WEBVTT - The Ethics of Piracy

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello, everyone,

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>welcome to tech stuff. My name is Chris Poulette and

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I am an editor here at how stuff works dot Com.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me as always a senior writer, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>The code is more what you'd call guidelines and actual rules,

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Parley Poley. Um. That actually leads us directly into a

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>little Facebook feedback. That's a thing, well it could have.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not listener mail our Facebook. So I heard it

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that way everymore. Yeah, I just made it up. So

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Facebook feedback lots of fs and that. Uh. This listener

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>mail comes to us from home. Ecebook feedback comes to

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>us from someone whose name I can't pronounce because my

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>pronunciation for names and Indian languages is terrible. But I'm

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>going to give it a shot and he can write

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>to me on Facebook and tell me how wrong I

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>got it. On Tricks says Hey, I've got an awesome

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast idea, the ethics of pirating media. You have already bought. Well,

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not that clear, here's an example, you buy

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a music CD and you travel somewhere. You had the

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>music from the CD on your computer, but you accidentally

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>deleted it. Is it right to download the music from

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>an illegal source? Maybe torrents? Downloading without purchasing is illegal anyway,

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 1>but people argue that this is ethically right. I'm one

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>of them too. You could read this as a listener

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>mail and you can mention my name too. I tried. UM.

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna talk about piracy ethics. You know, when

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is it is it ever all right to download something

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>uh for free? You know, whether you've purchased it or

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't purchased it, and sort of the issues that surround

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>this and make it more complicated than you might first imagine.

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So let's get started, shall we. Yes, Now it does

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>become more complicated as you start uh crossing international boundaries.

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>This is uh. If it was a piece of music

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>recorded and save Britain, UH and you were in Germany

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>when you had your files deleted and you wanted to

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>download them, uh, it makes things even more complicated. Unfortunately,

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>well fortunately and unfortunately for the pirates. I suppose, UM,

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>there are treaties in between these different countries, including those

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:42.679
<v Speaker 1>but around the World Intellectual Property Organization or Weepoh wow, Yeah,

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I I focused mainly on the United States because that's,

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>for one thing, is the easiest for me to get

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>information on in a language that I can read. Yes,

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.119
<v Speaker 1>that is our sphere of operation, of course, so it's

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a little easier for us. But you know, on tricks,

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.839
<v Speaker 1>we do know from his frequent feedback on Facebook. Hey,

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that's lots of alliteration there. Um does live in India,

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>so you know, he might have a different perspective than

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the media. Right. But in the United States, copyright law

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>as it stands is already fairly complicated. Yes, okay, So

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in general, a work created on or after January one,

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy eight has a copyright that will last through

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the duration of the author's life plus seventy years. Yes,

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>before January one, ninety eight is more complicated. Um. And

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>also you could, uh, from the ones from before then,

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>corporations and authors had the opportunity to extend copyright further

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>if they wanted to, which could not bring it up

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to the same amount of time as if it were

0:03:55.320 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>created after nine. But it's it's complex. So, uh, what

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>copyright allows you to do? Is it it allows you

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to dictate how how your your content can be purchased

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and distributed. Uh. So let's say that I create an idea,

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>I've got it under copyright. What I choose to do

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>with that content, that content belongs to me, and I

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>can license it out to people as I see fit. Uh,

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that's really a lot of the arguments I see kind

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of ignore this whole licensing issue, which is to me

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>right at the very heart of the problem. But UM,

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, you're better to say something. Yeah, well, I

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>was just going to say, at least in the United States. UM,

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>let's say you're an author and you're writing a book. Well,

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 1>as soon as you finish it and you you've you've

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, say, printed it out, it's in a fixed

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>form and you're done with it. Copyright already is protecting

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that work in the United States. As soon as they

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>exists in a fixed form, it is under copyright. You

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>are the copyright holder. Um. You do not have to

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>file paperwork for it, although for some protection it does

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>help you to do that. Um, but you've already got

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it. It It starts right then and there. Now, say you

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>want to have your work published. You'd like to see

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>your name in print. You want to go on tour

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and do book signings. This is the dream that you've

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>always been wanting to pursue. Well, you're going to need

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a publisher to help you with that. You could self

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>publish it, but you're still you know, unless you happen

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to own a printing press, it's gonna be hard to distribute. Yeah,

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you're going to want some kind of publishing

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>help with it. So let's say, uh, let's let's say

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.239
<v Speaker 1>you're really interested in having somebody like Random House publish

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>your work, and so you submit it and they're they're

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>gaga over the whole thing. They love it, they love

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the idea. They want to print it. But you're going

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to have to license the copyright to them in order

