States. The utility was

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 2>somewhat limited, and the idea was that it really would

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 2>be more like a business equipment, right. It was meant

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 2>for things like taking notes, for dictation, that kind of thing.

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 2>The sound quality wasn't fantastic. It was not really intended

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 2>for pre recorded music. It wouldn't do well for that purpose.

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 2>The invention actually did a little bit better in Europe

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 2>than it did here in the United States. Here in

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the US, the business didn't stay around for very long.

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 2>But other businesses that also took Polson's patent and licensed it,

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>they were able to create a business that stood the

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 2>test of time a bit better than the American version,

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 2>but let's get to the development of magnetic tape. So

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:03.839
<v Speaker 2>this approach which showed that it was viable to use

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 2>magnetism as a recording medium or recording method, but the

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 2>steel wire just wasn't really the best approach. In the

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 2>mid nineteen twenties, there was an American named Joseph O'Neill

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 2>who theorized that you could quote quote a strip of

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 2>paper or some other cheap material end quote with magnetic

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 2>material for the purposes of recording audio to it, and

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 2>this would remove the need to use steel wire, or

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 2>steel coated threads, or steel tape. These all had limited utility.

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 2>With the case of thread, there was limited resilience, like

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 2>it could eventually break or fray. So he said, why

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 2>not just use a strip of material, coat it with

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 2>this magnetic stuff, and then use that for recording. However,

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 2>while he had suggested the concept, he didn't appear to

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 2>pursue this in any serious way as far as I

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 2>am aware, where he did not produce an actual example

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 2>of this. He just kind of theorized that it could

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 2>be done. Whereas a German engineer named Fritz Fleoimer had

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 2>developed a method to put metal stripes on cigarette paper

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 2>to want purpose. I do not know. I'm sure there

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 2>was a reason to put metal stripes on cigarette paper,

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 2>but I don't know what it was. But I didn't

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 2>look it up because I've got enough bunny trails going

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 2>on in this episode anyway. But he reasoned that because

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 2>he had figured out how to do that, how to

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 2>put metal stripes on cigarette paper, he could use a

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 2>similar approach to coat a strip of paper like paper tape,

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 2>with magnetic material, and then the paper tape could be

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 2>used as a recording medium for audio. The process of

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 2>recording and playback would be pretty similar as what it

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 2>was with the telegraphones, so not that different from steel

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 2>wire or steel tape. You would still have a right

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 2>head that would use a fluctuating magnetic fee to record

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 2>audio signals sent from a microphone to this magnetically coded

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 2>paper tape as it passed by underneath the right head,

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 2>and then later if you wanted to play it back,

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 2>a playback head. A red head would pick up the

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 2>magnetic stripe with its particles in various alignments, and this

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 2>would create the electric current that was created through induction,

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 2>and then that current would get amplified by an amplifier

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 2>and could then be sent as a signal to playback

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 2>sound on a loudspeaker. His work in the late nineteen

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 2>twenties would ultimately lead to the development of the Magnetophone

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 2>K one, which he unveiled in nineteen thirty five, which

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 2>was the first practical tape recorder. Okay, so that sets

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 2>the first stage for what would become the foundation for

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 2>the Walkman. When we come back, I'll talk a little

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 2>bit more about Walkman pre history, and we'll talk about

0:15:56.800 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Sony itself and how it came about developing the Walkman

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 2>device and why it became one of the top fifty

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 2>most influential gadgets in history according to these folks in time.

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 2>But first, let's take a quick break. Okay. When we

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 2>left off, before the break, I was talking about Fritz Fleoimer,

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 2>a German engineer, an Austrian German engineer who developed this

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 2>magnetic tape that ultimately he would unveil in nineteen thirty five,

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 2>and that was the Magnetophone K one that was the

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 2>first practical tape recorder. But this was also during a

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 2>time where the world was heading into World War Two. Obviously,

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 2>World War two ends up being this massive conflict and

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 2>US forces were very much interested in one learning what

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 2>technology the Germans had access to and to stealing it.

