WEBVTT - Structural Changes To Society Will Reshape Post-Virus Economy

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl podcast on Paul Swing You.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa brahma Witz, each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penil podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:22.959
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Two trillion dollars US stimulus package

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>coming out that SCO's about ten of the nation's total output.

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>The question is is it enough. Francis Donald, managing director,

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>chief Economists and head of macro Strategy at Manual Life

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Investment Management, joins us to lend her thoughts. So, Francis,

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We're starting to get

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:42.599
<v Speaker 1>some initial details about this stimulus plan. What is your

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>early read as to kind of the scope and scale

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of this plan. Well, like almost every data point in

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>policy move, we get unprecedented, huge, massive, But just like

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>every other policy we've seen from other governments, it's not

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be enough to prevent a massive dislowcation in

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>this economy. We are still going to experience a recession

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>what I call it compressed recession in a very short

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>period of time. This passage is about mitigating just how

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 1>bad that might be and preventing it from creating other

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.759
<v Speaker 1>spillovers that last an extended period of time. So for me,

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't really change how I think the next three

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>months ago. It does give me more hope that by

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the year end we have seen a little bit more

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 1>of that recovery. I'm not in V shaped recovery. I'm

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>in U shaped recovery. I'm not sure how much the

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>distinction matters. It's good news, it's not a savior. So

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are looking ahead to initial jobless

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>claims tomorrow. A lot of economists are just throwing up

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>their hands and saying, we don't know. I mean, this

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>seems unprecedented. The range of outcomes is so wide that

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to make a forecast. What are you

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at? To give you some sort of compass through

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>this period? We have to look at a lot of

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>different alternative data sets, things I've never looked at before,

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>like subway ridership. How many people are They're looking at

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>open table reservations, looking at surveys that we maybe haven't

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>seen before. This is really difficult to forecast, and there's

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a reason why the set through up its hands and

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>said we're not giving you the summary of economic projections. Basically,

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>the only way to do forecasting here is to take

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>an economic model and break it, push through a bunch

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of assumptions that are based on just various scenarios, and

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>hope it gives you some point forecast. But that is

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>false precision. What we need to be doing now is

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the progression, the quarter by quarter progression, and

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>how does anything that happened in the next three months

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>create longer term damage. I do think we need to

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>realize that we can't and we probably will not unwind

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>all of the damage that we see in the next

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>three to six months, that there are structural changes that

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>are coming from this, and most importantly, a lot of

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the policies that were put in place monetary and fiscal

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>are not going to be unwind unwounded three months. So

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we kind of have to distinguish here between what's going

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to rebound and what isn't. That conversation is so much

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 1>more important than what is the GDP hit, what is

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>initial jobs claim is going to be? So what do

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 1>you think some of the structural changes might result out

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of this Friensis. The biggest one is if I'm opening

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a company right now, I'm thinking twice three times about

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>do I want to global supply chain. We haven't just

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>had one hit to global supply chains. The paraffs who've

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>now had a second entirely different one. So if I'm

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>opening a company, I'm thinking, yeah, maybe, And you have

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to pay for domestic labor, which is more expensive, but

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a form of insurance. I also think that we're

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>going to get a sense that people can work remotely

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and do not need to travel into downtown cores. That

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>could change housing markets, It can change the way companies operate,

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>It can change the push towards new and better technologies

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>for remote working. These are the types of conversation that

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>we need to have. Um of course, the biggest one

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is we have now, you know, expanded the sets balance

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>sheet to something unprecedented. We now have deficits that will

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>blow out across the entire world. And I don't think

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have anyone who says we shouldn't have

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>spent that amount of money. So even our notions of

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>what's the appropriate rule of a central bank and how

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>much money should government spend is going to change as well. Francis,

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly where I wanted to go, this idea that

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the deficit is now going to double to where it was.

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>You've got helicopters dropping money, You've got the FED basically

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 1>saying we'll buy whatever you want with expectations at the

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Fed's balance sheet, which already is at a record high

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>now is going to at least double in the next

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, if not far sooner than that, to more

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>than nine trillion dollars. At what point is this inflationary

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 1>versus deflationary, So eventually that will create some inflation. And

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>this is why I think we're seeing a steeper curve.