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to do that, and you're going to sign a long

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>agreement that allows them to be the publisher to do that,

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and so you're basically giving them access to or copyright

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>if you will. So at that point, um, making unauthorized

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>copies affects the company too, and not just you as

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the author, right, And then we have to kind of

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>address something that's there's a lot of confusion around this

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>as well. The concept of fair use. Fair use definitely

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>has its place, but unfortunately or fortunately, depending on which

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>side of the argument you happen to be on at

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>any given time, it's not firmly defined. In general, fair

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>use allows a couple for a couple of different um

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>exceptions to the whole copyright issue. One is, if you

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>are using material for educational purposes and you are commenting

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>on it, or you are um, you know, using it

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to illustrate a point, you are allowed to use a

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of information without it being considered a violation

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of copyright. However, that certain amount is up for discussion.

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>There's no there's no clear definition. There's no like two

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>paragraphs is the limit and over to paragraphs is copyright

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>violation or is the utmost limit you can go to.

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing set in stone. It ends up being a

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>case by case basis. Right, if you're going to use

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a portion of someone else's work in your own and

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the person who's copyright uh is in question, uh, you know,

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>feels that is being infringed upon, they take you to court.

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>It is ultimately going to be up to the judge

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to decide, you know, how much is being used and

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>for what purpose? If it it relies on a couple

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of things. It needs to be transformative. So if you've,

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>for example, weird al Yankovic takes songs that are already

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>um popular and will remake them into a parody. Often

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>puts it in a different key, and rewrites new lyrics

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to it, and makes subtle changes to the song to

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>make it his own. But it's essentially a song that

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is recognized old people. Parody is protected. Parody is protected,

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>but it is what he has done is transformed the

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>original work and and put it under a parody. So

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>he's okay with that. Now, if you took an entire

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>poet's poem and used it in your work and claimed

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it was your own, then you're probably gonna get in trouble,

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>right Or if you if you end up writing a

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>an essay, let's say that makes the exact same point

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>as the essay that you are using to illustrate your point,

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>there might be an argument there that that's just plagiarism

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and copyright violation, that you're not you're not using this

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>in a new way of or or really using it

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to educate or illustrate. You're just borrowing someone else's stuff,

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and using it as part of your own material. Um,

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>but you can also make copies of things that you

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>purchase intellectual property. Essentially, you can make copies of I

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>P for archival purposes. Yes, Now that means that, let's

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>say that you bought this really came about, especially back

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>with during the whole vinyl album and cassette era, and

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>say that you would buy a vinyl album. Kids, if

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what that is, actually probably do because

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of coming back with the whole DJ stuff.

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But that in our our tech stuff audience is probably

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>into that anyway. Yeah, but but you might want to

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>make a copy of that because this is physical medium,

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and media can sustain damage and wear and tear over time,

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and you still want to be able to listen to

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:36.359
<v Speaker 1>that content after that media has died out or perhaps

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.119
<v Speaker 1>perhaps even it gets to a point where the equipment

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you have that can play that media no longer works, right,

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>So you want to be able to create an archival copy. Now,

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a copy for your own personal use. It's

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>something that you're keeping so that you can again maintain uh,

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the ability to access that material that the license that

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you have essentially purchased to that material for a while

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that in the United States that became really pretty much

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>impossible to do with legally, right because companies were putting

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>DRM on top of UH of their physical media like

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>let's say c d s or DVDs, and in order

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to be able to create a copy, you had to

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>break the d r M, right, But breaking the DRM

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>was illegal, So even though it wasn't illegal to make

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the copy, it was illegal to break the protection that

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>prevents you from making a copy. So in effect, it

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>became illegal for you to make a copy because there's

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>no legal way to get around it. Yeah, now it's

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to come as any big shock to any

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:51.439
<v Speaker 1>of our listeners that the world of computer technology has

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>completely changed, uh the need for copyright protection in the

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>eyes of people who own copyright. Now, I mean, you

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>had a six page book, you know, in eighty two.

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>The only way anybody was going to make a copy

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 1>of that was my hand and that right then and

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>there is going to be a deterrent to most people

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to make another copy of the book now. I mean,

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously the the printer is going to have the printing

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>press and be able to make more copies of it,

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and you could do that Um, but it's not like

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody on the street is going to be able to

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 1>do that. Now that everyone has a computer and it's

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>easy to make copies of let's say, for for the

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>purposes of this particular part of the conversation, unprotected anything

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that's unprotected like electronic books, digital music files, digital video files.