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Now that's not just the Americans. Everybody was like this,

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 2>right in. Any country that perceived that another country had a

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 2>technological advantage wanted to remove that advantage from their opponents,

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 2>wanted to be able to exploit it themselves. So this

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 2>was going on across all enemy lines, like everybody was

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 2>spying on and stealing from everyone else, even allies in

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 2>some cases. But here US forces were able to get

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 2>possession of some German recording equipment as well as some

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.959
<v Speaker 2>German tapes, and soon Americans began developing their own version

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 2>of Floimer's technology. They began to create their own magnetic

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 2>tape systems and magnetic tapes themselves. By the late nineteen forties,

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 2>the recording industry had begun to use magnetic tape in

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 2>order for music production. Tape actually opened up a ton

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 2>of new opportunit unities. For one thing, you could record

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 2>several sessions to tape, and then you could physically cut

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 2>and edit the tape to put together a master recording.

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, maybe you have some various takes that are

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 2>all pretty close to each other. But maybe take three

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 2>the band had a really great intro into the song.

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 2>It just sounded really good. But take five has the

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 2>best version of the bridge, and the group really nailed

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the ending of the song just on the second take. Now,

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 2>before the days of magnetic tape, you pretty much had

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 2>to decide which of these takes was your favorite. And

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 2>it may not have all the best qualities of all

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 2>the best takes, but you're stuck with what you've got,

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 2>and so you got to pick whichever one is going

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 2>to be the master, and that's what you go with.

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 2>But with tape, with a really good editor, you could

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 2>actually put together a recording that doesn't really exist right

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 2>or at least it doesn't exist in one performance. It's

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 2>actually a combination of performances. You could do that if

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 2>you were really good with editing, and if the band

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 2>was really consistent, you could actually put this together. And

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 2>you could also do other things, like you could do

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 2>multi track recording. You could do overdubbing. That really opened

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 2>up a lot of opportunities. Overdubbing means you would record someone,

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 2>Let's say it's a vocalist singing, but it could just

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 2>as easily be a musician playing some instrument like guitar

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 2>or piano or whatever, and then you've got your recording.

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Then you could play the recording back, and meanwhile the

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 2>vocalist or musician or whatever could play their own harmonies

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 2>along with the original recording, so they're accompanying themselves. They're

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 2>accompanying the recorded version of themself live. Then you could

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 2>record that. That's overdubbing. This way, you could layer your

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 2>recordings to get a more lush, rich sound than would

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 2>be possible if you were just relying on and you know,

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 2>a single artist or band or whatever. You could really

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 2>flesh sounds out that way. The tape machines in those

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 2>days were often these big, real to real devices, and

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 2>so it was not common for your average person to

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 2>get hold of one of those. I mean, they were

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 2>sold sometimes to consumers, but they were expensive and to

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 2>get the actual media was hard to There weren't a

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of places selling real to real tape of performances.

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 2>So vinyl records were still the dominant form of recorded

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 2>media in the consumer space, but that would change thanks

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 2>to a Dutch electronics company called Phillips. Now the Phillips

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Electronics Company dated back to eighteen ninety one sensing a

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 2>theme here, I'm sure like all these technologies and companies

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 2>date back to like the late nineteenth century, Brothers Anton

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 2>and Gerard Phillips created the Phillips Company in the Netherlands.

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Their original focus was on light bulbs, and generally the

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 2>company's philosophy was that they would aim to create high

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 2>quality products, even though that meant that their products would

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 2>be priced for a fairly limited market, which is a

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 2>nice way of saying their stuff was expensive, you know. Now,

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 2>for a while, their company was part of a global

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 2>cartel that dominated the light bulb market, and on the

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 2>one hand, that did lead to forming certain standards in

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 2>the light bulb industry, but on the other it arguably

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:29.360
<v Speaker 2>prevented competition in the marketplace. Anyway. By the late nineteen forties,

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Phillips was starting to get into other types of technologies,

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, like electric shavers, but they found out the

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 2>profit margins are razor thin. Not really, but I couldn't

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 2>resist the pun. But in the nineteen fifties, Phillips got

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:45.239
<v Speaker 2>into the recording business. They launched a music label. They

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 2>later in the nineteen sixties acquired smaller record labels like

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Mercury Records, and they were also thinking, well, how can

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 2>we also be in the business of the medium upon

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 2>which recorded music can go. So an engineer at Phillips

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 2>named lew Atten's worked out of an office in Belgium

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 2>where he was pioneering a new technology that would bring

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 2>magnetic tape media to home consumers. This was in nineteen

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 2>sixty two, and the invention that he pioneered was the

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 2>cassette tape. This tape would use a very thin strip

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 2>of plastic film coded in magnetic material. The film would

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 2>wrap around a pair of reels. Those reels would be