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>It's why you're going to hear people say I'm a

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>seller of the thirty year that inflation is coming. Um.

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 1>This is why you're going to see people who like

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>gold in this type of environment. But for the meantime,

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the next six months, we're going to have

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to deal with demand destruction, and in my view, that

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>demand destruction it's going to be so much more powerful

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>than any sort of inflationary dynamics that come from these policies.

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>We also have a very strong US dollar, and that

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is a deflationary force. I don't think that strong US

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>dollar is going to unwind significantly this year. So yes,

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>do we need to think about inflation. Absolutely, Do we

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>need to think about it in the next twelve months

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>or even twenty four months, I don't think so. So.

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Francisk you're talking about you more of a U shaped recovery,

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>do you? In fact? And I think that we will

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>see a recovery in the third quarters that can be

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>pushed out maybe more to the fourth quarter. This could

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>be a lower for longer type of hit to the

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>second quarter. I suspect you're going to see some seeds

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of the recovery by the third quarter, and by that

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean you will see shops open back up and

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>some rehiring activity. Are we truly back online? Do we

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>start to see an economy that even resembled where we

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>were in January? Probably not till the fourth quarter. You know,

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>we have a supply shock and then we have two

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>types of demand shocks. Here. We have forced closures, which

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>means even if you want to buy a latte at

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the coffee shop, you can't, And then you have this

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.119
<v Speaker 1>other type of demand shops, which is just confidence based,

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>which is saying, you know, even if the store is open,

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm too afraid for my personal safety to go outside

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the house. Right now, a lot of these can be

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>cleared up. Supply chains are already coming back online out

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of China. That's good news. You can press a button

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and or sign a paper and open up a segment

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. But it's probably going to take a

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit of time before we have people who are

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>generally happy to go to concerts through movies. Again, that's

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the more of a confidence shock. Those are really difficult

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>to forecast. But you know, just thinking it true, I

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 1>don't think we're all going to be going around shaking

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>hands by June Francis. Just real quick here, I'm wondering

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>how much of the economy is still online that's getting discounted,

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>basically that the American business community hasn't gone to zero

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>as people shop online and uh and order stuff online.

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, And we see a variety of different types

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of companies that are hiring because there's a segment of

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>this economy that isn't just holding place, but it's going

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to re accelerate. And what they're seeing is just like

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the full weakness of the economy isn't going

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to redown. I suspect the strength in those particular industries,

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>everything from telecom to online shopping. They're not going to

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>lose all of this stump either as we continue to

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>have the structural shift. So certainly we're going to see

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>some front loading activity in March. Wash grocery store sales

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>for March, they're gonna be through the roof, um, but

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be substantially offset by the significant amount

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of downward pressure we have from small businesses, restaurants, job losses, um.

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Those are going to significantly outweigh Francis Donald. Thank you

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. Frances Donald, chief economists

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and head of macroeconomic strategy for MANU Life Asset Management.

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Joining us on the phone from Toronto really interesting to

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>try to forecast what the society might look like on

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the other side of this. We don't know how long

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be, Paul, but they're us seem to be

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a feeling things are going to be very different in

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>certain ways at least. Yeah, absolutely, and again her economic

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>outlook more of a U shaped recovery than some of

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the V shaped recoveries. That we've seen come out of

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. Over the last three or four days, we've

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>been hearing consistently about some of the growing strains on

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the health care system, particularly in New York City and

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Javit Center being outfitted with hundreds of beds in order

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to accommodate the influx of expected patients. Joining us now

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>someone with a lot of experience planning and existing within

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>this type of ecosystem. Dr Lena When, emergency physician as

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 1>well as a public health professor towards Washington University previously

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>serving as Baltimore as Health Commissioner. Dr When, thank you

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. I want to just

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of a state of play. How close

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>are we in New York City and some of the

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>other epicenters to a an Italy type situation where we

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>end up with just hundreds of people dying a day. Well,

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>if you talk to any of our frontline healthcare providers

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in New York and in other epicenters around the country,

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>they will say that we are already at this breaking point.