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if there were no protection at all, Uh,

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it would be easy to you know, rip new copies

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of that and give them to everybody you knew, distribute

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>them on the internet freely and amount of seconds. In fact,

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that happens all the time. Sure, sure, So DRM is

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in is digital rights management is an attempt on the

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>part of the copyright owners and the publishers of that

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>content who have a stake in it too, now that

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they have a license to to produce and distribute the content. Um,

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it is an attempt for them to protect it and

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to get people to actually fork over the money for it. Um.

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>The thing is they have also pushed government in general

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and multiple countries to help them do that by lobbying

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>intensely for very thorough and someone to just say, you know,

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 1>draconian measures that help them protect their d r M

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and leave it in place. Which is what the which

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is what's often used in conjunction with the Digital Millennium

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Copyright Act here in the United States. Yeah, d m

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>c A. You've probably heard that term before, especially if

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you live in the United States. That's that's what I

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>was talking about with the d m c A, where

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it made it a criminal act to try and either

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 1>bypass DRM on a DRM product or to create software

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>or some other tool that would allow you to bypass DRM.

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>So if you created a tool that would break d

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>r M and UH, and even if you had never

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>done it yourself, like if you never created a file,

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>just creating that tool was illegal under d m c A. Yes. Now,

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of course, the entertainment industry in the United States is

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>very very big and very very powerful. UM. The d

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>m c A was signed into UH into law on

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>enter by President Bill Clinton UM, and it did bring

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States into compliance with two different w I

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>p O treatise UM, which UH basically is the w

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 1>y p O Copyright Treaty and then w I p

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>O Performances and Phonograms Treaty. Now, everybody who's all the

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>countries that are are on board with these treaties UM

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>have an obligation to protect copyright from on things from

0:13:56.400 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 1>other countries just as much as they would anything that

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>was copyrighted in their own country. So um, if somebody

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in Russia wanted to uh copy and distribute Madonna's latest album, um,

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and Russia has signed onto the w I p O treaty,

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>they are at the government is legally obligated to protect

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:17.719
<v Speaker 1>it as though it was somebody a Russian artist who

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>had also recorded and released an album in its own country.

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Right now, let's get even more complicated with this whole

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>digital media. So okay, so we've already established the idea

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that creating digital copies from physical media can be uh well,

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>depending on the exceptions. Also because d m c A

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>does have some exceptions that that tend to get in

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>introduced every three years or so. But um, but creating

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>digital copies of physical media can be difficult and in

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>some cases illegal because you have to violate the DRM.

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Another reason why this is a complicated issue is that

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to wrap your mind around stealing a digital

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>five because really what you're doing is you're creating another

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>instance of that file. Yeah, you're not taking anything from someone.

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>For example, if I own an album that Chris wants,

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna call it, um let's see the Ramones

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Greatest hits. Let's say I've got the Ramones Grace Hits

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>on vinyl and Chris is thinking, you know, I'd really

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>like to listen to Blitz Creek Pop. And Jonathan's not looking.

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take that album and he takes the album

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>out of my house. Well, I no longer can listen

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Ramones Grace Hits because my copy has been

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a student. But let's say that I have the album

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in digital file format on my computer and Chris says,

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want to listen to Blitz Creek Pop.

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna copy that file off Jonathan's computer and put

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it on my computer. Well, I can still listen to

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>my copy of Blitz Creek Bop. As far as I

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>can tell from my perspective, nothing bad has happened because

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>everything I have is still where it should be. Ut,

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a case of theft. It's just not a case

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of theft that is analogous necessarily just stealing physical goods.

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And this, I think is where are a lot of

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the arguments center around this concept, the idea that if

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you're not if you're not really bereft of something, if

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>if the object is not has not left your possession,

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>how can you call it stealing? Well, this is where

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>we get to the concept that when you purchase i P,

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not really purchasing the i P. You're you're licensing it, right,

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Like if I buy a book from Chris, Like Chris

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>has written a book and he's published the book, and

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I buy it from him, I know I don't own

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Chris's work, that that ownership does not transfer to me,

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that that intellectual property doesn't transfer to me, just my

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>access to it. That's a license to access that i P.