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 2>encased inside a plastic cartridge. On the outside of this

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 2>cartridge you would see like the two holes that'd be

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 2>the center of these two reels. They'd be pronged so

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 2>that they could fit onto a tape player's spokes, and

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 2>a small length of this tape is obviously uncovered. That

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 2>section could be then inserted into a tape recorder for

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 2>recording or playback. The cassette was such a small form

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 2>factor that immediately people saw advantages over larger reel to

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 2>reel machines that were far more bulky and expensive. Now,

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 2>the initial plan for the audio cassette was to sell

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 2>them as business tools like this was an idea like

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.479
<v Speaker 2>again for dictation and taking notes and that kind of stuff.

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 2>It didn't take long, however, before Phillips and other companies said, hey,

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 2>what if we put pre recorded music on these and

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 2>sold them like we do with vinyl albums. Now you

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 2>might wonder what artist was the first to offer an

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 2>album on cassette tape. The answer to that is unclear.

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 2>Christian Romer has a blog post on legacybox dot com

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 2>about this and lists a few potential contenders for the

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 2>first album on cassette tape. One is Nina Simone's Wild

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:44.479
<v Speaker 2>Is the Wind, Another is Johnny Mathis's The Shadow of

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Your Smile. But my favorite is Eartha Kit's Love for

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Sale album. I love Eartha Kit, what an amazing performer.

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 2>But as Romer points out, no one was really documenting

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the history of albums on cassette when they first started

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 2>to become a thing, so it's unclear what the actual

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 2>answer is of who was first. I would also like

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 2>to point out that music labels likely produced more than

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 2>just one album on cassette at a time, because it

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 2>seems like an odd choice to just go with let's

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 2>just do one and see how it goes. Someone's album

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 2>obviously had to be the first off the manufacturing line,

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 2>but I think that's just splitting hairs. At that point,

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 2>cassettes were easier to store than vinyl albums, they took

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 2>up less space. They did have their own peculiarities. However,

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 2>if you brought a cassette tape near a strong magnet,

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 2>well you just screwed up the recording on your cassette

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 2>tape because the magnetic particles on the tape would realign

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 2>to this new powerful magnetic field, so effectively you would

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 2>erase your cassette. Anyone who had cassette tapes also knows

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 2>the pain of tape getting snagged on something and then

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 2>unreeling from inside the cassette. You would just have this

0:24:56.240 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 2>massive plastic film just unspooled from out side inside the cassette.

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Now it's outside the cassette. So to fix that you

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 2>would have to do the old standby, which is what

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 2>I call inserting a pencil into the spokes on one

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 2>reel and gently coaxing the tape back into place by

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 2>twisting the pencil slowly, one twist at a time. What

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 2>a joy that was. But you know, while the cassette

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:26.479
<v Speaker 2>media was far more portable than vinyl, the players weren't

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 2>that much more portable, at least not at first. I mean,

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:34.360
<v Speaker 2>they were smaller than turntables, but they weren't pocket sized,

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 2>you know. Tape decks, like tape recorders, were still fairly large.

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 2>They were too large to carry around easily. Like you

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 2>could put a strap on one and wear it around

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 2>your neck like it was like a handbag or something,

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 2>but it was still pretty bulky. A lot of tape

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 2>decks did have headphone jacks, but not all of them,

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 2>because a lot of them had a built in speaker

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 2>in the tape deck itself, so you would just push

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 2>play and listened to the music coming straight out of

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 2>the tape deck. It's usually pretty tenny. It wasn't typically

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 2>a very good quality of sound, but it worked. But yeah,

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't necessarily the case that a tape deck would

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 2>have a headphone jack. A lot of them did, but

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't a sure thing. And that's kind of where

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 2>things sat for about a decade. But now let's flash

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 2>forward to the nineteen seventies in Japan. So the story

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 2>goes that one of Sony's co founders, a guy named

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Masaru Ibuka, wanted to be able to listen to albums

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 2>on a portable playback device. Specifically, he wanted to be

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 2>able to listen to opera. He took lots of flights.

