Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 2: Welcome to the Buck Brief. Everybody.
Speaker 1: Are the walls finally closing in on Biden's candidacy? That's
Speaker 1: what I want to focus on this time around. Let
Speaker 1: me tell you what's going on. You've got Representative James
Speaker 1: Comer saying that he has subtena subpoena and obtained two
Speaker 1: bank wires revealing Hunter Biden received payments originating from Beijing
Speaker 1: in twenty nineteen when Joe Biden was running for president,
Speaker 1: and Joe Biden's home is listed as the beneficiary address
Speaker 1: for both of those wires from China. We also have
Speaker 1: reporting that the investigation the Special Council looking into Biden's
Speaker 1: handling of classified documents, that that.
Speaker 2: Is escalating, uh dramatic. I'm not so sure about that.
Speaker 1: I have some thoughts that I will want to share
Speaker 1: on that one. But let's start with what's going on
Speaker 1: with Joe Biden first, and this latest from Representative James Comber.
Speaker 1: What have we been waiting for all along? Here? What
Speaker 1: is the thing that, more than anything else, would be
Speaker 1: the last push to end Biden's re election efforts, which
Speaker 1: are underway. I know we don't hear about it very often,
Speaker 1: but technically Joe Biden is still running for re election.
Speaker 1: It would be the smoking gun quid pro quo corruption evidence.
Speaker 1: It would be something like wire transfers that were clearly
Speaker 1: meant to from China no less, I mean from a
Speaker 1: foreign adversary, that were meant to bring about some kind
Speaker 1: of relationship change in policy, and something that you could
Speaker 1: just say, this is as clear cut corruption as it gets.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: I understand that they're going to hold to this line
Speaker 1: that it's just Hunter and that Joe knew nothing about it,
Speaker 1: but at what point? At what point does that start
Speaker 1: to crumble? I mean, he's listing Joe Biden's home address
Speaker 1: as the wire beneficiary. Could say, Okay, well Hunter did that.
Speaker 1: That's not Joe's fault. Who pays for all of Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's stuff all these years? I mean, you really think
Speaker 1: about it, Joe Biden has been in public life for
Speaker 1: his entire life, and the guy's got like a three
Speaker 1: or four million dollar beach house, got a multimillion dollar
Speaker 1: mansion in Wilmington, Delaware. I mean, Joe Biden has somehow
Speaker 1: done very very well from stuff.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: I understand you could say after he was vice president
Speaker 1: he was able to probably get money for a memoir
Speaker 1: and some speeches, all right, but how much clearly not
Speaker 1: that much, because Hunter Biden felt the need to go
Speaker 1: as the bag man for the Biden family and pick.
Speaker 2: Up millions and millions of dollars.
Speaker 1: And I think that that's that's a recognition here that
Speaker 1: we all need to have. We all need to understand.
Speaker 1: We're talking about the kind of money that people will
Speaker 1: take enormous risks for. You know, we're talking about the
Speaker 1: kind of money that people would be willing to some
Speaker 1: people sell out their principles, maybe even their country. I mean,
Speaker 1: juxtaposed this for a second to the case of Menendez,
Speaker 1: who is facing as we know, a second felony indictment,
Speaker 1: second felony prosecution for corruption. And the problem I have
Speaker 1: with all this is what is the difference really? I mean,
Speaker 1: when you start to look at this between what menendez
Speaker 1: Is wife, who is also indicted, did here and what
Speaker 1: hundred by and did, start to look at those, start
Speaker 1: to look at those comparisons, look at that connective tissue.
Speaker 2: If you will.
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden was accepting large sums of money on behalf
Speaker 1: of his well family. No one thinks that Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: was getting paid money because he was an expert in
Speaker 1: anything other than selling access to his dad. The whole point,
Speaker 1: whether explicit or not, of Hunter as global collection agent
Speaker 1: for the Biden crime family, was you give us that money,
Speaker 1: and you know you'll get that special access, you'll get
Speaker 1: taken care of. Now, if this was an American business,
Speaker 1: it's still me it's still unseemly, and it still would
Speaker 1: have to be looked at as a function of law.
Speaker 1: But you could you could say, you know, how bad
Speaker 1: is this really going to be? You know, how how
Speaker 1: much damage is really going to be done. It's it's corrupt,
Speaker 1: but it doesn't feel like a betray But when you're
Speaker 1: talking about taking money from the Chinese Communist Party, right,
Speaker 1: that's a level above That's an escalation beyond what we
Speaker 1: have seen. That's an escalation beyond the stuff that you
Speaker 1: would generally think of in American politics that qualifies as corruption. Right,
Speaker 1: because that's a country that we have substantial not just
Speaker 1: interest in dealing with, but wishes us certainly economically, and
Speaker 1: I think just in general harm over the long term.
Speaker 1: China wants to supplant US, and China sees any US
Speaker 1: weakness as advantage as advantage. Some people say, oh, that's
Speaker 1: just the nature of international relations. Now, we don't sit
Speaker 1: around in America saying, oh, man, Belgium's weakness is to
Speaker 1: our advantage, like we don't care. Right, China matters in
Speaker 1: this way.