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you think of it in terms of licenses,

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>then these questions start to get a little easier to understand. Now,

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the question we were specifically asked was about getting an

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the legal copy of something that you already own legally

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and where does that fall ethically? And I guess that

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>really depends upon whom you ask. Yeah, yeah, I mean

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>speaking speaking as a recording artist myself. Um, you know,

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>long time listeners will recall that I am I've been

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 1>in several bands and have done recordings with with a

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 1>few as well. Um, I sort of sympathized with the

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>big name artists who have uh basically hollered about the

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>about people stealing their music because you know, for them

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that's how they make their living. Um, so basically people

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 1>are taking away a potential source of revenue. Now it

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't you know, you could argue, you could make the argument, Hey,

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I know these guys are on name of major label here,

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>they're only getting a buck for every CD and I'm

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>basically on stealing a dollar from their coffers of money

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that they're making touring. It's no big deal. But to them,

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, if suddenly thousands of people are doing that,

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>then there's a possibility that they might have to go

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>get a day job. And I mean seriously, but there's

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>also there's a getting to make that. To make it

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>more complicated, of course, this in this particular situation, we're

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about someone who has purchased that that product legally,

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>has converted it into digital media, which again is legal, yes,

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>but then loses the digital copy and does not immediately

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>have access to the physical copy. Is it wrong to

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 1>download those files again for free? I would say that

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>here's the problem that I have with this. The problem

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is that by downloading those files for free, you are

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>participating in piracy. From from your perspective as the consumer,

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not a huge deal, right, You're getting access to

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>files that you originally had access to in the first place.

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>So for you, it just seems like it's it's like

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>nothing's really changed. But what you're doing is you're actually

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>trafficking with someone who is distributing these files for free,

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and that means that they have violated copyright. They don't

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>have the right to distribute that content. They are doing

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>something that's wrong, and you are a part of that.

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>So I would say that ethically, on your end, it

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like a big deal, but in a bigger

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>picture perspective, it's the wrong thing to do. I think

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>legally it's more black and white. Well legally it's black

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and white, but ethically and legally are two totally different concepts. Well, no,

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that's That's what I wanted to stress, is that there

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>there is a clear division there. You know, legally, yes,

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>there's really no question according to these these laws that

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>have been set up in in so many countries and

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the treaties that they have made to protect them, Yes,

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that is technically theft. Um or at least technically piracy.

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>But ethnically, you know, from the user standpoint, it's a

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>lot murk here. From the artist's standpoint or the author standpoint,

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like, hey, you know, you bought a copy of

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>my book. I can't help it if you left it

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:09.719
<v Speaker 1>on the train. You know, that doesn't give you an

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>excuse to go to the the library, you know, photocopy the

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>entire thing and make yourself another copy for free. That's

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>not that's not my fault, right. But from the user's point,

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've already paid my twelve right, that's a

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 1>that's a very good point. I'm glad you paid that

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>way because the example I used when Chris and I

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>were just kind of chatting about this casually before the

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>podcast was I said, well what if what if you

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 1>um uh see how did I words? Le'll say, you

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you buy a book, okay, and then the book gets

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>damaged beyond repair, or you lose it or whatever. At

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>some point you no longer have access to that book,

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>but you purchased it. That does not give you the

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>right to go out and steal another copy of that book.

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>But then you have the argument of hey, you're talking

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>about physical media, here, by stealing a physical object, you

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>have didn't eyed the the publisher or bookseller or whomever,

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the right to sell that. Whereas when you're talking about

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>digital again, you're making a copy, you're not stealing a

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>physical object. But it's again, if you go back to

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the license argument, as you did, because you were talking

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>about going to the library and copying a book, that's

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.959
<v Speaker 1>still not legal. And is it ethical or not? Well,

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>it depends on upon whom you ask again, Like like

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I said, they are like Randy Cohen, who writes for

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times magazine. Randy Cohen writes about ethical issues,

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and he was specifically asked about a case where someone

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>had bought a hardback copy of a novel and she

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be able to read an electronic copy of

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that novel, but there was no e book available for purchase.

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>So what she was wondering was is it wrong to

0:21:55.320 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>download a pirated electronic copy of that book having already

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>purchased the book through legal means, and there's no there's

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>no legal recourse to get an electronic copy. Mr Cohen

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>said that he thought ethically that was all right. Yeah,

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that blew my mind too. I I'm not so quick

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to jump on that. Um. Here, here's the thing. If

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you went and you purchased a book, and you brought

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it home and scanned every single page and created a

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.719
<v Speaker 1>digital copy yourself, I have no problem with that because

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I think of that as fair use. You're doing that

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>for archival purposes, or you're doing it you're your your

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>space shifting the work correct like you're you're shifting it

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>from a physical medium to a digital medium. UM, I

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>have no issue with any of that. What I have

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>a problem with is the fact that by going to

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>a source where they are distributing this, you have taken

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>part of an illegal practice, and that means you're supporting

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>an illegal practice. Now, now from your perspective, you're doing

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it very ethically because you've already purchased that content. It's

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>not like you are getting around purchasing the content again

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>because again there's no legal recourse for you to get

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that e book ethically for you, I guess I don't

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>have an issue with it. But again, big picture, you're

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>supporting a larger piracy effort that violates the distribution portion

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 1>of copyright. So while while I would say that, I

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>would feel as on my own end that I would have.