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 2>Being the head of a major electronics company in Japan,

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 2>he had to fly a lot, and he liked to

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 2>listen to opera, and he wanted a way to bring

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 2>opera albums with him on flights so that he wasn't

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 2>having to pay attention to everything else that's going on

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 2>on a plane. And he asked his engineers to look

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 2>into a way to achieve this goal, like how could

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 2>he listen to stuff on a device that was small

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 2>enough for him to easily bring it with him on

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 2>a flight. And a designer named Noria Oga got the

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 2>high pressure assignment of figuring out how to make something

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 2>that Ebuka would appreciate. So then Oga turns to a

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 2>product that Sony had already started producing at that point.

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 2>This was a product that they were producing for the

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 2>business market, and it was a small handheld tape recorder

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 2>called the TCM one hundred B. It was also known

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 2>as the Pressman because they were thinking that this would

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 2>be a device that reporters for newspapers would want to

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 2>use in order to make verbal notes. That kind of

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 2>thing did not digital, but recorded notes, and so it

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 2>was a handheld cassette recorder for voice memos and stuff.

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:54.199
<v Speaker 2>It was small enough that you could hold it in

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 2>one hand. You would operate it by pressing the various buttons,

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 2>and they had buttons for stuff like rewind and fast

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 2>forward and record and play. All the basic functions of

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 2>your tape deck all built in. So the base elements

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 2>for a Walkman were already present in the Pressman. So

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 2>Oga just used the Pressman as kind of a launching pad,

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 2>and he created a prototype portable cassette player. He worked

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 2>with engineers to take the Pressman and tweak the design

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 2>of that product. So one thing they did was they

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 2>removed the recording feature, so it was purely a playback device,

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.439
<v Speaker 2>not a recording device. They also changed it so that

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 2>the Pressman was monaural mono in other words, so you

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 2>didn't have two different channels of sound going to the

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 2>different speakers in your headset. It was all mono. They

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 2>changed it to stereo so it would be able to

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 2>support stereo recording. He then gave this prototype to Abuka

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 2>before Abuka was to go on another flight around the

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 2>world to do business e things in order to test

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.479
<v Speaker 2>it out. And Abuka must have really liked the result,

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 2>because Sony would then go on to produce the Walkman

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 2>portable cassette player the following year, in nineteen seventy nine. Now,

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 2>this was never a sure thing. In fact, within the company,

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 2>there was a lot of resistance to this idea. There

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 2>were a lot of executives who said, I don't know

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 2>about this. I don't think there's actually a market big

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 2>enough to support the production and marketing of a portable

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 2>cassette player. But then Sony's other co founder, a guy

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 2>named Marita Akio, saw the potential for great success and

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 2>he said, no, Abuka was right, Like, this wasn't just

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 2>a project for Abuka so that he could listen to

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 2>music when he was on his flights. This thing could

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 2>be a real blockbuster hit for our company. So, with

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the support of the co founders, the company did go

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 2>into the development for a consumer portable cassette player and

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 2>they began to develop the Walkman. All right, we're going

0:29:57.480 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 2>to take another quick break. When we come back, i'll

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 2>talk more about the Walkman story and its place in history. So,

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 2>with the support of Sony's co founder's engineers, that Sony

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 2>got to work in creating a consumer version of the

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 2>prototype that OGA had created for Ibuka, and they created

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 2>a device that had the designation TPSL two, but it

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 2>would get the name Walkman. Akio came up with that

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 2>name and said it should be called the Walkman because

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 2>you can walk around with it and listen to music. Pressman,

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 2>the voice recording device that was for the press. Walkman

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 2>is for walking around and listening to your music, and

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 2>they launched it in Japan in July nineteen seventy nine

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 2>for the equivalent of around one hundred and fifty dollars,

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 2>which is a big o' yikes, one hundred and fifty

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 2>dollars in nineteen seventy nine. The United States would not

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 2>get the Walkman until nineteen eighty. Meanwhile, you might wonder, okay,

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and fifty bucks in nineteen seventy nine, what

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 2>would that be equivalent to today? Well, using a handy

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 2>dandy inflation calculator, that comes out to around six hundred

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 2>forty six dollars for a portable cassette player. Keep in

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 2>mind that the original Walkman didn't have recording capabilities. Just playback,

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Holy cats, y'all. That is as incredibly expensive. Like again,

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 2>I always think about things like video game consoles that

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 2>launch for around five hundred to seven hundred dollars, and

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 2>people talk about how expensive that is. Keep in mind

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 2>that original Walkman would have set you back six hundred

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 2>forty six dollars, more than what some video game consoles

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 2>launch at. That's expensive. Now. When it did launch in

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 2>the United States, the original name for the device wasn't