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>We are already seeing our hospital system stretched to capacity.

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And what's extremely worrisome is that our healthcare providers for

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>on the front lines don't even have the basic equipment

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that they need in order to protect themselves, which frankly

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>is something that I never thought we would see in

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>this country. I mean, it was just two months ago

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 1>that we saw the images emerging from China of nurses

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>who had to reuse their masks for several days at

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a time, doctors whom had to fashion their own gowns

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 1>out of garbage bags. And now we're seeing this playing

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>out all over the country. First we're ratcheting masks, then

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to run out of doctors, and then we're

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>also going to run out of hospital beds and I

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 1>see you bed and other critical capabilities that will keep

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>patients alive. I mean, I hate to present this dire picture,

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>but this is what's happening in our country due to

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>lack of preparedness. But all is not lost. We do

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>have an opportunity to ramp up production dramatically in this

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>country through a coordinated national effort, and we need everyone

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to continue to do their part to do social distancing

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and other measures that can reduce the rate of transmission

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>in these epicenters, but as critically in other parts of

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the country, to to prevent every part of our country

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>from turning into the China and Italy scenario that we

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>have seen playing out so dr when there has been

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>some growing discussion over the last week or so that

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>perhaps it's time to think about getting in the country

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote back to work and perhaps kind of open

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>up the economy somewhat. From your perspective on the healthcare side,

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>how do you view that? I mean, I understand the

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.079
<v Speaker 1>desire to get back to normal, because frankly, right now

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>life is not normal at all. It's not imaginable compared

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to where we were a month ago or two months ago.

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>But we also have to look at the reality of

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>where things are. We can't navigate based on our wish list.

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>We have to navigate based on the reality and what

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the reality is that we have this urgent need to

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>stabilize our health care system. We have an urgent need

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to ramp up testing because unless we do that, we

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>have no idea of where we actually are. We have

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 1>case counts every day of the number of people who

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>are infected, but we don't know how accurate these counts are.

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>In fact, basically every public health expert I know thinks

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that these counts are far off because we just don't

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>have the testing capability to understand what's happening in our country.

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So unless we can shore up our health care system,

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>unless we can get real data about what's going on,

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>we can't let up on really the only effective intervention

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that we have at this time, which is social distancing.

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 1>I wish that this were not the case. Don't get

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>me wrong. I wish that we had testing up and running.

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 1>I wish that our hospitals were not overflowing. But given

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the situation that we're in, we can't let up, or

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>else we are going to have tens of thousands of

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 1>people die, maybe even more because of our own in action.

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Dr when I'm wondering right now, we're looking at a

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>recommendation that anyone from New York quarantine themselves for fourteen

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>days if they travel outside of this state. How prevalent

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is your estimates is the research currently is the virus

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in the United States beyond New York? In other words,

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>if some of the hot spots are contained, will that

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>be enough to sort of stave off a crisis situation

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the United States. It's a great question.

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is that we don't know, because

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't know the true prevalence in other communities, but

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>there's reason to believe that you can do both of

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>these things at the same time. So mitigation efforts, meaning

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>mitigation in these hotspot areas as well as containment in

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>areas that probably are not yet so affected, although very

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>likely they are much more affective than we think, but

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>still there is a chance at that, and I think

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>as long as there's a chance, we should be trying

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to do both, trying to to um do every day

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>we can to both to the healthcare system in these

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>hot spots and to reduce the rate of of transmission

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in other areas too. Dr Lena When, thank you so

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. We really appreciate your learned perspective

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>on this issue. Dr Lena When is an emergency physician

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and public health professor George Washington University. She previously served

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>as Baltimore's health commissioner. So, Lisa, still, I think what

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing from Dr When is that, obviously we are

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>still at the relatively critical stages here, particularly in some

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of the hot spots, so perhaps a little bit premature

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I think about opening up the economy. There was a

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>story that caught my attention this morning about how New

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>York hospital workers are basically foregoing tests to see whether

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>they have the virus. If they don't have symptoms, they're