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't have a big problem with doing this.

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>If I thought about my actions beyond just the fact

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that this is benefiting me to this is supporting an

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>entire illegal industry, then that's where the problems start coming

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in for me Ethically. It's it's it's a a tough question. Um,

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you. Let me be perfectly honest here.

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll just to lay it out on the table. There

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>was a particular television series that came out in the UK. Yes, Um,

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>several years ago. He's trying not to smile because we

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>just talked about this in a completely unrelated light the

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>other day. So it's really funny. So this particular television

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 1>series came out in the UK, and there was no

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 1>legal way to get access to a US version of

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>this UK television show. The only thing I could have

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>done is I could have purchased the UK version of

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the show and then bought a UK or region free

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>DVD player so that I could watch the show. But

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>other than that, there was no way for me to

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>do it. The only thing that I could do if

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to watch the show was to download it illegally. Subsequently,

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the show became available in the United States and immediately

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.719
<v Speaker 1>went out and purchased a copy. Because I did download

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it illegally, I left that part out. I illegally downloaded

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a television show that was not legally available in the

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 1>United States. Uh. And I didn't feel badly about it

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>because I was like, I would pay for this if

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>there were a way for me to pay for it,

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>and I will pay for it if there ever is

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.959
<v Speaker 1>a way, and I did. Doesn't justify my action. Still

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think my actions are really justifiable, because ultimately,

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the way I acted was that I said, I want

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>access to this content, and I'm going to get it.

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 1>But there is nothing in the universe that guarantees you

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>access to any content. You do not have the right

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to access content just because it exists. This is where

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan goes on a rant, because I mean, I am

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I have fallen guilt guilty of this in the example

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I used as a perfect example. By the way, in

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>case you're wondering, the show was spaced so it was

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>a different show. Yeah, but I do remember, dude, you

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>don't need to tell them I've done it more than once. No,

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>that's not the one you were talking about I think

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I was taked about Battle Royal, wasn't I? Yeah, okay,

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Battle Royal, which I subsequently ended up deleting eventually. But

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that was another example early on. Uh No, Space was

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>what I was thinking of this the UK show I

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>was thinking. You meant a different show that we were

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>talking about was someone had uploaded to YouTube. You mean

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the American pilot for the I T crowd And you

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>want me to just keep on naming things and dig

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a hole even deeper. But you didn't download anything illegally,

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>know that one I just watched somebody uploaded Italy. So

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.239
<v Speaker 1>at any rate, Getting back to the Space discussion, as

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>soon as it became available legally, I went out and

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>purchased a copy, and I ended up deleting my um my,

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the copies I had digitally because it didn't need them anymore,

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>like the DVD copy was superior to the digital format

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.719
<v Speaker 1>that I had. Um But yes, you don't. You are

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 1>not entitled to content just because it exists. Let's say

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that a cool game comes out and it's more expensive

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 1>than you are able to justify in your budget. You

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>have no right to that content. It's not like you know,

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>just because it's more expensive than you think it's worth,

0:26:57.720 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that you should go out and steal it. That's wrong.

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>That's that is, that is the very definition of wrong.

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>The way you do this, the way you go about

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>this is that if you think content is too expensive

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>for what it is worth, you do not buy the content,

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and if enough people do not buy the content, the

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>content provider will have to change the way things are

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>or the content provider goes out of business. You do

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>not say, hey, that game is sixty dollars, but I

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's only worth ten dollars, so I'm gonna steal

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>it for free. That does not work. That is the

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong way to do it. That is stealing. I I

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>feel compelled to point out that that I feel that yes,

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>it is simply put, information does want to be free,

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and that was That's part of the whole thing about

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:49.199
<v Speaker 1>copyright protection is that, um, there is some provision for

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>fair use, and there's also the expiration of copyright law.

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>That's been the big um. The big thing about copyright

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>law extensions that have come up, especially with the Sonny

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Bone Know extension a few years ago, was the Mickey

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>Mouse Protection extension. Is what some people derisively referred to

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that as well. Yes, because of course Disney UH is

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>very serious about protecting characters such as Mickey Mouse. Makes

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>perfect sense from a business perspective, from a creative perspective,

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>for the people who would like to build upon things

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that have already come before, which is, by the way,

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the history of human development. UM, it's antithetical, it's it's

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it's harmful to keep extending copyright. But for the people

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>and the corporations, who, as we know in the United

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>States are treated as people, UH, it makes perfect business

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>sense to keep extending it as long as as possible

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in order to ensure that you've got that that exclusivity.