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 2>the Walkman. It was the Soundabout which sounds about wrong

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 2>to me anyway. But eventually Sony would migrate back to

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 2>the Walkman, which was a Buka's suggestion from the get

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Go and Occhio suggestion. The two of them argued that

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 2>it should have been that from the beginning. Interestingly, there

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 2>was a dispute about the origins of the Walkman concept

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 2>because there was another inventor who came up with a

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 2>very similar idea and in fact patented that idea in

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy seven, two years before the Walkman came out. Now,

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 2>this inventor was Andreas Pavel, who had an invention that

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 2>he called the stereo belt, and as the name suggests,

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 2>the stereo belt was a belt that had audio equipment

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 2>attached to it, which included a battery pack as well

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 2>as audio players, and you would can headphones to this

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 2>belt in order to listen to it. So not exactly

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 2>the same thing as the Walkman, but the idea that

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 2>being a portable music playing device is what made it

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 2>similar to Walkman. Eventually, Pavel would bring lawsuits against Sony

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 2>in various regions, arguing that there was a patent infringement

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 2>going on that Sony had essentially copied the design that

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Pavel had created without paying for it, without licensing it.

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 2>In several places, these complaints were ultimately dismissed. In other places,

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Sony would settle out of court with Pavel rather than

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 2>have to go through the whole process of a legal proceedings,

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 2>which can be really expensive even if you win. So

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 2>while Sony never admitted any fault in this, they did

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 2>eventually pay a pretty hefty settlement out of court. Anyway,

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 2>back to the Walkman, so I mentioned earlier, the Walkmen

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 2>ran on a pair of double A batteries, which was great.

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, their batteries weren't too expensive. You could take

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 2>them on the go, you didn't have to be tethered

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 2>to an outlet. They did require headphones because the Walkman

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 2>had no on board speaker. If you pushed play on

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 2>a Walkman and there were no headphones plugged into it,

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:24.399
<v Speaker 2>all you would hear would be the gears turning as

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 2>the spokes were being rotated by the player itself. Sony

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 2>made around thirty thousand units initially in nineteen seventy nine

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 2>when they launched it in Japan, and sales were a

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 2>little slow in the beginning. However, Sony used some good

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 2>old fashioned elbow grease to get interest up in the product.

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 2>And by that I mean that Sony employees would literally

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 2>hit the streets in Japan with a Walkman and cassettes

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:55.279
<v Speaker 2>and find people out there on the street and have

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 2>them listen to cassettes on the Walkmen and let them

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 2>have the experience of this portable music player. And it worked.

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:08.439
<v Speaker 2>That marketing push really was effective. By August, just two

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 2>months after they launched, Sony had sold out of their

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 2>initial run of units. They were hoping for around like

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 2>five thousand units a month. Instead, they sold thirty thousand

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:21.840
<v Speaker 2>and two months pretty incredible. Now, not everyone was super

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:25.839
<v Speaker 2>happy about the Walkman and its success in the marketplace,

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:28.240
<v Speaker 2>like it also saw great success here in the United

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 2>States once it came out in nineteen eighty, but not

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 2>everybody was really thrilled about this. There were people who

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 2>were warning that this technology was inspiring young folks to

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 2>shut themselves away from the world even while they were

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 2>walking around in the world, rather than being engaged in

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:51.439
<v Speaker 2>the wholesome surroundings. Undoubtedly learning great moral lessons from their

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 2>wise elders, these hooligans would be listening to their Bob

0:35:56.760 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Dylans and their Judas priests at even and their Smothers

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 2>brothers on headphones and blocking out the outside world and

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 2>allowing themselves to be shaped by the evil, wicked whims

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 2>of professional musicians. Oh the humanity. I'm making fun of it,

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 2>but the moral panic was real, right, There was moral

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 2>panic around portable cassette players. It just shows that fuddy

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 2>duddies will find moral panic in the oddest of places.

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Heaven help you if you happen to also play dungeons

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 2>and dragons while listening to music on a Walkman, because

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 2>you were just destined for h double hockey sticks. Alan Bloom,

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 2>the author, said essentially as much in a book titled

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:48.479
<v Speaker 2>The Closing of the American Mind. Bloom argued that young

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 2>people listening to personal music devices would eventually lead to

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 2>moral decay. Pretty crazy stuff. Sony would release many follow

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 2>ups to the original Walkmen, so there were lots of

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 2>improvements over the device over the following models. Some of

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 2>them were even smaller. Some of them would incorporate a

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:13.399
<v Speaker 2>record function because people missed having that. The Walkmen would

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:16.840
<v Speaker 2>also become almost synonymous with portable cassette players, kind of

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 2>like how the iPod would become almost synonymous with MP

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 2>three players. Folks would use the term Walkman even if

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 2>they were talking about a product from a competing company.