Speaker 2: It's different.
Speaker 1: And that's where so much of this, so many millions
Speaker 1: of dollars, we're coming from. And so then we sit
Speaker 1: here and we say, okay, what would it take. What
Speaker 1: would it take for Hunter Biden to have done something
Speaker 1: so egregious or in this case, Hunter Biden to have
Speaker 1: ensnared his dad, the sitting president, into something so outrageous
Speaker 1: that Democrats would agree. And finally, Joe Biden would say,
Speaker 1: I've decided for reasons of health. We all know that's
Speaker 1: what he would say. I've decided for reasons of health
Speaker 1: and age. I'm not going to seek reelection. I go
Speaker 1: back and forth on this. I'm not really sure there
Speaker 1: is a clear defined level. It obviously exists. There must
Speaker 1: be because they know, and it's not because they have
Speaker 1: some principle. And if Joe Biden violates the principles, They're
Speaker 1: going to feel badly. It's because they know at some level,
Speaker 1: they know, at some level of understanding, the independence and
Speaker 1: the swing voters they're going to need in some of
Speaker 1: those key states will be so turned off by the
Speaker 1: Biden crime family corruption apparatus that they won't be able
Speaker 1: to win. It's all about power. It's not about principle.
Speaker 1: It's about power. And I wonder what that level really
Speaker 1: looks like. I wonder what that distinction is really going
Speaker 1: to be going forward. You know, what could happen here?
Speaker 1: And that brings me to the question of the classified
Speaker 1: information that they're looking at with a special counsel at
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, which I'm just going tell you right now. Well,
Speaker 1: I have a different take than what ABC News and
Speaker 1: the rest of the media wants you to believe on
Speaker 1: this one. You know, there's some chatter these days in
Speaker 1: financial circles that our federal government could announce a new
Speaker 1: form of digital currency. If the rumors are true, it
Speaker 1: would replace our current currency system. One well researched financial
Speaker 1: newsletter editor and former Wall Street insider thinks it's going
Speaker 1: to happen. His name is Tika Tawari. This is the
Speaker 1: type of thing you want to prepare for. He's exposing
Speaker 1: this government plan in a revealing new video and showing
Speaker 1: you the three steps you need to take to prepare.
Speaker 1: See it online at dollar recall dot Com. Watch this
Speaker 1: video that some in the government don't want you to see.
Speaker 1: Go to dollar recall dot com learn how to prepare
Speaker 1: before it's too late. That's dollar Recall dot Com. Dollar
Speaker 1: Recall dot Com paid for by Palm Beach Research Group.
Speaker 2: So now there's this other.
Speaker 1: Story that the federal investigation into Joe Biden and his
Speaker 1: handling of classified documents is a massive, sprawling investigation. They've
Speaker 1: interviewed I think over one hundred people. That says they've
Speaker 1: interviewed witnesses, including Secretary of State Blinken. This is all
Speaker 1: because twenty five documents marked classified were found at the
Speaker 1: home or homes and also the Biden the Pen Biden Center,
Speaker 1: and they shouldn't have been there. Twenty five documents one
Speaker 1: or two. I honestly look, I used to I used
Speaker 1: to work with classified documents. It was taken so extremely
Speaker 1: seriously that it's like they wanted everybody to have some
Speaker 1: kind of a mental disorder. Like, oh my god, like
Speaker 1: if I've left a document on the table in the
Speaker 1: wrong you know, skiff for five seconds, like the Russians
Speaker 1: will win and will lose to the nuclear war.
Speaker 2: I mean they terrify you, is what I'm saying. They
Speaker 2: terrify you.
Speaker 1: The prospect of mishandling anything classified and classified documents in
Speaker 1: general are really unimpressive. Generally speaking, the classified documents that
Speaker 1: most people are handling, you would say, why is that classified?
Speaker 1: In fact, I have seen myself examples of things that
Speaker 1: are classified that you know you couldn't. It's like the
Speaker 1: first thing that would come up on Google.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's just ridiculous. It's ridiculous.
Speaker 1: But the overclassification is constant with the government that said
Speaker 1: the there are things that are sensitive in secret and
Speaker 1: need to be kept so and if everybody else is
Speaker 1: going to be held very accountable for this kind of stuff,
Speaker 1: you would think that the people at the very top
Speaker 1: of the national security apparatus would be held accountable for
Speaker 1: how to handle this stuff. But here's what I'm telling
Speaker 1: you about the Joe Biden. I'm giving you a different
Speaker 1: take on this than you're going to hear from most
Speaker 1: other folks. And it is, well for maybe anybody.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure what other people are saying about it yet.
Speaker 1: I just read this story and now I'm telling you
Speaker 1: what I think. They want to make it seem like
Speaker 1: this is a really serious investigation. They want to make
Speaker 1: it seem like this is incredibly important to get right,
Speaker 1: because ultimately I can tell you where this is going.