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And I assumed that probably in the next fifty two

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>seventy five years there's going to be another attempt to

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>lobby for from Disney or someone else who had UH

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>characters that are still very viable in the marketplace that

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>have been around for a very long time. They're they're

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>going to keep lobbying government to to UH extend that.

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is, it's it's designed to expire specifically

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>for the purposes of building upon that and and UH

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and making changes to you can you could say things

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>about pride and prejudice and zombies um, which is completely

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>legal because um, you know, the person the work itself

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>is in the public domain at this point. And I

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>should point out that the w I p O treaties

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>have a provision for that things that are in the

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>public domain or in the public domain, no matter where

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>they are. So if it's something that, say in Britain

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't in the public domain, but or is in the

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>public domain, but it wouldn't be in the United States,

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the country it's published and it's in

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>public domain, then it then it counts. So it's um.

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's sort of a thorny thing. And and you know,

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>don't get the idea that we're uh completely on the

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>side of of all protecting information. But the thing is,

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>if it's still under copyright, uh, you know, it's still

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>protected and you have to abide by the law. You're

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>supposed to abide by the law. And that's you know,

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.959
<v Speaker 1>where the line is to go on to go on record.

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>As far as my opinion goes with the whole copyright thing,

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I think copyright law is really messed up. And I

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>think that a lot of the motivations that come from

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the pirates quote are at least semi legitimate. Um that

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of the problems come out of the

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that that the UH copyright practices and particularly DRM

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>practices are so over the top and ridiculous that it

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>promotes an a a environment of piracy. So for example,

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>if you video games are a great example, right, like

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you get video games that have really heavy DRM on it.

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes that makes it difficult to play the game. Legitimately, yes,

0:30:57.560 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a big part of why Spoor ended

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>up tanking and badly as it did, was because the

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>initial complaints about the the fair play Wait now that's

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple's sorry, I can't remember the name of it. Anyway,

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the the DRM they had included it Electronic Arts UM

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>was so you know, it actually hampered playing the game.

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I had trouble playing it on my Mac because of

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the DRM, And as soon as they removed that sent

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 1>me the download and it updated, it was fine to

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>play after that. But you know, by that point, the

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>reviews that come out, um, you know, it's still I

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:31.959
<v Speaker 1>look the other day, it's still something like two stars

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon, and most of the negative comments are over

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the DRM, which has been removed years ago. Chris I

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>got a question for you. Okay, all right. Let's say

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that you have purchased a game such as Spore. Okay, okay, uh,

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and the DRM has made the game virtually unplayable. Right,

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>but you have the option of illegally downloading a version

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of that game that has the DRM broken, which would

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>make the game perfectly playable on your system. Right, So

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you've already bought the game. I paid for it, You

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>paid for it. Uh. Would you download the illegal copy? No?

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I would not. All right? Now, do you think it's

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>ethically wrong for someone to get the illegal copy knowing

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that they like, let's say, they don't even bother to

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>take the Spore version out of their box. They're not

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>going to give it away. The boxes just sitting there

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in the closet, So they're they're going to keep a

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>copy if the if the Feds show up in No,

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I see, I bought a copy of this thing. It's

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in my closet, exactly. You still find do you still

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>find that ethically troubling? Yeah? I do find it ethically troubling.

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So this is one of those gray areas that's hard

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>for me to It's hard for me. I tend to

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>feel sympathy for the pirates because on the one hand,

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, hey, I've purchased something. They've promised me a

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>particular experience, and I am I am not a I

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>followed all the rules, I've done everything they've asked of me,

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and the experience is not what they said because they've

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>put so much protection on this that I can't run it.

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Another good example is let's say you get a game

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like the ones Ubisoft put out where the only way

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you could play it is if you could connect to

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>their servers, and that was how they put on DRM.

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're not familiar with the story, what Ubisoft did

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>was for a couple of the games they put out,

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you would have to have a persistent Internet connection to

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the Ubisoft servers to confirm that you had a legitimate

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>copy of the game. And if you lost Internet connection

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>during any point of playing this game, and these were

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>single person games that were not multiplayer games, you don't

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>You aren't using the network for anything like that, You're

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>just using it to verify the copy of the game.

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>But if you lost the Internet connection, you would no

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>longer be able to play the game until your Internet

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>connection was restored. For a single player game, now again,

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>pirates were breaking the codes on this and then offering

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>up the game for free, essentially saying that if you

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>purchase this game and you want to play it, then

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you should go ahead and get this version of the

0:33:56.680 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>game because you don't have to worry about your Internet connection. Um.

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I can kind of see their argument because the DRM

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>has gone so far as to make the product unusable.