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 2>You know, it wasn't a portable cassette player. It was

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 2>a Walkman, even if it wasn't actually a Walkman, which

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 2>meant that Sony had to do a lot of work

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 2>to protect their trademark. Now, around the same time, you

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 2>had the fate of the cassette tape itself. So initially,

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 2>cassette sales were going very strong in the nineteen eighties,

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 2>but cassettes didn't totally replace vinyl records. For one thing,

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 2>you had music lovers who would call themselves audio files,

0:37:56.120 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 2>who would tend to prefer vinyl records over cassette tapes.

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 2>That cassettes could warp over time, you would get audio distortion,

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 2>you would get a hiss. There was a hiss associated

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 2>with audio cassettes, and therefore people who really valued the

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 2>experience of listening to music on high end equipment tended

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 2>to prefer vinyl to cassette tapes. However, the convenience of

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 2>cassette tapes plus the fact that you could purchase a

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 2>blank cassette and then record stuff to make your own tapes,

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 2>and thus giving birth to the cultural phenomenon of the mixtape.

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Now making a mixtape that's an art form unto itself.

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 2>That meant that the cassette had a really firm foothold

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 2>and culture, and the incorporation of tape decks into car

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 2>entertainment systems helped too. This gets complicated by the introduction

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 2>of eight tracks, but that's a different matter. Anyway, it

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 2>appeared as though the party would never end. In nineteen

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 2>eighty four, Billboard reported that cassette tape sales were outpacing

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 2>vinyl LPs for the first time, and at that point

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:03.360
<v Speaker 2>made up around fifty three percent of all albums shipped.

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:08.399
<v Speaker 2>Now that shipped not necessarily sold, but still cassettes were

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:12.360
<v Speaker 2>clearly making a lot of headway. They were easy to manufacture,

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 2>They again took up less space, You could sell a

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 2>whole lot more of them, You could get a lot

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 2>more in stock at a record store than you could

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 2>with vinyl, and yeah, people were digging them. However, the

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 2>introduction of the compact disc, which also was introduced in

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the early nineteen eighties, would ultimately set the stage for

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 2>the cassette's decline. Now, it would take quite a few

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 2>years for compact discs to really establish themselves in the market,

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 2>particularly since early CD players were ridiculously expensive, like just

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 2>prohibitively expensive for most people. However, over time CDs would

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 2>start to catch on and cassette sales began to take

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 2>a turn, just as vinyl had done before it. In

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety one, CD sales were higher, at least from

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 2>a dollar value, than cassette sales. So it doesn't mean

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 2>that there were more CDs sold, but more money was

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 2>made selling CDs than cassettes starting in nineteen ninety one.

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 2>So the nineties saw the decline of cassette sales continue

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:21.400
<v Speaker 2>with more and more people switching to CDs. Vinyl became

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 2>an almost obsolete format for the general public. It never

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 2>fully went away, and of course it's enjoyed a resurgence

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 2>in more recent years, but in the nineties and early

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:37.280
<v Speaker 2>two thousands it almost disappeared. Cassettes did enjoy a brief

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a comeback. I mean, I guess arguably

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 2>it's still going now because some artists have released some

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 2>of their albums on cassette formats, including like Megan v.

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Stallion and Taylor Swift, but it's not like a common thing.

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Cassette sales in general were pretty low, and that also

0:40:56.760 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 2>meant that cassette players weren't really flying off store shelves either,

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 2>so it didn't make much sense to keep making them,

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 2>which brings us to our sad little tale coming to

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 2>a close here, because Sony actually did continue producing The

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Walkman all the way through the nineteen nineties and all

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 2>through the first decade of the two thousands, despite the

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:19.839
<v Speaker 2>plunge in cassette sales over that time period. But in

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 2>twenty ten, Sony threw in the towel and announced it

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 2>would shut down the portable cassette player line, so the

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Walkman cassette player would be no more. They stopped production

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:34.799
<v Speaker 2>in twenty ten. It however, was not the end of

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:39.240
<v Speaker 2>the Walkman as a brand, because Sony gave the Walkman

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 2>brand to other products that were also in the music space.