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>being told just to come to work because a they're

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>needed and be there aren't enough tests, and it just

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of highlights the fear felt by a lot of

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>people currently in the healthcare system. And I will tell

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you personally, I've spoken to people who are nurses in

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>this situation, and it is a frightening situation at this point,

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's expected to peak in about two weeks, so

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of concern about whether people who could potentially

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>be saved will be able to saved, as well as

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the lives of a lot of the people who are

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>on the front lines as hospital workers. Our next guest

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Hans Olsa, and he'sa chief investment officer food Shary Trust

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>company in Boston with about fourteen billion dollars under management. Hans,

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. What do you make

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of the market performance of the last couple of days?

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Are just kind of forming maybe a little bit of

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a bottom here? Is this just a dead cat bounce? No,

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're in the very early stages of a bottom.

0:14:55.480 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Formation here with the Setter reserves action being joined by

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the Congress's actions, I think we have the conditions now

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to start to put a double line underneath this episode.

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're in the early stages. There's definitely

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>um some some probably shockingly difficult headlines will have to

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>deal with in the week ahead, but most important, I

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>think we've got the beginnings of a base being formed.

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a question here how you get some

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>conviction at a time of such lack of conviction when

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it comes to economic forecasts. I'd love to get your sense.

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>How do you gain a sense of assurance behind your

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>call that we're getting stability and it's time to perhaps

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>buy well. I think you have to look at the

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>credit market, because in our commercial lives, the sort of

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the well spring of all the activity starts with credit,

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>right with money changing hands and the ability to get

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>credit to to transact UH. And you know, what we've

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>seen over the last week or so is severe dislocation.

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>We're right out through right cross the credit landscape, and

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>what we're starting to see now is some normalization beginning

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to happen in that that space, whether it be UH

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>yield spreads on investment grade bonds or high yields starting

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to come down. Once that we start to get a

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>return of normalization there, that will flow through to the

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>equity markets, and I think they're both happening at the

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>same time at the moment. So, Hans, one of the

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>areas that's been a little bit troubled obviously in the

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>credit side of the business is the mortgage markets. What's

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>your take on what's going on there and kind of

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>what the response has been from the FED. I think

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's efforts have been really good, uh in addressing

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the primary markets. We need to get into the secondary markets,

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>especially in commercial back uh, commercial back mortgage paper and

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the like. I think there needs to be some help

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>there on the part of the set of reserve there.

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>They need to basically supply capital to that part of

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the market so that um uh, some liquidity is there

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and we get a sort of beginning of a return

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to normal trading. It's not there yet. There's still some

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>distress sellers and liquidations occurring. But if the FED turns,

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it's considerable resources there that will start to tamp down

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. Hans. We're speaking with Hans Olsen, chief Investment

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Officer a fiduciary trust company in Boston. Hans, I'd love

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to get your sense of how you go about buying

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in this situation, given the fact that it's very hard

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 1>to depend on any actual data that we've previously relied on,

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>like earnings or estimates, to get a sense of what

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the financial picture is. Yeah, I think that's a two

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>part process. One you have to sort of look through

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to the other side of this. So if we if

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>we fixate on the data that we see in front

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of us right now, we're always two to three weeks

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 1>behind the curve and uh, you know, whether it's the

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>p M I like only actually with the p M I,

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>some of them are just beginning to to to reflect

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the UH sort of the severity of the draw down.

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think if you focus through to UH and

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and to a recovery, when we get a return to

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>a bit of normalcy, then I think it's just a

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>matter of having exposure. It's really more of a beta

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>play than it is trying to pick an individual stock

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>here or there. Things have sold off so so systemically,

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and in some cases in such a disorderly way. Uh,

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>just exposure to markets now in the base formation is

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>I think the first step into a successful um re

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>emergence of this from this period son for the brave

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 1>of heart that are willing and able to look to

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the other side of this, where should they be looking? Well,

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the US is the first place. And we

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we have liked international names for for some time, UM,

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's hard to imagine the global economy emerging from

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>this global slowdown, of this global crisis without the US

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>leading the way. We tend to be the most vibrant