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, you are supporting this this

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>pirate piracy environment, so it's really an honor system thing

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 1>in a way. You're saying, hey, you know, I want

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to support this company, I want this this I've paid

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for this this content, I just want to have access

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to it now. It's a complicated issue, you know. That's

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that one's not very easy. The same thing with like

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the music services that came out, where

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the DRM was tied to servers and then the servers

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>were going offline, and the music service services were saying, hey,

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you know all those songs you bought from us, Yeah,

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you might want to burn those two CD like now,

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>because we're gonna turn the servers off in a month

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and you won't be able to play those files anymore. Yes, yes,

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 1>more than one name, big name did that. Yeah, and

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.479
<v Speaker 1>in these cases, like you could argue, well, you've only

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 1>purchased a license to listen to that music from so

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and so, But when you purchased the license, it was

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>understood to be in perpetuity, right, there was no time

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 1>limit on that, Like you can listen to this song

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>until January seventeen, two thousand and eight. That that wasn't

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in the agreement. Yeah. Now see the thing the thing

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 1>about that this is if you've bought a copy of

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it and you find it's unplayable speaking of games, still um,

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and you've gone out and downloaded a pirate copy the

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:32.439
<v Speaker 1>company still even though you've purchased a copy legally. The

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 1>thing that bothers me to other than the ethics standpoint,

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is the company doesn't know what's going on. They have

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the company has no idea what that that you have

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>encountered this trouble with the d r M, that you're

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:46.839
<v Speaker 1>upset about it, that you're downloading an illegal copy of it,

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think it's important to one of

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>the things is I'm not saying that piracy is good.

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I ethically still have a trouble pirating and copy of

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.359
<v Speaker 1>that game, but you know it would be. It would

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 1>have been good to have known that up for and

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 1>not spend your money with them, because then more people

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 1>spend money on it intending you know. Now, say you

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 1>know that it's going on, your friends said, oh, this

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 1>is a great game, but it's unplayable with this DRM.

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>If you go out and buy a copy of this

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and then pirate the game, you paid for it and

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you're still playing it, and then you're still supporting the

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 1>company applying that DRM the game. What you're saying is

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that you are not letting the market correct itself because

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you are participating in this kind of charade. Everything is cool,

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can totally see that. Yeah, yeah, it

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>is a weird thing. Um. Like I said before, if

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you want content and they have a certain asking price

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>for it and you can't or won't meet that asking price,

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>then you go without that content. If you want content

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 1>and you're willing to pay what they're asking for it,

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 1>there's usually no problem till you encounter this DRM issue. Um.

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:57.479
<v Speaker 1>And if you encounter the DRM issue, then that's where

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 1>things got gray for me. And it was a little

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>it was still a little darker for you than it

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>was for me. Um, But I mean here's another. One

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:08.359
<v Speaker 1>other example, or one other point I want to throw

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>out is that part of the justification for piracy comes

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>from some disingenuous statements that various content providers and organizations

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>have made regarding how much money they lose as a

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 1>result of piracy. So they're not helping themselves, right that

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:33.879
<v Speaker 1>You've got the pirates on one side and these organizations

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>on the other, and you have organizations saying, hey, we're

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>losing you know, X billion dollar amount per year due

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to piracy. Well, the Government Accountability Office filed a report

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in t that's the United States Government Accountabilities Yes, the

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>US Government Accountability Office. The report was Intellectual Property Observations

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on Efforts to quantify the economic effects of counterfeit and

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>pirated Goods. This one beyond just did total media. This

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>was all sorts of counterfeit goods. Right. Well, in this case,

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>they said that it was impractical, too impossible to figure

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 1>out how much money was lost because you can't quantify

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:18.879
<v Speaker 1>factors like, uh, how much, Uh you know, how how

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>many of the people who stole something would have purchased it? Otherwise, Yeah,

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>there's really no way to know unless you do a

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:26.359
<v Speaker 1>survey with them and we get down to piracy. People

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't again, right, honest. Yeah, So if you can't if

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you if there's no way of knowing how many people

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>would have bought it if they hadn't stolen it, it's

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>hard to say what the actual economic impact is. Now

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we know that there is an economic impact if nothing else.

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 1>There's an economic impact in the sense that studios and

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 1>companies are pouring money into finding ways to prevent piracy.

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:52.759
<v Speaker 1>So there's an economic impact, right. It's not direct. It's

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 1>not saying that, oh, we lost twelve bucks because you

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>downloaded that album illegally. It's saying, hey, we lost x

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>amount of money because that's how much we had to

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>pour into trying to prevent people from downloading stuff illegally.

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's a complicated issue. Um. Ultimately, I would say

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 1>don't pirate stuff, like don't if it don't illegally download things.

