WEBVTT - Here's Why Crypto Fans Are Underwhelmed By Trump's Plan

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News. I'm Stephen Carroll, and

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this is Here's Why, where we take one new story

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and explain it in just a few minutes with our

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>experts here at Bloomberg.

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I promise to make America the bitcoin superpower of the

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 2>world and the crypto capital of the planet, and we're

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 2>taking historic action to deliver on that promise.

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's election sent a shock wave of excitement through

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the crypto world, propelling bitcoin to record highs of over

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand dollars.

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 2>There was a lot of uncertainty on whether we would

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 2>have a crypto friendly administration here in the US. The

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 2>answer is a resounding yes, and so I think we're

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 2>seeing all this pent up demand.

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>The US President has become a strong advocate for digital assets.

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>He even has his own mean coin, so investors were

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>bracing for a big moment when he gathered industry executives

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>for a digital Asset summit at the White House and

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>appointed David Sachs as its cryptos are.

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 3>We've decided that bitcoin is scarce, it's valuable, and that

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 3>is strategic for the United States to hold on to

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 3>this as a long term reserve. Asset.

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump also signed an executive order creating a US

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin reserve and a separate stockpile of other tokens, but

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>investors didn't seem impressed. The price of bitcoin and other

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>crypto assets slumped after the announcement. Here's why crypto fans

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>are underwhelmed by Trump's plans. Let's bring in our executive

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>editor for crypt Stacy Mrishmel, for more. Stacey Ury, great

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us. What exactly are the reserves

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump now wants to create?

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 3>That is the one hundred thousand dollars question, so to start,

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it's important for folks to understand that this

0:01:56.280 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 3>was a big campaign pledge from now President Donald Trum

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 3>when he was still you know, pre election. He stood

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 3>at a huge gathering of bitcoin fans in Nashville in

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the United States last July and said, we want to

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 3>make the US the crypto capital of the planet. We're

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 3>going to do it with bitcoin. We're going to have

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 3>this idea of a bitcoin Fort Knox. And at the time,

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 3>what people thought that meant was the US government is

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 3>going to become a buyer of bitcoin. Right, like, to

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 3>use the industry parlance, the US government was going to

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 3>become a bitcoin whale and hold a whole bunch of

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 3>these tokens, buy a whole bunch of these tokens. Fast

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 3>forward to March and this executive order that you just mentioned,

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 3>and the reality is a little bit more muted, shall

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 3>we say, because this idea of the reserve is formalizing

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 3>the idea that for any bitcoin the US government currently owns,

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 3>they're not going to sell it. But there isn't this

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 3>enormous mandate to go out and buy a huge amount.

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>More So, why does the Trump administration want to be

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>invested in crypto at all or even if they're not

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>going to bias?

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 3>There are a few ways we've attempted to answer this

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 3>question right. The first is, and it's very much related

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 3>to this idea of why was the presidents at a

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin conference in last July anyway? And the answer is,

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 3>over the past few years, the crypto industry, and in particular,

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 3>some very wealthy individuals in the crypto industry, became mega

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 3>donors to political campaigns, presidential campaigns, congressional campaigns up and

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 3>down the ballot. Democrats, Republicans, and you know, politicians realized

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 3>that this was a new constituency to be courting for

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 3>their considerable financial reserves, and so this idea of appealing

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 3>to that audience by making promises about crypto, by making

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 3>promises about bitcoin, was definitely something that happened. Fans of

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin will often say something to the effect of they're

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 3>only ever going to be a certain number of tokens.

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 3>That introduces this idea of scarcity, and so if the

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 3>US government buys some of those tokens, it's going to

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 3>help the price go up even further. And so everybody

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 3>who's currently holding bitcoin is really going to benefit, including

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 3>the US government. Now there's a little bit of circularity

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 3>to that argument if everybody buys it and nobody sells

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 3>and the price will go up, you know, which is

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of like, okay, well, if you have a reserve,

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 3>sometimes you might want to use that to do other things,

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 3>not just hold it infinitely into the future. But that's

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 3>also one of the reasons this idea of having a

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 3>big strategic investor, shall we say, like the US government

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 3>giving a vote of confidence to this often very volatile

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 3>digital asset, will introduce a floor for the price of

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 3>this thing.

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>So, okay, the reason that we explain the price reaction

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is because the US government isn't investing in it. I've

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 1>got that part. What other things, though, has President Trump said,

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>like for example, on regulation that are being more broadly

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>perceived as positive for crypto.