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>uh and most creative economy. Uh. And you know it

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>would it would be a break with history for US

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to come out of a global slowdown without the US

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>leading the way. So I think the US is the

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>first place to be. I think credit is beginning to

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>look pretty interesting. Uh. I think I would go credit

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>first and then equities second, just because credit has to

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>recover before equities can recover. So if you have incremental

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>money UM, splitting it between those two sectors of the

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>capital markets would seem to me to be a good idea.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we're in credit because we've seen an

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>out performance in the past couple of days, and investment

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.959
<v Speaker 1>grade as a federal reserve backstops that as a class,

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.719
<v Speaker 1>but high yield has continued to underperform as people expect

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the default rate to spike in the wake of the

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of the shutdowns. The places that we're looking at right

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 1>now haven't pulled the trigger, but we're doing the work

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>on would be levered loans those are down trading in

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>the seventies. Now on those are applying implying default rates

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and recovery rates that probably won't come to pass, give

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and all the extraordinary efforts on the part of the

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank and now Congress, and then once that starts

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to catch a bid, I think we'll see a bit

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of a recovery and high yield already, though high yield

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>oh a s is down from the peak that achieved

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of days ago. So Hans, it's interesting

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the looking out to the other side. Are there sectors

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 1>in the economy that you would look at? Would you

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>look at the ones that got really crushed, whether it

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>be leisure or the airlines, transports, that type of thing.

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that for for us, where we would look

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>first would be various, Like um um industrials actually is

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. Picking in technology, although that hasn't sold off

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>as much energy. Some of the top names, and energy

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>might make a lot of sense here. They have the

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 1>wear with all the balance sheet, of the depth of

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>business and the access to resources. UH. In order to

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>lead out our way out, we start to get a

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>bid for for energy prices, so it would be energy,

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it would be health there, it would be UH. Financials

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>at some point here in the States are going to

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>look pretty interesting. So some of the areas that have

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>gotten hit harder. But it's but focusing really on the

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.959
<v Speaker 1>larger companies in that in those sectors, because those are

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the ones that will lead out. In an environment like this,

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to see how the smaller companies lead us

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>out of this. Hans Olson, thank you so much for

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>being with us, and take care of yourself. Hans Olsen

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>as chief investment officer, a fiduciary trust company in Boston.

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Volatility markets a little bit of weak this year today

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:35.679
<v Speaker 1>after that tremendous and historic rally yesterday, was at the

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>start of something new or just a bear market bounce.

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 1>We have Aaron Dunne, co director of Value and Equity

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Investing and portfolio manager at Eaton Vance with us. Aaron,

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Give us your thoughts

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of kind of what we're seeing in the market over

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the last several days. Obviously tremendous volatility, but what are

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the themes you're looking at. Well, I thank you.

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>You've gone through a couple of weeks here where you've

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of technical issues in the market, whether

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it be sort of UH leverage calls, et cetera, that

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>are exacerbating massive moves in the market here. UM. I

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 1>think more technical factors have been driving the market. What

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we're starting to see, though, is a little

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a an attention to fundamentals. And it's

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>really what we're trying to uh shift, you know, to

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>sift through for ourselves in terms of UM, how we

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>come out on the other side of this. And you know,

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this is an unprecedented time. It's a downturn that many

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>struggle to foresee, UM and so I think it's sifting

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>through the winners and losers on the other side of this.

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's gonna be UM back to business

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>as usual in a month or two. I think there's

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be some lasting impacts. And I think the UM

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the American public is probably UH at some point here

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get very anxious to get out and get

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>back to life as normal. So, um, sort of looking

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>at that and saying, who are who are the big

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>winners here? Uh? And maybe a little bit of a

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>new world who are some you know that? I think

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>we're going to struggle once we get on the other

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>side of this, Aaron, That's exactly where I wanted to go.