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's you again, if you if you bought

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 1>something in one medium and you converted to digital and

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>then you lose the digital copy, you still have the

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:27.959
<v Speaker 1>physical medium even though it's not at hand. You wait

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 1>until you get your hands on that physical medium again,

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 1>because that then you're following the rules of fair use.

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:38.959
<v Speaker 1>But just going out and getting something because you bought

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 1>it once before. Is that's a slippery slope, And really

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. It doesn't take much longer before you get

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to the point where you're saying, hey, you know, I

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>bought books one through ten of the series and book

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 1>eleven is out, and um, you know it's it's already

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>out of print, and I would have bought it, so

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to download it. That's you know again,

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:02.959
<v Speaker 1>that's it's leading you down a pathway that is more

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 1>difficult to justify. Yeah, and I don't just as a

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:11.279
<v Speaker 1>note that I thought of as sidebar, um, there's another

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>reason why you might not want to be running around

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:17.840
<v Speaker 1>downloading a lot of torrents if you don't have to. Well,

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, torrenting is not in and of itself illegal.

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 1>It is the method of sharing files. But if you

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:26.359
<v Speaker 1>are downloading illegal files, especially if you don't know who

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:30.399
<v Speaker 1>you're downloading them from, there's a possibility there's a security issue.

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a possibility that you're going to download something very

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 1>nasty because uh, people who like to start bought nets

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:40.320
<v Speaker 1>like to put malware on servers like that and disguise

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it as other files. Yeah, An unnamed friend of mine

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>recently posted something on Facebook where this unnamed friend said,

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I've found a virus on my computer. It's something called

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a root kit? How bad is that? And did not

0:40:56.160 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 1>like my answer of that is very very bad. That's

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 1>about as bad as it gets. Really, yeah, kind yeah,

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 1>giving you back to our access to your computer, that's that's.

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of something that's worse than that. Well,

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's obviously the laws are different no

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:19.239
<v Speaker 1>matter where you go. I mean, they're they're all going

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:21.399
<v Speaker 1>to be similar in some ways in different than others.

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:23.280
<v Speaker 1>So I mean it's it's up to your local laws

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:25.840
<v Speaker 1>depending on on some of these questions about whether or

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 1>not it's it's ethical legal to do that. And you know,

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>ethically this is an issue with which we're all going

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to have to come to grips. But um, you know,

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 1>in general, I think Jonathan's right. If it's if there's

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a question of whether or not it could be illegal,

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 1>then you you shouldn't do it. Yeah, uh yeah. And

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that might mean that, you know, you campaign to have

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 1>laws changed, and that I'm fully in support of that.

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that's the way to go. It's

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>It's much better than going all Batman and saying I'm

0:41:57.200 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 1>above the law, because that that's a losing game. It

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is this for everyone ultimately, because if you get caught,

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 1>then you have to face these incredibly ridiculous finds that

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that organizations like the r I Double A and the

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 1>MP Double A demand be placed on people who violate

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the copyright laws. But you also hurt everybody else in

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the sense that these companies continue to try and find

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>ways to prevent piracy that ultimately hurt honest consumers the most. Yeah. Yeah,

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but it sounds it sounds like entricks is you know,

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a legal consumer. He's already purchased the music in the

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 1>first place, so he wants to do the right thing. Um,

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think most people do that. The producers want

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to produce stuff that people will buy, the people want

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to fork over their money for it. It's just that

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>there has to be a level of trust between them

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 1>for the for the transaction to work out. Okay, and

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>then d r M and copyright law, you know, just

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>complicates that matter of trust. Agreed, Yes, yes, neither side

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:03.359
<v Speaker 1>is wholly without blame. So with that being said, please

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>don't steal this. Actually this podcast is freely available, so

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and distribute it all you like and tell

0:43:09.280 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>all your friends to listen to it. And if you

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>have any comments or questions you can listen. Know on

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Twitter are handled. There is tech Stuff hs W,

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 1>or you can email us. Our email address is tech

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:24.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff at how stuff works dot com and Chris and

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I will talk to you again about something else I'm

0:43:27.719 --> 0:43:36.319
<v Speaker 1>sure that will be ethically disturbing really soon. If you're

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a tech stuff and be sure to check us out

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter text Stuff hs wsr handle and you can

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>also find us on Facebook at Facebook dot com slash

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff h s W for more on this and

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:52.359
<v Speaker 1>thousands of other topics because at how stuff works dot com.

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 1>And be sure to check out the new tech stuff

0:43:54.160 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>blog now on the how Stuff Works homepage. Brought to

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camry. It's ready,

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>are you