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 2>They just weren't cassette players. So the main one would

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 2>be digital music players, digital audio players or DAPs, and

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 2>this is what I would often just call an MP

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 2>three player back in the old days. Like the Apple iPod,

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Sony started introducing digital audio players way back in nineteen

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:05.399
<v Speaker 2>ninety nine, which is actually two years before Apple would

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 2>introduce the iPod, But Sony's version initially only supported a

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 2>proprietary digital audio format called a track at r AC.

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Sony had control over that file format and felt like

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:23.280
<v Speaker 2>this would protect Sony's interests in the actual music production side.

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 2>In other words, this was a way to prevent piracy.

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Sony specifically did not want to support file formats like

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 2>MP three. Now, the Walkmen would ultimately fall well behind

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:41.879
<v Speaker 2>the iPod in sales in most countries. When it got

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 2>to digital audio players. The Walkman did okay in Japan,

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 2>but outside Japan it just it could not compete against

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the iPod. However, you can still find digital audio players

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 2>that are branded as Walkman today, including high end players

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:00.879
<v Speaker 2>that cost a whole bunch of money, like more than

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 2>one thousand dollars for some of these devices. I think

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:06.279
<v Speaker 2>that's a pretty tall order when we live in a

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 2>world where smartphones have access to tons of music through

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 2>various music streaming platforms. Now, sure the fidelity isn't necessarily

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:18.760
<v Speaker 2>top notch. You know, that depends on the streaming service,

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:21.319
<v Speaker 2>the format they use, how much compression is used for

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:24.759
<v Speaker 2>the files, and what kind of headphones or headset you're

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 2>using to listen to it. However, I think for the

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 2>majority of people out there, the convenience and accessibility that

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 2>is presented through smartphones that ends up being more important

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:39.840
<v Speaker 2>than musical fidelity for most people, not everybody. Some folks

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 2>are more concerned with the quality of the experience. I

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.800
<v Speaker 2>think that's legitimate. I think it's legit to really want

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 2>the absolute best quality of sound. However, that is also

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 2>a very subjective thing, right. You could have two people

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 2>and they could have the same taste in music, but

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 2>they might have very different perceptions of what set up

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 2>is best, and you can't you know, necessarily agree on

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 2>a common standard. The world of high fidelity audio is

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:10.920
<v Speaker 2>filled with a lot of marketing that strikes me as

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 2>being just a stone's throw away from pure pseudoscience. But

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 2>I've talked about that before, so I'll leave it for now.

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 2>So the cassette Walkman has been out of production since

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:24.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty ten. The brand still exists for digital audio players,

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 2>and some artists do continue to put stuff out on

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 2>cassette because nostalgia is a hell of a drug. Personally,

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:35.919
<v Speaker 2>I do miss the days of putting together the perfect mixtape.

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 2>There's something really special about getting one just right, like

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 2>finding that right progress of songs so that you know

0:44:42.800 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 2>you've got like the really high energy number comes in

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 2>at song number three, and then you've got a cool

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:50.680
<v Speaker 2>down number for song number four. That kind of thing.

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:54.279
<v Speaker 2>Making a curative playlist doesn't really scratch the same itch

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 2>for me. There's something really tactle about using cassette tapes

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 2>and creating a mix tape that way, and slapping a

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 2>really good mixtape into a portable music player and then

0:45:05.040 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 2>just going for a walk is a pleasure that I

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 2>think people should really seek out if they're able to

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:12.720
<v Speaker 2>that kind of thing is just one of the simple

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:16.920
<v Speaker 2>pleasures of life if it's accessible to you. I hope

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 2>that this episode was interesting to all of y'all. I

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 2>hope you're doing well, and I will talk to you

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:24.520
<v Speaker 2>again really soon.

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>For tech Stuff, I'm Cara Price. Kyle Murdoch wrote our

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 1>theme song. Join us next Wednesday for Textuff the Story,

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 1>when we will share an in depth conversation with the

0:45:42.640 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 1>co founder and CEO of Roadblocks, David Bizuki. If there

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>are children in your life, you'll definitely want to check

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 1>this one out. Please rate, review, and reach out to

0:45:52.360 --> 0:46:08.239
<v Speaker 1>us at Textuff Podcast at gmail dot com.