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at some of your research ahead of this,

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and you were saying, don't look at the next round

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of earnings. It's no longer a leading indicator. Look beyond that,

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>but it enters the realm of theory, of sort of

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>philosophy of what will sort of be the most missed

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>aspects of people's lives. So how do you cope out

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of handicapping the big winners on the other side

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 1>when you really cannot look at the number is to

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>determine that? Now, Yeah, I think the numbers are so

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in flux that you know the next quarters earnings. I

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>mean you had basically half a quarter in the books

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's the calendar quarter earnings, and we had Nike

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>come out today that had some excellent results driven by

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>the rebounded Shauna and some of the online UH sales

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they were able to book. I think that's one differentiator

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>for retail companies. UM. For us, we look we want

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to really look at because the current environments in such

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>flux and earnings numbers are in such flows. In a

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>company with a calendar quarter that has a call in

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>late April, I don't know that there's a ton of

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>informational value and what they're going to report right, they're

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna say it's really challenging. UH. We want to make

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>sure we have liquidity to make it through. UH don't

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>know when people are you know, really gonna go back

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to life as usual. So there is some fundamental look

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>here on what liquidity looks like. And that's one thing

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>we've also been very focused on. We like to own

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>quality companies with with low leverage UH at eaton bands,

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and so we're looking at make sure our companies have

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>plenty of liquidity to get to other side of this.

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>And so some some things we're looking at our you know,

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>very liquid, well capitalized retailers UM looking at derivative plays

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>on on the other side of this, so UM, you know,

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe not owning capital intensive airlines or cruise ships. We're

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 1>not really interested in going there. We're not interesting something

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna get a bail out. But there's some derivative

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>plays on the other side of this that are interesting. Um,

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think one example one is we look

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>at as as uh plain vanilla as this. Maybe we

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>look at corrugated box manufacturs, right, I mean Amazon is

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>still delivering, Um, They've announced a big increase in employee

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>based so plays like that where you can see some

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals that come back much quicker. They actually go through

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>this with smooth sailing. Stuff like that I think is

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>extremely interesting here and looking at kind of two what

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>layer this year when the market looks forward, what is

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 1>what's normalized earnings number? Look like? That's how I think

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:34.239
<v Speaker 1>you sift through today's environment. To the other side of

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>this is looking at what the impacts are today, but

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>look at what the impacts are. Two is going to

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:46.959
<v Speaker 1>really embed a lot of upside in portfolios today and

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>go along a lot of pajamas because that's what people

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>are doing right now, exactly exactly. So Aaron as co

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>director of Value Equity Investing, how's value done in this

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>market route? It's been very tough, and I'll tell you why.

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>It's I mean, I think we were looking at coming

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>into this, you had really a couple of years where

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 1>growth outperformed value massively, and that's because you had these

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>big growth tech companies that excellent balance sheets, and so

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in our view, as we went through last year and

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>in early this year, the market got very narrow in

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these big tech company and then look

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>how big Apple was in the index. Look how big

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 1>um some of these other companies were in the index.

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Um they you know, they grow so much of the

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>upside relative to the rest of the market. The value

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>benches tend to be very uh have much more of

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a cyclical grouping. And that's happened over the last couple

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of years is energies falling more into value. You know,

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>materials have fallen more industrials, So the value bench tends

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to be very um more a little more cyclical. Now

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>have let's have more exposure to defensive groups like utilities, reads,

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. So if you look at performance of values,

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>say versus growth, if that's your comparison, values and performed

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>growth quite a bit um. But I also think that's

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity here is a lot of these spaces that

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>have really been um decimated. Have the opportunity to sort of,

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 1>uh to rebound the most on the other side of this,

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>as we get a little more visibility and the cyclical

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>work every here. Aaron Done, thank you so much for

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>being with us. Take care of yourself and your family.

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Done, co director of Value Equity Investing in portfolio

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>manager at Eaton Advance. Talking about the road forward, how

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you even start to sort of game out what might

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>be the other side, Paul, I mean, honestly, the concept

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 1>of even collective working and the concept of exercise. I mean,

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you just have to wonder how much we'll go back

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>to the same versus be fundamentally changed. Yeah, it's really

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be interesting to see how we all come

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>out on the other side of this. Thanks for listening

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Lisa abram Woids. I'm on Twitter at Lisa A.

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Bramwoit's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio three.