Speaker 2: Didn't mean to do it.
Speaker 1: No harm, no foul that that will be. They'll write
Speaker 1: some report to make it seem more official. Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: you know, we have to tighten up our handling of
Speaker 1: classified and blah by by blah and all this risk stuff.
Speaker 1: They'll write so I kind of report on it. They'll
Speaker 1: do something to try to indicate for everybody that this
Speaker 1: was looked into with all the seriousness that it deserves
Speaker 1: and everything else. Right, they'll try that, But the truth
Speaker 1: is that the fix is in and there's absolutely no
Speaker 1: way that they're going to have any real culpability. And
Speaker 1: what would that even look like for Joe Biden, Well,
Speaker 1: what would they even do. He's a president. They can't
Speaker 1: prosecute him. They're not going to prosecute anybody else. But
Speaker 1: I think there's something else another piece of this you
Speaker 1: should keep in mind while they're telling you how serious
Speaker 1: they are about this investigation, while they're explaining to everybody
Speaker 1: how they've you know, overturned every every stone and rock
Speaker 1: and everything else. While they've done all of that, truth is,
Speaker 1: I think they're just getting They're trying to make themselves
Speaker 1: a better position, create a better position from which to
Speaker 1: really hammer home the federal.
Speaker 2: Indictments against Donald Trump. Right. So that's also a part
Speaker 2: of this too.
Speaker 1: See with Joe Biden, they did everything they could to
Speaker 1: look into that classified information. Oh, let's take a look
Speaker 1: at the marl Lago document situation. Oh let's take a
Speaker 1: look at what happened there and there a retention of
Speaker 1: documents and all the rest of it. Right, That's I
Speaker 1: think a major component of this as well. They want
Speaker 1: to make it seem like, oh, they appointed a special counsel,
Speaker 1: look at Joe. They want to make it seem like
Speaker 1: there was fair process that wasn't just about making everything
Speaker 1: better for Joe Biden and making it more precarious for
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. But that's exactly what they've done. That's exactly
Speaker 1: what the situation is as it as it plays out here,
Speaker 1: or just one more thing. I didn't tease this at
Speaker 1: the beginning of the Buck brief. There's a story that
Speaker 1: Biden's one of Biden's dogs has now bitten another Secret
Speaker 1: Service officer. I couldn't believe this for they're now saying
Speaker 1: it's the eleventh biting incident. Some of these incidents, they've
Speaker 1: drawn blood, they've had to go they've had to go
Speaker 1: to the hospital or get medical attention to Secret Service agents.
Speaker 1: I mean, they haven't a dog hasn't killed anybody. But
Speaker 1: this is crazy. Can we just take a set take
Speaker 1: a second here and think about this. Eleven times these
Speaker 1: dogs have bitten Secret Service agents? What kind of dogs
Speaker 1: the Bidens have? I understand the people get very defensive
Speaker 1: about this. They say, oh, but you know they're rescues
Speaker 1: or something. Okay, well, I know a lot of people
Speaker 1: that have rescues. They're not biting everybody all the time.
Speaker 1: And even if the dogs have temperament issues, they should
Speaker 1: be trained or they should be kept away from people
Speaker 1: so they can't bite them.
Speaker 2: I'm also gonna put this out there.
Speaker 1: People's dogs are generally reflection of their energy, emotions, and
Speaker 1: you know the way that they interact day to day
Speaker 1: people's dogs are generally speaking. Like I said, it's a
Speaker 1: mirror into the household that owns that dog. And I
Speaker 1: just think there's something Maybe I'm looking into it a
Speaker 1: little too much. I think there's something really unsettling that
Speaker 1: the president of the United States, the current president the
Speaker 1: United States, has dogs that are biting people a lot,
Speaker 1: not once or twice a lot. Why you could say, oh,
Speaker 1: it's not their fault or whatever. Really, how many other
Speaker 1: presidents have had dogs that were drawing blood from secret
Speaker 1: Service agents? Almost a dozen times zero. You know, there's
Speaker 1: so much falsehood and dishonesty and honestly depravity at the
Speaker 1: center of the Biden universe. And I think some of
Speaker 1: that bad energy. Maybe I'm crazy, I think some of
Speaker 1: that bad energy it's picked up by the dogs and
Speaker 1: they're anxious and they're scared, and they attack. They attack
Speaker 1: out of it. Look, I love dogs. I feel badly for
Speaker 1: these dogs. My point is just there's something wrong here.
Speaker 1: You know, there's some they're feeling. The dogs are picking
Speaker 1: up a negative energy from whoever in the Biden family
Speaker 1: or whoever the handlers are that are dealing with them
Speaker 1: the most. I mean, I don't think it's Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: But something, something doesn't smell right about the whole thing.
Speaker 1: They're picking up some kind of like I said, bad energy.
Speaker 1: All right, everybody, that's the buck briefer today.
Speaker 2: I'll talk to you soon. Shield Time,