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.359
<v Speaker 3>As you mentioned this idea of the bitcoin Fort Knox,

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 3>the strategic reserve was only one of the promises made

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 3>to the crypto industry. Another really big one was to

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 3>undo what was perceived by the industry as this hostile

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 3>regulatory climate. You know. So under the previous chair of

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 3>the Securities and Exchange Commission, really important US regulator, a

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of crypto companies had been sued investigated. You know. Famously,

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 3>there was the FTX crypto exchange fraud that saw sam

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 3>bankmin Freed go to jail for relatively long amount of time.

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 3>But there were also allegations against finance at still the

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 3>world's largest crypto exchange, who were you know, sued for

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 3>four point three billion dollars on kind of very significant allegations,

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 3>including failure to prevent money laundering and other such crimes.

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 3>So there was a perception from the industry that what

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:51.799
<v Speaker 3>they described as a few bad actors had unreasonably tainted

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 3>everybody else, and that the SEC was overly aggressive in

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 3>attempting to police them. Trump at this same conference in

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Nashville said one I'm gonna fire Gary Againstler. He didn't

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 3>have to fire Gary Againstler. Chair Againstler resigned And you know,

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 3>on the same day that Trump was inaugurated, that took effect.

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 3>But since then, you know, under Trump, regulators have taken

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 3>a really different approach. The same SEC which was doing

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 3>all of these investigations has dropped or paused most of

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 3>the open investigations in cases, other regulators have come out

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 3>and said, we're going to be effectively much more chill

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 3>on this than we were previously.

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>What are the features that's helped to boost the prize

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin in recent years has been more professional investors

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>getting involved in this space. What's their view of these changes?

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>And what about the economists perspective and all of this.

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Do they think that a strategic reserves a good idea?

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll start with the economists, because it's very much linked

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 3>to the atmosphere that we're in right now. If anyone

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 3>has ever thought of a strategic reserve, I don't know

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 3>what kind of dinner party conversation everybody else has, but

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 3>my friends and I talk about this all the time.

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 3>So when you know, when you talk about a strategic reserve,

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 3>you're often thinking about oh, okay, foreign exchange or gold

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:06.119
<v Speaker 3>or oil, things that are traditionally perceived as having some

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 3>sort of value or utility that can be exchanged, used

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 3>sold as might be you know, necessary to either support

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 3>the ongoing operations of a country or for other financial reasons.

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 3>And so the you know, the kind of the critics

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 3>of this idea of a reserve are like, well, what

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 3>are you going to do with the bitcoin?

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Though?

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Right? Like, is what is the problem that you are

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 3>trying to solve here? And there has been a certain

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 3>amount of skepticism that this makes sense.

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 3>We had an opinion piece from Bill Dudley, former presidents

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 3>of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and now

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg columnist, who said, without mincing words, it's hard to

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 3>fathom how this would benefit most Americans. And that's the

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 3>idea of other than inherent speculative value, or this idea

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 3>of you know, if you buy and hold, the price

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 3>might appreciate. There isn't necessarily a wide bread utility for

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin as a means of payments. For instance, enter those

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 3>institutional investors that you mentioned. A big thing that has

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 3>rallied or contributed to the rally in bitcoin over the

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 3>past year or so has been the introduction of exchange

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 3>traded funds that are backed by bitcoin. And so you

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 3>can now go to a financial advisor here in the

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.239
<v Speaker 3>US and say, I want to get some crypto exposure

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 3>in my portfolio. What is one of the ways that

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 3>I can do that. You can buy an ETF, and

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 3>ETFs are some of them, like the most popular kind

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 3>of retail products that are available to different kinds of investors.

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 3>And the problem, though, is when you institutionalize an asset class,

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 3>when you have it being bought at very large size

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 3>by other people who take macroeconomic considerations into account, when

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 3>the economy is perceived is not doing too well, or

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 3>when people's risk profile changes, anything that they have in

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 3>those portfolios that they consider it to be risky gets

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 3>sold off with everything else. You have a correlation problem.

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 3>That's really been something we've been seeing with crypto. You know,

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 3>there's concern about tariffs, stocks are falling, Bitcoin is falling,

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 3>there's concern about slowing rates of growth. Stocks are falling,

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Bitcoin is falling.

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Stacy Murriy shmel Our, executive editor for Crypto. Thank you.

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>For more explanations like this from our team of three

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand journalists and analysts around the world, go to Bloomberg

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash explainers. I'm Stephen Carol. This is here's why.

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll be back next week with more. Thanks for listening.